Agenda - 09/09/1991 AGENDA
WOODBURN CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 - 7:00 A. PM
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
City Council minutes of regular meeting of August 26 and
executive session of August 28,1991.
Park Board minutes of August 13, 1991.
Library Board minutes of August 21, 1991.
Woodburn Museum Advisory Committee minutes of August 14, 1991.
3A
3B
3C
3D
m
APPOINTMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Proclamation: Constitution Week - September 17 - 23, 1991.
4A
Be
=
9.
10.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Chamber of Commerce
B. Woodburn Comeback Campaign
COMMUNICATIONS
A. Written - None
BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
(This allows public to introduce items for Council consideration
not already scheduled on the agenda.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
TABLED BUSINESS
GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Council Bill No. 1336 - Ordinance establishing system development charges
for water, sewer and park & recreation facilities.
IOA
Page 1 - Woodburn City Council Agenda, September 9, 1991
11.
12.
13.__=.
14.
Council Bill No. 1337 - Resolution setting system development charges.
Eo
Council Bill No. 1338 - Resolution awarding a contract on a storm drain 1__~_C
Willow Avenue to Senecal Creek.
Council Bill No. 13~ - Resolution reclassifying salary ranges for certain
employees; modifying range/step system for future management employees. 10___~D
10__. E
Approval of 9-1-1 equipment purchase.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
A. Voucher No. 11001 - 11231 for July 31, 1991.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Authority: ORS 192.660(1) (a)
Purpose: To discuss consideration of employment of a city administrator.
PUBLIC COMMENT
NEW BUSINESS
15. SITE PLAN ACTIONS
16. STAFF REPORTS
17.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORT_S
20. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 - Woodburn City Council Agenda, September 9, 1.991
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
0001. DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY
OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, AUGUST 26, 1991.
0003 CONVENED. The Council met in regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Kyser
presiding.
0013 ROLL C.__ALL.
Mayor Kyser Present
Councilor Figley Present
Councilor Galvin Present
Councilor Hagenauer
Councilor Jennings
Councilor Sifuentez Present
Councilor Steen Present
Staff Present:
City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Tiwari, Community Development
Director Goeckritz, Finance Director Gritta, Park Director Holly, Police Lt. Eubank,
Public Works Manager Rohman, Deputy Recorder Tennant.
O022
MINUTES.
HAGENAUER/STEEN .... approve the Council minutes of July 29, August 12 and
15, 1991 as written; and accept the Park Board minutes of July 16, 1991. The
motion passed unanimously.
OO45
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT.
Marlis Peterson, representing the Chamber of Commerce, reminded the Council of
the following Chamber sponsored events: Ag Tour - August 27th, and the Annual
Golf Tournament, September 7th,,"
0067
Community Development Director-Goeckritz read a letter from Developer Pete
Cam advising the Council of his intent to appeal the Planning Commission's
condition to construct an east/west street across wetlands within his proposed
development south of Meadowvale. Director Goeckritz stated that the appeal
would be before the Council at their September 23rd meeting.
0107
Joan Garren, 1750 Landau Drive, submitted a letter to the Council regarding future
development on the east side of Landau Drive. She ~tated that Landau Drive is
currently a half street and requested that any development on the east side of the
street, whether by one or multiple developers, be required to provide widening of
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
O253
0353
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
the street prior to occupancy of any new residences. She also expressed
concerns regarding sewer hook-ups and capacity level of existing lines.
Community Development Director Goeckritz stated that no applications have been
submitted for development of the properties at this time, however, a partitioning
may be submitted to the Planning Commission for their review. The applicant has
been informed of the need to obtain a 30 foot right-of-way for the full length of the
street and the street improvement would be required. The partitioning request
before the Planning Commission does require public notice and the residents
within the affected area would be able to express their concerns to the Planning
Commission.
Tom Waggoner, 849 Woodland, spoke on behalf of several residents within the
Willowbrook subdivision expressing their concerns on the quality of materials used
by the contractors and the City's inspection of construction projects.
Mayor Kyser stated that he would look into the situation and contact Mr.
Waggoner within the next few days with a report on his findings.
PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92.
O493
Mayor Kyser declared the public hearing open at 7:12 p.m..
Deputy Recorder Tennant provided a brief staff report regarding the proposed
supplemental budget which was approved by the Budget Committee following
their hearing on July 22, 1991.
No one in the audience spoke either for or against the proposed 1991-92
supplemental budget.
Mayor Kyser declared the public hearing closed at 7:16 p.m..
PUBLIC HEARING -WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS.
Mayor Kyser declared the hearing open at 7:17 p.m..
Public Works Director Tiwari reviewed the original State Economic Development
grant and loan funding allocations for the infrastructure improvements which
includes the new sewer pump station near I-5. Since the construction bids
exceeded the estimated project co~ts, the City negotiated for additional funding
from the State Economic Development Department. The State has agreed to
provide an additional $33,345 in grant funds bringing the total grant to $500,000
which is the maximum allowed under the State's program. An additional $257,574
will be provided to the City under the loan program of which property owners in
the benefitted area have agreed to pay their fair share in the amount of $203,800.
The City would be responsible for the repayment of the $53,774 loan balance.
The interest rate on the loan is 6.5% to be repaid over a 20 year period.
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
O953
1059
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
Director Tiwari also advised the Council that the Contractor has agreed to extend
the date for bid acceptance until August 29th, however, a further time delay would
result in delaying the construction until next year.
Mayor Kyser expressed his appreciation to the property owners in their willingness
to work with the City to complete this project.
Dan Ritter, attorney representing Davidson Farms, urged the Council to support
the agreement between the benefitted property owners and the City for the
repayment of the additional loan funds.
No one in the audience spoke in opposition to the proposed acceptance of state
grant and loan funds.
The hearing closed at 7:34 p.m..
INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEES.
1496
Mayor Kyser declared the hearing open at 7:35 p.m..
Public Works Director Tiwari briefly reviewed the workshop held on July 29th in
which the Council received a report from consultant Don Gainer of Henderson,
Young & Co.. Based on the methodology in calculating the maximum water and
sewer system development charge, Director Tiwari provided the Council with a
proposed 4 year plan for increasing system development fees. The increases
would begin upon enactment of an ordinance establishing the new fees and the
first year increase would be approximately 30-35%. All development within the
City would be paying the same rate per gallon of estimated use and funds derived
from new development would continue to be reflected within the Capital
Improvement Funds for water and sewer.
Bill Costine, 1740 Rainier Rd., stated that the fees established by the consultant for
the sewer system were higher than the amount proposed by staff. He expressed
concern regarding the surge of development within the City before the end of the
four year period and the potential burden on the current property taxpayer for new
construction costs.
Director Tiwari stated that it would be approximately 5 years before any new
construction would take place and that capacity limit has not been reached at the
current plant. However, some problems still exist at the plant which have been
created by new DEQ regulations and changes must take place to modify the
existing plant until a new plant is constructed.
Preston Tack, 2197 Camellia Way, questioned the method in which the formula
was derived and if the developers are required to pay the fees up front.
Director Tiwari stated that the fees are required of all new construction and
payment is required when permits are issued.
Gil Flowers, 1352 Astor Way, questioned the wastewater capacity level. Following
a brief discussion on this issue, it was the consensus of the Council to schedule a
workshop regarding the wastewater issue.
Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
2767
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August26,1991
Director Tiwad stated that the state law does allow system development fee for
storm drain and the City currently charges a system development fee, however,
the methodology has not been completed to make any adjustments to the
established rate.
Park Director Holly briefly reviewed the methodology established by the consultant
to determine the park system development fee. The proposed system
development fee ordinance would replace the current park dedication ordinance
and the City would continue to accept either cash or park land in-lieu-of cash. All
funds would continue to be refiected within the Park Capital Improvement Fund
and used for improving existing park facilities within the development area or
creating a new park facility to meet the needs of the new development. Funds
could also be diverted to fund a project which would benefit all city residents such
as a new pool. The Park Board has recommended that the City only charge 75%
of the maximum limit and that the increase be phased in over a 5 year period.
Some discussion was held regarding the need for an indoor pool and
overcrowding at existing parks in the late afternoon/evening hours.
Mayor Kyser closed the hearing at 8:20 p.m..
PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RE: CORNER LOTS.
Tape 2
0016
Mayor Kyser declared the public hearing open at 8:21 p.m..
Community Development Director Goeckritz reviewed the staff report and Planning
Commission recommendation to allow a 13 foot setback on fences constructed on
corner lots but not within the public right-of-way. Additionally, the fence within the
vision clearance area would be limited to 30 inches in height.
No one in the audience spoke either for or against the proposed amendment.
The Mayor declared the public hearing closed at 8:24 p.m..
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1326 - ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE 1616
OO46
(NUISANCE ORDINANCE) REQUIRING TOILET FACILITIES ON
CONSTRUCTION JOB SITES (Second Readinq).
The second reading of the bill was read by title only since there were no
objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed
unanimously. Mayor Kyser declared Council Bill 1326 duly passed with the
emergency clause.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1329 - ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92.
Council Bill 1329 was introduced by Hagenauer. The two readings of the bill were
read by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call
vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Kyser declared Council
Bill 1329 duly passed with the emergency clause.
Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
0078 COUNCIL BILL NO. 1330 - ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LOAN FROM THE
STATE OF OREGON SPECIAL PUBLIC WORKS FUND FOR
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS NEAR I-5.
Councilor Hagenauer introduced Council Bill 1330. Deputy Recorder read the two
readings of the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council.
On roll call vote for final passage, Council Bill 1330 passed unanimously. Mayor
Kyser declared the bill duly passed with the emergency clause.
0110_
019~3
0221
O255
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1331 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SEWERAGE IMPROVEMENTS NEAR I-5.
Council Bill 1331 was introduced by Hagenauer. The bill was read by title only
since there were no objections from the Council.
Attorney Shields distributed copies of a revised agreement in which Davidson
Farms will pay Pioneer Trust's share of the costs, however, Pioneer Trust will not
be allowed to connect to the system until they pay their share of the total costs.
On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Kyser
declared Council Bill 1331 duly passed.
ILL NO 1332-RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARKING TIME
~~O~S AND'ESTABLISHING A LOADING ZONE IN SELECTED AREAS
WITHIN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.
Council Bill 1332 was introduced by Council Hagenauer. The bill was read by title
only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final
passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Kyser declared Council Bill 1332
duly passed.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1333 - ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 1807
REGARDING SETBACK DISTANCES OF FENCES ON CORNER LOTS.
Councilor Hagenauer introduced Council Bill 1333. Deputy Recorder Tennant
read the two readings of the bill by title only since there were no objections from
the Council. On roll call vote for fin'al passage, the bill passed unanimously.
Mayor Kyser declared Council Bill 1333 duly passed.
CONTRACT AWARD - I-5 SEWER LINE BORE AND PUMP STATION WET
WELL INSTALLATIONS-
The staff recommended the acceptance of the Iow bid from Pipe Tech, Inc., in the
amount of $441,305 for installation of a sewer line bore and the concrete shell of
the pump station.
HAGENAUER/SIFUENTEZ .... award the contract to Pipe Tech, Inc., in the amount
of $441,305. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
0302 CONTRACT AWARD - WEST WOODBURN SEWAGE SYSTEM PUMP STATION
0326
AND FORCE MAIN.
The staff recommended the acceptance of the Iow bid from Kizer Excavating in
the amount of $380,290 for lift station pumping facilities and installation of force
mains.
