The URL can be used to link to this page

Ord 2135 - Modify Ord 2095 COUNCIL BILL NO. 1583 ORDINANCE NO. 2135 AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE 2095, APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR A RETAIL OUTLET CENTER TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, Ordinance 2095 reclassified certain property located in the southeast quadrant of Interstate 5, south of State Highway 214, from Marion County Urban Transition (UT) zone to City of Woodburn Single-Family Residential (RSl. Multi- Family Residential (RM) and Commercial General (CG) zoning districts, and WHEREAS, this reclassification approval was subject to certain conditions of approval, and WHEREAS, the applicant, Capital Development, has requested modification of these development conditions, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City COl,lncil have noticed and conducted public hearings on the proposed modification of said conditions, and WHEREAS, the applicant has also submitted a site plan for consideration and approval, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance 2095, Exhibit "A", Condition of Approval No.1, is amended to read: 1. Phase 1 of the development is allowed to proceed conditioned upon the applicant's use of the existing land use designations with no reconfiguration, as depicted in the following map of the subject property: Page 1 - Council Bill No. 1583 Ordinance No. 2135 ,.- .- ~ ~~~i~ ;IN N€WB€RC RO.'D ~ !:! '" ~ ..ftT 2H ~ CURRENT Pl.IIN IiJ.p .AREAS I . COMI.IERCIAI.. - 51,B acres -- ~N.llLY - 31,B acres lijISINGu:.fAMllY - 87.3 acres 1UTAI.. N:if/ES 176.ll:f: acres MAP 2 / Page 2 - Council Bill No. 1583 Ordinance No. 2135 - ~."._'.'~"'"."'"~-'-"""'---"'"~-~'"'-~""".-r----'~~---~-"'-'--"'^ Section 2. Ordinance 2095, Exhibit "A", Condition of Approval No.2, is amended to read: 2. Development of the site is permitted but no configuration change of the land use designations is allowed until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060(1)(b). Section 3. The Site Plan Review application in Case No. 93-22, previously approved by the Planning Commission, is granted. Section 4. Modification of the Conditions of Approval herein and the approval of the site plan review application are based upon the staff report and, specifically, the findings contained in the staff report which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference are incorporated herein. Section 5. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. ." .~ '\ / Approved as to form~)n/v\T ,{y;(~ ~p-v/ --, , (1 2/ r) (f City Attorney ~ Dat APPROVED: ~ ~ Le Kelley, Mayor Passed by the Council September 26, 1994 Submitted to the Mayor September 27, 1994 Approved by the Mayor September 27, 1994 Filed in the Office of the Recorder September 27, 1994 ATTEST: Mar Tennant, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 3 - Council Bill No. 1583 Ordinance No. 2135 ~. ...- .....-.- ---..-------r . EXHIBIT "A" Capital Development Staff Report Due to the volume of this exhibit (79 pages) it is not included with your agenda. A copy will be available at the meeting, as well as filed with the office of the City Recorder. ,..,.,.., .. c..........----.--1 .... ~~_.,.~-~-- ----;....... .'l. EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 7& ~ CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT II INDEX Introduction Pagels) PART I Chronology of Events Maps 1 - 6 Attachments I - III 1-3 4-8 9-15 PART II Request to Amend Ordinance Nos. 2095 and 2098 Applicant's Request Staff's Response 1 6-1 8 19 PART III Traffic Impact - Staff comments Goals and Policies - Applicant's findings Consultant Traffic Engineer reports Oregon Department of Transportation 20-21 22-24 25-30 31-32 PART IV Site Plan Review - Staff Report Attachments A - E Applicant's request 1-12 1 3-24 ; ; PART V Supplemental Documents Memorandum Opinion 93-04 Oregon Department of Transportation and Map I Planning Commission recommendation to City Council 1-3 4-5 6 CAPDEV.INX ~ . , '-"~'-"--'""-r- r--....._ I ~ PART I G:"':1 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 79 . ,.. r-' .<----,~.,--..-. -- ~ ~~, .J. EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 of 79 !i]~ft~~~E{1}t~:{t~~:lli1.j~1l.t':/~~I~~~I~~;~~.1.lifjl:Kil~t~:b.~~::I:~lrS~~!.~~!f:I~~i:?~.:~;:t111:ttl~tt~tf~J1~t1.:1~: M.....,.................,...~~V::V:)\:J> ... ClD:\J"F\PI"'N;;i:-F\W'Q- --' - ;I})l..\:I-..}...w.x::J.%v..<<$-;m. ttlmWHmWk1:'*i:ht:~::;:~:h~:~:::i:~::{:::::::::~bB:::t:h::::::&t;tt:::~:::(:::h/::;~:~::::i:::::;::::::::::::::::::~ij::;:t::::::>lMt1mtimlM~ CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS On ___ an application was submitted for the development of 177 acres located adjacent to Interstate 5, south of the Wal-Mart Store and bordered on the east by the Evergreen Road right-of-way (see Map 1 of Part I). Owner of property - Prairie Corporation Applicant - George Brice Investments Consultant - Waker Associates There were four requests associated with this application: 1. To annex 177 acres to the City of Woodburn (#91-01) 2. A zone change request from Marion County EFU (Exclusive Farm Use) zone to City of Woodburn Commercial General District--approx 57.8 acres, Multi-Family District--approx 31.8 acres, Single Family Residential District--approx'87.3 acres (see Map 2). 3. The request also called for the reconfiguration of commercial and high and low density residential properties on the Comprehensive Plan Map (see Map 3). 4. Lastly, applicant proposed to subdivide the 177 acres into 11 lots (see Map 4 of Part I). On ~ the Woodburn Planning Commission heard the applicant's request. The report contained: 1. Staff and applicant's report 2. A soils and wetlands study (J.E.S. Associates) 3. JRH Transportation engineering study - traffic impacts of full build out After taking testimony, the Planning Commission recommended the Woodburn City Council approve with conditions the annexation, zone map and comprehensive plan map configuration. In ~ the city council passed Resolution No. 1053 to hold a hearing on the applicant's annexation, zone map and comprehensive plan map reconfigurations on June 10,1991. On ~'ItB the applicant requested the hearing before the council be continued to June 24, 1991. On ~ the applicant requested the hearing regarding the subdivision be continued until the June 27, 1991 hearing. On ~JIl the applicant withdrew their request from the council for a hearing and withdrew their request for a hearing before the planning commission on June 27, 1991. .L Page 1 - CAPDEV.SYN ~ "l--'..'-.-...-.----~.. ,'. EXHIBIT "Au Page 4 of 79 ,.. tt""""t-...~ This proposal remained inactive until ItiJI when the land was purchased by Capital Development. On ..... Capital Development submitted their application request for the Annexation, Comprehensive Plan, Zone Map Amendments, and Partition for the 177 acres. This was necessary since the prior applicant did not finalize the hearing process and receive final approval from the city council. The proposal consisted of: 1 . A 24-page staff report 2. Correspondence from a) Marion County, b) Oregon Department of land Conservation and Development, and c) Oregon Department of Transportation. 3. The applicant's 50-page staff report 4. level I environmental assessment report 5. JRH Transportation Impact Analysis On ~ the Woodburn Planning Commission held a hearing on the applicant's proposal. On ~ the Planning Commission recommended approval of the applicant's request to the city council. The plan called for the reconfiguration of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map similar to Prairie Corporation's proposal (see Map 5-6 of Part I). The city council approved a resolution on September 14, 1992 calling for a hearing on September 28, 1992. The council approved the applicant's request and adopted Ordinance 2095 on ~ .. (see Attachment 1 of Part 1- ODOT letter). On ~ the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOTI raised concerns regarding condition number two (21 of Ordinance 2095. The wanted the city council to amend that ordinance to reflect their requirements (see Attachment 2 of Part I). The council then amended Ordinance 2095 with Ordinance 2098 to meet ODOT's request on ~ (see Attachment 3 of Part I). Now Capital Development is coming before the planning commission to basically make three requests: Al Modification of Condition #1, Exhibit" A" of Ordinance 2095 (Attachment I of Part I) Existing: 1. Prior to any development of the 173.84 acre parcel the Comprehensive Map be amended to generally reflect the applicant's proposed land configuration (C.P. 92-021. / To be amended to reflect: The applicant's ability to proceed with development based on the existing, not reconfigured, map amendment. AND " L Page 2 - CAPDEV,SYN . '.-------..---1 .. .----_.~-~._,--,............._.~-_..._-" ....-. -:. EXHIBIT "A" Page 5 of 7~ \ (B) Modification of Condition #2, Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 2095 and amended by Ordinance 2098 (Attachment III of Part I). Existina Lanauaae: "Assist the city in amending its 1985 transportation plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-060(1 lib) regarding adequate transportation facilities to support proposed land uses. No development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designations will be permitted until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060(1 lib)." To be amended to read: "Development permitted by New Land Use Applicant to the property and no configuration change of the land use designation allowed until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060(1 lib)." (C) Approval of their site plan. The Planning Commission held its first hearing on ~ regarding thE! ordinance amendment requests of Ordinance #2095 and #2098 along with Site Plan Review 93-22 and continued the hearing until ~. The reason for the continuation was that the city had not received ODOT's comments regarding highway mitigation requirements (see ODOT correspondence, pg 4-5 and Map I of Part V). The May 19, 1994 hearing was continued until July 14, 1994 due to a request by a client's attorney requesting a continuance. On ~ the commission approved SPR #93-22 and recommended the city council amend Ordinances #2095 and 2098 to allow Capital Development to proceed with developing the property (see page 6 of Part V). / Page 3 . CAPDEV.SYN '3 ~ "-".-<''''-'.'r.~-'-----_>o'~~'~'._--''.''--~- , -- , \ ~ , - Nt -- MAP 1 / - .,... +_~. __'.,...._"_.__...._..__. ...----d"."'--1..'. EXHIBIT "A" Page 6 of 79 -4- ~ EXHIBIT "A" Page 7 of 79 , IN HEW&RC ""'" RT 21<4- 1 CURRENT PIAN tiN> AAf}S I i ~ ~ 2 . cot.o.fERCW.. - fi1 Jj Gens .. --IMll-f'N.IlI.Y - :llJj CICR$ un' ~uSlNGlE. fN.lll.Y - t:1.:5 CICR$ 10TAL ICflES 176Jl:1: CICR$ ~ ~ MAP 2 ! ...-... ""'" i f If 214 tN " MAP 3 I -5- ~ .-...........---...-.....-".---.1-.-----..- ,-- ",,",,-, (~ ,~ EXHIBIT "A" Page 8 of 79 , tN PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ~:S?@-9' . . t . . J , , , , , , , , , , , , , / , , , , , , , "I. !I! I fI ~ I .~ ! ~ , tI f UJW DENSITY RESIDENl1AL , ......X . tl 1Il - I t. t I I . ~~--~~--~~~~---~~~"1 ,_~ .. I '''-.1 .. .. .. .. . .. ----------- ------ - - ~. ,j i I!; UJW DENSITY ReSlDENlW, t... x. MAP 4 - fa- ~ ., --"-""'-'-'1---~ --------..--.- " " ' ,..-, -l~; ~ q "j. EXHIBIT "A" Page 9 of 79 , I '" !,j .... .. .... .. !;~ fi~ ~g I I g~ ~ tl lii~ i ~ ~z ~ ~ 0(') ! og i:J:o f ~ QO :I ~ 000 t C"t" zoo .... ~ ~ N\f'\\l')[ ~ ~ ~ ~'!M[rn =i~ ~ SO' __ - hO ......y Ctua...-;-- - - -' ~ 1m ~~ ! mH~ i * ~ ~Ul ~ , ~....;3 ~ ~~i~g; o~ i UUU Z .. II I. I 9 -1- . I ~~~. _. 'it ,...,......,. ..... "- , ""'. , ~~', >!1~, o , , : ~', I 00-2 ~.~ ", . I a.al AC11ci:t. ~"~' r- ~ COWlER ~~;:,. I ~ ,~ ~ ~'" k'<~, I 0 "1 !!!.. 5 -~ ~:t. ~~" I "'Iili q lri~ 0 J:: -f~ ~,,&; , <: · ~E ~ eP ""'~" ~ ~I ~e ;0 ~;f ~~; "- ".. '&: ~ .. i!:fjl Ql >0" "'"', ~ ~I " ~ E= s..., ~ . ~ l'J ...... fe '~ ~ ,l:1 0( s:<>g .....,,~;s; tb:~~', . . ~o:.:t~ . P " M~'''' ,,",,.,,., ~ ......... ~ _..: t-'" ./', "'............ , ,...... , , , ",-.... " ' ,,\' , ''\' , '\ " " '\'\ '\~ I I ~ ~ "I N '" .. q ... _.. STUBB ~I ~i::rJ ~ f"'G'fJ :..1 ~>.. ~I ~E ~ _ ~lT40'40"1I' (2110.83') - 143 ACRES ~ -: ~ :. 0 ~ g c: ~ z ___~__ o ~ o CO CO .... Z Q '" Zoo Cl;; .....g: ~>. "'0" >1>' ~El ... 0( lUl-l 10.6~,.t~y Mtru - g: OJ '" "1 ... Cl EXHIBIT "A" Page 10 of 79 ----., L_ ~ -I \~ ,\\ '\\ , "- , , " , , ...... ......, .. ICl r/~ ......_J !A \/Sa! ROAD ~ ~ ~ ROAD"! el'" fr~g, .~~ It ~O 00 is .. 0...... J 'g, t"... I ~ ll:lttl e. c:c: > t:l ~~ ~ ~ . Z X ~ 00 ~ 0 :<l~ 'OS ~O "'t/) .. >t/) t:l Z.... ... Z ~ 0 J t t oil ~ > ~ El ~~~t~~ 00""Z80 oioi~C...S: tIl>~~::!f;j OJ....~:d "'>;.,9 1>'''1::> l'iI::-r- ~!<!< ~ o E:: z o tl ...... t/) 8 :>:' ...... ttl ~ .... o Z ~ i .. .. .. ~ i . . . . . . _0&01:: oo!"9tt:o. c.~8:Ot.... .. >> >>i;i;oo ldldl>'l>'&l&l f2ElIU~", ,i\[\? ~ ~ ~ .. -8- -'T ~- .- ,( "'~ f EXHIBIT "A" Page 11 of 7~ COUNCIL BILL NO. 1426 ORDINANCE NO. 2095 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING AND RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SOUTH EAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSTATE 5 SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 214 FROM MARION COUNTY URBAN TRANSITION (UT) ZONE TO CITY OF WOODBURN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS), MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RM) AND COMMERCIAt GENERAL (CG) DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Map has established certain land uses within the City of Woodburn's Urban Growth Boundary, and WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council has reviewed the record in Annexation Case No. 92-02 and Zone Change Case No. 92-03 and considered the public !e!?timony previously presented, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The legal description of the involved real property is as follows: A parcel of land lying in the A Dubois Donation Land Claim No. 98, and the M. Lore Donation Land No. 61, in Sections 12,13, and 14, Township 5 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, Oregon, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a % inch iron rod marking the Southwest corner of the A. Dubois Donation Land Claim No. 98, in said Township and Range and running thence South 000 39' 31" West 530.27 feet to a V. inch iron pipe; thence North 890 32' 20" West 2110.97 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of Interstate Highway 5; thence alol!g said right of way line North 350 53' 54" East 3649.14 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Donation Land Claim No. 98; thence along said Donation Land Claim line South 000 31' 65" West 69.04 feet; thence continuing along said Easterly right of way line North 350 57' 00" East 246.21 feet; thence South 880 51' 55" East 1349.22 feet; thence North 00040' 55" East 27.96 feet to a point on the Southerly line of West Hayes Street; thence along said Southerly line South 880 51' 55" East 628.17 feet to a point on the Westerly line of Evergreen Road; thence along said Westerly line South 000 47' 17" West 2111.00 feet to a 6fs inch iron rod; thence North 890 28' 13" West 2110.60 feet to a point on first said Westerly line of said Donation Land Claim No. 98; thence along said Westerly line South 000 31' 55" West 470.58 feet to the point of beginning all in Marion County, Oregon. Section 2. The real property described in Section 1 of this Ordinance is hereby annexed to the City of Woodburn. / L Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1426 ORDINANCE NO. 2095 P\\\~C~ 1. , -~ - ~ ."," "I -.