Agenda - 05/24/1993o
CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
A. City Council minutes of May 10, 1993 regular meeting.
APPOINTMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
APPOINTMENTS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Special Council meeting: Monday, June 7, 1993 at 7:00 p.m.
specifically to hold a public hearing on the Transportation Plan.
PROCLAMATIONS
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Chamber of Commerce
B. Woodburn Comeback Campaign
COMMUNICATIONS
A. Written -
BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
(This allows public to introduce items for Council consideration
not already scheduled on the agenda.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. OLCC hearing: Luise's Bakery.
B. Oregon Community Development Block Grant.
C. Sale of surplus city property.
Page 1 - Woodburn City Council Agenda of May 24, 1993.
3A
8A
8B
8C
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
TABLED BUSINESS
GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Council Bill No. 1470 - Resolution authorizing the sale of surplus city
property.
B. Council Bill No. 1471 - Resolution authorizing administrative fee for
providing lien searches and duplicate water/sewer bills.
C. Council Bill No. 1472 - Resolution authorizing the transfer of operating
contingencies.
D. Council Bill No. 1473 - Resolution terminating a trust agreement with
ICMA and authorizing a replacement agreement.
E. Council Bill No. 1474 - Ordinance relating to installation of traffic
signal at Bi-Mart/KMart access to Hwy 214 and providing for payment
through assessment.
F. Request for closure of Alexandra Court for neighborhood
4th of July celebration.
G. Award of bid: City Hall repair.
H. Approval of salary step increase for Finance Director.
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
PUBLIC COMMENT
NEW BUSINESS
SITE PLAN ACTIONS
STAFF REPORTS
A. Water service extension for fire protection services to
Agripac's new facility.
B. Election results.
C. FEMA reimbursement update.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
10A
10B
10C
10D
10E
10F
10G
.10H
15A
15B
15C
Page 2 - Woodburn City Council Agenda of May 24, 1993.
3A
TAPE
READING
~001
0003
0011
0O20
OO32
OO59
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10,1993
DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY
OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, MAY 10, 1993.
CONVENED. The Council met in regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor
Kelley presiding.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor Kelley Present
Councilor Arntzen Absent
Councilor Figley Present
Councilor Galvin Present
Councilor Hagenauer Present
Councilor Jennings Present
Councilor Sifuentez Present
Staff Present:
City Administrator Childs, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Tiwari,
Community Development Director Goeckritz, Police Chief Wright, Finance
Director Gritta, Park Director Holly, Public Works Manager Rohman, Library
Director Sprauer, City Recorder Tennant
MINUTES.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... approve the Council minutes of April 26, 1993 and
special meeting minutes of May 3, 1993; accept the Planning Commission
minutes of April 22, 1993, the Library Board minutes of April 28, 1993, and
the Recreation and Park Board minutes of April 12, 1993. The motion passed
unanimously.
ANNOUNCEMENTS.
The Chemeketa Cooperative Regional Library Service (CCRLS) is soliciting
applications from Marion County residents interested in serving on the CCRLS
Advisory Committee.
A forum to address Youth Gangs within our community will be held on
Wednesday, May 12th, 7:00 p.m., in the French Prairie Middle School
gymnasium. The forum, sponsored by the Police Department and Woodburn
School District, will focus on problem identification and possible solutions.
PROCLAMATION - PEACE OFFICER MEMORIAL WEEK.
Mayor Kelley proclaimed May 10 - 14, 1993 as Peace Officer Memorial Week.
The proclamation is posted on the City Hall bulletin board.
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
TAPE
READING
OO8O
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10,1993
PROCLAMATION - PUBLIC WORKS WEEK.
Mayor Kelley proclaimed the week of May 17 - 23, 1993 as Public Works
Week within the City. This proclamation has also been posted on the City Hall
bulletin board.
0092
0114
0220
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT.
Greg Lundeen, representing the Chamber Board, reminded the Council of the
Chamber's Ag Tour scheduled for Wednesday, May 12th. The businesses to
be toured are Fiber-Fab and Stage II. Tickets are available for $9.00 which
includes the bus ride and dinner.
WOODBURN COMEBACK CAMPAIGN REPORT.
Vee Ott, Comeback Campaign Co-Chair, introduced Joey Knauf who developed
a survey for the committee for distribution to residents within the community.
Joey Knauf, Local Scout Troop #69, stated that the survey form contained
such information as neighborhood concerns and priorities for their particular
area and city-wide. He stated that he, along with a few of his friends, went
door-to-door to obtain information listed on the survey form. By helping the
committee in identifying specific concerns, he hoped to obtain his eagle status
within the Boy Scouts.
Councilor Figley stated that the results of the survey have been distributed to
the Council for their review. She also expressed her appreciation to Mr. Knauf
for his contribution to the community.
LETTER OF APPRECIATION - OREGON ASSOCIATION OF POLICE CHIEFS.
0252
Administrator Childs read the letter from the Association expressing their
appreciation of the work done by the Chief during his tenure as a Board
member and the City's support of his state-wide work. As a result of his
professionalism, he was elected to serve as Secretary/Treasurer of the
Association.
LETTER FROM COUNCILOR ARNTZEN RE: RESIGNATION.
Administrator Childs also read a letter received today from Councilor Arntzen
advising the Mayor and Council of his intent to resign from the Council
immediately due to health reasons. Administrator Childs stated that the
Charter provides for the Mayor to appoint an individual to fill the vacancy and
the Council approves the appointment. To assist the Mayor and Council with
the selection process, Administrator Childs provided them with a copy of an
opinion prepared by City Attorney Shields in June 1985 regarding the same
type of situation.
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
TAPE
READING
0314 PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 347 N. FRONT STREET.
O559
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 7:14 p.m..
Administrator Childs read his staff report which summarized the condition of
the building and an updated progress report. The building, which housed Salud
Medical Clinic, has been vacated and stabilized and an engineering study is
being done to determine the feasibility in rebuilding or removal of the building.
The staff recommended that the Council continue this public hearing until
November 8, 1993, 7:00 p.m., to allow the Clinic ample time to secure
funding for either restoration or removal of the building.
Attorney Shields stated that he had no additional testimony to offer at this
time.
Councilor Figley expressed concern on continuing the public hearing for a six-
month time period since she did not want to have a structurally unstable
building in the downtown area without any action being taken to correct the
situation.
FIGLEY/JENNINGS .... continue the public hearing on the dangerous building
located at 374 N. Front Street until August 9, 1993, 7:00 p.m..
The motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 503 N. FRONT STREET.
O657
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 7:23 p.m..
Administrator Childs read the staff report summarizing the initial damage to the
building and the work completed on the building to date. The building, which
housed Correos, Inc. (packing and shipping business), is being repaired by the
reconstruction of the south wall and parapet and reinforced bracing of certain
portions of the internal structure. The staff recommended that this hearing be
closed and the building be removed from the dangerous building list.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... close the public hearing on the building located at 503 N.
Front Street and remove it from the dangerous building list. The motion passed
unanimously. The public hearing was declared closed at 7:25 p.m..
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 237 N. FRONT STREET.
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 7:26 p.m..
Administrator Childs reviewed the staff report which summarized the condition
of the building following the earthquake and the action taken by the property
owner as of this date. The building, which houses the Bahai Assembly, had
received some minor structural damage to the parapet and minor shear cracks.
A representative of the Spiritual Assembly of Bahai had contacted the Building
Official to advise him that they were securing volunteers to complete the
repairs disclosed in the engineering report. The staff recommended that the
public hearing be continued until June 14, 1993, 7:00 p.m..
Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
TAPE
READING
0724
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
JENNINGS/FIGLEY .... continue the public hearing on the dangerous building
located at 237 N. Front Street until June 14, 1993, 7:00 p.m.. The motion
passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 573 N. FRONT STREET.
O938
1180
1265
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 7:28 p.m..
Administrator Childs reviewed the staff report outlining the damage to the
parapet, roof trusses, and ceiling joists. He stated that a preliminary
engineering report had been submitted, however, a final report was due to be
received by May 15, 1993. The building, which housed the Pool Hall, has
been posted as "No Occupancy" and the owners have applied for a Small
Business Administration Loan. Administrator Childs also stated that the staff
recommendation is to continue the public hearing until June 14, 1993, 7:00
p.m., however, he requested that the Council allow testimony to be taken at
this time from Structural Engineer Jed Sampson who is present at this hearing.
His testimony will then be part of the record and he will not be required to
return to future public hearing date(s) on this issue.
It was the consensus of the Council to allow the testimony of Mr. Sampson.
City Attorney Shields submitted 20 exhibits into the record (see attached list).
In response to questions from City Attorney Shields, James (Jed) Sampson
reviewed his credentials as a Structural Engineer and stated that he is currently
employed by the City of Portland. He stated that he had used criteria
established in the Applied Technology council (ATC) field manual - post
earthquake safety evaluation of buildings to assess the damage to this building
(form ATC-20). On this particular building, the south wall of the building had
severe cracks and the walls tilted at a plumb. In his opinion, another
earthquake could bring the wall down. In his evaluation, he rated the building
as limited entry and requested that further structural engineering be required.
In addition, he expressed concern regarding the stability of the roof and stated
that further loading on the roof such as ice or snow could provide additional
structural damage.
Councilor Figley questioned when the repair work should be completed to make
the building structurally sound.
Mr. Sampson stated that the repairs should be completed no later than
September.
