Ord 2187 - Inter Telecomm Fac Re
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1778
ORDINANCE NO. 2187
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND MAKING LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS
TO SUPPORT SAID DECLARATION; ENACTING INTERIM TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES REGULATIONS; SETTING A REPEAL DATE; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, telecommunications technology has recently experienced rapid
growth, and
WHEREAS, the growth of this technology, together with federal legal
deregulation, has resulted in an enormous increase in wireless communications, and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance was enacted prior to the advent
of this telecommunications expansion, was intended to address only radio and
television transmitter equipment, and is inadequate to address the contemporary
technology of telecommunications facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to enact interim regulations
which fairly and uniformly address applications for telecommunications facilities, while
preserving the public's interest in reasonable requirement for these facilities, NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council hereby declares that an emergency exists within
the meaning of the City of Woodburn Charter of 1982. The Legislative Findings in
support of this declaration of emergency are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and are,
by this reference, incorporated herein.
Section 2. The Interim Telecommunications Facilities Regulations, attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference incorporated herein, are hereby enacted
to alleviate the emergency.
Section 3. The passage of this ordinance, and the Interim Telecommunications
Facilities Regulations, enacted herein is expressly declared to be a temporary interim
measure. This ordinance is repealed on August 1, 1997.
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1778
ORDINANCE NO. 2187
,.,....- ~. "-~--'''''._--'._'~'~'''''''----~-'------
-.
Section 4. The City Council hereby directs planning staff to proceed
immediately to initiate an amendment of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance to address
zoning and development regulations of telecommunications facilities.
Section 5. The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any portion of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 6. This act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the
public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance
shall be in full forc~fect from and after the date of its passage.
Approved as to form: ~ ~ 2 -I f) - ? 7-
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
&--2
Nancy A. II((rksey, Mayor
F ebrua ry 10, 1997
February 10, 1997
F ebrua ry 10, 1997
February 10, 1997
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST: 11(M.;/~*
Mary 'Alnnant, City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1778
ORDINANCE NO. 2187
.,........ ..._..,______..".._'_..____4~'...-"-.
EXHIBIT" A"
LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS
I. Reauirement of Findinas
A. While nothing requires that the City Council's legislative decision be
supported by findings, the City Council makes these findings to show its intent
and its compliance with all applicable legal standards.
II. Declaration of Emeraency
A. Chapter II, Sections 4 and 5 of the City of Woodburn Charter of 1982
enumerate the powers of the City of Woodburn as follows:
Chapter II
POWERS
Section 4. POWERS OF THE CITY. The city shall have all powers
which the constitutions, statutes, and common law of the United States
and of this state expressly or impliedly grant or allow municipalities, as
fully as though this charter specifically enumerated each of those
powers.
Section 5. CONSTRUCTION OF CHARTER. In this charter, no
mention of a particular power shall be construed to be exclusive or to
restrict the scope of the powers which the city would have if the
particular power were not mentioned. The charter shall be liberally
construed to the end that the city may have all powers necessary or
convenient for the conduct of its municipal affairs, including all powers
that cities may assume pursuant to state laws and to the municipal home
rule provisions of the state constitution.
B. The City Council finds that this charter provision gives the City of
Woodburn all the rights, powers, privileges and immunities which the
Constitution, statutes and common laws of the United States and of the state
expressly or impliedly grant or allow to a municipality. The charter is to be
liberally construed to the end that the city shall have all the powers
contemplated by municipal home rule provisions of the Constitution and laws
Page 1 - EXHIBIT" A"
..,..-.. ~-~_. -_.~_._._,..--',..~-----'--
~,
of the state. It is effective to grant the city the full extent of powers which the
home rule amendments to the Constitution permit.
C. The City Council further finds that as a municipality it has the power and
authority to enact an emergency ordinance. Thielke v. Albee 79 Or 48, 153 P.
793 (1916).