--..-.----~."'~...-,~--"'"---.,~---'-..-'~~-.. ,I(~<~~ ,', """~ '1" ) EXHIBIT "A" Page 12 of'. Section 3. The zoning designation of said real property is hereby reclassified from its present designation of Marion County Urban Transition Zone (Ul) to the City of Woodburn Single Family Residential (RS), Multi-family Residential (RM) and Commercial General (CG) districts. Section 4. The zoning reclassification is subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, that the Council finds reasonable. Section 5. The ann1:lxation, and zoning reclassification of said real property are based upon the staff report and, specifically, the findings contained in the staff report which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 6. The City Administrator or his designee is hereby directed to correct the Woodburn Zoning Map to the classification herein made. Approved as to fO:J'l ~ ~ City Attorney I'D I r /i2- Dete I /1. I . APPROVED: 'i/'LR-J" 7J/ FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR , 14 . r ; l- C. ',!..../; . ! ."../... v- . Passed by the Council October 12, 1992 Submitted to the Mayor October 13, 1992 October 13, 1992 Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder October 13, 1992 Attest: /71~ ~ o-.-.f MARY TE NANT, CITY RECORDER CITY OF WOODBURN, OREGON / l/ Page 2 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1426 ORDINANCE NO. 2095 1 , -\0- ~. ....--.-.-.- I _,._~,_'.~n__'.__ L, ~ ,~,. .-.;' . '( " EXHIBIT "An Page 13 of 79 - , " EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to any development of the 173.84 acre parcel the comprehensive map be amended to generally reflect the applicant's proposed land configuration (C.P. 92-02). 2. Assist the city in amending its 1985 Transportation Plan'for the Highway 214, 1-5 interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-060(1)(bl regarding adequate transportation facilities to support proposed land uses. " 3. Any reconfiguration of the land use designations maintain the same ratios as identified on the original comprehensive plan. / 1- ; ,....--'----.-'"-~t.......--.------ - \ \- ~ ^~ t'..'"'';j.-, ~, 3 \" October 23, 1992 Steve Goeckritz, Director Woodburn Community Development Services 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, OR 97071 Subject: Condition of approval #2, Ordinance #2095 Dear Steve: The Oregon Department of Transportation (OD01) has concerns with the wording in Condition #2, Ordinance #2095. This is the ordinance authorizing annexation and land use designations for the property known as Woodburn Crossing and owned by Capital Development Company. The condition states: Assist the city in amending its 1985 Transportation Plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-060(1)(b) regarding adequate transportation facilities to support proposed land uses. Our concerns are that the wording does not clearly state that the Transportation Systems Plan amendment must occur before development can occur, and that it does not state that reconfiguration of the land use designations is dependent upon amendment of the Transportation Systems Plan. Based upon ODOTs testimony and our telephone conversation on Friday, I believe this is the intent of the condition. However, the use of assist in the condition creates concern. The wording states only that the developer must assist. How much assistance must be provided? A little or a lot? If the developer partially funds the study, hasn't it "assisted" prior to development? How is compliance to be measured? The potential for variance in understanding the condition's intent could result in a widernnge of results, inclUding property development regardless of the Transportation Planning Rule issues. I If I have misunderstood the conditions's intent, please let me know as soon as possible. If Woodburn agrees that this is the council's intent, OOOT l"", requests that the condition be modified as follows: fJ\ P\ C t-\ IT {67 (3-91) EXHI~II "A" Page 14 of - Vregon DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Division Region 2 FILE COOs, ... .. . .,.- 2960 State Street SE Salem, OR 97310 (503) 378-2626 FAX (503) 378-4317 ; - \ 1- ~ .-~""r".--~-.""'-----"..._"" '-"'.'''' ;" ;-, ,.:.\ Steve Goeckritz Ordinance 2095 page 2 I I i/ ( Assist the city in amending its 1985 Transportation Plan for the Highway 214,1-5 Interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-o60(1)(b) regarding adequate lrdnsportation facilities to support proposed land uses. No development of the properly or reconfiguraJion of the land use designations will be permitted until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR- 660-12-060 (1)(b). I know that this development proposal remains a volatile issue in Woodburn. We hope this matter can be resolved without unduly elaborate city councilor other land lIse procedures. If some other way of accomplishing this is proposed, please let me know. We must hear from you relatively soon in order to avoid further land use procedures. - hn G. deTar Region Planner cc: Dick Reynolds, OOOT Bob Rindy, OLeO Larry Knudsen, Justice L".' .' 11 EXHIBIT "A" Page 15 of 7, ; - \~- ~ .,~..."t+~~-__"'''''._.''_'.'-''""''--'"'--~''''_'''k' ~. ,~ \, \ ._.J EXHIBIT "A" Page 16 of 7$:. COUNCIL BILL NO. 1443 ORDINANCE NO. 2098 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THAT SECTION OF ORDINANCE 2095 WHICH RECLASSIFIED CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF INTERSTATE-5, SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 214, FROM MARION COUNTY URBAN TRANSITION (UT) ZONE TO CITY OF WOODBURN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS), MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RM) AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL (CG) DISTRICTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, a section of Ordinance 2095 reclassified certain property located in the southeast quadrant of Interstate-5, south of State Highway 214, from Marion County Urban Transition (UT) zone to City of Woodburn Single Family Residential (RS), Multi-Family Residential (RM), and Commercial General (CG) districts, and WHEREAS, this reclassification was subject to three conditions which were agreed to by the applicant, Capital Development Company, and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation has proposed a minor change in one of the conditions, and WHEREAS, Capital Development Company has agreed to the change in said condition, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Condition number two of Ordinance 2095, referenced in Section 4 of Ordinance 2095 and set out in Exhibit" A" of that ordinance, is amended to read as follows: Assist the city in amending its 1985 transportation plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-060(1)(bl regarding adequate transportation facilities to support proposed land uses. No development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designations will be permitted until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060(1 )(b). Section 2. The city finds that Capital Development Company has consented to.the amendment of this condition. A copy of the written consent is appended to this ordinance and, by this reference, incorporated herein. . L Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1443 ORDINANCE NO, 2098 AT\ACM m= , -\1.\- ~.. ._ .,....'_~..I'.~~__m__...._'__,.____.__~__~__......,W"O*. --_..,.- .--' EXHIBIT" A" Page 17 of 79 Section 3. This ordinance being necessary for the immediately preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. Approved as to form~.~ ~ City Attorney APPROVED: For: 12/2'2/72 ate' Council President Passed by the Council December 28, 1992 Submitted to the Mayor December 30, 1992 Approved by the Mayor December 30, 1992 Filed in the Office of the Recorder ---- ~ ATTEST: ~~ !.JL. Mary Tenna ,City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon December 30, 1992 / lo/ Page 2 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1443 ORDINANCE NO. 2098 TIT- ; -\~ . .....-'..-r..~--.__._-->--~.~'--~>--_.,.-..__.- ..~~~ ~ r'- , D EXHIBIT" A" Page 18 of 79 PART II / . '~."'^"'l-~--'-------'-'~'- - --, /..J" EXHIBIT "AU Page 19 of 79 ~ Capital Development Company March 14, 1994 Planning Commission City Council 270 Montgomery Street Woddburn, Oregon 97071 RE: Case File Number Annexation 92-02.with information contained in Council Bill No. . 1426 of Ordinance No 2095 and Council Bill No. 1443 of Ordinance No 2098. The cont~nt of this letter is directed to both the PllInning Commksion and the City Council in request of your review and approval for a new Land Use Application on a portion of the 173.84 acre parcel owned by Capital Development Company (Capital). The directive entitled New Land Use Application is the reco=endation by City Attorney, Mr. Shields, to the Co=w:rity Development Director, Mr. Geokrltz, as .the procedure Capital is to request for land use. This document is recognized as Memorandum Opinion 93-04. The portion of land which we have selected to become a phase one development is in a General Co=ercial zone and does not effect a conditionallanduse or a zone change from the original Woodburn Comprehensive Plan previous to our annexation. Please, also note that the same 13 acre land portion requested for development in the New Land Use Application does not cause any variation to the zone change approved under the Council Ordinance No. 2095. The land use intentions upon which Capital purchased the parcel for development in 1991 as a single owner and privately held company, have not changed. Historic reference shows that the land request, New Use, is and has been zoned for co=ercial development from the early 1980's adoption of the comprehensive land use plan within Woodburn's urban growth boundary. 1brough the land purchase and request for annexation, we became involved with Woodburn and their transportation issues and Capital partially funded the- Woodburn Transportation Study and participated as a member of the Transportation Task Force.' Therefore in presenting the conditions of zone change and our requested. changes within Exhibit "AU of Ordinance ijo. 2098, this is an acceptable request. The request and purpose is granting a limited de~lopment, completely within the zoning guidelines of the city's comprehensive plan, O.D.O.T.'s level of service compliance and the original intent of the land purchase agreement. P.O. Box 3487.691 Sleater.Kinney Rd. S.E.. Suite 100. L:tcey. Washington 98503-1069. 206/491~6850 ID# 0 l-CA-P~ TO . 323D5 , FAX# 206/459.8747 ~\.~- ~ "_----.---.-...........--.-.--...-.4....' .- ~" ~ EXHIBIT "A" Page 20 of 79 Page Two: March 14, 1994 The City Attorney has advises the Co=unity Development Director that the property owner should present (to the Planning Commission and City Council) their specific revisions to the conditions of their zone change. May Woodburn please review and acknowledge our conditional changes for a New Land Use Application as follows: 1. Condition one of Exhibit "N, Ordinance No. 2095 needs to be amended to reflect the applicants ability to initiate Phase 1 of this project prior to any adjustment to the comprehensive plan map reflecting the applicants proposed land use configuration on the entire 173.84 acre parcel. That portion of the property intended to be utilized in Phase 1 currently conforms to the comprehensive map plan and is properly zoned for the uses intended in Phase I. 2. Condition two of Exhibit "N, Ordinance No. 2095 and amended under Ordinance 2098 is requiring a change and is effected by our request. Please note the amended portion under this current condition was required by O.D.O.T. to be incorporated by Woodburn, creating Ordinance No. 2098. To proceed we must change the condition as it reads: "No development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designation will be permitted until transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 66Q-l2-060(1)(b). We require the amended to read: Development permitted by New Land Use Application to the property and no configuration change of the land use designation allowed until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060 (1)(b). Capital gives three reasons that provide support in our request of Woodburn to amend the condition for the approval of development. 1. The original Ordinance No. 2095 was modified by O.D.O.T. requesting Woodburn and Capital to consent to the no development language placed in the second condition. O.D.O.T. now concedes that the transportation plan has advanced to a level of acceptance which could permit limited development. Therefore we believe that Woodburn could modify the constraint or condition number 2 without objection from it's author. 2. To facilitate a phased development through the new land use application, Capital would make an improvement to the 1-5/214 Interchange area. This improvement will assist by providing adequate support to the transportation plan by increasing existing capacity which is in compliance with OAR 660-12-060 (l-f(b). . 3. The third reason is a condition of time. Capital's property was annexed in October of 1992. It is now March of 1994, one year and five months later. Woodburn has made signifi,Cant progress on their transportation plan for the interchange area and is developing a -long term plan to fund the necessary improvements. Tin;1e continues to be a major concern for Capital. Further delays in this process potentially will create competitive environments in nearby co=unities that would eliminate the potential to develop this site. , -\1- c-,. ~ EXHIBIT "A!L. Page 21 01 Page Three: March 14, 1994 Condition 3 of Exhibit. A", Ordinance No. 2095 and Ordinance No. 2098, is not effected by our request. The New Land Use Application imposes no change to condition three because there is no configuration change within the present land use. We understand the statement to read: "any reconfiguration of the land use designation maintain the same ratios as identified on the original comprehensive plan." At this time, Capital has no request to modify condition 3. We do not effect this condition because the phase one project is scaled down to a nominal 13 acre portion contained in the approximate 58.61 acres as zones for Commercial General. Again, we show the 13 acres are within the appropriate zoned boundary formed by the original comprehensive plan. Capital Development's request for aNew Land Use Application is a rational response in acknowledging the land owner's right to improve his land to the highest and best qse within the conditions of the approved zone. Please recognize this application to be consistent with the requirements of the Oregon Administrative Rules. Our project goals continue to recognize that the Woodburn Transportation Plan is in the best interest for both present and future growth. Sincerely, John R. Donaldson Senior Vice President JRD/jd ; -\8- ..............