Agenda - 12/09/1996
AGENDA
WOODBURN CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 9, 1996 - 7:090 P.M.
270 Montgomery StreeJ · · · · Woodbum. Oregon
1.
;,.~\~~:[71 i'f ~..[1 ~~y "
.~ . ~ /O~ yy ,..... 0, ...... .............. >VI.
A. Call to Order and Flag Salute
B. Roll Call
2. "
'" . ?.0: ,," y;"/. "'" ". "" h
";"_,,",^i~~~~: ", ~l.-:". \~;.~.
A. Oath of Office
B. Ballot election of president of the Council
3. __
A.
B.
Council minutes of November 25, 1996 regular and executive meetings.
Planning Commission minutes of November 14, 1996.
3A
3D
4.
}~ ; ::.... ~; ~~~ ~ ~'\ ~ ~;.;t: ~'::;.'..'.,:' ~; ;..... .,. \ ~L" Co S.l.. ,.>~ (,~, > l)~~ ~ ~~.!~ $ ~~
. y ". .~" y.. n, .... n~'" ". -.--. >T...'"'>> "<.,, . .-, '" ,,..., ."", y'
APPOINTMENTS:
A. BoardICommittee appointments.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
B. Council workshop with Woodburn School Board concerning
archeological findings - December 10. 1996. 7:00 p.m. at City Hall.
C. Council workshop concerning Measure 47 impacts
December 16. 1996. 7:00 p.m. at City Hall.
D. Holiday Office Closures:
City Hall: closed at noon on December 24th, all day on
December 25th and all day on January 1, 1997.
~
Library: December 24th hours: 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon, closed all
day on December 25th and January 1, 1997.
PROCLAMATIONS
s.
t;.~)~\ h~ ~ ~ t t ~ ~),,~ ~~ ;}', ~.:~} ~..;,: >.;':
, . ..." .
A. Chamber of Commerce
B. Other Committees
6.
7.
%. ~~,{:LI~!1~J~LYtit:L ~J~
; ~}.."i s\>J r~$ ;M ~ ~jl,)!t ~ ~ ~ m ~S :~.."y >
(This allows public to introduce items for Council consideration
not already scheduled on the agenda.)
PAGE 1 - COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 9, 1996.
'1!'
,.
10.
11.
u.
13.
14.
15.
'X~n~L~: ~23 it~~.'t~\i ,~}>.:
A.
Council Bill 1758 - Ordinance imposing an additional motor
vehicle fuel tax on motor vehicle fuel dealers for purposes
of pavement preservation.
2A
t~ ~~b ~~~~?9\ t..; ~it,,~~ ~~~~ J.~~
... , ,~... 'n'o' .,..... C. -... -,....-....'.. .,........
A.
Council Bill No. 1766 - Ordinance amending Ordinance 2113 (the
Human Rights Commission Ord.); extending the ordinance expiration
date to December 31, 1997. .
Engineering Report for Parr Road Improvement.
Award of Bid for Park Long Term Comprehensive Plan Consultant.
No Parking restrictions on Patrick Way.
No Parking request on Hawley Street near Wilson Street.
.lOA
lOB
.lOC
1QU
lOB
B.
c.
D.
E.
~ ~.'\ ~~/~\~:<\ ~~:J;) (,. c~~. .\ 6'~~"} t:;:
. . . ,.. . .
A.
Claims for the month of November 1996.
llA
~.~~}:~ ~/ C~:..",.t;~j>I'';~ L\ ~ ~:-:},~:.
.. ,... .,., .-. -.. . ,,-.. y ^on' >n, -.,..., .. -. ,.
~J :4,\ 'U ~i ~j;;:} !:f. ~,,,,,:;;:
..,.."-,,, .- ."... ....-........ ''>''T -,-.,A-'-.-"
'-?':' . . < \. , ",- ,."" . .
"'/ ~ ~. ..r -^~^;;:; ~ '.~ ~~ ~ $. <.- ~ .;;'",~~,<"'~-::~y,t-
~ ~'.\ J ~~:;. ~~ ;() ~~cj ~~ K
A. Certified General Election results. 1M
B. Draft resolution estabJishil'lg policy tegarding private wells in the city
and cost sharing for abandonment of such wells. ~
c. Access Management draft ordinance. llC
D. Community Center ,,~ti1lg system failure. 1m
E. Settlemier A venuelParr Road intenection to utilize State funds
committed for Cleveland Street. .1.SE
F. Storm water information and policies. m
16.
17.
18.
t-j ~ ~/.'~? f "' \ ~) ;~; ~ ~ ~ s ~}. ~. ~. i..'" ~ f ;~ } ~ <, . >:: : '",: :? ~.' ~; ~..~ ~
:,,-;j~.,.......{t';:~ ,"\~J~';.:";; .~..;~~(;, ::~(, '.~~f ~.~~;:;v~;..
.. .. " . ,.. .
~, ~,,~'^\~ tJJ,Ft, ~;:J :,~::; ,~!d~
A. To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body
to negotiate real property transactions. ORS 192.66O(1)(e)
B. To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body
with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed. ORS 192.660
19. _
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA, DECEMBER 9, 1996.
""
3A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
00Q1 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY BALL, CITY OF WOODBURN,
COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, NOVEMBER 25, 1996.
CONVENED. The Council met in regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Kirksey
presiding.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Kirksey
Chadwick
Figley
Hagenauer
Jennings
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present (7:04 pm)
Present
Staff Present:
City Adminim-ator Childs, City Attorney Shields, Public WOIb Director Ti~
Cnmm1Ul~ Development Director Goeckritz, Park &. Recreation Director Holly, Police
Chief Wright, Finance Director Gillespie, LJ.'brary Director Sprauer, Public Works
Manager Ro~ City Recorder Tennant
QQl2 MINlITES.
JENNlNGSIFIGLEY.... approve the Council minutes of November 12, 1996; and accept
the Planning Commission minutes of October 24, 1996 and the Human Rights
Commission mimlte$ of November 13, 1996. The motion passed ummimously.
0030 APPOTNTMRNTS.
Mayor Kirksey appointed the following individuals to serve on the RSVP Advisory
BoaId: Marijo Poujade, Ann Naffziger, Esther FJdridge, Richard Weaver, and Shirley
Hackett. Mayor Kirlcsey stated that tbesc individuals would serve on the Board in
unexpired positions and the normal appointment dates occur in March of each year.
JENNINGS/FIGLEy.... appointments be approved. The motion passed unanimously.
0056 ANNOUNCEMENTS.
(A) Office closures during the holidays are as follows:
City Hall: November 28 and 29, 1996 - Thanksgiving Holiday
Library : November 28 and 29, 1996 - Thanksgiving Holiday
November 27, 1996 - close at 6:00 p.m..
The Woodburn Aquatic Center will be closed December 2, 1996 through December 13,
1996 for annual maintenance.
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
1l'l"
3A
COUNCll.. MEETING MINUrES
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
(B) An Open House will be held on to solicit input from the public on the Water Master
Plan on Thursday, December 5, 1996, City Hall, from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm.
(C) A joint Counci1IScbooI Board workshop will be held on Dccembec 10, 1996, 7:00
p.m., City Ball Council Chambers, to hear an informational presentation from the
archaeologists.
(D) A Council workshop will also be held on December 16, 1996, 7:00 p.m., City Hall
Council Chambers, to begin preliminary discussions on the impacts of Ballot Measure
No. 47.
mm. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RF..PORT.
Randy Saunclezs, tepIUt"til\g the Cham"""" Board, stated that the Chamber and Kiwanis
are co-sponsoring the Holiday Lighting Contest and be encouraged the local residents to
participate in this contest. On December 18th, the Chamber Forum will be held at the
Settlemier House where tours will be given of this historic house.
Mayor IGrlaey also encouraged the public to attend the Tree Lighting at SettlemieT
House on Saturday, December 7th, 6:30 pm, followed by the Tree Lighting at the
Community Center.
0138 Marc Ndson, 990 Cupids Knoll Rd, Monmouth, requested an opportunity to speak on
the Gas Tax proposal Mayor Kirksey stated tbat she would be allowing public comment
under Item 9(A).
ow Ken Pahlke, Woodburn Downtown Association Manager, stated that the 3-Va1leys
Project is considering various projects to help support. One of the projects proposed by
the WDA and being consideced for partial fundif\g is a mini-pJaza in the downtown area
at the interseCtion of Hayes and First Street. A drawing of the mini-plaza was shown to
the Council and, if this project does move forward, the WDA hopes to begin work on
Phase I in the very near future. Phase n of this project would be a part of the overall
Downtown Plan.
~ TABLlm BUSINESS - COUNCIL BR.T. 1758: ORDINANCE IMPOSING AN
ADDITIONAL MOTOR VRRTM R FlIRT. TAX.
JENNINGS/FIGLEY... Council Bill 1758 be removed from the table. The motion
passed unanimously.
Mayor Kirksey stated that, as a result of comments made by the Councilors at the last
meeting, she bad requested staff to prepare another version of the Council Bill that
would refer this issue to the voters at the May 20, 1991 election.
Councilor Pugh suggested that the Council wait until they know what the impacts of
Ballot Measure 47 are before any action is taken.
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
1JT'
3A
COUNCll.. J\.lliJ!;llNG MINUTES
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
Councilor Figley expressed her opinion that something needs to be done about the streets
and this dedicated tax will provide funds to make necessary improvements in the years to
come. She spoke in favor of taking this issue to the voters for their approval.
Councilor Jennings stated that he was not adverse to Councilor Pugh's suggestion to not
take any action at this time.
Councilor Pugh suggested that the Council bring this issue back for consideration once
the City bas a better undentanding of what are the j~ of Ballot Measure 47 to the
City's financial situation and he would like to see what the legislature is going to this
term.
Councilor Bagm8ner agreed that it may be better to wait but he also felt that the
proposed ordinance should be submitted to the voters.
Councilor Sifuentez suggested that the ordiml~ go before the voters.
Councilor OIadwick fdt that the Council should wait before any action is taken and
ultimately, a vote should be taken on this issue.
Mayor Kirksey reminded the Council that the ordinance would become null and void if
the legislature takes action to impose a state-wide gas tax that would provide the City
with a funding level equivalent to what would be generated with a 2C gas tax.
Additionally, this bill would refer the proposed tax to the voters at the May 20th election
date if the legjm~ture does not take action on the state-wide gas tax during the first part
of the legislative session.
0500 Mate Nelson, 990 Cupids Knoll ReI., Monmouth, stated that he owns a gasoline business
in town and that he strongly feels that the issue should be mmal to the voters. In his
opinion, the method in whidl the Council attanpted to get this bill passed was the wrong
way to start since it bas drawn a lot of opposition. Additionally, the local dealers now
have the support of the major gasoline dealf".nl and otba' large orpni-nltiOOS to oppose
this tax and they have a lot of financial backing to defeat this tax at the poDs. He
suggested that Woodburn submit a bond measure to the voters which would generate
$3.9 million and, in his calculation, payback over a 10 year period would be
appt'Mim,....Jy $.62 pel' $1,000 assessed value. He suggested that a Committee be
formed to look at various funding alternatives that would gaaate necessary dollars to
make the street improvemestts rather than imposing the motor vehicle fuel tax. H such a
Committee was fonned, he offered to serve on this Committee. He also expressed his
opinion that the local property owners should pay for the improvements mther than the
motorists who are only driving through town toward another destination. If a bond
measure was submitted to the voters, he stated that he would be willing to talk to other
local gasoline dealers to provide financial assistance in preparing and distributing
literature on the passage of a bond.
0845 Ron Halter, 16700 Arney Rd., spoke on behalf of the local gasoline dealers and he
reiterated their willingness to be a part of a committee to work cooperatively with the
City in arriving at a solution that will work for the City and for the local dealers. If the
Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
f
COUNCIL MEETING MINUI'ES
November 25, 1996
3A
TAPE
lffiADING
issue goes to a vote of the people, the dealers along with other supporting organi7~tions
will fight to defeat this issue even though they would prefer not having to take this type
of action. He also expressed his opinion that individuals who do not drive should still
conttibute to the street improvement costs since it not only benefits their property but
they have friends and family members who use the street when they visit and they rely
on local businesses to provide them a service at their home.
0944 Mark Crow, 1560 Newberg Highway, reiterated his opinion that private businesses
should not have this burden placed upon them. He again questioned the City's past
practice as it relates to the cost of improvements, implementing a bid process, and using
firm figures rather than estimates on future projects. He also expressed his opposition
to a state-wide gas tax and it was his understanding that the dealer's association was also
opposed to a state-wide tax.
Administrator Childs informed Mr. Crow that the City's financial records are audited
annnally by an independent auditor.
Mayor Kirksey stated that the City follows a formali7,ed bidding process on all projects.
Councilor Jenni1lV reiterated that the City publicizes in the Daily Journal of Commerce
and other local papers and the City conforms to all bidding regulations.
1079 Mike Sherlock, Executive Director of Oregon Gasoline Dealers Association, stated that
they are record in support of a state-wide 5C gas tax which would go to cities and
counties. It is their hope that the Council will drop this gas tax issue at this time and let
the legislature review a state-wide tax proposal. In his opinion. it will be late in the
legislative session before any decision is made on a state-wide gas tax.
1190 Councilor Pugh stated that he had heard two objective opinions at this meeting and feels
that this bill should be dropped until after the legislative session. Additionally, he
informed the public that the Councilors receive $25 per month.
Councilor Figley stated that she would prefer to wait until the Governor's Task Force
has released their report and then review the report to determine if we should pursue the
issue in later December or January.
Councilor Jennings stated that road repair costs continue to escalate and for every dollar
not spent now will cost 4 times that much next year. However, he was encouraged by
the willingness of the local dealers to work with the City in coming up with an
alternative to the gas tax. If no suitable alternative is arrived at, then the gas tax should
be pursued.
Councilor Pugh stated that the voters want to know what will the tax money go for
whereas now it is a very emotional issue generating a lot of opposition.
1414 Administrator Childs reminded the Councilors that a potential bond issue was discussed
at the prior workshop on this subject. With the recent passage of Ballot Measure 47, it
may be more difficult to pass a revenue measure.
Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
11'
COUNCn. MEETING MINUTES
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
Councilors Hageoauer, Sifuentez. and Chadwick reiterat:ed their desire to impose a user
tax rather than proposing a bond issue. Additionally, they supported the ref~ of the
gas tax to the voters.
Discussion was held on tabling the issue at this time and notice be given to the public
and gasoline dealecs at least 30 days before it is brought back before the Council for
consideration. This will also give the Council time to educate the public on the need for
additional revenue to fund street improvements and to work coopemively with the
gasoline dealers.
Administrator Childs requested that the Council determine which version of the bill they
want to have as part of the ordinance (version 1 does not refer it to the voters whereas
version 2 refers it to the voters on May 20, 1997).
FIGLEYIPUGH... Council Bill 1758 be amended to read in entirety the draft known as
Version 2. Following a brief discussion, the motion passed unanimously.
JENNINGSIPUGH.... Council Bill 1758 be tabled indefinitely. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mayor Kirksey told the public that this bill was brought up for considecation at the
direction of the Council following a workshop they had previously on the issue of street
repairs.
12W. COUNCIL BIT". 1764 - R~oumON AMENDING THE ICMA RRTlRRMENT
CORPORATION DEFRRRRD COMPENSATION PLAN AND TRUST FOR
14'MPI fl~~
Council Bill 1764 was introduced by Councilor Hagenauer. Recorder Tennant read the
bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for
final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Kirksey declared Council Bill 1764
duly passed.
.12ll COUNCIL BIT". 1765 - RF,SOT.ImON FlITERING JNro AN A(,,~RRMRNT
wrm SOUTH14xN PACIF1C TRANSPORTATION CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION.
OPERATION. AND MAINTENANCE OF AN UNDERGROUND SEWKK
PlPRT JNE.
Council Bill 1765 was introduced by Councilor Hagenauer. The bill was read by title
only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final
passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Kirksey declared the bill duly passed.
1973 CONTRACT AWARD - TRACTOR/MOWER FOR WASTEWATER DIVISION.
Bids for a tractor with an attached flail mower were received from the following
vendors: Ernst Hardware Co., $11,865.00; Lennon Implement Co., $13,250.00; Fisher
Implement Co., $15,500.00; and Northwest Outdoor Equipment Inc, $15,185.00. Staff
recommended the acceptance of the low bid from Ernst Hardware Co..
Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
m"
3A
COUNCIL MEKl1NG MINUTFS
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ.... award the bid to Ernst Hardware Co. in the amount of
$11,865.00. The motion passed unanimously. .
20U llFSTRICTED PARKING PROPOSAL FOR PARK CIRCLE AND PARK
AVENUE NORm OF ALEXANDRA AVENUE.
Staff recommended that No Parking be allowed from Mt. Hood Ave. to the north
interseetion of Park Circle and a 4 hour parking limitation be imposed from the north
intersection of Park Circle to Alexandra Ave. and all along Park Circle.
Discussion was held regarding the extension of the No Parking to the south end of Park
Circle.
JENNINGS/FIGLEy.... amend the staff recommendation to implement parking
restrictions as follows: (1) No Parking from the south end of Park Circle north to the
Mt. Hood Ave. intersection; and (2) 4 hour parking be imposed from Alexander Ave. to
south Park Circle and in Park Circle. The motion passed unanimously.
ill1 RFSUMPl'ION OF A FlTlJ....TIME CITY ATTORNEY POSITION.
In reference to the Administrator's staff tepOrt on this mattrr, Councilor Jennings stated
that he had spoken with the Mayor and Councilors over the last several months
regarding the need to, once again, have a full-time City Attorney. Even with the recent
passage of Ba110t Measure 47, he feels strongly that more attorney hours are necessary
since we continue to have large contracts that need to be reviewed, lawsuits being filed
by developers, and general ovenIllegal issues that require more attorney time than we
currently have allotted. He suggested that a committee of Councilors and the Mayor
negotiate a personal services contract with Attorney Shields for a full-time attorney
position.
JENNINGS/SIFUENTEZ.... Councilors Pugh, FIgley, and Jennines be appointed by the
Mayor to serve on the committee to negotiate a personal services contract with our
attorney. The motion passed unanimously.
2216 SITE PLAN REVIEW #96-16 - UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS.
The Council took no action on the Planning Colllmi~on's approval, with conditions, of
an expansion project submitted by Universal Forest Products which in located in the
Industrial Park.
222Q STAFF REPORTS.
(A) BoardICommittee Positions - Mayor Kirksey stated that she would be contacting
each Councilor by the middle of the week to solicit names for appointments.
(B) Establishment of City Well FreId - Public Works Manager Rohman stated that the
City has requested the State Water Resources Department to create a well field that
allows water flow volume permitted under all city water rights to be pumped from any
Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
11'1"
3A
COUNCn. MEETING MINUfES
November 25, 1996
TAPE
READING
Public Wodes Director Tiwari stated that the City bas been abandoning wells and
transferring water rights. By creating the well field. all capacities will stay within the
City and Urban Growth Boundary. The City bas a good cbance of this request being
approved and staff will continue to work towards the protection of the City's water from
contamination.
(C) Appoinnnent to Government Law Section Executive Committee - Attorney Shields
has been selected by his peers to serve on this Committee of the Oregon State Bar. This
Committee consists of 12 individuals who represent over 300 member attorneys
stateWide representing various governmental agencies.
2605 ADMINISTRATOR'S ),lRPORT.
Admini~tor Childs distributed copies of the new City brochure to the Council. He
credited the work to former student intern Scott Spence.
W1 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS.
~ Councilor Jennings expressed his opinion that the Councilors should be allowed to
interject humor during the meetings.
Mayor Kirksey stated that she bad received commentS from the public as to why the
meetings do not portray a more professional attitude.
Councilor Hagenauer questioned if staff bad been contacted by concerned individuals
regarding the pay telephone at the intersection of Hayes and Front Street. Administrator
Childs suggested tbat the individuals write a letter to the City o.rtlining their concerns.
Councilor Chadwick stated that she bad attended her first LOC conference and she felt it
was very informative and hopes to attend future conferences.
Mayor Kirksey also felt that the sessions were very infonnative at the conference. In
regards to the Eagle Scout project at Library Parle. the circle of stone bas been
completed and it will contain a small garden. Underground sprinklers have been
installed by the Park staff and a work crew from Maclaren School. A plaque is being
made to dedicate the work done by the volunteers.
2824 EXEClJ'lTIlE SESSION.
JENNlNGSIFIGLEY.... adjourn to executive session to (I) conduct deliberations with
persons designated by the governing body to negotiate real property transactions (ORS
192.66O(1)(e)), and (2) to consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of
a public body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed (ORS
192.660(1)(h)).
The motion passed unanimously.
Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
111"
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 25, 1996
3A
TAPE
READING
The meeting adjourned to executive session at 8:23 p.m. and reconvened at 9:25 p.m..
.~
Following the executive session, .
JENNINGSIPUGH.... Attorney be requested to inform Salud Medical Center that if they
cannot show some positive action within the next 30 days we will reactivate the lawsuit.
The motion passed unanimously.
~
ADJOURNMENT.
JENNINGSIPUGH.... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m..
APPROVED
NANCYA.~EY,MAYOR
ATIEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
!Jf"
Executive Session
COUNCIL MEK'l'ING MINlITES
November 25, 1996
3A
DATE. CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF
MARION, STATE OF OREGON, NOVEMBER 25, 19%.
CONVENED. The Counc~ met in executive session at 8:26 p.m. with Mayor Kirksey presiding.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Kirksey
Chadwick
Figley
Hagenauer
Jennings
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Mayor Kirksey rernindP.d the Councilors, staff, and press that information discussed in executive
session is not to be discussed with the public.
Staff Present: City Administrator Childs9 City Attorney Shields, City Recorder Tennant, Public
Works Director Tiwari (left at 9:10 p.m.)
Press: Patrick Johnso~ Woodburn Independent
(I) The first portion of the executive session was called under the authority of ORS 192.66O(1)(e)
to conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to negotiate real property
transactions.
(2) The second portion of the executive session was held under the authority of ORS
192.66O(1)(h) to consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with
regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed.
ADJOURNMENT.
The executive session adjourned at 9:23 p.m..
APPROVED
NANCY A. KIRKSEY, MAYOR
ArrEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 - Executive Session, Council Meeting Minutes, November 25, 1996
11'1"
38
MI'IUTES
WOODBURN ~ COMMISSION
November 14,1996
1) ROll.. CAll.:
Chairperson
VIce Chairperson
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
CommisSioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Mrs. Bjelland
Mr. AtkInson
Mrs. Warzynski
Mrs. Henkes
Mrs. Schultz
Mr. Will
Mr. Lawson
Mr. Frawley
Mr. Palmer
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Staff Present:
Steve GoeckritL Community Development Director
Naomi Tejeda, Assistant Planner
2) MINU1ES:
Commissioner Warzynskl moved 10 approve the minutes of October 24,
1996 with a few corrections.