D. The City Council further finds that an emergency exists because
telecommunications technology has recently experienced rapid growth and this
has resulted in an enormous increase in wireless communications and
telecommunications facilities siting requests. The Woodburn Zoning Ordinance,
which was enacted before the advent of this telecommunications expansion,
was never intended to address this technology and is inadequate and out-of-
date. Therefore, it is necessary for the City Council to enact interim
telecommunications facilities regulations in order to protect the public's interest
and alleviate the emergency.
E. The City Council further finds because the enactment of this ordinance has
not been subject to the City's standard hearing and citizen involvement
procedures for enacting ordinance, it is the Council's express intent that this
ordinance be a temporary interim measure. This ordinance shall, therefore, be
repealed on August 1, 1997.
F. The City Council further finds that because of the importance of enacting
permanent regulations, planning staff will be directed to proceed immediately
to initiate an amendment of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance.
III. Reaulations not a Moratorium
A. The City Council finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations do not constitute, and are not intended to be, a land development
moratorium under ORS 197.505, et seq. The city of Woodburn will continue
to process applications for telecommunications facilities on a uniform,
reasonable and expeditious basis.
B. The City Council further finds that the City of Woodburn has the power and
authority to enact an emergency ordinance providing for interim
telecommunications facilities regulations without imposing a development
moratorium.
Page 2 - EXHIBIT" A"
"..- - .."..".._-_....,....--------~~_._-~....
IV. ComDliance with Federal Law
A. The City Council finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations comply with federal law and, specifically, the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-104).
B. The City Council further finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations do not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally
equivalent services or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal
wireless services.
C. The City Council further finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations provide, consistent with the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance and
Oregon statutory requirements, that the city shall act on any request for
authorization to place, construct, or modify personal wireless service facilities
within a reasonable period of time after the request is duly filed with the city,
taking into account the nature and scope of such request.
D. The City Council further finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations do not constitute regulations of the placement, construction, and
modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the
environmental effects of radio frequency emissions.
E. The City Council further finds that the Interim Telecommunications Facilities
Regulations provide, consistent with the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance and
Oregon statutory requirements, that the denial of a request to place, construct,
or modify personal wireless service facilities shall be in writing and supported
by substantial evidence contained in a written record.
A,\FINDINGS
Page 3 - EXHIBIT" A"
EXHIBIT "B"
INTERIM TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES REGULATIONS
Section 1. Definitions
As used in this Ordinance:
1 . Aerial means a privately owned and operated antenna for noncommercial
uses subject to height limitations as specified in the Woodburn Zoning
Ordinance. For purposes of this ordinance "aerial" includes ham radio
antennae and is not a "telecommunications facility. n
2. Exchanae Carrier means a provider of telecommunications services.
3. Telecommunication Facilities means facilities designed and used for the
purpose of transmitting, receiving, and voice and data signals from
various wireless communication devices. The following definitions apply
to the regulation of telecommunications facilities:
a. Ancillarv Facilities means the structures and equipment required
for operation of the telecommunication equipment, including but
not limited to antennae, repeaters, equipment housing structure,
and ventilation and other mechanical equipment.
b. Antenna(el means an electrical conductor or group of electrical
conductors that transmit or receive radio waves.
c. Attachment means an antenna or other piece of related equipment
affixed to a transmission tower.
d. Backhaul Network means the lines that connect a provider's
towerslcell sites to one or more cellular telephone switching
offices, and lor long distance providers, or the public switched
telephone network.
e. Collocated Facilitv means new attachments, antennae, or towers
placed on existing suitable structures or existing or rebuilt
transmission towers or the addition of ancillary facilities to an
existing transmission tower facility site without increasing the
tower facility site area.
f. New Facilitv means the installation of new transmission towers.
New attachments are not new facilities.