The property owners of record, Francisca & Ireneo Garcia and the Archdiocese
of Portland, were not in attendance at the hearing.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... continue the public hearing on the dangerous building
located at 573 N. Front Street until June 14, 1993, at 7:00 p.m.. The motion
passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING AT 479 N. FRONT STREET.
Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
TAPE
READING
1781
1892
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
The public hearing was declared open at 7:45 p.m..
Administrator Childs reviewed the staff report which summarized the damage
to the building which housed upstairs apartments, beauty shop, and the former
Smart Shop business. He stated that an engineering report has been submitted
to the City along with specific measures to be taken to make the building safe.
The owner has stated that he intends to apply for a Small Business
Administration loan to finance the repairs. In addition, the fire escape was
removed from the east wall to relieve the stress on the wall. He recommended
that the public hearing remain open until June 14, 1993, 7:00 p.m., however,
testimony from Mr. Sampson be allowed as in the previous hearing.
City Attorney Shields submitted 15 exhibits into the record (see attached list).
In response to questions from City Attorney Shields, Jed Sampson restated his
credentials as a Structural Engineer and referred to the Applied Technology
Council (ATC) Field Manual - Post Earthquake safety evaluation of buildings.
He stated that the building did receive severe damage to the east wall. In the
ATC-20 assessment report, he had rated the building as limited entry and
further engineering study for structural damage needed to be completed. The
fire escape on the east side of the wall was removed and he had recommended
that the two apartments along the east side of the building not be used. In his
opinion, the building was dangerous and the east wall did need to be repaired
since the wall contained many shear cracks and the columns in the east wall
were out of plumb.
Councilor Jennings stated that in a report from another structural engineer, the
building was salvageable except for the east wall.
David Lindenmuth, property owner, stated that he intends to replace the east
wall and will submit detail drawings as soon as possible.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... continue the public hearing until June 14, 1993, 7:00
p.m., on the dangerous building located at 479 N. Front Street. The motion
passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 591 N. FRONT STREET
3A
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 8:04 p.m..
Administrator Childs reviewed the staff report outlining the damage to the
I.O.O.F. Lodge. He stated that as of this date, he had not received any
information from the property owner as to what they plan to do with the
building and that the second floor of the building is closed.
Attorney Shields submitted 13 exhibits into the record (see attached list).
In response to questions from City Attorney Shields, Jed Sampson restated his
credentials and reviewed damage to the exterior walls. He stated that they did
view the inside of the building but the exterior walls show shear cracks and the
parapet on the south side of the building needs repair.
Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
TAPE
READING
2370
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
Betty Donnelly, representing Home Rebekah Lodge//88, stated that the
transfer of property to their organization was signed in late February but not
recorded until recently and information pertaining to the building was sent to
the former owner of record. She stated that they had ordered an engineering
report 4 days after the earthquake, however, the engineer did not inspect the
building until April 15, 1993 and she had just received the report today. She
submitted a copy of the report into the record as an exhibit. In regards to
what will be done with the building, she requested Council continuation of the
hearing until they are able to review the report and determine if repairs can be
accomplished through their existing trust funds or if they will need to apply for
a Small Business Administration loan.
Attorney Shields stated that the report would be entered into the record and he
also confirmed that there was some confusion regarding the ownership of the
property.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY .... continue the public hearing until June 14, 1993, 7:00
p.m.. The motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING RE: DANGEROUS BUILDING - 199 N. FRONT STREET.
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 8:16 p.m..
Administrator Childs reviewed the staff report which summarized the condition
of the building and action taken to date. He stated that the major damage to
the building was the shear cracks on the east wall and the north face of the
structure. The building has been posted as "limited entry" and the property
owner has taken no action as of this date to stabilize the building.
Attorney Shields submitted 14 exhibits into the record (see attached list).
In response to questions from City Attorney Shields, Jed Sampson provided his
credentials as a Structural Engineer. Mr. Sampson stated that there were
numerous shear cracks on the east side of the building caused by the
earthquake and that he could not see the south side of the building very well.
On the ATC-20 assessment report, he had listed the building as limited entry
and the building needs a thorough structural engineering analysis. In his
opinion, the building is dangerous and should either be repaired or removed.
Nora Fives, contract buyer of the property, stated that she had obtained a
structural engineering report from Breshears/Thornton Engineering Consultants,
Inc., which stated that most of the cracking was pre-existing, however, the
earthquake widened the existing cracks. She stated that she had made
arrangements to have the building torn down next week, however, she would
also like to have an opportunity to sell the building.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY .... continue the public hearing until June 14, 1993, 7:00
p.m.. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
TAPE
READING
3O43
Tape 2
0001
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
Councilor Jennings expressed his appreciation to the property owners for their
prompt attention in trying to stabilize their buildings and for their attendance at
the public hearing.
Attorney Shields also thanked Jed Sampson for providing technical assistance
to the City following this disaster and for coming to this meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT K-MART/BI-MART
0130
0187
SHARED ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 214.
Mayor Kelley declared the public hearing open at 8:31 p.m..
Public Works Manager Rohman reviewed the engineering report along with
background information regarding the commercial developers signed
agreements to pay for the installation of a traffic signal when it was warranted
by the State Highway Division. The estimated cost to benefitted property
owners is $123,000 which equates to $4,804.69 per acre. The staff
recommended that an ordinance be drafted to provide for the improvement
with costs to be paid through a special assessment district.
No one in the audience spoke either for or against the proposed improvement.
The public hearing was declared closed at 8:36 p.m..
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ .... staff be directed to draft an ordinance ordering the
traffic signal improvement at the K-Mart/Bi-Mart shared access point to
Highway 214 and it be carried out by special assessment. The motion passed
unanimously.
TABLED BUSINESS - COMMUNITY CENTER FIREPLACE BID AWARD,
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ... the matter of the Community Center fireplace repair
be removed from the table. The motion passed unanimously.
Park Director Holly stated that he had attended a Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) meeting regarding the possibility of receiving
federal funds to replace the chimney which was damaged during the March
25th earthquake. If federal funds are available, this project would be part of a
City application process and replacement of the chimney would be required
rather than the repair of the damaged portion. He suggested that the bids for
repair of the chimney be denied at this time.
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ .... bids received earlier for the repair of the chimney be
denied. The motion passed unanimously.
OLCC LICENSE REQUEST - LUISE'S BAKERY.
Chief Wright stated that a liquor license request for a new package store outlet
was submitted by Luis & Luisa Quintero DBA Luise's Bakery, 523 N. Front
Street. Since the downtown area experiences a higher level of criminal
complaints, Chief Wright recommended that a public hearing be held at the
next regular meeting to receive public testimony on this issue before a decision
Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
TAPE
READING
O333
O386
O400
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
on the license application is made by the Council. He also stated that the
Planning Department would be issuing a memo regarding the provisions within
the Historic District zone as it applies to liquor establishments.
Councilor Jennings stated that he did have some concerns regarding the
addition of another package store outlet in the downtown area.
Chief Wright stated that the public hearing is necessary in order to meet the
due process procedure established by state law.
JENNINGS/HAGENAUER... hold a public hearing on the liquor license
application on June 14, 1993.
JENNINGS/HAGENAUER .... amend the motion to hold the hearing on May 24,
1993, 7:00 p.m.. The motion to amend passed unanimously.
The motion as amended also passed unanimously.
OLCC LICENSE TRANSFER - YOUNG STREET MARKET.
Police Chief Wright stated that the records show nothing significant for this
location regarding criminal activity. The package store license application was
submitted by Byung Chuh Cho and Ui Ja Cho DBA Young Street Market, 1030
Young Street.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY .... accept the recommendation of staff and approve the
liquor license application submitted by Byung & Ui Cho. The motion passed
unanimously.
ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS - SMITH ADDITION NO. 4.
The staff recommended the acceptance of eight utility easements within Smith
Addition No. 4 from Hazel Smith.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... accept the utility easements in Smith Addition #4 as
recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously.
YOUTH SERVICES GRANT.
Park Director Holly requested authorization to apply for a $46,000 grant to
fund a year-round youth drop-in center which would provide leisure service
programs to children. The Woodburn School District has assisted in the
drafting of the grant proposal.
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ... authorize the Park Director to submit the grant
application to the Marion County Youth Services Commission. The motion
passed unanimously.
0412
CLAIMS FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 1993.
SIFUENTEZ/GALVIN .... approve claims #18437 - #18791 for the month of
April 1993. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
TAPE
READING
0449
0470
0799
0994
1029
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
RESIGNATION OF ALLEN ARNTZEN.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... reluctantly accept the resignation of Allen Arntzen from
the City Council. The motion passed unanimously.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY |FEMA) REIMBURSEMENT.
Administrator Childs advised the Council that federal funding would be
available for repair and/or replacement of city buildings which were damaged
by the March 25th earthquake. Outright grants of 75% would be made
available to public agencies and non-profit organizations. FEMA
representatives have been surveying the damage and preparing preliminary
reports. The major areas to be repaired and/or replaced at this time are: 1)
Park Dept. Maintenance office structure, 2) rebuild the fireplace and chimney at
the Community Center, 3) repair structural damage to parapet on the southeast
corner of the City Hall building, and 4) repair significant floor cracks in the
Library. It has also been determined that the Park staff would proceed with the
filling of the swimming pool to see if there was any damage to the pipes or
lining of the pool. The staff will provide a status report on this issue at the
next meeting.
PROPOSED STATE LEGISLATION.
In a memo from Administrator Childs, he advised the Council that House Bill
3652 would suspend payment of cigarette and alcohol tax monies to cities and
counties beginning July 1, 1993. If this bill is approved, the City will lose
between $100,000 and $140,000 annually to fund General Fund programs.