Commissioner Frawley seconded the motion.
A vote was taken and the minutes of October 24, 1996 were accepted.
3) BUSINESS FROM 1HE AUDIENCE:
None
4) COMMUNICATIONS:
None
1
J
38
5) nOSED PU80C HEARt4G:
A. Site Plan Review 96-16, Universal Forest Produc1s
The nature of the Application Is site plan approval for the
construction of a lumber storage sheet The building area is 6,750
square feet. The property is located at 2895 Progress Way In
Woodbum and is zoned IP lridustrial Park.
Staff reported that Universal Forest Produc1s is located towards the
end of Progress Way on the west slde of the highway. The Applicant
Is asking approval for the expansion of an existing foclli1y.
Staff Indicated that the one Issue, as It relates to the water main Is,
It seems they are not quite sure exactly where It would be located In
relation to the storage facility. Staff further added that It does
appear, the way the faclli1y is proposed, that a water line would
dissect a port1on of that fadli1y. From their latest drawings, it
appears that the line would potentially dissect this storage facility.
He indicated that there wos a serious amount of disolSSion between
Universal Forest ProduCts and the Public Works department regarding
the locatiOn of this line and how they can possibly accommodate this
facility and not be In a sttua1ton where that line would be obs1ructed
In some way by an enclosed s1ructure.
It Is Staffs understanding that Universal Forest Producls worked with
the Public Works department and they In tum, have mentioned the
fact 1hat they feel that some accornmodOtIons CCI'l be made In
regards to the water line and Irs locatiOn In relation to the building.
Staff also stated that In the memo to the Planning ConmIssJon, Public
Works stated that they believed that they could work out this
sttua1ton.
Staff Indicated that this Is the only Issue that Is of any real
concem. The staff report lnd1cates that the Are Department, Fire &.
life Safe1y, and Building OffIdal feel comfortable about this proposal
with the exception of the water line Issue.
Staff reported that the landscaping needs to be maintained and
there are twelve parking spaces In the right-of-way of Progress Way.
However, there has not been a full built out In that area NE of the
existing plant.
Commissioner Will inquired whether staff had any problems with roof
drainage.
2
~
'1l'
38
Staff reported that there is good drainage due to the fact that there
is continuous asphalt in that area.
CommisSioner Palmer pointed out the last sentence of the Memo
from Staff which reads as follows: wthls will be aooroved bv PublIc
Works deoartment orIor to any bulldlna oerml1sw. Commissioner
Palmer stated he would like this to be changed to say wmust be
aoorovedw.
Staff Indicated that this can be modified as a condi11on.
Testimony by the Applicant, Steve Springl Director of Manufacturingl
Universal Forest Products. He indicated that as stated in the Staff
Reportl the area is already under asphalt alCI any repairs to any
existing lines that are undemea1h the asphalt would have to be dug
out In any effect. The building has a 17 foot eave height on It and
a thin metal construction on the ou1sIde to shield lumber from water.
Universal Forest Product Is aware of where the water main crosses.
The structure Is large enough to operate equipment Inside the
building. The applicant indicated that they recognize the fact that
Universal would be liable for any and all costs that would go Into
any repairs and modifications to the building In the future that had
to be made In such a case of repairs. 1he Applicant stated that the
building Is of such a type that the business risk Is vlr1ually nUl as far as
the repairs of the said building.
There was no testimony from opponen1s or proponen1s to the project.
Chairperson Bjelland moved to close the public hearing.
There was no dIscuSSion.
CommIssioner Wills moved to approve Site PIal Review 96-16 with
the wording change -must be- suggested by CommisSioner Palmer.
Commissioner Warzynskl seconded the motion.
3
!11"
38
B. Proposed Access Management Ordinance
The nature of the application Is to protect transportation fadllties,
corridors and sites. The applicant Is the CI1y of Woodburn.
Staff reported that the Draft Report was a cooperative effort by a lot
of different agencies and jurlsdlct1ons. There was alot of assistance
from the Transportation Growth Management Group, as well as with
the Oregon Department of Transportation, LCDC, and Marlon County.
The number of players that were Involved with this were the same
number of players that were Involved in developing our Initial
Transportation Plan. Staff stated that this Is the first Access
Management Ordinance In the State of Oregon that meets the
Transportation Planning rule.
Staff stated he would like Randy Rohmal to provide the presentation
highlighting some of the poIn1s he feels should be brought out In
discussion. Then the discussion would be opened up to the
Commission and the audience as to what their comments may be In
regards to the draft proposal. Staff recommended that If the
Commission felt comfortable with It, the Commission would then
Instruct Staff to come back at the next meeting with an order so that
Staff could prepare the findings. The order would be signed by the
Chair at the next meeting.
Randy Rohman stated that Access Management was one of the
things that was Included In the Transportation System Plan in the area
where Ordinances should be modified and incorporated Into the
various Zoning Ordinances. He stated they spent a considerable
amount of time taking a look at some of the State Highways that run
through the community. Randy added that they have worked with
ODOT and the various people from LCDC and the Transportation
Growth Management Program on the ordinance to get their Ideas.
Randy indicated that Access Management Is not a new Idea and
has been pracflced as sites were developed. He stated that
formalizing the process was something that Is a bit newer. ODOT has
done It for several years. Randy stated that Highway 99E was
reconstructed from Uncoln St. to the north CI1y I1ml1s. As part of that
reconstruction, the. Council passed an Access Management
Ordinance and they entered into 00 agreement with ODOT for
access management along that stretch of roadway.
4
1Tl"
38
Randy explained to.lOO Commission that Access Management cuts
down on a number of accesses or driveways that connect a
roadway. The Intent of Access Mooagernent Is to restrict where
people get onto mainly arterial streets. Access Management would
preserve the flow and make the street I1seIf operate most efficiently.
Randy pointed out that there are a few minor corrections that.need
to be made to the Ordinance. . He Indicated that there are a few
stree1s In Table 1 that are Incorrect, but the baSIc Intent of the
Ordinance Is correct. Randy also reviewed the various Secf10ns of
the Ordinance.
commissioner Palmer pointed out on Table 2, page 9 - Major
Arteries, that Oass 2 should be listed as Young St. instead of Young
Ave.
Randy reviewed correctionS on Table 2. He stated that Uncoln St. will
be looked at from the East City Iiml1s to Settlemler Ave. and Gatch St.
would be from aeveland St. to lJncoIn St. rather than Young St.
commissioner Warzynsld inquired who owned the property of the
driveways off of South 99E, south of Uncoln St.?
Randy responded that the State has righk>f-way. All the driveways
are located on State right-of-way. He stated that the people who
original built there years ago, In aU probability, have an access
permit from ODOT.
commissioner Lawson Questioned an Item on page 12, SectIon E -
Coronoted Joint ParkIng Design. He stated. he couldn't find where
any IndMdual buSIness would have their own reserved parking and
If It would 011 be a convnunl1y 1ype deal.
Randy responded that each busInesS would still have their own
parking reQulremen1s. However, 1hey would have to provide a way
for people to build from one's busInesS' lot to the other business' lot
without going out onto the street to do It.
commissioner Shul1z made a remark regarding Highway 214 and all
the driveways on It. She stated that as much as she would like to see
some offhoSe driveways cloSed, she wonders. what this is going to do
If all the access then comes off of Country Oub Rd. because that Is
becoming a bigger zoo than 214.
5
'Il'
38
Chairperson Bjelland stated she appreciated all the work done on
this project. It Is a good accomplishment for the City. especially
since this is the first one that has been developed that mee1s all the
standards. Chairperson Bjelland commended the staff on this
project.
Commissioner Warzynskl motioned to accept the Access
Management Plan with minor corrections.
Commissioner Frawley seconded the motioned.
The motion passed.
6) DISCUSSION 1TEtA:
Au lnt line Adjustment 96-04 - Capitol Development Company
Staff indicated these are discussion items for the Commission's
information.
Commissioner Frawley questioned whether this was the same party
that was planning on developing a Factory OUtlet.
Staff stated this was oorrect. State indicated that development on
this site can not be continued until 1hey meet the criteria of the
Transportation rule and put a Transportation Plan in place.
Therefore. the developer has been watflng patiently while the City
has gone through the three year exercise to adopt a Transportation
Plan. one that would meet ODOrs and the communi1y favor. Staff
indicated that this process has been done. Now what they are
looking to do Is to follow through with that approval that was given
by the Planning Commission and City Council to reconfigure the zone
designation In this area.
B. Proposed Zoning Amendment Paper
Staff Informed the Planning Commission that Jim Nash.
Representative from Foster Farms. stated that they are not going to
locate In Woodburn.
Staff further indicated that the Zoning Ordinances will be revised
over this next year.
6
ll'
38
7) REPORTS:
Building Activity Dollar Amounts
8) BUSI'IESS FROM lI-E COMMISSION:
COmmissioner Palmer stated that the Northwood Medical Center, as a
Medical Center, has a very good overflow Into his parking lot, but as a
Conference Room, Ifs a mad house. He stated they have been blocked
out of their parking lot enl1rely on three different occaslons because of the
overflow. Commissioner Palmer further stated that he does not remember
this Issue being brought up. When approval of this was given, It was
stressed that the bulldtng had suffldent parking as a Medical Center.
Commissioner Palmerstronglyreconvnended 1hatwhen theordlnances are
revised, conference center parking should be based on the occupancy or
number of people that can occupy the building.
Staff reported that they have leased properly from the Wocx:Ibum School
District and plan on accommodating an additional 20 or 30 spaces.
COmmissioner Shul1z wished everyone a Happy ThanksgMngI
Commissioner Warzynsld Invited all to attend the lhree Valleys meeting at
City Hall, Monday, November 18th at 6:30pm. They will be discussing plans
for an Improvement In this town with monies to be received from the
Rockerfeller Foundation. She further stated that they dained that we
would receive even more monies If we came up with a good plan.
Chairperson Bjelland inquired whe1her the site plan becomeS void after
one year for the properly on the comer of Front St. and Cleveland St.
Staff responded that the site plan Indeed does become void after one year
and the Individual has been notify that they have to reprocess their
application.
Chairperson Bjelland stated that this Is a very important piece of property
for parking.
The COmmission Is Interested In the Coundllooklng at this issue quickly.
7
m"
38
Commissioner Henkes stated she felt discouraged about the way that they
did regarding the Esperanza Court project and not having the backing of
the City Council.
Staff reported that the Council went along with the Commission's
recommendation, although they were very tom and It was a very difficult
sltuatJon. .
Chairperson Bjelland stated In the notes she took, that as Plamlng
Commissioners you plan for your Community In terms of what is In the best
Interest of the Community. She also mentioned the Comprehensive Plan.
She stated that It seemed so sad the way It tumed Into a radallssue when
she felt It was not a racial Issue. Chairperson Bjelland further stated that
it Is very discouraging when you sit on this Committee and you volunteer
your time and you know In your heart that the Ci1y should have acquired
that property for growth and It does not get done.
Commissioner Will agreed with Chairperson Bjelland and Commissioner
Henkes on the apartment complex. He also wished everyone a Happy
Thanksglvlngl
Commissioner Bjelland announced she is on the borderline of considering
leaving the Commission. She stated she was going to announce It next
week. Commissioner Bjelland Indicated she has enjoyed it and stated it
has been a wonderful experience but she thinks It is time for her to leave.
She further indicated that the apartment complex is part of the reason for
her consideration for leaving. She has never been so disheartened about
a decision to know, that In her heart, that growth is going to happen In the
City. She feels very sad that this was put on us when the Council ignored
a Task Force that recommended for the growth of the Oty. They did not
do that and the Councll has to sit here and agonize over It Old then have
all the racial slurs make you feel like you are biased. Chairperson Bjelland
stated that she thinks the same thing is going to happen on Front St. and
Oeveland St. She indicated that the Council ads on a handful of people
and the good of the community gab Ignored. Chairperson Bjelland
Indicated that for her to go through that agony, she Is just not interested.
She further added that when you are on a commission, you do not ever get
. to speak as a citizen and your Input Is squashed. She Indicated that this
is a problem for the personality of her nature.
Staff indicated to Chairperson Bjelland that a lot of good has come out of
the commission and he asked Chairperson Bjelland to think about this Issue
before she decides to step down.
8
'"
38
All the Commissioners encouraged Chairperson Bjelland to stay on.
9) ADJOURf\lMENT:
Commissioner Frawley made the motion to adjourn the Planning
Commission meeting.
Commissioner Lawson seconded the motion.
A vote was taken. the Planning Commission meeting adjourned.
9
'!!'
4A
MEMO
TO: i-.. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
..\ ~
FROM:.'" ~ANCY A. KIRKSEY, MAYOR
DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1995
SUBJECT: BOARD/COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
The following listed individuals are hereby appointed/reappointed to board and
committee terms as noted.
BudQet Committee
Position 3 - Tom West, 1999 Jansen Way (vacancy)
Position 6 - Barbara Lucas (reappointment)
Term Exoiration
Dec. 31, 1999
Dec. 31, 1999
Plannino Commission
Position 2 - Terry Will (reappointment)
Position 5 - Alberto Torres, 950 Gatch Street (vacancy)
Dec. 31, 2000
Dec. 31, 2000
Recreation and Park Board
Position IV - Mel Schmidt, 840 Hermanson St. (vacancy)
Position VI - Eliasar (Char) Quinones,
1355 N. Front St. (vacancy)
Position VII - Barbara Rappleyea (reappointment)
Dec. 31, 1997
Dec. 31, 1999
Dec. 31, 1999
Cable TV Advisorv Board
Position 6 - Jack Barnett (reappointment)
Position 7 - Milt Parker (reappointment)
Dec. 31, 1999
Dec. 31, 1999
1Tl"
9A
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Chris Childs. City Administrator
lJt,t.
SUBJ.:
DATE:
December 5. 1996
Prior to re-tabling this matter at the November 25, 1996 Council meeting, a
motion was passed to amend the Council Bill under consideration to reflect what was
referred to in discussion as .Version II., which included language to facilitate referral
of the issue to voters. Attached is a .clean. copy of the Council Bill (.Version II.) as
it existed at the time it was tabled on November 25th.
For succeeding meetings, reference to this tabled matter will be made only in
the agenda index under the .Tabled Business. heading. Councilors indicated that they
wish to give thirty (30) days' notice before again removing this from the table. When
such a date is established, the full text of the Council Bill will again be printed in the
agenda packet.
!11"
9A
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
A ORDINANCE IMPOSING AN ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE FUel TAX ON MOTOR
VEHICLE FUEL DEALERS FOR PURPOSES OF PAVEMENT PRESERVATION; PROVIDING
FOR ADMINISTRAnON, ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION. OF SAID TAX AND SETTING
EFFECTIVE DATES AND IMMEDIATELY REFERRING SAID ORDINANCE TO THE ELECTORS
OF THE CITY OF WOODBURN.
WHEREAS, the State of Oregon grants municipal authority to impose a motor vehicle
fuel tax as adopted in Article IV, Section 3a of the Oregon Constitution; and
WHEREAS, under Section 8(a) of Measure 47 (enacted by the Oregon voters at the
November 5, 1996 General Election) the tax imposed by this ordinance does not constitute,
and is not intended to constitute, a replacement for reduced property tax revenues under
said measure since the government products and services paid for by said gas tax are not
from ad valorem property taxes; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 2028, the City of Woodburn Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax
Ordinance, is currently in effect, and
WHEREAS, the Oregon Gasoline Dealers Association advocates increasing the
statewide gasoline tax by up to an additional five cents per gallon; and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council supports the Oregon Gasoline Dealers
Association proposal to increase the statewide gasoline tax, particularly if the additional
funds are earmarked for distribution to the respective cities of Oregon; and
WHEREAS, upon passage of any statewide motor fuels tax that would ensure the
City of Woodburn the same level of revenues that would be generated by the tax
contemplated in this ordinance, it is the intent of the Woodburn City Council that this
ordinance then be immediately repealed; and
WHEREAS, the motor vehicle fuel tax revenue is exclusively for reconstruction,
improvement, repair, maintenance, operation and use of public highways, roads and streets;
and
WHEREAS, if old pavements are allowed to deteriorate and not brought back to their
original strengths by preventative maintenance and resurfacing, then reconstruction of
these streets will be necessary at a future date, the cost of reconstruction is much higher;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a workshop on September 10, 1996 to discuss
street pavement related issues. After input, the City Council reached a consensus to
expand the existing resurfacing program and to include a certain number of streets for
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
".
9A
resurfacing based on the age of the pavement, and
WHEREAS. the City Council recognizes the need for street pavement preservation
and improvements based on the information provided by the staff and on field investigation
made on their own; and
WHEREAS. the City Council recognizes the need for an additional dedicated source
of funding for pavement preserva~ion and street projects; NOW THEREfORE.
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ii1IL. This ordinance shall be known as the wCity of Woodburn Pavement
Preservation Ordinance. W
Section 2. Puroose. This ordinance is intended to raise tax revenue in addition to
Ordinance 2028 for the purpose funding street resurfacing and repavement. This ordinance
is not intended to amend, modify or change any provision of Ordinance 2028, the City of
Woodburn Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Ordinance.
Section 3. Definitions: As used in this ordinance, unless the context requires
otherwise:
(A) W Aircraft fuelw means any gasoline and other inflammable or combustible gas
or liquid by whatever name such as gasoline, gas or liquid is known or sold, usable as fuel
for the operation of aircraft, except gas or liquid, the chief use of which, as determined by
the City is for purposes other than the propulsion of aircraft.
(B) W Authorized AgentW any person or agency that has been given authority to
implement a portion of this ordinance.
(C) wCityw means City of Woodburn, a municipal corporation of the State of
Oregon.
(D) wDealerw means any person who:
(1) Supplies or imports motor vehicle fuel for sale, use or distribution in, and
after the same reaches the City, but wdealerw does not include any person who imports into
the City motor vehicle fuel in quantities of 500 gallons or less purchased from a supplier
who is permitted as 8 dealer hereunder and who assumes liability for the payment of the
applicable motor vehicle fuel tax to the City; or
(2) Produces, refines, manufactures or compounds motor vehicle fuels in
the City for use, distribution or sale in the City; or
(3) Acquires in the City for sale, use or distribution in the City motor vehicle
fuels with respect to which there has been no municipal motor fuel tax previously incurred.
Page 2 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
!1l'
9:4
(E) RMotor Vehicle Fuel-HandlerR means any person who acquires or handles
motor vehicle fuel within the City through a storage tank facility with storage tank capacity
that exceeds 500 gallons of motor vehicle fuel.
(F) RDistributor. means, in addition to its ordinary meaning, the deliverer of motor
vehicle fuel by a dealer to any service station or into any tank, storage facility or series of
tanks or storage facilities connected by pipelines, from which motor vehicle fuel is
withdrawn directly for sale or for delivery into the fuel tanks of motor vehicles whether or
not the service station, tank or storage facility is owned, operated or controlled by the
dealer.
(G) RHighwayR means every way, thoroughfare and place of whatever nature,
open for use of the publiC for the purpose of vehicular travel.
(H) .Motor VehicleR means all vehicles, engines or machines, moveable or
immovable, operated or propelled by the use of motor vehicle fuel.
(I) RMotor Vehicle FuelR means and includes gasoline, diesel, mogas, methanol,
and any other flammable or combustible gas or liquid, by whatever name such gasoline,
diesel, mogas, methanol, gas or liquid is known or sold, usable as fuel for the operation of
motor vehicles, except gas, diesel, mogas, methanol, or liquid, the chief use of which, as
determined by the City, is for purposes other than the propulsion of motor vehicles upon
the highways. Propane fuel and motor vehicle fuel used exclusively as a structural heating
source are excluded as a taxable motor vehicle fuel.
(J) "Person" includes every natural person, association, firm, partnership, or
corporation
(K) .Service Station. means and includes any place operated for the purpose of
retailing and delivering motor vehicle fuel into the fuel tanks of motor vehicles.
(l) .State. means State of Oregon.
Section 4. Tax ImDosed. An additional motor vehicle fuel tax is hereby imposed
as provided herein on every dealer operating within the corporate limits of Woodburn. The
City of Woodburn motor vehicle fuel tax imposed shall be paid monthly to the City or to its
authorized agent.
(A) A person who is not a permitted dealer or permitted motor vehicle fuel-handler
shall not accept or receive motor vehicle fuel in this City from a person who supplies or
imports motor vehicle fuel who does not hold a valid motor fuel dealers permit in the City.
If a person is not a permitted dealer or permitted motor vehicle fuel-handler in this City and
accepts or receives motor vehicle fuel, the purchaser or receiver shall be responsible for all
taxes, interests and penalties prescribed herein.
(B) A permitted dealer or fuel-handler who accepts or receives motor vehicle fuel
from a person who does not hold a valid dealer or fuel-handler permit in this City, shall pay
Page 3 -
COUNCil BilL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
...
9A
the tax imposed by this Ordinance to the City or it's authorized agent, upon the sale, use
or distribution of the motor vehicle fuel.
Section 5. Amount and Payment.
(A) Subject to subsection (B) and (C) of this section, by law, every dealer engaging
in his own name, or in the name of others, or in the name of his representatives or agents
in the City, in the sale, use or distribution of motor vehicle fuel, shall;
(1 ) Not later than the 25th day of each calendar month, render a statement
to the City or to its authorized agent, of all motor vehicle fuel sold, used or distributed by
him in the City as well as all such fuel sold, used or distributed by him in the City as well
as all such fuel sold, used or distributed in the City by a purchaser thereof upon which sale,
use or distribution the dealer has assumed liability for the applicable motor vehicle fuel tax
during the preceding calendar month.
(2) Pay a motor vehicle fuel tax pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance
computed on the basis of two (2.0) cents per gallon of such motor vehicle fuel so sold,
used or distributed as shown by such statement in the manner and within the time provided
in this ordinance. This two (2) cent per gallon tax shall be in addition to the one (1) cent
per gallon currently imposed by Ordinance 2028.
(B) In lieu of claiming refund of the tax as provided in Section 21, or of any prior
erroneous payment of motor vehicle fuel tax made to the City by the dealer, the dealer may
show such motor vehicle fuel as a credit or deduction on the monthly statement and
payment of tax.
(C) The motor vehicle fuel tax shall not be imposed wherever it is prohibited by
the Constitution or laws of the United States or of the State of Oregon.
Section 6. Permit ReQuirements. No dealer or fuel-handler, shall sell, use or
distribute any motor vehicle fuel until he has secured a dealer or fuel-handler permit as
required herein.
Section 7. Permit Aoolications and Issuance.
(A) Every person, before becoming a dealer or fuel handler in motor vehicle fuel
in this City shall make an application to the City or its duly authorized agent, for a permit
authorizing such person to engage in business as a dealer or fuel handler.
(B) Applications for the permit must be made on forms prescribed, prepared and
furnished by the City, or its duly authorized agent.