SlFUENTEZ/STEEN .... approve the Iow bid from Kizer Excavating in the amount of
$380,290. The motion passed unanimously.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1334. - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY TO EXECUTE
AN AMENDMENT TO A CONTRACT WITH CH2M HILL FOR PROFESSIONAl-
0371
SERVICES.
Public Works Director Tiwari briefly reviewed the proposed bill which pertains to
the consultant fees for designing the pump station and force main. The City
would pay only 1/2 of the additional costs not to exceed $18,000 with the balance
being absorbed by CH2M Hill.
Council Bill 1334. was introduced by Hagenauer.
since there were no objections from the Council.
passage, Council Bill 1334 passed unanimously.
duly passed.
The bill was read by title only
On roll call vote for final
Mayor Kyser declared the bill
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1335 - RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO A COOPERATIVE
0495
AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF OREGON AND WAL-MART STORES, INC.
FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTAl I &TION AT HWY. 214/EVERGREEN ROAD.
Council Bill 1335 was introduced by Councilor Hagenauer. The bill was read by
title only since there were no objections from the Council.
Public Works Manager Rohman stated that the State Highway Department will
install the traffic signal, Wal-Mart Stores will pay for the installation costs, and the
City will be responsible for maintenance of the asphalt and the electrical power
costs to operate the traffic light.
On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. The Mayor
declared Council Bill 1335 duly passed.
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT ON SETTLEMIER STREET NEAR SE'R'LEMIER
PARK.
'r/he staff recommended the acceptance of easements from Robert & Lois
Montgomery and Jerry & Nancy Shirley which allows for the construction of a new
home on property transferred to the Shirley's. The easements as rewritten will
provide adequate width and depth to meet the City's needs.
SIFUENTEZ/HAGENAUER... accept the easements from the Montgomery's and
Shirley's as recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 26, 1991
TAPE
READING
0517
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS - INDUSTRIAL PARK.
The staff recommended the acceptance of a waterline and sewerline easement
from trustees C.W. Bagley, Ray Johnson, and Marlin Hammond.
HAGENAUER/SIFUENTEZ... accept the waterline and sewerline easement as
recommended. The motion passed unanimously.
0527
SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY - CLARIFIER SYSTEMS.
Public Works Manager Rohman recommended the acceptance of the high bid
from Logan International, Ltd for purchase of 4 clarifier systems from the old
Sewage Treatment Plant since the clarifiers are of no use to the City.
SlFUENTEZ/HAGENAUER .... accept the bid of $2,000 to purchase the 4 clarifier
systems as recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously.
0581
ANNUAL CITY INVESTMENT REPORT.
Finance Director Gritta provided the Council with an informational report on the
status of City investments in accordance with the City's investment policy.
0627
A bdef staff report on the Transportation Project was included in the agenda
packet for Council information. A more detailed report will be provided at the next
regular meeting.
0654
A staff report on the Communications Enhanced 9-1-1 conversion was briefly
reviewed with Council review of bids at the next regular meeting.
0681
Councilor Sifuentez urged the Planning staff to pay close attention to the street
width issue on Landau Drive before any development on the east side of the
street is allowed.
0716
Mayor Kyser expressed his appreciation for the cooperation demonstrated by
Davidson Farms and KLAW Holdings in completing this most recent agreement.
He also stated that he would investigate the complaints made by Willowbrook
residents and report back at the ne~xt meeting.
O766
ADJOURNMENT.
The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m..
APPROVED
FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR
A'I-rEST
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, August 26, 1991
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Executive Session
August 28, 1991
TAPE
READING
DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF
MARION, STATE OF OREGON, AUGUST 28, 1991.
CONVENED. The Council met in special session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Kyser
presiding.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor Kyser Present
Councilor Figley Present
Councilor Galvin Present
Councilor Hagenauer Present
Councilor Jennings Absent
Councilor Sifuentez Present
Councilor Steen Present
Staff Present: Deputy Recorder Tennant.
Selection Committee Members: John Hudanish, Job Valverde, Mary Schultz, Keith
Robinson, Dan Glennon
EXECUTIVE SESSION.
The Council met under the authority of ORS 192.660 (1)(a) to consider employment
applications for the position of City Administrator.
The executive session convened at 7:01 p.m..
The Council and Selection Committee members reviewed 12 applications for the
position. Following the review, 5 applications were selected as primary candidates
from which the Council will continue the review process towards final selection of an
individual to fill the position.
The executive session concluded at 8:39 p.m.
The Council reconvened the special meeting at 8:40 p.m.. The Mayor stated that no
action would be taken by the Coudcil at this meeting.
ADJOURNMENT.
The special meeting adjourned at 8:41 p.m..
APPROVED
FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 - Special Council Meeting Minutes, Executive Session, August 28, 1991
MINUTES
WOODBURN RECREATION AND PARKS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 13, 1991
CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order at 7:20pm in the Woodbum Community center by Chairman
Andy Yanez.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Andy Yanez, Dave Ott, Sue Fofana-Dura, Barbara Rappleyea, Larry
Watson.
Members Absent: Lynda Hamilton and Jack Mitchoff
Staff Present: Director Nevin Holly.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES
The Minutes of the July 16, 1991 Recreation and Parks Board were presented for approval.
Dave Ott asked if Roger Wilder from MacLaren School had been given his certificate of
appreciation. Director said this certificate was being drafted at this time.
MOTION: D. OTT: Moved to adopt the Recreation and Parks Board
" Minutes of July 16, 1991 as written.
S.FOFANA-DURA:
Motion passed unanimously.
Seconded the Motion.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
The Agenda for the August 13, 1991 Recreation and Parks Board Meeting was presented for
adoption.
MOTION: D. O'i-!': Moved to adopt the Recreation and Parks Board
- Meeting Agenda of August 13, 1991 as written.
5o
S.FOFANA-DURA:
Motion passed unanimously.
Seconded the Motion.
NAMING OF WEST WOODBURN PARK
The names submitted for the naming of West Woodburn Park were reviewed. There were
several excellent suggestions, however the Board unanimously choose the name Burlingham
Park, which had been submitted several times, in honor of long time Woodbum Community
Leader Don Burlingham. The dedication of this park will be discussed at the next meeting.
PARKS ClP PRIORITIZATION '"
The plans for Centennial Park were reviewed. The Board then took a ride over to Centennial
Park to familiarize themselves with the Park site. Upon returning from the tour the Board had a
long discussion on Centennial. All agreed this must be a high priority in the coming year. It
was unanimously decided that a task force be formed which would work with the Director on
this project. Nevin indicated he felt the Centennial Task Force should be representative of all
segments of the community. The formation of the Fund Raising Community eluded to earlier
was discussed. Nevin suggested that possibly it would be a more effective group if they were
challenged in one direction, such as a Centennial Fund Raising Committee.
PAGE 2
Recreation and Parks Board Minutes
August 13, 1991
The Capital Improvement Programs list were was reviewed by the Board. The Director went
over the proposed project developments on each site. The Board discussed long term
comprehensive park planning and how it relates to Department goals and obiectives. After a
lengthy discussion and review, it was decided that a priority list would be established at the
next Board meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Meeting adjourned at 9:40pm.
MINUTES
MONTHLY MEETING OF WOOOBURN PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD
DATE:
August 21, 1991
ROLL CALL:
Phyllis Bauer - Present
Joan Flomer - Present
Gloria Predeek - Present
Jean Weatherill- Excused
Jan ZyryanoFF - Present
STAFF PRESENT: Judy Coreson, Recording Secretary
GUESTS: None
CALL TO ORDER: President Phyllis Bauer called the meeting ko
order at 1:4D PM Following a delicious luncheon
she provided at her home.
SECRETARY'S
REPORT:
The monthly Board minutes oF July 24, 1991
were approved as submitted.
DIRECTOR'S
REPORT:
~inda could not attend the meeting due to a Family
illness. Judy reported on the items listed on the
agenda.
Monthly/Annual Statistics:
were sel~-explanatory.
The monthly statistics
Activities: A list oF activities was distributed
to the Board. On August 1 twenty Five children
and seven adults attended the Marion County
Extension Service "Healthy Snacks" presentation.
AFter the demonstration, recipes were given out
and the children decorated lunch begs. On August
15 the "Magic oF Reading Show" was well attended
with 100 children and 2S adults. Cookies were
donated by Roths IGA and SaFeway. Twenty eight
teens attended the Teen Summer Contest Party at
the Uoodburn Be~y Museum. A prize drawing,
museum tour, ice cream sundaes, 'end 2 videos were
provided. A total oF 38 teems were involved in
the Teen Summer Contest. Planning ~or the Fall is
now bein~ done which includes school visits,
Float in the Farm~est Parade, preschool storytime,
and a meeting with the school librarians.
Book Detection System: Linde is
information From the Knogo Company
their system.
needing more
concerning
"Tree Hazard": The Street Department promptly
repaired the sunken bricks around the tree at the
2nd Street entrance at Linda's request.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS:
A letter o~ appreciation to Woodburn Womens Club
· or their donation o~ $25.00 in memory o~ Ems
Seeley was signed by President Phyllis Bauer.
BUSINESS TO/FROM
THE CITY COUNCIL
AND/OR MAYOR: None
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:3S PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Recording Secretary
Library Board Minutes - 8/21/91 2
Woodburn Museum Advisory Committee, Regular Meeting: Aug 14/91
CALL TO ORDER
President Vance called the meeting at 1:15 pm.
Present: Vance Yoder, Red Eaden, Lou Jane Cornwell,
Nevin Holly, Clair Nelson, Gene Stoller, Bob Baynham,
Nancy Kirksey, and Hazel Smith. Absent: Bob Hughes, Ed
Murphy, Paul Graham, Ernie Livesay, Chris McNulty and Bob
Sigloh.
Guests: Glen Eaton, OR Electric Historical Soc.,
393-1399
Jim Audritsh, Jim's Cleaning Service, 981-6008
Kevin Hohnbaum, Plaza Players, 981-3648.
II
Red Eaden moved to accept July 10th minutes as written
and mailed. Motion seconded/passed.
III
Correspondence: Chris McNulty's letter was read by Nevin
Holly, offering to learn grant application writing to
benefit the Museum. Consensus of the Board Members was
to relay our hearty acceptance of her offer.
TREASURE'S REPORT, by Lou Jane Cornwell:
Expenditures:
646.00 Elk's theatre dinners/sandwiches
150.00 Starry Night Players
253.17 Hoffman Pluming, supplies (Cemtury Club
Membership for his labor)
160.00 Marion County Permit.
Income:
1,000 dollar donation from Dr. Reed.
3 Century Club members, Crafts & Ice Cream (not tallied).
Total Balance: $16,168.42.
Bills presented:
Gower Graphics, front sign 46.00
Wolfers,labor & water htr pan 11.10
True Value Hardware 61.16
Woodb. Lumbr. 2 months bill 210.74
Red Eaden moved to acce'~ the report:
Seconded/passed
V
Guest's Reports:
1. Glenn Eaton described a future trolley circling one/two
blocks in downtown, requiring a grant to install
historically designed light poles to extend
electricity. G. Stoller will be liaison person.
2. Jim Audritsh will advertise the Museum on his van
with a 18x24 space. He presented $100 donation for
VI
which the Museum offered Century Club Membership.
3. Kevin Hohnbaum's theatre group will present "Plaza
Suite" by Neil Simon Aug 22,23,24, @ 7:30, Aug25 @ 2:30.
They expect to perform 4 plays a year.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Bldg Sales Contract: will finish Sept 1, 1991.
(New) N. Holly reported we are expected to pay the
street assessment lien plus closing costs estimated to
total around $1,000.00.
