Minutes - 04/15/1996 Workshop
TAPE
READING
0001
0003
0020
0042
"11
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY
OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, APRIL 15, 1996.
CONVENED. The Council met in a workshop session at 7:03 p.m..
The purpose of the workshop was to discuss wastewater rates
for residential customers.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Kirksey
Chadwick
Figley
Hagenauer
Jennings
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Staff Present:
City Administrator Childs, Public Works Director Tiwari,
Public Works Manager Rohman, Finance Director Gillespie, City
Recorder Tennant
Mayor Kirksey informed the audience that a staff report would
be given on this issue. Following this report, the audience
was invited to participate during the discussion
WASTEWATER RESIDENTIAL RATES -- STAFF REPORT.
Public Works Director Tiwari stated that the Wastewater
Advisory Committee had met for approximately two years during
which time they held 2 Open Houses. One of these Open Houses
discussed the issue of wastewater rates and a division was
made between residential, commercial, and industrial. The
rates proposed by staff were flat rate, minimum + volume rate,
and volume rate. The Committee found that at the level of 500
cubic feet, the monthly cost for a residential customer was
almost the same for minimum + volume ($20.20) and volume only
charge ($20.05). It was noted that the residential flat rate
necessary to collect the same amount of revenue versus of
volume charge was $27.38 per month. The Committee thoroughly
reviewed the available options and recommended to the Council,
based on a fair share concept, the implementation of a minimum
+ volume charge to residential customers. Ultimately, the
Council adopted this concept which imposed a minimum charge of
$20.20 for 500 cu. ft. of water usage plus $3.59 per 100 cu.
ft. of water usage over the minimum. The rates were adopted
in September 1995 with the first billing period under the new
rates effective November 1995. He briefly explained the
first-year billing process as it relates to charging customers
each month for the months of November, December, January, and
February on an actual use basis, then calculating an average
Page 1 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
'r-'.'
rrr
I
""1
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
TAPE
READING
1265
which will be charged over the next 12 months so that
residents will not have to pay based on actual water use
during the summer months. The winter months are being used to
calculate the average since it more accurately provides for
the volume of water actually being put through the system.
Recently, the City Council modified the wastewater ordinance
(#2157) changing the average calculation period to the 3
lowest months of the 4 listed above, and providing language
relating to leak adjustments. Additionally, customers can
elect to use an average of any other 3 consecutive months to
replace higher winter months that they may have incurred.
Adjustments will also be made in those cases where water to an
unoccupied building has been shut off and locked. He reviewed
the Task Force's method to determine the minimum rate and the
amount to charge those customers who are not in residence in
Woodburn during the winter months. He explained how
adjustments for a high reading are accounted for in
determining the average water use. In reviewing the monthly
bills paid, approximately 50% of the single family residential
customers paid between $20 and $21 per month, approximately
40% of the customers paid between $21 and $45 per month, with
the remaining 10% paying over $45. It was noted that of the
4,025 customers, only 39 customers paid in excess of $80 per
month.
Director Tiwari explored various options available that would
still provide adequate funding of facility construction and
operations. Those options include: 1) keep the fair share
concept with no changes; 2) keep the fair share concept with a
minor adjustment by either (a) placing a cap of $55 per month
and raising the minimum charge by $.55, or (b) reduce the 100
cu ft charge to $3.00 and increasing the monthly minimum
charge by $1.15; or 3) adopt a flat rate or volume rate
concept. In any event, dollars paid by one-half of the
customers would have to increase under the options provided in
order to receive approximately the same amount of dollars
necessary to fund the wastewater facility.
Preston Tack, 2197 Camilla Way, questioned how much of the
base rate in the current rate structure represents
construction versus operations.
Director Tiwari stated that approximately 50% will be used to
pay for construction, environmental upgrades, and bond costs
with the remaining balance to fund operations. It was also
noted that systems development charges will be paying for the
portion of construction costs involving plant expansion since
facility will need to be built to accommodate the City's needs
over the next 20 years.
Ashish Mistry, 1025 N Pacific Hwy., questioned the monthly
water usage of the 2,013 customers who pay the minimum monthly
bill.
1090
Page 2 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
'_.._._._'~'
-
.
,.
TAPE
READING
1835
2194
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
Director Tiwari stated that the breakdown of water usage by
customers receiving the minimum bill is as follows:
approximately 22.73% of the customers use between 0-300 cu ft;
approximately 12.27% of the customers use between 300-400 cu
ft; and approximately 13% of the customers use between 400-500
cu ft per month.
Mr. Mistry expressed his opinion that the volume charge for
wastewater makes more sense under the "fair share" concept.
As a motel owner, he felt that they are carrying an extra
charge under the minimum plus volume charge since they are
charged on a hotel/motel unit cost whether that unit is
occupied or not.
