Loading...
Agenda - 10/25/1999 CfTY COOIYCIL AGElYDA ~~~ OCTOBER25, 1999-,,7:00P.M. 1e{~nGL9A<d'r~ 270 Montgomery Street * * Woodburn, Oregon 0 'It) -:-/ , , 10 ZS;?1' ~ 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FlAG SALlITE WIJ'( ks. J'-at try-. 2. ROLL CALL TI F:s "+- S t>~ Is 1....)C<.c.J 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS A.."-~ c{' t.'".. 10/2.-5/:7 J A. Public Hearing: November 8, 1999 - Recreation Be Parks System Development ~"-.., ~J Charges and Traffic Impact Fees B. Public Hearing: November 22, 1999 - Boones Ferry Place Retirement Center. 4. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS A. Recycling Awareness Week - November 8 - 15, 1999 ........................ 4A 5. COMMITIEE REPORTS A. Chamber of Commerce. B. Woodburn Downtown Association. C. Woodburn School Djstrict. D. livability Task Force. 6. COMMUNICATIONS 7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBUC (This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda.) . 8. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be enacted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A.. Approve Council minutes of October 11, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. SA B. Accept Planning Commission minutes of October 14, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8B C. Accept Recreation and Park Board minutes of October 12, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8e D. Accept Museum Board minutes of October 13,1999 ........................ 8D . E. Receive Audit of Motel Operators ....................................... 8E F. Receive Water System Consumer Confidence Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8F 9. PUBUC HEARINGS A. Continuation: Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update .............. 9A Page 1 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of October 25, 1999. !Ir B. Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Amendment 99-04, Subdivision 99-03 Variance 99-10 - 1.32 acres located on the north side of Aztec Dr . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9B C. Subdivision 99-02, Variance 99-09 - 1.8 acres near the intersection of Luba Sb'eet and Parr Road (Oakwood Subdivision) ......................... 9C 10. TABLED BUSINESS 11. GENERAL BUSINESS A. Council Bill No. 2000 - Resolution establishing compensation for Assistant City Engineer and Public Worb Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ItA B. Council Bill No. 2001 - Resolution authorizing fund exchange agreement wit:b. OooT ........................................................ 118 C. Authorization for letter to C. Sauvain regarding underground storage tank low level contamination of public right-of-way ....................... 11C D. Acceptance of easement covering the SE comer of Jansen Way subdivision .... lID E. Contract award for E. Hardcasde sidewalks .............................. lIE F. OLCC license upgrade and change of name for OGA ....................... 11F 12. PUBUC COMMENT 13. NEW BUSINESS 14. SITE PlAN ACI10NS A. Site Plan Review 99-22 - Public Works storage facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14A 15. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Government Law Section Election (City Attorney) ......................... 16A B. Economic Development Department Loan and Grant (Public Works). 16. MAYOR AND COUNCL REPORTS 17. EXECUTIVE SESSION - (A) To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to carry on labor negotiations under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(d); (B) To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with regard to CUJTeDt litigation or litigation likely to be moo under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(h); (3) To consider records that are exempt by law from public inspection under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(f). 18. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of October 25, 1999. - 4A CITY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503)982-7433 · FAX(503)982-5244 PROCLAMATION RECYCLING AWARENESS WEEK NOVEMBER 8 -15, 1999 WHEREAS, Oregonians have a long history of environmental stewardship, understand the value of our natural resources and want to preserve them for future generations; and WHEREAS, achieving the state's goal of reducing per capita waste generation by the year 2005 will require a cooperative effort from Oregon's businesses, institutions, and concerned citizens; and WHEREAS, these efforts have achieved a 37 percent recovery rate for 1998; however, in order to reach the state's 50 percent recovery goal, further efforts are necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, L RichardJennings, Mayor of the City of Woodburn, hereby proclaim November 8 - 15, 1999 to be RECYCLINGAWARENESS WEEK in Woodburn and encourage all citizens to join in this observance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause the seal of the City of Woodburn to be affixe this 2161 day of October, 1999. YOR~ '. , (\ i' 7,',:' "'14'( ,,:~,I . I J l:.(h l\}' ,'II.... 'I- .! ~. ,)/ ~I:.... . l ....L,.. \ \' ) r. ~ . ,<_'~I I I '1 in J\ ~ ~ ~: l . " \. /, t'J > "I , .~.~. ':\i'l Ok ~. )\' . TIr SA COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING 0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, OCTOBER 11, 1999. CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Jennings presiding. 0007 ROLL CALL. Mayor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Jennings Bjelland Chadwick Figley Kilmurray Pugh Sifuentez Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Tiwari, Community Development Director Goeckritz, Park & Recreation Director Westrick, Police Chief Null, Finance Director Gillespie, Public Works Manager Rohman, Management Analyst Smith, City Recorder Tennant 0040 ANNOUNCEMENTS. A) Woodburn Beautification and Cleanup Awareness will be held on Saturday, October 23rd. B) Public Hearing: The City Council will hold a public hearing on a proposal to annex 1.32 acres of property located on the north side of Aztec Drive east of Highway 99E on Monday, October 25, 1999,7:00 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers. 0055 PROCLAMATIONS. Mayor Jennings stated that he has issued proclamations for the following: A) Hands are notfor Hurting Week: October 17 - 23,1999; B) Violence Awareness Month: October 1999; and C) Disability Employment Awareness Month: October 1999. He stated that he would not be reading each proclamation at this meeting, however, they are posted in the hallway on the bulletin board. 0085 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT. Phil Hand, representing the Chamber Board, stated that the Chamber's Business After Hours will be held on Thursday, October 14th, Cascade Park, beginning at 4:30 p.m.. He also reminded the public that the Chamber Business Week will be held October 18th through 220d and he briefly reviewed the following events scheduled for that week: Page I - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 "" 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING 1) October 18th - a class on conflict resolution will be held from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm at Chemeketa and there is no charge to attend; 2) October 19th - an Industrial Tour of Woodburn Fertilizer and Waremart Foods will be held for Chamber members. Also attending the tour will be approximately 65 people from the Salem Economic Development Corporation; 3) October 20th - Chamber Forum will be held at the Woodburn Medical Center at 12:00 noon with the guest speaker being Bureau of Labor Director Jack Roberts; 4) October 2151 - Business Showcase will be held at the Woodburn Armory from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m.; and 5) October 22nd - A free class will be held at Chemeketa from 8:30 am to 11:00 am on hiring, retaining, and managing a blended workforce. 0187 Mayor Jennings stated that he would be inserting the public hearing agenda items between item 8 (Consent Agenda) and item 9 (Tabled Business) rather than waiting until after the General Business items are discussed by the Council. 0222 Tom Waggoner, 849 Woodland, stated that there was 28 foot of curbing along the west side of the second median strip tom up by contractors when they improved Woodland A venue and he questioned if the City had made arrangements to have the repair made to the curbing. Staff will look into this issue. Mr. Waggoner reminded the Administrator that the microphone button needs to be pushed when he speaks into the microphone otherwise the Cable TV viewing audience does not hear what he is saying. 0295 CONSENT AGENDA. A) Approval of Council minutes of September 27, 1999; B) Acceptance of draft Planning Commission minutes of September 23, 1999; C) Receipt of Fall leaf pickup report; D) Receipt of Police Department Activities Report for July 1999; E) Receipt of Building Activity report for September 1999; F) Receipt of Claims for the month of September 1999; and G) Receipt of annual System Development Charge (SDC) report. PUGHlSIFUENTEZ.... accept the consent the agenda as presented. Councilor Figley requested that a verbal report be given by the Public Works Director on the fall leaf pickup program. The motion passed unanimously. Public Works Director Tiwari briefly summarized the leaf pickup program which includes (1) increased street sweeping in the downtown area and main streets leading to schools between November 8th and December 18th ,and (2) the new leaf drop off site at 300 Cleveland Street (Public Works materials yard). In years past, the wastewater facility Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, October II, 1999 - 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING was used as a drop off site, however, with the increase in construction activity at the plant, the site has been change to the materials yard. Other options available to the citizens include composting on private property, pickup by United Disposal Service utilizing yard debris container and/or pick-up of bagged leaves, and composting at the North Marion County disposal site. Residents would need to check with United Disposal and the County for costs involved in utilizing their services. He requested that branches or twigs not be raked out into the roadway since it will clog up the sweeper. Additionally, too many wet leaves in one location will also cause the sweeper to clog up and delay the pick up process. He reminded motorists to be cautious when driving since wet leaves can be very slippery and kids do play in the leaves that are along the curbside. 0465 PUBLIC HEARING - PARK AND RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. Mayor Jennings opened the hearing at 7: 18 p.m.. He stated that the Parks Master Plan update has been in the works since 1997 and, even though hearings having been held and public input obtained, there seems to be a need for some additional site visits or public input before this hearing would be closed. He requested that the Council continue this hearing until the next meeting once testimony has been taken at this meeting. Attorney Shields stated that this is a land use matter but legislative in nature, therefore, the land use statement is not necessary for this hearing. There were no declarations by the Mayor or Council on this issue. Director Westrick briefly reviewed the staff report which summarized the work completed by the Board in developing a draft master plan. The City contracted with Consultant Don Ganer & Associates to develop the draft plan and they used a variety of methods to develop a plan that incorporates goals and policies for recreation programs and park development through the year 2020. At the conclusion of the hearing, staff will be recommending approval of the plan along with a revised Appendix A which was distributed at this meeting. He also stated that part of the strategy of the Park & Recreation Board is to liquidate property that is not used as much as it could be citing the Community Center as one example. He recommended that the plan update include language that would adopt Attachment 2 of the staff report thereby establishing a policy that would allow for a feasibility study of a new community center and, if a new center is constructed, liquidate the present community center and the sales proceeds would be applied to the construction of the new facility. 0600 Don Ganer, project consultant, stated that he began work on the project in early 1997 and has spent a lot of time with public involvement, the Park Board, and Planning Commission. He stated that the initial review involved researching other City plans to see how the parks plan would interact and coordinate with these other plans. A community profile was developed to identify needs of the citizens, enhance the image of Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, October II, 1999 I'll' 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING the community, and documented features of the City as it relates to location, physical setting, population, and demographics. Existing and projected land use and growth patterns were analyzed and facilities were identified that are impacted by employment as well as residential development. A inventory of park and recreation facilities, green ways and open space, neighborhood parks, community parks, mini-parks, cultural historical resources, special use facilities, public school facilities, sports and recreation programs, and privately owned facilities was completed to determine what the City currently has available for public use. Surveys were sent to 800 residential addresses and 187 completed surveys were returned which were then used to help determine what the residents thought were important and provide feedback on the current level of maintenance, repair, and facilities within the City. All of this information was used to develop findings and identify specific issues which are found in the plan beginning on page 20 with the suggested list of policies and goals beginning on page 24. He briefly reviewed the tables and maps provided in the plan. The list of needs includes updates and new facility needs over the next 20 years. Also included in the plan is a recommendation for maintenance levels of service, City adoption of standards for maintenance at modes that are identified by the National Recreation & Park Association, and identification of a number of different alternatives for sources of funding. It was noted that no specific source should be adopted as a part of this plan since the City needs flexibility in determining the funding sources. Councilor Chadwick questioned if the renovation of Senior Estates Park included playground equipment for children. Mr. Ganer stated that the current version of the plan does not include playground equipment. He also stated that several schools have facilities that are considered park and recreation facilities that are joint use facilities for recreational purposes and this has been taken into account in the development of the plan. Some limited funding recommendations have be identified in the plan but, for the most part, the school would own the property and the City could participate in a new or upgrade of a recreational facility. Councilor Kilmurray stated that she could understand the partnering aspect with the school district but questioned as to what assurance the City has that the school district would allow continued use of the facility by the City. Mr. Ganer recommended that a formal agreement be entered into between the City and the School District before any funding arrangements are finalized. Director Westrick stated that the City currently has on file an agreement with the School District regarding the tennis courts at the high school since that facility was paid for, in part, through Land Water Conservation Funds and the Park & Recreation Department is in negotiations with the School District on a formal agreement that would spell out each agency's responsibility when using each others facilities. He reminded the Council that Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 11r 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING the Parks facilities are open to dusk and there may be a similar type of language in the agreement that would keep neighborhood facilities open to dusk. He would anticipate a beginning and ending date for the agreement, however, up until now, the agreements with the School District, other than the tennis courts, have been a handshake arrangement. The written agreement will protect both the City and the School District as personnel changes occur within each jurisdiction. Further discussion was held regarding limitations placed within an agreement along with term expiration dates and the drawbacks in providing funding to enhance a facility with the possibility of not being able to the use the facility several years after the improvement was made. It was noted that the master plan is a method of strategy of meeting objectives with no commitment for funding. 1376 Letters submitted by Lyle & Janice Ringgenberg, 944 Hermanson St., and Al & Penny Tischendorf were placed into the public hearing record. 1436 Barbara Lucas, 214 E. Clackamas, provided a written statement to the City regarding the Park & Recreation Comprehensive Plan update. She stated that she generally approved the update but had a few concerns regarding non-funded capital improvements, omission of use of golf carts on off-street pathway system, and funding for greenway acquisition. Mayor Jennings stated that it is his understanding that the current law prohibits the combining of a golf cart, walkpath/bikepath since the golf cart is a motorized vehicle. Ms. Lucas stated that she spoken to a gentleman in Seattle, W A, with the National Highway Safety Transit Board who had consulted with an individual at the State Dept. of Motor Vehicles (legislative liaison for ODOT) and they suggested that the City build a bikepath/pedestrian path in between Country Club Road to Lind's Market and make it slightly wider so golf carts can use the path. She will provide his name and telephone number to the City. Mayor Jennings stated that he is also interested in the Goose Creek issue since he was under the impression that it would be covered up with a large culvert. Attorney Shields stated that discussion can be held at this meeting since it is a legislative land use action then the Council could continue the hearing at the conclusion of the discussion. Councilor Figley stated that she would like to talk about the plan all at one time rather than discussing it at this meeting. It was noted that the Councilors did not receive a copy of the plan with their agenda packet. A copy of the draft plan will be provided to each Councilor by the end of the next working day. Director Westrick clarified that the Attachment A distributed at this meeting gives total cost figures for each project. The projects are not prioritized and funding categories are not listed since things will change in the years to come. If the detail document included Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 - 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING in the original agenda packet was adopted, then a change in the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary every time there is a change in the timing or funding of specific projects. Christine Spencer, 980 Wilson St, questioned if the plan was available for review by the public. She stated that they had received a notice in the mail that this action may affect the use of their property. Administrator Brown stated that a copy of the plan is located at the Woodburn Library, City Recorder's office, and the City Administrator's office. He stated that the notice was provided as a result of statewide Measure 56 and it was sent to every household. The language that has caused everybody some concern is that it may affect the property owner's ability to develop your property and/or affect the value of your land. In this particular instance, the staff suspects that neither the development or land value statement is true, however, the City is required under the initiative to include the language in the notice. 2043 FIGLEYIBJELLAND....continue the public hearing until October 25, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.. The motion passed unanimously. 2065 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - STEIN OIL. Mayor Jennings stated that Stein Oil Company has withdrawn their application and it is no longer an item of concern to the City. Attorney Shields recommended that, for the record, the Council dismiss the appeal since they had brought it up for an appeal hearing. PUGHlFIGLEY.... Council dismiss the appeal based upon the fact that the applicant has withdrawn the application. The motion passed unanimously. 2139 COUNCIL BILL 1996 - ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF EVERGREEN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF W. HAYES STREET. Council Bill 1996 was introduced by Councilor Chadwick. Recorder Tennant read the two readings of the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. Administrator Brown stated that the 100' strip was dedicated to the City about 30 years ago for transportation purposes. The City has re-routed the roadway within the new Montebello Subdivision and it was determined by the Council that there is no longer a need for the full 100' strip of right-of-way. The Council will be retaining a 50' width for pedestrian, bicycle path, and golf cart path, and the remaining portion will be given back to the abutting property owners. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 1996 duly passed with the emergency clause. Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 1lr SA COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING 2267 COUNCIL BILL 1997 - ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE REVISED 1999-2000 SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES. Councilor Chadwick introduced Council Bill 1997. The two readings of the bill were read by title only since there were no objections from the Council. PUGHlFIGLEY... correct the bill to read "Richard Jennings" as Mayor. The motion passed unanimously. Administrator Brown stated that the copy fee charge has been changed to $.05 per page for simple copy requests, however, if it involves 15 minutes or more of time to process the request, then the research fee of $28 per hour chargeable in 1/4 hour increments will apply. Management Analyst Smith stated that the fees in excess of 100% are NSF check fees, facility rentals in parks for commercial organizations based on market rates, and Legion Park facility rentals which is also based on market rates. It was noted that all of the system development charges regulated by statute are 100% or less within the proposed fee schedule. On roll call vote, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 1997 duly passed with the emergency clause. 2550 COUNCIL BILL 1998 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF BOONES FERRY ROAD AND SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB ROAD. Council Bill 1998 was introduced by Councilor Chadwick. Recorder Tennant read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. Mayor Jennings stated that this hearing had originally been scheduled for October 25, 1999, however, the Planning Commission has not completed their work on this land use matter and it is anticipated that it will be completed by the November 22nd hearing date listed in this bill. On roll call vote, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 1998 duly passed. 2619 COUNCIL BILL 1999 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 347 N. FRONT STREET FROM ALL AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT LLC. ASSUMPTION OF A TRUST DEED FROM MARK C. WOLF. AND AUTHORIZING CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Councilor Chadwick introduced Council Bill 1999. The bill was read by title only since there were no objections from the Council. Councilor Pugh declared a conflict of interest on this Council bill and he will be unable to vote. Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, October II, 1999 ~ SA COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING On roll call vote, the bill passed 5-0 with Councilor Pugh not voting as a result of his declaration. 2711 ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY: SPRAGUE LANE. Staff recommended acceptance of the right-of-way being conveyed by Craig Realty Group and Warde & Patricia Hershberger in conjunction with the development of Woodburn Company Stores and Hershberger Motors. FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y... accept the right-of-way as described in Attachment "C" of the staff memo in the agenda packet. The motion passed unanimously. 2738 EXTENSION OF CITY SEWER SERVICE TO 2374 BOONES FERRY ROAD. Administrator Brown stated that the City had received a letter from the residents of 2374 Boones Ferry Rd. requesting permission to annex into the City and hook-up to the city sewer without hooking up to the city water system. Staff recommends that the property owners be required to annex into the City in order to hookup to the sewer system but it not be required to hookup to City water. This practice has been followed in the past to other property owners who need sewer service but have a serviceable water well. The property owners are then charged a flat rate for sewer service rather than a rate determined based on water use. Director Tiwari stated that the owners had previously supplied water to the Glatt House but this changed when the Glatt House began using city water and sewer services. Attorney Shields stated that an annexation application is the next step to be followed by the property owner. FIGLEYIPUGH... approve the request for connection to city sewer for property located at 2374 Boones Ferry Rd with the following 3 conditions: A) the property be annexed to the City; B) all costs associated with the annexation be paid by the property owner; and C) all costs associated with connection be paid by the property owner. The motion passed unanimously. 2928 INSTALLATION OF PRIVATE FENCES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Councilor Figley expressed her opinion that the recommendation of staff to handle this issue by a vacation process would certainly work in this case. She feels that there are still two issues that eventually need to be discussed by the Council - (1) permit process be looked at as a method of handling this type of request, and (2) staff look into the feasibility of incorporating some language in the zoning code that would deal with requests of this nature. Councilor Pugh stated that he had previously voted to deny a zone change in this area from RS to ill in order to protect the older homes in this area. In this case, he agrees with the staff recommendation to vacate a 5 foot strip on both sides of the existing Mill Street Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 1'11"' 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING thereby changing the 50 foot right-of-way to 40 feet. The right-of-way vacated would be need to be retained by the City as a public easement. Tape 2 Councilor Sifuentez stated that she was in agreement with this proposal and she assured the public that the Council is willing to work with all citizens to try and solve issues of concern. Discussion was held on who should be initiating the vacation application process and the reaction of neighbors to this proposal. At this time, the neighbors were not opposed to the vacation of 5' on each side, however, they did object to having the full street right-of- way vacated. It was also noted that publication and posting costs are borne by the initiating party and concern was expressed in the City establishing a precedent of paying associated costs when property owners would benefit from the street vacation. 0229 FIGLEYIPUGH.... staff contact the party making the request and assist them in initiating a vacation application per the exhibit in the staff memo. The motion passed unanimously. 0235 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND BUSINESS MEETING. Mayor Jennings requested that the Councilors return the registration forms to the Administrator's office as soon as possible since the forms need to be forwarded to the League office. Additionally, the City needs to designate a voting delegate for the Sunday business meeting. It was the consensus of Council to appoint Councilor Sifuentez as the voting delegate with Councilor Chadwick as her alternate. 0464 COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER POSITIONS. Administrator Brown reviewed the staff memo which recommended a pay grade adjustment of 10% for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and Public Works Manager. He stated that the pay adjustment will make these positions more competitive with the surrounding communities but it will still not bring us to the level those communities are paying. The City has gone out 3 separate times for the filling of an Assistant City Engineer position but we have been unsuccessful in filling the position. In one case, we had offered the position to an individual, however, he declined to take the job once he was told that the City was locked into a salary range level that was not negotiable at that time. He reminded the Council that this is a Deputy Department Head level position and one other position that should be affected by this adjustment is the Public Works Program Manager. Both positions were budgeted at the recommended grade level in anticipation of this change earlier this year, therefore, no adverse budget impact is projected. Page 9 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 111" 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING PUGHlFIGLEy.... authorize the positions of Asst. City Engineer and Public Works Program Manager both to be established at the salary range of M-13. Administrator Brown stated that staff would be coming back to the Council with a resolution to enact this change. The motion passed unanimously. 0554 Barbara Lucas, 214 E. Clackamas, questioned what property is located at 347 N. Front and if the property was conveyed to the City or to another party. Administrator Brown stated that the building is more commonly known as the Salud Medical building. The City has been involved in negotiations and lawsuits over the last several years to obtain some compliance with dangerous building codes. The building has changed hands several times and it has become apparent that the current owner is not willing or financially able to make repairs within a reasonable time frame. There is also concern on the part of the City, based on engineering evaluations, that the building does not have much longer to stand and presents a liability to the life and safety of pedestrians and to people patronizing businesses next door to this building. In this case, the City is looking at a protracted legal process whereby the City would ultimately end up taking action to either renovate or demolish, placing some kind of lien on the property, and ultimately foreclosing on the property and ending up with the ownership. The staff reluctantly recommended that the City Council approve this action which the Council adopted with the passage of the ordinance at this meeting. He also stated that studies had been completed regarding renovation options and the conclusion has been it cannot be renovated and still present a viable economic option in terms of rent or lease. Barbara Lucas also questioned the location of the private fence in the public right-of-way. Mayor Jennings stated that the vacation of the right-of-way along Mill Street is the property under discussion. 0727 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A) Labor Negotiations: The Classification and Compensation study was included in the current AFSCME contract and, following receipt of the study, the City and AFSCME will enter into negotiations for wages with the intention of looking at changing classifications and/or compensation levels. We are in the final stages of this report and hope to return to the Council at the next meeting in an executive session to talk about this Issue. B) Review of Visioning Process: He suggested that the Council meet on November 20, 1999 in a workshop to talk about what has been accomplished since the first of the year when the Council met with the consultants in facilitating the visioning process. It would also be a good time to focus on the community center concept and other improvements Page 10 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 11r SA COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING that are of interest to the Council. It was the consensus of the Council to meet on November 20th even though Councilor Pugh would be unable to attend since he will be out of town that weekend. 0839 MA YOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS. Councilor Sifuentez stated that she will be going to Orlando, Florida on business and will not be able to attend the next regular Council meeting. Councilor Figley expressed her thanks to the Police Department and Parks Department for the improvements to the traffic situation at Centennial Park last weekend as compared to previous Saturdays. She stated that she had walked down to the park that morning and did see 2 cars parked on the Smith property and a Police Officer was trying to take care of that situation. She also stated that the cars parked on the dirt were not parked in an orderly fashion and questioned if some coning could be placed in the lot to keep adequate isle space for cars to travel. She also stated that her husband had recently attended a lecture on archeology at OMSI and brought back materials that they are willing to loan out to interested persons. Councilor Figley also stated that she, along with the Mayor and Administrator Brown, had met earlier today with Congresswoman Darlene Hooley about issues that are important to the City. She thanked her for her positive pro-active outlook and they would like to follow-up with meetings with Senators Smith and Wyden. Councilor Kilmurray also thanked Administrator Brown and Chief Null for arranging for the two officers to join her in a visit with a neighborhood watch group on Marcel Court last week. She stated that it was very informative for her and she was pleased to have the officers in attendance. Mayor Jennings stated that he was encouraged by what he had heard from Ms. Hooley who had given them ideas on how to find federal funding. He stated that they had taken her for a drive to see where federal rehabilitation dollars were being spent and she was impressed with Centennial Park. He also stated that they were able to get 3 hours of her time and a letter will be sent to express the City's appreciation. The Mayor also questioned when the No Parking signs would be placed on Young Street since the Police Department felt that this was an important item to be taken care of. Director Tiwari stated that if the signs were not up yet that they would be installed tomorrow. Mayor Jennings also questioned which type of bone was recently found in the Woodburn digs. Administrator Brown stated that he understood that a wing bone was found that most closely approximates a Condor but is considerably larger. They also found a tooth which they do not know yet what it goes to plus other pre-historic bones. Ultimately, all of the Page 11 - Council Meeting Minutes, October II, 1999 ~ II" 8A COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 TAPE READING bones end up in ownership of the City and can be used as part of a collection in a natural history museum or a natural history wing of a museum in our community. Administrator Brown also expressed his appreciation to Director Goeckritz who put together the impressive list of rehabilitated homes that they viewed today thereby impressing Congresswoman Hooley as to how successful Woodburn's program has been over the years. 1070 City Attorney stated that there was no need for an executive session at this meeting. 1075 ADJOURNMENT. PUGHlFIGLEy....meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.. APPROVED RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR ATTEST Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 12 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999 111" ~ 8B WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION October 14, 1999 CONVENED The Planning Commission met in a regular session at 7:00 p.m. with Chairperson Young presiding. ROLL CALL Chairperson Vice Chairperson Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Staff Present: Young Cox Will Lawson Lima Mill Bandelow Lonergan Heer P P A A P P P P P Steve Goeckritz, Community Development Director Jim Mulder, Senior Planner Nancy DeVault, Secretary MINUTES Commissioner Lima referred to page 2, Ex-Parte Contacts section of the September 24, 1999 Planning Commission minutes and pointed out the IllS" should be removed from the word "Commissioner". He also noted his question to Mr. Bickler regarding the 17 -foot setback in the southwest part of the property was not included in the minutes. Staff stated the question may be incorporated into the minutes. Vice Chairoerson Cox mentioned his comment included midway on page 5 should read "Vice Chairperson Cox pointed out that the applicant is 4% over on the lot coverage requirement and 19% over on the square foot of lot area per dwelling." Commissioner Lima moved to approve the September 23, 1999 minutes with the noted changes. Commissioner Heer seconded the motion. Motion carried. Chairoerson Young welcomed everyone. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE None COMMUNICATIONS A. Follow-up of Commission comments at Seotember 23. 1999 meeting. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 1 of 14 11r 8B PUBLIC HEARING A. Site Plan Review 99-14. Variance 99-07. Comprehensive Plan 99-02. Annexation 99-02 and Zone Change 99-06. proposed Alzheimer facility and retirement center. 2523 and 2551 N. Boones Ferry Road. Boones Ferry Place. Wally Gutzler I Anthony Kreitzberg. applicant (continued). This portion of the minutes were provided verbatim so that Staff could pull all of the findings correctly. Chairperson Young we'll go right into the Public Hearing for Site Plan Review 99-14, Variance 99-07, Comprehensive Plan 99-02, Annexation 99-02 and Zone Change 99-06. Can we have a staff report please. Staff this item was heard at your last meeting and the Commission decided to continue it to this meeting. The record was closed for all testimony but left open to allow for additional written testimony and in your packet you received a letter that was received at the last hearing and two letters in opposition to the project that was received while the record was left open for additional written testimony. And then we received a response from the applicant to those letters. I guess what I can do is couple of things. For those that were not here at the last meeting, would you like me to go through kind of a summary of the project or do you think you need a complete presentation of the project? Chairperson Young I got an opportunity to review the material both from the September 23rd meeting and this evenings material but perhaps a recap would be in order just to bring everyone up to speed. Commissioner Mill I would also like to state for the record that I have had a chance to review the minutes and also Commissioner Lima and I met and he also brought me up to speed but I would like the recap as well. Staff there are five parts to this application. First, it is an Annexation request. The property is currently an enclave. The second application is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the current Comprehensive Plan for this area. The entire area is currently Comprehensive Planned as low density residential. The proposal is to change that to a high density residential. The next application is a Zone Change. The Zone Change would affect the property to the north. There is an existing parcel here at the very south end that is already in the City limits and it is zoned single family residential. The remaining part that is unincorporated at this point is zoned urban transition farm under Marion County zoning. The applicant is requesting to change both of those zones to a multiple family residential zone, the RM zone. The fourth application is the proposed site plan which is for a retirement facility that consists of three different buildings. The building here would be an Alzheimer unit with 12 rooms. This would be an assisted care facility with I believe 60 rooms. And the third building would be a retirement facility. It is not necessarily a Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 2 of 14 11" 8B congregated care but it would have rooms with a central cafeteria. Building number three is a 2 % story building, the middle building is a 2 story building and the Alzheimer building is a single story building. As part of the site plan review the applicant has submitted an application for a Variance...actually two Variances. One would allow the lot coverage of the buildings to exceed 30%. The applicant is requesting 34% lot coverage. The other is to let the site be smaller than what would be required under the multiple family zoning based on the number of units that are proposed. Based on the number of units I believe they would be required to have around 40,000-45,000 square feet of additional area. If you reviewed the minutes and the additional written testimony then that should get you up to speed as far as what has occurred since the last meeting. As far as your options tonight, I outlined those in the memo in your packet that you have various options. The one option you have is to go ahead and deliberate at this time and render a decision. Your second option is to reopen the hearing if you choose, the public hearing and allow additional testimony. That would require however that anyone again can come up and request a further continuance as was done at the last meeting. And then your third option is you can continue the hearing again if you need additional time or if you desire additional evidence or something happens at the hearing that could potentially modify the application. You can certainly request a continuance to allow those things to be done. Are there any questions? Chairperson Youna how far along are we on the 120-days? Staff since this is an annexation and zone change that is not applicable for this application. Chairperson Youna are there any questions of staff? Staff you do have before you that correspondence and I would hope that you had opportunity to read the points and counterpoints of that information. Chairperson Young should we go through that then? Staff that depends on how the Commission wishes to move forward with this application. Like Jim has pointed out you do have three alternatives and of course discussion no doubt is in order but how you want to proceed I believe the Commission should make that decision. Chairperson Youna as far as where we are in the order, the Public Hearing has been closed for all testimony and at this point the Commission could begin our discussion? Staff yes. Chairperson Young anyone have comments to begin with? Vice Chairperson Cox well Mr. Chairman of the three procedural options that are opened to us outlined by Jim Mulder, I prefer number 1. The evidence is before us. Let's talk about it. Make a motion or it's either up or down. I think we've got about as much Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 3 of 14 11r 8B information as we need to make a good decision. Chairperson Young okay. Commissioner Mil!l agree. Chairperson Young well let's continue on then. There's a couple of things I'd like to address. One was the lighting. The concern that the lights would be shining in the residences windows and that's addressed in the letter from the applicant. Also, it was one of the conditions. There's 52 conditions that I counted in the packet from...or of the first meeting and one ofthose conditions is thatthe lighting doesn't interfere with the neighbors. SO...let's start with that one. Vice Chairperson Cox one new thing that came in our additional written materials was the compromise proposal or the secondary position of the applicant to lower the height of the one building by knocking one story off of one end of it. But that in turn requires other adjustments for the uses and so forth of other buildings on the project. It is my personal feeling, although maybe others don't agree with me, that it's kind of late in the process to start redoing the plan here at the Commission. This is too complicated a project to try to redesign it in midstream and it seems to me that is what we would be doing if we tried to think of all the ramifications of other things that might be affected that you start changing one part of the plan, what does that do to other things. I'm not sure I have enough information to decide that or if everything else was okay, if the zone change and the comp plan change were okay, then that might be appropriate. But even then it's an awfully big change to try to work out here at the table by committee. My feeling is we should not attempt to do that. Commissioner Lima I agree with Commissioner Cox. Chairperson Young they are requesting to have extended time after the granting of the permit and I am not in favor of that. They are requesting four years and I think that is too long of a time to keep that open. Commissioner Mill I wasn't here for the discussion however, I have taken a look and there's one thing that worries me a lot in this particular instance. If you're talking about going back and amending the comprehensive plan, now it does say that the comprehensive plan is supposed to be a living document. That we're supposed to be able to change it if there is a compelling need in the communities best interest and so forth. What I'm looking at is an area that is surrounded by single family residential. That it is a usage that is consistent with what has been envisioned that seems to be a consistent pattern in the area. When we put something in like this, we are convoluting that plan. We are putting in a usage which is not compatible with what that original plan is for. We drew up that plan for a reason. To stick with that plan. If we went along and changed every time it appeared to be convenient or every time there's a very good looking project, there would be no purpose in having the plan. And I really believe that in this particular case we need Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 4 of 14 '" 8B to take a very hard look at that plan and why it was put into place and why specifically that area was designated the way it was designated and it's usage around it. And we also need to take into consideration the feelings of the neighborhood around that regarding those feelings, regarding that designation. Chairperson Young I think that's a very good point. Vice Chairperson Cox with regards to the comprehensive plan amendment, the City now is in the middle of the revision process of this comp plan. And it may well be that after all the dust settles the area might conceivably be re-designated to some thing other than single family. I don't know. But it seems to me that we're kind of getting the cart before the horse to do this on a piece of property on a piece meal basis. Which incidentally I see that same problem on a bigger scale going up out west of the freeway on another application that's before us. Commissioner Bandelow I have some of the same concerns especially when it comes to the re-zoning to multi family, even if there were restriction that approval, that zone change would only be for this particular usage. It then creates a section of land, there is a section of vacant land between this use and the apartment building that much against the desires of the Planning Commission and the City Council became a RM zoning. We then are left with this piece in between that I just foresee in the future someone is going to come and want that re-zoned for multi family for apartment buildings because there it sits isolated between two multi family zones. It would be so easy to request it. I just fully see that would happen. Vice Chairperson Cox is that the piece to the west that you're talking about? Commissioner Bandelow yes directly to the west of this. There is the church and there is this rectangle along Country Club and then further west there is another rectangle but it has the apartment building. My concern is that it would just look like a continuation of use and would be very easy in the future. I fully see that going RM if this happens. The concerns for the neighborhood, when the homes around there were purchased, everyone was looking at it as single family zoning. And the homes that back up to that I could understand the opponents when they spoke if you have a 30 foot backyard and then as little at one point as 17 feet to a building that is 50 feet tall. If you draw a line showing those two and what the view would be from that window, those people are going to be looking out their backyard at what amounts to such a sizeable fortress back there. This is a huge building. While it's a fantastic project in terms of design, it's a very large project on a very small piece of land right in the middle of nothing but homes. My third concern is staff has said if there is not sufficient drainage at this point for their storm drain they would be allowed to run that water from that project into tiny little Goose Creek down there which is already a problem for the City. And to add all the water from those roofs and that parking lot into that little creek and we haven't been able to fix the problem we've got there now. I think we would just be compounding it more. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 5 of 14 ,.. 8B Commissioner Lonergan I loved the design. I would love to see this come to Woodburn. I see real need for a complex like this in Woodburn. In that location I definitely have a concern. And my biggest concern is the height of it. And I'm with Commissioner Bandelow. I agree in going out and looking at that again today with how close that would be up to the homes. To me there's no question, this is not 2 Yz story, this is a 3rd story and with what we're looking at tonight is too tall for that neighborhood. I think I should also share with the Commission in our minutes of our last meeting. On page 4 I expressed my concern regarding the difficulty in waste removal with trucks having access to that and Mr. Bickler informed me that he had obtained approval from the sanitation folks. Well, I'm not sure who he talked to but after talking to the sanitation folks and the person that would make that decision, he was not aware of this at all. I know Mr. Gutzl.er has been a very reputable man and doing a lot of work in this area but somewhere along the lines something was missed there. So, as far as the waste removal, that was not looked at. So, I obviously have a problem with that. Chairperson Young I'd like to ask staff, on page 3 ofthe applicants response it says, "The applicant requests Planning Commission impose a condition which restricts the development of Phase 1/ to be consistent with the proposed site plan." I believe that would be a normal condition but when you're going to continue on something that can only remain consistent with what it's planned for. I just want to make sure that's clear on the record that we have that in place. Staff yes the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 15 I believe of the Zoning Ordinance that has to do with zone changes specifically gives the City Council the authority to condition a zone change contingent upon completion of an approved site plan. And then if that site plan isn't completed as conditioned then the zone change would go away basically. No longer be valid. It would revert back to the previous zoning. Commissioner Lima I would like to address some of my concerns which have been addressed by all other Commissioners I think about the size of the property. It is a beautiful design. I have problems having an industry in a residential area. This is an industry and this is acknowledged by the letter from the applicant rebuttal. A few other things that caught my attention in the rebuttal. It says here "the subject property is not attractive for single family development. If single family homes were forced to be developed on this property..." Who is forcing? It mentions here that you have a commercial telephone company building one side and the church on the other side. This is exactly myself and Mr. Mill live. We have a church on one side and then we have commercial property nearby and we have been very, very happy there. Very nice neighborhood. Also, it says here that "because the small size and the fact that the major portion of the property abuts Boones Ferry Road which is very busy, noisy arterial road. " Well, if it is noisy now, adding an industry to that area is going to create more traffic, we'll have to have staff around the clock to provide service to the people there. So, in the previous Commission meeting was brought to our attention again the fact that the intersection of Boones Ferry Road and Highway 214. If we increase the number oftraffic, Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 6 of 14 III 8B that is going to be a major bottleneck. I went there and I don't know if there is any way to make that intersection any better other than going into the Presbyterian Church and the School property. I don't know about density. It talks here, saying that in Salem 40% ofthe lot area may be covered in a RM zone and then it mentions about Monmouth, Eugene and in Canby. Well, we're not Salem, we're not Monmouth, we're not Eugene, we're not Canby. So this is what we have in our books here. So, if you want to come to my dance, you play to my music. At the bottom of the other page, which is page 3, there's a very interesting comment here about the calculation of lot coverage. And it says at the last sentence, "utilizing computers with design software". That is fantastic! Today we can do a lot with computers. Exhibit "A" from the applicant. I have hand drawn pieces here trying to convince me that it cannot be done. On the last page I have a nice computer layout. Very, very nice. This is intimidation as far as I'm concerned. They have the knowledge, they have the software, they have the computer, they have a highly paid individual to do this. Why not do it? I really resent that. Furthermore, the timetable now, they are dictating what we can do. This is something that...you know...if you don't do this, you have to do that. The extension from two to four years and so on...this is something that really, really upsets me. Proposed compromise. The applicant's request is if we so decide the site plan be approved in it's original form as it meets the State and local zoning requirements...Why are we here, a rubber stamp? So anyone can come with a project, present and the only thing we have to do is say hi. I'm not paid to be here. I work. This is a volunteer thing but this is another slap on my face. Perceived impact. Perception becomes reality and the reality is that this is going to effect a lot of people. A lot of people. As I mentioned before, on page 6, middle of the third paragraph, they acknowledge this is an industry. So what they are trying to do is put an industry in a single residential area. This is much more than I can stand. I have problems with this project. It's a beautiful project. I wished this would be available in some other location. I have a little bit more to add. We're talking about Alzheimer and I want for the record to be acknowledged that I'm licensed to practice medicine in the State of Oregon. There are many things we can talk about Alzheimer and if you want to really fall asleep I can start reading medical literature here but I have just a few things here about Alzheimer and Dementia. I spent four hours yesterday on this and I called several institutions in the Salem area asking about availability of Alzheimer beds. Brookstone, Marion States, Farmington Square, Benedictine Center and so on and so forth. "Our census is half full. The market is saturated, very soft. Most of us only have 50% occupancy." Even Benedictine Center here, which is 6 miles from us, has Alzheimer beds. So, if we are going to talk about having really the need, region wide, which is a catch man area, it appears to go against what the applicant is saying. Granted, if we think it is for the future, you can extrapolate saying that yes, people are going to get older and they may need. The thing is there are many non-Alzheimer type of dementia that will not require any confinement at this type of institution. I think I'm speaking too much on all that. Well, those are my concerns. Thank you. Chairperson YounQ thank you very much. You really are our spokesperson at this point because you are the one that's most familiar in the industry. Do we have any other comments on Commissioner Lima or comments in general? Commissioner Heer. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 7 of 14 8B Commissioner Heer Mr. Chair when I first saw the project and read over it a couple of weeks ago, I thought it would be an addition to...a great addition to the neighborhood. I live very close to that area. I don't see it as industrial. I see it as a good mix with the community. Across the street you have a funeral home, you have an ambulance business, so it's not that far off from what is just across the street. However, I was really glad that we didn't make the decision at the last meeting because it really gave me some time to think. I went to Wal-Mart the other day and I looked at the apartments, retirement living complex that's three stories high and I visualized what it would be like 20 feet or 17 feet from that 3 story apartment building. It was pretty overwhelming and so with that I do not agree with the Variance for this project. And I would probably vote no. Vice Chairperson Cox I agree with most everything that's been said. The project in the abstract is good, good design and all that. I don't think it belongs there. They told us that they have to have over 100 beds, 100 and some odd beds in order for it to be economically feasible and I just think this site is not big enough to support 100 and some beds. Particularly where it's located on that end of the project. It becomes a closer call if you weren't involving the property that's already in the City and already zoned single family. I really have difficulty about rezoning what is now single family which butts up against a new single family development. To rezone that and to put that big project there. That is clear enough to me we shouldn't do that. And I guess that's probably alii need to say. Although I do think that it would be a much closer call and perhaps I could approve it in a completely different configuration on the other part of the property. Chairperson Young as we go through the voting process I think we will split it up in each of the five groups. The Planning Commission is responsible for the zone change. The City Council will make the final decision on the other four items. Staff the City Council is the final decision making body always on an Annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Normally the Planning Commission is final decision making body unless appealed to the Council on the Variance and the Site Plan but since they're all going together as a package. I would recommend that you just forward everything as a recommendation to them. Chairperson Young so you want just one vote for the whole thing for recommendation? Staff no, you can do a separate vote for each one but each one would be in the form of a recommendation to the City Council. What Staff would do is at your next meeting bring back a final order reflecting the motions you make tonight and then also I would assume you would direct us to make the findings based on the information you have already provided us or any additional findings or information you want to provide for us to bring back to you. Vice Chairperson Cox Are we ready for some motions now? Do you want me to do it that way? Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 8 of 14 "" 8B Chairperson Young probably so. We've been around the table. We've all expressed our ideas and thoughts. Vice Chairperson Cox the one part of the application which I have no problem with, is the Annexation. Although the applicant may choose not to go ahead with the Annexation if the rest of the project isn't approved. But just to open the ball game here, I would move that we recommend approval of the Annexation to the City Council on the grounds that this is an appropriate piece of property to be Annexed and it meets all the criteria for Annexation. Commissioner Lonergan I'll second that. Chairperson Young okay we've got a motion to accept Annexation 99-02 and a second. Do we need a roll call? Staff yes please. Chairperson Young okay. We've had a motion to accept the Annexation 99-02 and we had a second. Can we have a roll call vote please? Vice Chairperson Cox do we need findings on something like that when it's just a recommendation to the City Council? I'm not clear on that. Staff on the Annexation we should develop findings on all the actions to take. Yes. Chairperson Young so we would request to return with the findings at the next meeting and a recommendation to City Council. Motion unanimously carried. Vice Chairperson Cox I move that we recommend to the City Council to deny the ' Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-02 and have Staff come back with findings for a final order on that. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion, which carried. Vice Chairperson Cox I move that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it deny the Zone Change application 99-06 on this property and also with findings to be brought back. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion. Motion carried with Commissioner Heer voting No. Vice Chairperson Cox with Staffs consent, I think we can cover the Site Plan Review and the Variance in one motion. I move that we recommend City Council deny the Site Plan and deny the Variance. Site Plan Review 99-14 and Variance 99-07 on this property. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion. Chairperson Young we have had a motion to deny the combined Site Plan Review 99-14 and the Variance 99-07 and we're asking the Staff to return with the findings and the Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 9 of 14 '" 8B recommendation to the City Council. May we have a roll call vote please? Motion carried. B. Annexation 99-01. UGB 99-01. ZC 99-01. annex business park into the Corporate limits of the City and establish the IL zone on the property. The parcel is located on the SE corner of the intersection of Butteville Road and State Highwav 214. Wally Lien. applicant. Chairperson Young opened the public hearing. Staff read the applicable ORS statement. Staff entered the following Exhibits into the record: Exhibit I Exhibit II Exhibit III Exhibit IV Exhibit V Exhibit VI Exhibit VII Exhibit VIII October 14. 1999 Staff Report Correspondence received after the packets were put together: Request for a Continuance by the Applicant as of October 14, 1999 and an October 7, 1999 Letter Submitted by the Department of Agriculture. Also a petition before the Woodburn Planning Commission regarding Highway 219 and Butteville Road. Application for Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. UGB Expansion and Zone Change from Exclusive Farm Use to Light Industrial. Land Use Inventory and Analysis Report West Woodburn Area Land Use Background Report North Central Woodburn Land Use Background Report South Central Woodburn Land Use Background Report Northeast Woodburn Land Use Background Report Southeast Woodburn Land Use Background Report Staff informed the Commission the applicant is requesting a continuance of this public hearing. He recommended the Planning Commission continue this hearing based on the amount of information, questions, issues and concerns raised by various jurisdictions. Staff reported he is not sure as to the time line of when it will come back before the Commission. Most likely the Periodic Review process will be completed prior to coming forward with this application. Chairperson Young moved to recommend to continue the hearing off calendar. Commissioner Lonergan seconded the motion. Vice Chairperson Cox interjected Staff should not be required to have to work through ODOT or LCDC issues. He suggested the application be denied or perhaps open it up for public hearing and see what the evidence is and then render a decision. It is not good policy to have an application pending without a specific time. Vice Chairperson Cox stated his opposition to postponing the hearing. Commissioner Mill agreed with Vice Chairperson Cox. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 10 of 14 '" 8B Commissioner Bandelow inquired what the procedure would be for a continuance? Staff explained the proposal would be set aside. Staff's objective is to go through the Periodic Review process. Focusing on the Periodic Review will give us justification or no justification for what this application is about. Vice Chairperson Cox further stated it bothers him to have an application on the books without knowing exactly when, if ever, it will be brought forward to the Commission. Staff reported the applicant will pull their application if it looks like the Periodic Review will not help them justify their request. Staff pointed out this statement is incorporated as one of the comments in the memorandum by the applicant provided to the Commission. Commissioner Bandelow inquired whether the applicant will be satisfied if their request is denied at this point and brought forward after the Periodic Review? Staff explained the State will be satisfied at this time if this is put on continuance. They know this is not coming before a Planning Commission and City Council for a hearing. He further stated to deny this application at this time would really cause some discomfort to Staff because they have to start going through and completely reverse everything said in the Staff Report. Vice Chairperson Cox said he will be willing to go along with Staff's request as long as Staff assures the Commission that he will not spend a lot of time working on this application. Staff replied he will not and the application will be set aside. Commissioner Mill concurred with Vice Chairperson Cox with getting things lined up before we take further action on something like this. However, he is reluctant to continue because we do not have all of the information needed and leaving it out in never-never land. Nonetheless, he will reluctantly agree for continuance in the interest of making life easier for Staff. Commissioner Lima asked if a timetable may be specified for this? Staff responded he will feel uncomfortable about a specific date certain because he cannot tell the Commission exactly when the Periodic Review process will be completed. Most important, all individuals, interested parties and property owners would need to be notified at the time of review. Vice Chairperson Cox assumes the Planning Commission or Staff can remove the application if they feel the applicant is not proceeding. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 11 of 14 ,.. 8B Commissioner Mill questioned if it is possible to set a diary date for a year from now? Staff answered the Commission will get a progress report on the Periodic Review and that this application could be on the table after the completion of the Periodic Review. Vice Chairperson Cox pointed out it may be that the use will be correct but the timing could be wrong because of traffic considerations. Chairperson Young stated he had made a motion to recommend continuance indefinitely off calender which was seconded by Commissioner Lonergan. Motion unanimously carried. FINAL ORDER None DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Site Plan Review 99-22. administrative approval to construct a 288 sauare foot storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works materials yard located at 300 Cleveland Street. Commissioner Mill commented he thought this was within the area of Staff's ability to approve. Staff reported this is an administrative Site Plan brought forward to the Planning Commission for review and acceptance of Staff's decision. Chairperson Youna stated he is familiar with the site. The site is maintained by the City and seems to be neat and orderly. He added it seems to be a good plan. Commissioner Lima moved to approve Site Plan Review 99-22 as written in the Staff Report. Commissioner Heer seconded the motion, which carried. B. Lot Line Adjustment 99-02. administrative site plan approval of a property line adiustment between tax lots #6300 and #4900 east of the Southern Pacific Railroad and north of Hayes Street. Chemeketa Community College and Withers Lumber Company. applicant. Commissioner Lima moved to accept as presented. Commissioner Mill seconded the motion. Motion unanimously carried. REPORTS A. Building Activity for September 1999 Chairperson Young commented there were only two residential additions and alterations in 1999 that were greater than the seven done in 1998. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 12 of 14 iIr 8B BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION Chairperson Young thanked Staff for answering questions he brought forward with Commissioner Lonergan at the last meeting in his absence. He added he utilized the information provided to develop his recommendations for the new sign ordinance. Commissioner Lima praised Nancy DeVault, Community Development Secretary, for doing such a good job with the transcription of the Planning Commission Minutes. He stated the minutes are very clear and easy to read. Chairperson Youna commented on the article in the Independent regarding the Salud building and stated he is glad about that. Commissioner Lonergan inquired whether Final Order conditions of approval are recorded with Marion County? Staff answered the Final Order is not recorded. However, it is his understanding there is instruction by the Council that any subdivisions and PUD conditions be recorded with the subdivision plat. He further stated conditions of approval for site plans are not required to be recorded with Marion County. Staff feels the records kept by the Planning Department are adequate to enforce those conditions. He added these conditions are reviewed from time to time. Commissioner Sandelow pointed out Staff was to follow-up with Mr. James Atkinson's concerns regarding the traffic light that intersects Hwy. 214 and Soones Ferry Road. Staff replied he has not followed up with Mr. Atkinson because this is an ODOT area of responsibility and therefore, he will have to obtain some response from them in regards to the road alignments and right-of-ways. Commissioner Mill mentioned he has seen some utility locators going in on Tierra Lynn Dr., Kevin Ct. and James St. and asked Staff what is going on there? Staff responded he does not know what is going on but would obtain the information from Public Works and get back to him. Commissioner Mill also asked Staff who has jurisdiction on City streets designating areas as No Curb Side Parking etc? Additionally, he stated the Shop-N-Cart fence is still a problem. Staff responded it would be Public Works Street Department. However, no street parking signs have to go through and be approved by the City Council. Staff stated a field visit to the site was made today. In regards to the Shop-N-Cart fence, it is Staffs opinion that it is the church's issue because the people are walking across the church property and they appear to be the ones most impacted by what is going on there. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 13 of 14 1"11' 8B Commissioner Mill interjected the neighborhood is the impacted party. He reported people are walking through the streets, fights occurring, unruly behavior, drinking etc. in the church property. Commissioner Mill pointed out the church functions as a neighborhood park and therefore, it becomes a neighborhood issue. Staff reported he spoke with the individual from the church about fencing the whole property and posting no trespassing signs. He added the City has no mechanism to require the church to do this. Commissioner Mill pointed out the existing fence is owned by Shop-N-Cart not the church. He also said one of the conditions of approval of the Shop-N-Cart property was that they keep and maintain that fence in good order. Staff informed the church would have to fence off their property along Alexandra Avenue to stop from getting onto their property. He stated there is no easy solution to this problem. Vice Chairperson Cox inquired what the time line might be for the proposed sign ordinance revisions? Staff reported since staff is running on overload at this time he will be making application with the University of Oregon to help put together a draft sign ordinance. He is hoping to secure an award from the University of Oregon in March. Vice Chairperson Cox mentioned the Palm Harbor Village Mobile Home site has the freeway fence cluttered again with big banners. He requested Staff take a look at this situation. Staff stated perhaps he can set up a schedule to perhaps collect these signs or he can locate businesses and inform them by letter that they need to abide by the standards of the sign code and remove the signs. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Mill moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999 Page 14 of 14 - 8e MINUTES WOODBURN RECREATION AND PARKS BOARD October 12, 1999 Council Chamber, City Hall 1. CALL TO ORDER.. The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by ghair Lee Ehrens. ' - . . :~-::'d.~?"{/~: ~'-~tr 2. ROLL CALL.. MEMBERS PRESENT: Frank t\i1derson, L~~.; ..",\~,Janet .:.:"\" ._',"_: ','" ...,.-~}C,::;,.:,.;\),;,;.>O;;~t:"".:;:. Greenwell, Darryl Kelly, Dorothy Senatra, Patricia Watts, and9oundl'if'~"'.J.<athy Figley. "'",, -," MEMBERS ABSENT: Deb,............~~~r STAFF PRESENT: Randy W~n'i:.~<iRecreation and Parks Director; Kathy Willcox, Aquatics Manager; Brial1Sj6'rtf eation Supervisor, and Pat Chandler Smith from the Office. ade in the Minutes of ouncil Meeting" inutes of the September r motion, which passed . There was no business from the "OM ,"''':-:- DIVISIO~"., ":...Maint nee Division: Randy reported for John, who is on .;.T'~'.;'-',,' ,~^ '~.. vacatiol1"th~t repa! :. n made to Legion Park Stadium, but that more will be "'::'.-: ',- ....~: " .~ necess~i-y, as well moi~i.,w.,.>:,.,;'to bring the stadium to standard. He said that, as is often the.9lse with an older !~tmty, there were more problems than anticipated. /'~dy told the BoaF~'that the water level in Hermanson Pond was no longer low, that Ii" j\', bor Pete Cam'$,:l\Vell had been used with Maintenance Division pipes and experience :'.;';. . 'a~,~~~~~$91jtem. He suggested that Board wo~k be done this ~nter.on the . ')lan, so that agreements could be made m advance of d1fficulues. Administrative Report: Randy said that staff would be re,visiting the Department's Mission Statement at meetings in November, anticipating the beginning of the budget cycle. He requested that the Board change the December meeting date from the 14th to the evening of the 15th, for a holiday celebration. And he announced that the new phone system the City had been waiting for was being installed, and that employees were taking - T 8C training on it. Darryl Kelly asked about Randy's meeting with Congresswoman Darlene Hooley. Randy helped host her visit to Woodburn and show her how federal dollars were being put to use here, not only at the parks, but also the tennis courts at the high school. The Senate is presently re,funding the Land Water Conservation Fund, and there is a possibility of state grant monies for local projects, as well. Finally, Randy reported that the Comprehensive Plan is moving t,hrough,the process, and that he expects it will be adopted at the October 25th Council:M~,~~g. ~':lFA::' Recreation Division: Brian gave the Board his'pudget report,: . ,,'<" on temporary employment for which he anticipates ;~mid,yearadjustrii~ff about the costs of his phone services at the new offices t S~.ttlemier Park's' ,." 'c -"-,-.,- high, because the location is not on the City lines. . .'> ,'~;'': The re,location there is accomplished. The Drop,In'~'Pte{.has been near,capacity, with some 50,55 youth participating daily. He was.pt~~~ii(i .> ,unce that Youth Tackle is a hit; he sees two teams playing next ye~. In addi. ..... ,Rec dances have been well attended, 242 at the first and 213." outh Soccer Jamboree is scheduled for October 23rd.{/(i.}t:~" Brian reported that there will be two,,~efit to: :it May and next July, at (~;\~ A'h. Legion Park to generate revenue for~ttivities,,,!#Reve is year, he said, are 11% ahead oflast year. .li' · '/~r Lee Ehrens asked if Legion ~~2the onl"~~rk whe~~,'ournaments could be held. Both Legion and Centennial ar~fa~!J.ities for . -'i'The field at Legion will not be ready until nex~,le~r, Brian s~!9.i~~9puse un ;?i?<",)~,~)\..,,!1rrigation and resurfacing are planned. Both AdUlt ... ball anlli'~iit1:l:j3all will'~/ti~la there. Lee also wanted to know whether ",:.{.:<:~;~;;.: '. "-fl.': ,''>::{~:~?~:~~i;;::~;~P''';;," existing fenp.,)",puld rem~;r~riflJl told him it depended upon revenues. There wasa~~~~.~~n abO'ii($~B~tJ.g portable soccer goals, which could be locked up when not in\JSe\ta~ill$cQurage uiiautltorized play on the fields. Lee wanted to know about the scorePo~td~~~1illiR~Bij~~aid dries not run long enough for soccer, and is costly to ~:~~.cc, -~~~\f-:"~~':~;_;,;Wt'&'~.. operat.e7Darryl Kelly~l<~a~lbout the Pepsi van, which is still bringing in a good share of reveti~e.,i;,:li{;.j;~' >>~kn reported thatshe parking problems at Centennial were being alleviated. The City , ... e have been. v~.. ;:h.elpful; there still are not enough people parking their cars at Valor lking over,,~though signs have gone up and Brian has mentioned it in his ,,,.j,,:-,,' Kelly wanted to know how many more parking spaces were needed, a .' he thought 100. He plans to re,configure the site plan. Seven soccer fields"are currently being used at once, all day, from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Ann Finch's Christmas dance performance has been scheduled for the 11th of December, and she reports that numbers of participants are higher this year than last. Brian noted that there are times when there are eight programs running simultaneously at six different facilities. expenditures . c l:~lked' ::;;t~~'~!1l~y were ~ "II'" 8C Frank Anderson asked about problems with the programs when the weather was bad. A discussion followed about investing in a covered playshed for young participants during our rainy months; it was suggested that the idea find its way into the budget process. Aquatics Division: Kathy reported on her September budget analysis, that the costs for temporary employment are up, because the pool has been busy, particulat;:ly in the evenings, and she has had to staff for the increase in use. She advised the BOard that many of the supplies purchased are a one~time expense. Postage i$hi~her, because there are more members to whom to send newsletters. She is looking into,WJ,lythere has been more use and cost of pool chemicals. In addition, shesaid that reyen\J.~'~~:higher, and that more is being sold at the concessions. ..,h">i/;..' Kathy credited increased pool use to both the weatl1.?rlastmonth, and th~.p~~()tions her division has begun. BUCK FRIDAY has filled thepoplwith 180 ~ 200 ~Wifufuers, when, she said, there had been 30. September's FREE$\y~.;~rought in some 300 people. October's promotion is a free guest for everyone whoitiehdS'~~~er fitness program. The pool will shut down early in November fo..r. ....c:p1nual m~it{"';;~{'" ..',.,....~... Kathy told the Board that what was planned was draining t . ,/c. 'v , ,,~:lean st:":'~t had accumulated on the bottom from local hard water. B. )r2:!<en. repla5~ . The facility will be pressure washed, and the locker roomsf~"ll be fr. ." Lee Ehrens asked how the equipm~rwas r~bing.'ur years of constant use, things wear out. That very day,,'tf{y said,-f1<als had~i"en replaced, but the lift, she noted, was old. Lee asked spe' F Uy a ,',!the pUlyp'imotors, and Kathy referred him to ~";,~~~;, John's division for answers to "inten p,,';" "'. Randy added that the purchasing practices changed, ~d, two were now ordered, so that there were st ack~ ,; Lee ask..... .... the H ' ,(,':,r,.,S~lIl' Randy said that he planned to propose for budget consideratioJ'~,,~9allevilit~~il},~hpmidity problem which needs attention. Frank An ,,,,.;~t here'\t1t~;Water would come from to re~fill the pool after the '~.',...~' shut~downth 0, d Kathy said it would be local, and not trucked in from _~~.~'_ " 't'. outsiq~fof town. ;" .rIf"" She 'continued that a . U 'water~fitness classes have not had to be rescheduled around "-:-""";t':" ;<--;- .,'- tB practices. She~' been working with local schools on the logistics of district swim , ,~. . , and she rep~i~d to the Board that there are Saturday in...services being held for the t their owni&:iuest, so that what they learn is fresh for the meets held in the .>i' rian about use of the armory as a facility for dances. Brian said it would be costly. 