Ord 2347 - Design Review Winco
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CASE FILE NO. 03-
14 AFFECTING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 WOODLAND AVENUE; AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the applicant, Iverson's Unlimited Inc., submitted Design Review
Application Case File No. 03-14 to place a 320 square foot modular office building on the
east side of the Winco Foods property located at 400 Woodland Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn Community Development Director previously
approved said application; and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council called this approval up for its review;
and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council has conducted a public hearing and
reviewed the record in Design Review Application Case File No. 03-14; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That based upon the findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit
"A" which is affixed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, Design Review
Application Case No. 03-14 is approved.
Section 2. That the land use application approved by Section 1 herein is subject
to the conditions contained in Exhibit "B", which is affixed hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein, which the Council finds reasonable.
Section 3. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of
the public peace, health, and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and this
ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by
the Mayor.
Approved as to form?].C}v(r- ~
City Attorney
/0-2'/- 190J
Date
Page 1- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r".- .....'...-.--..-........,.....-r-...-.'-..'--
T
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
October 29, 2003
Approved by the Mayor
October 29, 2003
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
October 29, 2003
ATTEST:
~~
~.
Mary Te ant City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r....-....-. ....'-.--r T
r
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
DESIGN REVIEW 03-14
I. APPLICATION INFORMATION:
Applicant:
Iverson's Unlimited Inc.
P.O. Box 100
Sublimity, OR 97386
Property Owner:
Winco Foods
ATTN: Roger M. Roth
P.O. Box 400
Woodburn, OR 97071-0400
II. NATURE OF APPLICATION: The applicant requests administrative design
review approval of a 320 square foot modular office building on the east side of
the Winco Foods property located at 400 Woodland Avenue.
III. RELEVANT FACTS: The subject site is located at 400 Woodland Avenue and
further identified on Marion County Tax Assessor's Maps as Township 5 South,
Range 2 West, Section 11, Tax Lot 100 and 5 South, Range 2 West, Section 14,
Tax Lot 100. The property is 82.12 acres in size and is currently being used as a
distribution and warehousing center for Winco Foods.
The subject property is zoned Light Industrial (IL). The adjacent properties to the
north ( across Newberg Highway) and east are zoned Commercial General (CG)
and designed as "Commercial" on the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan map. The
property on the east is in use as Hillyer's Mid-City Ford Car Dealership and the
property on the north (across Hwy 219/Newberg Hwy) is being used for the Miles
Chevrolet auto dealership. The parcel to the north and west (across Woodland
Avenue) is zoned Light Industrial, designated "Industrial" on the Woodburn
Comprehensive Plan map and is being used for a warehouse and distribution
center by the Do It Best Hardware Company. Interstate 5 extends along the
southeast side of the property. The properties to the west (across Interstate 5)
are zoned Commercial General (CG), designated "Commercial" on the
Woodburn Comprehensive Plan map and are the location of the Wal-Mart retail
store and vacant land. The Woodburn City Limits extend along the west and
southeast sides of the subject site. The Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) extends
along the property's west boundary. The adjacent property to the west is zoned
Marion County Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) and is used as farmland. There is no
wetland located on the Winco property. The subject site is located outside of the
500 year floodplain.
Page 3- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r-~ ...-----...~-r-r.--.-~.--.- "-""
The subject property has been developed with a 911,097 square foot (main
building, truck maintenance garage and salvage building) food distribution facility
which is owned and operated by Winco Foods. The Woodburn Community
Development Director approved the partition of the subject property into two
parcels (an 82.12 acre parcel and a 1.39 acre parcel) on March 11, 2003 (Case
File No. PAR 02-02). In 2002 (Case File No. SPR 02-02) the Planning
Commission approved an expansion of the north side of the main building with a
49,496 square foot cold storage area and a 4,629 square foot equipment storage
area. This 54,125 sq. ft. addition was part of the phase III development of the
overall master plan for the site. Phases I and II were approved by the Planning
Commission in May of 1996 through site plan review approval (Case File No.
SPR 96-05).
IV. RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA:
WOODBURN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
Section 2.110 Light Industrial (IL)
Section 3.101 Street Standards
Section 3.102 Utilities and Easements
Section 3.103 Setback, Open Space and Lot Standards, Generally
Section 3.104 Access
Section 3.105 Off Street Parking and Loading
Section 3.106 Landscaping Standards
Section 3.107 Architectural Design Guidelines and Standards
V. FINDINGS:
WOODBURN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
Section 2.1 Land Use Zoning
Section 2.110 Light Industrial (IL)
Section 2.110.16 Dimensional Requirements
The following dimensional requirements shall be the minimum
requirements for all development in the IL zone.
A. Lot Standards.
Lots in an IL zone shall comply with the applicable standards of
Table 2.1.17.