Director Tiwari briefly explained that "fair share" was
developed as a concept to integrate both the construction and
operational costs.
Mayor Kirksey suggested that consideration be given to place
motel/hotel units on a commercial rate rather than the
residential rate structure.
Dement Brown, 3283 Nekia St, stated that he did not fully
understand the reasons for the substantial increase in
wastewater rates and he felt that the high cost for this
service will be detrimental to larger families within the
City. He suggested that the minimum rate should be increased
to offset costs to larger families or to implement a flat rate
concept.
Martina Lopez, 767 Hall St., read a letter into the record
(signed by 74 residents) requesting consideration of a flat
rate system to more equitably distribute the costs for the new
facility to all customers. She also questioned if refunds
would be given if adjustments are made to a bill since, in her
case, she did have two extra individuals living with her
family for a portion of the time in which the average bill was
calculated.
Director Tiwari stated that the average establishes a
consistent rate for a 12-month period. Customers can request
that the average be re-calculated based on 3 consecutive
months during a different time period. Any adjustment is for
future billing periods unless the Council decide to make it
retroactive.
Laurel Zurlinden, 259 willow Ave., questioned if the most
recent bill (received April 1996) is the average flat rate to
be used for the next 12 months and Director Tiwari confirmed
that the rate will now remain constant for a 12-month period.
Ms. Zurlinden stated that she had canvassed the neighborhood
in obtaining signatures on the petition and she heard many
heart-breaking stories on the effect the new rates have been
having on some of the families within the community. She
Page 3 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
r ---~-_.--
m
,
TAPE
READING
2400
2891
Tape 2
'II
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
understands that the City is being forced by federal mandates
to upgrade our current facility but feels that all should pay
reasonable rates rather some families paying extremely high
monthly rates. She also felt that a flat rate amount of
approximately $27 would probably not have that great of an
affect on most residential customers.
Thukor Mistry, 2450 Country Club Ct., questioned if the City
really considered the financial impact the rate structure
would have on residents and the business community when plans
were being made to upgrade the wastewater facility.
Mayor Kirksey stated that the Wastewater Task Force started
their project about 3 years ago during which time they
reviewed numerous recommendations in order to accommodate
federal mandates and growth. Even if the City experienced no
growth, the City would still need to pay approximately $20
million on the upgrade of the facility to meet federal
mandates. Of the 4,025 customers, approximately 250 customers
are paying over $50 per month. She reiterated that something
could still be done to lower the bills to those individuals,
however, the majority of the customers pay less than $50 per
month for their sewer bill. She also advocated water
conservation during the months in which the average is
calculated in order to keep the monthly rate down.
Director Tiwari reviewed a chart listing 10 comparable cities
to determine how the City's current rate, based on 1,000 cu
ft, compares to the average of these 10 cities. It was noted
that the average of the 10 cities was $36.70 per month while
the City's rate is $39.03 per month.
Tom Waggoner, 849 Woodland, stated that some cities also pay
property taxes on general obligation bonds for wastewater
facilities in addition to the monthly utility rates. In his
opinion, the rate structure currently in place is fair to the
customers.
Rudy Castillo, 458 W. Cleveland, stated that his household
uses an average of 1,000 cu ft per month and feels that
customers do have some control over how much water is used in
their household. In those cases where the bills are extremely
high, indications would be that there is something wrong such
as a leak or faulty meter. He also stated that the monthly
bill in Silverton for wastewater is definitely higher than
Woodburn and that he does have a family member who lives in
Washington that also pays more for wastewater service.
Preston Tack, speaking on behalf of the Senior Estates
Community Relations Committee, stated that the financial
impact of the rate increase is substantial and those customers
Page 4 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
111
,
,
.l.-...----->~".--..,~~-----.."--..-,....-,.-"-.,--.-M-
I
TAPE
READING
0185
0291
0381
0456
0560
1
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
using less than the 500 cu ft are in one way or another
subsidizing other customers. He did state that residents of
Senior Estates are supportive of the community, however, they
do want to keep the "fair share" concept in tact. As a
reminder, all other utilities are paid on an actual use basis,
therefore, rates for wastewater service should be treated the
same. He also suggested that the City go back and develop
costs in more detail and place those costs on charts which are
easier for the general public to understand. He also
requested that if the Council considers a change to the
ordinance, that the Council wait two months between the
readings of the ordinance in order to give his committee an
opportunity to solicit comments from homeowners within Senior
Estates on the proposed change.
Barbara Lucas requested an explanation of the volume rate
charge since, under the chart comparing alternative rates, the
volume rate to one-half of the customers is less than the
minimum plus volume rate structure.
Councilor Jennings briefly summarized the Task Force's
rationale in determining which alternative should be forwarded
to the Council for consideration.