House Bill 2277 would eliminate the June election date, therefore, the next
available election date would by in September which is 2.5 months after the
start of a new fiscal year. However, the bill would broaden the City's ability to
call for a special emergency election.
Finally, Senate Bill 762 would eliminate the local option fuel taxes.
WATER TEST RESULTS.
Public Works Manager Rohman stated that the quarterly test results for Phase
II and Phase V, which includes asbestos and several pesticides and herbicides,
were below the detection limit of the test.
TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE REPORT.
Community Development Director Goeckritz stated that a public hearing will be
held on May 24th regarding the Transportation Plan for the I-5 corridor area. A
complete copy of the report will be provided to the Council as part of the
hearings process.
Councilor Jennings stated that the report is very complex and he requested the
Mayor and Council to review the report prior to the meeting so that the
Page 9 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
3A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 10, 1993
TAPE
READING
information within the report along with other public testimony can be
considered and action taken at the same meeting.
1137
Administrator Childs reviewed the activities scheduled for Public Works Week
and he encouraged the Council and general public to attend the ribbon cutting
ceremony at on Wednesday and attend the open house at each public works
facility on Thursday.
He also commended Chief Wright for his involvement in a state-wide
organization and for preparing the program agenda regarding the Community
Forum on Youth Gangs.
1227
Councilor Jennings requested that the Mayor advise the Council when he is
going to make an appointment or if he would like to go through a selection
process similar to that which was done several years ago.
1266
Councilor Hagenauer stated that the berms located in Centennial Park need to
be sprayed to keep the weeds down. Park Director Holly stated that he hopes
to have the National Guard assisting the City with contouring the land in
August and that he would have his staff spray the berms within the near
future.
1309
Councilor Sifuentez encouraged the Mayor and Council to attend the Gang
Forum on Wednesday, May 12th. She also stated that the next Pool
Committee meeting is scheduled for May 23, 1993, at 7:00 p.m..
1327
ADJOURNMENT.
The meeting adjourned at 9:17 p.m..
APPROVED
LEN KELLEY, MAYOR
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 10 - Council Meeting Minutes, May 10, 1993
8A
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through City Administrator
Community Development Director
Public Hearing - Luis Bakery
May 20, 1993
The Chief of Police contacted my office requesting that I provide a land use interpretation
as to whether a bakery that sells alcohol is a permitted use in the City's Downtown
Historic District (DHD). The Police Chief also mentioned the bakery would have a
restaurant type setting and sell some grocery items.
Based on his description this facility is a delicatessen rather than a bakery, both of which
are a permitted use in the DHD.
City Of Woodburn
Police Department
270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071
Ken Wright
Chief of Police
Date: May 20, 1993
To: ] Mayor & Council
Thru: ~--/--%Chris Childs, City Administrator
Fro~ /~en Wright, Chief of Police
Subj"'e~xr~.' Public Hearing - Luise's Bakery
At the May 10, 1993 City Council meeting, the Council set a public hearing to review and
take testimony for the application of Luise's Bakery. Luis and Luisa Quintero have applied
for a package store license. The proposed location is located at 523 North Front Street,
Woodburn.
(503) 982-2345
(Overhead) Historical District Map (not included)
The proposed location is within the boundaries of the designated Woodburn Historical
District. Refer Planning Director staff report. As I stated in my initial memo to the Mayor
and Council, applicants are cUrrently licensed by OLCC in Newberg. Applicant background
was completed finding no adverse information.
Applicants, upon interview, informed the Police Department that they would intend on
operating a bakery and serving hot foods for on-premises consumption as well as to go.
There will be tables and chairs for a dining atmosphere, they would propose to only sell
beer and wine in package form for off-premises consumption.
The Police Department requested the Council hold a public hearing to consider public input
and review the applicants application in detail.
As the Council will recall, another applicant applied for a package store license in 1990.
a result of the testimony and public hearing, the applicant withdrew prior to the decision
point.
As
The area in question is around the coruer from the previous location. The location still has
much of the same clientele and continued criminal problems.
Reference Material in Part: (Included in Packet)
(Overhead) 1. -Liquor Licensing In Oregon, A Citizen's Handbook (Pages 8-9 and 20-
23) printed and published by the Oregon Liquor Control Commission
(Overhead) 2.
Oregon Administrative Rules, In Part.
OAR 845-05-007(4) Information From the Public
OAR 845-05-026(3) License Not Demanded by Public Interest or
Convenience
(Overhead) 3.
Oregon Revised Statutes, Volume 9
ORS 472.160(5) Grounds for Refusal of License
I would bring to the Council's attention the repeated and emphasized statements quoted by
the OLCC and as emphasized in both administrative rule and by statute.
Information that the Council can make a decision on must be factual and or a "reasonable
probability". I would emphasize reference material OLCC Handbook, page 23. Listed are;
(1) illegal activities, and (2) disorderly activities.
(Overhead) 4. City Map with Grids (not included)
Criminal conduct and police activity within the area described at 523 North Front Street, also
is identified on the police maps as Grid 601. The following are activities for Grid 601
between years 1990 - 1992. (overhead graph chart)
The Police Department has divided the City into grids, or sections. Each grid is bounded by
geographical markers such as streets, intersections, and City Limits. Each grid generally
contains properties zoned or utilized for the same purposes. We have grids identifying
business areas as follows: (C'~ map w/grids)
101 - Fairway Plaza
201 -
301 -
311 -
601 -
99E & Young
99E & Lincoln (Mall 99)
99E & 211 (North Park Plaza)
Downtown Area
I am providing as an overhead the Police Department's Oregon Uniform Crime Report
(OUCR), as provides by the Law Enforcement Data Systems, State of Oregon. This report
only provided partial data for the City as a comparison of the total crime statistics for the
entire city over the past five years are as follows:
Overhead Graph:
(not included)
1992 - 8172
1991 - 8338
1990 - 8668
1989 - 9540
1988 - 10,355
2
8A
As revealed by the OUCR data, the crime statistics show a continued and on-going problem
within the city's downtown area. I believe the crime data supports the OLCC requirement
for a denial of license as per ORS 472.160(5), OAR 845-05-007(4), OAR 845-05-026(3), and
OLCC Handbook, (page 22 - Reasonable Probability, and page 23 - Disorderly Activities)
* (Overhead 601 Graph of Activities)
POLICE RECOMMF~NDATION: - Deny Applicant -
KLW/nje
cc: File
3
~ 0 0 r.-'
8A
~" ~"~ %r° ~ D 0 (1)fy ¢.~
~ ~ ~ o ~o o~
o o ~ ~
~', ~ -.
· . ~ ·
o ~
OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
CHAPTER 845, DIVISION 5 - LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
8A
DIVISION 5
CRITERIA FOR ISSUANCE
AND MAINTENANCE OF LICENSES
Purpose
845-05-005 The purpose of these rules is to set forth
the principal criteria which shall be considered by the
Oregon Liquor Control Commission in granting, denying,
modifying, or mewing liquor licenses and related privileges
and by the Commission staff in recommending such actions
to the Commission. The rules may be used as guidelines to
local government in making recommendations to the Com-
mission.
StaL Auth.: ORS Ch. 471 & 472
Hist.: LCC 46(Temp), f. & cf. 1-21-74; LCC 47, f. 3-28-74. el. 5-1 ~74;
LCC 16-1979, f. 8-28-79, cf. 8-29-79; Renumbcred fre,m
845-10-700
[ED. NOTE: The text of Temporary Rules is not printed in the Oregon
Administrative Rules Compilation. Copies may be obtained from the adopting
agency or the S~cretary of State.
Public Notice of License Applications
845-05-006 (1) At least 14 calendar days before thc
Commission grants or den/es an initial annual license, a
change of license privileges, the addition of alcoholic bev-
erage sales or service to an outdoor area, or a change of
ownership where the Commission determines that the poten-
tial exists for problems with unlawful activities, noise or
disturbances in or around the premises that are related to the
sale or service of alcoholic beverages, the Commission w ill
provide written notice as follows:
(a) Conspicuous notice posted on the premises pro-
posed to be licensed; ~
(b) Notice to licensed child care facilities, elementary
or secondary schools, hospitals, nursing care or convales-
cent care facilities, parks, children-oriented recreational
facilities, or alcohol and other drug treatment or rehabilita-
tion facilities within 500 feet of the premises in urban or
suburban areas 'and 1,500 feet in rural areas; and
(c) Notice to the neighborhood organization(s) for the
area in which the proposed premises are located if the
organization is recognized by the appropriate city or county
and registered with the Commission. If there is no recog-
nized organization, the Commission will notify any organi-
zation registered with the Commission that represents at
least 25 households in the area.
(2) The notice will include:
(a) Name of Applicant. If applicant is not an individ-
ual, the name(s) of the person(s) who will have primary
responsibiLity for operating the business.
(b) Address of premises proposed to be licensed.
(c) Type of license.
(d) Legal hours of operation.
(e) How to contact the Commission within 14 days for
further information about: (A) The application;
(B) Providing information to the Commission to help
determine the appLicant's eligibility for a license; and
(C) Participating in the Commission's licensing proc-
CSS.
(3) The applicant will, by providing a copy of the
license application, give notice to the incorporated city in
which the premises are located, or if the premises are not
located in an incorporated city, the county in which the
premises are located.