(C) The applications shall be accompanied by a duly acknowledged certificate
containing:
(1) The business name under which the dealer or fuel-handler is transacting
Page 4 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
111"
9A
business.
(2) The place of business and location of distributing stations in the City.
and in areas adjacent to the City limits in the State of Oregon.
(3) The name and address of the managing agent, the names and addresses
of the several persons constituting the. firm or partnership and, if a corporation, the
corporate name under which it is authorized to transact business and the names and
addresses of its principal officers and registered agent, as well as primary transport carrier.
(D) The application for a motor vehicle fuel dealer or fuel-handler permit having
been accepted for filing, the City or its authorized agent, shall issue to the dealer or fuel-
handler a permit in such form as the City or its duly authorized agent may prescribe to
transact business in the City. The permit so issued is not assignable, and is valid only for
the dealer or fuel-handler in whose name issued.
(E)
permits.
The City Recorders Office shall keep on file a copy of all applications and/or
(F)
herein.
No fee(s) shall be charged by the City for securing said permit as described
Section 8. Failure to Secure Permit.
(A) If any dealer sells, distributes or uses any motor vehicle fuel without first filing
the certificate and securing the permit required by Section 7, the motor vehicle fuel tax
shall immediately be due and payable on account of all motor vehicle fuel so sold,
distributed or used.
(B) The City shall proceed forthwith to determine, from the best available sources,
the amount of such tax, and it shall assess the tax in tile amount found due, together with
a penalty of 200 percent of the tax, and shall make its certificate of such assessment and
penalty, determined by City Administrator or the City's duly authorized agent. In any suit
or proceeding to collect such tax or penalty or both, the certificate is prima facie evidence
that the dealer therein named is indebted to the City in the amount of the tax and penalty
therein stated.
(e) Any fuel-handler who sells, handles, stores, distributes, or uses any motor
vehicle fuel without first filing the certificate and securing the permit required by Section
7, shall be assessed a penalty of $250.00 unless modified by Section 28 Subsection -a-,
determined by the City Administrator or the City's duly authorized agent. In any suit or
proceeding to collect such penalty, the certificate is prima facie evidence that the fuel-
handler therein named is indebted to the City in the amount of the penalty therein stated.
(D) Any tax or penalty so assessed may be collected in the manner prescribed in
Section 12 with reference to delinquency in payment of the tax or by Court Action.
Page 5 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
'II'
9A
Section 9. Revocation of Permit. The City or its authorized agent shall revoke
the permit of any dealer or fuel-handler refusing or neglecting to comply with any provision
of this Ordinance. The City or its authorized agent shall mail by certified mail addressed
to such dealer or fuel-handler at his last known address appearing on the files, a notice of
intention to cancel. The notice shall give the reason for the cancellation. The cancellation
shall become effective without further notice if within 10 days from the mailing of the
notice the dealer or fuel-handler has not made good its default or delinquency.
Section 10. Cancellation of Permit.
(A) The City or its authorized agent may, upon written request of a dealer or fuel-
handler cancel any permit issued to such dealer or fuel-handler, the cancellation to become
effective 30 days from the date of receipt of the written request.
(B) If the City or its authorized agent ascertains and finds that the person to
whom a permit has been issued Is no longer engaged in the business of a dealer or fuel-
handler, the City or its authorized agent may cancel the permit of such dealer or fuel-
handler upon investigation after 30 days notice has been mailed to the last known address
of the dealer or fuel-handler.
Section 11. Remedies Cumulative. Except as otherwise provided in Sections 12
and 14, the remedies provided in Sections 8, 9 and 10 are cumulative. No action taken
pursuant to those sections shall relieve any person from the penalty provisions of this
Ordinance.
Section 12. Pavment of Tax and Delinouencv.
(A) The motor vehicle fuel tax imposed by Sections 4 and 5 shall be paid on or
before the 25th day of each month to the City or its authorized agent which, upon request,
shall receipt the dealer or fuel-handler therefor.
(B) Except as provided in subsection (D) of this Section, to any motor vehicle fuel
tax not paid as required by subsection (A) of this Section, there shall be added a penalty
of one percent (1 .0%) of such motor vehicle fuel tax.
(el Except as provided in subsection (D) of this Section, if the tax and penalty
required by subsection (B) of this section are not received on or before the close of
business on the last day of the month in which the payment is due, a further penalty of ten
percent (10.0%) shall be paid in addition to the penalty provided for in subsection (B) of
this Section.
(D) If the City or its authorized agent, determines that the delinquency was due
to reasonable cause and without any intent to avoid payment, the penalties provided by
subsections (B) and (C) of this Section may be waived. Penalties imposed by this Section
shall not apply when the penalty provided in Section 8 has been assessed and paid.
(E) If any person fails to pay the motor vehicle fuel tax of any penalty provided
Page 6 - COUNCil Bill NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
..
SA
for by this Ordinance, the amount thereof shall be collected from such person for the use
of the City. The City shall commence and prosecute to final determination in any court of
competent jurisdiction an action to collect the same.
(F) In the event any suit or action is instituted to collect the motor vehicle fuel tax
or any penalty provided for by this ordinance, the City shall be entitled to recover from the
person sued reasonable attorney fees at trial or upon appeal of such suit or action, in
addition to all other sums provided by law.
(G) No dealer who collects from any person the tax provided for herein, shall
knowingly and willfully fail to report and pay the same to the City or its authorized agent,
as required herein.
Section 13. Monthly Statement of Dealer and Fuel-Handler. Unless modified by
Section 28, Subsection -b- every dealer and fuel-handler in motor vehicle fuel shall render
to the City or its authorized agent, on or before the 25th day of each month, on forms
prescribed, prepared and furnished by the City or its authorized agent, a signed statement
of the number of gallons of motor vehicle fuel sold, distributed, used, or stored by him
during the preceding calendar month. The statement shall be signed by the permit holder.
All statements as required in this section are public records.
Section 14. Failure to File Monthlv Statement. If any dealer or fuel-handler fails to
file the report required by Section 13, the City or its authorized agent, shall proceed
forthwith to determine from the best available sources the amount of motor vehicle fuel
sold, distributed, used or stored by such dealer or fuel handler for the period unreported,
and such determination shall be prima facie evidence of the amount of such fuel sold,
distributed, used or stored. The City or its authorizing agent, immediately shall assess the
motor fuel tax in the amount so determined, as pertaining to the reportable dealer, adding
thereto a penalty of 10 percent for failure to report. Fuel-handlers failing to file a monthly
statement of motor vehicle fuel shall be assessed a penalty of $50.00. The penalty shall
be cumulative to other penalties provided in this Ordinance. In any suit brought to enforce
the rights of the City under this section, the above determination showing the amount of
tax, penalties and costs unpaid by any dealer or fuel-handler and that the same are due and
unpaid to the City or its authorized agent is prima facie evidence of the facts as shown.
Section 15. Billing Purchasers. Bills shall be rendered to all purchasers of motor
vehicle fuel by dealers in motor vehicle fuel. The bills shall separately state and describe
to the satisfaction of the City or its authorized agent the different products shipped
thereunder and shall be serially numbered except where other sales invoice controls
acceptable to the City or its authorized agent are maintained. The bills required hereunder
may be the same as those required under ORS 319.210.
Section 16. Failure to Provide Invoice or Deliverv Tag. No person shall receive and
accept any shipment of motor vehicle fuel from any dealer, or pay for the same, or sell or
offer the shipment for sale, unless the shipment is accompanied by an invoice or delivery
tag showing the date upon which shipment was delivered and the name of the dealer in
motor vehicle fuel.
Page 7 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
m"
9A
Section 17. TransDortina Motor Vehicle Fuel in Bulk. Every person operating any
conveyance for the purpose of hauling, transporting or delivering motor vehicle fuel in bulk
shall, before entering upon the public highways of the City with such conveyance, have
and possess during the entire time of his hauling or transporting such motor fuel an invoice,
bill of sale or other written statement showing the number of gallons, the true name and
address of the seller or consignor and the true name and address of the buyer or consignee,
if any, of the same. The person hauling such motor vehicle fuel shall at the request of any
officer authorized by the City to inquire into or investigate such matters, produce and offer
for inspection the invoice, bill of sale or other statement.
Section 18. ExemDtion of EXDort Fuel.
(A) The license tax imposed by Section 4 and 5 shall not be imposed on motor
vehicle fuel:
(1) Exported from the City by a dealer; or
(2) Sold by a dealer in individual quantities of 500 gallons or less for export
by the purchaser to an area or areas outside the City in containers other than the fuel tank
of a motor vehicle, but every dealer shall be required to report such exports and sales to
the City or its authorized agent in such detail as may be required.
(B) In support of any exemption from motor vehicle fuel taxes claimed under this
section other than in the case of stock transfers or deliveries in his own equipment, every
dealer must execute and file with the City or its authorized agent an export certifICate in
such form as shall be prescribed, prepared and furnished by the City or its authorized agent,
containing a statement, made by some person having actual knowledge of the fact of such
exportation, that the motor vehicle fuel has been exported from the City, and giving such
details with reference to such shipment as may be required. The City or its authorized
agent may demand of any dealer such additional data as is deemed necessary in support
of any such certificate, and failure to supply such data will constitute a waiver of all right
to exemption claimed by virtue of such certificate. The City or its authorized agent may,
in a case where it believes no useful purpose would be served by filing of an export
certificate, waive the certificate.
(C) Any motor vehicle fuel carried from the City in the fuel tank of a motor vehicle
shall not be considered as exported from the City.
(D) No person shall, through false statement, trick or device, or otherwise, obtain
motor vehicle fuel for export as to which the City motor vehicle fuel tax has not been paid
and fail to export the same, or any portion thereof, or cause the motor vehicle fuel or any
portion thereof not to be exported, or divert or cause to be diverted the motor vehicle fuel
or any portion thereof to be used, distributed or sold in the City and fail to notify the City
or its authorized agent and the dealer from whom the motor vehicle fuel was originally
purchased of his act.
(E) No dealer or other person shall conspire with any person to withhold from
Page 8 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
11"
9A
export, or divert from export or to return motor vehicle fuel to the City for sale or use so
as to avoid any of the fees imposed herein.
(F) In support of any exemption from taxes on account of sales of motor vehicle
fuel in individual quantities of 500 gallons or less for export by the purchaser, the dealer
shall retain in his files for at least three years an export certificate executed by the
purchaser in such form and containing such information as is prescribed by the City or its
authorized agent. This certificate shall ~e prima facie evidence of the exportation of the
motor vehicle fuel to which it applies only if accepted by the dealer in good faith.
Section 19. Sales to Armed Forces Exemoted. The motor vehicle fuel tax imposed
by Sections 4 and 5 shall not be imposed on any motor vehicle fuel sold to the Armed
Forces of the United States for use in ships, aircraft or for export from the City; but every
dealer shall be required to report such sales to the City or its authorized agent, in such
detail as may be required. A certificate by an authorized officer of such Armed Forces shall
be accepted by the dealer as sufficient proof that the sale is for the purpose specified in
the certificate.
Section 20. Fuel in Vehicles CominQ Into City Not Taxed. Any person coming into
the City in a motor vehicle may transport in the fuel tank of such vehicle motor fuel for his
own use only and for the purpose of operating such motor vehicle without securing a
license or paying the tax provided in Sections 4 and 5, or complying with any of the
provisions imposed upon dealers herein, but if the motor vehicle fuel so brought into the
City is removed rom the fuel tank of the vehicle or used for any purpose other than the
propulsion of the vehicle, the person so importing the fuel into the City shall be subject to
all provisions herein applying to dealers.
Section 21. Refunds. Refunds will be made pursuant to ORS. 319.280 to 319.320.
Section 22. Examinations and Investigations. The City, or its duly authorized agent,
may make any examination of accounts, records, stocks, facilities and equipment of
dealers, fuel-handlers, service stations and other persons engaged in storing, selling or
distributing motor vehicle fuel or other petroleum products within this City, and such other
investigations as it considers necessary in carrying out the provisions of this ordinance. If
the examination or investigations disclose that any reports of dealers or other persons
theretofore filed with the City or its authorized agent pursuant to the requirements herein,
have shown incorrectly the amount of gallons of motor vehicle fuel distributed or the tax
accruing thereon, the City or its authorized agent may make such changes in subsequent
reports and payments of such dealers or other persons, or may make such refunds, as may
be necessary to correct the errors disclosed by its examinations or investigations.
Section 23. Limitation on Credit for or Refund of Overoavment and on Assessment
of Additional Tax.
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, any credit for erroneous
overpayment of tax made by a dealer taken on a subsequent return or any claim for refund
of tax erroneously overpaid filed by a dealer must be so taken or filed within three years
Page 9 -
COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
11"
9A
after the date on which the overpayment was made to the City or to its authorized agent.
(B) Except in the case of a fraudulent report or neglect to make a report. every
notice of additional tax proposed to be assessed under this ordinance shall be served on
dealers within three years from the date upon which such additional taxes became due.
Section 24. Examinina Books and Accounts of Carrier of Motor Vehicle Fuel. The
City or its duly authorized agent may at any time during normal business hours examine the
books and accounts of any carrier of motor vehicle fuel operating within the City for the
purpose of checking shipments or use of motor vehicle fuel. detecting diversions thereof
or evasion of taxes in enforcing the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 25. Records to be KeDt bv Dealers and Fuel-Handler. Every dealer and fuel-
handler in motor vehicle fuel shall keep a record in such form as may be prescribed by the
City or its authorized agent of all purchases. receipts. sales and distribution of motor
vehicle fuel. The records shall include copies of all invoices or bills of such sales and
purchases. and shall at all times during the business hours of the day be subject to
inspection by the City or its authorized officers or agents.
Section 26. Records to be KeDt Three Years. Every dealer and fuel-handler shall
maintain and keep. for a period of three years. all records of motor vehicle fuel used. sold
and distributed within the City by such dealer or fuel-handler, together with stock records,
invoices, bills of lading and other pertinent papers as may be required by the City or its
authorized agent. In the event such records are not kept within the State of Oregon, the
dealer shall reimburse the City or its duly authorized agents for all travel, lodging, and
related expenses incurred in examining such records. The amount of such expenses shall
be additional tax imposed hereunder.
Section 27. Use of Tax Revenues.
(A) The City Administrator shall be responsible for the disposition of the revenue
from the tax imposed by this ordinance in the manner provided by this section.
(B) For the purposes of this section, net revenue shall mean the revenue from the
tax imposed by this ordinance remaining after providing for the cost of administering the
motor vehicle fuel tax to motor vehicle fuel dealers and any refunds and credits authorized
herein. The program administration costs of revenue collection and accounting activities
shall not exceed 10% of annual tax revenues.
(C) The net revenue shall be used only for the activities related to the resurfacing,
and repair, of public highways, roads and streets within the City of Woodburn.
Section 28. Administration. The City Administrator or his designate is responsible
for administering this ordinance. In addition, the City Administrator may enter into an
agreement with the Financial Services Branch of Oregon Department of Transportation as
an authorized agent for the implementation of certain sections of this ordinance. If the
Financial Services Branch is chosen as an authorized agent of the City, then the
Page 10 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
".
9A
modifications outlined below shall apply:
(a) The fuel handler's penalty of Section 8 Subsection "c" shall be reduced to
$100.00. And if the Division determines that the failure to obtain the permit
was due to reasonable cause and without any intent to avoid obtaining a
permit, then the penalty provided in Section 8 and this Subsection may be
waived.
(b) The fuel handler's monthly reporting requirements of Section 13 and 14 shall
be waived.
Section 29. SeDarabilitv: If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 30. Effective Dates: The permit requirements imposed by this ordinance
are effective July 1, 1997 and the taxation imposed by this ordinance is effective
September 1, 1997.
Section 31. Voter Referral. This ordinance shall be referred to the electors of the
City of Woodburn at the May 20, 1997 special election. Said election shall be held in
accordance with the applicable provisions of law. The appropriate notices shall be given
as provided by applicable law. A copy of the ballot measure for this referral is attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The taxation imposed by this ordinance
shall commence on September 1, 1997, upon approval of a majority of the electors of the
City of Woodburn at the special election of May 20, 1997.
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Date
APPROVED:
Nancy A. Kirksey, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 11 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 1758
ORDINANCE NO.
~
9A
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
CITY OF WOODBURN
Marion County, Oregon
May 20, 1997
Submitted to the Voters by the City Council
REFERRAlOF ORDINANCE IMPOSING MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL TAX
QUESTION: Shall the City of Woodburn adopt an ordinance imposing a motor vehicle
fuel tax?
EXPLANATION: The proposed ordinance imposes a tax of two cents per gallon, in
addition to the existing one cent tax. on motor vehicle fuel sold,
used or distributed within the City of Woodburn.
Revenues collected by this tax shall be used only for resurfacing
and repair of city streets.
The City Council intends to repeal this ordinance when revenue
received by the city from any additional future statewide gas tax is
determined to be equal to or greater than the revenue generated
by this tax.
F\GASELEC
'1J'
lOA
City of Woodburn
Police Department
STAFF REPORT
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
(503) 982-2345
Ken Wri
Chief of
Date:
December 3, 1996
To:
Mayor and Council
Subject:
Human Rights Commission - Ordinance 2113
At the October 14, 1996 meeting of the City Council a motion was passed to extend Ordinance
2113 for one year. This was brought about by the sunset clause attached to the ordinance when
it was originally passed in 1993.
Recommendation: The City Council approve extending Ordinance 2113 to December 31,
1997. This would allow the Human Rights Commission to develop and
return to the CouncD with a operating plan prior to December 31,
1997.
Backszround: As the Council will recall the Human Rights Commission was established by
ordinance, but membership was not appointed immediately. Between passage of the ordinance
and October 1995 no meeting were held. In October 1995 the City Council held the annual
workshop to review Council Goals. There was lengthy discussion concerning the Human Rights
Commission. It was the consensus of the Council to establish a goal that would 1) make Human
Rights a responsibility of every citizen within the community and 2) form a committee to
establish policies and guidelines for the staff and public. Subsequently the mayor contacted
interested individuals and appointed them to the committee. On September 24, 1996 the first
meeting of the Woodburn Human Rights Commission was held. The meeting was a introduction
of the membership and review of the current ordinance establishing the committee. Because of
the enthusiasm of those attending the meeting it was my suggestion that the original ordinance
be extended to allow the committee to develop itself. At the October 14, 1996 meeting of the
City Council a motion to extend the original Human Rights Commission for one year was
adopted. The Council expressed a desire to give the Committee and opportunity to develop their
agenda in concert with the mission and purpose of the Council and to solicit participation from
other community organizations in hope that it will bring a broader representation of community
participation. The next scheduled meeting of the commission will be January 8, 1997 at 7 P.M.
the location is to be announced.
111'
10A
COUNCIL BILL NO. I 7100
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2113 (THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
ORDINANCE); EXTENDING THE ORDINANCE EXPIRATION DATE; AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS. the City Council passed Ordinance 2113 creating a Human Rights
Commission on December 13, 1993; and
WHEREAS. the expiration date of this ordinance was originally established as
December 31, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City Council continues to perceive a need for this ordinance
and the participation of a Human Rights Commission in the Woodburn community;
NOW. THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 7, Ordinance 2113 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 7. Exoiration. This ordinance shall expire and is repealed on
December 31, 1997. This matter shall be brought to the attention of the
City Council 90 days prior to the expiration of the ordinance.
Section 2. This ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of
the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist and this
ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage by the Council and approval by
the Mayor. ::JJ
Approved as to form: .~ ~ /1- 5 - 16
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
Nancy A. Kirksey, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
11f'
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Page 2 -
Mary Tennant, City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
'II'
10A
108
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City Council through the City Administrator
Public Works Director~ ~
Engineering Report for Parr R Improvement
DATE:
December 5, 1996
RECOMMENDAnoN: Approve the Engineering report as presented and direct staff to
prepare -Resolution of Intent to Improve Parr Road".
Project Summary
The entire project is divided into three parts and only one portion is being presented for
assessment:
1. Assessment Project
Parr Road, 100 feet west of Settlemier, to the west
boundary of school property.
West bou1dary c:l school property to west property
line of Centennial Park.
City, state and railroad funds to be used
a) Parr/Settlemier/Front intersection
b) Settlemier extension toward aossing
c) Railroad crossing itself
2. Future Assessment Project:
(fronting parK property)
3. Project not part of assessment:
M~r Policies Used
1. Front footage method for a 34' wide street has been used as the basic assessment
method. This means that property assessment is based on the cost for 34' wide local
street, and not on the cost for 39' wide collector street; however, the school will pay
the cost for the additional five feet street width fronting their property and also the
school will pay for the bikeway fronting their property.
2. The properties whim already have sidewalk along a public street on one side have
been assessed only me-half (112) the cost of sidewalk improvement along Parr Road
sidewalk improvement.
3. Driveways are assessed against the property it serves.
4. The assessment cost for the properties outside the city's jurisdiction is calculated
similar to other properties, but the initial cost has been equally divided between the
school district and the city. This is because the school project necessitated the
improvement and the city is unable to assess the properties because of jurisdictional
problems. If these properties pay for the cost as part of an annexation in a
recommended period of ten (10) years, or due to other negotiations, then the original
cost to the school and city will be reimbursed equally at one-half (112) of the amount
collected.
Page 1 - Parr Rd Report 12/10196
11"
10B
5. A standard subdivision lot. which has previously paid for a public road fronting the lot
and is not having direct a<xess to the proposed collector road, is not assessed for this
collector street.
6. No property other than the city and school will pay for the bikeway unless the project
fronting park property is included for construction in the future.
7. A considerable amount of the city's capacity improvement funds will be used to
supplement assessment monies so that this high priority project could be
accomplished.
8. At least two years' allocation of state fund exchange monies will be utilized for
Settlemier/Parr Road intersection.
BACKGROUND: Woodbum School Distrid has requested the creation of a local
Improvement District to improve Parr Road because the new school is being constructed
in the area. As a condition of approval, Woodbum School District and Parr Acres Mobile
Home Court is required to participate in the local Improvement District. 1he creation of
a 'local Improvement District' requires that the city follow a defined process outlined
below:
1. City council directs staff to prepare an engineer's report for its review.
2. Preliminary engineering is performed so that the engineer's report with proper
assessment could be forwarded to the city council.
3. If the engineer's report is acceptable, city council may direct staff to prepare a
-Resolution of Intent to Improve- that defines the local Improvement Distrid boundary
and sets a date for the required public hearing.
4. City council holds a public hearing on the project and receives input from affected
property owners.
5. If more than 50% of the property owners approve the project, then city council may
direct staff to bring an ordinance that authorizes improvement cost assessment against
the benefitted properties in the Local Improvement District.
6. After assessment ordinance has been approved, city council may authorize sale of
bond to generate revenue to pay for the projed or, on smaller projects, city council
may allow borrowing of funds from other city sources on a temporary basis.
7. After assessment ordinance has been approved, city staff completes the final
engineering plans and contrad document, advertises the project. and bids are
received.