6. SPECIAL EVENT OPERATIONAL POLICIES: Randy reported to the Board that the Council had approved the Special Event Fees Resolution, i.e. $1275 for one day, $400 each day thereafter, or $50 per booth per event, whichever is greater. He - T 8C reminded the Board that the figures covered the cost to the City of providing the parks for special use. Negotiations were possible for co' sponsored events, where the city became a partner in any profits made. A discussion followed about rules and regulations to protect parks. Randy said that he had requested model application forms be faxed in from other agencies. He said there would be a management presence there at all times during such events, and that it would be the responsibility of the organizers to make sure that all venders were aware of regulations. Lee Ehrens said he would like to form a committee tq<r~view the.nt1~iand regulations for park use. In addition, he posed a question concerriing how much()u,l:parks should be ,,' .,. '.-,-', used. Frank Anderson wanted to know if there were..a maxim. urn..... " number()f. b......oo................t.....h....s.. allowed for the fees charged. Randy said he would Hl1kwitl1. the City Adirttmsttator about a ceiling on the number of attractions. ~~~2J;~~/t .. '. .' . There was talk of offering a model booth contract tgr' .;.;'QJ~anizers that had the regulations on the back, so that there was advance...~prd,.i<",.J:~le. Lee suggested that there could be, in addition, suggested plans for set,"p, so thl~i<';:;";>fould be more user, friendly, not having everyone in only one ar ading 0 " ths, with ideas on where security and first aid could be made" ges, was made that each booth have two trash cans, one for th~n.der 4''llblic, to help keep the area clean. Darryl Kelly asked about the i.il' ,tion 0 i boo ;; , and the Board talked about the permits the County requires. I .>0. etion ese ~~ . s and things like carnival rides was discussed. Kathy W.mcox ai ~ e thou e' ty could be called and told, "We are having th~ " vent, and e to as . e out." Randy told Lee that he would have sq ...., ation.... t the n eting from the Building Codes people on applicatr'~ ....J....."..oced~ '. Wl..'ng rides. Darryl Ke::"\ he issu ..' . ~J,and Randy said that the City has an ordinance about too mll d that .. e Police who answer to such situations. He added ""~~': ./14- that whil~it'ls no" ment's responsibility to enforce, it will have a presence on hand ~<>'monitor. P~6icia Watts sugge~~e "Ulsurance for venders, separate riders for each vender; she said t ,'J't is fairly inexpe~ive, and that it would further protect the City. :'..;i;.' Jli;:~!;'. u~~~nter Visioning Process: Consistent with the City Council's ,''''''' 'urn being "a great place to be", the Board was asked to undertake a VlS ess toward a common view of what a Community Center might be, given that it is part of the Comprehensive Plan, and a centerpiece for a possible bond issue in November 2000. Ideas for getting people involved were sought, and Jan Greenwell suggested those who utilize the existing center could be asked to participate. Lee and Darryl both wanted to see maintenance resources as part of the plan. Randy explained that the monies were there in the funding strategies, under renovation which ..... .... 8C will be accomplished, he said, working with the neighbors of each park. He told the Board that there was little to "maintain", until irrigation and proper drainage are brought up to standard. This is the intention of the renovation funds. Lee expressed his view that things ought evolve, one step at a time, while Randy sought to impress on the members that more than one project could and should be undertaken, to get more done. Randy said that he really wanted to turn the Board loose g~ visioning and engaging the public in the process; he felt that rather than a t~l< for~~i2ffi.e Board was the ideal group to accomplish the process. " .- Mayor Jennings came in and addressed the members.<'He, too" e Board to be ..",..". C'.;'.- ~'; the nucleus of the process, and added that a task for~could be i!#>. for the bond issue. Frank Anderson asked whether a consultant ~ltould beQf6ught' ~ participants, and .added he recalled needs. ass~ssme !~!cfi ~~i1ken ~o~e i i,':tt:'~e Mayor was more m favor of local folks bemg mvolv . than hmng fro e outside. Jan Greenwell suggested that the name of the proc ." ed to Community Improvement Project to broaden not only the app~:"u as well. Several avenues were discussed, then, concerrli " how to workshop was brought up, to be held at Settlemier's Drop,' a regula:ng with only this item on the agenda (leaving the remaini " an i . m mailing); and a Saturday meeting scheduled to engage re peq ted. The date of the Board's next reg.uly sche~~~d me ovember 9, 1999. Dorot enatra wanted the members to be n addition, she reported on an "t Senior Estates. e routing e sign at Burlingham Park be darkened, so 'r.:'.. ,.;,proved. He also mentioned the logs at the end of the 9. ADJOt.JRN.. .orothy Senatra moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m., and Erilrik Anderson Je.... ,e(1her motion. The meeting was adjourned by unanimous vOt~t ,', 'it'"!;,,,, 8D WOODBURN WORLDS BERRY CENTER MUSEUM: 101113/'3':j Outline of City Mgr., J. Brown proposal: I Museum administered by the Recreation ~ Parks Dept. (1) House railroad collection (2) House Archeological Discoveries collection (3) Historical Collection II Establish Advisory Commission (5 to 7 members) instead of Museum Board with Quarterly Meetings. (1) Use volunteers under City Staff Administrator. (2) Establish by Ordinance. (3) Any of Board Could Apply for Commission Seat. III Museum Budget to be Established in January. (1) Museum revenues maintained separate fund from City to be earmarked for Museum Expenditures only. IV Future (1) Increase number of Days "Open"/ (2) Greater use of Bungalow Theater (3) Staff person in Charge to also do Grant Writing. ~ ~ T 8D CITY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503)982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 October 13, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECf: Berry Center Museum Board ~ John Brown, City Administrato~ F Museum Mana2ement ProDosal Back2round: Your Board is seeking alternatives to the current Museum management structure. Several of your members no longer regularly attend meetings, and a number have indicated strong interest in resigning to pursue other interests. I understand you discussed options for remaining an autonomous organization. You also asked the City to consider taking over museum management. I attended your September 1999 meeting and proposed an option for conveying management to the City. Discussion: I proposed the City assume the Museum function, to be administered by the Recreation and Parks Department. I hope to support the Museum function so it will grow and diversity over time, to justity a museum division or a new City department. Opportunities for diversification include a railroad collection and, with recent paleontological/archaeological discoveries in our parks, an ancient history collection. Policy Guidance Some of your Board wish to maintain involvement independent of the City Council in guiding museum policy. Accordingly, I proposed that an advisory commission to the Council be substituted for the Museum Board. This is an alternative to eliminating the Board and vesting policy determination solely with the City Council. Day to day operations would be conducted with existing volunteers, under the administration of City staff, answering to the City Administrator. Museum Commission Composition, Selection, Qualification, Terms, Duties, and Meetings The Museum commission would be established by Ordinance, similar to the Human Rights or Planning Commissions. - - Berry Center Museum Board October 13, 1999 Page 2. 8D The commission should have an odd number of members. A composition of five to seven is recommended, to keep the group size manageable. Per current policy, commissioners would be solicited through an open recruitment of eligible applicants and would be appointed by the Mayor subject to City council approval. It is suggested, if it is legally possible, that the opportunity to serve be extended to any interested individual in the greater Woodburn Area. Qualifications should require an interest in or experience with historical collections, historic preservation, and local and/or natural history. Any of your Board could apply for a seat on the Commission. Duties would include making policy recommendations and providing policy guidance with respect to museum collections, exhibits, programs, operations, and short and long term capital improvements. Terms would be four years, and staggered to replace or re-appoint approximately half the commission every two years. Based on our discussion, it appears quarterly meetings of such a commission would be sufficient. Officers would be selected from within the membership, at the first meeting of each calendar year. Financial Accountability You have expressed concerns regarding the funds in your checking account, and in certificates of deposit. As a City function, I propose a museum budget be established, and that museum revenues and investments be maintained in a fund separate from the City's general purpose revenues and earmarked for museum related expenditures only. While it is not customary for advisory commissions to approve expenditures, I offered that the Museum Commission could, if it desires, approve expenditures before they are made. For timeliness of payments, this approach is not recommended, but could be implemented if you so choose. As there is currently no museum budget, one will need to be established by the Budget Committee. It is currently my intent to reopen budget hearings in January 2000, to adopt a supplemental budget. If your Board accepts this proposal, a museum budget could be established at that time. Transition Lacking a budget until January creates an operating problem that can be avoided by making no changes to the present Museum management until December. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Museum Board retain responsibility for management and volunteer operations until a budget for the museum can be adopted. This was discussed with you in September, and seemed to meet with general agreement. - "I" Berry Center Museum Board October 13, 1999 Page 3. 8D Administration, Staffing, and Volunteers Since our meeting last month, I discussed this proposal with the Mayor and Council President. They were agreeable to both my proposal and greater City involvement in future museum development. The Mayor suggested, however, for at least the short term, that the Museum be made a function of the City Administrator's Office. With respect to staffing, I propose to seek a new position that would be responsible for both museum operations and coordinating special events on a City-wide basis. The position would also be responsible for related grant writing. The museum is currently open two days a week, and is run with volunteers. I understand the volunteers are coordinated with the assistance of an individual who acts as a curator. It is my intent, should the City take over Museum operations to increase the number of days per week that the museum is open to the public, and to make greater use of the Bungalow Theater. This goal will take time and planning, and will rely on obtaifiiIig an operating budget from the Budget Committee and City Council, obtaining staffing resources, and receiving the continued assistance of your membership and volunteers. Other Issues I am unclear as to your official status as an organization. I am advised you may be an incorporated not-for-profit organization. In that case, the Board would need to consult with its legal counsel and disincorporate if the City takes over museum management. At this time, it does not appear that any not-for-profit status you may hold would either prevent or delay making the changes I have proposed. Conclusion: The foregoing proposal is offered for your consideration. I am pleased to discuss any changes you deem appropriate, and to present a final proposal to the City Council for their approval. JCB cc: Mavor and City Council Budget Committee Finance Director Recreation and Parks Director - 8E SUBJECT: Mayor and Council through the City Administrat~ Ben GiUespie, Finance Di~ Audit of Motel Operators TO: FROM: DATE: October 11, 1999 The City engaged its audit firm, Boldt, Carlisle, and Smith, to review conformance of hotels and motels operating within the city limits with ordinance 2057, the Hotel/Motel Tax. The audit team will review one third of the hotels/motels each year. They began this year with the Woodburn Inn, the Woodburn 1-5 RV Park, and the Fairway Inn. A copy of their report is available in Central Files. Compliance was generally good. However, Boldt, Carlisle, and Smith did note these exceptions. Woodburn Inn-The 6% tax was not collected on all rents. Offsetting that, the motel calculated the tax based on total receipts including the tax, and thus over reported the amount due to the City. Woodburn 1-5 RV Park-The tax was reported net of deductions for membership in the Good Sam Club. The ordinance expressly prohibits this practice. Offsetting this were adjustments (increases) that were not supported by any provisions in the ordinance. Fairway Inn-The Certificate of Authority was not displayed on the premises as required by the ordinance. Letters have been written to each of the hoteVmotel operators describing the findings and what must be done to be in compliance. A copy of the ordinance has been included for their reference. Where an operator has over-reported, the City has given the motel an opportunity to claim a reimbursement, if they wish to review their records and calculate the amount. The net financial effect on the City is expected to be zero plus or minus $500. The long term benefit of this audit is to remind hotel/motel operators that the City has the authority to review their books for compliance with ordinance 2057. - T 8F MEMO FROM: City Council through City Administrato'p Public Works Program Manager4 fl---- TO: SUBJECT: City of Woodburn Water Consumer Confidence Report DATE: October 19, 1999 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the city to distribute a "Consumer Confidence Report" to all city water customers. The report was a requirement of the Safe Water Drinking Water Act of 1996. The Oregon Health Division adopted the federal standard. The attached report will be included in all city water bills and will be distributed to other customers, such as those in apartments, who do not get water bills. The primary message of the report is contained in the headline on the first page. City meets water quality standards City public works staff including all employees in the water division have this as a primary goal. Every effort is expended to make sure that the city's water supply is safe and complies with all state and federal standards. The report is for 1998. A report which covers 1999 will be required to be provided prior to July 1, 2000. In following years the report will be required by July 1 of the following year. .... - :t~ ~~ 8F City of Woodburn 1998 Consumer Confidence Report City meets water quality standards This report is a snapshot of your drinking water quality. It contains information regarding the source of the City's water, any contaminants that may have been detected, and some special language for the immune deficient. Detected contaminants must be reported, even though the level may fall below the federal standards. The City of Woodburn is proud to announce that your tap water has met all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) and Oregon Health Division (OHD) drinking water health standards. We will be providing you with a consumer confidence report on an annual basis. It is a new federal regulation. If you have any questions about this report, please call us at 503-982-5240. Special notes for the immune deficient Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.lmmuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EP AlCenters for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Water Drinking Hotline (800-426-4791). Surface water and wells for Woodburn The City of Woodburn draws its water from 3 aquifers levels, accessed by 6 wells. All ofthe wells are located within three miles of each other, inside the urban growth boundary. Well depths range from 150 to 300 ft., and can pump up to 1000 gallons per minute. Each well is equipt with external generators in case of emergencies. City Council Meetings: Twice A Month at 7pm Be involved with your city! City Council meetings for Woodburn occur twice a month, on every second and fourth Monday of every month. Meetings begin at 7:00 pm in the City Hall Chamber, located at 270 Montgomery Street. Call Woodburn City Hall at 503-982-5222 for more information. How to make this report work for you Although this report may seem overwhelming, it contains valuable infonnation. Within this report there are terms that must be defined in order to alleviate confusion or concern as you review the supplied infonnation. Contaminant is a word used throughout this docwnent. This is a commonly used tenn associated with the drinking water industry. The presence of this tenn should not necessarily invite concern. All drinking water is subject to some quantity of contaminants. The purpose of this report is to provide you with an understanding' and perspective so you can make infonned "decisions about your drinking water. In measuring contaminants in drinking water, the units used to describe the quantity of contaminants found are recorded as either parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb ). To gain a perspective on this measurement, imagine one billion (1,000,000,000) blue jellybeans. Now imagine that one of these jellybeans is black. The amount of black jellybeans in relation to blue ones would be I ppb, or 1/1,000,000,000. This example works the same way in respect to ppm as well. As you read this report, be sure and keep these figures and definition in mind. This will assist you in interpreting what you are reading and empower you as a water customer. - T Water Quality Data Table The presence of contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. Un less otherwise noted, the data presented in this table is from testing done in the calendar year of the report. The EPA or the State requires us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of the data though representative of the water quality, may be more than one year old. Tenns and Abbreviations used below: AL: Action Level: The concentration ofa contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow. Range: The lowest amount of contaminant detected and the highest amount detected during a sample period. MCLG: Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level ofa contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level ofa contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. NR: Not Regulated: Neither EPA ofOHD has set an MCL for this contaminant. Your Range Sample Contaminant(s) (units) MCLG MCL Water Low High Date Violation Typical Source Inorganic Contaminants Arsenic (Ppb) NA 50 I3 11 13 5/2/99 No Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards Microbiological Contaminants Total Coliform (# samples) 0 n/d 0 No Naturally present in the environment (# of monthly positive samples) Radioactive Contaminants Alpha emitters (pCi/l) 0 15 2.79 0.41 2.79 No Erosion of natural deposits Your Samples> AL Sample Exceeds Contaminant(s) (units) MCLG MCL Water # 95%ile Date AL Typical Source Inorganic Contaminants Copper (ppm) 1.3 1.3 0.01 0 0 8/23/96 No Corrosion of household plumbing systems Lead (ppb) 15 15 6 0 0 8/23/96 No Corrosion of household plumbing systems Units Description: ppm: parts per million, or milligrams per liter (mg/\) ppb: parts per billion, or micrograms per liter (Ilg/I) pCi/l: picocuries per liter (a measure of radioactivity) # of monthly samples: Number of samples taken monthly that were found to be positive Results of radon monitorill2 The City of Woodburn tested for Radon on April 21, 1998. The results of these tests indicated a range of 153 to 537 picocuries per I iter (pC ilL) in our drinking water. Radon is a radioactive gas that you can't see, taste, or smell. It is found throughout the U.S. Radon can move up through the ground and into a home through cracks and holes in the foundation. Radon can build up to high levels in all types of homes. Radon can also get into indoor air when released from tap water from showering, washing dishes, and other household activities. Compared to radon entering the home through soil, radon entering the home through tap water will in most cases be a small source of radon in indoor air. Radon is a known human carcinogen. Breathing air containing radon can lead to lung cancer. Drinking water containing radon may also cause increased risk of stomach cancer. If you are concerned about radon in your home, test the air in your home. Testing is inexpensive and easy. Fix your home if the level of radon in your air is 4 pCi/L or higher. There are simple ways to fix a radon problem that aren't too costly. For additional information, call your state radon program or call EPA's Radon Hotline (800-80S-RADON). For more information, contact: Randy Rohman City of Woodburn 503-982-5240 EP A Hotline: 800-426-4791 Oregon Health Division: 503-791-4381 Provided for tbe City ofWoodbura by Oaddlow Maaagemeat lac. 800-841-7689 Copyright BMII999 T 9A Memo _ Woodburn Recreation and Parks Department to: Mayor and City Council via John Brown, City Administrator ~ from: D. Randall Westrick, Recreation and Parks Director ~ date: October 21, 1999 subject: Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update At the October 11, 1999 meeting the City Council continued the public hearing regarding the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update. At that meeting, public and written testimony raised issues regarding facilities within the greenways, golf cart transportation and Appendix "A" the attached Capitol Improvement Program. The Council continued the hearing until the October 25, 1999 meeting. ..... "I' 9B CITY OF WOODBURN Community Development MEMORANDUM 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Date: October 25, 1999 Mayor and City Council thru City Administrator JO-o/ To: From: Planning Commission Subject: Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Change 99-04, Subdivision 99-03, and Variance 99-10 At their hearing of September 9, 1999, the Planning Commission reviewed a request by Tony Caragol to approve an annexation of 1.32 acres to the City of Woodburn, a Zone Map change from Marion County Urban Transition Farm (UTF) to City Single Family Residential (RS), a subdivision to create 6 lots from 3 existing parcels, and a variance to the lot coverage requirement for accessory structures in the RS zone. The subject property is located on the north side of Aztec Drive east of Highway 99E. On September 23, 1999, the Planning Commission approved an order recommending that the City Council approve Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Change 99-04 and Subdivision 99- 03 and recommending that the City Council deny Variance 99-10 without prejudice. In regard to the proposal, the City Council has the following options: (1) Concur with the Planning Commission's final order and approve Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Change 99-04 and Subdivision 99-03 and deny Variance 99-10 without prejudice. (2) Modify the Planning Commission's final order. (3) Deny Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Change 99-04, Subdivision 99-03 and Variance 99-10. It is recommended that the City Council instruct staff to prepare an ordinance to substantiate your decision. Attachments: Exhibit A: Planning Commission 9/9/99 Staff Report Exhibit B: Planning Commission Final Order, dated 9/23/99 Exhibit C: Planning Commission 9/9/99 Minutes ~ J 9B ATTACHMENT "A" Planning Commission 9/9/99 Staff Report i 9B CITY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION 99-03 ZONEMAPAMENDMENT99~4 SUBDIVISION 99-03 VARIANCE 99-10 (September 9, 1999) I. APPLICATION INFORMATION: Applicant: Tony Caragol 489 SW 1 sl Avenue Canby, OR 97013 Property Owner: Gene Koffler 1542 Big Valley Way -7b Reno, NV 89511 Pete Bagdanoff 20965 S. Virginia Reno, NV 89511 Application Deemed Complete: July 21, 1999 120 Day Rule Deadline: n/a Staff Report Available for Public Review: September 3, 1999 II. NATURE OF APPLICATION: The applicant has submitted a petition requesting to annex 1.32 acres to the City of Woodburn. The owners of the subject property have filed the necessary petition and do consent to the proposed annexation. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Zone Map change from Marion County Urban Transition Farm (UTF) to City Single Family Residential (RS). The annexation and Zone Map change are being proposed in conjunction with a request to subdivide the property to create 6 lots from 3 existing parcels. As part of the subdivision, the applicant requests a variance to the lot coverage requirement for accessory structures in the RS zone. III. RELEVANT FACTS: The subject property consists of approximately 1.32 acres and is located on the Page 1 9B The subject property consists of approximately 1.32 acres and is located on the north side of Aztec Drive east of Highway 99E. The property is bounded by the City Limits on the south, east and west sides. The property is identified specifically as Tax Lots 4400,4500,4600 in T5S, R1W, Section 17BA. The subject property is designated for residential development < 12 units per acre by the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. The property is currently zoned "Urban Transition Farm" (UTF) by Marion County. The UTF zone is applied to land outside of the city, within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), to ensure that it remains undeveloped until annexation to the city for development at urban densities. The subject property is currently developed with an existing shop building located at the northwest corner of the site. The size of the building is approximately 1,695 square feet. Surrounding zoning and land use: North: Zoned UTF (outside City Limits) and developed with single family residences. Zoned RS and developed with single family residences. Zoned RS and developed with a single family residence. Zoned CR (Retail Commercial) and developed with a duplex. South: East: West: General description of the area: a) Topography - generally level. b) Vegetation - field with grasses, weeds and a few trees. c) Drainage - generally sheet flow with no delineated channels. d) Flood area - there are no flood plains within the immediate area. e) Utilities - sewer, water and other utilities exist in Aztec Drive adjacent to the site. Schools: The nearest school is Washington Elementary located approximately % mile from the site. The Woodburn School District uses a ratio of .54 students per dwelling to determine the number of students a subdivision could generate. Based on this formula, the proposed 6 lots would generate approximately 3 students. Park and Recreation Facilities: The project does not include any parks or open space. No topographical or environmental constraints have been identified on the subject property. IV. RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA: ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 2 9B A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan: Chapter IX. Goals and Policies: A. Residential Land Development Policies D. Annexation Policies G. Housing Goals and Policies H. Public Services Goals and Policies K. Transportation Goals and Policies M. Growth and Urbanization Policies B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: Chapter 8 General Standards Chapter 9 Residential Standards Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards Chapter 13 Variance Procedures Chapter 15 Zone Change Chapter 22 Single Family Residential District Chapter 39 Mandatory Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-Iieu of C. Woodburn Subdivision Ordinance D. Woodburn Transportation System Plan E. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance v. ANALYSIS: A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan - Chapter IX. Goals and Policies: Residential Land Development Policies (IX-A): A-1. Residential areas should be designed around a neighborhood. Neighborhoods should be an identifiable unit bounded by arterial non-residential uses, or natural features of the terrain. The neighborhood should have a community facility, such as a school, park, or privately owned community facility to allow for interaction within the neighborhood. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision will not create a neighborhood but will become part of the existing and developing neighborhood in the area. The applicant is proposing no specific community facility due to the very small scale of the 6-lot subdivision. The proposal complies with this policy. A-2 Living Environment - Developments in residential area be ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 3 9B constructed in such a way that they will not seriously deteriorate over time. Zoning ordinances should be strictly enforced to prevent encroachment of degrading non-residential uses. Construction standards in the state Building Code shall be vigorously enforced, and if necessary, additional standards the City detennines should be imposed to insure non-degrading housing units, should be encouraged by the City. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision is designed in compliance with the City of Woodburn Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable ordinances. Additionally, the City of Woodburn's building permit process will assure that the buildings built within this development are established in compliance with applicable City standards and the state of Oregon Building codes. These factors combined will ensure that the proposed development is a quality living environment, and that the development will not seriously deteriorate over time. The proposal complies with this policy. A-3 Development should promote, through the use of moderate density standards and creative design, a feeling of openness and spaciousness with sufficient landscaped area and open space to create a pleasant living environment. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision, due to its small size, will not include any open space. However, the subdivision will be developed with lots that exceed the minimum 6,000 square foot lot size. The proposed lots will range from 7,791 square feet to 10,238 square feet. The relatively large size of the lots will contribute to a feeling of openness and spaciousness which will enhance the living environment in the area. The proposal complies with this policy. A-5 Residential developments should strive for creative design which will maximize the inherent values of the land being developed and encourage slow moving traffic. Each residential development should provide for landscaping and tree planting to enhance the livability and aesthetics of the neighborhoods. STAFF COMMENT: The design of the proposed subdivision is limited by existing street improvements in the area and by the size and shape of the property. The relatively large lots will provide ample yard areas for landscaping to enhance the livability and aesthetics of the neighborhood. The proposal complies with this policy. ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 4 9B Annexation Policies (IX-D): 0-1 Annexation policies are extremely important for the City. While it is important that enough land is available for the necessary development anticipated in the City of Woodburn, it is also essential to prevent too much land being included in the city limits as this leads to inefficient, sprawling development. Because of the need to plan for public improvements, the City should insure that there is a five year supply of vacant land within the City. Services should be provided to that land during that five year period. STAFF COMMENT: The Urban Growth Boundary was adopted in 1980. This boundary designates areas outside Woodburn's City limits that could be annexed to accommodate growth to the year 2000. The annexation of this land is to accommodate the growth demands of the City in a timely manner. The subject property is contiguous to the current city limits line on the east, west and south. Because the site is almost an island surrounded by the city, because city facilities are adjacent, and because there is urban development on all sides of it, it cannot be considered "sprawling". The proposal complies with this policy. Housing Goals and Policies (IX-G): G-1-1 The City will insure that sufficient land is made available to accommodate the growth of the City. This requires that sufficient land for both high density and low density residential developments is provided within the confines of the growth and development goals of the City... STAFF COMMENT: Lands within the urban growth boundary and outside of the city limits are available for development. The subject property has been planned for residential development. Market conditions and supply of developable land dictate what parcels within the city's planning area are developed. The proposal complies with this policy. G-1-2 It is the policy of the city to encourage a variety of housing types to accommodate the demands of the local housing market. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision is being proposed in response to local housing market demand for single family ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 5 9B residences. Public Services Goals and Policies (IX-H): H-1 Public Facilities and services shall be appropriate to support sufficient amounts of land to maintain an adequate housing market in areas undergoing development or redevelopment. STAFF COMMENT: Sewer, water, and storm drain lines are available to the property. It will be the responsibility of the developer to construct the infrastructure that is needed for this development to occur. All sizing and location will be subject to review and approval by the Public Works Department. Transportation Goals and Policies (IX-K): STAFF COMMENT: Transportation policies are implemented through the Woodburn Transportation System Plan and Woodburn Access Management Ordinance. The project's compliance with these is discussed in Sections V-D and V-E below. Growth and Urbanization Policies (IX-M): STAFF COMMENT: The developer will be required to pay systems development charges for their impact on City infrastructure. The City of Woodburn and Marion County have maintained a process for providing an exchange of information relative to the proposed annexation. A comment form and the application materials were forwarded to Marion County so that they would have the opportunity to review and comment on the annexation as part of the application review process. Marion County has not submitted comments for this proposal. Once the annexation takes place, the property will fall under the City's jurisdiction. The conversion of land within the urban growth boundary to a land use that is planned and anticipated by the city's comprehensive plan, subject to public facility improvements and other standards, is acknowledged by the state and therefore conforms with the statewide planning goals. The proposal complies with the policy encouraging in-fill development of developed areas before conversion of urbanizable areas in that the proposed subdivision is adjacent to existing uses developed at urban densities. B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 6 f 9B 1. Chapter 8 General Standards STAFF COMMENT: Section 8.010 requires through streets to have a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Aztec Drive currently has a right-of-way width of 50 feet with 30 feet provided on the south side of the centerline. A condition of approval will require an additional 1 0 feet of right-of-way be dedicated. The area to be dedicated is shown on the preliminary map. The proposal complies with all other general standards including the requirement that all dwellings be accessible to public streets -- all lots will have frontage on an existing public street. 2. Chapter 9 Residential Standards STAFF COMMENT: Section 9.020 restricts lot coverage by accessory structures to no more than 25% of the rear yard. Lot 1 shown on the preliminary subdivision map is proposed to contain an existing shop building. The shop building is approximately 1,695 square feet in size and falls under the definition of an accessory structure which is defined as, "A detached subordinate structure or building, the use of which is incidental to that of the main building or to the use of the land." The intended primary use of the land is for a single family residence. The shop building will cover more than 25% of the rear yard area of Lot 1 if a future dwelling exceeds a depth of 21 feet, assuming compliance with the required 20 foot front yard setback. The applicant does not believe that it is feasible to construct a dwelling with only 21 feet of depth. Accordingly, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow the shop building to cover more than 25% of the rear yard area and proposes a dwelling footprint that is 50 feet deep. This will result in the shop building covering approximately 37% of the rear yard area. Section 9.030 limits the height of accessory structures to a maximum of 8 feet at the lot line and increases this limit one foot for each foot set back from the lot line up to a maximum height of 15 feet. The shop building is set back 10 feet from the rear lot line which will allow a height of 15 feet. The shop building is 15 feet in height which complies with this standard. Section 9.050 requires accessory structures to be set back a minimum of 5 feet from side lots lines. The side yard setback of the shop building exceeds this requirement. ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 7 9B The proposed lots in the subdivision are all of sufficient size and dimensions to allow a typical dwelling to be placed in conformance with all setback requirements. 3. Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards STAFF COMMENT: Each lot in the proposed subdivision is configured to provide for direct driveway access to Aztec Drive in conformance with City driveway standards. 4. Chapter 13 Variance Procedure Section 13.010. Power to Grant Variances. Subject to the restriction and provisions contained in this Ordinance, the Planning Commission shall have the power to vary or modify the strict application of any of the regulations or provisions of this Ordinance in any case where such strict application would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships with reference to requirements governing lot area, lot width, percentage of lot coverage and number of dwelling units or structures permitted on a lot, height of structures, location, yards, signs, parking and loading space, vision clearance and use of property. The power provided herein to the Planning Commission to grant Variances from the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used sparingly, within the limits granted the Planning Commission, within the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, and applied reasonably to maintain and not abolish the distinctive classifications created by the Ordinance. STAFF COMMENT: The applicant is requesting a variance from the maximum rear yard coverage requirement of 25% for accessory structures. Lot 1 shown on the preliminary subdivision map is proposed to contain an existing shop building. The shop building is approximately 1,695 square feet in size. The shop building will cover more than 25% of the rear yard area of Lot 1 if a future dwelling exceeds a depth of 21 feet, assuming compliance with the required 20 foot front yard setback. The applicant does not believe that it is feasible to construct a dwelling with only 21 feet of depth. The applicant proposes a dwelling footprint that is 50 feet deep which will result in the shop building covering approximately 37% of the rear yard area. The Planning Commission has the authority to approve, modify or deny the applicant's request. ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 8 'T!' 9B Section 13.020 Conditions for Granting a Variance. The Planning Commission may permit and authorize a Variance when it appears for the application, or the facts presented at the public hearing, or by investigation: (a) That there are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships or practical difficulties which can be relieved only by modifying the literal requirements of the Ordinance. STAFF COMMENT: The applicant states that "the costs involved in removing the building could make the value in the lot considerably less and actually the building could be of considerable value to a hobbyist." In order to construct a dwelling on Lot 1 (as currently configured) it will be necessary to construct one with a depth of 21 feet or less, or. the shop building would need to be removed or reduced in size so that it occupies no more than 25% of the rear yard. Constructing a dwelling with a depth of 21 feet. while feasible, is not practical. According to the City Building Inspector home plans are typically at least 24 feet in depth. Another alternative would be to require that Lot 1 be increased in size to remove the need for a variance. This would be difficult to do without adversely impacting the configuration of the entire subdivision since Lots 2. 3 and 4 are the minimum width of 60 feet and there is a jog in the lot line between Lots 4 and 5. Lot 1 has already been configured to maximize its width to accommodate the shop building. Because a dwelling with a 24 foot depth is the minimum practical standard and because the lot is relatively large (9,965 square feet), allowing a greater depth can be justified. Therefore, there appears to be an unreasonable hardship or practical difficulty applicable to this situation which only can be relieved by modifying the rear yard coverage requirement. The question is how much of a modification is necessary? The applicant's request to allow a dwelling with a 50 foot depth would result in a rear yard coverage of 37%. This is an increase of 12% which is almost 1% times the amount allowed by code. This appears to be excessive. An increase of 5% (30% coverage) is more reasonable. This would allow a dwelling depth of 36 feet which is sufficient depth to construct a typical dwelling and will minimize the magnitude of the variance in relationship to the perceived hardship. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, or use ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 9 9B referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land, buildings, or uses in the same District; however, non-conforming land uses or structures in the vicinity shall not in themselves constitute such circumstances or conditions. STAFF COMMENT: The exceptional condition that applies to the subject property which does not generally apply to properties in the same district is the fact that the subject property has an existing large accessory building on it and other properties generally do not. (c) That granting the application will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood of the premises. STAFF COMMENT: The requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood in that a small change in the coverage of the rear yard not be noticeable to neighbors. (d) That such Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property right of the petitioner. STAFF COMMENT: The substantial property right of the petitioner in this application is the right to allow an existing accessory building to remain on the site. It could be considered unreasonable to require removal or reduction of a building, especially one which still has significant value, that will otherwise conform to all City codes and ordinances. (e) That the granting of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, adversely affect the health or safety of persons working or residing in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant. STAFF COMMENT: Based on earlier findings, and a review of the proposed subdivision, no health or safety impacts will result from the granting of this minor variance to the rear yard coverage requirements. (f) That the granting of the application will be in general ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 10 t 9B harmony with the intent and purpose ofthis ordinance and will not adversely affect any officially adopted Comprehensive Plan. STAFF COMMENT: The general purpose of the zoning ordinance and of the lot coverage requirement is to ensure that development does not block light and air movement, overburden public facilities, create a safety hazard, or lack sufficient open space and recreation for the residents of the city. The minor variance requested will be in general harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance. The granting of such a minor variance will not adversely affect implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. However, to ensure that the building is used in a way consistent with the RS zone, the use of the shop building shall be limited to uses allowed in the RS zone and not be used for commercial or industrial purposes. Section 13.090. Variance Right Must be Exercised to be Effective. Variances granted under this Ordinance shall be effective only when the exercise of the right granted thereunder shall be commenced within six months from the effective date of that Variance, unless a longer period is specified or thereafter allowed by the Planning Commission. The applicant requests that if the variance is granted that it be effective for one year. Inasmuch as the variance is linked to a subdivision proposal, it is reasonable to allow one year for the variance to be exercised since 6 months may not be sufficient time to record the final subdivision plat and obtain a building permit for a dwelling on Lot 1. Obtaining a building permit for Lot 1 would be necessary in order to exercise the variance approval. 5. Chapter 15 Zone Change Procedure STAFF COMMENT: When property is annexed into the City the property must be rezoned from the County zoning to the City zoning. The zone change is necessary to reclassify the subject property from the current zoning of "Marion County Urban Transition Farm (UTF)" to the City RS (Single Family Residential) zone. The RS zone conforms to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan designation for the property which is Residential <12 units per acre. 6. Chapter 22 RS Single Family Residential District ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 11 9B STAFF COMMENT: The applicant's request for approval of a subdivision and variance are subject to City Council approval of an annexation and a zone change from County UTF to City Single Family Residential District (RS). Section 22.01 0 allows single family dwellings and accessory buildings as permitted uses. All proposed lots are of sufficient size and dimension to accommodate front, rear and side yard setback requirements. All proposed lots will exceed the minimum required area of 6,000 square feet and meet or exceed the minimum required width of 60 feet. 7. Chapter 39 Mandatory Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-Iieu-of STAFF COMMENT: The System Development Charge for park purposes is $483 per lot. A condition of approval specifies that the applicant shall pay the required parks systems development charges in full, or on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. The Parks Department had no other comments beside specifying the system development charge. C. Woodburn Subdivision Standards 1. Section 6(2): No tentative plan for a proposed subdivision and no tentative plan for a proposed partition and replat shall be approved unless: (a) The streets and roads are laid out so as to conform to the plans of subdivisions and partitions already approved for adjoining property as to width, general direction and in all other respects unless the City or County determines it is in the public interest to modify the street or road pattern. STAFF COMMENT: All proposed lots will front on Aztec Drive which is a public street that has been improved with pavement, curb and gutter. The planned right-of-way width of Aztec Drive is 60 feet. The portion of the right-of-way in front of the proposed subdivision is only 20 feet wide from centerline. An additional 10 feet shall be dedicated to the ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 12 '"11'" 9B City. Sidewalks are required and shall be installed at the time each lot is developed. Sidewalks shall be constructed adjacent to property lines and one street tree per lot provided in the parkway strip. (b) Streets and roads held for private use are clearly indicated on the tentative plan and all reservations or restriction relating to such private roads and streets are set forth thereon. STAFF COMMENT: No private roads or easements are proposed with this application. (c) The tentative plan complies with the applicable zoning ordinances and regulations and the ordinances or regulations adopted under ORS 92.044 that are then in effect for the City. STAFF COMMENT: The tentative plan complies with applicable zoning, subdivision, and access management ordinances of the City and with applicable regulations adopted under ORS 92.044 as discussed in those specific sections of this report. 2. Section 7 Procedure For Subdivisions STAFF COMMENT: Sufficient information has been submitted by the applicant to adequately review the proposed subdivision. 3. Section 12 (A) General Street Standards STAFF COMMENT: Aztec Drive is an existing improved street right- of-way and provides street access to the proposed lots. The planned right-of-way width of Aztec Drive is 60 feet. The portion of the right-of-way in front of the proposed subdivision is only 20 feet wide from centerline. An additional 1 0 feet shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks are required and shall be installed at the time each lot is developed. 4. Section 13 (B) Lots: All lots shall have a minimum size of the zoning district in which they are located. In cul-de-sacs the minimum lot line ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 13 9B fronting the turnaround shall be 40 feet... and in no case shall the lot width be less than 60 feet at the buildina line... The minimum size for various types of lots shall be given in the following table: Type of Lot Corner lot Interior lot (fronting one street) Flag Lot ' Double Frontage (fronting two streets) Minimum Width 80 feet 60 feet 30 feet 60 feet STAFF COMMENT: All lots in the proposed subdivision will meet the minimum lot area and width standards. D. Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) STAFF COMMENT: Aztec Drive is classified as a local residential street on the TSP. The policies and recommendations of the TSP are implemented through the Woodburn Zoning, Subdivision, and Access Management Ordinances. The proposed subdivision has been designed in compliance with these ordinances or conditions of approval have been attached to this application to ensure such compliance as discussed in the sections of this report pertaining to each ordinance. E. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance (AMO) Section 18. Connectivity A. The street system of a proposed subdivision shall be designed to coordinate with existing, proposed, and planned streets outside of the subdivision as provided in this section. B. Local residential access streets shall connect with surrounding streets to permit the convenient movement of traffic between residential neighborhoods or facilitate emergency access and evacuation, but such connections shall not be permitted where the effect would be to encourage the use of such streets by substantial through traffic. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision is located on Aztec Drive which is an existing local residential street. The subdivision will not create a new street and each lot will take direct access from the existing street. The applicant will be required to dedicate 10 ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 14 '"!r 9B feet of street right-of-way to provide a 60 foot street right-of-way. The 10 feet to be dedicated is shown on the preliminary plan. VI. COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS: Attachment A - Public Works Department Attachment B - Parks Department VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this report, the findings required to approve the proposed annexation, zone change, subdivision and variance applications can be made. Staff recommends approval of these applications subject to the following conditions of approval: Annexation and Zone Change: 1 . Provide Planning Staff with a copy of a detailed description and map of the new boundaries prior to the City Council hearing. This will be necessary for the City Recorder. Subdivision and Variance: 2. Subdivision and Variance approval is subject to approval of the annexation and zone change. 3. Approval shall be as shown on Attachment "C" - Preliminary Subdivision Map, dated August 5, 1999. The final plat must be in substantial conformity with the tentative plan for the subdivision and shall be platted according to standard surveying practices. The applicant shall submit a copy of the final plat map to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to recordation with Marion County. The final plat shall be approved by the Community Development Director and recorded with the Marion County Recorder. 4. Following recordation with Marion County, provide three (3) copies of the final plat to the Planning Department. Building permits shall not be issued until said copies are submitted to the Planning Department. 5. The applicant shall comply with residential lot standards. 6. Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 15 9B building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with residential setback and lot coverage requirements. Any new fencing will also be reviewed for compliance with residential standards prior to permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall comply with Woodburn Subdivision Standards. 8. Meet Chapter 10 Off-Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards. Each lot shall comply with the single family driveway standards. 9. This variance allows the existing shop building on Lot 1 to cover up to a maximum of 30% of the rear yard area. 10. This variance shall be valid for the life of the existing shop building on Lot 1. This variance shall be null and void if the shop building is demolished or removed. 11. The use of the shop building on Lot 1 shall be limited to uses allowed in the RS zone and not be used for commercial or industrial purposes. 12. This variance shall be exercised within one year of the date the annexation is effective. Exercised shall mean that a building permit is issued for a dwelling on Lot 1. 13. Parks System Development Charges shall be payed in full prior to recordation of the final plat, or on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. 14. Any conditions attached to this approval shall be conditions on the issuance of a building permit. A violation of the conditions shall be considered a violation of the applicable ordinance. Public Works Conditions: 15. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards. 16. Existing on-site water wells or sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned in accordance with state regulations. 17. The applicant is responsible for obtaining permits from any other agencies that may require approval or permit. ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 16 'I!' 9B 18. This development shall not cause storm water runoff to be impounded on adjacent properties. 19. Property owner shall enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6, prior to acceptance of the final plat. Also, prior to construction of the subdivision, the City will require approved construction plans, a performance bond and payment of construction permit fees. 20. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn Standards and all State Building Codes. 21. Dedicate to the City an additional 1 0 feet of right-of-way adjacent to this subdivision along Aztec Drive. 22. The asphaltic concrete street surface of Aztec Drive adjacent to this subdivision shall be milled to a depth of 1 %" of class "C" mix, after all of the services have been installed to the proposed lots. 23. Sidewalks conforming to City standards shall be installed adjacent to each lot at the time of building construction. Sidewalks shall be constructed adjacent to property lines and one street tree per lot provided in the parkway strip in conformance with City street tree standards. 24. Only two 6" diameter sewer services are stubbed to the parent parcel. The remaining sanitary services shall be installed by the applicant. Open cut will be allowed in the existing street, subject to the above requirement for milling and inlaying with AC. 25. If Lot 1 is used for commercial purposes, a backflow device shall be required. 26. Comply with fire protection requirements of the Woodburn Fire District. 27. Prior to any construction, a reproducible mylar of the final plat shall be filed with the Public Works Department after all required signatures have been obtained and the plat has been recorded with Marion County. ANX 99-03, ZMC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 17 41+td: k lVl~r 11-- II 9B SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROMISED LAND I. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards 2 On-site existing water wells and subsurface sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned in accordance with state regulations. 3. The applicant, not the city is responsible for obtaining pennits from any other agencies that may require approval or permit. 4 This development shall not cause storm water runoff to be impounded on adjacent properties. 5. The Subdivision shall be platted in accordance with standard surveying practice, approved and recorded with Marion County. 6. The owner applicant shall be required to enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6, prior to acceptance of the fmal plat. Also prior to construction of the subdivision commencing the city will require approved construction plans, a performance bond and construction permit fee's paid. 7. All work shall conform to the City ofWoodbum Standards and all State Building Codes. STREET AND DRAINAGE: 1. Dedicate to the city an additional 10 feet of right -of- way adjacent to this subdivision, along Aztec Drive. 2. The asphaltic concrete street surface of Aztec Drive adjacent to this subdivision shall be milled to a depth of 1 V2 and inlaid with 1 W' of class "C" mix, after all of the services have been installed to the proposed lots. 3. Sidewalks conforming to city standards will be installed adjacent to each lot at the time of building construction. SANITARY SEWER: 1. Only Two six inch diameter sewer services are stubbed to the parent parcel, the remaining sanitary services will need to be installed by the applicant. Open cut will be allowed in the existing street, subject to the above requirement requiring milling and inlaying with AC. WATER: 1. If the existing lot currently being used as a commercial use and the use is to remain the same a backflow device will be required. 2. Water service can be provided from the existing water main on the south side of A71ec Drive. 3. Fire protection requirements shall be as per the Woodburn Fire Districts conditions of approval. 'IT 4f/c..chl'Y1(jl1f 8 9B SUBDIVISIONI SITE PLAN REVIEW - PRE-APPLICA TIONI NOTES ------------------------------------------ REQUEST DATE: July 22, 1999 DEPARTMENT: Planning CONTACT PERSON: Jim Mulder, Planning Department, 982-5246 APPLICANT: Tony Caragol TYPE OF PROJECT: Annexation of 1.3 acres, Zone change from County zoning to RS, and Subdivision to create 6 lots from 2 existing lots. PROJECT LOCATION: North side of Aztec Drive, east of Hwy. 99; Map NO.5 1 W 17BA TL4400, 4500, 4600 CONFERENCE PLACE: Conference Room Woodburn City Hall Date: August 4, 1999 TIME: 2:00 p.m. GENERALINFORMA TION TO APPLICANT I have read the information sheet provided me and understand that which is pertinent to my Site Plan Review/Pre-Application request. All materials are to be collated and folded. Signature - Owner/Agent DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1> t=' / L rM A.d 3L I. ~,' t::. tf 2, ~ <1 <6 . 0 0 A(l-.~ ,,<.t.-S - l€ L1. "\.,' 1"";) X /1) _ ""\.-, W (t()O ~'.l ~ k( ~ ~ "1-t oCc.t t--s. /), /l-4t:r ~ THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED AFTER PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: 1) Eight (8) copies of Final Plan must be brought into Public Works 2) "As Builts" must be provided prior to issuance of the building permit Blank SPAPAE fOAM \ \ \ II \ j: . \ . ~ '\ t:\ '\~, ~ i~ ' ~ i \ \ :\ ., ~\\'!4 \ \3:\:\~ ~, ~\~ i~g _, 0 ~ 0 N \ ~ ; l-~,n;d - n I "( \ ,)c \ I \ J _ -. ~ ...... . '" r- '.. ~:t o;l1 III n, g II> ~ r- "'H.:::~ !~~~n, , "'~ ;i'~C'l - ~-...... : ~~~ :;. ~~~ 'Q ii'.,~ ~ ...~IIl ...... , ; I'i~~ l! -:~~~~' ~ ~ ~ - ~.... "'~ 'Qr DI> 0-< , ... - D ,~ r <D- O'" IV - ... (' , ..(. '/, N~'3\ 40 W ,.0 00 ;;. \71 6A Po 11' ~ -- 1"1 -.0'- ~ , l~fO~ l"lt:tO <J' 0 H"nt) VI ~ .ri ~ - . E~- ~ ~ " l)~~lJ___ ' ;;\ z '" -" 0 '0, ,. ," - , ''-' ~ " J ,\. \ ~ " --~-''-''::- ~; v. " ~ o ~ ~ 129 - qq ,- s '" o ~,- :~ ::. O. 159.68 69 691 30' \(.SS I I I I -. I II ~. I 11 ! ~ ~ ! ~ l~oZ ~ "'"' VI l,I) ", VI Z ~ 11 ~ :0 ~ 11 ~ ~ 2 F' "' NS"31 .ton", ~_ 29 69 ':: z t>> ~ S '" "' '" : ; lJ - (7) C. mLJlm ::E ZhZ Z Ol\)m m IJ "- t> U U r )~ ~~ ii -0 n :::: · .t .ll ~~ ~. ~ ii IClICl '" ~~ ~t ~ ~.. ..... .. .;:" iE' t iw .~ ; "'..... Z"' ~~ :~ .;) "..-- ....r ~~ ii ~ ..8 ,.. <c -.. .ft\ If.:= :=If. ~; ~~ ~! ~i C> "'. o ~, D'" ~ ~< _0 7 i~ il!~ i ::li'l - 9B ~~:= ~ ~...~ I o -< ..~.ll< -< l"'l't\ ... "'~ 9 -.- ~~~ ~ ~ ;j~ W7' z~o <C>'T1 'T1 < r- ll' 1> nl leI r 11 ~ J I f- . ~ n 1 )- /" ~ ), ~:; no 7 <cr ~~ - ". .,. L CJ lJ 1.... ~-1 --'J L----- .~c. n ~ <-< ~-< n I ~o Z'TJ .... --<~ -<0 o 3:0 l> W. UC D Z r"t) OD no Jot. .....m .....n 0,-< Z v.n Z2". ........4 ~~g ~~~~ s [JUl ~ ~~ .--1 ~. '---1 ~~ c==; t---< c= ~ UUi ~ ~ c; :;: rTI o ~ , Z n -1 t-iI -1m -< -1 OI 'lm ~z O~ :t>0 CO....,. G) OJ'-.... CC.D. (f):D -1Z0 . " Ul 3::(f) ~ ....,.:t>m LD:Dn ~ LDt-i-1 LD 0 t-i ZO cg Z n 0""" ~ C'-J Z' -1 -< -1 c:: . Ul @ O' TI(f) m. [N G)' 0 ~ ZIJ ~ ~ ~ ~ "c II 9B NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NATURE OF APPLlCA TION/PROPOSED USE: Annexation of 1.3 acres, Zone Change from County Zoning (UTF) to Residential (RSl, Subdivision to create 6 lots from two lots on the north side of Aztec Drive and Variance from lot coverage of rear yard. APPLICANT: Tony Caragol 489 SW 1 s1 Ave. Canby, OR 97013 PROPERTY OWNER: Gene Koffler 1542 Big Valley Way Reno, NV 89511 LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The subject property is generally located on the north side of Aztec Drive east of Highway 99E. It can be identified specifically on Marion County Assessor Map T5S, 1 W, 1 7BA Tax lot #4400, 4500, 4600. HEARING DATEITIME: September 9, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. LOCATION: Woodburn City Hall, Council Chambers DECISION MAKER: Woodburn Planning Commission APPLICABLE ORDINANCE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CRITERIA: 11 WOODBURN ZONING ORDINANCE Chapter 8. General Standards Chapter 9. Residential Standards Chapter 10. Off-Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards Chapter 13. Variance Procedures Chapter 15. Zone Change Procedures Chapter 22. Single Family Residential District Chapter 39. Mandatory Parkland Dedication or Cash-in-lieu of 2) WOODBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Residential land Development Policies Housing Goals & Policies Annexation Policies Public Service Goals and Policies and Plan (19851 Transportation Goals and Policies Growth and Urbanization Policies 3) WOODBURN SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 4) WOODBURN LANDSCAPING PO~ICIES AND STANDARDS 51 WOODBURN ACCESS MANAG"EMENT ORDINANCE 6) WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN INFORMATION: a) A copy of the application. all documents. and evidence relied upon by applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be available at a reasonable cost. b) A copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least 7 days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost. 9B c) Any person wishing to speak either for or against this proposal may do so in person or by an attorney at the public hearing. d) Written comments may be filed with the Planning Director or submitted into the record at the time of the public hearing. e) The failure of an issue to be raised in a hearing, in person or by letter, or failure to provide statements or evidence sufficient to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue precludes appeal to the land Use Board of Appeals based upon that issue. PLEASE CONTACT THE FOllOWING REPRESENTATIVE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: JIM MULDER, WOODBURN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 270 MONTGOMERY STREET, WOODBURN, OREGON 970710 (503) 982-5246. lJ~G\DlJ & lJO\Yl~ ~O:=& 11 ~OO@[M]O@~[Q) 0:=&~[Q) ---. ....-'- ......L."'!...!:'. ......... l' '.....0 '" 'rr:;~.J:. ..~t\::..r:=~..( - -_.._".::\.;".:=:... ==--~.t.r 1""100(. a:s= =~ :.:t:Iq: ::.,::...".."'" =~-'::~~~I~ -."'~'I" :r---" - fir ~""'I'" LOCATED IN THE THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17. T.5.S.. R.1.W. W M CITY OF WOODBURN. MARION COUNTY. OREGON AUGUST 5. 1999 <' ---n- \ ..- PROJEC T t ~ LOCATION ~- ~ ------. QtlIrEA/APPlI (:"N 1 GENE ...()frLE~ tS42 81& VAllE.' ....". REHQ NV ago; : : NOf.l~1- , .~: 'i:: C I TV-OF wOOliilURN VICINlTY NAP ...1"0116[ ~ '. ~\ LEGENO ~t -< , ~ :\ :\ ,r.1. . C - ".'10<:" ~ ~ '\ ~ _._._ SAMI'UI" S(OIl("'-tlo( _,.,_ ,'l)lIlMS(OIl(IIIl.INf _._._ ...l(lIll.l" 10_11"""" 'S(tl(A .......o<.( (..tc.. ...SI" _" . ;_ ~~ :~;:;='~.UI:.:"ON ~.. :~.. =- '_~ t1 __'_ . t.................t\.Iool. ..'01 ~ t)l -~ --.~.--.--:- .-- - -~.--. 'Q ': AZlEC DRIVE .. .'-' ' -------- \ ~\ \ n, ' ........ ,,>c \ ," 1 ." ~ ~ I ~ . 11\" . , ~\':--:c: ~~1;) ~'-=3 "ILHfLH fNG1NffRING. lNl ("~ "N(, (""J~ERS ~ W!Il'O'f.QAS .':'::1: .~;.:::r..:, _ """ .."I.J. .... ...,. .,......, l,'EQ LiSt PR[-Pl.l PRO_' q9Q? J 9B tr REC'O -tr ANNEXATION INFORMATION SHEET I. DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: JUN 2 9 1999 'T'rm y (' rl R II r,n T. (NAME) V'~:COt~':'.dl~' ~ ~ ,~. ',: 0.' : '. , DE\,,' ":'L'j~-':: _ 1_ ~- xxxtxxx 489 SW 1st Ave. (ADDRESS) 503-266-6861 (TELEPHONE) Canby (CITY) OR (STATE) 97013 -- (ZIP CODE) II. PROPERlY OWNERS: r,pnp Knfflpr NAME (PLEASE PRINT OR lYPE) 1542 Bia Valley W~y _. Reno.NV 8951 ADDRESS & ZIP CODE III. LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE PROPERTY: Aztec Drive, Woodburn, OR 97071 1.3 acres ****************************************************************************** APPLICATION CHECKLIST ~ NO OFFICE USE ONLY ANNEXATION PETITION SIGNED, (NOTORIZED SIGNATURES) BY PROPERTY OWNERS EXHIBITS: 1. REASON FOR ANNEXATION REQUEST (Exhibit "A") 2. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF AREA (Exhibit "B") 3. EXISTING CONDmONS OF AREA (Exhibit "O? 4. SCHOOL IMPACT ANALYSIS (Exhibit 11011) 5. PARK AND RECREATION FACIUTlES AVAILABIUlY (Exhibit "E'~ 6. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY (Exhibit "P~ 7. PLOT P~N (Exhibit IIG") 8. UST OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PROPERTY (Exhibit 'HIl) Y _ 9. ASSESSOR'S MAP (Exhibit 11111) Y _ ****************************************************************************** / ;;z= ~- d//= ~= SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: DATE: annl'x.bs/bw 9B Exhibit "A" June 14,1999 Subdivision name "PROMISED LAND" The intent of this application, is to change the zone from Marion County-Urban Transition Farm (UTF), to City of Woodburn-Residential Single Family (RS). This is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. This application will divide a 1.3 acre tract of land into six large single family residential lots. This property borders Woodburn City limits on the south, west and east and is within the Urban Growth Boundary. The zoning does conform to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. City services including water, sewer and storm drainage are located on Aztec Drive. Phone and pwer are available and will need to be extended. 9B Exhibit "B" PROMISED LAND All properties to the north, south, east and west of subject are developed. The owner intends to sell the lots as soon as possible for single family dwellings. (See site plan) 9B Exhibit lie" PROMISED LAND Land area- 1.3 ACRES The ground is flat, typical to the area with only wild grasses and weeds growing. Drainage is typical for the area with no flooding. Sewer is available to all lots along Aztec Drive and phone and power are available. Immediately to the south, east and north are existing single family residences and to the west is a commercially zoned property previously housing Neal's Framery. 9B Exhibit "0" PROMISED LAND The nearest school to the subject is Washington Elementary approximately 1/8th of a mile northwest. It is conceivable that an average of two children per lot or twelve children maximum could enter the school district. 9B B. What is the expected student population of the area upon completion of the development: 5. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES Exhibit lip A. Is there sufficient area to provide for park or open space for the development: 6. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPRlY Exhibit lip 7. PLOT PLAN: Show all properties within 250' from and parallel to the subject property and the land use of each. Exhibit'IG" 8. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF ALL PROPERlY OWNERS (husband and wife) within 250' from an parallel to the subject property. Obtain certified list and map from title company and attach. Exhibit ItHI 9. ASSESSOR'S MAP. Attach copy of Marion County Assessor's Map showing subject area and outlining 250' notification area. Exhibit "l" We the undersigned, hereby certify that all the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith are true and complete, and we are the owners of record or contract purchasers of property which the annexation is requested: \CS42 '~I Q II uJ ,f\.:::> R.~1 0 f'j9 "09 t. ~ ~ UAA-~ ~. - -~ ?I (). scrs ( I .~1t ;f2:1~ annex,bslbw \ Ao-~_...,--,.-, '. .................. ~\ ,.' _ ., IORI MENDENHALL r "., '., '. - Neb' . '"/';.$1019 of Navodo ',~, ~ - API - TIOnt No. 9006732 I '...~r,.., My .\1'1" ElCpIr8S Mor 1.2000 . l -f'_ ,. .. f"'-.'-/ ...... '-.. -.. --""'" - --- - ,. ~ l; I \ \ \ (_ ' . · __ v- I r -', r'- <~. I ( ( '--II l VI. VVUUUUUI~IIi, Uhl:uUIII ANNEXATION PETITION AND CONSENT 9B We, thc undcrsigncd Icgal owncr or contract purChascr and resident clcctors of a ccrtain parcel of land herein described and attached to this Annexation Petition 2S Exhibit I, petition the Honorable Mayor and City Council of Woodburn for anncxation of that ccrtain property to the City of Woodburn. We further desire that by this petition that the certain property be annexed to and be included within the corporate limits of the City of Woodburn, OrC\lon, a municipal corporation, and we do hCteby consent to such annexation, without the necessity of any election being called with the area above described, and we do hereby consent that the City Council of the City of Woodburn, Oregon, take steps as arc necessary to determine whether or not the said above described area shall be annexed. Resident Electors means Registered Voters (\~ ~a.d"- STATE OF OFU:GON COUNlY OF MARIeN uJ 8.611 G'-- I. G..::" ~\"\.V1.ci ~ ^- l- L Ci I' . being duly sworn upon oath, say that I secured each name appearing on the within and foregoing petition, and each name was signed freely, voluntarily, without undue influence of any nature and under no misrepresentation as to the facts, further affirm, that to the best of my knowledge the individuals above named constitute a majority of the e{ectors registered In the territory proposed to be annexed and the owners/contract purchasers of more than half of the land in that territory. (Signaturel di;;:,--,-. .\\~ ~~'- Subscribed and sworn to me this 2 l Absentee Owner(s) or Contract Purchaser(sl: bX;rl!_~ Resident Owner(s) or Contract Purchaser(s) that are Resident Elector(s}.: Resident Electors. that are not Land Owners: 55 ANNEXATION PETITION AND CONSENT ANNEXPCT.693 Address: r '5-'-\ L G Ie) ~ o. U (J uj(l'J ;J09hL) S U~~~ 1-2l no, N J '(/'lS (I ~ /jj),?1? , Address: Address: Date: lc . .2 \ . '\\ day of ~ '--'-1'-,- d6-~ Y\~c::..~~~ NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON- I\tUll..dc-,- My Commission expires: ~. \. C\C) , 1 9 C\<\ LORI MENDENHALL Nolay PublIc. Stole of Nevada Appolnlment No. 9606732 My Appl. ElCplres Mar 1. 2000 ~r'.__............... PETITION FOR ZONE MAP CHANGE, n-. I LOtfl'f1-6/7e-NS7U (f PC/7/'-/ DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: /6 tJ'I CAfZ.A-<::'.:...o~ (NAME) 4 8) -~ w t3S- Avt; (ADDRESS) CAt-JD( (Cm') ..A.. q;''::'""''I' i.,. W " l_e '-J _~. . JUN 2 9 1999 ".....'(I,.....~:I :r....' :'': "',~ OR- (STATE) REQUEST: 9B IY/tP c..y~6C ;;L'=- b - 6 If ~ ( (TELEPHONE c;/}O L~ (ZIP CODE) Id Tr;-- ..J1M--t ~~(,.(, To change I, 0_:) AC of (present zone/present compo plan)'&..l..J ' ~'d>O ~ I"Y~ . - ,. To (desired zone/desired camp. plan)&'S .L.k,~~s such zones are defined by the City of Woodburn Zoning OrdinanCe. OWNERS: NAME (PLEASE PRINT OR lYPE) . ~ lJe f..LD Fr=-I-f5.e_ \1>~ jJ A-j d /'r ^' J f r- ADDRESS & ZIP CODE 15":1'2. 1>)<) Ja ~f~ ~.:ThL R.L&~5~ o.-t!:JC(" 1] ~. t.J~ ~ 11I}.8 LOCA llON AND SIZE OF THE PROPERlY: or if not addressed, then state distance to the nearest intersecting street or know lartdmark. ****************************************************************************** APPLICATION CHECKLIST OFFICE USE ONLY YES ~ V'/ XV' ~/ _/ t- v' 1. 2. 3. 4. Statement of Intent (Exb. A) Plot Plan (Exb. B) Legal Description of the Property Ust of All Property Owners within 250 Feet of the Property Assessors Map 5. NO 9B REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS 1. STATEMENT OF INTENT should discuss/explain the reason this request is made. Include brief description of any proposed construction or land use dlange. show that the request is: 1) in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; 2) there is a public need for this change; 3) that need is best met by this proposal; 4) there is no other available and appropriately zoned land in the vicinity; 5) petitioner's cannot make a reasonable use of the land as it is currently zoned. (See zone change policy considerations). (Mark EXHIBIT IIAj 2. PLOT PLAN: Show all properties within 250' from and parallel to the subject property and the land use of each. Mark EXHIBIT liB". Draw to scale. 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION of the property in metes and bounds (as it appears on the deed); Mark EXHIBIT IIOC, or if property is within a platted subdivision: * Lot: . Block: . of (Subdivision) . *NOTE: If a fraction of the lot, then attach full description as if it were metes and bounds. 4. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF Au.. PROPERlY OWNERS (husband and wife) within 250 feet from and parallel to the subject property. Obtain certified list and map from title company and attach. Mark EXHIBIT liD". 5. ASSESSOR'S MAP. Attach copy of Marion County Assessor's map showing subject area and outlining 25<r notification area Mark EXHIBIT liP! We, the undersigned, hereby certify that all the statements in the plot plan, attachments. and exhibits transmitted herewith are true and complete, and we are the owners of record or contract purchasers of property for which the zone map chanqe is requested: NAME DATE \ '54 L ~ \Cj ~Q llo) J~ - 7~( R~",c f1 J ~br{., iJ -So t/~o..AI EHS f(l'/l'\<' n.') ~I- -<h-~ if 4 ~cId,,~- '.~...&.~ .... .-. ...... .JI-~ .~.. A~.""........;tat.-oIl j 1 ~. I 'fl'/rllNH/" I'~' . ,. .' Nol..... ~."'J1E! ':If NovodO C \,,-~",\. - i<iJi'''''','\~.~n' 1'>10. Qf{y'.J32 l"'~~' ' ,.' I , ,"'\".-:' lOC>O ...~ . "f_... ...... . - ~ .. '.;~ ......... ..... ..",...",,-- . J. \\"(.'..' , \ c... L ,. "I). I ( ( , tr . t I < 1'-, ~ SUBDIVISION/P ARTITION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION oon LG: (N.Y: Rec. By: 9B Date: .A.. '-'i _'- """ ..) AQp. N~3 ;,J hcv! 'P' JUN 2 9 1999 CONCURRENT REVIEWS: ADJUSTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE SUBDIVISION NAME: PRnMT~Rn Ll\.Nn REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTACT PERSON: . ". -", ,:.~:; "I'"~ c~ ZONE MAP AMENDMENT COMPo PLAN AMENDMENT Tony Caragol 266-6861 263-6223 (NAME) (PHONE) (FAX) 489 sw 1st Ave. (ADDRESS) C"rlnhy OR (STATE) CJ7013 (ZIP CODE) (CITY) PROPERTY OWNER:(Please print or type) ADDRESS & ZIP CODE 1. Gene Kodifler 1542 Big Vallp.y WrlY Reno, NV 89511 /2. Certified list, on pre-pasted labels for mailing, with the names and addresses of property owners within 250 feet for a Subdivision and 100 feet for a Partition. /3. REQUEST: .... Give the acreage, number of lots, average lot size and any variances being requested. For example: -To divide 32.6 acres into 74 lots with variances to allow for lot frontage on a cul-de- sac of 38- where 40- is required." 4. The ZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN designation in which the parcel is located. RS :lon~ Woodburn Com.pr~h~nsi"e Pl",i} 5. Describe the location of the property or give the address: 1.3 Acres on north side of Aztec Drive 6. Map No. S IIA/ rrM Tax Lot #(s) 4400,4500 & 4600 7. Attach a written statement, marked Exhibit - A-which explains your reasons for subdividing the land and provides evidence that the request conforms to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Policies. 8. Attach a preliminary plat and narrative which contains the following information (Exhibit "B"): The applicant bears the burden of proof that all approved criteria has been met. 'II nellrlllllary ~UOOIVISIOn (t"artltlonl .....Iat Checklist. (t Date ('>1 Vicinity Map (;4 Area map identifying adjacent structures and lots W Subdivision Name (The name of any proposed subdivision shall not be the same as or similar to any name used . on a recorded plat on the county or city). c<~ Township, range, section, tax lot number(s), acreage of the property to be divided. ~ Attach a legal description(s} of the property. (;{ North arrow, scale (one inch equals 200 feet or .Iarger) W Locations and names of all existing streets within or on the boundary of the proposed subdivision/partition. c{) Locations and names of all proposed streets. <<> Lot (parcel) layout with approximate dimensions, lot(parcel) numbers and areas for all lots . (parcels). Vi Provide a footprint of the buildable area for each lot. (xi Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations in the proposed subdivision (partition) and area adjacent to the proposed subdivision- (partition). K'l Indicate which buildings are to remain and which are to be removed. M Topography within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision/partition. W Locations of drainage ways, flood ways, or floodplain within and adjacent to the proposed s ubd ivis io n/partition. t6 The location and size of all proposed water, sewer, and storm drain lines. c() The location of all proposed fire hydrants. 9B Signatures of each owner (husband and wife) or contract purchaser. NAME .~~ fd~ ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE \S4~ ~\5 ~Cl.llLj ~-lD. 'ttLA(:) ~J e~~l( f)6Yb5 ~ tI~1 ~ /{.J81SJ ~. LORI MENDENHALL . _ Notay Public. Slote of Nevada . ~ - Appointment No. Q608732 . ~ ,- My APPt. Expires Mru 1, 2000 .~~~~ --- -- - ....... ......~. .L \ ( '(' :':'('(~'I ~i...._.-' I\~'~"-'- ~~ "- '.) l.C,\ 08/10/99 13: 58 'lr50J 982 5244 WDBN PUBLIC WKS ~004 9B-- Application: II VO( qq-/b App RlC'd by: Date; Receipt: VARIANCE APPUCATION ^~~~~^^~A^^^^^^^AA~^A^^^^^~^AA^AA^^^A~^^^^^~^^AA^^AA^A^^^^^^^^^^ DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: NAME IDJ--'-I CA-~'2.-A-G-u L-- PHONE: .7--L ~ ~.y (;. ( ADDRESS t_-/ is <j . ~- (I ~---' /"'- ,S V (~_J rb.J-c, C-n t-I /'~ '1 0 /L- ~l 7 t::.' (3 , 1. We, the undersigned applicants. being owners of the property herein described, do hereby make application for permission to (list each variance separately): LeA vc; ~ E)L, j. It ,..J ~ 13 v U-::in 1-J '-' I ~ ~{ d~ (E'-Mflvi:2 PJ..,A-7 j).PcJ 1\.4.( ~eV LA~, LoT I ( 2. Loc8tion of the property (street address, or if not addressed, then state the distance to the nearest intersecting street or known landmark) including the section, range and township: UC-.J (14- CJF ~ ~ ~ i '}; I"..s s _ f2., ( v.J - , w...M~ ........,.",. I ( A ~ 1e c.... . {~ft-\. v"t W ~ ClJ21 S oJ.zz.-I . 0 R..- - I ' ~^jC. Lu ( .. 3. Legal description of the property as it appears on the deed: Map No. Tax Lot #(s) ~t./ () 0 Lot ( , Block , of ~Jk MfJe}) L-k~JLyP-t7P6.sE?P) subdivision. NOTE: If a fraction of the lot, then attach a full description as if it were metes and bounds or attach 8 metes and bounds description. marked "EXHIBIT "A". 4. Zone in which property is loc8ted:J ~ 5. Attach a copy of the applicable Marion County Assessor's Map. Mark "EXHIBIT "sn. 6. Plot plan to be attached, marked "EXHIBIT "C" and inCluding land uses on surrounding lands in notification area, site layout of subject parcel and structures with dimensions and lot lines shown. The plot plan should show clearly the nature of the variance. p~ 3. VARf'R0Ca6193 '.