Stat. Auth.: ORS Ch.
ltlsL:
Information From the Public
845-05-007 Local governments, other government
agencies, and any otherorganizations, facilities, or individu-
als may provide reliable factual information to the Commis-
sion concerning whether there is a basis to grant or deny a
license or to impose License reslrictions under ORS chapters
471 or 472 or OAR chapter 845. As an example, "reliable
factual information" includes personal observations of ac-
tivities in or around the proposed outlet, as opposed to
opinion, feelings, beliefs or speculation. Some of the bases
to deny or restrict licenses include the following issues
relating to probable conflicts between the community and
the exercise of the license privileges:
(1) Disturbances, lewd or unlawful activities or noise
in or in the immediate vicinity of the premises that are
related to the sale or service of alcoholic beverages. See ORS
471.295(5); ORS 472.160(5); OAR 845-05-027.
(2) Applicant has a history or record of using alcohol
or other drugs to excess. See ORS 471.295(4)(a); ORS
472.160(4)(a): OAR 845 4354325 (4).
(3) Applicant proposes to locate near a licensed child
care facility or elementary or secondary school; a church; a
hospital, nursing care faciLity or convalescent care facility;
a park or children-oriented recreational facility; an alcohol
and other drug treatment or rehabilitation facility. See ORS
471.295(1), 472.160(1) and OAR 845435-026(2). :.-_.........~
(4) Applicant p?pos?..to~.t¢:i~. :.~an_~._area that
history of ~6ri6u~_6r'~6~ts'/6n~'~obl;~_'~:. ~u37.!. awful
fivities, noise or disturbances. See ORS 471.295(1), 472.160(I
and OAR 845-05-026(3)7 ._....___..~
Stat. Auth.: ORS Ch.
Il[st.:
Interpretation
845-05-010 These rules shall be interpreted by the
Commission so as to provide tmiformity in consideration of
license applications and to effectuate the purpose of the
Oregon Liquor Control statutes. The Oregon Liquor Control
statues may provide requirements additional to these rules.
In the event of conflict between these rules and the statutes,
the statutes shall prevail. OAR 845-05-005 through 845-05-
050 shall be given retroactive effect so as to apply to all
license applications still pending before the Commission as
of August 29, 1979. The March 1, 1987 amendments to this
division apply to all license applications filed on or after
March 1, 1987.
Stat. Auth,: ORS Ch. 471 & 472
Hist.: LCC 46(Temp), f. & cf. 1-21-74; LCC 47, f. 3-28-74, el. 5-1-74i
LCC 16-1979, f. 8-28-79, el. g-29-79; LCC 27-1979(Temp),
f. & el. 11-23-79; LL~ 4-1980, f. 1-28-80, el. 2-1-80; Renum-
bered from 845-10-705;OLCC 2-1987, f. 2-9-87, cf. 3-1-87
[ED. NOTE: The text of Temportry Rules is not printed in the Oregon
Adminisuafive Rules Compilation. Copies may be obtained from the adopting
agency or the Secretary of State.]
1 - Div. 5 (April 1990)
OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
CHAPTER 845, DMSION 5 - LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
8A
passage of time since la_st relevant incident and previous
record of compliance.
(5) The applicant has been convicted of a felony when
there is a relationship between the facts that support the
conviction and applicant's fimess m exercise the license
privileges. When there is a relationship between the appLi-
cant's timess and the felony, the Commission considers any
intervening circumstances in determining whether to deny
the license based on this criterion.
(6) The applicant provides material false or mislead-
Lng information to the Commission.
(7) The applicant is not at least 21 years old. Good
cause to overcome this criterion includes a showing by the
applicant that the minor applicant will not participate in the
management or control of alcohol-related business deci-
sions or of employees involved in alcoholic beverage sale or
service.
Stat. Auth.: OILS Ch. 471 & 472
Hint.: LCC 46(Ternp). f. & el. 1-21-74; LCC 47, f. 3-28-74, et'. 5-1-74;
LCC 6-1978, f. 6-23-78. eL 7-1-78; LC-'C 16-1979, f. 8-28-79,
el. 8-29-79; Re.umbered from 845-10-720, OLCC 2-19117,
L 2-9-87, et'. 3-1-87
[ED. NOTE: The text of Tc~nporary Rules is not primtxt in the Oregon
Admiaistr~tive Rules Ccmpilatic~. Copies m,y be obtained fram the adolxi~
agency or the Secretary of Sta~]
License Not Demanded by Public Interest or
Convenience
845-05-026 ORS 471.295(1) and 472.160(1) allow
the Commission to deny a license that public interest or
convenience does not demand. The following are some of
the public interest or convenience reasons for Milch the
Commission may deny a license unless the applicant shows
good cause to overcome the criteria:
(1) Alcohol-Related Problems at Other I_5a, msed Prem-
ises:
(a) 'Fne applicant has had repeated problems at another
licensed location during the two years preceding this appli-
cation or has had a License cancelled or renewal refused
because of problems with disturbances, lewd or unlawful
activities or noise. These problems:
(A) Must occur on the licensed premises or be caused
by patrons in the immediate vicinity of the licensed prem-
ises;
(B) Include. but are not limited to, obtrusive or exces-
sive noise, music or sound vibrations; public drunkenness;
fights; altercations; harassment; unlawful drug sales; alco-
hol-related litter;, trespassing on private property; and public
urination; and
(C) Must be related to the sale or service of alcohol
under the exercise of license privileges;
Co) Good cause to overcome this criterion is a showing
by the applicant that the applicant wilI reasonably control all
of the applicant's licensed premises to prevent problems
described in subsection (1)(a) paragraphs (A), 03) and (C) of
this rule. Factors that affect this good cause determination
may include, but are not limited to:
(A) Applicant is currently licensed at an outlet that has
not had the problems described in subsection (1)(a) para-
graphs (A), 03) and (C) of this rule in the past yea~,
(B) Applicant successfully regained control of prem-
ises that had problems described in subsection (1)(a) para-
graphs (A), (B) and (C) of this rule;
(C) Applicant has a corrective plan that is likely to be
effective;
(D) License conditions or restrictions would enable
control of applicant's premises;
(E) Applicant did not participate in the dally operation
of the problem outlet, and there has not been a pattern of
problems described in subsection (1)(a) paragraphs (A), (B)
and (C) of this rule at other outlets where applicant has been
licensed;
(c) This criterion does not apply to renewal applica-
tions.
(2) Proximity to Facilities:
(a) The licensed premises:
(A) Will be located within 500 feet in an urban or
suburban area, or within 1,500 feet in a rural area of the
boundary (measured property line to property line) of a
licensed child care facility or elementary or secondary
school; a church; a hospital, nursing care facility or conva-
lescent care facility; a park or children-oriented recreational
facility; and alcohol and other drug treatment or rehabilita-
tion facility; and
(B) Will adversely impact the facility.
Co) Good cause to overcome this criterion includes, but
is not limited to, a showing by the applicant than
(A) The proposed operation is consistent with the zon-
ing where the proposed premises will be located, is consis-
tent with the general character of the area and the adverse
impact will not unreasonably affect thc facility; or
(B) The size of the proposed premises, community is so
small that the proposed location is a reasonable location for
the proposed operation.
(c) This criterion does not apply to renewal applica-
tions or to changes of ownerskip with no change in license
privileges or operation.
(3) Problem Areas: '----/
(a) The licensed premises will be located in an area that
has a tory o. ous orpe istentprobiems with u aw,
activities, noise or disturbances. These problems need not
alcohol related.
Co) Good cause to overcome this criterion includes, but
is not limited to, a showing by the applicant that'
(A) Alcoholic beverage sale or service at the premises
will not substantially contribute to the problems; or
(B) The applicant has a plan that demonstrates a will-
ingness and ability to adequately control the proposed
premises and patrons' behavior near the licensed premises.
(c) This criterion does not apply to renewal applica-
Lions or to changes of ownership with no change in license
privileges or operation.
(4) Package Store Licenses:
(a) The applicant seeks a package store license in
conjunction with a dispenser license. Good cause to over-
come this criterion is a showing by the applicant that the
community is inadequately served by other package store
licenses or that the package store license will not detract
from the dispenser's primary operation as a restaurant.
CO) The applicant seeks a package store license at an
outlet that sells petroleum products and does not or will not
maintain a wide variety of grocery items that is available for
immediate sale. "Wide variety" means an inventory at a cost
to the applicant of not less than $5,000 of foods that satisfy
the general public's ordinary eating habits and personal and
household products. "Wide variety" does not include alco-
holic beverages or tobacco products. It also does not include
(April 1990) 4 - Div. 5
8A
SALE OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR BY INDIVIDUAL DRINK
472.160
(2) The commission may, by order, pro-
vide for the manner and conditions under
which:
(a) Alcoholic liquors lefc by any deceased,
insolvent or bankrupt person or licensee may
be disposed of;
Co) The business of any deceased, insol-
vent or bankrupt licensee may be operated
for a reasonable period following the death,
insolvency or bankruptcy;
(c) A business licensed pursuant to OP~
472.110, 472.117 or 472.205 subject to a secu-
rity interest may be continued in business by
a secured party as defined in ORS 79.1050 for
a reasonable period after default on the
indebtedness by the debtor; or
(d) A license granted under this chapter
may be transferred from the place for which
the license was originally issued to another
location. [1957 c.220 §6 (enacted in lieu of 472.140);
1965 c.284 §4; 1971 c.470 §5; 1973 c.311 §4:1977 c.332 §2;
1977 c.360 §4l
472.145 License terms; initial licenses
for less than year;, computing fees. (1)
Except for licenses issued as provided by
ORS 472.116, 472.195 and 472.205, all licenses
and renewals thereof shall be issued for a
period of one year which shall expire at 12
midnight on .March 31, June 30, September
30 or December 31 of each year.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this
section, a license issued for the first time to
an applicant may be issued for less than a
year. The license fee for th~e~first license of
an applicant, if the license is issued for a
fraction of a year, shall be proportionate to
the annual license computed on a quarterly
basis, counting a major fraction of a quarter
as a whole quarter. {1971 c.470 §7; 1979 c.187 §41
472.147 Inclosure of licensed premises.
Nothing in this chapter requires any licensed
premises to be inclosed by wall, fence or any
other means. [1975 c.207 §6]
472.150 Application for initial license
or renewal of license; license fees. (1) Any
person desiring a license or renewal of a li-
cense shall make application to the Oregon
Liquor Control Commission, upon forms fur-
nished by the commission, showing the name
and address of the applicant, the applicant's
citizenship, location of the place of business
which is to be operated under such license,
and such other pertinent information as the
commission may require. No license shall be
granted or renewed until the provisions of
this chapter and the regulations of the com-
mission shall have been complied with.