-. ,- ~ ; 1. EXHIBIT "A" Page 22 of . STAFF REPORT REQUEST TO AMEND ORDINANCES #2095 AND #2098 As earlier described in the chronology and requested and correspondence of March 14, 1996 Capital Development is requesting the city council amend Ordinance 2095 and 2098. staff Comments: A. Under the existing ordinances no development can take place until the transportation plan OAR 66-12- 060 (1) (b) is completed. B. The applicant is requesting the ordinance be amended to allow the development of 13.04 +/- acres of a 58 acre commercially designated area. If the amendments were could, under specific proposed development and transportation rule. D. The state' transportation rule only takes effect when a Comprehensive Plan Map or Zone Map Amendment occurs. approved the applicant conditions, build his not be affected by the C. E. The applicant in not requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map nor Zone Change at this time. F. The application would allow the applicant to develop 13.04 acres that is presently designated for commercial development. G. The 13.04 acres represents property that is presently designated as commercial. At the time reconfiguration occurs, the property will still be designated as commercial. H. The Oregon Department of Transportation and the City have required the applicant to submit a traffic impact and mitigation study. I. On site and off site street and highway ~mproveme~ts will have to be made. -\9- .Om"."_ .._ ,....."..,.. .,__.._... _._,_.~_.....,,_____.____.__......___._~~__.~H__._--<__. """.- t '. \ ,("">:- \. 1...1 PART III -. .......-.....,.-''" __._..,_.,,_..O'-....._.__..~~__..~_.I"" EXHIBIT "A" Page 23 of 79 .- ,..,.".... EXHIBIT "A" Page 24 of 79 TRAFFIC IMPACT STAFF COMMENTS: It was a requirement by the City and Oregon Department of Transportation to require Capitol Development to develop a traffic impact and mitigation study. The objective of the study is to basically analyze the impacts this retail outlet center would have on existing streets and highways and secondly to mitigate any negative traffic impacts on these streets and highways. The attached correspondence consists of the applicants response to City Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies that must be addressed in evaluating the legitimacy of the proposal. The remainder of the aftachments consist of studies and discussion between the Oregon Department of Transportation and Howard Stein, transportation consultant representing the developer regarding transportation analysis methodologies and various traffic mitigation techniques. As for various street and highway improvements staff has broken them into two parts. Those being street improvements that are on and off site. Those that are on-site consists of streets that are built by Capital Development on their property and properties that adjoin their property. Off-site improvements address primarily the interchange area. As for on-site improvements they consist of the following: .5..tacy Allison extension from where it ends north of the Wal-Mart store and turns south running parallel to Interstate 5 for 1,200 feet where it connects to "Outlet" Avenue. Right of way - 60 feet with a 10 foot utility easemelJt on the east side, two travel lanes I Improved Road Surface - 42 feet asphalt curb to curb, two 6-8 foot bike lanes, and sidewalks. -2.0- ..-", ~, -0-.. EXHIBIT "Au Page 25 of 7, Outlet Avenue runs east/west for approximately 900 feet and connects" Stack Allison with Prairie Boulevard. Right of way - 60 feet with 5 foot utility easements one each side. Improved Road Surface - 42 feet asphalt curb to curb, two 6-8 foot bike lanes, and sidewalks. Prairie Boulevard (Wal-Mart Ave.) runs north/south Right of way - 100 feet no easement necessary, two travel lanes and turn lane. Improved Road Service - 54 feet curb to curb, two 6-8 foot bike lanes, and sidewalks. . Two off-site improvements are obvious. One is the installation of a traffic signal at the north bound interchange ramp on the east side of the interchange. A second off-site improvement would be the widening of the north bound ramp to two lanes in addition to widening the north bound ramp accessing 1-5. An additional improvement, prior to retail operations could be changing Lawson Avenue to a right in-right out only. The traffic study concluded the retail outlet center will generate 3,200 daily vehicles trips with 320 trips being generated in the peak pm hour with 10% of those trips being multi-stop shopping trips. It should be noted that an assumption is being made on the part of OOOT when evaluating this proposal. This assumption is that if the conditions of Ordinance #2095 and #2098 are amended by Council relating to the zone reconfiguration and completion of the City's Transportation Plan then the developer can proceed with his proposal. _ In other words, this proposal could be developed on existing commercial land subject to OOOT conditions and not be in violation of the Transportation Rule. / As for OOOTS specific recommendations for off site improvements they are forthcoming. -"2.\ - ,.._..._..."_.".-,._.,.,.._--_.-.-....----"~---_._".__...---" ,......,..~ A?? \J ( I-\~\ \~~l EXHIBIT "A" Page 26 of 7':> CERTAIN SPECIFIC CITY OF WOODBURN GOALS AND POLICIES APPLY TO 1HE PROPOSED PHASE I OF WOODBURN CROSSING OUTLET SHOPPING CENTER. 1HE SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT POLIrTF.<; lHAT REIATE TO 1HE APPLICANTS PROmCf ARE IDENl1FlED BELOW WITH 1HE APPLICANfS RESPONSE. COMMERCIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES B-1. The City should at all times have sufficient land to accommodate the retail needs of the City and the surrounding market area. The City presently has four major commercial areas: 99E, 1-5 Interchange, the downtown area and the 214/211/99E four comers intersection area. No new area should be established. Phase I of the Woodburn Factory Outlet Shopping Center will help to promote the above City policy by providing additional commercial area for retail services in one of the four existing major commercial areas near the Interstate 5 Interchange. B-2. Lands for high traffic generating uses (shopping centers, malls, restaurants, etc.) should be located on well improved arterials. The uses should provide the necessary traffic control devices needed to ameliorate their impact on the arterial streets. The Woodburn Factory Outlet Shopping Center Phase I helps the Qty meet the intent of this policy because the project will be located sufficiently on improved arterials utilizing typical traffic control devices, like limited access points to provide limited impact on arterial streets. 1.1.2. Develop a transportation system that interconnects residential areas with employment centers, commercial areas, schools, parks, churches, and regional transportation networks. The proposed center will assist the City in attempting to enhance the transportation system by providing additional opportunities for commercial area to interconnect residential areas with new commercial activities. / -22-- _ _ ,____~ .4~___""""""""_'__' '_"'~~'__~~___"_______"'__'___'~_"~ :'~ /.. EXHIBIT "A" Page 27 of 7':. 1-1-3. Develop a street system wherein arterial streets are of sufficient width to accommodate traffic flows without interruption. Collector streets should function to conduct traffic between arterial streets, which serve to accommodate movement within neighborhoods. The proposed project increases the City's ability to comply with this policy because all streets within the project meet or exceed the City's street width requirements. Prairie Boulevard, when completed in Phase II of the project, will function as a major north/south thoroughfare. This new major road network will provide additional opportunities for collector streets and arterials to function in such a way to accommodate traffic movement within neighborhoods to and from commercial areas and adjoining neighborhood road networks. 1-1-4. To insure that state and federal highways with routes through the City are improved in accordance with projected traffic volumes and the elements contained within this plan. The developer is negotiating presently with the Region II Department of Administration for Oregon Department of Transportation to provide assurance that state and.federal roads through the City are improved in accordance with acceptable traffic volume levels. 1-2. Develop a transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance upon any one fonn of transportation. The proposed plan provides for a transit station and bike paths within Phase I and subsequent phases of the project. This will encourage use of alternate transportation methods to and from the site and is consistent with the intent of the above policy. 1-2-2. Develop a bikeway and pedestrian system which will provide routs connecting residential areas to schools, parks, places of employment and commercial areas. Thirteen feet of bike path along Prairie Boulevard provided by the developer will have the ability to connect to adjoining residential and employment centers as well as other commercial areas and help the City meet this policy. / -23 - ,...",.....,- +.~+,..~._. '1 .~- fh. '. ;j , EXHIBIT "A" Page 28 of 79 1-2-3. Promote optimum efficiency within the transportation system by the use of traffic management techniques including access controls on major arterials and the utilization of available transit system capacity prior to the construction of major new transportation facilities. Phase I and subsequently other phases help to promote efficiency within the transportation system by restricting access from the development to a limited number of points on major arterials like Prairie Boulevard. Also the development incorporates and promotes use of transit by establish transit stations within the project as an additional means of reducing automobile traffic. 1-2-4. Encourage the design and development of transportation facilities that can be readily modified to accommodate future demands. The project provides for additional right-of-way to be utilized to widen additional lanes of traffic on major streets within all phases of the development. This right- of-way will help the City stay in compliance with its' policy to meet future transportation demands. . 1-3-2. Provide a level of transportation services to the urban area that are compatible with the environmental, economic and social objectives of the community. The completion of Prairie Boulevard, which will provide a new north/south corridor from the existing area to the urban growth boundary, will significantly enhance the City's desired intent to provide acceptable levels of transportation to the urban area. -24-- . .", .. _.___...__4...4__"__.._"_._.__'..___'_-'~___<'_'_.'__'_.___..._.,....._.,_ H. S. Stein Consulting Engineer EXHIB;T~ Page 29 0, J 13340 SW, Hanson Rd. Beavertan. OR 97005 Phone/Fax (503)641-1437 March 28, 1994 Project No.: 105.2 Mr. Terry Hockett Planning Section Oregon Department of Transportation 325 13th Street NE Room 501 Salem, OR 97310 SUBJECT: Results of Additional Analyses Requested for the First Phase of Woodburn Crossing in Woodburn, Oregon Dear Mr. Hockett:: Based on your letter dated March 15, I have prepared the additional analysis you have requested of the traffic impact for an initial phase of the proposed Woodburn Crossing mixed-use development. As before, this flI'St phase will consist of a 100,000 square foot factory outlet retail center. This center will be located completely within commercially zoned land parcels on the east side of the I-5jHighway 214 interchange. The following paragraphs document the details of the analysis methodology, results, and major findings. BASELINE TRAFFIC VOLUMES As noted in the past, several traffic counts have been taken in this study area. The most complete set of counts were those conducted in November of 1992. Consequently, these were used as the baseline traffic volumes. (These volumes were previously submitted to ODOT.) As you requested, these traffic volumes were adjusted for peak summer season by increasing them by 10 percent. Figure 1 show the peak summer traffic volumes that resulted from this adjustment. All traffic volumes except those less than 20 vehicles per hour were rounded upward to the nearest 5 vph. . Traffic Operations . Development Impact . Parking . Accident/Safety Analysis . '1c::-- - 1-...,:) -* ".,._-"..,.....~ ,-..."- .....,. " ~,"',--:', >- EXHIBIT "A" Page 30 of 79 T. Hockett March 28, 1994 Page 2 FUTURE YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC VOLUMES As you have requested, I have analyzed traffic conditions for the year 2000 which will be several years after this first phase has been opened. To estimate future year 2000 traffic volumes, the baseline traffic volumes were increase using a general growth factor 0(4 percent per year. This growth factor was verified with you earlier. Thus, all the traffic volumes in Figure 1 were multiplied by 1.37 (1.04 factored for 8 years). These resulting volumes are shown in Figure 2. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES The first phase of Woodburn Crossing will consist of a 100,000 gross square foot factory. outlet retail center which will be located on commercial zoned land. Based on your comments and discussions with you, it was recommended that the trip generation rates for this center be based on those obtained in the Boston area that were detailed in recent ITE article. This article reported a weekday p.m. peak hour trip rate of 3.2 vehicles per 1,000 square foot and an average daily trip rate of 32 trips per 1,000 square foot. Based on these rates and as shown in Table 1, it is estimated that the r1l'St phase of Woodburn Crossing will generate 3,200 vehicle trips (both into and out of the site) throughout a typical weekday, including 320 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour. Traffic to the center during the a.m. peak hour should be minimal. The percentage going into and out of the site during the p.m. peak hour was assumed to be the same as a general retail center: 4S percent inbound and SS percent outbound. It should be noted that this estimate does not take into account the fact that a substantial portion of the traffic to the factory outlet retail center during the p.m. peak hour will likely come from vehicles already on the roadway as well as people already shopping at the nearby Wal-Mart store. To account for some of these trips, this analysis assumed that 10 percent of the p.m. peak hour trips to/from the center would come from multi-stop trips in which shoppers currently going to the Wal-Mart store and/or fast food restaurants in the area will also shop at the proposed factor outlet retail center and will not increase the number of vehicles on Highway 214. / -2<0- i""\ EXHIBIT "A" Page 31 of 79 T. Hockett March 28, 1994 Page 3 Table 1: Trip Generation for First Phase of Woodburn Crossing Dally A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Trips Total I In lOut Total Iu Out Land Use FactoIy Outlet Cooler 3,200 Minimal 320 145 175 (100,000 asp) Adjusted for Local Multi-Stop 288 130 158 Shopping Trips (10 % Reduction) . Distribution and Assignment of Site Generated Traffic The directional distribution of traffic associated with the factory outlet retail center was assumed to be the same as the distribution used in the traffic impact study for the Olappell Development and is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 also shows the resulting assignment of site-generated traffic during a weekday p.m. peak hour. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Traffic capacity analysis was conducted for both the baseline and future year 2000 traffic volumes using ODors SIGCAP program at the three major intersections in the study area: . 