~(~ I 'j~9 :i42AM 'C'!OJ 9825244 WDtltJ Pl'BLIC WKS NC ~o~_ 7. CONDITIONS for GAANTJNG II VA6!ANCE: Submit 8 detailed !it8tement .xplaining why the r.quest is boing m,dl. Address the \tCJrianco ~ or adjustment nppro\tsl criteria given under .Con~dorationse, A.F. Attach and mark 4FXHIBfT eD-, 8. t-IAM~S AND A.DDRESS.eS: Submit ('ij,~t~o..rty own,,,, with'.. 100 feeT 01 the s"bjeo,'s a'Openy bound.r;e, ~~ f' ~-r' \ 4. \:;1~& ~ mO., t r"\j' ~E I~QQJ3ESS &. ZIP CPPJ: _12:c~'? -<.-c4 t'~t9~" PL.-AiJ r~H~~ S. TJ-:i~APPLlCANT(S) ATTEST THA.T: a) The above request dOG. not violet. any deed restrictions that m.y b. .ttached to or imposed upon the lublect pro~rty. b) If the variance appfication Is granted, the appficant wiU exercise tfl4iI right5 granted in accordance with the terms end subJlct to all the conditions end limitations of the approv61 by the Pllnning CommlMlon. c) All the above statements and the $t8~menta In the plot plan, attaohments and exhibits transmitted herewith Ir. true; end the 8pplicant(s) sa acknowledge that any permit issued on the applioation may be revok.ed if it be found that IJny such ~t8tem8nt5 an:! false. DATE: III day of -11u 6- _' '9:1.1 SIGNATURES of f!8ch owner (husbend end wife) or contf8ct pU(eha~er. NAME ~~ ADDRESS &. ZIP CODE /S4:l 13, (,. V Ac.,.L-e.'I WAY . Y1ef,X}~V rg9SI! I Applic~ltion r(!c~i\led: By Date ~8;;j? -r " - '.... """~000e;1V:I 9B d (I t5:t- M dJ (T J:> VARIANCE APPLICATION LOT 1, PROMISED LAND AZTEC DRIVE WOODBURN The subject building has been on the property since the late 1960's and is located on the rear boundary of the proposed lot. The lot is considerably larger by todays standards and after deducting for the building and set backs, the remaining lot size is very close to accomodating a home approximately 50' by 50'. The costs involved in removing the building could make the value in the lot considerably less and actually the building could be of considerable value to a hobbyist. I am aware of other like buildings existing presently on like residential lots in Woodburn and since this building exists already, the applicant was hoping the building would be allowed to remain on the lot. Allowing the building to remain on the lot should have no detrimental impact on adjoining property owners or the public welfare or adversely affect the health or safety of the neighboring properti&.S . 'lr ~rtBl' C- 9B 76.7A' 6.58' 10,01 . 60.00' \:P~ ~tfJ1v~\ ~>P~v o o ~ ('f') o . 0 OJ SHOP 56.A9' . 8.58 " o <1" ~ . ~~ ..... '"J> ~~ , ,.. .0 o FT · \ 0' sd ~ Sf) ~ V/'~-( ('t) ~r-~;;~ ~. ,,~, ' LO'T 2 7792 SO FT . -p, ,co ~ ".' U) " I . .. , . o '~ q ~'(\t ~ ~ en .' ':\0 % \ s- ,t ... . ~;'" 76. 1 \--<0- J.'r. ~ 6 \J \.. Q ~. 60.00' .,- - - ~~ ~ ~ t. S - . I .oe =",. ~t .. .~ .. S 't s - S T, s' STORM SEWER EXISTING = -AZTEC s -- .",,~t' -, ... , ' . '.. . - s - . ' 9B ATTACHMENT "8" Planning Commission Final Order Dated 9/23/99 'IT" \ ' 9B CITY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 . (503) 982-5222 IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF WOODBURN, OREGON ANNEXATION 99-03 ZONE CHANGE 99-04 SUBDIVISION 99-03 VARIANCE 99-10 ) ) ) ) FINAL ORDER WHEREAS, a request was made by Tony Caragol for the Planning Commission to hear a proposal for approval of an annexation of 1.32 acres to the City of Woodburn, a Zone Map change from Marion County Urban Transition Farm (UTF) to City Single Family Residential (RS), a subdivision to create 6 lots from 3 existing parcels, and a variance to the lot coverage requirement for accessory structures in the RS zone, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the matter at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 9, 1999, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the written and oral testimony presented by staff, the applicant, and other interested persons to the proposal, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission closed the hearing, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission moved to recommend the City Council approve Annexation 99-03, Zone Map Change 99-04, and Subdivision 99-03, but recommended that the City Council deny Variance 99-10 without prejudice and instructed Staff to prepare findings and conclusions, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COMMISSION: 1. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Annexation 99- 03, Zone Map Change 99-04 and Subdivision 99-03 and recommends the City Council deny Variance 99-10 without prejudice, based on findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit "A", and subject to conditions of approval contained in Exhibit ItB", which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. Approved: qJ~Jlg Date FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 9B EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Annexation, Zone Map Change and Subdivision: 1. FINDING: The proposed subdivision will not create a neighborhood but will become part of the existing and developing neighborhood in the area. The applicant is proposing no specific community facility due to the very small scale of the 6-lot subdivision. 2. FINDING: The proposed subdivision is designed in compliance with the City of Woodburn Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable ordinances. Additionally, the City of Woodburn's building permit process will assure that the buildings built within this development are established in compliance with applicable City standards and the state of Oregon Building codes. These factors combined will ensure that the proposed development is a quality living environment, and that the development will not seriously deteriorate over time. 3. FINDING: The proposed subdivision, due to its small size, will not include any open space. However, the subdivision will be developed with lots that exceed the minimum 6,000 square foot lot size. The proposed lots will range from 7,791 square feet to 10,238 square feet. The relatively large size of the lots will contribute to a feeling of openness and spaciousness which will enhance the living environment in the area. 4. FINDING: The design of the proposed subdivision is limited by existing street improvements in the area and by the size and shape of the property. The relatively large lots will provide ample yard areas for landscaping to enhance the livability and aesthetics of the neighborhood. 5. FINDING: The subject property is contiguous to the current city limits line on the east, west and south. Because the site is almost an island surrounded by the city, because city facilities are adjacent, and because there is urban development on all sides of it, it cannot be considered "sprawling". 6. FINDING: Lands within the urban growth boundary and outside of the city limits are available for development. The subject property has been planned for residential development. Market conditions and supply of developable land dictate what parcels within the city's planning area are developed. 7. FINDING: The proposed subdivision is being proposed in response to local housing market demand for single family residences. FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 1 ~ 9B 8. FINDING: Sewer, water, and storm drain lines are available to the property. It will be the responsibility of the developer to construct the infrastructure that is needed for this development to occur. 9. FINDING: The conversion of land within the urban growth boundary to a land use that is planned and anticipated by the city's comprehensive plan, subject to public facility improvements and other standards, is acknowledged by the state and therefore conforms with the statewide planning goals. The proposal complies with the policy encouraging in-fill development of developed areas before conversion of urbanizable areas in that the proposed subdivision is adjacent to existing uses developed at urban densities. 10. FINDING: The proposal complies with all requirements of Chapters 8, 9, and 10 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance. 11. FINDING: When property is annexed into the City the property must be rezoned from the County zoning to the City zoning. The zone change is necessary to reclassify the subject property from the current zoning of "Marion County Urban Transition Farm (UTF)" to the City RS (Single Family Residential) zone. The RS zone conforms to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan designation for the property which is Residential <12 units per acre. 12. FINDING: Section 22.010 allows single family dwellings and accessory buildings as permitted uses. All proposed lots are of sufficient size and dimension to accommodate front, rear and side yard setback requirements. All proposed lots will exceed the minimum required area of 6,000 square feet and meet or exceed the minimum required width of 60 feet. 13. FINDING: All proposed lots will front on Aztec Drive which is a public street that has been improved with pavement, curb and gutter. The planned right-of-way width of Aztec Drive is 60 feet. The portion of the right-of-way in front of the proposed subdivision is only 20 feet wide from centerline. An additional 10 feet shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks are required and shall be installed at the time each lot is developed. Sidewalks shall be constructed adjacent to property lines and one street tree per lot provided in the parkway strip. 14. FINDING: The tentative plan complies with applicable zoning, subdivision, and access management ordinances ofthe City and with applicable regulations adopted under ORS 92.044. 15. FINDING: Aztec Drive is an existing improved street right-of-way and provides street access to the proposed lots. The planned right-of-way width of Aztec Drive FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 2 9B is 60 feet. The portion of the right-of-way in front of the proposed subdivision is only 20 feet wide from centerline. An additional 10 feet shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks are required and shall be installed at the time each lot is developed. 16. FINDING: All lots in the proposed subdivision will meet the minimum lot area and width standards. 17. FINDING: Aztec Drive is classified as a local residential street on the TSP. The policies and recommendations of the TSP are implemented through the Woodburn Zoning, Subdivision, and Access Management Ordinances. The proposed subdivision has been designed in compliance with these ordinances or conditions of approval have been attached to this application to ensure such compliance as discussed in the sections of this report pertaining to each ordinance. CONCLUSION: The proposal satisfies all approval criteria relating to the annexation, zone map change and subdivision. Variance: 18. FINDING: The fact that an existing accessory structure will make it difficult to locate a new dwelling on Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision does not in itself result in an unnecessary or unreasonable hardship or practical difficulty. There are viable options that can be implemented in lieu of modifying the requirements of the zoning ordinance such as removing the accessory structure or reducing its size, or design a home which is 24 feet deep or less. In addition, the request for a variance is premature in that this variance should not be requested until such time as a building permit application for a new dwelling is proposed. At that time, the practical difficulties relating to that specific proposal can be better assessed. CONCLUSION: The findings necessary to grant the proposed variance cannot be made and the variance should be denied. The denial should be made without prejudice to allow the applicant to return with a variance request once a building permit application is submitted for a new dwelling on the lot. FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 3 9B EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Annexation and Zone Change: 1. Provide Planning Staff with a copy of a detailed description and map of the new boundaries prior to the City Council hearing. This will be necessary for the City Recorder. Subdivision: 2. Subdivision approval is subject to approval of the annexation and zone change. 3. Approval shall be as shown on Attachment "C" - Preliminary Subdivision Map, dated August 5, 1999. The final plat must be in substantial conformity with the tentative plan for the subdivision and shall be platted according to standard surveying practices. The applicant shall submit a copy of the final plat map to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to recordation with Marion County. The final plat shall be approved by the Community Development Director and recorded with the Marion County Recorder. 4. Following recordation with Marion County, provide three (3) copies of the final plat to the Planning Department. Building permits shall not be issued until said copies are submitted to the Planning Department. 5. The applicant shall comply with residential lot standards. 6. Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with residential setback and lot coverage requirements. Any new fencing will also be reviewed for compliance with residential standards prior to permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall comply with Woodburn Subdivision Standards. 8. Meet Chapter 10 Off-Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards. Each lot shall comply with the single family driveway standards. . 9. The use of the shop building on Lot 1 shall be limited to uses allowed in the RS zone and not be used for commercial or industrial purposes. 10. Parks System Development Charges shall be payed in full prior to recordation of the final plat, or on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. 11. Any conditions attached to this approval shall be conditions on the issuance of a FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 4 9B building permit. A violation of the conditions shall be considered a violation of the applicable ordinance. Public Works Conditions: 12. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards. 13. Existing on-site water wells or sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned in accordance with state regulations. 14. The applicant is responsible for obtaining permits from any other agencies that may require approval or permit. 15. This development shall not cause storm water runoff to be impounded on adjacent properties. 16. Property owner shall enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6, prior to acceptance ofthe final plat. Also, prior to construction of the subdivision, the City will require approved construction plans, a performance bond and payment of construction permit fees. 17. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn Standards and all State Building Codes. 18. Dedicate to the City an additional 1 0 feet of right-of-way adjacent to this subdivision along Aztec Drive. 19. The asphaltic concrete street surface of Aztec Drive adjacent to this subdivision shall be milled to a depth of 1 %" of class "e" mix, after all of the services have been installed to the proposed lots. 20. Sidewalks conforming to City standards shall be installed adjacent to each lot at the time of building construction. Sidewalks shall be constructed adjacent to property lines and one street tree per lot provided in the parkway strip in conformance with City street tree standards. 21. Only two 6" diameter sewer services are stubbed to the parent parcel. The remaining sanitary services shall be installed by the applicant. Open cut will be allowed in the existing street, subject to the above requirement for milling and inlaying with AC. 22. If Lot 1 is used for commercial purposes, a backflow device shall be required. FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 5 9B 23. Comply with fire protection requirements of the Woodburn Fire District. 24. Prior to any construction, a reproducible mylar of the final plat shall be filed with the Public Works Department after all required signatures have been obtained and the plat has been recorded with Marion County. . FINAL ORDER - ANX 99-03, ZC 99-04, SUB 99-03, VAR 99-10 Page 6 9B ATTACHMENT "C" Planning Commission 9/9/99 Minutes 'lr 9B c. Subdivision 99-02 to divide aporoximately 1.8 acres into 9 lots between Ogle and Brown Street south of Parr Road. Variance 99-09 to lot width standards to two flag lots requirement 30 feet rest 15'. Oakwood Subdivision. Wilhelm Enaineering applicant. Break Chairperson Young opened the Public Hearing. Staff read the applicable ORS Statement and provided presentation as reflected in the Staff Report. Staff indicated he concurred with the applicant's rationale to approve this Variance request. He pointed out that Staff comments were not incorporated into the Staff Report because he was unable to review the application. However, they would make sure that any order that would come back to the Planning Commission, if it is favorable to the Variance, that would substantiate the recommendation. The following are two recommendations made by Staff that are not conditions within the existing Staff Report: (1) the applicant can be required to have property line sidewalks so that a planting strip can be allowed; (2) tree plantings in front of each proposed parcel. Staff recommended approval of Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09. Vice Chairperson Cox inquired whether property line or curbside sidewalks are addressed in the Subdivision Ordinance? Staff reported it is not addressed in the Subdivision Ordinance but it does say that sidewalks will be required but it is up to the discretion of Staff and the Commission to determine where those sidewalks can be placed on the property. He added it is a judgement call on each application because there are no particular standards set forth in the Ordinance. Chairperson Young thanked Staff for including the blue prints. He said they are much easier to read than the small condensed versions that they normally get. Vice Chairperson Cox commented that Staff slipped back to incorporating by reference other departments comments in the Staff Report instead of spelling them out in the list of conditions. Staff explained he did not have the opportunity to review this Staff Report once it was developed. If he had seen this he would have had the individual incorporate them into a long list. He said the order will reflect what the previous process has been. Commissioner Lonergan asked if 30 foot access on the flag lots is good enough for the Fire Department? Staff responded yes. He explained the Fire Department's primary concern is making Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 11! 9B sure that we have adequate area for them to access the site and back out and turn around. Chairperson Young commented he did not notice any fire hydrants out at the site. Staff stated those become conditions by the Fire Department and Public Works. Vice Chairperson Cox inquired how to work it into the conditions to require tree plantings in the parking strip? Staff replied it would be worded "tree in front of each individual lot" . He added we would be looking at a total of six trees. There are requirements as to trees that we make allowance for and those trees that we do not allow within the right-of-way under our Ordinance. Vice Chairperson Cox asked if the language of the dedication on the actual plat is done by Public Works? He remarked somebody has to double check and make sure that this reciprocal easement and that the easement for utilities in the flag poles of lots 6 and 7 winds up getting in the dedication language on the plat or by a separate easement document. Staff reported there is one person in the Public Works Department that specializes in just reviewing these plats, conditions of approval and making sure that those things that are stated in the Staff Report are followed through on. Testimony by the Applicant George Wilhelm. Wilhelm Engineering. P.O. Box 561. Woodburn. OR stated he is representing the owners, applicant Greg and Olga Saverchenko. He said they believe the requirement of a minimum width of 40 feet for flag lots severely limits and maybe eliminates the option to use flag lots for unique situations. Mr. Wilhelm further stated the proposed 15 foot access with reciprocal easements will provide adequate width for a 24 foot wide paved access way and still leave room for utility services. He believes the application and exhibits adequately address all of the pertinent criteria for approval. Testimony by Proponents Paul C. Sedoruk. LOCO Design Group. 3400 State St. NE. Salem. OR 97301 represents the Lucky Company that developed Steklov Subdivision. He stated they support the subdivision 100%. However, he expressed concerns based on the conditions of approval with their subdivision. Firstly, he reported their concern with the run off water from this new subdivision draining into the detention pond which is owned and maintained by the Lucky Company. He reported his client is liable for this detention pond and suggested that perhaps the City take ownership and maintenance of the pond. Mr. Sedoruk said it seems like an unfair burden if someone is maintaining a detention pond to allow anyone in the neighborhood that develops this property to Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 'IT" 9B have access to this pond with no additional cost or responsibility that goes along with maintaining and being liable for such a facility. Secondly, he conveyed their concern with Parr Road. Mr. Sedoruk explained that his client has a contract with the City stating that after a year the road has been put in the City will come out and look at the condition of the road. If the road is found to be in good condition, the City will accept the road and release his clients maintenance bonds. He reported in order to develop the new subdivision Parr Road will have to be cut open for water laterals, sewer and storm water connections. He questioned how his client will be relieved of the responsibility of maintaining Parr Road in good stead during that period? They feel a continuance of two weeks to discuss with the City, the Project Engineer and the property owners regarding these issues which at this time, would be in the benefit of the public good. Vice Chairperson Cox asked Mr. Sedoruk if there was a provision placed at the time the detention pond or the road was put in by his client for cost sharing by other properties as they developed to contribute towards the cost of the detention pond? Paul Sedoruk did not believe so. He said they would love to have cost sharing but from what he understands it is too late to ask for that. There was a cost sharing agreement when they did Steklov that even though Brown Road had been approved adjacent to their property that his client had to pay their fair share for Brown Road's improvement. He commented he was not the person representing the Lucky Company during the subdivision of Steklov and did not know why they did not ask for cost sharing at that time. Mr. Sedoruk commented George Wilhelm was the engineer on record and perhaps he could explain why cost sharing was overlooked. Opponents None Applicant Rebuttal George Wilhelm stated he felt Mr. Sedoruk's issue is with the City. As far as his representation with the Lucky Company, they did negotiate with the City on the detention pond and as far as he knows they did receive some concessions. He added the Lucky Company does have an obligation to provide for a storm water that is upstream from their property. Mr. Wilhelm said it is his understanding that this hearing tonight is primarily to consider testimony with regards to the land use issues and although he appreciates the comments from the Lucky Company and their representatives, he thinks they need to address City policies, standards and ordinances at a different time and place. Mr. Wilhelm remarked the applicant he represents tonight will comply with all of the City's appropriate ordinances. Vice Chairperson Cox asked if the development of this subdivision will change the natural course of the surface water flow and divert it into the Lucky Company's subdivision? Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 II" 9B George Wilhelm replied it will not. He added he believes Parr Road is designed so that the adjacent property will drain onto Parr Road. There will be some drainage that now goes onto Parr Road that will continue to go there as a result of this development. Mr. Wilhelm further commented it is his understanding that Public Works does have a condition that any cuts made in Parr Road, the applicant for this subdivision will be required to grind down the asphalt an 1'Y:z inch and replace a whole new surface along there. Chairperson Young announced we are looking at Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99- 09 and therefore not really prepared to go beyond that because they do not have information on it. Additionally, it has been noted and it is in the record. He suggested perhaps the Lucky Company discuss the issue with Staff at a later time. Staff stated if additional documents or evidence are provided by any party, the Planning Commission may allow any party a hearing, a continuance of the hearing or leave the record open to allow the party a reasonable opportunity to respond. Vice Chairperson Cox remarked Mr. Sedoruk has the right to submit new evidence if he wants to but if he just wants time to talk, the Commission will not stop him from talking to Staff or to the applicant. Chairperson Young interjected as part of the order at any public hearing you have the opportunity to submit other evidence for five days afterwards. Vice Chairperson Cox asked Mr. Sedoruk if he is willing that the Public Hearing be closed? Paul Sedoruk replied affirmatively. He stated they just wanted their concerns stated for the record. Chairperson Young closed the Public Hearing. Discussion Vice Chairperson Cox stated it is a good application. He remarked the Commission has no authority over the issues raised by Mr. Sedoruk on behalf of Lucky Company. If there were some decision for the City to take over the detention pond, the decision would have to made initially by Public Works and then approved by City Council. Vice Chairperson Cox stated the new project will be required to take good care of the pavement and will have their own separate obligations in addition to the obligations that the original builder of the street had. He does not foresee any problems sorting those two things out at the Staff level. Commissioner Bandelow has no objections to the project and stated it fits in with what is going in that end of town. Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 9B Commissioner Heer concurred and sees no problems with the 30 foot driveway. Commissioner Lonergan stated he has no problems with the applicant or the project but he personally does not like flag lots. He sees cramming a lot of homes to a small piece of area and would like to see a cul-de-sac or something better. Chairperson Youna expressed his concerns with the requirements for the trees being in the sight view. He added the street will have circulation at some point in time but sees no other way to change the configuration. He also stated he does not like flag lots but he thinks it works well in this situation because these lots are much larger than the lots in some of the surrounding developments. Commissioner Heer moved to accept the Staff Report on Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 with the added conditions of the landscaping and the property line sidewalks and Staff will return with an order. Vice Chairperson Cox seconded the motion. Motion carried with Commissioner Lonergan voting No. Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 1'1't' 9C Community Development MEMORANDUM 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Date: October 21, 1999 Mayor & City Council thru City AdministratorJe11f' To: From: Planning Commission Subject: Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 At their hearing of September 9, 1999 the Planning Commission reviewed a request to approve an application for a subdivision to divide approximately 1.8 acres into 9 lots. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Variance to the flag lot width standards for Lots 6 & 7. On September 23, 1999, the Planning Commission approved an order for Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 based on findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit "A" and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit "B". In regards to this proposal, the City Council has the following options: (1) Concur with the Planning Commission's Final Order and approve Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09. (2) Modify the Commission's Final Order. (3) Deny Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09. It is recommended the City Council instruct Staff to prepare an ordinance to substantiate your decision. Attachments: Exhibit "A" Planning Commission September 9, 1999 Staff Report Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Final Order dated September 23, 1999 Exhibit "C" Planning Commission September 9, 1999 Minutes '"11"'" J 9C ATTACHMENT "A" Planning Commission 9/9/99 Staff Report '11 <t;) Q.-,-q'q'W v 9C CITY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 STAFF REPORT SUBDIVISION 99-02 VARIANCE 99-09 APPLICANT: Wilhelm Engineering Inc. 1771 Mt. Jefferson Ave. Woodburn, OR 97071 II OWNER: Grigory & Olga Saverchenko 2785 Pacific Highway Hubbard, OR 97032 III NATURE OF THE APPLICATION: The applicant has submitted an application for a subdivision to divide approximately 1.8 acres into 9 lots in the city of Woodburn. The owners of the subject property have proposed to name the subdivision "Oakwood". In addition, the applicant is requesting a variance to flag lot width standards for lots 6 & 7. Subdivision standards require a flag lot to be 30 feet wide, the applicant is requesting 15 feet. IV RELEVANT FACTS: Land area: Approximately 1.8 acres The applicant's site is within ~he City Limits, approximately 30 feet southwest of the intersection of Luba street & Parr Road. The property can be identified specifically as Tax Lots #8000,8100,8201, 5S, 1 W, Section 18CB. One single family residence is located on the subject site as identified by lot 1. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 1 I1r 9C V RELEV ANT APPROVAL CRITERIA: A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5 Permits and Enforcement Chapter 6 Planning Commission Chapter 7 Public Hearing Chapter 8 General Standards Chapter 9 Residential Standards Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards Chapter 13 Variance Chapter 22 Single Family Residential District Chapter 39 Mandatory Parkland Dedication or Cash in Lieu C. Woodburn Subdivision Ordinance D. Woodburn Transportation System Plan A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan STAFF COMMENT: The applicable comprehensive policies have been addressed by the implementing ordinances of the adopted subdivision standards, zoning ordinance and any other ordinances in affect at the time of approval. B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8 General Standards Section 8.010 Minimum Street Width. STAFF COMMENT: The applicant's proposal will access onto an existing street ( Parr Road) that meets city standards. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 2 11'"' 9C Section 8.1 90 Vision Clearance STAFF COMMENT: Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with vision clearance standards. Chapter 9 Residential Standards STAFF COMMENT: Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that the building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with residential set back requirements. Any new fencing will also be reviewed for compliance with this section prior to permit issuance. Section 9.045. Front Yard Setback. Every building shall setback from lot lines adjacent to streets at least 20 feet...When by this Ordinance or any other ordinance a greater setback or a front yard of greater depth is required than specified in this section, then such greater setback line or front yard depth shall apply. STAFF COMMENT: A condition of approval is that the applicant shall comply with the required front yard setbacks. Chapter 1 0 Off Street Parking, Loading and Driveway Standards Section 10.080 Driveway Standards STAFF COMMENT: A condition of approval is that each lot will be subject to single family driveway standards. Chapter 13 Variance Procedures Section 13.020 Conditions for granting a variance (a) That there are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships or practical difficulties which can be relieved only by modifying the literal requirements of the ordinance; SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 3 rrr 9C APPLICANT COMMENT: Requiring 30 foot wide drives for each lot would waste valuable residential land, a 60 foot access to serve two residential lots is a needless waste of residential property. The proposed 15' lot frontages for lots 6 and 7 with reciprocal easements would combine together to form a 30 foot access which would be sufficiently wide to permit a 24' paved driveway to both flaglots. The city driveway standards ordinance requires that where. the property frontage is 30' or less the maximum driveway width is 12 feet. The proposed 30' easement has sufficient width for utilities to access the two lots. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings or use referred to in the application,which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land, buildings, or uses in the same district; however, non-conforming land uses or structures in the vicinity shall not in themselves constitute such circumstances or conditions; APPLICANT COMMENT: The flaglots are created be dividing a land locked parcel which, otherwise would have no roadway access. This parcel is approximately 100' removed from a public street. Requiring the pole section of flag lots to meet the lot width requirement defeats the generally accepted purpose for flaglots (to provide a means to develop residential property where the geometry is difficult.) Creating an access easement to these properties which is larger than necessary would remove buildable land from the adjoining lots to the east and west, and place it in non buildable areas as part of access to lots 6 and 7. The proposed variance provides adequate access while using the residential land efficiently in spite of difficult geometry. (c) That granting the application will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the premises; APPLICANT COMMENT: Granting this application will in no way be detrimental or hazardous to the public welfare. The proposed plat provides adequate access and turn around for fire and emergency vehicles. This configuration will make the area more visually pleasing by reducing driveway area which is generally not as aesthetically pleasing as home landscaping. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 4 ~ 9C (d) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the petitioner; APPLICANT COMMENT: The variance will allow the petitioner to create lots in this subdivision which are consistent in size with the lots of the surrounding area and reflective of the property zoning. Without the variance the applicant would lose one lot which would significantly reduce the density for this plat. (e) That the granting of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, adversely affect the health or safety of persons working or residing in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant; and APPLICANT COMMENT: Granting of this application will not compromise the health or well being of the citizens working or living in the surrounding community. Adequate access and turnarounds are provided for fire and emergency vehicles. If the variance is approved, this development would be similar to recent developments in the area. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. (f) That the granting of the application will be in general harmony with the intent and purpose of this ordinance and will not adversely affect any officially adopted comprehensive plan. APPLICANT COMMENT: Granting of this application would be in accordance with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. Although there is confusion as to ordinances that may apply to flaglots, the zoning ordinances clearly allow for flaglots. The variance is required because there is a section of the subdivision standards that requires a 30 foot minimum width for flaglots and that is being interpreted a applying to the pole or access section. It may be appropriated to clarify the interpretation to apply to the body of the lot and in particular at the building line. Approval of this variance will allow practical application of flaglots to provide density consistent with the zoning ordinance. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 5 - TIf' 9C Chapter 22 Single Family Residential District Section 22.010 Allowed Uses Within the RS Single Family Residential District no building, structure, or premises shall be used, arranged or designed to be used except for one or more of the following uses: (a) Single Family Dwelling STAFF COMMENT: The proposed subdivision and single family residences are an allowed use. Section 22.040 Height. In an RS District, no building or structure shall exceed 35 feet or two and one-half stories in height... Section 22.050 Rear Yard. There shall be a rear yard on every lot in an RS District which shall have a minimum depth of 24 feet for a one-story building, 30 feet for a two-story building and 36 feet for a two and one-half story building. In the case of a corner lot, the minimum depth shall be 14 feet for a one-story building, 20 feet for a two-story building and 26 feet for a two and one-half story building. Section 22.060 Side Yards. There shall be a side yard on each side of the main building on every lot in an RS District in width not less than five feet for a one-story building, nor less than six feet for a two or two and one-half story building. Section 22.070 Front Yard. Every building erected, constructed, or altered in an RS District shall conform to the front yard setback set forth in Section 9.040. Section 22.080 Lot Area and Width. In an RS District the minimum requirements for lot area shall be 6,000 square feet for each dwelling... SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 6 '1r 9C STAFF COMMENT: Each of the proposed lots meet the 6,000 square foot minimum lot area requirement as shown by the applicant on the preliminary plat. The side and rear yard setbacks specified in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance vary according to the height of the proposed home. If the applicant proposes to build two story homes, then greater side and rear setbacks are required. The applicant is requesting a variance to the flag lot width requirement for lots 6 and 7. The existing residence meets the side yard setback requirements. Chapter 39 Parkland Dedication and Cash-in-lieu STAFF COMMENT: The System Development Charge for park purposes is $483 per lot. A condition of approval specifies that the applicant shall pay the required parks systems development charges in full, or on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. -See-A-ttachment-e:-- C. Woodburn Subdivision Standards Chapter III Section 7 A. Tentative plans for subdivisions shall include the following information: a. Name of proposed subdivision b. Vicinity map c. Subdivision plan d. Names and addresses in notification area e. Diagram of water system f. Diagram of sewage & storm drain system g. Diagram of streets and sidewalk system h. Legal description of subject property I. Name of proposed streets J. Lot numbers k. Identification of easements, parkland dedication, and private utilities. ST AFF COMMENT: Sufficient information has been submitted by the applicant. Attached with this application is a preliminary plat that indicates the proposed lots. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 7 11r 9C Section 12 (A). General Street Standards The location, width and grade of all streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions, to public convenience and safety..... Section 13 (8) Lots: All lots shall have a minimum size of the zoning district in which they are located. In the case of a curved lot line where the radius of curvature is 100 feet or less, the minimum lot line fronting that curvature shall be 40 feet... and in no case shall the lot width be less than 60 feet at the buildinq line...The minimum size for various types of lots shall be given in the following table: Type of Lot Minimum Width Corner lot Interior lot (fronting one street) Flag Lot Double Frontage (fronting two streets) 80 feet 60 feet 30 feet 60 feet ST AFF COMMENT: The applicant has met this criteria with the exception of lots 6 and 7. The applicant is requesting to the flat lot width standards from 30 feet to 1 5 feet. D. Woodburn Transportation System Plan STAFF COMMENT: Parr Road is a improved residential street. Ten vehicle trips per day is standard for single family residential units. Additional road dedication along Ogle street is a condition of approval as well as a non- remonstrance consent form to participate with improvements to Ogle street. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 8 ~ 9C VI CONCLUSION: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide approximately 1.8 acres into 9 single family lots with lot sizes of greater than 6,000 square feet. Lot number 1 will already have a single family residence on it that will meet the required setback. Lot numbers 6 and 7 are proposed to be flag lots. The subdivision ordinance requires the lot width to be 30 feet wide, the applicant is requesting to make the lots 15 feet wide. With conditions of approval, the proposal can meet applicable policies and standards of the city of Woodburn, as found in the previous sections. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: If the commission chooses to approve the applicant's request, Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be In substantial conformance with the preliminary plan. 2. The subdivision shall be platted according to standard surveying practice, approved and recorded with Marion County. 3. Prior to recordation with Marion County submit two paper copies of subdivision plat for review to planning department. 4. Applicant shall provide for the installation of all franchised utilities and shall provide any required easement on final plat. 5. Prior to any construction, a reproducible mylar of the final plat shall be filed with the public works department after all required signatures have been obtained and the plat has been recorded with Marion County. 6. On site construction shall not commence until the improvements plans have been reviewed for compliance with subdivision and street width standards and approved by the public works department and all right-of-way permits, park fees and system development charges have been paid. 7. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall submit one set of reproducible as-builts. 8. Meet vision clearance standards. 9. The applicant shall comply with the Woodburn Subdivision standards. SUB 99-02 V AR 99~09 9 rll' 9C 10. Meet private driveway standards. 11. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall comply with the comments provided by the fire department and public works department. 12. Comply with the following chapters of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: Chapter 8, 9,10,13,22,39 13. Construct property line sidewalks 14. Provide street plantings as approved by Planning Staff Waste Water Department: 15. Cross connections; Water Department - All units that put in either a underground irrigation system, swimming pool, hot tub and fire sprinkler system will be required to install backflow prevention assemblies (DC) (Double Checks). The assemblies shall be installed by the water meter next to the property line. Unless approved by city engineers. Please see Inspector on Installation Standards phone 982- 5283. Public Works Conditions: 16. final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards. 17. The subdivision shall be platted according to standard surveying practice, approved and recorded with Marion County. 18. The owner/applicant will be required to enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6 prior to acceptance of the final plat. Also, prior to construction of the subdivision commencing the city will require approved construction plans, a performance bond in the amount of 100% of the improvement cost and public works permit fee's paid. 1 9. Existing on-site water wells or sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned by the applicant in accordance with state regulations. 20. The applicant, not the city is responsible for obtaining permits from any state and/or federal agencies which may require approval or permit. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 10 " 9C 21 . This development shall not cause storm water runoff to be impounded on adjacent properties 22. Applicant shall dedicate to the City of Woodburn an additional 30 feet wide strip of land adjacent to Ogle Street for roadway purposes. 23. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn standards and all State Building Codes and Regulations. STREET: 24. To accommodate the installation of the required services. The applicant shall grind the existing asphalt surface of Parr Road to a depth of 1 %", and inlay with 1 %" of class "C" mix asphaltic concrete, after all services have been installed. The grinding and inlay shall be required adjacent to the entire north line of this subdivision, and shall include the intersection of Luba Street. 25. The shared driveway access serving the flag lot 6 and lot 7 shall conform to Chapter 10 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for driveways serving more than one dwelling unit. A proper road maintenance agreement shall be recorded for shared driveway with the subdivision plat, this shall be reviewed and approved by the city prior to recording. 26. This development shall be responsible for street improvements to Ogle Street. The owner will be required to sign a non-remonstrance consent form to participate and pay the fair share cost of such improvements meeting city standards on Ogle Street as determined by the City Council. 27. The driveway approach serving the shared access shall comply with the City of Woodburn Commercial Driveway Standards. DRAINAGE: 28. Single family residential lots, other then the flag lots, shall drain to the street though weep holes in the curb. 29. The flag lots shall be served by an underground piped storm sewer service connecting to the existing city storm sewer main within Parr Road. The applicant shall install a separate service to each lot. New taps on the storm sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 11 I". 9C SANIT ARY SEWER: 30. The existing sanitary sewer main within Parr Road shall be extended westerly and a sanitary service installed to each of the proposed lots by the applicant. The lots adjacent to the existing sewer main shall require a sanitary service line to be installed to each lot by the applicant. New taps on the sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. WATER: 31 . The applicant shall install a water service in conformance with city standards from the existing city water main on the north side of Parr Road to each lot. New taps on the water main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT 32. Driveable access to within 150 feet of all side of all structures is required. Access ways more than 150 feet in length require a turnaround provision. Minimum width of access way is 20 feet. 33. Residential flow is 1000 gpm. 34. One hydrant within 250 feet of all properties. Coordinate with Woodburn engineering department prior to placement of any hydrants. 35. Local residential alarms as required by ORS. 36. Flag lots need to be addressed on a sign located at entrance way from public road. address numbers to be assigned by the fire district in cooperation with the city building official. (parr road name is incorrect. Please change to Bridlewood Lane). 37. An onsite water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to the city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during construction must support the weight of fire apparatus and allow access to facility . SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 12 'IT 9C PARKS 38. A Park fee of $483.00 per lot is required at the time of issuance of a building permit. Any conditions attached to the approval of the site plan shall be conditions on the issuance of a building permit. A violation of the conditions shall be considered a violation of the ordinance. SUB 99-02 V AR 99-09 13 . 9C SUBDMSION REVIEW OAKWOODSUBDMSION GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards. 2. The subdivision shall be platted according to standard surveying practice, approved and recorded with Marion County. 3. The owner/applicant will be required to enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6 prior to acceptance of the final plat. Also, prior to construction of the subdivision commencing the city will require approved construction plans, a performance bond in the amount of 10".1% of the improvement cost and public works permit fee's paid. 4. Existing on-site water wells or sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned by the applicant in accordance with state regulations. 5. The applicant, not the city is responsible for obtaining permits from any state and/or federal agencies which may require approval or permit. 6. This development shall not cause storm water runotfto be impounded on adjacent properties 7. Applicant shall dedicate to the City of Woodburn an additional 30 feet wide strip ofland adjacent to Ogle Street for roadway purposes. 8.. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn standards and all State Building Codes and Regulations. STREET: 1. To accommodate the installation of the required services. The applicant shall grind the existing asphalt surface of Parr Road to a depth of 1 W', and inlay with 1112" of class "c" mix asphaltic concrete, after all services have been installed. The grinding and inlay shall be required adjacent to the entire north line ofthis subdivision, and shall include the intersection of Luba Street. 2. The shared driveway access serving the flag lot 6 and lot 7 shall conform to Chapter 10 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for driveways serving more than one dwelling unit. A proper road maintenance agreement shall be recorded for shared driveway with the subdivision plat, this shall be reviewed and approved by the city prior to recording. 3. This development shall be responsible for street improvements to Ogle Street. The owner 9C will be required to sign a non-remonstrance consent form to participate and pay the fair share cost of such improvements meeting city standards on Ogle Street as determined by the City Council. 4. The driveway approach serving the shared access shall comply with the City of Woodburn Commercial Driveway Standards. DRAINAGE: 1. Single family residential lots, other then the flag lots, shall drain to the street though weep holes in the curb. 2. The flag lots shall be served by an underground piped storm sewer service connecting to the existing city storm sewer main within Parr Road. The applicant shall install a separate service to each lot. New taps on the storm sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. SANITARY SEWER: 1. The existing sanitary sewer main within Parr Road shall be extended westerly and a sanitary service installed to each of the proposed lots by the applicant. The lots adjacent to the existing sewer main shall require a sanitary service line to be installed to each lot by the applicant. New taps on the sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. WATER: 1. The applicant shall install a water service in conformance with city standards from the existing city water main on the north side of Parr Road to each lot. New taps on the water main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. 2. Fire protection requirements shall be as per the Woodburn Fire Districts conditions of approval. 11!' WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT Prevention Division 9C Site Plan Review Comments Memo To: Teresa Engledinger, Planner City of Woodburn Date: 08-24-99 From: Robert Benck Fire Marshal Facility/ Project Name: Oakwood Subdivision Location: Birddlewood & Luba Occupancy Class: R-3 A. Access: 1. Exterior of Facility: Driveable access to within 150 feet of all sides of all structures is required. Access ways more than 150 feet in length require a turnaround provision. Minimum width of access way is 20 feet 2. To Interior of Facility: NA B. Building Exit System: NA 1. Occupant Load: 2. Number of Exits: 3. Exit Hardware: 4. Exit Signage: 5. Emergency Lighting: C. Fire flow/ Water Supply: Residential flow is 1000gpm D. Hydrants: One hydrant within 250 feet of all properties. Please confer with City Engineering department prior to placement of any hydrants. E. Sprinkler/FDC: NA F. Alann System: Local Residential alanns as required by ORS. G. Premise Identification: 9C To meet city standards. Flag lots need to be addressed on a sign located at entrance way from the public road. Parr road name is incorrect please change to Bridlewood Lane. Address numbers to be assigned by the Fire District in cooperation with the City Building Official. H. Special Occupancy Requirements: NA I. Building Size & Limitations! Type of Construction: NA J. Fire and Life Safety Review Requirement: NA K Special Comments: An onsite water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to the city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during construction must support the weight of Fire Apparatus and allow access to facility. COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PERMISSION TO BUILD. BUILDING PERMITS AND PLANS REVIEWS BY THE APPROPRIATE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS REQUIRED. PERMITS AND APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT 1776 Newberg Hwy. Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 982-2360 Fax (503) 981-5004 !il' ., .".AJ -"'(' OFFICE USE ONLY: App. Rec. By: Date: Application No. Receipt 9C .J'v F-':::: ,-., i) ..A... '~ :, ~.~- '.--' ),..( JUL 3 0 1999 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ VARIANCE APPLICATION DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: NAME: Wilhelm Engineering Inc. PHONE: (503981-3181 ADDRESS: 1771 Mt. Jefferson Avenue. Woodburn. Oregon. 97071 1. We, the undersigned applicants, beings owners of the property herein described, do hereby make application for permission to (list each variance separately): To allow 15' lot widths for flaglots 6 and 7 (combined 30') versus 30' foot each (minimum width per the Subdivision Standards). 2. Location of the property (street address, or if not addressed, then state the distance to the nearest intersecting street or known landmark) including the section, range and township: SW 1/4. Section 18. Township 5 South. Range 1 West. Willamette Meridian. City of Woodburn. Marion County. Oreoon. Approximatelv 30' southwest of the intersection of Luba Street and Parr Road. 3. Legal description of the property as it appears on the deed: Map No. 51W18CB Tax Lot #(s) 8000,8100. 8201 Lot , Block , of Subdivision. NOTE: If a fraction of the lot, then attach a full description as if it were metes and bounds or attach a metes and bounds description, marked "EXHIBIT An. 4. Zone in which property is located: RS 5. Attach a copy of the applicable Marion County Assessors Map. Mark "EXHIBIT B". 6. Plot Plan to be attached, mark "EXHIBIT C" and including land uses on surrounding lands in notification area, site layout of subject parcel and structures with dimensions and lot lines shown. The plot plan should show clearly the nature of the variance. TIl' 7. CONDITIONS FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE: 9C Submit a detailed statement explaining why the request is being made. Address the variance of adjustment approval criteria given under "Considerations", A-F. Attach and mark "EXHIBIT D". 8. NAMES AND ADDRESSES: Submit a list of all property owners with 100 feet of the subject's property boundaries. NAME ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE 9. THE APPUCANTCS) ATTEST THAT: a) The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached or imposed upon the subject property. b) If the variance application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval by the Planning Commission. c) All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments and exhibits transmitted herewith are true; and the applicant(s) so acknowledge that any permit issued on the application may be revoked if it be found that any such statements are false. DATE: day of ,19 SIGNATURES of each owner (husband and wife) or contract purchaser. NAME ~ ~~~ ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE 2785 Pacific Hwv Hubbard. Oreaon 97032 Application received: By Date Page 4 . VARPROC=6I93 111 9C /J.' ~-'~. ~.-~-~ ~..--.~ , 1-) 'r): JUL 3 0 1999 CONSIDERATIONS: A) That there are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships or practical difficulties which can be relieved only by modifying the literal requirements of the ordinance; Requiring 30 foot wide drives for each lot would waste valuable residential land, a 60 foot access to serve two residential lots is a needless waste of residential property. The proposed 15' lot frontages for lots 6 and 7 with reciprocal easements would combine together to form a 30' access which would be sufficiently wide to permit a 24' paved driveway to both f1aglots. The City driveway Standards ordinance requires that where the property frontage is 30 foot or less the maximum driveway width is 12 feet. The proposed 30' easement has sufficient width for utilities to access the two lots. B) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land, buildings, or use referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land,. buildings or uses in the same district; however, nonconforming land, uses, or structures in the vicinity shall not themselves constitute such circumstances or conditions; The flaglots are created by dividing a land locked parcel which, otherwise would have no roadway access. This parcel is approximately 100' removed from a public street. Requiring the pole section of flag lots to meet the lot width requirements defeats the generally accepted purpose for flaglots (to provide a means to develop residential property where the geometry is difficult.) Creating an access easement to these properties which is larger than necessary would remove buildable land from the adjoining lots to the east and west, and place it in nonbuildable areas as part of access to lots 6 and 7. The proposed variance provides adequate access while using the residential land efficiently in spite of difficult geometry . C) That granting the application will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or premIses; Granting this application will in no way be detrimental or hazardous to the public welfare. The proposed plat provides adequate access and turn around for fire and emergency vehicles. This configuration will make the area more visually pleasing by reducing driveway area which is generally 1 'Ir 9C not as aesthetically pleasing as home landscaping. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. D) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the substantial property rights of the petitioner; This variance will allow the petitioner to create lots in this subdivision which are consistent in size with the lots of the surrounding area and reflective of the property zoning. Without the variance the applicant would lose one lot which would significantly reduce the density for this plat. E) That the granting of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, adversely affect the health or safety of persons working or residing in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant; and Granting of this application will not compromise the health or well being of the citizens working or living in the surrounding community. Adequate access and turnarounds are provided for fire and emergency vehicles. If the variance is approved, this development would be similar to recent developments in the area. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. F) That granting of the application will be in general harmony with the intent and purpose of this ordinance and will not adversely affect any officially adopted Comprehensive Plan. Granting of this application would be in accordance with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. Although there is some confusion as to ordinances that may apply to flaglots, the zoning ordinances clearly allow for flaglots. The variance is required because there is a section of the Subdivision Standards that requires a 30 foot minimum width for flaglots and that is being interpreted as applying to the pole or access section. It may be appropriate to clarify the interpretation to apply to the body of the lot and in particular at the building line. Approval of this variance will allow practical application of flag lots to provide density consistent with the zoning ordinance. 0- RF:t"";' 0 -cr JUL 3 0 1999 ""~r,';:J:'~i~-,( .~ ~ i);-FT 2 - OFFICE USE ONLY: App. Rec. By: 9C Date: Application No.,. :0; :-:: '.:'.~' ,oJ /7 SUBDIVISION PARTITION PRELIMINARY APPLICATION JUL 7 1999 . 'iY SUBDIVISION NAME: OAKWOOD , - _. -...... . . DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: Wilhelm Enqineerinq Inc. (NAME) 1771 Mt. Jefferson Ave. (ADDRESS) Woodburn (CITY) Oreqon (STATE) 97071 (ZIP CODE) ADDRESS & ZIP CODE PROPERTY OWNER: (Please print or type) 1. Griqorv & Olqa Saverchenko 2785 Pacific Hiohway Hubbard. OR 97032 2. Certified list with the names and addresses of property owners with 250 feet for a Subdivision and 100 feet for a Partition. 3. REQUEST: To divide 1.8 acres into 9 lots with a varience to allow 15' frontage widths for flaglots 6 and 7 (combined 30'). 4. The ZONE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN designation in which the parcel is located: The parcel is zoned RS. with a Comprehensive Plan desiqnation of Sinqle Family Residential by the City of Woodburn. 5. Describe the location of the property or give the address: The property is located at the intersection of Oqle and Parr Road. 6. Map No. 5S 1W Sec.181.r~ Tax Lot #(s) 8000. 8100 and '- 8201. 7. Attach a written statement, marked Exhibit "A" which explains your reasons for subdividing the land and provides evidence that the request conforms to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Policies. The applicant bears the burden of proof that all approved criteria has been met. P8ge 2 - SUBPARTo::6193 iJT 8. Attach 10 preliminary plats which contain the following information (Exhibit "B"): Preliminary Subdivision (Partition) Plat Checklist. 9C ( ) Date ( ) Vicinity Map ( ) Subdivision Name (The name of any proposed subdivision shall not be the same as or similar to any name used on a recorded plat in the County or City). ( ) Township, range, section, tax lot number(s), acreage of the property to be divided. ( ) North arrow, scale (one inch equals 200 feet or larger). ( ) Locations and names of all existing streets within or on the boundary of the proposed subdivision/partition. ( ) Location and names of all proposed streets. ( ) Lot (parcel) layout with approximate dimensions, lot (parcel) numbers and areas for all lots (parcels). ( ) Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations in the proposed subdivision (partition) and area adjacent to the proposed subdivision (partition). ( ) Indicate which buildings are to remain and which ones are to be removed. ( ) Topography within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision/partition. ( ) Location of drainage ways, flood ways, or floodplain within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision/partition. ( ) The location and size of all proposed water, sewer, and storm drain lines. ( ) The location of all proposed fire hydrants. Signatures of each owner (husband and wife) or contract purchaser. 4?(j ~dL ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE 2785 Pacific Hwv. Hubbard. OreQon 97032 o~~ ..Qw~ Page 3 - SUBPART~ !11" 9C REQUEST: The purpose of this subdivision is to divide 1.8 acres into 9 lots with a variance to allow 15' frontage widths for flaglots 6 and 7 (combined 30'). A-1 Residential areas should be designed around a neighborhood concept. Neighborhoods should be an identifiable unit bounded by arterials, non- residential uses, or natural features of the terrain. The neighborhood should provide a focus and identity within the community and should have a community facility, such as a school, park, or privately owned community facility to allow for interaction within the neighborhood. The proposed subdivision strives to afford a comfortable and harmonious environment. This single family residential development is bordered on all sides by single family residential zoning and single family residential developments. To the northeast of the property is Steklov's Addition Phase I. Nearby, northwest of the property, along Parr Road are two public schools. These schools would serve this proposed subdivision nicely as a community recreation and leisure facility. A-2 Uving Environment - Developments in residential area be constructed in such a way that they will not seriously deteriorate over time. Zoning ordinances should be strictly enforced to prevent encroachment of degrading non-resident uses. Construction standards in the State Building Code shall be vigorously enforced, and if necessary, additional standards the City determines should be . ", t';:: (';' i1 ..fr JUL 3 0 1999 Oak'NOod Subdivision Application . ", ',':.~:.;I ;i-,y - i .:~ ,yr. 11'1" 9C imposed to insure non-degrading housing units, should be encouraged by the City. The developer proposes to follow existing zoning ordinances. Also, care has been taken to adequately design streets and sewer systems so as to ensure graceful aging. The infra- structure will be designed to City standards A-3 Development should promote, through the use of moderate density standards and creative design, a feeling of openness and spaciousness with sufficient landscaped area and open space to create a pleasant living environment. The design of the subdivision is such that all lots meet and most vastly exceed the minimum square footage requirements. Most lots are rectangular in shape and thus provide continuity for landscaping and an appealing neighborhood environment. A-4 Streets in residential areas should be used by residents for access to collectors and arterials. Residential streets should be designed to minimize their use for through traffic, however, whenever possible dead-end streets and cul-ue- sacs should be avoided. There are no dead-ends or cul-de-sacs located within this project. There is also no good reason for excess traffic to travel through this proposed development because the residential streets around the development provide efficient transportation to Soones Ferry Road, which is a major collector. The layoqt of ". r ," .~" - ..A.. . :-!., IJ ).,( JUL 3 0 1999 Oakwood Subdivision Application l ",....r-.... .......J., _,,",._I'~~' ,,,,,--.., It 9C the street within the project provides effective and efficient traffic flow for its residents. A-5 Residential developments should strive for creative design which will maximize the inherent values of the land being developed and encourage slow moving traffic. Each residential development should provide for landscaping and tree planting to enhance the livability and aesthetics of the neighborhood. Each property owner will be responsible for landscaping their lot. A-6 Non-residential uses should be prevented from locating in residential neighborhoods. Existing non-conforming uses should be phased out as soon as possible. Upon development of this parcel, there will be no existing non- residential or non-conforming uses of the area. A-7 Home occupations and combination business and home should be allowed if the residential character is unaffected by the use. In the case of home occupations, these can be allowed through the zoning ordinances. All homes will have adequate use of the roadway which should provide ample means of transportation for residents with or without a business. A-B High traffic generating non-residential uses should not be located in such a manner as to increase traffic flows on residential streets or residential collectors. .Ar ~: t.: (" , n .J.... ~ -' ..........(' JUL 3 0 1999 Oakwood Subdivision Application ", '~~':t. ".:.,;t'i--;-Y " . :rr 9C This subdivision is designed to provide lots for single family residential dwellings with minimal amounts of traffic. The proposed subdivision is designed to efficiently transport traffic to Boone's Ferry Road, a major collector. A-9 Industrial and commercial uses which locate adjacent to residential areas should buffer their use by screening and design control, and should be controlled with sufficient setback so as their location will not adversely affect the residential areas. There are no industrial or commercial buildings bordering the property and with the current residential zoning and development of the surrounding property there is no reason to expect there ever will be. A-10 High density residential areas should be located so as to minimize the possible deleterious effects on adjacent low density residential developments. When high density and low density areas abut, density should decrease in those areas immediately adjacent to low density residential land. Whenever possible, buffering should be practices by such means as landscaping, sight-obscuring fences and hedges, and increased setbacks. There are no high density developments currently in existance or planned for properties bordering the propsed subdivision. '/'-,.,. '-'... ....,...--.. ''-.-t ",/~ . . JUL 3 0 1999 ,. Oakwood Subdivision Application - 9C A-11 Traffic from high density residential areas should have access to collector or arterial streets without going through other residential areas. There are no high density residential areas to deal with in this capacity either abutting or adjacent to the property. JUL 3 0 1999 Oakwood Subdivision Application m 9C LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4, SECTION 18, T.5.S., R.1.W.. W.M. CITY OF WOODBURN. MARION COUNTY, OREGON JUNE 25, 1999 RS - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL // /; / 0>0. / UTILITY PAVING / / ~y \,Yo, /:/r~~ /~~~Y' ~ ../ -///';p (: 0, /Y 0, .... ." o li) 4." f;C:; '-./6}t I\~ /<1 . /[}, 1..0 9<1 I J::-. 2& v So f:'i NORTH 1"=60' 9& . 2<1' "'6'0 . <?6'. 5'6'~ Ir <2JO '00. !1r ~; 'i ~. '. ~, . '.~" )"v: "~" .,>__'. .. ~I!!/' . ..... "'t.' .....~,! . ...,.... -;, , i- rl!!"'~ It "- 60:. _ _ , I!!: ;,;;r~ F. "'; .. I ., '. '" _~, .. ;:: ,~c ,I - .... '.s::' - - ~~. .:::5:" II! -'.,. I -I!!~. '/0 ,..,' -..4/ -' ~. y _.'~ ~.'.' ~, ~. .::- _"'''_ _...J . ... ; '-'J /~ I c<;: ,; ::i?,{t """ J ~I 1~' 10 1 .. .-1- - - I .... ~, ~ ~I ~'- \,,- -;:-_:-~-=- ~ t- - - .'-- ~' ;~ii;' ~;. ..~ ::;. ;: ~ /..<,'^7 ~ .::- - ,\ I I yo, _ ~ ' - .I ~2IX' ----------' ,I',..J ,_, -..!'1;... a' r ~. - '...... ;..r;..: I --I : J --;1';'-----7 J'J'~ . --- /~ (( 3< I, 1 - - .1 ! r, -": .' $/; c,) J 60; ~ 7'< ~~ ,,?o~ t-;:;.--"r----I. r.~----........ ~:~ f:v:. - ;,~ - - - ~- - - - ~ k 1 I r- I" 1 ./' r----r----l I I II ...aw s -..m /4 1116 CO" .., " : i;:' f , , 'STREET' , , ' ~ ~ :'It~~ - 103 .0303' 5 - n,6/; ~ --->- --.Ie:> <J.J e:> <J.J c:> <J.J 1__ _~1~n__ ___ -. g04.3' i t~ t. CP I~ p ,tJ - . --~ :~ g ': lit. 10 (~ '7.lta \ 1,3]0-- \ \ 1\ II .)--. Z o ~ -es ~"" ,/ ", u o ~ ,:,. J ,. I ... IS ~ .~..{]! ______nQ>. ~ \.~~. ~ u. o ,J \10 ~~-\ 'ji I\) R; V--~ ., 0 o '- -. , 76.QO 10 \ ,..~ V' 0> U, ~ ~ \.';/0 o <.:> oct\::.--_ '" ~~ w 8 ;~ z ~ In o -; " o o " ., ~ ~~ ),.0 C") c. cJ " o 80.87 90_ '76) A u, rTl 8 / r o cJ t ~-~ - 0 t 90 I\) 8 ,--".::-::E ~~::z ~~ Cl OJ .~.. ::t w g t 8 3 'O/t t .....{ --- IS ~\. d ~ 8 t ' w <:) 16 t;;1 '~I ,!:II '" l>. ~ Ci 0 !:l 0 ;l 94.01 l1: '" ~ u. 0 0 ':l 0 81 ~ I\) l>. '/ ,,, C> ~, g , (j Ci 71 ;3 0> l>. 0 o o g: 16.83__ '" ill / 8 IS / .... ~ / C> C> / '~~" ~~ ~~ ~ :, ", ~_____ --.It. .s'>-~.~o;~.'''~ \. '-". ~ ";~~~ 8 'r> ,() '-: " "I[J > u. 'r Aj10 \ ~'. '",--u /) - 60 " <<>o~. ~. " "UJ ""'~~, "", 0> - -"", "1~"'" '\ ',u. /) '"'t,' TO '" ". (/ qJ ',,- ~() ~, "- ' ~ -'t. ~ '\ '" " '" ~ C) c..,.., 8 cz:> ~.. CJ1 ' ~'I " ' \ ~' /(J) -; Xl' m: m. -;, .. a ~ 'n, 110 f-'\ . . , r i/./ }';/;; ,{~ .: "~~-':".6!,~ t, /:-; .~\. ,tl:' \ 1i'~o:jll. . -,.,'?o'a \. \ ~ '.' 'I' If lr --..<-. ..~\J ' _' ~~l Ib I \1:: ....--.~<lf' . f". OJ <;'11<-.. ,I.O,/1,^ I ,\-. .:'::,7<. t -, "'ii.?' VI VI1' ,,'9 "['\1 ?~~ I " c./. fl '" '3 '" ' ~ ,'1'!, !<')11~'" . '... Sr- . Be "'\ :',:' /: !;t~'7~'ii -'--, rL.. ,. ~~8~IW f:t /t! '. / j, \ \ 0 ,. , I', I' I.'j' s: )_f' , , I '\ -, 7.,73 ,- .J{,.!.. I..!:'_ _ :... _'y~8~,.=!_ .~\. 7 , 6S6.4~ 70' -I> ~ fj :E - ,\ \ \ /'" l}' 1.,-;- 11 I ig I I I 1 I I I -I. I I I I \." \ I L __, r -' \ I 1 \ \ I )/ I( I l!'_ /1 I I I". ., '~'~,8$I\o'~) -'~~ '" "'J 1.':- - 'I. .-:.------Ivl... _=_ \ ~J 6- {'~l I. /' I<!2Q8J '-,' I _ l/! _ I .... . I (, 1O;:j I I I. I U' 1i\i;: I ,;~ l. -.,... I I I I '" ----..-.- l I,)!' <> , ,,_' I / :-\~'--,\ 'L.EIVf/!ifi"--", ..;~. : i ~t'. \~" '~~~.~.\ :~-\BO,\~"t.- ':; ~ " . Of " ~"3f7 "'_ '- -, I.. R-8<' I / ~"', '_" ""-"j '~~"r '~~' f / .~~ k 62;~',( ~~~~~.\~,~ "~~:('/~ i '''i ~~\-,1:t " f '\ ' '~/\I . '" 'I....~ tI' .I .. ~ . , I ..... ~" ~s~;''','' ~/' '~~ Q\ /', """ .,. I(~-; , '\ " >. "It .... '" b ...$0 'b 0, " ~ b ... b ~/ ~ rrr 9C ATTACHMENT "B" Planning Commission Final Order Dated 9/23/99 1[' " \ \ "~ " '-.:, I ", '. r' 9C CiTY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · TOD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 (503) 982-5222 IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF WOODBURN, OREGON SUBDIVISION 99-02 VARIANCE 99-09 ) ) ) FINAL ORDER WHEREAS, a request was made for the Planning Commission to hear a proposal to create a 9 lot single family subdivision and grant a variance to the subdivision standards allowing for 15 feet wide flag lots instead of 30 feet wide. WHEREAS. the Planning Commission reviewed the matter at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 9, 1999, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the written and oral testimony presented by staff, the applicant and proponents and opponents of the proposal, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission closed the hearing, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission moved at their hearing of September 9, 1999 to approve Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 and instructed staff to prepare findings and conclusions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COMMISSION: 1. The Planning Commission approves Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 based on findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit A, and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit B which are attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. Approved: q(3))qq Date FINAL ORDER - SUB 99-02, VARIANCE 99-09 - Oakwood ( ~ 9C EXHIBIT A FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan FINDING: The applicable comprehensive policies have been addressed by the implementing ordinances of the adopted subdivision standards, zoning ordinance and any other ordinances in affect at the time of approval. B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance FINDING: The applicant's proposal will access onto an existing street ( Parr Road) that meets city standards. FINDING: Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with vision clearance standards. FINDING: Each lot will require a separate building permit. At such time that the building permits are issued, each lot will be reviewed for compliance with residential set back requirements. Any new fencing will also be reviewed for compliance with this section prior to permit issuance: FINDING: A condition of approval is that the applicant shall comply with the required front yard setbacks. FINDING: A condition of approval is that each lot will be subject to single family driveway standards. Variance: FINDING: Requiring 30 foot wide drives for each lot would waste valuable residential land, a 60 foot access to serve two residential lots is a needless waste of residential property. The proposed 1 5' lot frontages for lots 6 and 7 with reciprocal easements would combine together to form a 30 foot access which would be sufficiently wide to permit a 24' paved driveway to both flag lots. The city driveway standards ordinance requires that where the property frontage is 30' or less the maximum driveway width is 12 feet. The proposed 30' easement has sufficient width for utilities to access the two lots. FINDING: The flag lots are created be dividing a land locked parcel which, otherwise would have no roadway access. This parcel is approximately 100' removed from a public street. Requiring the pole section of flag lots to meet the lot width requirement defeats the generally accepted purpose for flag lots (to provide a means to develop residential property where the geometry is difficult.) Creating an access easement to these properties which is larger than necessary would remove buildable land from the adjoining lots to the east and west, and place it in nonbuildable areas as part of access to lots 6 ''I!' 9C and 7. The proposed variance provides adequate access while using the residential land efficiently in spite of difficult geometry. FINDING: Granting this application will in no way be detrimental or hazardous to the public welfare. The proposed plat provides adequate access and turn around for fire and emergency vehicles. This configuration will make the area more visually pleasing by reducing driveway area which is generally not as aesthetically pleasing as home landscaping. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. FINDING: The variance will allow the petitioner to create lots in this subdivision which are consistent in size with the lots of the surrounding area and reflective of the property zoning. Without the variance the applicant would lose one lot which would significantly reduce the density for this plat. FINDING: Granting of this application will not compromise the health or well being of the citizens working or living in the surrounding community. Adequate access and turnarounds are provided for fire and emergency vehicles. If the variance is approved, this development would be similar to recent developments in the area. The same access configuration is used in the Steklov addition just north of Parr Road. FINDING: Granting of this application would be in accordance with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. Although there is confusion as to ordinances that may apply to flag lots, the zoning ordinances clearly allow for flag lots. The variance is required because there is a section of the subdivision standards that requires a 30 foot minimum width for flag lots and that is being interpreted a applying to the pole or access section. It may be appropriated to clarify the interpretation to apply to the body of the lot and in particular at the building line. Approval of this variance will allow practical application of flag lots to provide density consistent with the zoning ordinance. FINDING: The proposed subdivision and single family residences are an allowed use. FINDING: Each of the proposed lots meet the 6,000 square foot minimum lot area requirement as shown by the applicant on the preliminary plat. The side and rear yard setbacks specified in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance vary according to the height of the proposed home. If the applicant proposes to build two story homes, then greater side and rear setbacks are required. The applicant is requesting a variance to the flag lot width requirement for lots 6 and 7. The existing residence meets the side yard setback requirements. FINDING: The System Development Charge for park purposes is $483 per lot. A condition of approval specifies that the applicant shall pay the required parks systems development charges in full, or on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. See Attachment C. Woodburn Subdivision Standards: 111 9C FINDING: Sufficient information has been submitted by the applicant. Attached with this application is a preliminary plat that indicates the proposed lots. FINDING: The applicant has met this criteria with the exception of lots 6 and 7. The applicant is requesting a variance to the flag lot width standards from 30 feet to 1 5 feet. FINDING: Parr Road is a improved residential street. Ten vehicle trips per day is standard for single family residential units. Additional road dedication along Ogle street is a condition of approval as well as a non-remonstrance consent form to participate with improvements to Ogle street. CONCLUSION: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide approximately 1.8 acres into 9 single family lots with lot sizes of greater than 6,000 square feet. Lot number 1 will already have a single family residence on it that will meet the required setback. Lot numbers 6 and 7 are proposed to be flag lots. The subdivision ordinance requires the lot width to be 30 feet wide, the applicant is requesting to make the lots 15 feet wide. With conditions of approval, the proposal can meet applicable policies and standards of the city of Woodburn, as found in the previous sections. EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plan. 2. Prior to recordation with Marion County submit two paper copies of subdivision plat for review to planning department. 