(2)(a) The annual license fee for a Class
"A' dispenser's license shall be $400 and for
a Class "B" dispenser*s license shall be:
For clubs with fewer than
500 members ............................................ 5100
For clubs with 500 to
1,000 members ......................................... $200
For clubs for 1,000
or more members ....................................$300
(b) The annual license fee for a Class
"C' dispenser's license shall bc $300.
(c) The license fee for a seasonal
dispenser's license shall be $40 per month.
(d) The annual license fee for a caterer
dispenser*s license shall be $300. ~1953 c.175 §9;
1955 c.434 §2; 1965 c.284 §5; 1967 c.28 §2; 1971 c.470 §8;
1973 c.395 §8; 1979 c.126 §2; 1979 c.881 §la; 1989 c.120 §5]
472.155 Temporary letter of authority
on change of ownership. (1) The commis-
sion may grant a temporary letter of author-
ity for a period not to exceed 90 days on
change of ownership applications for licenses
granted under this chapter if the applicant
pays the fee prescribed by the commission for
a temporary letter. A temporary letter of au-
thority issued under this section or under
ORS 471.262 or 471.297 shall not constitute
a license as defined in ORS 183.310 (4).
(2) The commission summarily and with-
out prior administrative proceedings may re-
voke a temporary letter of authority, any
time during the 90 days if the commmsmn
finds that any of the grounds for refusing a
permanent license under ORS 472.160 or
canceling or suspending a license under ORS
472.180 exist.
(3) A person subject to subsection (2) of
this section shall be given an interviexv un-
der the direction of the commission if the
person requests an interview prior to revo-
cation of a temporary letter. However, the
proceedings are not a contested case under
ORS 183.310 to 183.550. [1989 c.416 §21
472.160 Grounds for refusal of license.
The commission may refuse to license any
applicant if it has reasonable grounds to be-
lieve:
(1) That there are sufficient licensed
prerrdses in the locality set out in the appli-
cation, or that the granting of a license in
the locality set out in the application .is not
demanded by public interest or convenience_
(2) That the applicant has not furnished
an acceptable bond.
(3) That, except as allowed by ORS
471.456, any applicant to sell at retail for
consumption on the premises has been fi-
nanced or furnished with money or property
by, or has any connection with, or is a man-
ufacturer of, or wholesale dealer in, alcoholic
liquor.
472.170
LIQUOR; DRUGS
(4) That the applicant:
(a) Is in the habit of using alcoholic
beverages, habit-forming drugs or controlled
substances to excess.
03) Has made false statements to the
commission.
(c) Is incompetent or physically unable to
carry on the management of the establish-
ment proposed to be licensed.
(d) Has been convicted of violating any
of the alcoholic liquor laws of this state,
general or local, including the provisions of
this chapter, or has been convicted at any
time of a felony.
(e) Has maintained an insanitary estab-
lishment.
(f) Is not of good repute and moral char-
acter.
(g) Did not have a good ~'ecord of com-
pliance with the alcoholic liquor laws of this
state and the rules of the commission when
previously licensed.
(h) Is not the legStimate owner of the
business proposed to be licensed or that
other persons have ownership interests in
the business, which interests have not been
disclosed.
(i) Is not possessed of or has not demon-
strated financial responsibility sufficient to
adequately meet the requirements of the
business proposed to be licensed.
(j) Is unable to read or write the English
language or to understand the OreEon Liquor
Control Act or rules of the commission.
.eewrt(i That there is of serious and
history
a
istent problems involving disturbances,
or unlawful activities or noise either in
the premises or involving patrons of the es-
tablishment in the immediate vicinity of the
~preimises if the activities in the immediate
vicinity of the premises are related to the
sale or service of alcohol under the exercise
of the license privilege. Behavior which is
grounds for cancellation or suspension of a
license under this section, where so related
to the sale or service of alcohol, includes,
but is not limited to obtrusive or excessive
noise, music or sound vibrations; public
drunkenness; fights; altercations; harassment
or unlawful drug sales; alcohol or related
litter; trespassing on private property; and
public urination. Mitigating factors include
a showing by the licensee that the problems
are not serious or persistent or that the ap-
plicant has demonstrated a willingness and
ability to control adequately the licensed
premises and patrons' behavior in the imme-
diate vicinity of the premises which is re-
lated to the licensee's sale or service of
alcohol under the licensee's exercise of the
license privilege. [1953 c.176 §10; 1979 c.744 §35a;
1979 c.881 §5; 1981 c.599 §6; 1989 c.785 §91
472.170 Examinations of books and
premises of licensees. (1)The commission
shall have the right a~er 72 houxs' notice to
the owner or the agent of the owner to make
an examination of the books and may at any
time make an examination of the premises
of any licensee, or to check the alcoholic
content of liquors carried by the said
licensee, for the purpose of determining
compliance with this chapter and the rules
of the commission.
(2) The commission shall not require the
books of any licensee to be maintained on
the premises of the licensee. [1953 c.176 §13; 1977
c.215 §2]
472.180 Grounds for suspension or
cancellation of license or imposition of
fine. The commission may cancel or suspend
any license granted, or impose a monetary
penalty in lieu of or in addition to suspen-
sion as provided by ORS 472.187, if it finds:
(1) That the licensee has violated any
provision of this chapter or any rule of the
commission adopted pursuant thereto.
(2) That the licensee has made any false
representation or statement to the commis-
sion in order to induce or prevent action by
the commission.
(3) That the licensee is not maintaining
an acceptable bond.
(4) That any person licensed under this
chapter is acting as an agent of, or is a
manufactuxer or xvholesaler of, alcoholic liq-
uors, or has borrowed money or property, or
has accepted gratuities or rebates, or has
obtained the use of equipment i~om any
manufacturer or wholesaler of alcoholic liq-
uor or any agent thereof.
(5) That the licensee maintains an insan-
itary establishment or has been supplying
impure or otherwise deleterious beverages or
food.
(6) That the licensee is insolvent, incom-
petent or physically unable to carry on the
management of the establishment of the
licensee.
(7) That the licensee is in the habit of
using alcoholic liquor, habit-forming drugs or
controlled substances to excess.
($) That the licensee knowingly has sold
alcoholic liquor to persons under 21 years of
age or to persons visibly intoxicated at the
time of sale or has knowingly allowed the
consumption of alcoholic liquor on the li-
censed premises by a person who is visibly
intoxicated at the time of consumption.
(9) That the licensee has misrepresented
to a customer or the public any alcoholic
liquor sold by the licensee.
8B
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
City Council through City Administrator
Public Works Program Manager/~ ~/~
SUBJECT: Oregon Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing
DATE:
May 17, 1993
The national objective of the Community Development Block Grant program is the
development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a suitable
living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of
Iow and moderate income.
The objective of the Oregon Community Development Block Grant program is to
enhance the quality of life in Oregon communities. The Oregon goals are to:
Increase business and employment opportunities;
Conserve the existing housing supply and improve housing conditions;
Improve the availability and adequacy of public facilities;
Resolve situations which pose a serious and imminent threat to
community health or welfare; and
Increase the supply of housing affordable to Iow and moderate income
persons.
To achieve this goal, the Oregon program offers grants to eligible cities and counties
in six categories. They are Public Works, Housing Rehabilitation, Community
Facilities, Handicapped Accessibility, Economic Development and Technical
Assistance.
For the 1993 program, the State expects to have approximately $15 million in federal
funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to grant
to nonentitlement cities and counties for eligible community development projects.
This amount includes unobligated 1992 program year funds remaining on June 30,
1992, program income, and recaptured funds from prior year grants.
The purpose of this public hearing will be to give citizens an opportunity to propose
projects before the city makes a decision about what project to apply for.
The application deadline has passed for all grant categories with the exception of
Public Works. Inputs are solicited however on possible grant opportunities for the
other categories. The application that the City will be contemplating will be for a
public works grant. There is approximately $4.2 million available statewide for public
works grants.
8B
City Council through City Administrator
May 17, 1993
page 2
Projects under the public works category include all types of publically-owned capital
improvements such as sanitary and storm sewers, water works, and streets.
Improvements may be required to solve a problem affecting the entire community or
just a neighborhood.
The Oregon Economic Development Department has for the past several months been
preparing to change the public works category from an annual competition to a year
round application system. Uncertainty about President Clinton's economic stimulus
proposal further delayed implementation. Final rules are now projected to be available
by August 1, 1993.