Page 4- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r,4
.'.'-T..-r------...... .,~..,.__._-
T
TABLE 2.1.17
Lot Standards in an IL Zone
In an IL zone the lot area for a non-residential use shall be adequate
to contain all structures within the required setbacks. There shall be
no minimum width or depth.
FINDING: The proposed mobile office is located over 100 feet from all property
lines which exceeds the required 60 foot setback from Newberg Highway /State
Highway 219, 10 foot setback from Woodland Avenue and Interstate 5 and 5
foot interior yard setback. This approval criterion is met.
B. Building Height.
The maximum height of buildings shall not exceed 70 feet, EXCEPT
chimneys, spires, domes, flag poles and other features not used for
human habitation (EXCEPT telecommunication facilities), shall not
exceed 100 feet.
FINDING: The modular office is proposed to be 12 feet in height which meets
the above stated standard.
C. Setback and Buffer Improvement Standards.
1. Front Yard Setback and Setback Abutting a Street:
a. Dimensions:
The minimum setback abutting a street shall be 10 feet plus
any Special Setback, Section 3.103.05.
FINDING: The subject parcel has frontage on Newberg Highway/State
Highway 219, Woodland Avenue and Interstate 5. The required setback
adjacent to Newberg Highway/State Highway 219 is 60 feet (50 foot special
setback plus 10 foot front yard setback). The required setback adjacent to
Woodland Avenue and Interstate 5 is 10 feet. The proposed mobile office is
located over 200 feet from Interstate 5, over 300 feet from Woodland Avenue,
and over 1300 feet from Newberg Highway. The proposal meets this criterion.
b. Off Street Parking, Maneuvering and Storage:
1) Off street parking and storage shall be prohibited
within a required setback.
Page 5- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2.479
ORDINANCE NO. 2437
r..'..-. --......--T ,
T'
2) The distance between the sidewalk on a public street
and a loading dock shall be sized to preclude
vehicles using the dock from projecting over the
sidewalk.
FINDING: The applicant is not proposing any parking or storage as part of this
proposal. This criterion is met.
2. Interior Side and Rear Yard Setbacks.
a. Development in an IL zone shall be subject to the setback
and buffer requirements of Table 2.1.18.
TABLE 2.1.18
Interior Yard and Buffer Standards for IL Zones
Abutting Property Landscaping Wall Interior Setback
RS, R1S, RM, CO, There is no buffer Solid brick or 30 ft.
P/SP zone; or yard landscaping architectural wall
requirement for an with anti-graffiti
Existi ng interior yard surface,noless
residential unit abutting a buffer than 6 feet or
wall. greater than 9 feet
in heiqht.
CG, DDC, IP or IL There is no buffer Alternative A: 5 ft.
zone yard landscaping
requirement for and Wall requirements
interior yard shall be determined
abutting a buffer in conjunction with ------------------------
wall. the applicable
Design Review Alternative B:
process.
------------------------- Zero setback
abutting a building
Alternative B: wall.
No wall required.
FINDING: The abutting property to the west is located outside of the city limits,
is zoned Marion County Exclusive Farm Use (EFU), and is used as farmland.
The abutting property to the east is zoned CG and is the location of a car
dealership. The proposed mobile office is located over 700 feet from the car
dealership property and over 1400 feet from the EFU zoned property to the west
which meets the 5 foot interior yard setback. A wall is not required on the west
Page 6- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r-' .. -...-----.-,.." f
T
property line because the property to the west is located outside of the city limits
and has a county zoning designation. A wall is not required between the subject
site and the car dealership property to the east because the proposed mobile
office is small in size, is compatible with the car dealership, and located a large
distance from the dealership (over 700 feet). This approval criterion is met.
Section 3.1 Development Guidelines and Standards
Section 3.101. Street Standards
FINDING: No street improvements are proposed as part of this development.
Newberg Highway/State Highway 219 and Interstate 5 are under the jurisdiction
of ODOT. A referral was sent to ODOT on August 20,2003. Woodland Avenue
has been improved to exceed the local street standards specified in the
Woodburn Transportation Systems Plan. Consequently, the standards in Section
3.101 do not apply to this project.
Section 3.102. Utilities and Easements.
FINDING: The existing facility currently has adequate storm, water, and sewer
facilities serving the site. The applicant is not proposing to expand or alter these
facilities as part of this project. Any future utility expansions or changes or future
easements will be subject to the standards of the Public Works Department. No
new lighting is proposed as part of this project.
Section 3.103. Setbacks, Open Space and Lot Standards, Generally.
Section 3.103.05. Special Street Setbacks
B. Setback Requirements.
Required setbacks adjacent to a street shall be in addition to the
special setbacks required in this Section. The special setback
distances shall be measured at right angles to the center line of the
original street right of way.