3. Applicant shall provide for the installation of all franchised utilities and shall provide any required easement on final plat. 4. Prior to any construction, a reproducible mylar of the final plat shall be filed with the public works department after all required signatures have been obtained and the plat has been recorded with Marion County. 5. On site construction shall not commence until the improvements plans have been reviewed for compliance with subdivision and street width standards and approved by the public works department and all right-of-way permits, park fees and system development charges have been paid. I'" 9C 6. Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall submit one set of -reproducible as-builts. 7. Meet vision clearance standards. 8. The applicant shall comply with the Woodburn Subdivision standards. 9. Meet residential setback requirements. 10. Meet private driveway standards. 11 . Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall comply with the comments provided by the fire department and public works department. 12. Comply with the following chapters of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: Chapter 8, 9,10,13,22,39 13. Construct property line sidewalks 14. Provide street plantings as approved by Planning Staff Waste Water Department: 15. Cross connections; Water Department - All units that put in either a underground irrigation system, swimming pool, hot tub and fire sprinkler system will be required to install backflow prevention assemblies (DC) (Double Checks). The assemblies shall be installed by the water meter next to the property line. Unless approved by city engineers. Please see Inspector on Installation Standards phone 982- 5283. Public Works Conditions: 1 6. Final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards. 17. The subdivision shall be platted according to standard surveying practice, approved and recorded with Marion County. 18. The owner/applicant will be required to enter into an improvement agreement as outlined in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 6 prior to acceptance of the final plat. Also, prior to construction of the subdivision "" 9C commencing the city will require approved construction plans, a performance bond in the amount of 100% of the improvement cost and public works permit fee's paid. 19. Existing on-site water wells or sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned by the applicant in accordance with state regulations. 20. The applicant, not the city is responsible for obtaining permits from any state and/or federal agencies which may require approval or permit. 21 . This development shall not cause storm water runoff to be impounded on adjacent properties 22. Applicant shall dedicate to the City of Woodburn an additional 30 feet wide strip of land adjacent to Ogle Street for roadway purposes. 23. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn standards and all State Building Codes and Regulations. STREET: 24. To accommodate the installation of the required services. The applicant shall grind the existing asphalt surface of Parr Road to a depth of 1 % ", and inlay with 1 Y2 II of class "C" mix asphaltic concrete, after all services have been installed. The grinding and inlay shall be required adjacent to the entire north line of this subdivision, and shall include the intersection of Luba Street. 25. The shared driveway access serving the flag lot 6 and lot 7 shall conform to Chapter 10 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for driveways serving more than one dwelling unit. A proper road maintenance agreement shall be recorded for shared driveway with the subdivision plat, this shall be reviewed and approved by the city prior to recording. 26. This development shall be responsible for street improvements to Ogle Street. The owner will be required to sign a non-remonstrance consent form to participate and pay the fair share cost of such improvements meeting city standards on Ogle Street as determined by the City Council. 27. The driveway approach serving the shared access shall comply with the City of Woodburn Commercial Driveway Standards. DRAINAGE: 28. Single family residential lots, other then the flag lots, shall drain to the street though weep holes in the curb. 29. The flag lots shall be served by an underground piped storm sewer service connecting to the existing city storm sewer main within Parr Road. The applicant ~ 9C shall install a separate service to each lot. New taps on the storm sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. SANIT ARY SEWER: 30. The existing sanitary sewer main within Parr Road shall be extended westerly and a sanitary service installed to each of the proposed lots by the applicant. The lots adjacent to the existing sewer main shall require a sanitary service line to be installed to each lot by the applicant. New taps on the sewer main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. WATER: 31 . The applicant shall install a water service in conformance with city standards from the existing city water main on the north side of Parr Road to each lot. New taps on the water main will be done by the city, tap fee shall be paid by the applicant. WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT 32. Driveable access to within 150 feet of all side of all structures is required. Access ways more than 150 feet in length require a turnaround provision. Minimum width of access way is 20 feet. 33. Residential flow is 1000 gpm. 34. One hydrant within 250 feet of all properties. Coordinate with Woodburn engineering department prior to placement of any hydrants. 35. Local residential alarms as required by ORS. 36. Flag lots need to be addressed on a sign located at entrance way from public road. address numbers to be assigned by the fire district in cooperation with the city building official. (Parr road name is incorrect. Please change to Bridlewood Lane). 37. An onsite water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to the city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during construction must support the weight of fire apparatus and allow access to facility. Any conditions attached to the approval of the site plan shall be conditions on the issuance of a building permit. A violation of the conditions shall be considered a violation of the ordinance. "" 9C ATTACHMENT "C" Planning Commission 9/9/99 Minutes m" 9C c. Subdivision 99-02 to divide approximately 1.8 acres into 9 lots between Ogle and Brown Street south of Parr Road. Variance 99-09 to lot width standards to two flag lots requirement 30 feet rest is', Oakwood Subdivision. Wilhelm Engineering applicant. Break Chairperson Young opened the Public Hearing. Staff read the applicable ORS Statement and provided presentation as reflected in the Staff Report. Staff indicated he concurred with the applicant's rationale to approve this Variance request. He pointed out that Staff comments were not incorporated into the Staff Report because he was unable to review the application. However, they would make sure that any order that would come back to the Planning Commission, if it is favorable to the Variance, that would substantiate the recommendation. The following are two recommendations made by Staff that are not conditions within the existing Staff Report: (1) the applicant can be required to have property line sidewalks so that a planting strip can be allowed; (2) tree plantings in front of each proposed parcel. Staff recommended approval of Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09. Vice Chairperson Cox inquired whether property line or curbside sidewalks are addressed in the Subdivision Ordinance? Staff reported it is not addressed in the Subdivision Ordinance but it does say that sidewalks will be required but it is up to the discretion of Staff and the Commission to determine where those sidewalks can be placed on the property. He added it is a judgement call on each application because there are no particular standards set forth in the Ordinance. Chairperson Young thanked Staff for including the blue prints. He said they are much easier to read than the small condensed versions that they normally get. Vice Chairperson Cox commented that Staff slipped back to incorporating by reference other departments comments in the Staff Report instead of spelling them out in the list of conditions. Staff explained he did not have the opportunity to review this Staff Report once it was developed. If he had seen this he would have had the individual incorporate them into a long list. He said the order will reflect what the previous process has been. Commissioner Lonergan asked if 30 foot access on the flag lots is good enough for the Fire Department? Staff responded yes. He explained the Fire Department's primary concern is making Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 11[" 9C sure that we have adequate area for them to access the site and back out and turn around. Chairperson Young commented he did not notice any fire hydrants out at the site. Staff stated those become conditions by the Fire Department and Public Works. Vice Chairperson Cox inquired how to work it into the conditions to require tree plantings in the parking strip? Staff replied it would be worded "tree in front of each individual lot". He added we would be looking at a total of six trees. There are requirements as to trees that we make allowance for and those trees that we do not allow within the right-of-way under our Ordinance. Vice Chairoerson Cox asked if the language of the dedication on the actual plat is done by Public Works? He remarked somebody has to double check and make sure that this reciprocal easement and that the easement for utilities in the flag poles of lots 6 and 7 winds up getting in the dedication language on the plat or by a separate easement document. Staff reported there is one person in the Public Works Department that specializes in just reviewing these plats, conditions of approval and making sure that those things that are stated in the Staff Report are followed through on. Testimony by the Applicant George Wilhelm. Wilhelm Engineering. P.O. Box 561. Woodburn. OR stated he is representing the owners, applicant Greg and Olga Saverchenko. He said they believe the requirement of a minimum width of 40 feet for flag lots severely limits and maybe eliminates the option to use flag lots for unique situations. Mr. Wilhelm further stated the proposed 15 foot access with reciprocal easements will provide adequate width for a 24 foot wide paved access way and still leave room for utility services. He believes the application and exhibits adequately address all of the pertinent criteria for approval. Testimony by Proponents Paul C. Sedoruk. LDCD Design Group. 3400 State St. NE. Salem. OR 97301 represents the Lucky Company that developed Steklov Subdivision. He stated they supp"ort the subdivision 100%. However, he expressed concerns based on the conditions of approval with their subdivision. Firstly, he reported their concern with the run off water from this new subdivision draining into the detention pond which is owned and maintained by the Lucky Company. He reported his client is liable for this detention pond and suggested that perhaps the City take ownership and maintenance of the pond. Mr. Sedoruk said it seems like an unfair burden if someone is maintaining a detention pond to allow anyone in the neighborhood that develops this property to Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 t 9C have access to this pond with no additional cost or responsibility that goes along with maintaining and being liable for such a facility. Secondly, he conveyed their concern with Parr Road. Mr. Sedoruk explained that his client has a contract with the City stating that after a year the road has been put in the City will come out and look at the condition of the road. If the road is found to be in good condition, the City will accept the road and release his clients maintenance bonds. He reported in order to develop the new subdivision Parr Road will have to be cut open for water laterals, sewer and storm water connections. He questioned how his client will be relieved of the responsibility of maintaining Parr Road in good stead during that period? They feel a continuance of two weeks to discuss with the City, the Project Engineer and the property owners regarding these issues which at this time, would be in the benefit of the public good. Vice Chairperson Cox asked Mr. Sedoruk if there was a provision placed at the time the detention pond or the road was put in by his client for cost sharing by other properties as they developed to contribute towards the cost of the detention pond? Paul Sedoruk did not believe so. He said they would love to have cost sharing but from what he understands it is too late to ask for that. There was a cost sharing agreement when they did Steklov that even though Brown Road had been approved adjacent to their property that his client had to pay their fair share for Brown Road's improvement. He commented he was not the person representing the Lucky Company during the subdivision of Steklov and did not know why they did not ask for cost sharing at that time. Mr. Sedoruk commented George Wilhelm was the engineer on record and perhaps he could explain why cost sharing was overlooked. Opponents None Applicant Rebuttal George Wilhelm stated he felt Mr. Sedoruk's issue is with the City. As far as his representation with the Lucky Company, they did negotiate with the City on the detention pond and as far as he knows they did receive some concessions. He added the Lucky Company does have an obligation to provide for a storm water that is upstream from their property. Mr. Wilhelm said it is his understanding that this hearing tonight is primarily to consider testimony with regards to the land use issues and although he appreciates the comments from the Lucky Company and their representatives, he thinks they need to address City policies, standards and ordinances at a different time and place. Mr. Wilhelm remarked the applicant he represents tonight will comply with all of the City's appropriate ordinances. Vice Chairperson Cox asked if the development of this subdivision will change the natural course of the surface water flow and divert it into the Lucky Company's subdivision? Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 ~ 9C George Wilhelm replied it will not. He added he believes Parr Road is designed so that the adjacent property will drain onto Parr Road. There will be some drainage that now goes onto Parr Road that will continue to go there as a result of this development. Mr. Wilhelm further commented it is his understanding that Public Works does have a condition that any cuts made in Parr Road, the applicant for this subdivision will be required to grind down the asphalt an 1 ~ inch and replace a whole new surface along there. Chairperson Young announced we are looking at Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99- 09 and therefore not really prepared to go beyond that because they do not have information on it. Additionally, it has been noted and it is in the record. He suggested perhaps the Lucky Company discuss the issue with Staff at a later time. Staff stated if additional documents or evidence are provided by any party, the Planning Commission may allow any party a hearing, a continuance of the hearing or leave the record open to allow the party a reasonable opportunity to respond. Vice Chairperson Cox remarked Mr. Sedoruk has the right to submit new evidence if he wants to but if he just wants time to talk, the Commission will not stop him from talking to Staff or to the applicant. Chairperson Young interjected as part of the order at any public hearing you have the opportunity to submit other evidence for five days afterwards. Vice Chairperson Cox asked Mr. Sedoruk if he is willing that the Public Hearing be closed? Paul Sedoruk replied affirmatively. He stated they just wanted their concerns stated for the record. Chairperson Young closed the Public Hearing. Discussion Vice Chairperson Cox stated it is a good application. He remarked the Commission has no authority over the issues raised by Mr. Sedoruk on behalf of Lucky Company. If there were some decision for the City to take over the detention pond, the decision woul<:i have to made initially by Public Works and then approved by City Council. Vice Chairperson Cox stated the new project will be required to take good care of the pavement and will have their own separate obligations in addition to the obligations that the original builder of the street had. He does not foresee any problems sorting those two things out at the Staff level. Commissioner Bandelow has no objections to the project and stated it fits in with what is going in that end of town. Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 'II'" 9C Commissioner Heer concurred and sees no problems with the 30 foot driveway. Commissioner Lonergan stated he has no problems with the applicant or the project but he personally does not like flag lots. He sees cramming a lot of homes to a small piece of area and would like to see a cul-de-sac or something better. Chairperson Young expressed his concerns with the requirements for the trees being in the sight view. He added the street will have circulation at some point in time but sees no other way to change the configuration. He also stated he does not like flag lots but he thinks it works well in this situation because these lots are much larger than the lots in some of the surrounding developments. Commissioner Heer moved to accept the Staff Report on Subdivision 99-02 and Variance 99-09 with the added conditions of the landscaping and the property line sidewalks and Staff will return with an order. Vice Chairperson Cox seconded the motion. Motion carried with Commissioner Lonergan voting No. Planning Commission Meeting - September 9, 1999 I1r llA COUNCIL BILL NO. 2000 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR THE POSITIONS OF ASSIST ANT CITY ENGINEER AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed a recommendation from the City Administrator to make a salary range adjustment for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and Public Works Manager pursuant to Rule 9.7 of the City's Personnel Policy and Procedure Manual; and WHEREAS, the City Council is obligated per Section II of the Woodburn City Charter to establish compensation for each City officer and employee; now, therefore, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The salary range for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and Public Works Manager be adjusted from grade level II to grade level 13 of the Non-Union General Service Employee Competency/Merit Salary Schedule effective October I, 1999. Section 2. As provided for in Rule 9.7 ofthe City's Personnel Policy and Procedure manual, incumbents in these positions will remain at the same step level in the new range and eligibility for merit adjustments will not change with this salary adjustment. Approved as to Form~ ~/)fv/ ~ \ () - 2. '2. - '1 '\ City Attorney Date APPROVED RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page I - COUNCIL BILL NO. RESOLUTION NO. '"II' liB MEMO FROM: City Council through City Administrator~ Public Works Program Manager ~ $- TO: SUBJECT: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Exchange DATE: October 19, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached resolution entering into a fund exchange agreement with the State of Oregon to exchange federal highway program funds for state funds. BACKGROUND: The federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) enacted in 1999 continued the Surface Transportation Program (STP) which was instituted as part of the Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (lSTEA). The STP funds still must be utilized each federal fiscal year under TEA-21 rules. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) in conjunction with the League of Oregon Cities developed a program after ISTEA was enacted that allowed a city to exchange $1 .00 of this federal STP funding for 94<<:: of state funds which could then be utilized for a much wider variety of projects than authorized under federal funding utilization requirements. This agreement will exchange $80,576 of federal funds for $75,741 in state funds that can be used on any city project approved by ODOT. The project that ODOT approved for the 1999 fund exchange agreement is the widening and addition of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on Soones Ferry Road and Country Club Road. r lIB COUNCIL BILL NO. 2001 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO 1999 FUND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT NO. 17678 WITH THE STATE OF OREGON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO SIGN SUCH AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the State of Oregon acting through its Department of Transportation is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with cities for the performance of work on certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions agreeable to contracting parties pursuant to ORS 366.770 and 366.775, and WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn has applied to exchange federal funds for state funds to assist with the project for widening and addition of bike lanes, sidewalks, storm drainage and signal modifications on Boones Ferry Road and Country Club Road, and WHEREAS, the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, has determined that the city's project is eligible for the exchange of funds, and WHEREAS, the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, has approved the exchange of $80,576 in federal funds for $75,741 in state funds, NOW THEREFORE: THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Woodburn enter into 1999 Fund Exchange Agreement No. 17678, which is affixed as Attachment nAn and by this reference incorporated herein, with the State of Oregon acting by and through its Department of Transportation to exchange $80,576 in federal funds for $75,741 in state funds to assist with the project for widening and addition of bike lanes, sidewalks, storm drainage and signal modifications on Boones Ferry Road and Country Club Road. Page 1 COUNCIL BILL NO. RESOLUTION NO. "" lIB Section 2. That the Mayor and City Recorder of the City of Woodburn are authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City. Approved as to form~'~~ City Attorney Ocf l <h ~ 1 J. Date APPROVED: Richard Jennings, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2 COUNCIL BILL NO. RESOLUTION NO. October 8, 1999 liB Misc. Contracts and Agreements No. 17,678 1999 FUND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "State", and the CITY OF WOODBURN acting by and through its elected officials, hereinafter referred to as "Agency". RECITALS 1. By the authority granted in ORS 366.770 and 366.775, State may enter into cooperative agreements with counties and cities for the performance of work on certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting parties. NOW THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing RECITALS, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: TERMS OF AGREEMENT 1. Agency has submitted a completed and signed Part I of the Project Prospectus outlining the schedule and costs associated with all phases of the widening and addition of bike lanes, sidewalks, storm drainage and modifications of existing signal on Boones Ferry Road and Country Club Road, hereinafter referred to as "Project". 2. To assist in funding the project, Agency has requested State to exchange 1999 Federal Funds, which have been allocated to Agency, for State funds based on the following ratio: $94 State for $100 Federal Based on this ratio, Agency wishes to trade $80,576 Federal Funds for $75,741 State Funds. 3. State has reviewed Agency's prospectus, considered Agency's request for the fund exchange, and has determined that Agency's project is eligible for the exchange funds. 4. The term of this agreement shall begin on the date all required signatures are obtained and shall terminate within two calendar years following that date, unless otherwise extended or renewed by formal agreement of the parties. 11r lIB Fund Exchange Agreement 10/08199 Page 2 5. The parties agree that the exchange is subject to the following conditions: A. The Federal Funds transferred to State may be used by State at its discretion. B. State dollars transferred to Agency must be used for the project named in Terms of Agreement, Item 1, Page 1, of this agreement. This fund exchange is to provide funding for specific roadway projects and is not intended for maintenance. c. State funds may be used for all phases of the project, including preliminary engineering, right of way, utility relocations and construction. Said use shall be consistent with the Oregon Constitution and statutes (Section 3a of Article IX Oregon Constitution). Agency shall be responsible for accounting for expenditure of State Funds. D. This Fund Exchange shall be on a reimbursement basis, with State funds limited to a maximum amount of $75,741. All costs incurred in excess of the fund exchange amount will be the sole responsibility of Agency. E. State certifies at the time this agreement is written that sufficient funds are available and authorized for expenditure to finance costs of this agreement within State's current appropriation or limitation. Funds available for reimbursement on or after July 1, 1999 are contingent upon the legislatively approved budget of State. F. Agency shall be responsible for all costs and expenses related to its employment of individuals to perform the work under this agreement, including but not limited to retirement contributions, workers' compensation, unemployment taxes, and State and Federal income tax withholding. G. Agency shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, executive orders and ordinances applicable to the work under this agreement, including, without limitation, the provisions of ORS 279.312, 279.314, 279.316, 279.320 and 279.555, which hereby are incorporated by reference. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Agency expressly agrees to comply with (i) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964; (ii) Section V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (iii) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and ORS 659.425; (iv) all regulations and administrative rules established pursuant to the foregoing laws; and (v) lIB Fund Exchange Agreement 10/08/99 Page 3 all other applicable requirements of federal and state civil rights and rehabilitation statutes, rules and regulations. H. Agency, or its consultant, shall conduct the necessary preliminary engineering and design work required to produce final plans, specifications and cost estimates; purchase all necessary right of way in accordance with current State and Federal laws and regulations; obtain all required permits; be responsible for all utility relocations; advertise for bid proposals; award all contracts; perform all construction engineering; and make all contractor payments required to complete the project. I. Agency shall compile accurate cost accounting records. Agency shall bill State in a form acceptable to State no more than once a month for costs incurred on the project. State will reimburse Agency at 100 percent of the billing amount not to exceed $75,741. The cost records and accounts pertaining to the work covered by this agreement shall be retained for inspection by representatives of State for a period of three years following final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. J. Agency shall, upon completion of project, maintain and operate the project at its own cost and expense. K. Agency, its consultants or subcontractors, if any, and all employers working under this agreement are subject employers under the Oregon Workers' Compensation Law and shall comply with ORS 656.017 which requires them to provide workers' compensation coverage for all their subject workers. L. This agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of both parties. 1. State may terminate this agreement effective upon delivery of written notice to Agency, or at such later date as may be established by State, under any of the following conditions: a. If Agency fails to provide services called for by this agreement within the time specified herein or any extension thereof. b. If Agency fails to perform any of the other provisions of tnis agreement, or so fails to pursue the work as to endanger - 11r lIB Fund Exchange Agreement 10/08199 Page 4 performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms, and after receipt of written notice from State fails to correct such failures within 10 days or such longer period as State may authorize. 2. Either party may terminate this agreement effective upon delivery of written notice to other party, or at such later date as may be established by the terminating party, under any of the following conditions: a. If either party fails to receive funding, appropriations, limitations or other expenditure authority at levels sufficient to pay for the work provided in the agreement. b. If Federal or state laws, regulations or guidelines are modified or interpreted in such a way that either the work under this agreement is prohibited or either party is prohibited from paying for such work from the planned funding source. 3. Any termination of this agreement shall not prejudice any rights or obligations accrued to the parties prior to termination. M. State and Agency hereto agree that if any term or provision of this agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the agreement did not contain the particular term or provision held to be invalid. 6. Agency personnel who sign this agreement shall be duly authorized to do so by the City Council. 7. This agreement and attached exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the parties on the subject matter hereof. There are no understandings, agreements, or representations, oral or written, not specified herein regarding this agreement. No waiver, consent, modification or change of terms of this agreement shall bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties and all necessary approvals have been obtained. Such waiver, consent, modification or change, if made, shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose given. The failure of State to enforce any provision of this agreement shall not constitute a waiver by State of that or any other provision. I1r lIB Fund Exchange Agreement 10/08/99 Page 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written. The funding for this fund exchange program was approved by the Oregon Transportation Commission on October 15, 1997, as a part of the 1998-2001 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The Financial Services Branch Manager approved the fund exchange on September 20,1999. The Oregon Transportation Commission on March 18, 1999, approved Subdelegation Order No. 2 in which the Director grants authority to the Executive Deputy Director/Chief Engineer to approve and execute agreements over $75,000 when the work is related to a project included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program or in a line item in the approved biennial budget. STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Department of Transportation CITY OF WOODBURN, by and through its elected officials By Executive Deputy Director/Chief Engineer By Title Date By APPROVAL RECOMMENDED Title By By Region 2 Manager Title Date Date APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY By Assistant Attorney General By Agency Legal Counsel I Date Date t lIe MEMO FROM: City Council through City Administrato~ Public Works Program Manager 4 TO: SUBJECT: Authorization for Letter to Chuck Sauvain on Underground Storage Tank Low Level Contamination of Public Right of Way DATE: October 19, 1999 The City Administrator will sign the attached letter, unless council has questions or would like additional information, to Chuck Sauvain regarding contamination from a leaking underground storage tank at 689 N. Front Street that has migrated to some extent beneath the Front Street right of way. Responsibility for the contamination will remain the responsibility of Mr. Sauvain or future owners of the property at 689 N. Front Street. Sauvain Motors in 1993 removed leaking underground storage tanks from the sidewalk area at 689 N. Front Street. There was contaminated soil around these tanks which was removed. Soil was removed from a trench that was 12 feet wide, 13 feet deep and 42 feet long. Due to small amounts of contamination outside of this area and potential danger to the adjacent building and street, DEO allowed the contamination to remain under the building and the street. Tests on the east side of Front Street indicated that no contamination had migrated across the street. The levels of contamination in the street right of way and the building were significantly under the cleanup limits for the contaminants found. DEO has requested that Mr. Sauvain notify the owner of the right of way, the City of Woodburn, and obtain the city's authorization to allow a portion of the contaminant plume to remain under the Front Street right of way. City staff visited the DEO office in Salem and review the entire file on the leaking tanks. The data gathered indicated that the contamination that is under Front Street is well under cleanup standards and that it does not extend beyond the right of way. Staff also held discussions with DEO staff and they indicated that they did not consider the existing levels under Front Street to be of concern and that the letter of authorization from the city is needed to close the file on the site. Staff is recommending that the City Administrator sign the letter to Mr. Sauvain authorizing the contamination to remain under the right of way. '" lIe ODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · TOD (503) 9 , Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 FAX (503) 982-5244 October 26, 1999 Mr. Chuck Sauvain 3216 N. Boones Ferry Road Woodburn, OR 97071 RE: LUST #24-91-4347 Sauvain Motor Company 689 N. Front Street, Woodburn, Oregon Dear Mr. Sauvain: You have provided the City of Woodburn notification that there is contamination under city right of way near 689 N. Front Street as a result of the subject underground storage tank leak. The city has reviewed the completed reports, Initial response and abatement measures - Investigation for soil/groundwater cleanup and Closure report - Sauvain Ford, for the property that were prepared by your consultants. The City of Woodburn has right of way to the east of the area of release of the contamination. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has requested that the city provide you with "authorization granted ........ to allow a portion of the contaminant plume to remain indefinitely beneath the right of way" for submission to DEQ prior to their closing of the site. It should be noted that if contamination is present in the North Front Street right of way, that contamination continues to be the responsibility of the property owner. Should such contamination remaining, in the future, effect publically owned utilities present or work in the effected right of way, any cost associated with the contamination will be the property owners responsibility. I1r llC The City of Woodburn will authorize the conta "ntion to remain under the North Front Street right of way with the understa n t esponsibility for any future additional corrective action, if required rem he property owner of the subject site. John C. Brown City Administrator Sincerely, III" lID MEMO DATE: City Council through City Administrator# Assistant City Engineer ~ October 20, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Easement Covering the Southeast Corner of Jansen Way Subdivision RECOMMENDATION: That easement be accepted as presented. BACKGROUND: The City is in the process of extending a gravity sewer to a 30-year-old pump station. This will nullify the need for a pump station to be there any longer. The work of extension is being accomplished as part of Miller Links Subdivision installation. Miller Links is north of Vanderbeck alignment. When the new gravity sewer is installed, it will be owned and maintained by the city. An easement will, therefore, be required because Jansen Way Subdivision is privately owned. DM:lg Attachment EASEMT/JansenWay IIr lID GRANT OF EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That for and in consideration of the sum of One and No/100 Dollar ($1.00) paid to, H Maroin Adams, Trustee and Claire L Adams, Trustee, has granted and by these presents does grant an EASEMENT unto the City of Woodburn, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, Grantee, its successors and assigns, for the construction, operation and maintenance of a utility easement across the following described property, to wit: A portion of that tract of land situated in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 6, Township 5 South, Range I West of the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, City of Woodburn, Oregon and being more particularly described in a Warranty Deed, recorded in Deed Reel 1240, Page 687 ofMation County Deed Records. Permanent Utility Easement: Commencing at the Northeast comer of Lot 15, Block 5 of Woodburn Senior Estates No.8; thence Northwesterly along the north line of Lot 15 and the arc ofa 1010 foot radius curve to the right an arc distance of 61.04 feet, (the long chord of which bears North 83036'18" West a distance of 61.03 feet); thence North 4040' 12" East parallel to the east line of said Deed Reel 1240, Page 687, a distance of 88.04 feet; thence South 83036' 18" East parallel to the above said long chord a distance of 61.03 feet to said east line of Deed Reel 1240, Page 687; thence South 4040'12" West along said east line a distance of 88.04 feet to the point of beginning. Contains a Total Permanent Utility Easement Area of 5390 square feet, more or less. Temporary Construction Easement: A strip ofland ten (10) feet in width, adjoining and abutting the west and north side of the above described Permanent Utility Easement. All sidelines are to be extended or shorten to intersection said property lines. Contains a Total Temporary Construction Easement Area of 1590 square feet, more or less. Bearings are based on City of Woodburn control which is Oregon State Plane, North Zone 360 I, NAD 83/91, US Foot. Except for current structures as of September 29, 1999, no structure shall be placed within the easement or within a 450 projection upward from the bottom of any pipe. Access, by the City of Woodburn, to the utilities shall be allowed at any time for inspection or repair. Restoration: Grantee agrees to remove and dispose of all waste material or debris, fill all holes and depressions caused by construction with material meeting the City standards and reshape the area to conform to adjacent undisturbed topography. Landscaping and paving restoration shall be in conformance with City standards. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said easement unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. H:/wp "'proj/112-020/easementJeasl,otl5.doc 09/29/99 3:25 PM - 11'f' lID This instrument does not grant or convey any right or title to the herein described property, except for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining utilities; however, the rights to the Grantor is exercising is herein granted, shall not interfere with Grantees use of said described real property. Dated this day of ,19_, GRANTEE: GRANTOR: CITY OF WOODBURN, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon By: By: Name Name Title Title By: By: Name Name Title Title SSe by Brenda Will iarns - Notary Public - Oregon My commission expires May 04, 2002 1_ OFFICIAL SEAl BRENDA A. WilLIAMS .... ../ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON , COMMISSION NO. 311906 MY COMMISS!O!\! S<PIRES MAY 4, 2002 ~-~--- H:/wp ...,proj/112-020/ea.sement/easlotl ~ . doc 2 09/29/99 3:25 PM Ill' A o 15' 30' PERMANENT EASEMENT t//./ // ///A TEMPORARY CONSlRUCllON EASEMENT 1--- --- -- ------1 TAX LOT 100 TAX LOT 100 JANSEN WAY PUMP STATION (EXISTING ON SEPT. 29, 1999) lID 60' CURB CURB JANSEN WAY 17 ~ AS10R W A '( WOODBURN SENIOR EST A TES EXISllN 7' JANSEN WAY GRAVITY SEWER 16 / / / / / / / / l.{) ~ () 15 0 -..J QJ PROPOSED HERITAGE PARK MEADOWS 14 DAlE (I~~-~ aTY OF WOODBURN FIGURE .."..... '.::.:\ Zngi . j.sW\l8ying SEPT 29, 1999 ." .. '~~::~:" neenng UllUTY EASatENT ( ~:~-:,. '-".".".:. I esee SE LN<E RD. SUITE D 1 /1 ~NO. ::~;::.. ...,. 1llI..WAUIQE, OREGON 17222 S.W. 1/4- OF SECTION 6 - .... 'j . 4 uu 112-020 ...:::':::' .,;::r PH: (~$54-200& T.55., R.1WN' W.M. CITY OF WOODBURN ';'::'!.5':', ~ FAX: ) 854-2575 MARIO COUNlY, OREGON 1rr liE MEMO For Council Action, through the City Administrator #'k6 Randy Scott, CE Tech III, through Public Works Director Contract award for sidewalk construction, bid no. 20-07 October 21, 1999 To: From: Subject: Date: RECOMMENDATION: It is being recommended the City Council award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, D & D paving Co, dba: Axis Curb Co. for the East Hardcastle Sidewalk improvement in the amount of$45,420.65. BACKGROUND: The contract is for the installation of a 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk on the South side of East Hardcastle Street, Project No 990045-45, Bid No. 20-07. The sidewalk will be installed from Heritage Ave. to the existing sidewalk near Mall 99. Presently no sidewalk exists on either side along this portion of East Hardcastle. The installation will provide for safer pedestrian traffic. The preliminary design for future street improvements on East Hardcastle has been completed to establish design grades and location of the future improvement. The sidewalk is being installed to conform with location and grades as established by the design. This improvement is funded under approved budget line item 363-631-710.004. Staff received a total of two qualified bids, as listed below 1. D & D paving Co, dba: Axis Curb Co $45,420.65 2. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc. $46,768.90 The Engineers Estimate $49,360.00 ( Note the low bid is 8% Below the Engineers estimate) - City of Woodburn Police Department IIF STAFF REPORT 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn OR 97071 (503) 982-2345 Date: October 19, 1999 From: Paul Null, Chief of Police To: Mayor and City Council John Brown, City Administrator% Through: Subject: Oregon Golf Association, Members Club, Inc - Liquor License Application (License Upgrade and Name Change) On October 15, 1999, the police department received application from Oregon Golf Association Properties - Members Club Inc., to upgrade their liquor license from a Retail Malt Beverage (RMB) license to a Dispenser Class A license (DA). Oregon Golf Association liquor license is currently under the name of OGA Members Course - 19th Green. The applicant is also requesting the liquor license be issued under the new business name of OGA Members Course. Applicant, OGA Members Course, has been licensed by OLCC since May 1994. A comprehensive background investigation was completed by the police department and nothing of an adverse nature was found on applicants or the license premise. The background investigation also established no violations of liquor laws have occurred at the licensed premise. OGA is in the process of building a new club house, restaurant and lounge. The new restaurant & lounge will be managed by Dennen Van Wagner. A background investigation was completed on Mr. Van Wagner and nothing of an adverse nature was found. Dispenser, Class A License: This is the only license that allows the sale of distilled spirit drinks to the general public for consumption on the premises. The sale of wine and malt beverages for consumption on the premises is also allowed. This dispenser license is issued only to places where food is cooked and served and where food sales account for 25% or more of the gross (food and liquor) sales. This percentage is required at all times. Hours of sale and consumption are 7 a.m. to 2:30 a.m. Recommendation: The City Council recommend to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission to grant a Dispenser, Class A license to the Oregon Golf Association Members Course. cc Applicant OLCC ~ fII" Woodburn Police Department IIF Distribution: OLCC Records Ini tial. Report 99-007347 Connect , Liqour Lic App - Upgrade Reported Date/Time: 10/15/1999 0908 Occurred Date/Time: 10/15/1999 0908 to Location: 2850 Hazelnut DR Woodburn Grid: ........~-~ ............. 1 ---= UPLOAD SUMMARY: On 101599, I began a liquor License application background investigation into the OGA's members' Course. The business was applying for an upgraded liquor license and new manager. ADDITIONAL INFO: Business: OGA Members Course AKA: 2850 Hazelnut DR Woodburn, OR Phone: (503}981-0270 Type: Business Past name of business: OGA Members Course (19th Green} .... Business: Oregon Golf Association Prop AKA: 2990 N Boones Ferry RD Woodburn, OR Business: Oregon Liquor Control Comm AKA: 213 Madrona ST SE Salem, OR Phone: (503}378-4871 Type: Business Lionel Salgado, Inspector OLCC Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17~ Case Status/Date: EN 10/15/1999 Approved: Follow-up Required: N Assigned to Patrol or Detectives: Follow up Assigned to: # Date: By: Other: C.M. Entry: Page 1 30J 111" 99-007347 Woodburn Police Department IIF -:-1' Business: Secretary of State AKA: 158 Twelveth ST NE sALEM, OR Phone: (503)986-2200 Type: Business Corporation Commission Division ~ ~- ".. ... - ~-~- ......~--: --~- Business: Better Business Bureau AKA: SW Market ST Portland, OR Phone: (503) 226-3981 Type: Business LA' ---~::- -~ Business: Dept of Justice- Atty General AKA: 1162 Court ST NE Salem, OR Phone: (503)378-4320 Type: Business Department of Consumer/Business Services - Complaints Business: u.s. Bankruptcy Court AKA: 1001 SW Fifth ST Portland, Phone: (503)326-2231 OR Type: Business L= .:II. .. Involved Person: Stetson, Martin Sumner AKA: Stetson, Tim Hair: Grey/Partial 13310 SW Fox Run DR Phone: (503)639-9210 OLN: 393945 (OR) Employer/School: Stetson and Associates 13310 SW Fox Run DR Days: Varied Hours: Varied Schenectedy,New York/ General Manager OGA Members, Inc DOB: OS/29/1944 Hqt: 5 FT 8 Eye: Brown Age: IN Wqt: 55 WM 195 Lake Oswego, OR Type: Home SSN: 017-34-0691 Phone: Lake Oswego, OR (503)981-6105 Business Work Work PoB: - Involved Person: Pearson, Jerry Mizera AKA: Pearson, Jerry Hair: Grey/Partial 5970 Langford LN Lake Oswego, OR Phone: (503)620-2836 Type: OLN: 1920772 (OR) Employer/School: Self employed OGA Members, Inc/ President of DOB: 07/11/1935 Hqt: 6 FT 0 Eye: Blue Age: IN Wqt: 64 WM 185 Home SSN: 535-30-4626 Financial Consul Phone: the Board of Directors (503)684-3438 Business -- - Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17716 Page 2 I1r 99-007347 Woodburn Police Department 'II I'i' - ....111. III _r ........... " - IIF Involved Person: Van Wagner, Dennen ARA: Hair: Brown 29590 SW Courtside DR #1 Phone: (503) 582-8662 OLN: 9611005 (OR) Employer/School: OGA Members, Inc 2850 Hazelnut DR Work Days: varied Work Hours: varied DOB: 08/19/1971 Hqt: 6 FT 6 Eye: Brown Wi1sonville, OR Type: Home IN Age: Wqt: 28 WM 240 SSN: Phone: (503)981-0270 Business Woodburn, OR ...--.... ==========--: ~~---~=--~~~ -- = ~= C1UME ANALYSIS DATA: SOLICITED: Other TOOL USED: CRIME PREY: Alarm Operation ID CARDS: None TARGET: AREA: Residential TYPE: Private PREMISE: Golf Course Club House , ENTERED: 0 ~ __--<I..... -- Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17716 Page 3 ur 99-007347 Woodburn Police Department T ~ - ~~~r IIF ~~~= Background Investigation: stetson, Martin Sumner - 1. Criminal History: No criminal history was located for Mr Stetson. 2. Operator License Status: No entries were found on the driving record of Mr Stetson. Pearson, Jerry Mizera - 1. Criminal History: No criminal history was found for Mr Pearson. 2. Operator License Status: One entry was found where Mr Pearson was involved in a traffic accident. The incident occurred on 032990. No other entries were found on the driving record. Van Wagner, Dennen - 1. Criminal History: No criminal history was located for Mr Van Wagner. 2. Operators License Status: One entry was found on Mr Van Wagner's driving record. The entry was for a speeding citation. Van Wagner convicted on the charge. Corporation Division: The Corporation Division was contacted. The division advised that The OGA Members, Inc, is a valid corporation and has been incorporated since July 7th, 1993. Better Business Bureau: 1. No listings or complaints were found against the OGA Members, Inc. 2. No listings or complaints were found against the business formerly called the 19th Green/OGA Members Club. Oregon Liquor Control Commission: 1. No liquor violation citations were issued to the 19th Green. 2. No violation citations were issued to the OGA Members, lnc business. Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17716 Page 4 - 99-007347 Woodburn Police Department T__~ '" ~ .4~=-- 11F 3. No violations incidents or violation citations were found on any of the principle person involved in this license application: Van Wagner, Stetson, or Pearson. state of Oregon Department of Justice/Consumers Complaints: 1. No complaints were filed against the OGA Members, Inc./19th Green business. Bankruptcy Court: 1. No bankruptcy issues were found by the court. Records Scan for involved business: 1. business The scan majority insecure involved A records scan was conducted for the 19th for the calendar year of 1997. showed a total of thirteen (13) calls for of the calls were for alarms, burglary, premises, and traffic accidents. No calls liquor violations or disturbances. green/OGA Members, Inc service. The for service 2. A records scan was conducted for the 19th Green/OGA Members, Inc business for the calendar years of 1998. The scan showed a total of fourteen (14) calls for service for the business. The calls were again for burglaries alarms, vandalism, and traffic accidents. No calls were found involving liquor violations or disturbances. 3. A records scan was conducted for the 19th Green/OGA Members, Inc for the calendar year of 1999. A total of ten (10) calls for service were found dating to June of 1999. Again, as in the previous scans, no calls for service involved liquor violations, disturbances, fights, etc. Narrative: On 101599, I completed a background investigation for a liquor license application. and change of ownership for the business called the 19th Green/OGA Members, Inc at located at 2990 N. Soones Ferry Rd. The new club house address will be 2850 Hazelnut Dr. I contacted spoke with Mr Martin Stetson. He advised that he has not monetary interests, and he was not the owner of the OGA Members, Inc lounge/club. He advised that he was General Manager for the golf course as well as a consultant for the organization. He advised he has the authority to conduct business for the organization, but that he would not be involved in the actual sale of alcoholic beverages. He stated that would be left up to bar manager, Dennen Van Wagner. I contacted and spoke with Mr Jerry Pearson. He advised that he is the Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17716 Page 5 ~ 99-007347 Woodburn Police Department - - -~ ~v-- - ============ President of the OGA Members, Inc and the golf course. He advised that He would not be involved in the running and sale of alcoholic beverages. He stated that the manager of the bar, Dennen Van Wagner, would be the one in charge of the that aspect of the business. Mr Pearson advised he did not own and he did not have any monetary interests in the organization/business. IlF I contacted Mr Dennen Van Wagner. He advised me that he was the manager of the food and beverage section of the OGA Members, Inc, business. He advised that he was the primary license holder. He advised that he already had a license from OLCC. He advised me that he would be on the premises most of the time and be in charge of the section. He would also have input on who is going to be hired to bar tend when the club house and lounge fully opens. He stated the business hours for the restaurant/lounge would vary by season. The hours were not set as yet, but as soon as that was completed the I would be notified of what those hours would be. I conducted a wants/DMV records scan on each of the involved person. They were all valid and clear. No one had a criminal history. A records scan on each person showed no calls for service involving any of them. I contacted and spoke with Laurie McDaniels from OLCC in Salem. I requested she check the files on the 19th Green, and the OGA Members, Inc. I was advised, by Miss McDaniels, that the OLCC files showed no violations, or complaints against the business. She also advised me that this was an upgrading and a change of ownership from the 19th Green to the OGA Members Course. I also spoke Miss McDaniels about the license possessed by Mr Van Wagner. She advised me that no voilations were found in the OLCC files involving Mr Van Wagner nor any of the other subjects on the application. The license was valid for Van Wagner. - - - ~ ~ = Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17716 Page 6 !I!' WORKSHOP MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES and RECREATION AND PARKS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES 'IT October 25, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Counci!...,// City Administrator ....J W System Develooment Chal'2es and Transoortation Imoact Fees Workshoo Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council conduct a workshop regarding system development charges for Recreation and Parks, and Transportation Impact Fees. Background: System development charges, or SDCs, and transportation impact fees, or TIFs (system development charges for transportation), are collected to assure future growth contributes its fair share to the cost of capital improvements and additions to city facilities required to accommodate the needs of that growth. Recreation and Parks SDC's were set in 1991, and have not been updated. TIFs were updated in 1993, effective January 1, 1994. Both were established on standards of service methodologies, rather than on specific capital improvements, and were set at less than one hundred percent recovery. Standards-based fees reflect the expected cost of providing improvements at existing levels of service rather than on the cost of specific capital improvements. Both sets of fees are subject to periodic review, to maintain an appropriate nexus between the fees to be collected and the improvements and facilities to be funded with the fees. Discussion: Since 1993, the Transportation System Plan was adopted, an alternatives analysis has been conducted for 214 widening, and a capital improvement plan for street improvements has been completed. Street projects were completed, and a Recreation and Parks Comprehensive Plan and accompanying capital improvements schedule was presented to the City Council for adoption. There are also changes to state law that affect SDCs and TIPs that need to be incorporated in the city's procedures. Based on the forgoing, fee update studies were undertaken by the consulting firm of Don Ganer and Associates. Mr. Ganer was instrumental in setting and updating our SDC's and TIFs in the past. The updates that will be discussed during your October 25th workshop are primarily based on capital improvements as defined by approved plans, but include some standards-based assumptions as well. The workshop scheduled for October 25th will provide you with background regarding the current legislative authority for system development charges, the types of I1r Mayor and City Council October 25, 1999 Page 2. fees, and the legal requirements and concepts that guided the proposed update methodologies. These items are detailed in the update methodology and rate studies compiled by Mr. Ganer and included with your agenda package. A public hearing is set for November 8, 1999 to discuss Recreation and Parks SDCs and TIPs. Mr. Ganer will be at your October 25th workshop to discuss these in detail and to answer any questions you may have. JCB I1r CITY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) UPDATE METHODOLOGY REPORT AND RATE STUDY as of October 20, 1999 15418 NW White Fox Dr. · Beaverton, Oregon 97006 · (503) 690-8981 Don Ganer & Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ 1.0 Introduction......... ........ ............... ......... ......... ...... ..... ......................... 1 2.0 Authority and Background Information...................................... 2 A. Legislative Authority .............................................................. 2 B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's..... 2 C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts.. ........................................................................ 3 D. Guiding Concepts......... ...... ..... .................. ............................. 4 E. Alternative Methodology Approaches............................... 5 3.0 Transportation Impact Fee Methodology................................... 7 A. SDC Basis and Justification.................................................... 7 B. Future Trip Projections.......................................................... 7 C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC...................... 9 4.0 Calculation of the Transportation Impact Fee............................ 15 A. Formula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip by Mode of Travel.................................................................. 15 B. Formula 2: Net New Person-Trips....................................... 16 C. Formula 3: Length Adjusted Person-Trips......................... 21 D. Formula 4: Motor Vehicle (MY) Cost Per Unit................. 27 E. Formula 5: Pedestrian/Bicycle (P/B) Cost Per Unit.......... 32 F. Formula 6: Transit Cost Per Unit......................................... 37 G. Formula 7: Transportation Impact Fee Per Unit............... 42 Table 3.1: Table 3.2: Table 4.1: Table 4.2: Table 4.3: Table 4.4: Table 4.5: Table 4.6 Table 4.7: LIST OF TABLES Projected Growth in Average Daily Trips (ADT)............ TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects................................................................................. . Cost Per New Person-Trip By Mode Of TraveL............. Net New Person-Trips. ........ ........ .......... .......... ..... ........... .... Length Adjusted Person-Trips................. .......... ..... ..... ....... Motor Vehicle Cost Per Unit.............................................. Pedestrian/ Bicycle Cost Per Unit....................................... Transit Cost Per Unit... ........ ......... ........................ .......... ..... Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Per Unit....................... ~ 8 12 15 17 23 28 33 38 43 CITY OF WOODBURN Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Update Methodology Report and Rate Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Woodburn implemented a Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) for all new development in the City occurring after January 1, 1994. Because the City's Transportation System Plan was not yet completed at that time, the TIF amounts were based on the expected costs of providing road facilities at the existing Levels of Service (LOS), rather than on the costs of specific capital improvement projects. In June 1996, Kittleson and Associates, Inc., completed a 20-year Transportation System Plan (Plan) for the City of Woodburn which identifies roadway, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, access management, and other transportation needs in accordance with the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Transportation Planning Rule, OAR 660 Division 12. The Plan includes an assessment of existing conditions of the transportation system, an assessment of highway and transit system alternatives, identification of potential financing mechanisms, and an evaluation of alternate pedestrian and bicycle facility and Transportation Demand Management (rOM) strategies. The Plan also includes recommended facilities, standards, and improvements for roadway, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and rail transporta tion. Several of the transportation system projects included in the Plan have already been completed, and additional transportation capital facility needs have been identified by the City since the time the Plan was adopted. A portion of these facility needs are for capacity-increasing capital improvements which will accommodate growth, and which may be funded with revenues from a TIF. This report presents the methodology used to update the City's TIP to include growth-related motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Section 2.0 presents authority and background information including (1) legislative authority for the TIF; (2) an explanation of "improvement fee" and "!reimbursement fee" SDC's; (3) requirements and options for credits, exemptions and discounts; (4) guiding concepts for SDC's and (5) alternative methodology approaches. The methodology used to develop the updated TIP is discussed in Section 3.0, and the rate calculations are included in Section 4.0. Don Ganer cSt Associates 1 as of 10/20/99 2.0 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Legislative Authority The City's TIF is a System Development Charge (SDC) authorized by the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314). The purpose of this Act was to "...provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...". In 1993, SB 122 was passed to include additional statutory provisions. Together, these pieces of legislation require local governments who adopt SDC's to: · enact SDC's by ordinance or resolution; · develop a methodology outlining how the SDC's were developed; · adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to designate capital improvements that can be funded with SDC revenues; · provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of "qualified public improvements"; · separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC revenues; · develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and · use SDC revenues only for capital expenditures (operations and maintenance uses are prohibited). B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of SDC's: (1) "improvement fee" SDC's, and (2) "reimbursement fee" SDC's. "Improvement fee" SDC's may be charged for new or expanded capacity-increasing capital improvements needed to serve growth. The City's current TIP is an "improvement fee" SDC. "Reimbursement fee" SDC's may be charged for the costs of existing capital facilities if "excess capacity" is available to accommodate growth. Revenues from "reimbursement fee" SDC's may be used on any capital improvement project, including major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements funded with "reimbursement fee" SDC's do not need to increase capacity. The City's water and sewer SDC's include "reimbursement fee" components, but the TIF does not. Don Ganer &: Associates 2 as of 10/20/99 C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts (1) Credits A credit is a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific development. The Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the construction of a "qualified public improvemenf' which (1) is required as a condition of development approval, (2) is identified in the CIP, and (3) either is not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or is located on or contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project. The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied against an SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a transportation improvement can only be used for a credit for a transportation SDC), and may be granted only for the cost of that portion of an improvement which exceeds the minimum standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular project. For multi-phase projects, any excess credit may be applied against SDC's that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project. For "reimbursement fee" SDC's, credit must also be given for future property tax payments, such as repayment of bonded indebtedness, used to fund the "excess capacity" facilities for which the reimbursement fee SDC is charged. In addition to these required credits, the City may, if it so chooses, provide a greater credit, establish a system providing for the transferability of credits, provide a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the capital improvement plan, or provide a share of the cost of an improvement by other means. None of the City's current SDC's include credit provisions beyond those required by law. Don Ganer & Associates 3 as of 10/20/99 (2) Exemptions The City may "exempt" specific types of development from the requirement to pay SDC's. Exemptions reduce SDC revenues and, therefore, they either increase the need for funding from other sources, such as bonds, or reduce/ delay the completion of transportation projects. The City's current SDC's provide limited exemptions for alterations, expansion or replacement of an existing dwelling unit where no additional dwelling units are created; the construction of accessory buildings or structures which will not create additional dwelling units and which do not create additional demands on the City's capital improvements; the issuance of a permit for a mobile home on which applicable system development charges have previously been made as documented by receipts issued by the City for such prior payment; and development with vested rights. (3) Discounts For "improvement fee" SDC's, the City may "discounf' the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of growth-related improvements to be funded with SDC's. For "reimbursement fee" SDC's, the City may "discounf' the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of "extra-capacity" facilities for which the reimbursement fee SDC will be collected, or by making other adjustments in the fee. Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as bonds, that may be needed to meet Level of Service requirements. All of the City's current SDC's include discounts. D. Guiding Concepts In addition to the requirements of the Oregon SDC Act and sa 122, court cases from Oregon and other states provide additional guidance for the methodology to be used in developing SDC's. Don Ganer & Associates 4 as of 10/20/99 (1) "Essential Nexus" Requirement In a 1987 case, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court established that government agencies must show that an "essential nexus" (e.g. reasonable connection) exists between a project's impacts and any dedication requirements. For SDC's the "essential nexus" requirement means there must be a reasonable connection between the nature of the development and the facilities for which the SDCs are charged. For transportation SDC's the essential nexus is met for any development that connects to the transportation system. (2) "Rough Proportionality" Requirement In a landmark 1994 decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard, the U.S. Supreme Court cited the requirement for "rough proportionality" between the requirements placed on a developer by government and the impacts of the development. Case law is conflicting on the question of whether Dolan applies to SDC s. However, to avoid controversy, the City's TIF update is structured so that the Dolan test is satisfied. The concept of rough proportionality is applied by insuring that new growth is not required to pay an amount beyond a level "roughly proportionate" to the new development's impacts on facilities through the use of nationally recognized standards for levels-of-service and trip generation. E. Alternative Methodology Approaches There are three basic approaches used to develop SDC s; "standards-driven", "improvements-driven" I and "combination/ hybrid". Don Ganer & Associates 5 as of 10/20/99 (1) Standards-Driven Approach The "standards-driven" approach is based on the application of level-of-service (LOS) standards (i.e., A, B, C, etc.) for facilities. Facility capacity is determined by applying the LOS Standards to the projected future use of the facilities. SDC- eligible amounts are calculated based on the costs or value of capacity needed or available to serve growth. The "standards-driven" approach may be used to develop "improvement fee" SDC's and! or "reimbursement fee" SDC's, and works best where LOS Standards have been identified and! or adopted as part of a comprehensive plan or facilities master planning process. The City's current TIF was developed using the standards-driven approach. (2) Improvements-Driven Approach The "improvements-driven" approach is based on a specific list of planned capacity-increasing capital improvements. The portion of each project that is attributable to growth is determined, and the SDC-funded costs are calculated by dividing the total costs of growth-related projects by the projected increase in units of facility use (i.e., trips, persons, etc.). This approach may be used to develop "improvement fee" SDC's, and works best where a detailed project list has been developed and the benefits of projects can be apportioned between growth and current residents. (3) Combination! Hybrid Approach The combination! hybrid-approach includes elements of both the "improvements-driven" and "standards-driven" approaches. LOS standards may be used to develop a list of planned capacity-increasing projects. The growth-related portions of projects can then be used as the basis for determining the SDC-funded costs. This approach may be applied in developing "improvement fee" SDC's and works best where a list of capacity needs has not recently been developed and where sufficient data is available to identify levels- of-service. Don Ganer &: Associates 6 as of 10/20/99 3.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE METHODOLOGY A. SDC Basis and Justification The "combination-hybrid" approach has been used to update the City of Woodburn's TIF. A list of planned capacity-increasing motor vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit transportation capital improvement projects was analyzed to identify: 1) the modal split (motor vehicle, pedestrian/bicycle, and/or transit), 2) the growth-related portion (based on application of the City's adopted transportation Level of Service standards), and 3) the local benefit of each project. The resulting SDC-eligible project costs were then divided by the estimated total number of new person-trips expected during the planning period, yielding the cost per new person-trip for each travel mode. The methodology used for the Transportation Impact Fee is for an "improvement fee" only and establishes the required "essential nexus" between a project's impacts and the SDC through the use of trip generation data for specific land uses. Trip Generation (6th Ed., 1997) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) was used to estimate the number of new motor vehicle trips generated by each type of new development. The SDC to be paid by new development meets the "rough proportionality" requirement because it is based on the impact of each specific development on the transportation facilities for which the SDC is charged. The TIF is based on the impacts of new trips, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact (e.g. new trips) a development is expected to have on the City's transportation system. B. Future Trip Projections Current projections indicate that Woodburn will see a significant increase in the average number of motor vehicle trips either beginning or ending in the City between 1999 and 2020. EMME/2 traffic model data for the City maintained by Kittleson and Associates indicates that new daily vehicle trips will increase by approximately 32,832, as shown in Table 3.1, page 8. Don Ganer &; Associates 7 as of 10/20/99 The methodology used for the City of Woodburn's TIF update required estimates of motor vehicle occupancy, pedestrian/bicycle trips, and transit ridership. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) maintains average motor vehicle occupancy rates for Oregon cities with populations above 10,000. ODOT's average motor vehicle occupancy rate for Woodburn is 1.54 persons/ vehicle. Transit trips were estimated at 2% of vehicle occupancy, based on ridership data included in the 1996 Transportation System Plan. Pedestrian and bicycle trip rate data for various land uses is not available, so estimates of 5% to 10% of vehicle trips are often used by planners and traffic engineers. The City of Portland's traffic model estimates pedestrian and bicycle trips at an average of approximately 8% of vehicle person-trips. Because Woodburn is not as urbanized as Portland, 5% of vehicle person-trips was used to estimate pedestrian and bicycle person trips in the City. These estimates were used to calculate the total average number of person-trips generated per vehicle trip: 1.65; so for every ten motor vehicle trips, an average of 15.4 persons travel by motor vehicle, and an additional 1.1 persons travel as pedestrians, by bicycle, or by transit. The projected increases in average daily motor vehicle trips and person-trips are shown in Table 3.1, below. TABLE 3.1 PROJECfED GROWTH IN AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT) 1999 - 2020 Trip Category 1999 ADT 2020 ADT Increase Motor vehicle trips 71 ,228 104,060 32,832 Motor vehicle person-trips 109,691 160,252 50,561 (at 1.54 persons/vehicle) Pedestrian/ bicycle person-trips 5,485 8,013 2,528 (at 5% of motor vehicle person-trips) Transit person-trips 2.194 3.205 1,011 (at 2% of motor vehicle person-trips) Total person-trips 117,370 171,470 54,100 Don Ganer &: Associates 8 as of 10/20/99 C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC Capital improvement projects included in the City's adopted 1996 Transportation System Plan which have not yet been completed were reviewed and considered for TIP funding. Each uncompleted project which includes capacity-increasing capital improvements on collector or arterial roads for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, or transit facilities has been included in the TIF. The list of capital improvement projects and the SDC-eligible portion of costs is included in Table 3.2, pages 12 - 14. For each project, the following information is presented: 1) Name/Description - a brief description of the project scope (i.e., capacity only improvement, capacity/design improvement, etc.) and location. Some projects include improvements that will benefit more than one mode of travel, such as motor vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle travel, while others benefit only one mode of travel. 2) Project Cost - the total estimated cost for the project (1999 dollars). 3) Federal/State/Other Funding Sources - the estimated portion (percentage) of project funds from federal, state, or other sources. 4) Net Local Transportation Funding - the estimated portion (dollars) of project funds that will come from local transportation sources (including TIP). 5) Capacity Portion - the estimated capacity-increasing portion of the project. 6) Motor Vehicle Costs a) Motor Vehide Benefit -the estimated portion of the project that will serve motor vehicles, as opposed to pedestrians, bicycles, or transit. Don Ganer &: Associates 9 as of 10/20/99 b) Motor Vehicle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve future growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies were determined using the following formula: Current Volume minus Current Capacity Future Capacity minus Current Capacity c) Motor Vehicle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. The percentage of through trips was estimated at 49% based on EMME!2 traffic model data for the City. d) Motor Vehicle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Motor Vehicle Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-motor vehicle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. 7) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Costs a) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will serve pedestrians and bicycles, as opposed to motor vehicles or transit. b) Pedestrian! Bicycle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for off-road facilities were determined based on the following formula: Future Population (2020) minus Current Population (1999) Future Population (2020) Deficiencies for sidewalks and on-road bicycle facilities were determined using the following formula: Don Ganer &: Associates 10 as of 10/20/99 Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads Without Sidewalks Total Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads c) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. An estimate of 5% of all pedestrian/ bicycle trips being "through trips" (neither beginning nor ending in the City) was used for collectors and arterials. d) Pedestrian/Bicycle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Pedestrian/ Bicycle Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-pedestrian/bicycle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. 8) Transit Costs a) Transit Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will serve transit users, as opposed to motor vehicles, pedestrians, or bicycles. b) Transit Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for transit facilities were determined based on the following formula: Future Population (2020) minus Current Population (1999) Future Population (2020) c) Transit Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. 100% of transit trips are considered to be local. d) Transit New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Transit Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-transit benefit, non- growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. Don Ganer & Associates 11 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 3.2 TIP-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects page 1 ~...I()~~I.:Jl!lI{~~tl!( ,..~tLoc;~1 Motor MV Future; MV Local' MV New SDC "., ::Projl!,c~ ~()~L. ,~!!t!~,., L.. IJ~r1lO., ui .<:a,Il~l:iJ)'. jYl!I1~1e J~,{G~.~~t~]jrjp~~;;~~L:::~jiQ!~j;; ,. ...uuuuu.. Proiect Title ,... ' .u.tlnID. ..,;Fundina (%LFundina ($) .fportion (%):,.Benefit % 'f Benefit %; Portion %;'..'.Am9Jm1. ~~Il,a,cit}'.Qr1IY.J!!lIl~c;I,~I!,ml!Il,t!!. .., ........ """".u, ..... ........ ..... .... ......'- ........u,...... 199!t-2005 .......................... ...,.... '...................u...,..u. ,...u.,... 1~,5..J>ar~~.I.<:,~.~r.Ie.~.t7.~,sigIl!EIl,v,.~t!llliI!1l. .~l..U().6.()()1.. ..9.9%L..u~1JI.()~.()Lu.1. 00% ,.....Il,5%! ,u,J,o()%; ... .JiJ%;,...u$~,()&~Ei !~.5. 1 /2 p.m~J..~~.~f'!4!~L~,S,()r1~,r.!Il:tj()1l u:,$.oM.Q(),9(),oL ....Ei~.%1..~L.5.,~'O~()(),()~.......J'O'()%j .u....1l5%: ..,J.Q.<>%j..,.Eil.%L. ..~7.9..~.1~.()5. ,H!gI1~'y',~,I,<l..I;.(l.v.i!'.()r1~r1~~L~~.~Y..", ,. ., ."" '" ".""" ,j.,',.~5.()(M9()j. '" .,.' .1<>~,;.. ....$~}Q(),,()<>()L, ..,J,<>()%[ .8,5.%l "",J.()().%: "..,'",Eit~l, ",.$J.5.5.,.5.5.'O' .Wic:ll!I1.tfi!l."waY.?H.~.I-:!i.~().!J()()IlI!li.FI!f.~ .$4,,~!i!M.o.()~., ..u6,Ei~,L$J,Ei5.?,,o,Ei():..... J<><>%L .....85.%~. 1 OO%'..H~L u.~5.Ei,,5.9.~ .. .....,.. . ,..2006-2015. . ." ........ ., ........ I-:!iJl1t,erl:~.!1.lll!..~'~ern~~lO.~~u,dy .uu,.".,."".,.". ...JJjQ;9i,lQ[:."..()%,: :::,$i~9:Q99j ,."jQ~[.:.u...~,5.%,[ J()()~: ',:,:::~i%l,.....~n.?!..5., .Nt!~!:-5.!r1~l!r(;~llgl!.... ......L$1.M()},1.0()!. .J()()%[ .$<>1, 100%: 85%' 190% .....Ei1.%l.u.........$<>, Wic:ll!r1.tfi!l.,,~y.?H.~JJ()()Ill!lO fl!,r~,J()p.~r~."~, ,. ,L$4,.~9.9.()9()L ,., .7:!i.%{:~i:~4.i:5.<>()L:i9~[::::::a:~%I. 190%'" u. ,Eil%L.....$,().4M?9., ~(),uJI1. NJl!r.~L:"~()"~!)l!lO.J~.rr.y,..,...",,,,. ,. "L.~I.Ei.Ei7.,:4,~(),l"", '".".,55.,.,Oo',,'~,',,'~.. ',..'.'.SS.,..~l,.',.,87'",39'.',.,36',~ 78.....71..,51.,.,!:..',','".,',','"""~I.,..00.,,.~,.,.,',',;..,," "".,....Il,5.,%.i ,u,J.o,9.%.;. ",Ei,1.%.J..,$,l,,~~Z.7..8J ~,uJI1."r.tl!r,~L:,~.()~..fl!rJ}',~,d:.~(),I:l,~..9.9.,E . .~M,nI1?L 7V. A V7V. ..........Il5..%.L.J.o.<>%l. .,..EiJ.%.L....$9.H.H!l 9?,()IeY,R()!I11"~,tl!r1llill!H(),~!!Y.l!~()!LRll,, ,,~?.u().,9.,l,()+: ,.,',',',',',',',','.',',.0,',.%,',',','::,:. ...~u,.,.,5.,.,O,.,~"9."l",,O,'.'~:.:::.',',.., 1 9,0.%.,:: ,..Il,5,%L...J9()%J 61%: Sl 426347 ,<:~ 1I~(;,i,ty/Ql! lOi9. !!.... !!!l.P.r.~.Vl!!11,e,!!~lO ---,',,',---.---',',: .. ---.... n....' . .. ','"",'.,'"'".".,,.,,',,',,".'.".,',,1,...... -'--.. ..,......, '.n..n.................. 1999-2005, .... "n.___. nn...'......___ .---..'~..'..n------....___L....___..., ... ...........______..., ll()()I1l!lifl!f.JY.,~,()!Ic:t~.Higl1~.Y:,n4.,~(),~I:l. .... .....,.~l",?(),().()().()j ---..n9%L,~,L?()();Q(i!>L 25%. 80%. 1 00% ....Eil'!f>L....,~J.'I:!1,,1()() f[(),nt,~J~,4!~t.:.~!:c:t~~!l!.~,~,n.~,Jc;I,,!iigI1,,~,~1 .,....[,.,""$!iJ~.9()()1. . ..,.,',().%.j..,.,"'$.5.~.5.,,()9Qj,"" "'..,'ii'%!.,'",..'"j9,%.L,,,',.i9,9.'%L, ...,',l?,!,~j,""',..$~~.~l.() frc;l,(lt .~~r,~t::,Hjg/1.~,!=,I:I;()()!. ~,(), ,~r1/1J!G!L ,........ .l.... ...$9.,5.().9()()1(),%.L..". .$.~.5,().()9()l...... , ~2'5 5. ~;, " , , ,,8!J....00.. '.~. ,,:..:.,.... '.. ,.11',.0.0.'. .~.. .%." i: .. ---,,',", !