Loading...
Ord 2203 - Inter Ord 2092 Sign O COUNCIL BILL NO. 1835 ORDINANCE NO. 2203 AN ORDINANCE INTERPRETING ORDINANCE 2092 (THE WOODBURN SIGN ORDINANCE) AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter at its July 24, 1997 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Commission, after providing a full and fair opportunity for testimony, closed its public hearing and adopted a final interpretative order; and WHEREAS, Hillyer Ford, Miles Chevrolet and Hershberger Motors appealed this interpretation to the City Council by a letter received by the city planning department on August 22,1997;and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a dl: 1IQYQ. public hearing on October 13, 1997 and considered public testimony, written information and the record of the Planning Commission proceeding; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds that it is called upon to interpret the terms of the city's own enactment, to-wit: Ordinance 2092 (The Woodburn Sign Ordinance). The City Council has the legal authority to make this interpretation and it constitutes a "local government interpretation" under ORS 197.829, Gaie v City of Portland, 319 Or 308 (1994) and Clark v Jackson County, 313 Or 508 (1992). Section 2. The City Council concludes, based upon its interpretation and the facts presented, that none of the appellants, Hillyer Ford, Miles Chevrolet, and Hershberger Motors, constitute an "integrated business center" as that term is used within the context of Ordinance 2092. Section 3. The City Council's interpretation is based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Attachment "A", which is affixed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 4. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1835 ORDINANCE NO. 2203 ~'-"--'--".-r---' Approved as to fOrmm.~~ City Attorney 10- 23' -- ~'} Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST:~ 1~~.Jr:- Mary Te t, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Date APPROVED~ ~ Nancy A. Kirksey, Mayor . Oc~ober 27, 1997 October 28, 1997 October 28, 1997 October 28, 1997 Page 2 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1835 ORDINANCE NO. 2203 "0-- "___"_'__'"~__'.~_~_.. Attachment "I\:' Page ---1- of 2- FINDINGS INTERPRETATION OF ORDINANCE 2092 L NA TlJRE OF PROCEEDINGS On July 24, 1997, the Woodburn Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the interpretation of Ordinance 2092 (the Woodburn Sign Ordinance) and Section 4(B). That section provides as follows: Integrated Business Center. A group of two or more businesses which are planned and designed as a center, whether or not the business, buildings or land are under common ownership. This ordinance interpretation was requested by three car dealerships: Hillyer Ford, Miles Chevrolet and Hershberger Motors and was related to proposed signage. If the car dealerships were found to constitute integrated business centers, one free-standing sign with a maximum area of 150 square feet would be permitted by the sign ordinance for each dealership (Section 12, Ordinance 2092). If the car dealerships were found not to constitute integrated business centers, one free-standing sign with a maximum area of75 square feet would be permitted by the ordinance for each dealership. (Section 11(C)(6), Ordinance 2092). The Commission issued its Final Order dated August 15, 1997, interpreting the term "integrated business center" and determining that none of the car dealerships constituted an integrated business center. Hillyer Ford, Miles Chevrolet and Hershberger Motors appealed the Commission's Final Order to the City Council in a letter received by the city on August 22, 1997. On October 13, 1997, the City Council conducted a l1l: IlQYQ public hearing and considered public testimony, a presentation by the appellants, written information, and the record of the Planning Commission proceeding in order to make an interpretation of Ordinance 2092. II. FINDINGS OF FACT A Facts 1. The facts concerning this matter before the City Council are contained in the record of this proceeding, including the staff submissions, public testimony and documentary evidence presented before the City Council and the record of the Planning Commission Page 1 - FINDINGS . --. _._~--- --r Attachment "A" Page ...iL of L proceeding, all of which are by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The City Council finds that appellant Hillyer Ford is engaged in several business activities, including the sale of new cars, the sale of used cars, car rental and car advertising. Several legally distinct corporations exist that enable the pursuit of these different business activities. 3. The City Council finds that appellant Miles Chevrolet is engaged in various different business activities, including the new car sales of Chevrolet and Geo, sales of car parts, car service and repair, service and repair of recreational vehicles, car rental, and a real estate holding company related to the car dealership properties. Several legally distinct corporations exist that enable the pursuit of these various business activities. 4. The City Council finds that appellant Hershberger Motors is engaged in various business activities, including new car sales of Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, and Jeep/Eagle, the sale of used cars, and car rental. B. Conclusions: 1. The City Council concludes that Ordinance 2092 (The Woodburn Sign Ordinance) constitutes the City Council's own enactment. 2. The City Council concludes that Section 4(B) of Ordinance 2092 (The Woodburn Sign Ordinance) is not clear on its face and needs interpretation. Specifically, the term "integrated business center" is defined as "a group of two or more businesses that are planned and designed as a center, whether or not the business, buildings or land are under common ownership". However the term "businesses" is not defined in the context of the ordinance. Thus, it is necessary for the City Council to define the term "businesses" in order to interpret the term "integrated business center". 3. The City Council concludes that it has the legal authority to make the necessary interpretation. The Planning Commission interpreted Ordinance 2092 based upon guidelines contained in Section 2.040 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance. The final interpretative order of the Planning Commission was then appealed to the City Council and the appellants were afforded a lh: IlQYl2 public hearing prior to the City Council making the necessary ordinance interpretation. 4. Appellants argue that business activities such as a new car dealership, a used car dealership, a rental car agency and car advertising are each separate "businesses". However, the City Council concludes, within the context of the ordinance, that these are not separate "businesses" but merely components of a single business. Page 2 - FINDINGS --.'.--- Attachment "A" Page ~ of ...l.. 5. Appellants argue that legal incorporation, by definition, creates separate "businesses". However, the City Council concludes, within the context of the ordinance, that legal incorporation does not of itself create different "businesses". 6. The City Council concludes that, within the context ofthe ordinance, the term "businesses" is interpreted to mean individual commercial establishments. This is a practical definition that is consistent with both public perception and the city's business licensing procedure. 7. The City Council concludes that appellant Hillyer Ford is not "two or more businesses" and does not constitute an "integrated business center" under the ordinance. 8. The City Council concludes that appellant Miles Chevrolet is not "two or more businesses" and does not constitute an "integrated business center" under the ordinance. 9. The City Council concludes that appellant Hershberger Motors is not "two or more businesses" and does not constitute an "integrated business center" under the ordinance. Page 3 - FINDINGS ...,-_." '-^"~-"~'--~