Lou J. Cornwell moved to pay the street assessments and
closing costs based on N. Holly's estimate. Motion
seconded/passed.
2. Roof: Vance Yoder and Ed Murphy will contact landlady on
the North, Esther Cookman, about necessity of repairing her
roof. Consensus of the members was that we should pay a
portion of the roof repair to insure a northern dry wall.
3. Plumbing Bill: Since Elmer Hoffman contributed his labor,
R Eaden moved to give him a Century Club membership plus a
certificate of recognition. Motion seconded/passed.
NEW BUSINESS;
1. G. Stoller asked to have L. Minard come to the next
meeting to explain "graphics arts" and "visual arts"
museums.
2. N. Kirksey asked for help with the screen Aug 15,
1:00 pm., for library function.
3. Calendars: N. Kirksey moved we have 1992 calendars.
Motion seconded/ Passed. R. Eaden will chair, assisted
by N. Holly.
4. Public Relations: R. Baynham and V. Yoder will
consult with W. Independent requesting sensitivity in
reporting financial obligations of the Museum. The City
in only the legal vehicle for purchase of the buildings.
5. Awards:
Certificates of Recognition were prepared for Century
Club Members. A special thanks to Bob Baynham for his
newsletter.
October 10th = Rotary & Volunteer Recognition day. N.
Kirksey and LJ Cornwell will arrange refreshments, and
H. Smith will invite them.
6. N. Kirksey moved the n~t meeting date Sept 18th.
Motion seconded/ passed. Adjourned: 3:00 H. Smith,
recording secretary.
CITY OF
270 Montgomery Street ·
WOODBURN
Wooclburn, Oregon 97071 · 982-5222
PROCLAMATION
CONSTIT WEEK
SEPTEMBER 17 - 23, 1991
WHEREAS, Our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessing of liberty for
themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United
States of America, and
WHEREAS, The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was
ratified in 1791 and for 200 years has stood the test of time and the stress of history, and
WHEREAS, It is very important that all citizens fully understand the provisions and
principles of the Constitution in order to support it, preserve it and defend it against
encroachment, and
WHEREAS, The independence guaranteed to the American people by the
Constitution should be celebrated during the Constitution Week, September 17 through
23, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States of America,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Fred W. Kyser, by virtue of the authority vested in me as
Mayor of the City of Woodburn, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through
23, 1991 as Constitution Week in Woodburn, and urge all citizens to pay special attention
to the advantage of American citizenship.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of
the City of Woodburn to be affixed this 4th day of September, 1991.
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through Acting City Administrator
Nevin Holly, Director- Recreation and Parks
System Development Charges
September 5, 1991
In tonight's council packet is a resolution to adopt the proposed Systems Development Charges
as they pertain to Recreation and Parks. As alluded to in the August 22 memorandum the
Woodburn Recreation Parks Board and Staff views these fees as critical in that they give the
department a means to deal with future development needs.
The level recommended by the Henderson and Young study, which allows the department a
means to keep pace with development at the current level of service is 322.16. In the August
22nd memorandum a standard of 241.60 or 75% of the Henderson and Young recommended
level was proposed. The recommendation of a five-year phasing program was projected in that
scenario. In order to be consistent with the water and sewer system development proposal, the
revised Parks SDC recommendation phases in its fees over a four-year plan, which is in
concurrence with sewer and water. In order to maintain a minimal impact on developers, the
$177.00 per capita figure is proposed. This represents 55% of the Henderson and young
proposal of 322.16. Although this proposal represents only roughly haft the level which is
necessary to maintain parks at their current level of standard, the fund certainly will serve as one
of the few identifiable sources of capital development on Woodburn parks. These funds can
only be expended on capital park projects. The cannot by law be expended to correct existing
deficiencies. The funds are held in separate SDC accounts and must clearly be expended on
projects which new developments impact. They cannot be held in long term trust and, in fact,
must revolve in and out as development occurs.
The Woodburn Recreation Parks Board and staff feel these System Development Charge fees
will have a long term measurable impact on Woodburn City Parks.
NH:Ig
NEVIN.$DC
WOODBURN RECREATION AND PARKS
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
FOUR-YEAR PHASING PLAN
From ordinance adoption - December 31, 1992
PERSON SDC COST SDC CHARGE
TYPE OF UNIT PER UNIT PER CAPITA PER UNIT
Single Family- Detached 2.73 98.20 268.10
Single Family- Attached 2.69 98.20 264.20
Multi-Family 2.78 98.20 273.00
Mobile Home 2.17 98.20 213.00
January 1, 1993 - December 31, 1993
Single Family- Detached
Single Family- Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
2.73 124.50 339.90
2.69 124.50 334.90
2.78 124.50 346.10
2.17 124.50 270.20
January 1, 1994 - December 31, 1994
Single-Family- Detached
Single Family- Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
2.73 150.70 411.40
2.69 150.70 405.40
2.78 150.70 418.90
2.17 150.70 327.00
January 1, 1995 - Final Phasing
Single Family- Detached
Single Family- Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
2.73 177.00 483.20
2.69 177.00 476.10
2.78 177.00 492.10
2.17 177.00 384.09
NEV[#.SDC
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through Acting City Administrator
Public Works Director'~~:~
Water and Sewer Systems Development Charge
September 3, 1991
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council authorize staff to bring the documents that allow acceptance of the water and
sewer methodology basis of systems development charges recommended by the consultant
and allows the charges to increase gradually in a period of four years.
BACKGROUND:
The state legislature adopted Oregon System Development ACt (ORS 223.297-223.314) in 1989.
The purpose of this legislation was to provide uniform framework for systems development
charges also known as connection fees and capacity fees. The law required that all
communities be in compliance by July, 1991, and restricted the use of systems development
charges to capital improvements only.
In response to state law, the City of Woodburn hired Henderson, Young and Company to
develop methodology for imposing systems development charges that meet the requirements
of the law. Woodburn City Council held a workshop on July 29, 1991 to review the work done
by the consultants. It appeared that the council was satisfied with the methodology but it was
not ready to make a policy decision and adopt the higher charges without further consideration.
It should be noted that the City of Woodburn does have a systems development charge but it
is called a connection fee for sewer and capacity fee for water. Since the city ordinance dictates
these revenues be used for capital improvements only, the City of Woodburn already complies
with one segment of the new state law. After the acceptance of the consultant's
recommendation on methodology, the city will be in compliance with the other segments also
as it relates to water and wastewater system development charge.
It is recommended that the change in the system development charge be approved in
incremental phases as follows:
WATEFI:
Current fo(ed charge
Current f'~(ed charge basis
Future charge allowed by study
Recommended charge basis
S/gal x no. of people/house x gal/capita
(use 2.69) (use 108)
For Single Family Residence
$ 750
$ 2.79/gal (based on 108 gal. per capita)
$ 5.26/gal (will allow fixed charge of $1,530.00)
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year
(Jan '93) (Jan '94) (Jan '95)
~ 3.50/gal $ 4.00/gal $ 4.50/gal $ 5.00/gal
$1016 $1162 $1307 $1452
/o4
It is recommended that all residential units, i.e., single family detached/attached and multi-family
units be placed in one category for the system development charges. The mobile home park
units utilize 2.17 people per unit for the determination of charge. The non-residential units will
be based on the estimated flow.
For Sin.qle Family Residence
Current r0(ed charge
Current fLxed charge basis
Future charge allowed by study
$1,000
$ 3.71/gal (based on 108 gal. per capita)
A- $ 9.76/gal (will allow rD(ed charge of $2,842)
B- $14.37/gal (will allow fixed charge of $4181)
Although the city may choose any number below $14.37/gal it is recommended that $9.75/gal
be used as a basis for developing incremental numbers, since it considers plant expansion also.
Ultimate recommended basis
Incremental recommended basis
Recommended charge basis
Recommended fixed charge
S/gal x no. of people/house x gal/capita
(use 2.69) (use 108)
$ 9.75/gal (will allow fixed charge of $2,832)
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year
(Jan '93) (Jan '94) (Jan '95)
~$ 4.50/gal $ 6.25/gal $ 8.O0/gal $ 9.75/gal
$1307 - '- $ 1815 $ 2324 $ 2832
It is recommended that all residential units, i.e., single family detached/attached and multi-family
units be placed in one category for the system development charges. The mobile home park
units utilize 2.17 people for the determination of charge. The non-residential units will be based
on the estimated flows.
I will be available in the meeting to answer questions.
GST:Ig
SYSDEVEL.CHG
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1 33 ~
ORDINANCE NO. ,,.? 0'70
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES FOR WATER,
SEWER, AND PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES.
WHEREAS, future growth should contribute its fair share to the cost of
improvements and additions to City water, sewer, and park and recreation facilities that are
required to accommodate the needs of such growth; and
WHEREAS, the imposition of system development charges will provide a source of
revenue to fund the construction or improvement of the City's water, sewer, and parks and
recreation facilities necessitated by growth; and
WHEREAS, ORS 223.297 - 223.314, adopted in 1989, authorizes local governments
to impose system development charges; and
WHEREAS, the City's present system development charges must be revised to
comply with Oregon law; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn has completed a review and modification of its
system development charges in order to insure their compliance with Oregon law; and
WHEREAS, system development charges are charges incurred upon the election
to develop property at a specific use, density and/or intensity, and the incurred charge
equals, or is less than the actual cost of providing public facilities commensurate with the
needs of the chosen use, density, and or intensity; election of other uses, densities, and/or
intensities causes direct and proportional changes in the amount of the incurred charge; and
system development charges are separate from and in addition to any applicable tax,
assessment, charge, fee in lieu of assessment, or other fee provided by law or imposed as
a condition of development; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definitions. The following definitions apply:
(A) "Applicant" shall mean the owner or other person who applies for a building permit,
development permit, or connection to the City's water or sewer system.
(B) "Building" shall mean any structure, either temporary or permanent, built for the
support, shelter or enclosure of persons, chattels or property of any kind. This term shall
include tents, trailers, mobile homes or any vehicles serving in any way the function of a
building. This term shall not include temporary construction sheds or trailers erected to
assist in construction and maintained during the term of a building permit.
Page I - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
(C) "Building Permit" shall mean an official document or certificate authorizing the
construction or siting of any building. For purposes of this Ordinance, the term "Building
Permit" shall also include any construction or installation permits which may be required for
those structures or buildings, such as a mobile home, that do not require a building permit
in order to be occupied.
(D) "Capital Improvements" shall mean public facilities or assets used for any of the
following:
1) Water supply, treatment, storage, and transmission/conveyance;
2) Sewage collection/conveyance, treatment, and disposal; or
3) Park and recreation.
(E) "Citizen or Other Interested Person" shall mean any person who is a legal resident
of the City of Woodburn as evidenced by registration as a voter in the City, or by other proof
of residency; or a person who owns, occupies, or otherwise has an interest in real property
which is located within the City limits or is otherwise subject to the imposition of system
development charges, as outlined in Section (3) of this ordinance.
(F) "Development" shall mean a building or other land construction, or making a physical
change in the use of a structure or land, in a manner which increases the usage of any
capital improvements or which will contribute to the need for additional or enlarged capital
improvements.
(G) "Development Permit" shall mean an official document or certificate, other than a
building permit, authorizing development.
(H) "Dwelling Unit" shall mean a building or a portion of a building designed for
residential occupancy, consisting of one or more rooms which are arranged, designed or
used as living quarters for one family only.
(I) "Encumbered" shall mean monies committed by contract or purchase order in a
manner that obligates the City to expend the encumbered amount upon delivery of goods,
the rendering of services, or the conveyance of real property provided by a vendor, supplier,
contractor or Owner.