1-5 Southbound Ramp/Highway 214, . I-5.s=und Ramp/Highway 214, and . Evergreen RoadJHighway 214. It should be noted that the future year 2000 scenario assumed that Lawson Drive would be limited to right in/right out maneuver&.- / .' - 11,- . .. -- T"'. --.... . ..... '-'--"'- --. .-.. -------. r-,.....,~,. ~; , EXHIBIT "A" Page 32 of 79 T. Hockett March 28, 1994 Page 4 Tables 2, 3, and 4 show the results of these capacity analyses under the baseline traffic volumes and year 2000 traffic volumes as well as for different intersection lane configurations. The first set of calculations were performed assuming existing roadway conditions. For the year 2000 traffic volumes. additional analyses were conducted to determine what roadway improvements would be necessary for achieve LOS C at the 1-5 Ramp intersections and LOS D at the intersection of Evergreen Road and Highway 214. In some cases. there are more than one set of improvements that would achieve this objective. Afterwards, these analyses were performed again adding in the traffic that would be generated by the first phase of Woodburn Crossing. These results are also shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4. All the SIGCAP worksheets are attached to this letter. In all cases, the traffic that would be generated by the first phase of Woodburn Crossing would IIOt necessitate additWnal roadway improvements beyond those needed to bring baseline year 2000 traffic COrulitiOllS up to acceptable levels of service. If there are any questions related to the data or analysis contained in this report, please contact me directly. Sincerely, II~ s: ~ Howard S. Stein, P.E. Attachments cc: Steve Goeckritz, City of Woodburn Dan Fricke, OOOT John deTar, ODOT John Grassman, ODOT John Donaldson, Capital Development Company ODOT2000.RPT AI.) ~ \\ \ O~ l\L \j t\ TI\ \ f \<.'tD.IJ~~\~'CJ. .' -2B- . ~~,. .,.,- ...-,~ -1"""'- H. ... Stein Consulting Engineer ,~ EXHIBIT "~ Page 33 c.. 9 133-40 S.w. Honwn Ro. Beaverton. OR 97005 Phone/FtDt (503) 64H4U April 6, 1994 Mr. Steve Goeckritz Director, Community Development City of Woodburn 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 S.bJect: TrqJftc Gen,rat,d by till Flnt Ph"II 0/ W/1odbum Croll''', Dear Steve: It has come to my attention thatS6veral of the citizens Jiving in Senior Estates are concerned about the traffic that would be generated by the first phase of the Woodburn Prossing development, a fllClOry oullel center. In particular, lhey life collcem about the number of vehicle trips that might use West Hayes to go to/from the site. It is likely that after the center has been opened for a while, the number of vehicle usin8 West Hayes will be minimal. First, the factory outlet center wJ1l attract most of its traffic from patrons traveling along 1-5. Second, most patrons in the greater market area will also use 1-5 to travel to the center. Only local patrons, such as the residents of Senior Estates, might benefit from using West Hayes. It is difficult to predict how many vehicle lrips to the factory outlet center ACtually would use West Hayes. Some counts were taJeen after the nelIrby Wal-Mart store that could provide insight regarding this issue. A letter report that I wrote (while I was at Kittelson & As&ociatea) to Randy Rohman (dated Decentber 9, 1992) presented these traffic t'(.)unlli. TIle cbanges illlraffic in the vicinity of this area revealed that: 1) The total number of new trips on the nearby roadways (I-S, Highway 214, and West Hayes) were about half the numbel' that was estimated using 1TE trip generation rates, and 2) The directional distribution used in the Itafflc study to assign trips to/from the Wal-Mart store appears to different Ihan the actual pattem of increased vehlele trips exhibited in the traffic rounts. These counts found thal about 20% of the vehicle trips to the Wal-Mart slore canle from vehicles along West Hayes. (These counts did not distinguish between rcsidcnts of Scnior Estates and other residents of the Woodburn area.) . TfOfflc OperotlOll, . "'vSlo~nt Impact . Porltlng . AecldantlSafety Analysis . - '29, - " \ EXHIBIT "A" Page 34 of 79 s. Oocckritz April 6, 1994 Page 2 Given that Woodburn Qossing is a faclory oullet maJl center rather than a general relaillltore which offers goods people need on a daily basis. it is highly likely that the trips to this outlet center via Weat Hayea will be leaS than the percentage noted for WaI.Mart. As shown below, the tolal estimate of p.m. peak hour traffic to/from Woodburn Crossing is 288 vehicle trips including 130 trips entering the lite and 158 trips exiting the site. If the pen:ent using West Hayes is estimated to be 10 percent, then during the p.m. peak hour there would be an additional 13 vehielc trips would travel westbound and 16 vehicle trips would travel eastbound on this roadway. (Throughout the remainder of the day and on weekends the number of the trips will be lower than these values.) These numbers of IIdditional vehicles would not significantly affect traffic operations and safety cbar~r1sdcs along West Hayes. Dally A.M. Peak Jlollt P.M. P.... Rour TrIp. TotIIl I In I Oat . Lad U.. Tota. III OUt Factory ODdet Ceater 3,200 Minimal 320 14S 17S (100,000 OSF) Adjuted for Local Mulll-Slop 288 130 151$ SIaoppfDI Tripe (10 'l\\ Recluaioa) Tul. 1: TrIp GeIIent10a ror I'IrIl P1w. or Woodb.... eroN's, It would be premature at this time to set in motions mitigation plans because the actual number of trips anticipate is relatively low and the pattern of these trips is unknown. If a probl6ln does arise, a study could be pelformed to Identify the pattern of these additional trips and then lppropriate mitigation measures could be implomented. If you have any question regarding the traffic analysis I have submitted or this letter, please contact me direci1y. Sincerely, !I~ Su.# All:. Howard S. Stein. P.E. cc: J. Donaldson, Capital Devel~pment WIIt!lAYIlS.LTll / -~o- ~ ...~~ .."... 06/0./84 10:Zft tr~ , 7:t: 1038 , I" nrST 3 RW\. MA'NT . EXHIBIT "An Page 35 of 79 ,.., .., /.- .- April 22, 1QQ4 - ...... . . Mr:-steve G<)eekritz, Director 'Plaiinlng OQpartment City of Woodburn . 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, OR 97071 .1U: CODE: SUBJECT: Woodburn Cros.lng FactoryOuUetCenter_Caplf.a1 Development co. DEPARTMENT OF !RANSPo~noN Di&tdct J Dear Mr. GoeckrItz: Thank you for meeting with Oregon Department ofTralllpOl'tatlon (0001) staff on April 21 to diccuea rctoIution of ~llon Issues. OOOT'c principle concern 1$ with encuring that the operation of Slate HIghway 219 and the l-6 interchange ere not further degraded by area development We hllVG limited our review and recommend~tions to Impacts and improvements fo the etate highway system onry. . In recognition of the above, lII1d in an effort to ensure that project-generated tnIffic nu;ults I/:l Wno net impact". to the transportation system, ODOT requests that the following conditions be adopted. as part offhe aGtion on the Proposed factoly outlet center. 1. Prfoi to the luuance of 8 grading permit or buOdIng permit. wh/ehever occurs first, the sppffCflnt malT submit pfamJ for tha following ImproV9fnents fortho ,.\liQw and epproVtJl of the D/sfric;t Msnsaer; Of8(JOn Depsrtment of Transportation. DIstrict 3: Widenfng and 8fr/pIng the 1-5 northbound oH-ramp to inclUde separate left and rfghf tum fanes. Widening and sttfp/Jlg the 1.5 $Outhbound off-ramp to ir<<,-(ude . separate left end tfght tllm lane$. Install" traffic signal at the J-5 notthbourJd rsmpsMighway 214 interssctfon. "lma.~ InstsIJ centormedian control on Highway 214 from ths northbound 1-5 Tampa to Evergreen. Install righttum ItJ/Iea at the folloWing locations: sastbound Highway 214 to ~outhbound Evergreen . eastbound H'tghway 219 to southbound l-5on-rsmp westboUnd HIghway 214 to northbound 1.5 tn-ramp , . 88.5 Ahpert Rood s.J...., OR 97.310 15(J3} 98&-2874 !lAX (503) 986-2061 , . I 3\ "'.--.- ".-.......,.---. .._,-~->".. - oil _.~ .t.. J..V~Q VI>! 3 IlWY IlAINT ":' EXHIBIT "A" Page 36 of 7S 2. Prior to the isl1UMCe of sny pennit for use and OCCUpancy. the improvements 8fJBCi/ied in Condition 1l1haU be Installed and operational in a manner meeting the 11pprOva/ of the DIWict Manager, Oregon DePBttment of TfIIIISfJOrtalion. District 3. . . Based on ana/y5es prepared by Iho apprlCant 8!l<l ODOT &taft, we are confident that iostaJJallon of thoso impRM!lllentl will 4UUle that existing levels of service on state CaclllUes are maintained. OOOT is a/eo prepared to patticipate In the alSt Of installation of the traffic signal at HIghway 2191/-6 notfhbound ramps lntel'8ection aod the center median COotroI on Highway 219. , , Thank you for the opportunity to n1'1iow and comment 00 thIa project. OOOT ~ the COOperative e/forts of the City of WOOdburn staff in bringing lhese isaues to closure. This /otter .hoU/d be Included In U1e hearing record 8S OOOT teatimony. OooT ahould be considered a party to Ihe hearrng and be entitled to no~ of future hearinga, or homfng continuances or oxtenalons. Please provide me . with a copy of the dty'c deeilloo. k1dudlog findings and c:oneJlI$/onc. YoUl'8 truly, JO/1~~sman. P.E. District 3 M8nager C: Dan Fricke, ODoT. Region 2 D1cIc Reynolds, ODOT Corridor and General Planning Mellucas. OLCO John Donaldaori, Capital Development Co. / , i - -. - .-- .--- ---_.. - '-. - .-. _. -".- ... .--....-. -.- . ~2. - ~~~- 4_ 'T"- --- ~ ~ EXHIBIT" A" Page 38 of 79 STAFF REPORT Site Plan Review 93-22 Modification 93-01 APPLICANT: Capital Development PO Box 3487 691 Sleater-Kinney Rd. SE Suite 100 Lacey, WA 9850-1069. II NATURE OF THE APPLICATION: The applicant is requesting site plan review approval of an approximate 85,000 square foot retail outlet center and the modification of Ordinance 2095 and 2098. III RELEVANT FACTS: / This staff report will address the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the Site Plan. The request for the modification has been addressed previously. The site is located along Interstate 5 and south of Hayes Street. The subject property can be identified specifically on Marion County Assessor Maps as Tax Lot 200, 5S,2W, Section 12C. Tax lot 200 is 124.58 acres in its entirety. On this property there are three zoning designations, single family residential, multi- family residential and commercial general. Approximately 58 acres of tax lot 200 is zoned commercial. This commercially designated portion of tax lot 200 runs parallel to Hayes Street in a east, west direction from 1-5 to the back of Senior Estates. The applicants original request for annexation and a zone change was approved with conditiOflS (Ordinanca2095 and 2(98), One oHhose conditions was to move this commercially zoned portion of tax lot 200 in a north, south direction to front entirely along 1-5, therefore, moving -it away from Senior Estates. The second condition of approval was imposed by ODOT. It stated that no reconfiguration of the zoning designations could occur until the transportation plan was approved. The applicant understands the conditions of approval from Ordinances 2095 and 2098 and will comply with them. The applicant is requesting a new application which includes site plan review, and permission to build one phase of their retail outlet center along 1-5 in what is already zoned commercial. It will be located to be in compliance with Ordinance 2095 so that when the transportation Page 1 - SPR93-22 _._-_._-----,.,,--~_.-..__.- ~ / r, , 'i -- .. f,i""" 'I ,.j~, l ~. EXHIBIT "A" Page 37 of 79 PART IV / II / " ---~._-~ -- r. EXHIBIT" A" Page 39 of 79 plan is finished, the reconfiguration of the commercial and residential land can take place as approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant is requesting to develop on approximately 13.04 acres of commercial property that runs along 1-5. Once the transportation plan is complete, the applicant will proceed with the original condition of approval and reconfigure the remaining Commercial General Property away from the existing residential areas to the east. The site is currently being leased for farming. IV RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA: A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Commercial Land Development Policies Public Services Goals and Policies Transportation Goals and Policies B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5 Permits and Enforcement Chapter 6 Planning Commission Chapter 7 Public Hearings Chapter 8 General Standards Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveways Private Street Standards Chapter 11 Site Plan Review Chapter 29 Commercial Retail Chapter 30 Commercial General C. Landscaping Policies D. Sign Ordinance Page 2 - SPR93-22 ,-_. .".... ........ ".,..~" EXHIBIT "A" Page 40 of 79 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Transportation policies have been addressed in Part III of this report. Commercial Land Development Policies B-1 The City should at all times have sufficient land to accommodate the retail needs of the City and the surrounding market area. The City presently has four major commercial areas: 99E. 1-5 Interchange. the downtown area and the 214/211/99E four corners intersection area. No new areas should be established. STAFF: The subject property and development complies with this policy because the applicants request for the retail factory outlet is located at the 1-5 interchange area. This proposal will help to accommodate the retail needs of the City and surrounding market. B-2 Lands for high traffic generating uses (shopping centers. malls. restaurant. etc.) should be located on well improved arterial. The uses should provide the necessary traffic control devices needed to ameliorate their Impact on the arterial streets. STAFF: The proposed use has complied with this policy because the site plan and property owner will be complying with Public Works requirements relative to streets and drainage. The site will be served by three streets. The applicant will dedicate 100 feet of right-of-way and improve 54 feet of roadway for Prairie Blvd. It will have two travel lanes, two bike lanes and one turn lane. This will be improved from its intersection south of Stacy Allison Way to the intersection of Outlet Ave. Prairie Blvd. will eventually connect to Parr Road. Interstate Way will run parallel to 1-5 between the Interstate and the development. It is an extension of Stacy Allison Way. The applicant will provide 60 feet of right-of-way and 42 feet of improved surface down to Outlet Ave and 34 feet from Outlet Ave south. The third street is Outlet Av.e. This street runs in an east, west direction and connects Interstate Way with Prairie Blvd. This, like Interstate Way will include 60 feet ofR.O.W. and 42 feet of improved surface. Phase In will have ingress and egress onto Outlet Ave. which in north of the development. Restricting access here will reduce impacts on Prairie Blvd. Page 3 - SPR93-22 ~.. ,._,.., "'-"~~"-'''-"-''--'''--''~'-'-~''''''--''''I'-'- .. ~ .,.