Page 1 - EXHIBIT "B"
'_~.. ..._._._._."_.__.._".M'<O__'_~~""'--"___"'~_'
_T
g. Pre-existino Towers and Pre-existina Antennas means any tower
or antenna for which a building permit has been properly issued
prior to the effective date of this ordinance.
h. ReDeater means equipment containing both a receiver and a
transmitter; used to relay radio signals over large distances or to
provide signals in an area otherwise in shadow.
i. Shadow means a geographic area that has less than adequate
telecommunication service coverage.
j. Tower FootDrint means the area described at the base of a
transmission tower as the perimeter of the transmission tower
including the transmission tower foundation and any attached or
overhanging equipment, attachments, or structural members but
excluding ancillary facilities and guy wires and anchors.
k. Tower Pad means the area that encompasses the tower footprint,
ancillary facilities, fencing and screening.
I. Tower Heioht means the vertical distance measured from the
highest point on the transmission tower or other structure,
including any antennae, to the original grade of the ground directly
below this point.
m. Transmission Tower means the structure on which transmitting or
receiving antennae are located. For purposes of this chapter, ham
radio transmission facilities are considered "aerials" and not
"transmission towers."
i) Guved Tower. A tower which is supported by the use of
cables (guy wires) which are permanently anchored.
ii) Lattice Tower. A tower characterized by an open
framework of lateral cross members which stabilize the
tower.
Iii. MonoDole. A single upright pole, engineered to be self
supporting and does not require lateral cross supports or
guys.
4. Utilitv. For purposes of this chapter, a utility is any person (as defined
by the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance) who is a local exchange carrier or
an electric, gas, water, or other public utility, and who owns or controls
poles, ducts, conduits, or rights of way used, in whole or in part, for any
wire or cable communications.
Page 2 - EXHIBIT "B"
.....~^ ~ ,'_" "_'_'_'d.~_"'~_'"'_""".~" _"._._"...__...,_".._..""__,,,.. ..__~_._""~,,,~__,""''''
Section 2. Use Desianation
1. New Telecommunications Facilities shall not be permitted in any
residential zones and shall be a conditional use in all other zones. For
the purposes of this ordinance, the Central Business District and the
Downtown Historic District are residential zones.
2. Collocated Facilities shall be a permitted use in all zones.
Section 3.
Method of Review
Conditional use applications for new telecommunications facilities shall be
reviewed pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance and these
Interim Telecommunications Facilities Regulations.
Section 4. AODlication Reauirements
In addition to standard required application material, an applicant for a new or
collocated telecommunication facility shall submit the following information:
1. A visual study containing, at a minimum, a vicinity map depicting where,
within a three mile radius, any portion of the proposed tower could be
visible, and a graphic simulation showing the appearance of the proposed
tower and accessory structures from five points within the impacted
vicinity. Such points are to be mutually agreed upon by the Planning
Director and applicant. This study shall not be required for collocation
on existing transmission towers, but shall be required for collocation on
other structures.
2. A demonstration that an alternative technology that does not require the
use of towers or structures, such as a cable microcell network using
multiple low-powered transmitters/receivers attached to a wireline
system, is unsuitable. Costs of alternative technology that exceed new
tower or antenna development shall not be presumed to render the
technology unsuitable.
3. A landscape plan drawn to scale showing proposed landscaping,
including type, spacing, size and irrigation methods. This plan shall not
be required for collocation on existing buildings or where there is no
opportunity to provide additional landscaping.
4. Evidence demonstrating collocation is impractical on existing tall
structures, existing transmission towers, and existing tower facility sites
for reasons of safety, available space, or failing to meet service coverage
area needs. This evidence shall not be required for collocation proposals.
Page 3 - EXHIBIT "B"
5. A report containing the following information:
a. A description of the proposed tower and reasons for the tower
design and height.
b. Documentation to establish the proposed tower has sufficient
structural integrity for the proposed uses at the proposed location
in conformance with minimum safety requirements as required by
the State Structural Specialty Code, latest adopted edition.
c. A description of mitigation methods which will be employed to
avoid ice hazards, including increased setbacks, and lor de-icing
equipment.
d. The general capacity of the tower in terms of the number and
type of antennae it is designed to accommodate.
e. Documentation demonstrating compliance with non-ioOlzlng
electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emissions standards as set forth
by the Federal Communications commission (FCC).
f. A signed agreement stating that the applicant will allow
collocation with other users, provided all safety and structural
requirements are met. This agreement shall also state that any
future owners or operators will allow collocation on the tower.