(J) "Improvement Fee" shall mean a fee fo~.r costs associates with capital improvements
to be constructed after the effective date or'this ordinance.
(K) "Owner" shall mean the person holding legal title to the real property upon which
development is to occur.
(L) "Person" shall mean an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an incorporated
association, or any other similar entity.
Page 2- COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
,/
(M)
"Qualified Public Improvement" shall mean a capital improvement that is:
1) Required as a condition of residential development approval;
2) Identified in the capital improvement plan adopted pursuant to Section (4)(D); and
3) Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of residential
development approval.
(N) "Reimbursement Fee" shall mean a fee for costs associated with capital
improvements already constructed or under construction on the effective date of this
ordinance.
(0) "System Development Charge" shall mean a reimbursement fee, an improvement fee,
or a combination thereof assessed or collected at the time of increased usage of a capital
improvement or issuance of a development permit, building permit or connection to the
capital improvement. System development charges are separate from and in addition to any
applicable tax, assessment, fee in lieu of assessment, or other fee or charge provided by
law or imposed as a condition of development. System development charges do not
include connection or hook-up fees that reimburse the City for the average cost of
inspecting and installing connections to water an sewer capital improvements.
(P) "System Development Charge Study" shall mean the study adopted pursuant to
Section (3)(B), as amended and supplemental pursuant to Section (3)(H).
Section 2. Rules of Construction. For the purposes of administration and
enforcement of this ordinance, unless otherwise stated in this ordinance, the following rules
of construction shall apply:
(A) In case of any difference of meaning or implication between the text of this ordinance
and ion, illustration, summary table, or illustrative table, the text shall control.
(B) The word "shall" is always mandatory and not discretionary; the word "may" is
permissive.
(C) Words used in the present tense shall include the future; words used in the singular
shall include the plural and the plural the singular, unless the context ctearly indicates the
contrary; and use of the masculine gender shall include the feminine gender.
(D) The phrase "used foP' includes "arranged for", "designed foP', "maintained for", or
"occupied for".
(E) Unless the context clearly indicates the contrary, where a regulation involves two or
more items, conditions, provisions, or events connected by the conjunction "and", "or" or
"either"...or", the conjunction shall be interpreted as follows:
1) "And" indicates that all the connected terms, conditions, provisions or events shall
apply.
Page 3 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
2) "Or" indicates that the connected items, conditions, or provisions or events may
apply singly or in any combination.
3) "Either...or" indicates that the connected items, conditions, provisions or events
shall apply singly but not in combination.
(F) The word "includes" shall not limit a term to the specific example, but is intended to
extend its meaning to all other instances or circumstances of like find or character.
Section 3. Imposition of System Development Charges. System development
charges are hereby imposed, subject to the following conditions.
(A) Development Subject to Charges. System development charges are imposed on all
development within the City for capital improvements for water, sewer, and parks and
recreation,. System development charges are imposed on any development outside the City
boundary for water and sewer capital improvements, if such development connects to or
otherwise uses the City's water or sewer systems. The system development charges shall
be paid in addition to all other fees, charges and assessments due for development, and
are intended to provide funds only for capital improvements necessitated by new
development.
(B) Rates of Charges:
1) The City hereby adopts and incorporates by reference the study entitled "System
Development Charges for Woodburn, Oregon", dated July 29, 1991, particularly the
assumptions, conclusions and findings in such study as to the determination of
anticipated costs of capital improvements required to accommodate growth and the
rates for system development charges to reimburse the City for such capital
improvements.
2) System development charges shall be imposed and calculated for the alteration,
expansion or replacement of a building or dwelling unit if such alteration, expansion
or replacement results in an increase in the use of capital improvements compared
to the present use of the development. The amount of the system development
charge to be paid shall be the difference between the rate for the proposed
development and the rate that would be imposed for the development prior to the
alteration, expansion or replacement.
3) The City shall, based upon the study referred to in subsection (1) above, adopt
by resolution the amounts of system development charges.
(C) Payment of Charges. Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, applicants for
building permits, development permits, or connection to City water or sewer systems shall
pay the applicable system development charges prior to the issuance of the permit or
connection by the city.
Page 4 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
(D) Alternative Rate Calculation. _Applicants may submit alternative rates for system
development charges, subject to the following conditions:
1) In the event an applicant believes that the impact on City capital improvements
resulting from his development is less than the fee established in Section (3)(B),
such applicant may submit a calculation of an alternative system development
charge to the City Council.
2) The alternative system development charges rate calculations shall be based on
data, information and assumptions contained in this ordinance and the adopted
system development charges study or an independent source, provided that the
independent source is a local study supported by a data base adequate for the
conclusions contained in such study performed pursuant to a generally accepted
methodology and based upon generally accepted standard sources of information
relating to facilities planning, cost analysis and demographics.
3) ff the City Council determines that the date, information and assumptions utilized
by the applicant to calculate the alternative system development charges rates
comply with the requirements of this Section by using a generally accepted
methodology, the alternative system development charges rates shall be paid in lieu
of the rates set forth in Section (3)(B).
4) If the City Council determines that the data. information and assumptions utilized
by the applicant to calculate the alternative system development charges rates do
not comply with the requirements of this Section or were not calculated by a
generally accepted methodology, then the City Council shall provide to the Applicant
(by certified mail, return receipt requested) written notification of the rejection of the
alternative system development charges rates and the reason therefor.
5) any applicant who has submitted a proposed alternative system development
charges rate pursuant to this Section and desires the immediate issuance of a
building permit, development permit, or connection shall pay the applicable system
development charges rates pursuant to Section (3)(B). Said payment shall be
deemed paid under "protest~' and shall not be construed as a waiver of any right of
review. Any difference between the amount paid and the amount due, as
determined by the Council, shall be refunded to the applicant.
(E) ~. The following developmerjt-shall be exempt from payment of the system
development charges:
1) Alterations, expansion or replacement of an existing dwelling unit where not
additional dwelling units are created and no change in use has occurred.
2) The construction of accessory buildings or structures which will not create
additional dwelling units and which do not create additional demands on the City's
capital improvements.
Page 5 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO,
3) The issuance of a permit for a mobile home installation on the property which
applicable system development charges have previously been made for such
installation as documented by receipts issued by the City for such prior payment.
4) Development with vested rights, determined in the following manner: Any owner
of land which was the subject of a building permit or development permit issued
prior to the effective date of this ordinance may petition the City for a vested rights
determination which would exempt the landowner from the provisions of this
ordinance. Such petition shall be evaluated in writing by the City Attorney and a
decision made by the City Council based on the following criteria:
a) The existence of a valid, unexpired permit issued by the City authorizing the
specific development for which a determination is sought;
b) Substantial expenditures or obligations made or incurred in reliance upon the
authorizing governmental act;
c) Other factors that demonstrate it is highly inequitable to deny the owner the
opportunity to complete the previously approved development under the
conditions of approval by requiring the owner to comply with the requirement of
this ordinance. For the purposes of this paragraph, the following factors shall be
considered in determining whether it is inequitable to deny the owner the
opportunity to complete the previously approved development:
(i) Whether the injury suffered by the owner outweighs the public cost of
allowing the development to go forward without payment of the system
development charges required by this ordinance; and
(ii) Whether the expenses or obligations for the development were made or
incurred prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
(F) Credits for Development contributions of Qualified Public Improvements. The City shall
grant a credit against the system development charges imposed pursuant to Section (3) (A)
and (B) for the donation of land as permitted by Ordinance 1807. or for the construction of,
any qualified public improvements. Such land donation and construction shall be subject
tO the approval of the City.
1) The amount of developer contribution credit to be applied shall be determined
according to the following standards of valuation:
a) The value of donated lands shall be based upon a written appraisal of fair
market value by a qualified and professional appraiser based upon comparable
sales of similar property between unrelated parties in a bargaining transaction;
and
b) The cost of anticipated construction of qualified public improvements shall be
based upon cost estimated certified by a professional architect or engineer.
Page 6-
COUNCILBILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
2) Prior to issuance of a building permit, development permit, or connection, the
applicant shall submit to the City Administrator a proposed plan and estimate of cost
for contributions of qualified public improvements. The proposed plan and estimate
shall include:
a) a designation of the development for which the proposed plan is being
submitted;
b) a legal description of any land proposed to be donated pursuant to Chapter
39 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 1807, and a written appraisal
prepared in conformity with subsection (1)(a) of this Section.
c) a list of the contemplated capital improvements contained within the plan;
d) an estimate of proposed construction costs certified by a professional
architect or engineer; and
e) a proposed time schedule for completion of the proposed plan.
3) the City Administrator shall determine if the proposed qualified public
improvement is:
a) Required as a condition of residential development approval;
b) Identified in the capital improvement plan adopted pursuant to Section 4(D);
and
c) Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of residential
development approval.
The decision of the City Administrator as to whether to accept the proposed plan of
contribution and the value of such contribution shall be in writing and issued within
fifteen (15) working days of the review. A copy shall be provided to the applicant.
4) Any applicant who submits a proposed plan pursuant to this Section and desires
the immediate issuance of a building permit, development permit, or connection,
shall pay the applicable system development charges. Said payment shall be
deemed paid under "protest" and shall not be construed as a waiver of any review
rights. Any difference between the amount paid the amount due, as determined by
the City Administrator, shall be refunded to the applicant. In no event shall a refund
by City under this subsection exceed the amount originally paid by the applicant.
Page 7 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
(G)
5) In the event the amount of developer contribution determined to be applicable
by the City Administrator pursuant to an approved plan of contribution exceeds the
total amount of system development charges due by the applicant, the City may
execute with the applicant an agreement for future reimbursement of the excess of
such contribution credit from future receipts by the City of other system development
charges. Such agreement of reimbursement shall be subject to City Council
(~oproval and not be for a period in excess of five years from the date of completion
of the approved plan of contribution and shall provide for a forfeiture of any
remaining reimbursement balance at the end of such frye year pedod.
Appeals and Review Hearin.qs.
1) An applicant who is required to pay system development charges shall have the
right to request a hearing to review the denial by the City Administrator of any of the
following:
a) A proposed credit for contribution of qualified public improvements
pursuant to Section (3)(F).
2) Such hearing shall be requested by the applicant within fifteen (15) days of the
date of first receipt of the denial by the City Administrator. Failure to request a
hearing within the time provided shall be deemed a waiver of such right.
3) The request for hearing shall be filed with the City Administrator and shall contain
the following:
a) The name and address of the applicant;
b) The legal description of the property in question;
c) If issued, the date the building permit, development permit, or connection was
issued;
d) A brief description of the nature of the development being undertaken
pursuant to the building permit, development permit, or connection;
e) If paid, the date the system development charges were paid; and
f) A statement of the reasons why the applicant is requesting the hearing.
4) Upon receipt of such request, the City Administrator shall schedule a hearing
before the City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting or a special meeting called
for the purpose of conducting the hearing and shall provide the applicant written
notice of the time and place of the hearing. Such hearing shall be held within forty-
five (45) days of the date the request for hearing was filed.
Page 8- COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
5) Such hearing shall be before the City Council and shall be conducted in a
manner designed to obtain all information and evidence relevant to the requested
hearing. Formal rules of civil procedures and evidence shall not be applicable;
however, the hearing shall be conducted in a fair and impartial manner with each
party having an opportunity to be heard and to present information and evidence.