Councilor Pugh reviewed options that had been brought up
during this workshop and he expressed his concern in keeping
Woodburn as a competitive community for growth. At this point
in time, he is leaning toward a flat rate charge or going back
to the drawing board to find a rate structure that would
lessen the impact on families.
Councilor Figley stated that, in her opinion, the main concept
is good but it may need fine tuning. She does support a cap
on the dollar amount rather than adjusting rates based on
family size.
Councilor Jennings felt that the basic rate structure should
not be changed, however, he was willing to look at
establishing a cap on the monthly charge.
Councilor Hagenauer felt that the current rate charge was fair
and that high bills paid by customers may be an indicator that
there is a problem with a water leak or the meter.
Councilor Sifuentez agreed with the "fair-share" concept but
realizes that there are many customers that are working
minimum wage jobs or are low income families. She would like
a win-win situation in which any adjustments would have a
minimal effect on the customers and total revenue collected to
pay for construction and operational costs. She suggested
that we continue to get information out to the public on the
Page 5 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
" ,.., ..--..-.-
..
w
,.
TAPE
READING
0645
0674
1900
~,
11
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
sewer rates and do whatever we can, such as putting them on a
monthly payment plan, to assist families who cannot pay so
that their water is not turned off.
Councilor Chadwick stated that most of the individuals that
she has spoken with are satisfied with the current rate
structure and she feels that a single person who is on a fixed
income should not subsidize families who use substantially
more water.
Mayor Kirksey felt that it is difficult to assess if an
increase should be assessed to low users of water in order to
cap the cost for high water users. She is concerned about the
lack of water conservation in those cases where a cap on costs
is imposed. She briefly mentioned that other utility
services, such as PGE, charge higher rates as you use more
electricity since they are actively trying to get customers to
conserve electricity. She does feel that the Council should
consider giving customers a retroactive credit in those cases
where the customer has significantly reduced their bill over a
3 consecutive month period.
Councilor Jennings questioned the difference between the
hotel/motel unit residential rate structure versus commercial
rates. Director Tiwari stated that hotel/motels would
probably pay more under the commercial rate. Historically,
the City has always treated hotel/motels and apartments under
the residential rate structure.
A lengthy discussion continued on what action, if any, the
Council should direct staff to pursue along with different
options that should be considered such as a rate structure
tailored based on family size, minor adjustments to the
existing rate structure which would lower the cost to high
water users, and retroactive adjustments.
Mayor Kirksey suggested that consideration be given to a 2-
month average versus a 3-month average in those cases where
customers have over a $50 wastewater bill along with a
potential retroactive adjustment.
It was noted that the more months used to calculate the
average is a fairer representation of actual water used for
billing purposes.
Barbara Lucas questioned if the Council has considered how
additional revenue will be generated if they reduce the
calculation period of the average bill.
Further discussion was held regarding methods which could be
used to determine average such as using the 3 lowest out of 5
consecutive months.
Page 6 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
'..--. .._-
-
-
TAPE
READING
2547
2726
2761
ATTEST
~.
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES
April 15, 1996
A suggestion was also made to put the issue of deciding the
appropriate rate structure before the voters.
Director Tiwari stated that the bills will continue to include
inserts on the sewer rates and water conservation.
It was a consensus of the Council that retroactive adjustments
should possibly be allowed.
Mayor Kirksey solicited opinions from the Councilors regarding
their current position on the rates. Councilors Jennings,
Figley, Hagenauer, and Chadwick stated that they would prefer
to keep the minimum rate at $20.20. Councilor sifuentez and
Mayor Kirksey were willing to slightly raise the minimum in
order to offer some relief to those households having a higher
water consumption. Councilor Pugh requested that the Council
receive some input back from Senior Estates before any
decision is made since he would still like to pursue a family
size concept which still needs to be developed.
Mayor Kirksey qualified her response in that she was willing
to increase her own monthly bill, however, she was reluctant
to increase the minimum bill for other residents who use less
than the minimum allowable water consumption.
Mayor urged staff and volunteers to put together a
conservation workshop to educate consumers on wastewater rates
and water conservation. The workshop could be televised on
the community access channel and communicated in English,
Spanish, and Russian.
Director Tiwari briefly summarized the direction given to
staff which is to advertise that lowering of any 3 consecutive
month average could lower their bills, even after a winter
average has been established, and a plan for making
retroactive adjustments be investigated and it be brought back
to the Council with other modifications approved previously.
ADJOURNMENT.
The meeting adjourned at 9:48 p.m..
APPROVED ~
NANCY A.
MAYOR
~C"lV~r-'~~
Mary ~ant, Recorder
City of woodburn, Oregon
Page 7 - Council Workshop Meeting Minutes, April 15, 1996
. 'I