This agreement is not necessary if the applicant is collocating and
does not own the facility or structure; however, a consent to
allow the owner to grant access to other users for the same
structure or facility shall be required.
g. A soils report if the property contains weak foundation soils or has
landslide potential.
h. Documentation that the ancillary facilities will not produce sound
levels in excess of those standards specified in section 5(7) or
designs showing how the sound is to be effectively muffled and
reduced pursuant to those standards.
i. Identification of the entities providing the backhaul network for
the towers(s) described in the application and other cellular sites
owned or operated by the applicant in the municipality.
Section 5. Standards of Aooroval- All Telecommunications Facilities
All new telecommunications facilities shall comply with the following standards:
Page 4 - EXHIBIT "B"
1. Site Size: A new telecommunication facility shall be located on a
property large enough to provide:
a. A setback from any property line to the tower footprint which
is at least two-thirds the tower height. This standard shall not
apply to collocated telecommunications facilities.
b. A tower "pad" large enough to allow for additional collocated and
ancillary facilities. The tower or towers shall be located centrally
on this pad. This standard shall not apply to antennae attached
to existing structures or towers located on rooftops.
c. Protection to adjoining property from the potential impact of tower
failure and ice falling from the tower. A licensed structural
engineer's analysis shall be submitted to demonstrate that such
failure and ice fall will be accommodated on the site.
d. Separation from pre-existing towers. Tower separation shall be
measured by following a straight line from the base of the
proposed tower to the base of any pre-existing tower. Minimum
separation distances (listed in linear feet) shall be as follows:
Lattice Guyed Monopole Monopole
>80' <80'
in height in height
Lattice 5,000 5,000 1,500 750
Guyed 5,000 5,000 1,500 750
Monopole > 80' 1,500 1,500 1,500 750
in height
Monopole < 80' 750 750 750 750
in height
2. Collation
a. Before a proposal for a new transmission tower is considered, an
applicant shall exhaust all collocation options including placement
of antennae on existing tall structures and placing multiple
antennae or attachments on a single tower. In cases where an
existing tower is modified or rebuilt to a taller height to allow
collocation, such change may only occur one time per
communication tower site and may only occur when the
Page 5 - EXHIBIT "B"
,.,...-- ~,.~ '-'-'-~""-'~-'-'-'..,....-.'~--_...'_._--'-"
modification or rebuild request has been initiated by a separate
exchange carrier.
b. New telecommunications facilities shall be constructed so as to
accommodate future collocation, based upon expected demand for
transmission towers in the service area. Towers shall be designed
so as to accommodate a minimum expansion of three two-way
antennae for every 40 vertical feet of tower.
c. Towers or attachments may be collocated on existing structures
such as athletic field light poles, utility poles or towers, and tall
buildings provided the addition of the antenna equipment will not
cause undue interference with the normal operation of utilities or
existing transmission facilities and the tower or attachment either
complies with the height limit of the underlying zone. The color
and design of such antenna equipment and structures shall be
compatible with the existing structure.
d. Replacement of existing pole type structures may be permitted for
the purpose of collocation, provided that there is no change to the
type of tower. Setback and other locational criteria of the
underlying zone shall still apply.
e. Multiole Attachments on Utilitv Towers. In conformance with the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 703, a utility shall
provide any telecommunications carrier with nondiscriminatory
access to any pole, duct, conduit, or right of way owned or
controlled by it, unless there is insufficient capacity or access can
not be granted for reasons of safety, reliability, and generally
applicable engineering purposes.