6) Any applicant who requests a hearing pursuant to this Section and desires the
immediate issuance of a building permit, development permit, or connection shall
pay prior to or at the time the request for hearing is filed the applicable system
development charges pursuant to Section (3)(B). Said payment shall be deemed
paid under "protest" and shall not be construed as a waiver of any review rights.
7) An applicant may request a hearing under this Section without paying the
applicable system development charges, but no building permit, development permit,
or connection shall be issued until such system development charges are paid in the
amount initially calculated or the amount approved upon completion of the review
provided in this Section.
(H) Review of Study and Rates. This ordinance and the system development charges study
shall be reviewed at least once every four years. The review shall consider new estimates
of population and other socioeconomic data, changes in the cost of construction and land
acquisition, and adjustments to the assumptions, conclusions or findings set forth in the
study adopted by Section (3)(B). The purpose of this review is to evaluate and revise, if
necessary, the rates of the system development charges to assure that they do not exceed
the reasonably anticipated costs of the City's capital improvements. In the event the review
of the ordinance or the study alters or changes the assumptions, conclusions and findings
of the study, or alters or changes the assumptions, conclusions and findings of the study,
or alters or changes the amount of system development charges, the study adopted by
reference in Section (3)(B) shall be amended and updated to reflect the assumptions,
conclusions and findings of such reviews and Section (3)(B) shall be amended to adopt by
reference such updated studies.
Section 4. Receipt and Expenditure of System Development Charges.,
(A) Trust Accounts. The City hereby establishes a separate trust account for each type of
system development charge to be designated as the 'Water SDC Account", the "Sewer SDC
Account", and the "Parks and Recreation SDC Account", which shall be maintained separate
and apart from all other accounts of the City. All system development charge payments
shall be deposited into the appropriate trust account immediately upon receipt.
(B) Use of System Development Char.qes, The monies deposited into the trust accounts
shall be used solely for the purpose of providing capital improvements necessitated by
development, including, but not limited to:
1) design and construction plan preparation;
2) permitting and fees;
Page 9- COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
3) land and materials acquisition, including any costs "of acquisition or
condemnation;
4) construction of improvements and structures;
5) design and construction of new drainage facilities required by the construction
of capital improvements and structures;
6) relocating utilities required by the construction of improvements and structures;
7) landscaping;
8) construction management and inspection;
9) surveying, soils and material testing;
10) acquisition of capital equipment;
11) repayment of monies transferred or borrowed from any budgetary fund of the
City which were used to fund any of the capital improvements as herein provided;
12) payment of principal and interest, necessary reserves and costs of issuance
under any bonds or other indebtedness issued by the City to fund capital
improvements;
13) direct costs of complying with the provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314,
including the costs of developing system development charges methodologies and
providing an annual accounting of system development charges expenditures.
(C) Prohibited Uses of System Development Charges. Funds on deposit in system
development charge trust accounts shall not be used for:
1) any expenditure that would be classified as a routine maintenance or repair
expense; or
2) costs associated with the construction of administrative office facilities that are
more than an incidental part of other capital improvements.
(D) Capital Improvements Authorized to be Financed by System Development Charges.
Any capital improvement being funded wholly or in part with system development charges
revenue shall be included in the City's capital improvement program. The capital
improvement program shall:
1) list the specific capital improvement projects that may be funded with system
development charges revenue;
Page 10- COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
2) provide the cost of each capital improvement project, and an estimate of the
amounts of each revenue source, including system development charges, that will
be used to fund each project;
3) provide the estimated timing of each capital improvement project; and
4) be updated at least once every four years.
(E) Investment of Trust Account Revenue. Any funds on deposit in system development
charges trust accounts which are not immediately necessary for expenditure shall be
invested by the City. All income derived from such investments shall be deposited in the
system development charges trust accounts and used as provided herein.
(F) Refunds of System Development Charges. System development charges shall be
refunded in accordance with the following requirements:
1) An applicant or owner shall be eligible to apply for a refund if:
a) The building permit, development permit or connection has expired and the
development authorized by such permit is not complete; or
b) The system development charges have not been expended or encumbered
prior to the end of the fiscal year immediately following the ninth anniversary of
the date upon which such charges were paid. For the purposes of this Section,
system development charges collected shall be deemed to be expended or
encumbered on the basis of the first system development charges in shall be the
first system development charges out.
2) The application for refund shall be filed with the City Administrator and contain
the following:
a) The name and address of the applicant;
b) The location of the property which was the subject of the system development
charges;
c) A notarized sworn statement that the petitioner is the then current owner of
the property on behalf of which the system development charges were paid,
including proof of ownership, such as a certified copy of the latest recorded
deed;
d) the date the system developr~ent charges were paid;
e) A copy of the receipt of payment for the system development charges; and,
if appropriate,
f) The date the building permit, development permit, or connection was issued
and the date of expiration.
Page 11 -COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
3) The application shall be filed within ninety (90) days of the expiration of the
building permit, development permit, or connection, or within ninety (90) days of the
end of the fiscal year following the sixth anniversary of the date upon which the
system development charges were paid. Failure to timely apply for a refund of the
system development charges shall waive any right to a refund.
4) Within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a petition for refund, the City
Administrator will advise the petitioner of the status of the request for refund, and if
such request is valid, the system development charges shall be returned to the
petitioner.
5) A building permit, development permit, or connection which is subsequently
issued for a development on the same property which was the subject of a refund
shall pay the systems development charges as required by Section (3).
(G) Annual Accountin~ Reports. The City shall prepare an annual report accounting for
system development charges, including the total amount of system development charges
revenue collected in each trust account, and the capital improvement projects that were
funded.
(H) Challen.qe of Expenditures. Any citizen or other interested person (as defined in
Section (1)(F) may challenge an expenditure of system development charges revenues.
1) Such challenge shall be submitted, in writing, to the City Administrator for review
within two years following the subject expenditure, and shall include the following
information:
a) the name and address of the citizen or other interested person challenging
the expenditure;
b) The amount of the expenditure, the project, payee or purpose, and the
approximate date on which it was made; and
c) the reason why the expenditure is being challenged.
2) If the City Administrator determines that the expenditure was not made in
accordance with the provisions of this ordinance and other relevant laws, a
reimbursement of system development charges trust account revenues from other
revenue sources shall be made within.one year following the determination that the
expenditures were not appropriate. *'
3) The City Administrator shall make written notification of the results of the
expenditure review to the citizen or other interested person who requested the
review within ten (10) days of completion of the review.
Page 12-
COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
Section 5. Severability. If any clause, section or provision of this ordinance shall
be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason or cause, the remaining portion of said
ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be valid as if such invalid portion thereof had
not been incorporated herein.
Approved as to form: Is/ N. Robert Shields
City Attorney
Date
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
APPROVED:
Fred W. Kyser, Mayor
A'I-rEST:
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
SYSDEV.ORO
Page 13 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
COUNCIL BILL NO. / -~ ~ 7
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SE'I-rING THE AMOUNTS OF SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
WHEREAS, ORS 223.297 - 223.314 authorizes local governments to impose
system development charges; and
WHEREAS, the City completed a review and modification of its system
development charges in order to insure compliance with Oregon law; and
WHEREAS, the City passed Ordinance 2070 establishing system development
charges for water, sewer, and parks and recreation facilities and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 2070 provides that the amounts of system development
charges be set by resolution; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The schedule of system development charges for recreation and parks
attached as Exhibit "A" and, by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.
Section 2. The schedule of system development charges for water and sewer
attached as Exhibit "B" and, by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby adopted.
Approved as to form:
/s/ N. Robert Shields
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page I -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
EXHIBIT IIA|I
WOODBURN RECREATION AND PARKS
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
FOUR-YEAR PHASING PLAN
FROM THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 2070
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1992:
TYPE OF UNIT
Single Family - Detached
Single Family - Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
SDC CHARGE PER UNIT
268.10
264.20
273.00
213.00
JANUARY 1, 1993 - DECEMBER 31, 1993:
Single Family - Detached
Single Family - Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
JANUARY 1, 1994 - DECEMBER 31, 1994:
Single Family - Detached
Single Family - Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
FROM JANUARY 1, 1995
UNTIL MODIFIED BY RESOLUTION:
Single Family - Detached
Single Family - Attached
Multi-Family
Mobile Home
339.90
334.90
346.10
270.20
411.40
405.40
418.90
327.00
483.20
476.10
492.10
384.09
EXHIBIT "B"
WATER:
For Single Family Residence
1st Year* Jan 1, 1993 Jan 1, 1994- 4th Year**
Dec 31, 1993 Dec 31, 1994
Charge per gallon: (flow)
$ 3.50/gal. $ 4.00/gal. $ 4.50/gal. $ 5.00/gal.
S/gal x no. of people/house x gal/capita:
(2.69) (108)
$1016 $1162 $1307 $1452
All residential units, i.e., single family detached/attached and multi-family units are placed in one
category for the system development charges. The mobile home park units utilize 2.17 people per
unit for the determination of charge. The non-residential units will be based on the estimated flow.
SEWER:
For Single Family Residence
Charge per gallon: (flow)
$ 4.50/gal. $ 6.25/gal. $ 8.00/gal. $ 9.75/gal.
S/gal x no. people/house x gal/capita:
(2.69) (108)
$1307 $1815 $ 2324 $ 2832
All residential units, i.e. single family detached/attached and multi-family units are place in one
category for the system development charges. The mobile home park units utilize 2.17 people for
the determination of charge. The non-residential units will be based on the estimated flows.
* From adoption of Ordinance 2070 through December 31, 1992
** From January 1, 1995 until modified by resolution
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through Acting City Administrator
Public Works Director '~ I~--~-~-~----.,-----
Storm Drain Contract Award
September 5, 1991
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the city council, after reviewing the facts,
determine On-Line Construction to be the Iow responsible bidder and accordingly award the
contract as outlined in Attachment 1. A proposed resolution has been prepared for your
consideration.
BACKGROUND: This proposed storm drain project is to provide service to HWI property and
also help resolve the future Hwy 214 drainage problem. The funding for this project is mostly
shared by the property owner/HWI and the Oregon State Highway Department. The property
owner/HWI is funding $45,000 of the project cost, the balance will be paid by the city initially and
then next year it is planned to be charged back to Hwy 214 widening cost. There have been
more administrative problems on this project than engineering problems.
After resolving the easement problems, the City prepared contract documents and advertised
for bids having two pipe material options, one being CMP (corrugated metal pipe) and the
second being the standard concrete pipe.
The bids were received and opened on August 9, 1991 at 10:00 a.m. After bids were analyzed
by the engineering staff it was determined that concrete pipe, having the longer life, should be
chosen.
The contract bids tabulation for concrete pipe option is outlined below:
Sched B
Contractor Concrete
1- On-Line Construction 73,245.80
2- Pipe Tech, Inc. 86,233.00
3- CEMS, Inc. $89,348.00
4- Bob's Backhoe 102,940.80
(Low bidder)
Soon after the bid information became public, the second bidder on the list, namely Pipe Tech,
Inc., protested the contract award possibility to On-Line Construction stating that On-Line
Construction was not a responsive bidder. The objection is best stated by their attorney in
Attachment 2. Two objections which Pipe Tech's attorney is making for trying to disqualify the
first bidder, On-Line Construction, are as follows:
1. The addendum was not acknowledged by On-Line Construction because they were not
attached to and returned with the bid document.
2. The location of the contractor's principal office is not written in on page six of the bid
document.
In regard to the objection on the addendum acknowledgment issue: The contract document
bid item 5(c) was corrected by the first bidder, namely On-Line Construction, indicating that the
contractor has been in possession of the last addendum. Also, On-Line Construction did
acknowledge to Mr. Morrison on phone that they have received all addenda. Later Mr. Morrison
asked the contractor to send the copies of addenda as acknowledged on the phone. The letter
from On-Line Construction along with copies of addenda are enclosed for your reference as
Attachment 3.