C. Special Provisions.
Buildings, structures and paved surfaces shall not be located within
the special setbacks EXCEPT as specifically provided for in the
WDO. Any portion of a building or structure lawfully established
within a special street setback prior to [the] date of [the] WDO shall
be considered a nonconforming structure.
Page 7- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r- "'-,.-..---..- -----r-r---
T
D. Special Setback Standards.
Special setback standards by street classification are established in
Table 3.1.1. The special setback standards shall be applied to
streets within the City of Woodburn as functionally classified in the
Woodburn Transportation System Plan.
r TABLE 3.1.1 Special Setback Standards by Street Classification I
WTSP Functional Classification Special Setback from Center Line
Major Arterial 50 feet
FINDING: As previously discussed in this report, the required setback adjacent
to Newberg Highway/State Highway 219 (major arterial) is 60 feet (50 foot
special setback plus 10 foot front yard setback). The proposed mobile office is
located over 1300 feet from Newberg Highway/State Highway 219. The proposal
meets this criterion.
Section 3.104. Access
Section 3.104.01 Applicability
A. Street Access Required.
1. Every lot shall have direct access to an abutting public street or
to a public street by an irrevocable access easement.
FINDING: There are four direct accesses to Woodland Avenue that serve the
subject site and a fifth curb cut, which is currently closed off, where the north-
south and east-west portions of Woodland Avenue intersect. These accesses
were approved in the initial site plan review request for the facility. No new
accesses or street improvements are proposed as part of this development.
Section 3.105. Off Street Parking and Loading
Section 3.105.01 Applicability
The provisions of this Section shall apply to the following types of
development:
B. Expansion or Change of Use.
Page 8- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
,--~'"'''_...,~._~. ~ .
~
Any additional parking and/or loading required by the WDO to
accommodate a change in use, or expansion of an existing use shall
be subject to the following.
2. Applications subject to Type II Design Review, Section 5.102.02,
where the change or expansion increases the required area for
parking, loading or landscaping by 25 percent or more, shall
conform to all parking, loading and landscaping to the standards
of the WDO. Parking, loading and landscaping required for
changes or expansions of less than 25 percent shall be limited to
those necessary to conform with the increment of change or
expansion.
FINDING: The proposed 320 square foot mobile office does not require
an increase in parking, loading or landscaping by 25% or more, therefore,
the applicant is not required to comply with all the parking, loading and
landscaping standards of the WDO.
3.105.02
General Provisions for Off Street Parking and Loading
E. Off Street Vehicle Parking Requirements.
1. Off street vehicle parking spaces shall be provided in
amounts not less than those set forth in Table 3.1.2.
FINDING: Table 3.1.2 of Section 3.105 requires the greater of one
space per 5,000 square foot of gross floor area or 1 space per
employee for a warehousing use. The applicant's proposed mobile
office is less than 5,000 square feet and no new employees will be
added to the site for the proposed mobile office so no new parking
spaces are required or proposed by the applicant. This approval
criterion has been met.
G. Off Street Loading Requirements.
1. Off street loading spaces shall comply with the dimensional
standards and amounts not less than those set forth in
Table 3.1.3.
2. The off street loading facilities shall be on the same lot, or
site, as the use or structure they are intended to serve.
Required loading spaces and required parking spaces shall
be separate and distinct.
Page 9- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
T
FINDING: The proposed addition and existing building total 911,417
square feet. Four loading spaces (12 feet by 30 feet) are required for
911,417 square feet of building area. There is currently 174,300
square feet of loading space on the subject site which exceeds the
5,760 square foot loading space requirement. These approval criteria
a re met.
Section 3.106 Landscaping Standards
Section 3.106.01 Applicability
The provisions of this section shall apply:
A. To the site area for all new structures and related parking
EXCLUDING single-family and duplex dwellings and accessory
structures; and
B. To the entire site area of the development, where the cumulative
effect of additions to structures and/or parking areas increases the
total area covered by structure and parking by 50 percent or more
than existed at the date of the WDO adoption.
FINDING: The proposed 320 square foot mobile office does not increase the
total area covered by structures and parking by 50% or more than existed at
the date of the WDO adoption so the landscaping section of the WDO does
not apply to this proposal. Existing trees will screen the mobile office from
Interstate 5, Woodland Avenue and Newberg Highway/State Highway 219.
The existing buildings on the subject site will screen the proposed mobile
office from the properties to the west and south.
Section 3.107 Architectural Design Guidelines and Standards
Section 3.107.08 Design Guidelines for IP and IL Zones
B. Design Guidelines.
1. Loading.
a. Loading facilities should be located at the rear or side of
structures to reduce their unsightly appearance.
FINDING: The applicant is not proposing any additional loading
facilities. This approval criterion is met.