3. Heiaht. New telecommunication facilities shall not exceed the height
limits established by the underlying zone. Exceptions to height
limitations in this subsection require a variance per Chapter 13 of the
Woodburn Zoning Ordinance.
4. Visuallmoact. The applicant shall demonstrate that the tower will have
the smallest practicable visual impact on the environment, considering
technical, engineering economic, and other pertinent factors.
a. The height and mass of the transmission tower shall not exceed
that which is essential for its intended use and public safety as
demonstrated in a report prepared by a licensed structural
engineer.
b. Towers 200 feet or less in height shall be painted in order to best
camouflage the tower with regard to compatibility with
Page 6 - EXHIBIT "B"
_.. ..- . ',...._-_..~-- ""--'.or---._~----"- ."-..----,--~- --..... .-_,_..
surrounding objects and colors. Unless towers are otherwise
disguised or collocated, towers shall be camouflaged as trees
whenever structurally possible.
c. Towers more than 200 feet in height shall be painted in
accordance with the Oregon State Aeronautics Division and
Federal Aviation Administration. Applicants shall attempt to seek
a waiver from OSAD and FAA marking requirements. When a
waiver has been granted, towers shall be painted andlor
camouflaged in accordance with subsection 4(bl. above.
5. Accessorv Uses. Accessory uses shall include only building facilities that
are necessary for transmission function and associated satellite ground
stations, and shall not include broadcast studios (except for emergency
broadcast), offices, vehicle storage areas or other similar uses not
necessary for the transmission or relay function. No unenclosed storage
of materials is allowed.
6. Liahtino. No lighting shall be permitted on transmission towers except
that required by the Oregon State Aeronautics Division or Federal
Aviation Administration. This standard shall not prevent shared use or
replacement of an existing light pole. For collocation on existing or
replaced light poles the transmission tower shall have no net increase to
the spread, intensity, or direction of the existing light source.
7. Noise. Noise generating equipment shall be sound-buffered by means of
baffling, barriers, or other suitable means to reduce sound level measured
at the property line to 30dBA when adjacent to residential uses and
45dBA in other areas.
8. Fences and LandscaDino:
a. The tower(s) and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a six foot
fence meeting the requirements of the Woodburn Zoning
Ordinance. Chain link fences, when allowed, shall be black vinyl
coated. Where a six foot fence in sound condition already exists
on a side or sides of the tower pad area, fencing requirements
may be waived for that side.
b. Landscaping shall be placed outside of fences and shall consist of
fast growing vegetation with a minimum planted height of six feet
placed densely so as to form a solid hedge.
c. Landscaping fencing shall be compatible with other nearby
landscaping and fencing.
Page 7 - EXHIBIT "B"
~
^"_.. ".".""'"T"'">~._.__._u..__.,-~.,._-_,__.,_~___.,____."_.
.T
d. Where antennae or towers and ancillary facilities are to be located
on existing buildings or structures and are secure from public
access, landscaping and fencing requirements may be waived.
9. ~: One non-illuminated sign, not to exceed 2 square feet, shall be
provided at the main entrance to the facility stating contact name and
phone number for emergency purposes. Signs shall not be placed on
towers and antennae.
Section 6. Abandoned Facilities
A transmission facility where use is discontinued for a period of six consecutive
months or longer is hereby declared abandoned. Abandoned facilities shall be
removed by the property owner no later than 90 days from date of
abandonment. Failure to remove an abandoned facility is declared a public
nuisance and is subject to abatement pursuant to the Woodburn Nuisance
Ordinance and any other available legal remedies. Upon written application
prior to the expiration of the six month period, the City Administrator shall
grant a six month extension for reuse of the facility. Additional extensions
beyond the first six month extension may be granted by the City Administrator
subject to any conditions required to bring the project into compliance with
current law(s) and make compatible with surrounding development
Page 8 - EXHIBIT "B"
.....-. .__..._.~----,...._-----,...-_._~." - ""'-.-., "..".-..<--".._-.~-,..,-,.-._.-
-,