8. Staff makes recommendation to council to award the centrad to the lowest responsible
bidder.
Page 2 - Parr Rd Report 12110196
",.
108
9. Construction activities take place under the supervision of Engineering.
10. The last step of the process is performed by the Finance Department as they complete
the final assessment process and place the amounts on city docket.
At present, we are on the second step with presentation of the engineering report to the
city council. Unless something unforeseen occurs, the Parr Road improvement
construction activities will take place in the summer of 1997.
Council approval of the engineering report is requested.
GST:lg
PARR'RP'T12IO.C
Page 3 - Parr Rd Report 12/10196
!11"
108
PARR ROAD ENGINEERING REPORT
A) DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS:
The project will consist of improving Parr Road from Settlemier Avenue to the west
property line of the Woodburn Middle/Elementary school site. Parr Road will be widened
to a 39 foot improved surface from cwb to cwb, including storm sewers, five foot
sidewalks on both sides and a 10 foot wide bike path on the south side. See detail "A" for
a typical cross-section.
This project will also include the improvement of both intersections of Front Street and
Settlemier Avenue with Parr Road with. Settlemier intersection will be widened and
provided with turn lanes. Front Street will be widened and realigned.
The City, in conjunction with Southern Pacific Railroad, is preparing to realign and
improve the existing Parr Road railroad crossing. However, this is not a part of this
project due to time constraints.
B) BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICf:
The property subject to the assessment of this district will be restricted to those properties
within the city boundary, fronting the unimproved portion of Parr Roacl, from the west
property line of the school property to a point 100 feet west of the centerline intersection
of Parr Road and Settlemier Avenue. .
Property not within the city boundary at this time, but fronting Parr Road and which will
benefit from this improvement:, will be required to reimburse the properties funding this
improvement upon annexation into the city, if it takes place within a recommended period
of 10 years.
The intersection improvement of Settlemier Avenue and Front Street; although planned to
be constructed with this project, is considered to be a capacity improv~ and will be
funded by other resources.
~'
C) PROPERTIES IN THE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT:
The following properties are located in Section 13, Township 5 South, Range 2 West of
the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, Oregon.
TAX LOT NO.
OWNER
500
102
103
100
400
WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSIDP
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
SMITH, HAZEL M- TRUSTEE
MONNIER, RONALD & DEBRA
The following properties are located in Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 1 West of
the Wdlamette Meridian, Marion County, Oregon.
1300
BOO
3300
2400
2300
1400
3400
5700
5800
7400
7300
7200
7100
7000
6900
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF WOODBURN
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF WOODBURN
BODUNOV, LAZAR & SANDRA
MARTINFZ, VIRGINIA
GARDNER, NORMA
HILL, GLENN & VIRGINIA
YBARRA, MANUEL & BENITA
W AGENMANN, TODD & KAREN
BEJARANO, ALMA
CITY OF WOODBURN
LOPEZ, YOLANDA
.VSHIVKOFF, LUKA& ANASTASIA
RIOS, EMILIO & HERMD...INDA
MANSEIL, MARVIN & MARIA
LOPES, DAMASO & CATALINA
'IT'
108
2
108
3
D) PROPERTIES WITHIN MARION COUNTY. SUBJEcr TO COST SBARING
NEGOTIATIONS OR PAYMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT FUNDS UPON
ANNEXATION WITHIN A to-YEAR PERIOD.
The following listed properties are within the Local Improvement District but are not with
in the current city boundaiy.
TAX LOT NO.
OWNER
100
400
SMITH, HAZEL M- TRUSTEE
MONNIER, RONALD & DEBRA
E) PROPOSED METHOD OF ASSESSMENT:
The proposed method of assessment is based on the front footage adjacent to Parr Road.
The project cost will be broke down into separate categories and assessed accordingly.
F) IMPROVEMENT SECI10N BREAKDOWN
As referenced in section "A" of this report, Parr Road will be widened to a 39 foot wide
improved surface from cwb to curb, including storm sewers, street lighting, five foot
sidewalks both sides and a 10 foot wide bike path on the south side. See detail "A" for a
typical cross-section.
Excluding the school district property, the benefitting properties as described in Section 1-
D. will only be assessed for a standard residential section which will include a 34 foot wide
improved surface cwb to cwb, storm sewer, and street lighting) see detail "8." The school
district property will be assessed for the standard 34 foot wide residential section, the
additional 5 foot widened capacity portion and the bikelane fronting their property. The
city will fund the cost of the widened portion of the road not fronting school district
property .
The sidewalk costs and driveway approach cost will be estimated and assessed separately
from the street improvement assessment so that it can be distributed fairly to benefitting
property.
The portion of the improvement not included in the assessment to the benefitted properties
is the 10 foot wide bike path, the additional five feet of street surface improvement (except
the_school district property), and the additional asphaltic concrete in excess of the
standard two and one half inch residential thickness.
'lr
lOB
4
G) PROPOSED PROJECf BOUNDARIES
AND ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
The engineer's estimate is broken into four sections.
Schedule fa is that portion of Parr Road west of the school district property to the west
line of ~ennial Park property which will be constructed as a later phase.
Schedule Ib is calculated from a point 100 feet west of the centerline intersection of Parr
Road and Settlemier Avenue, to the west boundary of the school district property and is
the project area to be assessed.
Schedule n improvements include the Parr/SettlemierlFront Street intersections, a portion
of Settlemier Street, and a portion of Parr Road 100 feet west of the Settlemier
intersection. This portion of the project will not be assessed against properties within the
LID district.
Schedule m is the improvement of the railroad crossing and is also a future phase of
construction and will not be assessed.
G-l SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR ALL PHASES AND RELATED
PROJECTS IN PARRISETfLEMlER AREA.
The estimated cost of the Parr Road improvement is listed below and referenced on the
map as Exln'bit ~'A".
Width as designed
Standard residential width
1. FUTURE PROPERlY OWNER'S AND CITY RESPONSmlLITY
(Outside of city boundaIy, west of school property)
Schedule Ia = $202,976.00
(Future phase)
$143,566.00
2. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S AND CITY RESPONSmillTY
(West end ofscboo~ to near SettlemierlParr Road intersection)
Schedule Ib = $648,889.00
(Current phase)
$486,714.00
Schedule II = $231.929.00
(Current phase)
$231,929.00*
SUB TOTAL = $880,818.00
Sch. Ib and Sch. II
$718,643.00
'lI'
lOB
5
3. FUTURE RAll..ROAD AND STATE RESPONSIBllJTY
(parr/Settlemier railroad crossing)
Schedule III = $286,939.00:1:
(Future phase
To paid by Railroad and State)
$286.939.00:1:*
Current + future phase
GRAND
TOTAL $1,370,733.00
$1,149,148.00
* No reduction in cost for a 36 foot wide street at intersection
because of turn lane.
H. BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED COST - SCHEDULE lb.
1. COST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A 39 FOOT WIDTH AND
A 34 FOOT WIDlH STREET.
= $ 91,750.00
2. ESTIMATED COST OF 34 FOOT WIDE STREET
(Including sidewalk and approaches, no bikelane)
= $ 486,714.00
a. Estimlrted cost with out sidewalks
and drive way approaches
= $ 415,734.19
b. Front foot cost with no property
exempted from the assessment
($409,470/4.I67lf)
= $ 99.77 /L.F.
c. Front foot cost with currently
improved frontage property exempted.
(Note: front footage of unimproved property
within the city boundary = 2,655.70 lineal feet.)
= $156.54 /L.F.
3. ESTIMATED COST OF BIKELANE IMPROVEMENT TIm ENTIRE LENGlH.
(From parr/Settlemier intersectionto west boundary of school property)
a. Cost estimate for fronting school property = $ 38,812.74
b. Cost estimate for remaining portion of
schedule Ib = $ 31,612.26
TOTAL = $ 70,425.00
Note: Ifbikelane in schedule Ia (west of city limits)
is added the estimated total cost will increase to $ 95,848.20)
",.
lOB
6
4. ESTIMATED COST OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT THE ENTIRE
LENGlH.(From parr/Settlemier intersection to west boundary of school property)
TOTAL
= $ 56,907.42
NOTE: SEE APPENDIX A FOR ABOVE COST CALCULATIONS
I) FRONTING FRONT FOOTAGE
TAX LOT
500
102
103
1300
1100
100
400
3300
2400
2300
1400
3400
5700
5800
7400
7300
7200
7100
7000
6900
OWNER
LINEAL FEET
WOODBURN SCHOOL D.
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSIDP
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH
HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH
SMIlH, HAZEL M- TRUSTEE
MONNIER, RONALD & DEBRA
BODUNOV, LAZAR & SANDRA
MARTINFZ, VIRGINIA
GARDNER, NORMA
HIlL, GLENN & VIRGINIA
YBARRA., MANUEL & BENITA
W AGENMANN, TODD & KAREN
BEJARANO, ALMA
CITY OF WOODBURN
WPFZ, YOLANDA
VSIDVKOFF, LUKA & ANASTASIA
RIOS, EMlLIO & HERMILINDA
MANSEIL, MARVIN & MARIA
LOPES, DAMASO & CATALINA
1,225.5 L.F.
253.6 L.F.
646.0 L.F.
333.5 L.F.
63.6 L.F.
393.0 L.F.
115.0 L.F.
103.9 L.F.
100.4 L.F.
87.6 L.F.
91.0 L.F.
75.0 L.F.
90.0 L.F.
75.0 L.F.
133.5 L.F.
90.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
50.0 L.F.
TOTAL
4.167 L.F.
1['
108
9~ Construction activities take place under the supervision of Engineering.
10. The last step of the process is performed by the Finance Department as they complete
the final assessment process and place the amounts on city docket.
Ai present. we are on the second step with presentation of the engineering report to the
city council. Unless something unforeseen occurs, the Parr Road improvement
construction activities will take place in the summer of 1997.
Council approval of the engineering report is requested.
GST:1g
~
Page 3 - Parr Rd Report 12/10196
1l"
10B
PARR ROAD ENGINEERING REPORT
N DE~ONOF~ROVEMEN~:
The project will consist of improving Parr Road from Settlemier Avenue to the west
property line of the Woodburn MiddlelE1ementary school site. Parr Road will be widened
to a 39 foot improved surface from curb to curb, including stonn sewers, five foot
sidewalks on both sides and a 10 foot wide bike path on the south side. See detail" A" for
a typical cross-section.
This project will also include the improvement of both intersections of Front Street and
Settlemier Avenue with Parr Road with. Settlemier intersection will be widened and
provided with turn lanes. Front Street will be widened and realigned.
The City, in conjunction with Southern Pacific Railroad, is preparing to realign and
improve the existing Parr Road railroad crossing. However, this is not a part of this
project due to time constraints.
B) BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVRMF.NT DISTRICf:
The property subject to the assessment of this district will be restricted to those properties
within the city boundary, fronting the unimproved portion of Parr Road, from the west
property line of the school property to a point 100 feet west of the centerline intersection
of Parr Road and Settlemier Avenue. .
Property not within the city boundary at this time, but fronting Parr Road and which will
benefit from this improvement, will be required to reimburse the properties funding this
improvement upon annexation into the city, if it takes place within a recommended period
of 10 years.
The intersection improvement of Settlemier Avenue and Front Street; although planned to
be constructed with this project, is considered to be a capacity impro~ and will be
funded by other resources.
m'
108
2
C) PROPERTIES IN THE LOCAL ~ROVEMENT DISTRICf:
The following properties are located in Section 13, Township 5 South, Range 2 West of
the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, Oregon.
TAX LOT NO.
OWNER
500
102
103
100
400
WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
SMITH, HAZEL M-TRUSTEE
MONNIER, RONALD &. DEBRA
The following properties are located in Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 1 West of
the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, Oregon.
1300
BOO
3300
2400
2300
1400
3400
5700
5800
7400
7300
7200
7100
7000
6900
HOPE LurnERAN CIRJRCH OF WOODBURN
HOPE LurnERAN CIRJRCH OF WOODBURN
BODUNOV, LAZAR &. SANDRA
MARTINFZ, VIRGINIA
GARDNER, NORMA
HIll., GLENN &. VIRGINIA
YBARRA, MANUEL &. BENITA
WAGENMANN, TODD &. KAREN
BEJARANO, ALMA
CITY OF WOODBURN
LOPEZ, YOLANDA
.VSIflVKOFF, LUKA &. ANASTASIA
RIOS, EMILIO &. HERMll...INDA
MANSELL, MARVIN &. MARIA
LOPES, DAMASO &. CATALINA
'"
10B
3
D) PROPERTIES WITHIN MARION COUNTY. SUBJECf TO COST SBARING
NEGOTIATIONS OR PAYMENT OF REIMBITRSEMENT FUNDS UPON
ANNEXATION WITHIN A to-YEAR PERIOD.
The following listed properties are within the Local Improvement District but are not with
in the current city boundary.
TAX LOT NO.
OWNER
100
400
SMITII, HAZEL M- TRUSTEE
MONNIER, RONALD & DEBRA
E) PROPOSED METHOD OF ASSF.sSMF.NT~
The proposed method of assessment is based on the front footage adjacent to Parr Road.
The project cost will be broke down into separate categories and assessed accordingly.
F) IMPROVEMENT SECTION BREAKDOWN
As referenced in section "A" of this report, Parr Road will be widened to a 39 foot wide
improved surface from curb to curb, including stOlm sewers, street ligbting. five foot
sidewalks both sides and a 10 foot wide bike path on the south side. See detail "A" for a
typical cross-section.
Excluding the school district property, the benefitting properties as described in Section I-
n, will only be assessed for a standard residential section which will include a 34 foot wide
improved surface curb to curb, storm sewer, and street ligbti11g, see detail "B." The school
district property will be assessed for the standard 34 foot wide residential section, the
additional 5 foot widened capacity portion and the bikelane fronting their property. The
city will fund the cost of the widened portion of the road not fronting school district
property .
The sidewalk costs and driveway approach cost will be estimated and assessed separately
from the street improvement assessment so that it can be distributed fairly to benefitting
property .
The portion of the improvement not included in the assessment to the benefitted properties
is the 10 foot wide bike path, the additional five feet of street surface improvement (except
the_school district property), and the additional asphaltic concrete in excess of the
standard two and one half inch residential thickness.
'lI'
10B
4
G) PROPOSED PROJECf ROITNDARW-S
AND ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE
The engineer~s estimate is broken into four sections.
Schedule fa is that portion of Parr Road west of the school district property to the west
line of ~tennial Park property which will be constructed as a later phase.
Schedule Ib is calculated from a point 100 feet west of the centerline intersection of Parr
Road and Settlemier Avenue, to the west boundary of the school district property and is
the project area to be assessed.
Schedule n improvements include the ParrISettlemierlFront Street intersections, a portion
ofSettlemier Street, and a portion of Parr Road 100 feet west of the Settlemier
intersection. This portion of the project will not be assessed against properties within the
LID district.
Schedule m is the improvement of the railroad crossing and is also a future phase of
construction and will not be assessed.
G-I SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED COSTS FOR ALL PHASES AND RELATED
PROJECfS IN PARRISE'ITLEMlER AREA.
The estimated cost of the Parr Road improvement is listed below and referenced on the
map as Exlubit "A".
Width as designed
Standard residential width
I. FUTURE PROPERTY OWNER'S AND CI1Y RESPONSIBILITY
(Outside of city boundary, west of school property)
Schedule Ia = $202,976.00
(Future phase)
$143,566.00
2. CURRENT PROPERlY OWNER'S AND CflY RESPONSmlLITY
(West end of school, to near SettlemierlParr Road intersection)
Schedule Ib = $648,889.00
(Current phase)
$486,714.00
Schedule II = $231,929 00
(Current phase)
$231.929.00*
SUB TOTAL = $880,818.00
Sch. Ib and Sch. II
$718,643.00
1fl"
lOB
5
3. FUTURE RAILROAD AND STATE RESPONSmILI1Y
(parr/Settlemier railroad crossing)
Schedule III = $286,939.00:1:
(Future phase
To paid by Railroad and State)
$286,939.00i:*
Current + future phase
GRAND
TOTAL $1,370,733.00
$1,149,148.00
* No reduction in cost for a 36 foot wide street at intersection
because of turn lane.
H. BREAKDOWN OF ESTIMATED COST - SCHEDULE lb.
1. COST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A 39 FOOT WIDTH AND
A 34 FOOT WIDTH STREET.
= $ 91,750.00
2. ESTIMATED COST OF 34 FOOT WIDE STREET
(Including sidewalk and approaches, no bikelane)
= $ 486,714.00
a. Estimated cost with out sidewalks
and drive way approaches
=$415,734.19
b. Front foot cost with no property
exempted from the assessment
($409,470/4,167lf)
= $ 99.77 /L.F.
c. Front foot cost with currently
improved frontage pioperty exempted.
(Note: front footage of unimproved property
within the city boundaJy = 2,655.70 lineal feet.)
= $156.54 /L.F.
3. ESTIMATED COST OF BIKELANE IMPROVEMENT TIlE ENTIRE LENGTH.
(From parr/Settlemier intersectionto west boundary of school property)
a. Cost estimate for fronting school property = $ 38,812.74
b. Cost estimate for remaining portion of
schedule Ib = $ 31,612.26
TOTAL = $ 70,425.00
Note: Ifbikelane in schedule Ia (west of city limits)
is added the estimated total cost will increase to $ 95,848.20)
-
108
6
4. ESTIMATED COST OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT THE ENTIRE
LENGTII.(From parr/Settlemier intersection to west boundary of school property)
TOTAL
= $ 56,907.42
NOTE: SEE APPENDIX A FOR ABOVE COST CALCULATIONS
I) FRONTING FRONT FOOTAGE
TAX. LOT OWNER
LINEAL FEET
500 WOODBURN SCHOOL D.
102 DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
103 DETOM GENERAL PARTNERSIDP
1300 HOPE LlITHERAN CHURCH
1100 HOPE LlITHERAN CHURCH
100 SMITH, HAZEL M- TRUSTEE
400 MONNIER, RONAlD &, DEBRA
3300 BODUNOV, LAZAR&, SANDRA
2400 MARTINFZ, VIRGINIA
2300 GARDNER, NORMA
1400 IDLL, GLENN &, VIRGINIA
3400 YBARRA, MANUEL &, BENITA
5700 W AOENMANN, TODD &, KAREN
5800 BEJARANO, ALMA
7400 CITY OF WOODBURN
7300 LOPFZ, YOLANDA
7200 VSHIVKOFF, LUKA &, ANASTASIA
7100 RIOS, EMILIO &, HERMlLINDA
7000 MANSElL, MARVIN &, MARIA
6900 WPES, DAMASO &, CATALINA
1,225.5 L.F.
253.6 L.F.
646.0 L.F.
333.5 L.F.
63.6 L.F.
393.0 L.F.
115.0 L.F.
103.9 L.F.
100.4 L.F.
87.6 L.F.
91.0 L.F.
75.0 L.F.
90.0 L.F.
75.0 L.F.
133.5 L.F.
90.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
80.0 L.F.
50 0 L.F.
TOTAL
4?167 L.,F.
'lI"
108
7
I) ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
I-A, SIDEWALK ASSESSMENTS
SIDEWALK COST CALCULATION, SEE APPENDIX<< A"
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
1000.10 COST = $ 15.84/ L.F.
500.10 COST SHARE = $ 7.92/ L.F.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WIDCH HAS PREVIOUSLY
CONSTRUCTED SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE ADJACENT TO
A PUBLIC ROAD SHAll, BE LIMITED TO A 50% COST SHARE
OF THE SIDEWALl{ ASSESSMENT.
ES11MATEO SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
sew. COST SHARE
TAX LOT FRONTING SIDEWALK TOTAL CITY PROPERTY
FOOTAGE COST COST SHARE ASSESSMENT
LF. ERR $ $ $
3300 103.94 $7.92 $1,646A1 $123.20 $123.20
2400 100A $7.92 $1.-.34- $7t5.17 $795.17
3400 75 $7.92 $1.181.00 $594.00 $594.00
5700 90 $7.92 $1.425.60 $712.80 $712.80
5800 75 $7.92 $1.181.00 $5M.OO $594.00
7300 90 $7.92 $1 ....lI!_ $712.80 $712.80
7200 eo $7.92 $1.267.20 $633.60 $633.60
7100 80 $7.92 $1.267.20 $633.60 $633.60
7000 80 $7.92 $1.267.20 $633.60 $633.60
6900 60 $7.92 $792.00 $396.00 $396.00
TOTAL 824.34 $13.057.55 $6.528.77 $6.528.77
'11'
PROPERTIES WHICH HAVE NOT PAlO FOR ANY PUBUC
SIDEWALKS PREVIOUSLY, AND ARE ASSESSED FOR FULL
COST OF THE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
ESTIMATED PROPERTY OWNER
SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT
NO COST SHARE
TAX LOT FRONTING DEDUCT ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE APPROACH FOOTAGE COST AMOUNT
LF. LENGTH LF. $1 LF. $
500 1 ,,"tC en I 104.00 1.121.50 $15.84 $17.764.56
102 253.60 31.00 222.60 $15.84 $3.525.98
103 646.GO 0.00 646.00 $15.84 $10 ----
1300 333.50 27.00 306.50 $15.84 $4.154.96
1100 63.&0 OM 63.60 $15.84 $1M7A2
7400 133.50 0.00 133.50 $15.14 $2.114."
400 115.00 19M 16.00 $15.14 $1.520.64
2300 87.60 0.00 87.60 $15.14 $1.317.51
1400 91.00 0.00 91.00 $15.84 $1.441.44
TOTAL 2.941.30 181.00 2.768.30 43..849.17
SIDEW AI.K ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FULL ASSESSMENT
PROPERTY OWNER 50% SHARE
50% SHARE OF PICKUP, BY CITY
=
=
=
TOTAL
=
I-B DRIVEWAY APPROACH ASSESSME~
APPROACH COST CALCULATION, SEE APPENDIX "A"
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
DRIVEWAY APPROACH COST WILL BE ASSESSED TO ONLY
THOSE PROPERTY'S WInCH REQUIRE AN APPROACH MEETING
CITY STANDARDS.
'l!
10B
8
543,849.87
S 6,528.77
56.528.77
556,907.41
= $ 4.092/ SF.
ESllMATED DRNEWAY
APPROACH ASSESSMENT
TAX LOT LENGTH OF APPROACH II
APPROACH I:OOTAGE COST II
LF. SF. S I SF.. S
500 27 513 $4.09 $" ftQQ "JftI
500 27 513 $4.09 lit" ftQQ "JftI
500 27 513 $4.09 $2.099.20
500 23 437 $4.09 $1.788.20
SUB $4.09
TOTAL 104 1176 $4.09 $8 ....... -
102 31 589 $4.09 S2A10.19
1300 27 513 $4.09 $
400 19 361 $4.09 $1.477.21
TOTAL 181 3439 $1"
· EACH APPROACH INCLUDES 3 LINEAL FEET
FOR APRON.