>6",.11.".~.,',';:',',', ',', ',',',$,.'Sl.. ...~1...50..'...~~'.',O()..,O().., !;~r9.rl!l!Il..R()~c:t.::Jt~y.?l:4.~,(),~~.9',~~!!,w.~y___.L....__$~.~().()()(),l n---..'..()%L____$.?!i~M9()L....... 7V 7V V7V. 7V. 9?~!!~..Q!I~..:..~~, fl!~.ry ..~(), .~~(),r....,. ,....,.,..... .l,...... $}Q().9()().[.. ".".. ..o.~L.. .$.~ ()9,,()()():., . .'... ?,5.%.J. ....,.... ,1l().~).,...1. 'O'Q9.6!......... EiJ ,%.L.... .$~,Ei&()() .f.~()r1~,~,~r~,t,:,~,Io!r1ll..~()..~~~!l!!!l!ll~ .... ....,. ." ........i...,. . ,$4 !i.().()().<>j .... .......,()%L....$4,~().()()()i....... ..?!i%l., ,... .~.()%L....J,()()%j,......,EiJ.%l..,..,'$5.~~~()9 Hardcastle - tt.wY 99E to Cooley .___L....__~.5..5.().()()()L.___ 0%. S550000. 25%, ,.....,!!,o.%j...--J.99.?(........l?.1.%.L........$~.?:..l.()() ~",.~~,;if~J;;'~.~~.m ..... .mmL" ..~~.,...,............~~r....~~~:~~[~~~f...... ......:~~....:=!:l~t.~ji::~i: ____n__uu_____ __o.-u__.....____..._ .u.~ ___u.nu..__o_____.._. ~;~i~g~~~!?~~:m.'.;n~~iij:is!:~;i:ii!i~~[ii!EI!!'m;lglii~ii~ ~~~~i~;:~:~~:~':::~~::~ll,,?lY~1~~~9~.:.:::..:.::~,:$2..67::,,90::,',',22:,',:33',',:',86:=..:, .:., '.,., """",n,2"""05,,,:,.,,'. ....,.,.",'.' '.',' :,S,','$2.. :,' '7',0" :"0~,:,'.:2:" :,' :"32,' :"68,:"[..,,.:.:., :.'.:.:.'.:.' :,,:,:,11:" :00,:,=,:,:,:,:,'::,',:,::,:------. "~~:~:::"~~,O%o:,:,-,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,,::,::,:.:,6,:.:,o1.:,:,:,:,J..::.:.::::~i8.;~~1: W~~,~Yl!~L~~r.~.t::J~~g,rl!l!!!.~~~..~()__9!~,ac:te.Q,r)-- _ 7V V7V. ,()%i 7V. 7V, .$() ,~~."'~I1!!l!.~."'!1C=()II1..S,~.t().I:!!Ir.".!=.~.~.,..,~. ""'$~~.!i,~.();___.,. ___ ....,()~.l...___..$,~Il,,~.~!L.....,. J,()9%l ...,..,. ,.".()%l .()%l ......., ..()%l.. "",.,",.,~. ~()~~t..::~~~I;ar1<ln~t..~().",~c:t!e.Y:,~,t "n... n..." .$.?~,,?E;~l o~L ___,$?9.,.?l?,5.L.. ..J(),o.%.L ..nn....()%j 0%' 0%: ....$() fr.()!!t.,~~.~~~~..~..~\'~~,~,~~"I()..~r.r..R.c:t: .: .,. .,.HF,()EiQl. .,.... ....Q'l~:" ......$.UI,9~,Q\---......J.'O,Q~(....... ",..,..0.%1...."...:::9.%.]:'::,:::,::::9.%.1:.... ........ .......$.Q ,~t~m~L~..$.~.~,.~"~p~,~C!..~~,IJ,...,..".., .,.... ...,....., . .....,$.lU.. Q.o.Qj., ...,<>%,l.. ...,~u~,.QQ'Oj..... --- J,<>Q%l "',',',',...,.,P,..%"",,,f... ',',',',',','.'.....().%.[ ..,Q%~............ ..,...,$<>, ..........,.............,...2006-2015.......... ___,...........___ _ ........,........ :t:~~~~;~~~~~:~~~~:;.::~~:~:.::~~,.::t::::::~~~:i~i;~C.n....~~r.:.::~IH:~:~F::.:.}~~[.:::........J~i:::::..::.:~~:. . :: .. ::~~~::... , . .:::::::~ '~ii~;~~;~I:.~;;:~~.:~i~::~:~!Ir.~l..., ",., '"...',...,.,",',: ....,,~~.lI.()l?()j....'....,'..~%.. " $J.,J.,~:.~~,~!:':..:':.,.:..:..1.~7r..............~~r,...:.:.-:..:~?i,::::'::.::',:~'~l:.....-,.::.:..::"::..:~~ M!.<;r,ee,k..9?mIl9r.~.~~I!!r1!1tJ?r:..~(),y.()!I!1!l..R,i7:?~;iiiI ....___!!.o~L,..,~H,5~1..5.,1L......J9o.%.j.... 0%: 0%: O%:....$() :;:;::';C''::'i=~::::~:~, ...:~:::::[..........:=I.......::l.,.,.~0:.,43:,:.:.:,:0.,..':1:...':3':':: ":',':.'.:.'.:1::~'''~''~''~:'::~::':'':':':'':':':'':':,:,:.:.'.:0:.:.._:....+:.:: :,':,:,:.':,:,:.':.:.'.':.:9:.%.~.':.:.I:..:..:.:.:.:.':.:....:.:.':.:.':.':0:.':.':.;.':.",1:::.:".:.:.'.....:.:,..:.::::::.:.:: .Wl!~..M!lI,.Q',4!4!~,9?,rrtll()J,.:..~~,~~KJ()..!Jl,;~,.. ....,.".,. .."~5..1,5"Q~,~L.',.......,.8....,9,.,",.,'.,f::::::",,.",'!f"",......."",....., VV7V 7V_ 7V 7V ..,......$() p......,~!~....If.!!Il~,~..,~y~l!~t,.~.P.~~!..J~p.r.().~!!l~.n.~!I.... . ,..___..,........, .........,.. ... .,,' .................... ...,....,.........,.................,. u................ .......... 1999-2005 ,..,.l : . ; ; ~~~~~ TOTALS : $65 567 388! : $30569 lli :: i $9014370 Don Ganer &: Associates 12 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 3.2 TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects , fXlgel ____. __~.__IQ~..Lnlf~l,lIStlI~t!I:'~t!tn~l;lCat_ __;,,~l,l,t!.~tr.i~nLl"(!Lfl!tur~__pIB Local: PIB New SDe ~..<"y..~'~~,a;;.. m. "i~.~~;'f~~'Ti:'~.;(S'if;~~~t;~r~'1':~~~(::,!:,f~~:1.'.:,......',.......'.a"~'..'~'."'.$'.'b'5.":.':.'0~".'.':0:."'~4:..',. 1~~__l'artJal__<;)cl.\Il!r.~t.~n~!9n!~.v,__~Wcli~l> __~J. U.9..(i.Q9~. ____ __!J().%:____~J 1)',()~(l[ __...J9.()% j __ __ __ __ U%.[ . 1~.~J/~__I'..~iat~love~f.~__9>l1str.ll~tjlln __$:4,~()(),(l()()L . Jif?%l __g~.!J,$,.()()()L__J().()%j ____________J.~%.l ----.J()%Lnnn~'~,%L..n..~~.~.lJJ H!9!l"'""y__~J~__E,n.Vir:~mf11t!!'!t,~t~~,LM:Iy__.____ __________________n" __,__$~C?(),99,()i________:4()%L____.~~()(),().()()j __.J.QCl%.L__ __.J.~.%L__. 30%: 9S%' $12,825 WKlt!I1__H.ig"VJay.~14__~J:~__tQ,~QI1e!;__F~rrY --$4,8~9'~~~i-- .6Ei%! __$1,Ei,s?,<>6Qj 1 00%'____________15%! ____:j9:%i::::::::::~~~[:::::::::$i9,:~~~ ____.2006-2015 .____.____________>__ .______________.__.__________.____.__________n.___. ____ ____nn______. !-:,5JI1~.~,r~I1a~t!__~!~e.r!'!..~!;__~tudy__ .$1,s(l,99()j------u--()%;' ____~15().()()9j. J.Q().%[ .____.15%.i..}().%[ ______.__~~%L.n__.__.$~AJ.!? .~l!'I~~II1t,t!!"!;""!,!g~ ' . . __;$1..5,~().3,199L.. ....lQ9%1 soj __ __J90%' nn1.5.%.i .3.().%1 95%: $0 ~t!I1__H.ig"~y__n4__~__~QI1~!;__Ferry__tQ__l'ark..A~, .$4,,~~(),9()()iu__..__U%.: ji?~'ij9:Q]'____.J9()%.: ____n__..J5.%! ..n3.(),%i 95%' $53331 ~.~,A.r.~~r.~t:__tQ__~~__f.t!rry______ __ ____ __ __.... '. $7.&6] .:4.3.()).. n__~(),%l ,$.3.,~:u.7J,(. __. J9.Q%j ____J ~%.,l ~.ll,~I1A.rW.~I.:~()I1t!SF.t!r.!'YRd.t()I:t.~...99E __$.3,,5n!,,~L .__~()%: __$.l,!~~,,(l]L__J()Q%j nnnJ'~%.l =i:0~=~~~~~E~~~i:' .. mmmg7'.'''.;mO%!t?,''.'91.imJ~[. .. mT '''Jm.......,...,......3:3,'...~o'...,...:.......,i.::,..........,......................:9....:~.....:...,.,;,l:...,.,....,......:...$$:....1.J':"7..:,i'!1.."'0.''."'0:.'.' .~!'!~,I'~[l)'.~.~d__~__Ii!9~",""Y.n4__t,o.-'J~1l ________________, ,$1,2.99;~Q<i:u_____..__()%j __$1,.?()()t()()()j,?~~L .2.()%.L. 711 711. !!~.~J.SJr.~.t::.ttar.~~!I.~!t!.~.v.t!.lllle,.t,C?J!!9I1.S:<:II()o.I.__..l...__. .$.5.3.~,Q99t .n. ... __. 9%.l.. f.f.C?llt~.~~J.::,tI!9l1__~.~Il<l9.!.!,C?,~cml:l..~!L ....__1,.. .__.~~.~9,QQ().l.__.. .. ......9.%l ~Y!!!'.ll~~~I1__~~__:.tl.~__~lB,o.,~~.~__~,Iil>()I1W.~Y. ... ...l__.__. .~!?~9,.9.9.()1...__ ..... .__().%: 9?ll.!lt!'YQ!!!!__:__~~f.~m:y',~()__~l>~9L__. ... __L__nUQQ.99.()[ ..______().%: ,~:;~i;~..~~:.;;:~;;,~m~r.... ..... __X.,.__~,i~:~~~l,............~~:.. ~.~__~!'!Y..H!L:.&'RJ9__~l!t,!1.!)~,!L________nLn.$~.~9,9()9L __ ____ __()%.l ~~R~~~:~~~hi1t:r~:J9--~t,~!)1~r.:~~':\:::::~~:~~:~~~L:::::~~: . $614000: 25%: 20%: 30%! 95%: $8 750 =~;:;:,~~~;"C"'."""..."i"'f;:iii:i;:L.... ...~!...~:~ii;i;:i~i~[...i:Lj~!i~~!!~~~ii~ ~()!I1,~~,~.1Ie__7__~~.JQ__H.VJy .~~.E!~.atl:".~o.Fr.C?l1t. . ..[. ..$l..7..3.~,:4~~l.. ,..... ....()~:...$L7..3. ~A~~l __....... ..~,~.%.) .... ... --...?9%i. .........~.()%;.:::::':::~.~.%j__ .:::::ii.~&(l,~ .....______.______'____m__.____2016-2020 __m______' _..____________.__. ____m.m__i__.m________.__mm.i-mm.____________,____ : ' : =:~~"!r:ii.~~'4 ........!:j~~~:!i;im......~l:j~~:!~E....~!~I.........~~i......:.::.i.:,.~.:.:.:.:.:,I::,:.:,:,:.:.:,:.:,:.:,~,:,:.~.~,E.~.~,..I:,,~.:.:.:.:.:.:,..,:.:.:n:l:f .!!!~~J!;~,ctJc~!'!!.~~.~t!!;!;m~!!!!~.9~_'rl~l1.t__J!)1.Pr.()".e.~~llts : ____.....____.____. __n...'.________n__:__ ',' ____m.m____________1999-2005 __ . __n___n;. n__ __.__ ______.m._n..__.__. . -- --____ ; ,\I:IJt!~,c;.~j()!'!__<;""!!I1e~,a,~jll!!..:..17,s!Hi.9!IVJ~y.~1~ .. __ .$~~.~.,3.()()1 .. .... ::.:: 7.: ~?:bt__ .. .~1~6..~,?~j,.__::..:;Q~l.., ....__~()%.!..:::::::~9:~::::::::::::~~~l::::::::::~~::}1:~, ,\I:IJt!!.~.c;:.~jll!!..~~~z,a.~j()!!..:..I_!l!'Y,__?.1:4/~t!g!t!!)1ier.i __ ....__~~1..~:4.~; ......... __ .__()%.J.... . .__uL~~~L.,__. .J9Cl%.[ __ .__.~9%j,..__....3.().%L__,.m__~~~L_________$4,.6.7.J ,~~!.~.~!!!!I.~j()I1..J\!()~__H.ig"~y__9.~L : $117 060:.5()%J ___n$5,M.~9L__ __J9Cl%.[__ __ .__?()%.jn______.3.9,%Lm.n__.~~~.L_____m__$~'.~.3.~, ~::::~::~~~::~:~:~h.~~::11:;~,~~:~='::. .__.__ __._.__...: ......il.~Q~4.i~+--...-- .... ::~~: .. ----~l~(),:~~~~.:::::::J:~:~t.::::::::::::::?~~:t:::::::::~:::~L:::::::~:5:~l:::::::::::~:::.~~~ ~~~S;~~~.~~.n.II4!:I~~:n::~:~~!;.?1"!211(~9.~...f ..:::~~:~~:?~~I.... . ... .:~~~:.... ...l?().l ,:~~:8:...:.:::1,~()%.~. n. n.n~~~:[.::.:.::~:~~L:::::::.~.5:~L::::::~::::::~:1:~ n______n'nn 1999-2005 ,____.. nn n__nmmn. . '.nmn______;__'m__nmmn'.mmnn__nn__"nm_______________m W~.tlay~.l1.~.~!:t!,4!!,t.::J~r.g!.t!t!I1.~~~.J9__~!;c;:adt![)~,l n__n__$.7.9,.?~~Ln. .__9%L 100% 30% 9S%- $20017 .Pa~',.,.,'9~,.'!i'.'..nA.....~~...t...!1.'.!I4l.-..'..pe'.--..,.,!-y',!~!1C..Ia.,..9!1d.,!.!1..,'..SS.,.tt.,'...,...t~..oo.....,..HB'.'.~r:a'.r...dd....cIe.,.:st..,.~'.Ie~""..A.--\Il!.'. ' ... ...'$.:$.$'1:':25;,:.8~-"':":',~5:.:.3:6.:.o05.:.:l::,:,'. n -- m ,<>% 1...................~..:...$.$$.1.:.:..2~.1..:.~~7.::;2~S:..:.363,!i.::.:~0.5::...;::,::,.......'..':..:.'.:.......::.':.1111,:..,~00,::.:.~0-:.::::.:.::.::,:':::,:.:..:.:.n Er>~,_,~'~",I.~';~" .mm~~i: .:mI!~L~~i-I~~L'-~i:.~t~ .~~mit!LkS.il,l.~.~.~~.~~U).~.~Lm__m__'__ .__$. l,UA9.().() L__ .____()%:__ --n~1].~,().()9Ln:::::l:~~l------ 100%: 30%: 95%l $49,-(l,7..~ :t:.::.~~i~~t~~~:i~~~t:~t:~~..............__..>:..::.~~~}:~~~!::.... ....::.~~j:......:$$:.~1..~1..~7:.::,PO~..:6.:00~.:.j:,:.:'.:.'. -- .~1...~0::,;,l:u::--::-:~1:.:~0.::~0::.E,:::.i:,::::--:::,::.~.:.~0:,:,E.:,:.I:,:.:,:.:.'.'.:..,:.:...:9..:.~~..%.~.:.~,f:,l:.:.....~.:,:.:.:.:.:.~,..3,5,:.:.~.:.t.::,~. .Y...r.I.C?u,~__t,~Ut,rt!t!~n(().~n~()....~r.~)n mm$.J.1.V~!i.<l; .n.......n...O.....%.'....::,......n . V71I 711 711 711 ~ Q'J:~l~~.!!L,!'~l"l!'!IY.L..mn----nnmn.------l n.j ______n,__m__ nm____L.m__.m__.)m.___m__m._____m nnmnn.__'__ 1999-2005 . ____nn__nn'__nn. ~ __ n__nnn._____.' :: M!~__q-.e,ek__9?!:!'~9!:~__tla?;~!!'!!lq~r,ntQnr()!ll1g__~t. .$7.:?~;ji~.l ..(l,(),%! ____$H,5,1.,5:4~mmloO%T .~J~r.~~.~__9?!.~!!!Q!.,~__~L~r.~.UQ..H~.'..?J..,.. ..__..$~9I.3.,~~1 ......~.()%; .....,~1.QQ.l1nj .J,9Cl%.[ nnnnn.__'______.__ nn2006-201 5 n____nnn>m. .n__mmmn". .nmmmn~ .m__.m____'__ .Mi~__c;:r~~__9?H!!!~L~.JQ,llt:ID..~.t,__tQ.~!l~"Ar~t!r.ioIlm.L .n$4?J.1.1.EiL. . .__~.()%j ______.n".~,~~L..:::iQ~i .__..____1.9(l~L. ,W!!st__~LQ',~.1,c .9?rr.Il,l~J..:,,~.~!.~~K.t~. .fJ(,1IJ.....__.__..L. ...$~.1.~.9~._'li ...........:.:...:'.I!:.:,O:.:..%....:~.:::,. __n$J.()3..9uL .:::.......1....0...'.0%,'...'.'..,1:," .1.().l>%.'...'.j", !'.l,I.~!!!:nJ!:!!!!~.i1.__.$Y~~!!ffl__..~.P.!~!!!...'mp.r.~~mt!~!,~ ................, ____,______...__m____.__m.n__ 1999-2005m.n__, m.n.n.mn__._____n:____. n.n__n.nn__'.__. ____n..nm__..____... .__n____...____. :::~::~~~;:+;:;;:::~L~::L=~:~~F:::;Fi:lm...Lm""lmmmJll TOTALS :$67817388: :$3j'334772i : __nm____: : ! $1186216 Don Ganer & Associates 13 as of 10/20/99 ,.. , TABLE 3.2 TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects "[ .l'r~~c:~~~:~tIFoI!%Sh:t!:J. ':':~i~~~~~" ........... . ............. Proiect Title ..................... ....: ....u.ml. ..) Fundina (%)!.. Fundino ($) c;a."..~it)' ..<:)"Iy. ..lI1pr.C?~I1I~Il.t!S.. ................. ............... ....... 1999-2005....................... ...........;... ................... 1~.~..I'~~~Lc:Ic1~r.!~.~.L:~jgl1/l:l1v..litlldil!!i .... .....~1,1J:9,.6.()Cl~. . .....!J()'lo( .HU:,Cl.6.();:io.9%( 1~~.1.a..l'ilr~~!~Io\le.rlt!ilL~..~(),,!Str.Ill.:til>n .......... .....$:4,,s.()9,.9.()Cll...........~.6.%.]. ..$?,.?!J.~.Cl.9.()L.. 1 00%: .H!gb~),.;z.H ..t:.!I.vi!:c;>"II1t!,,~~L~~~y .............................. .... ..$.,5()9~9Cl.9.L.. ...... ...ACl.%.L....$}()9,.9.()().: ........!.().9.%.j W~I!"..H.g!!~..Y..;Z.1:4..:I:,s..~l;)..!J<>l;)IlI!!i .Fl!r!Y..$4,~,s~~9().9.:.. Ji~%.i ...$J.~,5;z,.9.!!(): .. ......1 ().9.%.: 2006-2015. . ............ .!-:,5..!m.~~l.:~'191!..M.~rl1llt.i.\Ie!S..~tud'y ......$.1.,s.()~9().9.j ..Cl.%.] ....$.1.,s()~9.()(): .........1.Cl.9.%.L. 0% .~".,I:-,5IIl~l!rc:l\;I"gl!.. ..L$.1.,5,1l9.3~I.()9.: ..J()().%.i .............$9: ........1.9.9.%.:. 0% .W~I!'1..H.g!!lNOIy..;zJ4.. - ~111!!S.Fl!r!Y..tl;).~rl<.~ yt!, ... ..L..$4,9.~.(M~().()j ....... J5%.: ...$.1..?H,.,s.9(): .........1.l>.()%.] ........ .... .().%.: ~.Ilt!1..~r.Wi;aL:tl;)..~I1I!!SEer!y.. .... ...L..~!,!!6.!,:4}Cl: ............5.()%.L$.3,.llU..!Uj .........,U>9%.L .......9.%. ~.Ilt!1..~ftl!ril!!~~.c;>Ile!S..f.I!Uy.~(l.-.t.c;>I:I~,!I!JE . ..$~.,,s.n14?1.... ........5.9.%.L$I,!!!.~..~nj ......J.9.9%..l...............9.%.~ Q?<lley..~l;)OIcl..~.~I!'1!iic>'1~c;>.lijlyl!~.()(lRcl,.. ..$?.!,59,!JJCll............9.%.L$?,7:!i.9..!lJ9) 1 09%l ..... .........9.%.~ .c:..p.ilc:.i.~ylP.I!!S'Il"...!II1P.r.l;).v.I!II1.e.rl~!i ............ ............ ................................ ............ ................... .................. ..................... ...................................1999-2005 .................. ......... ... :: ................... ~11~..FI!r:ry.~()ad. .~.H.ig!!~Y.?J4.~() .l!~Il... ..$ i ;:i,Ci:D.,i>:o.ci) :. .:::.: :::.Ci%:::J,:iciCi;:o.i>:D.['.. ........?5%.; ........ ...... .()%.:.: ........:::i>%I .::::.:.::::::9%L..............$9. hO.r:l.~.!itr.~.~t~.!:I;a!.~l.:iI!StIt!.~.v.e.nll.e..~9..!:ljgb .~~M()I....... . .....$.,5.~,s,.9.()ClJ...... ..9.%3. ...$,s},5.().9.();.. ..... ?,s%.l. 0%: .......().%.L.............()%J...............$9 hcmt!i.~f.~.t~.Hjg!!..S.~.~L~.C?..~~I)..IlG~......L......$~.,59,.9.()()L...... . . ~ .. ... .... t- $0 l:~fll~I!I!I1..R.c:>iI~.~.I:I~..?.1:4.J9..li~.~.!',I!i~'1.w.aY..... L......$;z.,59,.()()Cll .:.:.:.:...:...~.:.:.:.:.~.:....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.L.:.~.:...~.:.:.~.:.~.:..:.:.....:....::...:...:.:.~.:.!.:.:.:.:.:.t:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.r.:.:....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...~.:.:.:.:.:.!:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.t:.:.:.:.:.:.'.':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.$0$0:.:.:.:. 9?Il.(lW.QIJ!?..:..~~.f.l!f.!y~l;)..~tl;)L....................l......$.3.()~M>()Cl1 . . .. . .f.~~Il~.!i.~rl!4!.t..:.94!~."'!1cl.JC?..~~tlemie~ . ......$.4!i~M>().():.. .....Cl.%.:.......$:4!iCl,.()9.9.l...........?~.%.: ......Cl.~;.............()%l ...........9%l $0 !:I;a!.cl!:il~!I!.~.tl\ft')'..9.!I~..~C?..~Je.Y . .$,s.,5(),.9.()Cll o%! $550000i 25%! 0%: O%i" O%i............$O ~.~..~HY.Rcl,..:.!V~.JC?..~l!t.~.lJ<?.~....... ... ... ............:.......$~,59,9.()Cl1..:::.:::::::::Q~I:::::::~~:~:Q:9.QQr:::::::::i.~~:[:::::::::::::::Q~I::::::::::::9.~L::::::::::::9.~L:::::::::::$.Q ~;~~:~~/t=~~~::~~::Qr::t~::~~t~II1~r..~~:::l::::::::~I~:~~~l::: .........:~~I:.::::::~:it~~~j::::::::::::i~~r::::::::::::~~:I:::::::::::::~~L::::::::::::~~L:::::::::::~ ................................. 200ti-2015.... :. .' .. .. . ... . ...~..... . > 1:I;a!.!!!:iI~!I!.!',~.!!~.~..!t~~.Y..~~~.~c;>.fr.c;>(lt..~t, .. .:...$.?X6.?,~JJi~..... .......()%L..$?.I.!~.?.&t!!L....n...?.~%.l . .. .........9.%L.. .... 0'%1 ... . O%r ..... . so rC?!'.~Jl.~y.~~.:J:~n~~.JC?.f.rC?I1~.~t............... ........ . .:. ~ 1.,~.??,n( .. ..........9.%L.$.1'.~??,n!!j.............?,5%.l............... .9.%J...::.::.::::9:%;:::.:::::::.:::i>%i::::::::::::::jQ .~~..~~.~.~...~...~~~~.~:g.~~.~.~!=.!!..~Q..Fr.C;>(l~......L..$J.U?,:4.11~l O%i $1 732488: 25%i 0%: 0%]. 0%1....$9. =;d'~i~~~~<J;Y~"'l$j~~t~:~~j~L~ii;~~;ii[~f~[~~[:L~~ .W~."'!1cl..II,~!!~..:.Ii.~..?J"Ul;)..W:I!Io.W..~I!t!,......L..$J,1.Cl.o~~~.4: 0%: $1 100364: 25%! 0%: 0%: 0%: $0 .!!!~~:r~~:c:t~~'::~~:~~1~:99~;g6r:~~~tl~~r~~eje:~t:~~:~'~99...."~!,5~::. :.:.' :.:.:.$"':"$1.:.48:.:.6.1:.:39:.:.'42.:.:.'25.:.':.::: :.... ........ ........11.....09:.:.~.:.%......:...::.......................:.:.:.:.:.09...:.~.:.:.:.::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...::.:.Oo:.:.%.~.:....i:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....00:.:.:.~.'....1,::.:.:.'....:.:.~.~.:.~.~.:.~.~.$O$O:':':":'" :~i:~;:~~:~::~~~~:::~:~::~::~~~~i~~~~~~~~r:j .......$Il1..~:4.?: n.......m...Cl~! ~ U7V 7V 7V_ 7V .~!1iI! .~.~clil:Ja.tiC?l1. "Ic;>~ .1:!i!l!!INOIY. .!I!lI:.. ...... . .$1.1J ~9~.(): ............. ,59.%.: ........ ~~Il,.,5 ~.o.:..........~. Cl.9.%!............. mCl%:............ .()%..~......... n...Cl.~L... ......... ..$9. ~~~::~~~!:~:~~:~'~~::iri'rr~:~~' ..... .. .. ......... ......~.14(),:4.n+.. ... .........9.%.;. ..::::~~~::::~:7:~j...........1()9%..l................()%.1..:::::::::~~j:::::::::::::::::~L:::::::::::~ ~~:~S;~I~:.c:~:n:~I~t~n..~..Ii~!i::~l ~'::2111o~.~~.... ..:~?:~~;:i,~~ + ':.:: .::::?:5.%I::...~~:::J:.~:~~I:::::::::~:~~:~::.:.:::..:::::~ t .........::~:~j::::::::::::.:.::~L::.:::::::.t() w~.~y~i~~i~~~:~I;:~~.~~~~~~~~~9. ~~i~~.p.i:.l:.:... ...$.i.9;i~~:.. : .:. .:.:.:.:Q%) . ..:...:~io.;i.~~:':.:..::::1:Q9%l:::::::....::...()% ;"::..::.::.:9:%C:::::::::::.o.%.I:..::.::::::..$.i) .::~.~:-.;~~:.~t:.':'~~:'~;~s~,~~'........... .......:.~.::.~~~t '.' ......~~l-...:i.;:.i.~~~r........}~~t .. ..........~~L...~~~........~~-l....................~~L~~...............J~ f.~.~!!~..~~~~~..~..~~~~..~.t,.:r~. .~rL.~!I, ............. ... ..... ... ..$lJ.!',9.~().l..... ......... ..Q%l..... ..$1U.().~9 1.. .........1.Q9%1.......... ...Q'J:(.... .....9.%:.............Q%1. ........$9 .~~~m~L~..~.~.~..~..~.P.!~t~9..!'....~L.....m......... : $175000! 0%: $175000: 100%! 0%: 0%: O%! $0 .~~~~::w.~Y.:~..~~i1~~~~~~~~rY. .QIJ~..R.~, :..:..' :T:::::.~I:.~;:~~:~r.........::.:.~:~r......~l.~;::.~.~[:..:.:..~:~~~L..:..:.:..:::~~[..:..:..:..~~F::.::::::.:~~[:::.::...:::~: .~.~.~..~~.~~~L:.I:I~,..!I~.~.~~..~iI~.~.~..~t...... .... .............. ...~.!.!~~:....... .. .. ...Cl.~:.........~!!!,.!~.,s.l. ........J.9~;......... ... ... .9.%.!.........h..()%.l..........u..Q%Lmu...u...$9 .~i.t;ii~~ill..~ii~:.~i~~....?.9..~~r.~)............................~.~~~I..1.!.'~~.~l................~~ 1." .....~.1..I.~,.~.~.~!. .......h. tQ.~L'....... ......... 9.~!........... ..()~-;. ......................9~1.....................$9 ......... ..u.............. .. 1999-2005... ...~.........~ M!~..9:e.e.~. .C;9n!<ll;)r..~.!:I;a;1;~!!1I!~J)r, .JQ .Y.QI!119. .~t... .' ... .~i?~J.i~ I... ... ......~:Q%I. ......$li~j:~~]:.. ...:..1:QQ'l:6.\..... .... .....9.%1.. .....::::9.%L.... ........()%.I...u.........$9 .~l;)!SI!..ql!~.~.~~~~icio~k~~~.~ .t~.Ii.~, .?1:4. .... ...< ..:.::$~~3:,~:,5:11;.. ... ...... ..!!Cl.~!...... .$H!9,.6.!?L.... .....I.Cl~ 1..........h....9.~:.u:::::::~~:l::::::::::::::~~I:::::::..:.::::~: .~~..9~1<..c:C?r.r~Qr..~ Jl;)..mll.!i.t..~l;)..~I!~!!. !',~Willl..... L... ...$.4n1J6.) ........ ... ..!!9.%.[ .. ....:.$~~~?~i[:.. ..1.()~j ........: ::.::9%[.: . ...... ...()%.L............Cl.~L..............$9. .W~~..M!lL9'.~~.9?.rf.~C?.L:..~.~!.Q~.~.Jl;)..lJ<?.!!...... 'h...L. .....$.~1.,5~()~4: ....!!Cl.%.j. .....$.1.()~~()1.~.;...................~...9....0%.......'.'1::' ........Cl%..i..... .h.......'O.....%.......f..:..............................9....%.....-l,:...................~........=. p..Il.~!;c:...T!.~!!~.i.L.~.Y.~~I!'"....~p.'~~LJI1I".r~'t~.II14!.!!~s. ........ ..........~ '''''. ................,......... . ...... ....... 1999-2005... ...........................~. ................... ...... ........ . . ....~................... ~!1c.:~.icll!..{P..~~ulJ..O,s(t~"...c:I!!Sl ........ ............ .~.. . .$.,5'~~'.~.()()F... ..J.9.%.,[.. ..$,s.?~;!:i.i>j:.:..:....UiQ%F:.::j9.~F::::: ii.%.j::::: :::::):O'Q%t.tJ.!!4~!l9.~. :~fi!~~~.(P.~~:~~~~O~~~~~j::... .:..:J:::::::$.~~il~:o.j:::: ..:..:::i9.%::::.:::$.~i~~Q~i.l.:..:.::::i99.%j::.::::::j:Q~j...::::.:j!.~1:::::::::iQ:D.%t:.;e,.;.;:.Q4~. TOTALS :$67,817388: i$3133477Zi 1 1 ! :$311848 Don Ganer & Associates 14 . page 3 . :... : TR .fll.~ure: TR Local :rR New ~P.l; . )<=iiP!!c:i~Y... 1. Iril!!!ii.tUlU]. . Gr()\yth .] Iri~~~~~~T:.~i~i:~i~:: iPortion (%): Benefit (%t:Benefit (%] Portion (%);...Am2mlt.. . . . . . . . . . "__ ____u................_...._.......... . ".._n_..._...... .................... ......()%; 0%] .Cl%i 0%' .......-.... ........9.%!...nn.9.%.l.nn..$.9. ........ n 9%. j. n........9.%1.........$9 .. ()%..~.......... ...Cl.%. [..............$9. ..n...()%..l.........9%i ..n$9. ..... .9%..~."'.:... ().%:.:.......... $9. .........()%.i...........Cl.~L....... ....$9. .... ..... .()%..L.............9.~:...............$9. .....().%.; O%! ......nt<> .. .........o%L......... ..:0.%.1::.........$9 .................~.~.~......................~.~L.~..................~. as of 10/20/99 4.0 CALCULATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE The Transportation Impact Fee is calculated using a series of formulas which, when completed, result in the SDC rates for each type of new development. These formulas: a) identify the cost per new person-trip for SDC-eligible capital improvements for each mode of travel (motor vehicle, pedestrian! bicycle, and transit) b) calculate the net number of new person-trips for each type of land use, c) adjust trip rates to allow for differences in trip lengths, d) identify the motor vehicle, pedestrian! bicycle, and transit growth costs per unit of development, and e) calculate the Transportation Impact Fee. A. Formula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip by Mode of Travel The cost per new person-trip for each mode of travel (motor vehicle, pedestrian!bicycle, or transit) is determined by dividing the total cost of SDC-eligible projects for each mode (from Table 3.2, pages 12 - 14) by the number of new daily person-trips for each mode (from Table 3.1, page 8) using the following formula: 1. SDC-Eligible Project Costs New Person- Trips Generated = Cost Per New Person-Trip The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.1, below. TABLE 4.1 COST PER NEW PERSON-TRIP BY MODE OF TRAVEL (1999 - 2020) Mode of Travel Motor Vehicle Pedestrian! Bicycle Transit SDC-Eligible Project Costs $ 9,014,370 $ 1,186,216 $ 311,848 Projected New Person-Trips + 50,561 2,528 1,011 Cost Per New Person-Trip $ 178.29 $ 469.23 $ 308.45 Don Ganer &; Associates 15 as of 10/20/99 B. Fonnula 2: Net New Person-Trips (by Type of Land Use) The net new person-trips generated per day is calculated for each type of land use using the following formula: 2. Est. Total Person-Trips x Percent New Trips Net New Person-Trips The Estimated Total Person-Trips is determined by multiplying the motor vehicle trip rate for each type of land use by the estimated number of person-trips per vehicle trip (See Section 3B, page 7). The primary data source for trip rates included in this methodology is Trip Generation (6th Edition) by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip Generation contains rates for different land uses based on trip generation studies conducted nationwide, and provides the base data of unadjusted counts of trips generated by various types of land use. The trip rates included in Trip Generation are based on all traffic entering or leaving a primary location, and do not account for diverted '1inked" trips or trips by traffic that is passing by and interrupts a "primary" trip between two other locations. These "pass- by" and "linked" trips are not "new" because they would occur regardless of development activity. "New" trips are often based on the assumption that all trips from residential land uses are new trips (therefore, percentage = 100%), and all other land uses are evaluated to reflect the percentage of their trips that are "new" versus the remainder (which are "pass-by" trips). No land use category has greater than 100% new trips, but some categories may have less (i.e., various retail categories range from 47% to 77% new trips). The percentages used to account for pass-by trips in this methodology are based on an analysis of data included in Trip Generation (5th Edition). Table 4.2 (pages 17 - 21) lists the number of new person-trips generated for each land use category, using Formula 2. Column 1 lists land use categories and their ITE code numbers. Column 2 contains either the Weekday Average or Weekday PM Peak. Trip Rate from Trip Generation. Column 3 identifies the estimated total person-trips generated, based on 1.65 person-trips per vehicle trip. Column 4 shows the percentage of trips that are new, as opposed to pass-by or linked trips. Column 5 is the result of multiplying column 3 by column 4, producing the net number of new person-trips generated per day by each land use category. Don Ganer &: Associates 16 as of 10/20/99 ~ TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) . ITE Est. Net ..u... __n_ _. _ _. _h _hu',",O _..................n. _.. _. __. __ _ _ _. n._ _un. _ n.n.__ _........_ ..".. _)..n .n. n. __. ....__ ... ..0..0 ..no..on.n...._.. .u.............. .n. n. n... .. n_ ._. on ....n.n..... no.. ...... __... _.. on... _ "._.... ...............n. n..... n. ..........u.u...........................................................................................l......M.~~~.~..... .......!~~~.L.....L......%..._.._. ..._........N~~........._. .........._....u._..............._............... i Vehicle Person- ~ New Person- ~::~~~~~~t.~~~~~t~~~~al~H~:t~~=~~H~H::H~:~~~~!=:: :'?}.Q...?~~g~_~..~~.~yJ~9~4~~..P~p1~~)u...Lu._..........2_:?? ......o.._oJ_-?_?2JuJQQ%o ................_.uJ.?:?? I4~~~&..~t...m. 220 Apartment i 6.63 10.94l 100% 10.94 / dwelline: unit ~Q....g~~~~~~~~t~~~~.~rr~.~~~.~~~.....L....._._.....u?:.~ .................?:.~?LJQ.Q.%_ .................._......2.:~?. I~~~lli:!!g.~L_..._ .~~Q..._M~~f.!!~.~~tH~_~o~~K.(~_.P..~~)).........__.._...1::.~!. ................?:.?1:LJQ_9.%. .........................?:?~. I~~.~~.~~m..... 260 Recreation Home i 3.16 5.211 100% 5.21 / dwelline: unit ..._Un_n.n.n..._n...__....__uu..........................................n.....................n.t..............__..._.................................__...__.............n..................n............nn...n.....n...n...........__.......__....nn..... RECREATIONAL ! ii.i_._-.~iiY_-_-p~~.-_-.-.....o:o..o..oo:.o:.-u.oo..o.o-.-_.:.-_.:...o.o-.....o..o.......oo:___uo.ouo'ou....:.....-.....---:------I---....--.-.......o.:....o-:_i.~~-_-.-_.:.-_.::::_._...:.....i.~i.T.._.:.iQ_Q_%.-:.-....:...._-.._..-.-_._-_-_.:::_-.-...-.-.._?_~-~i"j.~~.!i:::._:._.__-.-.-.-.-_-._.-_-._::.-.-..:.-.-_-.-.-.-...... !~~i~~;~t.~~~~ik~i::J~:~:!;~J~r3:!:I~e;~~i!~:::= 430 Golf Course : 35.74 58.97! 100% 58.97 thole ........._._ -.. ...................n........._ __ _ __ __ _ _.. ............ ..... ....... ...._... ..._... .._. __....~ ...... ..................__.. .__...._. ...............................___n.... _... ........................hhh.. n...n....................__..__...n............ 432 Golf Driving Range (b) : 1.25 2.06i 100% 2.06 I tee ~~?o...M~~p~q?~~~J~:~_~.J~_~~......mmm.u.u.j..............?Q}~ ........_.J.1:?J~L.JQ.Q.%. ._._.........m_J~.?.:l~ .!..!~sili.~u._...u.._.unu..nu__ 41~..nM_~y.J~nTh~.~~~~uY'!L~~~..~~_~~~~..u....i........m??Q:.Q.Q .._....m.~~~:_QQLml.Qg.%. ....nm.mm__.~~.~QQ. .!..~~.~.~.~nmmm___mmm.m. 444 Movie Theater w / matinee ~ 153.33 252.99l 100% 252.99 / screen 1?~._o.~~.~~.!..y~.~_~_~_.P_~~~.~!.!:__~~~ry..Q?.).l.....-.-....J~.:~~. _......_._m??.:l~J...JQQ% __.._u___......_._o..?~:J.~ .I..!=?.:~~G:~::A:............. ~.Q...~~.~~~~~~.lTh~_~~..r~!.~....m..m..m...l..o.....m..??_?~_ ..mm_J?'_-?_:QQ.L.JQQ%_ mn........_.....!.?~:.Q.Q I~~.~............._.................... 491 Tennis Courts : 31.04 51.22: 100% 51.22 / court ....................................................................................................--.---~--......__..................................n..........+............................._..............n.............................nn.................n....... _1:?:,?:...g!!~q~~!..Gh~1?umm.mm.....m.....mm....numm_uu..i..o...........1:Q=_?~ m..uum._~:.~?l...JQ.Q.%_ ...mu.___..........~~.:~?. .!..~.~P:.~..__.._........................ 494 Bowline: Alley j 33.33 54.99: 100% 54.99 /lane 495 Recreational Community Center 22.88 37.75: 100% 37.75 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area TS.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 17 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 2 of 5 ..................................................OJ... ..................... ..... ...............L.........{?l......... ...........(~)..........l.......(~)...... ............J?).............. ...................j~L.................. ..........................................................................................................\.........m.......... ..........~~~~........J................... ..............N~t............ ................................................. ~ Motor Total: % New ...... .... ...... n. u__. ._on_ _. .uu..u... ........... _ _. ..... .no...... .._.. _..... _ _....... _............... ..... n.. _0 ......... _.. _ _. _ _ __. _ _._ _u ..0..0.. on on ..~.n on ....n... .n.. ...... .....n.Un on on on....... 0.. ...... _h _n... '''''.._o..u...... ..nu..o...._. : Vehicle Person- New Person- =:~=:~~~::~~~~:~:~~~:=~~:::::t:~~=::~~~~.: .:::::.~~~:::::::I:::~~=::::: :::::::::::~~=:::::::::::.: .::::..:.:::::::::::~~::::::::::::::::::::: INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL: ! :~~~:::~~~!:~:~~~~L:::..:..::.::..:..:..:..:..:...::::::I:::::::::::::::t~t::::::::....:::t:~~L:l~:%::::::::::::::::::.::.:::t~~::Z::~~~~==::::::::::::::::: 522 Middle/Junior Hi~h School ! 1.45 2.39: 100% 2.39 I student 1=!~~~t~~!~~~"::t:::~l:i:t:~tlr~=-=~I:I~~~ii!t~::~~:~~ 560 Church 1 9.11 15.031 100% 15.03 IT.S.F.G.F.A. .._......_....._noU..................nu............................................-..............................................................n_--......-c-.-.........................-.....-..................................................................n.__ 565 Dav Care Center I Preschool 4.52 7.46~ 100% 7.46 I student ~~m~i~!:~..m....m..mm....m...mmm.m...................m...m.l.............~.:QQ. ...mm.m~.~.~J.Q.L.JQQ%. ..................m.~~~J.Q II~$..~f:G~f~A::.....m..... ~.!.Q....H~~p.~~~.mm.............mm...............................mm......Lm......J.!..?? ............Y?A.?J...JQQ%. ............m.....J~~4?: IJ?.~.~....hh.m.....h...h........_. 620 Nursing Home : 2.61 4.31: 100% 4.31 Ibed .~Q...~~....m.m..m........mmmm.....................mmmm........1..............~JA? ..m.........?l~.~~t..J.Q.Q.%. ..............mm..?.!.:~~. .!I:?J~:.g.:~.:A::............ .CO"MMERWiisERVicES...............m.......-\-...............m......... ...............000...000....1-000................ ..........000000000.....000....000000 ....m..m.....mmmmm................. 310 Hotel/Motel 1 8.23 13.58! 77% 10.46 I room ~j~:::~:~j~j!ig::M~~~~~~:i~~rii~~!::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::~~:~zj: :::::::::::::~:~;~~:I::::::::zZ%: ::::::::::::::::::::::~Q;1~ ::iI;~;f~G;f;!\~:::::::::::: 813 Free-Standing Discount Store i i ............hwith.G~~~ri~................................m...............r............46:96 .......m....ii...48rmm49%. ......................37.Jii "jT..S~F~Gji..A:............ ........................_._..n.................................................................__........................n................_..._..................oI.....u..............................................................uu.nnn.nn..n.....U.n....... 814 Specialty Retail Center ! 40.67 67.11: 77% 51.67 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~:~:~::::wl~~:~T~{~~~~~~~~~~::~~~:::~~:::::::::t:::::::::::::~:~~~: .:.::::::::::~~;11[:::::1?%: :::::::::::::::::::::i$.;:7.~ jr;~;f;G;f;!\~:::::::::::: 816 Hardware I Paint Stores 51.29 84.63: 77% 65.16 IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~1?....N~~~ry!..9.~!4~P.:..G~P.:!~.!..mm.m..m..m..[m...........~~.Q.~ ..............~?:.~~L....??%.....m....mnm...~?:~ IT:?:.~:.g.:~.:A~............ .~~Q....?h.~pp.~!~$.~.~.~~~~.........mm.......................m.....L.m....m.~~??.: .............?Q~.~~L....~?%. ..............m.....~.:ZQ. .!I:?~.~:.g.:~.:A~....n...... 823 Factory Outlet Center ! 26.59 43.8?! 49% 21.50 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 18 as of 10/20/99 'Tr TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 3 of 5 .::.:.::.:':.:::::':':::::::::::.:.::.:..:::::::(:~:)'::.::::::::.:::':::':":::::::::::::::.::::::::1:-::'::::tfl:::.:..::: :.::.::::~~~~:::::::::I:::::.:~~~:::::: :::::::::.:::&~(:::::.::::: :::::.:..:::::::::::::~~~:::::::::::.::':::::: ~ Motor Total! % New X!:~::~ANP::y~~:.GQpgZGAmG9~x::::::I:I~~~~~1~: ::::~i~;;:~::l:iJ~:: ::::::::~f~;::~:::::::: :::::::::::::::::::y~i::::::::::::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : ~f~t!~~~~~~:~;ki~~)r:=~~'~~~~~'~L~~::~~~.~?~.~.~.~,.F~~~ Restaurant i 130.34 215.06: 54% 116.13 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ....................______.._____.__..............._o__....._____...__.__.................__......_....... .._. ..__n..Un.n_.__...... .....uu..........__.......+__....n..un._... "._. .................__... _ 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) j 716.00 1181.40: 27% 318-:98..7Tj3~I(G~F.:A:............ ~~:::~~i:p.i:~~~~<fu~=~::::::::::::::I::::::::::~jt~: ::::::::::~:i~~~!::::::::~~: ::::::::::::::::::::::i~~i.~ ::~:t~~~~~~~~~A~:::::::::::: 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop: 40.00 66.ooi 54% 35.64 /Service Stall 840 Automobile Service Center (b) i 4.01 6.62j 77% 5.09 /T.S.F.G.L.A. :~!::::~~~::~:~:~:~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!::::::::::::::~?~:$.9. ::::::::::::::~j~:~I:::::::Z!%: ::::::::::::::::::::::~Z:~~. :ZI:~~~~~g:~f.:~~~:::::::::::: 844 Gasoline/Service Station! i (no Market or Car Wash) . 168.56 278.12! 49% 136.28 IV.F.P. ~~~rt~!j~~~t~~~~I)li~i.t~:i~~;;E~~~::.i;~;~;!V,~.i 846 Gasoline / Service Station i : u_.__........_.....n_n.....................................................-.-.---.-------......................................................................-1........._._................................._...................n....................................n. (W /Conv. Market and Car Wash) 152.84 252.19: 49% 123.57 IV.F.P. ~...I~~n?!~_~!::_m_mmm_.n....._..mmm..m..m........m.........~.._....._....~~_:~Z_nn.___.____~.!.:~.lmn..?Z%.__........__n.._...m~J.:?.QIT?._:;E:G:f.:A:........_____ ~.Q_..?_~~~~~~t__....._.__..____.n_n_____.________n__.._.__n_..--l----.--._.n.l.:?J.._.....J~.~.:~.l........~%_____m..__.___.......~:~.?:..lI:?.:;E:G:f.:A:..........._. 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) ~ 737.99 1217.68~ 43% 523.60 IT.S.F.G.F.A. :@::::~~~~r::~~~~1~::~=~~::~=~=:::::::I:.::::::::~;j~ :::::::::::=ij~:i~t:::::::ft~: :::::::::::::::::::=j:~~~: :Zf:~~G:~f.:~A;:::::::::::: 861 DiscO\1l'\t Club ! 41.80 68.97! 77% 53.11 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~.?:..J:!~!!!~J~P!~y~~~_~~n?~p.~_~~~!!::_.L.._.._.._}?:Q?.. .............??:~.~.l.......zZ%. m.___._.m...__....~:.?.~ II:?.:;E:Q:_~:A:..........n. 863 Electronics Superstore : 45.04 74.32: 77% 57.22 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 19 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 4 of 5 .nn........n...n....n.n.n..nn......n..nUtn...nn__.n....n..__.............n--....J.........J~2...nn... ...........P2......nnl....nn(4.L... ....n..n......<.~.Ln__........ ..00..00......00..00..(2)..................00 : ITE Est.: Net .. _n......... n. - -... h. -.. 0.. _'BU. ---... hu ..no....... 0.. no... - --... - -.. U. - no... n _h -... --... h.:Uh.. __..ono.nu...o .~_.. 0... nuo. "0........ .......~.... on. ......n.... ....0 _..... On... On. n _ h... _ n ".u. . : Motor Total: % New' ..00....00.......00..00....................0000 ii~~ti~~Q:iP~j<::ATI:ipRXlf~~~~i~~f:;:-~ii~~ .:~f~Ii~.. ...tiii!C COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) 1 . :~!Q:::Ap.p~i:~I:~~~!~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::~;4Q::::::::j:Q?;:~r:::::::~:%::::::::::::::::.::::::~2j~::i.I~~j!~;:G~f.~A;:::::::::::: 880 Pharmacy / Dru~store: j Without Drive- Thru Window j 90.06 148.601 49% 72.81 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~!::::fh~~~9r..:i.:~g~!~!~:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .....-...nn.!Y.~.!hnP!:!y.~:~_~~4~~m............._....L.....n.....~~.!.2 ...-....n.H:?A2L...._~.?%. .........nn.nn....?.~.:?~ .!I.~:.F.:.g.:f..:A~..._.._..... 890 Furniture Store j 5.06 8.35: 77% 6.43 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ..........--.................u_.......__....._u.................................................----...-.......................................................................___.........................._...__...-...-.....~u.~u..~u_..nn~uu._un.un_.u~. 895 Video Arcade (b) 1 56.81 93.741 49% 45.93 /T.S.F.G.F.A. m~~~~~~:::Tj~;~~~~I:~j:::j~:~2f~lg1:4;:: 912 Bank/Savin2:s: Drive-In ! 265.21 437.60: 85% 371.96 /T.S.F.G.F.A. .nn.nn.._.... .-- ..... -.............. -... ..._-.. ............... ......._-.......... - .....- ......-................ ........... ... ... _.. .._..... ...... _....._ --.....-i...n.........~.__.. "'''.'''''.'''.''''''._..n_ ""_n. " .--....n....n.u.__.~..n....n_.~.__...h.__ OFFICE i ! ii.Q..~..g.~~~i~~fQii~~~...~.iiij~.~i'.~..:..~................~.-....~..............~..I....................-...ii.~'Qi. -...~......~..~~....~.i~.~ii.Lj_Q~i%~ .....-..~~....~....~..:~....~......'i~ji jt_~~-f~Gj~;A_~~..~~..~-.:..~~~ .?J-~...~~!P~--H~~~q~.~~~-.~.~~~4J~g,..__....__1.....__.____h..?:Z? ...........,).?:?~.L.J.QQ%_ ....-..........____.J.?~?~ I!:?_:f:9~f.~!\.....__......_. ?!.~...?~g~~..I~~~~~-Qffl~--~~.~4~g,..____..__.L.__.m__hJ~.~?? .--m"hmJ.?:9.?.L.J.QQ%. ........m....n...J.~~g~ I!~?.:f:9~.f~!\_:.......__... fk~~~~i~~i;;il:;1:i"'::j:~J~ii~;i~Lt~ji~:~}ZI1~ft::: 731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. i 166.02 273.931 100% 273.93 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~~~~~~c~~t~TI;Ulr~:~lt~!r~:~ :~f~:~~~~1:: 760 Research/Development Center: 8.11 13.381 100% 13.38 /T.S.F.G.F.A. 770 Business Park 12.76 21.051 100% 21.05 /T.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 20 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 5 of 5 ..................................................(1L..........._____......__....__.____........__!.........J?L....... .--.--......<~J.........L......<~J..... ................(?J.............. ......................(l?L.........__...... : ITE Est.: Net : Motor Total: % New i;~(~0~~~I?~i~ft~~~Jf~~~~~~m~i~:-ItJ~~~~~::~~~: .... un .......... ........__un.. n.._ nO .h_...... n.. -.. --. --. -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - --. -- - - --. - - - -- - - -- - -...:....... h.... __ _ __. __. ____. _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __. _.. _... _. _ _. .__.~.--............. .... ......_ "." On. __. n.. n. h n_ .__.____ ____..... '__'__'''''U'... __nnnn__ n... __un PORT/lNDUSTRIAL : i :@:::~~~Z~~ili~~~:~~:~~:~~~:::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::~:~~~: ::::::::::::::~:t.~~1!:::::i:~~%: ::::::::::::::::::::::~:t.;~ ::~:~~g~~~~~~:::::: 093 Li~ht Rail Station W I Parking 1 2.51 4.14: 100% 4.14 I Parking Space .!.!.Q....9~~~.~~UAgh~..~~~~~.~...........................j.................l?:.?? ..............!.!.:.?QL.JQQ.%. .....................}.!.:?Q lI:.?:.~:.q.:f..:A:............ .!.~Q...G~~~.!~..!:!~~Y.Y..~4~~trt~L....................:............___J:.?.Q .................~A~LJQQ.%. .........................?:~.lI.:?J:.q:.f..:A:............ 130 Industrial Park : 6.96 11.48: 100% 11.48 IT.S.F.G.F.A. .!.~....M~.~~~~&...................................................L..............~.:~? .................~.}Q.L...!.QQ%. .........................~}.Q IT$..:F..:G:f.:b::............. .!~Q...W.~!~h~~~.~.............................__.__.........__.___....___..L...............~...?~. ................~.:.1~L..JQQ%. .........................~:.!.~ IT$..J:G:f.:b::............. 151 Mini-Warehouse : 2.50 4.12: 100% 4.12 IT.S.F.G.F.A. i70...Utiliti~.(b.).....--..--...................................................:............--..0:.49 .........--.--...o~.siI....ioo.%. .........................o.:s1" fr.:s~F~.Gj~.:A:............ (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. C. Fonnula 3: Length Adjusted Person-Trips (by Type of Land Use) The ITE trip generation rates do not account for differences in the lengths of trips for different types of development. Because longer trips have a relatively greater impact on the transportation system than do shorter trips, an adjustment factor is needed to account for differences in trip lengths relative to the length of an "average" trip. The length-adjusted person-trips generated per day is determined for each type of land use by multiplying the number of new person-trips (from Table 4.2) by the trip length factor for each type of land use: Don Ganer & Associates 21 as of 10/20/99 Net New 3. Person-Trips Generated x Trip Length Factor = Length Adjusted Person-Trips Trip length data from surveys conducted for the U.S. Department of Transportation and published in the "National Personal Transportation Study" (1984) were used in developing the Trip Length Factorsl as were concepts and methods recommended by James C. Nicholasl in "The Calculation of Proportionate-Share Impact Fees" (American Planning Association, 1988)1 and "Development Impact Fee Policy and Administration" (American Planning Associationl 1990). Table 4.3 (pages 23 - 27) lists the length adjusted trips per day on the transportation system for each type of developmentl as calculated using Formula 3. Column 1 repeats the ITE codes and land use categoriesl and Column 2 repeats the net new person-trips per day from the last column of Table 4.2. Column 3 presents the trip length factor for each type of land use. As the result of multiplying the number of trips (Column 2) by the trip length factor (Column 3)1 Column 4 displays the length adjusted person-trips per day for each land use category. Don Ganer & Associates 22 as of 10/20/99 1T TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) .:..:...:.::.::..:::::::.'.::.::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::::::::::~:.~:::::::::I:::::::::::f~p::::::::::L:t~~~;~:::: .....n....__n..........._____..__........ : Person- ~ Length ~ Person- . .._.--....--.......--........--.--.....~-- :=::~=.:~~~::~:~~~:~:~~~=~:~:.:::t::::::::~~=~:::::::::i::::::::~:~:~:~:~~:::::::t::::::::::~~~~::::::::: .................y~~................ -.-........__._....__......__._....__.._n__ RESIDENTIAL : 1 ~ ~i9.:::~~i.~::f~Y.:i~St~~~~::t?~Pl~~)::::I:::::::::::::::::i:~;?~L::::::::::::::::::::fQQL::::::::::::::::i~~?~: -..........__....u_._n............_...... I~~~.~g.~!__ 220 Apartment 1 10.94: 1.00! 10.94 / dwelling unit . . 230 Residential Condo/Townhouse j 9.671 1.00~ 9.67 I~~~~&..~~... :i.1Q::::M~~~~~~~:!!Qi!~~g::c~::v~~fr::::::::::::::::::::?~~1[:::::::::::::::::I;Qg:[::::::::::::::::::::Z~:~~ I~~~~..~~L 260 Recreation Home l 5.21 i 1.00: 5.21 / dwelling unit ~~~~~~~~:_==E-~~iit=-_:=iiit=i.~ ______nn__.._..____n______________u_._. .....___n____________u..__.___...________ _I.~q.~..._..._.._--_......._._... 412 Coun!}' Park : 3.76i 1.11: 4.16 l~~!_~..._.....__...........mm ~I~~:~~~I~~_r=;~~~)I:-f~E:I~F~==~~~ _.!..~~P..~!!~_._.__....... .!.J?~~h.............m....._ 430 Golf Course i 58.97: 1.50: 88.46 Ih9J.~.......__....._..m_...m ..........__..................._._.__.__._____._____..____.......___.__..............................__...,..............__...........__oo...:.......................oo....__..i................................. 432 Golf Driving Range (b) 1 2.06~ LIt 2.28 /tee :~~:::~iY.1~~::.~~~~i.~~1~i~~~~::::::::l::::::::::::::::~~~~~L::::::::::::::::::tjj:I::::::::::::::::~t:~ I facili~ ................... --.................... _.I..~q~~!)_____.__.......m... 444 Movie Theater wI matinee : 252.99~ 1.11: 279.86 I screen . . 1'!~_...~~.~9lY!~_~_~_.r.~~.~.~I.~.~!!~!Y_.Q?JL.__________m__~_?J.?J..__.________________tJ_!L.._..._.........?~_~?J _/I~~~.f.~_Q.~f..~A~._____ 480 Amusement/Theme Park : 125.00j 1.11: 138.28 .I.~q~..........._..._........... .........................__..n__....oo.oo.....nn..n.....u..........u__..............__...............,......................u............__....u................n......"f-......oo........un...nnn.... 491 Tennis Courts i 51.22~ 1.11i 56.65 l~~~!!........................ ...u.u....u.u...u...................................__....__.........................................;.u........__.__nnnn.......oo.;..oo.____......__....nn.n.n.n~.......__.....__.n...n4nn.n. 492 Rac9.uet Club i 66.871 1.11i 73.98 I~~~!!......_.._...._.________ ..n....................._.......u............................u......._.._........................................................n...+.....................................u_.__........................ 494 Bowling Alley ~ 54.991 1.1( 60.83 / lane 495 Recreational Community Center 37.751 1.50: 56.63 /T.S.F.G.F .A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 23 as of 10/20/99 - TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 2 of 5 ...:.::..::.::.:::::...:..:..:::::..:.::..::....(.~:>.'..:::::.:::.:.:::::'::::::::::::::"::::::::1::::::::::::g~~::.::.::..t.:::::::::::~~):::::::::::::::::::::(~~i~h::::::I:::::::::::::::::::~~):::::::::::::::::: ~ New ~ Trip Adjusted ! iigiJ@i.i$j{~Qi5~ii::A:lliqQ~xt=f~i-...I}~:~......~f~;::cl......Vi!\i: INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL 1 ~ . ~:Qi:::Mi~~~:~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.::::.I:'::::::::::::::::I?~[:::::::::::::::::::::i:~::::::::::::::::::::::~j!rz:~:~P.~~y~~::::::::::: 520 Elementary School ~ 1.68: 0.40 0.671/ student 1!!t~~~;;~~~II!I::~:~:~=J~~1~iJ1iii~t~~=~ 560 Church ~ 15.031 0.75 11.271 /T.S.F.G.F.A. :~~::::BFi.~::~::=:~:~~~~':::~~~~:~=~~:I:::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::~~~:~L::::::::::::::::::~:~~~::::::::::::::::::::~~~~~I::~:f~i~~f.;~~::::::: 610 Hospital ! 19.42! 1.06 20.58: / bed ~~~~~o=;:_-t~~:~t-~:~~~~j~:~~~~;~~~~;~ COMMEROAL!SERVICES j i j ..___...............___.__.__.....__...__.._..............____......__.._...._._.__._______.....___._.............__.___________.____.__..__~-.-.._.._........_...__-.._.__......__.__.....................u.u..._._.......__................__............ !l~~[!!~~~~lt~~t~---t:----~~:~t:_~:~===:::~:~t~~~!~~~:=: With Groceries ~ 37.97: 0.84 32.031 /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~H:...?p~~~:~Hy..g~~~H..~~~.~~!..............................L.................?1~.~zL...................9..:~...................4;?~.~.~jII:?:f..:G:f:A~....... 815 Free-Standing Discount Stores ~ 1 ! ..............with~~t.G~~c~.ri~~..........................................r..................4559r..................ojW..................""3S:631"if:sj:::G:ii::A:....... 816 Hardware/Paint Stores 1 65.161 0.84 54.971/T.5.F.G.F.A. Il~:~~;;~~~f~:~~~~i~iI:~:~E:~:~::~~~HllIgi~~ 823 Factory Outlet Center ! 21.50: 0.84 18.14: /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 24 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 3 of 5 _...._ ___ ___.._____.____.....______________._..___01___._._______._____. ....--.-------..-..-..------l..- __________(~2________.____l_____.._..___(~J..____....._ _....______.._<4:2...._.._____1_..___...____..__..(?_L__._.._______.. \ Net : Lenl!th : ___________________......._________._______..______..___.__________________._____..______..__________._..:_______....N~_~____..___L...----..I~p...--_..... ._...A.4i~~!~4...J........................................... : Person- : Length Person-: ji~:..1ANPjj~~:.GQP~i.GA~GQ~i:::::F:::::::Tiip~:::::::.:_L::::::f:~~!~.i:..::::: :::::.:::.f~p.~::::::::...F..::::::::::::y~i::::::::::::::: ~11r!~~~~~~~~~~)Jlli.~~rl.~ili.~17.~.~~~~~~S.:; Restaurant : 116.13: 0.50 58.07: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~.~...F~~.tf.~~4.n~~~.~.JN.~.P.!iy.~~I~L.l...............~J.~.~~~.L....................Q=.~Q .................1..?~...4....9..UT ..S.. .F .G.F .A. 834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) : 221.0l! 0.50 110.51j If".S~F~'Gj~~A:'''''' ~..n.__.uu..__._._..._____.._.____n_n__.u.______...__n..._u____u.__._.uu..___.._u__._..__.__.~.n.u.u.....-..-.--.u--......_....n__u..............__..n....___u.u.nn_unu...............,....n_...n...n....n__......_n..______. 836 Drinking PlacelBar (b) ~ 10.28! 0.50 5.141/T.S.F.G.F.A. m~!~\!!!~i~~~;;~~~~t:~:iFi:!::~;ll~lr~~= 844 Gasoline I Service Station 1: : ...................___........................_...__...........___......__...........__.__................".......................................................................................................,.................__..n...n......n.n...n (no Market or Car Wash) : 136.28: 0.42 57.62\ IV.F.P. .~?..G~~~!~~.l.?.~!.Y.!~~.~!~!~.~~......_.._..............:.................._..............i-............................................................................................................... (With Convenience Market) j 131.6t 0.42 55.64~ IV.F.P. ......n.....................u.u.....................................................................................................u...~....................................................nn.................................nn...........0....... 846 Gasoline I Service Station [: 1 ......._......(~l.~~~y..~..M.~!~~!..~~4...~!.W.~~.ht...............1~.~.~??L....................Q=1?:...................?~.~~4:l.l.Y:.f.}~.~...................... 848 Tire Store i 31.60\ 0.84 26.66~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. nn......nn...n....................h............................................................nn"...........................................................n........n................n.......n...-t.....n__..........................n...... 850 Supermarket ~ 88.32: 0.84 74.51l IT.S.F.G.F.A. 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) j 523.60\ 0.42 221.37: IT.S.F.G.F.A. :~~~::::~~riy.:~::M~!~~!5~~Iih)~~~jj~~~P::::::r:::::::::::::.~~;.~?L:::::::::::::::::::9.~~~::::::::::::::::I~?~:t.~U:Y~fj~;.:::::::::::::::::::::: 860 Wholesale Market j 8.55! 0.84 7.211 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ..n...n...........n..........n.......................................................................~..........................n.....~.......................................................n..........lo.....n.............n.............n...... 861 Discount Club 1 53.11 ~ 0.84 44.80: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .....n.u.................n......n.n.....nu......n.....n...........n............................+.................................:.n..__...................h..........n.n............n....................................................... 862 Home Improvement Superstore: 44.53: 0.84 37.57i IT.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Suoerstore 57.22: 0.84 48.28: /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer lc Associates 25 as of 10120/99 TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 4 of 5 ..................................................(12......................................___........!-.............c~L..........L............P)............. .............(4J............1-.................(?L............... : Net : Length : .._..__..n......__.___...__._.._____......______......__.......___._____....._____......._____......____.;.._._____....._._..._.._____._.._~.-_--....._____....___......___... .....__.__.._____. ..___.......:.._._._......._._._........_.____..______... : New : Trip Adiusted . !j~(ANRi:i~~i.X>t.>~i~'rnGQ~xt~f~;:::,~:iPof~;:-'Iij';;i COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : : :~!.Q:::App~~~I:$.!~:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.L::.:::::::::::.::~?~:i:~L:::.::::::::.::.:::9:~~.::::::::::::::::::4?;2!IZt$.j~~G;~;A~::::::: 880 Pharmacy / Dru~store ': :. Without Drive- Thru Window: 72.81: 0.84 61.43~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. ----.............._._...u..._________.__u...........n._________.....--.----......--.....-..--.--......00-.................--__....u..._........__............__...._____....................................-}............n...................n........ 881 Pharma!;y/Drugstore ~: : .............~........jy~.ili...P!!y.~~~..W~.~~.~........................."...........T...................................if.?~T.........................................Q.;.~. ......................................~Qj.~tl..I~~.;~.;.G.;f.~A;............. 890 Furniture Store ! 6.43: 0.84 5.42! /T.S.F.G.F.A. ......n..n.Unnun..n.u_.._.nnn..nn......n...............................................................................n...."'............................................................n.................................................. 895 Video Arcade (b) : 45.93~ 0.84 38.75: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~:i~j!;~~R~kJ~~:~!~:~i~;m~I~~:~;~~~:-: 912 Bank/Savinl!s: Drive-In ~ 371.96: 0.84 313.79: /T.S.F.G.F.A. . . 731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. : 273.93~ 1.06 290.33: /T.S.F.G.F.A. t~~~~~~~c~~I!r~:~iJ~~:~:~~:~jHI~~~~:~;~:~~ 760 Research/Development Center : 13.381 1.06 14.181/T.5.F.G.F.A. 770 Business Park 21.05: 1.06 22.311 /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 26 as of 10/20/99 If TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 5 of 5 .......................___....__..................01...............___..___........................-L........J?L........J.............G?t........... ...........j~t..........L.................<?J..........___.... ..........................................................................---............................L...........N~~..........J................................ .......J.~.~.~g~h.......L........__................................ : New : Trip Adjusted: : Person- : Length Person-: :~X~::~ANP::y$.~::~QP~JGArtG9gx:::::r::::::::trlp.:~:::::::::F:::::f:~~.t~i::::::::::::::::I~p.~:::::::::r::::::::::::::y~i::::::::::::::: :. : PORT!INDUSTRIAL :: . ;!~{~~:~zi2~::::tl1:~l:i:l~-~i:~ij~1~~f~~:: 110 General Lil!ht Industrial j 11.50: 1.06 12.19: /T.S.F.G.F.A. 120 General Heavv Industrial : . 2.48i 1.06 2.62: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ijO...fud~~tri~.P;~k..................................................T .................ii48r........u...........i~.06 ...................i2j717T~Sji~.G~F~.A:...... hU____U..uu_........._._...__.o..ounnn.______..______u..__u._.....................u...--.....-c.---.......--............u_...__.:............____.......u__u.____u...............nn________u......_n..._____......nn_n_______________ 140 Manufacturing i 6.30i 1.06 6.68: /T.S.F.G.F.A. .l?Q....W~!~.h.~~.~~.....................u.___.u.u.u.........................:.........._________...~J.~L.................J.~~. ...........n.........~:??UT~.~F..~G.:f:A:....... .l?1....~~.W~.~.h~.~~.~..............................................i...___................~:.l?L..------------.....!.~~.......___..mm.....1::~?UI:~.~F..:G:f:A:....... 170 Utilities (b) : 0.8t 1.06 0.86! /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no avera,ge daily trip rate. D. Fonnula 4: Motor Vehicle (MV) Cost Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The motor vehicle cost to serve each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (93% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's motor vehicle facilities (versus pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities), and multiplying this product by the motor vehicle cost per trip ($178.29) from Table 4.1, page 15. 4. Length Adjusted X Percent X Person-Trips MY Trips MY Cost Per = Person-Trip MY Cost Per Unit Don Ganer & Associates 27 as of 10/20/99 The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.4, below. TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Jt~~:~!~~~~J~~~~ ..........--.......--.........-......----.. ...--.......--....--.....................-. i Person- i Trips @ i Cost @ __......__...._n__...._____.__....__....... ~io~~~:~$.~?:~~~j,~~~~~]~~~~_.I~:=~i~~~~:.~?-. .mu..m.m..y~tmm........ __......_n__...._____.........._____....... RESIDENTIAL i i i __.___n__._n__n.n.__...................._..h__.......__.........____............_.__....__.___...__...}..........__.......____.__.u___.._.u._.____._________......._____~_u___-..-..-____u_u-.'.'''_''0 __....On_u....___n__..........___.____._ .~JQ...~~~g~.~uf.~YJ~9~4.~~..P~P~~.~)......l.u...u..........J.?:?21........m......J~:.~?1...........m.$.~f.~1~. .!.~~.~~.~~.. 220 Apartment i 10.94: 10.17: $1,814 / dwellin~ unit 230 Residential Condo/Townhouse ~ 9.67J 8.99~ $1,603 I4.~~~..~t. .?~::::M~~~~~ji~~:~fug::{~::~:~~)::I:::::::::::::::::::::z~~~L:::::::::::::::::::!;~?r::::::::::::::$.i;~j:~ I4.~~~..~t 260 Recreation Home ~ 5.21! 4.85! $865 / dwelline: unit ..n..nnnn......................................................_____.................................;........................-----....j.........._nnn................L......____................._.... ..n.n..........n__._.............__..... RECREATIONAL 1 i i ~f~~~~~~----::I]~i~E-=::-l~~F~~ ..____.n......__._.................__..... nl.~.q~...........n.m...n...... ..l.~q~.m............m....m.. 416 CamPlITound/RV Park (b) ~ 0.74: 0.69~ $123 / camp site 420 Marina i 7.33~ 6.81! $1,215 .!.~~~hnmmn...._...m.. ..............n___...____.__.....................__..__________-------................________...___...............___-----n...------..----...--.........................n__oI-.....o_n..____......__......... 430 Golf Course i 88.46~ 82.26~ $14,667 Lh9.J.~.....n..m...mmu..n u........____.___..n___....._______.........____................______________................_______................._.........._.n.n.._.n....................u.__......{.....................u._._u_... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) i 2.28~ 2.12~ $378 /tee ~~::::~~~iii::~~~~j~~f~j!~~~:::::::I::::::::::::::~t~L::::::::::::~:i.~~~~:I:::::::::::::~:~~ / facili ..................~.....m............. .l~q~~~......n.......mm 444 Movie Theater w / matinee : 279.86j 260.27j $46,403 /screen :~Z~u..~~.~9.lY~~.~.~..P.~~.~.!l~~~~~ryJ~)L...._._.....m.~.~:?.!.L.....nnnu....~~.~QL....nnm..~!.~. .!!.:~:.f.:.g.:~.:A:..m. 480 Amusement/Theme Park i 138.28! 128.60~ $22,928 _f.~q~....._.....n.m.n....... :~H:~4~~~--:---:-T:-::~:gE::~~1~::=:~tB~ .l~~!!~..........n............ l~!?!!!.!........................ 494 Bowling Alley ! 60.83! 56.58! $10,087 / lane 495 Recreational Community Center 56.631 52.661 $9.389 /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 28 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 --"--..----------------"---------------..-.'-''''-..-.-',-.-,-,'.---,'.',',',-,'-',','-','~'~.>.-,.-'-',-..-...----.-,-...,-,--,-,-,','.','-.-'.'..---.------,.-','-.,'.-..'--------"-.-'.J,',',-,',',-,'1~~~.t.h,-,',',-,-I-',-,-_-_.."_'~l:l.~i','.-,-_-,.,.. '...,',-,',~)J~~i.._..,._-,-,t..'._._',.,-_',',',',..'...."""~'~~'_._._._._'.'.',~._'..,..._..-,',., --"..........----...............................................---....-...,.........---.........._..___L...A~i~.~~~4_...L....Y~N~~....... ,......Y~~.~~~.__...L.____......_____......___..........__m'. ! Person- : Trips @ Cost @ ! .D]..~ANP..y?~..~QP~/.~A~,GQBX.m,LmmI~R~..m'mL__...m,2_~%'m...__., $178.29: Unit iNsTITUiioNA:ilMEDicii.....---...m....r..mm.......mmm..m....----'-m...--..,"mm.m.._. ............_.__.__......_.....-..;......-..........~...--.......... mmm.'-mmm.-m.....--r--........m...mmm......m..m.__ 501 Military Base ! 3.11! 2.89 --m--..'..__m...$.?,!.~.!I~~pJ~y~.~....__...... :~?Q:::~J~!!!~~j~::~:~h~~L:::::::::::::::::::::::::':'.::::::::r::::::::::::::::::.:Q~:~zL::'::::::::..:'::::Q~~?: '---'m.--..m',.lUJjI~.~_~4.~P.:!...m___.m_m. 522 Middle I Junior Hi~h School j 0.951 0.89 $1581 I student ~:::~~~:~~~~~!Y::~~n:~g~::::::::::::+::::::::::::::::::::t~~:I:::::::::::::::::::::t:~ $367: I student ......u...--.....................~...........u....n.........n......_.nn. ',-..-.--..---:_'.'.'.'.~.,',._._..~.~t.-.Z:;_~.~.:-~~..._-.._-.-.-::...._..-_-_-_._-_-. .??Q....y.~y._~_~_~!Y!.9?M~g.~....'m____.___mm'.__..'mm__..L......m__......m?:_~~L_________..__.'.m_:?_~?~. 560 Church j 1l.2t 10.48 ..m-m'__..,.$J-'-~~UI~$._:f..~9~f~A:....... ..........__._nn...................____n_n_nn_____.______._____..........--..-----.......---------..:.---n..................___..__..o(__.h..n..................___.... 565 Dav Care Center I Preschool j 2.981 2.77 $493 j I student 590 Libr~ j 35.551 33.06 -..-.,..---..-..$.?!-~~~lII:-?~-f.~.Q:.f.:.A~______ ~i:Q.:::H~p~!_~L::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::':::?:Q:;~~r::::::,:::':":::!~~I~ $3,413Ubed .........._.._.__.u..~......___......_nu........__........~...n......_.._. 620 Nursing Home : 4.561 4.24 $757j Ibed :~~:::==:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::,,:::::::::r:.:::::::::::::::~~~:~~L::::::::::::::::~,~:~:~~: .=?~!:=fl'f.'=:=:~'=~'= COMMERCIAL/SERVICES ~ : 310 Hotel/Motel ~ 13.00: 12.09 $2,155 j I room ~If::~~~:fug::M~~~!!~i~~~:~!::::::.::"::::r::::::::::::::::4i.;~r:::::::::::::::::~~~:~~ ................................................nun............__'''''_un -.'.'.-...',.,...:,..._'...'_..~.~~_~_~.~'t/.~~'~_~-=~'~~~~~.~~~_._~-_-_._-. .~l~....F.~.~.~_:?!~~.~gJ?~~_~~_~~!__?!~!~..__..___...L..mmm___....mnm'm.L__...m__m__.._m__m__m With Groceries 1 32.03~ 29.79 ,.--.--...._,..$,?-'-~.!J_tLI~?.:f..:9~f~A:.m_.. .8i4-..SD~ci~tV..R~t~if"c~nt~~m--...--...-....m'mm--!..-......'.---m--4i"S9rmm....m..m4<is:4- $7,228! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.!.~mf.-!~~::?!~4.~~gJ?!~~~~_t?~~_!~~_'mmL.....__nm'..m__m_____..Lm'___.m__....m_______..., ::::::::::::::::$~;.~Q~I:i.I~~j~~:~i~f~A~:::::: ...mm__..WJ~.h~.~~..G.!~~~!!~~..n.m'..mmmm...__....'m_____L.....mm.m~.~2~.L.___,......___m~?~.~~ 816 Hardware I Paint Stores j 54.97j 51.13 $9,115~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~lZ.-.-N~~~!Y!.G.~r.4.~~__~~~~~.rhn__________m___.l.m.________nm~:,~ZL___.._m......~:?,:~~ --....'.___m.~.A.!.?JlI:$..:F._:G.::f:A:...m_ .~~Q....?h~p.P.!~g..G.~.~~~!.....................................'.m'_..L......m...--...~?~.??Lm..............??~?~ .........m...$j.&~LlI~.~f,~G~f~A~,...... 823 Factorv Outlet Center : 18.14: 16.87 $3,007: /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 29 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 ...____.____..._.......___..........____..__....(1.).........__.__.______..__.___....____...._......_L.......j~L.........L...........{~L......... ............J~L.........L...............(?L............... : Length : Motor Motor i ____........__..._...________._.....________.____....__________......_.._...___._...________.....__......l.....A~i~~~~4...L.__..Y~.h!~~.__._.. .......Y~N.~~~....._L._...........__................___........ ............____.__............__.............____...............................................__.....1____.J.~~!~.~~~...___L.....I~p~..~...... ......Gg~.t...~.......L.....__............................... m.1ANP.Y?~..GQP~l.GATIGQRX....l.........I~p~.------...:--.----..y.~%..--.-..--- $178.29: Unit ..................................:.nnn..........~............... .coMMi~iiciALjsERvicEs..(~~tj....-1------....-.................-.I...-............................ .................................-r-........................--.--...--....... .~~!...~~H~..R~~.~.~~~~q~~!..~..~h~~L..L.............JJ.~~.?QL............J9.~A?. ::::::::::::=:~:::~~~:~l::::~:~:~~:~=::~:~:::::::: _~~~____llighI~~~y.~.!{..?~t~.P.~~~......._......._..._l....___...........____...--.....-L.--..--.........--............ Restaurant i 58.0t 54.00 $9,628: jT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~.;?...f..~.~!..f..~Q4...~~~.tJN.Q..Prty.~:~L.L............J?.~A~.L............).~:.;??: ......__.....$.~~A~:?l.l.!:.~:.f.:.G:.f.:.A.:...... 834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) 1 110.51~ 102.77 ...........__$.!~{.~?~l.lI:.~~!=.G:.f.::A:...... 836...D..:.....~--:.........Pl~~~jB~.(b)-------------...--------...-T...-----------------5:i4r--....---------.....4~.78 $852~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~~?...~~~.1~~.~~!!2.~..Y~N.~~.?h2P......~..__...__...__.....~Q~.Q?;..__.............__~?:?.~. _____.._______.$.1:L~.~.?L!..~~!Y.!~.~..~~~~...... .~.___A~.~g~2.~M~..~~!Y.!~.~..~~.~~~!.Jp.Ln___L...___..._...__...J=.~QL..n...___..._____~.:Q9.. ............___.....~?!.~1.l.I:?.~f.:.G.:1.:A=....... ~!....N~~n~..~~~~...mm.......n__mn_________....._m.........Ln______________~9..:!~.L.________n____}?:.~~ --......-----...$.~A~.III:.~=.f.:.G=.f.:.A.:...... 844 Gasoline I Service Station : j .......____.____............n._.............n._u___.......______.........n......_.........__._......_~_____....-......__...--_.____.__....................u............. ..................................~........................................... (no Market or Car Wash) 1 57.62~ 53.58 $9,553: IV.F.P. 845 Gasoline I Service Station ::::::::::::::(W:~fu::~~~y.:~:~~~~~::M~~~~j::::::::::::::t:::::.:::.:::::::$.$.~:~I::::::::::::::::.:~:i:;?~: :::::::::::::::~~;.:~~I:zy:;~;~~::::::::::::::::::::::: 846 Gasoline I Service Station : ! m__m_____.<WI...G~.~y..~..M~~~~!__~~4...~!..w.~~.N....--...--m.m??::~~.!..m___._____.____~=.?~ $8,6621/V.F.P. .n.n.....un.............n....~..n.........n.u.......................n ~..T~!~__~~2.~~mmm__..____mm_m..__._________.m.mm__m._......Lm__m.m...~.~.:~.Lm________.m...?~:?~ ................~{.~Ql.lI~.~:.f.=.G...f....A:...... 850 Supermarket ~ 74.51: 69.29 __.__.__....$.!.?-L~?4.j..lT:?.~f..:G.~f:A:.______ .85imc~~:;~;rl~~~~.M~~k~i...(24..h~~~)mmr..m.....m--22ij7r....--.'.".20'S"j37. ___.........$~.~ZQ.?U.T:?.:f..:Q:f:A=mm. .....................n........__..uu.........................n............n.......n.n...__........................................u.i.........................--....... .~?~__..GQ~y..~..M~~~.!.WJ.th..f.~~LP~~P.__.__jm__mmm.J.~?=?~L.m...___)?.!.:~Z __....__....$.?-.~L~~?j..l.y.:f..~:P.:m__.____.m.__...... ~.9.___Wh~!~~.~!~.M~!~.~.t___mn...______...__n___.m.___m...L......_______nnm?.:~.V.------------------n~}J. .__.__..........$.!{.!?~l.lI::?=.f.~.g:.f.:.A~...... 861 Discount Club i 44.80i 41.67 $7,429: IT.S.F.G.F.A. un.n...........n.....n....................n................n.........................................................................:................................. .......................nu......-t.....un.................n....n......... 862 Home Improvement Superstore i 37.57: 34.94 $6,229i IT.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Superstore 48.28: 44.90 $81005~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 30 as of 10/20/99 'If TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 4 of 5 ............................................._....nt......_mmm___._....._................--L..........J~Ln........[........n....(~.L........n n.........J4L..........l...................(?L............... ] Length ! Motor Motor : .............m_..................._m._mm................_mm.m_..mm_m_m_..._______:___._A~i~_~~~~...].......Y~N~t~....... ....__.Y~N~~~......j.......________..................____...___ ! Person- ~ Trips @ ......_~g~.!_.~_..____L......._.._......m___..._............... i{~..._~ANt.?..y$.~..._~QP~/~A~_GQRy.._-_-_..T_._-_-_._-.-..--."I~p.~--...---.-.-....-F-..-----.-.---..--?~%...............-.'.-.. $178.29] Unit ................._............_..-f....._........_-~..._..-........ ...._.............._.....u......................................nnn..........n............_....nn.f-............n...................:.............n.................. ........_..__._...........__.n.._~.._.__....._..__.._.....__.__.._........... COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) i ] :~~::::~fi:~:.~7~~g~~~ii:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::~~~:~~J:::::::::::::::::~:~~: :::::::::::::::~:::~~::::~I::~:~~~:~~:~~:~~~~~::::::: Without Drive- Thru Window i 61.43] 57.13 $10,185i IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~J....P.h~~~lP~g~.tQ!~.......................n.......L...........n.................L........,',"'''''''''...m... ___............................._+..._______.......nu.......__.............. With Drive-Thru Window 1 60.13: 55.92 $9,970: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ..........._.................nn__.__......._............nn...........................................+.................................:................................. .......-...-.....................-t........................................... 890 Furniture Store : 5.42~ 5.04 $899: IT.s.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) : 38.75~ 36.04 ................~~~.?J.!.!:~.~E~Q:E:A=...m. ......................................nn.......................n..n......................_..............................................(-................................. 896 Video Rental Store (b) ~ 21.511 20.01 ...._...._......$.~~~?Jl!:~.~E~Q:f:A=....... .?.!I__.~.~i~~.y~i~~.j~j~~!~~.~__________..__..____..____...-___.-___..__....______.T____..______________________}~.~.~..!~.L______..________________It~;}?. $30,6991 IT.S.F.G.F.A. n....n...............n........~........n...n..........n................ ~.1.?:.--~~!..~~y.!~g~;)?~y.~J~......m..........nm..tm.nmmm~J~.?~.I........n......?:?!=.~~ $52,030l IT.S.F.G.F.A. ..........n.....................-r........................................... OFFICE :ziQ:::G~~~!~(Q#I~~.:!i.~M4~g..:::::::::::::::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::i~;.~~t::::::::::::::::jZ:~~i" :::::::::::::::i~;':!2~j:zt~:~f~G;f~A~::::::: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building j 13.50i 12.56 $2,238i IT.S.F.G.F.A. ?!?m_~~gt~__!~.~~~_.Qff~~~..~~.Q4J~K...m...__L..m.......__...~.Q.:~~.L._nmm._....J.~:.~?: ..........__....$.~l~??U.T=.~J~=.g=.~=.A:.._._. Z~.Q..nM~~::P~~~~.9.ffi~~.~~~~Km....L..mm_________?~.:.!?.l...__.__......__.__?~:z:~ $10,476j IT.S.F.G.F.A. :i~:::~~r:~~i~~~i~:~~(::::.:::::::::::!:::::::::::::::1~~~~t:::::::::::::::~t~~~~. .________________....__.ii?;?~iriI~~.~F..~.G.;f__;A;..__..______. ........n..~!..!~.?j.!.!:~.~~.~Q:f:A=__...__ 732 U.S. Post Office : 189.20j 175.95 ......_.....$..~J!.~z:!.j.!.!:~.~f..~G.:f:A=.__m. .?~_______Q!~.~.~____~~~.____.._....__________..____..__________________..__________________..____..__________..____..__________..____..____...J..__..____..________....____-____...!?~??r________________..______________..}~.;.~t. $3,311: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .............n..................v...un.................................... ?~.Q...J~:~.~~~~hlP~y.~J~P~~~~..~~~~~r....L......__...m..)4J?.l..n.nm........J.~=J.? $2,352~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. ....................n............t...............n..____nn..n....n...... 770 Business Park i 22.31: 20.75 $3.700~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 31 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 (!:+~~~~ij;JM~~~iM~~;:j(50: i Adjusted! Vehicle Vehicle: : Person- ! Trips @ Cost @ ! X~ii~PQ~~i:;QQ~i9:Jji99BYII;:;~r2j%:$iZ~;ii+Yii!i= PORT/INDUSTRIAL ! i . ......................--..................................-........--..-............-----....-___....__..-<-...___n....__---..--..............................................._____...---.............--.......)0__.......__....._..___.........__.......... 030 Truck Terminals : 17.231 16.02 $2,856: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~1~l~~~~~~~~zW:f~g-I--~:~Em_-J:gm:m-.m~~1~I~~H:~ 110 General Light Industrial 1 12.191 11.34 $2,021! IT.s.F.G.F.A. J?:QmG.~.~~!:!!!.;H.~.~.yyJP:~.~~!!'!~.Lm....m..h_....L....m.......m__.?~~~.Lh..._...mm.....?~.# ....._............m$.1:~?Ll.I~~:.f.:.Q:.f.~A~hm. 130 Industrial Park ! 12.17~ 11.32 $2,0181/T.S.F.G.F.A. .............--._...___...........____u.....__.____u.............._..__u..._u....................__..+__........................n.............................u.__..u................__....._.......____-)-u..___uu.__....__..u...._....____.... 140 Manufacturin~ j 6.681 6.21 $1,108i IT.S.F.G.F.A. l~Lij't:ii~w::;;i;~i!i~rt~tl~:~t~~~ii~~~~~= 170 Utilities (b) i 0.861 0.80 $1421/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. E. Formula 5: Pedestrian/Bicycle (P/B) Cost Per Unit (by Type a/Land Use) The pedestrian I bicycle cost for each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (5% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's pedestrian and bicycle facilities (versus motor vehicle and transit facilities), and multiplying this product by the pedestrianlbicycle cost per trip ($469.23) from Table 4.1, page 15. 5. Length Adjusted X Person-Trips Percent P IB Trips X PIB Cost Per = Person-Trip PIB Cost Per Unit Don Ganer &: Associates 32 as of 10/20/99 The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.5, below. TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (2) (3) (4) (5) .......n....................__.__......... ......-..-...-..-............--.--......... ..__......n................._.........n... nm...nmn..Y~~.....m.m.... ......---......__.__...........__.....uu__ _n__.._.._______n..._____........n...___ .!.~~.~.~.~~n 220 Apartment : 10.94j 0.55i $257 / dwellintr unit ~g~~;~ijtJ~1;;'~~~~iL........J:~...~~I:~~J~~~~L 260 Recreation Home i 5.21i 0.26i $122 / dwelling unit (1) rtf1~!;~:~:mli~r::ii~r:::~;:~:~:~~ 416 Camptrround/RV Park (b) ~ 0.74: o.04i $17 / camp site ~Qn.M~~mm.mmmmmmmnmnm..mmnnm..nhh...mmn;.mnmmmnn..?:~.~.Lnmmnhm.....Q:}zL.......m.mm.~1Z~. .!.~~.~h.....m.....nmmn 430 Golf Course : 88.46i 4.42! $2,075 thole --.........--..............--..........--.......--.----.--.---.-------...--............................--.)-..------.---...-.....................--...................-.........(-......__..._.__.........n...._____.............nn_..n___.______......... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) : 2.28j O.l1i $54/tee .1:~m.M~!~P~q?~~~ng~..~~.9J~~uu..u....mm.m.Lu...mmm~~~..~~Lmm..........P.:.!.~L...ummm~~~.?~ If~~~.......n.u......... 443 Movie Theater w / out matinee j 401.541 20.08j $9,421 / screen 444..uM~~~..Th~.~t~~..;i~~ti~~~mm...uuuuur.........m...279~86r.........m....ii99rmm.........$6~566 7~~~~~.................m. Ilf~~ii~~=~~~~e0~li-mm~i.iil:-:i:il!['1~~~00~:: 494 Bowling Alley : 60.83: 3.04~ $1,427 {lane 495 Recreational Community Center 56.63: 2.831 $1,329 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 33 as of 10/20/99 ~ TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 mm~~~m-m:-mFA~~~J~e~i~~~i~~~~~:~jrm(5) ! Person- : Trips @ Cost @ : m..~ANP.Y~~..~QP~L~~GQRX.....t.......-.IrtP~""''''--I--_......ooooa____......oo ."-"'~.?~?.~......-foo........--..ooY~~....noooooooo .........................................................--........-..--.....-..-.....-----..--...........}.-.........--...-................:.....----...................--.............--......................j...-----.............--.--................-- INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL:! : ~~~~~~~!i~~(!~:m~:~:r:H~~~~~=": 522 MiddlelJunior Hi~h School ! 0.951 0.05 $22:1 student ?;?.Q___H!gh..~~~.~L......oo...n___.______..___.....................______L______oo.oo.....___..?.~??L.........h------...Q:JJ.___..___....h..h...___$.??.lI~~4.~.~!..oo....h---..--- ~...1.~~!.!..9?~~~J~..~~Jt~g~..___oooo...ooL._.noo---...ooJ.~?.Q.~oo---.---oo.oo....h..Q~.Q? ....-.------......oo..h~?lI~~4.~.~~.______......_____ .??Q....y~y..~.~.~.~!..9?~!~g.~___.............h.______.___..______..L.h...___....oo.....?:.?~L..---------.........Q.J?. ....h_________.___....~~.?.jI~.~~~~!___.___.___....... 560 Church ! 11.271 0.56 $264! /T.S.F.G.F.A. ..........__________un_____..__..______n__.n_n........................._____...._...__..._.........................._.._...............<(................................h.............................................................................. 565 Dav Care Center I Preschool ~ 2.98: 0.15 $70j I student ~~:::~~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::t::::::::.::-::::::~:~:~~:t::::::-::::::::::::::t:~~::::::::::::.::::::::~r:Z~:4~::~:.:=~:~:~:::::: 620 Nursine Home 1 4.56! 0.23 $107[ Ibed =:=~J==.~L~.70~:=l'~==I!=S..~'~'~.~:.:: COMMERCIAL/SERVICES i i 1 310 Hotel! Motel ~ 13.00: 0.65 $3051 I room ~l~l~~:~~t:~~~~t~~~I:-~.~F::.:.~.~~:~~E~~~F;~~~~~. With Groceries ! 32.03~ 1.60 $75( IT.S.F.G.F.A. ...nu...........................n..n.....................................h_............................................................<(............................................................................................................... 814 Specialty Retail Center j 43.59! 2.18 $1,023i IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~J.?...f..!~~::~.t~~~&.P.~~~~~~t.~~~.r:~~.m.ml.m......u......._..__.__umJ.mm..muu.u....mm.mum.......mmmmmmu..'._..umumnu.........._...mmum Without Groceries i 38.63~ 1.93 $9061/T.s.F.G.F.A. ..........................................................................._.............................A........_.__._-.-.............................._...................._................................t........................................... 816 Hardware/Paint Stores j 54.97~ 2.75 $1,2901/T.S.F.G.F.A. ~~:~~~~~~?-==t~:i~;~~Ll:~:~~i)H:~:~:~~: 823 Factory Outlet Center 1 18.141 0.91 $426! IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 34 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 (J)J!;.;~iij;ii''''!~~~~~i~~4~~~~~iL(~) : Adiusted i Bicycle Bicycle: - - !(i{~Q~~<:::QP~i<;'Ai:i!GQ~Yi=f~ii:-r=~~~~:~t:Y;;ti COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : i .........____...............n....._......._n...............___.--.-......-----..-........--.---.-..-..-~_._---._.__.....--....------.-...~.__.--....-.-.._....--..__..-.n_.-._...........--................v.............____.._____....__.......___... ~~-L.Q~_~!~.R~~~~~~_~~_{!l9_~.~__~h~_~t..I.........._.....P_~.~?g.l..._..........__.....?~?~ -............._.$.~A~_[ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 832 Hi~h Turnover, Sit-Down:: .. ......-..................................... Restaurant : 58.071 2.90 $1,362! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ..........--.--.............--.--------.-.....--...............__u......_........__..._....__...__...____.__.....n.___.____......--------.-(.......----....__.................___n__......______.....u____..~...__...~............__.......__.......____. 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) ~ 159.491 7.97 $3,742: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .....__...................__..........u....u..........__.~...........--.--....................................................--..........'t-..................................................................~.........__...~......................____... 834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) : 1l0.5t 5.53 $2,593: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~:::R~g:r!~~Z~~:(~L::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::~ji.L::::::::::::::::::::Q~:?~:::::::::::::::::::::$.i.?jriI~~~:~~:g~~~A;:::::: 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop: 30.07j 1.50 $705l/Service Stall -~----A~.~-~~Q~M~..~~!Y!~-~..~~~!~!..(1J.L.....i___________m________4:~_~QL..--.--------..h.--Q-~~J---...._________...l!gJ.LlT$.:f~.G_~~~A~n..n. 841 New Car Sales : 40.191 2.01 $9431/T.S.F.G.F.A. ._u........................__.__....................__u........._...............-............-.-............._.....................--.....-t.........................--....... .........................................................__.__............__.. 844 Gasoline I Service Station i! : (no Market or Car Wash) . 57.62: 2.88 $1,352! IV.F.P. ~~:::G~~~fui~i~~i.Y~~:~::~!~!~~:ri:::::::::::::::::::.::::L:::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1::::::::::'::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::: (With Convenience Market) : 55.64i 2.78 $1,305: IV.F.P. 846 Gasoline I Service Station j : ..............................--......................................................-.............-..............-.............-.-........-t................-................. .....__...........__.__...........................__.......__........._....... (W/Conv. Market and Car Wash) 52.24: 2.61 $1,226: IV.F.P. ...................-.......--.--.-..................--...............................-.............-....--.........--.......................t-................-......--........ ........................u.......~............~..........................u... 848 Tire Store ! 26.66: 1.33 $625: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~Q:::~~p~~~i.~~!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::i.i;~jr::::::::::::::::::::~~:t.~::::::::::::::::~j;.?~r:zI~~~:~~:g~~:~A;:::::: 851 Convenience Market (24 hour): 221.37: 11.07 $5,194: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~~~n--G~~y._:..M~~~~..w.t!h..f~~Lr~~p___....L_____.......J.~~~?~L.______....._______~J1 ...-----.......~.~_'__~J.?jIY.~:f.~;p~..______nn.........n 860 Wholesale Market j 7.21! 0.36 $169l/T.S.F.G.F.A. .86i---Di~~~~~t..ci~bn---.-----.-..-------n--.......--n--.......h....T---....--.--------44j~Or.--.------n""'.2~24 ....---------..$i~o5i]"iisji~G:F:A~.....n ~.~n..H~-~~J~P!~y.~~_~_~~_J~~P~~~~.!~__L...__h..mm~?~??Lm......hm_.___.1~.~ ....--_______n___h.$.~ll/T~.$.~.f~.g::f...A:__n.. 863 Electronics Superstore : 48.28~ 2.41 $1,133: IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 35 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 4 of 5 .n.......n...n.n..............................<.u................................................l..........j?L..........L..........J~t.......... ...........j~L..........l........... (5) : Length ! Pedestrian/ Pedestrian/: ..................00........... ....0000. .00...0000...............................................................00.00.00..............L...A:~j~~~~~L.l.n.....~~~sl~....... .....J~J9'9.~.......i.............n..........n..........n..... ..........................................................................................................L.....p~!~.~~.~......L....T.!"JP~..~...n. ......Gg~.L~.......j.........n.......n.n.......n.n........ .~..~ANP..y$.g.GQP~l.GA:~.GQRX.....t.........I~p.~..........I.............~...................$:1&?.:?~.....nr...............Y~Ln.......... ..............___.._......._....__.._.........._......_...._u__.._.._.___.________.._.._......_.__.._.._~................____.._.__..__...~...._.._.._.._.._......__._...._. ._....._.....__._.._..._...._.....~_.._._.....____....................__...... COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) :: : ~~=~~iiiiii~i;;ii!::~~.~:loL:~~~=!,!:::!J.}:'=.::~~.~.~. Without Drive-Thru Window j 61.43: 3.07 $1,4411/T.5.F.G.F.A. ~J....p.h~~9'.I.P~g~.