There are two public hearings required for the application process. The second
hearing is to bring public comments about the specific project proposed for the grant
application to the attention of the city. This second hearing will be scheduled after
final application guidelines are received.
Again, the purpose of this hearing is to give citizens an opportunity to propose
projects which the City may make application for an Oregon Community Development
Block Grant.
8C
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through City Administrator
Public Works Program Manager ~
Public Hearing on Proposed Sale of Surplus Property
May 18, 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the resolution prepared declaring this property surplus and making it available
for sale.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department purchased an approximately 7.5 acre lot in the Woodburn
Industrial Park off National Way in 1981 with the intention of constructing Public Works
shops, storage areas, and a water well.
A water well was constructed on the property in 1988 and is currently utilized as a part
of the City water supply system.
In 1991 as a part of an agreement to provide sufficient land for the construction of the
Kmart retail store the Public Works lot was divided into two parcels and approximately
four acres were sold. The lot arrangement after this transaction is shown in attachment
A. The four acre parcel is owned by Morgan Drive Away and is used for manufactured
home storage. Since 1982 companies providing school bus service to Woodburn School
District have leased a portion of this lot for their operation. This portion is the area
enclosed by the chain link fence annotated on attachment A. School Bus Services, Inc.
currently leases this area. With the sale of the four acre parcel there was not sufficient
land remaining to construct the Public Works shop complex.
There has been interest by both School Bus Services, Inc. and Morgan Drive Away, Inc.
in purchasin9 a portion of the remainin9 Public Works property. With this possibility
Public Works asked the Planning Commission for approval of partitioning the property
into two parcels. The Planning Commission approved the partition as depicted on
attachment B. Parcel 3 which consists of approximately 1.4 acres would be retained by
the City since it does contain a City well and well house. Parcel 1, which now consists
of approximately 2 acres, has no further beneficial use for the City. It is this parcel that
is surplus property and should be made available for resale.
8C
City Council through City Administrator
April 21, 1993
page 2
Since there are two parties who have expressed interest in the property the sale of the
property will be through advertisement and the receipt of sealed bids. A minimum price
based upon an already completed appraisal will be established. Terms of the sale will
be cash upon closing.
The resolution to be considered as part of general business should be approved
declaring this property surplus and making it available for resale.
8C
I N0.U, STRIAL
LOT 10
/
BLOCK I
;'~ 4o~. ,~ LOT 2
LOT I1~ ~ ~O. '~
29L60'
LOT I
55~.3~' (Ng9°38'49"w 556.36')
9 ?.13'
CAP
CURVE DATA
ATTACHMENT A
~~.%
·
LOT
;TRIAL ~
_OT I0
CO~ ~0'
/
CEL- 2
ACRES
/
29L60'
(EO TOP
· 556.36' )
PARCEL 1 2.03 ACRES
S.£. COR. COT I
~ 9 7.13'
"~""'- 5/8~ I.R. ~/PL. CAP
'I~ASOH" (C.S. 260491
CLOCK
LOT 2
~o-
4,/'~,o -
(.c'/
~.cc£SS
c
e'/~'LR. ~,/&L. CAP
K Ir COR. LOT I ~
LOT. I
PARCEL TO BE SOLD
8C
LOT 2
ATTACHMENT B
10A
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1470
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN CITY PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
WOODBURN INDUSTRIAL PARKTO BE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING ITS
SALE TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing has been published on the proposed sale
of the below described city property, and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council has conducted a public hearing on May
24, 1993, to hear testimony concerning said sale, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The description of the involved real property is as follows:
A 2.03 acre portion of Parcel 1, Partition Plat 91-37, Woodburn, Marion
County, Oregon.
Section 2. The Council finds, based upon the staff report dated May 18, 1993
from the Public Works Department and upon the public testimony herein presented,
that the property is not needed for public use and that it is in the public interest to sell
said property.
Section 3. The Council further finds, based upon an appraisal conducted on
August 28, 1992, that the appraised value of the property is $65,000 and that this
is the fair market value of the property.
Section 4. The Council hereby authorizes the property to be sold by a sealed
bid process and sets a minimum bid of $65,000 for the property. The property shall
then be sold to the highest bidder, with the full amount of the bid payable to the City
in cash at the close of~ffscrow. _-~ ~ ,
Approved as to form: ~" ~/ -J- t J
City Attorney Date
Page I -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
lOB
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAY 18, 1993
CITY COUNCIL THOROUGH THE CI-FY ADMINISTRATOR
NANCY GRITTA, FINANCE DIRECTOR
LIEN SEARCHES
The number of requests we are receiving from title companies requesting lien searches
has increased dramatically in the last two years. This is taking more and more of
employees' time. In the past we have done this totally without charge. It no longer is
financially prudent, given the time involved, to continue to provide this service free of
charge.
The amount charged for this service varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We suggest
that a fee of $10 be incorporated as part of a general policy expressed in the ordinance
which is part of this packet. Also included will be a $1 fee which we have been charging
since February 18, 1992, for replacement water/sewer bills for customers who have lost
their bill.
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1471
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LIEN SEARCH POLICY AND IMPLEMENTING
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES.
WHEREAS, numerous requests are submitted for city lien searches and
replacement water and sewer bills; and
WHEREAS, the city incurs administrative costs in providing these services; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that persons requesting such services should pay
a portion of the costs incurred; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the attached policy regarding lien searches and water and
sewer bill replacement is hereby adopted by the city.
Section 2. That administrative fees of $10.00 for a lien search and $1.00 for
the creation of a replacement water and sewer bill are hereby impleme,nted.
/
Approved as to form: ,, /
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Len Kelley, Mayor
lOB
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
lOB
CITY OF WOODBURN LIEN SEARCH AND
WATER/SEWER BILL REPLACEMENT POLICY
Persons requesting lien searches for the city shall make requests in writing to the
Finance Department of the city of Woodburn. Request for lien searches shall provide
the following: address of the property in question, owner of the property, tax I.D.
number of the property, known liens on the propertY, person requesting lien search,
and phone number of person requesting line search. The city shall not be responsible
for lien searches for which incorrect information is provided.
Requests for lien searches shall be accompanied by a $10.00 fee and a self-
addressed, stamped envelope. Information about liens will not be given over the
phone with the exception of updates on water/sewer bills for which a written
response has previously been issued or liens for which interest accrues until the day
of payoff and the city has indicated, "Call for final pay-off amount", on a previously
written response. Any written lien search shall be considered invalid if action has not
been taken on the property within 6 weeks of the date of the search.
Water/sewer customers for whom replacement bills must be produced shall be
charged ~ 1. This fee will not be charged for customers making pre-payments on their
accounts.
10C
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER
APPROPRIATIONS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992-93.
1472
OF OPERATING CONTINGENCY
WHEREAS, Oregon Revised Statutes 294.450 allows for the
transfer of operating contingency appropriations within a fund to an
existing appropriations category within the same fund during the year in
which appropriations are made, and
WHEREAS, the General Fund requires a transfer of operating
contingency to the Materials & Services category within the Non-
Departmental accounts to cover unanticipated litigation costs incurred
during the fiscal year, now, therefore
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That authorization is hereby given to transfer the
following operating contingency appropriation:
GENERAL FUND:
Transfer From:
Operating Contingency
$23,000
Transfer To:
Materials & Services - Non-Departmental
city Attorney
$23,000
Date
APPROVED
LEN KELLEY, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the office of the Recorder
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
city of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
ICMA
RETIREMENT
CORPORATION
April 15, 1993
Christopher Childs
City of Woodburn
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, Oregon 97071-4730
Cot porale Headquarters
Suite 600
777 North Capitol Street, NE
Washington. DC 20002-4240
(202) 962 4600
Toll-Free (800) 669-7400
RE: 0007
Dear Christopher Childs:
At the beginning of our relationship, the ICMA Retirement Corporation ("RC")
and the C~ty of Woodburn entered into an agreement entitled "lrust Agreement
with the ICMA Retirement Corporation" (also known as Appendix C) with the
Retirement Corporation. That agreement only refers in a very general way to
the administratove services to be provided by RC and the fees to be paid for
those services, and it does not provide an accurate portrayal of our current
relationship.
To illustrate, the ICMA Retirement lrust currently consists of $2.4 billion in
total assets, and that figure represents the pooled monies of approximately
145,000 local government employees. This is a significant increase over the.
$459,000 managed by RC for 285 participants in 1972. With the growth of the
Retirement Trust, the services RC provides for administration of your deferred
compensation plan have also grown. The administrative services we now provide
include:
* Educating and enrolling participants;
* Maintaining employer accounts and employee subaccounts, and associated
records;
* Crediting employer contributions to employee accounts;
* Reporting investment activity and account information to the employers
and employees on a quarterly basis;
* Providing information about various features of deferred compensation
plans on a regular basis;
* Paying benefits and handling related tax reporting.
Consequently, the "Trust Agreement" we initially entered into does not
describe the services RC provides in sufficient detail.
As a result, we have prepared a new Administrative Services Agreement, two
copies of which have been signed by RC and enclosed. We believe the
1OD
ICMA-RC Services, Inc.
biember N,ASDandSIPC ~sawhollyowred broker doa!er suosid,aryo!tnelCMA RetlrementCorporatlon
Administrative Services Agreement provides a more accurate and up-to-date
description of the existing relationship between you and RC.