10B
9
** TAX LOT 400 IS SUBJECT TO A REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT PERIOD
AND NOT SUBJECT TO ASSESSMENT AT TInS TIMa 1lIE CITY Wll.L FUND
THE SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT.
TOTAL
I-C BIKELANE ASSESSMENTS
BIKELANE COST TO BE FUNDED BY mE CITY
AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. SEE APPENDIX "A"
FOR COST CALCULATION
C-l BIKELANE COST TO THE SCHOOL
DISTRICf PROPERTY
COST OF BIKELANE,
($32.04/L.F. X 1225.5 L.F.)
BIKE LANE COST TO CITY
TOTAL BIKELANE COST
$ 14,072.39
= $ 39,265.02
$31,129.98
= $ 70,425.00
""
I-D 34 FOOT WIDE STREET SURFACE
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
STREET IMPROVEMENT CALCULATION, SEE APPENDIX" A"
ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE
ESTIMATED PROPERTY OWNER
STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
TAX LOT OWNER FRONTING IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE COST AMOUNT
L.F. $/L.F. $
500 SCHOOL 1,225.50 $99.77 $122.265.93
102 DETOM 253.60 $99.77 $25.301.22
103 DETOM 646.00 $99.77 $64 450.26
1300 -....--.. 333.50 $99.77 $33.272.69
1100 CHURCH 63.60 $99.77 $6.345.26
7400 CITY 133.50 $99.77 $13.319.05
100 SMITH 393.00 $99.77 $39.208.90
400 MONNIER 115.00 $99.77 $11.473.34
irOTAL 3 163.70 S315..636.65
I-E CAPACITY ASSESS~
CAPACITY COST TO BE FUNDED BY THE CITY
AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT COST CALCULATED
IN SECTION H-l
1. CAPACITY COST TO THE SCHOOL
DISTRICf PROPERTY
COST OF ADDmONAL WIDENING,
($41.27/L.F. X 1225.5 L.F.)
TOTAL CAPACITY COST TO THE SCHOOL
108
10
= $ 99.77 IL.F.
$ 50,576
'"
108
11
2. CAPACfIY COST 1'0 CITY
SCHEDULE Ib CAPACITY COST
EXCLUDE SCHOOL DISTRICT PORTION
SCHEDULE Ib CAPACITY COST
=$ 91,750
- $ 50.576
=$ 41,174
SCHEDULE Ib,TOTAL CAPACITY COST TO CITY
S 41,174.00
I-F PROPERTIES OUTSIDE CITY JURISDICI10N
t. ASSESSMENT AMOUNT
ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS, SEE APPENDIX "A"
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT. PROPERTY OUTSIDE CfTY BOUNDARY
TAX SIDEWALK BIKEl>>4E APPROACH STREET TOTAL
LOT ASSESSMENT ASSESSaENT ASSESSaENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
I-A I-B I-C 1-0
400 $1.520.64 $0.00 $1.4n .21 $11.473.34 $14,471.19
102 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $39,208.90 $39,208.90
TOTAL S1.520.64 $0.00 -51 A77 .21 SSO.682.24 153.680.09
2. METHOD OF FUNDING: Unless negotiated payment agreement is
made, the above costs will be born by the city and the school district equally
CI'IY SHARE OF COST
SCHOOL DISTRICf COST
TOTAL
= $ 26,840.05
= S 26.840.04
= S 53,680.09
'II'
10B
12
J) INDIVIDUAL ESTIMATED PROPERTY ASSESSME~
The assessment summary amounts have been calculated using the methodology in
this report, the assessments are estimSlt~ only. The City Engineer, however, will use the
actualconstJ:'Uction cost for the actual final assessment
ESTIMATED PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS
PROPERTY
TAX SIDEWALK BlKElANE APPROACH STREET CAPACITY OUTSIDE TOTAl
LOT CITY
I-A 1-8 I-C ~ I-E I-F
500 $17,764.56 $38 823.84 $8.085.79 $122,265.93 $50.576.00 $26.840.04 $264.356.16
102 $3,525.98 $0.00 12.410.19 $25,301.22 $0.00 $0.00 $31.237.39
103 $10232.64 $0.00 $0.00 $64,45026 $0.00 $0.00 $74.682.90
1300 $4.854.96 $0.00 12.099.20 $33.272.69 $0.00 $0.00 $40.226.85
1100 $1.007.42 $0.00 $0.00 $6,34526 $0.00 $0.00 $7.352.68
7400 $2,114.64 $0.00 $0.00 $13.319.05 $0.00 $0.00 $15A33.69
2300 $1.387.58 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.387.58
1400 $1.441.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.441.44
3300 $823.20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $823.20
2400 $795.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $795.17
3400 $594.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $594.00
5700 $712.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $712.80
5800 $594.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $594.00
7300 $712.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $712.80
7200 $633.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $633.60
7100 $633.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $633.60
7000 $633.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $633.60
6900 $396.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $396.00
TOTAL S48..857 .99 $31..823.84 S12..S95.18 S264.954A1 S50.576.oo S26.840.G4 5442.647 A6
ESllMATED CITY PROJECT COST
REMAINING PROPERTY
SIDEWAlK STREET BlKElANE SCHEDULE Ib SCHEDULE . OUTSIDE TOTAL
COST COST COST CAPACITY CAPACITY CITY COST
COST COST COST
S6.528.77 S100100.54 $31.601.16 $41.174.00 $231.929.00 S26 840.05 $438.170.54
tr
108
13
K) FUNDING METHODS
The improvement costs for the project will be supported utilizing three funding sources,
the LID property assessments, and council approved system development funds to be used
for capital improvements, and State Department of Transportation S.T.P. funds.
L) FUNDING SUMMARY
1. LID PROPERTY ASSESSME~
Note: Includes city portion of $15,433.69 for
Tax Lot 7400
$442,647.46
2. CITY RESOURCES
A. TIF/SOC FUNDS (System Dev. Charges)
B. SIDEWALK SUBSIDY (from State Gas tax)
$291,641.77
+ $ 6,528.77
CITY TOTAL FUNDS
= $ 298,170.54
3. STATE S.T.P. FUND EXCHANGE
S 140.000
FUNDING TOTAL
S 880.818
'11'
108
DETAIL II A II
RW
39' Street
5'
S/>>, 4.5' 13.5~ Lane 12' Lone
AC. overlay f
S- .
Crushed rock ~Ih
course d' to 18'
where required.
Existing AC. and base
13.5' Lone
S' 10'
Min. Bike Path
Crushed rock
S' Asphaltic concrete
PARR ROAD
N.T.5.
".'
-c
o
-c
)>
r-
-m
Chen
O-c
fflB:
0)>
C-c
Jnm
_0
>-
':..B:
OJ"
=:::0
~O
c~
CIJ;!:
Om
:I:z
m-c
go
Jn~
5-c
- .
~
...
~
~
o
:...
(,oJ
(,oJ
108
~ "
.. -,. ~o e
.. ~o
~ -c
.~ i "V:::o ~:x: e
;r. :::Ou
o~ Nm :::0
.., ~ - r-
"vo <- ~o m
,. ~ m~
::Um 3:- Q)e -u
oz mO r- :I:
'"1)..... ~ zrn m )>
mm -f(/)
:::oz ,... flIt-f - en
.....z . _:::0 t>> m
~)> :-. "",rn
r- ~ <.>> m
'"1) , 'Ut-f
)> . 0)
:::0 0)
^
IIII
?-
en
o
8
,
"'0
~
"'0
m
]J
~
-<
OJ
o
c
z
o
)>
:::0
f.._"~~-':;~~~~~-'l
i r'-- 1 j ! I-r
' : 1 , j 'f!IY"
-! , : , ,
j i ~ I ..... ~ 1 1A.c-
i: I: oml ,
: ~ i I - en l !
! ! '! 0 -I: i
l j loi Oolti
i~i !~i ........!J:
:::t: .it:, fIIl...i",
\~. : 1 m V' '"'I.
:~, \ , .....01 .
!"t, :"..... ,..j
. , 1.., .......... .
1." 'I!:oo '~i
\"tj ll1ij 001=:
'I, 1", 3:.... l"t'
1~1 'I.. crT
' . '! (J) -: i
ij !:fII(J), ,
. j 1 .........., I
' I .....:0, ,
~! li;;loi
..jL- !:,.....!
--- . ! ~-o',.
---~ L...m.....! I
~.....;V..it
-----=::::- - 0 _...
z-o_..
.....m
::0.
-4
(J)
-- rn
-.:=~~,.- --..-
--- -. - -- "-
....
o
:0
~
~
it.
-n
cne
~O....
N:z:C
O)m:;:o
~Om
~e-u
cDr-X
m)>
=cn
m.
en
~o
NX
(,oJm
~O
cDC
Nr-
cDm
....
o
:::0
u
~
~
6
fII.,.
en-
-f-
:og
fn(,oJ
~:...
-CD
3:~
"'0
:0_
Oz
fiiQ
~-
mz
Zo
.....r
flItc
Gto
~z
N(j)
~~
r=
JJ
~
c
o
]J
o
C/)
CIJ
Z
G>
en
o
J:
m
o
c
r
m
-
en
o
J:
m
c
c
fn
s=
~
o
~
11"
m
><
:J:
-
OJ
-
-f
-
)>
m
en
::!
B:
)>
-c
m
o
o
o
en
....
en
APPENDIX "A"
A) ESTIMATED COST BREAKDOWN
SC~DULE Ib
A-I SIDEWALK COST TO BE ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST
ESTIMATED SF.
ESTIMATED COST
10% CONI1NGENCY
SUB TOTAL
LA&EAT20%
ESTIMATED SIDEWALK COST TO BE ASSESSED =
ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAL = $15.84
A-2 DRIVEWAY APPROACH TO BE ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST
ESTIMATED SF.
ESTIMATED COST
100.10 CONTINGENCY
SUB TOTAL
LA & E AT 200,10
ESTIMATED DRIVEWAY APPROACH
COST TO BE ASSESSED
ESTIMATED COST PER SQUARE FOOT = $ 4.09
lOB
= $2.40/SF.
= 17,963.20
= $43,111.68
= $4,311.17
= $47,422.85
= $9,484.57
S 56.907.42
= $3.10/SF.
= 3,439 SF.
= $10,660.90
= $1,066.09
= $11,726.99
= $2,345.40
S 14.072.39
'!I'
108
A-3 ESTIMATE CAPACITY COST FOR
WIDENED STREET SECOON
ESTIMATED COST TO WIDEN SCHEDULE Ib
= $ 91,750
ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAL FOOT
($ 91,750/2223 LF)
= $ 41.27 L.F.
ESTIMATE CAPACITY COST
S 91.750
A-4 ESTIMATE BIKE LANE COST
ESTIMATED BIKE LANE COST
= $70,425
ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAL FOOT
($70,425/2223 L.F.)
= $ 31.68
ESTIMATED BIKE LANE COST
$70.425
A-5 ESTIMATED COST WITHOUT
WIDENING AND BIKE LANE
COST ESTIMATE SCHEDULE I, 39 FOOT F ACll..ITY
EXCLUDE CAPACITY COST OF
ADDmONAL WIDENING
$ 648,889.00
$91,750.00
EXCLUDE COST OF BIKE LANE
$70,425.00
EXCLUDE COST OF SIDEWALK CALCULATED
IN SECTION H-I
$56,907.42
EXCLUDE COST OF DRIVEWAY APPROACH
CALCULATED H-2
$14,072.39
ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL STREET
COST TO BE ASSESSED
S 415.734.19
A-6 ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN.
The estimates in section H have been prepared from preliminary design plans only
and include 200.10 for administration and engineering cost, 100.10 for unknown
contingencies. The estimate does not include any right-of-way acquisition costs.
".
10C
STAfF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: ~ris Childs, City Administrator
FROM:~evin Holly, Director Reaeation and Parks
SUBJECT: Park Long Term Comprehensive Plan Consultant Selection
DATE: December 4, 1996
One of the City's primay goals as identified in the Council's Goal Setting Sessions was the development of
a Long Term Reaeation and Parks ConlllehellSive Plan. FlIlds were aIIoc:ated in the 1996/1997 Recreation
and Parks Budget to bring In a consulting finn to assist the City of Woodburn with this task.
R~ IeSts for propc:.sals were sent out during October and three candidates were interviewed by myself and
representatives of the Recreation and Parks Board on Monday, Oeoember 2, 1996. There were three
proposals submitted and all three were interviewed. The three proposals and their bids were:
The ORB OIgaI.a.ation $25,252.00
Randy SaoodersIWm Ries and Assodate& $39,130.00
Doo Ganerand ~ \\4Ih David Reed
and A9SOCi3tIo 0 $23,500.00
~ a result of these interviews. the Committee and myself recommend the bid be awarded to Don Ganer a~
Associates in the M1CU1t of $23,500 and that Council direct staff to negotiate a contract \Mth Mr. Ganer and
brought to to the next Council Meeting.
You may recall that Don has done a considerable amount of consulting for the City of Woodburn and
developed the City's System Development Study as it pertained to fees for P8fb, Water and TraffIC. The
City has had very favorable resutts from the work Mr. Ganer has performed in the past. Mr. Ganer is very
familiar \Mth Recreation and Parks Long Tenn Planning and has provided services for localities such as The
Tualatin Hills Recreation and Parks District. among others.
Joining Mr. Ganer in developing Woodburn's long Term Plan will be David Reed, P.H.D.. Dr. Reed is a well
kl'1Ot\'l'l Parks PlaMer Vttto has developed comprehensiVe plans for Willamalane Park and Recreation District
and the City of Austin, Texas to name a few. Dr. Reed has served in the capacity of College Professor of
2 major universities and is currently a visiting Professor at Oregon f?tate University.
Attached is a copy of the proposed scheduleltiming for this project. I feel certain the City of Woodburn will,
at the conclusion of this study, have a long Term Comprehensive Plan which will reflect the values of
Woodburn and will serve as a guide into the 21st Century.
NH:swp
'11'
II
APPENDIX
10C
I
I
I
I
I
I .~~.~~~M~e::=~e.~~ory/~l>~s.~e~t
.......:iii~~~~ryiios d~t:~~i~~ti~n
I'l~~ii:;~~~~
... .:3.~'I'~~~r.tAltion linkag~
}~61'~pa~facilities map
an OF WOODBURN
PARKS AND RECREA nON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
PROPOSED SCHEDULE/11MING
......... ... ........ .... . . ...}.~......;... ....... ......... .'. ..;.""'" ............ ....;.. .....~9.2!.h..;.. ..................0....,... ..."""00
..............~oo...n...... Dee . Jan : Feb [March ~ April [ M~i...
j~~T~~..~~~~~~~.... ...................~.~....~......._..... ..i. ....._....-..~.~~~~.~.~I.......~.~......~...~.....~..~..r~...~.~..~.....~~~..~~........:;.......~.~~.~..~.......~.r~--..................--.~.r~~~...~..~~.....~..~~~~.~~..
jj~=~5t~:~;,;;;;;t;;;jlT':I:T=:I::=::L=:::J:::::
oo......+!~..~~~~.c::.~~!.a..~~.I!':~ti~~.. ......................... ..~::::::::F::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::t::::'::::::::::-_-=~"r-:::::::=::::::':::::T-~:::~~~~::::~'::~........
...........;:.............u.......... ___ u..... _.._...u "..__ ......n. .....n........_ __.H' ___ ..._. ._._ .._u... .... _._. _. _.... ..... ......:........... --- ........ ...:...-----....- .... ..._._~_. _...-.--_.. .._._u.....~.__...._._......u....._ -r ....n........ .....-...-
.~J.~~.~9'.~~~................. ............. ~ .'
.....J.~1...~~~~~)(~llg<i~e.llts .~'.. ..... . ...oo~.....::::.::.::::.......oo......r.-::::~:~::_h:::_.....
.....t~.~~~..c:f:)I!':J'.l~llity.Pll?f.il~. . ==-- .... .... ..... . . .....0.............. .............
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~..
.................
.\
. ..~..~...
..~~~])~~~rvi<:e~I~v~~~I.~~fis..-..e.~t.
1IIlIIIIII1IIII
.___..d.
. ...................'.............................1
. .. . ... !
1
;
.....1
I
I
i
I
.....n..... .
~~.:~~t:y.Involv~e.nt
.5.1 Staff interviews
n.u.....~....................-u...................-.............
.........l~:?:~~~~y..................
...~.~~.~~ullity\\'o~~P.. .
.]~
. .
. ...__..h....~..............-........
. .
. .
. .
. .
-~.~~+~.~~~..~P~~~............. .....-.......
........l.~.:!..~~~.~~~.~~~~.g~~~~li~~.......... ...
..__....\.~.:?-}~~.~fy..~ye.ll~~.................... ........-.. ........
..._.....i~~.y~~te..~.~~.~~~._. .....00.............
.... ..!.~~~.~l~~~Ilc:iillg/p~~~~.~P.ti.~~..
........L~.~~..~~..~..................................oo.......................
.........l~~~.~~.~.P~~a.I!l~~~a.~~~............... .
..-............tt~.-j;~~;l~t;~i~~~~~~~~~....
. .
, ' , , , . l'
. . . . .
. .... - _.. - . _. n._.. .. ......~..... on
. ..
. ..'
. ..'
. ..'
. ..'
_~~~~~~~~~~:~~~:~~::~:~:~~:::::::::::::::::::::~::::::.::~:::::~:::::~::~::~::::.::::::~:~:::~:::~:~::::::::~:::::::::::::::::~::::::.i
. . . . .
, .11'. ..TTm
m... . mL.Tmmm. I
. ......................1.......................J.....oo........... ..... \
III:: . mLmm \
. - . .....f.... .. ...- . ..i... - I
...~... _......u.._~.................
1
. _.. .... ....:U..dH............ ....~.............. . .....,
. .............._ ............;....00. .....i
*"11111111111111111111111111111111 1
.............................. ...
I
I
I
I
.J.:~T~~~...~~!!~.'.\fI.~.~~.P.~~~..................:.....:........:...................
~7.1 Rec & Park Board review .
..........:Ij.~.~.~~b~~~................................................................................:..........:.....
_!.?;3..~~a.[l!l~Ilg. c:()J'.l~~i~~l9qr_(:()~Il<:i:I~e.':V
I
....1
I
,
i
Don Ganer & Associates
Appendix
November 4, 1996
~
100
MEMO
SUBJECT:
City Administrator for Council Action
Public Works Director b~
Iulie Moore, C.E. Tech III Cf)f\"--.J
,-
No Parking Restrictions on Patrick Way
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
December 2, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve no parking restrictions on Patrick Way. This will
eliminate large trucks from parking on the street and allow for better traffic movements on the
street.
BACKGROUND:
Patrick Industries has notified us of a parking problem along Patrick Way involving semi-trucks
being parked along Patrick Way and causing congestion with the regular truck traffic coming to
and going from Patrick Industries. Patrick Way was installed when Patrick Industries built their
new plant and has direct access to Hwy. 99E. It has a 44 ft. paved width, like the rest of the
streets in the industrial park.
The entire Industrial Park is currently signed for No Parking because of the large volume of semi-
truck traffic. Therefore, to continue this policy, it is recommended that no parking restrictions
include Patrick Way.
'1!'
CITY UHITS
1
1
1
.
~
....
. ....
"'to -
.0
-
-
o
~
~
;~
,
J.
h
! ~ .
I
i
4
" I.... 4 j
_ - 7 _ --~ N-'-:' p · ~
~. l~ ~ ~ ~ ~....~_.-=l. ~ ~
I ~ .lr. ~ I JS -
.
II ZIIillC::i .&1.... ~ ~~ 0 7 0
.. ~ ~I ...Iib ~
II ~ 0 . :/
.OE H ;- ,.;a:i' c.:7Y $';C~. ".- '." ~ I ...
'( I \\ 0 . r-: - -l)'J ~ ...' ........ 1;
· 0 -~~U' .-/ <~- ~ "''')(..~'''^-
"/ ." 10.&.-.:..... ..... a - rJ~'. ~I/' 'U 7._'::<~C! ~," :-'"
~.... . . ..... ,.~ . A." ~ 'VD~"
... . ~ . I K . L"'::' I A:A.. -~ ,
u:.::.. 1':'11\ r.,~ .:. -:i$-':" co co · &. ~l4J.=./~ '.
r~ ...,1I>IJ,,''t" , 'i'-~~~ ~ . / k]V-,;:;/Jt" .
'f Rr~o I o? :JL~,~ {'h~ / b. :.. ~~ '.
I I' ~ V 1lII~ ~ ' / L ~ '.:/~'-;!~ _'"/
~. I-- ~i1'" . /$~!/ GO I co L~'O ~rl .0
-I' [:f..l;...~t~ ~~. . ~;- '~.GOiiJlim:~~~'>'ir~JdInf"-
. '--C-; I-- MJ .... " ., '....... ~.j.
I =- I~ h-i I GO." ~ r~ ~ ....
_ == · .I~.l .. ..ICiJ ",' :.. N'n'[;J .
a l' Q)' '".IlJ - '. If"!"~ ."..Ft.".. - J'l-.J7.-1./
h.' .. GO , l".J ~.
= . ]fltIT~ '- ;~~:;p p h; t~ :~~
-
'A
/
. /
)~~Z?
p~:ty; de. If
way 0
-;/,
/ J ' l
- fj
.f -
~
~"i'E" SU<<'Ci.
" .
tJAAj ,N =nvTW
y
-
-
-
] . ..
u"/
. -.rT
...
.
~
I .
. 1
J
10E
MEMO
SUBJECT:
City Administrator for Council Action
Public Works Director ~~
Julie Moore, C.E. Tech 111 ~
No Parking Request on Hawl~ Street near Wilson St.
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
December 3, 1996
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that a no parking area be designated on Hawley Street near Wtlson Street so
access can be made to a roadway that serves several lots along the roadway. This will also ensure
emergency vehicles will have access to these lots.
BACKGROUND:
Residents along a roadway off of Hawley Street near Wtlson Street have requested a no parking area
be installed along Hawley Street near the entrance to the roadway, which serves several properties.
The residents have been finding vehicles being parked on Hawley Street and blocking a portion of
the roadway. They are concerned that when the roadway entrance is blocked, emergency vehicles
and the residents themselves cannot use the access.
The roadway is approximately 20 feet wide and is located approximately 25 feet north of the
HawleylW"tlson intersection There are four properties that use this roadway to access their lots. See
an attached map.
Therefore, it is recommended that a 110 parking area be approved for installation along Hawley Street
near Wtlson Street to make certain this roadway entrance remains clear.
'11'
/
221.85
9200
924KJ11O
a.oac A
l' RESERVE: STRP
~q
~
,
9100
4JJ.IJooo
.......
.
No fo.Y~V\~
PrretL
t
N
~~,oI"-
. - ~ "':. 4~''''~,
. '. .~::>.~.