~g!~................................L................................l............................................................................................................... ......n...nW~fu.Prty~.~~..W~~9.~........m.........L................?.QJ.~.1....................}~.Q!.................$.lAlll/I:.~~.~:.G~.~:.!.\:...... 890 Furniture Store : 5.42: 0.27 $12i /T.S.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) j 38.75: 1.94 $909: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ._u_____nu______n......_..._..._n_n_..____....._..____..............................................................__.__.__..........<C-.......__....____..............__n.n.............__.__................__.................__...__............. 896 Video Rental Store (b) j 21.51j 1.08 $505: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ..un......................................................................................................................................'i-.........................n..........n......................__n.~..............................n..........__ ?_P....~~l?~y.~g~;..W~~~.~_~............................l...._.........J~.?~.!?j....-............-....?:.?.~................$.4:!.~lII:.~~.~:.G.:~-"_A.:...... ?.!.?....~~I.~~y.!!1:~;..Prty~.!~..........................t....m........~.!~.:Z?..I..................J.?:.~? ................$.?!:~?VI:.~:.~:.G-".Y..A.:.m.. .Q.f.f..I.~~..................................................................................L.................................................-.........................................m............m.................................... ?!.Q...G~~~!~..Qffl~~..~.~4.~K...........................L................J.?~.??L..................9.~??....................$.4:?..?.jII:~.~~.~G:f~A~....... 714 Corp. Headquarters Building: 13.50i 0.68 $317! /T.S.F.G.F.A. rJ~~~"Sm~i~!~~Jjl:ll:~i:lt:-:ufJl~ll:i;l:t1: ?~l.m~t~t~..M.~t~!.Y~N~~~~..P~p.t~...................L..............??Q:}~L............ml~.:?? ...............~.~!~}}.UT$..:~.:G.:f:A:....... ?~?...y:.~~..?.~~.!_.Q!~~.~...................................................L.............J.~?~.?QL...................?.:~................}!A~.~UT~.:~.:G.~f~A:....... ?~....Qff!~~..?~~...............m............................m............L..............J.?:??L...m..............l:.QQ......mm.........~?.llI:~:.~:.G:.~:_A::n.... ?~9.....R~.~.~.~!;h.!..P~y..~J~p.~~~~..G~~~~!.....L..............J.'!:.!~.L.....................Q:?!.m..................$.~~~.l.lI:~:.~:.G:.~:.A::...... 770 Business Park 22.31: 1.12 $52{ /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 36 as of 10/20/99 ~ TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 (1) i (2) i (3) (4) i (5) nn.m.n..........n.n...........n..........mmm.mm.mnnm.mm.m...mn..mmnrmnL~~gth..mTp~d~~tri~~i"P~d~~tri~.~ir..................n..mm......m.m n.m__.n....................................m............m...........n.n.n..m.......m.......~.....A~i~.~~~4__.j.........~~~~J~...nn __....J~iq:~l.~..m.!.........n.........n.......n.n.......... n..n...n............mmmmmm....mm..m...........................n.....nmm.m....1......;p~!~g~~mnj..mnI~P~..~...... .......~.Q~.L~.......L....nn..m.....m....m...m.n.... !J.]J~ANP..y$~nGQP~L~ATIGQRX.....LmmI~P~m....mlm.n.nn__~......__n..nm.~.?.~~~.......l........mm..y~tmmn..... '. . '. . '. . '. . ;~iltl~~~~~~~:J:li:~f::i~:~~~i~~~~~i 093 Light Rail Station W I Parking 1 3.49~ 0.17 $82j IParkine: Space .Ug.nG.~~~!~..!:~~ght.~~.~~~~___...m...mmmn...L.......mmmJ.?:.!~jm.m.......--m...Q~.~L.....n..nm....n$.~~.JI:.~~.~=.G:.f....A~n.n. J.?Q...G.~~~!~!.H.~.~.Y.Y..!~~.~~!rt~J....n......__....n..l......................?:~~j........m...........QJ~.............m........~?lII:.~=.~=.G:.f.:.A:.... 130 Industrial Park 1 12.17j 0.61 $286l/T.S.F.G.F.A. .. .HP...M~~~~gm..mmn..mnm..........m..n..._____...j.mmmm..___.m~:.~~Lmn..m....nmnQ.}~..mnm...n__....$.J.??LlI=$.:f..:G=f~A=.....n .!~.mW~!~.h.Q~.~~..............n....m.m.n..............m...........n.L....mnmnmm~=.~ZLmm..............Q.A~..n....mmm....$.~9~jII~$.:f..:G~f~A=..m.. 151 Mini-Warehouse ~ 4.37~ 0.22 $103~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 'i70mUtiliti"~..(b).....nmn.........m.mn....m.m.......m...........rm......m.m.nO:86Tnm..n---....mnO~.04mnnm...n..n.m.$2oTjT~sj~~-G~F~.A:-...n (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. F. Formula 6: Transit Cost Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) --The transit cost for each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (2% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's transit facilities (versus motor vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities), and multiplying this product by the transit cost per trip ($308.45) from Table 4.1, page 15. 6. Length Adjusted X Percent X Transit Cost Per = Transit Cost Person-Trips Transit Trips Person-Trip Per Unit Don Caner & Associates 37 as of 10/20/99 The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.6, below. TABlE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) i (4) (5) : Length i i ::IE.~~~~S=~~~L~~~~yj~~!~~~Im:~~~mI~~~m~m:m~~t:m: RESIDENTIAL :! i ..........--......--.--...--..............................-......u...__........__.._........_.............;,..........-.-..-..__n.._h_____.:h__.._....._.n___..__.._..____.~._-..__..._n...__....____.....__............__...__......__..___...____.._. .~J.Q...~~~g!~..f~.~y..(~~.~4~~--P~P~~?~Jm..l.hhm..mh...J.?~?~.L..hh..h.m.____Q~.~?L.h.--h..hh...h.~??. .!.~~.~.~K~!!!~.. 220 A artment : 10.9{ 0.221 $67 /dwe' unit ~~ij-:~-~~~;~Ji;'gl~j;~kj3;m~:t~L:~H:~~llii::~} 260 Recreation Home ! 5.21l 0.10! $32 / dwellin unit . . . . . . ---............---..............----........----...................--.0--...-...............__...._____..1...............-.._..___._____...!n_.....__._.._____....._........~.............u..-.......u.u...............uu..............u.u....u.u RECREATIONAL i 1 ! ~H~~~~~i:-----~--F-~~;~E--:---~:~[--1ft~:~-:~-- 416 Carn ound/RV Park (b) ! 0.74: 0.01: $5 / cam site 420 Marina . 7.33: 0.15: $45 /berth 430hG;;iTC~~~~.....hm.........m.....hm.....h......h...m....r.....h_.m...88:46r-m.....m........i.77r..........m....$546..Th~I~....m.......m.......... .........__.._......._.u......._......__...........___.........-----....-------...------....-.-..-......-~........-.-........................u..._...................u.....{.u..................n.............u.u.....n................n......n... 432 GolfDrivin Ran e (b) i 2.281 0.05: $14/tee .~~?....M~!~p~g?.~.~~..~~.~..f~9M!Y......h.__.......h..j......hh._.m?.~~:.~?Lm............h..4A?L.....h...m.$.1L~.~Q If~~~y..........m........ 443 Movie Theater w / out matinee! 401.54: 8.03! $2,477 / screen .444....M~~i.~..Th~.~t~~..~T~~ti~~~_..........m....Tm.....--....279j~6r.......m.......m5:6oT.........m...$i~726'i~~~~~m.....m.......... !~~~~~i~~=~~~~~e~0)i~~i:ll:f:lf-~I~i~~.~.~.- 494 Bowlin Alle : 60.83: 1.221 $375 /lane 495 Recreational Communi Center i 56.63! 1.131 $349 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 38 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 .n.n.n.n......n.n.n.h .mn.......nnm.(u. ....n..mn..nn.....m.....n.mn.nnnL.....n.....{?}.n.....n.1......mnJ;?L..n...... ....n........<4t..h.n....j.n...n........J?>...hm........... : Lenf!th i : ....n.n......... ....nn.n....n....... ....n.....n.n..n n......n.....n.n..nm.h.....nm...L.hA~J~~~.!~.~....!n.nhI~~.~~.~m'h' ......nTt.:~~~!.h....ln.n.n.....n.n......nh.n.mn.n.n Ii~IANP\.j~~<:QP~Ig~GQ!iYJ~f~~-!~~f%~~'W,~[ij~! '. . '. . '. . ......__...u._........__.__.__........___..._................----......--.--.--..............___....__...:...--........--..............--.-i........--..--.--................. ...__.__........... .....; INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL i: nnmn f.nnn.......n..m.nn.....m.mnh. $~~:::~~~~~:~~~h~~L::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::::::~;~iL:::::::::::::::.:::~;:~t::::::::::::m..nn..$.~l~.:~~~:;-~~.....nnn 522 Middle I Tunior High School i 0.951 0.02 ...m.m.m$6if~~d~~i.moonoo.nm. ~fu~~~~~iiYQ;_ij~ii~~ii:~L::~:~:iji!);~~~~: 550 University I College j 2.93! 0.06 $18! I stud~~t."'.'hmm.... 560 Church : 11.27: 0.23 $70i IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~~~~[:~~~t~~j~~:~l]::~:;r::J:n~::-iH~t~t!~~~~~.~: 620 Nursinf! Home j 4.56: 0.09 $28! Ibed ~.Q.h~~n.h.mm.mm.mn.m.m...mm.mnmoo.h.mh.m.mmm.Lnh.h...mm?.~.~9.9..l..mmnnmm.ml:.!.Q nnmmhh...nJ~~?lII:.~:.~:.G.~~:.A....m '. . '. . '. . '. . '. . '. . '(~oMi~{EitCiALjSERVjC.E.Snnm.mnnnhn.nrmm.mmm...h..h.hh.[...nmnhnm.mmnnnh. ..mmoo....n...mmm.mrnmmmmoonn...m.mnnnnn. 310 Hotel/Motel i 13.00: 0.26 $80! I room -................--.----...........-............-..-................-......-.......--..--.........-..-.......-......--.--.....-..-..-.u...-<C--......_....._.___......__.____.....__._u_..._.._..__.__________..............___......Uh.____U..u___uu. .~~.?---~~J4.~K.M.~~~~i.~J.~!.~.~~~~.m________oo...L..m___.._____J?:.?~Lm.oo--.hmoo___9..~~?n___m.h.mmoo$.~?.~.JIT~.~f.~~;U~~A:.....oo ~J~...f..!!:!:::~~.~.~4.~gJ?J~~~~.t~~9..!!:.mm___.L................oo....m.......L..m.....oo.m.....moo........______..........______....m.1............___oom.........oo___.___..... With Groceries i 32.03: 0.64 $198: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ...._......_......._.....___.......u...____.__....._..___......_.-..-.---.....--......-.-.-.-.....u.-.-.c-.-..--_..................u.._...:......_......_.._.__......_____u....._........._u............_...}____._..............___..__........___..._. ~J1:oo.~P~9.~~mR~.~.~~.tG~!l:~~~........n.mm...______....L.....n........A.~.~??.l.........mmoo.....Q:.~?. ...---n.........m.$.?~?l.l:r...~:.~:.G...~...A~...... 815 Free-Standing Discount Stores j! ~ ..............With~~t.Gr~c~.ri~~............mm.---oomoo.oo.oonn---r__mmm...ooh38~.63r---oo...oo.m....mo.57-----.....mmmoo$238j7T:sj~;~G:F:A~nmoo _......_.._....__._.._..___.........._.__...._......n........._______..__........_.............____..._.....__....................-....----i........................._n.........__._...n....__.__.._........_....._.___.__..........._..___.__._.......... 816 Hardware I Paint Stores i 54.97~ 1.10 $339j IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~l~:::~~~~~i:~~rif.;i::~:~:~~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::.:::::::i~;~jl::::::::::::::::::::::~;:~:::::::::::::::::::::~f.~jlft~$.;;;:~~~~~;:::::: 823 Factory Outlet Center i 18.141 0.36 $112: IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 39 as of 10/20/99 T A'8LE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 ......::.m....:::.......:.:.:...:..:......:.::::~~>...:.........:..::.::.:::::..::.::.::.:::.:..l:..:::1~~~~<:::J::::::.:::::::~~~::"""'"'' ..m.........(~L..........:--........m..(?Lm............ ! Adiusted: Transitm.... .......T~ans.iim... .... m......m...........mm..m ! Person- j Trips @ Cost @ : ii~::~ANP:jj~g::GQPg[GATI9QgX::::T:::::::IriP.~:::::::::r:::::::::::~::::.:.:::::::::::$.~9~;~~:::::I:::::::::::::::Y~i:::::::::::::: COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) ! : :~~i::~~~iY::g~~:!~~~~!:(~~i:~:~h~~2::::r::::::::::::ji4~~Qr:::::::::::::::::::::i:;?~:::::'::':"'::"::j?'Q:~jjt~:;f~G;f;A~:::":' 832 Hi~h Turnover, Sit-Down j! j'" Restaurant 1 58.07: 1.16 $358: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ............u......__..............................................._......_.._......_.._....____.__._..~.__.__.__._.._.......__......n..............................................................__._....~.....n.._.._.._....._.__.._.._.._......... 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) 1 159.49j 3.19 $984: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~-~~~~~ji:~~i~>:_I-:~j~~tlE::-~Jr~~rit,~:~:~:~:~; 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop j 30.0t 0.60 $185j /Service Stall 840 Automobile Service Center (b): 4.30j 0.09 $271 /T.S.F.G.L.A. 84i...N~~.~~..SaI~~....................................................r...............4(J:i9r....................oj~Oh...............m.$248TiT':Sj~~.G~F.:A:..m. ....................___.__u_u_uu...._____._n..........u.........nn...nu........u..............t-..................n.nu.n...............n.u..........un..........u......_........................_........................__.............. 844 Gasoline / Service Station ~ ~ j (no Market or Car Wash) j 57.621 1.15 $355~ /V.F.P. .__....u............................n.n.............__n....n__.n...n.....n.._____._.___.__._._......................................i-.................---.--..--------.---.............-......__..................................................__ 845 Gasoline / Service Station 1: : .~~~~~~..~~..~~..d1!~h....G.q~.y.~~~.~~~.~M~!~~jf......~..~~.............T..~...............................~.~.~.~r..~...~............~....~......~...i;.ji ~................~..........~.........$.~~r]V)~j~\............~..................~..~~.... 846 Gasoline / Service Station :! : .............._._...._....._____....___.___..___............._....._....................n...........n..t-.____n.____.._.____.___.._....__:.....__..__h______.__......__._._.............n..................}........................................... .~...J~f~~i.;.~....~~~~~~....~~....~~~.~.~~~~l-........~....~....::..::....:~~~.~t..............:::..::....:..::...~.~.~. ...::....:......................:Ji.~t.~..f:.l:.lGj~:;A;:....:..... .~_~Q..J?~P.~.~~~~~.....m....mmm.............u.u.mu.m.mmtmnmm......?~~.~!L..................J.A~. .mm...mmm.~.QjIT~~.:f.:G~f~A~n..... 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) j 221.3t 4.43 $1,366! /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~.~...9?~.Y~nM~!~~~..W~!h.f~.~J.P~.~PmmLm.mm.J??~??..L.m...............}=.?:~...m..m..m$.lr.Q%j.Y=.f=.r.:..nmn.mm....n ~.QmWhQ~~~~!~..M~!~~.Ln..m..mnmm..m....m...n..Lunmmm..m.?:?Jlnummnmmm.Q=J4unm...nun...m..~U.I~.?~.~~.g:.~~.A.:.mn 861 Discount Club ! 44.S0! 0.90 $276! /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~?....~.~~~..!.~p..!.~.y.~~~~~...~~P~.~.~.~!.~.j...................~?:.~?L....................Q.:??. ....................~.?~.?:tl.T:~.:f.:G:f:A:....... 863 Electronics Superstore j 48.28l 0.97 $298j /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 40 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 4 of 5 _______..__..__n____n_nn..............nL______..._..__ i (2) : (3) (4): (5) ---n-...-----------n-n----r-..-..-L~~~th--n-T-..---------..-.._.._________n ---..-..---------..-..-..-..----r-..----..-..----..--..-..-.....--n-...--- !~:~~~~jJ~~~~~'r~t _m_.~ANP..y~~..~QP~/.~A~qq~X.____!-..-....-I~p~--..-..---~-..--..-.._..~.._.._....__ --..-..$.~9..~-~1:-~--..-..l..-----..----..-y~~--..---..--..-- ; 1 1 .h..h____n..........UU.....h____h.h.U._.__________.__.__................h_u..__._.............~__.__--_-.........___--------..--~........h___...........-..--......uu..........u....._........u~--_u...-._..__.h._....'''__uh__.._nn. COMMERCIAL/SERVICES <Cont.) i: i ~H'~'.iZ:b";;li~iQ~!~9..9.JLl,~~=Q~!~=.~~=:~'=~.:: Without Drive- Thru Window j 61.43: 1.23 $379: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~:~::::~ili:=~i~~~R~4.~:~:::::::::::-::::::_J::::::::::::-::::~:Qj~:I:::::::::::::::::::j:;:?Q:::::::::::::::::::::$.~Zi1:ZI~~;f.;:G~f.~A;:--... 890 Furniture Store j 5.42j 0.11 $33j IT.S.F.G.F.A. ----- 895 Video Arcade (b) j 38.751 0.77 $239! IT.S.F.G.F.A. .....n_._..._h..........._n_n_n..___n__n_n.................._.h_...__.__..........................._.................__nnnn____-(........................._n.___.......nn...............___h__h......_n_..n~..n~__.._..~..~~.._.........~ 8% Video Rental Store (b) ~ 21.5t 0.43 $133UT.S.F.G.F.A. ~}H~~~f:;~~~~~f~}~:~r~H~H~~~tH~HIU~;~;~:~ _Qff..!~_~uu_u____uuu_____________________________mu_ummm_m_____umm.Lumu_________u__u_u__m_<-__mu_mu_______uuuu_____uuum__________m__mu____.u_mu_________uu__U___________Um___ ?!Q.uG~~~!~uQf.ff~~__~_1.!A~_!P.:g_u__..___._______mm___uL___________mu.!?~_?~L....uu------.._.9_:~?.._______uu____..._~_P.?.!II:~.:f._:G:;f:~~___m_ 714 Corp. Headquarters Buildine: 13.50: 0.27 $831/T.S.F.G.F.A. ~J~-~~l~"S;~~!f~~~:j:il:~tml:~ :::il~t~l!:t~t~:: ?~.~.___$._~~~!::uM.~~~!_Y!::N~~!::~__P!::p~~__u__u__u_u__uj_______uuuu-??'Q~-~~Lu-_m____________!?_:~J___um_u_____~Jt?~J_LlI:~_:f_:G~;f:~~.______ 732 U.S. Post Office ! 189.20: 3.78 $1,167! /T.S.F.G.F.A. i~_-_-_-_9i#.~_~_-_~~k_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-------_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:_-_-_-_-_-:_-_-__-_._-:_._-_-_-_-------.--------------------T.-------------:-.------------------12_;2Z1.._._-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:_-_._9AQ- :::----:::::::::::::::_$.I?-~Iit:-~;-f;-G-:-f;-A~...:...'.-: ?~uuR~_~_~_~_~!;~lP~y~.l_<?P~~P.:~u~~P.:~~!m__L--uuum-mJ4J~L_um______________Q~_?:~ u__u__________m_____$.~?_JI._~~_f~_G:_F.~_!.\~u_m 770 Business Park ~ 22.31! 0.45 $138i IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 41 as of 10/20/99 'I'" TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 ....h......hh ....... .h.... ......JD...... ... ....... ................ ........h~......... J?L..........[........h....(;?L..h. ... ....h ......J~L......h .... ..... ....J5L. .....h..... Length : ................ ...................h.......................................h.............h...........:.....A4j~_~~~t:L.L....J);~~~~....... .......T.~~_~.~_t.h...L........_..........._.............h_..... : Person- : Trips @ Cost @ : i!!!~ii~!'.i::Qp~i(:'A:1.ji(;Q~Xtj'.iP;;Lli~Q8.~~ry~t ._....Unn - - _n...... - -- "." _n ...... no<... -- - -- n_ - - UU'''' n. - --. -- u -. -... __ - __ - __ _'U ._. h n_ n. _',<_h n_ n_. n_" h _ _ __ _.. ......... _~_.n. _ _h ......h_ n. ..... _h_ on Uh ___ _..... Un _._ ........ ---.ut ___ _un. _......__n.... _...n.... _..n.... PORT/lNDUSTRIAL : i : ~-}~~~~~~i~~~~~.r:.~~:~~[.~:~....~~H~~g~F~~~i 093 Light Rail Station W /Parking! 3.49: 0.07 $22: /Parking Space 110 General Light Industrial i 12.19: 0.24 $75: /T.S.F.G.F.A. iiQ:::G~ri~!i(H.~.~yy::~4~tr!~L.::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::j;~~r::::::::::::::::::::Q;:Q$.:::::::::::.::::::::::::$.1~I:Zf~~;f;:9:~t~;:::::: 130 Industrial Park : 12.17j 0.24 $75: /T.S.F.G.F.A. li~;;~~~~..:l..:!:~t:~:~:--~if:!~i:g~i;~: 170 Utilities (b) : 0.86! 0.02 $5: /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. G. Formula 7: Transportation Impact Fee Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) per unit is calculated for each type of land use by adding the Motor Vehicle Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.4), the Pedestrian/Bicycle Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.5), and the Transit Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.6). 7. MY Cost + Per Unit P /B Cost Per Unit + Transit Per Unit = TIF Per Unit The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.7, pages 43 - 47. Don Ganer & Associates 42 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Motor Pedestrian/ : : ...n on...... ._.... n.. __. __ _ _ _.. _....u........ _....._. _ __ ___. __ _. h_ _...._. __.. _......... _ _ _ _ __....~ _ _ _ _. _._ Uh_. _... "n. _ n _ _ _. _ _.. ..... .n...u... _h _u.. n........ _ n. n......... _ _.. ___ -i- __ _ __. _. on _...... h h_. _.. __ +_... n. _ __ "._. n _ n _ ._.._. n _._.... __ _... n _.._._ : Vehicle ! Bigrcle ! Transit: Total : ................................................................................................. .......i.........C~.~.t........:.........C.~~.t........r........C"~~t.......T.........TiF.........r................................................ ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY : Per Unit: Per Unit: Per Unit 1 Per Unit: Unit ~~$~~~~~~:mmmImmFrmmImF:~:m:: .?J.Q...~~gt~..f..~.~y.{~9~4~s...P.~p~~~).....L...........$.?A.!~.l.................$~?.Q.L...................$.~?.].............$~r.Q~~lL~~~~g..~~~........ 220 Apartment 1 $1,814! $257! $6T $2,138i I dwelling unit ~&-:~~~H;{s~1~~~~i1~i~i~L::~L~~I:l1~n~~:=~L 260 Recreation Home ! $865i $122: $321 $1,019j I dwelling unit (1) . . : : : : 420 Marina : $1,215: $172: $45: $1,4321 I berth 430...G~i{c~~~~....h.............................h....mm.h.m..hr.......$i4;667r......h...$~f6751"""..............$.546rm......$i7~288nh~i~......_.......................... ...........................................__......___.__....................___......____________.__.____1-._.____.___....-...................-----------.-............................................-c-----.------.--.....-..........~...n.....................................__...._ 432 Golf Driving Range (b) : $378: $54: $14: $4461/ tee .~?mM~H!P~9?2~~.~~~..f~qM~...m.....m_.._..L.......$_;'.?(.~Ql......_....$?r.?~L..........$.J,~~~.9.l......h.$.4;?2J~UJ~~~....._...mmm.mm. 443 Movie Theater wI out matinee ! $66,580: $9,421: $2,477j $78,478j I screen _........._..................un.n.n.........n...._.........................._.._____.____._.________..._............u.....u.......fo........uu............__._._l'_____.................................................._...u_............................_..................... 444 Movie Theater wI matinee 1 $46,4031 $6,566: $1,726: $54,695il screen itii~{~~~=:-;=~:0~)t:~1Iig!I;\]~!~lf~~.;.~. 494 Bowling Allev ! $10,087: $1,427: $375j $11,889l/lane 495 Recreational Cornmunitv Center $9,389: $1329: $349l $l1,067l /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 43 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 2 of 5 (!)+M~~~~~~~~i~~~L(~)(5)L(~) : Vehicle Bicvcle! Transit Total ii:~~Qi:i~~<::QP~lQ\TIi(';()gXlj'~'ij~i...j'~'ij~iJ...i'~'ij~i...j'~ill;;ji.r.............jj;;ji.... INSTITUTIONAL!MEDlCAL ! . ~:QL:MW~~iY:~~~~::::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::..::_::r:....::::::::.:$.~j~::::::.::::::.:::::::$.Z~r..::::::...:.:::::~i~:::::::::...:::::~~Q~I:Z~:~p~~y~~:::::::::::::.::: 520 Elementarv School ! $111 $16: $4 $1311 I student ~ffii:~~==~~~=~I........J...~~~~j:..............~~.:...~~fi:~~~~:::.................. ~tr~~:~f;~Uii;~=~:~=J~:mllItl~jjlz:~1~~: 560 Church . $1,869 $264~ $70 $2,203! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~B~~.==!==I=~=-=()l......J.~~~~ .:~L.............~n;........~~lix~~~\i;:A.::.: 610 Hospital : $3,413 $483! $127 $4,023~ Ibed ~~~~~~~7;..:j.:~:~I~~~~~~t~~~~~JZ!~~~:~~~,~.: COMMEROAL/SERVICES j ! : :~jQ:::H~~~~Z:M~~~L:::::::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::..:.:::::::::::..::r::::::::.::$.~~i~~::::::.:::::::::::~~Q~L::::::::::::::.::~~Q:::::::::::::~:?;~iITi~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::':::: :~~~i~~~~i:g~tJiiL=7.'~!. ...==I......=~~ ........=~'==~V~.~'=.=--'=~............ With Groceries ! $5,311 $75( $198 $6,260j IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~i:~~~.z,~iiibic~~~i~i~;;';s........!...........~Z,~= ........:~='=~:~===::::=I=~.=,=,~,~:~.............. Without Groceries 1 $6,405 $906: $238 $7,5491/T.S.F.G.F.A. 816 Hardware I Paint Stores : $9,115 $1,290: $339 $10,7441/T.S.F.G.F.A. ll~~~~~1;~1:~::~~~~::.]::~~~::~~r.:~~[-:~~:~r~I~~:~~:~:~:.: 823 Factorv Outlet Center . $3007 $4261 $112 $3 545~ IT.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 44 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 3 of 5 ...............................................jn....uu..... u..... ........................... .:...........J~)........... ............J.:?t........l. u...... .(4)..u....... .... u..... .(?t. ...... ..............(~2........u........... +~~~I~ [>e~r~~~I1':f~~;,siiHf~t~CI : Cost Cost. Cost TIF' ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY ! Per Unit Per Unit: Per Unit Per Unit: u........Ypj.L................ ... ........................... .... ... .......... ............................... ............. ...............r u........................... .................. ............(............................ .............................. i........ .(ijMMEiiciAijSEi{vicE.S..(~~~~i)......!........u.u................. ...u.u.........................u............................ ........u.................u.r-............u...................u............. ~.~.L.Q~.~.~~...~.~.~~~~~.~~.J.~9..!.~..~h~~L.L......$l~!.?~~. ............$.?A~.L....mu.....$.?Q~. $22,378: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.~.?...H!g.h.I~.~.~y~!L~~~::P9..~.~...................uL.....u....................u .u...........................1.............................. .:...:..:.:::::::::::.:....:::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::.::.:::::::::: Restaurant : $9,628 $1,362~ $358 $11,349~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) j $26,445 $3,7421 $984 $31,171! IT.S.F.G.F.A. 1~~f}~L~~~~~~~;mI~I:~-~~!~t~I~~k~~jli~~:ft~~ 840 Automobile Service Center (b) j $713 $101j $27 $8401/T.S.F.G.L.A. .~1....N~~..~r~.~.~~....................................................:.............$~i?~..................$.~4~L......m.....$~~.............~?!.~~.~U.T~.:~.:9.~;f.~A:............. 844 Gasoline I Service Station 1 : j ...............(no..i\iu.i~et..or.car..Wash).....................T............$9~.553 .............$ijs21".u.u..........i3SS. .........$iii6ii7\i:F~P:...................m.u.u. ~=:::{~r~~:~~;ri~::~;f~~~):::::::.:::.::t:.::.:::::$~;.??~: ::::..::.::ij;.~:Q.$L.:..::.:..:.J~~ ::::::::::$lQ~~Z~Iiy:f~i~:~::::::::::::::..:::.:::::.:. 846 Gasoline/Service Station! : ! u. .. (W I Conv. Market and Car Wash) $8,662 $1,2261 $322 $10,210j IV.F.P. ~:l~!=~~!::r:~~~~~~r~t~lf~~IIii~~;~:~:-:-- 851 Convenience Market (24 hour): $36,705 $5,194j $1,366 $43,2641/T.S.F.G.F.A. ........................nn_n.n.__n...n.________.___n..........u.....__._...__.....__._.__......_.~...-..-----.--.--......-..-.--...................._......_...___..........__.._........_.._.....___........._.._.........?....................._..........._._...._.___._. 853 Conv. Market With Fuel Pump : $26,987 $3,819j $1,004 $31,810l/V.F.P. .~Qm.WhQ~.~.~~!~..M~~~~Ln....m..............mm...m....Lm........~J.(.1.~~ ..m..n..n.....~J.~?Lnnm..mmm$M. ...n.......~.1A.!.Q.LI.T~.:~:.G.~~~A:m...n..... 861 Discount Club ~ $7,429 $1 05t $276 $8 756j IT.S.F.G.F.A. ......mm...nm.mnmmn...................m.mm......................nmmnm................m.................... ..n......m......(..........~m.........n......m....... ..................!.......m......................................m.....nn.. 862 Home.Improvement Superstore j $6,229 $8811 $232 $7,342! IT.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Superstore $8005 $1,1331 $298 $9,435! IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 45 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 4 of 5 .J?) ..... ..... .. j~L.... ................(42........... ..... ....J.~.L. ..............V?>.......... .......... Motor Pedestrian I ......... ............. ....... ................................ ..... ................... .........:......Y~N~~~.... .......I.J.i~~Ie......L...T~~~~t..... .......T~.t~.L....L................................................ L..... Cost. Cost: Cost TIF: ii.~.IANP...4$.~...~QP.gi~Art.GQ~x......l...y~i...4~f.... ........R~i...y.ii}j.....r......p..~i....y~(.. .........~~i..\!.~.f..l....................................y~~.............................~..... - .__H.........____. ___....................____ ________.___ _........huh_. n_ __.......... ___. __ no" .....:. "0__. n___ ...... n_n___..... _.._. --..........u........u.:..................hhU...... .._.._...... .......... .; COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : ~ . .......1................................................. .~ZQ...App~te.1...~~~.~~.....................................................L...........$.~~.??~ .............$!(.1.Z!L................$~Q~. ............$~lZ:??.JLT:$..:f..:G.::f:A:............. .~Q....rh~~.~.g.LP.~~g~~~!~.m............................:.............................. ..............................1.............................. ..............................L................................................ Without Drive-Thru Window : $10,185 $l,44t $379 $12,005~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.~J....:ph~~~.I.P~g~.t~~~................................L............................ ............................................................. ..............................+................................................. With Drive-Thru Window : $9,970 $1,411! $371 $11,7521 IT.S.F.G.F.A. 890...F~~~.~~~.St~~~..................................................r.................$899. .................$liiT...................$33 .............$i))6017i.s:F:Gj~~A.~............ 895 Video Arcade (b) : $6,425 $909: $239 $7,573! IT.S.F.G.FA. i!r!:~~l[l~:Smr:i~lm:~~[:;tr~I!~jil~~:~~::- OFFICE : :?!Q:::q~ri~i~.Qf.#~~::~:~~4~g:...:::::::::::..:..:::..::I:::::.:..:.:~~~:i:~? :...:.:::::::::.:.~~?L.::::::::::..:~ii2: ::::.:::::::$:~;.Z~j!:ir;~:~f:~GI~;A;;::::::::::::: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building ! $2,238 $317: $83 $2,639~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. 770 Business Park $3,700 $524: $138 $4,361! /T.S.F.G.F.A. ..............01........ (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Assodates 46 as of 10/20/99 TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 5 of 5 :::::::::::..:...::.:.::::::::....::::::....:..~~:>::.::.:..::::.:....:::::.:::::::.:::.....:::I:::::::M~i~~.::::: ~~4.~~i~~~:L:..::.:::~~):::::::::::: ::::::::::::~~~:::::::.J:::::::::.:.:...::.:.~~~::::::.:::':::::::": : Vehicle Bicycle! Transit Total: : Cost Cost. Cost TIF. !!~Q.NPlJ~~g5[i~/c-:ATI:0i{x....I~,,;:lJiii!...~";:ij~!i~~;:lJ~i.~~;:ij~i!T.................ij~!............... .~QBI/lN:PY.~I~~A~......:.:.....................::.......:.............................. ...:.m......:............................................ ............:.:.m...............................................:...:..m. m!S~{~i~::~j~~~it~~~~;t..~ln.~kmt~I:~:~!:~ 110 General Light Industrial i $2,021 $286: $75 $2,3821 IT.S.F.G.F.A. 1~:~;r:;~!(~i;r1I==~t~~!................J~~ ..........~~t.......Ji~~ljjll~l~;~~:~~::.. 140 Manufacturing : $1,108 $157l $41 $1,3061 IT.S.F.G.F.A. 150 Warehouse \ $1438 $203! $54 $1 695~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. i$.f::Miri!~W:~~hQ~~~:.::..::.:.::::::::::..::..:.::..::.:::::::::T..::::::..'::::$.Z?~: ::::.::::.:...:::~iQ~[::.:::::::::::::::::$?;t ::::::::::::::::::$.~~I:ZI;.~;f;:q~:f:A:.....::::::: 170 Utilities (b) : $142 $20\ $5 $1671 IT.S.F.G.F.A:m.. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 47 as of 10/20/99 PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES METHODOLOGY AND RATE STUDY UPDATE City of Woodburn. Oregm! as of September 30, 1999 15418 NW White Fox Dr. . Beaverton, Oregon 97006 · (503) 690-8981 Don Ganer & Associates 'II" CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 AmHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Legislative Authority B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts D. Guiding Concepts E. Alternative Methodology Approaches 3.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC METHOOOLOCY A. Population and Employment Growth B. Benefit of Facilities C. Facility Needs D. Facility Costs 4.0 RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES A. Formula 4a: Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita B. Formula 4b: Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit C. Formula 4c: Compliance! Administration Cost Per Dwelling Unit D. Formula 4d: Residential SDC Credit Per Dwelling Unit E. Formula 4e: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit 5.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC RATES A. Formula Sa: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee B. Formula 5b: Compliance! Administration Cost Per Employee C. Formula 5c: Non-Residential SDC Credit Per Employee D. Formula 5d: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee 6.0 CONCLUSION APPENDIX: SDC Capital Improvements Plan Don Ganer & Associates I1r ~ 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 7 7 8 11 12 14 14 15 16 16 17 19 19 20 20 21 23 as of 9/30/99 TABLES ~ TABLE 3.1: Estimated City of Woodburn 8 Population and Employment Increases (1999 - 2020) TABLE 3.2: Estimates of Average Weekly Availability 9 of Parks and Recreation Facilities TABLE 3.3: Total Annual Availability of Parks 10 and Recreation Facilities TABLE 3.4: Total Residence and Employment Related 10 A vailability of Parks and Recreation Facilities TABLE 3.5: Employee-To-Resident Parks Demand Ratio 10 TABLE 3.6: Current Average Levels of Service (LOS) 11 and Applied LOS Standards TABLE 3.7: Additional Facility Needs For Population and 12 Employment Growth Based on LOS Standards TABLE 3.8 Residential and Non-Residential Growth 13 Required Facilities Costs TABLE 4.1: Facilities Cost Per Capita 14 TABLE 4.2: Average Persons Per Dwelling Unit 15 TABLE 4.3: Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit 15 TABLE 4.4: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Dwelling Unit 16 TABLE 4.5: Credit Per Dwelling Unit 17 TABLE 4.6: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit 18 TABLE 5.1: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee 19 TABLE 5.2: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Employee 20 TABLE 5.3: Credit Per Enployee 21 TABLE 5.4: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee 22 TABLE 5.5: Square Feet Per Employee 23 Don Ganer & Associates i i as of 9/30/99 '1f' CITY OF WOODBURN Parks and Recreation System Development Charges Methodology Report and Rate Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION System Development Charges (SDC's) are one-time fees charged to new development to help pay a portion of the costs associated with building capital facilities to meet needs created by growth. Oregon local governments are authorized to enact SDC's for capital facilities for transportation, water, wastewater (sewer), stormwater drainage, and parks and recreation facilities, and the City of Woodburn has implemented SDC's for all authorized facilities. In January 1997, the City of Woodburn engaged Don Ganer & Associates, working in association with David Reed, Ph.D to update the City's Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan (Plan). Following completion of the draft Plan, the City requested a review and update of the City's Parks and Recreation SDC methodology and rates to reflect growth-required facility needs identified in the Plan. lIDs report presents an updated SDC methodology, documents the calculation of Parks and Recreation SDC rates, and identifies projects to be funded from SDC revenues. Section 2.0 of this report presents authority and background information including (1) legislative authority for SDC's; (2) an explanation of "improvement fee" and "reimbursement fee" SDC's; (3) requirements and options for credits, exemptions and discounts; (4) guiding concepts for SDC's and (5) alternative methodology approaches. Section 3.0 presents the methodology used to develop the updated Parks and Recreation SDC's, section 4.0 presents the calculation of Residential Parks and Recreation SDC Rates, and section 5.0 presents the calculation of Non-residential Parks and Recreation SDC Rates. The Parks and Recreation SDC Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which lists projects which may be funded with SDC revenues, is included as an Appendix to this report. Don Ganer & Associates 1 as of 9/30/99e 11f 2.0 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. Legislative Authority While SDC's have been In use In Oregon since the mid-1970's, State legislation regarding SDC's was not adopted until 1989, when the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314) was passed. The purpose of this Act was to "...provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...". SB 122 and HB 3172, passed in 1993 and 1999, respectively, include additional statutory provisions regarding SDC's. Together, these pieces of legislation require local governments who enact SDC's to: . Enact SDC's by ordinance or resolution; . develop a methodology outlining how the SDC's were developed; . adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to designate capital improvements that can be funded with "improvement fee" SDC revenues; . provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of certain "qualified public improvements"; . separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC . revenues; and develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and . use SDC revenues only for capital expenditures (operations and maintenance uses are prohibited). B. Nlmprovement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of SDC's: (1) "improvement fee" SDC's, and (2) "reimbursement fee" SDC's. "Improvement fee" SDC's may be charged for new capital improvements that will increase capacity. Revenues from "improvement fee" SDC's may be spent only on capacity-increasing capital improvements identified in the required Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that lists each project, and the expected timing and cost of each project. "Reimbursement fee" SDC's may be charged for the costs of existing capital facilities if "excess capacity" is available to accommodate growth. Revenues from "reimbursement fees" may be used on any capital improvement project, including major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements funded with "reimbursement fee" SDC's do not need to increase capacity, but they must be listed in the CIP. Don Ganer & Associates 2 as of 9/YJ/99 !IT C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts (1) Credits A credit IS a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific development. The Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the construction of a "qualified public improvement" which (1) is required as a condition of development approval, (2) is identified in the Capital Improvement Plan, and (3) either is not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or is located on or contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project. The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied against an SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a parks and recreation improvement can only be used for a credit for a parks and recreation SDC), and may be granted only for the cost of that portion of an improvement which exceeds the minimum standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular project. For multi-phase projects, any excess credit may be applied against SDC's that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project. In addition to these required credits, the City may, if it so chooses, provide a greater credit, establish a system providing for the transferability of credits, provide a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the Capital Improvement Plan, or provide a share of the cost of an improvement by other means. (2) Exemptions The City may "exempt" certain types of development, such as "non- residential development" from the requirement to pay parks SDC's. Exemptions reduce SDC revenues and, therefore, increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as bonds and property taxes. Don Ganer &. Associates 3 as of 9/30/99 11!' (3) Discounts The City may "discount" the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of growth-required improvements to be funded with SDC's. A discount in the SDC may also be applied on a pro-rata basis to any identified deficiencies to be funded from non-SDC sources. For example, the City may charge new development an SDC rate sufficient to recover only 25% of identified growth-required costs. The portion of growth-required costs to be funded with SDC's must be identified in the SDC-CIP. Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as bonds or general fund contributions, required to meet Level of Service Standards. D. Guiding Concepts In addition to the requirements of the Oregon SDC Act and SB 122, court cases from Oregon and other states provide additional guidance for the methodology to be used in developing SDC's. (1) "Essential Nexus" Requirement In a 1987 case, Nollan v. Californiil Coastal Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court established that government agencies must show that an "essential nexus" (e.g. reasonable connection) exists between a project's impacts and any dedication requirements. For SDC's the "essential nexus" requirement means there must be a reasonable connection between the nature of the development and the facilities being funded with the SDC revenues. For example, new parks are needed to serve the recreation needs of new development in order to prevent overcrowding of existing facilities and to meet the Level of Service Standards included in the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan; therefore an "essential nexus" exists between new development and the SDC's charged to to build parks needed to serve new development. Don Caner & Associates 4 as of 9/30/99 111'" (2) "Rough Proportionality" Requirement In its landmark 1994 decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard, the U.S. Supreme Court cited the requirement for "rough proportionality" between the requirements placed on a developer by government and the impacts of the development. Case law is conflicting on the question of whether Dolan applies to SDC's. However, to avoid controversy, the Parks and Recreation SDC is structured so that the Dolan test is satisfied. This concept of rough proportionality is applied in "improvement fee" SDC's by insuring that new growth is not required to pay (either through fees or exactions) to upgrade existing deficiencies or provide new facilities beyond a level "rougWy proportionate" with the extent of new development's impact; "improvement fee" SDC's can be charged only for the portion of capital facilities costs that are attributable to growth. As an example, if an SDC is designed to provide funding for Community Parks at a Level of Service (LOS) of 2.0 acres per 1,000 persons, new development can only be charged a fee sufficient to provide facilities for new residents at 2.0 acres per 1,000 persons, and cannot be required to pay additional costs that may be needed to eliminate deficiencies. E. Alternative Methodology Approaches There are three basic approaches used to develop improvement fee SDC's; "standards- driven", "improvements-driven", and "combination/ hybrid". (1) Standards-Driven Approach The "standards-driven" approach is based on the application of Level of Service (LOS) Standards for facilities such as neighborhood parks, community parks, etc. Facility needs are determined by applying the LOS Standards to the projected future population. SDC-eligible amounts are calculated based on the costs of additional facilities needed to serve growth. This approach works best where LOS Standards have been adopted as part of a comprehensive plan or facilities master planning process and the Levels of Service provided to current residents are at or near those required by the LOS Standards. Don Ganer & Associates 5 as of 9/30/99 I1r (2) Improvements-Driven Approach The "improvements-driven" approach is based on a specific list of planned capacity-increasing capital improvements. The portion of each project that is attributable to growth is determined, and the SDC-eligible costs are calculated by dividing the total costs of growth-required projects by the projected increase in population. This approach works best where a detailed master plan or project list is available and the benefits of projects can be apportioned between growth and current residents. (3) Combination/ Hybrid Approach The combination/ hybrid-approach includes elements of both the "improvements-driven" and "standards-driven" approaches. If not already adopted, LOS Standards may be developed and used to develop a list of planned capacity-increasing projects. The growth-required portions of projects can then be used as the basis for determining the SDC-eligible costs. This approach works best where a detailed master plan or project list of capacity needs has not recently been developed and where sufficient data is available to identify the existing Levels of Service. Don Ganer & Associates 6 as of 9/30/99 Hr 3.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC METHODOLOGY The Combination/ Hybrid approach has been used to develop the updated Parks and Recreation SDC methodology. The City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update identifies facility needs through 2020, based on the application of Level of Service Standards for the City's projected population and employment. The Level of Service (LOS) standards included in the Plan are currently met or exceeded for current residents. The Capital Improvement Plan included as Appendix A includes the same projects as are identified in the Comprehensive Plan Update, but they have been modified to identify the growth-required portion (if any), the estimated timing, and the estimated cost of each project. Parks and recreation facilities benefit City residents, businesses, non-resident employees, and visitors. The methodology used in developing the City's Parks and Recreation SDC's establishes the required lIessential nexus" between a project's impacts and the SDC s by identifying specific types of parks and recreation facilities and analyzing the proportionate need of each type of facility for use by residents and employees. The SDC's to be paid by a development meet the "rough proportionality" requirement because they are based on the nature of the development and the extent of the impact of the development on the types of parks and recreation facilities for which the SDC's are charged. The Parks and Recreation SDC's are based on population and employment, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact a development is expected to have on the City's population and employment. For facilities that are not generally used by employees (Le., mini-parks and neighborhood parks), only a residential parks and recreation SDC may be charged. For facilities that benefit both residents and employees (Le., community parks and centers, municipal parks, greenways, open space, and trails), parks and recreation SDCs may be charged to both residential and non-residential development. A. Population and Employment Growth The Parks and Recreation SDC's is based on a portion of the growth-required capital costs per "capita" (person). Projections of population and employment growth were calculated using data provided by Marion County and the U.S. Bureau of Census; and from a report prepared for the City in 1999 by E.D. Hovee. The estimated population and employment increases are shown in Table 3.1. Don Ganer & Associates 7 as of 9/30/99 11r TABLE 3.1 ESTIMATED CITY OF WOODBURN POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT INCREASES (1999 - 2020) 2020 (Projected) Estimated Current Estimated Increase Population: Employment: 26,290 9,058 16,937 7,051 9,353 2,007 B. Benefit of Facilities The LOS Standards used to determine facility needs consider the proportionate benefit each type of facility has for residents and employees. For purposes of this report, mini parks and neighborhood parks are considered to be used primarily by residents, rather than by employees and other non-residents. Therefore, the LOS Standards and identified needs for these types of facilities are based only on population and do not consider employment. For all other facilities including community parks and centers, municipal parks, greenways, open space, and trails, both population and employment were considered in development of the LOS Standards and facility needs. While parks and recreation facilities benefit both residents and employees, the amount of time these facilities are available for use by employees is not the same as for residents; an employee does not create demands for facilities equal to those created by a resident. In order to equitably apportion the need for facilities between employees and residents, an employee-to-resident demand ratio was developed based on the potential time these facilities are available for use. First, estimates for the average number of hours per week these facilities are available for use were identified. Children's ages, adult employment status, work location (inside or outside the City), and seasonal variances were taken into account and are displayed in Table 3.2 (page 9). Don Ganer & Associates 8 as of 9/30/99 - T ABLE 3.2 ESTIMATES OF AVERAGE WEEKLY AVAILABILITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Non-Employed Live In/ Live In/ Live Out/ Adult (18+ ) 5-17 Kids Work In Work Out Work In Total Summer Oune-Sept) Weekday Before Work 1 1 2 Meals/ Breaks 1 1 2 After Work 2 2 4 Other Leisure 12 12 2 2 28 Sub-Total 12 12 6 2 4 36 Weekend Leisure 12 12 12 12 0 48 Sub-Total 12 12 12 12 0 48 Summer Hrs/Day 12 12 7.71 4.86 2.86 39.43 Spring/Fall (April-May, Oct-Nov) Weekday Before Wark 0.5 0.5 1 Meals/ Breaks 1 1 2 After Work 1 1 2 Other Leisure 10 4 2 2 18 Sub-Total 10 4 4.5 2 2.5 23 Weekend Other Leisure 10 10 10 10 0 40 Sub-Total 10 10 10 10 0 40 Spring/Fall Hours/Day 10 5.71 6.07 4.29 1.79 27.86 Winter (December-March) Weekday Before Work 0.5 0.5 1 Meals/Breaks 1 1 2 After Work 0.5 0.5 1 Other Leisure 8 2 1 1 12 Sub-Total 8 2 3 1 2 16 Weekend Other Leisure 8 8 8 8 0 32 Sub-Total 8 8 8 8 0 32 Winter Hours/ Day 8 3.71 4.43 3 1.43 20.57 Annual Wtd. Avg Hours 10 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02 29.29 Next, the Annual Weighted Average Hours calculated for each category (from Table 3.2) were applied to population and employment data (1990 Census) to determine the Total Annual Weighted Average Hours for each category of Resident and Employee. The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 3.3 (page 10). Don Ganer & Associates 9 as of 9/30/99 r TABLE 3.3 TOTAL ANNUAL AVAILABILITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Non-Employed Live In! Live In! Live Out! Adult (18+ ) 5-17 Kids Work In WorkOut Work In Total Population & Emp. Data 3,680 3,581 2,046 2,652 1,289 13,248 (1990 Census) Annual Wtd. A vg Hours 10 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02 29.29 Tol Annual Wtd. Avg. Hrs. 36,800 25,579 12,422 10,734 2,609 88,144 Next, the available hours (from Table 3.3) were allocated between employment-related hours and residence-related hours, as displayed in Table 3.4. TABLE 3.4 TOTAL RESIDENCE AND EMPLOYMENT RELATED AVAILABILITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Residence Related Hours % of Total Resident Non-Employee Resident Employee sub-total 73,113 .8.2B1 81,394 8259% 9.40% 92.34% Employment Related Resident Employee Non-Resident Employee sub-total: 4,141 2609 6,749 4.70% 2.%% 7.66% Finally, the Employee-to-Resident Parks Demand Ratio was calculated by dividing the total of employment-related hours by the total for residence-related hours (from Table 3.4), with results summarized in Table 3.5. TABLE 3.5 EMPLOYEE-TO-RESIDENT PARKS DEMAND RATIO Weighted Avg. Hrs. Residence-Related Weighted A vg. Hrs. Employment-Related Employee % of Resident 81,394 (92.34%) 6,749 (7.66%) 8.3% Don Ganer & Associates 10 as of 9/30/99 ~ C. Facility Needs The Level of Service Standard included in the City of Woodburn's Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update provided the framework for identifying facility needs. Specific needs were determined based on the development and application of Level of Service (LOS) Standards based on "Units of Facility Per 1,000 Persons". LOS standards were developed for Neighborhood, Community, and Municipal Parks; and for the Core Parks System. LOS standards were not developed for Mini-Parks, Cultural Resource, or Special Use Park/Facilities, or for Greenways/Open Space, Trails/Pathways because these are site-specific facilities for which population standards are difficult to apply. For those facilities for which LOS Standards were not developed, population proportions were used to determine the growth-required portion of a project. The LOS standards identified in Table 3.6 provide objective criteria by which facility needs can be determined. Using these LOS standards, excess capacity facilities and growth-required needs were identified. TABLE 3.6 CURRENT AVERAGE LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS) AND LOS STANDARDS Facility Type Service Area Current Average LOS (Units per 1.000 persons) LOS Standard Neighborhood/School Park* Communi~/Municip~Park Core Park System** 1/2 mile radius Ci~ Ci~ 7.69 acres 2.74 acres 11.78 acres 5.50 acres 2.00 acres 8.25 acres * Public school playground and recreation facilities were included in the current inventory. ** Includes neighborhood/ school parks, communi~ parks, municip~ parks, and all other ~pes of facilities, such as special use, greenways, open space, trails, etc. To determine facility needs, the LOS standards are applied to the 2020 population and employment projections. Table 3.7 presents a summary of facilities needed to serve growth based on application of the LOS standards. Don Ganer & Associates 11 as of 9/30/99 ,..- TABLE 3.7 ADDITIONAL FACILITY NEEDS FOR POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BASED ON LOS STANDARDS Facility Type Neighborhood/ School Park (acres) Municipal/Community Park (acres) Total Core Park System (acres) Current Surplus or (Deficien<;y) 36.90 13.05 57.25 Pop. Growth Required Units 14.55 6.00 21.28 Empl. Growth Required Units 0.00 0.10 0.37 The LOS analysis results in the identification of excess capacity that is available to serve new development, and for which a "reimbursement fee" SDC may be charged; however no "reimbursement fee" SDC is include in this methodology because: . excess capacity neighborhood! school park facilities include recently completed Woodburn School District facilities which also serve as parks and recreation facilities, and which have outstanding bonded debt that is being repaid through property taxes; and . excess capacity municipal! community park acreage includes Centennial Park, which is under construction, and Legion and Settlemier parks, both of which need extensive renovation. D. Facility Costs The Woodburn Parks and Recreation SDC Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which is included as Appendix A, identifies facilities needed to serve both residential and non- residential growth needs through the year 2020. Table 3.8, page 13, shows the breakout between residential and non-residential costs. Because each employee needs only 8.3% of the equivalent facilities needed for a resident, the residential share of growth costs is 98.2% of the total for those facilities which benefit both residential and non-residential development (i.e., municipal parks, etc.), and 100% for those facilities which benefit residential development only (Le., neighborhood parks, etc.). Don Ganer & Associates 12 as of 9/30/99 1'!1" TABLE 3.8 RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REQUIRED FACILITIES COSTS Facility Neighborhood/School Parks. Sports/ Recreation Facilities Municipal/Community Parks Greenways, Open Space, Trails Maintenance Facilities Totals Total Facilities Growth Costs $1,713,800 1,564,200 446,500 189,000 12.600 $3,926,100 Residential Growth Costs $1,713,800 1,536,044 438,463 185,598 :u.m $3,886,278 · these facilities are considered to benefit residential population only. Don Ganer & Associates 13 Non-Residential Growth Costs $ 0 28,156 8,037 3,402 227 $39,822 as of 9/?JJ/99 I1r 4.0 RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES The City's Residential Parks and Recreation SDC rates are calculated using a series of sequential formulas which, when completed, yield the total SDC rates for each new dwelling unit in the City. The formulas identify: . the residential facilities cost per capita (Formula 4a, below), . the residential facilities cost per dwelling unit (Formula 4b, page 15), . the compliance/ administrative cost per dwelling unit (Formula 4c, page 16) . the credit per dwelling unit (Formula 4d, page 17), and . the residential SDC per dwelling unit (Formula 4e, page 17). The Residential SDC is an "improvement fee" only and does not include a "reimbursement fee" component. A. Formula 4a: Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita The residential facilities cost per capita is calculated by dividing the residential portion of growth-required facilities costs (identified in Table 3.8, page 13) by the expected increase in the City's population during the next twenty years (from Table 3.1, page 8). 4a. Residential Facilities Costs Population Increase Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita Table 4.1 presents the calculation of the facilities cost per capita. TABLE 4.1 FACILITIES COST PER CAPITA Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita Residential Facilities Costs Population Increase $3,886,278 9,705 $400 Don Ganer & Associates 14 as of 9/30/99 f B. Formula 4b: Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit The Residential Parks and Recreation SOC's is based on facilities costs per capita and is calculated based on the number of persons per dwelling unit. Dwelling units typically house different numbers of persons depending on the type of unit (i.e., single family, multi-family, etc.). To determine the appropriate number of persons per dwelling unit, census data gathered in 1990 was analyzed, and the resulting calculations are displayed in Table 4.2. TABLE 4.2 AVERAGE PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT Type of Unit Single-Family 1990 Census Avg. Persons Per Dwell~ Unit 2.71 Multi-Family 2.95 Manufactured Housing 1.93 The residential facilities cost per dwelling unit is calculated by multiplying the average number of persons per dwelling unit (from Table 4.2) by the residential facilities cost per capita (from Table 4.1, page 14). 4b. Persons Per x Dwelling Unit Residential Facilities Cost = Per Capita Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.3: TABLE 4.3 RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES COST PER DWELLING UNIT Average Residential Residential Persons Per X Facilities Cost Facilities Cost Per Type of Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Per Capita Dwelling Unit Single-Family: 2.71 $400 $ 1,084 Multi-Family: 2.95 $400 $ 1,180 Manufactured Housing: 1.93 $400 $ m Don Ganer & Associates 15 as of 9/30/99 ,..- C. Formula 4c: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Dwelling Unit The City will incur compliance and administrative costs associated with the Residential Parks and Recreation SDC's. ORS 223.307(5) allows the City to recoup the direct costs of complying with Oregon law regarding SDC's. Recoupable costs include consulting, engineering, and legal fees as well as the cost of accounting for revenues and expenditures. The total compliance/ administrative cost is estimated to be 10% of the residential facilities costs per dwelling unit. The compliance! administrative cost per dwelling unit is determined by multiplying the residential facilities cost per dwelling unit (from Table 4.3) by 10% 4c. Compliance! Administration Rate Residential x Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit Compliance! = Admin. Cost Per Dwelling Unit Table 4.4 presents the compliance! administration cost per dwelling unit. TABLE 4.4 COMPLIANCE/ADMINISTRATION COST PER DWELLING UNIT Residential Compliance/ Compliance/ Facilities Cost Per X Administration = Admin Cost Per Type of Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Rate Dwelling Unit Single-Family: $ 1,084 10% $ 108 Multi-Family: $1,180 10% $ 118 Manufactured Housing: $ 772 10% $ 78 D. Formula 4d: Residential SDC Credit Per Dwelling Unit The Master Plan identifies capacity improvements for both growth and non-growth needs. Bonds and property taxes will likely be used as a source for funding a portion of these improvements, and a portion of bond repayments and property taxes will be paid by growth. Therefore, a credit must be calculated to provide for these payments in order to avoid charging growth twice for the same facilities Don Ganer & Associates 16 as of 9/30/99 lTi' A credit has been calculated for each type of dwelling unit usmg the following assumptions: · $2.5 million in G.O. bonds for parks improvements issued in 2001, · 20 year bond term, 6% interest, · 5.5% annual increase in total property tax assessments, · 3% annual increase in assessed property valuations, · 4% annual inflation (decrease in value of money), · Average 1999 property valuations for new dwelling units at $125,000 for single family, $55,000 for multi-family, and $85,000 for manufactured housing units ($75,000 for unit, $15,000 for lot). Present Value 4d. of Future Property Tax Payments SDC Credit Per Dwelling Unit The amounts of these credits are shown in Table 4.5. TABLE 4.5 CREDIT PER DWELLING UNIT Type of Dwellint; Unit Credit Per Dwellin~ Unit Single-Family: $430 Multi-Family: $189 Manufactured Housing: $215 E. Fonnula 4e: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit The residential SDC rate per dwelling unit IS calculated by adding the compliance/ administration cost per dwelling unit (fable 4.4, page 16) to the residential facilities cost per dwelling unit (from Table 4.3, page 15), and subtracting the credit per dwelling unit (from Table 4.5). 4e. Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit + Compliance/ Admin. Cost Per Dwelling Unit Credit Per = Dwelling Unit Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit Don Ganer & Associates 17 as of 9/30/99 The results of these calculations are shown in Table 4.6. TABLE 4.6 RESIDENTIAL SDC PER DWELLING UNIT Residential Compliance/ Residential Facilities Cost Per + Administration - Credit Per SDC Per Type of Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Cost I Unit Dwellins Unit Dwellins Unit Single-Family: $ 1,084 $ 108 $430 $ 762 Multi-Family: $ 1,180 $ 118 $189 $ 1,109 Manufactured Housing: $ 712 $ 78 $215 $ 635 Don Ganer & Associates 18 as of 9/30/99 ,w 5.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC RATES The City's Non-Residential Parks and Recreation SDC rates are calculated using a series of sequential formulas which, when completed, yield the total SDC rates for each new employee added by new development in the City. The formulas identify: a) the Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee (Formula Sa, below), b) the "Compliance! Administration" Cost Per Employee (Formula Sb, page 20), c) the Credit Per Employee (Formula Sc, page 20); and d) the Non-Residential SDC Per Employee (Formula Sd, page 21). The Non-Residential SDC is an "improvement fee" only and does not include a "reimbursement fee" component. A. Formula 5a: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee The Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee is calculated by dividing the non- residential growth-related facilities costs (from Table 3.9, page 13) by the expected increase in the City's employment through 2020 (from Table 3.1, page 8). Non-Residential Sa. Growth-Related Facilities Costs Employment Increase Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee Table 5.1 presents the calculation of the Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee. TABLE 5.1 NON-RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES COST PER EMPLOYEE Non-Residential Growth-Related Facilities Cost Employment Increase Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Emplo.yee $ 39,822 2,007 = $20 Don Ganer &; Associates 19 as of 9/30/99 '" B. Formula 5b: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Employee ORS 223.307(5) allows the City to recoup the direct costs of complying with Oregon law regarding SDC's. Recoupable costs include consulting, engineering, and legal fees as well as the cost of collecting and accounting for revenues and expenditures. The total compliance/ administration cost is estimated to be 10% of collected SDC revenues. The Compliance/ Administration Cost Per Employee is calculated by multiplying the Non- Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee (from Table 5.1, page 19) by 10%: 5b. Non-Residential Facilities X 10% Cost Per Employee = Compliance/ Admin. Cost Per Employee Table 5.2 presents the calculation of the Compliance/Administration Cost Per Employee. TABLE 5.2 COMPLIANCE/ADMINISTRATION COST PER EMPLOYEE Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee Cost Factor Compliance/ Admin. Cost Per Employee $20 x 10% $2 C. Formula 5c: Non-Residential Credit Per Employee The Master Plan identifies capacity improvements for both growth and non-growth needs. Bonds and property taxes will likely be used as a source for funding a portion of these improvements, and a portion of bond repayments and property taxes will be paid by growth. Therefore, a credit must be calculated to provide for these payments in order to avoid charging growth twice for the same facilities. Don Ganer & Associates 20 as of 9/30/99 "" A credit has been calculated for employees using the following assumptions: · $2.5 million in G.O. bonds for parks improvements issued in 2001, · 20 year bond term, 6% interest, · 5.5% annual increase in total property tax assessments, · 3% annual increase in assessed property valuations, · 4% annual inflation (decrease in value of money), · Average 1999 property valuation for non-residential development at $10 per square foot, · An average of 500 square feet per employee 5c. Present Value of Tax Payments Per Employee Credit Per Employee The amount of this credit is shown in Table 5.3 TABLE 5.3 CREDIT PER EMPLOYEE Credit Per Employee Present Value of Tax Payments $ 17 D. Fonnula 5d: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee The Non-Residential SDC Per Employee 15 calculated by adding the compliance/ administration cost per employee (fable 5.2, page 20) to the non- residential facilities cost per employee (from Table 5.1 page 19), and subtracting the credit per employee (from Table 5.3). N on-Residential 5d. Facilities Cost + Per Employee Compliance/ Admin. Cost Per Employee Credit Per Employee Non-Residential SDC Per Employee Don Ganer & Associates 21 as of 9/30/99 ~ The results of these calculations are shown in Table 5.4. TABLE 5.4 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC PER EMPLOYEE Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee Compliance/ + Administration - Employee Credit Per Employee Non-Residential SDC Per Employee $ 20 $2 $17 $5 The parks and recreation SDC's for a particular non-residential development are determined by: 1) dividing the total building space (square feet) in the development by the number of square feet per employee (from the guidelines in Table 5.5, page 23), and 2) multiplying the result (from step 1) by the Non-Residential SDC Per Employee rate (Table 5.4). For example, the parks and recreation SDC's for a 100,000 square foot Distribution Warehouse would be calculated as follows: 1) 100,000 (sq. ft. building size) + 2,500 (sq. ft. per employee) = 40 employees, 2) 40 employees X $5 (SDC rate) = $200. For non-residential development where more than one SIC may be used, multiple SIC's may be applied based on their percentage of the total development. Don Ganer & Associates 22 as of 9/30/99 TIT" TABLE 5.5 SQUARE FEET PER EMPLOYEE (recommended guidelines from Metro Employment Density Study) Standard Industry Square Feet Standard Industry Square Feet Classification (SIC) Per Employee Classification (SIc) Per Employee Manufacturing: Trucking 1,500 General 700 Communications 250 Food Related 775 Utilities 225 Textile, Apparel 575 Lumber, Wood Products 560 Retail: Paper and Related 1,400 General 700 Printing and Publishing 600 Hardware 1,000 Chemicals, Petrol, Food Stores 675 Rubber, Plastics 850 Restaurant/Bar 225 Cement, Stone, Clay, Glass 800 Appliance/Furniture 1,000 Furniture and Furnishings 600 Auto Dealership 650 Primary Metals 1,000 Gas Station (gas only) 300 Secondary Metals 800 Gas Station (gas and service) 400 Non-Electrical Machinery 600 Regional Shopping Center 600 Electrical Machinery 375 Electrical Design 325 Services: Transportation Equipment 500 Hotel/Motel 1,500 Other 400 Health Services (hospital) 500 Health Services (clinic) 350 Wholesale Trade; Educational 1,300 Durable Goods 1,000 Cinema 1,100 Non-Durable Goods 1,150 Personal Services 600 Finance, Insurance, Warehousing - Real Estate, Business Services 350 Storage 20,000 Distribution 2,500 Government Administration 300 6.0 CONCLUSION The City's growth will require a combination of techniques, including system development charges, bond revenues, and other sources of funds to pay for capital facilities needed to serve the parks and recreation needs of current and future residents. As growth occurs and the demographics of the community change, the City's parks and recreation facility needs will also change and should be periodically monitored through the use of opinion surveys and similar techniques. The CIP should be reviewed and updated at least once every two years to reflect changes in parks and recreation facility needs. The System Development Charges methodology should also be periodically updated when significant changes are made to the CIP, and/ or when cost estimates become outdated. Don Ganer & Associates 23 as of 9/30/99 " o C en Cc .2 as ..- asD.. fU) u" )(eDC _a:~ COOeD zc> Waso D..u)Q. D..~E <(... as- D..- as C:!:: ...c. :Jas ,go '0 o o 3= ~ tI o .a o'f ~ o ... <!J ,... Q) W Ol ~ Clu o III .s::. ... '#. ~ ... <!J .s::. ... ~ o ... c:l I e o Z '.s::. e ... o ~ Z 0 ... '#.c:l ,.... " tI '" ... ... '" o E I- .;; III w 8 o o N ID ilIt o ilIt ;f. o CIO ;f. o 8 o LI) LI) ~ ilIt 8 o o ,.... ~ ilIt ~ N ;f. 8 8 o LI) ,.... ,.... ilIt 8 o ,.... ~ ilIt e ... tI .s::. ... ::l o III tI .s::. .... ,,;~ ti 5 ';:: c ~ o a.2 G) '- .,...... tV t)cnC'au G) _.~ ..... C) ..... "ii C) :;.: (J c: .... 0 t) '5 'c'~ ii ~5 III 0_ E .S ~ .s .s ~ lii iij ~ lii a. .v a. .... ~ ] Eii",'l;; ~Euia. 0lG)"''' -= :;l ii e 5 1i. E ~ m ~ ~ ~ o ... ~ e ... e a. 41 ~ [.: ~ E '5 ~ 'S: ~ ~ Z".s 'oa IV o"l!~a. ae" E::l - ,- e g' ] ~'P ",,,,.s::. ~1i.g' .S ~ ... ...... '" III a.G) ... " 0 o '" ~LI) o x .a 0 .s::. ... Ola. 'ij fi- e '-' '" ?;- g-u ti~ ii .... ~o .~ 5 5-'f o 0 ~ a. 8 v ,.... ,.... ilIt '#. ID ('t) 8 ID ,.... ('t) ilIt '#. v ID 8 o L/) ~ N ilIt ... E o '" ::l.s::. ... 01 t: e c=-E o ::l um ~ ~ 8 o o ,.... ilIt ;f. 8 8 o o ,.... ilIt ti ... ::l ... 'c ... ::l - III .... e G) E 41 > o a .~ " e ::l_ o ... ... ::::J 01.... >. - J!~ a.e 0141 .S E " 41 ::::J > o e e a. ~ E ... ...: l'II 41 OIl a. Ol~ e '" ::::J o .S .a III ~ tI ti"a. Z - rl o~~ .... OIl c: III E l'II "'41- eo" OIl ..!! e ~ a. l'II ~~~ ... ... e a.e41 .~ ~ ~ 41 .9- :;l 1i 5- 1i. ~ 41 ~ ~ ... '" a. 01 e '5 ::::J U e G) ~Ol ... l'II t:. e (I) "i! ~" l'II" :n ; o OJ ._ e ij 'P 1Il~ 41= 'l;;?;- ~ ';:: e G 41 OIl 0:: III o ilIt ;f. o o o o o N ~ ilIt ;f. 8 8 o o N ilIt o ilIt ~ 8 L/) N ilIt ~ 8 LI) N ~ ilIt L ... l'II a. III III 41 o o '" 01 ,g Gi ::::J 01 U ~ .S 01 ~ 'iii ~~ ~ a.. l'II 0 OIl _ IV 0101 ~.s x' . t: .1: ~ g' [ o >. a. ..., +' ~ :! 'S e 0 G) 41 E III G) ....: ~IV ... :!: a. 01 E e -; :5 ~ l'II ~~ 8 v ID CIO ilIt ;f. ID ('t) 8 ID ('t) L/) ~ ilIt '$. v ID 8 o o v N ilIt IV " C l'II ... ... ::::J o u t:: o a. III " " '" e o 'f o a. e ... ., ... III l'II 41 41 .s::. ... .S ~ ... '" a. " o o .s::. ...... 6 II .a ... .s::. 0 01'" . ij LI) e X '" 0 8"5. _a. ., l'II >'-' -8?;- 't;u .= ... ::::J.s::. 0'... :lo ~ ... IV >. a.. l'II e :!: o.s::. III ... ti~ Z ... ,,~ fi 'l;; a.G) Jj :!: 8 LI) N ('t) N ilIt ;f. o ('t) 8 LI) N V L/) ilIt '#. o ,.... o o o LI) ,.... ,.... ilIt e ... ., ... ~ :!: .s::. ... ::::J o III 41 .s::. ... 8 LI) ,.... $ ilIt '#. o m 8 LI) ,.... ,.... ilIt '$. o 8 o L/) ,.... ,.... ilIt .S ~ . ... ...... l'II III a.~ " 0 o '" .,gLl) 5 x .a 0 .s::. ... Ola. 'ij fi- e '-' '" >. ... g-u ti~ ii ... ~o ~ e '5.2 gt:: ~~ g't: '5~ ~ III .S ti ... ~ ::::J ... ... '" 'c a.. ::l ... - 41~ 41 ... ... l'II ~ a. ....... e e o OIl at E .s::. G) ... 0 ... '" 01i. Z G) ... o ... ... e III G) ~ E Gi .,a.Cl E '5 ~ 410'01 ~ ., III "'''" a. e e .~ 5 l'II G) mi' ~~5 ~ a. 0 m o ilIt '#. o 8 LI) ,.... ID ilIt ;f. 8 8 LI) ,.... ID ilIt ~ ::0 '" ... o 'c o '0.. 0111 e 'p '5 'c ::l ., u E .S IV III ... (5 41 0-5 .s::. 0 o III" .!:! fi ::0 - ::::J III a. 1;: o tI ... E III G) ... 0 e e G) IV E.s::. ~ ij e" a.e E 5 .- ... 41 01 1ii;' ~1i. ~ o o 1IO ('t) ,.... ilIt ;f. o 8 LI) ,.... U) ilIt o o ,.... ('t) ,.... LI) ilIt ;f. 8 o o LI) ,.... ID ilIt o o LI) ,.... 1IO N ('t) 4II't ..J ~ I- o I- m :::> III o o en C:c: .2 cu -- cue.. !rn u- ><CI)i -IXE o'CCI) zc:> UJcuo e..rnQ. e...llIl::E <C:a- e..- cu c:== ~Q. ~cu ,go 'C o o == ~ ., o .a C\I c~ <Il w ~ ~ e Q.u" o II) 8 \I') \D ~ iI't ~ ... ;f. ~ .. " "S- r-- v ~ ... ~ o .. " I C o z 8 \I') ('f) o \I') iI't '~ c ... o ~ Z 0 .. ;f." 'S. ('f) \I') r-- o o N " ., III ... ... III o E I- .;:; UI w 8 o o \I') en iI't c o 0 ....... ";:; ra 'Eg .:! Ii '+- '"OL.L.~ t'lI".ac 1nS,,1lI VI O)ocui I) c....nsli .- 0) .. ;g">'m~ :3 ra _ ., :g "2 a."~ ~ t) ",; ~ 0 '-' 1: "'C 'c ~ ., O)-.~ raEce.. 0.. ., ",i:j a. C>~:3 ,2 e.~ e O)Q.- 0) ~ .~ ~ Ii I) en "C: c 1;; tl G .g g~~-~,~ ., 'tl t: ra Rl ~ 0) E t .2 c ~ :l c .~ III .~ U ~ 0 ~ VI -a ., .~ 'in~~i;E -8~" aB ~ .~ ~ .~ Ii o iI't "S- O 8 o o o CO iI't ~ 8 o o o co iI't -e :3 8....~ Ci~o .,-e~" "~uc :3 UI ll! lIS urae.. - .!:.o~1!l o -0 .. ii ... c ., E ~ 5 ii ... ~ 61~ i; >.U1a ~ ~"~ E "~ ri' ,[ ~ Eii";~ ~ E ~'iij ... ~ E i; ... 0 8 - ~ a..!! 6 ~.~ ~.~ "rl-gg:J ~ g lIS ~ 5i c~6EE 0) ... .- 0 ... "in 0)1;; e ~ -8~g1nO ~ .*, ~ ~ .~ o iI't #. o 8 o o r-- r-- iI't "S- 8 8 o o r-- r-- iI't Ui ... c ... E ... > ... 0 > .. ";; e.. ~ .~ =i e- ..... .2: ~.2... co)ra .- c E -8~~ ~ [ ra ,E -g .~ o lIS ii : ti ~ .. .. 0 lIS .a III Q. 'c " ~.2li .~~ ~ E lIS 'C o e.. :3 g C ~ ...J 0 III ... .;; ... > E ... o ra lIS ... ... :3 e..oCi .E:5~ o iI't ~ 8 o N iI't ~ 8 o N ~ iI't o iI't #. o 8 \I') N ~ iI't ~ 8 \I') N ~ iI't ... ~ ... ... lIS ... ::c 'in III ... U U III E 2:0:3 :i ... - ~ E~ o ~ o ... ... c ... ., ~u ... ... ~ ~ ... lIS ., ElIl -g~ ra-c >.0 .!,!3: Ii c ... ... :3 ".0 Ill" mg :3-3: ~ ~ e.. III ... 0) cii c .;; ~ 21 Cl tic :; oa ... rl 'c III .2-g ...ll! -c-c :3 c U III .E 't: o .a ... ., .:.t. ... ... 0 III ... c.. tl ~... l! 3,t.- .a III ::i] .,...... > 0 0.0 ... ., e..N .E ~ ~ o o lD N iI't ~ 8 \I') ('f) iI't o o v N N iI't ~ 8 \I') ('f) ~ iI't ,..... ....: iii o o o r..: '-" -c ... r o c en C:c: .2 ca ...- cae. !cn 0'" ><CI)i _a:e c"CI) zc:> UJcao e.cnQ. e.~e c('- ca- e.- ca c:~ '-Co ::sca ,go " o o ~ ~ I) O.J:I C C") c -5 0 en jjj ~ t:l) 0 ~ CI:l .... 0 Cl..UClo.. Cl V) .r."l:! .... ~ I) d'~Gl ez C) -5 c ~ 0 0';:; .... .... CI 0 co.. o z I C .r. "l:! o ... Z ~ ~ -s.l5Z "l:! I) I'll ... ... I'll o E I- ... UI W 8 ~~ ~ .... I) .r. ... I'll I) ~ =i 4i > 1)<( -g.!! gt; 0- I'll B~ ~j! ~ 0 c: ... Gl I) ... (;Vl c: i:15 I'll 0 0.. c: I)::J ::E E >'0 3:.t: I) i;' -g ~ a~ 0.1'11 ::::lo. 'if. ;f. ~ 0 8 8 N 0 0'1 0 ~ M ~ ~ ! ~ 8 8 o 0 o 0 M M ~ ~ .:;. .... .... I) I'll .r. 0.. ... I) ~ q:: ~ iii -,... 3: 'ii "e 1)- "l:!>. :J ... YU o~ I) o.r; ... ... o - ... "O.r; C .... '" :J _ 0 = UI - ... IIllll ~"O I'll c: 0. I'll ~cli I'll 0 > OUlI) ~ ; D .... E E "l:! .... 0 c:~.t: I'll I) I) >. o -g ~ .!! ~-E I) 0. I'll ~::::lo. 8 o U) M ~ -s. (0 M 8 o 'Of" U) ~ 'if. $ o o o o o ~ ~ c c: 0 o UI UI c: C I'll I'll E E ~ ~I I... I'll ... "'"0 ~ 5 I) 0. [ti: 05 tl a 0_ I) :~ ~ ~ :J E e~ ell) i;'~ - .... 0. Oc I) .... ti:.2 o~ .2 lii I) 0. .... "l:!lij c: ... I'll UI C I) 0- ~ .;...- ~ Q.~~ I) I'll I'll ~o..o.. o ~ 8 o U) M ~ ~ -s. U) M 8 o LI) M ~ 8 o 'Of" U) ~ 'if. 8 ! 8 o LI) M ilIt 8 o o o ~ ~ E o -g.t: 1'11"0 ~ ; o _ o c: c 0 ::J Oiij E c os: 0 al '6 J:: ~ .g .r. ~Vl~ ~ .J:I ~ I'll C U) :u 0... (I) R'lI 0... ..... nI I) "ij I) Ci ~ E Ci ...."0 Gl .... o I'll ';:i 0 "l:!1)..."l:! oE :a ~ OE 8 .~ 0 8 -ti 2l- ~ ij I) I) Gl Gl U ~ ~ u ...... =VlV) :i"O"l:! ~~~ 05 ~ ~ ff .!! ..!! <(UU 8 U) ~ N ~ 'if. (0 M 8 'Of" IX) M ~ -s. 'Of" U) 8 o o U) ~ o .... ~ .... I'll 0.. c: o '5'1 I) ...J el c: . o~ - I) I'll I'll I) Gl -.... c: "l:! U UI ~ I) >.~ UI I'll .... g ~liiCl ...0..- I'll 0 0 o....~ "l:!~c c: .... I'll 1)1'11.0 ><o...~ I) .... .... o o!! 6 ... E UI UI .!! Gl .......c: ii ~ ... E III c: I) E 0 lIle-g I) _ I'll UI .- UlI)':;'- ~ .~ :l 0"0 .... I'll... U I):J- .... c: I'll os Ii ~ aNC: o I'll Gl <(IV) :i I) co ....C1 05 ::::l al) o.r; <(.... 8 U) 'Of" IX) ~ $ M 8 'Of" o LI) ~ ~ -s. $ 8 o LI) M N ~ rl'!' - 1'1.,1...1, . 14A CiTY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 NOTICE OF DECISION WOODBURN PLANNING DIRECTOR ACTION TAKEN: Site Plan Review 99-22 DATE OF DECISION: October 14,1999 NATURE OF ACTION: On October 14,1999, the Woodburn Planning Commission accepted the Planning Director's administrative approval of a request by the City of Woodburn to construct a 288 square foot storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works materials yard located at 300 Cleveland Street. A copy of the staff report is attached to this Notice of Decision and is, by reference, incorporated herein. APPEAL RIGHTS: The final decision of the Woodburn Planning Director is appealable to the Woodburn Planning Commission if written notice is filed with the Woodburn Community Development Department within 10 days of the date this notice was mailed. Notice of Decision - SPR 99-22 f IIr 14A CiTY OF WOODBURN 270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222 TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244 STAFF REPORT SITE PLAN REVIEW 99-22 October 14, 1999 (Administrative Review) \. APPLICATION INFORMATION: Applicant: Woodburn Public Works Department Property Owner: City of Woodburn Application Deemed Complete: October 5, 1999 120 Day Rule Deadline: February 2, 2000 Staff Report Available for Public Review: October 8, 1999 II. NATURE OF APPLICATION: The applicant requests administrative site plan approval to construct a 288 square foot storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works materials yard located at 300 Cleveland Street. III. RELEVANT FACTS: The applicant proposes to construct a 288 square foot storage building on an existing .45 acre site. The site is currently used for the storage of bulk materials such as sand and gravel, and contains a wash rack for washing of city vehicles. The storage building is proposed to be used for storage of vehicle washing supplies (no flammable materials) and will provide a restroom. The site is located at 300 Cleveland Street (Marion County Tax Map T5S R1W 1880 Tax Lot 100). The property is zoned PS (Public Service District) and has a comprehensive plan designation of Public Use. The PS District allows, "municipal or government service building, structure, and use, Le., reservoir, water tower, pump station, sewage treatment plant, garbage and refuse landfill operations, bus, equipment, parking servicing or repairing" (WZO Section 37.060(a)). Adjacent property to the north is zoned IL (Light Industrial District) and property to the east, west and south is zoned RS (Single Family Residential District). There is a residential use immediately adjacent to the east side of the site and a residential use at least 60 feet away from the west side of the site. The site is relatively level, paved with asphalt and the Page 1 1'11' II" 14A perimeter enclosed with a chain link. fence with slats to provide screening from the adjacent residential uses. The street frontage of the site has been landscaped with trees and red lava rock.. No topographical or environmental constraints have been identified on the subject site. IV. RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA: A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: Chapter 8 General Standards Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards Chapter 11 Site Plan Review Chapter 37 Public, Semi-public and Governmental Use Districts C. Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards D. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance V. FINDINGS: A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan STAFF COMMENT: Applicable goals and policies have been satisfied through the implementing ordinances of the adopted zoning ordinance and other ordinances in affect at the time of approval. B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance: 1. Chapter 8 General Standards STAFF COMMENT: The proposal complies with all general standards including the required 40 foot setback. of buildings from the centerline of Cleveland Street and vision clearance requirements. 2. Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards STAFF COMMENT: The nature of the use of the site does not require the provision of designated parking, handicap, or loading spaces. However, the site currently is paved with asphalt and provides ample space for parking and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. An existing 30 foot wide paved driveway is provided that meets commercial driveway standards. An existing 6-7 foot high chain link. fence with slats encloses the site and provides a visual screen for the adjacent residential uses. 3. Chapter 11 Site Plan Review SPR 99-22 City of Woodburn Public Works Dept. Page 2 '11' 1'1f SPR 99-22 14A Section 11.070. Criteria for Evaluating a Site Plan. The following criteria shall be used in evaluating a Site Plan: (a) The placement of structures on the property shall minimize adverse impact on adjacent uses. STAFF COMMENT: The placement of the proposed storage building will minimize adverse impact on adjacent uses in that it will be located in the middle of the site, is very small in size, and an existing screen fence is provided. (b) Landscaping shall be used to minimize impact on adjacent uses. (c) Landscaping shall be so located as to maximize its aesthetic value. STAFF COMMENT: The site currently is landscaped along the Cleveland Street frontage. Landscaping includes trees and red lava rock.. Landscaping appears to be well maintained. The Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards require a landscaping plan be provided for uses in the PS District, but provides no standards or requirements for such uses. Also, the PS District provides no standards or requirements for uses allowed in the district either. Inasmuch as there are no landscaping standards or requirements for uses in the PS District, the existing landscaping is deemed to satisfy the above criteria. (d) Access to the public streets shall minimize the impact oftraffic patterns. Wherever possible, direct driveway access shall not be allowed to arterial streets. Wherever possible, access shall be shared with adjacent uses of a similar nature. STAFF COMMENT: Cleveland Street is classified in the Woodburn Access Management Ordinance as a Service Collector. The site has an existing 30 foot wide driveway. This driveway has been located and improved in compliance with city requirements. (e) The design of the drainage facilities shall minimize the impact on the City's or other public agencies drainage facilities. STAFF COMMENT: The site is currently developed with catch basins to convey storm water runoff. The proposed building will not increase runoff since its proposed location is currently paved and impervious. The existing drainage system has incorporated City of Woodburn Public Works Dept. Page 3 J 1if' SPR 99-22 14A pollution controls in compliance with State Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ) requirements. (f) The design encourages energy conservation, both in its siting on the lot, and its accommodation of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. (Note: specific solar access provisions are described in Section 8.200.) STAFF COMMENT: This is not applicable to the proposed development in that the project consists of a small storage building. (g) The proposed site development, including the architecture, landscaping and graphic design, is in conformity with the site development requirements of this Ordinance and with the standards of this and other ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the proposed development are involved. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed storage building will be constructed with T-1-11 on the walls and a metal roof. The building, due to its small size and location, is in conformity with site development requirements (h) The location, design, color and materials of the exterior of all structures and signs are compatible with proposed development and appropriate to the character ofthe immediate neighborhood. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed building is appropriate to the character of the immediate neighborhood in that it is small and located in the middle of the site with a screen fence surrounding the site. 4. Chapter 37 Public, Semi-Public and Governmental Use Districts STAFF COMMENT: The PS District allows, "municipal or government service building, structure, and use, Le., reservoir, water tower, pump station, sewage treatment plant, garbage and refuse landfill operations, bus, equipment, parking servicing or repairing" (WZO Section 37.060(a)). Use of the property as a materials storage yard and vehicle washing facility including the proposed storage building is consistent with the permitted uses in the PS District. Section 37.090 limits height of buildings to a maximum of 35 feet or 2 % stories. The proposed building will be less than 20 feet in height. Section 37.100 requires a front yard adjacent to a street with a minimum depth of 20 feet. The site plan indicates that more than 20 feet is provided City of Woodburn Public Works Dept. Page 4 rrr Ill' 14A between the proposed building and the street. Section 37.110 requires a side yard setback. with a minimum depth of 5 feet. The proposed building exceeds this requirement. Section 37.120 requires a rear yard setback with a minimum depth of 20 feet. The proposed building exceeds this requirement. Section 37.130 limits lot coverage by buildings to a maximum of 30%. The proposed building will cover much less than 30% of the site. Section 37.140 requires site plan review for all buildings and structures. The proposed building is subject to administrative site plan review since it is less than 4,000 square feet. C. Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards STAFF COMMENT: The Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards require a landscaping plan be provided for uses in the PS District, but provides no standards or requirements for such uses. Also, the PS District provides no standards or requirements for uses allowed in the district either. Inasmuch as there are no landscaping standards or requirements for uses in the PS District, the existing landscaping is deemed to be sufficient. D. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance STAFF COMMENT: Cleveland Street is classified in the Woodburn Access Management Ordinance as a Service Collector. The site has an existing 30 foot wide driveway. This driveway has been located and improved in compliance with city requirements. VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION: The proposed project complies with all City ordinances, policies and standards. Based on the findings in this report, the Community Development Director grants administrative approval of the applicant's request subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plan. 2. All landscaping shall be maintained year round. Plantings shall be watered regularly and in a manner appropriate for the specific plant species through the first growing season, and dead and dying plants shall be replaced by the applicant during the next planting season. No buildings, structures, storage of material, or park.ing shall be permitted within the required landscape and buffer areas. All landscape and buffer areas shall be maintained and k.ept free of all debris, weeds and tall grass. The applicant shall show proof of how landscaping is to be maintained and irrigated. The parking area shall be k.ept free of debris. SPR 99-22 City of Woodbum Public Works Dept. Page 5 II" 14A 3. All conditions contained herein shall be conditions on the issuance of a building permit. Violation of these conditions shall be considered a violation of the Zoning Ordinance. Building Department Conditions: 4. All work. shall conform to City of Woodburn standards and State building codes. 5. Building permit issuance required priorto construction of storage building. Material Safety Data Sheets shall be submitted along with three sets of complete building plans for Building Department review and approval. Fire District Conditions: 6. Repairs in storage building limited to exchange of parts. No spray paint operations or use of open flame devices. 7. An on-site water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to the city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during construction must support the weight of fire apparatus and allow access to the facility. VII. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Woodburn Fire District Comments Building Department Comments Site Plan Application SPR 99-22 City of Woodburn Public Works Dept. Page 6 '" [- 14A / / / ~. / O' / / ~. / / At; / / i~ / / i;' / . I .~K-' ~ Sf 8ERW .., <0' . - ~ ... ; r.cA7;~ ~ / , C. 1Y BI.4-/lC / -:DO!CURD LU a. a. :r o CLEVelAND ST 0 ~ \PROJECT VICINITY MAP SITE ',~ X", ""'"" EXISTlNG STRIPORAlN , t '" " ' f, " END OF C , '....... " , >- < ~ W a: u.. 10 .1. HWY 214 '-. / , / / / / / / , ~ 1 79.90 ENO OF CUR8 " ". '. .'. ", C{.t-. . ''-. " ,"' I'. . , ~~ ''-< 1/ '~ ", , '. . '- ~',,- 179.90 '-. "- '. , CONSTRUCT 3- ClASS C ~:.MlX TO GRADE IN. ~WlTHSPEOflCATI()t, N-I). TO CAADE. F.G. , 79.90 EXIS'11NG e" PvC f'ERf. PIP( ~g~~ 1,", II" 16A MEMO From the OjJice of the City Attorney TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL N. ROBERT SIllELDS, CITY ATTORNEY ~(,.-<> FROM: SUBJECT: RESULTS OF GOVERNMENT LAW SECTION ELECTION DATE: OCTOBER 21, 1999 As most of you are aware, I have served for the past three years as a member of the Executive Committee of the Government Law Section of the Oregon State Bar. The Government Law Section has a statewide membership of approximately 500 government law lawyers and is governed by its12 member Executive Committee. On September 17, 1999, at the Oregon State Bar Convention, I was elected Secretary of the Executive Committee. The Secretary is an officer in the progression to eventually become Chair. I strongly believe that my participation in this professional activity has benefits for both me and the City of Woodburn. 11f II" it CITY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) UPDATE METHODOLOGY REPORT AND RATE STUDY as of October 25, 1999 15418 NW White Fox Dr. . Beaverton, Oregon 97006 · (503) 690-8981 Don Ganer & Associates ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ Executive Summary............................. ..................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction....................... ............................. .............. ............... ..... 1 2.0 Authority and Background Information...................................... 2 A. Legislative Authority.............. ..... ................... ........... ............. 2 B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's..... 2 C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts.. ...... .... ................ ...... .... ...... .......... ...... ........ ...... 3 D. Guiding Concepts............ .......................... ......... ......... ........... 4 E. Alternative Methodology Approaches............................... 5 3.0 Transportation Impact Fee Methodology................................... 7 A. SDC Basis and Justification.................................................... 7 B. Future Trip Projections.......................................................... 7 C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC...................... 9 4.0 Calculation of the Transportation Impact Fee............................ 15 A. Formula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip by Mode of Travel.................................................................. 15 B. Formula 2: Net New Person-Trips....................................... 16 C. Formula 3: Length Adjusted Person-Trips......................... 21 D. Formula 4: Motor Vehicle (MY) Cost Per Unit................. 27 E. Formula 5: Pedestrian/Bicycle (p !B) Cost Per Unit.......... 32 F. Formula 6: Transit Cost Per Unit......................................... 37 G. Formula 7: Transportation Impact Fee Per Unit............... 42 LIST OF TABLES ~ 8 Table 3.1: Projected Growth in Average Daily Trips (ADT)............ Table 3.2: TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects.. ..... .... .................... .... ...... ... ..................... .............. ... Table 4.1: Table 4.2: Table 4.3: Table 4.4: Table 4.5: Table 4.6 Table 4.7: Cost Per New Person-Trip By Mode Of TraveL............. Net New Person-Trips...... ... .......... ............... ...... ....... .......... Length Adjusted Person-Trips................... ...... ....... ............ Motor Vehicle Cost Per Unit.............................................. Pedestrian! Bicycle Cost Per Unit....................................... Transit Cost Per Unit....... ......... ......... ............. ............. ........ Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Per Unit....................... 12 15 17 23 28 33 38 43 111' CITY OF WOODBURN Transportation Impact Fee (TIP) Update Methodology Report and Rate Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. . TIF Metlwdology Update In 1989, the State of Oregon adopted the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314) to "provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges by local governments." The Act requires local governments to enact System Development Charges (SDC's) by resolution or ordinance, and to develop methodologies to establish the principles used in arriving at the SDC rates. The City of Woodburn adopted an ordinance and resolution establishing SDC's for transportation facilities in 1993. Included in the ordinance was a requirement for the ordinance and methodology to be reviewed periodically to consider new estimates of population and other socioeconomic data, changes in the cost of construction and land acquisition, and other adjustments. A review of the ordinance and methodology has been completed, resulting in an updated methodology for the City's Transportation Impact Fee (TlF) and some recommended modifications to the TIF ordinance I resolution. The City's SDC for transportation was originally referred to as the Traffic Impact Fee, but has been changed to Transportation Impact Fee (l1F) to more accurately reflect the facilities for which revenues are used. The TIF remains an "improvement fee" designed to - generate revenue for construction of future facilities; it does not include a "reimbursement fee" for facilities which are already in place. The 1993 TIF methodology was completed prior to completion of the City's 1996 Transportation System Plan. Because specific project costs were not then available, TIF rates included in the 1993 methodology report were based on the "typical" costs of constructing capacity-increasing improvements needed to maintain a Level of Service of 6,000 vehicles per day for arterial and collector roads in the City. The TIF rates included in the updated TIF methodology are based on the growth- related costs of specific capacity-increasing projects on arterial and collector roads identified in the City's adopted 1996 Transportation System Plan (updated to include project completions, changes and modifications). Don Ganer & Associates as of 10125/99 1ft" The updated TIF rates were developed using trip generation rates for major land-use categories included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation manual (6th Edition, 1997). As in the 1993 methodology, the ITE trip generation rates for the update were adjusted to account for peak-hour impacts and pass-by trips, and were then multiplied by the average trip-lengths for each land-use category to determine the total number of new person-trips per day. The cost per new person-trip for each mode of travel (e.g., motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit) was determined by dividing the total growth-related costs for each mode of travel by the number of new person-trips expected for that mode. The numbers of new person-trips expected for each type of land use were determined by multiplying the total length-adjusted person-trips for each land use by the percentage of total person-trips for each mode of travel (e.g 93% motor vehicle, 5% pedestrian/bicycle, and 2% transit). These numbers were then multiplied by the cost per person-trip for each mode of travel to calculate the cost for each mode for each land-use category. The maximum TIP rates in the updated methodology ($3,076 per single family dwelling unit) are very close to the maximum rates in the original 1993 methodology ($3,020.20 per single family dwelling unit). The City Council in 1993 adopted initial TIF rates at 25% of the maximum rates identified in the original methodology report, with rates increasing by 1% of the maximums annually to a total of 30% of the maximum rate ($906.06 per single family dwelling unit). The maximum TIF rates for each land-use category included in the updated methodology report are included in Exhibit A. B. Ordi11Jlnce Modifications Credits The 1993 Oregon Legislature modified legislative requirements concerning the provision of "credits" against SDC's for certain improvements required as a condition of development approval. In order to comply with these changes, replacement language for the TIF ordinance has been drafted, as follows: Don Ganer & Associates ii as of lOj2Sj99 J "Qualified Public Improvement" means a capital improvement that is required: (1) Required as a condition of development approval; (2) Identified in the adopted capital improvement plan (OP); and (b) Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or Located in whole or in part on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval and required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project to which the improvement fee is related. (3) (a) Annual Rate Adjustments The current ordinance does not provide for annual adjustments in rates to account for changes in costs of acquisition and development. The following new language has been recommended to provide for annual rate adjustments to account for changes in costs, as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision, the SDC rates adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. _ shall on January 1st of each year be adjusted to account for changes in the costs of acquiring and constructing facilities. The adjustment factor shall be based on the change in average market value of all land in the City, according to the records of the County Tax Assessor, and the change in construction costs according to the Engineering News Record (ENR) Northwest (Seattle, Washington) Construction Cost Index; and shall be determined as follows: Change in Average Market Value X 0.50 .::L Change in Construction Cost Index X 0.50 System Development Charge Adjustment Factor The System Development Charge Adjustment Factor shall be used to adjust the System Development Charge rates, unless they are otherwise adjusted by action of the City Council based on adoption of an updated methodology or capital improvements plan (master plan). Don Ganer & Associates iii as of 10/25/99 111" " EXHIBIT A" TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 10f5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) .................n_......._...m.............._..............................n.................................MQ!.~!...... ~~4.~~~.~~.L............n................ .............................................-.........--........................ j Vehicle Birvcle i Transit Total 1 _______u.._..~_____n______.d______nn.._u______n___________________________n__.__n_________n.____.__n....U_______________u_________...n__~.J._.n_._______+.....--__-......n-.---------_..n-.....-.....___n...__n__...____............__n....__n____......____..... ~ Cost Cost i Cost TIF i ITE LAND USE CODE 1 CATEGORY i Per Unit Per Unit i Per Unit Per Unit 1 Unit ~~~~~~~~~~:==:=:=:::==:::F:=:::===::I::=====::::::==:~:::::F::=::::::=:::: .~!Q...?!~g!~.f~.Y..(~~~~~~J?~~~~2......[.............$.?:A.!.~ ..................$.;??QL.................$.~?. ............$.~i~~.~.l.~.~~.~K~!......... .~~Q....Ap~!!:!~~!!!.................m.__....................__.................L....._.....$.!.!.~.!.1.........._......$..?:~ZL.................~? ............$..?-ll~.~j.l.~.~~.~K~!......... .?-.~.Q...~~~~~.~!!~~..GQ~4.Ql.IQ~~~~.~.....l............$.J~~Q~. .................$.~z.L..................$..~.Q .............$.!(.~?Qll~~~~..~~........ ?~...M~~~~~4...H~~~.~g..(~.;P.~~)..l............$..~l~l~. .................$.l~~.L..................~? .............$.1(.~~11l~~~~g..~~........ 260 Recreation Home 1 $865 $1221 $32 $l,019i / dwelling unit .RE.CREATiONAL....................................................T............................. ..............................~.............................. ................................................................................. .4ii...ci~..P~k.........m.............................m..................mT...............$48"1 .....................$68r.................$i8..................$567T/~~.~...............m......m....... 412 Coun!y Park 1 $690 $98i $26 $8131/ acre 4i~:::~p_i!~~ii~z:~S~::~~!k:Q?2::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::$l~~::::::::::::::::::::ii.zI::::::::::::::::::::::$.~:::::::::::::::::~l~~I:z:~~.P::~:i!~:::::::::::::::::: 420 Marina . $1,215 $172~ $45 $1,432~ /berth 430 Golf Course 1 $14,667 $2,075: $546 $17,288l1hole ~~~J~~~~!~~===~-I~iil!~~~~=;~E-==Kit~=~if~~~~~-=:-~= 443 Movie Theater w / out matinee ~ $66,580 $9,421 ~ $2,477 $78,4781 / screen ____n_n______.....n__.._n..__....._______..._...___....._._nn______........_________n_nn_.._<'}___n__.u.u____________________n___.________nnn_______:_n__________....______________.......n..nnu._____n___+_._.______....___n____n__n__._.____n_____ 444 Movie Theater w / matinee $46,403 $6,5661 $1,726 $54,695j / screen .1?~....~~.~~~!.y!4.~Q..rQ~~!.l.1.Q!!.~.!Y...<!?).L...........$.1}!?1.......m........$.~??l.................$.l?J ............~lZ~Jj./I:~.:f.:.q.:f:A::............. 480 Amusement/Theme Park i $22,928 $3,244: $853 $27,025j / acre ______n_______nn___u_____u______n__u...__nn_____.______u__..._n..._..______._.u.__._._o.__nn_nUun._.._.U_.._.___n_______u.___..__.....____-t.........n.....___.___.......u.____n_........_______.......___......____.__.......___nn....n.....___ 491 Tennis Courts : $9,394 $1,329\ $349 $11,0721 1 court ~~~~~=:-~====:::::::t:~~]~~=_=~t~:::::::::~:J}tJ~Ii~::::::::: 495 Recreational Community Center' $9 389 $L329~ $349 $lL067! IT.S.F.C.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates iv as of 10/25199 - '11' TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 20f5 (1) ~ (2) (3) i (4) (5) ~ (6) ~.:~..~~.'::.~~.~~...:.~~:;::~::::::....:.':::::~...~~~..:.'~.'.~::::..:::::~.':.~.:.~::~.:~'..:.'...':.'.'~::..::.]:....:.')1:~!.Q.!~::::~~'~~~jri~!iL::.~:.':~~'.':..::.'~':.'.':~....~ "...':.'.'~'::.'.':~:::.'.~..:..::.'.~.L.'.':::::::......:~.:..=:..........::::...~....:..::..::_~~.... ....................................................................................................._...l.....y~.h!~~..... .......~!g~.~.....L...I~~!t.... ........I2!~........L................................................ ~ Cost Cost 1 Cost TIF 1 ITE LAND USE CODE/ CATEGORY 1 Per Unit Per Unit 1 Per Unit Per Unit i Unit ~~~~~~~~=:=~::==~====::=:t:~-======::=:l::===:::~== !rii~~~~~~~::~~i~~~~pJ~~~-jl~~_~;I~-~li1~~~;;~ 540 Tunior/Communitv College 1 $315 $45j $12 $371! /student .~~Q....y~y..~~.~!Y.L~2!!~g.~......._________........______..___....l..___............~.~.....___..........___~~l.___..........___...$.!~..___.............$.?z.~.l.L~.~4.~P.:!......___.........___... 560 Church l $1,869 $264~ $70 $2,203l/T.S.F.G.F.A. _n___~~......._..________n.n_________....._____.___...______.__._n.._._nnnn..nn__.______n............nn............nn.......n........____.........__n.+.......n..._nn.n__......n_..__n__..__..........__.____.nn..nnn..__nn__.____n...._._n_.__...__._ 565 Dav Care Center/Preschool ~ $493 $701 $18 $5821/student ~~=~~~:=:==::=:::=:::::=:::::::+==~,'m ::::~l:::::::~ :==~~li~~~-==~=: 620 ~ucrsingIiome ~ $757 $107\ $28 $892~/bed 630 Clinic j $9,119 $1,290~ $339 $10,749\ /T.S.F.G.F.A. i~i~~iif~;i-=~]===:=~=~==_~~==I==:~~:= :-==_====:E========= 310 IiotellMotel ~ $2,155 $305\ $80 $2,541! / room ___.__n............._.__uuonnnn...u...._.__n.....un..........nuu.u.........un..n.......y..............nun...........u...........u.................__.nu...................................................?........n...............................nn... 812 Buildine Materials/Lumber ~ $7,057 $999~ $263 $8,318~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~!~....~!.~.~.~!~~gJ2~~.~Q.~!..~!Q~~............L............................. ..............................~........---................... ..........-..................................................................--- With Groceries j $5 311 $751l $198 $6 260j /T.S.F.G.F.A. ......___.______.___........___.............................................u................___............u___............!.......... .......................___....~...___........___..........___ ........___.......Lm......................................................... 814 Specialty Retail Center i $7,228 $1,023l $269 $8,520i /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~J.~...~.!~~::?!.~~&.P!~~Q~!..?!Q.!~~........L..............h............---......................................................................................~................................................. Without Groceries 1 $6,405 $906j $238 $7,549~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. ............nnn..nn.....nnn.......nn.nn..................u..............nn...__...........+n........n....n_n.......u.....n..n.nn...nnn........................-..-.......--.........................--.1-..............................n.........__...... 816 Hardware/Paint Stores l $9,115 $1,2901 $339 $10,744i /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~!?....N~~!.Y.!.9.~4~!!..~~P.:!~!........................L...........~lg~ ..................$..~Q?L..............~~~2. ............~ZI.??~.L!.I:?.:.~.:9.:;f..:A~............. .~~Q....~h~.P..P.~g..G.~.~!~~.............................................L...........~!.~.~ ..................~~7.L..............$.1~1. ............$..?lZ~1.l.LI.:~.:f..:G.::f..:A:.....___..... 823 Factory Outlet Center ~ $3,007 $426~ $112 $3.545~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure II column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates v as of 10/'25/99 IIr TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 3 015 (1) ~ (2) (3) ~ (4) (5) i (6) ::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::~::::~::::::::::::::::r:::::M~!~!.:::::~~~~~~~Z::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::.:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ Vehicle Bicvcle i Transit Total ~ .....................................................................................................................~Q.~!......... .........~.~~.!........h........~.~~.!........ ...........m..........~................................................. ITE LAND USE CODE/ CATEGORY i Per Unit Per Unit ! Per Unit Per Unit j Unit ...................................................000...................................................r............................. .............................T.............ooo............. ......................ooo.....r................................................ COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) ~ . ..__..........__..._uu.....__......._..n_...........nn.........-n......__n_.__....._n_nn.._n.........__n_...__nn_....n__nn...___..._n_n_u______....____...+____nn__n.......___nn..._n_.__n_n____..nn___n_....._..._n........_........_nn......._U......___u............n .~;?1ooo~~~..~..~~.!.~~~!..(~~~!..~.~~~Lj..........$J.~L.?.~~ .............~~!.~~L..............~?Q~. .........~~!.;??~JLI:?.:f..:G.:f..:A=...n........ ~}?:...IDgh.I~QY..~!'l..?!!::RQ.~.................ooo.l.................ooo.......................................L......................................................000.1................................................. Restaurant ~ $9,628 $l,36i $358 $11,349l/T.S.F.G.F.A. ...__u_nn....______________.._..____.._._nn____n__.__n...._..__n_____u_n_.__._______....__n_.h_+_U___.___nnn..___n__......__n___n.....n........_.....___....._u___n..._n....._____u..u_u__._.__n_u...__.._u_+__u...........u_..._____..u_n_...u__.______ 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) l $26,445 $3,742~ $984 $31,171l IT.S.F.G.FA. ~~~~~~.f~~i:f~~~:~B.~~!~.W.!!y.~.~~L:~..::~::~~I..~..~~~~$..!.~~~~~ ~~~~~~:~~:~~j~;.~~~[:~~~~:~~~~~::.$.~~~. .~~~~~~:~~~i.!;.~2~IZI.~~.:.f..~g~f.~;A;:~~:~~~~~~~~. .~~ooo~K.~J~.~~l~.~..Q?2.........ooo......ooo...moool..oooooo.....ooo.~~.?.~. ooo..............$.J.?:1L......m.........~~~. ............~.!l.Q.Q:?L1I.:?.:.!:.:G.:f..~A=.....ooo..... 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop \ $4,985 $705~ $185 $5,876\ I Service Stall ~:K~~~~======:::=L=d~=:=~~=:=:$1~=::$ootH1~:~tJ:~== 844 Gasoline I Service Station ~ ~ j (no Market or Car Wash) \ $9,553 $l,35t $355 $11,261\ IV.F.P. :~::::G~~~fui~Z~~iY!~~::~i~!!~~:::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..............nYIfu..~p..~y.~~~!!!;~.M~.~~.~~t...ooo......Looo........$.?!.~~~. ...........l!l;?.Q.?..l........ooo......$.~ ..........$.1Q!.~??Ll.y:f=.P.:............................. 846 GasolinelService Station i j [ ::::::::::::::(w..Z:~~!!y~::M~!~~!::~~::~~:W~~hi::::::::::::~~~i: :::::::::::::$.iji~l:::::::::::::::::~~?i. ::::::::::$.i.Q~i.i.QI:ZY..~f~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 848 Tire Store 1 $4,420 $625~ $164 $S,210l IT.S.F.G.FA. :~~Q::::~~p~~~~!:::::=::::::::::::~::::~:::::~:::::::::::::::::::r:::::~:$.!i.~:~~.::::::::::::~..i~t~L::::::::::::~~Q:::::::::ii:1j~!Ilt~~:~f~G:;f~~::::::::::::: 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) ~ $36,705 $5,194\ $1,366 $43,264\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.?~...~.~~y.=..M~~~!..~~!h.f~.~J..r~p.......L......$.~~l2~?.. ............$.;?in?.l.............$.!L.9.Q1: ..........$?1!.~1Qi.l..y:f=f:............................. 860 Wholesale Market : $1,1% $169\ $44 $1,410: IT.S.F.G.F.A. __________nn_..__nn_..._____..n_n....._n_._____...____n_.___nn_.___n_...___nn__..__n_n_n.....n_n.....n__..._.n___...______..___...__......____...._n..._________...n........__....._n.....nn_....__....._._ni"..._...__n_....n___..n.._...._.__.._nn...___ 861 Discount Cub . $7,429 $1,0511 $276 $8,756~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~~....H.~~.~..!!!!P.!.~y.~~~~.L$.~P~~.~.~!.~...L.m.......$.?{.~~ .................~.~t.................~~~~. ...........l?!.~L!.I:?.:~.:9.~~-A=............. 863 Electronics Superstore \ $8.005 $l,l33l $298 $9,435\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates vi as of 101'15/99 !If TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 4 0/5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Motor Pedestrian I :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::y~fu4~:::: --.............................................................. ::::::::I~!~::::~:I::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ___...~!~~_~_....L___:r~.~!t.... .__._________n.._.____n_________.__n________n___n_..._____________________._........_____________...L___n___G9._~!.....____ _.....___Gg.~_L__...L_____..~_Q~J.....n _______n..ill_______._.l...___n___n......___n_..___n___...________... ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY 1 Per Unit ~=~~~~~g~=~~= Per Unit ! Unit :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: =~-======l====~_======= .~9.MM~~.~!A!:!.~.~~Y:!.~_~.~._~~~~!~.Ln.L___....n.____mn.....____ .~ZQ___.ApP~.~L~!9.!:~n....n___m_..____________......_________.......___L___n.....~!_??~ $1,171 i $308 ----........$.-?lZ.??..I.JT:$..:f:.g.:f:A~----.-....-n 880 Pharmacy I Drue:store ! n....---------n....---.--..-1------..........--.........--- ___mn...J:'Y!!hQ~tQ!'!y:~~..W~4_Q~m.._.nnL-mn$.lQ!.1~?- ::::::::::::=:~~=:~:I:::::::::::::::::==:== $12,005~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~_~J.___.P.~~9':lQ~g~!Q!~___._nmn___.m___nnnm_L._____m________....mm. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: With Drive-Thru Window 1 $9,970 $1,411! $371 $11,7521/T.S.F.G.F.A. _~~Q____f.~~~._~!9..!~_n.._._.._..__nn___._._.nn______n._...nn.J__m.......n__~~.~ $1271 $33 .............$..!lQ~.QJ.lT:$._:f.:9.:f:A~......._.___. __....u...........un_......-:-.___..........___.__.......... _~~?__.Y!4.~.QnA!:~4.~._{!?J....._______........m___n....._.___n____.L...________$.~l!?:? ._____._.........$..~Q~L......._.......$.?~~. ...____.....$.Zl??~j.lT:$..:f.:9.:f:A~..n......___ 896 Video Rental Store (b) 1 $3,567 ..______.....____$.?Q.?L.....___......$._!~;?. .____.__.._..~{_?Q~ll!:.~~f.~.Q~_f.:.A.:.......___.. ~II:::!!~~z:~~~i~;::W~~~!!!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::$.~Q:~~ _.._n____...$.4'_~!____._.......$.l.!.!~ $36,185\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .__....__....__nn.nn______+.......______................___n___....-.-..... 912 Bankl Savings: Drive-In i $52,030 $7,3621 $1,936 $61,328!/T.S.F.G.F.A. :Qff!~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .nn_.______n....__.n__....".___n.........._.nn._n...._ n__n._n....._____nn....._._nn...___uu....uuunn....._.u..__..___n. n.._u.....n___......__nu..;...___u.nnnu..._u.u..... ...-----n..$.3;i631""lT:sji~G:F~A~m-....---- 710 General Office Buildine: ! $3,192 $452! $119 ?.!.~...~9._!P:..!!~~~g~~~~_~~4.~g.n........L___n....l?.!.?.~_ _....._________..$.~l?l..._______n.._..._..$..~.;? __________...$.?!_~~~LI..I~_~~f.~_Q~.f.~A_:n_......n. z.!.?__n?~~~nI~!!~!.9ffl:~.~__~~~~g._._______nLn.._.____$.~!.~??_ .....__________..~??.Lmn._.......l!:?_?. _.._......._.~!.~~LLI~.~~f.:.Q~-f.~A.:.........--- 720 Medical-Dental Office Building j $10,476 $1,482 ~ $390 $12,348\ IT.5.F.G.F.A. .z;?Q__.G9.y:~~~~!_Qffj_~_~_~~~g.uun___m.L..______$.J.~!.?.~z. $2,8281 $744 _n......$.:?_~'_??~_UT:$..:f_:9.:f._:A~._.____._..__ nn___.......n........n._..+.......n._.......__..._...... .z~l.m?!~!~nMQ!~!:.y~~~!~~..P~P!~_....mm.n.._.J__mn.~!.!.;?.~ $6,8111 $1,791 ...______$.?.~lZ:!?J_lT$._:f.:9.:f:A~....____u... ___...n_.___.....uuu......+._........n.__.._............ Z.~_?n._!!:~_:_.r9._~!..Q!#_~~...n___u...__________n___m..____m_....._...Lm...$.~1!.~?1. ....._m___$.4A~~.L.._........$.!.!.!.~z. $36,9771/T.S.F.G.F.A. ..n___.__.........n_......_+......._n_._......__.........._........n__.... 750 Office Park 1 $3,311 ....________...__$.1&~.l.____....____n_l!:?_;? $3,9031/T.S.F.G.F.A. nnn..n.._....__.__u_.._....u._.......n_.____....______n.....unn_un_....nnn...........n__+_nn__...__u____....._.___n ...n__.____._...__nnn.....+_......___n__...._n___n.__.______n...n_n_. 760 Researchl Development Center l $2,352 $333 ~ $87 $2,77t IT.S.F.G.F.A. 770 Business Park $3 700 $5241 $138 $4,361 ~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak: hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates vii as of lO/2!5/99 .. - r TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 50f5 (1) : (2) (3) j (4) (5) i (6) ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::M~i~i:::::~~4.~~!P:~L::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: \ Vehicle Bicvcle i Transit Total j Cost Cost Cost TlF ITE.iANI)'USE..COi5EIcATE"(X)Ry....T.i.>e~..U~j:t".. ....Pe~..Unit"..!....Per.UIrit".. .....P.e~.uirit".I...................uIrit.................. .........................................................................................................r.........................................................."]"...........................................................r................................................ PORT/lNDUSTRIAL : . .~........_.uu______....___u.____u..__......__..._____.....u...__._n.............___n_...n__u....:___................_u....__nu___...u_n_u__....______..+__n._______...___.........___.....__.............__u...........___u....u...____...._....................... .Q;?Q...I~~.I~~................................................l.............$.?!.~.?? .................~L................$.1Q~. ............$.~l~~.l.fI~~.:f..:9.~f~A~............. Q~.Q....P..~!~LR!4~..w~.th..~.~..~.~.~~~...............1............$.llQ;?'~. .................$.11?\.....................$..~.~ .............$.ll.??~LL.P.~~K.~.P..~~~...... itI:i~1!!~&~~::+-~-~~$o;-=:~~~;t~-=::~,:::~=$o~~ifil~~~= 130 Industrial Park l $2,018 $286: $75 $2,379\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .__n.._..._nn.___nnnuu.....___...._n__....__....u__...___.....______...___...._____..._______....___..._.____.._._____...._....___..____.....____....__.u.._y...______._.___.....____.________....__n.....----....----...----.....---......--...------...---....-----..---- 140 Manufacturing ~ $1,108 $157j $41 $1,306j IT.S.F.G.F.A. i~:~;~~~~~~=:=::=:=::~:+::=$:jm::==i}~~i:=:=iiL:::::~t1t~:~:~~1:==: 170 Utilities (b) $142 $20: $5 $1671/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure II column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates viii as of lOj'J!jj99 111" CITY OF WOODBURN Transportation Impact Fee (TIP) Update Methodology Report and Rate Study 1.0 INTRODUCfION The City of Woodburn implemented a Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) for all new development in the City occurring after January 1, 1994. Because the City's Transportation System Plan was not yet completed at that time, the TIF amounts were based on the expected costs of providing road facilities at the existing Levels of Service (LOS), rather than on the costs of specific capital improvement projects. In June 1996, Kittleson and Associates, Inc., completed a 20-year Transportation System Plan (Plan) for the City of Woodburn which identifies roadway, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, access management, and other transportation needs in accordance with the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Transportation Planning Rule, OAR 660 Division 12. The Plan includes an assessment of existing conditions of the transportation system, an assessment of highway and transit system alternatives, identification of potential financing mechanisms, and an evaluation of alternate pedestrian and bicycle facility and Transportation Demand Management (IDM) strategies. The Plan also includes recommended facilities, standards, and improvements for roadway, transit, pedestriaI\. bicycle, golf cart, and rail transportation. Several of the transportation system projects included in the Plan have already been completed, and additional transportation capital facility needs have been identified by the City since the time the Plan was adopted. A portion of these facility needs are for capacity-increasing capital improvements which will accommodate growth, and which may be funded with revenues from a TIF. This report presents the methodology used to update the City's TIF to include growth-related motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Section 2.0 presents authority and background information including (1) legislative authority for the TIF; (2) an explanation of "improvement fee" and "reimbursement fee" SDC's; (3) requirements and options for credits, exemptions and discounts; (4) guiding concepts for SDC's and (5) alternative methodology approaches. The methodology used to develop the updated TIF is discussed in Section 3.0, and the rate calculations are included in Section 4.0. Don Ganer & Associates 1 as of lO/'l5/99 if 20 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A: Legislative Authority The City's TIF is a System Development Charge (SDC) authorized by the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314). The purpose of this Act was to "...provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...". In 1993, SB 122 was passed to include additional statutory provisions. Together, these pieces of legislation require local governments who adopt SDC's to: . enact SDC's by ordinance or resolution; . develop a methodology outlining how the SDC's were developed; . adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to designate capital improvements that can be funded with SDC revenues; . provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of "qualified public improvements"; . separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC revenues; . develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and . use SDC revenues only for capital expenditures (operations and maintenance uses are prohibited). B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of SDC's: (1) "improvement fee" SDC's, and (2) "reimbursement fee" SDC's. "Improvement fee" SDC's may be charged for new or expanded capacity-increasing capital improvements needed to serve growth. The City's current TIF is an "improvement fee" SDC. "Reimbursement fee" SDC's may be charged for the costs of existing capital facilities if "excess capacity" is available to accommodate growth. Revenues from "reimbursement fee" SDC's may be used on any capital improvement project, including major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements funded with "reimbursement fee" SDC's do not need to increase capacity. The City's water and sewer SDC's include "reimbursement fee" components, but the TIF does not. Don Caner & Associates 2 as of 10/25/99 T C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts (1) Credits A credit is a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific development. The Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the construction of a "qualified public improvemenf' which (1) is required as a condition of development approval, (2) is identified in the CIP, and (3) either is not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or is located on or contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project. The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied against an SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a transportation improvement can only be used for a credit for a transportation SDC), and may be granted only for the cost of that portion of an improvement which exceeds the minimum standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular project. For multi-phase projects, any excess credit may be applied against SDC's that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project. For "reimbursement fee" SDC's, credit must also be given for future property tax payments, such as repayment of bonded indebtedness, used to fund the "excess capacity" facilities for which the reimbursement fee SDC is charged. In addition to these required credits, the City may, if it so chooses, provide a greater credit, establish a system providing for the transferability of credits, provide a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the capital improvement plan, or provide a share of the cost of an improvement by other means. None of the City's current SDC's include credit provisions beyond those required by law. Don Ganer & Associates 3 as of lO/2!5/99 - f (2) Exemptions The City may "exempf' specific types of development from the requirement to pay SDC's. Exemptions reduce SDC revenues and, therefore, they either increase the need for funding from other sources, such as bonds, or reduce / delay the completion of transportation projects. The City's current SDC's provide limited exemptions for alterations, expansion or replacement of an existing dwelling unit where no additional dwelling units are created; the construction of accessory buildings or structures which will not create additional dwelling units and which do not create additional demands on the City's capital improvements; the issuance of a permit for a mobile home on which applicable system development charges have previously been made as documented by receipts issued by the City for such prior payment; and development with vested rights. (3) Discounts For "improvement fee" SDC's, the City may "discounf' the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of growth-related improvements to be funded with SDCs. For "reimbursement fee" SDCs, the City may "discounf' the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion of "extra-capacity" facilities for which the reimbursement fee SDC will be collected, or by making other adjustments in the fee. Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that must come from other sources, such as bonds, that may be needed to meet Level of Service requirements. All of the City's current SDC s include discounts. D. Guiding Concepts In addition to the requirements of the Oregon SDC Act and SB 122, court cases from Oregon and other states provide additional guidance for the methodology to be used in developing SDC's. Don Ganer & Associates 4 as of 10/25/99 1f (1) "Essential Nexus" Requirement In a 1987 case, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court established that government agencies must show that an "essential nexus" (e.g. reasonable connection) exists between a project's impacts and any dedication requirements. For SDC's the "essential nexus" requirement means there must be a reasonable connection between the nature of the development and the facilities for which the SDCs are charged. For transportation SDC's the essential nexus is met for any development that connects to the transportation system. (2) "Rough Proportionali1;y" Requirement In a landmark 1994 decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard, the u.s. Supreme Court cited the requirement for "rough proportionality" between the requirements placed on a developer by government and the impacts of the development. Case law is conflicting on the question of whether Dolan applies to SDC's. However, to avoid controversy, the City's TIF update is structured so that the Dolan test is satisfied. The concept of rough proportionality is applied by insuring that new growth is not required to pay an amount beyond a level "roughly proportionate" to the new development's impacts on facilities through the use of nationally recognized standards for levels-of-service and trip generation. E. Alternative Methodology Approaches There are three basic approaches used to develop SDC's; IIstandards-driven", "improvements-driven", and "combination I hybrid". Don Ganer & Associates 5 as of 10/25/99 J (1) Standards-Driven Approach The "standards-driven" approach is based on the application of level-of-service (LOS) standards (ie., A, B, C, etc.) for facilities. Facility capacity is determined by applying the LOS Standards to the projected future use of the facilities. SDC- eligible amounts are calculated based on the costs or value of capacity needed or available to serve growth. The "standards-driven" approach may be used to develop "improvement fee" SDC's and! or "reimbursement fee" SDC s, and works best where LOS Standards have been identified and! or adopted as part of a comprehensive plan or facilities master planning process. The City's current TIF was developed using the standards-driven approach. (2) Improvements-Driven Approach The "improvements-driven" approach is based on a specific list of planned capacity-increasing capital improvements. The portion of each project that is attributable to growth is determined, and the SDC-funded costs are calculated by dividing the total costs of growth-related projects by the projected increase in units of facility use (i.e., trips, persons, etc.). This approach may be used to develop "improvement fee" SDC's, and works best where a detailed project list has been developed and the benefits of projects can be apportioned between growth and current residents. (3) Combination I Hybrid Approach The combination/ hybrid-approach includes elements of both the "improvements-driven" and "standards-driven" approaches. LOS standards may be used to develop a list of planned capacity-increasing projects. The growth-related portions of projects can then be used as the basis for determining the SDC-funded. costs. This approach may be applied in developing "improvement fee" SDC's and works best where a list of capacity needs has not recently been developed and where sufficient data is available to identify levels- of-service. Don Ganer &:. Associates 6 as of 10/'15/99 r 3.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY A. SDC Basis and Justification The "combination-hybrid" approach has been used to update the City of Woodburn's TIF. A list of planned capacity-increasing motor vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit transportation capital improvement projects was analyzed to identify: 1) the modal split (motor vehicle, pedestrian/bicycle, and/ or transit), 2) the growth-related portion (based on application of the City's adopted transportation Level of Service standards), and 3) the local benefit of each project. The resulting SDC-eligible project costs were then divided by the estimated total number of new person-trips expected during the planning period, yielding the cost per new person-trip for each travel mode. The methodology used for the Transportation Impact Fee is for an "improvement fee" only and establishes the required "essential nexus" between a project's impacts and the SDC through the use of trip generation data for specific land uses. Trip Generation (6th Ed., 1997) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to estimate the number of new motor vehicle trips generated by each type of new development. The SDC to be paid by new development meets the "rough proportionality" requirement because it is based on the impact of each specific development on the transportation facilities for which the SDC is charged. The TIF is based on the impacts of new trips, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact (e.g. new trips) a development is expected to have on the City's transportation system. B. Future Trip Projections Current projections indicate that W oodbum will see a significant increase in the average number of motor vehicle trips either beginning or ending in the City between 1999 and 2020. EMME/2 traffic model data for the City maintained by Kittleson and Associates indicates that new daily vehicle trips will increase by approximately 32,832, as shown in Table 3.1, page 8. Don Ganer & Associates 7 as of 10/'15/99 f The methodology used for the City of Woodburn's TIF update required estimates of motor vehicle occupancy, pedestrian/bicycle trips, and transit ridership. The Oregon D~partment of Transportation (ODOT) maintains average motor vehicle occupancy rates for Oregon cities with populations above 10,000. ODOT's average motor vehicle occupancy rate for Woodburn is 1.54 persons/vehicle. Transit trips were estimated at 2% of vehicle occupancy, based on ridership data included in the 1996 Transportation System Plan. Pedestrian and bicycle trip rate data for various land uses is not available, so estimates of 5% to 10% of vehicle trips are often used by planners and traffic engineers. The City of Portland's traffic model estimates pedestrian and bicycle trips at an average of approximately 8% of vehicle person-trips. Because Woodburn is not as urbanized as Portland, 5% of vehicle person-trips was used to estimate pedestrian and bicycle person trips in the City. These estimates were used to calculate the total average number of person-trips generated per vehicle trip: 1.65; so for every ten motor vehicle trips, an average of 15.4 persons travel by motor vehicle, and an additional 1.1 persons travel as pedestrians, by bicycle, or by transit. The projected increases in average daily motor vehicle trips and person-trips are shown in Table 3.1, below. TABLE 3.1 PROJECTED GROWTH IN AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT) 1999 - 2020 Trip Category Motor vehicle trips 1999 ADT 71,228 2020 ADT Increase 104,060 32,832 Motor vehicle person-trips 109,691 160,252 50,561 (at 1.54 persons/vehicle) Pedestrian/ bicycle person-trips 5,485 8,013 2,528 (at 5% of motor vehicle person-trips) Transit person-trips 2.194 3.205 1.011 (at 2% of motor vehicle person-trips) Total person-trips 117,370 171,470 54,100 Don Ganer & Associates 8 as of 10/'25/99 11' C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC Capital improvement projects included in the City's adopted 1996 Transportation System Plan which have not yet been completed were reviewed and considered for TIF funding. Each uncompleted project which includes capacity-increasing capital improvements on collector or arterial roads for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, or transit facilities has been included in the TIF. The list of capital improvement projects and the SDC-eligible portion of costs is included in Table 3.2, pages 12 - 14. For each project, the following information is presented: 1) Name/Description - a brief description of the project scope (i.e., capacity only improvement, capacity/design improvement, etc.) and location. Some projects include improvements that will benefit more than one mode of travel, such as motor vehicle and pedestrian/ bicycle travel, while others benefit only one mode of travel. 2) Project Cost - the total estimated cost for the project (1999 dollars). 3) Federal/State/Other Funding Sources - the estimated portion (percentage) of project funds from federal, state, or other sources. 4) Net Local Transportation Funding - the estimated portion (dollars) of project funds that will come from local transportation sources (including TIF). 5) Capacity Portion - the estimated capacity-increasing portion of the project. 6) Motor Vehicle Costs a) Motor Vehicle Benefit -the estimated portion of the project that will serve motor vehicles, as opposed to pedestrians, bicycles, or transit. Don Ganer & Associates 9 as of 10/25/99 r b) Motor Vehicle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve future growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies were determined using the following formula: Current Volume minus Current Capacity Future Capacity minus Current Capacity c) Motor Vehicle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. The percentage of through trips was estimated at 49% based on EMME/2 traffic model data for the City. d) Motor Vehicle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Motor Vehicle Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-motor vehicle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. 7) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Costs a) Pedestrian/Bicycle Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will serve pedestrians and bicycles, as opposed to motor vehicles or transit. b) Pedestrian/Bicycle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for off-road facilities were determined based on the following formula: Future Papulation (2020) minus Current Population (1999) Future Population (2020) Deficiencies for sidewalks and on-road bicycle facilities were determined using the following formula: Don Ganer & Associates 10 as of 10/25/99 :r Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads Without Sidewalks Total Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads c) Pedestrian/Bicycle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. An estimate of 5% of all pedestrian/ bicycle trips being "through trips" (neither beginning nor ending in the City) was used for collectors and arterials. d) Pedestrian/Bicycle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Pedestrian/ Bicycle Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-pedestrian/bicycle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. 8) Transit Costs a) Transit Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will serve transit users, as opposed to motor vehicles, pedestrians, or bicycles. b) Transit Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for transit facilities were determined based on the following formula: Future Population (2020) minus Current Population (1999) Future Papulation (2020) c) Transit Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not begin or end in the City. 100% of transit trips are considered to be local. d) Transit New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of each project that may be included in the Transit Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-transit benefit, non- growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost. Don Ganer & Associates 11 as of 10/25/99 1r TABLE 3.2 TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects pagel : Est. Total lFedlState/! Net Local : : Motor !MY Futurei MY Local \ MY New see ~~6~~I~10~~_=:1~!:1W~~kt:1~1~1~l~l~l 1-5 1/2 Partial Cloverleaf _ Construction ; $4 500 oooi 66%1 $1 530 oooi 100%~ 85%! 100%1 61%l $793305 Park Awnue _ UncoIn St. to Hardcastle Ave. ! $58530: 0%; $58530: 100%: o%i 0%1 0%; SO West Mill Creek Corridor _ Mil Creek to UG8 ! $515064: 80%: $103013i 100%1 0%; 0%; O%! SO ;~:7=i~~~'~~2Ef~:i~~~~/~~;~:f=-;:E~:~t~~i<~~: TOTALS i $65,56Z388! j $30.569.772: . i ~ ! $9.014370 Don Ganer & Associates 12 as of 10/25/99 J TABLE 3.2 TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects JXlge2 Front Street _ Cleveland St. To Parr Rd. 1 $117 0601 0%; $117 0601 100%; 100%; 30%1 95%; $33 362 West Mill Creek Corridor _ Mil Creek to UGB : $5150641 80%: $103013: 100%: 100%: 37%1 95%: $36209 ~~~~.;~~~-~~~~~t~:~~~i~~~~j:~~~~:~~;.r~:~:-~I~-~~[:~i~i=-~~~ :~~~~~~::<~ii~~:~~~1~Q~~~~~~~~i:::::::::::::::::::::::::J::::::::$.i~j=-1:~o.l::::::::::::io.~i:::::::$.~i~:9.~?j:::::::::io.~l:::::::::::::::::9.~j:::::::::::::Q~l:::::::::::~~~l:::::::::::::::::::ii TOTALS ': $65,567. 388! : $30 569,77Zj : : : ! $1 153 51 Z Don Ganer & Associates 13 as of 10/25/99 l TABLE 3.2 TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement Projects page 3 ::::::::::=::::::::=::::::::::::::::::::=:::==:::::=:::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::l:f:J~~t:::~~:::::::i::::~tr~~~::::j:9!P~=::iI!.i!;~:rr~)t:~[~:~j::~~~iLi~~~ m___nm_;nm._.mmnm ~iect Title __m_._mm_nn__mnm___fnm~nn__f Fundina (%) ~__ f>>ndina (SQP9rtion (%); IlItnefit (%) ;Benefit (%l('ortion (%); _A1m!lmt.__ ~:~:~;~~==~i~::::T~;~li~:ii!<>L::~iij,.+=~;;i,~~L::::,~t==:~t=::~:::::~t::::-~ 1-5 1/2 Partial Cloverleaf _ Construction ~ $4 500 000~ 66%! Sl 530 000; 100%~ O%~ 0%' O%i SO Parr Road _ School to UGB ! $235 000; O%~ $235 000; 25%; o%i 0%1 0%1 $0 Front Street _ Cleveland St. To Parr Rd. ,$117060; 0%; $117 060~ 100%1 0%: 0%: 0%1 SO West Mill Creek Corridor _ Mil Creek to UGB i $515 064~ 80%! $103 on! 100%! O%~ O%i O%~ SO :~~liEl~;~;l::=~~:L~~;:~~:~~~;=~:tf_:~:t~~;~E~:t~~~: TOTALS ) $65 5673881 ! $30.569 7721 ; , ) ! $311848 Don Ganer & Associates 14 as of 10/25/99 I!I'" 4.0 CALCULATION OF lHE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE The Transportation Impact Fee is calculated using a series of formulas which, when completed, result in the SDC rates for each type of new development. These formulas: a) identify the cost per new person-trip for SDC-eligible capital improvements for each mode of travel (motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit) b) calculate the net number of new person-trips for each type of land use, c) adjust trip rates to allow for differences in trip lengths, d) identify the motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit growth costs per unit of development, and e) calculate the Transportation Impact Fee. A. Fonnula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip by Mode of Travel The cost per new person-trip for each mode of travel (motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, or transit) is determined by dividing the total cost of SDC-eligible projects for each mode (from Table 3.2, pages 12 - 14) by the number of new daily person-trips for each mode (from Table 3.1, page 8) using the following formula: 1. SDC-Eligible Project Costs New Person- Trips Generated = Cost Per New Person-Trip The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.1, below. TABLE 4.1 COST PER NEW PERSON-TRIP BY MODE OF TRAVEL (1999 - 2020) SDC-Eligible Projected New Cost Per New Mode of Travel Project Costs Person-Trips Person-Trip Motor Vehicle $ 9,014,370 .- 50,561 = $ 178.29 Pedestrian/ Bicycle $ 1,153,512 2,528 $ 456.29 Transit $ 311,848 1,011 $ 308.45 Don Ganer & Associates 15 as of 10/25/99 J B. Fonnula 2: Net New Person-Trips (by Type of Land Use) Th,e net new person-trips generated per day is calculated for each type of land use using the following formula: 2. Est. Total Person-Trips x Percent New Trips = Net New Person-Trips The Estimated Total Person-Trips is determined by multiplying the motor vehicle trip rate for each type of land use by the estimated number of person-trips per vehicle trip (See Section 3B, page 7). The primary data source for trip rates included in this methodology is Trip Generation (6th Edition) by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE). Trip Generation contains rates for different land uses based on trip generation studies conducted nationwide, and provides the base data of unadjusted counts of trips generated by various types of land use. The trip rates included in Trip Generation are based on all traffic entering or leaving a primary location, and do not account for diverted ''linked'' trips or trips by traffic that is passing by and interrupts a "primary" trip between two other locations. These "pass- by" and ''linked'' trips are not "new" because they would occur regardless of development activity. "New" trips are often based on the assumption that all trips from residential land uses are new trips (therefore, percentage = 100%), and all other land uses are evaluated to reflect the percentage of their trips that are "new" versus the remainder (which are "pass-by" trips). No land use category has greater than 100% new trips, but some categories may have less (i.e., various retail categories range from 47% to 77% new trips). The percentages used to account for pass-by trips in this methodology are based on an analysis of data included in Trip Generation (5th Edition). Table 4.2 (pages 17 - 21) lists the number of new person-trips generated for each land use category, using Formula 2. Column 1 lists land use categories and their ITE code numbers. Column 2 contains either the Weekday Average or Weekday PM Peak Trip Rate from Trip Generation. Column 3 identifies the estimated total person-trips generated, based on 1.65 person-trips per vehicle trip. Column 4 shows the percentage of trips that are new, as opposed to pass-by or linked trips. Column 5 is the result of multiplying column 3 by column 4, producing the net number of new person-trips generated per day by each land use category. Don Ganer &: Associates 16 as of 10/'25/99 - J TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) . ITE Est. Net ::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::M:Q~2i.::::::::::::I2!~::::::r::::::~:::::::::::::::::::N~~:::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::~:~:::::::::::::::: i Vehicle Person- i New Person- :=~~~~~~~=~~~i~~~~:-:::~~=J~~~~~:=:~~~:~::~~:::~~~~:~~~:~: .~JQ...~~~.~__f.~YJ~~~4~~..Q.~p~~.~L.--i---......-------.?:??. ...___.......J~.:z~L..J.QQ%. ....__.......___....J.?:z:~ ..l.4~~lli!!g.~.t...... 220 Apartment ~ 6.63 10.94~ 100% 10.94 f dwellin2: unit .?~Q....~~~!.~~~~~.G.~~~.~rr~~~~.~~~.....j...._____...__...?:.~~ ..___......______2:.~?1....1.Q.9.%. ___.....____.............~.:f?Z. .IA~~lli!!g.~~......___ .?~Q__..M~~~~~.~__H~~.~~K.c~..~.~~.Lj....______..____.1::.~1. .___....._____..z:.~~LJ.Q.9.%. ......__........________?:~~.l.~~.~lli!!g.~!...._____ 260 Recreation Home i 3.16 5.211 100% 5.21 f dwelling unit __.__.___n...................__n__n.....__n.......___.......nn.__......._n..................nn.........__n_nn..........___..___n......n__nn_n._n........nnnn.........n_.....n_nnn__.__n_nn....._.__n__n....___........_______..._________....__ RECREATIONAL ! {ii-~~~~~~::-::-=:=::=:=:I~];~ ==~:1~iH~ ===:=]:~~i:~:=:~====:: .~l~....~~.P.~Q~~lBY..f.~~__Q?t..____.______...L__________....Q:.~~ _____._..___....Q:.~L._..zz:%. ....._____...._.........9.:?.Q. .L~~..~!!~.___._.....___.... 4?Q___M~..________...__________.______......______....__...______....__________.l.-----.--........~.:~~. ............_..:!:~.~.L.J.QQ%. .....__.___.....________.~:.~~ .lp.~!.!_h........__________......... 430 Golf Course : 35.74 58.971 100% 58.97 fhole .nn.........____n..._.u_unu...__n....u___.....___un_u..._n_....__...n......_u_u_n__...._+n___n......_n......nn.. ...nn.................nn.....n_u.u........ .....nu........_n_....n..nn.. ._..n......u_.....u__unn._u_..._...___.... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) ~ 1.25 2.06! 100% 2.06 f tee ~...M~!jp.!!!PQ~~.~~~__~~~!Y._...___m.__.......L.___.....___2Q:~.~ ..m.._J.1:2..J.~L.J.9.Q.%. _m.....___...J1.?_:1~. .l!~.~!Y_____m........____....... ~___.MQ~.~..Th~.~!~~..~LQ~!..~~.~~~...m..J..__..__...?:?:Q:.QQ .......m.~~:.QQL..!.Q.9.%. ..m.............}~~.:Q.Q. .1..f?q.~.~.~__..m........______....__ 444 Movie Theater w f matinee : 153.33 252.99l 100% 252.99 f screen :!?.~....~~.~~.!..Y!~.~.Q..yQ~~.~f.~.Q!!~ry..~)L.--.m...J.~.:~. m.......__..~.?.:1~.L...1.QQ%. ....m.......__......?:?:.1.~ ..I..I:.~.:f.:9:.~:A:........__..... ~Q.__A:~~.~~!!!~~!lTh~.~~..P~~__...m....._.___.l...__........z?_:Z~. m......J.??.:QQLJ.QQ%_ ....._.......____J.?:?:QQ .L.~q.~._.................._........... 491 Tennis Courts : 31.04 51.221 100% 51.22 f court ._un..u._._____._n...u_n_n......un.....n......_nn_n..u.n_u......._.........._.....n_...__.._nn........n........__u .....n.......u_...........+....._nn......... ....___n...n............n__....... ........._......_n................__nn........ .~~.?....~~~9.~~!..Q~.~.....__.............h....................__..........j..............1:Q:.?~ ..............~~...~?L...!.Q.9.%. ......................~~.:~Z. .1..~.~~.!!m..........__............... 494 Bowling Allev \ 33.33 54.99! 100% 54.99 flane 495 Recreational Community Center 22.88 37.75! 100% 37.75 fT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 17 as of 10/25/99 :r TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 2 of 5 .................................................(11................................................L..........(?:t......... ...........(~L.......L......(1:L... ............J?L........... ......................(~2..................... ..........................,...............................................................................!.........DJ;;.......... Est. ~ Net ..~.___...__........._....._.;...n__...._.u.._u no.........n............................... ............................................---.................. ..........................................................................................................L....M~!.~!'..... Total \ % New ..........__.....__....__n...+.nn................ nno....n___............._........... .....n....nnn....._...__......___.......__... ~ Vehide Person- i New Person- TI].~~..Y?g.GQQ~L~~~9Q~X.....P;:!'!R..R~.!~.. Tri ~ Tri T' ....................Y~!................... ::::::::::=i:::~: ...............!'!~........... no.u_.._..nn..._u_.._________._ ...___.....n__..u....n_______....._......_______. iNsiififfioNAi/MEDICA:i".................T........................... .?QLMW.~..~~~.........................................................L.............J.:?~. 2.94: 100% 2.94 .l.~.~P~~y~~................. n_nnn...un...n..._....,;......._......_..... ...__on.....___............_.......... .??Q...~!~~~.~!.~..?.~~~L......................................L..............J.:.Q.?: ...............J:.~~l...JQ9..%. 1.68 .l.~~~.~.~!........................ ..____on___n__n....____...__....._ 522 Middle I Junior High School ! 1.45 2.39~ 100% 2.39 I student :?.~.Q...B!g:h..~~~.~L.......................................................L............J.:??. .................~.:?:?.l...J.QQ~. 2.95 ..!..~.~~~~!.......m.............. ___u..a..o......o..n......._._.'" ~.J~~!LGQ~~~..~~JJ~g~m...........L..m.......J.:?~. ............m..~.:~1...JQQ~. 2.54 I~~~~~!........................ ...nno..__.._..__..___________.... .??Q....Y~y..~~.~!YLGQn~g.~.......m.............................Ln.............?::.~.~ ...............J:.~~!...J9.9..%. 3.93 l.~~~~.~~...m.................. __no.._...____..___________.._._.... .?~Q....Gh~~.....mn........m...m....m....m...............................L....m......n~)J 15.03: 100% 15.03 .LI:~:f:.G.:~:.A:............ _n_n__n.._n..n__..___..~_..._.___n__..n__ ..__..nnn_n__u.nn_..n__..___ 565 Dav Care Center I Preschool \ 4.52 7.461 100% 7.46 I student ??g...~.~~!'.~....m..........m...................m....n.........mm.........L....m.....~.:QQ. ..............~~.J9..L.J.QQ~. 89.10 .l.I~~.:f.:Q~f~A:............. .___on..__n________.._____..__.... ~J.9...H~~1?~!.~.m........m...mn...m...m...m....m....m...n.........L............!!.:??. ...m......J~.:~.L.J.QQ~. 19.42 ..!..p..~.~...m...m..m...m............ ____._n_n__n____n_._____.._____ 620 Nursing Home \ 2.61 4.31\ 100% 4.31 Ibed =:==~-~:::::::::=:::=:::\:==='~ ::::=~~~~=~= 51.89 lI:.?:.f.:.G.:~.:~:............ ____un_n____...n__n________._.._ n.............___...__n........_n. __nno.n__u..._n____.._..___.._....__....___. COMMERCIAL/SERVICES ! ~.l.Q...H~.!.~U.M~!~!....n....................................m............L..............~:.~~. .............J~.:?~L......?'Z~. 10.46 ..!..!~.~~............................. ..n................................. ~J~...~~~g..M~!~P.:~~.!..!:.~p..~!........mm..l......m..J?:?.l. ::::::~::~:::=:~~~:=L:::~:==:~ 50.45 .!..!:~.:f.:Q:f~A:............. .~!~.nf!'.~.~.-:-.~!~~gJ?i~.~~.~!..~!~!~m........L.......................... no...___n..._._"._"_"__.U._"O .....n.............................. ................-.........---...---..---....-.. .......m....~!!h..G.!~~!'!.~~..__...m....m...m...................n....mL.........1&:~.~ 77.48~ 49% 37.97 .f.I.:?:.f.:.G.:~.:~~............ ........---....--.........-.+.................... ........--.-.....--................-.. 814 Specialty Retail Center j 40.67 67.11! 77% 51.67 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.1.~n.f.!~~?!.~~gJ?!~~~~!..?!~.!~~.....mL.......................... ::::::::::::::i~;~L:::::~2~: ............--...................... ...........u.......__..........__.....__......... .............W!th~}!!..G!Q~-~!'!~~.......m...........n..................l.............~.:~~. 45.79 ..l.!:~.:f..:Q:.f.:A:............. ..n..__.....__.....__...._....._.. 816 Hardware/Paint Stores 1 51.29 84.631 77% 65.16 IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~!?...~~~ry:LG.~~~~..G~~!~.!....mn..nn........jm....m....;?.~~.Q.~ 59.53! 77% 45.84 .IT:.~:f.:.q:.f..:~:......m... ..n.........__.........n..~...............-..... n....d....n....._.................. .~~Q.m$.hQ1?P!P.:gJ~.~!!!~!:......m..mm..mm.mm.............L.....m.m~~2.~ .........m..zQ=.~?L.....~2.~. 34.70 .1..I.:~=.~:.Q.:f..:A:............ .............................................. 823 Factorv Outlet Center ! 26.59 43.87i 49% 21.50 IT.5.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 18 as of 10/25/99 r TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 3 of 5 . (1) \ (2) (3) i (4) (5) (6) m.....m......____.m__...._m..__mm.._____...__m.___m_..m____..-m.....-----.-------....r-....--.Iffi.........- --...-...E~t~--.-....r..----.....m..... -.........--.N~t.m....-m ....----......--.....-.-....-----.......----.--... n.~.u__n.._.____.n__-.n._______.____._._____nd________.____..n___n_u____n...__nn_...______..-:--_____............___...__.. .___....n..u...u...____..:.......__......__... .._____.n...____...........___..... ____n..._____________.....__...____....__....____ 1 Motor Total 1 % New ._mm___.._____..m_..__m..._m....__....__m_.._m_...._......__._.....m...._.__._....m....J__._y~~~-~.... ._..~~~Q.~:...l__.N.~~... __m..~~~Q_~:._....._ m......m__._mm.....__..._.._..___m...._ .m__!:-~__y~._GQP~!.G!.\~9QgX.m-I..I!!I?--~!~- ....-.-Ip.P~..-m1--.Ip.R~-- _m..___.__I.~p~__..._____. .._m___..___m..!:!.~!...m_....m..._ COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) 1 :~~f::Qi~tr:~~~~~~:~~::(~Q!:~:~~i::::I:::::::::::::~2.~~~: :::::::::::i~~~:!::::::::?J..%: :::::::::::::::::::ilI:i.~ ::lI~~~~~9~f.A;':::::::::::: .~~~.__lligh.I~Qy.~!'t..?.!!.-:-.P.~~.__m__.mm___...l___....__.._...___....000... m__....__....____....__._.1..__..m_......._. ._____....000_000_..000._....__....._ _......_m_....m.....___....m....__..___m_ Restaurant j 130.34 215.06i 54% 116.13 IT.S.F.G.FA. u___n._..___nnnnn..__.__..._______.__________..._______n_____nn.ouu......n.....___n__.______........_....._____n.__..... __nnn_.....__nnn__..__io-..__n_......_..... ____.._.._.....__........___....___.. ..__..u____....._oo_._.n_u______...__..~oooo_ 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) 1 716.00 1181.401 27% 318.98 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~~:J:~~:~=)=:j:=it~:::::l~~L~l::=Jl~~iiU~~:::=: 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop! 40.00 66.00\ 54% 35.64 I Service Stall .~_.._A~!~~Q.~M~__?~!'Y.!~.~__~~.~!~!...(P_L..___:_...__m__...m1::_9.1_ nm._______.___~:_~~l--..-]?.%- ..__m....____._..______?_:~. .lI:.?=_f.=_Q:.1_:A::..___._..._. .!?1:1.__~~~..G~__?~~~___.nm__..___...______._____.___..__m_...__.n.[_...__._._..._~Z_:_?Q m__..__...__~l:.~~L..__Z?.%. _mm..._______..___~Z:_~_ .IT..?.:f.:.Q_:!.:A::...__...___ 844 Gasoline I Service Station i 1 (no Market or Car Wash) j 168.56 278.121 49% 136.28 IV.F.P. :~:::Q~~:~~~j:~~iY!~~::~!~~9.!i::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::: (With Convenience Market) \ 162.78 268.59! 49% 131.61 IV.F.P. ________.______oo..n_oo....n_.~__oo__~n_____.~___....__n.__.noooo_._n...__oo_n.u_n__...oonu._._,,_______.____...___.___..nn_ ___n_n_____..._oo_._n_n_.+___n___.____..__n_ _..._u____..u______nn_...______~._._ _____oo_______._.____n._________u____~___...~_ 846 Gasoline I Service Station j ! n___u..._..._____.__._____..n____.___n_.n_____...._...._n___...._____..._.____.._u_......_.__n_u_n__.._.___n....u__..._.__._..__ .._n___~_..______._n__oo.ooi...---.u---.nu-...- .....n_u__......__n_____"."___". ___._________n_...__..____________u..___________ (W IConv. Market and Car Wash) 152.84 252.19j 49% 123.57 IV.F.P. 848 Tire Store . 24.87 41.041 77% 31.60 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~Q:::~~p~~~~~!:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::jji~i: :::::::::::i~~~~~[::::::::~~: ::::::::::::::::::::::~~:~i ::ZI~~~f.;9~f.~A~:::::::::::: 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) j 737.99 1217.681 43% 523.60 IT.S.F.G.F.A. _~?~..__G~~y..:..M.~~~!.!.Y~ili..!~~LP.~p...----t.-.-n...~:P.Q _.....____.~2?.._?:21-...-.-~-%. __m_.....__...._}~_:~Z. .lY.:_!...r..:..___..._._._...._....._____ 860 Wholesale Market \ 6.73 11.10! 77% 8.55 IT.S.F.G.FA. ___n_______u____._..u___________._u_n____.__n.______unn__.___n__.._oon..n....__.u.n__..._n__.__..__n....nn_.____nn.. .___..._________._.....___..0(-___..______.....___ 00...________..___.__.____.____....___ ...__.n_n_..........n_.___________...____..oo_ 861 Discount Club \ 41.80 68.971 77% 53.11 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~_~.....!:!~!P.:~..~P!.~Y.~~~~!..?~p_~~!~.!~_.l--...........~?:Q?. ...........__?z.:~.~.L____.T!..%. ...._____......__.....1:1::?.;?. ..I..!:?_:~.:G:f:!.\:.....___..._. 863 Electronics Superstore ! 45.04 74.32! 77% 57.22 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 19 as of 10/'25/99 11" TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 4 oj 5 . (1) i (2) (3) 1 (4) (5) (6) .u__n_n__...__u..._n___.....__n__nn__u..___nuu____n_.................._............_.________6........_.._____......._.___ __........__...04..._______..;....__.....____..... ..._..____n...............___n..... ..___.._.n______......_.__......_____........_._ ! ITE Est. l Net ....u.unn.__...__nnnnn.......n........_nnnn........__n.........._n__.____.................:.............____.__........ ........._nn......._n_n.i--n.........nn.... ..__n.__n_.............._n........ ......_n_...........____.......______.........__ l Motor Total 1 % New !iJ;J~Pjj~~~QP~i9\TIi9Q~i=lfr:~~::~f~:li~~=i:i::=jj~=:= COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : . :~ZQ:::App~~!::~!9!i::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::l::::::::::::::~;~ :::::::::::!Q~~~r:::::::~~: ::::::::::::::::::::::~~~j~: :ZI:~~~:~~9:~fJ~::::::::::::. 880 Pharmacy I Drugstore: ~ Without Drive-Thru Window l 90.06 148.60i 49% 72.81 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~f::rh~~!;Yi:~g~!:~!~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l:::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~:::::::::::: ___..______.._~~_!h_p~y~::~.~~4~~.____________...____.L...______...~~:.l.~ __......___1.~A~!....._._~~_%. _.._______.......___.?l.:~~.lI:?:_F.:_G.:!..:A:.._.____..._ 890 Furniture Store i 5.06 8.35~ 77% 6.43 IT.S.F.G.F.A. _U.._n.U___._________n_.nn..__n__......__.n__....nn.......nn..._.__n_nn_.._n_..........___.____......._____________n.. .________...._________......0(_____.__........0.. ...__n...__n___n_..........____... ____......_...n__.__....________u..________.... 895 Video Arcade (b) ! 56.81 93.74: 49% 45.93 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~ITI~~:is~R'~k::===_::J::j:~:~ :::=~~t::~l ==::~~1Hi~~f~=:: 912 Bank/Savings: Drive-In ! 265.21 437.60: 85% 371.96 IT.S.F.G.F.A. i[;;ii!iii~~I:=~::~ji::~lijf:ti~:~==~j[5ittiti::~ ?~Q.__M~~~:P~~~.Qfff~~..~_~~:t~g..._____j__..._......_.;?~:.l.;? ..___......__.??:.~1_!.....19.9..%. ....._______..........?~.:~1. .I.I..:?:.f.:.G.:!..:A:____..._.... ?;?Q___G~y.~~~~.Q@~~.~~~g__...______....L____..._____~:_~_;? ........_)X?:Z~L._)9.9..%_ _______..........Jl~_:Z~_lI:?:.F.:.G_:!..:A:......._____ 731 State Motor Vehicles Deut. ~ 166.02 273.93: 100% 273.93 IT.S.F.G.FA. :i.~:::~~~~~:~k===::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::~ji:~~: :::::::::::::I~~~I:::::t~~~: :::::::::::::::::::~I~~:~ ::~:l~:~~~~~~~~:::::::::::: 760 Research/Development Center 8.11 13.38j 100% 13.38 IT.S.F.G.F.A 770 Business Park 12.76 21.05[ 100% 21.05 /T.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 20 as of 10/25/99 111" TABLE 4.2 NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS page 5 of 5 ...m....................m..............mm.~12....m................m....m................l...........(~2....m... .m.......(;?2.....m..l...m.(~2...... ...........m..t?l............... ............m.......(~>..................... 1 ITE Est. \ Net i Motor Total: % New ~~~~~~~~~ii~~~~f.I~~~~~!~~t~~-~~;~~;~~~~ PORT!INDUSTRIAL l 1 ~~i~~~~Ji:~~ryi~~::~=:T::i~ =:=:!~~~Ll~~ =:=:=:~~~:Z~~~~~~~: 093 Li!!ht Rail Station W IParkine: : 2.51 4.14\ 100% 4.14 I Parkin!! Space JJQ...G~~~!~.1~gh~..~4.!!~!ti~.........m...............l......m........~:.?z. ..............l1:.?Ql..JQQ.%. ......................l1.:?Q. .1..I.:?:.f.:.G.:f..:A:............ J~Q....G~~~.!~J~~~yy..~4.~!ti~......................j....m..........!:.?.9. .................~:.@L..1QQ.%. .........................~.:~. .!..I.:?:.~:.G.:f..:A:............ 130 Industrial Park : 6.% l1.48i 100% 11.48 IT.S.F.G.F.A. i~:~1~~~_:::::::=+::::=::~~~::::~~I::liot=:=:=::~~~:Zt~1~~1==: 151 Mini-Warehouse i 2.50 4.12\ 100% 4.12 IT.S.F.G.F.A. .....................................~...;................m.................................._...............................m.... .............m............,......................................................... ..............................................--- 170 Utilities lD) \ 0.49 0.8!! 100% 0.81 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. C. Formula 3: Length Adjusted Person-Trips (by Type of Land Use) The ITE trip generation rates do not account for differences in the lengths of trips for different types of development. Because longer trips have a relatively greater impact on the transportation system than do shorter trips, an adjustment factor is needed to account for differences in trip lengths relative to the length of an "average" trip. The length-adjusted person-trips generated per day is determined for each type of land use by multiplying the number of new person-trips (from Table 4.2) by the trip length factor for each type of land use: Don Ganer & Associates 21 as of 10/'25/99 r Net New 3. Person-Trips Generated x Trip Length Factor = Length Adjusted Person-Trips Trip length data from surveys conducted for the U.S. Department of Transportation and published in the "National Personal Transportation Study" (1984) were used in developing the Trip Length Factors, as were concepts and methods recommended by James C. Nicholas, in "The Calculation of Proportionate-Share Impact Fees" (American Planning Associatiol\ 1988), and "Develapment Impact Fee Policy and Administration" (American Planning Association, 1990). Table 4.3 (pages 23 - 27) lists the length adjusted trips per day on the transportation system for each type of development, as calculated using Formula 3. Column 1 repeats the ITE codes and land use categories, and Column 2 repeats the net new person-trips per day from the last column of Table 4.2. Column 3 presents the trip length factor for each type of land use. As the result of multiplying the number of trips (Column 2) by the trip length factor (Column 3), Column 4 displays the length adjusted person-trips per day for each land use category. Don Ganer & Associates 22 as of 10/25/99 ~ .. TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 1 oj 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ....m__.__.....m___________...__.m__..mm...____m__.___m____......mm....___m.......m.l.....mm.N:~!--.....--.J..m......m................ml.......!.-.~.!!-g!h...... .._._____.._..__________uu____.._...___u ......m......m......__m.....m.........m.....m__.....m.......___m........mm....__m..1......m.N~~....m...L.........I!!p........__.1....~4j~!~~.... ...n_.........unn......._......_____ i Person- j Length i Person- ::::~~~~~-~~~~~~~~:t=~~~~=t:~~;~;;:~t:~~:=:: .................y~~................ ____.....__nnn.......____......___....___ _._...._.._..__.__.....u_uuu.__u..... .?JQ..__?~!~..f.~y__(~sl!!q~.~..!?~p.~~.~t___L.............__m!.?..~?~.L....__........m...!:.QQL...............J~.:Z~. .!.~~~.lli!!-g_~!.. 220 Apartment i 10.94l 1.00: 10.94 / dwelling unit ~~~~~~~~~r~iIL:::::::~~::::::::L~1:::::H~ lA~~~K.~!- .lq~~m~fi..~t. 260 Recreation Home \ 5.21l 1.00! 5.21 / dwelling unit . . . ______....___u_n....___n_.._______u__n_...______n______n_.____n_n__.__uun_...__n_..u_.__n_+____n_n.._____n_.._n_____n__:.___nn_.__n__.____n_.________+-._.._u_n_._un_n____u_n_... n__nn__...__n..__._n_n_.__...._..nU RECREATIONAL i i i ~ii~-ci!Y--p~k...m....mm--.--m.-..--mm----...--m.....--m.m...r....--.m--.mm2:.62r.........--...--...--i:iir----..............2~90. h~....__n_n....____....___.....__n..___ ..!..~g.~......m_.....__........... 412. ..c~~~--p-~k.-...---..---..m...---.m--...--...mm---.-------T........-.-.-..--...i76r.....m--...--...i:iir....................4~i6 ..L.~g.~.m....._____...........___ -~j~::::~~Pi!~~~:z~y~p.~~k:~L::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::::Q~~Qr:::::::::::::::::::I~Qr::::::::::::::::::::Q~:?'~ .L~~p...~!!~...__........ 420 Marina ~ 4.88~ 1.50: 7.33 L1?~!!h_.........__....__..._. ........._n_n....._....__...u__n.....___.....n_.....nn__._unn__...___n.......n_n__......__n.,.............n__o............_n_h...__n....__uu..__n_...._.__{...._n____n...._._..._______....O 430 Golf Course : 58.971 1.50~ 88.46 LhQJ~..__.....m......m...... .........__u_..____________.____.....__.......___....______._________..._________....______....._________10______....______....__......_n_.:..._n...un_......n..._..._n_".....n__.___._n_...._______..n. 432 Golf Driving Range (b) i 2.06! 1.It 2.28 /tee ~:~~1~if:~~~~~!~~~i:::L::::~~~~L~~~::t]jj::::ft~ / facili!y ____u...n....._n ....un.........on_. ..l.~~~~~.....n.............. 444 Movie Theater w/matinee j 252.99l 1.11l 279.86 / screen . . 4Z~..