We propose that the City of Woodburn and RC enter into the Administrative
Services Agreement to replace the "Trust Agreement with the ICMA Retirement
Corporation". Upon your acceptance of the Administrative Services
Agreement, that substitution will occur.
The Administrative' Services Agreement is not intended to affect in any way the
investments of your deferred compensation plan or the benefits payable under
the plan. Nor is it intended to change in any way the services actually
provided by RC, or the fees actually charged by RC with respect to the
administration of the plan.
Please sign each of the enclosed copies of the Agreement. Return one copy to
RC using the enclosed return envelope, and keep one copy for your records.
If we do not hear from you, and RC does not receive a signed Agreement within
90 calendar days of your receipt of this letter, and the Trust continues to
receive plan contributions, RC will interpret those actions as acceptance of
the terms of the Agreement after the expiration of the 90-day period.
If you have any questions regarding the Administrative Services Agreement,
please call Chris Baker of our Client Services division at (202) 962-8076, or
call my Legal Assistant, Jan Feldman, at (202)962-4677.
Since~.ely,
House Counsel
Enclosures:
Administrative Services Agreement (2 copies)
Return Envelope
1OD
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1473
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING A TRUST AGREEMENT WITH THE ICMA RETIREMENT
CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES AGREEMENT REPLACING SAID TRUST.
WHEREAS, the City maintains a deferred compensation plan for its employees
which is administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation; and
WHEREAS, the City originally entered into an agreement with ICMA entitled
"Trust Agreement with the ICMA Retirement Corporation", and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of ICMA and the City to replace the "Trust
Agreement with the ICMA Retirement Corporation" with an administrative services
agreement which is more accurate in describing the existing relationship between the
City and ICMA; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Council finds that it is in the City's interest to replace the
"Trust Agreement with the ICMA Retirement Corporation" with a more current
administrative services agreement.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to sign, on behalf of the City, the
administrative services agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and, by this
reference incorporated herein.
Approved as to form: v/~ v~t--
City Attorney Dat(~
APPROVED:
Len Kelley, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
MEMO
IOE
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
OPTIONS:
A)
B)
C)
City Council through the City Administrator
Public Works Program Manager
Ordinance for Bi-Mart/Kmart Signal
May 18, 1993
The council has three options to choose from:
Approve the ordinance and order that the improvment to be carried out.
Modify the proposed improvement.
Abandon the improvement.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the council adopt option "A", approve the
attached ordinance directing that the Bi-Mart/Kmart signal be installed and providing for
payment of the improvement through assessment of the benefitted property owners.
BACKGROUND: Resolution 1178 was approved by the Woodburn City Council on April 26,
1993 declaring the city would install, through special assessment, a traffic signal at the Bi-
Mart/Kmart shared access to Oregon Route 214.
The council conducted a public hearing at the May 10, 1993 meeting on the city's intent to
install the traffic signal. At the conclusion of that public hearing, council directed staff to
prepare an ordinance to direct the installation of a traffic signal through special assessment
at the Bi-Mart/Kmart access to Highway 214.
The concept that the affected commercial properties would be responsible for installation of
the traffic signal has been reinforced by the Planning Commission and Council since first
brought up in 1988 with development of the Bi-Mart store. The method of cost distribution
among the properties was presented to City Council in October, 1989. The permit to
construct the approach road for the Kmart store acknowledged as a condition of granting
access that property owners would share the cost of signal installation when warranted.
During the approval process for the Kmart store a non-remonstrance agreement for
installation of the signal, when warranted, was included. Property owner participation in the
signal installation has been an acknowledged part of planning for improvements in this area
and should be carried out in this manner. The ordinance requested by council has been
prepared and staff requests its approval.
RR:Ig
SGNL.CC
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1474
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO IMPROVEMENT OF THE BI-MART/KMART ACCESS TO OREGON
STATE HIGHWAY 214 BY INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL; ADOPTING ESTIMATES.
DIRECTING THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
AWARD; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT OF THE COSTS THEREOF BY PROVIDING THAT THE COSTS
THEREOF SHALL BE ASSESSED TO THE PROPERTIES BENEFITTED.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1172 directed staff to bring an engineering report to the city
council, and
WHEREAS, the engineering report was approved by the council on April 26, 1993, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1178 was passed to install a traffic signal at the Bi-Mart/Kmart
shared access to Oregon Route 214, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 10, 1993, and
WHEREAS, written remonstrances sufficient in number to prevent such improvement have not
been received, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the traffic signal at the Bi-Mart/Kmart shared access to Oregon Highway 214
be installed pursuant to Resolution No. 1178 in accordance with plans, specifications, and
estimates prepared for the city, which said estimates are hereby incorporated herein and made a
part of this ordinance by reference.
Section 2. That the cost of said improvement shall be at the expense of property specially and
peculiarly benefitted by such improvement within the assessment district established by Section
3 of this ordinance.
Section 3. That the property specially and peculiarly benefitted by such improvement and to
be assessed therefore is hereby declared to be the parcels of real property described in the Marion
County Record of Deeds as follows:
Tax Lot/
Subdiv Lot
a) 42504-143
b) 42504-144
42504-145
c) 42504-704
42504-859
d) 92840-040
e) 92840-041
f) 92840-042
Owner of Record
Woodburn Associates
Bi-Mart Corp.
Mabel Vaccari
Thrifty Realty Co.
VVWDM Properties
J. Larry Fugate
Savage, Savage & Brown
GFl-Woodburn Investments
IOE
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
IOE
Section 4. That the City Engineer's cost estimate, including engineering, finance, legal, and
administrative, is $123,000. The benefitted cost of each property is estimated to be-$4,804.69
per acre or a total of $123,000.
Section 5.
TAX LOT ACREAGE
ESTIMATED
COST SHARE
42504-143 3.07 14,760
42504-144 1.07 5,143
42504-145 6.34 30,456
42504-704 2.93 14,026
42504-859 0.50 2,404
92840-040 3.95 18,942
92840-041 0.69 3,321
92840-042 7.05 33,948
TOTAL 25.60 $123,000
That the benefitted property owners shall pay their share:
1) at the completion
of the project, or 2) sign the Bancroft application with the city within the allowed time and make
yearly payments for a period of ten years. The owners are allowed to pay off the remaining balance
at any time during the bonding period.
Section 6. That the City Council finds that it is in the public interest to assess costs to the
benefitted property at the completion of public improvement. City Engineer approved costs of
performing signal design engineering by a benefitted property owner may be included as a normal
project cost for assessment.
Section 7. That the City Engineer is hereby authorized to call for and receive bids or cause it
to happen.
Section 8. That the interest rate is hereby fixed at 7.0 percent.
Section 9. That the City Recorder is hereby authorized to proceed with the issuance of general
improvement warrants to finance the project. ~"
Approved as to form: ~ J ' / ~ ~
City Attorney Dar
APPROVED:
Len Kelley, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2- COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
'l OF
City Of Woodburn
Police Department
270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071
Ken Wright
Chief of Police
Date: ] May 19, 1993
To: ~. Mayor & Council
Thru'// [.. Chris Childs, City Administrator
Fr(m! ,~&en Wright, Chief of Police
Subj.:I Fourth of July Street Closure Request/City Ordinance 1900
(503) 982-2345
The City has received a street closure request from residents of Alexandra Court. As in
previous years, they again request to close Alexandra Court on July 4, 1993 from 10:00 a.m.
to 10:00 p.m.
Anne Lima and Cheryl Mill are in charge and have requested permission to block off the
street, which is a cul de sac. 100% of the residents have signed the petition. They have
also requested use of a "Street Closed" sign from the street department, which would be
returned after the event. There will be access for emergency vehicles.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Closure
KLW/nje
cc: Council
File
1OF
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
We. the residents of Alexandra Court. have been informed
of the plan to close our street on July 4th from loam - 8pm
and approve.
We will be holding our 6th annual Independence Day
party. The street wi]] be "closed" using our own red cones.
We also hope to borrow from the city a "Street Closed" sign.
Access will be made for emergency vehicles and residents
coming or going in the Court.
I WILLCOCK/M¢CORMACK
1420 Alexandra Ave.
., ~,,. -~% ~
JAMES Z3'
143/~lexandra~Ct.
LIMA
14~5 Alexandra Ct.
CROCKER
1395 Alexandra Ct.
s-fliLLs
1375 Alexandra Ct.
MUELLER [/
1450 Alexandra Ave.
~ IGOR I EFF
1430 A1 exandra Ct.
COLBY '
14i0 Al exandra Ct.
i LLER
1400 Alexandra Ct
WEBB
1380 Alexand~a Ct
t~ , FOURTH OF JULY PARTY
Here we go again.., the planning for our neighborhood
4th of July Party has begun.
1OF
This year we will have some special guests. The
originator of the 4th of July block party in this
neighborhood will be here to join us. Paul and Pam Harris who
now live in California will be here with their family. Also
we may have some vacationing Brazilians here.
As we have in years past, the street will be "closed"
around 10:00 a.m. If you have a portable barbecue we would
appreciate it if you could bring it to the end of the Court
around 10:00. We'll start the grills about 11:30 and cooking
should begin around 12 noon. Bring what ever you would like
to grill down to the end of the court and find an open spot.
Please bring a side dish for all to share (i.e. salad, baked
beans, etc.), your own plates and utensils and your choice of
drinks. Coolers will be located near the end of the Court
with the tables and chairs. Dessert will be provided.
After lunch we can sit and talk (or take a nap) and then
Gather again for dinner if you like (we always have plenty of
food ]eft over).