Page 10- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r~ ... ..-...'.....-.-....-r---...-...-'..---.......
T
2. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage, when permitted, should be
screened from the view of abutting streets by a solid brick or
architectural block wall not less than 6, nor more than 9 feet in
height.
FINDING: The applicant is not proposing any additional outdoor
storage as part of this design review request. This approval
criterion is met.
3. Outdoor Lighting. All outdoor lighting should be designed so
as not to shine or reflect into any adjacent residentially zoned
or used property, and shall not cast a glare onto moving
vehicles on any public street.
FINDING: The applicant is not proposing any additional outdoor
lighting on the subject site. This approval criterion is met.
4. Energy Efficiency. Building location, orientation, and design
should encourage energy conservation and solar access.
FINDING: The materials used in the proposed building will be
energy efficient. This approval criterion is met.
5. Building Bulk and Scale. Long blank walls abutting streets
should be avoided. The visual impact of building and scale
should be reduced by:
a. Articulating building facades;
b. Landscaping the area abutting building walls,
including plant materials that provide vertical
accents;
c. Tying entrances to the structure to the overall
mass and composition of the building;
d. Minimizing the use of smooth concrete, concrete
block and all types of metal siding;
e. Shading colors with brown or black to create
earth tones or tinting colors with white to soften
the appearance. Day-glow, flourescent and other
intense colors shall be prohibited;
Page 11- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r..'
~.. .. ... .........,......-,..----.---.-.........
,
f. Screening exterior building equipment, including
roof top equipment, from view; and
g. Altering roof lines, constructing cornices, or
parapets that offset the continuous plane of large
buildings and extended building lines.
FINDING: The proposed mobile office is square in shape with
wood siding, a metal roof and brick skirting. The applicant is
proposing to paint the mobile office an off-white color with a red
trim. The existing off-white warehouse buildings with red trim on
the subject site are also square in shape with metal siding. The
design of the proposed mobile office is consistent with the existing
design of the buildings on the subject site. A small existing
building will screen the proposed mobile office from Interstate 5.
Existing trees on the subject site will further screen the proposed
mobile office from Woodland Avenue and Interstate 5. Existing
buildings on the subject site will screen the proposed mobile office
from the south, north and west property lines.
6. Buffer Wall. A solid brick or architectural wall with anti-
graffiti surface, no less than 6 feet or greater than 7 feet
in height:
a. Should be constructed on the perimeter property
line of non-residential development to mitigate
adverse visual, noise and/or light impacts on the
abutting use when no comparable buffer exists;
and
FINDING: The abutting property to the west is located outside of
the city limits, is zoned Marion County Exclusive Farm Use (EFU),
and is used as farmland. The abutting property to the east is zoned
CG and is the location of a car dealership. The proposed mobile
office is located over 700 feet from the car dealership property and
over 1400 feet from the EFU zoned property to the west which
meets the 5 foot interior yard setback. A wall is not required on the
west property line because the property to the west is located
outside of the city limits and has a county zoning designation. A
wall is not required between the subject site and the car dealership
property to the east because the proposed mobile office is small in
size, is compatible with the car dealership, and located a large
distance from the dealership (over 700 feet). This approval
criterion is met.
Page 12- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
>r-~
-'--~..._~-r----' .
T
7. Sidewalk Location and Street Trees. Sidewalks should be
located at the property line along streets with street trees,
Section 3.106.
FINDING: Curb line sidewalks have already been constructed and
street trees have already been planted along Woodland Avenue as
part of the street improvement for Phase I of the Winco Foods
facility.
8. Solar Access Protection. Obstruction of existing solar
collectors on abutting properties by site development
should be mitigated.
FINDING: The above stated provision will be met because the
proposed mobile office will be located over 200 feet from all of the
surrounding property lines.
VI. CONCLUSION:
Based on the findings contained herein, all relevant approval criteria relating to
this approval of the Design Review request have been met
Page 13- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
,..~' ...-.,.- ...-......".... T
,
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DESIGN REVIEW 03-14
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:
1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the
submitted site plan dated July 17, 2003, floor plan and elevation plan dated
July 16, 2003 provided as Exhibit "B, except as modified by the conditions of
approval contained herein.
2. The applicant shall submit a color elevation of the proposed mobile office on
the subject site prior to the issuance of the building permit for review and
approval by the Community Development Director.
3. The property owner/applicant shall submit to the Community Development
Department a signed "Acceptance of Conditions" agreeing to all conditions of
approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the expansion.
4. Any conditions attached to the approval of the design review shall be
conditions on the issuance of a building permit. A violation of the conditions
shall be considered a violation of the Woodburn Development Ordinance.
Page 14- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2479
ORDINANCE NO. 2347
r~'
'-,.._.'''-~ 1r
r