-. EXHIBIT "A" Page 41 of 79 B-3 Strip zoning should be discouraged as a most unproductive form of commercial land development. Strip zoning is characterized by the use of small parcels of less than one acre. with lot depths of less than 150 feet and parcels containing multiple driveway access points. Whenever possible. the City should encourage or require commercial developments which are designed to allow pedestrians to shop without relying on the private automobile to go from shop to shop. Therefore. acreage size lots should be encouraged to develop "mall type" developments that allow a one stop and shop opportunity. Commercial developments or commercial development patterns which required the use of private automobile shall be discouraged. STAFF: The request complies with this policy because the proposal is designed as a "mall type" development. in that shoppers will have an opportunity to go from shop to shop without relying on a private automobile. The applicant has made allowance for alternative forms of transportation. Bicycle areas. bike paths and transit areas have been identified on the site plan. B-4 Architectural design of commercial areas should be attractive with a spacious feeling and enough landscaping to reduce the visual impact of large expanses of asphalt parking areas. STAFF: The applicant has complied with this policy because of compliance with the landscaping standards. The required landscaping is that at least 15 % of the total development be landscaped. the applicant is proposing that 16.40% of the site will be landscaped. B-5 It would be of benefit to the entire City to have the historical center of Woodburn an active. healthy commercial area... ST AFF:The proposed land use application is not subject to this policy because the development is not proposed to be located in the historical center or downtown area of Woodburn. B-6 Commercial office and other low traffic generating commercial retail uses can be located on collectors or in close proximity to residential areas.. . ST AFF:The proposed land use application is not subject to this policy because the proposed development is for commercial general and commercial ~tail use. Page 4 - SPR93-22 "_ 4__..,,-...._ ,__.0____"_"'__'_"" ,'. I , .-- EXHIBIT "A" Page 42 of 79 Public Services Goals and Policies H-' It is the policy of the City to provide facilities at the least long range cost to the City. H-2 Efficient design of all facilities should be encouraged. The sizing of all lines should be adequate to accommodate the expected growth within the expected lifetime of those lines. H-3 The City should oversize the lines where it is deemed reasonable that during the life of the facility the lines will be carrying additional capacity . STAFF: The applicant has complied with these Policies because utilities will be designed for future extensions. The proposed utilities will be subject to Engineering approval at final review and comply with City standard specifications. H-4 The City shpuld minimiZe the number of high maintenance and operational cost facilities such as lift stations whenever possible. To maximize the utility of existing city services. and to minimize maintenance costs. existing lands which are vacant should be developed to their highest potential. subject to constraints of the Land Use Plan. and excepting areas set aside for open space preservation of parks. STAFF: The development will utilizing the existing lift station that was in existence prior to development. The developer will be subject to final review and comply with City standard specifications. The proposed utilities will of designed to provide for future needs at the highest and best use of the property which is commercial and residential, therefore this poliCY has be complied with. H-5 The City should encourage development in areas of existing facilities first. Secondly. the City should encourage development in areas where extensions of existing City services can be accommodated. The City should encourage development of new areas to which services can be most cheaply extended. The City should develop any other areas only as a last resort. The City will adhere to the policies in the Storm Water and Water and Sewer elements of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF: City services are to the site. The pro'erty owner will be responsible for providing services throughout the development. This site is was identified as one of four major commercial areas that has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Page 5 - SPR93-22 . .,-- ....". ,,'-.',-_. _."._._...".,...._..,._.~" --- ~ L EXHIBIT "A" Page 43 of 79 H-6 To insure that the growth does not increase the cost to the present City residents, the City's policy should Insure that new developments pay for any additional services they demand. The City shall institute the necessary taxes and fees to insure that this is accomplished as far as is practical. STAFF: The applicant shall fund the construction costs for the required infrastructure and pay the appropriate Systems Development Charges. H-7 It shall be a policy of the City to maintain a working Capital Improvement Plan which shall detail a set of public facility projects, their costs, and funding for a six year period, and for the logical extension of public facilities over a projected twenty year period. It shall further be the policy of the City to conduct an annual review of the CIP and amend it as necessary to insure adequate public infrastructure where needed and to maintain compliance with Policy (HI(1) of the document and the statewide land use goal eleven (Public Facilities Planning). STAFF: The City has a working Capital Improvement Program that is in a constant state of revision. The most recent CIP regarding the interchange area consists of over $13,000,000 in new construction. / Page 6 - SPR93-22 ....,. - .... ,.._V..' EXHIBIT "An Page 44 of 79 Woodburn Zoning Ordinance The following sections of the zoning ordinance were found to be relevant to the approval of this application. Chapter 8 General Standards Section 8.010 Minimum Street Width Staff: The applicant has complied with the required street right-of-way width, therefore, this criteria has been met. Section 8.040 Special Setback Distances Staff: There are no requirements for special setbacks for this proposal therefore, this criteria is not applicable. The applicant has provided setback distances from the centerline of the new roads Ipg.6) Section 8.190 Vision Clearance Staff: The applicant shall comply with the requirements for vision clearance at any intersections. This will be necessary for any proposed signage or landscaped areas. Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards Section 10.030 Location Staff: The applicant complies with this criteria because parking is provided within 500 feet of the outlet center and employee parking is provided on site and within 2000 feet of the outlet center. Section 10.050 Off-Street Automobile Parking Requirements Off-street automobile parking shall be provided in the amounts not less than those listed below: Iwl Retail store 11 lone space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, plus one per every two employees. Staff: Four hundred twenty-six parking spaces are required per the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is-providing 512-, therefore this standard 'flas been met. . - Section 10.060 Off-Street Loading Requirements / Staff: Deliveries will taken within the "figure eight" shape of the building. The applicant shall comply with the loading space requirements. Page 7 - SPR93-22 .~ ., ,.-. -.- .,.~-_.. .,,-- "-.-.."'.. -_.- . /"'0 /- ,..- t:}\'HI~1I "A" Page 45 of 79 Section 10.070 Parking and Loading Area Development Requirements Staff:The applicant has provided evidence in the site plan and narrative that indicates compliance with this criteria. Specific design requirements of (a) through (j) shall be subject to final review. Section 10.080 Driveway Standards Staff: Two driveways will provide ingress and egress on to Outlet Ave. The driveways will be 28 feet wide. Both driveways exceed 50 foot of distance from the intersection of Interstate Way and Prairie Blvd, therefore, this standard has been met. Chapter 11 Site Plan Review Section 11.030 Approval of Site Plan Required (a) No building permit for construction of structures governed by this chapter shall be issued until the Site Plan for that structure has received approval under the provisions of this Chapter. (b) Any conditions attached to the approval of the Site Plan shall be conditions on the issuance of the building permit. A violation of the conditions shall be considered a violation of this Ordinance. Section 11.070 Criteria for Evaluating a Site Plan Staff: The applicant has addressed this site plan review criteria adequately, see attached narrative (pg.11) from applicant. (a) The placement of structures on the property shall minimize adverse impact on adjacent uses. Staff: The adjacent uses in this case are vacant property zoned for commercial and residential use. The applicant has indicated that the center is designed as a figure 8, creating two fronts. The service corridors are contained inside "this design enables the project to keep service traffic, refuse collection , utility connections and other unsightly activity away from potential visual pollution to nearby neighbors". The applicaRt has complied with the landscaping requirements for a. commercial general district. Once the reconfiguration of the commercially zoned portion of tax lot 200 is realized as part of the original condition of approval for the zoned change (Ordinance 2095), the entire 58 acres of commercial property will be shifted along 1-5 and single family residential land will adjacent to Senior Estates. Because of the location of the phase I development along 1-5 the future reconfiguration of the commercially zoned portion of tax lot 200, the proposal meets this criteria. Page 8 - SPR93-22 . """- .~ - .....------.- ..------ I Page 9 - SPR93-22 ~ r- ~ J EXHIBIT "A" Page 46 of 7 (b) Landscaping shall be used to minimize impact on adjacent uses. Staff:The applicant's proposal complies with the landscaping standards, therefore this standard has been met. (c) Landscaping shall be located as to maximize its aesthetic value. Staff:The applicant's proposal complies with the landscaping standards. The applicant has indicated that a landscaped architect will design the landscaping to conform to the surrounding area, therefore, this criteria has been met. (d) Access to the public streets shall minimize the impact of traffic patterns. Wherever possible, direct driveway access shall not be allowed to arterial streets. Wherever possible, access shall be shared with adjacent uses of similar nature. Staff: The applicant has complied with Chapter 10 standards for parking, loading and driveways. Two access points will be provided for to the north of the development onto Outlet Ave, therefore restricting access on to Prairie Blvd. (e) The design of the drainage facilities shall minimize the impact on the City's or other public agencies drainage facilities. Staff: The applicant will be providing onsite detention. This will be designed to City standard specifications following preliminary approval. Therefore this criteria can be met following preliminary approval. (f) The design encourages energy conservation, both in its siting on the lot and its accommodation of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Staff: The proposal does accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The applicant will be providing bicycle paths and sidewalks and a transit station, therefore this standard has been met. (g) The proposed site development, including the architecture, landscaping and graphic design, is in conformity with the site _development requirements of this Ordinance and with the standards of this and other ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the proposed development are involved. Staff: This staff report has discussed the approval criteria as it relates to site plan review. The applicant's proposal has complied with the current ordinances and standards as discussed in this staff report. ..........--.--.--.1 /'" ,~~~...;}. . :....J EXHIBIT "A" Page 47 of 79 (h) The location, design, color and materials of the exterior of all structures and signs are compatible with the proposed development and appropriate to the character of the immediate neighborhood. Staff: The proposal is compatible with the immediate character of the neighborhood which is commercial. Once the reconfiguration of the commercially zoned property takes place as was approved in Ordinance 2095, the character of the neighborhood will still be commercial. Section 11.085 Time Limitation At the time of final approval the applicant has six months to initiate construction. If construction has not begun within this time frame, the applicant can request, in writing, a six-month extension. The site plan becomes void one year after final approval, therefore, the applicant would have to reapply after that time period. Chapter 29 Commercial Retail Section 29.010 Within any CR Commercial Retail District, No building, structure or premises shall be used, enlarged or designed to be used, erected, structural altered or enlarged except for one or more of the following uses: (a) Any use permitted in RM district and Commercial Office District (b) Amusement and recreation (c) Communication (d) Community service (e) Printing and publishing (f) Retail (g) Retail and service (h) Service Staff: The proposed retail outlet center shall be permitted to conduct anyone of these allowed uses in a Commercial Retail zone. Page 10 - SPR93-22 . ., .~,. ..,... , ~--, ~ - - \ ~--~" ... EXHIBIT "An Page 48 of 79 Chapter 30 Commercial General Section 30.010 Use Within any CG Commercial General District, no building, structure or premises shall be used or arranged, except for one or more of the following uses: (a) Any use permitted in the RM, CO, and CR Districts Landscaping Standards Staff: The applicant is providing 93242.94 Sq feet ( 16.40%) of landscaping, the standards require 85,235.68 Sq. feet ( 15% ) of landscaping be provided. The applicant has meet this criteria. Sign Ordinance Standards Staff: Any proposed sign will be subject to review and will require a permit issued by the Building Official. . V COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS: Engineering: See attachment A Fire Dept: See attachment B Wastewater Dept: See attachment C Building: See attachment D Police: See attachment E VI ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: A. The request complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Map. B. The proposed use is allowed per Chapters 29 and 30 of the Zoning Ordinance. C. The site plan is in substantial conformance with Chapter 11 Site Plan Review. D. The applicant has submitted sufficient information as required Po/ Chapter 11 Site Plan Review. Page 11 - SPR93-22 T "--'-"--~----"-~--~'~._'-' I ,..............,.$.., VII CONCLUSION: EXHiBiT "A" Page 49 of 79 The applicant is requesting site plan review approval of an approximate 85,000 square foot retail outlet center. The proposed use and improvements have been discussed in detail by the applicant and in this staff report. VIII RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECISION: Based on the findings in this report, staff recommends approval of this application subject to the following conditions: A. No development can be permitted until the Planning Commission and City Council have approved modifications to Ordinance 2095 and 2098. B. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plan. . C. After preliminary approval, submit a landscaping and irrigation plan to the Planning Department for review. D. Approved backflow devices and grease traps shall be required (Ann O'Roke Wastewater 982-5283). E. Submit sign plan to Building Official for approval and permit (Bob Arzoian 982-5250). F. On-site construction shall not commence until the improvement plans have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and all right-ot- way permits, system development charges have been paid. Refer to part two Pg 9 of the standards document for site plan preview (Randy Scott 982- 5247). G. Upon acceptable completion of all improvements to be maintained by the City, the applicant shall provide the City a maintenance bond good for one year, in the amount of 10% of the improvement cost. H. Prior to occupancy permit issuance, the applicant shall submit one set of reproducible as-builts. I. Conditions of Approval also include the following attachments as submitted by: Public Works Department Wastewater Department / Building Department Fire Department J. Prior to building permit issuance, pay appropriate Systems Development Charges in effect at that time. Page 12 - SPR93-22 . T '~.,~'-"~~ ~ ,...... ~XHIBIT "A" Page 50 of 79 SITE PLAN REVIEW --..----- -. --. Capital Development GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Show split diamond interchange a. Minimum 100 ft. right-of-way b. Slope easements c. Locate development outside of that area 2. Show proposed utilities 3. Payment of conditional grant will be required. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedure and stmdards. 2. Franchised utilities and street lights shall be installed with the development. 3. The applicant is responsible for all permits or approval from state and federal agencies which may be required. 4. All work sball comply with the City of Woodburn's standards and specifications. 5. Off-site traffic mitigation may be required by Oregon Department of Transportation. STRRHT AND DRAINAGE 1. Prairie Blvd. shall be a 100 ft. dedication, 54 ft. improved surface providing two travel lane, two bike lanes and one turn lane. It shall be improved from Stacy Allison Way to it's intersection with Outlet Ave. This will be required to be connected to Parr Road, however, not with Phase One. 2. Interstate Way shall be a 60 ft. right-of-way dedication with a 10 ft. utility on the east side; a 42 ft. wide improved surface to Outlet Ave., 34 ft. wide improved surface from Outlet Ave. south. / AJ.A~(.~ men\- A .. T ,. .'-~~-~-"-"-----r'~<' r. .~_. EXHIBIT "A" Page 51 of 79 Interstate Way shall be improved from the end of Stacy Allison Way to the intersection of Outlet Ave. Interstate Way shall be completed south with Phase Two. 3. Outlet Ave. shall be a 60 ft. right-of-way dedication, with 5 ft. utility easements on each side, 42 ft. wide improved surface from Interstate Way to Prairie Blvd. 4. Sidewalks shall be required with street improvements. 5. Storm sewer for streets and on-site storm discharge shall be provided by the drainage way on the west side of Interstate 5. This will require a bore under 1-5, on-site detention and sized for future improvements. This will also require approval and permit from the Oregon Department of Transportation. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by a gravity main from the lift station at the southwest corner of the Wal-mart site. The sanitary sewer shall be sized and of sufficient depth to provide for future development. 2. Dedicate to city a 25 it. wide utility easement from the above referenced lift station to the south line of this development for future installation of sanitary sewer improvement. 3. On-site services shall be private, not city maintained. WATER 1. Water main for domestic and fire protection service shall be as follows: a. Install 12" dia. water main from existing main at the southwest corner of Wal-mart site along Interstate Way to Outlet Avenue, along Outlet Ave. to Prairie Blvd., extend to south end of Prairie Blvd. b. Install an 8" diameter main from the existing main at the end of West Hayes, amng Prairie Blvd. ~o the propoSed 12" diameter main to complete the loop. . c. On-site water main shall be sized according to fire protection requirements and shall be a looped system. A 16 ft. wide easement will be required. -.or ~.. . ~._~...~._-- I r , ~ EXHIBIT "A" Page 52 of 79 d. Backflow prevention devices will be required depending on water usage and on all fire and lawn sprinkler systems. e. Backflow devices shall be installed outside of the buildings f. Water meters shall be placed within easements. ....._' ~ vv~ Tf~ MEMO TO: Teresa Engeldinger, Planner City of Woodburn FROM: Bob Benck, Fire Marshal Woodburn Fire District RE: Woodburn Crossing DATE: Dec. 8, 1993 2/23/ q1 EXHIBiT "A" Page 53 of 79 Site Plan Review Comments WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT A. ACCESS: Minimum access is provided, concerns over "control gates & location of 7 ft. fence on south property line. B. FIRE FLOW: Maximurn for anyone building based on sprinkled facilities will be 2000 gpm. C. HYDRANTS: Hydrants to be spaced at intervals not to exceed 450 feet apart and located within 25 feet of the sprinkler FDC. Buildings A & B will have a minimum of three hydrants with in 500 feet of all sides, and building C two hydrants within 500 feet of all sides. D. SPRINKLERS IFDC: Buildings A,B, and C are to be sprinkled to meet Fire flow requirements. Fire Department Connections for the sprinkler systems are to be located clI.ofthe building at a location within 25 feet of a hydrant and at a location approved by the Fire District. . E. ALARM SYSTEM: Sprinkler systems will be monitored by an a approved 24 hour central station. F. PREMISE IDENTIFICATION: Address to be located and visible on each building. GCONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION: No cOmbustible construction may begin until an acceptable and approved on site water system is installed and operational. This system must be accepted by the City of Woodburn and meet their standards. Driveable access to within 150 of all sides of all buildings capable of supporting Fire Apparatus must be in place prior to combustible construction. 1776 Ncwberg Highway Woodburn, Oregon 97071 A~\iYY\e(\-t B T "- -"""-"'"'~'..'-~"-'~'."~"-'--'-"'-j- . ,... ~- , - EXHIBIT "A" Page 54 of 79 H. BUILDING PLANS: All Fire and Life Safety review must be completed by Marion County Building Department prior to the issuance of construction pencits. All buildings must meet minimum Code requirements as established by City, County,and State regulations. Note: No combustible merchandise or stock may be paced in any building until the sprinkler system is operational. / "- T ("'\ SUBDIVISION/ Silo:: . AN REVIEW - PRE-APPL:l"-""ION/I\I(l~ThIT "A" AAA^^AAAAAAA^~A^AAA.^AAAAA.^AAAAAA.AAAAA Page 55 of 79 REQUEST DATE: 2/ID/<?( DEPARTMENT: W~~ """" CONTACT PERSON: Teresa Engeldinger; Planning Dept, 982-5246 APPLICANT: CCjj?f'bl Uc-ve/oprr1r:-rrf c,. TYPE OF PROJECT: W<A::lIbum CV05:>;':j - 72-e-&d/~..e PROJECT LOCATION: ~ o-P WA/Nlr;rl- CONFERENCE PLACE: Conference Room Woodburn City Hall DATE: ,1993 ~/dJl11 TIME: /.30 GENERAL INFORMATION TO APPLICANT I have read the information sheet provided me and understand that which is pertint!nt to my Site Plan Review/Pre-Application request. All materials are to be collated and folded. Signature - Owner/Agent '1 _ (t/2h..A- a}~Y a G-_",,",o ;'> ","'"d or ~~'r ""' ?V<':;:::;{1(Jb- t:j f? d -, '1;2. :;j (J -/--93 THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED AFTER PRE-APPLICATION CO FERENCE: 1) Eight (8) copies of Final Plan must be brought into Public Works 2) "As Builts" must be provided prior to issuance of the building permit SPRPRE.FMl Ai-to..cnmpn-t c.. T '_."....-~~'~---'-_..~-_..t. .- ~_:' EXHIBIT "An Page 56 of 79 CITY OF WOODBURN CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ~ACKFLOW ~REVENTION DEVICES :. FI~E LINE" If any a~tifreeze or chemicals are used in the f:_re ;,>ystem an approved reduced pressure device (RPI must be io!stalled on the fire line and on the bypass line. If no chemicals are used, an approved double check detector check assembly (DeDel may be used. Th~ detector meter register must be located on line outside any enclosed building or structure. ",r,a!:.>le the Water Department personnel to read the the bypass This will meter. mete-4J -0 RP or rw~t~.~..J[..~-~_JI l~et~J.- -E.--I-. DC ---) 2. DOl-tEST-IC \.ATER LINE- A reduced pressure device. is required unless otherwise noted. The reduced pressure device is nel:'essary wherE~ theTe is a potential for a cross connection '''}.th t'ub" tances thr..t could cause a health problem. A double- -:he!::-}:: '.-]AVi.C''':''' wOllld be required if where contamination \llouId ~e ('o~lsiJered 2 nuj.sance. 3. IFR:GATION LINE- A reduced pressure device is required "heTe ;chemicals or fertilizer are used in the irrigation syster". It double check, pressure. vacuum breaker or atmospheric v;:,.cuum bre.aker is required if no chemicals are llsed ~ 1\11 devices must. be inst.alled adjaeent. too the water The deviee must. be inspeet.ed by a St.at.e eert.ified 2f':".t~}" inst.alJat.j.on. The t.est. result.s mailed t.o: met.er. t.est.er Ci t.y of Woodburn 2815 Molalla Rd. ~!oodburn, OR. 97071 WASTE TREATMENT '..Ias t.e trea tnlen t_ s ys t.ems are required where the f aei I i ty discharges mat.erial/ int.o t11e sewer t.hat. eould be harmful to (it.y per5011nl=.1. t.he sewerage syst.em, or the environment.~ GREASE fc.und t..r2tl:- TRAP/OIL ,,< in t.he Oregon SAND SEPARATOR- Requirement.s are Ur:iformed Plumbing Code. A grease gpm/40 Ibs capaci t.y is required in meat. depart.!11ent.:..') and ot.her similar of 2.t least. 20 ~eS~atlrallts. bakerVt ~ , ,._-....~.,....._-_...".."_.~.~._..t...~-~_ ..,. /""l, EXHIBIT "A" Page 57 of 79 raciJitie3. A properly sized separator is required for ...=:;1] ca_':.~ ';.la::::!1G:::, t gas st.at.ions and similar facili t.ies. L. WASTE TREATJ.\ENT SYSTEM- More. complex systems may be require/j t.e: redu('!e organic loading t met.als, t.oxic and flammable mat.erials. and <'t.her pollut.ants. The new facility would he required t.o complet.e an applicat.ion regardil~g i +- I.; prc.duct.ion and waste discharge. / . ... r-' SUBDIVISION/ Sj ~lA.N REVIEW - PRE-APP;r''3TION/ '--'EXHIBIT "A" ^^^^^~ '^^^^^^^^^^^^~^^^^^^^~ '^ Page 58 of . REQUEST DATE: /2.~-C(3 DEPARTMENT: 13\A.\ \c\i':j CONTACT PERSON: Teresa Engeldlnger; Planning Dept, 982-5246 APPLICANT: c...u:p(.\--M- t:::ii2V E l...6p}.1EA/t TYPE OF PROJECT: ~'i Ou!:\.& .M::<.\l PROJECT LOCATION: bO\.A...~ c+ VJ~~ CONFERENCE PLACE: Conference Room Woodburn City Hall De.e.13 DATE: ,1993 TIME: 7: 3D - ~ 2/~5/qt( GENERAL INFORMATION TO APPLICANT I have read the Information sheet provided me and understand that which Is pertll)ent to my Site Plan RevlewlPre-Application request. All materials are to be collated and folded. Signature - Owner/Agent DEPARTMENT COMMENTS . /ILl- ?t.II"-'$ .('~,.. e...u""~",";;-":'" S",.'I.. bJ!'" 'u{,_,r7'"EJ. r.. e:r, C<'~ Lob"', .".' .f- tf1If.Rtr>< e"''''~7ir' F,R/! L.,'.( E i- s~~"'.,. ~ r''-~A( R..J, i.w . "'0 / . '(.... r,~tf" . /:> Prc.v,J.rtt. /ILl- ~E!""S $I,ALL. ~I!" ,?~,d """,,,.,.. r" r...NST,.....r.-:.. S..,L> .. . .' lE?T rJrf ."..a-trd - ,':JrliTr . To . PL.,II.t..,.v~ . '"" O'--P e"f\fc."" rE. e"NcrE Tc- l,yJ :A/LE?- 5"'--[l- 6 rr TAJ;t'"J( -{".r 115'.$ T5 ~ 1/ JTi?y s- t>" v "'rei> . I ' /11.1. b~IL6:","< ShALL C"",,(JLV ~ ,,0.14. THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED AFtER PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: 1) Eight (8) copies of Final Plan must be brought into Public Works 2) "As Builts. must be provided prior to issuance of the building permit SPRPRE.FMl ~nmem-D r ... .-.-,.... ....--.....----.--'-..-.-.'1 ...............-.....~_._.,~~-_..------_._-~_.~_...- ~, - EXHIBIT "A" Page 59 of 79 CITY OF WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT ~~~(Q)~[M[Q)(1JJ~ Paul Null Servlcas Ueutenan Woodburn, Oregon 97071 982-2345 Ext, 352 December 8, 1993/ '2-/2!3/q1 TO: Teresa Engeldinger, Planning Dept, RE: Site Plan Review - Factory Outlet Store The following is a list of recommendations and/or concerns regarding the sIte plan review of the Factory Outlet Store. 1. Off street parking should be prohibited, "No Parking" signs posted. 2, In order to deter the likelihood of businesses becoming a victim of burglaries, it is highly recommended that all stores be pre-wired for alarms and that intrusion alarm systems be installed, 3, Lighting plan for parking, pedestrian and security be submitted, It is recommended that the builder consider the use of Low Pressure Sodium Vapor Lighting for street and parking lot. 4. Please submit a landscape plan for review. Low shrubbery, are recommended to prevent concealment. and open trees 5. Restrooms are a location that draw criminal activity, Please submit plans which include location of restrooms. Restrooms should be in a highly visible location, well lite. 6. It a Automatic Teller Machine (A TM) is going to be installed, please submit plan a~ to its location and design. The A TM should also be in a high visibility area and well lite. k-\-to.ctw\'\en-t- E T , __"_""n"__~ ....-......---------r---,...- ("'" (""'- ~ EXHIBIT "A" Page 60 of 79 WOODBURN CROSSING FACfORY OuTLET SHOPPING CENTER PHASE I, WOODBURN, OREGON Since the reviewers of this proposal may be unfamiliar with the concept of factory outlet shopping centers, we have provided a basic description, identifying how they differ from traditional shopping centers, key industIy definitions of other forms of retail centers and a profile of typical outlet center shoppers. Much of the statistical information contained herein is taken from Value Retail News, the official journal of outlet and off price retlliling. VRN is recognized as the principle authority on the outlet shopping center industIy, Outlet centers, while in some ways similar to other forms of retail development, stand out in a class of their own. Here is a snapshot of how outlet projects differ from other kinds of retail development: All outlet center development and leasing strategies revolve around what is known as retail sensitivity. . The term refers to a manufacturers strict policy of not opening outlet stores close to its primary wholesale customers, usually major department stores and specialty stores. Research by Value Retail News quantifies the practice: In a survey conducted late in 1991, 92 manufacturers said they maintain a buffer zone averaging 20.9 miles from department stores. Though outlet stores can be highly profitable, their revenues usually are only a fraction of a manufacturer's total income. That's why manufacturers refuse to open stores that compete directly with their primary customers. Because of retail sensitivity, outlet center sites are usually in the outlying areas, well away from population centers. Most outlet centers developed today are close to major interstates. They strive for high visibility from the roadway, excellent accessibility, and a strong passby traffic count. Three preferred kinds of sites have emerged: 1. Tourist destinations - Outlet centers perform well in, or on highways leading to, tourist destinations. This market is lucrative because tourists tend to be in a spending mindset. Examples of tourists locations where outlets are thriving are Branson, Mo.; Orlando, Fla.; Pigeon Forge, Term; and Iincoln City, Ore. 2. Passby locations - These sites, developed next to busy interstates between major cities, attract daytrippers, motorcoach tours and interstate travelers. Examples of outlet passby locations are Kenosha, Wis.; Slidell, La.; Valdosta, Ga.; Our Woodburn location fits this description. -I~- .,.. .