Later that evening, as dusk approaches, we will gather
at the end of the Court to set off fireworks for the "kids'~
If you'ld llke to come, bring your sparklers/fireworks and
3oin in with the
Afterwards, the city will be putting on their fireworks
display, and if all is like last year, we can view this
spectical from Bill & Maggie's lawn. So bring your chairs
and blankets.
If you have any suggestions or comments, please pass
them on to either Anne Lima (981-4413) or Cheryl Mill
(g81-62i2).
HOPE TO SEE YOU THERE!!!
lOG
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ.:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Chris Childs, City Administrator
Award of Bid - Earthquake-related City Hall Repairs
May 20, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Award bid for certain structural repairs to SE exterior corner
of City Hall building to Whitehead Construction in the amount of 94,875.
BACKGROUND: This structural damage was discovered after, and resulted from,
the March 25, 1993 earthquake. The damage was evaluated and a minumum of three
(3) informal bids were solicited, with results as follows:
Whitehead Construction
Key Construction
Oak Construction
94,875
97,310
(no bid submitted)
Payment for this work will be made from the General Fund City Hall
Maintenance budget. 75% (approx. 93,656) will come from a FEMA disaster
recovery grant, and the remaining 25% (approx. 91,219) will come from funds
previously budgeted for building maintenance and repair.
This project does not include replacement of a broken window (also earthquake-
related) in the Public Works office, estimated at 9100-$200, which will be handled
separately.
FORM 3850
REQUIRED ~ RIPLICATE_
PROPOSAL." -
lOG -
Sheet No
Work To Be Performed At:
/City _~J. ' _~_ dku~- . State
We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform .the labor .necessary for-the completion of ..
......
~:.!: ........
All material is guaranteed to be as s'~cified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and
specifications submitted for' above ,. work and-completed In a substantial workmanhke manner for the sp.~ of
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications irl~ing
~osts, will be executed only upon written orders, and wilL~[~com~"~n
°-xtra charge over and above the estimate. All agrseme~, contir~ent
~¢x~ strikes, accidents or delays beyond our 'COntrol. Q~er to 'c~j'ry
fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above
~e~'s Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on a, b~ve wor...~to be
;aken out by
I
Per
Note--This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted
within-~,. ,~_ ..... days.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
Yhe above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified.
~ayment will be made as outlined above.
Signature
Date ............................................................................................... Signature
1OH
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ.:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Chris Childs, City Administrator ~/~
Approval of Salary Step Increase (N. Gritta)
May 19, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve, pursuant to Sec. 3 of Resolution #1081
(dated 9/9/91 ), a salary step increase for Nancy Gritta, Finance Director, retroactive
to Ms. Gritta's May 1, 1993 anniversary date.
BACKGROUND: Resolution #1063 established the 1991-92 Non-Union Employee
Compensation Plan, which included a range/step plan for Executive Management
employees. Resolution #1081 (Sec. 3) directs that the City Council give final approval
to such increases.
A performance evaluations for Ms. Gritta has been recently completed,
demonstrating that overall job performance meets or exceeds minimum standards.
She is scheduled to advance from Grade M-26.5 Step D to M-26.5 Step E.
MEMO 15A
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
City Council through City Administrator for Information
Public Works Program Manager /~ ~
Fire Protection Service to Agripac Inc.
May 18, 1993
The City currently provides water service for fire protection to Agripac, Inc. This service
covers all existing buildings that comprise the Agripac processing facility. The City has
provided water for fire protection to Agripac since the facility was built. Agripac also has
a metered connection to the City water system. Agripa¢ may continue to use some City
water occasionally during their processing season. Agripac pays applicable outside city
limits rates for both the fire protection and water usage.
Agripac has requested that the City provide water for fire protection for their new
repackaging facility that is located within the urban growth boundary outside the current
city limits and is currently under construction to the south of their current facilities. Water
for fire service will be the only water service provided this new building.
The water for the fire protection would be provided from near Cannery Way at the north
entrance to their existing processing plant. As a part of the connection for the new fire
service, Agripac will be replacing old metering and backflow prevention devices on the
existing fire service and water connections. These replacements will improve the quality
of cross connection protection for the City water system.
Discussions have also been conducted on the possibility of all or a portion of the Agripac
facility being annexed to the City. Their facility is within the City's urban growth boundary.
The Agripac representative indicated that he would present this subject to their executive
management. The representative would keep the City informed on the results of
discussions on this subject.
15B
MEMO TO:
FROM =
DATE =
SUBJECT=
Mayor and Council
Mary Tennant
City Recorder
May 19, 1993
Special Election Results
The official results of the May 18th Special Election for a one-
year operating levy are as follows:
WARD YES NO
Precinct 124
Precinct 125
Precinct 126
Precinct 127
Precinct 128
Precinct 129
Precinct 130
I 401 400
III 133 140
II 182 134
V 413 377
I 156 193
VI 107 75
IV 289 229
Total Votes
1,681
1,548
15C
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ.:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Chris Childs, City Administrator
Update on FEMA Post-Earthquake Assistance
May 20, 1993
ACTION REQUIRED:
NONE - INFORMATION ONLY
CURRENT UPDATE: Council was advised at the May 10, 1993 meeting that staff
would be working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding
possible disaster recovery funds for earthquake damage to city facilities. As noted at
that time, FEMA will fund up to 75% of a project's total cost, with the benefitting
entity responsible for the remaining 25%. We are negotiating with FEMA on a number
of projects (with FEMA's tentative project cost estimate shown in parentheses), as
follows:
"Category B Protective Measures" (Emergency Assessment & Recovery Activities)
($9,010): This represents reimbursement for materials, equipment and labor (both
regular and overtime) and benefit costs incurred by the city resulting from the initial
response to the earthquake. Definitive costs were incurred by various departments,
including Police, Dispatch, Street, Water, Building Official, etc., during the period of
several days immediately following the earthquake. Generally, time spent in
management/administrative functions was not allowed. The total estimate includes
$7,606 for labor costs, $1,012 for materials and $392 for equipment rental or value.
Reimbursement received under this category will likely be distributed back to the
respective funds/programs which incurred the expense.
City Hall Parapet (SE Corner) Repair/Replace Window in Public Works*
($4,875/$200): This project will be accomplished through the informal bid process
for projects of less than $5,000 value (see related General Business item in this
Agenda).
Demolition of existing Parks Dept. Shop Building* ($3,000): This project will be
accomplished through the informal bid process upon completion of a replacement
facility. The structure will be replaced, rather than repaired, because cost of repair
15C
Page 2 - FEMA Assistance Update (5/20/93)
is estimated to exceed 50% of replacement cost. Source of local matching funds
(approx. $750) will be determined at time of project commencement.
Repair of Community Center Chimney* (undetermined; <$16,620): Upon
notification by FEMA as to acceptable type of repair, basic specifications will be
developed and this project will be advertised for competitive bids. Council has
previously authorized expenditure of contingency funds which should be adequate for
local 25% matching share.
Library; Repair of Chimney, Wall Cracks, Floor Cracks* ($26,293): This project
includes replacement of a limited amount of carpet. Cost to the city may be increased
if other existing carpet (in Children's Library area), scheduled to be put back down
after examination/repair of the floor cracks, is found unsuitable due to normal wear.
FEMA has ruled that this would not constitute "earthquake-related". This project will
require development of basic specifications and competitive bidding. Local matching
share (+/- $7,000) will likely have to come out of contingencies or Library
Endowment Fund.
* All projects marked with an asterisk constitute "Small Projects" in the FEMA
process. If one project ultimately costs more than originally estimated, the added cost
must first be made up by savings, if any, on the final cost of one of the other
projects. Only if the agaregate total of all four of these projects exceeds the original
estimate (+/- $50,988) can the city request additional funding from FEMA.
Construction of Replacement Parks Dept. Shop Building Structure ($51,463): This
is based on replacement of the existing structure rendered unuseable by the
earthquake. Generally, the project anticipates construction of an 864 sq. ft. concrete
block structure built to current codes (earthquake resistance, handicapped
accessibility, etc.) with commonly accepted features and fixtures for a structure of
this type. Appropriate detailed plans, specifications and blueprints for the project will
have to be developed, and the project then advertised for competitive bidding. If the
city considers increasing the size of the building, all additional costs beyond the basic
864 sq. ft. will have to be borne by the city. As presently visualized by FEMA, the
local matching share of this project would be some $12,865. Prior to commencing
with this project, decisions will have to be made regarding the source of these funds.
Repair of Woodburn War Memorial Swimminq Pool (undetermined): Examination has
revealed significant damage to the swimming pool as a result of the earthquake.
FEMA representatives have agreed that repairs (to the extent that they can be shown
as earthquake-related) will be reimburseable. A consultant who is familiar with this
15C
Page 3 - FEMA Assistance Update (5/20/93)
pool has spent this week evaluating the situation on behalf of the city and will present
his findings to FEMA for development of final project cost estimates. The consultant
will also coordinate his findings with the committee that is presently investigating
swimming pool options. More information on this topic may be available at the time
of the Council's May 24, 1993 meeting. A number of important questions and
decisions will have to be addressed in regard to what is ultimately done with the
swimming pool, including overall direction, timing, funding (local match) and other
considerations.
Both the Parks Dept. shop building and the War Memorial Pool projects
constitute "Large Projects" under the FEMA criteria. As long as work done is
consistent with the basic scope of work determined by FEMA in conjunction with their
project cost estimate, the city can request additional funding from FEMA if either of
these projects (individually) exceed FEMA's original cost estimate.