:...
...
~.
~'.:
t
'11'
11A
12/03/96
A/P CIIECI( LIS'lI1fG FOR m IIIlTB OF IOVEMBER 1996
Page 1
Old IUIber Budgetary Account IUIber Vendor IDe Vendor IIuJber Qleck - Date Written AIount of Check
...--- ----~_.---------
34502 POSTAGE IIETER-VWOOS OII!ED S!ADS POSTAL SERV 020089 1l/01/96 1,000.00
34503 PEm' ClSB-VWOOS em OF tmlI!ORR 015255 "11/01/96 141. 44
34504 PAYROLL-MP LEAGOB OP (UD cmES 060090 1l/06/96 144.28
34505 SERVICES-ilrER VAIUY IWLDIG SERVICE 021044 1l/07/96 588.00
34506 V 0 I D VOID VOID
34507 VOID VOID VOID
34508 VOID VOID VOID
34509 RElOID-il!ER/SIlIER 1IIU.IAM lOO!BIlIIAI DE 1l/08/96 45.92
34510 IEFUlHAftR/SEIER Jl(&R!' amIS!OPBRD DE 1l/08/96 13.20
34511 REFOI1HI1!BR/SEIfER IIWDlIl E IIlUR DE 11/08/96 28.00
34512 REFOIIHf1!ER/SEIIER WlIRf G ABIlL DE 1l/08/96 38.54
34513 REPOIOHIlTER/SEIfER IlIUI , JIWE BlRRIIGER DE 1l/08/96 27.65
34514 REFOIHlftR/SIWER IIllIaIUS CABl DE 11/08/96 7.45
34515 REPUIHlDR/SIWER D IAIUCE DE 1l/08/96 27.65
34516 REFOIJHflDR/SEIIER JOE mmR DE 11/08/96 46.94
34517 REP'tE-IlBRISIIBR DlY<XIIS!IIJCfI(II DE 1l/08/96 7.45
34518 REP'tE-IlBR/SEIER WESIDE ua1IOCfIOI DE 11/08/96 25.39
34519 REP'tE-IlBR/SIlIIBR IIAftDf ems DE 1l/08/96 39.09
34520 REPtD-IlURISIIIER J Pllll PW1 DB 1l/08/96 18.75
34521 REP'tE-IlBRISIIBR LDl S!IlCl DE 11/08/96 29.70
34522 LODGIIG-PARKS !OlLl!II BILLS PM , REC DE 1l/08/96 83.46
34523 SERVICES-POBLIC WORIS DfJllISI1 IIIRIQUBS DB 11/08/96 20.00
34524 SERVICES-POLICE PRlBLII pst IDE 11/08/96 99.00
34525 SERVICES-MP 1 , 1 PIlS! <D!JO, IIC 000011 11/08/96 170.00
34526 SERVICBS-PARKS lCI SEPrIC , ElClvmJG 000031 11/08/96 200.00
34527 SERVICES-POLICE m !OOCIl CIlLLOLAR 000113 11/08/96 579.42
34528 SOPPLIES-lIIllICE lIIIRIClI ElGLI GRlPBICS 000215 11/08/96 470.09
34529 SERVICES-PARKS lftIDIlIDlI PIQlUC!I<IIS 000436 11/08/96 234.00
34530 SERVICES-IIlUSIIG AIIDI JlIl'JlIlltiSES . ooosos 11/08/96 2,075.00
34531 SERVICBS-wrP WIIlll WIIOIII SBRVICES 000534 11/08/96 108.48
34532 SERVICES-VWOOS l!' , 000623 11/08/96 312.16
34533 SERVICBS-MP BlDR , BlDR 001070 11/08/96 240.00
34534 SOPPLIES-LIBRAR BI-IIlR! 0IIIQl1!I0I 001275 11/08/96 73.64
34535 SERVICES-PARKS Cl IIJDFRBIGII!' 002340 11/08/96 380.51
34536 SBRVICES-PUBLIC tDKS aIIRRY em ELJaRIC IIC 002424 11/08/96 48,378.36
34537 SERVICES-ElfG CII2IHIILL 002477 1l/08/96 1,695.65
34538 SERVICES-POLICE em or SALEM PIIAIICE 002518 11/08/96 16.00
34539 REIJIIlORSPXEIIPOLICE .DI OOGGIIS 002590 11/08/96 46.20
34540 SUPPLIES-POLICE 00AS!lL FAIII DE SUPPLY 002625 1l/08/96 171. 70
34541 SERVICES-POLICE <DIIBRCIlL SEl! rovERS 00 002715 11/08/96 150.00
34542 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY en ~OI 002926 11/08/96 661.13
34543 SERVICES-HOOSIIG DAVE IBI!JlIIBAD <XIfS!RUCl'IOH 003066 11/08/96 8,000.00
34544 SlJPPLIES-POLICE DIP-I-IXIIO!' 003224 1l/08/96 31. 36
34545 SERVICES-PAIlKS EUlER fERRY SBalRU'Y 004137 11/08/96 135.00
34546 SERVICES-PAIlKS BRIAR FWBIGAH 005170 11/08/96 206.00
66,766.61
Ill'
11A
12/03/96
AlP CIIJlC( LISTIIG JQ !'HE I<<lIft'II OF 1fOVl!MBER 1996
Paqe 2
aaect IuIber Budgetary Account bber Vendor IDe Vendor JIuIber Oleck - Date Written AIouDt of Qleck
----
34547 REIIIBOIlSI!IIEIft'-FIJWICE BEll GIU.ESPIE 006189 11/08/96 20.79
34548 SOPPLIES-LIBRlR GRACE PImJC!'S 006272 11/08/96 94.00
34549 SOPPLIES-roLICE BARRIS (JIIgMS 007090 11/08/96 249.25
34550 SERVICES-VARIOUS BARRIS AID EIDB 007095 11/08/96 3,500.00
34551 SERVICES-PUBLIC WORKS JIERALI) S BASOLL MAl 007099 11/08/96 400.00
34552 ~ ROY 1 DLSIIG 007138 11/08/96 28.98
34553 SERVICES-PlBS bcSIIBIlGIlIlm'OllS 007150 11/08/96 128.00
34554 stJIlllLIEHlft' BPC SWlIIrUIC , !IlaIIf(l,()GY 007189 11/08/96 170.78
34555 REIIIBOIlSI!IIEIft'-LIBRARY JlI IIDDUISIl 007335 11/08/96 7.50
34556 SOPPLIES-VARIOUS IJOOmDL RLDIIG SUPPLY 008100 11/08/96 134.64
34557 stJIlllLIEHlft' 1It1 ClPIT1L 008118 11/08/96 119.25
34S58 SERVICBS-IlOOSIlIG JILL Of !DDIlS 009098 11/08/96 168.00
34559 fiIIP DIPWYEES-EIG D :iII&IIIS DC 009119 11/08/96 874.60
34560 SERVICES-PARlS ma GR1PJIICS 010107 11/08/96 82.50
34561 SBRVICES-<mR'f MSI C2XIP DC 012015 11/08/96 125.00
34562 GAIG GRAft-roLICE IIWtI <mm FISCAL SVCS 012140 11/08/96 9,967.79
34563 SERVICES-PARlS IIWtI ammIIlIIBL SERVICES 012227 11/08/96 17.99
34564 SUPPLIES-VARIOOS IIB!'DOILIIG DC 012448 11/08/96 1,354.49
34565 SBRVICES-PWBIIG DR aD L IIIIUR Ol2509 11/08/96 430.00
34566 SERVICES-IDJSDIG IIIRla.E !ooc! PlIIfIIG 012512 11/08/96 1,800.00
34567 SlJllllLDS-POLICE JIll 0ImmIS DC 012630 11/08/96 2,416.00
34568 SERVICES-W'l'P ClISlft 1lIY1IWIIII1'AL S!lFPIIG 014055 11/08/96 636.00
34569 SOPPLIES-POBLIC WORKS (BD aJLVIRf CD DC 014155 11/08/96 750.00
34570 SERVICES-MP ~1I ".TanG CD 014653 11/08/96 181.00
34571 SOPPLIIS-W!P PlCIlIC AD Im!LID Il!ER 015059 11/08/96 24.00
34572 SOPPLIES-I1DR PlCIlIC 1l!lllICBS SUPPLY 015065 11/08/96 1,327.77
34573 SBRVICES-D DBPi' PC ~., DC 015214 11/08/96 654 .58
34574 SUPPLIIS-W1DR rr.llllliMl ~ J!QUIPMEII'1' 015253 11/08/96 1,727.73
34575 IBIIIBllRSllIIEVARIOOS CIft Of UI8JRI PBm CASH 015255 11/08/96 164.02
34576 SERVICES-VARIOUS IU!LlID GBIFJ1L JIlaRIC 015420 11/08/96 22,641.97
34577 SUPPLIBS-FmICE I'KMlIG lI!S DC Ol552O 11/08/96 135.03
34578 stJIlllLIEHlft' QUALm CXIftW)L SERVICES 016063 11/08/96 535.25
34579 SBRVICBS-MP REED ILIDIIC allPlIY 017143 11/08/96 545.00
34580 SERVICES-LIBRARY SUI) JLIVl!(Il CD 018610 11/08/96 176.59
34581 SUPPLIBS-PARrS S!lB S!III! SlIt SII(p 018777 11/08/96 20.00
34582 SUPPLIES-PlBS 'l'IIE SftEL oorLIt IIC 018788 11108/96 82.62
34583 SOPPLIES-VARIOOS 'l'IIE J 'lJIlDR <XJIPlIY 019100 11/08/96 1,702.20
34584 SBRVICES-HOOSIIG fBERlH)-LOC tIIIOOfS 019132 11/08/96 350.00
34585 SBRVICES-BOOSIlIG IILLI!II m.m 019183 11/08/96 425.00
34586 SUPPLIES-SDm' OIOCAL:BIlIIE GRWM OIL 020010 11/08/96 614.73
34587 SUPPLIES-SDm' USA BUJDKU 020046 11/08/96 259.69
34588 SERVICES-VARIOUS US WES! <DIIOIIcmOllS 020091 11/08/96 434.16
34589 SERVICES-VARIOUS US WES! <DIIUIIcmOllS 020095 11/08/96 3,131.43
34590 SOPPLIES-wwTP VALLEY WELDIIG SUPPLY 021050 11/08/96 9.70
34591 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY WAL-MAR! smms IIC 022035 11/08/96 9.43
34592 SERVICES-VARIOUS WES'l'LIIK PAGIIG 022163 11/08/96 170.50
125,564.57
'11'
11A
12/03/96
AlP CIIECI LISTIlfG FOR !lIE am OF JlOVEMBER 1996
Paqe 3
<beck IUIber Budgetary Account IUIIber Vendor IDe Vendor IUIber 0Md - Date Written AIIOunt of Check
34593 SERVICES-WfP WESURII PlMlR , JQJIPHEI'f 022228 11/08/96 1,501. 78
34594 SERVICES-PARKS iIUIEUI BIIGIIEBRIIG IllC 022322 11/08/96 265.90
34595 REDIIlORSDIBII!PAm nmY IILL(X)I 022390 11/08/96 243.09
34596 SERVICES-POBLIC OKS RlCBlRD UU IllC 022454 11/08/96 3,895.00
34597 SERVICES-POBLIC OKS UDDI Bl(D)B SERVICE 022500 11/08/96 2,850.00
34598 SOPPIJES-ISVP \UmJII OPFICE SUPPLY 022670 11/08/96 30.86
34599 SOPPLIES-PDWICI! YES GRlPBICS 024025 11/08/96 95.00
34600 P1YJW.-PWIDIG (llIO Il!IWL LIFE lIS ro 060400 11/08/96 17.09
34601 SERVICBS-IAfER VALLEY IWLIIG SERVICE 021044 11/14/96 430.56
34602 REGIS!R!UOI-1IIIIlI LEAGUE or CUD cn'IES 011110 11/14/96 149.00
34603 VOID VOID VOID
34604 VOID VOID VOID
34605 VOID VOID VOID
34606 REPOID-iAfER/SBiER SARA LEI GW'! DE 11115/96 15.69
34606 SBRVlCES-lIIIII AIR !OOCI CP.WJLAR 000113 11/15/96 6.95
34607 SlJPPLIIS-Il!ER 1 , A JmLLDG SERVICE 000010 11/15/96 1,090.00
34609 SBRVlCBS-WI'P /1ft 1RWil ElUM SERVICE 000534 11/15/96 126.63
34610 SERVICES-VWOOS Af' ! 000623 11/15/96 16.41
. )46ll SERVIC&H'RlISI! BIo-IIED BSmG SERVICE 001280 11/15/96 370.00
34612 JmIS'l'RAU(w-S'l/EIfG UlIlIUlUTA UIIIIti!I roLLEGE 002410 11/15/96 28.00
34613 SERVICBS-D DIP! CBI!IIR g !IE S!ODY 002415 11/15/96 408.33
34614 SERVICES-MP CII2IHILL 002478 11/15/96 1,062.31
34615 SERVICES-FIlWICE em or SWIll PmICE DEPT 002518 11/15/96 120.00
34616 SERVICES-ERG cmE , IIIISB!JI 002896 11/15/96 16,488.70
34617 SOPPLIES-RSVP en. aJIll(tiU~ 002926 11/15/96 1,462.04
34618 SERVICES-DAlSI! <DIIIIS JUa1IRS! DC 002933 11/15/96 1,492.88
34619 SERVI~IIG DAVE E1'IlIBlJ) CDISftOCUOI 003066 11/15/96 2,070.00
34620 SOPPLIES-LIBRARY DEIIOO IIOU 003110 11/15/96 775.93
3462l SBRVICES-mm GBLO) CDS!IIIJC!I(II ro 006061 1l/15/96 255.00
34622 SOPPLIES-LIBRARY GJlIJlR1L ILIICftIC CAPItAL 006079 1l/15/96 136.00
34623 SOPPLIES-IlI!P BACB ClDllICAL ro 007030 1l/15/96 90.90
34624 SUPPLIES-POLICE IWtRIS ..lNIII:i 007090 1l/15/96 172.80
34625 SOPPLIES-S'lIEEf BESSEL !I1C:.'D 007181 1l/15/96 922.69
34626 SUPPLIB.HII'P BPC SWluUiC' ftKB)UIGY 007189 11/15/96 209.54
34627 SERVICES-POLICE IIOOSlII1L IBU)IIG SUPPLY 008100 1l/15/96 16.75
34628 SERVICES-VWOOS ID OPFICE SI.1J!ICE 008119 1l/15/96 467 .14
34629 SERVICES-mBR/SfREET DS'llft rIB PlmBCUOI 008140 1l/15/96 384.45
34630 SOPPLIES-LIIlRARY JADfBC UB'UI'1Il GROOP 0090S0 1l/15/96 1,728.00
34631 !IlMP JlIIPLOYEES-BIIG D :ilDPBRS DC 009119 11/15/96 813.90
34632 SERVICES-VWOUS LUCEII! !DmUXiIBS 011370 11/15/96 2,206.90
34633 SERVICES-POLICE 1m LtJ!BII <XlISftOC!IOR 011375 11/15/96 650.00
34634 REDIBORSBMEIft'-LIBRARY JOYCE IlALmY 012065 1l/15/96 134.50
34635 SERVICES-PUBLIC DKS 1lW0I <mm am 012087 1l/15/96 3.75
34636 TAlES-PUBLIC WRKS 1lW0I <mm !AI roLLECroR 012220 1l/15/96 5,172.19
34637 SUPPLIES-ERG MCGRAW BILL <XJUlAlIES 012383 1l/15/96 158.79
34638 SUPPLIES-'l'RABS/DAR MErROFOEIJIG IllC 012448 11/15/96 291.80
174,391.82
, 1r
11A
12/03/96
AlP CHECK LISTIlfG FOR TIlE II)ITJI OF JIOVEMBER 1996
Page 4
Qleck IuJber Budgetary Account IUIber Vendor IaIe Vendor KuIber 01eck - Date Written !lount of Check
------ ------------ ------------------------------ ------ -------------------- ----------------
34639 SERVICES-POLICE JmI'l'AII FRESH PORE BOTTLED 012670 11/15/96 40.50
34640 SERVICES-FIIAJICE JORVAC ELEC1'ROHICS 013373 11/15/96 181.28
34641 SUPPLIES-PARKS IYSC! 013500 11/15/96 270.00
34642 SERVICES-VARIOUS OlE au. <XlRCEP'l'S 014054 11/15/96 60.30
34643 SERVICES-POLICE OR DEPf or AJIIIIISTRATIVE SER 014198 11/15/96 100.00
34644 SERVICES-POLICE OR DEPf or II11'OR VEHICLE 014240 11/15/96 13.50
34645 SUPPLIES-STREET PACIFIC ImRIATIOIAL PIPE 015035 11/15/96 700.00
34646 SERVICES-ERG PAVEIIEIT SERVICES IIC 015190 11/15/96 4,844.50
34647 SERVICES-STREET rom.AID GEIERAL Em.'TRIC 015420 11/15/96 8,916.12
34648 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY Mm,L'S BUS'1'OlUlS IIC 015467 11/15/96 291. 69
34649 SUPPLIES-BIG PIOO!SSItmL LAID SURVEYORS 015549 11/15/96 30.00
34650 SERVICES-IIOB DEPt WDAL SADIDERS 018189 11/15/96 150.00
34651 SERVICES-BOILDIIGjD!HS LES salI1B mE CEtITER 018300 11/15/96 255.90
34651 SERVICES-MP /AIIIII S'fA!ESIU JOORI!L 018760 11/15/96 249.34
34653 SUPPLIES-POLICE fiRRIDIlL SOPPLIES IIC 019060 11/15/96 88.52
34654 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS THE J mmR <XJCPAIY 019100 11/15/96 374.21
34655 SERVICES-IIOOSIIG !IIERIHHDC IIIOOifS 019132 11/15/96 5,407.00
3-4656 SUPPLIES-MP OIIOClL:EllIE GlWWI OIL 020010 11/15/96 329.30
34657 SERVICES-VARIOUS us IES'f OJIDICA!IOIS 020095 11/15/96 942.70
34658 SERVICES-wAfER WAfER,POOO , RESEARCII LAB 022062 11/15/96 95.00
34659 87 BAICROrr DDS WELLS F1IQ) 022145 11/15/96 690.34
34660 SUPPLIES-ERG JaIl IfILEY & SOlS IIC 022317 11/15/96 99.28
34661 SOPPLIES-FIIAICE WCDDI OFFICE SUPPLY 022670 11/15/96 16.99
34662 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS YES GRAlmCS 024025 11/15/96 716.65
34663 SOPPLIES-MP lEE MEDICAL SERVICE co 025070 11/15/96 61. 70
34664 SERVICES-wA!ER VALLEY II1ILIIG SERVICE 021044 11/21/96 463.52
34665 PEr1'Y CASIl-VARIOUS em OF mBJII 015255 11/21/96 163.37
34666 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY AMERIClIIIWIE SERVICE BOlE 11/22/96 299.98
34667 VOID VOID VOID
34668 VOID VOID VOID
34669 VOID VOID VOID
34670 SERVICES-coulICIL OXFORD sums JIOIE 11/22/96 208.11
34671 1lEFUID-i!!ER/SIMER SAIl LEE GLl'l'T BOlE 11/22/96 9.61
34672 REFUHD-WATER/SEliER BURGBAPl' , co lORE 11/22/96 61.60
34673 REFUHD-W!!ER/SEWER FARRII JI)C(Efi BOlE 11/22/96 20.60
34674 REFURD-WA!ER/SElfER GARY JWlSEI JOKE 11/22/96 34.83
34675 SUPPLIES-RSVP HID iILLAHE'l'TE VALLEY SEBIOR BOlE 11/22/96 22.00
34676 SERVICES-MP A , 1 PES! corrROL IIC 000011 11/22/96 170.00
34677 SERVICES-STREET AIR !OOaI CELLOL!R 000113 11/22/96 9.07
34678 SERVICES-WUER !JI'fES'f 0RJmI LLC 000400 11/22/96 215.25
34679 SERVICES-wrP l1WIARl OIIlORH SERVICE 000534 11/22/96 106.63
34680 SERVICES-POLICE A'I" LAIIGUlGE LIRE SERVICES 000659 11/22/96 289.12
34681 SERVICES-POLICE BAKER & BAKER 001070 11/22/96 111.60
34682 SERVICES-HOUSIIG BLARD COISTRUC'fIOI IIC 001295 11/22/96 8,260.00
34683 SERVICES-PDBLIC WORKS BDII , CALDWELL 001573 11/22/96 75,006.63
34684 SERVICES-POBLIC WORKS CH2M-HILL 002478 11/22/96 3,367.50
288,136.06
-
11A
12/03/%
AlP CHECK LISTIIG FOR t'IIE IDlTII OF IIOVIlMBER 1996
Paqe 5
Qleck JuIber Budgetary Account IUIber Vendor IIaIle Vendor IUJber Qledc - Date Written AIouDt of Check
------- -----
34685 SERVICES-IIOOSIIG DAVE IIIImIIEAD <XlISt'RUCfi<lf 003066 1l/22/% 9,000.00
34686 SUPPLIES-MP ERIIS'1' BlRIlflRE 004360 11/22/% 289.75
34687 SBRVICFS-MP HIaIlEL B FAIRaIILI) Ie 1SSOC 005015 llf12/% 345.00
34688 SERVICES-wrP FEDERAL muss <UP 005080 1l/22/% 39.75
34689 REIMBORSIlMEIIT-LIBRARY IWULYI FBLIPIl 005088 11/22/% 12.54
34690 REDUlORSDIERT-RSVP SUE FOFW-DURA 005197 11/22/% 8.94
34691 SUPPLIES-RSVP FO!O MAGIC 005258 11/22/96 32.52
34692 SERVICES-M'P J.iOORS(JI OOLF CARS 005265 11/22/% 130.55
34693 SOPPLIES-S!REE'l' G.I. IIACIIIIE 006009 11/22/96 154.58
34694 SOPPLIES-MP IIARRIIG!CW IIOOS!RI1L PLASTICS 007084 1l/22/96 317.69
34695 SOPPLIES-ilft'P Il<ll C1PI!1L 008118 11/22/96 141.05
346% SOPPLIES-M'P ID omCB ntmCllS 008119 11/22/96 628.00
34697 !'BMP DtPLOYEES-JlNG D SIIJlPIIlS DC 009119 11/22/96 897.80
34698 SOPPLIES-St'REEt' mBLBI r.mRPIISBS 010035 1l/22/% 125.75
34699 SERVICES-POLICE IILIm"S SEll SDAGE 010088 11/22/96 70.20
34700 SOPPLIES-VARIOUS IIE!JQOBLIJG DC 012448 1l/22/96 1,119.78
34701 SERVICES-POBLIC WRKS IDSB ~ DC 012611 11/22/96 112,804.52
34702 SERVICES-EIfG DmIIjg)'f GJmID DC 013287 11/22/96 1,385.60
34703 SOPPLIES-FIlWICE DVlC DC!'JDICS OU373 11/22/96 13.50
34704 SOPPLIES-roLICE Ol(p 014008 1l/22/96 63.00
34705 SERVICES-MP ClISIB gV~ mm:IfG 014055 11/22/96 1,060.00
. 34706 SOPPLIES-POLICE <It DBPf or 1IIIIIIS!Il!IVE SERV 014198 11/22/96 261. 04
34707 SERVICES-MP <mBlD DBPf OF IBVBIIUB 014217 1l/22/96 252.00
34708 SERVICES-iA!BR (BD IIIlL!I DIVISI<lI OU311 1l/22/96 160.00
34709 SOPPLIES-STREE'l' IQfBR IIlIl'S DC 015490 1l/22/96 17.06
34710 SOPPLIES-ftR,IroLICE R Ie I UIJ.f\IIIE) OF ORBD 017003 1l/22/96 384.22
34m SERVICES-Am I DEI! SIIIILDS 018450 11/22/96 5,712.50
34712 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS SOIPLtJS DIIBC! 018851 1l/22/96 416.62
34713 SOPPLIES-M'P !EIDG 019051 1l/22/96 202.35
34714 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS !lIB J ftIlYBR OJIPlIY 019100 1l/22/96 1,049.72
34m SUPPLIES-SftEB! mmc SAFm SUPPLY (X) 019220 1l/22/96 119.60
34716 SOPPLIES-SBm 0IIlCAL:1IIIB GRWII OIL 020010 11/22/96 513.41
34717 SBRVICES-D DEP'l' os BAlI OF (DD 020059 11/22/96 41,046.17
34718 SERVICES-PWIIIIG VlIJ.BY IIlILIJG SIlIVICE 021044 1l/22/96 1,645.73
34719 SOPPLIES-D DElI! VISIBLE aJIllO!II SUPPLIES 021200 11/22/96 166.49
34720 SOPPLIES-ERG m-mr S!(DS IIC 022035 11/22/96 48.48
34721 L01I P1YJlElf-POBLIC WORKS WELLS rlltGO 022U5 11/22/96 76,144.73
34722 SUPPLIES-POLICE m.DVILLE LOCJ: I<BS 022422 11/22/96 14.95
34723 SOPPLIES-JIOOSDtG m'IIERS IBIBER 022445 11/22/96 127.59
34724 SOPPLIE5-JIOOSDtG Q.FBRS BBmIG i AIR COlt]) 022460 11/22/96 101.25
34725 SERVICES-POLICE tomJRI CARCRAn' 022508 11/22/96 133.75
34726 SERVICES-PLAIIDIG umJRI IIDBPERDElft' 022630 11/22/% 118.25
34727 RBIMBlJRSEMEIft'-POLICE UIUl'B WRIGII! 022830 11/22/96 21.14
34728 SOPPLIES-RSVP YES GRAPIIICS 024025 1l/22/96 312.50
34729 SUPPLIES-POLICE fRlCY PEmIG!OR lORE 1l/22/96 160.00
34730 SERVICES-WA'l'ER VALLEY MAILIIG SERVICE 021044 1l/27/96 420.96
~.!. .. "/::'<, :' :'<~' - .: .' . ~ ,'. -......