-,- ~ -. EXHIBIT "A Page 61 of 79 3. Shopper destination - These sites are in "outlet towns," co=unities with such a high concentration of outlet retailing that shoppers are attracted to them as a primary destination. Examples of shopper destinations include Reading, Pa.; Boaz, Ala; and Freeport, Maine. Of course, some sites do not fit into just one category; there is often some blurring. Unlike traditional shopping centers and malls, outlet projects usually do not have anchors. Instead, outlet centers rely on the combined firing power of their tenants. A few large outlet stores of anchor proportions have emerged, notably WestPoint Pepperell and VF. Additionally, a sprinkling of hard goods retailers, like Carolina Pottery and Reading China & Glass, could be considered anchors in outlet projects. More often, though, it is the cache of a group of sought-after tenants - such a Polo/Ralph Lauren, Nike and Donna Karan - that become the collective drawing card. Outlet chains generally prefer to open stores in centers that are tenanted predominantly by other outlet tenants. Some go as far as to stipulate 80 percent of a center's tenants must be manufacturers outlets, which is why supermarkets, office-supply stores or real estate offices are not found in outlet centers. Further, many outlet chains will not commit to an outlet center until certain industry leaders do so. Among influential outlet chains in this regard are the Phillips-Van Heusen stores (PVH operates more than a half-dozen chains), Nike, Polo/Ralph Lauren, Bugle Boy, Liz Claiborne, Donna Karan and others. Marketing an outlet center is strikingly different than marketing a regional center. Because of retail sensitivity, outlet retailers abate advertising that pits them against their parent company's primary accounts, Additionally, because of their low margins, outlet chains have small advertising budgets, As part of their rents, however, outlet chains do contribute promotional/advertising funds, which are controlled by the developer, These funds are used to promote the center through billboard advertising, direct-mail promotions aimed at motorcoach operators, brochures distributed at rest stops, and ads in tourist and regional publications. Radio spots are sometimes used; television much less so. Kick-out clauses, once co=onplace, are all but dead in the outlet industry. Five year leases are the status quo with some leases of seven years or more being consummated. Increasingly the trend is toward longer leases. In 1991, Value Retail News asked outlet retailers about the average discount in their stores and they said it was just over 40 percent. / -\It- '....^.. ,-""_.~. _.~'T"--,..-..~.-." ..- .- EXHIBIT "A' Page 62 of 7~ Value Retail News asked nearly 3,000 shoppers what they thought their average savings would be during an outlet trip, and they estimated about 25 percent. Then Value Retail News sent researchers into the field to check prices on identical items found in outlets and conventional retail stores. The result: on 13 identical, first quality items, the outlet savings averaged 27,5 percent. Whatever the true percentage of savings is, outlet retailers say they are cogni"Jlnt of the critical importance sharp pricing plays in attracting consumers. Some Key Industry Definitions Outlet stores are owned and operated by the manufacturer, They sell primarily the parent company's merchandise, generally end-of-season, overruns and closeouts, and allow the manufacturer to control distribution of these goods. Most outlet chains also buy a limited percentage of outside goods to supplement their merchandise mix. Outlets must avoid competing with their wholesale accounts, so site selection principles for these chains are unique and critical to their success. . Off-price chains sell branded goods at reduced prices every day. Off-price retailers are distinguished from outlet chains by the fact that they are not owned and operated by the manufacturer whose goods they carry. The percent of branded merchandise and amount of markdown varies chain to chain. Examples of this niche are off-price apparel chains, category killers and membership warehouse clubs. Value retailing is the "umbrella" term describing the industry, including all stores that sell branded merchandise at reduced prices. The term encompasses outlet and off-price retailing. Discount stores sell inexpensive merchandise cheaply, as opposed to value retail stores, which sell branded or quality merchandise at reduced prices. The distinction is not always clear, however: 25 percent of K-Mart's apparel mix today is branded merchandise and another 25 percent consists of its own heavily promoted private-label goods. / - \~- ,."___._, . ,e.',' ,.".._., _~"_.._~_~.___.~_..__.,.., ._.____~__.~".__.____. P""!j.-. EXHIBIT "A" Page 63 of 7, I..,...;, " Outlet Center Shopper Profile :.T" .... he majority of outlet shoppers are affluent, ~ well-educated , working women who shop ~ mainly for brands and bargains, according ~... . to two surveys conducted by Value Retail News in December 1990 and August 1991. So similar were the results of each survey, conducted at 25 outlet centers across the country, that a clear shopper in all. Furthermore, a separate survey of 7,399 outlet shoppers, conducted in July 1990 by New York City-based Dataplan Inc., revealed a corresponding shopper profIle. An Upclose Look at the Outlet Center Shopper When Shopping, what's Important? According to these surveys: . the income level of outlet center shoppers is high: 44 percent put their annual household incomes at more than $50,000; . the average amount spent by shoppers during an outlet visit is $147; . the average distance travelled to a center is 77 miles; . 77 percent of those surveyed will visit a center more than seven times a year if the drive is less than one hour; . 46 percent will visit centers more than fIve times a year if the drive is less than one day, according to Dataplan; . an extensive survey conducted by a major outlet developer showed that 28 percent of its shoppers visit one specifIc outlet center seven times a year. Household Income Price Quality Selection Convenience Service 47% 37% 90/0 4% 2% $100,000 or more $75,000 to $100,000 $50,000 to $75,000 $30,000 to $50,000 $20,000 to $30.000 Up to $20,000 Some high school High school graduate Some college College graduate Post-graduate studies Sour.:.a:Value~News Sol.aru: v..... .... News iowa: v*", htaI News Frequency of Outlet Center Visits :l 0" "> 6 - o ~ .8 4 E ~ 2 7.29 D This year . Next year '""en< responding 67'M:l ~ 42'Mo .... ,... ..... Proximity WIthin. of centen l-hour drive Sow.:e:o.uplanIlK. < l-d.ys drive Visited while tr..vellng 7% 10% 27% 26% 18% 11% '90 '91 6% 6% 26% 22% 32% 29% 24% 29% 10% 13% ,...- The Outlet Shopper by Age 25.. 0 1990 .1991 " 01_ .. ~ c ~ " Q. ,... 20-29 30-39 ScM.ru: V41.... Retail News 40-49 50-54 55--64 age 65+ -.-..... ...,-_."r'....,,_._-_..,.._--~.,-" -\10- ~ ~- "'- ,..~,~: EXHIBIT "A" Page 64 of 79 Project Design Although the approvals sought in connection with this request involve only a small portions of the total shopping center project, we felt it important for the reviewer to understand the rationale for the unique figure eight design of the completed project. WOODBURN CROSSING has both exceptional exposure from Interstate 5 and to a major aterial (Prairie Boulevard), In an effort to keep from creating a traditional "front and back" of the center, Thomas Ellicott created a center with effectively two "fronts" with service corridors contained within the figure eight. In the center of the eight is a common mall and food court that acts as a passage way to either side of the center, This design enables the project to keep service traffic, refuse collection, utility connections and other unsightly activity away from potential visual pollution to nearby neighbors in the Senior Estates Development. The developer proposes to work closely with Senior Estate's representative as this project moves forward. / - n- "-,.,.----......--......-. ..._~-~-" ." ~."----_.--..._---. ..'-'-"""'-- ~- ~. .,....J BUILDING CONSTRUCfION AND MATERIAL EXHiBiT" A" Page 65 of 79 1. FOUNDATION: The foundation will be slab on grade, engineered and designed by a licensed structural engineer. Each building will be separated by a minimum of a 24 foot wide drive way with controlled access. This will allow access to the center courts which will contain employee parking, delivery area and emergency vehicle access, We will provide knox boxes at each access gate for emergency purposes. 2. Roof construction will use pre-engineered manufacturer metal trusses covered with a blue corrugated metal roofing. Building "B" will have a multi-colored, pyramid shaped metal structure on top. 3. The building shell will be constructed with metal studs. The exterior material will be off-white rough textured dry-vito 4. Interior construction will be metal studs with 5/8" gwb type "x" for fire separation between retail tenants. Each tenant space will have HDC accessible restrooms, one for employees and one for customers. Each tenant space will be fully sprinkled. 5. The building will have a sprinkler system designed and engineered by a licensed fire protection company. 6. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by a gravity main from the existing lift station at the southwest comer of the Wal-Mart site, A 25' utility easement will run from the above lift station south along Interstate Way to the most southerly property line owned by Capital Development Company, The sanitary sewer line will be 6" diameter pipe at an average depth of 15'. We believe this will provide adequate size and depth to allow for future development. 7. In addition to sanitary sewer line, we propose to incorporate a 12" water main from the existing main at the southwest comer of Wal-Mart site south along Interstate Way to Outlet Avenue. Also to install an 8" main from the existing main at the end of West Hayes, along Prairie Boulevard. A 6" main will be installed to provide on site fire protection. A 16" wide easement along Prairie Boulevard will be dedicated for water main. Approved backflow prevention devices will be installed on all fire and lawn sprinkler systems and on the outside of all buildings. -\8- '....-..--..--...'---.".--.-..------.....---'.'." ...... --.- ,-,;( EXHIBIT "A" Page 66 of 79 Section 8,040, Special setback distances. (19) Oregon State Highway 214, Interstate 5 to Oregon Way 50 foot setback The proposed setback from the center line of Interstate Way to the nearest structure is 238'1 ". The setback from the center line Prairie Boulevard to nearest structure is 370'0", The setback from center line of Outlet Avenue to nearest structure is 82'0", Section 8.140, No parking in front yard or landscaped areas. "No Parking" signs will be placed around the perimeter of the site at an interval of no less than 200' and no more than 500' or as required. Section 10.050. OfT street automobile parking requirements. (w) Retail store (1) one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space per every two employees. Our site parking calculations are based on tenant requirements which in most cases exceed city ordinances. In this case, our calculations are based on (1) one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space for every two employees. Section 10.070. Parking and loading area development requirements. (b) Surfacing: All parking areas will be paved with asphalt, all areas will be graded for on site retention of storm water runoff, (c) Bumper guards or wheel barriers. Every other parking area will be constructed with a 5' landscaped island with curbing for vehicle stops. Other area's including HDC stalls, to have appropriate wheel stops._ -\~- _ ,_~_ .k__.__....__'_.,..___'__~~.._.~~__"., """' EXHIBIT "A" Page 67 of 79 (d) Size of parking spaces and driveways. 1. All parking spaces are designed to exceed required sizes. Standard stalls are 9' -0" wide, 20' - 0" depth with 24' drives, With the exception of handicap stalls. All HDC stalls are of sufficient size and design to meet or exceed HDC van requirements. HDC stalls are to be 13' - 0" wide by 20' - 0" deep with a 9' - 0" wide stripe access island. All HPC stall areas and curb cuts are to meet ADA standards, 2. A maximum of 8 percent grade will be used for all parking areas, 3. Painted direction arrows will be used in all parking areas to control traffic flow. Section 10.080. Driveway standards, (d) (Two) driveways are proposed for Phase I off of Outlet Avenue, will provide ingress and egress to the site, These driveways are designed for two lane approach 28 feet wide with 20 foot radius at curb cut. (i) Driveway 1 is 150' from the intersection of Interstate Way and Outlet Avenue, Driveway 2 is 240' from the intersection of Outlet Avenue and Prairie Boulevard, Section 11.020. Site plan composition (A-H) (a) Site plans are submitted, drawn to scale and submitted, showing layout of Phase I and Phase II of project. These plans are divided into (1) general site plans, (2) parking layout, to include set backs, parking lot lighting, traffic flow, stall details, HDC stall details, HDC sign details, utility easements, bike paths, sidewalks and street widths, (3) landscape plan, showing landscape areas, percentages, plant types and locations. Also including fire hydrant locations and street lighting. Typical building elevations drawn to scale showing exterior dimensions, type of construction material and colors. / -10- , -----..,.. ,.~.- 1" -. ~ , L Chapter's 29 and 30 "Commercial Retail District" EXHIBIT "A" Page 68 of 79 "Commercial General District" As described in the beginning of this narrative, Phase I will be for factory outlet retail spaces. We propose to separate the co=ercial retail area from residential area by a major arterial "Prairie Boulevard". Also, the center is surrounded by landscaped areas providing a visually pleasant transition from co=ercial retail areas and residential zoning areas, Section 29.080. "Conditions Imposed Where Zone Change to CR District Abuts a Residelltial District. (a) A pole sign will be located on the north east property approximately 800 feet away from residential areas. Individual tenants will only have a wall mounted sign on the building facia. (b) Outdoor lighting will be installed in such a manor as to deflect the light only to illnrninllte the streets and parking areas. (c) Landscaping is designed to provide a pleasant transition between the two areas. (d) No screening. (e) Building setbacks exceed the requirements set forth by appropriate ordinances, (t) Ingress and egress are designed to be on property lines of two co=ercial retail areas. / - 2\- L EXHIBIT "A" Page 69 of 79 Woodburn Crossing Parking and Landscaping 3 a. Garbage collection will be placed in the center court area consisting of a cement apron and screened on all sides by a cyclone storm fence. Also a 3 foot landscaped strip on 3 of the 4 sides. b. Loading and unloading areas will be in the center court area of the figure eight constructed building, as well as the utility areas. As stated above, the utility areas will be provided with a 3 foot buffer area. IV. Landscape Maintenance. All landscaping will be maintained on a weekly basis to keep it free from debris, assure proper growth and promote visual appeal, At no time will parking be allowed on any landscaped area. VI. lighting of the street frontage will consist of high sodium vapor with 10 and 15 foot arms to insure proper spread of light. The off street parking will also ronsist of single and double high sodium vapor lights to insure proper lighting of all areas. VII. Landscape Plan Elements. 