In regard to the objection on not writing the location of principal offices, this is not required by
our contract documents on page six. The city contract document requires the name of the
principal officer or partner on page six. The contractor did provide his address on page two,
as required by the document.
Discussion with City Attorney: After receiving the protest, the award date was postponed and
discussion with the City Attorney took place. It was the opinion of the City Attorney that On-Line
Construction has substantially complied with the requirements of the contract and, therefore,
should be considered to be Iow bidder for concrete pipe. After we conveyed this information
to the second bidder, Pipe Tech, Inc., we received their request to allow additional time to review
the case.
The attorney hired by Pipe Tech, Inc. wrote us on August 29, 1991 stating his opinion in favor
of awarding the contract to Pipe Tech, Inc. and not to On-Line Construction. A copy of this
opinion is enclosed for your reference as Attachment 2.
On September 3, 1991, the City Attorney, Acting City Administrator, and Public Works Director
met and determined that On-Line Construction has substantially met the contract document
requirements and thus should be considered as Iow bidder. Also, as a Iow bidder, the contract
award decision should be made in favor of On-Line Construction.
Urgency for Project Completion: I would like to inform the council that this project is
necessary to transport storm water from HWI property to the Senecal Creek. HWI has already
completed its internal storm water system and has brought a storm water pipe to Hwy 214. And
according to the developmental agreement between the property owner/HWI and the city, this
portion of the drain pipe needs to be constructed.
The project has already been delayed because of protest by the second bidder. There may be
some liability involved if HWI business suffers because of pavement damage by ponding of
storm water.
GST:Ig
Attachments: 1. Bid tabulation memo by Mr. Morrison
2. Opinion: Pipe Tech, Inc.'s attorney
3. Addenda: On-Line Construction confirmation
4. Time Extension: On-Line Construction letter
SENANARD.CC
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through Acting City Administrator
Assistant City Engineer
Willow to Senecal Creek Storm Drain
August 23, 1991
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that On-Line Construction, Iow bidder for concrete schedule, be awarded the
contract for construction of subject storm drain, in the amount of $73,245.80.
BACKGROUND:
The bid schedules and plans for this project outlined two materials that could be used for
construction of the work, namely, corrugated metal pipe and concrete. The aim was to arrive
at lowest possible price in each option.
A portion of this project will be allocated to state grant for widening Hwy 214. City of Woodburn
is involved with design and construction inspection, and $45,000 is provided by the owners of
Davidson Farms.
The list of bidders and their bid amounts is as follows:
Sched A Sched B
Contractor CMP Concrete
1- CEMS, Inc. $69,694.00 $89,348.00
2- On-Line Construction 70,171.30 73,245.80
3- Pipe Tech, Inc. 82,411.00 86,233.00
4- Bob's Backhoe 89,040.80 102,940.80
Corrugated metal pipe option bid price:
$69,694.00
Concrete pipe option bid price:
73,245.80
Difference: $ 3,551.80
The difference between options, lowest bidders, is $3,551.80. It is believed that concrete will
afford longer life and, for the difference in cost, it is in the best interest of the City to select
concrete.
On-Line Construction is the Iow bidder in the concrete option with their bid of $73,245.80.
DN:[g
SENSTORN .
A'n'ACHMENT 1
fiUG729-91THU 16:13
P. 02
2.~5 Union Street
Salem,
(503) 585-2255
Portland Office:
Bank of California, Suite 1410
707 S.~L Xl;/L~OO Street
Portland, Or~gon 97205-3531
(,S05) 224-1490
Churchill, Leonard, Brown & Donaldson
P.O. B(~c 804
Salem, Oregon 97308-0804
August 29, 1991
· N. Robert Shields
City Attorney
270 Montgomery Street
Woodbu rn, OR 9707]
via Telefax #982-5244
John D. Albert
Douglas C, Brown
Michael Duaue Bro~'n
T.W. Churchill
Paul ILJ. Cormolly
Gordon IL Hanna
Richard L Henctrie, 31:
~ H, Leonard
Paul C Lodinc*
Krbxan Mitchell
Mauric~ L l~,us$clL II
Jeffr? n. W~lkLrtson
· ~l~o ada~ittcd ~o
Dear Mr. Shields'
I appreciate the City's cooperation in allowing me to fully state Pipe
Tech, Inc.'s position regarding the bid dispute on the Willow Street project.
The remainder of this letter is a discussion of Pipe Tech's legal position
which, in my opinion, mandates awarding the contract to Pipe Tech.
A. Governing La~w
The City of Woodburn is bound by the terms of ORS 279.011 e_~t _seq.
ORS 279.011 et. seq. applies to all public agencies, A public agency is
defined as follows:
"Public agency" or "public contracting agency" means any agency
of the State of Oregon or any political subdivision thereof
authorized by law to enter into public contracts . .
ORS 279.011 (5).
A public contract is defined as:
any-purchase, lease or sale by a public agency of personal
property, public improvements or services other than agreements
which are for personal service.
ORS 279.011 (4).
The City of Woodburn is a political subdivision of the State of Oregon
and is authorized by law to enter into public contracts. The Willow Street
storm drain is a contract for the purchase of improvements. Therefore, the
City is governed by all the requirements of ORS 279.011 et. seq. Generally,
that statute requires that all public contracts be awarded based upon a
competitive bid process. ORS 279.015(1).
1. Limitations on the Award of Public Contracts.
ORS 279.029 places 'specific limitations on public agencies when
awarding public contracts. It provides'
ATTACHMENT 2-4
RUG-29-9t~THU 16:14
P. 03
N. Robert Sheilds
August 28, 1991
Page 2
After the bids are opened as required by ORS 279.027, and after
a determination is made that a contract is to be awarded, the
public contracting agency shall award the contract to the lowest
responsible bidder.
ORS 279.015(1). (Emphasis.added.)
The "lowest responsible bidder" is defined as follows:
the lowest bidder who has substantially complied with all
prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements and who
has not been disqualified by the public contracting agency under
ORS 279.037.
ORS 279.029(6) (a).
So far as can be ascertained, the City of Woodburn has no prescribed
public bidding procedures or requirements enacted by ordinance. Thus, the
only prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements applicable to the
Willow Street project are those contained in the Invitation to Bid.
2. The Invitation to Bid's Procedures and Requirements.
The Invitation to Bid contains two clauses which are pertinent to
this dispute. They are as follows:
The bidder shall sign his proposal in the blank space provided
therein. Proposals made by corporatioris or partnerships shall
contain names and addresses of the principal officers or partners.
If the Proposal is made by a corporation, it must be acknowledged
by one of the principal officers thereof; if made by a partnership,
by one of the partners.
(Contract documents, Invitat~or~. to Bid, page 1, paragraph 4.)
12. ADDENDA- Any addenda issued during the time of bidding,
or forming a part of the Contract Documents loaned to the bidder
for the preparation of his proposal, shall be covered in the
proposal, and shall be made a part of the contract. Receipt of
each addendum shall be acknowledged in the proposal.
(Contract documents, Invitation to Bid, page 3, the first
paragraph numbered 12.)
A'I-i'ACHMENT
~UG729-9[ THU 16:14
P. 04
/,Od_..
N. Robert 5heilds
August 28, 1991
Page 3
The original Iow bidder on this project was CEMS, Inc. Their bid was
immediately rejected as non-responsive. Thus, for our purposes, the first
bidder on the Willow Street project, On-Line Construction, did not comply
with the requirements stated above. On-Line failed'to state on its submittal
the location of its principal offices or sign and acknowledge receipt of the
addendums to the contract documents. Ultimately, the question is whether
On-Line's bid substantially complied with the Invitation to Bid's prescribed
procedures and requirements and, if not, whether the City can waive the
defects.
B. The City'_s_ Right to Waive Defects.
As you know, the City reserved the right to waive informalities and
irregularities in proposals. (Contract documents, Invitation to Bid, page 3,
paragraph 11). However, the City's power to waive irregularities is limited
by the definition of responsible Iow bidder contained in ORS 27g.029(6)(a),
that is, one who has substantially complied with the procedures and
requirements, and the mandate of ORS 27g.02g which provides that the City
shall award the contract only to the responsible Iow bidder. ORS
279.029(6)(a). The question, then, is whether On-Line's bid is in substantial
compliance notwithstanding its undisputed defects.
C. On Line's Bid Does not Substantially Comply.
While Oregon lacks the wealth of case law available under federal
contract disputes, there is at least one Oregon decision which sheds some
light on the meaning of material defect. I n
Smith Tu9 v. Columbia-Pac Towin51, 250 Or 612, 443 P2d 205 (1968), the
Oregon Supreme Court held that where a high bidder on a public contract to
sell realty conditioned its bid on being able to perform certain improvements,
and the invitation to bid did not include that condition, the bid was
non-responsive and should have been rejected on the grounds that it did not
substantially comply with the Invitation to Bid. Id. at 639-640. The Court
noted that the condition may have altered the bidder's risk and was thus
inherently unfair. Here, On-Line's-'lCailure to acknowledge the addendum
materially changed its risk by creating possible legal defenses to On-Line's
obligation to perform to work under the addendum. One defense is that of
integration.
The contract documents are an integrated contract. The effect of an
integrated contract is to preyent extrinsic evidence of the parties intentions
or understandings which are not expressed in the documents themselves.
On-Line could, at some point in the future, disavow any knowledge of the
addendums or obligation to perform the work under them, and the only
evidence of On-Line's acceptance of the work under the addendums would be
ATTACHMENT
THO 16:1
P. 05
N. Robert Sheilds
August 28, 1991
Page 4
inadmissible extrinsic evidence. Thus, by failing to acknowledge the
addendums, On-Line has, albeit inadvertently, created a defense to enforcing
its obligation under the contract, potentially reduced its obligation under the
contract relative to bidders who acknowledged the addendums and exposed the
City to a possible future dispute over the scope of the work.
If this were a federal contract, there would scarcely be a dispute. It is
well established under federal procurement rules that failure to acknowledge
an addendum requires rejection of a bid as non-responsive. Of course, the
federal rules do not apply unless the project is utilizing federal money (a fact
of which I am not aware), but they are nevertheless persuasive authority in
the absence of extensive state law.
The bottom line is that On-Line's bid does not substantially comply with
the Invitation to Bids' procedures and requirements. Accordingly, pursuant
to ORS 279.029(1), the City must award the contract to the lowest responsible
bidder. That is Pipe Tech, Inc.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
response.
S i.r
~erely,
I look forward to your
/Wilkinson
JBWl0:vap5
cc: Pipe Tech, Inc.
A1-FACHMENT 24
J~-~LINE CONSTRUCTION C,,O,
3555 Blossom Drive N.E.
Salem, Oregon 97305
RECEIVED SEP 0
(503) 390-5000
FAX: (503) 390.0513
August 30, 1991
CITY OF WOODBURN
PUBLIC Works Department
Mr. Frank Tiwari, Director
270 Montgomery
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
Re: STORM DRAIN, WILLOW AVE. TO SENECAL CREEK;
Project # 900063-3, Bid # 92-02
Dear Sir:
Please find enclosed copies of addendums #1 through 3.
Please note that the receipt dates are stamped or printed on the
documents and were in fact received on these dates.
If we may be of further assistance in this matter please advise.
Respectfully,
Bill Heron
ON-LINE CONSTRUCTION CO.