;, ~ . ' ,.'.. . . . -.40".. '.. . .....- .' .. '.
.-. . . .. : .' .. '. ~ '.. . . '. . "."
546/327.09
-
11A
Uf03/96
AlP CIIID: LISTIIG FOR THE JIOIl'ftI OF lfOVIlMBBR 1!96
paqe 6
atec:t JuIber Budgetary Aooount IUIber Vendor IaJe Vendor IUIber Qledt - Date written !Iount of Check
---
34731 VOID VOID VOID
34732 VOID VOID VOID
34733 VOID VOID VOID
34734 SUPPLIES-LIBR!RY S<<mSI SOOC IDE 11/27/96 30.00
34735 IEIIII!ORSDIEIIRSVP CIIRIS R>>~RS DE 11/27/96 64.00
34736 SERVICES-VlRIOOS AIR !OOaI CELLULAR 000113 11/27/96 252.49
34737 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY !LA EDmOlS 000135 11/27/96 34.80
34738 OOES-LIBRARY AMERICAI LIBRARY ASSOC 000250 11/27/96 190.00
34739 SlRVlCES-PAIlIS !I!IDY IIDD J:IId)UCfIOIS 000436 11/27/96 124.00
34740 SBRVICES-VlRIOOS A1WI!Ill 0IIlQlII SERVICES 000534 11/27/96 181.23
34741 SOPPLIES-PAIlIS WIDS lID 1!BLmCS 000S80 11/27/96 150.25
34742 SlRVICBS-PAIlIS mf 1ITIRr.R.C:.c: SERVICES 0006S5 11/27/96 33.18
34743 SOPPLIES-PAIlIS BEllIAJILII S!(D 001205 11/27/96 7.93
34744 SOPFLIIS-VlRIOOS BI-IIAR! <DlIGlfI~ 001275 11rn /96 268.41
34745 SOPPLIES-LIBURY BOU.DOG VIDB> 001586 11/27/96 71.46
34,.6 SBRVIC!S-IW:CE CASE 11mlmIVE 002190 11/27/96 875.82
34747 SERVICES-LIBRARY aIDIEDfl CXIIDm OOLLEGE 002410 11/27/96 1,025.00
34748 SERVICBS-CIft JWJ. aIEIRJ em PUIIBJJG DC 002426 11/27/96 187.75
34749 SUPPLIES-LIBR!RY CIIII.D 0IIP1IY 002457 11/27/96 85.25
34750 SBRVICES-PAIlIS <UCDIIAS LOCI 002558 11/27/96 603.25
34751 SBRVICBS-<DJRl' II!IQ)f <DU! 002686 11/27/96 93.75
34752 . SUPPLIES-LIBRARY C1ilR1RlJl pnRJ.T~ 002891 11/27/96 232.63
34753 SBRVICBS-WIft'P <DIIIIS . 002933 11/27/96 740.64
34754 SOPPLIIS-VlRIOOS DAVID lOfO P!I!S 003080 11/27/96 643.79
34755 SUPPLIBS-lUICE DAVID lD!O P!I!S 003081 11/27/96 9.43
34756 SOPPLIBS-SfRBBf/MP P1III PW 00S062 11/27/96 38.79
34757 RBDIBORSBIIBII!AIlIS IIlK FISalER 005142 11/27/96 136.00
34758 RBIMBORSDDlIIHS SUB lOFAll-IlOR! 005197 11/27/96 158.00
34759 SUPPLIBS-lUICBfPAIlIS roro IAGIC 005258 11/27/96 58.48
34760 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY t:RDlllr.lClL PDN.lSBDG (X) IIC 006070 11/27/96 52.11
34761 SBRVICBS-PDlS GlIB'S .. IL1k.'l'JDICS 006130 11/27/96 89.00
34762 SOPPLIBS-PDlS/CI!Y JWJ. GU&L IJJIFIIlI! (X) 0062ll 11/27/96 901.80
34763 SUPPLIBS-II!P GLCaL UB'Ul'1Il( SOPPLIBS 0062U 11/27/96 321.38
34764 SOPPLIES-LIBRARY GRACE PImJC!S 006272 11/27/96 94.00
34765 IEIIII!ORSDIEIIRSVP SII!IQ GRBBI 006297 11/27/96 16.00
34766 SOPPLIES-LIBRARY GIQJBR pnRI.TSRTIG ro 006366 11/27/96 15.11
34767 SOPPLIES-VlRIOOS G.I. BlRIlI1RE CIlIIfBR 006405 11/27/96 700.20
34768 SOPPLIES-IIft'P JIARID rREIGIl! SALVAGE 007080 11/27/96 3,132.53
34769 SOPPLIES-PAIlIS IIOOS!IIlL 1IEIJ)DG SUPPLY 008100 11/27/96 15.90
34770 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY IIIGIWI DIS! GROOP 008116 11/27/96 1,600.78
34771 SOPPLIES-LIIlRlRY OR PImJCfS 010028 11/27/96 42.15
34772 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS L & L BOIIJ)IBG SOPPLIES 011010 11/27/96 239.25
34773 SUPPLIES-LIBR!RY LIFE InIS 011228 11/27/96 28.90
34774 SOPPLIES-POLICE LIGIlfIIIG rofDBR CO OlU3O 11/27/96 94.45
34775 SUPPLIES-PARKS LIID'S MARD'l' 011240 11/27/96 30.12
34776 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY LIBROS SII FROIITER!S 01U78 11/27/96 61.81
560,058.91
-
11A
12/03/96
AlP CIIECJ( LISTIIG FOR THE I<<IITII OF JOVEMBER 1996
Page 7
aaect IUIber Budgetary 10C0UDt IUIber Vendor late Vendor IuJber Oledt - Date Written AIount of Oleck
... --...
34m SUPPLIES-PARKS Ln"fLB amo:CAL 011285 11/27/96 1,076.45
34178 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY IIlDERl cmvmm IJC 012036 11/27/96 103.73
34779 REIMBURSElll!llLIBRARY JOYCE IlLmr 012065 11/27/96 27.50
34780 SERVICES-PARKS MW~ <DIm J!IV IlEALm 012125 11/27/96 470.00
34781 SOPPLIES-!RAIISl! JImtur1lILIIG DC 012448 11/27/96 297.25
34782 SUPPLIES-VWOOS MIDSTAftS OOAS!AL FARM 012475 11/27/96 317.28
34783 SERVICES-POLICE MILES aIB'VROLB!' 012490 11/27/96 363.39
34784 SERVICES-PARIS IDSBLIl'ftIC DC 012612 11/27/96 775.00
34785 SUPPLIES-PARIS ImcmL CBDISBAiCII 013030 11/27/96 1,574.75
34786 SERVICES-Cm BALL .. PDISSI<mL IlOOPIIG co 013297 11/27/96 1,248.00
34787 SERVICES-VARlOOS IUQ1IIIIm IltoRAL GAS 013350 11/27/96 205.65
34788 SOPPLIBS-LIBRARY (BD ,1I11III S!OCDlI 014300 11127 fJ6 19.95
34789 SBRVICES-POBLIC OKS CDD IDL!II DIVISI~ 014311 11/27/96 250.00
34790 SUPPLlBS-VARlOOS PlOLSD , ~ WDltwES 015173 11/27/96 1,909.63
34791 SUPPLIES-STREET PAUL'S SIIlLt lID SERV 015175 11/27/96 6.73
34792 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY m;&SUS BXn 015218 11/27/96 26.50
34793 SOPPLIES-PARltS J.D. PIICE AQUmC SUPPLY 015223 11/27/96 150.39
34794 SERVICBS-MP PICBER ELIC1'DICS 015345 11/27/96 23.36
34m SUPPLIES-STREET PIIBR PIPB , SUPP! DC 015515 11/27/96 116.00
3m6 SERVICES-WABR RADII (DlI(B!I~ 017035 11/27/96 626.25
34797 RElIIBORSDlEft-PAllIS JIll D 017348 11/27/96 72.76
34798 SUPPLlES-POLICE LBS saM1B !'DE CEII'l'ER 018300 11/27 fJ6 227.59
34799 REIIIBOISmIEIl'1'-PAllIS !WI SJO!BOI. 018456 11/27/96 130.38
34800 SERVICES-POLICE SU'lER <XIIIIIIClfIClIS 018522 11/27/96 275.10
34801 RBIIIOOiSPJIEIILlBRARY LIJDA SPti1JBR, DIIBCl'OR 018710 11/27/96 75.32
34802 SOPPLIBS-LIBRARY smE mm SAIl SID 018m 11/27/96 344.00
34803 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY SOISB!' 1WDICfI(I(S 018819 11/27/96 5.00
34804 SUPPLIES-POLICE DYLOR BLIaIIC SUPPLY 019030 11/27/96 76.68
3480S SUPPLIES-STREET tJ.YUm 1IJIIlC!<D DC 019033 11/27 fJ6 1,140.79
34806 SUPPLIBS-POLICEtpI mmc DA!'l SERVICE 019218 11/27 fJ6 2,861.94
34807 SUPPLIBS-LIllRAiY !IIU lSS(nlftS 019255 11/27 fJ6 24.04
34808 SUPPLIES-LIBRAIY (E8IIJ) IBSDIII DC 020012 11/27/96 349.82
34809 SUPPLIES-PmsjRSVP UIlJII) smBS POO!'AL SERVICE 020090 11/27/96 256 .00
34810 SOPPL1BS-LIBRAIY us IRS! DIRBC!' 020092 11/27/96 44.25
34811 SUPPLIBS-LIBRm UPSm!' 020180 11/27/96 26.89
34812 SUPPLIES-POLICE/pARKS VWIG OFFICE PIIODUC'l'S 021180 11/27/96 744.97
34813 SUPPLIES-POLICE 1lL-MAR! SDES DC 022035 11/27/96 59.17
34814 SOPPLlES-LIBRAIY MARY WA!'D IDL 022105 11/Tl/96 286.23
34815 SERVICBS-PARltS m.LAIIEftI ClAP RED CROSS 022328 11rn /96 105.00
34816 REIMBORSEMEIIf-PARKS fERRY WIUJAIIS 022396 11/27/96 185.75
34817 SUPPLIES-PAllIS 1mIlORI a.ElIERS 022530 11127/96 35.00
34818 SERVICES-POLICE tQDORI PLORIS'f 022600 11/27/96 29.00
34819 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY mmtI DO>BPEIIDBIft' 022630 11ITl/96 24.00
34820 SOPPLIES-MP /pARKS WOOJBJRII OFFICE SUPPLY 022670 llrn /96 78.47
34821 SUPPLIES-PARKS Q)I)BtJRI REIft'-ALL 022708 l1/Tl/96 225.00
34822 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY YES GRAPHICS 024025 11/27/96 172.00
577 ,501.88
'l!'
11A
12/03/96
AlP CIIECK LIS'fIIG FOR THE MOI'l'II OF IOVEMBER 1996
Page 8
aleCk IUIber Budqetary Account IfuIber Vendor IDe Vendor IfuIber Oleck - Date Written AIount of Check
--------- --------
34823 SOPPLIES-STREE'f mIAR I1IDUS'lRIES DfC 02S045 11rn /96 179.04
34824 REIMBORSI!IIEIft-RSVP LID LA ROQllE 035465 11rn /96 48.00
34825 IEIIIBORSIJIIIIHSVP VlDA CMEIS 035583 1l/27/96 27.50
34826 REIMBORSlJIEII'f-RSVP MARI!lI REED 0356is 11/27/96 15.75
34827 'REIIBlRSEIIElIHSV JtIlIE 1IOODC()(J. 035648 11m /96 69.50
34828 REIMBORSEIIEIIH JAY tmDS 035763 11/27/96 144.00
34829 REIMBORSllMEIIT-DAR 00R0i'BA BORIJJm 045060 11/27/96 28.25
34830 REIIIBORSEMElIHAR CORIELIUS DOIlHELLY 045230 11/27/96 94.00
34831 REIIIB01lSJlIIl'.ft-DAR FRED BAYES 045315 11/27/96 40.25
34832 REIMBORSlJIEII'f-DAR AIBERf JlEllRIcr 045320 11/27/96 7.50
34833 REIMBORSEMEft-DAR IXlmIlY JAEGER 045350 11/27/96 18.75
34134 RBIIIBOISJlIIll WARD O'BRIEI 045497 1l/27/96 141.00
34835 iBIMIlORSllIUlII!-DAR FiAI OLSOI 045500 11/27/96 18.50
34836 REIIIBORSIlIIEIf-DAR IIARILYI PARADIS 045512 11/27/96 34.25
34837 REIIIBORSEMEn'-DAR JOAI PREZEAlJ 045525 11/27/96 238.50
34838 RBIIIBOISJlIIll GERTRUDE REES 045545 11/27/96 63.25
34839 RBIIIBOISJlIIll WLA SPERA'l'OS 045560 11/27/96 6.00
34840 REIMBORSEMEft-DAR JAMES STROOP 045595 11/27/96 18.00
34841 REIIIBORSEMEft-DAR FRED t'OPOREK 045660 11/27/96 29.00
34842 REIMBORSlJIEII'f-DAR Bm'IE VAMDEOOVERIIIG 045670 11/27/96 12.50
34843 REIMBURSm4Eft-DAR JEAI WEBnE 045693 11/27/96 99.50
578,834.92
'1!'
15A
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Chris Childs, City Administrator
w
SUBJ.:
Certified General Election Results
DATE:
December 5, 1996
Attached are the final official November 5, 1996 General Election results, as
certified by the Marion County Elections Division, pertaining to Woodburn
issues/positions.
'1l'
0000000 d 0 10 -rj
.................,...a.~.- II - ....
(.IlI.ll'JlI.lI\JlI.ll\J . PJ I\J Z 15A
o.om....o-u.;> 00 0 II .0 00 0 0- 00 0 )>
lI.l- II l'J- .... !\J- .... r
"1lJ:J:J:J:J:m -I . E -I J: -I
....00000P1 U II -< .0 . 11 -< 0 I I -< 0
::UOOOOOZ 110 g "
P1 0 0 CH::lC:' .... Z-< 0 U 0 Em 0 J:::U 0 "
CDCDCDalalO om "TI " ~ :or "TI al :0.... "TI ....
mccCCC:tl m II c .... .... c ....0 0
-l:tl:tl:tl:O;O E 1:tI -10 J: :u .....:J: E ....
)>ZZZZZP1 0 11 Z P1)> 0 Z m)> 0 )>
-I m 0 11 I 0 1::U 0 r
....033 "1l "1l-l I:' U 0 ....m 0 "1l ....0 0
~....P111lli)0)> In U .... Z.... In C Z In 0
-1-1-1111111-1 C II -l " C 111 c... C ]>
-<xx P1 ;0 II -< C ::0 m ::u Z
OOalCDm Z Q m z CD z Z <
:J:OOCC U X Z C Z ]>
)>................0 I II )> ..... I .... ... 00
rmmrrr . r m r Z 00
r-l.....t:lt:lC ]> u r N 0 0 0 0
........0:1 t:l 11 0 .... to 0
OOZZ.1: < r. C II Z C
::J:XIi)CO .... U Z Ie Z
CC C m a 0 . 0
::U::O m 0 11 .... I ...
00 m ;0 II r . r
:J::J: -< " "1l U "'0
I II (11 U m
)> " ::u " ::0
0 II m a (/)
(;) II 0 U 0
C 11 Z U Z
I ... II U
I ;u U U I
I 111 Q .
w--ul\J/IJ';>, U 'J J: . W E
wu.ollJo-uW"l 0 "1l a 0 0 )> . 0- 0 )>
...u........wo.;> I - ::u II .;> ... ::0 U l\J ... ::u
1 0 I 0 U 0
I "'0 II II
I " 0- a PJ
w...lIJul'JlIJ(JI 1 II U
.o.;>.o.;>uo-.;> I 0 0 u ... 0
(JI1I).;>....,.OII) I l\J 3 .0 !\J II - 1\.1
I P1 .
I )> II
I m It
I C Z3
, 0 /lJ1IJ< ::0 0 < 0 < 0)>
000000'" I W - - 0 (11 0 (.I 0 0 W 0 <;0
I .,....-1 l\J-I W-I ....
I ';>U111l IIJ om ...o-m 0
I o....m .;> .o.;>UI ...I\.IUI U1%
I I ... ...
...._W'O.;>I\.I'O I 0 II) 0 0 m 0 (")
....lIJu-W'O.,. t .;> "1l 0 l\J .;. "1l .... .;> "1l -0
P1 m m .oc
u.,.::O .0:0 .0:0 ..0%
wo-o .;>uo 1\.1....0 0-.....
m m m -<
0.0% 1\.1....% .oOZ o-
r II)lI.l-l (.1....-1 UUl-l fTl
U %0
II 111;0
U ::OP1
U II )>0
II U ro
00 J: Q 00 J: U 00 E Z
.;>W .... u .;>W ... u ""to! .... P1
-I II -I U -I r
Q It X U II . :J: U 11 . J: fTl
U . n
co u co . co ....
Z< u z< u z< ....
om II I:1m II I:1m 0
P1::O .... U "':0 - II 111::0 ... Z
::0 II :0 II :0
< 0 u < 0 u < 0
<0 " U <0 "TI . <0 "TI
0.... U 0-1 U 0-1
-1m u ....111 U .....111
P1m u moo II 11100
m u UI a OJ
.... II ... II ...
II II
"1l U "1l . -0
::0 11 ::0 . :0
P1 U fIl II 111
(") . 0 . ("I
... . .... u ....
% U % a z
n u 0 . ("I
.... u .... U -I
m Q Ul II 10
U U
;0 U :tI ::u
P1 Q 111 f'lI
"'0 U "1l "'0
0 I 0 0
:0 II ::0 :0 ...
-I It -I .... ...
.... u ... .... I
Z II % % 10
Ii) II Ii) Ii) (Jl
U I
II ;0 ..0
II P1 0-
Il "IJ
U U 0
I " ::0
II II -I
U U I
I " 111
II II r
u u u
< II < II < lIJ
0 II 0 U 0
W -I II -l U .....
II) P1 II 0 P1 U II) 111
......00 II !\Jom II ....om
II II
II II "IJ
"IJ U \J U \J )>
P1 U 111 U 111 Ii)
:0 U :0 U :0 P1
() II () II (")
P1 " 111 U /TI 0
Z U Z U Z m
-I u ..... H ..... ...
'11
II 00 II 0000000
II ... ... II ... ~ ... ... .... .... ...
" lUlU II (,J1U1U1U1U1U1U 00 0 15A
" m4> 00 0 H o-Gm"o-<II4>
" ~..... ... II IU'" ...