1. The number and size of all trees are listed (A1) 2. Buffer areas are not applicable at this time, 3. The proposed landscaping is broken into two (2) major components, street frontage and parking lot. a. Street frontage to be a minimum of 42,228.32 square feet consisting of two (2) large trees per 100 feet and various plants, shrubs, and evergreens as required by City of Woodburn standards document. 4. Irrigation will be as stated in the irrigation section of this narrative. VIII. Landscaping Requirements (see sheet A-1) B. Co=ercial Strip Zones. 1. Total surface area = 568,237.68 sq. ft. Required 15% = 85,235.68 sq. ft. Street frontage actual = 42,228.32 sq. ft. Parking lot actual = 51,014.62 sq. ft. Site actual =/ 93,242.94 sq. ft. -1L.- ..........- ,.'------.. .._"-~,-_... --"-,".,,_...,.._-,-,--~.,_. -~~,_.---,---,. ~, :;;-. ..L t::XHIBIT "A' Page 70 of 79 2.a The street frontage landscaping will consist of a 10 foot wide (min.) landscaped strip, that will exceed the required landscape percentages, police department and fire department standards. 3. The site is to have fire hydrants placed not less than 450 feet apart and located within 25 feet of the sprinkler FDC. Building's "A & B" will have a minimum of 3 hydrants within 500 feet of all sides, Building "A" will have 2 hydrants within 500 feet of all sides. As required by City of Woodburn fire marshals. 4. Impervious surface requirements: Total impervious surface = Required at 10% = Total site actual = 233,868.5 square feet 23,386.85 square feet 25,196.1 square feet Approximately 1809 square feet in excess of the required amount needed, As per City of Woodburn ordinance. SIGNAGE We propose to erect a pylon sign advertising Woodburn Crossing Factory Outlet Center on the north comer of our property at the intersection of Outlet Avenue and Interstate Way. It will be a freestanding sign directly supported by poles or foundation supports in or upon the ground and meet the appropriate requirements outlined in the state of Oregon structural specialty code (Ordinance No. 2092 Section B freestanding sign, item 1) and not to exceed a maximum area of 150 square feet and height of 35 feet per ordinance integrated business center, item A Also proposed is a freestanding monument sign for secondary frontage on Prairie Boulevard and Outlet Avenue. This sign will not exceed 32 square feet in area and will not obstruct driver visibility from any direction. Individual business tenants in the Woodburn Crossing Factory Center will be allowed one wall (or fascia) sign limited to an area no larger than 30 square feet or one square foot per foot of frontage on a street or parking lot in compliance with Council Bill No 1421, Ordinance No. 2092, Section 12 Signs allowed for an integrated business center, Items C & D and one under the canopy sign not to exceed 60 square feet in area. / -l~- _.' _.__' - __ ,_._.,_......._.,_~.__ ~.__ ,_.+_.~,._.__.. .__..___.,...._._. . h'.__..__...._-__._."'._ ........ EXHIBIT "A" Page 71 of 79 Chapter 11 Section 11.070 (a) through (h) (a) The adjacent properties are at this time undeveloped and are owned by Capital Development. The properties that abut this site are zoned for commercial use. (b) Landscaping will be designed to have a visually appealing break between properties. (c) Landscaping will be designed by a landscape architect that is familiar with this area. This will allow us to design the landscaping so as to conform to the surrounding area. (d) Phase I has been designed to have ingress and egress at "Outlet Avenue" north of the structure. By having access at Outlet Avenue, this will allow traffic to flow east to Interstate Way or west to Prairie Boulevard. Phase II of our project will be designed to have ingress and egress on the south property line. Minimi7.ing traffic problems on the main arterial, Prairie Boulevard. (e) The project is designed to have on site retention with overflow to be tied in with an existing overflow system north of our site. (t) By placing the structures north and south, this allows pedestrian and bicycle traffic to flow easily from north of WalMart to the south. With this figure eight open design, we believe this will allow more exposure to the sun for solar heating. The placement also minimizes shadow casting on major streets and roadways. (g) As stated in this narrative and with the preliminary drawings we have shown great concerns in following the appropriate codes and ordinances. (h) The immediate area surrounding our project is undeveloped at this time. -24- ~. --~- '--..r.. -..-. --- ;1,!> \.. ) !l.tl PART V EXHIBIT" A" Page 72 of 79 "-.'ll " .~~ -- MEMORANDUM OP/NION 93-04 EXHIBIT "A" Page 73 of 79 --------- -- --- RE: STEVE GOECKRllZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR N, ROBERT SHIELDS, CITY ATTORNE~~ PROCEDURE APPLICABLE TO CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LAND USE REQUEST To: FROM: DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 1993 * * . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . You have recently provided me a copy of a letter from Capital Development Company (Capital) to the city (attached) requesting that the city -amend its' current no development condition on our annexation ordinance to reflect a Phase I development of 95.000 square feet, provided we can satisfy O.D,O.T. and the City of Woodburn that we can Improve existing levels of service on the 214 Interchange by the time the Phase I construction is complete,- Your question, as I understand It, Is what procedure should be followed for the city to consider Capital's land use request while stili complying with applicable state law, Since I know that time is a critical factor in most development proposals, I have expedited my response to your question so that you can advise Capital of the appropriate procedure. Facts In May 1992. Capital submitted applications for an annexation and a zone change. The Woodburn Planning Commission recommended approval of both applications. On October 13, 1992. the Woodburn City Council passed Ordinance 2095 approving the annexation and granting the zone change subject to certain conditions, On December 30. 1992 the City Council. with the consent of the applicant, acted to clarify the language of one of the three conditions attached to the zone change approval. The final form of the condition reads as follows: Assist the city in amending its 1985 transportation plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12-060 (1 lib) regarding adeq!Jate transportation facilities to support the proposed land uses, No development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use \ ~ '(~l . L Memorandum Opinion 93-04 Novembe 23, 1993 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" Page 74 of 79 designations will be permitted until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12-060 (1)(b).' The remaining two. conditions on the zone change approval are as follows: Prior to any development of the 173.84 acre parcell the. comprehensive map be amended to generally reflect the applicant's proposed land configuration (C,P 92-02), \' Any reconfiguration of the land use designations maintain the same ratios as identified on the original comprehensive plan, Procedure Under Oregon state law, the actions taken by the city councit to approve the ordinances were .Iand use decisions. and were subject to appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) within 21 days of final action. ORS 197.830, An appeal to LUBA could have included a request to modify or delete any conditions attached to the approval, However, at the time the decisions were made, Capital agreed to the conditions and a LUBA appeal was not filed, Since no LUBA appeal was filed within the required time, both land use decisions became final. Thus, Capital is presently subject to the condition imposed on the zone change that no development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designations occur until the transportation plan for this area complies with the state transportation planning rule. As acknowledged in Capital's letter, the transportation plan for this area is not yet approved and is still under consideration, Yet Capital indicates that it now wants to proceed ahead with a phased development proposal and solicits the city's response as to how to "amend" the "no development" condition, Legally, it is clear that Capital can not proceed under the terms of the present land use decision until the transportation plan amendment occurs. If Capital now wants the city to consider a phased development proposal without fulfillment of the condition, it must submit a new land use application to the city for a modification or deletion of the "no development" condition, This new application should be submitte4 to the planni'ng department and is subject to the normal process of planning commission and city council consideration, When the city's process is complete, it will result in a new 2 .~ "'-~'T"--" ._,....~._._._. _u. ". 1. EXHIBIT "A" Page 75 of 7 Memorandum Opinion 93-04 Novembe 23, 1993 Page 3 land use decision (approval or denial) by the city council that is again subject to appeal to LUBA, Conclusion In conclusion, it is my opinion that Capital must submit a new land use application in order for the city to consider Its proposal for a phased development at this point in time. This is because the zone change approval granted by the city contained a condition that no development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designations occur until the transportation plan for the area is completed. Since Capital originally agreed with and did not appeal this condition to LUBA, It must now submit a new land use application if it wants the city to consider modification or deletion of this requirement, NRS cc: Chris Childs, City Administrator . / 3> "'._"~".~ ~"",-~""-"~,,,,,-,,"""-'--'''--"-'''~--'''''--'-'-~'-' '- "};,, nrST 3 Hit',. 1<AtNT EXHIBIT "A" Page 76 of 7~ 5/04/84 10 \Ze April22,1004 .,... .... AI.. DIlPMn'MIlNT OF ~SPOR1lTION . Mr;-8teve Goee\aitz. Director . Plailnlng Department City of Woodburn . 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn. OR 97071 tlLE COllE: SUBJECT: Woodburn Croa.lng FactoryOuOetConler-Capltlll Development co. Distdct 3 Dear Mr. Goeckritz: Thank you for meeting with Oregon Department ofTralllportatlon (0007) .taff on April 21 to disCUG8 rcaofution of transportallan 1ss1Hl8. ODOrs principle concern 1$ with ensuring that the operation of Slate HIghway 219 and the J.5 interchange are not futther degraded by area development. We hevv limited our review and recommend~ns to Impaeta and improvements to the state highway system only. In reeognition of the above, and in an effort to ensure that proJect-g.nerated traffio reli:uit$ In Wno net impoc:t" to the transportation 6}'St8m, ODOT requests that the following conditioll$ be adopted as part of the ac:tion on the proposed faetoly outlet center: 1. Prfor. to the Issuanoe of a grading permit or buDding permit. whichever occurs first, the applicant aheN submit plans for the folloWing Improwmentl fortho ,.lIiGw and approve} oftha DIs1ric:t Manager; OfR(1On Department of T,.nf~fion. DIstrict 3: WidenIng end striping the /-5 northbound off-ramp to Include separate left and tfght tum lanes. Wtd6f1ing snd strfplng the /.5 ~uthbound off-ramp to il1c;{ude . separate left Bnd rfght tllm lane$, Instell a traffic signal et the 1.5 northboUnd rampsA-lighway 214 Interseotion. . Install centormedlan conftol on Highway 214 from the northbound 1.5 ramps to Evergteon, Instafl right tum lanes at the follOWing locations: eastbound Highway 214 to ~outhbound Ellerprean eastbound Highway 219 to southbound 1-5 on-remp /westbOUnd HIghway 214 to northbound 1-5 on-ramp . ~lmll~ 88.~ A 1'J'<"l Road Sol""" OR 97310 lS03} 986-2Jl74 PAX (503) 986-2081 Lt . ..-- ..---...,.--..- ,_.~---_...._._-' U~/U4/g4 JO:27 -, U30. 1038 ,~ DIST 3 llltY 1l.'INT '...- EXHIBIT" A" Page 77 of 7~ 2. Prior to the muMCe of sny Ps""it for use and OCCUpancy, the inIPlO~/$ specir/ed in Condition 1 shaH be Installed and operational In a manner mHting the approval of thtJ DIWict MBlIager, Oregol/ Def)aftment of T ranspotfaUon. DisIrict 3. . Based on analysea prepared by tho epprlCllnt 8.M ODOr ataff, we are conrldent that iostallaUoo of thoso ~ will a$Sure that existing levers of service on state fad/Illes are maintained, ODOT Ie also prepaced to Participate In the cost of installation of tile traffic lignal at HIghway 21W1-6 nolthbound ramp-Intersection and the conter median control on Highway 219. , , Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on thla proJect. ODOr apP/llC/ates tho OOOperative ell'orts of the City of WOOdburn stat!' In bringing rhese issues to dosure. This Iettor .hou/d be Included In the hearing record 8S ODOT testimony. OOOT should be conslc/ered a party to the hearing and be entitled to nolkea of future hearing., or helllfng continuancea or extensions. P/eaee Provide me . with II copy of the dty'c dOci$Ion. inclUding findings and coneIllslOne. . Yours truly, d;\-. JoIin\Gl'lI8sman. P,E. District 3 Manager C: Dan Fricke. OOOT. Region 2 Dlck Reynolds, OOOT Corridor and General Planning Mellucas, OLCO John Donaldaon, Capital Development Co, / - -.. ~ .-- ._---~._.. -.-.- .-. -. -...-... --....-.-.- . 5 ,..___~.. .~A..~'--.."--'-...-- WlDeNANDSTRiP~OfT lWoa> EXHIBIT "A" Page 78 of 7 - , . INSTALL RIGHT 1lIRN I..AlfE .~ I I , I' I 1 I I I I , I I , , I "' . I I I I- I , I I I ., ." i , KV 400,0J0 S1n ImIlllU1iQrj CI:Hlal ~ .. ! .f,1 ~ IIIU' ------~------------- .. ..- --- , I --- ':~l'" .:. , , I ,. 11 '" .," II mi' "!-' ---------- . ..' II . 11 : , , 1\/\ A ? I - - -----. . _..-.." '--r- ------.....----.-..---. ---... --_.0 ...~ EXHIBIT "An Page 79 of 79 t'ROPOSED ACTIONS Recommend to Council: A. Amend Ordinance No. 2095 Exhibit" A" . . . , , ~onditions of Approval 1. Prior to any development of the 173.84-acre parcel, the comprehensive map be amended to generally reflect the applicant's proposed land configuration (C.P. 92-02). 2. Assist the city in amending its 1985 transportation plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange, Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12- 060(1 Hb) regarding adequate transportation facilities to.support proposed land uses. Number 2 was amended by Ordinance No. 2098 to read: Assist the city in amending its 1985 transportation plan for the Highway 214, 1-5 Interchange, Parr Road area, prior to development, to bring it into compliance with OAR 660-12- 060(1 Hb) regarding adequate transportation facilities to support proposed land uses. No development of the property or reconfiguration of the land use designations will be permitted until the transportation plan for this area complies with OAR 660-12- 060(1 Hb). Numbers 1 and 2 of Exhibit" A" of Ordinance 2095 as amended by 2098 Be amended to reflect the applicant's ability to initiate Phase I development of this project prior to any adjustment of the comprehensive plan map which would reflect the applicant's proposed land use re-configUration. B. Approve the site plan with conditions as outlined by the city and Oregon Department of Transportation. MISC\SUPDOC.CAP Co - _.._. ._._._ _.__...,....- ._.__..__...... ._.._.. .__. __. ...0_.', __...