BH/jm
ATrACHMENT 3-4
CtTY OF WOODBURN
AUGUST 7, 1991
ADDENDUM #3
Project #900063-3
Bid #92-02
STORM DRAIN, WILLOW AVE. TO SENECAL CREEK
The purpose cf this addendum is to correct the following:
On page 3 of the "Bid Proposal", iterr,~ 5c, the unit should read
To:
I:'Z.X'
ATTACHMENT 3o
CITY OF WOODBURN
AUGUST 6, 1991
ADDENDUM #2
Project #900063-3
Bid #92-02
STORM DRAIN, WILLOW AVE. TO SENECAL CREEK
The purpose of this addendum is to clarify two points:
Referring to concrete pipe, page 4 of Special Provisions and Page 4
of drawing sheets, Pad No. 41.
Referring to Drawing Sheet 4, part number 41; what is intended is
under the "Specification" heading.
Page 4 - Special Provisions - calls out "meet criteria ASTM C76" and
"Reinforced". This was intended to allow equivalent 4-1/4" wall pipe,
ASTM C14 class 3, non-reinforced.
f
Part No. 12, backfill for corrugated pipe, and Part No. 42, backfill for
concrete pipe, should read 95% compaction (not 90%).
Page 1 of drawing sheets has a note on plan view near station 0+72
'which refers to "option manhole only if bore alignment is to be used."
This should read "option manhole---if arch pipe---used."
A'ri'ACHMENT
CITY OF WOODBURN
AUGUST 2, 1991
ADDENDUM #1
Project #900063-3
Bid #92-02
STORM DRAIN, WILLOW AVE, TO SENECAL CREEK
The purpose of this addendum is to allow another type of joint banding for
corrugated pipe option.
Referring to drawing sheet no. 4, part numbers 14, 15, 16 (O-ring gaskets,
semi-corrugated bands, bolts and nuts); another banding system identified
as corrugated band with sleeve gasket and equivalent bolts and nuts may
be substituted.
,, !
ATTACHMENT 34
O'-~LI~E CONSTRUCTION CO,
3555 Blossom Drive N.E.
Salem, Oregon 97305
/DE..
(503) 390-5000
FAX: (503) 390-0513
August 30, 1991
CFI'Y OF WOODBURN
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
Mr. Frank Tiwari, Director
270 Montgomery
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
Re: STORM DRAIN, WILLOW AVE. TO SENECAL CREEK
Project # 900063-3, Bid # 92-02
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to your offices request, we hereby acknowledge and accept
an additional 10 day delay beyond the 30 days allowed in the
proposal and contract documents for the above referenced project.
Respectfully,
Bill Heron
ON-LINE CONSTRUCTION CO.
BH/jm
A'I-rACHMENT 4
COUNCIL BILL NO. l ~,~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT ON A STORM DRAIN FROM WILLOW
AVENUE TO SENECAL CREEK.
WHEREAS, the City solicited bids for the construction of a storm drain from Willow
Avenue to Senecal Creek (Project No. 900063-3, Bid No. 92-02); and
WHEREAS, bids were solicited, received, and evaluated pursuant to Oregon State
Law and the City's bidding procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has recommended that the contract be
awarded to On-Line Construction as the lowest responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, Pipe Tech, Inc. has protested the bid and maintains that On-Line
Construction's bid did not substantially comply with all prescribed public bidding
procedures; and
WHEREAS, the City delayed awarding the contract so that Pipe Tech's bid protest
could be fairly evaluated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the matter prior to awarding the
contract; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council incorporates into the record all bid documents
relevant to the construction of a storm drain from Willow Avenue to Senecal Creek
(Project No. 900063-3, Bid No. 92-02) including the three addenda dated August 2, 1991,
August 6, 1991 and August 7, 1991.
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the bid submitted to complete the project
by On-Une Construction is the lowest responsible bid.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds that time is of the essence in that the storm
drain improvement must be completed b~/'the close of this construction season to enable
the City to comply with its project commitment for industrial development in the southwest
quadrant of the I-5 Interchange.
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION 4. The City Council acknowledges the arguments made by Pipe Tech,
Inc., but finds that the bid submitted by On-Line Construction is in substantial compliance
with all prescribed bidding procedures and requirements.
Specifically, the City Council finds that the information added by the three addenda were
mere clarifications of the bid documents and did not represent any significant change in
the scope or nature of the project.
SECTION 5. The City Council finds that any informalities or irregularities in the bid
submitted by On-Line Construction are not material and are hereby waived.
SECTION 6. Based upon the findings previously made, and the fact that On-Line
Construction is the lowest responsible bidder and is in substantial compliance with the
bidding procedures and requirements, the City Council awards the contract to construct
a storm drain from Willow Avenue to Senecal Creek (Project No. 900063-3, Bid No. 92-02)
to On-Line Construction.
Approved as to form:~'"~/~ · r~/~- ~
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
MEMO TO:
FROM :
DATE :
SUBJECT:
City Council
Fred W. Kyser, Mayor.,~.~/~['
1'
September 3, 1991
Appointment of City Recorder
Recommendation:
City Council approve the appointment of Mary Tennant as City Recorder for the City of
Woodburn.
Background:
Following the retirement of Barney Burris as Finance Director/City Recorder in April 1989,
former City Administrator Quinn appointed Mary Tennant as Recorder pro-tem. This
appointment was made under the authority of Section 23 of the City Charter.
As of this date, the City has not officially appointed an individual to the position of City
Recorder. In accordance with Section 21 of the Charter, I am appointing Mary Tennant
as City Recorder and request your consent of this appointment.
COUNCIL BILL NO. J,~ ~ /
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION RECLASSIFYING SALARY RANGES FOR CERTAIN CITY
EMPLOYEES AND MODIFYING THE SALARY RANGE/STEP SYSTEM FOR FUTURE
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1063 established the 1991-92 Non-Union
Employee Compensation plan which included a range/step plan for all non-union and
executive management employees; and
WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the City Council under the City Charter
to establish compensation levels for said positions; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary to adjust salary ranges for certain city
employees due to increased responsibility levels and adjustments due to external
compatibility factors relating to salary and fringe benefits; now, therefore,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
salary range schedule:
Position
That the following positions be upgraded within the existing
Change From: Change To:
Ran.cie/Step Range/Step
Public Works Director
City Recorder (Admn. Specialist)
Executive Secretary
M-29.5 (E) M-30.5 (E)
18.0 (E) 19.0 (E)
13.0 (E) 14.0 (E)
Section 2. That salary levels for all newly appointed Executive Management
employees be set by the Council within a minimum and maximum range level which is
established during the job recruitment process. Salary adjustments will be considered
every 12 months from the date of hire, however, adjustments will only be given based on
merit performance with the approval of the Council.
Section 3. That current Executive Management employees under the
established 5 step/5% increase range sch6dule will continue to receive a step increase
on his/her anniversary date provided that the overall job performance meets or exceeds
the minimum standard. The City Administrator will recommend the granting or denial of
a step increase to the City Council, who in turn, will give final approval of the salary
increase.
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
1, 1991.
Section 4.
That the adjustments listed in Section I be retroactive to July
Approved as to form.
City Attorney
Date
APPROVED
FRED W. KYSER, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
A'I-rEST
Mary Tennant, Deputy Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
, , IoE
WOODBURN ?OLICE DEPARTMENT
270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 .982-2345
.Ken Wright.
Chief of Police
DATE:
TO: ~
. Ken Wright, Chief of Police
:
Fred Kyser, Acting City Administrator
September 5, 1991
Mayor and City Council
SUBJECT: 9-1-1 Radio Console
As Lt. Null stated in his August 21st memo, this is the first of several requests
for purchase of Communications Center equipment and technology upgrade.
The 9-1~1 Director has accomplished the required bid process and received two
bids. One from Motorola Radio Corporation for $103,790 and Moducom Inc. for
$78,750. Both bids met the specifications set forth.
The 9-1-1 Committee recommends the purchase to be made from Moducom Inc. (1)
They were the Iow bidder and, (2) by utilizing Moducom, the City will be able to
save approximately $25,000. We have utilized Moducom equipment for the past ten
years and have found it to preform very satisfactorily.
I have included excerpts from the 9-1-1 Director's reports for your information.
I will be available for questions.
Recommend Purchase:
Moduc0m Inc.
13309 Saticoy Street
North Hollywood~ California 91605
Communications Radio Dispatch Console
Budget Fund 31-315-71009
$78,750
KLW/ils
~6/91
ATE
CHK NO
A/P CHECK LISTING
VENDOR
AMOUNT
PAGE 1
DESCRIPTION
01/~1 11001
01/91 11002
01/91 11003
01/91 11004
01/91 11005
02/91 11006
05191 11007
05/91 11008
05/91 11 O09
05/91 11010
05/91 11011
08/91 11012
09/91 11013
09/91 11014
10/91 11015
10/91 11016
10/91 11017
11/91 11015
11/91 11~19
11/91 11020
11/91 11021
11/91 11022
12191 11023
12/91 11024
12/91 11025
15/91 11026
15/91 11027
16/91 11028
16/91 11029
16/91 11030
16/91 11031
16/91 11032
18/91 11 033
18/91 11034
19/91 11035
19/91 11036
19/91 11037
22/91 11038
22/91 11 039
24/91 11040
24/91 11041
24/91 11042
24/91 11043
Z4/91 11044
24/91 11045
24191 11046
24/91 11047
Z5/91 11046
Z5/91 11049
Z5/91 11 050
75/91 11051
.~5/91 11052
.)6/91 11053
>.6/91 11054
~.6/91 11055
CHASE MANHATTEN BANK
CEDE & CO.
SECURITY PACIFIC CLEARING
LEE SOWERS
POSTAGE BY PHONE
D.G. BRACKENBROUGH
DAVE WHITEHEAD CONST.
U.S. BANK
DON EUBANK
U.S. POST OFFICE
U.S. BANK
TERRY WILLIAMS
P,T. HOOD RAILROA~
FIRST INTERSTATE 9ANK
SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE SANK
T£RRY RICHARDSON CONSULTI
P~wV COUNCIL OF GVMTS
FIRST INTERSTATE ~ANK
TERRY ~ILLiAMS
CITY OF WOODBURN
US POST OFFICE
CAN~Y POCL & SPA
US BANK
BANK OF AMERICA
kOODEURN CHAMBER OF COMME
JERRY DAUGHERTY
U. $. BANK
CHASE MAk HATTAN
JOHN M. FOX ENTERPRISES
JEFFREY POGOLOWITZ & ASSO
BLUE RIBBON JANITORIAL SE
U.S POST OFFICE
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
~ECURITY PACIFIC ~ANK
US :3ANK
FIER II
ASTORIA ~ARITIME MUSEUM
THE CHAR BURGER
COLUF, BI A STERNWHEELER
TERRY RICHARDSON
J.A. FREEMAN ~ SON
BRIAN SJOTHUN
FIRST INTERSTATE ~ANK
TERRY RICHARDSON CONS.