" I:Ul -I II "Tll:I: I:EEOO -I
II OITl . n < u"'OOOOOITl . . <
OZ ll::tlOOOOOZ EZ 0
e.... 1:0 0 II lTI C tH:::I c tl ...
ll:lO :;0... "Tl H tI:ltlltl:ltl:ltl:lO :::Ol> "Tl
e:;o ...n nwecccc:::o -Z
" -I~ I: U-I::tl:::o::tl::tl:::O -10 I:
ZITI ITI 0 IIl>ZZZZZlTI lTI-< 0
Ul l"tl 0 Q -I Ul I 0
3:-1 ...e 0 a_03:3"1J"1J-I "'l> 0
1TIl> Zli) ll:l UO...rrtlTlOOl> Z. ttI
-1-1 :I: e ItZ-I-I-IlTIl11-1 c
:I:ITI :;0 II <x:r 111 ~ :;0
Oul Z 1I OOtl:llUOO .... Z
0 II :roocc :;0
....n I II >...............0 ~ I
Ulr II rw(/)rrr (/)
-Ie 0 II r -I -I .0 0 e m 3:
ll:l 0 II ......tI:l -< l>
n:I: e II <"I<"IZz:r -<
0 IO Z II IIC.,O 0
ee 0 II CC C :;0
I :::000 .... " ::0::0 (lJ
0' 01Tl r II <"10 111
2- I "tl II II
ITI II
> :;0 If
0- m II
~. 0 u
., Z II
c
g. II
I II
II
(,JO- I: n O'PJ(,Jm~(,J"
0'0 0 )> II O...O'U..."CD 0
0'<11 ... :;0 II ...-G(JI~"O"OUl -
0 II
II
... II
If
... 0 II (,J PJ (,J (,J IU ~ - 0
moO 10 II O'...~"O(,JO'O' IU
II
II
41
II
0 <: II 0 tol<:
00 tol 0 U 001\.)0000 (,J ~ 0
..0-1 II 1\]0'-1
l\.l"m II -~1TI
"-1....00 II UI 'J UI
...4> H - ....IU-...IU
4>0- 0 II 0'''1U0'......'' 0
Ntol 4> "tl " 0'<J1Ulo-m""0' 4> "1J
m u 1TI
..0:::0 It ..0:::0
"""-In II <11.1>0
ITI II 1TI
"-II\JZ II O'''''Z
( ....0-1 n 00....
II
II
II
If
n
00 I: U 00 I:
4>tol ... II ~(.:J ...
-I If ....
II H X It a a :I:
n II
1I CO U ~~
u z< II
A om u 0111
II m:;O II) II 111::0 "-I
II :;0 n ::0
u < 0 II <: 0
n <0 .... II <:0 ....
ft 0-1 II 0-1
II -1111 U -1m
II I11Ul II lTIal
n al II UI
. N II "-I
II U
II "1J II "11
n :u u :;0
II I'l II 111
11 0 . 0
. .... u ...
n Z II Z
II 0 II <"I
II -I II -I
U UI a (/)
II "
U :;0 II :;0
n ITI " ITI
II -0 I! -0
0 U 0
:u " :u
-I II -I
.... II ...
Z II Z
Ii) a f)
II
"
II
If
II
II
II
If
II
II
If
n <: If <:
11 0 II 0
11 0- -I II ... -I
If 0 ITI II ~ 1TI
n U1000 II OIUUI
U "
U 11
n "1J II "1J
" ITI II 111
U :;0 II ;;u
n 0 II <"I
a ITI u rrt
U Z U z
n -I u -I
'1r
158
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administrator
Randall Rohman, Public Wor1<s Program Manager..t4 ~
TO:
SUBJECT: Private Well Abandonment Program for Councillnfonnation
DATE:
December 4, 1996
Well Abandonment Program. along with a copy of draft resolution is being forwarded to
council. This resolution as presented will be brought before council for approval in
January. Any input or modification from council will be appreciated.
BACKGROUND: Ai the September 23, 1996 City Council meeting staff made a
presentation on private wells and potential contamination problems that they could pose
for the city's water supply. There was also discussion on the abandoMl9nt of these wens
in accordance with Oregon Water Resource Department (WRD) requirements and how
these procedures protected the water supply aquifer from contamination.
As part of this presentation staff made a proposal that a registration program for private
wells within the city be established. Since the cost of abandoning a well in accordance
with WRD rules can be significant for the property owner. staff proposed that in
conjunction with the registration program that the city cost share in the abandonment of
walls that the property 0\\fl9I" had registered \Wh the city. Council appeared to concur with
staff proposals on the proportion of cost sharing and basic guidelines. This direction has
been incorporated in the attached resolution.
The decision on abandonment of a private well YJiIl be made by the owner of the well. The
city desires to know the location of all private wells located in the city. The city does
encourage property owners to abandon wells located on their property and should be
willing to share part of this cost if the well owner should decide to abandon the well.
1r
158
~'\
Q~
COUNCIL BILL NO.
D1?4f:r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABliSHING POUCY REGARDING PRIVATE WELLS IN THE CITY AND
COST SHARING FOR ABANDONMENT OF SUCH WELLS.
WHEREAS, The City of Woodburn's sole source of clean, safe drinking water
is from groundwater resources, and
WHEREAS, The public is a beneficiary of safe drinking water, and
WHEREAS, It is of paramount importance that the City's groundwater resources
be protected from potential contamination, and
WHEREAS, Private wells, those in use and those improperly abandoned,
potentially provide a direct route for contaminants to the city's underground water supply,
and
WHEREAS, The City has by ordinance established rules, regulations and
enforcement for use and supply of city water service, and
WHEREAS, To adequately plan for future water needs it is vital that the location
of private wells whether or not registered with Oregon Water Resources Department be
known, and
WHEREAS, The costs of private well abandonment, which must be
accomplished in accordance with Oregon Water Resources Department Regulations, may
cause an economic burden on the affected property owner, and
WHEREAS, The city assists in the costs of providing public infrastructure, and
WHEREAS, Protection of the city's groundwater resource is critical to
accommodate a growing population, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Woodburn hereby establishes a private well registration
program that requires residents and business operations to register with the city any private
wells, whether they are actively used or inactive, on their property with the city limits.
Page 1 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
'"'
DRAfT
158
Section 2. The City hereby initiates a private well abandonment program that
allows the City to cost share in the abandonment of private wells in accordance with the
requirements of the Oregon Water Resources Department (WRD).
Section 3. Those property owners who register their private well with the city
by December 31, 1997, within one year of annexation to the city or within one year of
when the well driller signs the well log for new well as being completed will have a share
distribution of 50% city and 50% property owner. The cost distribution will be available
to the property owner at that time when the property owner determines that the well will
be permanently abandoned in accordance with WRD requirements.
Section 4. Those property owners who desire to participate in the program but
who do not comply with the registration requirement of Section 3 will have a share
distribution of 25% city and 75% property owner.
Section 5. New residential and commercial subdivisions are excluded from this
cost sharing program since abandonment of wells found on such subdivisions are normally
the responsibility of the developer or builder as stipulated in subdivision conditions of
approval. However, cost sharing of 25% city and 75% developer will be allowed if well
abandonment is completed prior to start of any construction activity on the subdivision.
Section 6. The property owner will be expected to facilitate the transfer of
water rights established for any abandoned well to the city to be utilized for municipal
supply. Costs associated with the water rights transfer will be paid by the city.
Section 7. The program shall be initiated and administered according to
established procedures at the discretion of the city. These pOlicies and guidelines are
attached to this resolution for reference purposes. The interpretation and implementation
of this resolution and administrative policies is the responsibility of Public Works Director
or authorized designate.
Section 8. The creation and administration of this program by the city in no
manner relieves or absolves a property owner of the responsibility for contamination or its
remediation and its duty to indemnify the city for damages to persons or property that may
be required as a result of the private well or because of its improper abandonment.
Section 9. All funding assistance by the city is predicated on funding being
available and the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to make cost sharing decisions
within budget constraints and the limited resources available to the Public Works
Department.
Page 2 -
COUNCil BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
'1!'
DRAFT
158
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Date
APPROVED:
Nancy A. Kirksey, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 3 -
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
'11"
DRAFT
158
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND GUIDEUNES
PRIVATE WELL ABANDONMENT PROGRAM
The intent of this program is to register with the city private wells that are located in
the city limits and to help property owners properly abandon their private wells. The
abandonment of these wells will be at the discretio~ of the property owner in most
cases. The city does encourage the proper abandonment of wells that are no longer
in use or for which no future use is planned.
Property owners will be asked to fill out a form indicating where their well is located
so the city can maintain a record of the well location.
The city will provide cost sharing for those property owners who do wish to properly
abandon their well in accordance with the State of Oregon Water Resource
Department (WRD) regulations. The following criteria will be utilized to determine the
cost sharing participation by the city:
1. Property owners who register their private well with the city by
December 31, 1997, within one year of annexation to the city or within
one year of when the well driller signs the well log for a new well as
being complete will be eligible for a 50% city and 50% property owner
cost share. The cost share will be available to the property owner when
they determine that the well will be abandoned. The well must be
abandoned in accordance with WRD requirements.
2. Property owners who desire to participate in the program but do not
comply with the registration requirement will be eligible for a 25% city
and 75% property owner cost share. The well must be abandoned in
accordance with WRD requirements.
3. For new residential and commercial subdivisions a cost share of 25%
city and 75 % developer will be allowed if well abandonment in
accordance with WRD requirements is completed prior to the start of any
construction activity on the subdivision.
4. An application for cost sharing eligibility will be completed when the
property owner determines that they wish to participate in the city's
private well abandonment program. Public Works will maintain an
updated list of approved wells for the cost sharing program. The
property owner will be informed when funding is available for the city
share of the abandonment.
The determination of eligibility requirement is the responsibility of the Public Works
Director or authorized designate. The determination of eligibility will be final.
...
DRAFT
158
The determination of resource allocation will be made utilizing the following guidelines:
A. Willingness of property owner to abandon the well.
B. Potential for pollution of the city's underground source of drinking water.
C. Period of time that the well has been out of service.
D. Location of well in respect to existing City water supply wells.
The city cost share will be paid when a statement from a Certified Well Driller is
provided along with documentation of abandonment in accordance with WRD
requirements.
The city will coordinate with the property owner to transfer water rights, if they exist,
for the abandoned well to the city for municipal supply use. The city will fund any
costs associated with such transfer and will complete required forms.
'1!'
15C
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council through City Administrator
FROM: Community Development Director '5L <;
SUBJECT: Acc.ess Management Draft Ordinance.
DATE: December 5, 1996
In 1996 the City Council adopted by ordinance the "Woodburn Transportation Plan-. The
plan incorporates several goals and policies the city should initiate to improve vehicular and
pedestrian traffic movements through our community. The plan also identifies specific
ordinances that should be implemented to assist in that effort.
The draft Access Management Ordinance (provided separately from this packet) is the first
in a series of ordinances to be implemented to fulfill the goals and objectives of the
Transportation Plan.
Since this is a rather lengthy and technical draft ordinance it would be beneficial to provide
adequate time to review the document. For this reason, staff will be bringing this draft
ordinance for public hearing most likely in the second council meeting in January 1997.
C:\MEMO\MEMO.AMO
'1!'
15D
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: T~hriS Childs. City Administrator
FROM: &~evin Holly, Director Recreation and Parks
SUBJECT: Community Center Heater Shut-down
DATE:
December 2, 1996
The Woodburn Community Center heater has failed. On Friday, November 29th I was
called to the Community Center because a gas smell had been noticed. Emergency
personnel from the Fire Department cleared the building. Dangerous levels of CO2 were
found present in the dining area. Gas to the building was shut off. Wolters Heating Repair
Service was called in and a determination was made that the 40 year old heater was
beyond repair. In order to save money our Parks Maintenance staff have disenabled the
old heater and a new heater has been ordered through Wolters. The installation of the
new heater is $4,600.00. The expenditures of these dollars caused me to exceed the
Community Center Capital Fund by $2,600.00. However, the expenditure should be able
to be accommodated within the Recreation and Parks Budget without Council action. The
week of December 2nd through December 9th saw as few interruptions in services as
possible.
It is my hopes that the new furnace is installed and operating by this Council Meeting.
NH:swp
'11"
15E
MEMO:
TO: city council through city Administrator
FROM: Public Works Program Manager 4 #---
SUBJECT: Settlemier Avenue/Parr Road Intersection to utilize
State Funds Committed For Cleveland Street
DATE: December 3, 1996
staff Action Por xnforaation:
Publics Works Staff will be requesting the state to change a
desiqnated fund exchange project from one on Cleveland Street to a
higher priority project for the Settelmier Avenue/Parr Road
intersection. When approved by the state, the amendment will be
presented to council for approval.
Baaltqroun4:
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) replaced the old Federal
Aid Urban program in 1991. One of the changes in the new program
was that funds were to be committed each federal fiscal year. The
state of Oregon developed a program through which the federal STP
funds were exchanged for state funds. This allowed for a wider
range of projects to be funded than were authorized under federal
rules. The state exchanges $1.00 of federal funds for $.96 of
state funds. The city has entered into one of these fund exchange
agreements annually since the federal program change
On october 9, 1995 the city entered into Local Agency Fund Exchange
Agreement Number 13,836 with the state. The project identified in
that agreelRent was for widening of Cleveland Street between Front
Street and Second street with the city receiving $63,952 of state
funds to be used by the city for the project on a reimbursement
basis. The city did some preliminary engineering on this project
but other projects did not allow the desiqn of the project to be
completed. Also council was less supportive of the Cleveland
street Project.
In the interim the city, as a result of the proposed school
construction on Parr Road, developed a project to improve the
intersection of Parr Road/Front street/settleaier Avenue to
increase its safety and capacity. In order to complete this high
priority project fund exchange funding previously dedicated to the
Cleveland project, along with additional fund exchange monies from
the current year, were identified as a source that could be used to
accomplish the intersection project.
If Council does not want staff to divert Cleveland street funds to
Settlemier Avenuel Parr Road project, then staff will not proceed
with the stated action.
'"
15F
TQ:
FROM:
City Council, 1hrough City Administrator
Assistant City Engineer ~
SUBJECT: StormWater Information and Policies
DATE:
December 5, 1996
City is experiencing flooding conditions again for a second consecutive winter; however~
with experienced worlc crews who have kept the systems free of obstruction, no major
problems have been experienced. Hardcastle area is one of our major concerns, but with
construction of storm drains next summer, this area should not experience flooding next
winter.
Staff is enforcing FEMA requirements and bas been doing so since 1979; these requirements
constitute the National Flood Insurance Program of that same year.
These policies give the City authority to regulate filling (building) within certain distances
of the meandering centerlines of Mill Creek and Senecal Creek.
No building or fiJ1i1lg is allowed in the Floodways but building is currently allowed in the
Rood Plains. This is aDowed provided the structures are above 1he 100 year flood elevations
designated for any particular reach.
Staff is enforcing detention requirements as has been brought to council attention on
previous occasions. However, some refinements have been made. Because safety is a
con~ the standard depth of detention ponds will be restricted to three feet.
Current policy requires developers to provide enough storage volume to contain that volume
ofwate:r resulting mm a 2S year storm occmring over the land parcel in question. AIso~ the
developer must provide a design that will release the stored water at a 5 year storm runoff
rate. The pwpose of the lower release rate is to keep water levels lower in the receiving
pipes and streams.
These policies are administered foremost during site plan review periods as well as post
development; post development has been limited to retrofit where a problem was
encountered in a local situation.
Nelson PaIk was the first retention pond installation within the City; it was constructed about
20 years ago. Parr Acres is the most recent retention pond, it is about 3 years old. Both
have operated satisfactorily during recent storms.
Attached is guiding document sheet for detention requirements.
'TJ'
y "'L.U'.II;;;;~ .- ~., ..,..-.- ~,,~.... ..... J:;I...-:JI. . .-:J' "'"....;;J
· FOR 1o.ACRE SITE
(000 T method used)
100 yr.
i
= 435,600
=10 acres
Developed
= 0.71
UN)developed
= 0.25
.467'
tIP-
0.71
o 3.313 32,205 ft'
1.167 11,340 It'
0.25
10 yr.
0.435 in
hr
0.71
3.087 30,672 It'
1.087 10,800 It'
0.26
I yr.
0.285 in 0.71
hr
2Iwr~
03:1: .
~1.=--p . .
P
;0025>
10 yr.
.364 In 0.71
hr
27,605 ft'
0.25
9,720 ft'
0.25
8,415ft
2 yr.
,600 ft 0.71
or 10 acn!S
20,448 It'
7,200 ft'
0.25
.
15F
= ff x 36OOsec; )( bm
see hIS stonn
32.205 ft'
-11.~1t'
20,865 It
s volume
30,672 It'
-10.800 It
19,872 It
stora volume
.... ., .
..--,.................,............
...... .......,......... .
;::~.1...:H PO.:.
:1ess:te:>
::1.........;~:::=:P P; P;
.......::.:.:..:;:v~::::;:
27,605 It'
- 9.720 It'
17,88Sft
volume
23,199 It
IA111t'
15,4&4 It'
volume
20,448 ft'
7.200 It
13,241 It
volume
:rrv OF WOODBURN
RUN OFF DETENnON REQUIREMENT
1) Con*Uct. device thIIt.... CllP8ClYtordetlllningcllllnllCeln run off volume NC8Ived by undevelopeCland deveIoped..nd
for. 25 )I'" stoma.
2) Construct. d~ orIice of. size that the quantity of run off through the orifice is equal to run offftowfrom . storm of
~ or..... undeveloped land.
3) Construct. detention facility to have . post~ 25 ~ capacity with . d~ orifice
(or structure) sized to limit outflow to no more than the undeveloped site peak run off tor the
existing (undeYeloped) 5 year frequency storm.. Detention volumes Clllculated by the following
meChods .-e acceptable:
A. Santa a.bara Urban Hydrograph routing model (as prescribed by the King County Surface
Water Design Manual) for the post development 25 year runoll' hydrograph detained back to the
existing 5 year peak site discharge.
B. 18,883 CFJ 10 Acre drainage area as per City of Woodburn standard table. above, based on the
rational method.
SAFETY REQUlaEMENTS
1) Depth of stonn water within 50 feet from the edge of detention ponds, if open to public, shall be
limited to 2 feet, then gradual slope to higher depth shaD be allowed.
REV. A STRMVOIk1-10/02/95 updated 08/30/96 Item *3 added
'11'
:rO: City Council, through City Administrator
FROM: Assistant City Engineer ~
SUBJECT: StonnWater Information and Policies
15F
DATE: December 5, 1996
City is experiencing flooding conditions again for a second consecutive winter; however,
with experienced work crews who have kept the systems free of obstruction, no major
problems have been experienced. Hardcastle area is one of our major concerns, but with
construction of storm drains next swnmer, this area should not experience flooding next
winter.
Staff is enforcing FEMA requirements and bas been doing so since 1979; these requirements
constitute the National Flood Insurance Program of that same year.
These policies give the City authority to regulate filling (building) within certain distances
of the meandering centerlines of Mill Creek and Senecal Creek.
No building or filling is allowed in the F100dways but building is currently allowed in the
Flood Plains. This is allowed provided the structures are above the 100 year flood elevations
designated for any particular reach.
Staff is enforcing detention requirements as has been brought to council attention on
previous occasions. However, some refinements have been made. Because safety is a
concern, the standard depth of detention ponds will be restricted to three feet.
Cmrent policy requires developers to provide enough storage volume to contain that volume
ofwater resulting from a 25 year storm occmring over the land parcel in question. Also, the
developer must provide a design that will release the stored water at a 5 year storm nmoff
rate. The purpose of the lower release rate is to keep water levels lower in the receiving
pipes and streams.
These policies are administered foremost during site plan review periods as well as post
development; post development has been limited to retrofit where a problem was
encountered in a local situation.
Nelson Pmk was the first retention pond installation within the City; it was constructed about
20 years ago. Parr Acres is the most recent retention pond, it is about 3 years old. Both
have operated satisfactorily during recent storms.
Attached is guiding document sheet for detention requirements.
1fl"
MEMO
TO:
City Council through the City Administrator
FROM:
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Storm Water Detention Pond Volume and Safety Requirements
DATE:
December 17. 1996
RECOMMENDATION: Request that Item "15 F- from staff reports be shifted to agenda
item "10 F" for council action and its modified version be approved by council motion.
BACKGROUND: See Dean Morrison's memo attached under "15 F.,
The following modifications have been made:
1. The specified depth limit of storm water has been increased from two feet to three and the
distance from edge has been decreased from 50 feet to 30 feet.
2, Gradual slope at the bottom of the pond to provide greater depth that was not defined
previously is now defined at three percent.
3. Maximum pond side slope that was not defined previously is now defined as 3: 1 and it
conforms to U.S.A. and King County requirements.
GST/lg
STRMWTR
~
.. .. r~
VOLUMES FOR DIFFERENT INTENSITY STORMS
FOR 10-ACRE SITE
(0 DOT method used)
Storms ~Ults i A :1f~ C !'8~.;~oped t: .tJ: .If ~ 3600~ m
tes) IINTENSl11ES) storms see hrs storm
(UN)developed !(cfs)
C .. 0.25
100 yr. 1.~6" 0.467 in 435,600 ftZ 0.71 3.313 32,205 ff 32,205 If
il.. hrs fir or 10 acres -11.340 If
0.25 1.167 11,340 ff 20,865 If
storage volume
50 yr. 1.20" 0.435 in 435,600 ff 0.71 3.087 30,672 ff 30,672 If
2.76 hrs hr or 10 acres - 10.800 ff
0.25 1.087 10,800 ff 19,872 If
storage volume
25 yr. 1.14" 10.399 in 435,600 te 0.71 2.830 29,138 If 29,138ff
2.86 hrs hr or 10 acres - 10.255 If
0.25 0.996 10,255 If 18,883 If
storage volume
10 yr. 1.08" 0.364 in 435,600 ff 0.71 2.582 27,605 ff 27,605 ff
2.97 hrs hr or 10 acres - 9.720 ff
0.25 0.909 9,720 ff 17,885 ff
storage volume
5 yr. 0.935" 0.285 in 435,600 If 0.71 2.024 23,899 ff 23,899 ff
3.28 hrs hr or 10 acres - 8.415 If
0.25 0.713 8,4151f 15,484 If
)20 Pf'l1;; storage volume
2yr. 0.800" 0.220 in 435,600 ff 0.71 1.560 20,448 If 20,448 ff
3.64 hrs hr or 10 acres - 7.200 ff
0.25 10.549 7,200 ff 13,248 ff
~~ volume
CITY OF WOODBURN
RUN OFF DETENTION REQUIREMENT
1) Construct a device that has capacity for detaining difference in run off volume received by undeveloped and developed land
for a 25-year storm.
2) Construct a discharge orifice of a size that the quantity of run off through the orifICe is equal to run off flow from a storm of
5-year or less, undeveloped land.
3) Construct a detention facility to have a post-development 2S year capacity with a discharge orifice
(or structure) sized to limit outflow to no more than the undeveloped site peak run off for the
existing (undeveloped) 5 year frequency storm. Detention volumes calculated by the following
methods are acceptable:
A. Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph routing model (as prescribed by the King County Surface
Water Design Manual) for the post development 25 year runoff hydrograph detained back to the
existing 5 year peak site discharge.
B. 18,883 CFI 10 Acre drainage area as per City of Woodburn standard table, above, based on the
rational method.
SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
1) Depth of storm water within 30 feet from the edge of detention ponds, if open to public, shall be
limited to 3 feet, then gradual slope ( 3'Y.) to higher depth shall be allowed. Maximum pond side slopes shall be 3'
horizontal to l' vertical, however, gentler slope is desirable.
RE,\'4 _<; STPJ'1VOLIvi-3.I:./C,~/S;~, ;Jr.jc;ted 031=~C/~-:6 ~-~em #3 add~d
12!9/96 Safety Item revised.
-