__~~~.~QlY~.4.~_~..r.~~.~!L.!._.~!!~!Y..~.tl...--...--.mm..~.?:J?l.....m.....__m....1:.!JL......__.....m.~~.:~J.. lI.:?:.:f:.g.:!::.A:~...... 480 Amusement/Theme Park i 125.00\ loll! 138.28 .L~~~...__m..............."" .........____u...............................__...__..n.......n..................._n_................_-t__u.....n_....._n......n.u....__u..___......__........nn..--t--.............--.................- 491 Tennis Courts j 51.22: 1.111 56.65 .l~~!!!!......_......._.......__ _n......._......_u_n_non_nn...._n_n....___n_.__nn..._n__n_...._.___..u.._n_____n.._u___.__~._______.______._.______._.....__~--__---__un___.n....___..___n.;.....__________.....n....._.____. 492 Racquet Club ! 66.87! 1.11! 73.98 ..l.~~!!rt...............n....... ........___......................._........................................u........u........,,_u......................................................-0-............................................................................ 494 Bowline: Allev \ 54.99! 1.11: 60.83 /lane 495 Recreational Community Center 1 37.751 1.501 56.63 /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.LA. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 23 as of 10/25/99 - ,.. TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 2 of 5 . (1) i (2) i (3) (4) \ (5) ......__uu____...___..___....____........._.....___.._____...__u_____....._____n____nn___..........v___.._un__...___...u___._n.._:__..___n_____nn__________n___n_______n......_______._.._nn..:...n..___u_..n_...un.__.........__..... .........................................................................................................1............~~!...........L...................-....................1.~.~~.......L.........._......._....................... 1 New j Trip Adiusted ! l Person- i Leng!h Person- \ ![if~jJ~~QP!iE:ATIi:9Q~y:Fj'iir;;:FEc:t.;:,:::::=iriL:F=::it;;l!:=:: INSTITUTlONAL!MEDlCAL i! . :~Qi::::Mili~.:~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::i;?!L::::::::::::::::::i:~::::::::::::::::::::::jjjIZi~p~~y.~~::::::::::: 520 Elementary School i 1.68i 0.40 0.67\ / student 1::ilf~i~;~;~:~~~l~:~~:~~i~lt~=.~~~~il~--:~::=~}I1!al~~-~~~ 560 Church : 15.03! 0.75 11.27\ /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~-=B~~:===:==!=====:-=<>::::::\:::::~~~~+:::::~~::::::::~hi~r~&'E:.A~= 610 Hospital \ 19.42\ 1.06 20.58\ Ibed ~.~.Q....~~~~gJ:!~.~~...............................................j.....................~:~.!L..................J:.Q?..................._..~.:~~.Vp.~4..........._................- 630 Oinic \ 51.89\ 1.06 55.00! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ...___nn..u......___...nn...unnn__.............u....n_....nn.n._....._n..._...___.._.._...~_..u.d...n.....u.u..n....--:...............n................nn....n..........n.............,...............n........................... iiiMMEiiCiAiisEiiVIas------+------+------ ----------\-------- ~~~=r~~~~~l-~~~~=~=+=~-==~~~E~==:I~=::-~=:-:~~~:r~i~= ~.!.~...f.!~~=?~~4.~g,!?~~~~~..?~~.~~...........1.................................l...................................................................L.......................................... With Groceries ! 37.97\ 0.84 32.031 /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~l~_..?P.~.9:~!Y..g~!@..~~~~~!.....-........................L.................?l:.~ZL....................Q.:~..........-.........~:.?~U!.:?..:f..:G.:f:A:....... 815 Free-Standing Discount Stores \! [ ..........._..With~uiGr~c~ri~~.........._............................--T..................4559j"........-...........O:&i --...-.............38~63~7T:S:F:G:FA.:...... 816 Hardware/Paint Stores ! 65.161 0.84 54.97: /T.S.F.G.F.A. Iff~1~~~~t=~~~~-==~=I:~-=:~=~~===~==31{tIffl~~1I= 823 Factorv Outlet Center : 21.50: 0.84 18.14[ IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V .F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer &: Associates 24 as of 10/25/99 ,. TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 3 oj 5 ......m.m........mnn...uum......um(!2.u..m.........m.n..........................Lm..........(~2.............~.............(q1.......m.. ...........j~L.........L..............J?t......m...... ~ Net 1 Lenlrth i ..nm..m.....ummu.......mu...um............unn.......n....n..u...........n...nm.!...........N.~~.nm...Luu......I~P.num... nn.A:~j~.~!~~....Lu.........mmm......m.........m .........................................m................u..m...........................m........J......;p~!~.Q~:n...Lmn.~~.~&!hn.... uu..;p~!.~g.~.~mn.L....ummm......uu..u........n... .m.1~.Ys~..~QP~L~1A.Q9~X..n.t.........IrtP~.......ml......n.f.~~tg.!.....n ..........IriR~...umnf......u....u..!l!'!!............... ._..~...._..__._____.....__n.u...n__........____.__._____un_.._....._____.........___............u_.;._n_..............___............~__._.........n....n_..____n.u n_n...u...................on._j.__..................unuu........_n..' COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) 1 ! :~~r:~~~:.B~:~i~~:~fX~~!:.~:~~LI::..:::::::::..:Xii.~~L:::::..:..........:....:::I~QQ. _n___......nn..uu...n......-i-........uu...n....ou....__.__n.......- ::::::::::::::::~:~:~~::::~:I::~:::::~=:~=:~=:~=~=~~::::: .~~~....lligh.I~Qy.~!!..$.!!.~.P.Q~m.m.n....mmJ.......mmn..n....nm..mL.um.........mu.....um. Restaurant j 116.13i 0.50 58.07j IT.S.F.G.F.A. m:~::H;~~:t@~~c)::L::::~i:~:::j;~ 159.49i IT.S.F.G.F.A. _u_o........_.....uuo__.....__+____......._onon.nhn....nnn___non ....n........JJ9..~~l.l.L.I:.$.J~=.G:.f.:.~.~...... 836 Drinking Place I Bar (b) 1 10.281 0.50 5.141/T.5.F.G.F.A. .~~?m~~.1P.:~!!~!!9.~.Y~N.~~..~.hg.PmmL........m.m.}~=.~L........n.......nQ.~~. ...m........n...;?Q~.Q?j..l..$.~!Y!~.~..$.!~...... 840 Automobile Service Center (b) j 5.09: 0.84 ......................1:~.~.Q!..I..I:?:f.:.G.~~~b:=....... ......__n__.___.nn..__n__n............_n____......__u....__n_n___nn......___...nn...___......._nnnn..__o__._n_n........._-t-_n_.nn_...__.______n.____.._. ~!.mN~~..G.~n$.~~~...nm..m.....m.mmn.u.....m..n.......Ln.......mnn:'!!~~L.................m.Q=.~ ...................~.Q.~l~tII:.$.=f.=.g:.f..:A::.n... 844 Gasoline I Service Station i j ........___n..........._........_..._n___._u_..._...n_____...._nn_n_n......nn_n.......n...n.y..__n__nn_n_......nnn...__...n_..__nn____nnn__.....___ __n.._n_____n______________n_~--____--.-..---___--.______-n-___--.-__..- (no Market or Car Wash) : 136.28: 0.42 57.621 IV.F.P. 845 Gasoline I Service Station . . . . ..............(With..C~~;~~~~~~..M~k~t)...........unr......nnmIji:61rm.n...............O.::u. :::::::::::::::::::~~~:~17y~f~~~::::::::::::::::::::::: nu.....___nn...__nn_n_n.....__n........____....__nn.......__n_n..........................n__._n__....nn..___.....__....nn{n_n.....nn.......n_........_. 846 Gasoline I Service Station ! i ..............(WL~9.~y..~..M.~!~~!..~~..~.~~~hL....mm.J~.q.~~?l.......m......mmQ=.1:? 52.24l/V.F.P. ......__.u....._n....n...._...;......nnnn.........._...n_.._......... ~...I!!~..$.!9..~~..........m.........mm.......m.m.....mn.m.........l.m.........m.}.!A9..L.....m..m........Q=.~ 26.66~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 850 SUDermarket j 88.32 [ 0.84 ..........n.......7~i:5JJjT.:S~F~.Gj~.:A:...... 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) j 523.601 0.42 ................??:!.=.;?7..U.I~?:f..~9.::f~b:=....... .........n.n.n.......................n.....nu.......................n...........n....u........._...............__.........nn.....+_.........n_...""..__."._..._ .~~~m.~Q~y..~..M~~~.!.~Jfu..f.P.:~L~Pmm.l..m.....mm~~.:.??Lm.....mmm..Q.~~. ...m..........!.~?:=?~1.LY.~:f~;p=........m............ ~~.Q...~~!~~~~.M~~.~!...........m.m.....mm...m.......L..........mn....~.~??.L............nmm.Q=.~ 7.211 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ......nn.n....__nn.un...._.;............un........_n_.....uu_..... 861 Discount Oub i 53.11: 0.84 44.80i IT.S.F.G.FA. ...................__................................... ....._..............................._n...n....~......n.................-_......:............__.........._.n..... ..n..............n.............of............................................. 862 Home Improvement SUDerstore 1 44.53: 0.84 37.571 IT.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Superstore 57.221 0.84 48.281 IT.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Caner & Associates 25 as of 10/25/99 If TABLE 4.3 LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 4 of 5 . (l) i (2) ! (3) (4) i (5) .........unn...............n_...................................n..................un.............T...........N.~t..........r....................n.................L~~~h.....T.............n............................ _n.uunn_.________n.......___...__..n_nn__..________...n__.......____..._________._._______...__.*_____...._____....____.__.._____.~.______....__.._..n.___..._.__.._n._.._.....n..n6.~_~_n.n..._.___......______........n_...._n....__. j New 1 Trip Adiusted j ! Person- : Lengfu Person-: !:ii~!i~ic;Qt>~l~lligQ~XF:~I~~::f::~~<!~;;::==f;:jIi=::F==V~C:: COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) i i :~ZQ::::App~~(~!~i.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::~~;.i.~r::::::::::::::::::::::Q~~:::::::::::::::::::~~~~i.[zt~~~~~q~f;A~::::::: 880 Pharmacy I Dru~store : i j Without Drive- Thru Window i 72.81l 0.84 61.43: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~!-::~~~~~!~~~:::=~=:I_=:-;iiE:::==~~:::=:i~~ji~i~~~i:= 890 Furniture Store : 6.43: 0.84 5.42: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ____....._n_n....nn__....__..........._....___......____......____nn_u.__......._nn.nn..._n_n..................._.....___......"'---.....----....----.........----.-----...--------....-----.---......___..._un___...._____.....______._______. 895 Video Arcade (b) i 45.93\ 0.84 38.75! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~t1~~~W:~k:=::t::::i~~m::::::=~~==:=5~1}~1ZH~~;~f1~: 912 Bank I Savings: Drive-In l 371.96j 0.84 313.791/T.S.F.G.F.A. . . 731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. : 273.93: 1.06 290.33~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 732 U.S. Post Office l 178.51~ 1.06 189.20: IT.S.F.G.F.A. j~~:::Q!fi.~~:~~~:::::::::::::::::::~:::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::j:~;~I:::::~:::::::::::::::!~:~~:::::::::::::::::::j~:~~ZI:ZI:~~~:F.~:Q:~f.~~;:::::: 760 Research/Develooment Center : 13.381 1.06 14.181/T.S.F.G.F.A. 770 Business Park 21.05! 1.06 22.311/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 26 as of 10/25/99 '1r TABLE 4.3 LENGTII ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS page 5 of 5 . (1) 1 (2) \ (3) (4) i (5) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::~~!::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t.:~:~i!h:::::L::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 New ! Trip Adiusted i j Person- ! Leng!h Person-! ijj{t~~~Q!2~L~'mW~X:l::I~~::F)i~~:::l'~:=F::=(l~f=:: PORT/lNDUSTRIAL :! . ._______~...__._....._uu..__...u.u.u.__......__.u..___u.._.--__.._______~.u__.u....____......___~__..____....______...____n._.n....n_n___.n_ou..______.___....__nn.._____...____......___.__..ton--......---....-----......----.....---... 030 Truck Terminals : 16.25! 1.06 17.23: /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~H~{~j~~~~I~~~:I-=I~:::::::~~~:::=:=f~Hl~=~~~: 110 General Light Industrial ! 11.50: 1.06 12.19j /T.S.F.G.F.A. 120 General Heavv Industrial j 2.48! 1.06 2.62~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. i3omI~d~~tri~ip~k.............--............m....--.......m----Tm--....m....ii:48"r--m................Lo6 ..------m.--.....i2.~i7TjT"~s~i~~.G.j~~A:m... _n____n________uunn.___n__...___________n._u_____....___H.___n..._______n___n...____n_._.__~__---------.....--__n..---n.n-.-.------.___nn..__on...___________....___n...__nn.....__n...t____n....__---~-.-----...-------~------..- 140 Manufacturin~ i 6.30j 1.06 6.68: /T.S.F.G.F.A. .!~Q..JY~!:~h~~.~~---u.u....u...--....---.....u............n.....unu...:--m..___.......__...~J.~L...___n..__......nJ.~Q~. nm..________._____.~:.~Zj.LI:?.~~.~G.:!'::A:...____ 151 Mini-Warehouse \ 4.12\ 1.06 4.37\ /T.S.F.G.F.A. n.......______...._._.u.u__n.~........___._..n_.__..........d..__...n_n____n.___n_n.....___n._:~_.._._n._.__....._______....___y.___n__._____...._nn.._.___n.__n......__...............n....:._____..........----..........-.---......... 170 Utilities (b) j 0.8t 1.06 0.86: /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. D. Formula 4: Motor Vehicle (MY) Cost Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The motor vehicle cost to serve each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (93% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's motor vehicle facilities (versus pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities), and multiplying this product by the motor vehicle cost per trip ($178.29) from Table 4.1, page 15. 4. Length Adjusted X Percent X Person-Trips MY Trips MV Cost Per = Person-Trip MV Cost Per Unit Don Ganer & Associates 27 as of 10/25/99 - J The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.4, below. TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) :====~:=::===:::::::=====~=1!e-~!~~+:~~l= nU....n_u.....___.._____u...._......__ .______.n_..nnn____....__.__n....__u. __...._______.....___________.__n..._.___ ===~:=_=E======~::1=:=~:::J=::=~=:1=~~~~==:: ...-------......y~!---....---..... ..u.n___......__..__..._____n...__.__.... RESIDENTIAL :: ~ n_......_nn...__n__u..____......on......_.......un_...._n__n_uon___..n_n_n.......onn...._Ion_n....n__n....___.....____n...n__....n_n...__nn_._______...._________.....____...._____....._ ...u._o__n....._______...__.___.....___.. :?.!.9.___?.~g!~..;f..~y.{~sl~~~~__P~p!~~J....L....-----m...J?.:Z?.L-----..._____..J~l?~Lm____.....$.~A.~~. I~~.~~g.~!.. 220 Apartment i 10.941 10.17~ $1,814 / dwelling unit r~:M~~_~~fJ:~J:k~)::L::t~~~1=::=:~;m==:::n1~ I~~~~g.~~... .l~~~~K~.L 260 Recreation Home : 5.21l 4.85! $865 / dwelling unit . . . ....n_n____......n_..............n......oon.....oo.....oo_......oo_......._~_.n...n____.....nnoo.}...._.......oo....._n_~oo.._.n.:..oo.......oo...._._..n.........~...oo--...---.oo.n....-oo........ _....n___.......oo......__.oo..._.._....oo RECREATIONAL \ i 1 ~I:~~~~~::=:=:=::::-::=:=I:-=:-=1~E:=:I~==-=:fr~ ..n.....oo__.......__....__....__...n..._ .l~q.~..__.m....__m.mmm. ..L~q.~...m__....m__......m.. 416 Cammrround/RV Park (b) \ 0.741 0.69[ $123 / camp site .~Qm.M~....m...mm.mm.....__m....mn.m..m....n.mmmnm~.....m..m.nn...z:~.~L..mmm..m....~:.~!L...__mm..$..!!.~l?. .n?~!!h---..mm...mm... 430 Golf Course i 88.46\ 82.26: $14,667 .!J~QJ~._....................__.. n_._._...u.._n.._uoo._.....___......oo..._uoo_....uoo.__...nnn....n._....oo..n._....nn.......}u__.....u_..._u_..__.._u_.....00__.____._......_00.....00......01-_.......__00__..__.._......00.... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) j 2.28~ 2.121 $378 /tee ~:t1~~~~~~Z~~~tfu~~1:=~~i~===~~:~L==~@ /facili ...m.__.........!Y.....m...__m..... I~~~~!!...__m.......mm 444 Movie Theater w / matinee j 279.86! 260.27j $46,403 / screen ~?~....~~.~QlY!~.~.~..~.~~.~!L~.~!!~!Y..Q?2..L..m--......n...?:1:.?.!.Lm...m...n..~~:.~Q].m......m...~!.Q~. .!I:?:.f.:.G.:F..:~:...... 480 Amusement/Theme Park i 138.28j 128.60l $22,928 L~~~___m...........n.__..... ~[1~~~:=::-=~=:====:==:=i:=3~~{=~=~~E-:-:ilf!~ ..L~Q~!!..__.......__nm...___ I~~~............m......... 494 Bowling Alley : 60.83~ 56.58! $10,087 / lane 495 Recreational Community Center 56.63~ 52.66i $9,389 /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 28 as of 10/25/99 T TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 (1) 1 (2) i (3) ...........J1:L_.......L......._........(~t......_...___.. _.__u________n___u______._____.u~...______.._._n_______n___..h.__nu......__nno........_u.....-:-__.....nn.nnn....unn......__......__.___....._n......___u . i Length : Motor ...__...MQ.!Q!.......L......__..............................__.. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::A~l~.~!~~::I::::Y~N~~:::::: .......y~h!9~......L_..............__......................... 1 Person- ! Trips @ Cost @ : =:===:==~~~=~===!::=~~::1:=~:: .......~lZ~.~~2...__+..._...........Y~!......___...... INSTlTUTIONAL/MEDlCAL 1 : ......--..........-----....--.---.t......--.......--.---.--........--......... .?QLMW~..~~~.~..............__...............__......h...............J........h.......___..~:.!.1L.__................:?:~2. ___..............__.$.~.!~.!..L.~~pJ~y.~.~.......__... .??Q...J;;!~~~~!.~!Y..?.~~~.L___....................._____.........L....................QAZl...........__........9.:?:? ....................$.l.P.j..!..~.~4.~~!..............._.. 522 Middle/Junior High School : 0.95: 0.89 $158~ I student ~:;~t~~~:~~~~~=::t=:_=:=:;i=:=t~ $3671 I student .....__-......._................._I-....__............__u....__........___._.n ........_.__.........$.~!.?U..~!P.:~_~_~!.._______......... ............._......~~j..!..~.~4.~~!...__............. 560 Church i 11.271 10.48 ..__............$J!.~~.~.!.LI~?.~f..:G~!.~A:....... .......__nnou.............._n.........___.......nn....__n.......___n..._..n_.._n.....__n_._.n..n~__n_....__u_____....__.____....-l-.n.....--.......--........--.... 565 Dav Care Center/Preschool ~ 2.98: 2.77 $493 ~ I student 590 Libr~ ~ 35.55~ 33.06 .....___........$.~!.~?1:1.lI...~:.:f.:.G:.f....A~...... ~iQ.:::H~~p~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::iQ.;~~r:::::::::::::::::i~j~ $3,4131 Ibed ..__.........._____.......___.....)0___.____............__._____.....__.....--- 620 Nursing Home [4.56! 4.24 $7571 jbed ====:::::::.:::::.:::::::.::::::.:::::=1=::::::==1::::=::':= ::=:.:::==::=l~=~==~=-'~:='::: COMMEROAL/SERVICES \ 1 310 Hotel! Motel 1 13.00: 12.09 $2,1551 I room ~i:i.:::~~~~g:M~!~~~!~i~~~~i:::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::!i;~r:::::::::::::::::~~~:~~ ......._.___......______u...._.u)o......___...._.n____....______.__..___-... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...~~~~~~.t~~~~~~~~~=~~=~~=~~~~~~. 813 Free-Standing Discount Store ~ ! ------........with.G;~~ri~............--.....................-----.........--r......--........32~03r--.--.--...---.29:79. ..__...........~.?!.:?J1.j.LI:?.:f..:G~!.~A:....___ __........n___...._...___.....nn_....nn...._.__.__.__n.n......__......._.__.....nnn_._..._....__~_._...n_._.......__nn.._......~.............-.....-.--.......-... 814 Specialty Retail Center ~ 43.591 40.54 $7,228~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 815 Free-Standing Discount Stores ! ~ :::::::::::::R~ili~~i:G:~~~~!j~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::~:~;~~[::::::::::::::::~~~:~~ ::::::::::::::::$.~~~Q~rjI:~~~f~:G:~f.~A~:::::: 816 Hardware/Paint Stores l 54.97! 51.13 $9,115i /T.S.F.G.EA. .~!?....~~.~~ryf.9.~!~~~..~~~!~.!............---........J..................~~...~zL............__..~:?:??.. ................$.~A.!.?J.!..I~?.:~.:9.:f:A:...__.. .~?Q....~h~.Pp~g..~.~.~!~!.......--................................--...l...................?2...?7.L................7.z.:7.~. ......_.......__~!.~~!j.LI:$..:f..:G.:f~A:...---. 823 Factory Outlet Center ~ 18.141 16.87 $3,0071/T.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 29 as of 10/25/99 'II" TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEIDCLE COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 (1) l (2) : (3) (4): (5) .........___..__n_....___.._______________________u__n_______.uun_n_______._..______nn_______+..___..._____u__n___u....__.....__....____.__...._....____....______..___......__...____.____..-)0_____.______..____....___..__.....__ . i Length j Motor Motor i \ Ad]'usted i Vehide Vehide j ._._.....0".__"_ noo__n..n.no_n__..______.____....__............_.___...____..........uu_______n_.._..______... ......__.....__...{-_n...__.....n.....__........... ....___.____...__..._........__n...____.__nn__...______....__n,____n.'___ j Person- : Tri~ @ Cost @ \ X!:~~1bN!iV~~~_GQR~Z~~j]GQRy~~~~~F~~~~~~~I!jR~~~~~~~~~~_F~~~_-~~~~.?i~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~.-~~~~iz~_~~2~~~~~~F~~~~~~~~~~~~~y~!~--~~~~~..~~~~~~~ _n__n..___....._n..._...............uu.___.....__...n.__nn___............_...._u___....___.__...i-.....__n_..._______~.n...______i.__oo.__..n.___oo.~.u___..____.._u._....___...__oo..._n_.._____~n___....__..__._____n...._oo_...._...._oo COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) !: 1 .~;?!...~~~..~~~.~.~~.t~~~!._!!..~h~>..m.l.m_......mJH::_~Ql.....m.....JQ~A~_ ............$.!.~!.?~L!..I:~.~f..:G:f::A:.._.... .~;?~.__mgh.I~~y.~!!._$..i~::J?.~~..m._..m_....m.L..........._...__m_mm..._l.........._._....._..............._........._...._................L.._........_....m............._...._.... Restaurant j 58.07: 54.00 $9,628\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~.~.._.f..!!~.~..f..Q~4.__~~~.~.JN.QJ?rty._~:~L.L...--....-J?2.A?.L............_J.~:.~~.............$.~~f.~?.LL.I:.~:.f.:.Q...f....A:...... 834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) i 110.51\ 102.77 $18,324: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~.....nn...oo....._____...__n.___...._oo_....oo...____..__oo...______...__oo....n___.____....oooo._...,._.._..n.n..._n.__..oo__n____.~.oooo...____...oo.__.__...._n._..oo_._noo._._......._._oo..____n~...oon.---.__.....oon....._._nnn__oo__ 836 Drinking Place I Bar (b) j 5.14\ 4.78 $852: IT.S.F.G.F.A. a~!a~!~~~~!~~~:t::::=~~~t:::-~~i=:=:f!tiii~= 844 Gasoline I Service Station ! j i __....._.__......__...__._....n....___..._n__..._.....n....n_.._.._n...._.._...nn._.._..oo...__._v..__oo._.__nn_.uoon..oon____._oo......____oo_._.nnn.._______oon...___n.._.n...___.....noo)...nn...n__..nn__.._.__...oooo_...__... (no Market or Car Wash) ! 57.62\ 53.58 $9,553i IV.F.P. :=:::lw~i~~~~m~~~::~~~~!L::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::~~~~t:::::::::::::::~i:~?~:::::::::::::::::$.~;.i?~L{y~f;~~::::::::::::::::::::::: 846 Gasoline I Service Station j j \ _...mm._JWl.~~~y..:..M_!!!~~!..~4.._~~_W_!!~.hLm...m.._.___?.~_:~~.L_._m_...__.....~:.~2_.._m_..._m.$.~!.~~1IY:_f:_~.:_..__m_.__m_._m_ 848 Tire Store i 26.66\ 24.79 $4,4201/T.S.F.G.F.A. ._oo_......_n__...n_...oo_.._oon_..._nn.._n_._oo__....n...__n_...___.._.00__....______.._.__...._.0:-...__00._..00__....._.....00_.........._._...___...n_....__.....___._n__..n____..._n__..._.....nJ-_n.._n_..n_..._.___....__________..__.. .~?Q__..$.P.:p..~.~~~~L_........m....m_..m...__mm._mm.....m.l.m..............z~:_~!Lm_........._._~?_:~~_.._m_..m_$J.~!.~_?1L!..T~_~f._:G:f::A:....... 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) \ 221.37: 205.87 $36,705! IT.S.F.G.F.A. :~~~::::G~~y.:~::M~~~iiyIiji:f.~~!:~P::::::r::::::::::::::i~?~?~L::::::::::::j~i~z.::::::::::::i~~;.i~t[ZY~f;~~::::::::::::::::::::::: 860 Wholesale Market \ 7.21: 6.71 $1,196i/T.S.F.G.F.A. _.oo__...._______n_..__._.____..._.__.._____n__..____.__nn__n__.___nn____n_nn.___n___.".__n___n_...oo___.noo____...______n_n_____u.____._.__.._nn_._____..___.n__n....___..__+__.__...____.......n._...._.__._____..._ 861 Discount Club i 44.80~ 41.67 $7,4291 IT.S.F.G.F.A. __.....______...____.n._n__....n___..__..nu_____.._______nn_____nn_.__noon_.__nn__.._uu___-}nn.__.nn.._.________.n__n....n__.--n__._nn__n____....___..__n__..n__n.___n_n_n_.._.__,..un__...____..__n_._____..n___n__n.~. 862 Home Improvement Superstore! 37.57l 34.94 $6,2291 jT.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Superstore 48.28: 44.90 $8,005: IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 30 as of 10/'25/99 J TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT page 4 of 5 ............_____m_.._..m..__m........___..(11.....__m._m....._mm..mm....m......l..__.........(~2...._........L........_...(~>..__...._m_...m........{~2............l...._....._._.....(?}...m...._m... . j Length i Motor Motor \ 1 AdJ'usted i Vehicle Vehicle i ____un___..._____________._____u.._________________._________On_uu___n______.._________.._n_......:._._u___...._____n_.._____...-(.....__nun_________..._____...____.____........__....___..._____:____...._____..________.....n_.____...._.. : Person- : Trips @ Cost @ ~ ~~~~~~~~!:~~~~~:E=:~~~=l:~::~----=--~~~~=E=:~~~~==: COMMEROAL/SERVICES (cont.) i: : ~li=~L~g:~t~;:.;:=::::::~I:~:::=::l:-=='~: :=:=:=:~~l::===:=~-=~:: Without Drive-Thru Window ~ 61.431 57.13 $10,185\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~J.....P.h~~~l-R~g~!-q!'~...........-........-........-..l...-.............m............_\...__............................___......_......___.....__......_.;....__......m....___......_............... With Drive-Thru Window i 60.13: 55.92 $9,970: IT.S.F.G.F.A. nd__n___.u____....onn__un____n___u_..._____________n..._____.___n__u._nn.__.______._...u.+_______u...._.....______..__n_..__...___...__._.______._______.__________._______._n____.._n__~..t..~._____.n..._n_..n.___n.._~.n___.__. 890 Furniture Store j 5.42\ 5.04 $899: IT.S.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) : 38.751 36.04 $6,425~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ..._...........................__.................n..................-....._n....__..........._...... ......__...._n..~.nn~___n....._..v.....~.n_..._..n~_.n....__".. .___......_._nn._............__...........n..n.............nn_.....-.... 896 Video Rental Store (b) ~ 21.511 20.01 $3,567j IT.S.F.G.F.A. lfa~~~~~~:=::----T~-:=l~:gt--:--]ff~~::-=~~l~irH~~~It=: :~~=~~:~i.~LQffl;~~::!!~~~g:::::::::::::::::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::i?~~~t:::::::::::::::::::i?~2j:::::::::::::::::~;.:i:~~Llt;~~~~Q;f;~~:::::: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building j 13.50\ 12.56 $2,238~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 'lil'!!~~:~:!~:~~~iti~;~~:~it!~:-:~fJifJitl~; 750 Office Park \ 19.97\ 18.57 $3,311! IT.S.F.G.FA. ?~Q::::R~~~~~ip~y~l~p.~~~i:G~~!~i:::I::::::::::::::::i1;i~L:::::::::::::::i~~i.~::::::::::::::::$.?;.~~?IZi:~~~f.~:g:~~~A;:::::: 770 Business Park : 22.31: 20.75 $3,7001/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 31 as of 10/25/99 - lr TABLE 4.4 MOTOR VEIDCLE COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 . (1) j (2) ! (3) (4)! (5) ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::t.~~~h:::::I:::::::M~~~:~::::::::::::::::M~!:~!.:::::I::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 Adiusted \ V ehicle Vehicle! j Person- j Trips @ Cost @ \ i!:~::~@:t!.~~::~QQgZ~mQQ~X::::::I::::::::::t.~~:::::::::r:::::::::?i~::::::::::::::::::~i?~~~?::::::r:::::::::::::y~i::::::::::::::: :: : :. : PORT/lNDUSTRIAL ! j . n....n.......__uu...___...........___.....___..........__n_.........u...__....._n.__..__.......___{on..____....._____.__n___..._u..nn..___n_....__.....______.____.._n__..._._____..____.....____t____.____u_.._____..___________......__.. 030 Truck Terminals i 17.23! 16.02 $2,856\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~Q<jQ~)~~~Z.~4-~~-W~ili)~~~~$.~iY.!~i~~~_.~~~~~~~~~~r~~~..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_-~;_~~L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~.~~~-.~~~~~~~~~~_.~~~~~j)?_~.?ITr~~g~~p~~~ .Q~~...;qgh!--~~..?!~!!~~-.wl.P~!:!~!~K-----.-----L--------...-----.-.~~_4~L___...._..._....__}_:~?_ ____.________..___..$.?z.~L!..p.~~g.?p~~~ 110 General Light Industrial : 12.19: 11.34 $2,0211/T.S.F.G.F.A. .!.~.Q___G_~_~~!_~_H_~_~.Y.Y._!!!~_~~!!!~...____________...____L______.______._____~_~~~.L___.______..___..._~=_M....______.....__....~~?LlI:?.=.f.~-G~.f.:.b:~..____ 130 Industrial Park ] 12.17\ 11.32 $2,018\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. _..______n.._______.u..n__.____n_.._____n______________________n_______._.___n_.u___n_u.___....-:-___n...._____..______.....n..._~u_...._....__n....__n_........____n__...__._.....__.......__.....__._......_.....n_.....__....._.....____ 140 Manufacturing 1 6.68! 6.21 $1,108: /T.S.F.G.F.A. J~Q....W~~.h~~.~~.._______.._m..m__.....m_..._.....m.._______._m_...:______....._......__..~~.~?L...-m..----....---~.:Q?----m-..m..~JA?.-~.!.lI~?.:f..:Q:f_=A~._____. 151 Mini-Warehouse j 4.37: 4.07 $725j IT.S.F.G.FA. ._.n....._....._.__n.....___......_.._.....u..u_._...._u...u.._._....__...u.._.u._.u..__n...._._._......_.u....__u......._....._t-...__._._____...._____...........______.....__oo._____......_......___........_.....___.....__....__00_____.... 170 Utilities (b) 1 0.86: 0.80 $1421/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. E. Formula 5: Pedestrian/Bicycle (P/B) Cost Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The pedestrian I bicycle cost for each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (5% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's pedestrian and bicycle facilities (versus motor vehicle and transit facilities), and multiplying this product by the pedestrianlbicycle cost per trip ($456.29) from Table 4.1, page 15. 5. Length Adjusted X Person-Trips Percent P/BTrips X P/B Cost Per = Person-Trip P/B Cost Per Unit Don Ganer &. Associates 32 as of 10/'15/99 11"" The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.5, below. TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 1 at 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ...........................................................................n.............................L......~~!!g!h......!.r..~~~~!!1:~I..l~~~.~.~~~!. ..................--............--.......-- .........................................................................................................L..!\4j~~!~.~....l........~~~~~.......L.....~~~~~....... ___no__n.._.__...____....._...____.._____ :~:~~~~~~~~~~:-l-~~~;~:l:~~-~~J-:~~~=~ ___n_.n__nn_..._..___..._____u..._no ................y~~................ _no_n_...n.n.._._.__..._._________....__ ..___...._n....n....____...__....___..... .~J.Q...?~gl~..f.~y..~9~q~~..P.~pl~.~L...L.................J.~~z~.L....................Q:??L..................$.~~Q. l.4~.~~g.~!.. 220 Apartment i 10.94: 0.55~ $250 I dwelling unit 230 Residential Condo I Townhouse ~ 9.67i 0.48~ $221 Iq~~~g..~~... :~~:::M~~~~~;:fH~~~~i:(~j~~~j:::J::::::::::::::::::::::Z;.~~L:::::::::::::::::::Q;~Ql::::::::::::::::::::$.I~i. ..I.A~~~&.~~... 260 Recreation Home ! 5.21! 0.26\ $119 I dwelling unit . . . . . . ..___......._.........__n______...________ ......._nn_.un_n__n.___........__n....._._.._..u_.._..un.._n....._n............n.nn......_-)-....n...._n...___...........___:n.____._...____.n____~.__.~.._.i_u._~_u.uoo.n_____..oooo...._. .~~~~.~TIQNA1............n..................n....................l.................................\.................................1.................................. u_oo_.........oooo...__...__..n_...._... ~t1~:iti~~c::::=:=:j:::==:{~===::==~:iir:=:=m ..!.~.q.~..................n........ ..!.~~.~............................ 416 Campground/RV Park (b) j 0.74~ 0.04\ $17 I camp site ~Q...M~.........................................................................,.....................z::~~j......................Q~}ZL.......n....n...$.~.~?. .!..1?~!!h....................... 430 Golf Course : 88.46i 4.42\ $2,018 .l.h~J.~................._......... _...n___.._...~....__..n__._..__..._oo_..___...._oo.._.__.n____.__oo__..____noooooo_._____....________)o__..oo_.._____..._____...___..___.____oo....oo_..._oo_n.___...._...;__n........._oon_...__..._n_... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) : 2.28j 0.11! $52 I tee m:M~~~~2~:~~i:t===~~~L:-=::1k~L::::t~:}~ I facili ..................!Y..................... ..!..~q~~~..................... 444 Movie Theater w I matinee i 279.861 13.99\ $6,385 I screen ~Z~....G~~.~~.l..Y~~.~.2X2~.~.~l.1.2!!~!Y..Q?tt...........n......?.1:?.!.L..................J~.?~L...................$.?.;?.~. .lI:.?~.'f.~.Q.:f.:!.\:...... ~.9....~~.~~!!!~~V.Th~.~~..;P.~~....................L.............!.~.~:~?.Ln...........n....~~.?!L............~~!J??. .!..~q~........................... ~i:~~~f~':::=:==::=:=::L==::tt~I:===~l:::=:t}:@ .l5:Q~rt........................ .l.~Q~rt..n.........n......... 494 Bowling Allev : 60.83: 3.04\ $1,388 I lane 495 Recreational Community Center 56.63\ 2.83: $1,292 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 33 as of 10/25/99 T TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 .................................................{11.............mm...............m........mL....m.....(?2.............L...........n(~lm......... .....n.....J~2............L.......nn..J~L.m........_. .nm.................nn:................n..n...............m..m..........n.....................L.....1.~~g.th......lP~.4.~.~!!!.~f. ;p~~~~.~~.l.l............................_.....m...... nnn...........mmm...mn...........m....................mn.................nn...........j.m.A~i~.~!~4...1..m..~~~9~..mn ....m.~!~~.~......j........mm.......mn....n....m..... ! Person- : Trips @ Cost @ j TI].1ANP.V?~..~QR~L~ATI;;9Q~X.....tnm....I~~..........I.............~........... .......~.:?2.....+...n.........!J.~!......_....... n........u..__u_u...._nn..........._n.....-u..u.--_.........__n_uo..nn_no.._n__un__nu.i,._..__n..__un_..___n__u....._:.uun.___ou.__nn..._____u.. ...............mn......n......tnn.....m........n......m...mn.... INSTITUTIONAL/MEDlCAL ~ j 501 Mili~ Base j 3.11~ 0.16 .............n........$.z.!.J..!..~!P.-pJ~y.~.~........n.. :~~Q:::~!~~~~~:~:~~~~L::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::Q~:~zL:::::::::::::::::::Q~Q~ n....................l!.?.LI..~.~~~~!.................. 522 Middle/Tunior Hi~h School ! 0.95! 0.05 $22l I student ~==iR~~~!ic::~ij~~=:=:+:=:::=t~+=::==~~M $51\ / student ____........._.....n_n_u..__..o.}................_____.__.._.......--....--- $431 / student nn....____n.....onn.....___nt.._nn_nu.._n_u............n..__u--- .??Q....'!J~y.~~.~!Y!..Q?A~g.~..........n......m.......n........J.....m.......nm.?:.?~i......m.....m....g.J?. .......................$.?z.L!.~.~~~~!.................. 560 Church 1 11.27! 0.56 ....................$.??Z.jI!:?.:~.:9:!.::A:...n._ ..__.__n...._____...._.__n....__n__._..__.....______..______..~____.__.......__n_.._.__._____________.:.._____._..________._____49_49___-I._____.__...______.49____...._____ 565 Dav Care Center/Preschool j 2.98~ 0.15 $68! / student 590 Libr~ \ 35.55\ 1.78 ...m...............~!t.l..T.$.:f:.G:.f.:.A.:..n.. ~1:Q:::ij~~P~!~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::?Q;~~l::::::::::::::::::::::i~:Q~ $470 i / bed _.___9O__n_9O.._______9O._____9O+.____.9O_._____.._____9O..._n___.__....--- 620 Nursin~ Home \ 4.56j 0.23 $104: /bed =:=~==::=:=:::::::==:=::I::==::=~='~t:==::== :==:==+!-~==~='=== COMMEROAL/SERVICES j ! 310 Hotel/Motel : 13.00\ 0.65 $297\/room :~!~:::~~~~g:M~!~~~~/t~~i.::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::4i;~~L:::::::::::::::::::~~:!~ .________9O___________909O...__n.}o._______9O.___u....._.9O.____...-----..--- $971! IT.S.F.G.F.A. 813 Free-Standing Discount Store j ~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..~~~~~~~~~~~~r..~~~..~~~~~~~~~~~~.'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~. ......n......With.G~~~~rie~.......mm.......m..........n................1............m....32-:(J3Im......m......mi60 ....................$.?~.!J..!..!:?.:~.:9:!.::A:..n... ______n___.__._9O...____....____.____u..__...___..9O.______..___n_...._n___..________..._____nn__..__:___..__.......______nn_____.___-(_....__n__..___________n_.__..__ 814 Specialty Retail Center j 43.59: 2.18 $995! IT.S.F.G.F.A. =~fu;f:~~~=t:====:J=:::~:~==:::I:?~ ...______..._____n...__.....____4._______....__._9O..___....__.....___.n... $8811/T.S.F.G.F.A. .------.-...----......--....---.--t.-.----..------.....----..------...-.---.- 816 Hardware/Paint Stores j 54.97! 2.75 $1,254! /T.S.F.G.F.A. .~!Z.mN~~!YI.G.~4~~..~~~t~.!.....m......n........1.m...............~:.~Zl...m.............J.:~~. ............n......~~.?L!..!:?.:~.:9:f:A:....... .~~Q....~h9PpJ!!K.~.~!!~~r..............m...........................l...................?~~.??L.....................!.:~. $668~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 823 Fadorv Outlet Center i 18.14: 0.91 ....................i4i4T/"i:s:F:G:F:A:...... (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehide Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 34 as of 10/25/99 .. J TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 . (1) i (2) i (3) (4) i (5) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::I~~&!h:::::IP.~4~~~~Z:r.~4~~!ri~jr:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::: ! Adiusted j Bicvcle Bicvcle: \ Person- 1 Trips@Cost@i .._n........................_u............-..........-............................_......__n_..............___......................_n__oi...o..u....___.___.......__...._...............................h...__n.........................___........ .m..~ANP..!:!.~~..~QR~.!.~!.;\:rnGQ~Xm...I--m....I~1?~m.--m1---------....~m....m__ .......~~.?:~......I................y~!.....--......... COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : j :~~f::~~!i~~~~~!!!~~!::(riQ!::~::~h~L:r:::::::::::j}4;~:Q.L:::::::::::::::::::~~:z~::::::::::::::::~?;.~j?rzI~~~:~~:g~f~A;:::::: 832 High Turnover, Sit-Down i i [ Restaurant j 58.07: 2.90 $1,325j IT.S.F.G.F.A. :~~~::::f~~i:~~:~~:I~i~!::(N~:Priy.~~Ii.i~i:I:::::::::::::::i~~~~~r:::::::::::::::::::::i;2Z::::::::::::::::i~;.:~~~U:I;~;f.;G;f;~::::~: 834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) \ 110.5t 5.53 $2,521\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~:::p:!!~g:r.~~~~Z~~::<~}::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::::~j~l::::::::::::::::::::::Q~:i~:::::::::::::::::::::$.jjZIZI:;~~~~:g:;f~A;:::::: 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 1 30.071 1.50 $686 !I Service Stall 840 Automobile Service Center (b) [ 4.30l 0.21 $98[ IT.S.F.G.L.A. ..___.__...n_n._........___.n.__._.__.______.____.._~.___n_.~__u_u_.....__.u.H~nu_u.u__un.._h..__.n....n.nn__unn.n_n-l-.oo_oo....oon..nn.n..._n.u._nn..nn.n.....oo_....n._oo_..___n.......__...........n____...____.n__ 841 New Car Sales \ 40.19: 2.01 $917\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. __n._nn_____nn_._..._u___....__.._nn_...oo_n._______....n.n...___n.......n_n_...___n__......_................n.n__.....n._ioo_oo._____......_..n_...n.....__..._oon.n._._n.nn_n._n.....__n__..n_.nn._........n____...n..._oo 844 Gasoline I Service Station \! j (no Market or Car Wash) : 57.62: 2.88 $1,314~ IV.F.P. 845...G~~.~U;~is~~~i~~..St~ti~~.....m..-...m...--..rm............m.....m....r--............m............... ......m....m................T..m.................................m. ......n_._...__..___....._.__....._....u_n....oo___....nu_.n._n_...______....00_.._.....__._....._...._..._..__...____0000..____....00_._...oo_....__oo..._oo____....__..u._._......_.._....._....unn_.!-..__.._.._.n__.........__.nn_____._oo.oo (With Convenience Market) j 55.64\ 2.78 $1,269: IV.F.P. 846 Gasoline I Service Station [ : oo_.....___n_....____._...___u_._...___.__nn....._..___._n.....n_oo......u_._..~u.oo._.._...___.._._n__._...__u..._._...___oo__.._-C-....oo......n_._____oo._._u_n._...oo......n._._._nn__n__oo_...u._._____.._....._......~n._....nn.... (W I Conv. Market and Car Wash) 52.24[ 2.61 $1,192l/V.F.P. .._....._........n__...._n__...._n.....n......nu...____._......_....u__......__.._..._oo._...__n__....____.oo..._u___..........._n+..oooo....____..nn_....._._..._____...__._..u_n........____.....__...unn....._....u___....___..__un_. 848 Tire Store j 26.661 1.33 $608: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~~Q:::~~p.~!iii~~~i.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::z4;~:il::::::::::::::::::::::~~i~::::::::::::::::~i;.?QQI:ZI:;~~:~~g;.f:;A;:::~: 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) \ 221.37\ 11.07 $5,050: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~?~....G~~y.:...M~~~!.W.~!h..~~~LP.~P...mJ.....m.....).2~~z:21....mn............~.:1~.................$..~.2.!.;?U.Y.:f.::;p~....................... 860 Wholesale Market j 7.211 0.36 $165~ IT.S.F.G.FA. ....._n..____..oo___....___._.._..u_...oooo...n.__._....n..__.u_n...____n...._..__.__. ._0000_.__...._0000______._...._0000_.__.0000..1-__.___....0000.._00......._...... n_......._.....____......nn.....___...__.n......._......_n.._.n__.....n 861 Discount Club j 44.80: 2.24 $1,022j IT.S.F.G.F.A. 862 Home Improvement Superstore: 37.571 1.88 $857\ /T.S.F.G.~~.A....... .863..-EiectroIrics..Su:pe~.tor~...... .......................r.......m.......4S.:2"sT.....................2~.4i ................$i~ioiTjT":S~F~G.j~ .A~ (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 35 as of 10/25/99 J TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 4 oj 5 (1) : (2) : (3) (4): (5) m........m......m...:mm..........m.......m.......n.....m.m....m........mm......rn..i~~~mm!p~d~stri~rP~d~~tri~}rm......m........mm.............n .....m.........mm.mm....m.......m............n..m....m........m....................nL...A~i~~~~4...L......~~9':sl~.......m.....~Jq-~~....mL....mm...mnm....n.........m.n : Person- : Trips@Cost@\ Xi~::tANt.ijJ.$.~:.~QR~TGA~.GQ~X"..:::r..::::::I~R~:..:::::::r::::..:::::.~:::..::::::..::::::..:ill~~~~:::..::.L::::::::..::...y~!:::..::::~::..:: .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .____.....___n__..o.____u__n____u_n_____nn____...._n_._.__nou__u_nn...__n____....nnn__._.t_non....__n__...u____.___n__~__.______._____dhU____..._________.______._._________.__._______~-.----_n....._..____..______.__...________ COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) i j : .~ZQ.nAEP.~.~!..~~9.!:~......mn......mn...mm......m........mm[.m....m..n.m1:~:.~l.L.....m..........~.:?9....n........m.$.!l.!.~.?LI..!:?.:f..:G:!..:A:.m... .~~Q.mPh~~.ql.R.~g~!9.!:~..mm.....nmn......mn..L..m......m.....nmn.....L....m....nm..............n .........--..................--..]............................................ Without Drive-Thru Window \ 61.43\ 3.07 $1,401\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~Jm.Ph~~g:.!.P~g~~~!~.m......----..................L.......n..........--...........L............................... ............--....................,.........................................-- With Drive-Thru Window : 60.13: 3.01 $1,3721/T.S.F.G.F.A. n__._n__n_._._nno__ou__n___.u____..______.._.._nnon__nn...n__n....__n_n__..____u..........._nn....._nn.._n_n...._n___....n_.....un__o_nunn_nu...nn......n_nn_uu____uu_..._nnn*..nn*_*.._u_n_____n_u_______ 890 Furniture Store \ 5.42\ 0.27 $124i IT.S.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) j 38.75: 1.94 $884! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~fi~~~~i~~~:=::=:::]:-:::::~HM:-===:~;~ _:_-:-=::~~fiI~~if= ~J.~..n~.~L~~~g~:.J2!'!Y.~.~...n__m.___.__nmn..t.---.m....m~.!.~.:Z~.l---.....---.---..J.?:.~~ ------.......---~Z!J?~1.lI:~:.f:.g:.f.:.A~--.... :~~=~~~~i~(&&~~::~~4:~g::::::::::::::::::::::::::::l:::::::::::::::::j?~:?~t::::::::::::::::::::::Q.~~~:::::::::::::::::::::~~J:ZI;~:~~~Q~f.;A~:::::: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building! 13.50i 0.68 $308: IT.S.F.G.F.A. $462~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. nnuu_n__uu...___._u._nn_t-u.______n.___n.._n__*..._nuu____n__ $1,441: IT.S.F.G.F.A. n._..__n...u__..__n*...._n__~.uu*.....n.-..--nn..--.n.-n.....--*. ..m___....m.$.~L??.Q!..l.I:?..:f..:G.~:E:A:....n. m....__.__...~.~i?~.~tl.I.~?.~f..:G::E:A:___n.. n......n......$1L~J.~j.L!:?.~f..:G~:E:A:.....__ $456: IT.S.F.G.F.A. __n_....n_nu___nn...._.___*+____n._un_...._____nnnu___nn..... $324: IT.S.F.G.F.A. _n_....nn_n..._.__......_n...t-..__n.....___...n__...__.__..n..n..."_ 770 Business Park \ 22.31\ 1.12 $509\ /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 36 as of 10/25/99 -- 1" TABLE 4.5 PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 (1) i (2) i (3) (4) i (5) mm....m__..._.__.__..m_..._______...m_.._m____.___m...__m_._mm__......-m-...-mmr---i;~;rth-...Tp~d;~iri~l .........______.................__1-.......__..........__..........___..o..n" Pedestrian I 1 :i~~~TI~iti~liii~~i=t:-~~~t::~i~~~~ .__mJ~!g-~_~._...__L__...___._...___mm__.._m__.._.____.. m....G_~~.!._~.____._L_mm..._.__.....____mm_.___m.____ $456.29 i Unit ----....------...... .....----.j..-------...........------......----....... ~:Q~!aN!?!!~t!!!At.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: _.______nn__nn___.______n____j___.._____n_.__onnn_.._____u.__onO'_' ___u...____.....____.....____....;,.........___...................n.._.nn_.. 030 Truck Terminals i 17.231 0.86 .__._.___...._._....~~_~.~jII:?.:~_:Q:!"::A::..._.__ __u....n_u....__...u..__n...____......____...____......___n.....__n....___n......__n_n._nn__.__.u.:.......___n.__________...__..._..+__...______n__nn...____.n_____ 090 Park I Ride With Bus Service : 6.261 0.31 _.......m.....mll~!..!..;r~!~g.?p__~~~ ______n....__non_n____...oo___....oooo_...._n......n_n_n..__...oooo_oo..noo.oo.....oo.._oooo.......oo.._._oo....oo_oooo...oo_....oo_{...._oo_oo..__..n.__U.._OOoo'_._ 093 Lie.:ht Rail Station W IParkine.: 1 3.49: 0.17 $801 I Parkine.: Space 110 General Light Industrial j 12.19\ 0.61 $278: IT.S.F.G.F.A. i20--.G;~~;~(He~Y.Y.fud~tri~.--mm...m--.-.T--.--.-..u..-.-.----2:6.2r-....--u-..um....O~"i3 .._000000....___...000000....._.__1-...__00...._.___....____.....0000.._0000... $601/T.S.F.G.F.A. i30mfud~~iri~fp~k-..-.u----..m--m..m-.....--m--m...-----Tu--.....-m.-..i-z:i7r----.-.m--.m----.O~.6i __.oooo___....____oo__u___n...-too__.._._____.....oo...____u...-----.00.- $278\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. J.@mM~~~~g.-----.m.--m-------m...--m.-...-mm.-..--L...---m...--___m~:_~~L.._____._.._____..__Q.:~~_ .______._..m_.....~J?_?U.I:?_:~.:g_~!"::A::_____. 150 Warehouse j 8.671 0.43 ....__......_m...ll~.~L!..I:?.:~.~Q:!":~A::_.__... I~I~~_~W.~~h~~~..~~~~~~~~~~~~~.-~~~~~~~~~~~~..~~~.-~~.-~~.-..~~~~~~r~~~~~~..~~~~~~~.._-~~~_1~~?.t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q;_i~ $100~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. oo___..__oooooo...oo_oo.uoo___...J...oo....._....._oo__u..oo.............oo.. 170 Utilities (b) ! 0.86~ 0.04 $201/T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. F. Formula 6: Transit Cost Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The transit cost for each new unit of development is calculated for each type of land use by multiplying the new length adjusted person-trips per day (from Table 4.3) by the percent of travel (2% of all person-trips) that is expected to occur on the City's transit facilities (versus motor vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities), and multiplying this product by the transit cost per trip ($308.45) from Table 4.1, page 15. 6. Length Adjusted Person-Trips x Percent Transit Trips x Transit Cost Per = Person-Trip Transit Cost Per Unit Don Ganer & Associates 37 as of 10/25/99 111" The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.6, below. TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) :::=::=:::::::::::=::::j::A~:i~i=I!~!ij:::::ti~i=:::==::=:== ! Person- ! Trips @ 1 Cost @ ;;O~~i~i~~~:~:[!~:~~ii~I:::~~~~~I:~~;~:=i~~~ 220 Apartment : 10.94! 0.22\ $67 / dwelling unit ~~~'!J~iH:~~~~~~i:t:::::::y~I::=::::::::~~i~I:::::::::=mi~~=~: 260 Recreation Home j 5.21! 0.10! $32 / dwelling unit ...____.____....____nu...nn...................__...._...____....._____n......_.___n_._...._._nn.._~___-__-....--n_n __....____n.__L.______.n________..____n_n...~_.__-----.u....-n--._.n.___nn ......_n_n........n___..__..____....____ RECREATIONAL : i ! :HJ~~i=:=::=:::-:::F==-:It~:==-=-=~~~==:=:=:::~ljI~~F::::=:=- 416 Campground/RV Park (b) j 0.74: O.Oll $5 / camp site 1:?:Q.mM~____....___.___....______...m.m.......________.......__.___.....__.__>___....__mm.....__'Z:~?;?.L___....______...____QJ.~lm...._________.......~..L~~~.___........---........ 430 Golf Course ! 88.46j 1.77l $546 / hole u__n_n_n.___nn_n__.__n_nn_..___n_n_....___n.....__n.......n_n.__...u_nnn......nnnn......._n_nn....._n_n....__n_.......__n.................nnn(.....__...........___...._..._u....._____.....______.__n_---....--------..- 432 Golf Drivin~ Range (b) ! 2.28j 0.05~ $14 / tee .~~?___M~~p~!P9.~~.B.~.~nF~~~.....m.m.n..mnL___.u...m..??~:.~?L....___....nnm.:!~1?.L___mu___...$.lL~.~Q. .l!~~!Y....______......_____ 443 Movie Theater w / out matinee j 401.54\ 8.031 $2,477 / screen ......_._____.....____..........__.......____..._______....___._...._._..__........__........._._____..._<0_______._.___________..._______..-t-------..-------...-----......--...........------......--..........-.....-.----......-----.....--.--........--- 444 Movie Theater w / matinee j 279.86: 5.60~ $1,726 / screen :!'Z~....G~~.~!!9.IYi~.~.QnP..Q~~!L1Q!!~ry:h~J.L---.....mm...c?1~?JL.___......m.......Q:.~?L___......________..$.l?l.JI.~~:.F:.Q.~F.~A~...... 480 Amusement/Theme Park i 138.28~ 2.77! $853 / acre :~:~=!~:::_==__===::==:::i~=::-~gE::::]~~E=::=]~~H~~~--=:::=: 494 Bowling Allev 1 60.831 1.221 $375 Ilane . . 495 Recreational Community Center 56.63~ 1.131 $349 /T.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 38 as of 10/25/99 - 111' TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 2 of 5 (1) : (2) : (3) ...m...m..(1L..........\....m_..mm..~?2.._._........... ....m.....m..................m..m...........m..m._...m...m............m.......m...---.Tu---..L.~~Rili...mr.............m............---. ji~i~:~~:~~~~[~ti~~i--:t1i!t:!i~= Transit : .u..______.nn_n..____n......_oo}nn___n.._.n_____unn____.n...._n_._ Cost @ 1 ._n_uun_n...._u_...___.....-t_n____.nn__n_._____n..._n_....n....- ::==:t::::=:~~!:::::::: ...un...uun...__.....__....._..._____.._.......__.................n..........nnn..nnn_...n...:.._u_..._n....._n.....__....__~--.____u....-_.--__.._-._....._.. INSTITUTIONAL/MEDICAL ~ : 501 Mili~ Base j 3.111 0.06 ....m.....u..........$.!?ll.~.~p!~y.~~........... ~:?Q:::~!~iri~~!~::$.~h~~L:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::Q;~zI::::::::::::::::::::Q~:Q1 ..___..........u.......m$.1:.t.L~~4.~.~~................._ 522 MiddlelJunior Hie:h School \ 0.95\ 0.02 $6: j student ~:=~R;;:'~~iY~~~~g:~:::i:::j;~L::::::~~~ ..........m..........$..kt..I..~.~4.~~!.................. ..m.....m....u....$.J?JI~.~4.~~!..........m..... 550 University I College j 2.93j 0.06 $18! I student 560 Church 1 11.27! 0.23 $70\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. :~~:::t?:~y::G~~::G~~!~!Z~!~~~h~~L:::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::?;?:~r::::::::::::::::::::Q~Q~ ________......____.....____...___.)0................____.....__...._......n". $18: I student .n..._n_............n.....n..-t-__n...._...._n.._._n_n..__u...._..nO. 590 Libr~ ! 35.55! 0.71 ............m.....$.~J?J.l.I:?..:!..:q:f:~~....... :~iQ.)i~~P!!~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::L:::::::::::::::::?Q~~~L:::::::::::::::::::g;i.f .................m$.1~?LL!?~.4......m..___............." 620 Nursine: Home ! 4.56: 0.09 $281/bed ~::===::::~:=:::::::::L=='~\::=::~::= $339\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. ___._n.___.__.__....___..._n__.1n._.._____...___n.._......n_...__...-.-. COMMERCIAL/SERVICES ~ ~ ..m..............m...........1"........................---............... 310 Hotel/Motel \ 13.00~ 0.26 ..........m.....m..$.~.QjI!:~.~~..............m...... ~lfl~~~~~~=:::I=:-:=~~~E:==::~'~ ::::::::::::::::::::==~:=.t~:~~=~~~=~=~:~~:::::: With Groceries : 32.03: 0.64 $198: IT.S.F.G.F.A. if~~~:f~=&~~~ii~~=]-::=-~,~F=-::=:~~~~ ......_.._....___..__....____....-)0__....._...___....__.._..___.._.....n..... .::::::::::::::::::::==~~V:~:~=~:~~:=:~~:~~~::::::. Without Groceries : 38.63: 0.77 .........___...m..$.~~~.Ltr:?.:!..:Q:;f:~~...m. ___...__.n...____..._.__._n.....__...~n__n...__n.._._.._.n_n...n_....n_n__.._n_..n_n..nn_:..__n....._.....__....nn_.__n.c_..nn.....n..._...____....n_.. 816 Hardware/Paint Stores \ 54.9t 1.10 $339j /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~i~:~~~:i::=~=:=::::::J:=:-~;~tL::::::::~~ $2391/T.S.F.G.F.A. ...n.....__.....................+.nn_................_....._......_....... $181l/T.S.F.G.F.A. ..._......__.....................<1'..-............-......................-..... 823 Factory Outlet Center 1 18.141 0.36 $112i jT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 39 as of 10/25/99 1ft'" TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 3 of 5 .mn..mm_..mm.n:m_.m.m....m.m{12..m..nm......m.......m.....mm...m.!m..........{~1.mn...mt..m....m.{~2......m....mm....m'<:12.............1...................{~2.................. m..........m.......m.....m....m....m...........nm...mm.......m................m....L..m.1.~.!!K!h..m.Lm....m.....m....m....m.....mmm...mm..........]..m........___.m....m.......m...m. j Adiusted \ Transit Transit \ !!!L~Y~~Q}:T9\TI!GQBx::t=~f~:::::!=~i~~=:~~:t=:::!Tnlc::::- COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) j ! :~~i::~~!Y.::~~~!~~~!!i(~~!::~::~~j::::r::::::::::::::!!~;.~QL::::::::::::::::::i~?~:::::::::::::::::::::$.iQ.~l]f;~~~~Q;f~~;':::::: 832 High Turnover, Sit-Down j \ \ Restaurant j 58.07: 1.16 $358: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ....___.....___......___.....n__..._u......_n...nn.....__....oun__....__.__....._n_n..._._n_n.+____....___...._n_n_...._nu.........._u...__....__n_..........__nn...___n__....u__.uu___+.....__...._._.__n_...un_.....__..._u.. 833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) ! 159.49: 3.19 $984: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ~:&~~:;fL~:~i~:==J-:::-:~~~:i~E=::=:::~~~r::::~~JjIH~i:t=: 837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop j 30.07! 0.60 $185~ I Service Stall ~9....A~!Q~Q~.M.~..?.~!Y.i~~..~~~!~.~..Q?Jmm.L..m..mmmm~}Q.l..m.....mm..m.Q~.9.? m.....................~~Z.LlI~.~~f:9~1~.A:...... 841 New Car Sales 1 40.19\ 0.80 $248: IT.S.F.G.F.A. ...___n.....___._n._____...______....____..._____.~______....._____..._______dun__......___.____.___~n...--.-.....---nn...--.--.....nn....___......___.___n......._......n.......n............~__.I"....-..-...............-....-.............. 844 Gasoline I Service Station i! : (no Market or Car Wash) j 57.62\ 1.15 $355j IV.F.P. .__n_......___...u.n.__unn_.....__...._n......n....._nn.u....un..._....__.._....._n.u..___...uu__.n_n_......nu...___..~nn....~.__..n......___....._.......n...._____..................n_...........u.n_.........u_nU..._... 845 Gasoline I Service Station \ i j ...uu_......_._............._........u..............__......._......._.__.............___un.............nu__..............n.........i-.__n...._n....n._............_.__....._n.n..._n..............................n...................._..... m__...____..(W!!h..~.~~Y.~!!!~!I:~~.M~~~~2...mm......L....m...m..n??..:~.L...m....m....___.1~.U. .___.....m.........$.~.Vy:.F-:.r..:.n.....--............ 846 Gasoline I Service Station \ \ j ii2:~i~~~~~~~~~=~~~L:~~jtRf~~~11~~~~~~!Bf!j~i~= 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) j 221.37: 4.43 $1,3661/T.S.F.G.F.A. ~~:~~~~~t=====~::=L=:::1::jltj:::::::-=t~:::===:~nili9}i~~:: 861 Discount Cub 1 44.80j 0.90 $276\ IT.S.F.G.F.A. .~~....!:!.~~~..~.P.!~.y.~~~~!..?~~~.!.~!.~...l...................~Z~.~?L......n............Q.:Z?...................$.~.~.?j..!..I~?..:f..:.G:f:~~....... 863 Electronics Superstore j 48.28: 0.97 $2981 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 40 asoflO/25/99 111' TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 4 oj 5 (1) \ (2) i (3) (4): (5) _..__m..__m_...._....:___._m__..____....__..__m..m_____m_.___m__..m--....m....--.....-.r.-----i~~gth--..--[--........mm..--..-----_.--- .-....--...........--m...-----.r-......---...----...-----..--....---- =:=:::_=::::=::::=:::=::::=:::=i=~~~1=I::i:: ._.m_I.!_~J!____...J._....mm_...m.____.m__......_..____. __...._~.~~.!..~.._ooo.L__m._..ooo_.....___...._____...__...m_ m_1:ANR_:Q~_.~QP~L~]1;.gQ~X.----t.....-..IrtP~...--..-+....--....--~.....--.-..- --...--~~.Q.~.:1?--.---t..--..-------...Q~!..-....-----m w~__.____.w____nw._____________n.___-n__-.-_n--n__---n__un_nn__n_nn__unnn_n_n_nn_n_+_______.._.n_...______._n______~_______________.nn__n_________ ___.m___.___m..._.__...__ooo.t__._..._m_._..____.____m_.m__.._ooo_. COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : j :@::I~~~!il&ii:~~::::==j::::=:==~~L=:==~~ ::::::::::::::::::::===:=I::~~~~:~=:~=:~=~=~::::::: Without Drive-Thru Window i 61.43j 1.23 $379j /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~~J._.r.h~!!!;YL~g~.~Qr~-..m-..mm...---.--...-m.L.m............---.....-ooo....L._m__...ooo....__.......__.._ ___.....__u.U"__u_..u._....u.~.u_---..uu......u....._u........._ou.. h.__m...__!Y.~~_P!!y~_~~..W~~~~-m--.-mm.-m-l...m...---m..-?.Q.:1~_l__...m___m__..oooJ.:.?:Q $371! IT.S.F.G.F.A. _n______nu..__......_n...u...,..___....n__n..._n__...n_u_____....---- 890 Furniture Store i 5.42\ 0.11 $33! IT.S.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) \ 38.75: 0.77 _..._.____...__.....~~.~_~]..I..I:?.:f.:G:!.:A:_._..._ :~?~::::y~~~~::~~~!~:~:!~i~:::~)::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::?j~~ir::::::::::::::::::::::Q~~- ...._ooo_..__m_...$.J.~.J..!.I:?_:f_:G_:!.:A:___.__ 2JJ___J~_~l?~~g~;--W~~~---....------.mm...--mL.-.....---..J~-?-:J?-L.m_...__......_...~=?Q $l,l42l IT.5.F.G.F.A. .~.____..._._......u..___...n...J.n.._....._""__...._...un"un__.nn__.' 2.!.~ooo_~~I.~~~g_~:nP!!y~.~....m......m...______.t--m.-.m-.n~.!~-:Z2-1..__n...._m_._____.~:~.~ $1,936: IT.S.F.G.F.A. .__u_u....____....___.u""nn..[.__.....________.___..___....____...._n_n OFFICE ijQ:::~~~~i~:Q@~~::~~4.~g:::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::j?~?~t:::::::::::::::::::::Q~~~: :::::::::::::::::::ilI~r{t;~~f~Q~f;A~::::::: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building! 13.50\ 0.27 $83l IT.S.F.G.F.A. Z.!.?...?.~~~..T~_~!.gm~~..~~4J~g--.__--.....Lm..----..mm:?.Q-:~~L__m..._____.m__.Q:.1:Q $1251 IT.S.F.G.F.A. ....____...........___..........__1-....._____...._.....__..__...__..__.n_n'. ri:[ti;~~~~~~:~::::~~!lil~::~-iI ....__......_.....__.$.~?Ql.lI:.~J~:_9:_f:.A::___... __..._._.....___....$.ZMU.T:?.:f.:G:f:A:....... ___..____..._ooo$.!.22,!.!.LT:?.:f-:G.:!.:A:--..m ..___...ooo....~,!L!??j.LT:?_:f_:G:f..:A:___.... ..____m..........__$.1~~1.L.I:_~:_f.:_9:.f:.A::...___ ~!>O Research I Development Center i 14.18! 0.28 $8t IT.S.F.G.F.A. __ _____nd_un____n_._.___________.._____.."__________ n_u________nn______n__n__u____.___+____n____________________.._____n__.nn_______.._________n___ _____________________________-}_____nnn_u________...______...___...- 770 Business Park l 22.311 0.45 $138! IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 41 as of 10/25/99 - r TABLE 4.6 TRANSIT COST PER UNIT page 5 of 5 .m_m_.._m__._..m_m_.____m....__m.__J.1.>..mm...m__.._...m__..._.__m____...___._l..___.__.....~~2._...._m.._L....__m...{;?1..m___._._ (4)! (5) ~ Len21:h j ____...4..._______....__........._[____.._________...........__....________uo :=::-===::::-=::::::+1~~~~1=:i~~:: __...._I!'.~_~!....._.J.mmm.._..._m_......._.._....m__.__ _____..~_~~.!._~.....__Lm______________.______..._____m_.._.__ :~;:~~=~~~~~~~:t=:~~::~_t:_:=:== $308.45 i Unit .._.__...._n_ .......--n.....--1-----.--------.......- - ...o____nn_n_._ _.____..__......_....unu.....__t____u_n_n_uno_____.n........__n--... .Q;?Q...I~~I~~----m...-m.......--m......m.-..--------J...-------.------J.z:-~L...-------..._.......Q_:;?1_ -_-~~~~~.-.-~~~~~~..~.~_-ii.Q_~tZt;~j~.~G~I;~;~~~~_~_ 090 Park I Ride With Bus Service j 6.26: 0.13 ._._____.....__......__~.?j.lp.~~&.?p~~~ _Ohh__nn___.___nn._....uuo..o.._n_no.___________n___...__nn_.._n.__......___n......._____n..__nn........__n....u___.____+onnn_un.n.._.__.._.._..___ 093 Light Rail Station WI Parking j 3.49: 0.07 $22j IParking Space 110 General Light Industrial ! 12.19! 0.24 $751/T.S.F.G.F.A. Ii.Q:::G:~~~i~(H~~Y.i:~4~!!!~:::::::::::::::::::::T:::::::::::::::::::I~i.[:::::::::::::::::::Q~:Q~ ......__nn....n_n_...nn_n..;..__........._n_n...._..u.._u...u~.nn $16: IT.S.F.G.F.A. _n_.u~____hU___~.__u..u__...l"~__n_n_uu__..._u__.n.__~..______n___ 130 Industrial Park [12.17j 0.24 $75[ IT.S.F.G.F.A. J!QmM~~~~g-------..m......m-------..m-m..m..m.....L--.....m-m...-.-~:-~~L__m.....m_m.Q_:J~. ____..._m____....____~JUI~?_:f_:q~f~A::__...__ 150 Warehouse 1 8.67: 0.17 ._........_........_....$..?1:]II:?..:f.:q~f~A::.____.. uu~~.___..u._..n.uu.._..n.uu~_......_....."n_n..u.n"n_..."nn_h.__n._"...."._"n..u.nn:"_..__""n....nu"n.u.."__...~ot___n.~...u...u__"...~.___..__n 151 Mini-Warehouse j 4.37: 0.09 $271/T.S.F.G.F.A. i70---Utiliti;~..(b)---m--..----m-----.mn.--.m-----m-..m--....----nT--mm.--..m----0:86"1"mm----m.--m-.6:.02 ...m.--..mm-..--.--.-$5TjT~s~F:.G"j~.:A:..-... (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S~F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. G. Formula 7: Transportation Impact Fee Per Unit (by Type of Land Use) The Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) per unit is calculated for each type of land use by adding the Motor Vehicle Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.4), the Pedestrian/Bicycle Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.5), and the Transit Cost Per Unit (from Table 4.6). 7. MV Cost + Per Unit P/B Cost Per Unit + Transit Per Unit = TIP Per Unit The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.7, pages 43 - 47. Don Ganer &: Associates 42 as of 10/25/99 ... Ill" TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 1 of 5 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) : Motor Pedestrian I \ i ____n~h.n.._n_n_u_....___n.h.._..__nn.._..__n_n_.~.u__._____u._._.nn_nnn........_..n__j..__._nn.u___n___....._n_._.._.________..__n....._n..nn_nn_......nn__n___.......-t_n_..........._..nn..nn.n,._____...._...._____..._______..._______n_.....__ 1 Vehicle ! Birvcle : Transit 1 Total 1 ......uu....n.........n...___..........n_..._.._.........__.n__.n........_....u.nn.._..__....n.~._..--.._.........____.......-..n.n.._...'~J.n.___n___.....n.__..........._.__n._...i".._.n.__.......n....____...~..._.______......-______--..n_.-n_*n...n-____ ! Cost : Cost : Cost 1 TIP : . . . ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY : Per Unit i Per Unit 1 Per Unit! Per Unit! Unit ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::T:::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::T::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESIDENTIAL ! i 1 i ! _n..._n......._.._nnnn.nn...n.....___nn__......__..n......__n........._un.nnn......._Uy-._h.........._.nnu..._n._.....__nn......._.n....._..__.._....u.n_u....u..__._...y...un..n........._..._............__nn.......n..........n_n......._n.... .?J.Q...?~gl~..;f..~y..c~~~4~~..P.~p~~~2......l....mm..~;?A.~.~L.......n......$.~~.Q.!.........._.........$..??l......m...$.~!.Q?~.LI...~~~~g.~.~~........ 220 Apartment \ $1,814: $250: $671 $2,131! I dwelling unit ~~J~~~H:t.J:g]i'~~il:~i~~i~L=::~~iL:=:::=~I::=Jt~!i=~~~~~;=:: 260 Recreation Home ! $865~ $119~ $321 $1,0161 I dwelling unit mm..n......mmm........m.m....nm...nnmm......mnmm..nnmmmm.n.nm~mmn...nmmm.....mlm....mm......mmmnL.mnn.........nnn.....l.mm.........mmm...nLm..n.n.nm....mnm...nmmn...m RECREATIONAL ~ i : i i llL~!r~~~~:;~;~)~;-~I~~:!f~:~~:~;=~:~:;~lif-:_~~f~11t~~=s;:~-~~;~- 420 Marina ! $1,215: $1671 $45i $1,427: I berth nnn._......__n..n.......__.._n....n.nn___.n.nn___....nn.....n.._.._..___..__........_._____..______........_............_.........._n._.........._._.._.._...n.n_........n_...............__n..u...__n_._.........._.;.......____.........._____........__......n__.... 430 Golf Course \ $14,667! $2,018: $5461 $17,2311 I hole nn..._......_nn___n....n_.......u................_..._..___...nun.......n.n__.....n......___.Jo....u..............n.._.._.._.._....n...._.__..u...._..n._....._..........u.u........{-...................un.......~.........n.......n........._u_....u_._....... 432 Golf Driving Range (b) 1 $3781 $52j $14: $444: I tee .~...M~~P~~~~.~~..f.~~~..nmn..........mj..........$..~?(.Q?QLmn....$.?!.!Q;?L......nl!l;?~9..L.......~(:?z.;?La~~~..m.mn...mnm..... 443 Movie Theater wI out matinee j $66,5801 $9,161: $2,477j $78,218U screen n..............n._n.nn_...._..n_.u......n..........n........_.n.....nn...._....n_.nn..........__....___......_nn__......t'.__....._..__.........n..........n_...n..........._..u......._nnn....u_.._n_....___..._......n.._.........n........_n............___. 444 Movie Theater wI matinee j $46,403: $6,3851 $1,726j $54,514j I screen ~z:;?.n.~~~.~~IY~4.~.~..Y~~~!L~.~~~ry..(~J.l.n.....m.~lQ~.l.mnn.....nn$.0.??L......mm..~.!.~!.l.......mn~tZ??..llI:.?.J~:.g:.f.:.!.\~m.....nn 480 Amusement/Theme Park : $22,928! $3,1551 $853: $26,935: I acre ....__....__._.....u......._._.....u.._.u....._____......._.._.............._n...__nu.........__............u-..uu......_......u..u...._u_.nu......._____._w...u__..___u_...u.u.n...."""_"_..n................._..,.......n_..._u_unu_..nn...un_._........n 491 Tennis Courts ! $9,394! $1,293l $3491 $11,0361 I court .~~~::::~~q~~!::G!~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::~i.~;.?~~r::::::::::::~:i.~~~r:::::::::::::::~~I:::::::::$.j~;'~iQ.j:Z~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 494 Bowling Allev ! $10,087: $1,388: $375! $11.850j Ilane 495 Recreational Community Center $9,389! $1,292! $3491 $11.031: IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 43 as of 10/25/99 - - TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 2 of 5 . (1) i (2) (3) 1 (4) (5) i (6) ..u.._.u....___.__.__u__.__..uu____........_.__nn_......_n____n_n__n...........________n_____*........._n_u__n__......_n.........ou____........___.__.....__n__n_n_n.........._._____n____n_......._..._____+....uu....___..__....___.........____.......... j Motor Pedestrian/ ~ ...........n_u....n_...........__nn_.n.._.....__.............._....................................+...nn................................................_._nu.........................._...................._..................+........__................__n_................... 1 Vehicle Bicvcle! Transit Total 1 i Cost Cost 1 Cost TIF 1 i(!i~t!illP~iPp:glgmGQ~x::r~;;r:y;:;iT =y;;;jliiiiT'Si!!!iii= :=~i,:yiiii+=::=Qiiit::== INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL i . ~Q1::::Mili~:!i~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::$.~1~:::::::::::::::::::::$.?iL:::::::::::::::::~!:~::::::::::::::::::$.~Q~I:z:~:~p.!~y.~~::::::::::::::::: 520 Elementary School j $111 $15~ $4 $131~ /student 1!!i~~;~~~=~~~~~~~_I~_~~~~~~ll~~-_~]~~~~:il~~t;;--~=~ 560 Church $1,869 $257j $70 $2,196~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. ~rig~====:=r~=====::::i:=~~ ~~::=~:=~il~=:~~lif~I~;fA;::= 610 Hospital j $3,413 $470~ $127 $4,009j /bed ~~~:~~~-~~~~:~~~:~:==:~~~:-=t~==~~~~~::-:~~~~t~~~~:~~!~?~~!~~~~=~~ COMMEROAL/SERVICES ~ i ~ :~1Q:::H~!~!i:M~!~L:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::$.?~i~~::::::::::::::::::$.?~Zr::::::::::::::::::~Q.::::::::::::$.~;.~~:i!:zi~:~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~.!.?_..~.~~.~g.M~!~~~~l.~~~_~!............._...l__._........~Z!.Q?.? ._.._........._..~~Z.!.!_........._......$.~.@. ........._...$.~(.?:~ll.!.I:.?~f.~.G:.f.:A.:............ ~.!_~...;f..!~~::?!.~~~K!?!~~~~!..?!~.!~.......-...l............................................................L..........................................................l................................................. With Groceries $5,311 $731 j $198 $6,2391/T.S.F.G.F.A. .~H:...?.P.~.9:~!Y..~~!~..~~~!.~!...............................L...........$ZL~?:~ ....._..........J???l.................$.?:~~. ............$..~!.~2.1.Lt.I~?.:~.:q.~f:A~............. 815 Free-Standing Discount Stores ~ i j n_________n______._n_._.n____n_..n_________ .n___nn_n._____n________n__u_n__n____n....n._n.n__n__n_ununnn_." _________....___________...___~--------...u--__-___--_..-.-- nn_n___n____u__uu_n_n...___n_n__n_n_.n_nun__O_._..___nn_.----- Without Groceries j $6,405 $8811 $238 $7,524! /T.S.F.G.F.A. 816 Hardware/Paint Stores : $9,115 $1,2541 $339 $10,7091/T.S.F.G.F.A. I~E~~PZ1~~~~~~~~~====~=t=~I~ =~~~iE=]~r:~:]~~ffflf~:t1=:=:- 823 Factorv Outlet Center j $3,007 $414~ $112 $3.5331/T.S.F.G.FA. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.LA. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 44 as of 10/'15/99 r TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 3 of 5 ___.........___.___.........._.___.........mm.~1>-..m.........mm........mmmmm......L.....___....(~2..m...... ..m.......J~t........l...........{~L........ ~~-.~..~~....~.~..~~~.~...~....~....~.-t.-....~~....~~~.....~~....~....=~~~..~..~...-..~....~~..~~.-.~.- mm......___mmm..:.mmm........m............m___..............m.___..___..........ml..m.M.~~~!...... E~.4.~~!!j~I........m................m ! Vehide ......~!q~~.....L....J);~~!..... Total 1 ______nnUO..._____nn..___n_____.____.n_n__....o..n____n_.._._...___nun.........._.___n___n{-___...n.....______....._..___ on.n.....nn____non....._+___no.n..__n_n___.____u..o.__nnn_..o_._n ! Cost Cost : Cost TIP ! ~==:~===~=~~====:::_J:=:~===:: .....p..~!..y~!...t---.p..~.r:g~!... Per Unit 1 Unit __..__....un_n_nun........._nnnn_........unu........nn......nnn COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) 1 .........m..................!______..........______........ n_n__n_...n.....__u.._n.........._.____........_u..........__n_......n__ .~.~Jm.~.~!Y.R~~~~~~~..(~~.!..C!..~h~L.L......$.1?!.?~~. ::::::::::::=:::~~:::=:I:::::::::::::::::=::::~ $22,304! IT.S.F.G.F.A. ?g.?:___lligh.I~.~y.~~L~~!=Q~~.....................l...........m..---........... ......n...........---.---....r.......on--n.........--.........n...........-. Restaurant ! $9,628 $1,325: $358 ..........$11;311tIf~s:F:.Gji~A~............ .~~~....f.~~~..f.~.~4..R~~!..(N:~..Q~y.~=~).....j.........~.?.~!~? $3,639: $984 .........$.~.!t.Q??J.JI:~.:;f..:9.:E.:A:............. ........nnn.......n........+.............................. .~~m.f.~~!uf.~~_~n;g.~.~!u(P~y._~.-:-~2..m.___.m..L.u.___.$J~!.~.?:~ ..-:::::..:......::~$.iltL::::::::~..:......:~~. ........1~.!t.?~zl.1.I:~.:;f..:9.:E.:A:.u.......... ?~....P.~gJ~~~~~.I..~~.Q?L.nm..........._________L.........u.___~?.~. ......._...._$.1!.QQ1L!I:.~:.f.:.g:.f.:b.:..........u .~.~Z...~~u~~!?!!~!!~~Y~N~.~..~h~p.u..L...........~!.?~?. ...u___.........$.~~J............u..$.J~? $5,8571 I Service Stall ..............nn....nnn..+_u.............................nn..-......no_ 840 Automobile Service Center (b)! $713 $98j $27 $8371 IT.S.F.G.L.A. .~1....~~~..~..~.~.~.~......______.............m..........___umun..L.....___u.$.~A~ .....---........J?1Zt.............u..$.?~. ::::::::::::=:::~=~::::I:~=:~=:~=:.:=:~=~~:::::::::::::: .~....G~~~~~.I..~~~~~..~~~~.~~...u._________...m...Lu______u.....um.___n.. n__n............._n........-i-__..n.....___n..........__.. (no Market or Car Wash) j $9,553 $1,3141 $355 $11,223! IV.F.P. .~___g.~~.~.~~L~~!Y.!~~u~!~!!~~un....m...m.mm+n._.u...mmnn_.___n___ ::::::::::j~i7.~2.I:::::::::::::::::$.~~ ::::::::::$.lQ~~~21:zy;f~:~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....._......{W!!hn~.~~.Y_~~~~~~...M~~~!2.....u........Ln....___$.?!.?~~. 846 Gasoline I Service Station 1 .mnmm..(W.l..~.~~Y_:nM~!~.~!..~~u~~._!Y~~ht.u....m$.~!.~.~?: $1,1921 $322 m___ul!9t..!?Zl.1.y.J.:p.:..m........................ _n_n...__....._....__.......+_.............___............. .~...Ii!~.?.!~!.~.....___m......._mum.....___...m.............mmm...L...........$.1:L.4?:Q $608l $164 ............~!..!~.~.L!.I:~.:f..:9.:E.:A:...........n ._n___n......._...........__+..........._________.......... ??Q...?.~P~~~~.~!.....m.m..........___u.u.......n___..m.........L.m..$.1~!.~~_ m......___.$.!t.?99j._u.............~Q ...._.....$.1~!.?1~l.l..T.~:.f.:~:.f.:.A.:............ 851 Convenience Market (24 hour) l $36,705 .u___.u...~?t.9?.Qj.............$.!.!g.~ $43,1211 IT.S.F.G.F.A. nn_n..._n....._nnn_....._._n_n....._n_n......n____n__U.......___nn....u.n__n____n__..~.u.--.-......u.............. .........._.n......_nunu.+...u.n._.......____.........._.........___n... 853 Conv. Market With Fuel Pump ! $26,987 $3,713: $1,004 $31,704: IV.F.P. _~u..Wh~J~.~~~..M~~~~..._uu______u...._.______um___u___.Lu_________$!.~J5!.~ $1651 $44 ....______...$..!A9.?.lII:~.:f.:G.:f:~=.........___. ..u__..____nn....__nn____~...u------......__---...---__ _~1...~~.~~.~!..~1~!?.u.___.......mu___........___....................l.............$.?l!?:? $1 022! $276 _m._m...~.~t.??:?LI..I:?.:f.:9.:f:~=............. ...................f..._......+....m..............m...... 862 Home Improvement Superstore ~ $6,229 $857i $232 $7,318~ /T.S.F.G.F.A. 863 Electronics Superstore $8,005 $1,101\ $298 $9,4041 IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 45 as of 10/'l!5/99 1ft" TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 4 oj 5 ..____...........__.__.....____...................(.11.........................____..................__L...........(?:>..........__ ............(~>-..........j............(~2........... ............{?1......__...1. ........... ....._(~1.__.........._.__... j Motor Pedestrian/ i -- - : Vehicle Birvcle! Transit Total ~ __________.___d________n~__d________n__d_____.._n_____u________.u______________n..__.______n.n_.n_._h___n_________n._._.______u___.___~J.._..__nn___+.__nnn.........._unn_.__u........____.........____.__.------.......--.--.....--......--------........... . ~ Cost Cost! Cost TlF 1 .!i~:I;ANPjj~~:.GQP.~Z.GA~.9Q~x::..::.r:.P..~i.:.Q~i:... .::::~~i....y.~!.:l:::~~iIi.ri!!::: :....:.r.~~jj~i::F::....:::..:::::::...y~i:..::....::..:::....::.. ..__..............._..._....._n_nn.___....._n___n..___nn............_nn........___u_nn.nn....}__._nn_n......__n_nn....n_u_non...___.............:.u...___......__n_n_....._____...........n..............+____..........n.........n__..........n........ COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) i j @k~~~~jQii~::::::::I:~~=~=~~:::::-':~+::::::::-==::::::::~=~I<=r.=~:::'===~::: Without Drive-Thru Window j $10,185 $1,401l $379 $11,966~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. =::::~::::~~i~~Jii~~~~49.~::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::::$.2;~ZQ: :::::::::::::$.i;.~ti.!:::::::::::::::::~~ti. ::::::::::$.ll;.tl~l:zI;.~j~~:G;.~~:A~:::::::::::: 890 Furniture Store j $899 $1241 $33 $1,056~ IT.S.F.G.F.A. 895 Video Arcade (b) : $6,425 $884! $239 $7,548l/T.S.F.G.F.A. lfri~A!!~~~:~:::~f:j!~~~~-~tf:--~itl;~-~!~i~I~~~-~~~~ :?r-r~~9ff!;;;:A:;;;!~i!ii:::::j:::::$1iii:~:::::~~L::=:m2:::::::~;z~j]I~EG,fA:: 714 Corp. Headquarters Building j $2,238 $3081 $83 $2,630: IT.S.F.G.F.A. Z.!.?..?.~gt~.I~~!.9W:~.~..~.~~~K............l............$.~!.~?.~. .................~.~j................_~.!.?:? .............$.~{.?1:11II~.?=f.=.G~.f.~.A.:............ Z~Q....M.~4!~~~H2~!!~..Q@~~.~~4.~K........l.........$.lQ!.~Z~. ............~.!A~.!.L...............~~.?9. ..........$.l~{.~9.Zl.I..I~.?=f.=.G~.f.~.A.:............ ii:ilt!~~~~~~r!;~i!:;:;il--;;~iigii~fjliJI~; 770 Business Park $3,700 $5091 $138 $4 347! IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 46 as of 10/25/99 \I' TABLE 4.7 TRANSPORTATION IMP ACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT page 5 of 5 . (1) i (2) (3) j (4) (5) \ (6) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::MQi~i:::::~~4.~~~~L:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ! Vehicle Bicvcle \ Transit Total ~ !ijL~~~~QQ:tLc:::ATILG9!fy:rij~'Q~Ck~Q~i+f~~~~i::r~it;;;iF~~::Y~C:::= PORT/lNDUSTRIAL ! . :Q~Q:::!~~:t~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::~?;':~~~ ::::::::::::::::::~~~~I:::::::::::::::::~iQ~: ::::::::::::~~;'~~~I:j:t~j~~Q;f;~~::::::::::::: &J:r~{:~~~~~~~::W2~~~::i~::::!~':==:~I::::l~=:~~@il1~~~:~= 110 General Light Industrial $2,021 $278i $75 $2,374: IT.S.F.G.F.A. 1~:~~~j;~:=~=::::+:::~~ :=::jmL::::Jt~ =::_~~tHif~l~~.1;:~:=: 140 Manufacturin~ \ $1,108 $152: $41 $1,3011 IT.S.F.G.F.A. 150 Warehouse l $1438 $198~ $54 $1690i IT.S.F.G.F.A. i~i:::M!~~W:~~hQ~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::$.Z~~: :::::::::::::::::$IQQ!:::::::::::::::::::::~?'Z ::::::::::::::::::~~~r:Z!:~~;f~:G;'f.;'A~:::::::::::: 170 Utilities (b) $142 $201 $5 $167: IT.S.F.G.F.A. (a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column: T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position (b) The trip rate shown is the p.m. peak hour trip rate because there is no average daily trip rate. Don Ganer & Associates 47 as of 10/'15/99 - 1ft" " CITY OF WOODBURN Parks and Recreation System Development Charges Methodology and Rate Study Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Parks and Recreation Methodology Update In 1989, the State of Oregon adopted the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314) to "provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges by local governments." The Act requires local governments to enact System Development Charges (SDC's) by resolution or ordinance, and to develop methodologies to establish the principles used in arriving at the SDC rates. The City of Woodburn adopted an ordinance and resolution establishing SDC s for parks and recreation, water, and sewer facilities in 1991. Included in the ordinance was a requirement for the ordinance and methodology to be reviewed periodically to consider new estimates of population and other socioeconomic data, changes in the cost of construction and land acquisition, and other adjustments. A review of the ordinance and the parks and recreation SDC methodology has been completed, resulting in an updated methodology and some recommended modifications to the ordinance/ resolution. The City's SDC for parks and recreation facilities remains an "improvement fee" designed to generate revenue for construction of future facilities; it does not include a "reimbursement fee" for facilities which are already in place. The 1991 parks and recreation SDC methodology was developed prior to completion of the City's Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update. Because specific project costs were not then available, SDC rates included in the 1991 methodology report were based on the "typical" costs of constructing capacity-increasing improvements needed to maintain the then existing levels of service for parks and recreation facilities in the City. Don Ganer & Associates i as of 10/25/99 J The SDC rates included in the updated methodology are based on the growth-related costs of specific capacity-increasing projects identified in the City's 1999 Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update. Population and employment estimates and projections from Marion County, the U.S. Bureau of Census, and a report prepared for the City by E.D. Hovee were used to determine growth needs required for the Level of Service (LOS) Standards (units of facility per 1,000 persons) included in the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan update for neighborhood parks, community parks, and municipal parks, and for the core parks system Except for the non-residential SUC (which was not included in the 1991 methodology), the maximum SDC rates in the updated methodology ($762 per single family dwelling unit) are less than the maximum rates in the original 1991 methodology ($837 per single family dwelling unit) because a "credif' has been calculated to offset potential property taxes paid by new development for a planned $2.5 million bond issue; no credit was included in the original methodology. The City Council in 1991 adopted initial SDC rates at 32% of the maximum rates identified in the original methodology report, with rates increasing by 8.6% of the maximums annually to a total of 57.75% of the maximum rate ($483.20 per single family dwelling unit). The maximum sue rates included in the updated methodology report are as follows: RESIDENTIAL SDC PER DWELLING UNIT Residential Compliance/ Facilities Cost Per + Administration- 1:ype of Dwellin~ Unit Dwellin" Unit Cost/Unit Credit Per Dwellini Unit Residential SDC Per Dwellil\&' Unit Multi-Family: $ 1,084 $ 1,180 $ 108 $430 $ 762 Single-Family: $ 118 $189 $ 1,109 Manufactured Housing: $ 772 $ 78 $215 $ 635 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC PER EMPLOYEE Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee Compliance/ + Administration - Employee Credit Per Employee Non-Residential SDCPer Em.ployee $20 $2 $17 $5 Don Ganer << Associates ii as of 10/'l!S/99 ,.. B. Ordinance Modifications Credits The 1993 Oregon Legislature modified legislative requirements concerning the provision of /I credits" against SDC's for certain improvements required as a condition of development approval. In order to comply with these changes, replacement language for the SDC ordinance has been drafted, as follows: "Qualified Public Improvement" means a capital improvement that is required: (1) Required as a condition of development approval; (2) Identified in the adopted capital improvement plan (OP); and (3) (a) Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or Located in whole or in part on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval and required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project to which the improvement fee is related. (b) Annual Rate Adjustments The current ordinance does not provide for annual adjustments in rates to account for changes in costs of acquisition and development. The following new language has been recommended to provide for annual rate adjustments to account for changes in costs, as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision, the SDC rates adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. shall on January 1st of each year be adjusted to account for changes in the costs of acquiring and constructing facilities. The adjustment factor shall be based on the change in average market value of all land in the City, according to the records of the County Tax Assessor, and the change in construction costs according to the Engineering News Record (ENR) Northwest (Seattle, Washington) Construction Cost Index; and shall be determined as follows: Don Ganer & Associates iii as of 10/'15/99 .... Change in Average Market Value X 0.50 + Chan&e in Construction Cost Index X 0.50 System Development Charge Adjustment Factor The System Development Charge Adjustment Factor shall be used to adjust the System Development Charge rates, unless they are otherwise adjusted by action of the City Council based on adoption of an updated methodology or capital improvements plan (master plan). Don Caner & Associates iv as of 10/25/99 !Ir