~MERICAN RED CROSS
AMERICAN RED CROSS
~. OODGURN LANES
SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
U.S POST OFFICE
VOID
VOID
VOID
3,088.02 BONDS****
10,447.50 BONDS ****
115,~00.00 BONDS ****
540.00 BONDS ****
175.00 BONDS ****
800.00 SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
11.772.00 SERVICES - PW
17,~83.00 SERVICES - PW- HOUS. REH
1,576.25 BONDS ****
5,COO.GO INV. - PD
257.83 SERVICES- WTR
132.50 BONDS ****
18.00 SUPPLIES - PARKS
70.G0 SERVICES - PARKS
1~5.00 ~ONDS ****
397.50 BONDS ****
2,1 60.00 BONDS ****
2.100.00 I~AINT. - VARIOUS
1-500.00 CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT
540.00 BONDS ****
266.10 REIMBURSEMENT - PARKS
160.18 PETTY CASH ***
140.33 PERMIT - WTR
31.95 SUPPLIES - PARKS
530.00 6ONDS ****
28.760.00 PIR TSF *
250.00 DUES
265.00 80N~S ****
1,340.~0 BONDS ****
265.00 BONDS ****
6,770.00 SERVICES - PW HS REHAB
1,713.50 SERVICES - PW HS REHAB
385.00 SERVICES - WWTP
155.~2 P~RMIT - ~TR
675.00 BONDS ****
128.12 BONDS ****
662.60 bONDS ****
21.00 SUPPLIES - PARKS
60.00 FEES - PARKS
21.00 MEALS - PARKS
298.50 TICKETS- PARKS
39.95 SUPPLIES- STREET
125.00 SUPPLIES - PARKS
348.48 STMTS FOR BUS LICENSES
192.00 TICKETS- PARKS
256.24 BONDS ****
137.50 MAINTENANCE- COMPUTER
45.00 CLASS- PARKS
25.00 CLASS - PARKS
110.00 RENTAL- PARKS
135.00 BONDS ****
159.49 PERMIT - WTR
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 V 0 I D
.)6191
CHK NO
AlP CHECK LISTING
VENDOR
AMOUNT
PAGE
DESCRIPTION
114
-~6/91 11056
20/91 11057
-~6/91 11058
a0/91 11059
26/91 11060
~6/91 11 061
2.6/91
2.6/91 11063
;)6/91 11064
;)6/91 11065
2.6/91 11066
~6/91 11067
~6191 11068
~6/gl 11069
26/91 11070
~6/91 11071
26/91 11
Z6/91 11
~6/91 1107~
~6/91 11075
~6/91 11070
~6/91 11
~6/91 11078
Z6/91
26/91 11080
~6/91 110~
~6/91 1108~
~6/91 11086
~6/~1 11085
~6/91 11086
Z6/91 11087
R6/91 110~8
~6/91 11089
~6/S1 11090
~6/91 11091
~6/91 1109~
~6/91 11093
~6/91 1109~
~6/91 11095
Z6/91 11
~6/91 11097
~6/91 11098
~6/91 11
~6/91 11100
~6/S1 11101
~6/91 1110Z
~6/91 11103
~6/~1 1110~
~6/91 1110~
~6/91 11107
'.6/S 1 11108
',6/91 1111~
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
~OID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
~OID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
~GID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOiD
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
O.OO VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
O.O0 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
0.'00 VOID
0.00 VOID
ATE
CHK NO
A/P CHECK LISTING
VENDOR
AMOUNT
PAGE
DESCRIPTION
3
26/91 11111
26/91 11112
26/91 11115
26/91 11114
26/91 11115
26/91 11116
26/91 11117
26/91 11118
20/91 11119
26/91 11120
26/91 11121
26/91 11122
26/91 11123
25/91 11124
26/91 11125
26/91 11126
26/91 11127
26/91 11128
26/91 11129
26/91 11130
26/91 11131
26/91 11132
26/91 11133
2o/91 11134
26/91 11135
26/91 11130
26/91 11137
26/$1 11138
26/91 11139
26/91 11140
26/91 11141
26/91 11142
26/91 11143
20/91 11144
26/91 11145
26/91 1114o
26/91 11147
26/91 11143
26/91 11149
26/91 11150
26/91 11151
26/91 11152
26/91 11153
26/91 11154
~6/91 11155
26/91 11156
26/91 11157
26/91 1115~
26/91 11159
~6/91 11160
~/91 11161
~6/91 11102
~b/91 11163
~6/91 11164
~6/91 11165
VOID
ACME LOCK SHOP
AGUAMEDIA
ROBERT ARZOIAN
AUTOMATED OFFICE
AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCT
5AKER & BROWN
JILDA BALL~EE, ER
MICHAEL R. bLASKOWKY
BOISE CASCADE
800NES FERRY ELECTRIC
BRIM TRACTOR CO. INC.
CALLAGHEN & COMPANY
CLARK BOARDMAN COMPANY
COMFORT INN
CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO.
COPY OFFICE PRODUCTS
V. JEAN DEEN
DEPT OF ENVIR QUALITY
JAMES F. EVANS
FARMERS OIL
VOID
V 0 I D
V 0 I b
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
VOID
V 0 I D
¥ CZ D
MARK J. G£I~ER
GTE ~08ILNET
HARRIS UNIFORMS ......
HARRIS & RIDE
HI-TECH OFFICE MACHINES
JOES AVAILABLE
JR ELECTRIC
LAU SAFETY SUPPLY
LANDIS & GYR
THOMAS L. LA FOLLETT
LIND$ MARKET
LINCOLN EQUIFMENT CO.
LIPTON. STEPHEN A. ATTY
DON LUTHER CONST
~AI L-WELL ENVELOPE
~ARION COUNTY BLDG INSP
MARION COUNTY FISCAL SERV
MARYATT IND.
0.00 VOID
27.50 SERVICES- VARIOUS
54.25 SUPPLIES - PARKS
126.90 REIMBURSEMENT - ~LDG
627.82 SERVICES/SUPPLIES - VARIO
313.69 SERVICES - VARIOUS
204.97 SUPPLIES
60.50 SERVICES
15.00 REIMBURSEMENT
215.70 SERVICES
821.46 SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
743.93 SERVICES
131.12 SUPPLIES
115.~8 SUPPLIES
61.2~ SUPPLIES -
89.04 SERVICES
180.09 SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
178.75 SERVICES
7.20 REIMBURSEMENT- FINANCE
7-~20.00 SERVICES - PW
693.00 SERVICES - COURT
~1.82 SUPPLIES
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 VOID
0.00 VOID
C.O0 VOID
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 VOID
O.O0 V 0 I O
0.00 VOID
0.00 V 0 I O
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 VOID
O.O0 VOID
0.00 V 0 I D
0.00 V 0 ! D
0.00 V o I D
70~.61 'SERVICES - COURT
462.99
79.00
2.000.00
130.50
56.16
124.12
265.07
821.00
70.00
351.09
56.43
87.44
595.00
293.B0
4.5~0.41
162.00
275.25
SERVICES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES - FINANCE
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SUPPLIES - W~TP
SERVICES
SERVICES - COURT
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES - COURT
SERVICES
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SERVICES - P~
SERVICES - VARIOUS
SERVICES - VARVIOU$
06/91
ATE
CHK
NO
A/P
VENDOR
CHECK LISTING
aMOUNT
PAGE
DESCRIPTION
4
//4
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26191
26191
26/91
20/91
Z6/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
'26/91
26/91
26/~1
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
26/91
2o/91
26/91
2~/91
26/91
26/91
11166
11167
111o8
11169
11170
11171
11172
11173
11174
11175
11176
11177
11178
11179
11180
11181
11182
11193
11184
11185
11186
11187
11189
11199
11191
11192
11193
11194
11195
11196
11197
11198
11199
11200
11201
11202
11203
11204
11205
11206
11207
11208
11209
11210
11Zll
11212
11213
11214
11215
11216
11217
11218
1'1219
11220
EETROFUELIN6
MILLER FENCE CO,,
DR. CLEAN L. MILLER
t~ORTON INT. INC.
WALTER E. NELSON CO.
NPA WEST
O.C.D.L.A.
O.M.O.A. SHORTR SCHOOL
CR BLDG. CODES AGENCY
OR DEPT OF GEN SERV.
ORE SECRETARY OF STATE.
OREGON TRANSIT ASSO.
OREGONZAN PUBLISHING CO.
US WE ST COMM.
PACIFIC PRINTERS
LAWRENCE PARADIS
PIONEER GLASS
dEFFREY POGOLOWITZ
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
PORTLAND METAL FA~
PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS
PRECIS[Oh PRINTING SYSTE~
PTI COMHUN[CATION$
RADIO SHACK
RAIN
TERRY RAg, IRE7
REDDAWAY TRUCK LINE
RODS RENTAL
SALE~ HOSPITAL
LES SCHWAa T~RE CTR
SCOT SUPPLY
SEWING & VACUUM EXCHANGE
$ILVERFLE£T SYSTEMS
SILVERTON FIRE DISTRICT
SPA EMPOR IU~
PHILLIP S. SWOGGER
ROBERT E. THOMAS
THE SIGN CENTER
lIME INC. ~AG.
TOWN HOUSE REST.
UNOCAL
~J NITED LA~
USI
VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD
VIKING INS. LA~
WATER. FOOD g RESEARCH LA
WESTERN F IRE~ORKS
WOODEURN CONSTRUCTION
~OODEURN FLORIST
WOODEURN INDEPENDENT
WOODEdRN PHARMACY
WOODOURN 24 HR TOWING
VASILY O. KOPEIKiN
~UMIKO WATE RF, AN
PAUL GRAHAM
349.96
550.G0
130.00
500.00
208.36
775.00
50.00
45.00
1.837-93
190.00
40.00
105.00
~8.40
456.90
524.27
150.00
123.35
869.40
9,096.56
95
2,322.00
348.48
120.G0
54.90
7.G37.75
97.50
326.00
35.00
329.~0
1.250.06
2,552.61
55.96
1,801.59
44.77
63.00
238.00
1,941.44
107.00
1~.99
16.0~
633.76
304.08
387.35
130.90
400.00
315.00
5,000.00
1,035.00
17.50
82.50
40.00
108.00
200.00
37.80
419.80
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
SUPPLIES
REGISTRATION
SERVICES - BLDG
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SERVICES
REGISTRATION - TRANSIT
SERVICES
SERVICES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SERVICES - PW
SERVICES -
SERVICES - PW HS REHA~
SERVICES - VARIOUS
SERVICES
TICKETS - PARES
SUPPLIES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICES - COURT
SERVICES
SERVICES
SERVICE~
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES - VARIOUS
SERVICES
SUPPLIES
SERVICES - COURT
SERVICES - COURT
SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
SERVICES
SUPPLIES- STREET
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICES - WWTP
SERVICES - WWTP
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
~ATERIALS
SERVICES - VARIOUS
SUPPLIES
S~RVICES
REFUND
REFUND
REFUND
06/91
ATE
CHK
NO
AlP
VENDOR
CHECK
LISTING
AMOUNT
PAGE
O£SCRIPTION
26191
26/91
30/91
30/91
30/91
31/91
31191
31/91
11221
11Z22
11223
11224
11225
11226
11230
11231
R.C. EQUAL
ORRIN GRANLUND
FIRST INTERSTATE aANK
COLUMBIA SERN~HEELER
ERIAN SJOTHUN
SANK OF AMERICA
CREGON DEPT OF REV
TERRY RICHARDSON
32.85
35.00
132.50
89.55
180.00
147.581.90
69b.70
250.00
REFUND- OVERPI~TS
REFUND - BL
BONDS ****
TICKETS- PARKS
TICKETS- PARKS
PAYROLL TSF *
UNEHPLOYHENT TAX
SERVICES - COMPUTER
$176,341.90
$.00
S160.15
$138,581.23
S118,,960.2 7
$434.043.58
PAYROLL*
TCD/6.A.**
PETTY CASH***
BONDS/COUPONS****
~ATERZAL$/SUPPL[ES/ETC.
TOTAL FOR
JULY 1991
TH~ HONTH OF: