Agenda - 11/08/1999
CI1Y COllNCIL AOEIYDA
NOVEMBER 8, 1999 - Z'OO P.M.
270 Montgomery Street * * Woodburn, Oregon
1. CAlL TO ORDER AND FlAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CAlL
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS
Announcements:
A. Public Hearing: November 22. 1999 - (1) Boones Ferry Place Retirement Center.
(2) Park and Recreation ComDrebensive Plan Uodate (continuation).
(3) Annexation 99-03. Zone MaD Amendment 99-04. Subdivision 99-03.
Variance 99-10 - 1.32 acres located on north side of Aztec Drive.
(4) Subdivision 99-02. Variance 99-09 - 1.8 acres near the intersection of
Luba Street and Parr Rd. (Oakwood Subdivision)
B. November 20, 1999 - City Council retreat for review of Council visions and goals.
C. Library and City Hall offices closed on November 11, 1999 for Veterans Day.
D. Aquatic Center reopens November 15, 1999.
4. PRESENTATIONS/PROClAMATIONS
A. Recycling Awareness Week - November 8 - 15, 1999 ........................ 4A
5. COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Chamber of Commerce.
B. Woodburn Downtown Association.
C. Woodburn School District.
D. Livability Task Force.
6. COMMUNICATIONS
7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBUC (This allows the public to introduce items for
Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda.)
8. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine
and may be enacted by one motion. Any item may be removed for disrssion at
the request of a Council member. .
A. Approve Council minutes of October 11, 1999 regular meeting and
~~~ 25, 1999 workshop and meeting.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8A
B. Accept Planning Commission minutes of October 14, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8B
C. Accept Recreation and Park Board minutes of October 12, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8C
Page 1 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of November 8, 1999.
I1r
D. Accept Museum Board minutes of October 13,1999 ........................ 80
E. Accept Human Rights Commission minutes of September 9, 1999 ..:.......... 8E
F. Receive Audit of Motel Operators ....................................... 8F
G. Receive Water System Consumer Confidence Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8G
H. Approve claims for the month of October 1999 ............................ 8H
I. Receive Building Activity Report for October 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
9. PUBUC HEARINGS
A. Recreation and Parks System Development Charges ........................ 9A
B. City of Woodburn Traffic Impact Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9B
10. TABLED BUSINESS
11. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Council Bill No. 2000 - Resolution establishing compensation for Assistant
City Engineer and Public Works Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. llA
B. Council Bill No. 2001 - Resolution authorizing fund exchange agreement
wit:h. 0 DOT ........................................................ 11 B
C. Council Bill No. 2002 - Resolution railing for public bearing on annexation of
certain property located on north side of Aztec Drive ...................... lIe
D. Council Bill No. 2003 - Resolution accepting a COPS in the Schools Grant
from the U.S. Deparbnent of Justice .................................... 110
E. Council Bill No. 2004 - Ordinance annexing into the city approximately 63 acres
located on the west side of Boones Ferry Road also known as "Boones Crossing",
. amending the Zoning Map to single-family (RS), granting condition use approval
of a POO, allowing a variance and imposing certain conditions .............. lIE
F. Authorization of letter to C. Sauvain regarding underground storage
tank low level contamination of public right-of-way ....................... 11 F
G. Acceptance of easement covering the SE comer of Jansen Way subdivision .... IIG
H. Contract award for E. Hardcastle sidewalks .............................. IIH
I. Installation of "No Parking" signs on Arney Road and Robin Ave. . . . . . . . . . . .. 111
J. OLeC license upgrade and change of name for OregonGolf Ass<\ciation . . . . . . .. IlJ
K. Sound amplification permit Woodburn Company Stores . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. IlK
12. PUBUC COMMENT
13. NEW BUSINESS
Page 2 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of November 8, 1999.
t
14. SITE PlAN ACI10NS
A. Site Plan Review 99-22 - Public Works storage facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14A
15. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
A. Government Law Section Election (City Attorney) ......................... 16A
16. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
17. EXECUTIVE SESSION - (A) To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the
governing body to carry on labor negotiations under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(d);
(B) To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to
negotiate real property transactions under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(e); (C)To
consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with regard to
current litigation or litigation likely to be filed under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(h);
(D) To consider records that are exempt by law from public inspection under the authority
of ORS 192.660(1)(f).
18. ADJOURNMENT
\
Page 3 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of November 8, 1999.
-
4A
CITY OF WOODBURN
270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
TOO (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244
PROCLAMATION
RECYCLING AWARENESS WEEK
NOVEMBER 8 -15, 1999
WHEREAS, Oregonians have a long history of environmental stewardship, understand
the value of our natural resources and want to preserve them for future generations; and
WHEREAS, achieving the state's goal of reducing per capita waste generation by the
year 2005 will require a cooperative effort from Oregon's businesses, institutions, and
concerned citizens; and
WHEREAS, these efforts have achieved a 37 percent recovery rate for 1998; however, in
order to reach the state's 50 percent recovery goal, further efforts are necessary.
NO~ THEREFORE, I, Richard Jennings, Mayor of the City of Woodburn, hereby
proclaim November 8 - 15, 1999 to be
RECYCLING AWARENESS WEEK
in Woodburn and encourage all citizens to join in this observance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause the seal of the City of
Woodburn to be affixe this 2rt day of October, 1999.
YOR ~
t, ,
'/' "
. ,
" '1,,1 .. .
., ( ',1 \,
. .I (~ (}( I~I ~. \'
.. ..\; y ,{ ).' .rl",
. .\'
\' oJ '", ',1 I
L t/'
)\ ,~
I)
,
/'/1' 1')\:;\"
, III :)':,
~
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11,1999
TAPE
READING
0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN,
COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, OCTOBER 11, 1999.
CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Jennings presiding.
0007 ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Jennings
Bjelland
Chadwick
Figley
Kilmurray
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director
Tiwari, Community Development Director Goeckritz, Park & Recreation Director
Westrick, Police Chief Null, Finance Director Gillespie, Public Works Manager Rohman,
Management Analyst Smith, City Recorder Tennant
0040 ANNOUNCEMENTS.
A) Woodburn Beautification and Cleanup Awareness will be held on Saturday, October
23rd.
B) Public Hearing: The City Council will hold a public hearing on a proposal to annex
1.32 acres of property located on the north side of Aztec Drive east of Highway 99E on
Monday, October 25, 1999, 7:00 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers.
0055 PROCLAMATIONS.
Mayor Jennings stated that he has issued proclamations for the following:
A) Hands are notfor Hurting Week: October 17 - 23,1999;
B) Violence Awareness Month: October 1999; and
C) Disability Employment Awareness Month: October 1999. _
He stated that he would not be reading each proclamation at this meet~g, however, they
are posted in the hallway on the bulletin board. .
0085 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT.
Phil Hand, representing the Chamber Board, stated that the Chamber's Business After
Hours will be held on Thursday, October 14th, Cascade Park, beginning at 4:30 p.m..
He also reminded the public that the Chamber Business Week will be held October 18th
through 22nd and he briefly reviewed the following events scheduled for that week:
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
Ill"
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
1) October 18th - a class on conflict resolution will be held from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm at
Chemeketa and there is no charge to attend;
2) October 19th - an Industrial Tour of Woodburn Fertilizer and Waremart Foods will be
held for Chamber members. Also attending the tour will be approximately 65 people
from the Salem Economic Development Corporation;
3) October 20th - Chamber Forum will be held at the Woodburn Medical Center at 12:00
noon with the guest speaker being Bureau of Labor Director Jack Roberts;
4) October 21st - Business Showcase will be held at the Woodburn Armory from 12:00
noon to 6:00 p.m.; and
5) October 2200 - A free class will be held at Chemeketa from 8:30 am to 11:00 am on
hiring, retaining, and managing a blended workforce.
0187 Mayor Jennings stated that he would be inserting the public hearing agenda items
between item 8 (Consent Agenda) and item 9 (Tabled Business) rather than waiting until
after the General Business items are discussed by the Council.
0222 Tom Waggoner, 849 Woodland, stated that there was 28 foot of curbing along the west
side of the second median strip tom up by contractors when they improved Woodland
A venue and he questioned if the City had made arrangements to have the repair made to
the curbing. Staff will look into this issue.
Mr. Waggoner reminded the Administrator that the microphone button needs to be
pushed when he speaks into the microphone otherwise the Cable TV viewing audience
does not hear what he is saying.
0295 CONSENT AGENDA.
A) Approval of Council minutes of September 27, 1999;
B) Acceptance of draft Planning Commission minutes of September 23, 1999;
C) Receipt of Fall leaf pickup report;
D) Receipt of Police Department Activities Report for July 1999;
E) Receipt of Building Activity report for September 1999;
F) Receipt of Claims for the month of September 1999; and
G) Receipt of annual System Development Charge (SDC) report.
PUGHlSIFUENTEZ.... accept the consent the agenda as presented. \
Councilor Figley requested that a verbal report be given by the Public Works Director on
the fall leaf pickup program. .
The motion passed unanimously.
Public Works Director Tiwari briefly summarized the leaf pickup program which
includes (1) increased street sweeping in the downtown area and main streets leading to
schools between November 8th and December 18th ,and (2) the new leaf drop off site at
300 Cleveland Street (Public Works materials yard). In years past, the wastewater facility
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
lIr
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
was used as a drop off site, however, with the increase in construction activity at the
plant, the site has been change to the materials yard. Other options available to the
citizens include composting on private property, pickup by United Disposal Service
utilizing yard debris container and/or pick-up of bagged leaves, and composting at the
North Marion County disposal site. Residents would need to check with United Disposal
and the County for costs involved in utilizing their services. He requested that branches
or twigs not be raked out into the roadway since it will clog up the sweeper.
Additionally, too many wet leaves in one location will also cause the sweeper to clog up
and delay the pick up process. He reminded motorists to be cautious when driving since
wet leaves can be very slippery and kids do play in the leaves that are along the curbside.
0465 PUBLIC HEARING - PARK AND RECREATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
UPDATE.
Mayor Jennings opened the hearing at 7: 18 p.m.. He stated that the Parks Master Plan
update has been in the works since 1997 and, even though hearings having been held and
public input obtained, there seems to be a need for some additional site visits or public
input before this hearing would be closed. He requested that the Council continue this
hearing until the next meeting once testimony has been taken at this meeting.
Attorney Shields stated that this is a land use matter but legislative in nature, therefore,
the land use statement is not necessary for this hearing.
There were no declarations by the Mayor or Council on this issue.
Director Westrick briefly reviewed the staff report which summarized the work
completed by the Board in developing a draft master plan. The City contracted with
Consultant Don Ganer & Associates to develop the draft plan and they used a variety of
methods to develop a plan that incorporates goals and policies for recreation programs
and park development through the year 2020. At the conclusion of the hearing, staff will
be recommending approval of the plan along with a revised Appendix A which was
distributed at this meeting. He also stated that part of the strategy of the Park &
Recreation Board is to liquidate property that is not used as much as it could be citing the
Community Center as one example. He recommended that the plan update include
language that would adopt Attachment 2 of the staff report thereby establishing a policy
that would allow for a feasibility study of a new community center an9, if a new center is
constructed, liquidate the present community center and the sales proct\eds would be
applied to the construction of the new facility. '
0600 Don Ganer, project consultant, stated that he began work on the project in early 1997 and
has spent a lot of time with public involvement, the Park Board, and Planning
Commission. He stated that the initial review involved researching other City plans to
see how the parks plan would interact and coordinate with these other plans. A
community profile was developed to identify needs of the citizens, enhance the image of
Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
Ill'
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
the community, and documented features of the City as it relates to location, physical
setting, population, and demographics. Existing and projected land use and growth
patterns were analyzed and facilities were identified that are impacted by employment as
well as residential development. A inventory of park and recreation facilities, greenways
and open space, neighborhood parks, community parks, mini-parks, cultural historical
resources, special use facilities, public school facilities, sports and recreation programs,
and privately owned facilities was completed to determine what the City currently has
available for public use. Surveys were sent to 800 residential addresses and 187
completed surveys were returned which were then used to help determine what the
residents thought were important and provide feedback on the current level of
maintenance, repair, and facilities within the City. All of this information was used to
develop findings and identify specific issues which are found in the plan beginning on
page 20 with the suggested list of policies and goals beginning on page 24. He briefly
reviewed the tables and maps provided in the plan. The list of needs includes updates and
new facility needs over the next 20 years. Also included in the plan is a recommendation
for maintenance levels of service, City adoption of standards for maintenance at modes
that are identified by the National Recreation & Park Association, and identification of a
number of different alternatives for sources of funding. It was noted that no specific
source should be adopted as a part of this plan since the City needs flexibility in
determining the funding sources.
Councilor Chadwick questioned if the renovation of Senior Estates Park included
playground equipment for children.
Mr. Ganer stated that the current version of the plan does not include playground
equipment. He also stated that several schools have facilities that are considered park
and recreation facilities that are joint use facilities for recreational purposes and this has
been taken into account in the development of the plan. Some limited funding
recommendations have be identified in the plan but, for the most part, the school would
own the property and the City could participate in a new or upgrade of a recreational
facility.
Councilor Kilmurray stated that she could understand the partnering aspect with the
school district but questioned as to what assurance the City has that th.e school district
would allow continued use of the facility by the City. \
Mr. Ganer recommended that a formal agreement be entered into between the City and
the School District before any funding arrangements are finalized.
Director Westrick stated that the City currently has on file an agreement with the School
District regarding the tennis courts at the high school since that facility was paid for, in
part, through Land Water Conservation Funds and the Park & Recreation Department is
in negotiations with the School District on a formal agreement that would spell out each
agency's responsibility when using each others facilities. He reminded the Council that
Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
I1r
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
the Parks facilities are open to dusk and there may be a similar type of language in the
agreement that would keep neighborhood facilities open to dusk. He would anticipate a
beginning and ending date for the agreement, however, up until now, the agreements with
the School District, other than the tennis courts, have been a handshake arrangement. The
written agreement will protect both the City and the School District as personnel changes
occur within each jurisdiction.
Further discussion was held regarding limitations placed within an agreement along with
term expiration dates and the drawbacks in providing funding to enhance a facility with
the possibility of not being able to the use the facility several years after the improvement
was made. It was noted that the master plan is a method of strategy of meeting objectives
with no commitment for funding.
1376 Letters submitted by Lyle & Janice Ringgenberg, 944 Hermanson St., and Al & Penny
Tischendorf were placed into the public hearing record.
1436 Barbara Lucas, 214 E. Clackamas, provided a written statement to the City regarding the
Park & Recreation Comprehensive Plan update. She stated that she generally approved
the update but had a few concerns regarding non-funded capital improvements, omission
of use of golf carts on off-street pathway system, and funding for greenway acquisition.
Mayor Jennings stated that it is his understanding that the current law prohibits the
combining of a golf cart, walkpathlbikepath since the golf cart is a motorized vehicle.
Ms. Lucas stated that she spoken to a gentleman in Seattle, W A, with the National
Highway Safety Transit Board who had consulted with an individual at the State Dept. of
Motor Vehicles (legislative liaison for ODOT) and they suggested that the City build a
bikepathlpedestrian path in between Country Club Road to Lind's Market and make it
slightly wider so golf carts can use the path. She will provide his name and telephone
number to the City.
Mayor Jennings stated that he is also interested in the Goose Creek issue since he was
under the impression that it would be covered up with a large culvert.
Attorney Shields stated that discussion can be held at this meeting since it is a legislative
land use action then the Council could continue the hearing at the conclusion of the
discussion. _
Councilor Figley stated that she would like to talk about the plan all at \me time rather
than discussing it at this meeting. _ .
It was noted that the Councilors did not receive a copy of the plan with their agenda
packet. A copy of the draft plan will be provided to each Councilor by the end of the next
working day.
Director Westrick clarified that the Attachment A distributed at this meeting gives total
cost figures for each project. The projects are not prioritized and funding categories are
not listed since things will change in the years to come. If the detail document included
Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
Ilr
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
in the original agenda packet was adopted, then a change in the Comprehensive Plan
would be necessary every time there is a change in the timing or funding of specific
projects.
Christine Spencer, 980 Wilson St., questioned if the plan was available for review by the
public. She stated that they had received a notice in the mail that this action may affect
the use of their property.
Administrator Brown stated that a copy of the plan is located at the Woodburn Library,
City Recorder's office, and the City Administrator's office. He stated that the notice was
provided as a result of statewide Measure 56 and it was sent to every household. The
language that has caused everybody some concern is that it may affect the property
owner's ability to develop your property and/or affect the value of your land. In this
particular instance, the staff suspects that neither the development or land value statement
is true, however, the City is required under the initiative to include the language in the
notice.
2043 FIGLEYIBJELLAND....continue the public hearing until October 25, 1999 at 7:00 p.m..
The motion passed unanimously.
2065 CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - STEIN OIL.
Mayor Jennings stated that Stein Oil Company has withdrawn their application and it is
no longer an item of concern to the City.
Attorney Shields recommended that, for the record, the Council dismiss the appeal since
they had brought it up for an appeal hearing.
PUGHlFIGLEY.... Council dismiss the appeal based upon the fact that the applicant has
withdrawn the application. The motion passed unanimously.
2139 COUNCIL BILL 1996 - ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF
EVERGREEN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SOUTH OF W. HAYES STREET.
Council Bill 1996 was introduced by Councilor Chadwick. Recorder Tennant read the
two readings of the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council.
Administrator Brown stated that the 100' strip was dedicated to the City about 30 years
ago for transportation purposes. The City has re-routed the roadway within the new
Montebello Subdivision and it was determined by the Council that the~ is no longer a
need for the full 100' strip of right-of-way. The Council will be re~aining a 50' width for
pedestrian, bicycle path, and golf cart path, and the remaining portion will be given back
to the abutting property owners.
On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared
Council Bill 1996 duly passed with the emergency clause.
Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
I1r
SA
. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
2267 COUNCIL BILL 1997 - ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE REVISED 1999-2000
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES.
Councilor Chadwick introduced Council Bill 1997. The two readings of the bill were
read by title only since there were no objections from the Council.
PUGHlFIGLEY... correct the bill to read "Richard Jennings" as Mayor. The motion
passed unanimously.
Administrator Brown stated that the copy fee charge has been changed to $.05 per page
for simple copy requests, however, if it involves 15 minutes or more of time to process
the request, then the research fee of $28 per hour chargeable in 1/4 hour increments will
apply.
Management Analyst Smith stated that the fees in excess of 100% are NSF check fees,
facility rentals in parks for commercial organizations based on market rates, and Legion
Park facility rentals which is also based on market rates. It was noted that all of the
system development charges regulated by statute are 100% or less within the proposed fee
schedule.
On roll call vote, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill
1997 duly passed with the emergency clause.
2550 COUNCIL BILL 1998 - RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF BOONES FERRY ROAD
AND SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB ROAD.
Council Bill 1998 was introduced by Councilor Chadwick. Recorder Tennant read the
bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council.
Mayor Jennings stated that this hearing had originally been scheduled for October 25,
1999, however, the Planning Commission has not completed their work on this land use
matter and it is anticipated that it will be completed by the November 22nd hearing date
listed in this bill.
On roll call vote, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill
1998 duly passed.
2619 COUNCIL BILL 1999 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CONVEYANCE OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 347 N. FRONT STREET FROM ALL AMERICAN
DEVELOPMENT LLC. ASSUMPTION OF A TRUST DEED FRQM MARK C.
WOLF. AND AUTHORIZING CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE
ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
Councilor Chadwick introduced Council Bill 1999. The bill was read by title only since
there were no objections from the Council.
Councilor Pugh declared a conflict of interest on this Council bill and he will be unable to
vote.
Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
t
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
On roll call vote, the bill passed 5-0 with Councilor Pugh not voting as a result of his
declaration.
2711 ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY: SPRAGUE LANE.
Staff recommended acceptance of the right-of-way being conveyed by Craig Realty
Group and Warde & Patricia Hershberger in conjunction with the development of
Woodburn Company Stores and Hershberger Motors.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y... accept the right-of-way as described in Attachment "C" of
the staff memo in the agenda packet. The motion passed unanimously.
2738 EXTENSION OF CITY SEWER SERVICE TO 2374 BOONES FERRY ROAD.
Administrator Brown stated that the City had received a letter from the residents of 2374
Boones Ferry Rd. requesting permission to annex into the City and hook-up to the city
sewer without hooking up to the city water system. Staff recommends that the property
owners be required to annex into the City in order to hookup to the sewer system but it
not be required to hookup to City water. This practice has been followed in the past to
other property owners who need sewer service but have a serviceable water well. The
property owners are then charged a flat rate for sewer service rather than a rate
determined based on water use.
Director Tiwari stated that the owners had previously supplied water to the Glatt House
but this changed when the Glatt House began using city water and sewer services.
Attorney Shields stated that an annexation application is the next step to be followed by
the property owner.
FIGLEY/PUGH... approve the request for connection to city sewer for property located
at 2374 Boones Ferry Rd with the following 3 conditions:
A) the property be annexed to the City~
B) all costs associated with the annexation be paid by the property owner; and
C) all costs associated with connection be paid by the property owner. The motion passed
unanimously.
2928 INSTALLATION OF PRIVATE FENCES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Councilor Figley expressed her opinion that the recommendation of staff to handle this
issue by a vacation process would certainly work in this case. She fee~ that there are still
two issues that eventually need to be discussed by the Council - (1) petinit prOcess be
looked at as a method of handling this type of request, and (2) staff look into the
feasibility of incorporating some language in the zoning code that would deal with
requests of this nature.
Councilor Pugh stated that he had previously voted to deny a zone change in this area
from RS to ID in order to protect the older homes in this area. In this case, he agrees with
the staff recommendation to vacate a 5 foot strip on both sides of the existing Mill Street
Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
II!"
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
thereby changing the 50 foot right-of-way to 40 feet. The right-of-way vacated would be
need to be retained by the City as a public easement.
Tape 2
Councilor Sifuentez stated that she was in agreement with this proposal and she assured
the public that the Council is willing to work with all citizens to try and solve issues of
concern.
Discussion was held on who should be initiating the vacation application process and the
reaction of neighbors to this proposal. At this time, the neighbors were not opposed to
the vacation of 5' on each side, however, they did object to having the full street right-of-
way vacated. It was also noted that publication and posting costs are borne by the
initiating party and concern was expressed in the City establishing a precedent of paying
associated costs when property owners would benefit from the street vacation.
0229 FIGLEY/PUGH.... staff contact the party making the request and assist them in initiating
a vacation application per the exhibit in the staff memo. The motion passed
unanimously.
0235 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND BUSINESS
MEETING.
Mayor Jennings requested that the Councilors return the registration forms to the
Administrator's office as soon as possible since the forms need to be forwarded to the
League office. Additionally, the City needs to designate a voting delegate for the Sunday
business meeting. It was the consensus of Council to appoint Councilor Sifuentez as the
voting delegate with Councilor Chadwick as her alternate.
0464 COMPENSATION PACKAGE FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER POSITIONS.
Administrator Brown reviewed the staff memo which recommended a pay grade
adjustment of 10% for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and Public Works
Manager. He stated that the pay adjustment will make these positions more competitive
with the surrounding communities but it will still not bring us to the level those
communities are paying. The City has gone out 3 separate times for the filling of an
Assistant City Engineer position but we have been unsuccessful in filling the position. In
one case, we had offered the position to an individual, however; he d~ined to take the
job once he was told that the City was locked into a salary range l~vel that was not
negotiable at that time. He reminded the Council that this is a Deputy Department Head
level position and one other position that should be affected by this adjustment is the
Public Works Program Manager. Both positions were budgeted at the recommended
grade level in anticipation of this change earlier this year, therefore, no adverse budget
impact is projected.
Page 9 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
Ilr
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
PUGHlFIGLEY.... authorize the positions of Asst. City Engineer and Public Works
Program Manager both to be established at the salary range of M-13.
Administrator Brown stated that staff would be coming back to the Council with a
resolution to enact this change.
The motion passed unanimously.
0554 Barbara Lucas, 214 E. Clackamas, questioned what property is located at 347 N. Front
and if the property was conveyed to the City or to another party.
Administrator Brown stated that the building is more commonly known as the Salud
Medical building. The City has been involved in negotiations and lawsuits over the last
several years to obtain some compliance with dangerous building codes. The building
has changed hands several times and it has become apparent that the current owner is not
willing or financially able to make repairs within a reasonable time frame. There is also
concern on the part of the City, based on engineering evaluations, that the building does
not have much longer to stand and presents a liability to the life and safety of pedestrians
and to people patronizing businesses next door to this building. In this case, the City is
looking at a protracted legal process whereby the City would ultimately end up taking
action to either renovate or demolish, placing some kind of lien on the property, and
ultimately foreclosing on the property and ending up with the ownership. The staff
reluctantly recommended that the City Council approve this action which the Council
adopted with the passage of the ordinance at this meeting. He also stated that studies had
been completed regarding renovation options and the conclusion has been it cannot be
renovated and still present a viable economic option in terms of rent or lease.
Barbara Lucas also questioned the location of the private fence in the public right-of-way.
Mayor Jennings stated that the vacation of the right-of-way along Mill Street is the
property under discussion.
0727 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT.
A) Labor Negotiations: The Classification and Compensation study was included in
the current AFSCME contract and, following receipt of the study, the City and AFSCME
will enter into negotiations for wages with the intention of looking at.changing
classifications and/or compensation levels. We are in the final stages ~ this report and
hope to return to the Council at the next meeting in an executive session to talk about this
issue.
B) Review of Visioning Process: He suggested that the Council meet on November 20,
1999 in a workshop to talk about what has been accomplished since the first of the year
when the Council met with the consultants in facilitating the visioning process. It would
also be a good time to focus on the community center concept and other improvements
Page 10 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
II!"
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
that are of interest to the Council. It was the consensus of the Council to meet on
November 20th even though Councilor Pugh would be unable to attend since he will be
out of town that weekend.
0839 MA YOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS.
Councilor Sifuentez stated that she will be going to Orlando, Florida on business and will
not be able to attend the next regular Council meeting.
Councilor Figley expressed her thanks to the Police Department and Parks Department
for the improvements to the traffic situation at Centennial Park last weekend as compared
to previous Saturdays. She stated that she had walked down to the park that morning and
did see 2 cars parked on the Smith property and a Police Officer was trying to take care of
that situation. She also stated that the cars parked on the dirt were not parked in an
orderly fashion and questioned if some coning could be placed in the lot to keep adequate
isle space for cars to travel.
She also stated that her husband had recently attended a lecture on archeology at OMSI
and brought back materials that they are willing to loan out to interested persons.
Councilor Figley also stated that she, along with the Mayor and Administrator Brown,
had met earlier today with Congresswoman Darlene Hooley about issues that are
important to the City. She thanked her for her positive pro-active outlook and they would
like to follow-up with meetings with Senators Smith and Wyden.
Councilor Kilmurray also thanked Administrator Brown and Chief Null for arranging for
the two officers to join her in a visit with a neighborhood watch group on Marcel Court
last week. She stated that it was very informative for her and she was pleased to have the
officers in attendance.
Mayor Jennings stated that he was encouraged by what he had heard from Ms. Hooley
who had given them ideas on how to find federal funding. He stated that they had taken
her for a drive to see where federal rehabilitation dollars were being spent and she was
impressed with Centennial Park. He also stated that they were able to get 3 hours of her
time and a letter will be sent to express the City's appreciation.
The Mayor also questioned when the No Parking signs would be placed on Young Street
since the Police Department felt that this was an important item 10 be t~en care of.
Director Tiwari stated that if the signs were not up yet that they would be instillled
tomorrow.
Mayor Jennings also questioned which type of bone was recently found in the Woodburn
digs.
Administrator Brown stated that he understood that a wing bone was found that most
closely approximates a Condor but is considerably larger. They also found a tooth which
they do not know yet what it goes to plus other pre-historic bones. Ultimately, all of the
Page 11 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
~
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 11, 1999
TAPE
READING
bones end up in ownership of the City and can be used as part of a collection in a natural
history museum or a natural history wing of a museum in our community.
Administrator Brown also expressed his appreciation to Director Goeckritz who put
together the impressive list of rehabilitated homes that they viewed today thereby
impressing Congresswoman Hooley as to how successful Woodburn's program has been
over the years.
1070 City Attorney stated that there was no need for an executive session at this meeting.
1075 ADJOURNMENT.
PUGHlFIGLEy....meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m..
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
ArrEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
\
Page 12 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 1999
"'"
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN,
COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, OCTOBER 25,1999.
0007 ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Jennings
Bjelland
Chadwick
Figley
Kilmurray
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Absent
Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director
Tiwari, Community Development Director Goeckritz, Park & Recreation Director
Westrick, Library Director, Police Chief Null, Finance Director Gillespie, Public Works
Manager Rohman, Management Analyst Smith, City Recorder Tennant
At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Jennings informed the public that the regularly scheduled Council
meeting would not be held at the designated time of 7:00 p.m. since 4 Councilors must be
present to constitute a quorum. However, the agenda did include a workshop on Parks
System Development Charges (SDC) and Traffic Impact Fees (TIP). Since a quorum is
not necessary to hold a workshop, the Council will proceed with the workshop once the
City's consultant arrives around 7:30 p.m.. He stated that Councilor Sifuentez was out of
town on a business trip, Councilor Pugh was sent to Newberg to attend a STIP (State
Transportation Improvement Plan) meeting, and Councilor Kilmurrary was unexpectedly
delayed at work. If Councilor Kilmurray does arrive at City Hall prior to the conclusion
of the workshop, the meeting will be called to order and business conducted as scheduled.
Mayor Jennings also stated that the agenda did include a presentation to a recipient of a
Boy Scout award and, since the local organization was in attendance, he would give the
presentation as originally planned.
\
Mayor Jennings stated that Pauline Neal has been in Scouting for more than ro years and
has held various positions within her unit and at the district council level. She recently
received from the Boy Scouts the Silver Beaver award which is the highest award ever
given to a non-scout volunteer. He reviewed the types of training and positions held
which were necessary to obtain the award. Mayor Jennings awarded Pauline Neal with
the City of Woodburn Certificate of Accomplishment for receiving the award from the
Boy Scouts of America.
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 25, 1999
,..
SA
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
Pauline Neal stated that the community has been very good to her over the 53 years that
she has resided in Woodburn. She stated that it has been a privilege to not only work
with the youngsters but to see them grow and develop over the years. She stated that kids
need someone who cares about their growth and development and she feels that she is
privileged to be in a position to help them along the way.
The presentation concluded at 7:10 p.m. and the workshop began immediately following.
At 8:33 pm, the workshop concluded and the Mayor informed the public that the
regularly scheduled meeting would not be held since Councilor Kilmurray had not arrived
and there was no quorum.
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
A TrEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
~
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 25, 1999
Ilr
SA
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN,
COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, OCTOBER 25, 1999.
CONVENED. The workshop began at 7: 12 p.m. with Mayor Jennings presiding.
0007 ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Jennings
Bjelland
Chadwick
Figley
Kilmurray
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Absent
Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director
Tiwari, Community Development Director Goeckritz, Park & Recreation Director
Westrick, Police Chief Null, Finance Director Gillespie, Library Director Sprauer, Public
Works Manager Rohman, Management Analyst Smith, City Recorder Tennant
0250 Mayor Jennings stated that this workshop is being held to provide information to the
Council and the public on the consultant's report relating to Parks & Recreation system
development charges and traffic impact fees. He reminded the public that the City is
currently receiving only 30% of the maximum allowable traffic impact fees that were
established over 5 years ago. Likewise, the Parks system development charges are also
below the 100% maximum allowable amount. The Budget Committee had requested that
these fees be looked at during this budget year and they recommended that alternatives be
considered by the Council for potential adoption.
Public Works Director Tiwari stated that, process wise, the TIP's and Parks SDC's are
being presented to the Council in this workshop setting, then a public hearing will be held
on the proposed changes to the TIP's and Parks SDC's, and finally there will be direction
from the Council on an ordinance and resolution to implement changes.
\
Don Ganer, Project Consultant, presented the methodology report~ and rate studies for
each system development charge. He began his presentation with background
information on the statutory authority which allowed for the implementation of system
development charges. He reminded the Council that the statute does allow for system
development charges in water, wastewater, stormwater, transportation, and parks &
recreation. The City does have charges in place for each one of these areas, however, the
charges for transportation and parks & recreation are less than the 100% allowable
Page 1 - Council Workshop Minutes, October 25, 1999
111"
SA
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
amount based on the methodology report and rate studies completed in prior years. He
briefly reviewed the statute that also describes allowable improvements, credits for
qualified public improvements that would serve more area than the development, and
authorized use of revenues generated from system development charges. Additionally,
system development charges can be used to pay direct costs of developing and
administering SDC's. He briefly reviewed court cases that have had an influence in how
SDC's are developed within the methodology report and rate study. Other considerations
in developing SDC's are (1) identifying and collecting revenue sources that are growth
related needs as allowed under statute, and (2) SDC benefits and impacts on new
developments, affordability, and quality of life. He distributed a revised report dated
October 25, 1999 which corrects a spreadsheet error in the report submitted in the agenda
packet.
Mr. Ganer stated that the current TIP was adopted in 1993 before the completion of the
Transportation System Plan of 1996. The Council initially adopted rates at 25% of the
maximum allowable rate with a 1 % increase each year to a maximum of 30% of the
allowable rate. The current TIP addressed only vehicular traffic whereas the updated TIP
before the Council is a multi-modal which includes motor vehicles, pedestrian, bicycle,
and transit transportation needs. The updated TIP also is project driven and the report
includes a list of projects and the estimated percent of benefit based on type and mode of
travel. He reminded the Council that SDC's can fund up to but not exceeding 100% of
growth benefit of a project.
1218 He also reviewed a comparison chart of SDC fees charged by other local cities in our area
and, if the transportation and parks & recreation SDC's are increased to 100% of
maximum allowable, then the fees charged would be close to the average of the cities
surveyed. He also stated that the TIP's 100% maximum rate established in 1993 for
single family dwelling was $3,020 (only 30% actually being charged) whereas the
updated study would establish the TIP 100% maximum rate for single family dwelling at
$3,076.
Councilor Bjelland questioned the as to what would constitute a development with a
vested right which would then allow it to be exempted from SDC's.
Don Ganer stated that the exemption applied during the initial adoptiQ.n of the SDC's in
1993 and it is unlikely that the exemption would apply to any developr\ent at this time.
Councilor Bjelland also questioned the assignment of 85% of vehipulai benefit and 15%
pedestrian & bicycle benefit as it applies to the 1-5 partial cloverleaf project.
Mr. Ganer stated that the numbers were based on (1) estimated portion of cost of the
project and (2) percentage of usage by people. The percentage is a staff estimate based on
a review of the various projects and not based on standards. Staff will re-evaluate this
percentage distribution prior to the public hearing.
Page 2 - Council Workshop Minutes, October 25, 1999
,...
SA
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
Mr. Ganer also stated that once the City adopts the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the
City Council can still modify it at anytime to more accurately reflect the actual
improvement. Once the Council adopts the methodology, it cannot be challenged after it
has been in place for 60 days but individual expenditures could be challenged. He
reminded the Council that modifications to the plan can be made, however, it is necessary
to justify any modifications in conformance with state law.
Councilor Bjelland also referred to Table 4.2 (net new person trips) and questioned the
motor vehicle trip rate for manufactured housing being lower than apartments or condos.
Mr. Ganer stated that the ITE manual does take measurements allover the country and it
is possible that the ITE manual looks at manufactured parks rather than manufactured
homes on individual lots. Additionally, it may also be low because the number is taken
from areas that have a high population of retirees that may not travel as much. In the
absence of having an engineering study in Woodburn, the ITE manual is used for
calculations within the report. He reiterated that most SDC's currently in place are
roadway costs rather than multi-modal models. The City of Portland adopted their multi-
modal model in 1997 and, after doing some further research, he decided to take a similar
approach for this project since the City does have transit facilities, and specifically
identified sidewalks and pedestrianlbicycle needs. He also reminded the Council that this
workshop is being held to introduced them to this project and specific issues can be
addressed and modifications made as needed.
Administrator Brown stated that a public hearing is scheduled for November 8, 1999,
7:00 p.m., on the TIP and Park & Recreation SDC reports.
2290 Don Ganer proceeded with the Parks & Recreation Methodology report and he distributed
an executive summary that provides an overview of the major changes in the update. He
stated that the Parks & Recreation SDC's were adopted in 1991 and, at that time, the
Council implemented charges at 32% of the maximum allowable with a phase-in period
bringing the charges up to 57.75% of the maximum allowable. The original plan also
looked at parks as only being beneficial to residential development whereas the updated
plan does take into account the impact non-residential development has on the City's park
needs. The approach used in developing SDC rates was based on projects identified in
the Parks Comprehensive Plan update. He briefly reviewed the methC!dology in which the
maximum rates were established for both residential and non-residenti\l development.
He also stated that the Parks Master Plan and the Capital ImprovemenfPlan list are the
same since the Parks Master Plan is currently being updated by the Council.
In addition to the adoption of the report, Mr. Ganer stated that ordinance modifications
have been included that would adopt language changes adopted by the 1993 legislature
for credit against SDC's and definition of Qualified Public Improvement. It is also being
recommended that a provision be included in the ordinance that allows for automatic
Page 3 - Council Workshop Minutes, October 25, 1999
II!"
SA
COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
OCTOBER 25, 1999
TAPE
READING
annual adjustments that are based on review of construction costs and average market
value of land during the previous year. Annual rate adjustment language is quite common
in ordinances throughout the local area.
Administrator Brown questioned as to how often the overall SDC fees need to be
reviewed.
Mr. Ganer stated that there is a requirement in the ordinance that they be reviewed every
4 years by the Council.
2888 The workshop concluded at 8:26 p.m..
Mayor Jennings questioned the status of the public hearing on the proposed development
on Boones Ferry Road south of Country Club Road.
Director Goeckritz stated that this hearing will come before the Council on November
22nd since it is an annexation request.
Mayor Jennings stated that he would not be at the meeting on November 8th.
In regards to the other public hearings that had been scheduled for the October 25th,
Attorney Shields stated all land use matters will need to be re-noticed.
Administrator Brown stated that the SDC's public hearing will be held on November 8th,
however, the staff will be researching the publication requirements on the Parks Master
Plan and other land use issues.
The Mayor closed the session at 8:33 p.m..
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
A TrEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
\
Page 4 - Council Workshop Minutes, October 25, 1999
Ilr
~
8B
WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION
October 14, 1999
CONVENED The Planning Commission met in a regular session at 7:00 p.m. with
Chairperson Young presiding.
ROLL CALL
Chairperson
Vice Chairperson
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Staff Present:
Young
Cox
Will
Lawson
Lima
Mill
Bandelow
Lonergan
Heer
P
p
A
A
P
P
P
P
P
Steve Goeckritz, Community Development Director
Jim Mulder, Senior Planner
Nancy DeVault, Secretary
MINUTES
Commissioner Lima referred to page 2, Ex-Parte Contacts section of the September 24,
1999 Planning Commission minutes and pointed out the "'s" should be removed from the
word "Commissioner". He also noted his question to Mr. Bickler regarding the 17 -foot
setback in the southwest part of the property was not included in the minutes.
Staff stated the question may be incorporated into the minutes.
Vice Chairperson Cox mentioned his comment included midway on page 5 should read
"Vice Chairperson Cox pointed out that the applicant is 4% over on the lot coverage
requirement and 19% over on the square foot of lot area per dwelling. n
Commissioner Lima moved to approve the September 23, 1999 minutes with the noted
changes. Commissioner Heer seconded the motion. Motion carried.
Chairperson Young welcomed everyone.
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE
None
l
COMMUNICATIONS
A. Follow-up of Commission comments at September 23. 1999 meeting.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 1 of 14
II!"
SB
PUBLIC HEARING
A. Site Plan Review 99-14. Variance 99-07. Comprehensive Plan 99-02.
Annexation 99-02 and Zone Change 99-06. proposed Alzheimer facility and
retirement center. 2523 and 2551 N. Soones Ferry Road. Boones Ferry Place.
Wally Gutzler I Anthony Kreitzberg. applicant (continued),
This portion of the minutes were provided verbatim so
that Staff could pull all of the findings correctly.
Chairperson Young we'll go right into the Public Hearing for Site Plan Review 99-14,
Variance 99-07, Comprehensive Plan 99-02, Annexation 99-02 and Zone Change 99-06.
Can we have a staff report please.
Staff this item was heard at your last meeting and the Commission decided to continue it
to this meeting. The record was closed for all testimony but left open to allow for additional
written testimony and in your packet you received a letter that was received at the last
hearing and two letters in opposition to the project that was received while the record was
left open for additional written testimony. And then we received a response from the
applicant to those letters. I guess what I can do is couple of things. For those that were
not here at the last meeting, would you like me to go through kind of a summary of the
project or do you think you need a complete presentation of the project?
Chairperson Young I got an opportunity to review the material both from the September
23rd meeting and this evenings material but perhaps a recap would be in order just to bring
everyone up to speed.
Commissioner Mill I would also like to state for the record that I have had a chance to
review the minutes and also Commissioner Lima and I met and he also brought me up to
speed but I would like the recap as well.
Staff there are five parts to this application. First, it is an Annexation request. The property
is currently an enclave. The second application is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
change the current Comprehensive Plan for this area. The entire area is currently
Comprehensive Planned as low density residential. The proposal is to change that to a
high density residential. The next application is a Zone Change. The Zone Change would
affect the property to the north. There is an existing parcel here at the very south end that
is already in the City limits and it is zoned single family residential. The remaining part that
is unincorporated at this point is zoned urban transition farm under Marlen County zoning.
The applicant is requesting to change both of those zones to a multiple~amily residential
zone, the RM zone. The fourth application is the proposed site plan which is for a
retirement facility that consists of three different buildings. The building here would be an
Alzheimer unit with 12 rooms. This would be an assisted care facility with I believe 60
rooms. And the third building would be a retirement facility. It is not necessarily a
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 2 of 14
-
8B
congregated care but it would have rooms with a central cafeteria. Building number three
is a 2 ~ story building, the middle building is a 2 story building and the Alzheimer building
is a single story building. As part of the site plan review the applicant has submitted an
application for a Variance...actually two Variances. One would allow the lot coverage of
the buildings to exceed 30%. The applicant is requesting 34% lot coverage. The other is
to let the site be smaller than what would be required under the multiple family zoning
based on the number of units that are proposed. Based on the number of units I believe
they would be required to have around 40,000-45,000 square feet of additional area. If you
reviewed the minutes and the additional written testimony then that should get you up to
speed as far as what has occurred since the last meeting. As far as your options tonight,
I outlined those in the memo in your packet that you have various options. The one option
you have is to go ahead and deliberate at this time and render a decision. Your second
option is to reopen the hearing if you choose, the public hearing and allow additional
testimony. That would require however that anyone again can come up and request a
further continuance as was done at the last meeting. And then your third option is you can
continue the hearing again if you need additional time or if you desire additional evidence
or something happens at the hearing that could potentially modify the application. You can
certainly request a continuance to allow those things to be done. Are there any questions?
Chairperson Young how far along are we on the 120-days?
Staff since this is an annexation and zone change that is not applicable for this application.
Chairperson Young are there any questions of staff?
Staff you do have before you that correspondence and I would hope that you had
opportunity to read the points and counterpoints of that information.
Chairperson Young should we go through that then?
Staff that depends on how the Commission wishes to move forward with this application.
Like Jim has pointed out you do have three alternatives and of course discussion no doubt
is in order but how you want to proceed I believe the Commission should make that
decision.
Chairperson Young as far as where we are in the order, the Public Hearing has been
closed for all testimony and at this point the Commission could begin our discussion?
Staff yes.
\
Chaimerson Young anyone have comments to begin with?
Vice Chairperson Cox well Mr. Chairman of the three procedural options that are opened
to us outlined by Jim Mulder, I prefer number 1. The evidence is before us. Let's talk
about it. Make a motion or it's either up or down. I think we've got about as much
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 3 of 14
11r
8B
information as we need to make a good decision.
Chairperson Young okay.
Commissioner Mill I agree.
Chairperson Young well let's continue on then. There's a couple of things I'd like to
address. One was the lighting. The concern that the lights would be shining in the
residences windows and that's addressed in the letter from the applicant. Also, it was one
of the conditions. There's 52 conditions that I counted in the packet from...or of the first
meeting and one of those conditions is that the lighting doesn't interfere with the neighbors.
SO...let's start with that one.
Vice Chairperson Cox one new thing that came in our additional written materials was the
compromise proposal or the secondary position of the applicant to lower the height of the
one building by knocking one story off of one end of it. But that in turn requires other
adjustments for the uses and so forth of other buildings on the project. It is my personal
feeling, although maybe others don't agree with me, that it's kind of late in the process to
start redoing the plan here at the Commission. This is too complicated a project to try to
redesign it in midstream and it seems to me that is what we would be doing if we tried to
think of all the ramifications of other things that might be affected that you start changing
one part of the plan, what does that do to other things. I'm not sure I have enough
information to decide that or if everything else was okay, if the zone change and the comp
plan change were okay, then that might be appropriate. But even then it's an awfully big
change to try to work out here at the table by committee. My feeling is we should not
attempt to do that.
Commissioner Lima I agree with Commissioner Cox.
Chairperson Young they are requesting to have extended time after the granting of the
permit and I am not in favor of that. They are requesting four years and I think that is too
long of a time to keep that open.
Commissioner Mill I wasn't here for the discussion however, I have taken a look and
there's one thing that worries me a lot in this particular instance. If you're talking about
going back and amending the comprehensive plan, now it does say that the
comprehensive plan is supposed to be a living document. That we're supposed to be able
to change it if there is a compelling need in the communities best interest and so forth.
What I'm looking at is an area that is surrounded by single family residential. That it is a
usage that is consistent with what has been envisioned that seems \0 be a consistent
pattern in the area. When we put something in like this, we are convoluting that plan. We
are putting in a usage which is not compatible with what that original plan is for. We drew
up that plan for a reason. To stick with that plan. If we went along and changed every time
it appeared to be convenient or every time there's a very good looking project, there would
be no purpose in having the plan. And I really believe that in this particular case we need
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 4 of 14
Ilr
8B
to take a very hard look at that plan and why it was put into place and why specifically that
area was designated the way it was designated and it's usage around it. And we also need
to take into consideration the feelings of the neighborhood around that regarding those
feelings, regarding that designation.
Chairperson Young I think that's a very good point.
Vice Chairperson Cox with regards to the comprehensive plan amendment, the City now
is in the middle of the revision process of this comp plan. And it may well be that after all
the dust settles the area might conceivably be re-designated to some thing other than
single family. I don't know. But it seems to me that we're kind of getting the cart before
the horse to do this on a piece of property on a piece meal basis. Which incidentally I see
that same problem on a bigger scale going up out west of the freeway on another
application that's before us.
Commissioner Bandelow I have some of the same concerns especially when it comes to
the re-zoning to multi family, even if there were restriction that approval, that zone change
would only be for this particular usage. It then creates a section of land, there is a section
of vacant land between this use and the apartment building that much against the desires
of the Planning Commission and the City Council became a RM zoning. We then are left
with this piece in between that I just foresee in the future someone is going to come and
want that re-zoned for multi family for apartment buildings because there it sits isolated
between two multi family zones. It would be so easy to request it. I just fully see that
would happen.
Vice Chairperson Cox is that the piece to the west that you're talking about?
Commissioner Bandelow yes directly to the west of this. There is the church and there is
this rectangle along Country Club and then further west there is another rectangle but it
has the apartment building. My concern is that it would just look like a continuation of use
and would be very easy in the future. I fully see that going RM if this happens. The
concerns for the neighborhood, when the homes around there were purchased, everyone
was looking at it as single family zoning. And the homes that back up to that I could
understand the opponents when they spoke if you have a 30 foot backyard and then as
little at one point as 17 feet to a building that is 50 feet tall. If you draw a line showing
those two and what the view would be from that window, those people are going to be
looking out their backyard at what amounts to such a sizeable fortress back there. This is
a huge building. While it's a fantastic project in terms of design, it's a very large project on
a very small piece of land right in the middle of nothing but homes. My third concern is
staff has said if there is not sufficient drainage at this point for their storlri drain they would
be allowed to run that water from that projectinto tiny little Goose Creek down there which
is already a problem for the City. And to add all the water from those roofs and that
parking lot into that little creek and we haven't been able to fix the problem we've got there
now. I think we would just be compounding it more.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 5 of 14
I1r
8B
Commissioner Lonergan I loved the design. I would love to see this come to Woodburn.
I see real need for a complex like this in Woodburn. In that location I definitely have a
concern. And my biggest concern is the height of it. And I'm with Commissioner
Bandelow. I agree in going out and looking at that again today with how close that would
be up to the homes. To me there's no question, this is not
2 % story, this is a 3rd story and with what we're looking at tonight is too tall for that
neighborhood. I think I should also share with the Commission in our minutes of our last
meeting. On page 4 I expressed my concern regarding the difficulty in waste removal with
trucks having access to that and Mr. Bickler informed me that he had obtained approval
from the sanitation folks. Well, I'm not sure who he talked to but after talking to the
sanitation folks and the person that would make that decision, he was not aware of this at
all. I know Mr. Gutzler has been a very reputable man and doing a lot of work in this area
but somewhere along the lines something was missed there. So, as far as the waste
removal, that was not looked at. So, I obviously have a problem with that.
Chairperson Young I'd like to ask staff, on page 3 ofthe applicants response it says, "The
applicant requests Planning Commission impose a condition which restricts the
development of Phase /I to be consistent with the proposed site plan." I believe that would
be a normal condition but when you're going to continue on something that can only remain
consistent with what it's planned for. I just want to make sure that's clear on the record that
we have that in place.
Staff yes the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 15 I believe of the Zoning Ordinance that has to
do with zone changes specifically gives the City Council the authority to condition a zone
change contingent upon completion of an approved site plan. And then if that site plan
isn't completed as. conditioned then the zone change would go away basically. No longer
be valid. It would revert back to the previous zoning.
Commissioner Lima I would like to address some of my concerns which have been
addressed by all other Commissioners I think about the size of the property. It is a
beautiful design. I have problems having an industry in a residential area. This is an
industry and this is acknowledged by the letter from the applicant rebuttal. A few other
things that caught my attention in the rebuttal. It says here "the subject property is not
attractive for single family development. If single family homes were forced to be
developed on this property..." Who is forcing? It mentions here that you have a
commercial telephone company building one side and the church on the other side. This
is exactly myself and Mr. Mill live. We have a church on one side and then we have
commercial property nearby and we have been very, very happy there. Very nice
neighborhood. Also, it says here that "because the small size and the{act that the major
portion of the property abuts Boones Ferry Road which is very 6usy, noisy arterial road. "
Well, if it is noisy now, adding an industry to that area is going to create more traffic, we'll
have to have staff around the clock to provide service to the people there. So, in the
previous Commission meeting was brought to our attention again the fact that the
intersection of Boones Ferry Road and Highway 214. If we increase the number oftraffic,
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 6 of 14
I1r
8B
that is going to be a major bottleneck. I went there and I don't know if there is any way to
make that intersection any better other than going into the Presbyterian Church and the
School property. I don't know about density. It talks here, saying that in Salem 40% of the
lot area may be covered in a RM zone and then it mentions about Monmouth, Eugene and
in Canby. Well, we're not Salem, we're not Monmouth, we're not Eugene, we're not
Canby. So this is what we have in our books here. So, if you want to come to my dance,
you play to my music. At the bottom of the other page, which is page 3, there's a very
interesting comment here about the calculation of lot coverage. And it says at the last
sentence, "utilizing computers with design software". That is fantastic! Today we can do
a lot with computers. Exhibit "A" from the applicant. I have hand drawn pieces here trying
to convince me that it cannot be done. On the last page I have a nice computer layout.
Very, very nice. This is intimidation as far as I'm concerned. They have the knowledge,
they have the software, they have the computer, they have a highly paid individual to do
this. Why not do it? I really resent that. Furthermore, the timetable now, they are dictating
what we can do. This is something that...you know...if you don't do this, you have to do
that. The extension from two to four years and so on...this is something that really, really
upsets me. Proposed compromise. The applicant's request is if we so decide the site plan
be approved in it's original form as it meets the State and local zoning requirements...Why
are we here, a rubber stamp? So anyone can come with a project, present and the only
thing we have to do is say hi. I'm not paid to be here. I work. This is a volunteer thing but
this is another slap on my face. Perceived impact. Perception becomes reality and the
reality is that this is going to effect a lot of people. A lot of people. As I mentioned before,
on page 6, middle of the third paragraph, they acknowledge this is an industry. So what
they are trying to do is put an industry in a single residential area. This is much more than
I can stand. I have problems with this project. It's a beautiful project. I wished this would
be available in some other location. I have a little bit more to add. We're talking about
Alzheimer and I want for the record to be acknowledged that I'm licensed to practice
medicine in the State of Oregon. There are many things we can talk about Alzheimer and
if you want to really fall asleep I can start reading medical literature here but I have just a
few things here about Alzheimer and Dementia. I spent four hours yesterday on this and
I called several institutions in the Salem area asking about availability of Alzheimer beds.
Brookstone, Marion States, Farmington Square, Benedictine Center and so on and so
forth. "Our census is half full. The market is saturated, very soft. Most of us only have
50% occupancy." Even Benedictine Center here, which is 6 miles from us, has Alzheimer
beds. So, if we are going to talk about having really the need, region wide, which is a catch
man area, it appears to go against what the applicant is saying. Granted, if we think it is
for the future, you can extrapolate saying that yes, people are going to get older and they
may need. The thing is there are many non-Alzheimer type of dementia that will not
require any confinement at this type of institution. I think I'm speaking too much on all that.
Well, those are my concerns. Thank you. - ~
Chairperson Young thank you very much. You really are our spokesperson at this point
because you are the one that's most familiar in the industry. Do we have any other
comments on Commissioner Lima or comments in general? Commissioner Heer.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 7 of 14
Ilr
. , Water Quality Data Table
The presence of contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. Unless otherwise noted, the
data presented in this table is from testing done in the calendar year of the report. The EPA or the State requires us to monitor for certain
contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of the data though
representative of the water quality, may be more than one year old.
Tenns and Abbreviations used below:
AL: Action Level: The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system
must follow.
Range: The lowest amount of contaminant detected and the highest amount detected during a sample period.
MCLG: Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level ofa contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk
to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level ofa contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the
MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology.
NR: Not Regulated: Neither EPA ofOHD has set an MCL for this contaminant.
Your Range Sample
Contaminant(s) (units) MCLG MCL Water Low High Date Violation Typical Source
Inorganic Contaminants
Arsenic (Ppb) NA 50 13 II \3 5/2/99 No Erosion of natural deposits; runoff
from orchards
Microbiological Contaminants
Total Coliform (# samples) 0 n/d 0 No Naturally present in the environment
(# of monthly positive
samples)
Radioactive Contaminants
Alpha emitters (pCi/1) 0 15 2.79 0.41 2.79 No Erosion of natural deposits
Your Samples> AL Sample Exceeds
Contaminant(s) (units) MCLG MCL Water # 95%ile Date AL Typical Source
Inorganic Contaminants
Copper (ppm) 1.3 1.3 0.01 0 0 8/23/96 No Corrosion of household plumbing
systems
Lead (ppb) 15 15 6 0 0 8/23/96 No Corrosion of household plumbing
systems
Units Description:
ppm: parts per million, or milligrams per liter (mg/I)
ppb: parts per billion, or micrograms per liter (J.lg/I)
pCi/l: picocuries per liter (a measure of radioactivity)
# of monthly samples: Number of samples taken monthly that were found to be positive
Results of radon monitorine:
The City of Woodburn tested for Radon on April 21, 1998. The results of these tests indicated a range of 153 to 537 picocuries per liter
(pCiIL) in our drinking water.
Radon is a radioactive gas that you can't see, taste, or smell. It is found throughout the U.S. Radon can move up through the ground and
into a home through cracks and holes in the foundation. Radon can build up to high levels in all types ofhtmes. Radon can also get into
indoor air when released from tap water from showering, washing dishes, and other household activities. ctompared to radon entering the
home through soil, radon entering the home through tap water will in most cases be a small source of radon in indoor air. Radon is a known
human carcinogen. Breathing air containing radon can lead to lung cancer. Drinking water containing radon may also cause increased risk
of stomach cancer. If you are concerned about radon in your home, test the air in your home. Testing is inexpensive and easy. Fix your
home if the level of radon in your air is 4 pCiIL or higher. There are simple ways to fix a radon problem that aren't too costly. For additional
information, call your state radon program or call EPA's Radon Hotline (8oo-S0S-RADON).
For more information, contact:
Randy Rohman
City of Woodburn
503-982-5240
EPA Hotline: 800-426-4791
Oregon Health Division: 503-791-4381
Provided for tbe City ofWoodbura by Backflow Ma.agemeat lac. 8()()"84 1-7689 Copyright BMII999
"...
8B
Commissioner Heer Mr. Chair when I first saw the project and read over it a couple of
weeks ago, I thought it would be an addition to...a great addition to the neighborhood. I
live very close to that area. I don't see it as industrial. I see it as a good mix with the
community. Across the street you have a funeral home, you have an ambulance business,
so it's not that far off from what is just across the street. However, I was really glad that
we didn't make the decision at the last meeting because it really gave me some time to
think. I went to Wal-Mart the other day and I looked at the apartments, retirement living
complex that's three stories high and I visualized what it would be like 20 feet or 17 feet
from that 3 story apartment building. It was pretty overwhelming and so with that I do not
agree with the Variance for this project. And I would probably vote no.
Vice Chairperson Cox I agree with most everything that's been said. The project in the
abstract is good, good design and all that. I don't think it belongs there. They told us that
they have to have over 100 beds, 100 and some odd beds in order for it to be economically
feasible and I just think this site is not big enough to support 100 and some beds.
Particularly where it's located on that end of the project. It becomes a closer call if you
weren't involving the property that's already in the City and already zoned single family.
I really have difficulty about rezoning what is now single family which butts up against a
new single family development. To rezone that and to put that big project there. That is
clear enough to me we shouldn't do that. And I guess that's probably alii need to say.
Although I do think that it would be a much closer call and perhaps I could approve it in a
completely different configuration on the other part of the property.
Chairperson Young as we go through the voting process I think we will split it up in each
ofthe five groups. The Planning Commission is responsible for the zone change. The City
Council will make the final decision on the other four items.
Staff the City Council is the final decision making body always on an Annexation,
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Normally the Planning Commission
is final decision making body unless appealed to the Council on the Variance and the Site
Plan but since they're all going together as a package. I would recommend that you just
forward everything as a recommendation to them.
Chairperson Youna so you want just one vote for the whole thing for recommendation?
Staff no, you can do a separate vote for each one but each one would be in the form of a
recommendation to the City Council. What Staff would do is at your next meeting bring
back a final order reflecting the motions you make tonight and then also I would assume
you would direct us to make the findings based on the info rm atiof\. you have already
provided us or any additional findings or information you want fo pro+ide for us to bring
back to you. .
Vice Chairperson Cox Are we ready for some motions now? Do you want me to do it that
way?
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 8 of 14
8B
Chairperson Young probably so. We've been around the table. We've all expressed our
ideas and thoughts.
Vice Chairperson Cox the one part of the application which I have no problem with, is the
Annexation. Although the applicant may choose not to go ahead with the Annexation if the
rest of the project isn't approved. But just to open the ball game here, I would move that
we recommend approval of the Annexation to the City Council on the grounds that this is
an appropriate piece of property to be Annexed and it meets all the criteria for Annexation.
Commissioner Lonergan I'll second that.
Chairperson Young okay we've got a motion to accept Annexation 99-02 and a second.
Do we need a roll call?
Staff yes please.
Chairperson Young okay. We've had a motion to accepttheAnnexation 99-02 and we had
a second. Can we have a roll call vote please?
Vice Chairperson Cox do we need findings on something like that when it's just a
recommendation to the City Council? I'm not clear on that.
Staff on the Annexation we should develop findings on all the actions to take. Yes.
Chairperson Young so we would request to return with the findings at the next meeting and
a recommendation to City Council.
Motion unanimously carried.
Vice Chairperson Cox I move that we recommend to the City Council to deny the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-02 and have Staff come back with findings for a final
order on that. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion, which carried.
Vice Chairperson Cox I move that the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council that it deny the Zone Change application 99-06 on this property and also with
findings to be brought back. Commissioner Lima seconded the motion. Motion carried
with Commissioner Heer voting No.
Vice Chairperson Cox with Staff's consent, I think we can cover the Sit~ Plan Review and
the Variance in one motion. I move that we recommend City Council _eny the Site Plan
and deny the Variance. Site Plan Review 99-14 and Variance 99-'07 on this property.
Commissioner Lima seconded the motion.
Chairperson Young we have had a motion to deny the combined Site Plan Review 99-14
and the Variance 99-07 and we're asking the Staff to return with the findings and the
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 9 of 14
8B
recommendation to the City Council. May we have a roll call vote please?
Motion carried.
B. Annexation 99-01. UGB 99-01. ZC 99-01. annex business park into the
Corporate limits of the City and establish the IL zone on the proDerty. The
parcel is located on the SE corner of the intersection of Butteville Road and
State Hiahwav 214. Wallv Lien. aDDlicant.
Chairperson Young opened the public hearing.
Staff read the applicable ORS statement. Staff entered the following Exhibits into the
record:
Exhibit I
Exhibit II
Exhibit III
Exhibit IV
Exhibit V
Exhibit VI
Exhibit VII
Exhibit VIII
October 14. 1999 Staff Report
Correspondence received after the packets were put together:
Request for a Continuance by the Applicant as of October 14, 1999
and an October 7, 1999 Letter Submitted by the Department of
Agriculture. Also a petition before the Woodburn Planning
Commission regarding Highway 219 and Butteville Road.
Application for Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. UGB
Expansion and Zone Change from Exclusive Farm Use to Light
Industrial.
Land Use Inventory and Analysis Report
West Woodburn Area Land Use Background Report
North Central Woodburn Land Use Background Report
South Central Woodburn Land Use Background Report
Northeast Woodburn Land Use Background Report
Southeast Woodburn Land Use Background Report
Staff informed the Commission the applicant is requesting a continuance of this public
hearing. He recommended the Planning Commission continue this hearing based on the
amount of information, questions, issues and concerns raised by various jurisdictions.
Staff reported he is not sure as to the time line of when it will come back before the
Commission. Most likely the Periodic Review process will be completed prior to coming
forward with this application.
Chairperson Young moved to recommend to continue the hearing off calendar.
Commissioner Lonergan seconded the motion.
Vice Chairperson Cox interjected Staff should not be required to have to work through
ODOT or LCDC issues. He suggested the application be denied or perllaps open it up for
public hearing and see what the evidence is and then render a d~cision. It 1s not good
policy to have an application pending without a specific time. Vice Chairperson Cox stated
his opposition to postponing the hearing.
Commissioner Mill agreed with Vice Chairperson Cox.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 10 of 14
8B
Commissioner Bandelow inquired what the procedure would be for a continuance?
Staff explained the proposal would be set aside. Staffs objective is to go through the
Periodic Review process. Focusing on the Periodic Review will give us justification or no
justification for what this application is about.
Vice Chairperson Cox further stated it bothers him to have an application on the books
without knowing exactly when, if ever, it will be brought forward to the Commission.
Staff reported the applicant will pull their application if it looks like the Periodic Review will
not help them justify their request. Staff pointed out this statement is incorporated as one
of the comments in the memorandum by the applicant provided to the Commission.
Commissioner Bandelow inquired whether the applicant will be satisfied if their request is
denied at this point and brought forward after the Periodic Review?
Staff explained the State will be satisfied at this time if this is put on continuance. They
know this is not coming before a Planning Commission and City Council for a hearing. He
further stated to deny this application at this time would really cause some discomfort to
Staff because they have to start going through and completely reverse everything said in
the Staff Report.
Vice Chairperson Cox said he will be willing to go along with Staffs request as long as Staff
assures the Commission that he will not spend a lot of time working on this application.
Staff replied he will not and the application will be set aside.
Commissioner Mill concurred with Vice Chairperson Cox with getting things lined up before
we take further action on something like this. However, he is reluctant to continue because
we do not have all of the information needed and leaving it out in never-never land.
Nonetheless, he will reluctantly agree for continuance in the interest of making life easier
for Staff.
Commissioner Lima asked if a timetable may be specified for this?
Staff responded he will feel uncomfortable about a specific date certain because he cannot
tell the Commission exactly when the Periodic Review process will be completed. Most
important, all individuals, interested parties and property owners would need to be notified
at the time of review.
\
Vice Chairperson Cox assumes the Planning Commission or Staff can remove the
application if they feel the applicant is not proceeding. -
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 11 of 14
8B
Commissioner Mill questioned if it is possible to set a diary date for a year from now?
Staff answered the Commission will get a progress report on the Periodic Review and that
this application could be on the table after the completion of the Periodic Review.
Vice Chairperson Cox pointed out it may be that the use will be correct but the timing could
be wrong because of traffic considerations.
Chairperson Youna stated he had made a motion to recommend continuance indefinitely
off calender which was seconded by Commissioner Lonergan. Motion unanimously
carried.
FINAL ORDER
None
DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Site Plan Review 99-22. administrative approval to construct a 288 square foot
storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works materials yard located
at 300 Cleveland Street.
Commissioner Mill commented he thought this was within the area of Staff's ability to
approve.
Staff reported this is an administrative Site Plan brought forward to the Planning
Commission for review and acceptance of Staff's decision.
Chairperson Young stated he is familiar with the site. The site is maintained by the City
and seems to be neat and orderly. He added it seems to be a good plan.
Commissioner Lima moved to approve Site Plan Review 99-22 as written in the Staff
Report. Commissioner Heer seconded the motion, which carried.
B. Lot Line Adjustment 99-02. administrative site plan approval of a property line
adiustment between tax lots #6300 and #4900 east of the Southern Pacific
Railroad and north of Hayes Street. Chemeketa Community College and
Withers Lumber Company. applicant.
Commissioner Lima moved to accept as presented. Commissioner Mill seconded the
motion. Motion unanimously carried.
REPORTS
A. Building Activity for September 1999 \ -
Chairperson Young commented there were only two residential additions and alterations
in 1999 that were greater than the seven done in 1998.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 12 of 14
8B
BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION
Chairperson Young thanked Staff for answering questions he brought forward with
Commissioner Lonergan at the last meeting in his absence. He added he utilized the
information provided to develop his recommendations for the new sign ordinance.
Commissioner Lima praised Nancy DeVault, Community Development Secretary, for doing
such a good job with the transcription of the Planning Commission Minutes. He stated the
minutes are very clear and easy to read.
Chairperson Young commented on the article in the Independent regarding the Salud
building and stated he is glad about that.
Commissioner Loneraan inquired whether Final Order conditions of approval are recorded
with Marion County?
Staff answered the Final Order is not recorded. However, it is his understanding there is
instruction by the Council that any subdivisions and PUD conditions be recorded with the
subdivision plat. He further stated conditions of approval for site plans are not required to
be recorded with Marion County. Staff feels the records kept by the Planning Department
are adequate to enforce those conditions. He added these conditions are reviewed from
time to time.
Commissioner Sandelow pointed out Staff was to follow-up with Mr. James Atkinson's
concerns regarding the traffic light that intersects Hwy. 214 and Soones Ferry Road.
Staff replied he has not followed up with Mr. Atkinson because this is an ODOT area of
responsibility and therefore, he will have to obtain some response from them in regards to
the road alignments and right-of-ways.
Commissioner Mill mentioned he has seen some utility locators going in on Tierra Lynn Dr.,
Kevin Ct. and James St. and asked Staff what is going on there?
Staff responded he does not know what is going on but would obtain the information from
Public Works and get back to him.
Commissioner Mill also asked Staff who has jurisdiction on City streets designating areas
as No Curb Side Parking etc? Additionally, he stated the Shop-N-Cart fence is still a
problem.
Staff responded it would be Public Works Street Department. Howevei no street parking
signs have to go through and be approved by the City Council. Staff stated a field visit to
the site was made today. In regards to the Shop-N-Cart fence, it fs Staffs opinion that it
is the church's issue because the people are walking across the church property and they
appear to be the ones most impacted by what is going on there.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 13 of 14
8B
Commissioner Mill inte~ected the neighborhood is the impacted party. He reported people
are walking through the streets, fights occurring, unruly behavior, drinking etc. in the church
property. Commissioner Mill pointed out the church functions as a neighborhood park and
therefore, it becomes a neighborhood issue.
Staff reported he spoke with the individual from the church about fencing the whole
property and posting no trespassing signs. He added the City has no mechanism to
require the church to do this.
Commissioner Mill pointed out the existing fence is owned by Shop-N-Cart not the church.
He also said one of the conditions of approval of the Shop-N-Cart property was that they
keep and maintain that fence in good order.
Staff informed the church would have to fence off their property along Alexandra Avenue
to stop from getting onto their property. He stated there is no easy solution to this problem.
Vice Chairperson Cox inquired what the time line might be for the proposed sign ordinance
revisions?
Staff reported since staff is running on overload at this time he will be making application
with the University of Oregon to help put together a draft sign ordinance. He is hoping to
secure an award from the University of Oregon in March.
Vice Chairoerson Cox mentioned the Palm Harbor Village Mobile Home site has the
freeway fence cluttered again with big banners. He requested Staff take a look at this
situation.
Staff stated perhaps he can set up a schedule to perhaps collect these signs or he can
locate businesses and inform them by letter that they need to abide by the standards of the
sign code and remove the signs.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Mill moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Lima seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
\
Planning Commission Meeting - October 14, 1999
Page 14 of 14
8C
MINUTES
WOODBURN RECREATION AND PARKS BOARD
October 12, 1999
Council Chamber, City Hall
1. CALL TO ORDER ~ The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Chair Lee
Ehrens. <; .
;,','::>":<::.'.,
;;:,';::::-"':~A~' .:'~;";1~(' '~.%;::.\.
2. ROLL CALL ~ MEMBERS PRESENT: Frank !\tide~son, ~~": <..,c},\ik',,Janet
Greenwell, Darryl Kelly, Dorothy Senatra, Patricia W.., ".atts, an~,?(Jounc-!'nKat~};_
F I ,.....
igey. ~. .4.V
{..;tii.":t~~.. ."i~~;~~
MEMBERS ABSENT: Debb'l .'f
STAFF PRESENT: Randy
Director; Kathy Willcox, Aquatics Manager; Briaq;S ot
Pat Chandler Smith from the Office.
ecreation and Parks
~,ation Supervisor, and
ction ade in the Minutes of
. if4
. .Ji~touncil Meeting"
inutes of the September
r motion, which passed
" crOR:
Main nce Division: Randy reported for John, who is on
\,i-'
vacatioI!;t . t repal . made to Legion Park Stadium, but that more will be
neces~~~, as well mor 'to bring the stadium to standard. He said that, as is often
the,~1e with an older . ,c ltY, there were more problems than anticipated.
~h 'fI:
,~ dy told the Boa that the water level in Hermanson Pond was no longer low, that
bor Pete Cam' ell had been used with Maintenance Division pipes and experience
~. 'ate the em. He suggested that Board work be done this winter on the
, so that agreements could be made in advance o( diffic'tlties.
Administrative Report: Randy said that staff would be re,visiting the Department's
Mission Statement at meetings in November, anticipating the beginning of the budget
cycle. He requested that the Board change the December meeting date from the 14th to
the evening of the 15th, for a holiday celebration. And he announced that the new phone
system the City had been waiting for was being installed, and that employees were taking
8C
training on it.
Darryl Kelly asked about Randy's meeting with COngresswoman Darlene Hooley. Randy
helped host her visit to Woodburn and show her how federal dollars were being put to use
here, not only at the parks, but also the tennis courts at the high school. The Senate is
presently re,funding the Land Water Conservation Fund, and there is a possibility of state
grant monies for local projects, as well.
Finally, Randy reported that the Comprehensive Plan is moving ~b.roug4the process,
and that he expects it will be adopted at the October 25th Council1M~~~thg.
:;',:__ ,_:~~,d:.'\.i:~2~~~~:~}'~:.~",:"
Recreation Division: Brian gave the Board his budget reP9;{.}d~i!!!t!l8 expenditures
on temporary employment for which he anticipates a mid'yearadjustm~t.,'ij~,t,~ll<e.c.l
about the costs of his phone services at the new offi~~ at Se.ttlemier Parks~m1g:'!~ey were
high, because the location is not on the City lines. '~;!,t';::~{k;;" ' '
The re,location there is accomplished. The Drop,IW~~ as been near,capacity,
with some 50,55 youth participating daily. He waspleasea~t unce that Youth
Tackle is a hit; he sees two teams playing next yell~~ In addf""Co,Rec dances have
been well attended, 242 at the first and 213Alt,:' ';"i+;' , t recenlYouth Soccer
Jamboree is scheduled for October 23rd',,;:f,::};:\~0"~'
Brian reported that there will be twoJ~hefit tQ"
Legion Park to generate revenue forf~~t:ivitie~;,:,Reve
ahead oflast year. f'~\' !if" 4iE;<
Lee Ehrens asked if Legion w ' f"\k whe '~~;ournaments could be held. Both
Legion and Centennial are fa e field at Legion will not be ready
until next r, Brian s . rrigation and resurfacing are planned.
Both all a all wil there. Lee also wanted to know whether
existing uld re told him it depended upon revenues.
There was ' . on aoo <~!lg portable soccer goals, which could be locked up
when not in age " ,.','>orized play on the fields. Lee wanted to know about
the sco~~ ' ,aid d6es not run long enough for soccer, and is costly to
opera~~: Darryl Kelly "', ut the Pepsi van, which is still bringing in a good share of
revi!\~e.
'. n reported that'e parking problems at Centennial were being alleviated. The City
? have been ve . elpful; there still are not enough people parking their cars at Valor
lking ove ough signs have gone up and Brian has mentioned it in his
< Kelly wanted to know how many more parking spaces-were needed,
a he thought 100. He plans to re,configure the site plan. S~ven soccer
fields are currently being used at once, all day, from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30'p.in.
Ann Finch's Christmas dance performance has been scheduled for the 11th of December,
and she reports that numbers of participants are higher this year than last.
Brian noted that there are times when there are eight programs running simultaneously
at six different facilities.
May and next July, at
is year, he said, are 11%
.
II
-,v
.. ~}'t
~ t)i ~.
,,-' -:>~,
It 11 ',~~'~,
;\~\",'!'~ikn;..
F',f:l
T.' -')
~
8C
Frank Anderson asked about problems with the programs when the weather was bad. A
discussion followed about investing in a covered playshed for young participants during
our rainy months; it was suggested that the idea find its way into the budget process.
Aquatics Division: Kathy reported on her September budget analysis, that the costs
for temporary employment are up, because the pool has been busy, particula~ly in the
evenings, and she has had to staff for the increase in use. She advi~~d theJ3ciard that
many of the supplies purchased are a one, time expense. Postageis'~~her,because there
are more members to whom to send newsletters. She i~l.ooking in~~X~~y~pere has been
more use and cost of pool chemicals. In addition, she said that revenuij.~~?higher, and
that more is being sold at the concessions. ......... . . ., ',".i',"'./,:..,>.,
Kathy credited increased pool use to both the weather l~st~month, andtb.~j)~1nC:tions
her division has begun. BUCK FRIDAY has filled 'tli:~~~th 180 ' 200 ~'Mmfuers,
when, she said, there had been 30. September's FREE..':, '",,\prought in some 300 people.
_~. ':" ~,. ~:i~ ::.'" -
October's promotion is a free guest for everyone wJ16'att,.~,";"~~er fitness program.
The pool will shut down early in November foraU.nual m~l'.. '?';:';',t Kathy told the
Board that what was planned was draining t ;,clean stit had accumulated
on the bottom from local hard water. Br re lac . The facility will be
pressure washed, and the locker rooms
Lee Ehrens asked how the equipm was r ng. ur years of constant use,
things wear out. That very day, ,'Y said" als had IIJ en replaced, but the lift, she
noted, was old. Lee asked spe ly a . the pu ""motors, and Kathy referred him to
John's division for answers to nten ues . Randy added that the purchasing
practices 'd,changed, en a pa ' ~d, two were now ordered, so that there
were st" ack,
Lee as he H . Randy said that he planned to propose for budget
considerati alleVl idity problem which needs attention.
Frank An here 'ter would come from to re,fill the pool after the
shut,do\\l'Jlln ov Kat y said it would be local, and not trucked in from
outsidetBf town.
...~Vf .
Shc'!continued that a ,ater,fitness classes have not had to be rescheduled around
..... ~,",.' ,"
t~':~ practices. She ~ ~en working with local schools on t~e logi~tics of.district swim
, and she repo ~d to the Board that there are Saturday m,sefVIces bemg held for the
t their 0 " uest, so that what they learn is fresh for the meets held in the
rian about use of the armory as a facility for dances. Brian sLd it would be
costly.
6. SPECIAL EVENT OPERATIONAL POLICIES: Randy reported to the
Board that the Council had approved the Special Event Fees Resolution, i.e. $1275 for
one day, $400 each day thereafter, or $50 per booth per event, whichever is greater. He
8C
reminded the Board that the figures covered the cost to the City of providing the parks for
special use. Negotiations were possible for co,sponsored events, where the city became a
partner in any profits made.
A discussion followed about rules and regulations to protect parks. Randy said that he
had requested model application forms be faxed in from other agencies. He said there
would be a management presence there at all times during such events, and that it would
be the responsibility of the organizers to make sure that all venders,were aware of
regulations. ..........
Lee Ehrens said he would like to form a committee to.~view the~~~~flI1d regulations
for park use. In addition, he posed a question conceflling how ~y.phijllfPllJ'l<s should be
used. Frank Anderson wanted to know if there wer~.a maximwnnumbe!:Qi~tl1s ...
allowed for the fees charged. Randy said he would talkwitl),4he City Adrt1itl4'ij~tpr~bout
..\....~ . '
a ceiling on the number of attractions. \di ....
There was talk of offering a model booth contract tp{
regulations on the back, so that there was advancc,i#pro
there could be, in addition, suggested plans for set" , so tn
friendly, not having everyone in only one ar ading 0
where security and first aid could be ma ges
booth have two trash cans, one for th
area clean.
Darryl Kelly asked about the i
permits the County requires. I
discussed. Kathy Willcox sai
having thi ent, and
have sq, ation..
applicati edu
Darryl Ke
about too m
that while:{f s no
hand tcf;filOnitor.
Pa'~ia Watts sugges: ~. surance for venders, separate riders for each vender; she said
t i~{\ is fairly inexpe~ive~ and that it would further protect the City.
tf::-
~,~f
uni~nter Visioning Process: Consistent with the City Council's
. urn being lla great place to be", the Board was aske_d to urdertake a
VI ess toward a common view of what a Community Centermlght be, given
that it is part of the Comprehensive Plan, and a centerpiece for a possible bond issue in
November 2000. Ideas for getting people involved were sought, and Jan Greenwell
suggested those who utilize the existing center could be asked to participate.
Lee and Darryl both wanted to see maintenance resources as part of the plan. Randy
explained that the monies were there in the funding strategies, under renovation which
.ganizers that had the
., ~. Lee suggested that
..., ould be more user,
ths, with ideas on
as made that each
, blic, to help keep the
, and the Board talked about the
s and things like carnival rides was
ty could be called and told, "We are
e out." Randy told Lee that he would
t the n eting from the Building Codes people on
'ng rides.
. land Randy said that the City has an ordinance
that . e Police who answer to such situations. He added
Plent s responsibility to enforce, it will have a presence on
8C
will be accomplished, he said, working with the neighbors of each park. He told the Board
that there was little to "maintain", until irrigation and proper drainage are brought up to
standard. This is the intention of the renovation funds.
Lee expressed his view that things ought evolve, one step at a time, while Randy sought
to impress on the members that more than one project could and should be undertaken,
to get more done. Randy said that he really wanted to turn the Board loose Q ,visioning
and engaging the public in the process; he felt that rather than a t forc e Board was
the ideal group to accomplish the process.
Mayor Jennings came in and addressed the members. 't too,
~he nucleus of the process, and added that a task forio~' ould be ~,
Issue. Frank Anderson asked whether a consultant ould be .R{oug t "
participants, and added he recalled needs assessme avi!YJ~en done 1 e
Mayor was more in favor of local folks being involv than hiring fro1t@\f^outside.
Jan Greenwell suggested that the name of the proc ed to Community
Improvement Project to broaden not only the app",^) e. as well.
Several avenues were discussed, then, concemi 'how to workshop was
brought up, to be held at Settlemier's Drop,. ' a regula: ng with only this
item on the agenda (leaving the remaini " an i m mailing); and a
Saturday meeting scheduled to engage ' -'fe pe ted.
The date of the Board's next regul y scheed me ovember 9, 1999.
8. BUSINESS FROM T . Dorot enatra wanted the members to be
h addition, she reported on an
at Senior Estates.
routing e sign at Burlingham Park be darkened, so
roved. He also mentioned the logs at the end of the
9. ADJ(i)'" ":lPorothy Senatra moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m.,
and Frilhk Anderson s 'ea her motion. The meeting was adjourned by unanimous
i<~W; ~~~"~f;~}-{;'
voter
\
8D
WOODBURN WORLDS BERRY CENTER MUSEUM:
101 I 13/9':J
Outline of City Mgr., J. Brown proposal:
I Museum administered by the Recreation & Parks Dept.
(1) House railroad collection
(2) House Archeological Discoveries collection
(3) Historical Collection
II Establish Advisory Commission (5 to 7 members) instead of
Museum Board with Quarterly Meetings.
(1) Use volunteers under City Staff Administrator.
(2) Establish by Ordinance.
(3) Any of Board Could Apply for Commission Seat.
III Museum Budget to be Established in January.
(1) Museum revenues maintained separate fund from City to be
earmarked for Museum Expenditures only.
IV Future
(1) Increase number of Days "Open"/
(2) Greater use of Bungalow Theater
(3) Staff person in Charge to also do Grant Writing.
~
~
8D
CITY OF WOODBURN
270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
TDD (503) 982-7433 . FAX (503) 982-5244
October 13, 1999
TO:
FROM:
SUBJEcr:
Berry Center Museum Board ~
John Brown, City Administrato~ r
Museum Manae:ement Pronosal
Backe:round:
Your Board is seeking alternatives to the current Museum management structure.
Several of your members no longer regularly attend meetings, and a number have
indicated strong interest in resigning to pursue other interests. I understand you discussed
options for remaining an autonomous organization. You also asked the City to consider
taking over museum management. I attended your September 1999 meeting and proposed
an option for conveying management to the City.
Discussion:
I proposed the City assume the Museum function, to be administered by the
Recreation and Parks Department. I hope to support the Museum function so it will grow
and diversify over time, to justify a museum division or a new City department.
Opportunities for diversification include a railroad collection and, with recent
paleontological/archaeological discoveries in our parks, an ancient history collection.
Policy Guidance
Some of your Board wish to maintain involvement independent of the City Council
in guiding museum policy. Accordingly, I proposed that an advisory commission to the
Council be substituted for the Museum Board. This is an alternative to eliminating the
Board and vesting policy determination solely with the City Council. Day to day
operations would be conducted with existing volunteers, under the administration of City
staff, answering to the City Administrator.
~
Museum Commission Composition, Selection, Qualification; Terms, Duties,
and Meetings
The Museum commission would be established by Ordinance, similar to the
Human Rights or Planning Commissions.
Berry Center Museum Board
October 13, 1999
Page 2.
8D
The commission should have an odd number of members. A composition offive
to seven is recommended, to keep the group size manageable.
Per current policy, commissioners would be solicited through an open recruitment
of eligible applicants and would be appointed by the Mayor subject to City council
approval. It is suggested, if it is legally possible, that the opportunity to serve be extended
to any interested individual in the greater Woodburn Area. Qualifications should require
an interest in or experience with historical collections, historic preservation, and local
and/or natural history. Any of your Board could apply for a seat on the Commission.
Duties would include making policy recommendations and providing policy
guidance with respect to museum collections, exhibits, programs, operations, and short
and long term capital improvements.
Terms would be four years, and staggered to replace or re-appoint approximately
half the commission every two years.
Based on our discussion, it appears quarterly meetings of such a commission
would be sufficient. Officers would be selected from within the membership, at the first
meeting of each calendar year.
Financial Accountability
You have expressed concerns regarding the funds in your checking account, and in
certificates of deposit. As a City function, I propose a museum budget be established, and
that museum revenues and investments be maintained in a fund separate from the City's
general purpose revenues and earmarked for museum related expenditures only. While it
is not customary for advisory commissions to approve expenditures, I offered that the
Museum Commission could, ifit desires, approve expenditures before they are made. For
timeliness of payments, this approach is not recommended, but could be implemented if
you so choose. As there is currently no museum budget, one will need to be established
by the Budget Committee. It is currently my intent to reopen budget hearings in January
2000, to adopt a supplemental budget. If your Board accepts this proposal, a museum
budget could be established at that time.
Transition
~
Lacking a budget until January creates an operating problem that can be avoided
by making no changes to the present Museum management until December. Accordingly,
it is recommended that the Museum Board retain responsibility for management and
volunteer operations until a budget for the museum can be adopted. This was discussed
with you in September, and seemed to meet with general agreement.
~
Berry Center Museum Board
October 13, 1999
Page 3.
8D
Administration, Staffing, and Volunteers
Since our meeting last month, I discussed this proposal with the Mayor and
Council President. They were agreeable to both my proposal and greater City
involvement in future museum development. The Mayor suggested, however, for at least
the short term, that the Museum be made a function of the City Administrator's Office.
With respect to staffing, I propose to seek a new position that would be responsible for
both museum operations and coordinating special events on a City-wide basis. The
position would also be responsible for related grant writing.
The museum is currently open two days a week, and is run with volunteers. I
understand the volunteers are coordinated with the assistance of an individual who acts as
a curator. It is my intent, should the City take over Museum operations to increase the
number of days per week that the museum is open to the public, and to make greater use
of the Bungalow Theater. This goal will take time and planning, and will rely on obtaifiirtg
an operating budget from the Budget Committee and City Council, obtaining staffing
resources, and receiving the continued assistance of your membership and volunteers.
Other Issues
I am unclear as to your official status as an organization. I am advised you may be
an incorporated not-for-profit organization. In that case, the Board would need to consult
with its legal counsel and disincorporate if the City takes over museum management. At
this time, it does not appear that any not-for-profit status you may hold would either
prevent or delay making the changes I have proposed.
Conclusion:
The foregoing proposal is offered for your consideration. I am pleased to discuss
any changes you deem appropriate, and to present a final proposal to the City Council for
their approval.
JCB
cc:
Mavor and City Council
Budget Committee
Finance Director
Recreation and Parks Director
~
1.
8E
WOODBURN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - September 9, 1999
ROLL CALL
President Scott Summers
Vice President Wendy Veliz
Commissioner Doyne Deos
Commissioner Marilyn landeen
Commissioner Eliborio Fernandez
Commissioner Florence Jensen
Commissioner Walter Howell
Commis~ioner Patricia Garcia
Commissioner Alicia Hernandez
Present
Absent * *
Present
Absent * *
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
* * Advance notice of absence was given
Staff:
Present
Present
Paul Null
Nita Marr
2.
Minutes/June 99 - Commissioner Jensen moved to approve the minutes.
Commissioner Howell seconded the motion which carried.
3.
HRC Awards/Media - Commissioners reviewed ten nominations for this
year's Human Rights Awards, choosing six individuals as recipients for the
coming months. The choice for the first recipient, to be awarded in
November was Rosa Martinez, President of the Love, Santa program.
Discussion took place regarding logistics for presenting awards. It was
decided that awards would be presented at City Council meetings during the
months of November, January, March, May and July, with a coinciding press
story. Staff will develop a calendar for contacting recipients and news media
representatives.
4.
Activity Roster - Revised copies of the Activity Roster were distributed.
Upcoming activities for the November meeting include presenting the first
Human Rights Award and discussing/planning activities to observe the Martin
Luther King holiday.
5.
Public Transit at Salud (Follow up) - President Summers_ has ~ceived letters
of response from the City Administrator and Public Works Prdgram,Manager.
At this time, there is only one transit bus, which keeps to a 1-hour route
schedule. Problems with stopping specifically at the Salud facility include the
narrow driveway and difficulty maneuvering the bus through the tight
spacing and congestion in the parking lot. The transit program will be
undergoing planning for the future, and they will bear in mind the need at the
Salud facility.
8E
Human Rights Commissio!, "September 99
No response was received from Marion County Housing regarding a covered
bus stop at their facility under construction on Park Avenue.
6. Business Cards (Draft) - Commissioners approved the format for the business
cards. When the new telephone system is installed at City Hall, the Human
Rights Commission will have a voice mail box where they can receive
messages from the public.
7. Commissioner Duties - President Summers pointed out the language in the
HRC Rules of Procedure emphasizing the responsibilities of Commissioners.
He suggested that Commissioners who are unable to attend a meeting should
inform staff in advance that they will be absent.
8. Business From the Commission - Ideas for Publicity
Commissioner Howell proposed the formation of a partnership between the
Human Rights Commission and a student group from Woodburn High School
to participate in the Adopt-A-Street program, and to adopt Front Street as a
project. He will look into this further and report back at the November
meeting.
Suggestion was brought forth that the City should erect signage in three
languages (English, Russian, Spanish) of the City motto: "City of Unity".
Chief Null will discuss this with the Public Works Department and report
back at the November meeting.
9. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. The next meeting is
scheduled for 7:00 p.m., November 4, 1999, at City Hall Conference Room,
270 Montgomery Street.
cc: Woodburn City Council
Woodburn Independent
file
~
8F
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Council through the City Administrator
Ben GiUespie, Finance Di~
Audit of Motel Operators
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
October 11, 1999
The City engaged its audit firm, Boldt, Carlisle, and Smith, to review conformance of hotels and
motels operating within the city limits with ordinance 2057, the Hotel/Motel Tax. The audit team
will review one third of the hotels/motels each year. They began this year with the Woodburn
Inn, the Woodburn 1-5 RV Park, and the Fairway Inn. A copy of their report is available in
Central Files.
Compliance was generally good. However, Boldt, Carlisle, and Smith did note these exceptions.
Woodburn Inn-The 6% tax was not collected on all rents. Offsetting that, the motel
calculated the tax based on total receipts including the tax, and thus over reported the
amount due to the City.
Woodburn 1-5 RV Park-The tax was reported net of deductions for membership in the
Good Sam Club. The ordinance expressly prohibits this practice. Offsetting this were
adjustments (increases) that were not supported by any provisions in the ordinance.
Fairway Inn-The Certificate of Authority was not displayed on the premises as required
by the ordinance.
Letters have been written to each of the hoteVmotel operators describing the findings and what
must be done to be in compliance. A copy of the ordinance has been included for their reference.
Where an operator has over-reported, the City has given the motel an opportunity to claim a
reimbursement, if they wish to review their records and calculate the amount.
The net financial effect on the City is expected to be zero plus or minus $500. The long term
benefit of this audit is to remind hoteVmotel operators that the City has the authority to review
their books for compliance with ordinance 2057.
l
8G
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administrato; ~ .
Public Works Program Manager4 p.-----
City of Woodburn Water Consumer Confidence Report
TO:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
October 19, 1999
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has required the city to distribute
a "Consumer Confidence Report" to all city water customers. The report was a
requirement of the Safe Water Drinking Water Act of 1996. The Oregon Health
Division adopted the federal standard. The attached report will be included in all city
water bills and will be distributed to other customers, such as those in apartments,
who do not get water bills.
The primary message of the report is contained in the headline on the first page.
City meets water quality standards
City public works staff including all employees in the water division have this as a
primary goal. Every effort is expended to make sure that the city's water supply is
safe and complies with all state and federal standards.
The report is for 1998. A report which covers 1999 will be required to be provided
prior to July 1, 2000. In following years the report will be required by July 1 of the
following year.
l
:t~
~~
8G
City of Woodburn
1998 Consumer Confidence Report
City meets water quality standards
This report is a snapshot of your drinking water quality. It contains infonnation regarding the source of the City's
water, any contaminants that may have been detected, and some special language for the immune deficient.
Detected contaminants must be reported, even though the level may fall below the federal standards.
The City of Woodburn is proud to announce that your tap water has met all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EP A) and Oregon Health Division (OHD) drinking water health standards. We will be providing you with a consumer
confidence report on an annual basis. It is a new federal regulation. If you have any questions about this report, please
call us at 503-982-5240.
Special notes for the
immune deficient
Drinking water, including bottled water,
may reasonably be expected to contain at
least small amounts of some contaminants.
The presence of contaminants does not
necessarily indicate that water poses a
health risk.
Some people may be more vulnerable to
contaminants in drinking water than the
general population. Immuno-compromised
persons such as persons with cancer
undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with
HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be
particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water
from their health care providers. EP NCenters for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on
appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial
contaminants are available from the Safe Water Drinking Hotline (800-426-4791).
Surface water and
wells for Woodburn
The City of Woodburn draws its
water from 3 aquifers levels, accessed
by 6 wells. All of the wells are located
within three miles of each other, inside
the urban growth boundary.
Well depths range from 150 to 300
ft., and can pump up to 1000 gallons
per minute. Each well is equipt with
external generators in case of
emergencies.
City Council Meetings:
Twice A Month at 7pm
Be involved with your city!
City Council meetings for Woodburn
occur twice a month, on every second
and fourth Monday of every month.
Meetings begin at 7:00 pm in the
City Hall Chamber, located at 270
Montgomery Street. Call Woodburn
City Hall at 503-982-5222 for more
infonnation.
How to make this
report work for you
Although this report may seem
overwhelming, it contains valuable
information. Within this report there are
terms that must be defined in order to
alleviate confusion or concern as you review
the supplied information.
Contaminant is a word used throughout this
docwnent. This is a commonly used term
associated with the drinking water industry.
The presence of this term should not
necessarily invite concern. All drinking
water is subject to some quantity of
contaminants. The purpose of this report is
to provide you with an understanding' and
perspective so you can make informed
aecisions about your drinking water.
In measuring contaminants in drinking
water, the units used to describe the quantity
of contaminants found are recorded as either
parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion
(ppb).
To gain a.perspective on this measurement,
imagine 0" billion (I,000,000,000) blue
jellybean~. ~Now imagine that one of these
jellybe3ns is black. The amount of black
jellybeans in relation to blue ones would be I
ppb, or 111,000,000,000. This example works
the same way in respect to ppm as well.
As you read this report, be sure and keep
these figures and definition in mind. This
will assist you in interpreting what you are
reading and empower you as a water
customer.
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999 8H
CHECK DEPARTMENT VENDOR NAME VENDOR DATE AMOUNT
NO NO
47790 POSTAGE MTR-VARIOUS US POSTAL SERVICE 020089 10/01/1999 $1,200.00
47791 PAYROLL-VARIOUS CITY CTY INS SERV 002488 10/05/1999 $745.00
47792 SERVICES-WTR VALLEY MAILING 021044 10/07/1999 $676.40
47793 BOOKS-LIBRARY INGRAM DIST 008116 10/07/1999 $4,459.40
47794 SERVICES-NON DEPT WB CHAMBER OF COMM 022510 10/07/1999 $2,000.00
47795 SERVICES-LIBRARY MIKE BEDNAREK NONE 10/11/1999 $195.00
47796 SUPPLIES-STREET DSU PETERBUIL T 003285 10/13/1999 $20,741.75
47797 SERVICES-WATER VALLEY MAILING 021044 1 0/14/1999 $428.00
47798 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
47799 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
47800 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
47801 SUPPLIES-RSVP VOLUNTEER SOFTWARE NONE 1 0/15/1999 $10.00
47802 SERVICES-POLICE VAN METER & ASSOC NONE 10/15/1999 $125.00
47803 SERVICES-POLICE EDGEWA TER INN NONE 1 0/15/1999 $135.00
47804 SERVICES-POLICE D.P.S.S.T. NONE 10/15/1999 $138.00
47805 SERVICES-WWTP PNPCA CONFERENCE NONE 10/15/1999 $250.00
47806 SUPPLlES-A TTY CITY OF LINCOLN CITY NONE 10/15/1999 $35.00
47807 REFUND-BUILDING SENIOR ESTATES NONE 1 0/15/1999 $74.58
47808 SERVICES-POLICE OCEA NONE 1 0/15/1999 $55.00
47809 SERVICES-LIBRARY OLA CHILDRENS SERV NONE 10/15/1999 $18.00
47810 SERVICES-POLICE D.P.S.S.T. NONE 1 0/15/1999 $30.00
47811 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY PARSONS TECHNOLOGY NONE 1 0/15/1999 $55.95
47812 SUPPLIES-WATER A&A DRILLING 000010 10/15/1999 $1,090.00
47813 SERVICES-ENG AEROTEKINC 000080 10/15/1999 $335.00
47814 SERVICES-WWTP ARAMARK UNIFORM 000534 1 0/15/1999 $360.62
47815 SERVICES-VARIOUS ARCH PAGING 000535 10/15/1999 $175.22
47816 SERVICES-VARIOUS AT&T 000623 1 0/15/1999 $21.81
47817 SUPPLlES-STREET BEN-KQ-MA TIC 001200 1 0/15/1999 $2,248.00
47818 SUPPLIES-BUILDING BIMART CORP 001275 1 0/15/1999 $39.36
47819 SERVICES-VARIOUS BOLDT,CARLlSLE & SMITH 001345 1 0/15/1999 $17,765.00
47820 REIMBURSE-ADMIN JOHN BROWN 001490 1 0/15/1999 $1,403.48
47821 SERVICES-WWTP BROWN & CALDWELL 001573 10/15/1999 $54,584.39
47822 SUPPLIES-PARKS BSN SPORTS 001578 10/15/1999 $127.34
47823 SERVICES-PLAN ROGER BUDKE 001580 10/15/1999 $5,040.00
47824 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY BUSINESS JOURNAL 001631 1 0/15/1999 $72.00
47825 SERVICES-RSVP CANBY TELEPHONE 002062 10/15/1999 $19.95
47826 SERVICES-ENG CARLSON TESTING 002140 10/15/1999 $1,505.50
47827 SUPPLIES-PARKS CASCADE POOLS 002226 1 0/15/1999 $661.70
47828 SERVICES-SELF INS CIS CITY CTY INS 002488 10/15/1999 $28,995.21
47829 RETAINAG E-WWTP CITY OF WOODBURN 002525 10/15/1999 $110,359.57
47830 REIMBURSE-LIBRARY NANCY CONDIT 002755 10/15/1999 $14.25
47831 SUPPLIES-STREET CONSTRUCTION MACH 002775 10/11/1999 $83.29
47832 REIMBURSE-PUB WKS CRAIG REAL TV GROUP 002892 10/1 /1999. $89,383.76
47833 SERVICES-PUB WKS CRANE & MERSETH 002896 '10/15/1999 $11,345.78
47834 SERVICES-POLICE CRYSTAL SPRING WTR 002919 1 0/15/1999 $71.00
47835 SERVICES- TRANSIOAR C.T.A.A. 002923 10/15/1999 $160.00
47836 SERVICES-PUB WKS DAILY JOURNAL 003020 1 0/15/1999 $151.13
47837 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY DELOS TOOLE 003120 1 0/15/1999 $63.80
47838 PERMITS-WWTP DEPT OF ENVlR QUALITY 003205 10/15/1999 $47.47
Page 1
'II'
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999 ,8H,
47839 SERVICES-FINANCE DIRECT LINK 003240 10/15/1999 $315.00
47840 SUPPLIES-PARKS DYNA MED 003310 10/15/1999 $171.00
47841 SUPPLlES-WTR ENG CONTROL PROD 004180 1 0/15/1999 $707.35
47842 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY FC&A 005073 10/15/1999 $32.96
47843 SUPPLIES-STREET FMSI MARINE GOODS 005187 10/15/1999 $48.30
47844 SERVICES-WWTP JAMES W FOWLER CO 005215 1 0/15/1999 $509,433.54
47845 SERVICES-WWTP FOTO MAGIC 005258 10/15/1999 $20.00
47846 SUPPLIES-POLICE FRANKLIN COVEY 005332 1 0/15/1999 $46.60
47847 SUPPLIES-STREET G.K. MACHINE 006009 10/15/1999 $39.80
47848 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY GALE GROUP 006015 10/15/1999 $615.61
47849 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY GAYLORD BROS 006030 1 0/15/1999 $149.79
47850 REMBURSE-FINANCE BEN GILLESPIE 006189 10/15/1999 $7.00
47851 SUPPLlES-ENG GW HARDWARE CTR 006405 10/15/1999 $243.71
47852 SUPPLIES-WWTP HACH CHEMICAL CO 007030 10/15/1999 $154.45
47853 SUPPLIES-POLICE HARRIS UNIFORMS 007090 10/15/1999 $71.95
47854 SERVICES-STIWWTP HIRE CALLING 007240 1 0/15/1999 $3,112.19
47855 SERVICES-HOUSING HI TECH VINYL 007246 1 0/15/1999 $6,750.00
47856 SERVICES-POLICE HUBERS CAFE 007331 10/15/1999 $77 .25
47857 SUPPLIES-WATER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 008090 10/15/1999 $226.70
47858 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS IND WELDING 008100 10/15/1999 $52.25
47859 SERVICES-FIN IKON TECH SERV 008117 1 0/15/1999 $10.110.00
47860 SERVICES-VARIOUS IKON OFFICE 008119 1 0/15/1999 $596.47
47861 SUPPLIES-POLICE KAPAK CORP 010025 10/15/1999 $122.02
47862 SERVICES-PUB WKS KERR CONTRACTORS 010067 10/15/1999 $194,326.78
47863 SUPPLlES-WWTP LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 011024 1 0/15/1999 $196.22
47864 SERVICES-VARIOUS LAWRENCE CO 011175 1 0/15/1999 $200.00
47865 SUPPLlES-A TTY LEXIS LAW PUBLISH 011218 10/15/1999 $74.88
47866 SERVICES-WATER L1NDS MARKET 011240 10/15/1999 $30.00
47867 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY LIBRARY ASSOC 011244 10/15/1999 $15.60
47868 SUPPUES-WTR LITTLE CHEMICAL 011285 1 0/15/1999 $79.90
47869 SERVICES-VARIOUS LUCENT TECH 011370 1 0/15/1999 $621.90
47870 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY MADERA CINEVlDEO 012036 10/15/1999 $242.50
47871 SERVICE5-STREET MARION CTY TREASURY 012223 10/15/1999 $190.00
47872 REIMBURSE-LIB DONNA MELENDEZ 012420 10/15/1999 $33.00
47873 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS METROFUELING 012448 1 0/15/1999 $1,431.84
47874 SERVICES-HOUSING MIRACLE TOUCH PAINT 012512 1 0/15/1999 $6,107.00
47875 SERVICES-WWTP NICOLI ENGINEER 013192 10/15/1999 $27,182.45
47876 SERVICES-POLICE NORCOM 013198 10/15/1999 $20,681.25
47877 SERVICES-PUB WKS NORTHWEST GEOTECH 013287 1 0/15/1999 $4,087.25
47878 SERVICES-VARIOUS NW NATURAL 013350 1 0/15/1999 $43.54
47879 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY OFFICE DEPOT 014029 10/15/1999 $109.94
47880 SERVICES-ENG ONSITE ENVIRON 014055 10/15/1999 $1,857.40
47881 SUPPLlES-WWTP OR ANALYTICAL LAB 014107 10/15/1999 $222.00
47882 SERVICES-BUILD OR DEPT OF CONSUMER 014199 _ 10/1t/1999 $3,878.97
47883 SERVICES-PARKS OR DEPT OF CONSUMER 014201 10/1 /1999, $150.52
47884 SERVICES-ATTY ORDMV 014240 : 1 0/15/1999 $11.50
47885 SERVICES-STREET OR DEPT OF TRANS 014260 1 0/15/1999 $84.56
47886 SUPPLIES-POLICE OR FIRE EQUIP 014304 1 0/15/1999 $13.97
47887 SUPPLlES-A TTY OR LAW REVIEW 014335 10/15/1999 $24.00
47888 SERVIceS-PARKS OR REC & PARKS ASSOC 014431 10/15/1999 $280.00
47889 SUPPLIES-RSVP PACIFIC PRINTERS 015058 10/15/1999 $193.50
page 2
Ilr
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999 8H
47890 SERVICES-WWTP PACIFIC PURE 015059 10/15/1999 $65.50
47891 SUPPLIES-WATER US FILTER 015065 10/15/1999 $4,883.50
47892 REIMBURSE-POLICE LINDA PARKE 015148 10/15/1999 $18.02
47893 SUPPLIES-STREET PAULS SMALL MTR 015175 10/15/1999 $162.50
47894 SERVICES-VARIOUS PORT GENERAL ELEC 015420 1 0/15/1999 $34,227.39
47895 SUPPLlES-WWTP PRAXAIR DIST 015480 10/15/1999 $13.35
47896 SERVlCES-STIWTR PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLY 015648 1 0/15/1999 $444.68
47897 SERVICES-WWTP QUALITY CONTROL SERV 016063 10/15/1999 $290.35
47898 SERVICES-PARKS R-CO PAVING 017090 10/15/1999 $15,225.00
47899 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY RECORDED BOOKS 017102 1 0/15/1999 $85.80
47900 REIMBURSE-BUILD RLM CONSULTING 017257 1 0/15/1999 $68.80
47901 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY ROCKHURST COLLEGE 017275 10/15/1999 $193.70
47902 SERVICES-WWTP RUFFIN CONSTRUCTION 017345 10/15/1999 $31,255.00
47903 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY RUSSIAN HOUSE 017375 1 0/15/1999 $318.96
47904 SUPPLIES-PARKS S&S WORLDWIDE 018017 10/15/1999 $1,959.58
47905 SUPPLIES-STREET SAFFRON SUPPLY 018020 10/15/1999 $819.00
47906 SUPPLIES- TRANS SCHETKY NW SALES 018240 1 0/15/1999 $77.16
47907 SERVICES-OAR LES SCHWAB 018300 1 0/15/1999 $8.50
47908 SUPPLIES-POLICE SHAMROCK SCIENTIFIC 018420 10/15/1999 $42.50
47909 SUPPLIES-A TTY SHEPARDS 018430 10/15/1999 $623.12
47910 SERVICES-POLICE SHOOTERS MERCANTILE 018453 1 0/15/1999 $50.00
47911 SERVICES-LIBRARY SIEMANS BUILDING 018457 10/15/1999 $586.00
47912 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY SOUTHEASTERN BOOK 018627 10/15/1999 $26.73
47913 REIMBURSE-LIBRARY LINDA SPRAUER 018710 1 0/15/1999 $83.98
47914 SUPPLIES-PUB WKS STATESMAN JOURNAL 018760 10/15/1999 $14.80
47915 SERVICES-POLICE SUN RIVER 018848 1 0/15/1999 $316.40
47916 SUPPLIES-POLICE TIGERPAK 019157 1 0/15/1999 $356.52
47917 SERVICES-TRANS TIMS DIESEL 019167 1 0/15/1999 $1,157.01
47918 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS UNOCAL:ERNIE GRAHAM 020010 10/15/1999 $1,870.18
47919 SERVICES-PUB WKS UNION PACIFIC 020015 10/15/1999 $2,543.94
47920 SERVICES-VARIOUS UNITED DISPOSAL 020020 1 0/15/1999 $1,797.20
47921 SUPPLIES-WTR UNITED PIPE 020030 10/15/1999 $788.98
47922 SERVICES-VARIOUS US WEST COMM 020091 10/15/1999 $358.75
47923 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY USWEST DIRECT 020092 1 0/15/1999 $63.94
47924 SERVICES-VARIOUS US WEST COMM 020095 10/15/1999 $6,699.61
47925 SUPPLIES-PARKS VIKING OFFICE 021180 10/15/1999 $736.97
47926 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY VISIONS 021203 10/15/1999 $156.65
47927 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY WALMART STORES 022035 10/15/1999 $21.69
47928 SUPPLlES-WWTP WEAR-GUARD 022115 1 0/15/1999 $574.93
47929 REIMBURSE-POLICE RICHARD WEAVER 022125 10/15/1999 $43.15
47930 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY WEISS RATINGS 022128 10/15/1999 $184.95
47931 SUPPLlES-A TTY WEST GROUP 022160 10/15/1999 $138.50
47932 SUPPLIES-TRANS WESTERN BUS 022175 10/15/1999 $93.13
47933 SERVICES-WWTP WILLAMETTE ENG 022332 1 0/1 t/1999 $1,425.20
47934 REIMBURSE-PARKS KATHY WILLCOX 022390 10/1./1999 $151.48
47935 REIMBURSE-LIBRARY NICOLETTE WONACOTT 022478 : 1 0/15/1999 $4.00
47936 SERVICES-PARKS WBN FLORIST 022600 10/15/1999 $34.00
47937 SERVICES-VARIOUS WBN INDEPENDENT 022630 10/15/1999 $274.50
47938 SUPPLlES-ENG WBN RENT-ALL 022708 1 0/15/1999 $210.00
47939 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY WORLD MEDIA EXPRESS 022815 10/15/1999 $302.48
47940 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS YES GRAPHICS 024025 10/15/1999 $633.00
Page 3
'Ir
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999
8H
47941 REIMBURSE-COURT JAN ZVRYANOFF 025060 10/15/1999 $156.38
47942 SERVICES-WATER VALLEY MAILING 021044 10/21/1999 $488.40
47943 VOID VOID $0.00
47944 VOID VOID $0.00
47945 VOID VOID $0.00
47946 SUPPLIES-COURT DEER CREEK PRODUCTS NONE 10/2211999 $26.85
47947 SERVICES-TRANS BEST WESTERN NONE 10/2211999 $215.07
47948 SERVICES-POLICE BLUE LINE LEARNING NONE 10/2211999 $100.00
47949 SERVICES-WWTP A&A PEST CONTROL 000011 10/22/1999 $85.00
47950 SERVICES-ENG AEROTEK INC 000080 10/2211999 $180.00
47951 SUPPLIES-ENG AM FIRE PROTECTION 000222 10/22/1999 $252.00
47952 SERVICES-WTR/WWTP ARAMARK UNIFORM 000534 10/2211999 $206.76
47953 SUPPLIES-PARKS ARCH PAGING 000535 10/2211999 $15.92
47954 SUPPLIES-POLICE ASSOCIATED BAG 000562 10/2211999 $177 .44
47955 SERVICES-STIWTR AT&T 000623 10/2211999 $11.07
47956 SERVICES-PARKS AT&T WIRELESS 000655 10/22/1999 $3.11
47957 SERVICES-POLICE AT&T LANGUAGE LINE 000659 10/2211999 $398.18
47958 SERVICES-PUB WKS AWWA 000665 10/2211999 $104.50
47959 SUPPLIES-BUILD BI-MART CORP 001275 10/2211999 $12.58
47960 SERVICES-COURT MARGOT COMLEY 002686 10/22/1999 $156.25
47961 SUPPLlES-WWTP CORNELL PUMP 002865 10/2211999 $382.54
47962 SERVICES-PUB WKS CRANE & MERSETH 002896 10/2211999 $6,026.44
47963 SERVICES-ENG DE HAAS & ASSOC 003108 10/2211999 $116.00
47964 SUPPLlES-WWTP FISHERS PUMP 005147 10/2211999 $37.71
47965 SUPPLlES-C STORES FORCE 4 COMPUTER 005242 10/2211999 $1,021.74
47966 SERVICES-STREET DON GANER & ASSOC 006014 10/22/1999 $731.00
47967 SERVICES-PARKS GATEWAY PRO AM 006027 10/2211999 $277 .23
47968 SUPPLIES-LIB GE CAPITAL 006079 10/2211999 $178.05
47969 SERVlCES-WWTP KATHERINE HANCOCK 007053 10/2211999 $1,000.00
47970 SERVICES-STIWWTP HIRE CALLING 007240 10/2211999 $2,285.06
47971 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS IKON OFFICE 008119 10/22/1999 $527.29
47972 SERVICES-PUB WKS KERR CONTRACTORS 010067 10/2211999 $176,982.34
47973 SERVICES-PUB WKS KEY TITLE 010084 10/2211999 $35.00
47974 SERVICES-WWTP LANDMARK PACIFIC 011033 10/22/1999 $32,179.35
47975 SUPPLIES-PLAN MARION CTY TREASURY 012223 10/22/1999 $97.00
47976 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS METROFUELlNG 012448 10/22/1999 $1,604.18
47977 SERVICES-HOUSING METRO OVERHEAD DOOR 012451 10/2211999 $471.00
47978 SUPPLlES-WWTP MILES CHEVROLET 012490 10/2211999 $8.91
47979 SERVICES-HOUSING MORRIS CONTRACTORS 012608 10/22/1999 $5,003.00
47980 SERVICES-PUB WKS NW GEOTECH INC 013287 10/2211999 $2,131.95
47981 SERVICES-VARIOUS ONE CALL CONCEPTS 014054 10/2211999 $117.00
47982 SERVICES-ENG ONSITE ENVIRON 014055 10/2211999 $1,694.25
47983 SERVICES-WWTP OR ANALYTICAL LAB 014107 10/22/1999 $316.00
47984 SUPPLlES-WWTP PACIFIC SAFETY SPL Y 015040 _ 1 O/~1999 $179.60
47985 SUPPLIES-WWTP!WTR PACIFIC PRINTERS 015058 10/ 1999, $323.08
47986 SUPPLlES-ENG PIONEER ELEC 015345 :10/22/1999 $49.99
47987 SERVICES-WATER RADIX CORP 017035 10/22/1999 $256.74
47988 SUPPLlES-WWTP JACK RAWLINGS 017054 10/2211999 $116.96
47989 SUPPLIES-PARKS RIDDELL ALL AMERICAN 017205 10/2211999 $2,883.29
47990 SUPPLIES-PARKS S&S WORLDWIDE 018017 10/22/1999 $1,339.61
47991 SERVICES-OAR SALEM HOSPITAL 018100 10/22/1999 $45.00
Page 4
~
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999
8H
47992 REIMBURSE-SELF INS MARY TENNANT 019055 10/2211999 $103.23
47993 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS US OFFICE PRODUCTS 019100 10/2211999 $2,358.59
47994 SUPPLIES-STREET UNOCAL:ERNIE GRAHAM 020010 10/22/1999 $441.94
47995 SERVICES-HOUSING UNITED DISPOSAL 020020 10/2211999 $272.20
47996 SERVICES-WWfP VALLEY FIRE CONTROL 021040 10/2211999 $21.50
47997 SERVICES-POLICE WBN FAMILY CLINIC 022587 10/2211999 $8.00
47998 SERVICES-PUB WKS WBN INDEPENDENT 022630 10/2211999 $112.50
47999 SUPPLIES-BUILD YES GRAPHICS 024025 10/2211999 $349.00
48000 SERVICES-POLICE PHOENIX INN NONE 10/25/1999 $151.12
48001 SERVICES-POLICE NA TL PUBLIC SAFETY NONE 10/25/1999 $275.00
48002 PETTY CASH-VARIOUS CITY OF WOODBURN 015255 10/26/1999 $147.46
48003 SERVICES-CABLE TV WBN COMM ACCESS TV 022547 10/27/1999 $6,135.44
48004 SERVICES-FINANCE LORMAN EDUC SERV NONE 10/27/1999 $179.00
48005 SERVICES-WATER VALLEY MAILING 021044 10/28/1999 $406.40
48006 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
48007 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
48008 VOID VOID VOID $0.00
48009 SERVICES-LIBRARY NICKEL ADS NONE 10/29/1999 $46.00
48010 REFUND-PARKS BETH WEAVER NONE 10/29/1999 $57.50
48011 SERVICES-PARKS KARA ARNDT NONE 10/29/1999 $71.00
48012 SERVICES-PARKS AMBER VELASCO NONE 10/29/1999 $102.00
48013 SERVICES-PARKS SARAH LOPEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $60.00
48014 SERVICES-PARKS NONY MENDOZA NONE 10/29/1999 $96.00
48015 SERVICES-PARKS CHASITY LEDOUX NONE 10/29/1999 $10.00
48016 SERVICES-PARKS JUAN DE DIOS ANDRADE NONE 10129/1999 $87.00
48017 SERVICES-PARKS FABIAN HERNANDEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $58.00
48018 SERVICES-PARKS JAIME RODRIGUEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $88.00
48019 SERVICES-PARKS KYLE HENDERSON NONE 10/29/1999 $81.00
48020 SERVICES-PARKS CHRIS SCHROEDER NONE 10/29/1999 $47.00
48021 SERVICES-PARKS ISIDRO MEJIA NONE 10/29/1999 $111.00
48022 SERVICES-PARKS JAVIER AYALA NONE 10/29/1999 $106.00
48023 SERVICES-PARKS OSCAR LOPEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $90.00
48024 SERVICES-PARKS ISRAEL TORRALBA NONE 10/29/1999 $95.00
48025 SERVICES-PARKS FERNANDO BARAJAS NONE 10/29/1999 $101.00
48026 SERVICES-PARKS ERNIE MONTALVO NONE 10/29/1999 $52.00
48027 SERVICES-PARKS ADAM CATTERSON NONE 10/29/1999 $32.00
48028 SERVICES-PARKS JOSE LUIS GUZMAN NONE 10/29/1999 $22.00
48029 SERVICES-PARKS RAFAEL PELAEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $64.00
48030 SERVICES-PARKS SALVADOR GASCA NONE 10/29/1999 $308.00
48031 SERVICES-PARKS PACO MATADAMAS NONE 10/29/1999 $150.00
48032 SERVICES-PARKS FRANCISCO IBANEZ NONE 10/29/1999 $10.00
48033 SERVICES-PARKS LEVI ARIAS NONE 10/29/1999 $20.00
48034 SERVICES-PARKS HORACIO PENA NONE 10/?9/1999 $15.00
48035 SERVICES-PARKS BRIAN FLANNIGAN NONE - 1 0/~/1999 $250.00
48036 SERVICES-PARKS FREDDY LEON NONE 1Q12 /1999, $132.00
48037 REFUND-WTRlSWR KELLY BIZON NONE :10/29/1999 $43.85
48038 REFUND-WTRISWR ELAINE VENTRES-LUNA NONE 10/29/1999 $34.68
48039 REFUND-WTRlSWR BRICE INVEST REALTY NONE 10/29/1999 $32.99
48040 REFUND-WTRlSWR DOROTHY BRADBURY NONE 10/29/1999 $27.65
48041 REFUND-WTRISWR DAVID HORSEY NONE 10/29/1999 $33.27
48042 REFUND-WTRlSWR JERRY BORSCHOWA NONE 10/29/1999 $34.83
Page 5
-
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999
8H
48043 REFUND-WTRlSWR HOWARD BLA.KEL Y NONE 10129/1999 $48.25
48044 REFUND-WTRISWR RAY CROSTIC NONE 10/29/1999 $11.37
48045 REFUND-WTRISWR ENGLE & SCHMIDTMAN NONE 10/29/1999 $37.54
48046 REFUND-WTRlSWR JOSE MEJIA NONE 10/29/1999 $33.95
48047 REFUND-WTRlSWR SKYLINE DEVELOP NONE 10/29/1999 $9.80
48048 REFUND-WTRlSWR CENTEX HOMES NONE 10/29/1999 $28.45
48049 REFUND-WTRlSWR SKYLINE DEVELOP NONE 10/29/1999 $7.72
48050 REFUNO-WTRlSWR COMSTOCK DEVELOP NONE 10/29/1999 $36.97
48051 REFUND-WTRlSWR THE LUCKEY CO NONE 10/29/1999 $34.62
48052 REFUND-WTRlSWR SHERYL STRAND NONE 10/29/1999 $8.75
48053 REFUND-WTRlSWR WINDSOR SMITH NONE 10/29/1999 $7.45
48054 REFUND-WTRlSWR CARL AROLA. NONE 10/29/1999 $10.93
48055 SUPPLIES-LIBRARY NATURE OF OR INFO CTR NONE 10/29/1999 $4.00
48056 SERVICES-PLA.N OREGON APA NONE 10/29/1999 $120.00
48057 SERVICES-WWTP OR CHAPTER ABPA NONE 10/29/1999 $185.00
48058 SERVICES-PARKS A&A PEST CONTROL 000011 10/29/1999 $200.00
48059 SERVICES-PARKS ACE SEPTIC 000031 10/29/1999 $622.50
48060 SERVICES-ENG AEROTEKINC 000080 10/2911999 $548.00
48061 SERVICES-VARIOUS AIR TOUCH CELLULA.R 000113 10/29/1999 $944.12
48062 SERVICES-PARKS AIR TOUCH PAGING 000115 10/29/1999 $19.14
48063 SUPPLIES-PARKS AMEREC SAUNA 000190 10/29/1999 $28.05
48064 SERVICES-WTR AMTEST OREGON 000400 10/29/1999 $533.75
48065 SERVICES-VARIOUS ARAMARK UNIFORM 000534 10/29/1999 $396.36
48066 SERVICES-POLICE AUTO ADDITIONS 000558 10/29/1999 $52.00
48067 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS AWARDS & ATHLETICS 000580 10/29/1999 $231.00
48068 SERVICES-VARIOUS AT&T 000623 10/29/1999 $92.00
48069 SERVICES-WATER AWWA OREGON 000663 10/29/1999 $60.00
48070 SERVICES-WATER AWWA 000665 10/29/1999 $489.50
48071 SUPPLIES-PARKS HOUSEHOLD BANK 001199 10/29/1999 $294.60
48072 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS BIMART CORP 001275 10/29/1999 $234.10
48073 SERVICES-POLICE CASE AUTOMOTIVE 002190 10/29/1999 $1,090.48
48074 SUPPLIES-PARKS CASCADE COLUMBIA 002218 10/29/1999 $550.00
48075 SUPPLIES-PARKS CASCADE POOLS 002226 10/29/1999 $651.60
48076 SERVICES-PUB WKS CH2M-HILL 002478 10/29/1999 $100,030.84
48077 SERVICES-PARKS CLA.CKAMAS LOCK 002558 10/29/1999 $50.00
48078 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS COASTAL FARM 002625 10/2911999 $495.66
48079 SERVICES-LIBRARY W.H. CRESS CO 002906 10/29/1999 $275.00
48080 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS CTL CORP 002926 10129/1999 $9,642.00
48081 SERVICES-PUB WKS DAILY JOURNAL 003020 10/29/1999 $156.00
48082 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS DAVISON AUTO 003080 10/29/1999 $778.77
48083 SERVICES-WWTP ENG CONTROL PROD 004180 10/29/1999 $1,378.20
48084 SERVICES-VARIOUS ENGELMAN ELEC 004190 10/29/1999 $2,390.45
48085 SERVICES-A TTY ENGLE & SCHMIDTMAN 004196 10/29/1999 $1,227.20
48086 SUPPLIES-WWTP FAMILIAN NW 005030 - 1 0~/1999 $632.40
48087 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS FARM PLA.N 005062 1012 11999 ' $2,932.27
48088 SUPPLlES-WWTP FISHER'S SUPPLY 005147 10/29/1999 $98.19
48089 SERVICES-POLICE FOTO MAGIC 005258 10/29/1999 $105.87
48090 SERVICES-PARKS DON GANER & ASSOC 006014 10/29/1999 $1,912.50
48091 SERVICES-PUB WKS GELCO SERVICES 006061 10/29/1999 $1,195.00
48092 SUPPLIES-PARKS GRAND SLA.M 006273 10129/1999 $18.00
48093 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS GW HARDWARE 006405 10129/1999 $1,216.65
Page 6
II!"
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999
8H
48094 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS HACH CHEMICAL 007030 10/29/1999 $305.00
48095 SERVICES-PARKS HERSHBERGER MTRS 007150 10/29/1999 $438.73
48096 SERVICES-STREET HIRE CALLING 007240 10/29/1999 $899.04
48097 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS IND WELDING 008100 10/29/1999 $271.76
48098 SERVICES.BUILD INTL CONF OF BUILD OFF. 008290 10/29/1999 $195.00
48099 SUPPLlES-C GARAGE INTERSTATE AUTO PTS 008295 10/29/1999 $192.99
48100 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS L&L BUILDING 011010 10/29/1999 $345.58
48101 SUPPLIES-PARKS LINCOLN EQUIP 011250 10/29/1999 $125.87
48102 SUPPLIES-COURT MSI GROUP 012015 10/29/1999 $3,570.00
48103 SUPPLIES-PARKS MARION ENVIRON 012227 1 0/29/1999 $12.20
48104 SUPPLIES-ENG MARSH MCBIRNEY 012240 10/29/1999 $502.72
48105 SUPPLlES-wrR MCCORMICK BARKDUST 012350 10/29/1999 $120.00
48106 REIMBURSE-LIBRARY DONNA MELENDEZ 012420 10/29/1999 $8.00
48107 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS MR P'S AUTO PARTS 012510 10/29/1999 $373.73
48108 SERVICES-HOUSING MIRACLE TOUCH PAINT 012512 10/29/1999 $3,106.00
48109 SERVICES-HOUSING MORRIS CONTRACTORS 012608 10/29/1999 $3,218.00
48110 REIMBURSe.pLA.N JIM MULDER 012670 10/29/1999 $11.00
48111 SUPPLlES-ENG NESSCO SUPPLY 013160 10/29/1999 $101.70
48112 SERVICES-FIN NEW HORIZONS 013165 10/29/1999 $1,995.00
48113 SERVICES-VARIOUS NEXTEL COMM 013188 10129/1999 $359.53
48114 SUPPLIES-PARKS NORTH COAST ELEC 013215 10/29/1999 $111.60
48115 SUPPLIES-STREET NORTHSIDE FORD 013225 10/29/1999 $139.82
48116 SUPPLIES-WWTP NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL 013235 10/29/1999 $452.00
48117 SERVICES-PARKS NW ELEVATOR 013275 10129/1999 $300.00
48118 SUPPLIES-STREET NW SANITATION 013315 10/29/1999 $1,200.00
48119 SERVICES-PARKS NW NATURAL 013350 10/29/1999 $23.51
48120 SERVICES-WWTP OR ANALYTICAL LA.B 014107 10/29/1999 $1,800.00
48121 SUPPLIES-RSVP PACIFIC PRINTERS 015058 10/29/1999 $193.50
48122 SUPPLIES-WWTP PACO PUMPS 015098 10/29/1999 $2,380.00
48123 REIMBURSE-LIBRARY MARY PARRA 015168 10/29/1999 $10.00
48124 SUPPLlES-WWTP PAULS SMALL MTR 015175 10/29/1999 $343.96
48125 SUPPLIES-PARKS PEPSI COLA. 015225 10/29/1999 $684.05
48126 SUPPLlES-ENG PIONEER ELECTRONICS 015345 10/29/1999 $39.99
48127 SPPLlES-PARKS PROMOTIONS WEST 015563 10/29/1999 $529.30
48128 SUPPLIES-WTR PUB WORKS SUPPLY 015648 10/29/1999 $162.00
48129 SUPPLIES-WATER RADIX CORP 017035 10/29/1999 $500.00
48130 SUPPLlES-WWTP RED WING SHOE 017138 10/29/1999 $60.00
48131 SUPPLlES-WWTP ROGERS MACHINERY 017297 10/29/1999 $9.55
48132 SUPPLIES-PARKS ROTHSIGA 017340 10/29/1999 $120.99
48133 SUPPLIES-POLICE SALES SERVICE AMERICA 018145 10/29/1999 $180.63
48134 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS LES SCHWAB TIRE 018300 10129/1999 $1,281.41
48135 REIMBURSE-PARKS BRIAN SJOTHUN 018456 10/29/1999 $71.23
48136 SERVlCES-WWTP STATESMAN JOURNAL 018760 10/29/1999 $74.25
48137 SUPPLEI5-VARIOUS US OFFICE PRODUCTS 019100 _ 1 ~~/1999 $715.08
48138 SERVICES-HOUSING THERM-o-LOC WINDOWS 019132 10/2 /1999, $1,900.00
48139 SUPPLlES-WWTP UNOCAL:ERNIE GRAHAM 020010 :10129/1999 $392.63
48140 SERVICES-VARIOUS UNITED DISPOSAL 020020 10/29/1999 $583.10
48141 SERVICES-FIN US WEST COMM 020095 10/29/1999 $216.00
48142 SUPPLlES-ENGIWTR WALLING SAND 022029 10/29/1999 $1,083.01
48143 SUPPLIES-FINANCE WALL STREET JOURNAL 022030 10/29/1999 $299.00
48144 SUPPLIES-POLICE WALMART STORES 022035 10/29/1999 $144.60
Page 7
"..
AlP CHECK LISTING FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 1999
48145 SUPPLIES-PARKS WATER SAFETY PROD 022080 10/29/1999 $77.628H
48146 SUPPLIES-PARKS WILL RED CROSS 022328 10/29/1999 $15.00
48147 SUPPLIES-PARKS WITHERS LUMBER 022445 10/29/1999 $435.98
48148 SERVICES-PARKS WOLFERS HEATING 022460 10/29/1999 $958.33
48149 SUPPLlES-WWTP WBN FERTILIZER 022590 10129/1999 $149.93
48150 SERVICES-L1B1WWTP WBN INDEPENDENT 022630 10/29/1999 $193.91
48151 SUPPLlES-WWTP OFFICE SPEC 022670 10/29/1999 $24.39
48152 SERVICES-PARKS WBN RADIATOR 022700 10/29/1999 $249.50
48153 SERVICES-PARKS XEROX CORP 023020 10/29/1999 $264.00
48154 REIMBURSE-RSVP DELBERT MULLINS 035565 10/29/1999 $39.60
48155 REIMBURSE-RSVP ALMEDA QUIRING 035608 10/29/1999 $27.00
48156 REIMBURSE-RSVP MARIAN REED 035615 10/29/1999 $10.80
48157 REIMBURSE-RSVP JUNE WOODCOCK 035648 10/29/1999 $21.60
48158 REIMBURSE-RSVP RICHARD SNYDER 035655 10/29/1999 $35.00
48159 REIMBURSE-RSVP JAY WOODS 035763 10/29/1999 $35.00
48160 REIMBURSE-OAR DOROTHA BORELANO 045100 10/29/1999 $70.50
48161 REIMBURSE-OAR JANICE DAVIS 045200 10/29/1999 $5.75
48162 REIMBURSE-OAR CORNELIUS DONNELLY 045230 10/29/1999 $168.25
48163 REIMBURSE-OAR AGNES HAGENAUER 045310 10/29/1999 $127.00
48164 REIMBURSE-OAR FRED HAYES 045315 10/29/1999 $185.50
48165 REIMBURSE-OAR J WARD O'BRIEN 045497 10/29/1999 $69.50
48166 REIMBURSE-OAR JOAN PREZEAU 045525 10/29/1999 $289.75
48167 REIMBURSE-OAR GERTRUDE REES 045545 10/29/1999 $36.25
48168 REIMBURSE-OAR LOLA SPERATOS 045560 10/29/1999 $23.50
48169 REIMBURSE-OAR STEVE STURN 045585 10/29/1999 $123.75
48170 REIMBURSE-OAR FRED TOPOREK 045660 10/29/1999 $12.00
48171 REIMBURSE-OAR HATTIE VANOERCOVERING 045670 10/29/1999 $25.00
48172 PETTY CASH-VARIOUS CITY OF WOODBURN 015255 10/29/1999 $157.97
$1,688,131.61 /
l
Page 8
If
81
Community
Development
MEMORANDUM
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
(503) 982-5246
Date: November 3,1999
To: Steve Goeckritz, Community Development Director
From: Robert L. Mendenhall, Building Official
Subject: Building Activity for October 1999
1997 1998 1999
Dollar Dollar Dollar
No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount
New Residence Value 0 $0 1 $91,566 15 $1,792,667
Multi Family 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Residential Adds & Alts 8 $51,177 0 $0 3 $14,800
Industrial 1 $27,000 0 $0 0 $0
Commercial Value 1 $650,000 2 $14,500,000 0 $0
Signs, Fences, Driveways 5 $4,800 5 $11,206 4 $5,842
Manufactured Homes 3 $110,000 1 $79,000 0 $0
TOTALS 18 $842,977 9 $14,681,772 22 $1,813,309
July 1 - June 30
Fiscal Year To Date $33,234,533 $18,894,608 $9,141,871
RLM:n~
Bldg\actlvity October 99
~
'fr
...
9A
November 8,1999
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Coun.~cil:~
City Administrator ,p'P
System Develooment ChaNes and Transoortation Imoact Fees
Recommendation:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. Conduct public hearings regarding system development charges for Recreation and
Parks, and Transportation Impact Fees;
2. Approve fees and charges as appropriate; and
3. Direct staff to prepare necessary ordinances and resolutions revising
methodologies and rates for Recreation and Parks system development charges
and for transportation impact fees.
Background:
On October 25, 1999, your Council held a workshop on updates for Recreation
and Parks SDCs, and TIPs. The workshop provided background on the current legislative
authority for system development charges, the types of fees, and the legal requirements
and concepts that guided the proposed update methodologies. The staff report provided
to the Council for the workshop is included as Attachment 1. Based on the questions and
comments received from Council at the workshop, the City's consultant made minor
modifications to the proposed TIPs. Proposed Park SDCs were not modified.
Discussion:
Public hearings are set for November 8, 1999 to discuss Recreation and Parks
SDCs and TIPs. A separate hearing will be held for each. Included in your agenda are the
Methodology and Rate Study for Recreation and Parks SDC's presented to you on
October 25, 1999, a revised Methodology and Rate Study for TIPs dated October 29,
1999, and a staffreport prepared by the Public Works department. TIP revisions resulted
in an increase ofS16 per dwelling unit over the rates presented to Council on October 25,
1999. The City's consultant, Mr. Don Ganer will be present at the hearings to make
formal presentations and to answer and further questions you may have. .
l
In the past, the City Council chose to implement discounted rates. In order to
assure development adequately supports its impacts on City facilities and infrastructure,
your approval of un discounted rates (100 percent) is recommended.
JCB
~
,.
9A
PARKS AND RECREATION
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
METHODOLOGY AND RATE STUDY
UPDATE
City of Woodburn. Oregm1
as of
September 30, 1999
l
15418 NW White Fox Dr. . Beaverton, Oregon 97006 · (503) 690-8981
Don
Ganer &
Associates
1r
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. Legislative Authority
B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's
C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions,
and Discounts
D. Guiding Concepts
E. Alternative Methodology Approaches
3.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC MEIHOOOLOGY
A. Population and Employment Growth
B. Benefit of Facilities
C. Facility Needs
D. Facility Costs
4.0 RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES
A. Formula 4a: Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita
B. Formula 4b: Residential Facilities Cost
Per Dwelling Unit
C. Formula 4c: Compliance/ Administration Cost
Per Dwelling Unit
D. Formula 4d: Residential SDC Credit Per Dwelling Unit
E. Formula 4e: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit
5.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC RATES
A. Formula 5a: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee
B. Formula 5b: Compliance / Administration Cost
Per Employee
C. Formula 5c: Non-Residential SDC Credit Per Employee
D. Formula 5d: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee
6.0 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX: SDC Capital Improvements Plan
Don Ganer & Associates
...
I
~
1
2
2
2
3
4
5
7
7
8
11
12
14
14
15
16
16
17
19
19
20
20
21
23
l
as of 9/30/99
TABLES
~
TABLE 3.1: Estimated City of Woodburn 8
Population and Employment Increases (1999 - 2020)
TABLE 3.2: Estimates of Average Weekly Availability 9
of Parks and Recreation Facilities
TABLE 3.3: Total Annual Availability of Parks 10
and Recreation Facilities
TABLE 3.4: Total Residence and Employment Related 10
Availability of Parks and Recreation Facilities
TABLE 3.5: Employee-To-Resident Parks Demand Ratio 10
TABLE 3.6: Current Average Levels of Service (LOS) 11
and Applied LOS Standards
TABLE 3.7: Additional Facility Needs For Population and 12
Employment Growth Based on LOS Standards
TABLE 3.8 Residential and Non-Residential Growth 13
Required Facilities Costs
TABLE 4.1: Facilities Cost Per Capita 14
TABLE 4.2: Average Persons Per Dwelling Unit 15
TABLE 4.3: Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit 15
TABLE 4.4: Compliance/ Administration Cost Per Dwelling Unit 16
TABLE 4.5: Credit Per Dwelling Unit 17
TABLE 4.6: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit 18
TABLE 5.1: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee 19
TABLE 5.2: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Employee 20
TABLE 5.3: Credit Per Enployee 21
TABLE 5.4: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee 22
TABLE 5.5: Square Feet Per Employee 23
~
Don Ganer & Associates
i i
as of 9/30/99
II!"
CITY OF WOODBURN
Parks and Recreation System Development Charges
Methodology Report and Rate Study
1.0 INTRODUCfION
System Development Charges (SDC's) are one-time fees charged to new development
to help pay a portion of the costs associated with building capital facilities to meet
needs created by growth. Oregon local governments are authorized to enact SDC's for
capital facilities for transportation, water, wastewater (sewer), stormwater drainage,
and parks and recreation facilities, and the City of Woodburn has implemented SDC's
for all authorized facilities.
In January 1997, the City of Woodburn engaged Don Ganer & Associates, working in
association with David Reed, Ph.D to update the City's Parks and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan (Plan). Following completion of the draft Plan, the City requested
a review and update of the City's Parks and Recreation SDC methodology and rates to
reflect growth-required facility needs identified in the Plan. This report presents an
updated SDC methodology, documents the calculation of Parks and Recreation SDC
rates, and identifies projects to be funded from SDC revenues.
Section 2.0 of this report presents authority and background information including (1)
legislative authority for SDC's; (2) an explanation of "improvement fee" and
"reimbursement fee" SDC's; (3) requirements and options for credits, exemptions and
discounts; (4) guiding concepts for SDC's and (5) alternative methodology approaches.
Section 3.0 presents the methodology used to develop the updated Parks and
Recreation SDC's, section 4.0 presents the calculation of Residential Parks and
Recreation SDC Rates, and section 5.0 presents the calculation of Non-residential Parks
and Recreation SDC Rates. The Parks and Recreation SDC Capital Improvement
Program (CIP), which lists projects which may be funded with SDC revenues, is
included as an Appendix to this report.
l
Don Ganer & Associates
1
as of 9/30/99
II!"
~.o AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. Legislative Authority
While SDC's have been In use In Oregon since the mid-1970's, State legislation
regarding SDC's was not adopted until 1989, when the Oregon Systems Development
Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314) was passed. The purpose of this Act was to "...provide a
uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...". SB 122 and
HB 3172, passed in 1993 and 1999, respectively, include additional statutory provisions
regarding SOC's. Together, these pieces of legislation require local governments who
enact SDC's to:
. Enact SDC's by ordinance or resolution;
. develop a methodology outlining how the SDC's were developed;
. adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to designate capital
improvements that can be funded with "improvement fee" SDC revenues;
. provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of
certain "qualified public improvements";
. separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC
revenues; and develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and
. use SDC revenues only for capital expenditures (operations and
maintenance uses are prohibited).
B. Hlmprovement fee" and HReimbursement fee" SDC's
The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of
SDC's: (1) "improvement fee" SDC's, and (2) "reimbursement fee" SDC's.
"Improvement fee" SDC's may be charged for new capital improvements that will
increase capacity. Revenues from "improvement fee" SDC's may be spent only on
capacity-increasing capital improvements identified in the required Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) that lists each project, and the expected timing and cost of
each project. "Reimbursement fee" SDC's may be charged for the ~osts of existing
capital facilities if "excess capacity" is available to accommodate gro~h. Revenues
from "reimbursement fees" may be used on any capital improvement project, including
major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements funded with
"reimbursement fee" SDC's do not need to increase capacity, but they must be listed in
the CIP.
Don Ganer & Associates
2
as of 9/30/99
-
C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts
(1) Credits
A credit IS a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific
development. The Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the
construction of a "qualified public improvement" which (1) is required as
a condition of development approval, (2) is identified in the Capital
Improvement Plan, and (3) either is not located on or contiguous to
property that is the subject of development approval, or is located on or
contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or with
greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project.
The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied
against an SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a parks and
recreation improvement can only be used for a credit for a parks and
recreation SDC), and may be granted only for the cost of that portion of an
improvement which exceeds the minimum standard facility size or
capacity needed to serve the particular project. For multi-phase projects,
any excess credit may be applied against SDC's that accrue in subsequent
phases of the original development project.
In addition to these required credits, the City may, if it so chooses,
provide a greater credit, establish a system providing for the
transferability of credits, provide a credit for a capital improvement not
identified in the Capital Improvement Plan, or provide a share of the cost
of an improvement by other means.
(2) Exemptions
The City may "exempt" certain types of development, such as "non-
residential development" from the requirement to pay parks SDC's.
Exemptions reduce SDC revenues and, therefore, incr~ase the amounts
that must come from other sources, such as bonds and pr<lperty taxes.
Don Ganer &: Associates
3
as of 9/30/99
I1r
(3) Discounts
The City may "discount" the amount of the SDC by reducing the portion
of growth-required improvements to be funded with SDC's. A discount
in the SDC may also be applied on a pro-rata basis to any identified
deficiencies to be funded from non-SDC sources. For example, the City
may charge new development an SDC rate sufficient to recover only 25%
of identified growth-required costs. The portion of growth-required costs
to be funded with SDC's must be identified in the SDC-CIP.
Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that
must come from other sources, such as bonds or general fund
contributions, required to meet Level of Service Standards.
D. Guiding Concepts
In addition to the requirements of the Oregon SDC Act and SB 122, court cases from
Oregon and other states provide additional guidance for the methodology to be used in
developing SDC's.
(1) "Essential Nexus" Requirement
In a 1987 case, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Supreme
Court established that government agencies must show that an "essential
nexus" (e.g. reasonable connection) exists between a project's impacts and
any dedication requirements. For SDC's the "essential nexus"
requirement means there must be a reasonable connection between the
nature of the development and the facilities being funded with the SDC
revenues. For example, new parks are needed to serve the recreation
needs of new development in order to prevent overcrowding of existing
facilities and to meet the Level of Service Standards included in the City's
Parks and Recreation Master Plan; therefore an "essential nexus" exists
between new development and the SOC's charged to \0 build parks
needed to serve new development.
Don Ganer & Associates
4
as of 9/30/99
lI'
(2) "Rout;h Proportionality" Requirement
In its landmark 1994 decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard, the U.S. Supreme
Court cited the requirement for "rough proportionality" between the
requirements placed on a developer by government and the impacts of
the development. Case law is conflicting on the question of whether
Dolan applies to SDC's. However, to avoid controversy, the Parks and
Recreation SDC is structured so that the Dolan test is satisfied. This
concept of rough proportionality is applied in "improvement fee" SDC's
by insuring that new growth is not required to pay (either through fees or
exactions) to upgrade existing deficiencies or provide new facilities
beyond a level "rougWy proportionate" with the extent of new
development's impact; "improvement fee" SDC's can be charged only for
the portion of capital facilities costs that are attributable to growth. As an
example, if an SDC is designed to provide funding for Community Parks
at a Level of Service (LOS) of 2.0 acres per 1,000 persons, new
development can only be charged a fee sufficient to provide facilities for
new residents at 2.0 acres per 1,000 persons, and cannot be required to
pay additional costs that may be needed to eliminate deficiencies.
E. Alternative Methodology Approaches
There are three basic approaches used to develop improvement fee SDC's; "standards-
driven", "improvements-driven", and "combination/ hybrid".
(1) Standards-Driven Approach
The "standards-driven" approach is based on the application of Level of
Service (LOS) Standards for facilities such as neighborhood parks,
community parks, etc. Facility needs are determined by applying the LOS
Standards to the projected future population. SDC-eligible amounts are
calculated based on the costs of additional facilities peeded to serve
growth. This approach works best where LOS Standlrds have been
adopted as part of a comprehensive plan or facilities' master planning
process and the Levels of Service provided to current residents are at or
near those required by the LOS Standards.
Don Ganer & Associates
5
as of9/'!IJ/99
-
(2) Improvements-Driven Approach
The "improvements-driven" approach is based on a specific list of
planned capacity-increasing capital improvements. The portion of each
project that is attributable to growth is determined, and the SDC-eligible
costs are calculated by dividing the total costs of growth-required projects
by the projected increase in population. This approach works best where
a detailed master plan or project list is available and the benefits of
projects can be apportioned between growth and current residents.
(3) Combination' Hybrid Approach
The combination/ hybrid-approach includes elements of both the
"improvements-driven" and "standards-driven" approaches. If not
already adopted, LOS Standards may be developed and used to develop a
list of planned capacity-increasing projects. The growth-required portions
of projects can then be used as the basis for determining the SDC-eligible
costs. This approach works best where a detailed master plan or project
list of capacity needs has not recently been developed and where
sufficient data is available to identify the existing Levels of Service.
l
Don Ganer & Associates
6
as of 9/ 'YJ /99
'II'
3.0 PARKS AND RECREATION SDC METHODOLOGY
The Combination/ Hybrid approach has been used to develop the updated Parks and
Recreation SDC methodology. The City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Comprehensive
Plan Update identifies facility needs through 2020, based on the application of Level of
Service Standards for the City's projected population and employment. The Level of
Service (LOS) standards included in the Plan are currently met or exceeded for current
residents. The Capital Improvement Plan included as Appendix A includes the same
projects as are identified in the Comprehensive Plan Update, but they have been
modified to identify the growth-required portion (if any), the estimated timing, and the
estimated cost of each project.
Parks and recreation facilities benefit City residents, businesses, non-resident
employees, and visitors. The methodology used in developing the City's Parks and
Recreation SDC's establishes the required "essential nexus" between a projecfs impacts
and the SDC's by identifying specific types of parks and recreation facilities and
analyzing the proportionate need of each type of facility for use by residents and
employees. The SDC's to be paid by a development meet the "rough proportionality"
requirement because they are based on the nature of the development and the extent of
the impact of the development on the types of parks and recreation facilities for which
the SDC's are charged. The Parks and Recreation SDC's are based on population and
employment, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact a
development is expected to have on the City's population and employment.
For facilities that are not generally used by employees (i.e., mini-parks and
neighborhood parks), only a residential parks and recreation SDC may be charged. For
facilities that benefit both residents and employees (i.e., community parks and centers,
municipal parks, greenways, open space, and trails), parks and recreation SDC's may
be charged to both residential and non-residential development.
A. Population and Employment Growth
The Parks and Recreation SDC's is based on a portion of the growth-tequired capital
costs per "capita" (person). Projections of population and employment growth were
calculated using data provided by Marion County and the U.S. Bureau of Census; and
from a report prepared for the City in 1999 by E.D. Hovee. The estimated population
and employment increases are shown in Table 3.1.
Don Ganer &: Associates
7
as of 9/30/99
II!"
TABLE 3.1
ESTIMATED CITY OF WOODBURN
POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT INCREASES (1999 - 2020)
2020 (Projected)
Estimated Current
Estimated Increase
Population:
Employment:
26,290
9,058
16,937
7,051
9,353
2,007
B. Benefit of Facilities
The LOS Standards used to determine facility needs consider the proportionate benefit
each type of facility has for residents and employees. For purposes of this report, mini
parks and neighborhood parks are considered to be used primarily by residents, rather
than by employees and other non-residents. Therefore, the LOS Standards and
identified needs for these types of facilities are based only on population and do not
consider employment. For all other facilities including community parks and centers,
municipal parks, greenways, open space, and trails, both population and employment
were considered in development of the LOS Standards and facility needs.
While parks and recreation facilities benefit both residents and employees, the amount
of time these facilities are available for use by employees is not the same as for
residents; an employee does not create demands for facilities equal to those created by a
resident. In order to equitably apportion the need for facilities between employees and
residents, an employee-to-resident demand ratio was developed based on the potential
time these facilities are available for use. First, estimates for the average number of
hours per week these facilities are available for use were identified. Children's ages,
adult employment status, work location (inside or outside the City), and seasonal
variances were taken into account and are displayed in Table 3.2 (page 9).
l
Don Ganer & Associates
8
as of 9/30/99
....
TABLE 3.2
ESTIMATES OF AVERAGE WEEKLY
A V AILABILITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Non-Employed live In/ live In/ live Out/
Adult (18+ ) 5-17 Kids Work In WorkOut Work In Total
Summer Oune-Sept)
Weekday
Before Work 1 1 2
Meals/Breaks 1 1 2
After Work 2 2 4
Other Leisure 12 12 2 2 28
Sub-Total 12 12 6 2 4 36
Weekend
Leisure 12 12 12 12 0 48
Sub-Total 12 12 12 12 0 48
Summer Hrs/ Day 12 12 7.71 4.86 2.86 39.43
Spring/Fall (April-May, Oct-Nov)
Weekday
Before Work 0.5 0.5 1
Meals/ Breaks 1 1 2
After Work 1 1 2
Other Leisure 10 4 2 2 18
Sub-Total 10 4 4.5 2 2.5 23
Weekend
Other Leisure 10 10 10 10 0 40
Sub-Total 10 10 10 10 0 40
Spring/Fall Hours/Day 10 5.71 6.07 4.29 1.79 27.86
Winter (December-March)
Weekday
Before Work 0.5 0.5 1
Meals/Breaks 1 1 2
After Work 0.5 0.5 1
Other Leisure 8 2 1 1 12
Sub-Total 8 2 3 1 2 16
Weekend
Other Leisure 8 8 8 8 0 32
Sub-Total 8 8 8 8 0 32
Winter Hours/Day 8 3.71 4.43 3 1.43 20.57
Annual Wtd. Avg Hours 10 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02 29.29
Next, the Annual Weighted Average Hours calculated for each category (from Table
3.2) were applied to population and employment data (1990 Census) to determine the
Total Annual Weighted Average Hours for each category of Residentland Employee.
The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 3.3 (page 10).:
Don Ganer &. Associates
9
as of 9/30/99
111"
TABLE 3.3
TOTAL ANNUAL AVAILABILITY
OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Non-Employed Live In! Live In! Live Out!
Adult (18+ ) 5-17 Kids Work In Work Out Work In Total
Population & Emp. Data 3,680 3,581 2,046 2,652 1,289 13,248
(1990 Census)
Annual Wtd. A vg Hours 10 7.14 6.07 4.05 2.02 29.29
Tot. Annual Wtd. Avg. Hrs. 36,800 25,579 12,422 10,734 2,609 88,144
Next, the available hours (from Table 3.3) were allocated between employment-related
hours and residence-related hours, as displayed in Table 3.4.
TABLE 3.4
TOTAL RESIDENCE AND EMPLOYMENT RELATED
AVAILABILITY OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Residence Related
Hours
% of Total
Resident Non-Employee
Resident Employee
sub-total
73,113
8.281
81,394
8259%
9.40%
92.34%
Employment Related
Resident Employee
Non-Resident Employee
sub-total:
4,141
2.609
6,749
4.70%
2.96%
7.66%
Finally, the Employee-to-Resident Parks Demand Ratio was calculated by dividing the
total of employment-related hours by the total for residence-related hours (from Table
3.4), with results summarized in Table 3.5.
TABLE 3.5
EMPLOYEE-TO-RESIDENT PARKS DEMAND RATI.O
\
Employee % .
of Resident
Weighted Avg. Hrs.
Employment-Related
Weighted Avg. Hrs.
Residence-Related
81,394 (92.34%)
6,749 (7.66%)
8.3%
Don Ganer & Associates
10
as of 9/30/99
Ilr
C. Facility Needs
The Level of Service Standard included in the City of Woodburn's Parks and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan Update provided the framework for identifying facility needs.
Specific needs were determined based on the development and application of Level of
Service (LOS) Standards based on "Units of Facility Per 1,000 Persons". LOS standards
were developed for Neighborhood, Community, and Municipal Parks; and for the Core
Parks System. LOS standards were not developed for Mini-Parks, Cultural Resource,
or Special Use Park/Facilities, or for Greenways/Open Space, Trails/Pathways
because these are site-specific facilities for which population standards are difficult to
apply. For those facilities for which LOS Standards were not developed, population
proportions were used to determine the growth-required portion of a project.
The LOS standards identified in Table 3.6 provide objective criteria by which facility
needs can be determined. Using these LOS standards, excess capacity facilities and
growth-required needs were identified.
TABLE 3.6
CURRENT AVERAGE
LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS)
AND LOS STANDARDS
Facility Type
Service
Area
Current Average LOS
(Units per 1.000 persons)
LOS Standard
Neighborhood/School Park*
Communi~/MunicipmPark
Core Park System**
1/2 mile radius
Ci~
Ci~
7.69 acres
2.74 acres
11.78 acres
550 acres
2.00 acres
8.25 acres
Public school playground and recreation facilities were included in the current inventory.
** Includes neighborhood/ school parks, communi~ parks, municipm parks, and all other ~pes of
facilities, such as special use, greenways, open space, trails, etc.
*
To determine facility needs, the LOS standards are applied to the 2020 population and
employment projections. Table 3.7 presents a summary of facilities needed to serve
growth based on application of the LOS standards.
~
Don Ganer &. Associates
11
as of 9/30/99
11r
TABLE 3.7
ADDITIONAL FACILITY NEEDS FOR POPULATION AND
EMPLOYMENT GROWTH BASED ON LOS STANDARDS
Facility Type
Neighborhood/School Park (acres)
Municipal/Community Park (acres)
Total Core Park System (acres)
Current Surplus
or IDeficien<;y)
36.90
13.05
57.25
Pop. Growth
Required Units
14.55
6.00
21.28
Empl. Growth
Required Units
0.00
0.10
0.37
The LOS analysis results in the identification of excess capacity that is available to serve
new development, and for which a "reimbursement fee" SDC may be charged;
however no "reimbursement fee" SDC is include in this methodology because:
. excess capacity neighborhood! school park facilities include recently completed
Woodburn School District facilities which also serve as parks and recreation
facilities, and which have outstanding bonded debt that is being repaid through
property taxes; and
. excess capacity municipal! community park acreage includes Centennial Park,
which is under construction, and Legion and Settlemier parks, both of which need
extensive renovation.
D. Facility Costs
The Woodburn Parks and Recreation SDC Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which is
included as Appendix A, identifies facilities needed to serve both residential and non-
residential growth needs through the year 2020. Table 3.8, page 13, shows the breakout
between residential and non-residential costs. Because each employee needs only 8.3%
of the equivalent facilities needed for a resident, the residential share of growth costs is
98.2% of the total for those facilities which benefit both residential and non-residential
development (i.e., municipal parks, etc.), and 100% for those facilities which benefit
residential development only (i.e., neighborhood parks, etc.).
~
Don Ganer & Associates
12
as of 9/30/99
...
TABLE 3.8
RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL
GROWTH REQUIRED FACILITIES COSTS
Facility
Neighborhood/School Parks.
Sports/Recreation Facilities
Municipal/Community Parks
Greenways, Open Space, Trails
Maintenance Facilities
Totals
Total Facilities
Growth Costs
$1,713,800
1,564,200
446,500
189,000
12.600
$3,926,100
Residential
Growth Costs
$1,713,800
1,536,044
438,463
185,598
~
$3,886,278
· these facilities are considered to benefit residential population only.
Don Ganer & Associates
13
Non-Residential
Growth Costs
$ 0
28,156
8,037
3,402
m
$39,822
~
as of 9/30/99
II!"
4.0 RESIDENTIAL PARKS AND RECREATION SDC RATES
The City's Residential Parks and Recreation SDC rates are calculated using a series of
sequential formulas which, when completed, yield the total SDC rates for each new
dwelling unit in the City. The formulas identify:
· the residential facilities cost per capita (Formula 4a, below),
. the residential facilities cost per dwelling unit (Formula 4b, page 15),
. the compliance! administrative cost per dwelling unit (Formula 4c, page 16)
. the credit per dwelling unit (Formula 4d, page 17), and
. the residential SDC per dwelling unit (Formula 4e, page 17).
The Residential SDC is an "improvement fee" only and does not include a
"reimbursement fee" component.
A. Formula 4a: Residential Facilities Cost Per Capita
The residential facilities cost per capita is calculated by dividing the residential portion
of growth-required facilities costs (identified in Table 3.8, page 13) by the expected
increase in the City's population during the next twenty years (from Table 3.1, page 8).
4a.
Residential
Facilities
Costs
Population
Increase
=
Residential
Facilities Cost
Per Capita
Table 4.1 presents the calculation of the facilities cost per capita.
TABLE 4.1
FACILITIES COST PER CAPITA
$3,886,278
9,705
Residential
Facilities Cost
Per Capita
- ~
~OO
Residential
Facilities Costs
Population
Increase
Don Ganer & Associates
14
as of 9/30/99
-
B. Fonnula 4b: Residential Facilities Cost Per Dwelling Unit
.
The Residential Parks and Recreation SDC's is based on facilities costs per capita and is
calculated based on the number of persons per dwelling unit. Dwelling units typically
house different numbers of persons depending on the type of unit (Le., single family,
multi-family, etc.). To determine the appropriate number of persons per dwelling unit,
census data gathered in 1990 was analyzed, and the resulting calculations are displayed
in Table 4.2.
TABLE 4.2
AVERAGE PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
Type of Unit
Single-Family
1990 Census
A vg. Persons
Per Dwellin& Unit
2.71
Multi-Family
2.95
Manufactured Housing
1.93
The residential facilities cost per dwelling unit is calculated by multiplying the average
number of persons per dwelling unit (from Table 4.2) by the residential facilities cost
per capita (from Table 4.1, page 14).
4b.
Persons Per x
Dwelling Unit
Residential
Facilities Cost
Per Capita
Residential
Facilities Cost Per
Dwelling Unit
The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.3:
TABLE 4.3
RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES COST PER DWELLING UNIT
Average Residential - ~dential
Persons Per X Facilities Cost Fad . . es C~t Per
Type of Dwellin& Unit Dwellin& Unit Per Capita Dwelling Unit
Single-Family: 2.71 $400 $ 1,084
Multi-Family: 2.95 $400 $ 1,180
Manufactured Housing: 1.93 $400 $ 772
Don Ganer & Associates
15
as of 9/30/99
".
C. Formula 4c: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Dwelling Unit
The City will incur compliance and administrative costs associated with the Residential
Parks and Recreation SOC's. ORS 223.307(5) allows the City to recoup the direct costs
of complying with Oregon law regarding SOC's. Recoupable costs include consulting,
engineering, and legal fees as well as the cost of accounting for revenues and
expenditures. The total compliance/ administrative cost is estimated to be 10% of the
residential facilities costs per dwelling unit. The compliance! administrative cost per
dwelling unit is determined by multiplying the residential facilities cost per dwelling
unit (from Table 4.3) by 10%
4c.
Compliance!
Administration
Rate
Residential
x Facilities Cost
Per Dwelling Unit
Compliance!
Admin. Cost Per
Dwelling Unit
Table 4.4 presents the compliance! administration cost per dwelling unit.
TABLE 4.4
COMPLIANCE/ADMINISTRATION COST PER DWELLING UNIT
Residential Compliance/ Compliance/
Facilities Cost Per X Administration = Admin Cost Per
Type of Dwellin,& Unit Dwelling Unit Rate Dwelling Unit
Single-F amily: $ 1,084 10% $ 108
Multi-Family: $ 1,180 10% $ 118
Manufactured Housing: $ 772 10% $ 78
D. Fonnula 4d: Residential SDC Credit Per Dwelling Unit
The Master Plan identifies capacity improvements for both growth and non-growth
needs. Bonds and property taxes will likely be used as a source f~r fu~ng a portion of
these improvements, and a portion of bond repayments and property. taxes will be paid
by growth. Therefore, a credit must be calculated to provide for these payments in
order to avoid charging growth twice for the same facilities
Don Ganer & Associates
16
as of 9/30/99
IIr
A credit has been calculated for each type of dwelling unit using the following,
assumptions:
· $2.5 million in G.O. bonds for parks improvements issued in 2001,
· 20 year bond term, 6% interest,
· 5.5% annual increase in total property tax assessments,
· 3% annual increase in assessed property valuations,
· 4% annual inflation (decrease in value of money),
· Average 1999 property valuations for new dwelling units at $125,000 for single
family, $55,000 for multi-family, and $85,000 for manufactured housing units
($75,000 for unit, $15,000 for lot).
Present Value
4d. of Future Property =
Tax Payments
SDC
Credit Per
Dwelling Unit
The amounts of these credits are shown in Table 4.5.
TABLE 4.5
CREDIT PER DWELLING UNIT
Type of Dwellin.g Unit
Credit Per
Dwellin.g Unit
Single-F amily:
Multi-Family:
$430
$189
Manufactured Housing:
$215
E. Fonnula 4e: Residential SDC Per Dwelling Unit
The residential SDC rate per dwelling unit is calculated by adding the
compliance! administration cost per dwelling unit (fable 4.4, page 16) to the residential
facilities cost per dwelling unit (from Table 4.3, page 15), and subtracti.ng the credit per
dwelling unit (from Table 4.5). l
4e.
Residential
Facilities Cost +
Per Dwelling Unit
Compliance!
Admin. Cost
Per Dwelling Unit
Credit Per
Dwelling Unit
Residential
SDC Per
Dwelling Unit
Don Ganer & Associates
17
as of9/'!IJ/99
Ilr
The results of these calculations are shown in Table 4.6.
TABLE 4.6
RESIDENTIAL SDC PER DWELLING UNIT
Residential Compliance / Residential
Facilities Cost Per + Administration - Credit Per SDC Per
Type of Dwellin(; Unit Dwellin(; Unit Cost / Unit Dwellin(; Unit Dwelling Unit
Single-Family: $ 1,084 $ 108 $430 $ 762
Multi-Family: $ 1,180 $ 118 $189 $ 1,109
Manufactured Housing: $ 772 $ 78 $215 $ 635
l
Don Ganer & Associates
18
as of 9/30/99
!Ir
5.0 NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC RATES
The Citys Non-Residential Parks and Recreation SDC rates are calculated using a series
of sequential formulas which, when completed, yield the total SDC rates for each new
employee added by new development in the City. The formulas identify:
a) the Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee (Formula Sa, below),
b) the "Compliance/ Administration" Cost Per Employee {Formula Sb, page 20),
c) the Credit Per Employee (Formula Sc, page 20); and
d) the Non-Residential SDC Per Employee (Formula Sd, page 21).
The Non-Residential SDC is an "improvement fee" only and does not include a
"reimbursement fee" component.
A. Fonnula 5a: Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee
The Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee is calculated by dividing the non-
residential growth-related facilities costs (from Table 3.9, page 13) by the expected
increase in the City's employment through 2020 (from Table 3.1, page 8).
Non-Residential
Sa. Growth-Related
Facilities Costs
Employment
Increase
Non-Residential
Facilities Cost
Per Employee
Table 5.1 presents the calculation of the Non-Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee.
TABLE 5.1
NON-RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES COST PER EMPLOYEE
Non-Residential
Growth-Related
Facilities Cost
Employment
Increase
Non-Residential Facilities
Cost Per Employee
$ 39,822
2,007
=
$20 l
Don Ganer & Associates
19
as of 9/30/99
II!"
B. Formula 5b: Compliance/Administration Cost Per Employee
ORS 223.307(5) allows the City to recoup the direct costs of complying with Oregon law
regarding SDC's. Recoupable costs include consulting, engineering, and legal fees as
well as the cost of collecting and accounting for revenues and expenditures. The total
compliance/ administration cost is estimated to be 10% of collected SDC revenues. The
Compliance/ Administration Cost Per Employee is calculated by multiplying the Non-
Residential Facilities Cost Per Employee (from Table 5.1, page 19) by 10%:
5b. Non-Residential Facilities X 10%
Cost Per Employee
= Compliance/ Admin.
Cost Per Employee
Table 5.2 presents the calculation of the Compliance/Administration Cost Per
Employee.
TABLE 5.2
COMPLIANCE/ADMINISTRATION COST PER EMPLOYEE
Non-Residential Facilities
Cost Per Employee
Cost
Factor
Compliance/ Admin.
Cost Per Employee
$20
x
10%
$2
C. Formula 5c: Non-Residential Credit Per Employee
The Master Plan identifies capacity improvements for both growth and non-growth
needs. Bonds and property taxes will likely be used as a source for funding a portion of
these improvements, and a portion of bond repayments and property taxes will be paid
by growth. Therefore, a credit must be calculated to provide for these payments in
order to avoid charging growth twice for the same facilities.
l
Don Ganer & Associates
20
as of 9/30/99
IIr
A credit has been calculated for employees using the following assumptions:
· $2.5 million in G.O. bonds for parks improvements issued in 20Ot,
· 20 year bond term, 6% interest,
· 5.5% annual increase in total property tax assessments,
· 3% annual increase in assessed property valuations,
· 4% annual inflation (decrease in value of money),
· Average 1999 property valuation for non-residential development at $10 per square
foot,
· An average of 500 square feet per employee
5c.
Present Value of
Tax Payments Per
Employee
Credit Per
Employee
The amount of this credit is shown in Table 5.3
TABLE 5.3
CREDIT PER EMPLOYEE
Credit Per
Employee
Present Value of Tax Payments $ 17
D. Formula 5d: Non-Residential SDC Per Employee
The Non-Residential SDC Per Employee 15 calculated by adding the
compliance/ administration cost per employee (fable 5.2, page 20) to the non-
residential facilities cost per employee (from Table 5.1 page 19), and subtracting the
credit per employee (from Table 5.3). .
5d.
N on- Residential
Facilities Cost +
Per Employee
Compliance /
Admin. Cost
Per Employee
Credit Per
Employee
Non-Residential
= . SDC Per
tmployee
Don Ganer & Associates
21
as of 9/30/99
...
The results of these calculations are shown in Table 5.4.
TABLE 5.4
NON-RESIDENTIAL SDC PER EMPLOYEE
Non-Residential
Facilities Cost Per
Employee
Compliance /
+ Administration -
Employee
Credit Per
Employee
Non-Residential
SDC Per
Employee
$ 20
$2
$17
$5
The parks and recreation SDC's for a particular non-residential development are
determined by:
1) dividing the total building space (square feet) in the development by the
number of square feet per employee (from the guidelines in Table 5.5, page
23), and
2) multiplying the result (from step 1) by the Non-Residential SDC Per
Employee rate (Table 5.4).
For example, the parks and recreation SDC's for a 100,000 square foot Distribution
Warehouse would be calculated as follows:
1) 100,000 (sq. ft. building size) + 2,500 (sq. ft. per employee) = 40 employees,
2) 40 employees X $5 (SDC rate) = $200.
For non-residential development where more than one SIC may be used, multiple SIC's
may be applied based on their percentage of the total development.
l
Don Ganer & Associates
22
as of 9/30/99
",.
TABLE 5.5
SQUARE FEET PER EMPLOYEE
(recommended guidelines from Metro Employment Density Study)
Standard Industry Square Feet Standard Industry Square Feet
Classification (SIc) Per Employee Classification (SIc) Per Employee
Manufacturing: Trucking 1,500
General 700 Communications 250
Food Related 775 Utilities 225
Textile, Apparel 575
Lumber, Wood Products 560 Retail:
Paper and Related 1,400 General 700
Printing and Publishing 600 Hardware 1,000
Chemicals, Petrol, Food Stores 675
Rubber, Plastics 850 Restaurant/Bar 225
Cement, Stone, Clay, Glass 800 Appliance/Furniture 1,000
Furniture and Furnishings 600 Auto Dealership 650
Primary Metals 1,000 Gas Station (gas only) 300
Secondary Metals 800 Gas Station (gas and service) 400
Non-Electrical Machinery 600 Regional Shopping Center 600
Electrical Machinery 375
Electrical Design 325 Services:
Transportation Equipment 500 Hotel/Motel 1,500
Other 400 Health Services (hospital) 500
Health Services (clinic) 350
Wholesale Trade; Educational 1,300
Durable Goods 1,000 Cinema 1,100
Non-Durable Goods 1,150 Personal Services 600
Warehousing - Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate, Business Services 350
Storage 20,000
Distribution 2,500 Government Administration 300
6.0 CONCLUSION
The City's growth will require a combination of techniques, including system
development charges, bond revenues, and other sources of funds to pay for capital
facilities needed to serve the parks and recreation needs of current and future residents.
As growth occurs and the demographics of the community change, the City's parks and
recreation facility needs will also change and should be periodically m~tored through
the use of opinion surveys and similar techniques. The CIP should De reviewed and
updated at least once every two years to reflect changes in parks and recreation facility
needs. The System Development Charges methodology should also be periodically
updated when significant changes are made to the elP, and! or when cost estimates
become outdated.
Don Ganer & Associates
23
as of 9/30/99
-
o
c
en
Cc
.2 G
--
GD.
!U)
(J-
Cl)C
_a:~
c'tJCI)
zc>
Waso
D.U)Q.
D.~E
<(G-
D.-
G
C:!::
...Q.
::::IG
.ao
'tJ
o
o
3:
~ .,
o,Q c
.... 'o.s::. 0
~ ...
o ..
.. 0
Clo.
(I) W
~
Q.u
o
II)
.s::.-g
... I)
"#. ~ I)
ez
Cl
:; c
~ 0
0...
.. ..
Cl 0
co.
o
Z
C:.-s~
o ~ .,
z 0 I)
"#. ~ z
......
-g
.,
.. ...
... III
o E
1-';1
III
w
c
...
I)
.s::.
...
~
o
III
.,
.s::.
...
.~
~
.. ,.....,
III III
0..,
'&~
OU)
of .
o )(
,Q 0
.s:. ..
CIa.
'ij ~
c......
1lI11
8-U
'ii~
ii ...
~o
,~ 5
f}'f
U 0
c(o.
8
o
o
N
ID
iI't
"#.
o
IX)
8
o
II)
II)
;;
~
N
8
o
II)
......
......
iI't
qj~ ~
5.t: c ~
o ~.2 .,
.. .,... ~
~III~U
~ cr OL: fti
C) .....: u
c ~ U .,
'6 'c';:; ii
~ ... III
u~EII)
.~ ~ .g .g
i::'ii ~
III 0. .w
o.....~.!
~iilll_1;;
..cElli 0.
~Bt:"'C
._ .. ., c
~ 1i ~ III
m ., >
.. 0
0.... ...
.... C 0.
:! ~ .~
co..,
., '5 01
~ 0- III
> ., .~
o -g ~
c..c-g
E ~ -
.- e ~
., 01.-
~ 1;' 1:
~1i~
o
iI't
~
8
o
o
......
~
io/t
"#.
8
8
o
o
......
~
io/t
8
'<t
......
......
iI't
"#.
ID
('I)
8
ID
......
('I)
iI't
"#.
;$
8
o
II)
N
iI't
...
I)
~
c
4)
(J
>.
...
'> ~
.- ..
... III
~o.
... E
U III
~.s::.
.. 01
... C
III ._
CL:
o ~
um
s
o
iI't
tf.
o
~
8
o
o
......
io/t
8
o
o
N
~
iI't
"#.
8
~
8
o
o
......
iI't
8
o
o
N
;;;
.s::
....
-g III
C 0.
~ g't: l:l ~
a ~~ ~ g
'c 1;' - U U
s.... _ en ftI
~ 0.1: 01 ~
:!Cl" ~tig,
c.~E ~_II)
.,-g" ~~,
E.2~ u~-g
., u.. .~Cl-g
~ .~ ~ ~'iij
c.. ~.- . li-g
,~ li ~.! 0. fi
~~'~&ti
]'li~ :l.~
I) -6 Q. .~ ~
Z _"IE
O ~ U
.... C~ 9 ~
III E fi III'C
1:"-1:~
., U-g .,.,
E.!!C EIII
., 0. III .,...:
e~~ el
0. CEO.
.~ E 8 ~,~
., 0. III .,.5
~ '5 0. ~ :l
~2'f~f
~
...
III
0.
01
C
'6
~
u
C
-"" .,
... 01
III nI
0. ,!:
III l!
~"D
1lI-g
... C
.n III
... ti
,2 C
C .-
., ...
II)~
.,=
...>.
III ...
> .-
o ..
C U
., .,
0:: III
~
~
8
II)
N
~
iI't
~
8
II)
N
~
iI't
8
'<t
ID
IX)
io/t
"#.
ID
('I)
8
ID
('I)
II)
~
io/t
"#.
;$
8
o
o
'<t
N
io/t
Iii
-g
C
III
,.....,
.,
...
U
III
x
o
...
Q.
a.
...
......
~
...
III >.
0. III
C ~
o.s::.
III ...
'ii3,
Z ...
-g .,
c.s::.
3,1;;
Jj ~
8
II)
N
('I)
N
io/t
C
o
~
o
0.
C
...
.,
...
III
...
.,
4)
.s::.
...
.!:
~
...
III
0.
-g
o
~--'
6 tl
~ b
ClIII
'ij II)
c .
III ~
8-c..
'ii~
>......
{l11
't)u
.~ u
~.s::.
0-'"
u_
c( 0
"#.
o
('t)
8
II)
N
'<t
II)
io/t
"#.
R
8
o
II)
......
......
io/t
8
t/)
......
en
ID
io/t
~
en
8
t/)
......
......
iI't
"#.
o
8
o
t/)
......
......
iI't
C
...
.,
...
I!
~
.s::.
...
~
o
III
.,
.s::.
...
.~
~~
'6g,
-5 III
.!: ci
...
~ :3
... ...
III 'c
0. ~
...-
.,~
., ...
... III
tio.
.......
C C
o .,
at E
..c .,
1:: lil
00.
Z c-
0:\
:: i.
.t: ,E 'Ii
'I) 0. CI
E '5 ~
., g-.~
~ III
..-g-g
o.cc
.~ g III
I) ~ i'
~1;'~
III _ 0
~ 0. U
~ .
['if
...
U
III
II)
-g
o
o
.s::.
.. .
o ~
.0 ...
-ij,a.
.- Q.
4) '"
c......
.. >.
...
8-U
- .,
".s::.
ii ...
-g-
..... 0
.~ 5
~ .-
g~
c(o.
J
o
io/t
~
8
t/)
......
ID
io/t
tf.
o
o
8
t/)
......
ID
io/t
III
4)
J5
'"
...
U
'c
o
'is.
OIl!
C "+:;
'61:
:3 .,
'0 E
.!: '"
III ...
'0 .,
0'5
..c 0
o
III"C
.2 ~
::0 -
:3 III
o.c
o Cl
.... E
III .,
.... U
C C
., '"
E..c
., C
> .,
e~
o.~
E 0
.- ...
., 01
~ i;'
~1i
s
o
o
IX)
('I)
......
io/t
"#.
o
8
t/)
......
ID
iI't
o
o
......
('I)
......
t/)
io/t
"#.
8
8
t/)
......
ID
iI't
o
o
t/)
......
co
N
('I)
4o't
...J
<
I-
o
I-
m
::::)
II)
o
c
en
C:c:
.2 cu
--
cuo..
!cn
(,)-
)(CI)C:
_a:~
c'OCI)
zc:>
Wcuo
o..CI)Q.
o..~E
c(;_
0..-
cu
c::!::
...c.
::Jcu
.co
'0
o
o
3:
~ "
o ..a
C\j '0
Q) ii:i
~
Cl..u
o
III
.c: ;
~..
o ...
... 0
C)o..
8
II)
~
~
~
.c:"C
.. "
'#. ~ "
...z
C)
;f.
,..,
v
.c: c:
~ 0
o ..
... ...
C) 0
'=0..
o
Z
8
II)
M
o
II)
~
c~"O
o ~ "
z 0 "
..,.l5Z
;f.
M
II)
,..,0
ON
00
NN
"C
"
l'G ..
.. l'G
o E
f-~
w
8
o
o
II)
m
~
C
o 0
+J "+:i
,....,l'G
E g
.2 e; ....
"'C ~ L "lJ
~"CZ11i
lIlc"C
iii C15ci
" c....."
.- 01 "
~ "C>'C1~
.- :Jl'G_"
.N ] 1i.~ ii
tJ VJ- f! 0
'-' 1: "lJ 02
~ " cii.5:!
.. E c 0..
0.. " .+:; C-
C > .c: :J
.001- e .~ e
0.- 01
~ .S ~ i\i
" III 'C:: C
1;l II l'l .Q
>o",~c
00 III"C 0
5~....~ '0:;
..."c .~
"C 01 E :l .-
C ftI to) c: t:
.. ~ ~ " .~
c 'iij .. E .-
01 1i"~
'-"">E
1l"C"'0
"C .a "C a 2
~ .~ Ii .S ;
o
~
o
~
~
~
8
o
o
o
CIO
~
8
o
o
,..,
,..,
~
~
~
8
o
o
o
CIO
~
8
o
o
,..,
,..,
~
1::
:J
8 . ~
c:-5
]"EO
".. "C
"C " " C
:J ~ lil l'G
u!;H-fIi
.!:..a _ ..
o"'C~~
.. C " E
~:J~"
lii ~ ~ >
0..g:1Il~
... .. U c-
.!! 1i'2 .~
E ..5:!"
.!!:lc-C1
"c-..
"""c
~ E ~ 'ji
,,"E-u
.... > "
l'G 0 U'
> a..!! g
o E c-.+:;
ii .- ~ ..
~~-gg:l
Ii g l'G ~ ii
c~gEE
01 " .- 0 "
.- 01" 0 >
II l'G 13 ... ~
"C~.21iio
~'iij ~ ~,~
in
..
c
"
E
"
>
" 0
> ...
.+:; c-
~ .~ ~
e-..., .~
~.2..
c 01 l'G
.- c E
-8:g~
-5 [ l'G
.!: "C g'
o Ii .~
.. ". ~
~ ~ ~
0..
" .E -g
.~ .2 l'G
o~ ~
E l'G 'C::
oo.:J
o 0
.3 .~- ~
~E~
~I!~
Q.0l'G
E.... >
- .!: "
o
~
~
8
o
N
~
~
~
8
o
N
~
~
~
;f.
o
8
II)
N
~
~
;f.
8
8
II)
N
~
~
"
..c:
..
..
l'G
"
:::c
'iij
1Il
"
U
U
l'G E
2:-:J
"3 "
.... ~
1Il~
E ...
g ~
~ ii
lIu
~ ~
~ ~
Em
"C .111
c"C
l'GL:
>,0
.!!==
i\i c
...
" :J
"C..a
l'G"C
ag
g==
o
~
o
o
~
N
...
~
8
II)
M
~
~
o
o
V
N
N
~
~
8
III
M
~
fJ
:E
c-
..
...
01
cii
c
'+:;
..c:
~
til
tic
.... "a
.~ rl
E-fl
.2 Ii
,,~
"C C
-fi l'G
.!: 't:
o Z1
.. "
~ ...
... 0
.. ..
0.. :11
C:-'"
I!Jl
..a 1Il
:.J]
~'Cl
ei}
o.N
ji~
11r
o
C
CJ)
Cc
.2 C'G
--
C'GQ.
!cn
u-
)(Q)c
_a:~
c'OQ)
zc>
UJC'GO
Q.cnQ.
Q.~E
<(....
C'G-
Q.-
C'G
C~
....Q.
::IC'G
,go
'0
o
o
3:
~ tl
o ..c
C.") '0
Q) w
~
Cl..u
o
lI)
I
c:
o
Z
L c:
~ .~
o t:
... 0
CIa.
8
CXl 0
o to't
~
to't
L"C
.... -; tl
~ ;>0 tl
ez
CI
L
...
~
o
...
CI
I
c:
o
z
'#
1'1
...
o
I-
...
tl
L
...
1'1
tl
~
I
'ii ~
tl<
"g.!!
gti
._ 1'1
o u
..."E
iV'~
~ 0
c: ...
2l .;
...lI)
CI c:
~o
1'1 u
a. c:
tl::i
~ E
>-0
3:-t:
tl iV'
~ ~
m-5
0.1'1
::>0.
'# 'S.
~ 0
8 8
N 0
en 0
~ M
to't to't
! @
8 8
o 0
o 0
M M
to't to't
,:;. ...
... tl
1'1 .r.
a. ...
1'1
Gl Gl
~ ~ :l
'ii 'E
tl=
"C >-
::l ...
'OU
.~ tl
B-5
=B
"C.r.
c: ...
1'1 ::l
_ 0
= III
-:~
III(1)
~"C
1'1 c:
a. 1'1
~ c: 'il
~ g ~
~ ; D
... E E
"C ... 0
c:~-t:
1'1
tl tl >-
~~~
m-E
tl 0. 1'1
a:::>o.
8
o
\0
M
to't
'S.
\0
M
8
o
o:t
\0
to't
;f.
$
8
o
o
o
~
to't
c:
c: 0
o III
III c:
c: IIlI
1'1 E
E ~
~I
I....
...
...
"'''0
1: 5
Gl 0.
[~
'5 ~
0' ._
IJ .~
"0 c:
C tl
::l E
e~
C1t1
~~
0. 'c
tl ...
~~
U~
.2 ~
~ 0.
"C1ii
c: ....
... III
c:
tl .-
~':':E
Q.-t::~
tl 1'1 1'1
a: a. a.
o
to't
8
o
\0
M
to't
s
;f.
\0
M
8
o
L/')
M
to't
8
o
o:t
\0
to't
;f.
8
;f.
o:t
\0
8
o
L/')
M
to't
8
o
o
o
~
to't
E
o
-g-t:
"'''0
.E f;j
o _
u c:
c: 0
::i 'u; E
c: 'S: 0
:l '6 .t=
~ .g .r.
till)-t::~
..c~I'IC:
(II~Q..cn
ca 0... ... AI
Gl .- tl
... ~ tl ...
tV 0 E ...
6~.!! ...
"Ctl:::.g
'E ~ ~ 'E
8.5 0 8
~ -... ~
:ltti :l
U ~ ~ u
=0lV)
~"C"C
~~~
'5 ~ ~
ff .!! .!!
<uu
8
\0
~
N
to't
;f.
\0
M
8
o:t
CXl
M
to't
'S.
o:t
\0
8
o
g
to't
o
....
~
...
...
Q..
c:
o
'01
tl
...J
CI
c:
o~
lv Iii :l
tl -...
c: "C U
III ~ tl
1;' a: S
~ t:: 0
.r....c;t
....a._
tV 0 0
o....~
"C~c:
c: ... ...
ec....c
)( .r.
tl ... ...
o .!! 5
.... E III
III .!! tl
........r.
~ti....
E lI) c:
tl E 0
lIIe-g
tl _ tV
III .-
1IIt1~
~ .~ :l
o "C ...
tV.... U
tl ::l -
... c: ...
'5 'il ~
O'NC:
o 1'1 tl
<Ill)
~
tlm
...CI
'5 ::>
O'Gl
o.r.
<...
8
\0
o:t
CXl
to't
'S.
\0
M
8
o:t
o
L/')
~
to't
'S.
$
8
o
L/')
M
N
to't
l
'If
9B
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administ~;, ft---
Public Works Program Manager ~
TO:
SUBJECT:
Traffic Impact Fee System Development Charge Public Hearing
DATE:
November 3, 1999
RECOMMENDATION: After evaluating public input, direct staff to prepare an
Ordinance implementing the revised Traffic Impact Fee methodology and following
that a resolution which will establish council directed revised Traffic Impact Fee rates.
BACKGROUND: The premise for a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), which is a system
development charge for transportation, was that future growth should contribute its
fair share to the cost of improvements and additions to city transportation facilities
that are required to accommodate the needs of such growth. The city adopted a TIF
schedule in September of 1993 and the fees were effective January 1, 1994. The
TIF was set at 25% of the maximum and was to increase 1 % each year for 5 years
at which time the fee would be reviewed. This hearing is part of that review process.
Since the city adopted the existing TIF schedule the Transportation System Plan has
been adopted, an alternatives analysis has been done on Highway 214, a capital
improvement plan for streets has been completed and some street improvement
projects have been completed. There have also been some changes to state law that
affect system development charges and that need to be incorporated in the city's TIF
procedures.
The city's original "standards driven" TIF amounts were based on the expected costs
of providing road facilities at existing levels of service rather than on the costs of
specific capital improvement projects. The TIF update that has been prepared looks
at the city's facility needs for capacity increasing capital improvements which have
been identified in the Transportation System Plan and approved cap.ital improvement
plans, which will accommodate growth and may be funded by a systtm development
charge. The proposed "combination hybrid" TIF update includes growth related motor
vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities. These items are covered in detail
in the TIF update methodology report and rate study that was completed by Don
Ganer & Associates for the city.
"....
I1r
CITY OF WOODBURN
TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT FEE (TIF) UPDATE
METHODOLOGY REPORT
AND RATE STUDY
as of
October 29, 1999
15418 NW White Fox Dr. . Beaverton,. Oregon 97006 · (503) 690-8981
9B
l
Don
Ganer &
Associates
...
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
Execu ti ve Summary ..... .............. ......... ...... ....... ..... ...... ..............................
1.0 Introduction.. .................. ..... ...... ......... .............. ................................ 1
2.0 Authority and Background Information...................................... 2
A. Legislative Authority. .................. ..... ..... ....... .... ...................... 2
B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's..... 2
C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions,
and Discounts.......... ...... .......... .................. .... ...... ...... ...... ........ 3
D . Guiding Concepts... ...... ......... ..... ............................................ 4
E. Alternative Methodology Approaches............................... 5
3.0 Transportation Impact Fee Methodology................................... 7
A. SDC Basis and Justification................................................... 7
B. Future Trip Projections.......................................................... 7
C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC...................... 9
4.0 Calculation of the Transportation Impact Fee............................ 15
A. Formula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip
by Mode of Travel.................................................................. 15
B. Formula 2: Net New Person-Trips....................................... 16
C. Formula 3: Length Adjusted Person-Trips......................... 22
D. Formula 4: Motor Vehicle (MY) Cost Per Unit................. 28
E. Formula 5: Pedestrian/Bicycle (P/B) Cost Per Unit.......... 34
F. Formula 6: Transit Cost Per Unit......................................... 40
G. Formula 7: Transportation Impact Fee Per Unit............... 46
Table 3.1:
Table 3.2:
Table 4.1:
Table 4.2:
Table 4.3:
Table 4.4:
Table 4.5:
Table 4.6
Table 4.7:
LIST OF TABLES
Projected Growth in Average Daily Trips (ADT)............
TIF-Eligible Transportation Capital Improvement .
Projects.................................................................................. l
Cost Per New Person-Trip By Mode Of Travel..........~...~
Net New Person-Trips.... ..... ........ ..... ..... .................... ..........
Length Adjusted Person-Trips........ .... ..... ................ ...........
Motor Vehicle Cost Per Unit..............................................
Pedestrian/ Bicycle Cost Per Unit.......................................
Transit Cost Per Unit........... ............................ ..... ..... ..........
Transportation Impact Fee (I1F) Per Unit.......................
1Tr
~
8
12
15
17
23
29
35
41
47
CITY OF WOODBURN
Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Update
Methodology Report and Rate Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. TIF Methodology Update
In 1989, the State of Oregon adopted the Oregon Systems Development Act (ORS
223.297 - 223.314) to "provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system
development charges by local governments." The Act requires local governments to
enact System Development Charges (SDC's) by resolution or ordinance, and to
develop methodologies to establish the principles used in arriving at the SDC rates.
The City of Woodburn adopted an ordinance and resolution establishing SDes for
transportation facilities in 1993. Included in the ordinance was a requirement for the
ordinance and methodology to be reviewed periodically to consider new estimates of
population and other socioeconomic data, changes in the cost of construction and land
acquisition, and other adjustments. A review of the ordinance and methodology has
been completed, resulting in an updated methodology for the City's Transportation
Impact Fee (TIF) and some recommended modifications to the TIF
ordinance/ resolution.
The City's SDC for transportation was originally referred to as the Traffic Impact Fee,
but has been changed to Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) to more accurately reflect the
facilities for which revenues are used. The TIF remains an "improvement fee" designed
to generate revenue for construction of future facilities; it does not include a
"reimbursement fee" for facilities which are already in place.
The 1993 TIF methodology was completed prior to completion of the City's 1996
Transportation System Plan. Because specific project costs were not then available, TIF
rates included in the 1993 methodology report were based on the "typical" costs of
constructing capacity-increasing improvements needed to maintain a' }evel of Service
of 6,000 vehicles per day for arterial and collector roads in the City.: '
The TIF rates included in the updated TIF methodology are based on the growth-
related costs of specific capacity-increasing projects on arterial and collector roads
identified in the City's adopted 1996 Transportation System Plan (updated to include
project completions, changes and modifications).
Don Ganer & Associates
as of 10/29/99
11
The updated TIF rates were developed using trip generation rates for major land-use
categories included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation
manual (6th Edition, 1997). As in the 1993 methodology, the ITE trip generation rates
for the update were adjusted to account for peak-hour impacts and pass-by trips, and
were then multiplied by the average trip-lengths for each land-use category to
determine the total number of new person-trips per day.
The cost per new person-trip for each mode of travel (e.g., motor vehicle,
pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit) was determined by dividing the total growth-related
costs for each mode of travel by the number of new person-trips expected for that
mode. The numbers of new person-trips expected for each type of land use were
determined by multiplying the total length-adjusted person-trips for each land use by
the percentage of total person-trips for each mode of travel (e.g 93% motor vehicle, 5%
pedestrian/bicycle, and 2% transit). These numbers were then multiplied by the cost
per person-trip for each mode of travel to calculate the cost for each mode for each
land-use category.
The maximum TIF rates in the updated methodology ($3,092 per single family dwelling
unit) are very close to the maximum rates in the original 1993 methodology ($3,020.20
per single family dwelling unit). The City Council in 1993 adopted initial TIF rates at
25% of the maximum rates identified in the original methodology report, with rates
increasing by 1% of the maximums annually to a total of 30% of the maximum rate
($906.06 per single family dwelling unit). The maximum TIF rates for each land-use
category included in the updated methodology report are included in Exhibit A.
B. Ordinance Modifications
Credits
The 1993 Oregon Legislature modified legislative requirements concerning the
provision of "credits" against SDC's for certain improvements require" as a condition
of development approval. In order to comply with these changes, replacement
language for the TIF ordinance has been drafted, as follows:
Don Ganer &; Associates
i i
as of 10/29/99
...
"Qualified Public Improvement" means a capital improvement that is required:
(1) Required as a condition of development approval;
(2) Identified in the adopted capital improvement plan (OP); and
(b)
Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of
development approval, or
Located in whole or in part on or contiguous to property that is the
subject of development approval and required to be built larger or with
greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project
to which the improvement fee is related.
(3)
(a)
Annual Rate Adjustments
The current ordinance does not provide for annual adjustments in rates to account for
changes in costs of acquisition and development. The following new language has been
recommended to provide for annual rate adjustments to account for changes in costs,
as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision, the SDC rates adopted pursuant to Ordinance
No. _ shall on January 1st of each year be adjusted to account for changes in the
costs of acquiring and constructing facilities. The adjustment factor shall be based on
the change in average market value of all land in the City, according to the records of
the County Tax Assessor, and the change in construction costs according to the
Engineering News Record (ENR) Northwest (Seattle, Washington) Construction Cost
Index; and shall be determined as follows:
Change in Average Market Value X 0.50
.:t. Change in Construction Cost Index X 0.50
System Development Charge Adjustment Factor
The System Development Charge Adjustment Factor shall be use_d to ~just the System
Development Charge rates, unless they are otherwise adjusted by ,aCtion of the City
Council based on adoption of an updated methodology or capital improvements plan
(master plan).
Don Ganer & Associates
iii
as of 10/29/99
'II'
" EXmBIT A"
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page J of5
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
~
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the lTE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the p.m.
peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
iv
as of 10/29/99
Ilr
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 20f5
::.::::::,:::::,:.,:::,__,:::.,::,,:,:,__::::::::~,lo~::::::::::::::::::':::':::::::::'::":::::::::::I:::::M~l~~::::::~~:~~~~~~~L:::__',:':~~~:::":'::':'::'::::::':(:s.~:':":::j:::::__':":"::':.'::~~:)'::'____::':'::::::::
~ Vehicle Bicvcle: Transit Total!
. .
n....,..'ooonnoooooooooooooooonooo....oooonooooooooooooooo.......noonoonnmooonooo..n.oo.nooo;'ooo.m..,T~ooooonooo oooooo.m'!~mooo..n~oo.oo..oo.I,!-foonoo.m ooon,mooT!-f,.noooooo:ooo.ooooooooommooommooooooooooooonooo.ooo
ITE LAND USE CODE! CATEGORY ; Per Unit Per Unit : Per Unit Per Unit i Unit
n.m.n.....m.........oo'ooooomnoooooo........mooooom...n......m..........oonnnm'm..-r...mooonooooooooooooooo...........'..moo.oooonooooooorooooooooooooonmmooo.oonm...oooonooooooooooonoooo-roo.oooonoo....000=0000000000000000000
INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL : .
~i:::MW~:~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::L:::::::--::,::$.~??:::::::::::::::::::::~~r::::.::__::::::::ii:~::::::::::::':':::$.~lQr:i~:~pl~Y~~:::::':::::::::::
520 Elementarv School : $113 $15: $4 $1311 I student
i1r!r~~~;;~_~J~~~~I~~~_ll~~1~-~~lri~i!!i_:.:.~~
560 Church : $1,891 $247~ $70 $2,208~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
.r~:::Bf[~=::~:=~==~::~=~:::==~=:::::::::::::::::i:::::::::::::$.~~ :::::::::::::::::~ij~t:::::::::::::::::$.il~: ::::::::::::d~ti:2f;~~:~~;A;:::::::::::::
610 Hospital : $3,453 $450: $127 $4,030~ Ibed
~.!.~.nf..!~~::?~~5!~8..PJ~!;,~~!..?.!~'!~'mmnooLmmm...........nnooo ooo'mm'm..........ooon'Loooooooooooooooomooooo......n'n'nn'mooom.ooo..,nLnm.m.m..moo..m'mmn.........ooo
With Groceries $5,374 $701 j $198 $6,272! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
.~H:,oo?p~~~~__~~~~M__~~~.~~!,__"...,______oo"m"'n...L,,'nnooo"~?!,~},~,oo,"'..'..m,J~~l,,,.,.."..'ooo,,~?~~.__..oo,...,~l?~j.LT~?,:f..:G.~~~A~ooo'ooo".."
815 Free-Standing Discount Stores : : j
'm--m--':'With~~~~iG~~c;ri~~...........ooo......mm'm..--.ooooOOO~OOOOOO"'''--$6~480 'ooooo.----......$84:5:-ooo'mmmm$238' ....mmn$'7;564]"iisj~.:G:F:A~n....m'm
816 Hardware I Paint Stores ~ $9,223 $1,203~ $339 $10,765~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
...n............._....._n......n___.__n_..uun.......unu_.................._____u___n.......__+__u_....u...........____nn.___.................._.__.___._______....................._._____n__u_n________........+_n_..____.._................._......____________
817 Nursery I Garden Center ~ $6,488 $846: $239 $7.573~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the lTE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the p.m.
peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &. Associates
v
as of 10/29/99
ill'
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 30f5
.......'..moo.....hm....hoomm.........J~>......'hmoooooo'.mmm'moooooooo......mL..oooooo,{?Lmmoo, .'m.mm(~Loo....,.Loooo,ooj~L.mm. '..--oomJ?>......_...ooLm..__m'..noo..c~L....__m...______
uuh,n__nm.h_________.__h_n________n___u..__________._,n___n____.u_.....o._.._______L..o._M~~'J.,t:'.m' p..~,~~~~!:i':lP.:L.n___mo.'__n__oo...._ __,_.,..__ ___._.__.______00.0.1.'.000 ______0._ ___.m_______.o.._..__..._..__.o..
~ Vehicle Bicycle 1 Transit Total i
TW TW TW TW
i!~~Q~~~Q!?~ii:;A,ITQQj{X....I.i'~iQ;.!ii'.;;:y;.!!j.i'~t:ij.;;i. .i'~t:Q;.!ir.............y~C......
COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cant.) ~ .
~jQ:::~h~p.p~g::~~~!~!:,::::::::::::::::::,:'::::::::::,::.::::.:::r::::...:,:::$.4;.?i:f:::::::::::.:::::~r:':::_::::::::.$.:i~i:::::::::::.:$~;.?~?I:ZI~:$.~:~;G~:~~:A:;::::::::::::
823 Factory Outlet Center ! $3,043 $397~ $112 $3,5511/T.S.F.G.F.A.
~1:N:~~i~~i,~:~~~~~~)J=!=2!~::$=:~.O~L:=~~ ....:=~"=1L:T..~,=~.~,~.
Restaurant : $9,742 $1,270! $358 $11,370~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
833oo'F~~i'F.~~fR~~i.(N~.ij"ri~~~~)"'-i"'.",.,$26~758' 'o.."--m'$3;489io.'.'m"".'..'$984 moo'oo"$3i;23iTiT~s:Fi;~'F~A'~oo,..,--hoo
-~-~--______.U.h________._.._____n______u_..U_..___n____.hn_____n_............n_n____...+...._nn_...........nn_nu......._nn__n--.....-n.___:...............__._nn..n...n__.....n.__.....___n_..___+_n__n__________nn__n_..___nn...._uun...
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) ! $18,541 $2,418! $682 $21,640j IT.S.F.G.F.A.
@:~{~~~~~~;:j~~h().Pii:~.....:=~l:::::~~:~~~I)I~~~'~~:
840 Automobile Service Center (b) 1 $7,211 $9401 $265 $8,416~ IT.S.F.G.L.A.
841 New Car Sales ! $6,743 $8791 $248 $7,8711/T.S.F.G.F.A.
~:::Q~~:~~~T$.~~~~::~!~!~~:ri::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::..::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::':::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::1::::::'::::::::::::::::::::':'::::::::::::::::::
(no Market or Car Wash) : $9,666 $1 260: $355 $11 282~ IV.F.P.
'--mmmmoooo'..mm'm'....'..mmm....moo..o.__mm..oo.o.hm..mmOUo.'hmum..'m'OUho.'hu'mmmoo oo.o.u,u,m,m'{h__,mOOV'OOhummmmOO..'h,m ....oohm__m..!.mm......ooh'mooou'..m'm'mooh..,hmmm'm
845 GasolinelService Station 1 1 ~
......U...nn...............uuu...............____.............n....n....__....................._._.........______.._..__......n........____...................-:-.___........__....n....._...........h__........._u__n.......___.....nn..........___......___."._..____...
(With Convenience Market) 1 $9,335 $1,2171 $343 $10,896~ /V.F.P.
'846mGa~~lineis~'rrice'Stati~n....--mmmoum..T'oum'm....'oo..mmm'moooou'..m....oooo'oomr.oo..um........ou....'H'mooh'h,mm'mmooooj..'mmmooou'ou'mmooho.hhm_m__u,
::::::::::::::cw..z:~~~y:;::M~~~~!::~ri4::~:W~~h}:::,::::::::~;.Z~~: ::::::::::::$.j;.:i~~j:::::::::::::::::$.~J.i ::::::::::$iQ;.?~QI:Zy~:~;:p.:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
848 Tire Store l $4,472 $583: $164 $5,220j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
'~'m~~~~~!~~..,n"""""...."_""..",,,ouou,...."oo.._'h,j""m..~J?~'?.QQ'm.."..oo,$.!i?.~9.l.'m..'oo"oo__,~9...."m"$.J~!.?.~.Qjf:r?.~F..~G)~,:A:",......m'
851 Conyeniep':~,e, M~!~,~~ __(?~ooh~~L"L,mou$.'~?~J~Q moooooon..$.1{,~L......__.$..!!.~ moooooo~:?!.~.UI:?,~F..~G.:f:A:oom.....m
'f~53mC~~~'~..M~k~t--With F~el Pump i $27,306 $3,561: $1,004 $31,871j IV.F.P.
860 Wholesale Market $1,210 $158: $44 $1,4131/T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
YF.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the p.m.
peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer & Associates
vi
as of 10/29/99
I1r
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 40f5
00"" ...n.......mum.u.......... ..........0.)..0.000.......000..'..00 ..........000000..00.00. .l...u......,(?'Luu.m um.'....'PJ......h..;..h.Uuu,HL,mmu u.m'h.u(?)muuuu:u'h"h""h...uJ~)umumu.uuu.,
[ Motor Pedestrian I
:::::'m::...:::':..:..:::'.::...":::::::.:.:::.:::...:,:::...:,:.,.::':':::,...::.....:,.....L::Y~h!~)~::,:: :::::,~~~~~':::T:,.::I~~~~~::.:: ::..:,:,:I~~~L...,:r::":::::::::::::..:,::,.::::::::':::::::::::::::
: TIF TIF \ TIF TIP
ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY : Per Unit Per Unit j Per Unit Per Unit [ Unit
..u......................................................__.__..........u......__.....__...........__...;............................................................:...----.....-----..----.....................................;-..-----.--.-...-..~....-.._.....-.....
: : :
'C"(jMMERi~iALjSERViCESu(ro~tj""h..\.mhhum.mmu..'...., 0000000000000000.....00000000':0.'0.0000000000000000000000000 mmu.,u.u.uhuuum'l...uuu.umuuuummumuumuum..
861 Discount Club : $7 517 $980! $276 $8 773~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~?::::H~:~~::~P:~~y~~:~:ri~::$~p~~~~'~~:.I.:::::::::::~:~Q~: :::::::::::::::::~~l"::::::::'::::::$.:?~? :::::::::::::$.?:~~I:iI;.~~f;:G;.~;.A~::::::::::::
863 Electronics Superstore : $8,099 $1,056~ $298 $9,453j IT.S.F.G.F.A.
,~?Q...:App~t~~~!~mn.nm..m..'..umnmum...n,hh'mmLnm,mu~!~Z4 'm......u,$.!r.Q??Luumnuu.$.~Q~ ,..,..,...u$.?l?Z~.UI:~.:f..:q.:f..:!.\~m..........
,~....p..h~~.~,q.I...P,~g~~~!~,..'hmnmmm..'..h'.nhLuum'mm....'u0000000 numu.u..uuu,mhuul.mm,mmnm,mm,m 'm'...'.m..m............1.............,..um'..'.....m'mu......mn
~l:::~~~~~?~~~!;~=~:~~...::::::::t::::::':~~~~~~: :::,::,:::':~:~~=l:::::::':::::::::~~:~:~: ::::::::::~~:~~:=~=I::::=~:~~~~~~:=~:=:~::::::::::::
With Drive-Thru Window . $10,088 $1,316~ $371 $11,775~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
,~~.__.f.~.~~__~!~,!~".,__,__",..,.....'."'um"n'..'...,.",.,.,~'.""n'm.d__$.?JQ n.'.."u'n__"$.JJ?l,'n".""n.......$.~~, m'm'ml!l~.~j.Lr:~:.f..:q,:f~~..__"n.m'
.~~__,y!~~.~~~,~__~).__'uu'm"n'.".'"""u"".n."'.','i'."d"--~?!.Q.Q? "uu'n".'~{,4??ln."'.__,u$.?f.~~Q. ...__,...$.?~l~?Z!.lI~.:f.,:q.:f~~__m.'______
896 Video Rental Store (b) : $36,092 $4,706: $1,327 $42,126i IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~~-~~~;~~i.~~l~~~:-~~l~~~~-~~!:~~:~~;~-~~~~
~rE1!t~~;~~mr~~mlj;mm!111II~~l1:~~--
720 Medical-Dental Office Building $10,600 $1,382~ $390 $12,372! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
730 Government Office Building $20,223 $2,637~ $744 $23,604: IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the lTE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the p.m.
peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer & Associates
vii
as of 10/29/99
t
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTA nON IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
page 50f5
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the I~ Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on m,ltiplying the p.m.
peak hour trip rate X 10. .
Don Ganer & Associates
viii
-
as of 10/29/99
CITY OF WOODBURN
Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Update
Methodology Report and Rate Study
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Woodburn implemented a Transportation Impact Fee (TIP) for all new
development in the City occurring after January 1, 1994. Because the City's
Transportation System Plan was not yet completed at that time, the TIP amounts were
based on the expected costs of providing road facilities at the existing Levels of Service
(LOS), rather than on the costs of specific capital improvement projects. In June 1996,
Kittleson and Associates, Inc., completed a 20-year Transportation System Plan (Plan)
for the City of Woodburn which identifies roadway, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, access
management, and other transportation needs in accordance with the Oregon
Department of Land Conservation and Development Transportation Planning Rule,
OAR 660 Division 12. The Plan includes an assessment of existing conditions of the
transportation system, an assessment of highway and transit system alternatives,
identification of potential financing mechanisms, and an evaluation of alternate
pedestrian and bicycle facility and Transportation Demand Management (lDM)
strategies. The Plan also includes recommended facilities, standards, and
improvements for roadway, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and rail
transportation.
Several of the transportation system projects included in the Plan have already been
completed, and additional transportation capital facility needs have been identified by
the City since the time the Plan was adopted. A portion of these facility needs are for
capacity-increasing capital improvements which will accommodate growth, and which
may be funded with revenues from a TIF. This report presents the methodology used
to update the City's TIP to include growth-related motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian,
and transit facilities. Section 2.0 presents authority and backgro~nd information
including (1) legislative authority for the TIF; (2) an explanation -of lIm;.provement fee"
and "reimbursement fee" SDC's; (3) requirements and options for: credits, exemptions
and discounts; (4) guiding concepts for SDC's and (5) alternative methodology
approaches. The methodology used to develop the updated TIF is discussed in Section
3.0, and the rate calculations are included in Section 4.0.
Don Ganer & Associates
1
as of 10/29/99
'n'
2.0 AUTHORITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. Legislative Authority
The City's TIP is a System Development Charge (SDC) authorized by the Oregon
Systems Development Act (ORS 223.297 - 223.314). The purpose of this Act was to
"...provide a uniform framework for the imposition of system development charges...".
In 1993, SB 122 was passed to include additional statutory provisions. Together, these
pieces of legislation require local governments who adopt SDC's to:
· enact SDC's by ordinance or resolution;
· develop a methodology outlining how the SDC's were developed;
· adopt a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to designate capital improvements that
can be funded with SDC revenues;
· provide credit against the amount of the SDC for the construction of "qualified
public improvements";
· separately account for and report receipt and expenditure of SDC revenues;
· develop procedures for challenging expenditures; and
· use SDC revenues only for capital expenditures (operations and maintenance uses
are prohibited).
B. "Improvement fee" and "Reimbursement fee" SDC's
The Oregon Systems Development Act provides for the imposition of two types of
SDC's: (1) "improvement fee" SDC's, and (2) "reimbursement fee" SDC's.
"Improvement fee" SDC's may be charged for new or expanded capacity-increasing
capital improvements needed to serve growth. The City's current TIP is an
"improvement fee" SDC.
"Reimbursement fee" SDC's may be charged for the costs of existing capital facilities if
"excess capacity" is available to accommodate growth~ levenues from
"reimbursement fee" SDC's may be used on any capital improvement project, including
major repairs, upgrades, or renovations. Capital improvements funded with
"reimbursement fee" SDC's do not need to increase capacity. The City's water and
sewer SDCs include "reimbursement fee" components, but the TIP does not.
Don Ganer &: Associates
2
as of 10/29/99
111"
C. Requirements and Options for Credits, Exemptions, and Discounts
(1) Credits
A credit is a reduction in the amount of the SDC for a specific development. The
Oregon SDC Act requires that credit be allowed for the construction of a
"qualified public improvement" which (1) is required as a condition of
development approval, (2) is identified in the CIP, and (3) either is not located on
or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval, or is
located on or contiguous to such property and is required to be built larger or
with greater capacity than is necessary for the particular development project.
The credit for a qualified public improvement may only be applied against an
SDC for the same type of improvement (e.g., a transportation improvement can
only be used for a credit for a transportation SDC), and may be granted only for
the cost of that portion of an improvement which exceeds the minimum
standard facility size or capacity needed to serve the particular project. For
multi-phase projects, any excess credit may be applied against SDC's that accrue
in subsequent phases of the original development project.
For "reimbursement fee" SDC's, credit must also be given for future property
tax payments, such as repayment of bonded indebtedness, used to fund the
"excess capacity" facilities for which the reimbursement fee SDC is charged.
In addition to these required credits, the City may, if it so chooses, provide a
greater credit, establish a system providing for the transferability of credits,
provide a credit for a capital improvement not identified in the capital
improvement plan, or provide a share of the cost of an improvement by other
means. None of the City's current SDC's include credit provisions beyond those
required by law.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
3
as of 10/29/99
'II'
(2) Exemptions
The City may "exempt" specific types of development from the requirement to
pay SDC's. Exemptions reduce SDc revenues and, therefore, they either
increase the need for funding from other sources, such as bonds, or
reduce/ delay the completion of transportation projects. The City's current
SDc's provide limited exemptions for alterations, expansion or replacement of
an existing dwelling unit where no additional dwelling units are created; the
construction of accessory buildings or structures which will not create additional
dwelling units and which do not create additional demands on the City's capital
improvements; the issuance of a permit for a mobile home on which applicable
system development charges have previously been made as documented by
receipts issued by the City for such prior payment; and development with vested
rights.
(3) Discounts
For "improvement fee" SDCs, the City may "discount" the amount of the SDc
by reducing the portion of growth-related improvements to be funded with
SDC's. For "reimbursement fee" SDc's, the City may "discount" the amount of
the SDC by reducing the portion of "extra-capacity" facilities for which the
reimbursement fee SDC will be collected, or by making other adjustments in the
fee. Because discounts reduce SDC revenues, they increase the amounts that
must come from other sources, such as bonds, that may be needed to meet Level
of Service requirements. All of the City's current SDC's include discounts.
D. Guiding Concepts
In addition to the requirements of the Oregon SDc Act and SB 122, court cases from
Oregon and other states provide additional guidance for the met~odol~ to be used in
developing SDC's. _' _
Don Ganer &: Associates
4
as of 10/29/99
..-
(1) "Essential Nexus" Requirement
In a 1987 case, Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court
established that government agencies must show that an "essential nexus" (e.g.
reasonable connection) exists between a project's impacts and any dedication
requirements. For SDC's the "essential nexus" requirement means there must
be a reasonable connection between the nature of the development and the
facilities for which the SDC's are charged. For transportation SDC's the essential
nexus is met for any development that connects to the transportation system.
(2) "Rough Proportionality" Requirement
In a landmark 1994 decision in Dolan v. City of Tigard, the U.S. Supreme Court
cited the requirement for "rough proportionality" between the requirements
placed on a developer by government and the impacts of the development.
Case law is conflicting on the question of whether Dolan applies to SDC's.
However, to avoid controversy, the City's TIP update is structured so that the
Dolan test is satisfied. The concept of rough proportionality is applied by
insuring that new growth is not required to pay an amount beyond a level
"roughly proportionate" to the new development's impacts on facilities through
the use of nationally recognized standards for levels-of-service and trip
generation.
E. Alternative Methodology Approaches
There are three basic approaches used to develop SDes; "standards-driven",
"improvements-driven", and "combination/ hybrid".
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
5
as of 10/29/99
'II'
(1) Standards-Driven Approach
The "standards-driven" approach is based on the application of level-of-service
(LOS) standards (Le., A, B, C, etc.) for facilities. Facility capacity is determined by
applying the LOS Standards to the projected future use of the facilities. SDC-
eligible amounts are calculated based on the costs or value of capacity needed or
available to serve growth. The "standards-driven" approach may be used to
develop "improvement fee" SDC's and/or "reimbursement fee" SDC's, and
works best where LOS Standards have been identified and / or adopted as part of
a comprehensive plan or facilities master planning process. The City's current
TIP was developed using the standards-driven approach.
(2) Improvements-Driven Approach
The "improvements-driven" approach is based on a specific list of planned
capacity-increasing capital improvements. The portion of each project that is
attributable to growth is determined, and the SDc-funded costs are calculated by
dividing the total costs of growth-related projects by the projected increase in
units of facility use (i.e., trips, persons, etc.). This approach may be used to
develop "improvement fee" SDC's, and works best where a detailed project list
has been developed and the benefits of projects can be apportioned between
growth and current residents.
(3) Combination/ Hybrid Approach
The combination/ hybrid-approach includes elements of both the
"improvements-driven" and "standards-driven" approaches. LOS standards
may be used to develop a list of planned capacity-increasing projects. The
growth-related portions of projects can then be used as the basis for determining
the SDC-funded costs. This approach may be applied in developing
"improvement fee" SDC's and works best where a list of capaci~ needs has not
recently been developed and where sufficient data is available to identify levels-
of-service.
Don Ganer &: Associates
6
as of 10/29/99
IIr
3.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE METHODOLOGY
A. SDC Basis and Justification
The "combination-hybrid" approach has been used to update the City of Woodburn's
TIP. A list of planned capacity-increasing motor vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit
transportation capital improvement projects was analyzed to identify: 1) the modal split
(motor vehicle, pedestrian/bicycle, and/ or transit), 2) the growth-related portion
(based on application of the City's adopted transportation Level of Service standards),
and 3) the local benefit of each project. The resulting SDC-eligible project costs were
then divided by the estimated total number of new person-trips expected during the
planning period, yielding the cost per new person-trip for each travel mode.
The methodology used for the Transportation Impact Fee is for an "improvement fee"
only and establishes the required "essential nexus" between a project's impacts and the
SDC through the use of trip generation data for specific land uses. Trip Generation (6th
Ed., 1997) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) was used to
estimate the number of new motor vehicle trips generated by each type of new
development.
The SDC to be paid by new development meets the "rough proportionality"
requirement because it is based on the impact of each specific development on the
transportation facilities for which the SDC is charged. The TIP is based on the impacts
of new trips, and the SDC rates are calculated based on the specific impact (e.g. new
trips) a development is expected to have on the City's transportation system.
B. Future Trip Projections
Current projections indicate that Woodburn will see a significant increase in the average
number of motor vehicle trips either beginning or ending in the City between 1999 and
2020. EMME/2 traffic model data for the City maintained by Klttlesol and Associates
indicates that new daily vehicle trips will increase by approximately 32,832, as shown in
Table 3.1, page 8.
Don Ganer &: Associates
7
as of 10/29/99
'Ir
\ .
The methodology used for the City of Woodburn's TIF update required estimates of
motor vehicle occupancy, pedestrian/bicycle trips, and transit ridership. The Oregon
Department of Transportation (OOOT) maintains average motor vehicle occupancy
rates for Oregon cities with populations above 10,000. ODOT's average motor vehicle
occupancy rate for Woodburn is 1.54 persons/vehicle. Transit trips were estimated at
2% of vehicle occupancy, based on ridership data included in the 1996 Transportation
System Plan. Pedestrian and bicycle trip rate data for various land uses is not available,
so estimates of 5% to 10% of vehicle trips are often used by planners and traffic
engineers. The City of Portland's traffic model estimates pedestrian and bicycle trips at
an average of approximately 8% of vehicle person-trips. Because Woodburn is not as
urbanized as Portland, 5% of vehicle person-trips was used to estimate pedestrian and
bicycle person trips in the City. These estimates were used to calculate the total average
number of person-trips generated per vehicle trip: 1.65; so for every ten motor vehicle
trips, an average of 15.4 persons travel by motor vehicle, and an additional 1.1 persons
travel as pedestria~s, by bicycle, or by transit.
The projected increases in average daily motor vehicle trips and person-trips are shown
in Table 3.1, below.
TABLE 3.1
PROJECfED GROWTH IN AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT)
1999 - 2020
Trip Category 1999 ADT 2020 ADT Increase
Motor vehicle trips 71,228 104,060 32,832
Motor vehicle person-trips 109,691 160,252 50,561
(at 1.54 persons/vehicle)
Pedestrian/ bicycle person-trips 5,485 8,-013 l 2,528
(at 5% of motor vehicle person-trips)
Transit person-trips 2,194 3,205 1.011
(at 2% of motor vehicle person-trips)
Total person-trips 117,370 171,470 54,100
Don Ganer &: Associates
8
as of 10/29/99
111"
C. Capital Improvements Included in the SDC
Capital improvement projects included in the City's adopted 1996 Transportation
System Plan which have not yet been completed were reviewed and considered for TIF
funding. Each uncompleted project which includes capacity-increasing capital
improvements on collector or arterial roads for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, or
transit facilities has been included in the TIP. The list of capital improvement projects
and the SDc-eligible portion of costs is included in Table 3.2, pages 12 -14.
For each project, the following information is presented:
1) Name/ Description - a brief description of the project scope (i.e., capacity
only improvement, capacity/design improvement, etc.) and location. Some
projects include improvements that will benefit more than one mode of
travel, such as motor vehicle and pedestrian/ bicycle travel, while others
benefit only one mode of travel.
2) Project Cost - the total estimated cost for the project (1999 dollars).
3) Federal/State/Other Funding Sources - the estimated portion (percentage) of
project funds from federal, state, or other sources.
4) Net Local Transportation Funding - the estimated portion (dollars) of project
funds that will come from local transportation sources (including TIP).
5) Capacity Portion - the estimated capacity-increasing portion of the project.
6) Motor Vehicle Costs
a) Motor Vehicle Benefit -the estimated portion of the proj~ct that will serve
motor vehicles, as opposed to pedestrians, bicycles, or traAsit.
Don Ganer &: Associates
9
as of 10/29/99
'II'
~ .
b) Motor Vehicle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is
available to serve future growth and is not needed to remedy an existing
deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project
that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies were determined
using the following formula:
Current Volume minus Current Capacity
Future Capacity minus Current Capacity
c) Motor Vehicle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is
to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which
do not begin or end in the City. The percentage of through trips was
estimated at 49% based on EMME/2 traffic model data for the City.
d) Motor Vehicle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total
cost of each project that may be included in the Motor Vehicle
Improvements portion of the updated SDc, excluding the non-capacity,
non-motor vehicle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit portions of
the project cost.
7) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Costs
a) Pedestrian/Bicycle Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will
serve pedestrians and bicycles, as opposed to motor vehicles or transit.
b) Pedestrian/ Bicycle Future Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that
is available to serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing
deficiency, calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project
that is needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for off-road facilities
were determined based on the following formula:
~
Future Papulation (2020) minus Current Papulation (1999)
Future Population (2020)
Deficiencies for sidewalks and on-road bicycle facilities were determined
using the following formula:
Don Ganer &: Associates
10
as of 10/29/99
11r
L
Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads Without Sidewalks
Total Miles of Existing Arterial and Collector Roads
c) Pedestrian/Bicycle Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project
that is to serve local development in the City, excluding "through trips"
which do not begin or end in the City. An estimate of 5% of all
pedestrian/ bicycle trips being "through trips" (neither beginning nor
ending in the City) was used for collectors and arterials.
d) Pedestrian/Bicycle New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the
total cost of each project that may be included in the Pedestrian/Bicycle
Improvements portion of the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity,
non-pedestrian/ bicycle benefit, non-growth, and non-local benefit
portions of the project cost.
8) Transit Costs
a) Transit Benefit - the estimated portion of the project that will serve transit
users, as opposed to motor vehicles, pedestrians, or bicycles.
b) Transit Growth Benefit - the portion of the project that is available to
serve growth and is not needed to remedy an existing deficiency,
calculated by subtracting from 100% any portion of the project that is
needed to remedy a deficiency. Deficiencies for transit facilities were
determined based on the following formula:
Future Population (2020) minus Current Population (1999)
Future Population (2020)
c) Transit Local Trip-Ends Portion - the portion of the project that is to serve
local development in the City, excluding "through trips" which do not
begin or end in the City. 100% of transit trips are consi~e\ed to .be local.
d) Transit New SDC-Eligible Amount - the net portion of the total cost of
each project that may be included in the Transit Improvements portion of
the updated SDC, excluding the non-capacity, non-transit benefit, non-
growth, and non-local benefit portions of the project cost.
Don Ganer & Associates
11
as of 10/29/99
-
TABLE 3.2
~
TIF-Eligible Transportation
Gtpital Improvement Projects
>_~.Totill:l'l!<Il.~t..te/ . Nj!tLcl<:al_
,. .Pl:oje.c.t_~) _H()ttJerH _, Tram;
~_,FI6ldi/1Q {~~ . FU1dim {Sl.
P'lg~ 1
.;. _IoI<Mru. .1-lo4Vl'lJt~~Jtl<:<JIL.~.~~~_~
gpal:itY;VI!t1idl! (Io1\I)JH<ifClVl'tIlHLI riP::l:l1Ci~ LH HEli9.itJll!.
,Portion ('Ii)'_ Benefit 'liH: Benefit ~: Portion "L H.6ms!l4u
. . . .
[c.~<~ 0., ,;,~~~?,
! I-: 5 Partial. Clllverle<lf ~. ~ig.yErlv. . ~.tudies
I-: 5 ..1/2u P<lrtial. Cklverle<lf.~.. 9lnstr\JCtion.
~Y.21.4.~rt)R'ne~ill.~.l.M:ly...
VflClen.I-lig~.?1. 4. .~.1:-_5u t.ll .Il<lt:>_nl!!i l'j!rTY..
2006-2015 _
.1::5. .lnter~nge.AIt~tiv:e.s. ~l.M:ly.
!\Ie...1:: 5_~_f!fCha-,-ge_..
W~_H~y214_~uEl<lon!!s_rerJ)l tll. P<lr1c Ave-.
Sc>tJttlu"rtl!rial.~.. tCl. ~.nl!!i .1'1!nY_
Sl>tJt1l_ .J\rt.e.rial. ~ .El<l()~uF_em' .Rt:l.. t_o. .I-llNY:. !l.!lE
Cl)c)_Il!y. .~..fJ(t~~tll _~rtc)r\._~<i-..
c:ap.._c_j.tYI.~sign. ul~p'r()."j!rnell.t~
_HuumHm . __HUUH 1999-2005 UH
~_suF~~~uHiQt1vw;IYu2J 1tllu~__ ji LiOc):~()[ U H Hug'll.:.ii:?QQ:Q9QL:H H::?~"r__~g'lI,i- uu1J>9.'l(o:_ uum~l'l(o;_: .jj~;~_
rrtlrlt~t~_~u~~~_"'~t()I:Iigt\,5c:t<<loI.o S535 ooo'g'll.:u$53.s,l>9.OL 25~'u~()'lI.lu_1()9'l(oLuu ~l'l1.;um_l~S,;n()
F_~_.~r~t~!ig,_~_t()_~ClI1llul!_<>.E! UUUmu_ U. .i~~g:Qci(iI . ()~ $9SO 000: uui~"L HU ._.~j .1()9'l(oL uu~1'l1.: .mHl_S.!!99
I:ve~l1u~_tl~u~_21~ut_()_~ta9' "'!IislIIlIIV<lY U ul2.~.l>9.OLHUU()_9!.[uii.~:QQc)luu]5'l(oL uuu~()'l(o: U uJ()()'l(o_'uuu.ljJ'l(o_luuJ~(),_~
~1)'-~~u~_f~_rJ)ItIlA~l!f$3J,)(),l>9.OL mu()~[uuu$1!()()~QQQ_[ uuu__?S'l(oj uumuu@'l(o:uJ()()'lf.; uuljJ'l(o.lmuJ~~L~
fr~_~_V1!C!t~uQe~fllLtou~ttlen1i1aru u$:4~,l>9.O:. ()'J(,[ _u$4~~()()()Lu]5'l(o! 8O%u1QQ'lf.l 61~: um_J~...~_
- flcIr~~_ ~ul:\'lIWYu!l!ll:ut()uCoclleyumJSS().()()()" . H U uu()'llo; _ $5.~,l>9.O: U u. U u2S'llol uHu~g'lI,lu J()()'l(o[ u um6J'lI.Luuul~},_1QQ
~uft!!l)' ~'u~ ~t() u5()lJtll!J<3B u u$IlS() ...()()()'_u .m u()'lI. L. $~_ 5(),l>9.O j u u u2S'lf.L mu ull()'lI.) _ m 1.()9.'l(o:u _ _m6} 'lI.L___~JQ~..!99.
P<lrr:_~_~u~ut()JJGB u_ ml23_~,l>9.OLm O%:u -$?~~~QQQL___J5'l(oL 80%- 100~ 61~ $28670
IIV~.Ha~~~t~~(X._l()_Sett~ier Av.e.-.: .. .$~11,()()() ~.. O~ J614~()()()Lu!?_5.9.6L umn:~L:::::i:Q9;;6L::::::~:1~!::::::::iz~:~~-
- 2006-2015 - - _ _ __ __ ____.__ _______n__~ un__ _m______y - _mu____u__~UU___h____________
H1t~~o\~~l:\lN:Yu!l9Eut()Erorlt_St'u, _JUli!?,~)li: .....u...()'lI.'u.$?,lglj1.lj: ___u2S'lf.l u_lI()'lI.] n_J()_9.'l(oLuuuu~1.~Lmm~~_~_?'9.~1I.
'(~_~~L:I:lvwY~_!cI_E,_tQf'~u~: nu u___uuu.~L~?2,nll: O~: $1 322778:2_5.9.61..___ m1l9'l(,: 10096: 61~! $161 379
~-~~_~~~~~i:~<i<ltcl1-tO.I'~.~_1,.?_~:2~~~-~l......-.-:.-i)~i::ii:i~?:~~~Iu..um2~_'l(oj ..~[:::iQ~L.::::~:~~L:::i~ii:~~
~~:~!f:!j!L~IIV~_.t!!IY~_~,_It?__~y..?.1.4. ...$SIl_S...~{)()l ... .... ...Q;(;) .::i~:~~:~~L_ -:::::::~~;;6I:-:::::..-.-~i-.:::ji)Q;;;L:::::_~l:;(;;:::::::::iii:~i
~~flQn~~t~_~_~,~()J:~~~f'uuuu - u._.! ul!_,()Z~,~S_?jn_nn()~_l u~1~()l~...~~!?j 2S~ 8096 10096. 61". $131388
~~I1CiA~n~tIYn'_?J'Ut?W~A~-_u_Ln$J,U>9.,~~4L .()OJ(,; ._~V()().~E;:L . ::~:~;;-;lmn u_:~Q;;-;l::::::iQ~r::::=:~i~-l:::::::$.l~~~~_
Iflt~~_~~_!~.Ac::r:~LIoI..~~f!!_e.flLJ"'Jlrovj!~,e.rJts. _mu.__u uu . .. _._
__n_n____ n_m_un 1999-2005 _n_nh_ ____n n.n._" __n___mnnp
~~~__~.,.~~_~ul~S~~,21_4c u$_~_~~,~QQ; 'J5IJ~L___H4c~~3_2!)[
~~<;I1<J~ltzl!til;x1_~u~'n?)4!Sett~1Tlil!rL uuulllL!l:4_2:u()'J!l[ uuuJIl.1~~?l
~!S:()t?!~!!~-~-~n~~_!l_~L$lJ?()li9.' uS()~! ___ulS_Il.s~g:
Ad<:tl!cju~I~~Yu2J4!P<lrlcA\/e- . $1:4Q."72~_()'lI.:HH"9,,,7?:
uunnun_nu..m___2oo6-201 S.
IrIt~.i()I1__<:Ila~_~t_i()_n~..~._?14!,21.1.!9.!l.E.
Si.<i4!:wal~sn
$1,170,6{)()~
H,5{)(),.<l()<l'
$500 000'
$4,~~~:C>9(>I
90~
66~'
40%'
_u6li'll.;
_ _ $11-',O~_():u1()()~;9()'lI.'u_JOO'l(oL~I~j
- $1,!)3(),Cl9:()L1()()<J(,[ u~S'lI.10Q'l(o: 61~j
__$3{)(),l>9.OL _1()q'Ho'~5'l1.:_J()O'l(o:u . u61~L
uH.!?S_?O~: -uu.Jgq'Hol_uunllS'lI.lu 1 ()O~:Hu~l'l(o;
_l6.4.,266
_u$~li.!?_3_5
uuH5_S..s59
nuJ~_~M!l~
ijl~()~@()L
...L $ 15,1l():s,I_9.<I:.
. HL~!l(),()QQl
E,6E,4}()[
J3,5nX4?JH
_._$?.r~.~19:
n._O'll.]
19.()<J(,~_
J~'lI.L
_SO~;
u5_Cl'll.;
0%:
..._----..-0____- _.......___........
H5(),()99.iu_JCl()'J(,i___90'lf.L 10096i__u61"! uul~?,~_5_Q
pp- ___p~L uu)()_()'l(o:___up p!l5'l(o' .. pl()()'lI.lpp61_'l(ol..uppp~
$1,?47,!)9.<IL . 1 ()()'J(,L . . p85'l1.J 1 OO~ pu___~1"jpu$~"li.ll?9
u$M33,71~; .pul()()'Jb~1I5'J6JJ()()_'l(o! PHU6!'lI.i _$1..~!l!.l~J
u$1.,:7~l;.~71j u uJ()q'Ho_: uupp.pllS'lI.. _ _J()O'l(oLp __6J'llojum~!l~J.,F~
u$?.!S(),9101p ._J()_()9.6:_ ~.5.9.6'uJO()'lf.L ... .61",; JL4?!?,347
- -
- -
- ..... u_ _ ..... . _....... u_.,
- .
-_.._.-....~_____.._____...._l_
1 ()_()'l(o;
m__J()_g'lI,j
10096:
.._.l_Cl()'lf.~
- .
- -
. .
.-u--~~L--jO:Q;6r--....-6i%j---.----i7i-:W7
_ -.-. .-~9'l(o:-._J_()Q'lf.l_::::::~~:~L::::::t~i~~
80~: 100~u_~J~ju.ul?_Il.!)_~_3_
.... .......::~(i"I.-.:. iOQi(;[ ...U... .6J~L__u_l~Il.!)5:()
....$2_~~i311;.u U... 2~%'....j~()1~~~~I.....uJ():o.;(;:
- -
- .
u _ -80;(;: l()<>~:-ii~t u u_~!l!l,_~.1
1999-2005 --uu.._
IIV~_liayes_~t~J~_~<gOC<l~(jeJ)r,;u ..$X().n6; ........u.O'J!ll.
P<lrlc_~~_~__lifl(:()~_~._t~~_~~~_~."e,u;_l5_1l.?.3.(); O~
~!l._~__~.Q<!vetil!'Q_~:_t()__~.~y__~ . .-.....j.---l?!!.?~-~:..:....:.::Q~I
FrCllllu~~L~.~~_!'Q~-:r()_~rrRc1 u_~ H$1.17~Qlj()lu..u..()";
Settlernie[ f"..Side ~u~pIe ut() _P.arr U .$1]5~()()() L 0'"
.. uu_uum_....u 2006-2015 U
.&.st,~.w.~'J__:_l:Ivwy__2_'.~__~()_~ry_QlII:l_R_d.
I,jr~_'__$.~~t..~_~,__~~.t().<i<ltg._g. .__.._......_._...._
y;!r:illt!s._!,~_!)~_~S.JCl_~_?Q'l"~rs.>- UUn u_.
(m~~tre~tP;!ttl1lr..~. .
___u_u..__ 1999-2005. , uu _u_ m_,
tofi._<:r~~u~uH1tz,~u~.u~~'(()_~_St, .u.. ui7?sii?L 80~; ...$~4_5~I~L u1O()'l(oL_()i(;!_\ p()~j_ ... _u()";u . u~
G<:Klsieu<:r1!C!t:(:()rri<iclI_~__~~_9:e4!k_t()..~-u21Lu_$_S()~.~58: Huull~L_ u$1()().li!?1.._.1()()'l(o)u O~: '_pu_()~L uuu()'J(,[ .. PPUUH_~
--- - pu__u__2006-2015 -- ____u___..u_ -p __..__. ____u_u__ _u__._ __ __"____P"_'_ _u_u_u__ ______u_~ u. __u_._____,.__ ___n_______.___u__
.~~_c:re.e.ku~n~_v:~__~l-utCl~.,u"rte~lu u_u$"?M1lil uuu.I,l()'lI.: ___l~,?lI:S:ul(i~) uuu-(i"l()'l(o:muu_()~; u$Q
~t;Stu~c:re.e.k~r_~n~~_<:l:e:e.tutoW8 uuuu., .u.u$515.()Ii4;_ 80" u.H():s,OU:_uJ()()~;puu .Cl'lf.ipu()9.6L 0"" ...uuuuS9
1',,_tlliC:u.Tr;tl1!ijL~ysJ~_lI.lu_~pit_a_I--'f!!Prll,,_emefl~~ .n.. . ___u. p..u" ...,
H..U..m_uu uuum 1999-2oo5uu.. uPu_UUHU:_ _ _ U HUU_UU_uuu_' .u, UH_U___' uuuuu____
P.ar:k~J~sell_U~u~Li~1l5j99I puu 1()'lI.j..u$$?lj.:1l()ju 1_9096:u-_-__9.;6) __ _u()_~!Puu()~:uu-unuuu$tJ-
_PUH __u___.__uuu_ 2006-201 5 __ m..u__u P_ u-u-i-----u-u_---.u- P..___u___uu___u.___u _. u_u___m__'.._..__._u____u
~i~-~==-~~>-{1-~-~_=_____._l~~____~~Lv;~~~L ulCl~fu-- -Q~; _-___()-'l(oi__~~~L_i9:-j-j-5-~
.-iio;?i~l
$s~_~1!()l
.u._$?!l...?~si
.___.H17.()69L
U _l175,l>9.O [
uuu1().Cl~:_
uJ()()'l(o:
100~L
. uu1()()_K
U. . u JCl()'J(,[
uuu . u u,u-_uu_Q'lf.1- .. U__g~r u_._~_
_mu()'lf.L_ O~:mu nuuu~
uu _Q'lI.i __uQ'lf.:_____u~
_u()'l(o[ o~j uu.uuuu_S9
_u()~i --_O"')UHUUU,sQ
O~,
_U()~;_
O~-
u.._Q'lI.1
O~:
..__u....... ---__..._.... __...........__.. ...____ ...._.______ .......n..__.__.._ u..__......____.._..__
.. u__~.1.F.()_6_Q:u uu . ___ _()-'J(u u.$.1E...Cl~~ u ._u1_()Q_~:_u u()_~~uu uu __9.,(u___ uu()~-L_uw
u _u_~1I?,l!l_5: -- . uu()'J!lL u__uJll?L!9.?U.-uuJ-()-()'l(o[ u--uuu_()_~:.__uuu_()~;__uu._____()'J!llu__uu u___._.W
uu_$J.E~()!;()[ u__u()'lI.:_ uu$.1F&6_();unJ()()'J(,[uuuu_g'lloL_uu()_9.6!- u_o.~; um uu__,sQ_
Don Ganer &: Associates
12
as of 10/29/99
11r
TABLE 3.2
TIF-Eligible Transporbtion
Capital Improvement Projects
JIfl8~ 2
.......... ...~,TC)~i1luu:Fecll.~t;lteLNt!tl,()(;31 ..u. : Pe<1esVian/:P/BFutlrei.l'l.l3u\.,c><:aI[PI.!Ju~'l\f~
u..uu~Pro~.~u,~~r :Trails. u.u:Capac:ity u_ ,Btcycl<<!(I'IIl1.uc;r()'l\(tllu:Irip:-EnctsLuuJligil>le
~uJII1dina 1'16) FU1dirn 1$) _;Portion 1'16) Benefit %. j Benefit 'l6jPortion 'l6L .&:D2.\n
uuuu Proiect Titlen
C:a_P<lg~y_QIllY '1!IIIf:CI1"~III_l!Il~!iu
1999-2OOS u nn_u
~SuF'ilrt_ialuqoYflr1t!<lf~[)esig!yErlY'uStudit!s $1,1}0,6(l0, 90%.. HF,()l)(). 1.0()'Jb:. 10'16. ~O~i . 95'16
~~..1I.~nF'ilrtialul:!l:l~~f~c::ql15tr\ll:tionS4,SO(},()()() . 66'16 H.S;i(),()()(): .1Cl()'J(,'. 5'16 30%; 95'16
Higtr;v;lYn2.1"J~~~al~_LIiy . $~,()()(); nu..4()~:um)().0(}(): 100'lft u.1.5.~ 3g'l(>:uuu!lS.~:
Vf~nH!gI1lf!lYu2.)_4n~n~_~n~l;I_~~Ft!rT}'nS4,tl.~!l._()0(}; 66% uH.4i?2.,()Ej(); 1.()()'Jb~ 15% 30% uunu!l~~:
. _unu_2oo6-201 5._ u,
~~~~!gt!nAA-~~~_Sn~tLliyn'H$)?9,l.>Q<>i()%:S.1.5Q.0(}(): ..1.QQ'lL 10% 30% .!lS~:nu$4.275
~~n~~nll:<<ol!fC:tliI.~H,H~.~}.Il>:<>:ulCl()'Jbc UUUUHSO] 10.Cl'l6i S%, 3Cl'l6; .. .u9.~'l6Lu $0.
'l'(1d.l!rI.~n~},,__-~.E~I1)'~()J>ilrlcA\fe- . nS4,9!M.),l>:<>()[ uuJS%;$l,247~~Cl():lCl()~:u u.l.5.~:u _.33.__00_~___-;.' _-__-_-_ _-_-_99_n_-_SS_n_~_-__-.l-..-_-_ -$-Sl----65-33----.-83-g31il!
~lJtll__~I!fiilI~J.C)_.~~.Ft!rlYuu uS!,66!,4:l().; . SO%l3,fm,!1u5: 100'lft: 1S.~: '" '" .
SolItllnA.rtt!riaL~__~nFelryn~ntC)nliwj"ng9.E: nS~,~_n?42., un?()"ll uSLi'!Jl),!l!1lu . 1Cl()'J(, 15% 9S%_ $76.8161
<::()()_~_~~J,x~~_~()~~C)_r1_~-u nS2..!_5Q,!l_1CL . uO'l6;J2.,7.~().!J1.Cl; ..uJ()Cl'l6: u u l~'l6;_-_-_-_-_-__-_-_-_~_-_~_-_:_-_-_"_--------g-~i6;---.._-_-_-_-_S_:_:1_:_:_1._7_:_,_-_6_:_0_-_:1_.._-_11
<::ap~c::_ity/J~_s_i_gllulm.P~()~I!_IlI_l!Il~s_ . u _ u. .UHu_n..uU' _
unn___n___u unu 1999-2ooS __mnn ' I
:~:~~~~~~\~\:~luS1S~ii-~,uun ~:.~:li~~:~[ u~~:L .u~:Cu::t .n:::~~:l:.:::~ii:~~1
~~__~~~~.!iighJ;,g~~o._~_~Il_!J_~ u::.t~~9:QQgI u.. .u9'l6;_nnS!l_~_9..0(}0: ui~~I . u2.9_~L.u. u~g'l(>l 9S%: $13.5381
~~~~~:~;;~:~9~=:'!f~rl.W~. ..._:::j~:=;.u._...__.u~:....-:i~~:~f...._.._..~:::l... ..i~j._..._.._i:L--u.}~;E:u-::_:--::~:ii~J
~:~_.~=':-~t~mM!ru. . _u_.....___-_-_:.;~:=i_--~:tn-~-~:=l..uu--~~;L ~~:' ..uu_u~:L___-_:_:_:L:-:_-_-_-Jt:;~1
_~u~_'~~L:_~_~_~!K.3f,l n_$~~~~;()"':u_$~_s.o..~_l Hmu_2.;;'l6~ 209fl: uuuu~g'l(>L.u _u~t~_"'l . H?.. n2
Parr_~_~u~_J~__~~n___._. _s.2._~~,QQ(); 0%' $23S OOO~ unu.2._~"': 20'lft: 30%= 9S%: $3 349
W~J"~j'l!S__~~~u~..~:n~o._~~t~~A~,_j _n__$61.~.QQ(); uo"r-:i~11:9Q()] H....J~.'l6L 20'lft: u.:-j~;:::-::::~~~L ..,j~::i~(j
______uu__nn ____ 2006-2015 _._n - ____nuu_.u~-- uun_. _nunnu____T u_uu__un__n"_n nnn_u_nn.n ___u___ - ____n_
_~~_~~_::_~_!l~~__~_Ef.tIrlt__SL uuuuuuLnS.2.L?~.2.'_~!Eji 0% ul?~!g4il_l)1____2.5.'l6L u uun_?9_",:___ _un~g'l(>:________!l_5.'1ll~ n.___$3_~..~~?!
'l'~_~L:J~_~_!il~_!P__f~~!t.5.t_____Ln$J_.~.2..2..:nllj nu___Cl'l6l n$L.3.2.~.l?!ll.. u..;?~.'l6[u ..____2Q'l6j.. ______~~;________!il~'l6~ nnnH~,_Il~
~o.~~_:J~H~_..~o_~~f,!'~~q._~C!.F~_ ._.jnll.n?..~imn__ _()~i .$),n_2..:4.~, .... .....;?_~"';__ ....._._2.~;________n_~_~)_.n__m~_5.'-'j .h____$2."._~~
uu_n__________________n_ 2016-2020 ____nnnn_ ___;n____un_.;_
_~~_~_:_W~_ot!a~__5.t__To._liwy-"._2.H_ _. ._. .___l-_____$~~_5.~3()(h _. ... ....._()_"'~_._n_~i8_~.~()Q[. ...... ..:i~~I-.nn .__n.?..Q_~r:~::jQ9!{.. ....:.i~~[::.:::_:__ltl.,~:4_1.
~~~_:.~uS_L~~J~o~~!;__n____ _mL__U.()I~..!l~_?_: n__u()~___$1.9.!~.!l~_?j- .uuJ~"': 2~: 30'lft: 9S'I6: SlS 347
~~.~~::_~~J~J_~Lw:~_A~_.__o..__.___.L__$J_.}QQ.~~j . ...Q'IllL_.lJ.J()9._3~4; 2...~_-%_-_-_1_-_.--:::::i(j~;::::::::::.}~F:.::::i~~F::::::ii~::~~.
Jrlt_l!~~!~~~~~___~i1~~!!!~_IlL_tmpr~~l!!!!,e-rlt-!i..nnn----.-.-.---h.. _ .____..n.O______...___uO____.n_nn____._____n__ u _n.__j
1r1t~_~:_~~~~~~:~--?_i4::n ._n .mS_~_!l~.~()Qi__ 7 S%: $146325: .....1()_Q'1flL -20;6'---u-30;6[n.u-9-5;6'-----.-$8-341
5'~~~5!~""''''.Lclm:!F -'E' -.~~~~r _lIE, ..~:jm1~:~:=-r:~~1
.._ _..______2006-201 Sn__ ___n_ ..-- n, --- - ___n..nn..____ ____....nn_'___ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_9_-_5_-_%_-_-_~_--.--------...-n-S---l----_1_-,_5_j_O_-_1
~~_~_~_~_~~Il__:__~..2.1~!.;?Jy~!l~ _'_hn$;?_~~.ntl.i___. ....2.!i'l6~ n__..$_?9J.~2.!li __hJ()_Q'1fl~ u....___29'-').. ___.}9'-'L - - i
~i.c1!!lIIP_~I.It.~_ '1
-I
i3:3i61
:i_i:::~1
$7Cl,li?6
___h______.___ ___n____n 1999-2005 nn_______ ___n_~ ______"u ______n_ ______.
W~n~~__~~~_~__~~_~c1_~()_~~.J)r'.:n.__n.l?9.n~j ...~L
J>ilrlcJ~~__::J,-_~_~_.n~_~~g_II!__~~,...... ...L__..nn$.~_~.?}Q[..___ .__.____()'l6i.
~~Il_~,_:__~~,~()JI~~_Iey..g, . ...$?~.;:!l)sL..uuu()'l61
F~__~_~t._:ge~.,.ju~n:r~n~rT..~..nn. ___$1Jl...9(;()l___u_.__..()'l6:
Sett.lt!lllil!L~Sidc!__~..~IJ!l!..t()..f'ar.r ..---$1!5.~~l 0%
___..n____n_ 2006-201 S '..___n __
~~_W~yn:J~Y_?!1__!C)_~D'_9!JIl..Rcl_u_ . ..L____~JJ.!.~gL... ......Cl'l6l
~_~_~~L:.!i~L!iI~!;_!l;I_~~q.n~t'__ . un____l~!.!~_~L___ u..m()'l6i
";)~~L~t_~~(9::;:!()u,,.t!'lI"liL ..sul...()6<lL . ()~~
Off-~~_r~~t__-')~t"lIIP~}'~ _
____.. ._ ___u__n______1999-2oo5
to4i._.~_~__:_~_~._~._.~()_'(C)~~,
~__~_~._:_~~__~It_tC!.~.]1.4..
_.._______ 2006-2015 ..n____n
~~.9:~~._:..v:()I.Ill_~..~O'.~I1._~t!fial..
'#!e.st...~.~.QJI:ricIc:lr..:__N.'_~_~C)..lJ<>.l\. ..,
Pu.tJlic:.. .Tf!1I ~~ n_~y_S_!~_~..~pit_a_I___II!IP.rCl"ernl!Il!S .
....__.___....n___h._.____19~9-2ooSn____... u.....u............: ..nn_____...___......
1"a_~_~{!'h.;!_~..1.LO~n~) __uuuuu__uuu, ...._t!i~_5...~Cl9:u10'J(,[ ___nS?2.4i.!!O;
.__..n . . _n______ 2006-201 s..
1"a_~_~_{!'h.;!~.2.1_{J0(}..~1
roTALS
....$!Q.?3Ej! ......JQ_Cl'l6: .......J()~L__ ___~_~L_..-___~~i6Lu---___$?Q'-OJ7.
___.l!i~.S}()L n___J.()g~iu..nJ()()'I6L_ ..____~_9"'Ln n___9.!i~Lu_____$JEj,~tl.l
n$_2.~,.2._~~; 100%' ___..1.9()"L}Q'-'i_ ______~_!i'l6L______..sM41.
__nS1J!.Cll)()[ .. .1_Cl~L"H..H)g'l(>; _____}g'l(>:u _____!lS~L____n$3}.;i~2
......~~~:~.()()(): .......1~~i .1~~:~~_.-.un~~:~l...::::~:5.~!:::::H9.,~lS
$ 117 060: ..___WQ~~ JCl~j 30'lft' 95%: $33 362
"-::i~:;:i~~L ul_Q_Q~: n..!'Q9'-'L_-::3:Q"r _::::::~~~L:::::t~~:9i~
__u~117..()l)():10()'J(,~__uJQO'J(,;------n().~; u____!l5~[___n___ . ..$9
-"ii.?~;!..72L --~~Ln__$J1?J~1;__
S~_Cl~.~~!lL. _ ....llCl'l61 ....Ho(}.~!~;
uJQ_Cl'l6~
10()%[..__
...oC. .........--............. . ........-....
100%-\ __n3!%; ...~_?'-';.__n_$!il,.02.2.
iO'~]I::uE'-';.. unn9.!i'-'L ..$~!i,3!l~
-us:4z1'4;i;i
j~i5:()E>.4r
80'lft'-Uij4~i~i: _j_()r)'l6ru..n_..i()~r_u--~i~r '!l_5._"'\ ..n-_i2~:~i6
/3()'Jfli.._Sl()3,Cll}:u1Cl()'J(,luu__1()g'l(>: . ____E~: u__u!lS"';uuu$34i.209
..____u.~_
.1Q()'J(,:u
u..u9"'f- uuu..()_"';!J5.~;-m$(J
.. __. __ u ___::!i~;:. ::_ ':::!i~;.' ..uui~~L::: _:.. n n..J2
: $1,106'02
.. ..L_____t~i~~!:~L
: S65 567388:
10')6: $316062:... ..JCl()'-'~
......uTsio;S69:;7iz[
Don Ganer &: Associates
13
as of 10/29/99
1r
TABLE 3.2
.ol
TIF-Eligible Transportation
Capital Improvement Projects
Proiect Title.
Ca~c:it y uOnlyllllpr:Cl\(_e_III_I!"~!;
1999-2005 U u_uuu_uHH
I-SPart.ialqoVl!rll!af.~~igfllEnv. ~.tudies . ~1,1!()L(;()(L . ~O%~ Uili!;()~()) ulO()%; 0% 0% O%~()
I-S1!~uPo1ltiaU::Io\/erte<lfu~(;()t:I5VlJC.tlOn ;uH,5()(),()()()}. (;6"bj u~1,53.(),()()(); 100% uuO% . 0% 0%$0
~?14~e,.aluStll:lyH ..... u$~.O()(). .40": 'H$:}()(),()()(). . 10()%; .0'1(, 0'1(, 0% u. .$0$0$0._...--......[
WidenJtig~yu?l:4_~ul:-H()-'l~)()_I1ll!;JI!fT}'u uH,~~!l,()()()_u(;Ei'l(,;.$1,6~~.()6();u uu J()(),,(u O%()'l(,~ 0%
2006-201 S . ....
1-5HIrttl!f'c:t!iIrm~/tl!t113~~suStlldyuuJl~().()()()" H uuO'l(,;$I~().()()(1; 100%: 0% 0%: 0%
~nl-:~n~_~~n ; $J~.~_".}_()(LHuu_l()O,,;_nJ(). __l()()"j 0"__0_". u()'l6l j
W1denH!~u~14n~n~F~rry~()l'<IrtuAve-n '-HL~~,QQOl 75% u$1.,,2<t7.,5_0()L .. J()()lj(,[ n()'l6_c 0% 0% u ..::$0--_--_--_.._
~~"uMl!riiIl~utO_~~uF~E,_(;Ei7.,~,,()Lu--~()'l(,L u$M.3_~.7_1.~L .nl_()()'l6_: un__uu()'l6) UHuu()'l6[ 0%
~"~_l!rjaJu ~n~~ Fer:rynRtJ,ntonttrN'y,!l!lE un_~ n? ~Ru u u u~()'I(, u$1.,l!lEi.I3? 11 1()()lj(,.u H uun()'I(, u n H u()'I(,n u O%u u uu$<ll
ClJ()_II!YRo;l(jn~l!f1Si<lI1~()_~~(Jnu~_$?7.5().!lI(): 0%, n$.2.!5().!l10lHul()0'l(,) uu . u.O')6... 0% 0%$0 I
<:;apacit Y/~~ig., -. .1_mp~()\(l!1II1! .,~!i -. _._..._._._-_-_- __-I
1999-2005 _
~lll!S~Il~_~u~y?11nt()~Hnz:Q(i;:@91 _u_O'l(,) ji:iQ<):999;H?~_lj(,[ O'l(, UHU()'I(,_. n.()_".uuu .$<l
Frtlfltn~~~n~~_A~_~()l:ligtln~1 uJ~~_5.0()()[ 0". n_l~~~,QQ<lu uu~~'I(,luuuuu ()'l6; 0% nn .. n()"L $<l
Frl)rlL~r~-n~igtIu~:':Xl()U()~~u_$!l5().()()()lnu_"'I(,; nl!l~().QQ<l; 25%u_u u()'l6; 0'1(,; . __()".n . $<l
~VI!~I1._~d.~__l:i!WYn?I"_J_()__~~__~I1~)'__l?_5().()Q()L .. un()_'l6.: n_R~<>.()()()[unn?~"~u()')6._ 0% uu. .n()'l(,L un$O
~ry_~n:n~~_rry_~()_~l:!fu , .nU.un _$_~.()().()()(;l~ un..O.,,: nnS~9().()()()L ?~')6j nn.uu()": nuunn()_": n()'I(,} _nunn_$O
'~r~gf1!l!t~Cleve.t:a.,!B(Jn~gletnier nuuuu'u'Hn' .H5(),()()(;l: ,()". nuH.5(),()()()L . ,u?~%j 'UUHU.U .()%: Hnuu()')6.n u()'I(,L$O
~r~lI!~n~u!l!}~nt()~ _uu$~,5().()()();.uuuuu()'I(,luul~-5(),QQ<lJuu.?5'!': ..... muu()'I(,; u.._m()'I(,;'m..uuu()":' muuu$<l
~nter:w:Y_fltj-n:_ll!Bn~~_~t1_~ mJ~,5().9.QQ) u()",Lmml~~Q.QQgL_ n__..?:5'!'_t .. ..nm..()'!'_' ..()'!'_~ .. n..m..().,flj..n u$<l
Po1!!~_~_~__~Q__lIg~m m_n____....mnnn u u ~..____~.2_~_~.!lQ<l: .....m..n()_'l6.L.____.$~~_~.9.QQ_[ .. unnn?_~"~ "..m. ()_,,: .. m u u~'l(, L ..um.. _Q,,(.... mm..$O
~~uHa.YI!5..~re.e~~n~__[)q()~.t_t~ier:u~,,~.~ ..n$~J1.()()(;l~ o'J(,Lnn$~.1.~..()()()_L..u____?~'I(,j u.._mn()";n c)-'l6.L__mn~t_ _m nnnu$O
_uu_n_u 2006-2015.. -nnn..nn___h_
.~_"'~~J~!J~f_J9_E~SL...u.. __~~L?!!?L(;~_Eil .._::::Q~tj?~7:~?:~i~r .....-.n~-~-"L __()~~:::... .....O"r -.._n__:!?:;i;Ln__n_u_~
:r(JI,qJ_~~..~_~_!}_~~lf>>frtl!JL~u "nnn __..._lL~?_?,E~[ ..n()'l6.L$!..~??..?.!_~_L u.._n2~'-L..__n_()%j nm__--__-_-Q~T.n_ m_()'l(,L_h_n_$O
~n~~_~.!,l(iIHC?n~n!l~~~g.nt9_f~ !J..n?~_~[ ..uu__....()_'l6.:n_lV~.2.~~ mmu_?_~'l(,L.n.._ . <>_"L"h O%.m:n___()'I(,L____u__$O
_~~!!I!_~~~~t::~:w::;;;::j_p::~y:?:;~:...:L:::J.~~:~jQ{jrn-n-n._no~t::::~i~~~=~!?:(jj::::::.::?~~L::::::-:::::(j~r:::::::::-:n:ij~J:::::::::::~L::::::_:_jQ:
~~'OOh~~_~_~n$.t~_~~__':~__~~J;____n._.__.. ....;__l~~QZM_~~; ...___()'l(,:.__$!-,Ql_I?-,!l~?~.__.____n?_~'l(,i...n_n_nnQ.,,~____n_n_nQ-'f!;nn__n_.Jt~_i___n_______._$O
W~;1nd_~~_.::_!'!Jl!IY.?J_1J_()_J.(~,.~...hn.. nL_ $1_.1 OC}.~6~: __ ___ _-_-_-_-_-_-_._0_-_"_ -t... $J-'I()9-'~J!4t- ___-_-_-_-_-___2_-___5_~_;nnn-n_-_0_ ~.i:_n---------------------P-.--"-~-~---------------.--_-_-_-_-_O-_-_"_--~.,::---nmnnn-tQ
Iflt_I!~_e_!=ti()fl.f~c:~~_n_...'!~~IIl~_m._nllllpr_o"t!II1,~nt:s..u . _ _ _ _
____nun 1999-2005 ____ - _m..nn..nu~ _nnn_nn___.._.., mn_-_-_-_-_i_-_o_-_Q;._-_-_~.._-_-_-_-_-_-_-nnnnn-.,.n _.,. .
1rI~~iOl)__9l!1~t:~_~_!:_:5~_?J_1_ _ .. _l~_~~.~Q()L ..J~'l6.: _____$1.1~..~~:5_[ ________}_()_~_____.::__ ___-___-_n_-_-_-__OO-_-_~_-_-__::.-_-__-_----_--_--_--_--_--_--_--_OO--.--_~_-_--_..;,:-_-....--._--_--_--_--OO-_--_.~_--_;.._. ---nn_-__-_-_$O$O_-_._-_
1rlt~..Q:l;iI1l1l!~i()n__~n~'.?11!~~~ll!lJlil!ri ..uu..$_~~_.!}:4?L()_'l6.: u.__h$I3J..!l1?: V7Q 7Q 7Q .N_
SigrIaI_(;()C?t:tlirrati()l]_~ul:fi!Pl!a.Y!J!lL . _:m$1JZ.()I)(): 50%~ $58 530~u__J.()~'!( O%~ _n_()'I(,lnnn_.Q'l(,Lm_ ..u$<l_
_M(jl!d..~I:..l:IftIwvll)'..2J_1,1Po1r1cAve- ........u..uu.. ..J140;I!L uO'J6;-ji~::;i?;: ..u..J()~;' ..u:::(j~rn..u()'I(,lmn..~'l(,[ u __~
. ......n..2oo6.201 :i_ _Onn_' __uunm_n__ H_n_O. ___u_mn... ....___n_nni
lrlter:sl!c:!-_i()n..<:tla!1fll!Ii:z<l~_i(Jnu~ ._~..?1 :4!.21l/!l!l~ ..$2(;!l.~}fl;.. 2 5% :..$~()J.!l~I3_: .._ __l<>.<>'J6~....m 0,,: .. u u.. ()')6: ___.. ..~~ ___.... ....$0
.Si.c1t!wal~_s.. ....+
;u~,ToWu ;Fecl/~tilte/.
....~.PY:o~_.~..~...__Qt_tter
o ~FlrIdina (9(,):
prlgt3
Net Local..i uu; ...IRFutlle..IRL()C<lI~~
.... Ir_\lflS n..L<:ap;tCi~yuu ~Tr<lrl5iUIRt..GrC?'4V.tI1...Trip~E:~: E:~gil;Jle
FLfldiro ($) :Portion (%): Benefit (%) ~Benefit (1fI1Portion (%1: ..A!:oll.\.!!.!..
"n 1999-200:; ___
W~Haj't!Sn~.tf1!I!~~_~~grt!I!!l_'~!l'!(g().9a~_()r_, ~
~r1l_",~_~_L_~~.~()~~~~"'VI!'n
~._~~_~_~..IlCI.~,_~()_~.~_~t,
F~~.~~ . l;leveta_llCInSt-.IC?nllarr Rd.nm nuu...
_!ie.tt.lell\ier_.~ .~.:~pII!__t()__~ u.
u_nH_..n__ 2006-2015 n
1>.!;t,r;tr:w.ay.~.~_?1.1.tl!.~ryQl!J..R.d.-._
~_.~_tf1!l!t.~._~:__~~_~Q_~S:t.1.~,_.
.Yilrj()lJ!;_ !,o<;al. ~~t~_ (() .:. ?().. 'l'l!;Irs).
Off:~trt!et.. .I'a t.~..yS..
. H 1999-2005 .
~.u<:r~.~.~.~_I!!rM_!;1I:._.~():r()~__~.n _....E?~.n?[
~..~.~.:_~__~Il_t(J~..~.1" ....n$5()~.~5fl;
.Hun2OO6.2015_ .u__nuun .....__unu_.
Mi~qf!t!k(;()rTidor_~_Y()lqJn~~'_ .~()_~t1.~.I. u_H~M lEi
.We.s.t}4i11.9:eek. _~r_ .:__...i!I.~.JC?_ W~_ ... .'~.15.()Ei:4l
pu~__. Tra rlSi~. _.~y~~_.._._.9IP!t_..I._ .ItrIP_~Yelllel1~!i..
Hm___ _H_H H__HH..n_ 1999-2005 :
fla_rk.:fl:-RicII!. (F'tla~ Jln~(L~l.. .. .... u.. ......
_. . 2006-2015 H
Ilark::I1:Ricll!JPhase.?l {1()()~1..
TOTALS
_ n........~..
u__uuF_Cl.?36[
.uu$~~.~}Cl:
u_l2_!l.?_I?~~
u.JU7.()Ei()l
.nn~1I5.()()()l
.. -__.__________._~ ..._______uu___......
"HUUUOlj(,~. ___HVO..~~6~ 100,6:
H()'l6.~muu$~~..~~(): JQ()'l.!!:
........()'l(,:_nn_u$?~..?l!_~_~ .__.1<>.()')f,~
....__.u_O'l.!!L_l1J}.().(;(ll.unJ()()~l
mU"HuO%Luu$F~,()()()L 10()%
'H un.9%[
.u_...u.O,,~
...um()%L
n. . ()'J6_l
__u()'l6~
_uuu_()'l(,L .nunO'l(,L ..u$O
~."L O%L . .H$O
um()_'l6.:()'l'l_.uu.$O
__uu U()'I(,lH'HU uO'l6.: _u_u. uW
.u uuO'l6L .u..n()"i_ $<l
_u.; .....______________ _ n
H_$1J7..()~:
u____l~!,!~_~[
$1J7.()l)()l.
_n____.__.... Uu"'.
u()'l6.[
u__.()_'l6.l
.o'l(,l
..nHU..ClEi()L
__._.$~}.7.!}_5.L_
. .$lJl,()(;(li .
"H1<>.~:..
u J<>.<>'J6j
. uJ()()'Ilt~
UUHUC)":
mn_()%[
0'"
-.- .-. .Q~L--.....(i"l
_.uu()_'l(,Lu..u~l
u()'l6fumQ'l6.L
$0
$<>
$<l
.u ..ll()_~:.__. Jl_1_~..~_~.L u1<>.~L~~\
.Il~_~l-:~~~~~n; __:::~~:u- U~"~;H
u..u~O'l': ..u.'tl1,.2~t lQO'J(j: 0":
muu~~tu.l1.()3.,()J}(--~:(j~~u .'H:()~~
~L. . u:(j<J6Iuu'H$O
.9~~uuuu()'I(,+ UUU'H$<>
. H()"'luUHUU()"~_ u.uu$<l
"_~~T.....-...-9'l(,r.' ._....._.W
_-i~~~j(i(j.__Hj~j.i~i~:i.?();-___-i(iQ~l ......... .1-()()'Ilti... ... .--~l~;----l~~r-il..~~~:5-
uH.$~~J..!.~L HH..1Ci"L..i}~:~~Q:~?L::j~;Hmui(j~L n"~'7"r 100"! 1116943
: J65 567388. . J30 569 nz;..Hu-.nr $311848
Don Ganer &: Associates
14
as of 10/29/99
..-
4.0 CALCULATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE
The Transportation Impact Fee is calculated using a series of formulas which, when
completed, result in the SDC rates for each type of new development. These formulas:
a) identify the cost per new person-trip for SDC-eligible capital improvements for
each mode of travel (motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit)
b) calculate the net number of new person-trips for each type of land use,
c) adjust trip rates to allow for differences in trip lengths,
d) identify the motor vehicle, pedestrian/ bicycle, and transit growth costs per unit
of development, and
e) calculate the Transportation Impact Fee.
A. Fonnula 1: Cost Per New Person-Trip by Mode of Travel
The cost per new person-trip for each mode of travel (motor vehicle,
pedestrian/ bicycle, or transit) is determined by dividing the total cost of SDC-eligible
projects for each mode (from Table 3.2, pages 12 - 14) by the number of new daily
person-trips for each mode (from Table 3.1, page 8) using the following formula:
1. SDC-Eligible
Project Costs
New Person-
Trips Generated
Cost Per New
Person-Trip
The results of these calculations are displayed in Table 4.1, below.
TABLE 4.1
COST PER NEW PERSON-TRIP BY MODE OF TRAVEL
(1999 - 2020)
Mode of Travel
Motor Vehicle
Pedestrian/ Bicycle
Transit
SDC-Eligible
Project Costs
$ 9,115,846
$ 1,106,102
$ 311,848
Projected New
Person-Trips
50,561
2,528
1,011
-
dost P~r New
Person-Trip
$ 180.40
$ 437.54
$ 308.45
Don Ganer &: Associates
15
as of 10/29/99
'II'
B. Fonnula 2: Net New Person-Trips (by Type of Land Use)
The net new person-trips generated per day is calculated for each type of land use using
the following formula:
2. Est. Total
Person-Trips
x
Percent
New Trips
Net New
Person-Trips
The Estimated Total Person-Trips is determined by multiplying the motor vehicle trip
rate for each type of land use by the estimated number of person-trips per vehicle trip
(See Section 3B, page 7). The primary data source for trip rates included in this
methodology is Trip Generation (6th Edition) by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE). Trip Generation contains rates for different land uses based on trip
generation studies conducted nationwide, and provides the base data of unadjusted
counts of trips generated by various types of land use.
The trip rates included in Trip Generation are based on all traffic entering or leaving a
primary location, and do not account for diverted '1inked" trips or trips by traffic that is
passing by and interrupts a "primary" trip between two other locations. These "pass-
by" and "linked" trips are not "new" because they would occur regardless of
development activity. "New" trips are often based on the assumption that all trips from
residential land uses are new trips (therefore, percentage = 100%), and all other land
uses are evaluated to reflect the percentage of their trips that are "new" versus the
remainder (which are "pass-by" trips). No land use category has greater than 100% new
trips, but some categories may have less (Le., various retail categories range from 47%
to 77% new trips). The percentages used to account for pass-by trips in this
methodology are based on an analysis of data included in Trip Generation (5th Edition).
Table 4.2 (pages 17 - 21) lists the number of new person-trips generated for each land
use category, using Formula 2. Column 1 lists land use categories ~ their ITE code
numbers. Column 2 contains either the Weekday Average or We~kday PM 'Peak Trip
Rate from Trip Generation. Column 3 identifies the estimated total person-trips
generated, based on 1.65 person-trips per vehicle trip. Column 4 shows the percentage
of trips that are new, as opposed to pass-by or linked trips. Column 5 is the result of
multiplying column 3 by column 4, producing the net number of new person-trips
generated per day for each land use category.
Don Ganer &: Associates
16
as of 10/29/99
111"
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 1 of 5
___._____.__ ____________________________________(D__ -----.-----------------------n_----------l-----------(~t ___n ________ _._(~}___._____1______(4t____ ______________J?t____________ _ _n__________n___.(~L___________n___
________________________.__.._________________________________ __________________________________________,._______JJJL________ ----------~.~~~---------L------------------ u____u_u___N~tu__________ __u___________u_________u_u.u._________u____
: Motor Total: % New
i!jii:,illi:>y.s~mp~ii::AIT(;Q\l,x...lj'~i~i~ ..r.t~~jtJ~r.t~;:-:...... ..................y;;;i
_i~~~?~i~~~y::(~~~::P~P1~~~::::::--::-::-::_:L::::::::::::_::::::::::::_ :--::-----::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::__:: :::::::::::::::::--:----------u----- u.___u_______._._u___._.__.._u_u_.___u_.___
Mf~d. Housine: not m a Park) : 9.57 15.79: 100% - --i5:7~i Id:;~ij~g.~tn-.u.
~K:~~~~~q,;~~if~~.;J;~;;;;~+::~~~=~:~lj~~:=:~:~ l~~;=~L=:
~~____M~~~~_~4):!~~_~~&._(~uP_~~)___I..-uuuu------1:~-~n ---------------}~-?1:f----JQg-%- ______....__.__.__._____Z:~4 I~~~~g_~Lu___
....._u....................u.._u..__.......__.__.. ..uo.... ........ _._ _ ___ _ _......._ ._......_.u......~.. .........u......__ .... ... .........._........ ..u.....~........u.. ....... ....u.._.u ........ ".h_.. ....._.__ __.........._uun_______....__.................
RECREATIONAL j j
:jl::~~~ti~~~::::::::::::_:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::l:~~- ::::::::::::::::j~~~I:::::i~~~- :::::::::::::::::::::::::~;:i~ ::~::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
416 Camp~ound/RV Park (b) j 3.90 6.43~ 77% 4.95 / camp site
~Q..__M~_______u.___u____________________uu_______________________..uuuu_L______.u.__...~~.?~ u___uu______u1:~.~L)Qg-%- ______________uu_______4.:~~. I~~.~h..u.._____________________._
430 Golf Course j 35.74 58.97: 100% 58.97 /hole
....._nn.n.n___............._._.__.__....__.__.......................................................................un.n......................u.......u..+..............................u.u.u....unn.u...n.n...................nu....un.n............
432 Golf Driving Range (b) j 12.50 20.62: 100% 20.62 / tee
~u_M~J!i:P~!P_~~ug~.f.:~SW~u._u.._u___________L__uu___u~Q_:~_ .h.uuJ4~_J~.L_JQQ%_ u.___.._________J1:?J~ J!~~~u__________.uuu___u...
~~___M2_~~_Th~~~~t~L~_~_t~~~t:l~~uu____L___.u._~Q_:QQ_ _u___u__~.~_~QQ_L_J_QQ%_ ____________uu___~~~gQ J~q~~~_u_____u_____.___u______
~__uM~y._~~_Ih~_~~.~_!u~!_~~_~~~___________________j______...._!.~~~_~~ _____u.__.~~~~.??L-JQg%. ____..._____.._.u.~??_:~_ I~~.~.~.t:l.u_.._____.__...._____u__.
1:?~____~.~~~!.y_~4.~2..r2J~~!11~_~_~_ry_..Q?>.j____u___.J~~_~Q __u____.__~l~_?~L_JQg%_ _______....uu____~J:?~ .IT:?.~.f.~.G_~f..:A:._____u__..
480 Amusement/Theme Park : 75.76 125.00: 100% 125.00 / acre
i~L~~~f~r::I~:~~:~i{~~:~~~::
494 Bowlin~ Allev . 33.33 54.99: 100% 54.99 Ilane
495 Recreational Community Center 22.88 37.75: 100% 37.75 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
17
as of 10/29/99
'II'"
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 2 of 5
_________________________________________________(!_L______.______________________________________.l________---<?L___h___ _______._..(~)_.________[_______(1:L___ ..._.___..._h.(!?L______. _____ ----________.________J?2__________h_________
_______h__.___..___h______________________________________________________________________________.____l_________!m_h______ _.h_____~~_t_~_____.__L_______________ ______.____ _N~t.___________ __.h.__.__.___h___________________.__.________
: Motor Total j % New
: Vehicle Person-: New Person-
~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~y.]~~~~~~~~~l~~~t~~u~-~~!:-
INSTITUTIONAL!MEDICAL: j
____ununo....________....______....... o..u..uu..u.... _.._.._un............ ..0.. on............. -:-......u nO._ Un n_ __ n.. __ _ __ _ __ _ __. ._._. on.. no.. ..., ...... ....h__nn _ _ _ n_ __n _._ n_ _._ _un... h... _ _ _ _ _ ......... h_ _ __nun .un..nno..... .nouno__
501 Militcuv Base : 1.78 2.94: 100% 2.94 / employee
:~~:~~:Jl~z~~tijfih:~hQ9.C:::::::::::::t::::::::::::::t~~:::::::::::::::::1~~~L:i~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::1~tZ::fu~;.ri:l:::::::::::::::::::::::
530 Hieh School . 1.79 2.95! 100% 2.95 / student
?1Q__J~Q!:L~~~~~__GQJJ~g~______________L------------)-~?4.- ____h______.____?~?4..l___JQQ%_ _____________________.___?~_?4 I~~~~!!t..__h.__.h______mm_
??.Q___y~_y~~~~I~M.~g~_____._.__.______________h__hhh___L----------___:?_~~_ _mm____mm~_~?~L_JQQ%__ __m________________m_~~2_~ I~~.~~!!Lm__________h___...
560 Church ! 9.11 15.03: 100% 15.03 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
;~;~~~~~~~~~~"::~:lttt:;::~]i:~tltt-:_:-~~;~~!~~~~~~=
?7.!L:N_~!!!g):!Q_~~_._._._________________________________________--.l-----------._._.:?~?.l. .__.__...._____.4~~JL_JQQ%_ _h..___..__.h...___m_1:~~}_ I~.~.~.._.......__.._.__.._____m__..___
630 Oinic ! 31.45 51.89: 100% 51.89 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
__nn__n__u.nn_n_n_n_u_..__.._____._.n._n_n_n_nn_.........._n__...........__....__....................__.__.._______.__.___._______...__._._______......._____._.._.........................._...._____.__..__...............uu................u..............
_~9_MM~R_QA:~I~~_RY!_~~~__________________________Luuu____u____.hhh_._ _________________________m'____________________ _m_________________..__.h_________ _________________________________________________
310 Hotel/Motel: 8.23 13.58: 77% 10.46 / room
~J?___!3.~4.~g)~1~!~!!~~.l.~~~~_~!___________..___L___________~'!_~Z1_____________~_?_~?~_t_u__]Z%_ ______________mm__?QA_?_ IT$._~f~G~f.:A:____u_...._.
~J.~__J.!~~~!.~~~KPJ~~.Q~_t~!Q_!~...._...._-L__.__..___..._.___________ ______mm________________L______________u.. .._.._...____________.._m_m_____ _______m________.__.........__.._.________..____
With Groceries : 46.96 77.48: 49% 37.97 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~!1:__.$.~9~~J~~~!~M..~~~_~~!:____________u__________._____~_________.____~~?? _..h.h___.__~ZJ.lL___]?%_ __________..____....__!?J_..?Z_ /T~~J~:_g.~F._:A~________.___
-~~~~_.~~wrili~~r~;.;~rl~~~-~~~_-~~~~_~:-~_._.~_-_.~~_J_-_--_-_._.~~~~~_-_.~_~-~~_ -~_-~~~.-_..-_..-.._-~~~_~-#.t.-.-_-~.-_-~_~~%-_ -_-_-_._-~_-~_._-~~_.~~_-~_-_-~~_-4$-;.t.~_- j:t~j~_~G.;.~.;A.:~~~~~~~~~~~~.
816 Hardware/Paint Stores ! 51.29 84.63! 77% 65.16 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
......u............................h.h................................. ........... ............ ........-} ...... ... ............ .... ... ..............u............. _ __ _._ ....__.....h. ._..................... ....u.u.... ....__...._.......................................
817 Nursery / Garden Center ! 36.08 59.53! 77% 45.84 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
~
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
18
as of 10/29/99
I1r
L
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 3 of 5
______________.________________._.______ _.__.__O)___________._____________________________________L______j~>...__._____ __________J~L__.____L____(1L___ __________.___J~.L____________ _______________._.._{~L_________________
_.____________..__ .__._.________._____ _._.__.______________.___________________________.__________--L_______.m....______ _________~~_!.:__..____.l..__________________ _____________.N_~_t__________
: Motor Total! % New ----------------------.--------------------------
un. ..n_ n. ___._.... n_."............. _ _... .._.......u..... _..... n _ .n___ _ no<... __.. n.....* un. ............ nOnunon.nO.._no.. .... n. _ n_ ..____...._....__~. .._..u ......--.... n.__'" .non. huu....... .n. -.- - - - - - - - --. n_ -----,.. ......u.......... un. un._
: Vehicle Person- j New Person-
==~~~~~~I~':';~f;=~YoJ~~Po=!~ .......~~l'S.J~= ....~~l'S ..........~~::
COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) . :
~~:}~~~~:{~~j~i......j.Jl~ ............~:~}\J~~:~~~~ :H:~:~:~:~:A::=
831 Quality Restaurant (not a chain)! 89.95 148.42\ 77% 114.28 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
=:~~~~u::.f~r~=it~==~:ii~Q;~~i~:Q<<;L:~%ii~;inj':s1':9;~:A:=
~.~._..;f..~~!..f..~~~__g~~.~_JN_~J?~y_~~~>..___l----.-----?!~_:QQ _..____!J~J.:4.Q_[__._..}:?%_ ___.._.________.___~J.~:~.~ l!:~_:f..:G:f.:A.._____......__
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) \ 496.12 818.60! 27% 221.02 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.._..............__n.........._.............._......__....___......_..___..........._.......nn.....+......__nn......._n...._........n........n__..........__...nn......._.........n......un_.......__n_...n..___u.......__.__...u._._nnnn......_.....
836 Drinkint! Place/Bar (b) ! 115.40 190.41 [ 54% 102.82 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~~~~~~~~~:,,;i;fl~:i~=~ltL~~:~~1i:~~1~:_~
841 New Car Sales \ 37.50 61.88\ 77% 47.64 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
844 Gasoline / Service Station \
::::::::::::::(~~:M:~~~:(Q~::~:W~~hi:::--:::::::::::-:::I::::::j~:~~:::::::::::~!~j~I::::::~~%-::::::::::::::::::i~~:i~jy:f.;:r~:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::
845 Gasoline/Service Station \ \
(With Convenience Market) : 162.78 268.59: 49% 131.61 /V.F.P.
.n....nn...............................n........n....n......u..._..n...._.............................--........--...............n.....................n..c.---..................._......__..............n._....u.......u...........n.........._.......u........
=1WI~~~~~f~J'~w~~hL==@~~:~fi~L4'i%:i?i!5? Jy;~:!';=::::
848 Tire Store \ 24.87 41.04\ 77% 31.60 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
.n..__n..un.......unn.......n___..........................-..._......._......._......._.....nn.+__.............__..n_u.n_......u......_nn...._.__....___.....nn..._____._...__..._.....n....._uu......n....nnn.....___....._.........n_..nnnun
850 Supermarket \ 111.51 183.99: 48% 88.32 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~~!..._~~.~y.~~~~~_~__M~!~~!.___(?1__hp':Y.:L___\._________?~?.~'!J.. u_____J.?}?~_~L____1~_%_ ________._.________~?~_:~Q_ IT:~:.~:_g_:f..:A:_._______.__
_~~~____G~~y._:__M_~!~~tWJ!.h._!:~~t.P.~~p._____.L_________~:~g _._____..._~~~:.?~L______1~.%. ..__u__..______...~~.:~?. IY~_~:.P._:..._.__..._____.._______....
860 Wholesale Market ! 6.73 11.10: 77% 8.55 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.LA. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
i
Don Ganer & Associates
19
as of 10/29/99
I1r
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (TIP) PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
............................. ....................(1).................................................,M~l~i..... ~~~~~(;:;~~L.........(40)....... ..........(?).....I..............(t;).....................
Vehicle Bicycle! Transit Total i
TIF TIF TIF TIP.
.. - - - -..... 0.. h.._. n.... -- - -. - - - -- - -- - hO --. -- - - ......... - --. -- - -...... --. --. --...... _ h. -". on -.... --:- - - -......... .__... h_. __ __.... h _... n.. n. n. ......u..... _: _ _n... h. _.. n.... n...... _.. .... On.u ...... .... n... _no _..}. n.. _.. n.". on ....n.....n.n h...... _n"'On
=~=~s~~~I'l~l"IJ~~Xr~ery~II'~!~~lj~~!~~I.~~!.~.~~J:~~I.:
COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) : ! ~
-S20-mSh~pp-i~g--c~-~t~~----------.u------------------------u------i.u.---------$4~9ii -u.u.-------u--$6401----------.-------$1S1- ------------$-5~732l}T:sj~~G:F:A:----....m--
~-?:~....f~~!~ry__Q~_~J~_t~_~_~~~t____m__m_____________.____l___m______$.~r.Q1~. ----------_______$.~2?;--------u.-------$}J?: u-----------$.~,.~?llII~.?:.~=G~_f.~.A.:..m__...._
~~I..~-~J~.--R~~~~~~_~~__(~9J_~..~h~_~~)__..l______m$.J2r.?J.Q- m-.--m__$.?!.?.Q_5.L_____________..J?.Q!?. ----------$.??A??llI:_?:f:.~~.~~A.: . ...
832 High Turnover, Sit-Down: ! ! m m. ---.... -
Restaurant : $9,742 $1,270! $358 $11,370~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
...._.n.........n.n......__....____..........._......__........---...........-.......--.--........_____..........._..._.______.__..u.__.....u__...._.__.....__.__..~.-.....-----..-......---00............._.._......_..00....__...__00_..00_00_....__00__.....00__.....___00......__
.~;?;?..--~~~Lf~~4__~_~~~_JN9.P~.ty~::Ihr:~>.._u~_u_______$_?:~2?.~ -------------$.;?A~~Lu__m__..m_$.~~. ..m--..$~.!!.~~J.UI:?.:f.:_9.:~:A:m_.......__
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) ! $18,541 $2,418: $682 $21,640~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
m~a~i~~~1~t~~f-t:~m.:r~tnl:~lllil~4t~:~~
841 New Car Sales 1 $6,743 $879: $248 $7,8711/T.S.F.G.F.A.
---..u..--__......_..n.....__._..nu___......._n_.______n___......._--.-...-.-.---..-.....-..-..-..--...-------.....-..-..-...-.--.--.-.--.--...-..-.-.....-----.--.+......-.-...........---n-h___....._n_n...n_n_.....___.....u__n_..._._n___......_n_00__....________..
844 Gasoline / Service Station 1 ! 1
mh--m----(~-~-_M~~~_t..9.~__~!JY_~~_h).______u.___._____.ul___._.___...$~A~_ ...--.u----$}!.~~gL---u.---u---$-~?~ ----uu--$.JJ,_?:~~UY:-f=-P.:_m_____.u__m__________.
~?m9.~~-~t~~~L?~~.Y~~~__?~~~J9_~_________u_u._______uL._____.__________u___.______ ----------_____...u._________1m_____.u_____u__m_______ ----h---.--...-----u________Lm_.._umm___.u____m_____.u____mm
(With Convenience Market) $9,335 $1,217! $343 $10,896~ /V.F.P.
-~----G~~~M~~I?~_~_~~~_$!~rt~~_____m______u________L____m___..____m________ ..._u_mm_________________A____um___u________._______ ---.mm-----_mm________.m____..__mm___.__m___________m__m_m.
----..-.--....(..!!IG~~y=-.M~!~.~_t_~P:4__~~__W~~hJ____________$.~2~? -----._______$.J,J.1;?1____.________..__$.;???_ ...---m$.!.Q!.~~.Q_~IY_:~.:p.=m......___________._...____
848 Tire Store 1 $4,472 $583! $164 $5,220! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
m~~~~:;:~;JM~i~~i.(?~h~;.:i).L......~t;~ .......U;~~I.........$j~~;~tg::~:~:~;~J:...........
-~?~----~~P:y.-:--M~~~~LWJ~.h__f.~~t_~~~p_______L__.uu_$_??L~_Q!? ---------m-$.;?'_~JL_____ml1r.QQ1. m----..$~.!!.~?tIY.:f:P.:.mm.m._m__m..._.m
860 Wholesale Market j $1,210 $158! $44 $1,4131 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
}
Don Ganer & Associates
49
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 5 of 5
(1) j (2) (3): (4) (5) (6)
.. _ _ _... ..... _ _._. ....._." ........ .__. ....... ............ ...... _... ...............__..... _.__u_.. ___..._:_ __n__.. .......___..__..... ___ .....__u..._........____f-__.....____._...... .___un__. ......._____.__.... .....u -. ......... -...--.. ... ._..O__._u_______. ... -....
T~~~l~~~t~~i~~~;
==~s.~~~~~{=~=~~J~~~~~le~~~+~~~:~==~~!........
OFFICE (continued) i :
....uo__ ..._......u..._.....__.__.__......___...........__ .__..__ __.... ._.___... .__._. _ _ _ ._...... .___ __ _0_ _ _... ... ..U' .__..u__...._ ..____._____h_..........___i__.___...___....__.. ....-." ,.u, .___...........__....... ...n__.___u___u._______..____...__... ---- ..uo
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. ! 166.02 273.93~ 100% 273.93 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
Z~:?-____y.:~_:__p.~_~~_.Qf~~~______________________________________________hhV-------_JQ~J?_ ________J?~.:?.!.L.JQQ% ___________________I!~~.?.!. IT$..:f..:G~_~~A~_____________
??P____Qf~_~~..P.~~....______.__________________.._______h__.________....______L__________!!.:~. ._________....!~_:~_l____.!.QQ%. ..___________..._..__.J~=~ ..l.!=$.J~_:G~f=A~..__________.
760 Research/Development Center! 8.11 13.38~ 100% 13.38 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
770 Business Park i 12.76 21.05~ 100% 21.05 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
iijji~ii~t:-::l::::=]=::==:==::_:== =:==--:::===::
030 Truck Terminals i 9.85 16.25~ 100% 16.25 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
...._uu_n__....._____u...u_n_uu.___n..______n_._nu...______..............__uon...._.._....+____...u..__n.........____ ........_nn.......___.........__............. __...unn__.........._________.... ..._.__uu......._n_..n....__.._.____...___..__
090 Park/Ride With Bus Service 1 4.50 7.42\ 100% 7.42 /Parking Space
ili::~~:f~~~~~~.g'~=~+~~~:iti:}@::::it~2i~<t~~=.
120 General Heavy Industrial . 1.50 2.48j 100% 2.48 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.!~J~4~~~~LP.~l<--------------------------------------------------~----------------~-:?~_ ___________J.!_:~L...!.QQ%_ ______....__________)J.=~ ..lI=$..:f..~G=f=A~.____________
J1P._._.M~.~~.~_~K______________________________h__________________l______________}_:~?. ________________~_:~.QL_JQQ%. ..._.________.__________.~=~.9_ ..l.!=$..:f..:G.~f=A~.._________._
150 Warehouse ! 4.96 8.181 100% 8.18 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse i 2.50 4.121 100% 4.12 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
..__.n............................__...............__......_____......_........._......__..___......._.._.___...___.._................_.._...........__............c..............n_n...........__.__....._..........___.__.....__...........__.....u......................
170 Utilities (b) j 4.90 8.09) 100% 8.09 /T.S.F.G.FA.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S:F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. - l
Don Ganer &: Associates
21
as of 10/29/99
!1r
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMP ACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
--------------------------- __J1Lm_______________________ ___________L________J?Lm__m __m___mJ~.L_m.___L______J~L________ -------__J?Lm___Lm__ (6)
: Motor Pedestrian/ ! _ -_________m_m__mm___..m_____..
_____________________m______________________________.__________---------------------____L_.Y~W~J~____ ------~~~~~---J-.-J)::~~~t--- -------..I~~~L..__L-----------_________m__________________.__.__
.m____m______m_m_______mm______________________m____m___m_______________mmm___L__m__::rw.mmm m----_mm_mm__.!.._m_____J.Jf_....__m --..----m1Jf.--._____.1.mm.mm..____..__m______m__...mm..
ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY Per Unit Per Unit! Per Unit Per Unit' Unit
......h..n........_._......................h.__..._._.........______u...n............________ .. _'0 _ _..n....... _ _ ... ....... _ no..___ __....n...; ____........................_ ..........n....h................_n.....n.u...nn....___u....n............
RESIDENTIAL : :
Z.i~-=:~:!~~i~~~~)J~i~~H~F--~~:-:i;~z~i~~~i:
220 Apartment : $1,835 $2391 $67 $2,1421 / dwellin~ unit
-~~Q.---~~~~~~~-~J.G~~_4~II.~_~~~.~~~m__L_.mmm$.J~.~.?:~ -----._mm____.$_?J.~Lm______._mm_.~Q_ m_.m_m~.!i~~~JI~_~~_~g,~!...___.__
-~@-.--M~~~~.~__!!~_~~~gJ~_.P..~~L:_._mmm_$J.!.~_~~ -----------m--~J?~t---mmm.m----~~- --.___m____$.!!.?~II~_~~_~g,~~__.__._..
RECREATIONAL
4}f::G~~::p.~:i.~::_::::::::-::::::::::::::::-::-::-:::::-:::::::::-:-----:---:-::I::::::::-::::::~Z::_:::::::::::-::::::~jL::::::::::::::::::$:!:~:::::::::::::::::j~I:Z!~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
412 County Park : $698 $9( $26 $8151/ acre
m-i~d:~~:;~2J:::~!~!!~~IIH::~_~gllisit~:-~:
435 Multipurpose Rec Facility 1 $37,529 $4,894: $1,380 $43,803i / facility
-~~..--M.~y..~~..Th_~_~_~~.~__~L~~~__~~~~~~.~______..J_m__..~.~Z~_~_~~ ..m-..---..$.~r?~?L.....-m$.?A?? m.._.._$.?~A~~JI~_q~~~_____._..___..__mm__.m
444 Movie Theater w / matinee ! $46,952 $6 12t $1 726 $54 801 ~ / screen
--..-----...--------._____.__.____._________.._..._m___m..__ ______m__mm.. m_....___ _ _ ________ .___...__.____m_m___.._____ m__________mm(_.m_____~..__. -__m___....'-____.____..._______..__.....1........m.____.......__.___...........___________________...
473 Casino/Video Poker/Lottery (b)! $41,125 $5,363: $1,512 $48,oooj /T.S.F.G.F.A.
480 Amusement/Theme Park : $23,199 $3,0251 $853 $27,077i / acre
42f::!~~~:G~~~~:::.::::::::::::::::-::.::-::::::::-:::::::.--.-::::r:::::::::::$.2;.~Q~:::::::::::::$:!;.?~:~L:::::::::::::::$.~~::::::::::~HJ.;.Q?1I:Z~9~!j::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
492 Racquet Club : $12,411 $1,618: $456 $14,486j / court
-~~~--.~~~-~K_AM~y___mm___hh______mmm___h__________mmj.hh____~.!.Q~?_~ -m_mh_._$.l!_~~lL__________m__$.~??_ ____m_Jn!.~J~jI!~~.___________...______mmm____
495 Recreational Community Center 1 $9,501 $1,2391 $349 $l1,089j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
}
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
47
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS
page 1 of 5
__u_u_____u_.u_u____w____u____ ___u___(12..._____uuu_____u _u____u__._.._._______~--u-u-u----(~2---u.------L-u-u.u___(~)u________uL___u_uuJ1Lu___._.u _____u_uu__u_J?Lw_____uw__
u u u_ u: Net _ : : Length
wuu__u___w_u.u_u_u_u__u_uu_.u___u_u_u_____u_____uu_ __u___ ___w __u___ --r--u-----N~~ .u-u---.u---.-----Trip-.-w--u:-----Adi~st~d-.- _uu.u_u_u_uu____.u_u_w_____uu_
: Person- : Length : Person-
iji~ij~E<;QJ:>~i<::AlligQ!ixLIl"i~:j'i~~!~~TiiiRi:ij~!:
_~.~~~P~.NI~~u__wwuw______w__uw___._u______w___u___uuw:-.w-u---uuw____w___u_uvuuuwuww_uww_uu_lw_____wuu___uu_w____w uu__uu_uuuu__wu_._u_________,.._
_~!Q___?~~g!~..~~y3,~~_.~p!~~L._uww_uu.L-uuu--uww---wu-.uuLuw______u_______ww___jw____uwuuuw_________u_ uu___uuuu___w__________.__._._______
Mf~d. Housin~ not in a Park) \ 15.79: 1.00: 15.79 / dwellin~ unit
:?:?:Q.._Ap~!.~.~.~~!!!_____.__.____.____._._____.______..______,..________.________.l.w_____________.JQ~~4.L_______________wJ~.QQL--------------w!Q-~~4. L4~~lli!!g_~!..
=~:~~~~s~~~~~5.ri.;~t~:~t~~~~~~~~;
~i:~::~~i~=:::+1:~IH:tL::~jH~::=::::
416 Campground/RV Park (b) i 4.95\ 1.50\ 7.43 / camp site
~~~~:::i~:~Lt~L~~;~~~~==
432 GolfDrivin~Ran~e (b) [20.62: 1.11\ 22.81 /tee
~~~::"~r~i~~t~~~;,;,J~:~~itIjl~:~~~~~::=
444 Movie Theater w/matinee 1 252.99: 1.11! 279.86 /screen
:~Z~::::Qi~~~iy:~4.~~:r~~~iit~it~ry:::Q?)T::_::_::::::::~i~~~[:::::::::::::-::::iI!L::::::::::::::~4~~i~ jt~;f;G)~;A:~::::::
480 Amusement/Theme Park \ 125.00\ 1.11 j 138.28 / acre
~;~~~~~iifI~:~IHIL:~:~z:~~::=:
494 Bowlin~ Alley \ 54.99~ 1.1t 60.83 /lane
495 Recreational Community Center: 37.75\ 1.50\ 56.63 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
~
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
23
as of 10/29/99
11'r
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
! Length i
:__:::::::::::_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:::-:::::::::::::::::_::_-_:-:::__-::::::::_::_:__:__::.:::r::A4j~~~~~::::t:::_:::I.i.~~!(_::.:::::::t~~~~~:::::I:::::::-:_::__:-::::::::::::::::.:::::::::
: Person- : Trips @ Cost @ :
~~~~~~~~~~l==G<?~~I~~~r?-~:~:::!~!!it:
l~~~!~~~~;~~~~t.t:~B:~E.:..!:~~~~lt~~J:i:g:i~::
Z~Q.__.R~~~~!_~LP~.Y.~~2P~~_!lt.G~_!l!~!____L_______________nH:).~Lh__________________9.:~~________n____________n~?L!..T:~_:f_:Q:f.:A~___.___
770 Business Park ! 22.3t 0.45 $138: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~:Q:~!I!NPY~!~(:::_:__::::::::::::::::::-:::::_:::_::_::t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::::::::_::_::::::::_:__:__:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
030 Truck Terminals : 17.23! 0.34 $106: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~...~!!!~!.~~~..~~~h_~~n~~~.~.._...__________L________n_______n~~.?:~L______.n__________9J~_n_________..nn._.n_~~.~jIr.~~g.~P!!~~
_~m~~gh~..B~:!:L~~~2~._~LP.!!!~K__________L__._n.h._n_n.._~A~L___n_nn..n_....9.:Q?. ______________..n____J~_?:jIr.~!~g_~P!!~~
110 General Li~ht Industrial : 12.19: 0.24 $75! /T.S.F.G.EA.
:i.~:::~~i:~~~~~::~=~-~~~~~~:::::_::::::::::::::::t::::-::::::::::::::j~;i~I::::::::::::::::::::::~~:~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::'~~1:Zt~$.~:~~:~:~~~~;::::::
J.~...M~!!!~~~g_______________._______________.______n_____n____J_.______________h___~~_~~l._nh_______h_____hQJ~_ _n_n____n_n________$.4JjII:~_:f_:Q:f.:A~_______
150 Warehouse ! 8.671 0.17 $54: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
..___un____uu____________..._____...__...............................__..........._.________.............__...._____........_....._.....~-........-.._........___--.._..-.. ......................_._._..____..........____...____.__......................
151 Mini-Warehouse : 4.371 0.09 $27: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
170 Utilities (b) 8.571 0.17 $53: IT .s.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate,- basec.\. on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. .
Don Ganer &: Associates
45
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS
page 3 of 5
__ _____n_n____n_n_n_n____n________nnn.(!_L____n_nn___n.nnn____m____n_n_.__njn_mnm___(~)nnm.m_Ln-n-n--n(~L-n-n--n n.n_nnm_(4t_m.n_n~____n_n_mm_n(~L_____mn_n..
: Net : Length \
_____n__n_______n__nm_______n____n_n_nn_n______n__nnn_n_-nmn----.nm-nnn--n-+n---n-nN~~n-nn--T-n----nnTrip------n_. -m-Adi~st~~fnr-..-n-n--------n-n---.n---n-n-n-...
iiliI;&IPI.J$~~Qi?~LgftqQ~yl~i~~:L'f~:i~i:~;::::lOlj;.!i
-COMMERCIAijSERViCESn(~~~tXmrm--.-mmn-n-m-mmnrmn-.nmn..n_____.nmm .._mmm______n_m__..n___r_______nnn______________mm___...n
...u....._.u.....__......__...._________.___________o_____..________u..___.____________u...___..___.._~___._.._____.__..________.u____.~-..--_._..--__u--..--.-.._-.___..._..-____.........n__...........:......._________..______.__.____......_.un
820 Shoppine: Center j 34.70\ 0.84 29.27: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~_~.nf~~t~ry:_~Q~_!J~.t~_~_~!~~.__n__._.n___________n__....L___.n_______.._~.!.~?.Qj_.__n_._________.__._Q~.~ ______.________..J~_~!1.lII..~~.f.~_g~_f.~.A_~__.___
~.~.!._..~.~~~__~~~!~~~!J~~.!--~..~h~~}---Ln...mm-J!4.~~~.L--m..._m__.__.J~.QQ m__nmm_J!1:.~Q1II~.~~f~-9:.f.:-A-~------
832 High Turnover, Sit-Down 1 i \
______m_____g~~_!_~~~~~_L_________m...__m__.____m_m__m_n__m___.__n____.:._____________)J~:.!.~L--------------....Q-~~Q m______mn.____?~~.QZ.jII~~.~f..:Q~f:A:m..__
.~~.mf.~~!__f.~~~._~~~!__(~~._P!!y.~~I!~:~:~}__L.._mm.._._~!.~:_~~L__m___.________..Q_:~.Q n__._.m_mJ.?~&?.jII~~.:f.:9.:f:A:.._.___
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive- Thru) j 221.0i 0.50 110.51 \IT .s.F.G.F.A.
~~&el~~~f:J~~~~~t=~tE::~:11iti!=~
841 New Car Sales ~ 47.64: 0.84 40.19~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
___...___n_..____nu..___....n_n..__n__..__n_n_nn__.___oo......__00._.._____.......__00......._._....__.__.....__.00...__00_...01.00__......oooo....__.__......___....__.............u.oo.......__.._........u....n..___.........____....____
844 Gasoline / Service Station j ~ i
~~~t~~~'ii~~~tk;Jlo~.~L~.~~7~::=!':~'~~~.:
(With Convenience Market) \ 131.61\ 0.42 55.64\ /V.F.P.
846 Gasoline / Service Station ~ i
::::::::::::::~WZG~~y~::M~i.~~i:~~~:~::W~~hr::::::::::::j?~~~?r:::::::::::::::::::::Q~~:::::::::::::::~:::~?~:i1jjX~~~p.~:::::::::::::::::::::::
848 Tire Store \ 31.60\ 0.84 26.661/T.S.F.G.F.A.
~.Q___~_~P~~~!~~~..----------n...------..--------.-----m-nn-----.---L-mm.---n__~_~~~1__._______..__n___..Q~_~ _______..___._.___.?1_:?!l.lI~_~:.f.~9~.f.~.A.:__.___
851 Convenience Market (24 hour): 523.60\ 0.42 221.3t IT .s.F.G.F.A.
~~$.f~~~ii:y~~M_~~~_~~~W_~ih~_~~~D?~~p~~~~~T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~{~?L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q~~f~~~~~~~.-~~~~~j~?;i~IiY_~f~r;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
860 Wholesale Market \ 8.55~ 0.84 7.21 ~ /T .s.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer & Associates
25
as of 10/29/99
11r
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
___hh_h____hh__h_h____h_h --h_____h_._nthh___.___h_h___..h_h_h_h_____h_h..__.1.h__hh.m.(7.).h_m.....L_m...nj~L.....__._. .--.n-n....(4)..______n_.1.______h_________J?L______n_h____
i Length : i
h____________hh_________________h_________________h____________-----.------h-------n-----h-n-h--r-n-A~ii~st~d-nr------T~~~itn_h__ ----n-T~~~-ii----nlh-------h----h-h------.----n-h.-n--n
nnhnh____________nn_______nh__.h_________nhhh__________hhhhn_________n____._hh-..nL_____R~_~~_~::_nh_l_h___I~~P~n~______ ---h.n~~.~t~___h_Lnh-h------h_______________h___nn.__
.Q]J~ANPny~g-~QP~l~A1A_GQRX.___+-h-h--I~P~---h-----l------.--____4:&_________0._ -------$.~Q~A?_____.l-h-----h----J!~L___.__._____
: :
-(ijMMER.CiAijSERViCES--(co~t~fn.T-------n---------------n------r----h--_________h_hn______ --.---------h.-.------------..__.n_______n____..._____.._n___m_____nn_
_......____nn___.__......u.un__..........._..__.......__..______.___n__.__.____________._._....__h_O....._____._____...--.------__.__~.-...--_-._-....._-__-._....._______.....__________.......________.....______....___.____.________'_'__'_u___,_
820 Shopping Center ! 29.27! 0.59 $18( /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~'~~~~I~~~;;f~i{~~t~~ii~i1iij:j~H~i~:~~t~l~f~~:g;~;~:
832 High Turnover, Sit-Down i 1
-----n-m...R~~.~.~~!~.t______....___n________....n_________.........______________:_n_.-....n-------?~~.Q!.L..-..---------.....!.:l?_____n._....._______$.?_~jT~~_:f..:g~!':~A:_.___n
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) 1 159.49l 3.19 $9841/T.s.F.G.F.A.
-834---F~~t-.:i~~~fR~~t--(Dri~-~~~-jn-------------~n-..h--------ii(i5irn-----n------.----i~2i -----------------n.$68-2:riT:s~F~G~F~A~n.-...
~---J?~~gJ~~~~_n~~Jp.L..n___________________...L_________n_____?.!.A_g-.--------n--_____J:.9.~ ----n-.----------m$.~l!..lIT:.~:.f.:.g:.f..~:......
-~...-.-~t~~~~~~1~~~_~~i~r_._._.__J.......-.-_-_-_-_-_-------------~-~~-~~-t-....-----~-------.-.--.._._._-_-_------~-~.~_-_-_-~_._-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_._....-~l~.~t.-7_f;~~.~t~~...._._.~_
841 New Car Sales ~ 40.19i 0.80 $2481/T.S.F.G.F.A.
--...~..._-----.....----....._.._.__n......._____...h_.__.__.._...n......nnu...__..__._......__................_...................-c_un..u..........__......n.............u..........................uu..hno..._.....n_._..........____...
844 Gasoline/Service Station j ~ 1
-------------.(~-~uM_~~~_~__~_~__~!__~~~_htu_________________~__________hh____??:?~.l------------------J)-? -________h__h______$.~??_jy~_~:p_.u_.___u_______._____
~?._.G.~~~t~~~L~~!Y~~_~__~!~~~~___.____________________L__.____.______________h.____.1.__Uh___________.________u____ ___________________nn.__________t...________________________________________
(With Convenience Market) 1 55.641 1.11 $3431 / V.F.P.
846 Gasoline/Service Station ~ ~
......................_...................n.........................__n...........................__....:.........................__.......(.........n.................................n..n.n..un....................._____u......__.____.........00.
...-.------.uOY_l~~~y.:_.M~_~~~.t.~~~_.~!__~~~hJ.._._______-------?7.:_7.1:L......_______..._._J_:Q4:_ ---.-......--.---...$.??.:?J.!..y.:!'::r.~.....__......._..__._u
848 Tire Store ~ 26.66i 0.53 $164i /T .s.F.G.F.A.
~.?Q---~-~P~~~!~~.t.._________h_..________u____.....________________u__.L..------------u?1-:?-!-l---n.----n-n-------l~-1:~-----u---..-.-.-----~QlIT:_~:_f.:.g:_f.~A::______
~-?J----~~~y.~~_~_~~~__M~~_~~~____(:?_1.J}~_~L__L._______h___:?:?_t~?L__________________..1.~_1.~ ----------._....~.!!:~UI:_?:_!'::_q:_!'::_A.:______
.~?~....G~!.l:y..:--M.~!~~!_~.~.~.hJ~~L~~~p...____L______n_.__J~?~?~L.......---......-J.:?~.....____.......~JAQ1:UY.:;f~P.~...u____......______..
860 Wholesale Market ~ 7.21! 0.14 $44UT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
f
Don Ganer & Associates
43
as of 10/29/99
""
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS
page 5 of 5
(1) : (2) : (3) (4): (5)
...._. ........... _...... n.. nU"'" .......0... ............. .......... _.........._.._.... n.... _u._.... -In-"......... n_ ........... _ -- _ .n: n_ __...... - ...... .n_._' .n..... .uun. ........ ............. n...~ -.-.-. ...... n.... ..................--.....
__m__u__m_U__ n_Umn_ u_nm_______u_n___ ____ ______ ____nU __ ______u__________u___ _ _lu__._______N~~n____ __u_\_n_n__u_n____u___n___m___ ________~.~_~g!hu_____ln-u-----u-uu-n-------u--.-uu---u
I~~~~~=0~~I~~~R~lpr~~-.~~~~m~;~~I~~t-
OFFICE (continued) :. :
...............__n...............n_n......................______....___......____......._______......_J......_.__.......---......---..............---......--...----.........---..............................)-...........................................
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. \ 273.93: 1.06 290.33\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
r~g~~r~k=~L!i~;~Ll:~!i~:~ilf:~:~:~:~:A:
760 Research/Development Center j 13.38: 1.06 14.18\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
770 Business Park : 21.05\ 1.06 22.31: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
...nn_..__._u__...__n_..nnnu.....................u........._......__.................................................................:...u......_..........................._.._.__..........u.u....._)ou..........._._..u.___.........u_.......
:: :
fQ~jli~Q.y$i~!~(:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-t::::::--:::--::::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::::::_-:::_-::::::::_::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-
030 Truck Terminals \ 16.25\ 1.06 17.23~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
________._...u._n..__noo...._._......u._.u.___u.u.......................__........_.._..................._..............._.__oo...._i.......__....._..__........__........__......__....u..__u._..u.....____n..u._n___n._.u_n___u..u_n...
090 Park/Ride With Bus Service j 7.42: 0.84 6.26~ /Parking Space
iiH~t~~~~~~4~~~ljt:~ii~~::&!~1~i~E?li~=
120 General Heavv Industrial : 2.48\ 1.06 2.62! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.!_~_._~4_~_~!ti~L~_~~n__m_m____nm_____umu_unn__m_m___:u_______m______J}A~L_______n___uu.._J:~_ um________.u___~_?:J?Ll.I:?_:f._:G.:f:A:___u..
}1P._..M~~~~~K----------n------.n----------------.h--------\------.________.___m~}QL____________u___)_:~_ _____n___________u__~:~jII:?_:f..:G.:F.:A:...____
150 Warehouse \ 8.18\ 1.06 8.67: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse \ 4.12: 1.06 4.3t /T.S.F.G.F.A.
i70--.Utiliti~--(b)-------m----m-------mn-----mhh--u--n------nn--Tn-----mu--------8:09T----------h--mmj~06 ----nmhu---nm-8-:57rji:sj~:-c_:F~A:-u---
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F:A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in theJTE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate,base<\,on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. -' .
Don Ganer &: Associates
27
as of 10/29/99
-
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
( Length ~ !
::::::::-::::_:::-:::::::::::::__:::::-:::::-:::::::::::--:::::::::::::::__:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t::::A4J:~~i~~::J:::::::T!~~~i-::J:::::::I!~~~~--:::-:-:--::-:::::-::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::
: Person- j Trips @ : Cost @
~~:=~!'(===~~!~~~l~i~~=.~~~t
~:!*i!~;i~~~~!J}~~t::~:~r~B~~:=:r
_~Q_.__g~~!~~~!!~.~~_~~rf.~_~~~.~~~.....L__....._______.____~~_~zL_.__.............__Q.~J~.L____________.._______~Q. I~~~~~..~.L
240 Manufactured Housing (in Park) ~ 7.941 0.16: $49 /dwellin~ unit
.....nn...........___....n.................___......................_.._........__.._.n...............~_......n._.._.._................i..................................i......--......_........................__......u.........................n..
RECREATIONAL : l :
...._..__n__........u________nn_n_...__...___.........__.................................._..........,.............._....d__....__......_..__.......................__......__...___._..........................._...__...___n__.__.._.._...____.__...
411 City Park ~ 2.90j O.06j $18 / acre
~J~___.G~~!Y..p.~~_______.__.______________________..____________.________L_..._______________.~J.~L----.--------.--...QJ~~j--------------------..-$.-~-~ J~q_~_________.__u_uu_________
~l~.__.~.P~~~~~lgY__P.~.!~Jp.L__..._______....L..______.........__?A~L.__.____________._.Q.~J?.l._.__._____.__________.~ I~~p__~~~~.......____._
420 Marina j 7.33l 0.15: $45 I berth
430 Golf Course ~ 88.46! 1.77l $546 / hole
~~~~~~~:~~~k~I~~~~~E~:~F~~~B::~i~
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee j 401.54l 8.03: $2,477 / screen
....nn.u........n..n.nn_____....._...___.__n....__........__.nn......._._.__.__............._....._....__..........n.n__n....+...__................n._......................._____n.n...__..._._.n...__n_............._________.__.._.__
444 Movie Theater w / matinee j 279.86: 5.60j $1,726 / screen
~?~____~~.~.~9_{y~4.~.~_y~~~.!!_!:__~~~ry__0?)1--------.-u-__~~?:J~_[______u______________4:~_~QL-u----------$..!.~~J~ _!I.~?:_F.:_G.~~.~A_:______
480 Amusement/Theme Park ~ 138.28l 2.77: $853 / acre
_n___.........nnn_n_...__...._......__n___..._n._n._........._nn_n......u_u___......._unn~..-..---.--------...n--...-un-:.n........_..._n_n__.__...__..+._...............______.___._....____n_..........__.._.__n_n_n.........
491 Tennis Courts i 56.65l 1.13: $349 I court
_~~~____R~~q~~L~~~P_________________________._____________________________L__________u___]~:_~~L-------------------!.~~.L--u--------------$.1~I~Q~~:tu-u------------------
~~4:___~9~.~KM!~y.__________________.________________._._________.__.__L______._________~Q:.~~L------------------..!.~~.L------------------$.~?~JJ~~----------------------------
495 Recreational Community Center i 56.63\ 1.13\ $349 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
41
as of 10/29/99
..
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
! Length 1 Motor i Motor
:::::::::::-::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::-.:-:::::::::..::::::::::::.::.::::::::::::::::I:::A4j~~i~~::::L::5~~N~t~:::::I:::::Y~N~l.~::::oo-::::--:-:--.:--:-::::--::---:-:-::::-::::
~ Person- j Trios @ ~ Cost @
:~~~~~q.~~I===~YoI~~l?"\9.~~,~l~.~~~1
~:~~!i~~~i~~1~~~)E.l~:~:!}~:1~t~~B1~~ff:E
?'~Q._._~~~!~~!!!t_~..~g~_~~II~~~~_~~~._...!_......moooo__....oo~~_~?Lm-h.oooo-mm~-~22.l..moomm...$J.!~-?:?: I4~~~g.~~_L
240 Manufactured Housing (in Park) j 7.941 7.38! $1,332 / dwelling unit
:~~~~ATIQ~At::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::--::::1:::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::1:::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::.:::
411 City Park ~ 2.90j 2.70: $487 / acre - -
~~~:~T~Y~;;;:~1~j::+:~~1:::~~~+=:~t1:t~:~P;;{i;;.==
420 Marina ~ 7.331 6.81: $1,229 /berth
430 Golf Course ~ 88.461 82.26~ $14,841 /hole
~~~~~~:~~i::I:.~:~~I::?~:~E:~~1~}};~~::~
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee ~ 401.541 373.43: $67,368 / screen
.................___u....._______.....______o...______n.....___............_n.........___......._.......____........._u.______....u__+-____.____.........____.........._..........____............n_...n_n.___u._____.n....._...n.......____....
444 Movie Theater w / matinee j 279.86 [ 260.27~ $46,952 / screen
~?~__n~~.~Qly!~_~__p_~~_~_!:!_!:_.~~~ry._O?)_l-.-.---n-----_~4_?_~J~j_______.________?:??~_~~1-----.--.-..~J'-!?? II.:~~_f.~.G_:f:.A~__m.
480 Amusement/Theme Park 1 138.28! 128.60[ $23 199 / acre
m......mm_.........moo.......m_......_mm.._..mm._....mmmm_.n.._nm_moooooo-t_____..._oomm_...oooom._...._oooo_____._._moooom_......oo~_oooomm_........_'_m_.......oom..........m._......___oo.....m._.
491 Tennis Courts i 56.65\ 52.69j $9,505 / court
4.~?m_~~~_q~~!_g~_~m__oo_m_______m_mm______.oo_oomm...oonooL.__mmm__nZ~~.?~L--.m--mn..~-~~Q.l.......---oo~.!.?:A-U-I~~~~-mm..m------.oonn
~~4. ~Q~_M!!g..!.\H~y.mn____._nm_oon...nn__mm___.__nnnm._Lm__.._mm__~Q~_~~Lmmoo._____m~.~?~_lnmmm_$J.Q!~_~ jJ~_~oomnoo_m___m._mm_
-495m-Recreational Community Center 1 56.63: 52.661 $9,501 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer & Associates
29
as of 10/29/99
I1r
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) (2) _ (3) (4) (5)
hhh____h_______________________h____________________h__________ >__>____h_____h ___>_____>______>__~-> -->__~~~g~h_____.:.P.~4.~~~rt~~1 X'-~-~-~-~~~~_~lL______________________h______>h________
_______h_______h_________________h_____________>n__>_______________ > --_______________h______>______LnA~j~~~~~____1________~~_9'~~~_______ ---h-h~~9':~~______L----------h-----________h____>______h__
: Person- : Trips @ Cost @ :
~~:~~~~~~:!l{=~=~)'Ir.=~t!j~=~?~+:~~:
i~~t~;..~~il~l~~~I~~l)"p.t.Jj~~:~'l;:~~i~~jH~~~;~~~~:
750 Office Park : 19.9t 1.00 $43t /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.___.__.___._u........u.........__n..__...........__......__......__.____..___...._u__..___._._._._.___________________________u._un_y_______........._____n_.____.._.___n......____u.........n__n.___._.._________.___..______....._________..
.z~....B~~~LP~_y.~!~P!!!~~~hG_~.~~~_~.___j_____h__h________J~~-!.~].________h_____h_h_Q_:ZJh_____________._h_$.~J.9j_l!:~.:;f._:G_:f.::A:.......
770 Business Park : 22.31] 1.12 $4881/T.S.F.G.F.A.
- -
PORT!iNDusTRIALhhhn-----hh----m-------hnn---T-------------------m--------T-------m-----n----hh------h---h-h-----nh---hh---m-:-______________n_______hh_nh______h
__.__.______u____n..........._nnn_n_h...___.__...__.............____u.n...__u...____.____._.....__.__...__________________--...--0__.____.__....___.__.__.______.__..................................,......__.__.......__.__............____.....
030 Truck Terminals : 17.231 0.86 $37t /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.~...p.~~!.~~.~..~~~h.~~h~!.Y.!~_~___.____________Lh_______.h_hh...~:_?~L----.____h______.Q.:~_L_hh.h_____hh._$..!~?L{r~~g.~p~~~
-~_JAgh~..~..~~~~_~hW.LP.~~K____h___jm__________h___.___~A?L---------h_h___hQ_:J? hh____h______hh...$.?~_U_r~~g.~p~~~
110 General Light Industrial : 12.19) 0.61 $2671/T.S.F.G.F.A.
- .
ll~i!1I=~=~~lti~:~[m~:~m~i!t1It~:I:~::
150 Warehouse j 8.67! 0.43 $190~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
...nn...............__.____............____........................................................................._.....................0(.................................. ...........................................u.u.n.........__...........__...
151 Mini-Warehouse : 4.37: 0.22 $961/T.S.F.G.F.A.
. .
170 Utilities (b) 8.57: 0.43 $1871/T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V .F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
-
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the \TE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
39
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
! Length : Motor Motor i
:_--::-u__:-__:-.-_:-:_::::::_:_-----_-:_--:::__.:-:_.::_--_:-m.::_:::--:_-:_:::-----:_::_::------::L:A~H~s.i~~::::[::::y~N~j~:::::::::::::Y~N~l~:::J:::::::::::::::-::.::::::::::::::::::::::::
~ Person- : Trips @ Cost @
==~~Eo~~~EoI=~=~~lI.~l'~I'.l~~~!I1Q'~I~~!::
COMMERCIALISERVICES (cont.) : \ :
~1-~!{!i~~!$~~;~~~)Jmjl!.:~r~1~:~~~~I}!~:~:~~~~~
Restaurant : 58.0t 54.00 $9,742: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) : 159.49: 148.32 $26,758: IT.S.F.G.F.A.
834U-F~ij~.~~~fRe~t.(Dri~e~Th~)..---u---..ur----u------uiio:5i1u.------.-u---i02~'77 u'---'-'---'$i8)54iTjTj;~F~'G"j~':A:''''''
836---Dri~~.pi~~ejB~--(b)-------u-------m--------r-------u--------5i4ir----uu----------47~-8i ---u-----------$8)i2517T~S~ii~G~F~A:....--
~~~~~~i~~~~:~i~f:I:~;~~t~~;~~itt!~y~~~~:::
841 New Car Sales ! 40.19~ 37.38 $6,743\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
844 Gasoline / Service Station ~! .
~;~&~~~~~;~~~)I~~.~~FS.~;~~9.~~F~;~:~;:-:=::::
(With Convenience Market) ~ 55.64: 51.75 $9,335~ /V.F.P.
..._.............__......__n_n......_____..........__n.._n....._____.._.__..__.....______....._.___....._____......___--.....-.......----1--.--..-.---...--......-......--.--_....__u..__._.........___........____n._.____..__.._n____u._.._n.....n
846 Gasoline / Service Station :! :
~i~~~~=~~~!~~~=~~~~L~~:~L:~;i~=~illHf:lfg~:=:
850 Supermarket ~ 74.51! 69.29 $12,500\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
851 Convenience Market (24 hour): 221.371 205.87 $37,140! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
:~~~::::~~~y.:~::M~!~~!:W~!h::f~~Lr~~p::-:J::::::-::::::-5~~~i~L::::::::::::::i~i~?:::::::::::::jii;.~~J:iy~f~P.~:::::::::::::::::::::::
860 Wholesale Market ~ 7.21\ 6.71 $1,210j IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
f
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
31
as of 10/29/99
J
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 3 oj 5
____________uu___01.____ i (2) i (3) (4) i (5)
m::mj{t~~!~e;~~~l~~~tt~~tm:m::.::.-
ITE LAND USE CODE/ CATEGORY! Tri..ns ! 2%. $437.54 1 Unit
:~QMM:~~~XA~j$.~~yX~~$:i~rii~L:::t::--:--:-::-::::::::::::-:::::::r--:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::
820 Shoppin~ Center ! 29.27j 1.46 $640: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~~~u.F~_~~9_!Y_Q.ll:~~~~__~~~t~_!____________u_u______1_______---u---J~~-H:L-------.-------9..:~.L.________.________$.~?z:j.lI:~.:f..:G.:f:A:.______
-~~LQ.ll:~~__R~~_t~~~~_t(~~~~__~__~~~J.__.L______.___)J4:_?QL_____________._____?_:?~_ -----..-------.~.?L?.Q?UI:~.:f:G.:f:A:__._.__
832 Hi~h Turnover, Sit-Down 1: ~
Restaurant j 58.07j 2.90 $1,270j /T .s.F.G.F.A.
..........un__...u..............._____nu........nn................__.....__.u_..__.___.........__y......__..................nn___:_.__...........____n......_nn__u_....__._n......n_.__.......-t__nnn.............................__....
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) j 159.49: 7.97 $3,4891 /T .s.F.G.F.A.
......_n_.._n_u_nu......_...___nnnn............__n_____.........n_____n__n_..___....__n..__A.............__.........._n_....................__._n......_n_uu..._n_n_.......___.........-.-t---------.......--n......_.___..__~.._.___
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) 1 110.51~ 5.53 $2,4181/T.s.F.G.F.A.
.uu_u...___.........~u.._.u..._.....~~.........u___n.__...._....un...u__....._.._....._.u...__..............__.....................;...h._.n....._....._._.n.__.__.....__......._~__.n.......__un.__........._n.___.........___........u.___
-~---P~.~gJ~t~.~D;~~~:j~t__.._.._________________..J____....__________?!A!L----------....-----?:?? ----..-------..~J.!.!~U.I:~.:f~Q:f~:..u.._
837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop j 30.071 1.50 $658~ /Service Stall
840 Automobile Service Center (b) ~ 42.98: 2.15 $940: /T.S.F.G.L.A.
..........._.._nnnnnn......~.._n~nnnn._.....~.....____....h._._.._.....h.........__........_............._.....__..~........un.:........-...---....--..---..--..._nn_.........n.__.......n___......~....uu_n___........______............
841 New Car Sales ~ 40.19: 2.01 $879: /T.s.F.G.F.A.
..___...........__n_____.__.........n..___...._....~..~..__...__.u......_......_........ ..-.........-t-......---n.... ............_...u~............n-.---.......--..... ~.............-..-......~.....n.-t..~........._................_...........__..
844 Gasoline / Service Station ~: :
(no Market or Car Wash) ~ 57.621 2.88 $1,2601/V.F.P.
--.............._n_n....._......n__..__.....~....n..__.n__......h.__.nnn..........._.........n.....__......._..........unnnuf.....-......--.--........n..........n__~.....n._n__..............n.......u...__n..........._.............
845 Gasoline / Service Station j ~ :
--------------(With--C~~~~~~~~~--M~~k~t)--------------T----------------..55~-64r----..-------------..:i58 ..------.-....-$i"2i7j7v~F~P~--...-..u.u..----....
_____________.__....._...u____.__......_____________._.._____..________....._______________._______.____~---------------------------....__:--------------.------------....-. ------....____........f......____~.----..u...-.---...-----......._____......
846 Gasoline / Service Station :: :
~:4~~~'~~~~~i~~~~~~~~I--I~:~E~~I~:=~~~HiBiii_=
-~?Q.-..~~.P_~_~~~~~__.......__.________...____________.._._______.___._____L_________.----.?4:.?t....__....u_u____...~.~?~ --..____......u$J_l~Qj.lI~~f..~Q:f:A:.....__
851 Convenience Market (24 hour) ~ 221.371 11.07 $4,843~ /T.s.F.G.F.A.
~-~---G~~.Y=__M~~~~__~!~h_f~_~J_P~_~p______l_______.___.___J~_?_:?~j_____....___________._~=J.~ ---.._______....$.~f.?f?tIY:.F.~.p._:__..u...._________...
860 Wholesale Market 7.211 0.36 $158~ /T.s.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in'the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
37
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) \ (2) j (3) (4): (5)
~m_mtJ~~!~f~~~f~~~l
_P:]_J~NiP.oY?~.o~QP~IGArgG9gX-----:--------.I~p.~--m----J.m----____~~%mm.____ ______.~_J~QAQ_m_.L_________umy~~uuuu___._...
-OFFICE--(~~~ti~~~d)--m-u.m...--.-----..o-------...o------1-.._________m______________u__:__.o_________.___u______u__m -----u----------u--------------1-------------------u.ou---m----.-------
.............................._n..._n__...___....dU............_........____..._....___........__....v..............__u..__....__..........______..............________.........n_n........_......_n...}.......__.......__......n...__..____n__..
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. 290.33: 270.00 $48,709~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
?~~...y:~:.y~~.~_.Qf~~_~____u____u_______._________._._________._______.oL___________J~~=_?:QL-----------.I??-:~?- ____________$.~Jt?~?JlT~_:f_:q:~:A=_____u
750 Office Park : 19.9t 18.57 $3,351~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
-760uuR~~~~~hTD~~~i~-p;:~~i-C~~t~-;-mTummu------i4~i8rm-------u-----.iii9--mm..uuu$2~-379j7T:S:F:G:F:A~...-u
770 Business Park : 22.31\ 20.75 $3,7441 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
ii~i{~~ii~~(:J-=+::-.:=:===:E-.::=-.::-.-.=_::
030 Truck Terminals : 17.23: 16.02 $2,890l /T.S.F.G.F.A.
n....._nh...._.....___....._n_......__.u.__n....._n_u..._______.____.n.__......___........_..........___.._........__.......__...__o(.......__.........__u....................__.............n~n...u.u....__.un..........._..__._.un.u.___
090 Park/Ride With Bus Service \ 6.26~ 5.83 $1.051l /Parking Space
m~:~~~~i~~~==......L.........:&i~Ljt~:j~lft1F~~~
120 General Heavy Industrial \ 2.62: 2.44 $440\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
J.~_J.~~~-~~~~U;~-~-!~mmm----.o----m----mm-m------m-------:-mmmm-um!.~~J?Lm_mm__mlJ~~?. .mmm_..._$..~!.94:?:UI:~_:f=q:~:A=..____.
.!.~____M~~~~~g___m_m________________m___.mm______m_L____.m______m__~=_~L-----mm--------~-:~-!- ________m..__~JL!_~J.UI:~.:f_~9.:~:A=__...._
150 Warehouse 8.67: 8.07 $1,455~ /T.s.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse \ 4.371 4.07 $733~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
........._.............................._......._._.....____.....______.....____........_........_.......J__...._._...._._.....__................__............................................................."........................n...u..n........
170 Utilities (b) : 8.57\ 7.97 $1,438: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, base~ on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. l
Don Ganer &: Associates
33
as of 10/29/99
111"
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
+~:i~iPo~i~"~~IIPo~~"~'!~Hmmm
j Person- ! Trios @ ! Cost @ ----------------------------------------
~~~:=~J<:l~==~~i~~~sl~:r=~.~~~t
201O'=~:B::I;i~ii.i:i~~jJI~:i~IQ:?~L~Z~..i~w;.;g~i:
~l~:~~~~Qi~~;;ZI~~;;J;;;~~~:L=~~L~:~L:J~iz~;i=;::;:t
240 Manufactured Housing (in Park) ~ 7.94j 0.40! $174 / dwellin~ unit
:~~~~~TIQ~~t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::-::::::::t::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::I::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
411 City Park j 2.90j 0.15j $63 / acre
::~~~dj:~rl!i~liij:::I~;~I::~ltL:i~H=p~~ii~:::
420 Marina \ 7.331 0.37: $160 /berth
430 Golf Course ~ 88.46\ 4.42~ $1,935 / hole
}if~tf~~~~;~iI=~~~~EjH~F:d}fH:~~:::=:==-
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee ~ 401.54i 20.08j $8,785 / screen
....__...._n_..____......___....__n............._u........__n...............___..._.__......_.__....._..._.._....._.....__._....______..~__n__..............____n...___......._..._____n......_n_.......n.....___u...........______...._____..____
444 Movie Theater w / matinee ! 279.86: 13.99! $6,122 / screen
!!;?____~~.~!?IYi~.~.~--P..~~~!L~.~!!~ry..(~}.l----.----------~~_?_~J~j_____._____________l?~_?:f?l__.____________$.!?!.~~_ _lI:.~~.~:.G:.f.:A~____..
~.Q__.~~.~~~~~~.I..Th~.~~..~.~-~.------..-----.....-l...-.-..._____.J~:?~.l------....------...-.-f?:-~Jl---.....-------$.~!.Q?!? I~q~..._____.....___......__...
491 Tennis Courts ~ 56.65~ 2.83: $1,239 / court
~~~=~~::I~;~1:1~\:ti111~r::::
495 Recreational Community Center ~ 56.63\ 2.83: $1,239 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
35
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
__________u.__________________u________________________n____________________._m______u____m_.1..._...b~~g!~.____.~.P.~4~~~~~~LP.~.4.~.~~.~.~l ....................n.....................
_____.______n_m___________n___n____n___________________n___n________umm____n______n___mL_A~.j~~_t~.4____L_______~t~~~~----uL----J~i~~~~--n-- n__......._____._.__..._________..........
\ Person- : Trips @ \ Cost @
==~!>~~~~Ill="r."=~~i~!"il'!'+~i=!'~ ___.__u____m_PP.:!t_nu_._______
_._ n_ _ h .... ......n. .n. n_n _._ _ .unu..
. . .
RESIDENTIAL . . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. .
~:!*~!~~~~i~;~?~)tJ~:~l~~~~j-~ ____.............n.____.._...........n...
I~~~~g_~t
I~~~~.g,_~.t
230 Residential Condo/Townhouse : 9.671 0.48: $212 jA~~~g..~t
.............._u.uu_n....__nu...ou_n__............__......_n_un...........................u_n.............................n...+__.............n.....__...n......__........................_un_
240 Manufactured Housing (in Park) : 7.94~ 0.40: $174 / dwelling unit
. . . ....................................u.....
:~~~~~jjQNA:~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:::::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....-..--......------------..---------.....
411 City Park ~ 2.901 0.15! $63 / acre
~l7..__.~~!Y_J~~!~_...m____._..__m_______...m_____n__.______________L_______._._______._.4:_!.~1____.....____._____...Q_~7.J_l_m______m_____...J!2J _.l.~_q.f!;._____.__..._...._mm....
~l~._..~pg!~~_~LRY.r.~.!~Jp.)___..________...__L..._______._______.?A~l---m-----...-------.Q-~~?l.------------.-----l!.~.~. .L~~p._~!!~__.___.......
420 Marina ~ 7.33j 0.37! $160 / berth
. .
430 Golf Course i 88.46: 4.42i $1,935 Lh~Jf!;__._.._______m_...___m_
........................................nnn........................_u...._._._.._..._____...u...__._.~.....u......_..____.........n..:_._u.....................___....{-..................__.__......nn
~~~~l~~~~i~g~~~!Y+~~~~LiH~t:~~ .l_!~.~___mm..__..m____......_.
/facili!y
.__.u............. __....uuu........__
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee: 401.541 20.08\ $8,785 L~.q~~~____.__________.._.__
...._nn............._u_.__u..n_........__u_n.....................___..u..............................-.....................-....un.........................n........................._n__n....n_n_
444 Movie Theater w/matinee : 279.861 13.99: $6,122 / screen
!!~____~~.~~lYi4_f!;_~..P._~~.~.!L~_~~~ry__{~J.L___.mm__..7._~_?.:.!~.L..______________J?:_?~Lmm--------~?!.~~ _IT:?.:.f..:_G...F._:A:._m.
~Q.__~~.~~~~~_UTh~.~~._p._~!'~m...._______....._L_.__.....__J.~.~:7.?.lm_m....______m..~:.~nl........mm_~~!.Q7.? .!._~q~.....__m_......_._......_
491 Tennis Courts : 56.65~ 2.83: $1,239 / court
4?7...__~~~q~~~__G~~p.____.m________.____m__..___mmn.m_m_mm.L_____.________.?~:_?~L----m------------~-~?.Q.L-------------$Ji?J.~ _L~~~~_____m_______.__m....
_4?4..J~~~_~g_.A!1~y.m__________..__________..__________n_m_______mLm______________~Q:_~~L_______._________}_:~.l_______________~!_!_~_~J _.!.J~_f!;m__._._____m___..._.____
495 Recreational Community Center ~ 56.631 2.83! $1,239 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
35
as of 10/29/99
1'1'1""
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) i W ! ~ (4) : (5)
--::::_-.:-:::-_:::::::_::::-::-::::::::-::::_:::-:::::::::::--:--:::::::::::-::::::::::::-::-::::::::::T:-:::~~~g~h:::::r:::::::M:~~~!:::::::: ....................__...........)..............__...........__ou............
~~~t-:--
1 Adjusted! Vehicle
______________________________._______________h______h_h________h______________h---------mh----!-------p~~.~~~h-hrhhT~i~.@------
...___..............._...................._____......____......._______........._____.____.......____.____:.....___........_____......___...-1......_________ _.........-------
-=::~=-_-~~~:-_~~~~-I.:~~~=~~_-__::T-_:__-:__-:~~~.~---:::::ht_h:_h_-::-~_~_~_-_-:--::-::: =!~'~l~~t
OFFICE (continued) : i
7ji---St~t~hM~t~~hV~hi~i~~--6~-pt:.h-h-----------T----h-----m29li33r--hhhh----270jjO .....u.__..........__....___u__.~.._..................-u_______.._.._._..u
$48,709! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~~~~~i~k:~~~J~~;~tlJI~~~t h__________$.?J.{Z4?1.lI:$._:f_:Q:f:A:..._.h
hh_____.._..J~I?_?.!.t.!.I:$..:f.:Q:f:A:__.__..
760 Research/Development Center \ 14.18~ 13.19 $2,379j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
770 Business Park 1 22.31l 20.75 $3,7441/T.S.F.G.F.A.
i~~fft~~~~i=]~::=J:==~~ ~===~I~~~:=====~:=
030 Truck Terminals ! 17.231 16.02 ....__.._______$.J..I~~.QUI:~.:f.:G_:~:A:___....
n___uuu.__u_____n..............__........__n__........n__........u.__..._...............___......:...__.......__....__.nn___.....~......nn..._..___...__.__n__...
090 Park I Ride With Bus Service j 6.26: 5.83 $1,051 j / Parkine: Space
m:~:~im~~~~~==j:&i~L:d:~ ____h________._...h$.~llr~~lt~p_~~.~
$2,0451 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
nu__nnn......nu.___.....-}......______..........._.______._.__.......
120 General Heavy Industrial j 2.62l 2.44 $4401 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
J~_J!!~_~_~~_~U~.~~~_hhh___h______h____________h___h_m________:h______h_______)?:J?L_______________l.!.:~~ ______________..$.?A~!?:j.lT:$..:f.:Q:~:A:_.m_.
J~.___M~~~~~g_________mh____mh___________mhhhh_____j_h______hhh____.._~~_~Lh---h--h---h---?:?.!. ___________....$.Jl.!.?J.1.II~.:~_:Q:~:A:_....._
150 Warehouse j 8.6t 8.07 $1,455\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse 1 4.371 4.07 $733: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
i70h-Utiliti~~.-(bj------------.-h----------------------------h----------m--T-------------------h8:57[------.---------------7~.97 .....................................__.un_....._...__.......____.__..........
$1.4381 /T .s.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, base~ on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. l
Don Ganer &: Associates
33
as of 10/29/99
~
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 3 oJ 5
________m__u___m_JDu______ : (2) : (3) (4): (5)
IkiJt~~_I~ei~:i~~~~~~~J.F:
: Person- i Trips @ Cost @ :
............__.............................................__.....____.....__..................__..........._.........................__...."'.............__ ....u____......_ __.__...._n_n_U...____............__...__...............------_........".,-
ITE LAND USE CODE/CATEGORY: Tri..m; : 2%. $437.54: Unit
:~QMM~:~GtAtl$~~y!~~$.::(~~~i~L::t::::_:-::::::::::::::___::.::1:-_:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::_:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.-::-::::::::::::::::::::
820 Shopping Center : 29.27\ 1.46 $640\ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
_~~;3._u_F~~~~.ry__Q~~!~t~~~~_~_r:.uu____mu_______u____muL_____u___muJ~:J_1:Luu_______uu_____9..:2L________._uu_u__$.~~?LLI:~_:f.:q:f:A=__.....
_~~l___~~tr)~~~_t~_~!!~_t(~~~u!!_~h!!~L..Lu___________JJ.1:=_?QL________.________u.?_:?~_ u....___u____~.?!.?9._?.U.I:~.:F_:q:f:A=.____..
832 Hie:h Turnover, Sit-Down:! j
Restaurant i 58.07! 2.90 $1,270: IT.S.F.G.F.A.
......__u_....._n_.uu____uo.u...__..._____u_n._u._....._....__.._...__._..._.._.._.__..__u__._.~...n--.-__-_.._..-u_...u____....___..........____u__.....____u.u..........__...........................--.......--...........................
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) \ 159.49: 7.97 $3,489j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
......__........__.n.........u.d.............__....................___.._......__.............._.......1-..................___.__...__..................._.__.............._._..............__..._u.........-t...........................................
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) ! 1l0.51! 5.53 $2,4181/T.S.F.G.F.A.
..--.----..--.........----.....--...-.....----......--........---........----......--........--.................--..........-----.......--..{...............--.--........---.-.........---................--............--...........-...............--.--...
_~___p~Kyt~-~~D~-!!!uQ?)-u-----u-u----------------.Lu-----------.u-~!At.--------_.___________~.:~? _____.__u_____~Jl.!:??.UI:~.:f.:Q:f~A:__.....
837 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop ~ 30.0t 1.50 $658~ I Service Stall
840 Automobile Service Center (b)! 42.98: 2.15 $9401/T.S.F.G.L.A.
.....__....._____.....____....__.____......_.____..___......._____........__....__.....__.._...................._...._......___......__.....~...__.........--..__...-.u-----.........----.n.nn.h..--------......_....._..........___...........____.....
841 New Car Sales : 40.191 2.01 $879[ /T .s.F.G.F.A.
.......__....__.........._u......___..._..__................._____......___.un...__................._+......._.........................:.._____....uu............___.u.nu.......____.__.........___..-t.......-.......--.---............--........
844 Gasoline I Service Station \ i !
(no Market or Car Wash) : 57.62\ 2.88 $I,260l/V.F.P.
........__.......__.......___..........__........_n.....______.......____....._.__.............._..........................__.__.......--..01...----.-........--.......-..----...--.........--..........-...........__............uuu..............___._..
845 Gasoline / Service Station \ j 1
u..----------(With-.C~~~-~-ci~~~~--M~~k~t)----------u---ruu-------------55~64r.--------u..-----2:78- --------.---.--$i2i717v:F:p~....-----..--------....
______..______.u..____....._____......______.....______..uu______._.._______.__uu______________u___y____uu__________________.._____,___...u___u_____u..___......u ___u___......_._____.f.._.____..y..______...._____......______....._____....
846 Gasoline I Service Station :! i
~J~~~~~~~k.~!~n.~~i.~~~r1~:~l:li~~~~j1flf~~.=
_~Q.___?~P.~.~~~~~___...._u____..._________________..._________u_uu.__L._.__u_____.._]1::_?!_L______.._______....~_:?~. _____________..~Jl~~9.j.lI&:f_~q:f:A:_m..
851 Convenience Market (24 hour)! 221.371 11.07 $4,843~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~?_;?.__~~_~y:__M~~~~._~~~h_f~_~J._~~_~p..____l_._________.___J~:?::?~.l_._..._________..__.__~:J.1:u____.._.......~;3.!.~11LY:.~:-y:.-....--........---...
860 Wholesale Market : 7.21\ 0.36 $158! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in:the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
37
as of 10/29/99
Tn"
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
j Length ! Motor Motor 1
::::::-:::-:--::::----:::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::-::::::-::-:--::::::::._:::-::::--:--::::::::-_::-:r:::A4J~~i~4:--:C::::Y~hi:~A~::::::-::-:::Y~N~t:~:::::T:::-::_::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::
j Person- ! Trios @ Cost @ j
==~l>~=~~I~i\==~~J~~~S!90~~~!80g.'~I~~1
COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) ! 1 !
~:~:::~:~:~~r.~~~:~~~i.::__:::::::::::_____::_:::::::r:::_::__:_::::j~;i~I::__:__:::::::::::_i~;:~t::::::::::::::::~:~~i:Zf~~;~;:~~~~~;::::::
-~~-L.~~~~--~~~-t~-~~~-~-{~~:~~oo~.~h~~LooL._mm_mooU_1:~_?QLmmoo_.JQ~_:1:2_ moo-oo-__.$.!_?!.?.!gjII:~.:;f._:9.:f:A~.......
-~~?oo._ffigh_I~~y~!l.~~t~J?g~~m_oo_o.m_m_mLmoooo__o..__mm_m_mmL-oo.o.m_m__oooooo____.moo_ooooo.__moomm.____.___m_1..oom_.______..m........_.._............
Restaurant 1 58.0?! 54.00 $9,7421/T.S.F.G.F.A.
~~~--.f~~.~.J.~~__~~~_t.(N~__p~y.~~~2..__1-----oo-------..!?_?_:1:2j_oo___._._...__.~_~~.;g ----......---$.~~,Z~~1II:$.~.f.:.9:.f.~.A:_.....
~o..f~~!--f.-~~._~~~_~_.Q?~.Y~::~)__mm_mo.Lo.__mm_mPQ_:~}L____mmm.!g~~ZZ o.oomoom_$.!~,~}iII:.~~_f.:.9:.f.:_A:__....
836 Drinkine: Place/Bar (b) 1 51.41! 47.81 $8,6251/T.S.F.G.F.A.
.~Z...~.~~--~~~.rt.~t~Q-~_.Y~N_~~_~hgp.oo__Joomoomoooooo_}Q~.QZLmmoooo_______?Z:2~_ moo_oo_..m_$.?!..~1.L~~!:Y.!~~.~!!ill:_..._.
840 Automobile Service Center (b)! 42.981 39.97 $7,211lfT.S.F.G.L.A.
-84iooN;;.c;:-S~~~.--........moo-oooo.----oom-m.-.--.---m-m-~oomm-oo--.oom4o~i9ro.-moooooom37j8-...-..-mm.--$6~743]7T~Sj~;~G~F~A~......
844 Gasoline/Service Station ! 1 .
___u___u.uu.....uu.._______n.___...............nn_._____uu_u..___------..-....--..--.--.-----......---...-----..............................................---------..-..-----.-...........----......_-I-_______u...ou_________..........______._.
(no Market or Car Wash) 1 57.621 53.58 $9,6661/V.F.P.
_~~:_-_-_G~~:~fuj_~l.~~_~j~~-_-~!~!j~.~-_-_-_-_-_._-_-_-_-_--_oo--_oo--_-_-_-_-_r-_-_-_._-oo--_--_-_-_oo_-_oo_-_-_-_---------------------1.--:----..-----00--00--00-_-_-_._-_._-_-.-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ._-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-.-_-_-.-_-_-_._._._-_-_._-_-_-_-_-_-_-_..._.:_1_-_-::::::_._._._._._._._._._._-_._._-:_-_.::_.....:..:_._._..._..._._.:_
(With Convenience Market) i 55.641 51.75 $9,335! /V.F.P.
...-.---.............................................................-....n................._________..............________._..............OC..........----..-.............-_...........h...................................................................
846 Gasoline / Service Station 1! 1
(W /Conv. Market and Car Wash) 52.241 48.59 $8,7651/V.F.P.
~:::f~~::~!9.:i~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::~~;~~r:::::::::::::::::~{?? ::::::::::::::::$.1;'1Z~I:ZI~~~:f.~:G~f.~A;::::::
850 Supermarket 1 74.51j 69.29 $12,500! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
851 Convenience Market (24 hour)! 221.371 205.87 $37,140! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.................nn.....................n.....................n......................__..............................._..._...00........'1..............._................n................nu_............................................__00__.......
-~?~m-~~P:y.:-..M~~~~~__Wtth__~~~U:'~~P_o.o.__Lm___mmJ~~~Z~Lmm__mJ?.!.}Z .__m__m_$._:?-Z!.~9~jIY:f._~r.:__moom_moooooo._.
860 Wholesale Market : 7.21 i 6.71 $1.210: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
31
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.5
PEDESTRIAN!BICYCLE COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) (2) . (3) (4) (5)
: Length : Pedestrian/ Pedestrian/:
_:::-:-:::::::::-_::__:::::--::-:-::_:::--::-:_::_:::::---_-::-:_-_---:::_____-:_-::___::___:::::_:::I-.A4i~~i~4::::!-------:~~~:~1.~-::::: ::::::-:~~~~~:::..T::::::::::::::::::-::.-:.::::::-::::::::::
: Person- : Trips @ Cost @ i
=:~=~~lO~~~~{~~==~xl~~~t~:::=:~r:~~t
OFFICE (continued) ~! ~
l!g~;:~~~;~:~i;J~itlrTi~~~~'~lj~tli~~:-
770 Business Park : 22.3t 1.12 $488!1T.S.F.G.F.A.
. .
. .
PORT/iNDUSTRiAL.-----------mh_-------m_h----m----rm--------_----------m----r------mh_________________._..________________________________:_m__________________hhm______mm__
...._.........Puu...____n........___n................................................_........___....A....__........_.........._..___...._n__.__________.........__......__n....................._u_u__-t_n..._.____u_u_u_____.....____..__...-.
030 Truck Terminals ~ 17.23j 0.86 $377i /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~~~~lk::Wrk.;rkl~ilj:~~L:~:fL=~t~12~~~:~
110 General Lieht Industrial : 12.19: 0.61 $2671/T.S.F.G.F.A.
. .
!:!!r~1~~~~~ltlt:~l~;~~~~~J~ti1::
150 Warehouse \ 8.67! 0.43 $190\ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
....u..........._..............__.______.................._..............._............__........._..................-.....................01..........................................................--........................--..__n........__..........
151 Mini-Warehouse i 4.37: 0.22 $96~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
. .
170 Utilities (b) 8.5i 0.43 $187l IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
-
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the \TE Trip Generation
manuaL the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. -
Don Ganer &: Associates
39
as of 10/29/99
r
..
TABLE 4.4
MOTOR VEHICLE COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
: Length ! Motor : Motor
::--::-:--:--::::::::::::::::--::::::::::::::::::::-::-:_-:::-:-::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:--:::::::r::A4J:~~!~~'::r:::::Y~Nsj~:::::I":::Y~N~~~::::::--::--:::-:--::_:::::-:::::::::-::.:::::::
: Person- : Trips @ : Cost @
~=~~~~/====X....IT.!ij?S....!m90~%......rm~lo~'~...... .......~~t......_......
;!!~i~~~~~=:s~:t~u~I:::~!:~!:lti~~~:~~t
240 Manufactured Housin~ (in Park) ~ 7.94i 7.38~ $1,332 / dwellin~ unit
:~~_~~~TIQN:~t.:::::.::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::
411 City Park ~ 2.90~ 2.70~ $487 / acre -
~1.~::::~~~~4:ZgY::r~i.~:Q?>.::::::::::::::::::I::::::::::::::::::::::t:~1~1:::::::::::::::::::::~~~I:i::::::::::::::::$.~i~~::1.:~p.::~!~~:::::::::::::
420 Marina ~ 7.331 6.811 $1,229 /berth
430 Golf Course ~ 88.461 82.261 $14841 /hole
~~~~~i:i~~t_~:~I:::~;~~E-i~:~r-~g~~:~~~:
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee ~ 401.54: 373.43~ $67,368 / screen
'.n~.__......n'".'U'___'.n___._______________._____..__.._.__.........n________._..............___n._nn_____.___n.........uu....+..........................___.___.............._____.......nn._____....................__________....._______
444 Movie Theater w / matinee : 279.86: 260.27~ $46,952 / screen
1?~..__~~t~~IY~~_~_~np._~~~.~L~~~~ry__~!?lL___________n~1~~J?L__n________n~~Z~.~~L___nnn..~J'_l~? .!T~~=.!~~_G_~f_~A~___.n
480 Amusement/Theme Park 1 138.28~ 128.601 $23 199 / acre
....._......___...___...._____________._......______.____.._..n...._n..______n.._n..nn.._______nn.._______nn_n_n_.................n..___________n.n.......n___~______....._.___.._._'__.............._....._....n__._....._.___.._..___...
491 Tennis Courts : 56.651 52.69~ $9,505 / court
_~2~____~~~q~~Lg~_~n...___..________n______n___n..__.__..______...____L.______nn_n___Z;?~-~~L-----------n----~-:~QL___.....___~J~_A.!J.I~~~~_____n___n_nn.____...
_~2~n.~.~~gJ~JJ~y......._____n_n_._.......n____n___._...n......___L..._......______~Q~_~;?L..n_________nn~:?~L_...____n~.!.Q!.?Q? jJ~.~..........._._.n___..___...
495 Recreational Community Center 1 56.63~ 52.66: $9,501 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
29
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4)
! Length ! :
:::_-:_::-:::::-:::::::_:::::::::-:::::_:::.:::::::::::::::-:::::-::-::::::::_-::-:::::::::::::::::::::::1::::A4J:~~t.~4:J:::::::Ii~~~!::-:_t::-::ti~~~(_::_:--::-_::_-:--:-:--:::::-:----::::.-:.:::-
~ Person- : Trips @ : Cost @ -
==~s==~~'s-:A==~Y.I~~Po'I=I=='~~~1
RESIDENTIAL : i ~
;~~il~ti~~:~::~:~l-{.i:HI:it~t:!U!;:!I~I
240 Manufactured Housinl!; (in Park) ~ 7.94: 0.16: $49 / dwelling unit
(5)
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . .
...n._nn..U......................u.................................un.................__......__...;.......__.........................:.................................{............................................--...........--..................
_~~~~_!.\TIQ;NA1_.____n____n_________n____________________________L____._n__________.__n___.___L._____________nn_________.___!..._nnnn________________n__n ------- -- -. --.--
411 City Park : 2.90j 0.06: $18 / ~~~ - n_n_______________
~~:~~ii.i:ijiy~~~~Q;):lt~~l:::=~~~I::~~~i;';p~;i~:=
420 Marina j 7.33~ 0.15\ $45 Iberth
430 Golf Course : 88.46j 1.77~ $546 / hole
~~~ty~~~~::~~iE:~;~~Ft~I~l~3=~~:
443 Movie Theater w / out matinee j 401.54~ 8.03: $2,477 / screen
_u..._u.......__nn..........._..._n_nnn.............__............__n__.........n_.....................__..___........__........~.-..-......-............-..nn__~....__......__......-.u__n._......._..n.n._......_._....n...............
444 Movie Theater w / matinee ~ 279.86~ 5.60j $1,726 / screen
1Z.~____~~J~~.lY~4.~.~__r_~~~_!/_!:-_~~~rynQ?)1____.__________?1?~J_?.~__.___._______________4::5~QL_____________$..!,~~1?_/T~~:_f.:.q-,_f_~A~____n
480 Amusement/Theme Park ~ 138.28l 2.771 $853 / acre
.n_n.........__n.........u..u..._.____n_n......__..._un......._n.n._n..........nn...___nn~....n.n........-u----n....-.-:.__n.nn.__.......___...n_n._ot....nnun...._..n_n.__.........u__........._.____.__._....._......nn
491 Tennis Courts : 56.65~ 1.13i $349 I court
~~~~~~:I~~~L::l:~i~~~~
495 Recreational Community Center: 56.631 1.13~ $349 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
l
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer & Associates
41
as of 10/29/99
~
'"'
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS
page 5 of 5
_uuu_________uuuuu__________uuuu_u.JU____u____u u----u-uuu________u__u.___Luu_uuJ?Lu__u___L_u_________(;?Lu___u_.. ------u----u~~L_.....u_L..---u__---u.J?L.........___...
: Net : Length :
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_U"_-_-_-_-_n__-_-__-_-u-_u_-_-_-.--_-_u_-_--_-_u-u-_-u-u-_-_-u-_-_-.-_u_--_-_u-_--_-_-_-.-.n._-_-_--_-_"_--u.-n-_--_-__--_-"r"__--_-_-_------N~~_-_-_--_-_--_-_I-.-.---------------trip_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ----.---.Ai(I~~~~4_-_-_J_-_-_-.-_--_-_-_-_-_-_-__--_-_-_-_-_--_-_-_-_-_-_-.-_-_-u-_-_-.-.-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-.
1 Person- : Length Person-:
. un....... __.n.u..... ....h -- - _..n......... -.. hO. h.. -- -. -. -.. hO. -- - - - - -..... --. --....... h. __.....:........ _. on. _ ..... On "._ _ __. n. -:... U"onn. ..... ._ un....u "...... ......n .......... ...... h:.U. _. __. _U.. h.. ......... h. _....... ....n
-DJ;;-.~ANP-.y~!;:u~QP!;:IGAmGQ~X_n__:_____n._I~p.~___n____;.--u_u_!'_(l_~_t<?~_______ u-n--uT~P~_u___u_.u.n_u_n_nJ)~_t___uu.u__u_
-oFFjc)i(~~~ti~~~d)-----u-.---n.- --------n___n--n-_.--u.nr-n-nu--_n_-________.n_n_n:n____U__U_n_n_____U_U_n__ --unnn-u-u-n_------u-uur-u--____n____u____uu__n_uu..____
_____.....nn_un...___.........___....__............__......_____........-------....__._____........._.1............_____.........-----............_______.........___........_____.........--.--..............-lo..._n..__u.......____.......__....._n___
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. : 273.931 1.06 290.33: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
?~~---y~.~~__P<?~.~..Q!~~_~uu___n_uuu_u________u_______uu_________:u_____un_____1?~~_?JL___nn_n_________J:~_ --------u----J~?:_?gjIT:?_:f_:G_:.f:A:___....
750 Office Park : 18.84: 1.06 19.97: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
-760-.uR~~~~~hiD~~~1~-p~~~.tUC~~-t~~---u!u-u---u---------ii38r---.n.n--------uui(j6- u------uu.-..---i4i8]1T:sji~G~F~A~.--.--.
770 Business Park : 21.05~ 1.06 22.31: /T.S.F.G.F.A.
i~thi~Q~~~::-:Im::=J:_-_::_=-::E~_:-~~_:--=:
030 Truck Terminals : 16.25: 1.06 17.23! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.._.___.._____............______................n_______..................--............____......._.._.._..__.__....______...n-----u....c-_____.__.....___._n__u.._n..u....._n_n_n___...._________...._____....._______..______._........____.....
090 Park/Ride With Bus Service j 7.42: 0.84 6.26j /Parking Space
m~::~~:&;~~~~=..........I............it:~~IJ~~:..ii:0I1f~@i=
120 General Heavy Industrial : 2.48: 1.06 2.6t /T .s.F.G.F.A.
.!~mJ~4~_~~~tp._~~__.nn_____uun._________.___.n.____u__n:n.____________._J!A~j-n.--------uuu__J.~~_ -----------u____J?)ZLI.T~?_:~_~G:.f:A~__.....
.!~...-M~~~~~K____u_u___n___uuu______u______nu_uL______u__________~}QL----___n_________J:~_ ---u.u-________uu.~:_~UT:?_:~_~G:.f:A:_...._.
150 Warehouse j 8.18: 1.06 8.67! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse : 4.12: 1.06 4.37l /T.S.F.G.F.A.
u_n_.........n___._....._________......_..__..........__...__..--........-....---__......_______..._..-:-....___________.__.....__.._____._............_____.__....__.....___......__.____........_..__..........__....__....__...........u............._
170 Utilities (b) : 8.09! 1.06 8.571 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F:A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in theJTE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate,basec:\on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. _' .
Don Ganer & Associates
27
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
_n____nn__u____n_m__..n_n_n_n_______n_O)n_n__..____n_n_n__n_m_..n_n_..__m.n.\_nnn.....n(~L_n___.._1_-n-mnn.-(~Lmnm_. _um_nm--<~}_n_n____uL-h.---h-h-nn(?)--nh-----.--hn
: Length : .
__h_______n________..n__nn_.u._..h_n____.___ .---n----------.h-n------.m-nn---h-n-n---r-nAdj~st~dn-r..hhT~~~it-U---- --n-nT~~~iiu.u-r----h------h-h-----h-n-m-mn-m--
ij~~!illPv~~Q:>Q~ii::ATI;GQ~XtP.f~;;-:I~~~~:~Ij.i.;;i
.(ijMMERCiAijSERViCESh(~o~tjh-ml-n-.-n-m-u-hnm--m-hnrmu_mhnn_mmu____m nmmm_._.._mmmn..h-j--n_nnmm_mm.nmm______...n_.
...n.......nn..........n_...........__.............._u__..........___..........._.___......_______u...___........_________......._____"..............__.__..............._________........______.............._________.__......_nO...................
820 Shoppin~ Center j 29.27\ 0.59 $181j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
823 Factory: Outlet Center j 18.14j 0.36 $112j /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~~L:~~I~::f{~~!~~~~i:(riQf.:~::~h~:~)::I:::::::::::::::i:j{~Q[:::::::::::::::::::?~:?~:::::::::::::::::::::$.?Q~r:ZI:~~~:~~:G:~~~A;::::::
832 Hi~h Turnover, Sit-Down ~ i i
n_____n.m.B~~_~_~~~_~__________m_mm_nmmm.___.nm.__..mnm..nnn:....n__mn_nm?~~.Q?L__.._.nmmm.J:1~_ mnm....._.._m$.?.~.LI..I~?_:;f._:G_~;f~A:__..___
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) j 159.49: 3.19 $984!1T.s.F.G.F.A.
.....___.........u..........n_n_.u....u.._....___....................__.....___...........__.........._____........__.___.........u._.t-__................._....._u_u....._.._.__...............u.......u_uuun_..___n..__.................nn
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) i 110.51! 2.21 $682!1T.S.F.G.F.A.
m:aii:ii~~~~tj;~~t::~;!:-:miiiJ;~~-
841 New Car Sales ~ 40.19~ 0.80 $248~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
_._........n._u_n......n__.u____.._._...n.._un_..._.._...u.....nn_nn.....____.......____......_._.........____.___......__.....-Cu......__.._.......__............___........_..__..n.....................___nu............___._......n.u._
844 Gasoline/Service Station ! i \
_..__nmm_(I}_~_M~~~_t~_r:__~!.~_~~hL__m__wm____n~__u_m___m_m??A_?_l___uu____mmmJ~.!_? nnu__h__nmn._$.~??lly~_I.'~.r_:__mw___nmnm.
~.?__nG.~~~H~~L~~~~~~__~~~~~_~w__mm_m_nnmLmmw_m_u__________mLmnn______m____nmmn__nmn_mnn__wn.m___u__L-nmmu_________mm_____nn_nn_.
(With Convenience Market) l 55.64j 1.11 $343~ /V.F.P.
846 Gasoline / Service Station l ~
::::::::::::::(WZ~~~y.~::M~:~~~i~~4.:~::W~~hr:::::::::::_:::::~?~_?~r:::::::::::::::::::::iQi::::::::::::::::::::$.i?iJ:Zy~f~f:::::::::::::::::::::::
848 Tire Store j 26.66\ 0.53 $164~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~?Q.n?_~P~~~!~~~n_m__n_n_m_.__mmnm__mm____mmn__nL..mmm-n.?4~?J.L..w___.__m__nmJ~4?mnm......_m___~QlI!:_~~_I.'~.G:.I.':_A.~...on
851 Convenience Market (24 hour) I 221.37~ 4.43 $1,366~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~~~:::_G~~y._:::_M_~~h~_~::W_~_~.h-_F~~(_P.~P::::_-:_L_-_-:_n::::::-5~?;~_t.~L::::::::-:::::::j.~~~. -:::::::::::::::$j;.Q94Tiy.~f.j\::::::::::::::::::_-:::.
860 Wholesale Market i 7.21\ 0.14 $44l1T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
f
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer & Associates
43
as of 10/29/99
..-
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON- ffiIPS
page 3 of 5
_______________________________._____________..._.01._________________________.._.......____._......i._._____m..{~L____._____l----....-..j~L.-----h-- -._.m._____.(~L.........J_h_...._..____j?L__________h...
____..________________.___________._.____.__.__.___________________h___.hh___.h__h____________m_.L__________N~J_h_____hl________hhh____h_____________ ______J~~~g(h_____J____._______h___._____.__.___________hh
: New ! Trip Adjusted !
! Person- ! Length Person-:
ii.it.ANP:y~~::~QP~Z~A~:GQRX::::r:::::::Trlp~-:::-::::t::::::::f~~!~:i:::::::::::::::::trlp~::::::::I:::::::--:.:::y~~::::._:::::::::
:: :
'. .
'. .
'. .
-COMMERCiAijSEi{vjCES--(~~tj---h-!---.h-.-..-.------h.-----------r---_______________________h__.h -.---h.----h----------.--.-----r--------..-.------..-------m--------....
.......---..........................................--.--.....---........--......----........------.--.._..__._....._........__.....___.....-c...........___h....._....u...._...__...____..u_n......._______....._._.____..._.___._......____.............
820 Shoppin~ Center j 34.70\ 0.84 29.27: IT .s.F.G.F.A.
823 FactolV Outlet Center j 21.50j 0.84 18.14! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~~L:~~~~::g~~!~~~~ii~~~:~::~h~:fu):::I::::::::::::::i.:!{~~r::::::::::::::::::j~:QQ:::::::::::::::jj~:~~QI:I:t.:~$.~:~~:g~~~~;::::::
832 High Turnover, Sit-Down j j :
h_______.__hg~~.~~!~~_L___h____m...__________mhh________m__h___.hm....L.________.___)J.~J~Lm--h----mm..Q-:?Q ..._______mhm.~:.Q?.Ll.I:~.:~_:9.:f:A~___.h.
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru): 318.98i 0.50 159.49~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
-834h.-F~~tj~~~fR~~t..(Dri~~~~-j-...-.....----Tm--------m22i~02rhm.--mm....O~50 .---mm......iio~5iTiT~sji~G~F~A~...-..
~~l~:~};i~;:ii~h~p::L=:=~~L....:~;~=:~;~I1~~!i~:
840 Automobile Service Center (b) ~ 50.95: 0.84 42.98j IT.S.F.G.L.A.
_____________.._u____u__~...n.n....~.........u...__~u._.__u___unu.u~_n._........_....n..u.._h____u__..._._..__uuu_nu._.<I-__...._u.....................__.____u_uu.u..............n__h...._.n..~.....___n_..__n...........~..
841 New Car Sales ~ 47.64: 0.84 40.19l/T.S.F.G.F.A.
_...._.....n........n~._......n....nn.....n...n........_.._.n..._._..n._..u__________u__.n_~_...._n_u.u....__...nn...nn.+........__.._..____nn_nn_n_nu._.n......_n..nn_n_..__~.........~......__....__u~_.................
844 Gasoline I Service Station 1 \ j
~~:::~~~~~~~ii.~~r;~>:::::::_::::::::::::::J::::::::::::::~~:~~~:l::::::::::::::::::::::~~:~:::::::::::::-::-::==:~=~V::=~-=~:~::::::::::::::::::::::::
(With Convenience Market) : 131.6( 0.42 55.64! IV.F.P.
846 Gasoline I Service Station j j
______....__.._..._....................._........................___..._.._..~............____.____.__..__._____..__..._....__~u.un_.__..iu__.....u._..................._._.._._______...~._.............n.____uu.___._u_u._.u......_u._..un_._
h..____......O:v.lG~~y.~..M~!~.~!..~!!4..~hW~~htm_mm__J?~~_~?.L.mh.________..hQ.:~. mm...._.....__.~~:.?:~L{y_~~.~P~__mm_m.mmh..
848 Tire Store j 31.60j 0.84 26.661/T.s.F.G.F.A.
~.Q_..?_~P~~~~~!_mh.....__..___..._.._.._..._____...m_______m_mL_m_______m_~_~~?L___hmh________hQ:_~ ........_._..._mZ~.~~.L!.:r.~.~~.~~.9~.f.:-A~h...-
851 Convenience Market (24 hour): 523.60j 0.42 221.37! IT .s.F.G.F.A.
_~$.~_-_-_-_G~~y..)~-~~~~~~W{~.h~-f~~f--r~!rip~--.---.j....~~..~~~:.-~....~~_~~{~~t.r~.._.~~..~_.~~_-~_-_-~~~_-_-_-_'9.~~. -----------~--~..~~..~~.I~?~;-!~rly.~~~.r;~~....~_.....~~..~_.~:_.~_.~.......
860 Wholesale Market l 8.55i 0.84 7.21! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
f
Don Ganer & Associates
25
as of 10/29/99
w
TABLE 4.6
TRANSIT COST PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
i Length !
:-:_::__:_-:__:_--:-.:-::::-:::_::::::_:_::_:::_::_::____:_:--:-_:::::_:__:_:-:-:_::::::__::__:_:::-:::::r::::A4J:~~i~~::::l:::::::ti~~~i:_::_:-::::_.I~~~~~_-:.:T_:-::-:__::::::::::::::_-::::.::::--::::::
. Person- ~ Trips @ Cost @ !
==~~E.~~~Il!~==~Yi~~~t~:$='~~r~~t
OFFICE (continued) i \
~~;~~!~~~~~=~:~t.:l:.iii:~tt!!~~~r~l~U~i~g~i~:
?~Q..__R~~~~_~O?~.Y.~~~P~~_J.l~__G~_J.l!.~!_____!__________________.!1:J~L____..______________Q_:~~_ _______________________~?LI.T:?_:~_:G:;f:A:___.___
770 Business Park ~ 22.31! 0.45 $138j IT.S.F.G.F.A.
:~Q:~!li~p!!.~!~IA(:__:____:-:::::--:::_:::::::::::::::::::_::1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:--::::::::-:::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
030 Truck Terminals j 17.23: 0.34 $106~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~I~&~~~~~l:wz~:r~gl~~~lj:~L:i~t~:~:~i~:~
110 General Light Industrial ~ 12.19\ 0.24 $75\ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
:i.~:::fu~i:'~N~~~:.~=~:~:~~:~:-::::::::--:::::.::::i::::::::::-::_::::ii.:jt:[::-::::_-::::::::::~~:i~:::::::::::::::::::::::::'i~i:zi~~~:~~~~~A:::::::
.!~___M~~~~~g__________________________________________________j________________h____~~_~~L___________________Q.J~_ h_____________________$.4}_UI:?_:~_:G:;f:A:__.....
150 Warehouse : 8.67: 0.17 $54~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
..u..........................uu___.................__................_.______..........._.___..............____..........................0(-.................--.--.....................___.__._0____..__..____4......n__..........__.....________u__..__.
151 Mini-Warehouse : 4.3?! 0.09 $27! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
170 Utilities (b) 8.5?! 0.17 $531 IT .s.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, base<\. on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. '
Don Ganer &: Associates
45
as of 10/29/99
1TI"
TABLE 4.3
LENGTH ADJUSTED PERSON-TRIPS
page 1 of 5
_n.n._____n.n_______n.n_._____nn_nn(1)_.n___.___.n.n___.n ________.n __.n._n_'nn._.__n_n(~)_____.nnl________.n.J~L_n._nn.l.--_n_n_n-<1L_n_nn__ nnn_____n______(?L_______________
~ Net: ! Length
n__________n.____n_nn_______._.____n.n__._________.n____________----.n------n-----.----.n--nr-----n---N~~----n.n!n.--------Tri~n----n--!----Xdi~st~~i--- _.__._n_______n___nh.h__h_____________
: Person- ~ Length : Person-
!i!!~i.is.~gJp~igITG9R.YrI,.jp,;rf~~t~]"IIriiijj~i::
_~_~~!P_~.NI!A:~_h._____.__________________._________n___________n_________;____nh_________._________n____-<-____n________________________h_l____________n___________________________________n___.___.__n_____n____...
_~!Q___~.~~!~nf.~y___(~~~nP.~P~~_~L_______________j________n________n_________nnL_______________________________l_n______________________________ _n__nn__n__________________m...._mn
Mfed. Housing not in a Park) l 15.79j 1.001 15.79 I dwelling unit
!!!!~~~~!:~~)jl~:~[l:~I~~~~~~~~:
!!J..__~~!Y...P.~~._____..______m...___m__n____.______n____._______m_n_____L-_n___mm______7._:~_7._L-_________________JJ!ln----n-m--.n--n~-:9.Q.L~q~--._n______________......_
!!.?:....~~~.!YJ~~!~n___...._______...____..._.________...__________.-...---l--.....---------------~:??j-.--...---------------!~.U_L___....___________.~.:!~L~~~___......._____________....
416 Campe;round/RV Park (b) \ 4.95[ 1.50: 7.43 I camp site
~~~~=t~lt~t~;~~:t~r~::===
432 GoH Drivine: Ranee (b) [20.62: 1.11: 22.81 I tee
a:_~;i~~rE~~!~t~Im:lr-l:m:~!i;~==-:-
_~Z~____~_~~~LY.~4_~~._;p~_~~!l~~!!_~_ry___Q?).!________m_.___~!~_?9.L___m__h.________JJJ_l__._____mn__.7._1:?J~ I!:~_:~_:q:f:!\~___n..
480 Amusement/Theme Park j 125.00j 1.11l 138.28 I acre
491 Tennis Courts . 51.22: LIt 56.65 I court
4.?~:::R~~qii~:i:q~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::_::_:I::::::::-:::::::~;~iL::::::::-::::::::::iiiL:_:::::::::::::zj~?~.:J:~~ii~::::::::::::::::::::::::
494 Bowline: Allev 1 54.99: 1.111 60.83 Ilane
495 Recreational Community Center: 37.75: 1.50: 56.63 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
~
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
Don Ganer &: Associates
23
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMPACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 1 of 5
_uum____u_u____u_u_.__u_____ ____uJ1Lmu__ _u_ \ (2) (3) i ___u_HL_________ ______h_J?L__h_hj.:::______u______________(~)u______._hh_U____
m---------h-------u--ru---M~i~~---- b~d~~-tri~~r
_Uh_________h____.___hh____.________.______.____.__.______._____ __._____._____.__.__.h___.__._.l_____Y~N<;J~___u _____}~~<;y.<;~~____Lu-T!~~~~---u _____h_T~~~L___uL--u--------h--UU-------u-------.u-u----u
\ TIP TIP: TIF TIP ~
ITE--LANb-ijSE--CODEiCATIGORY---.-A---.p-~-;-.U~t--- ----p~;UU~t.u~--up~~-U~t--- ---up~~-U~tU~----u.u---u.uuU~t------.u-------u
iiisi6imiAi.h----m--.-------------.--.h---.--.------------.--.------r-------u----.uu--------u- -_._____u__u_____uu_______r___um______u_u.u_____ __u_.uu____u_u_________u.uu__________________h._.UU______u____._u___
~10~~:~~t~~~;Z~t~~~)T:~i,~~~~~j~~~~~~ili~i:~~i:-:
220 Apartment : $1,835 $239j $67 $2,1421/ dwelline:: unit
~~~;~~;~~~~~~~ittt~li~~\~lj1~lz1~~~i:Ii:
RECREATIONAL: .
~!I::G~~::~~~~:::-::.::::::::::::::::-::::____--:_:__:::-:_::_:::-::_:__:---:::r::_::::::::::::::~Z::::::::::_::::::::::~jL::_:::::::::::::i!:~:::::::::::::::::$.~rl~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
412 County Park : $698 $91\ $26 $8151/ acre
~~:~=-n.~I~~~~!ko=)iit~~~{~L~tj~17J~Jn;t=\\~::
1~.Q___G!?JrG_~~_~~u______._.__U_____h___.___u________u___.__.__ _.__.uL.____u_$11iH:.1.. __.___uu__$.!/~~_?ju__________u___$?:%? _____u___$.!z{_~~11Lh!?1~__.__nu________u_uu______.u
1~_?:_uq~~LPrty~~Kg~~g~uQ?L_u___uu_m______n_____L_m____u$~!.~~~_ __nh____u_____$.1~~L__u_________u$.!:1J _u__________$.~~A&~Ll!.~_~u____.u_u_____u________.u____._.
435 Multipurpose Rec Facility : $37,529 $4,894\ $1,380 $43,803l I facility
_~~u__M.~y~~JJ.~_~_~.!~_!_.~L~~~__~~!~~~~_______L_____._~?{~.~~ ________u___~{?~?l..--u----..$?A?? ____...__$Z~A??.iI~_q~~~_____._______________._.____
444 Movie Theater wI matinee \ $46,952 $6 122: $1 726 $54 80ll I screen
________________________...._____________..._...____.____......n___________________u______h_________h_._________..._....________.____ ___________......_.f..___.....~-u--...-----u---l-....u-- _..._...u..._____l._....___........__....._........._._......_____......_......
473 Casino I Video Poker/Lottery (b): $41,125 $5,363~ $1,512 $48,Oooj IT.S.F.G.F.A.
~=f:'~s;:~~f'e~~I'~!ko..L=~~~i~~I:J~l~ij:@H~;j.................
492 Racquet Club : $12,411 $1,618\ $456 $14,4S6l I court
_~?~...~~~_~K_A!l~y_______uu__m.________.___u_u...__n___u______.L___mJl.Q{_~_~ ______h.uu$.l{_~~ll----h--u------.$.~??- _......__$J1l~J~1D_~~___...______.__...___._.......uu
495 Recreational Community Center j $9,501 $1,2391 $349 $l1,089j IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
47
as of 10/29/99
~
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 5 of 5
m:(J.)mmmmimJ~~imi~t:t:(;mm ~~~~t~(62
_ ---- ---- i Vehicle Person- ~ New Person- -- _____h --------- ____h_______
iI.~L.~~~~~~~l~~~~~mr!~~~!~:m!~~:I~~~~m~~!~~m~:~~!:mmm
OFFICE <Continued) : :
un...............__.___........__.__...________.........____ .-... ... ... --- -. ...... ... ___ .......____ _..... ___ ........ ........ ... ...... .. ___ __n "_____._.._........(___uu_..........__ __...u __...... "'____""'_"____'___ ....0____.. ....n......__.....____...............
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. i 166.02 273.93~ 100% 273.93 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
i~~i~~~~=:=.......................................TJ.h:ll~r~~Ll~:~r~~~ B~:~:~~~~~.
760 Researchl Development Center j 8.11 13.38i 100% 13.38 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
770 Business Park 1 12.76 21.051 100% 21.05 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
----------.-.------...----------.....-----------.-.---------------------------.-----------.----------.----j--.------..-..------------.-------.h.------...-----....r----......-----... ------.....----...------..-----..---- --...----....------...-----...-------...---------
......----........___.un_n___n__.__n___..._____........___nu...........--.....----...........uu_:..........n..........._n.....-nn......---u......._+......uu_.....u......uuuu...___u.._u_.....n--...--.-.....__........_n......_.n....n........
-~QJ~Il!_N'.R!!~!~IA.~__________.____________.___________.____---.1------....________.._______ -....________._______....._.1._....._.____...... __......____...____._..._____...___. ....____....____._..______....____....________.._.
030 Truck Terminals : 9.85 16.251 100% 16.25 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
-.---n....__..._.._......_n__......__._n____n.........nn.___.............._.._.n........____...+__._._......___.......___n .......-....._.00...._.._00........__.......__ ..Unn......_.......n............ ..................-................._._......n...
090 Park I Ride With Bus Service : 4.50 7.42~ 100% 7.42 IParkine: Svace
m~:~~~};'.~~~;r:~:ljJi=3t~lj~:::=jt~~fh~lf=~:
120 General Heavy Industrial j 1.50 2.48: 100% 2.48 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
j~~~~~............................................I.....J:~:~:~jj~.....................l~:~H:~i:~:~~;
150 Warehouse i 4.96 8.18~ 100% 8.18 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse i 2.50 4.121 100% 4.12 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
._.....................n__......__....__...._.._....... ... .-.... ... ... -... ... ... '." ..._..... __.. ...... __,. ..........__...._..n._.... .. ...._....._...............-(..............____.. ..._.._..................._......___ ..U....n___.nn_n_._...._...__............_..
170 Utilities (b) i 4.90 8.09~ 100% 8.09 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S:EG.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. -- l
Don Ganer &: Associates
21
as of 10/29/99
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMP ACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 3 of 5
:-...::::::--_H:::-H--::H::::::::::-::-:-~~-~--_:-.....-:_HH...::-:::______:__::_ ::..t::::::M~~~~--:--: ~~4.~~~~~r-_-.-----~~>'-:::__::_: H_:_:_::_:_~~>.___:__:-:::C-:-:--:-:___::::_::~~~:::--:-:::::::_::_:::
: Vehicle Bicycle: Transit Total
TIP TIP TIP TIP.
...._ _._ "OU _.._ _.. n._...... o. _.......... __.._. __ _ __.........._ n_ h_........ _.... ___.... _... n.... __. _ __ {__........... .....0 _.. __ n_ _ __. ...... n. n. ..o..onn.." _ __ _.._. __. ..n.................... . n... ....n............. no. _+ __.. n_ n....... ..onuno..un... ...... .._... n
ITE LAND USE CODE/ CATEGORY : Per Unit Per Unit : Per Unit Per Unit : Unit
. n. n. nonnnn'" _._ .n. _..... _n.......... _... n .._.. ...n _....... __. __. n........ __ on _.... h...... -:-... _ _. __ _ __00_ _............. _ _ . _ _ _.. __ n_ _ __.............. ..~... n. n_ _..... ..0.. ._. _n' n_ h h........_ _"+._' __........~................. .......u__. _0" n. .._nnonn__
:~:QMM~~:~~Atl.$.~~y!:~~:$j~~~~~f:--:I.:::_m_____:::--...::_:.::----:--:--::-::----::--::::r-:------:::---:::::::-:-::::-::-:::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-
820 Shopping Center : $4,911 $640: $181 $5,732~ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
?_?_;?mf~~_!~ry__Q~.~J~_t~_~.~~~~____________m__m___________L__:m_m_$~!:Q4}. _________________$~271________.____.___$.JJ?: ____________.$.~{_~~lLlI~_?~!~G~.~~.A_:..___.._____
?~J..__~.~.~~___R~~~~~~~~J~~_t~__~h~~~J___L________$12,?:lQ_ _______m_.$..?l?Q_?Lm___________.$..?9.? _m_..___~??:{_~l.l..T ~.~.!:G~.~:.A.
832 High Turnover, Sit-Down : . - - - ----..........-
_.___.._______~~~.t~~_~~J.l_~__.__.._______m______________mm_______.________m______....._______J?21:?: __________m$.lt?:?QL..______m___$.~??_ ___._____$.JJl~?Q.1II:~_:~_:g_:!:~~___m_....._
833 Fast Food Rest (No Drive-Thru) j $26,758 $3,489~ $984 $31,231\ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
-834----F~t.F~~~fR~~t--(Dri~~~~-)-m-----------j---------$i8~-54i ----------m$2;4i8r--------------$682. ...---...$ii~640Tfi~sj;.~G~F~A~----------.--
m:-!\S(~i~~~~~~~fJ:~m~ltnl=:::~IJ~I;]:~::
841 New Car Sales j $6,743 $879: $248 $7,871! IT.S.F.G.F.A.
-844...Ga~~ful~7S;-iV-i~~-Stati~~-------m-------..-----jmm-----.-------mm----- --m-.---------...----------T-mmm--------.....----- -.--------------------u--.--Tu.u.....-..-.----------.--....------------.----
_..____..__m(J.l_~_M~~~.t~_~..9:t~__W_~~h)____m__._______...__y_____ _.._$.2A~. ___.__m.._$.Jl??Q-L___..____.._..$._~_~~ __________$.1.1.{_?:~?:lIY:-f~-P.-:--------------mmm-----
~~___q~_~~J~~~L~~!y~~~..~~~~~~_~___..____.__.__.__.__._.L.__.__._____.____...__..____ ..__________m__m...__..__l______________m__________. _.________.._______________..L____________m_m___________m_______________
(With Convenience Market) . $9,335 $I,217j $343 $10,896j IV.F.P.
_~____G~~~M~_~I~~!Y~~~_.?!~!t~~_.__.._________m__mL_m_____________..___..___..________mmm_____.____.~_________m______________m__.....____m______h__..._.__.___________Um___....._________m______________
___..m..___.(WI~_~l.l:y~__M~_~~_~_t~~4__~~__~~~htm__...._$_~~?~~ mm.._.__.$.1.{_!.~~Lm------..m$.~?:?- _________~J.Ql?~gU.Y_:f..:;P.~____.._____________________..
848 Tire Store j $4,472 $583: $164 $5,220\ IT.S.F.G.F.A.
Dt~~;iif;:;~~~~~:~~~~~~T;!~~~,;it~tmmit~~~i~;~:~
860 Wholesale Market l $1,210 $158: $44 $L413l/T.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
"
Don Ganer & Associates
49
as of 10/29/99
'Ir
I.
TABLE 4.2
NET NEW PERSON-TRIPS
page 3 of 5
(1) : (2) (3): (4) (5) (6)
----------------------:- .---------------------------- - --- -----------------:-------------------------------------------------------------:--------::---:1--------------Xii__::__________-_ -_-_-_-_-_-____-__~~i~-__::___-:::I-:__:-:___-:::::::::_-:_ -_-__-_-_-_-_-_-::_-_-_-.f{~j-_--_-_--_-_-_-_-_-:: __---_-_-:___--_-::_-_--_-_-_-_-_-_-_-:_-::_-_-_-::_-_-_-_--_-_-::___-_-__:.-:_
: Motor Total: % New
.n.. ..n..... __ no n_. n. _u n.........". U"..... ......... u................... UhO.. __ _ __ n_ ____ _ _. 'Y' ....n. .__....n. on.....,. U ..._...................h .._ _ _.. ___0...... n.. _ . "''''''0".. nOon. n... _ _ __ _ .n... .. __. __. __ _n ___UU"..n .____........... _ ......__
: Vehicle Person-: New Person-
:=::~=::~~~::~~~~:'::~~~=~~::::_J~~:::=~:t~: -:::-::~~~:::::J:~-~~:: :::::::::::~~~~:::::::::_: ::-::_::::::-::::_:~~t-----------------
COMMERCIAL/SERVICES (cont.) i i - _______________n_______
~~Q___~h~PP.~K_~~~!~.!.__________________________.________________L----------~_:??_ _________n]g:~:?_1________~?%_ ___.__________________~?:Q JT~_:f:9:_~:A:_m_________
~~___f~~~!Y__~_~J~_~__~_~_~~~!:________m_____________________L____________?~_:??_ n_______m.~_~:~?L______~?%_ ______________________?:!.:?.Q J!:~_:f:9:f:A:___ ____
831 Quality Restaurant (not a chain). 89.95 148.42: 77% 114.28 /T.S.F.G.F.A. ------
_~?___HJgh_!~__~~y~_!'{__$.!!_:__p_~~~________________.m.1______________________n____ ____________________________,_____.______________ --------------n---______n_______mH___________m___________nm_m_________n_m
_mmmm_~~~_!~~~~____n__________nn____.___n______n________________________.1______mJ~Q:_~ ----------_?J?:_Q~L--nn~%- ____________________ll~J~_ .!I.:$.J~:_g_:~_:A:____________n
~_~___~_~~!_J_~~~__~~~_~_J~_~__p_~y_~~~2____1-----.---Z1~_:QQ _____JJ~J_:~j________??%_ ____________________~_!_~:2~_ l.!:~_:f.::9:f=A:______________
834 Fast Food Rest (Drive-Thru) j 496.12 818.60i 27% 221.02 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
836---D--:-----~--:oo----n-Place-7Ba~-(b)-----------------------------r----------ii5-:40--------oo-iij-O:4i-i--------54%-------------------i02:82-/T:S:F~G:F:A-:------------
~?___~~~_1~~_~_~_~~_~__Y~N_~~__?h~p____..1______n___m!Q:g.Q ___________nn~:_QQl-------?1-%- _____n_______________}?_:~_ .!$.~!'Y!~_~!~tn________
.~.oo.A__~!.~~~.~M~oo?~!'Y!~_~__G~_~~~!:_-<~2.._.._..1._____________!Q=J.Q ...._..._.._._~:}Zl_______??%. ___________________...?Q.:??_ .!I...?.:.~=_9:~.:A:__...__.m.
841 New Car Sales i 37.50 61.881 77% 47.64 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
844 Gasoline / Service Station :
::::::::::::::(~~::M~~~:!:~~::~!:W~~:h):::::::::::::--::-::::I::::::::::!~:~~: ::::::::::i?~;:i.?[::::::::~~%_ :::::::::::::::::::i:~~?~ ::lY;f;r~::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::
845 Gasoline / Service Station: i
(With Convenience Market) : 162.78 268.59: 49% 131.61 /V.F.P.
_n.n.__._.__.__u......~....H____________.____.__.__._____.__________.___ _...... _... ........_. ._........__....__.___.______.. _._.._. ....... .......... ._n......-i... ........ ......... . ..... ...._u_n_ ..__................ ..__..____......_...................__.__._______
_~._._G~~~~_~.I.~~!Y!~~.$.!~~_~~._.____._.___.__________j__----------._.......00.__.._._________.________________1__.________._________________._______m..________________________.__.____..._....__._...___...____.____..._
_...._._____JW.l.~~_~y_:__M~!'_~~!__~~~__~__~~~_h)...-..----J~?_:~_ __________:??:?J~j________~?%_ _____._.._._._.__.J?~:_?? IY~f.:~;p~..._...._.......__.._________
848 Tire Store i 24.87 41.04i 77% 31.60 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
.....Un.._n_n__..__nnn......_n..........__n________..._.....................--.....-----.--.---...........--..--............._...._nn___.._____nnn_n.__hO.......__n____nn_nnnnnn__..u__.__...............__.__n..._________._.._....._........._...
850 Supermarket : 111.51 183.99: 48% 88.32 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
_~?loo__~~_~y.~N~~~_~__:M~!~~!_J~1:__h~~L_Jh__.....?~?/!J _____.J?J?:.~L----~~-%. ____.____.__________??~_:~Q_ JI.:$.:.~:.g.:~.:A:__________n
.~?~.___~~~y.:..M~~~LW_~_!h__~~~LP.~~Pn_h_j____._____~:~9 -.---------~??:.??L-----~~.%. .___.____._______n~~_~?? IY~_~:.P~....................____...._
860 Wholesale Market ~ 6.73 11.10: 77% 8.55 IT.S.F.G.F.A.
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, based on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10.
l
Don Ganer &: Associates
19
as of 10/29/99
-
TABLE 4.7
TRANSPORTATION IMP ACf FEE (TIF) PER UNIT
page 5 of 5
u_u_________________u_u____u_____________uDJ__u____uu_ __u_____u_______. (2) (3): ._uu{4Lu_____u uu____J?t_____u_L_____uu______uj~L____u_________u
.u_u._.. .______._____._ _.______._____._._____::::-::-::T:_::::M~:t-~i:::__ ?~4~~t.rt~~L--.n-u-n.n.n-u--------- n.n.n_un.__.n.n.__.__._____._..n.n.n___.__.___.n ..-....---..--
__.n__n..________.n. ..n__n___. n___________n .. nn_____nu__.n____n___L_.Y~N~J~_____ uun~~9'_~J~_____l------T.!<:'~-i~--u- ___n___T<>.~<:'L___L__n.u_u___n__u_____ .__________n____
: TIP TIP: TIP TIP:
__......____.....______...... __...._____....__......__....___....__....................___...........__-:....__......_.................. ..........................__..:....._____.......__.....____.. .....____........______.......-'...__..........___...__.____h.....__ ._______...__
ITE LAND USE CODE I CATEGORY ! Per Unit Per Unit : Per Unit Per Unit : Unit
-Qff.t~~_~~~rii{~~~_4L:______::-_:___::::::__--.:__-.::__-_--:___r::_:::::.:__:::-::-u_::::::::-::-:_::__::-::::__:::-::_:_:~-u__:____:-::::__:::-:-:_:::::-::_:__:_:-_--:.:_:____:::::-:::___:_:-_:__:___-::___::_:::-:_u__:__'_::::::_::
731 State Motor Vehicles Dept. : $48,709 $6,351 $1,791 $56,851 /T.S.F.G.F.A.
t~gf~~~~~~~~":.....................................T.~~~~~j .........~~j!$~~i~~~:ililZf'~I~:~:A:
760 Research/Development Center ~ $2,379 $310: $87 $2,777! /T.S.F.G.F.A.
~~~~s~":~':~~k$~,~~=L~lo~~'~9.!!~.=.f..~.f.~.
PORT/lNDUSTRIAL n : n _ - -: !
030---T~dj:;~~~~-u----uu---n-----n--u----------u-u -r --u----$2)390. __uu - -u---u$~i77T-u------u-uu$i06 -------------$3~373TiT~s:F:Gjj~-A~---u-------
_nn...._....._____.....__..._______......_....___......_.____.....__......__....._............__......_..,-...___......................................._........_........._._....._.........._............_...._.._....__.nn....~..__........_.........__un__....._.n_n.......
090 Park/Ride With Bus Service $1,051 $137~ $39 $I,227l /Parking Space
m~:~iilliifuti~~~g':==j.............~~ ..............$i~~L...J~ ...........~~17_~~:~lf~:
120 General Heavv Industrial 1 $440 $57l $16 $514~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
130 Industrial Park ! $2042 $2661 $75 $2,383~ /T.S.F.G.F.A.
i1Q::_M~~~~~~~i---::--.--:.:::--::::-:----:::-:-:-:::---:-:::::r:::::-:::::ii:ii:i.: -:_:::::::-:::::ii~L::::::_:::::::::::~j :::::::::::::$i;.~Q~rzt;~~f~G~f~:A~::::::::::::
150 Warehouse . $1,455 $190: $54 $1,698: IT.S.F.G.F.A.
151 Mini-Warehouse $733 $96: $27 $8561/T.S.F.G.F.A. --- ----
-i7o---utiliti~~-(b)-----------------.n-u.--.---n--------.n----.---u-n-u--.----u-n.-u$i~-438 ----..---u--..-u$i87r-u----------.-----$5~i ..-u----u-$i~678!7T:Sji~G:F:A~--- ---
(a) Abbreviations used in "Unit of Measure" column:
T.S.F.G.F.A = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area
T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position
(b) Because there is no average daily trip rate for this land use included in the ITE Trip Generation
manual, the trip rate shown is the estimated average daily trip rate, bas~d on multiplying the
p.m. peak hour trip rate X 10. l
Don Ganer & Associates
51
as of 10/29/99
llA
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2000
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR THE
POSITIONS OF ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER.
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed a recommendation from the City
Administrator to make a salary range adjustment for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and
Public Works Manager pursuant to Rule 9.7 of the City's Personnel Policy and Procedure
Manual; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is obligated per Section 11 of the Woodburn City
Charter to establish compensation for each City officer and employee; now, therefore,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The salary range for the positions of Assistant City Engineer and
Public Works Manager be adjusted from grade level 11 to grade level 13 of the Non-Union
General Service Employee Competency/Merit Salary Schedule effective October 1, 1999.
Section 2. As provided for in Rule 9.7 of the City's Personnel Policy and
Procedure manual, incumbents in these positions will remain at the same step level in the new
range and eligibility for merit adjustments will not change with this salary adjustment.
Approved as to Form~ r:vr\ ()t/ ~ \ () - 2. '2. - '1 ~
City Attorney Date
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
}
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
".
lIB
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administrator#
Public Works Program Manager 4 ~
TO:
SUBJECT:
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Fund Exchange
DATE:
October 1 9, 1 999
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached resolution entering into a fund exchange agreement with the
State of Oregon to exchange federal highway program funds for state funds.
BACKGROUND:
The federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) enacted in
1999 continued the Surface Transportation Program (STP) which was instituted as
part of the Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). The STP funds
still must be utilized each federal fiscal year under TEA-21 rules.
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) in conjunction with the League of
Oregon Cities developed a program after ISTEA was enacted that allowed a city to
exchange $1.00 of this federal STP funding for 94(: of state funds which could then
be utilized for a much wider variety of projects than authorized under federal funding
utilization requirements. This agreement will exchange $80,576 of federal funds for
$75,741 in state funds that can be used on any city project approved by ODOT. The
project that ODOT approved for the 1999 fund exchange agreement is the widening
and addition of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on Boones Ferry Road and Country
Club Road.
~
r
liB
COUNCil Bill NO. 2001
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO 1999 FUND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT NO. 17678
WITH THE STATE OF OREGON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
RECORDER TO SIGN SUCH AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, the State of Oregon acting through its Department of
Transportation is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with cities for the
performance of work on certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of
costs on terms and conditions agreeable to contracting parties pursuant to ORS
366.770 and 366.775, and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn has applied to exchange federal funds for
state funds to assist with the project for widening and addition of bike lanes,
sidewalks, storm drainage and signal modifications on Boones Ferry Road and Country
Club Road, and
WHEREAS, the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, has determined
that the city's project is eligible for the exchange of funds, and
WHEREAS, the State of Oregon, Department of Transportation, has approved
the exchange of $80,576 in federal funds for $75,741 in state funds, NOW
THEREFORE:
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOllOWS:
Section 1. That the City of Woodburn enter into 1999 Fund Exchange
Agreement No. 17678, which is affixed as Attachment "A" and by this reference
incorporated herein, with the State of Oregon acting by and through its Department
of Transportation to exchange $80,576 in federal funds for $75,741 in state funds
to assist with the project for widening and addition of bike lanes, sJdewalks, storm
drainage and signal modifications on Boones Ferry Road and CountrYlClub Road.
Page 1
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
llB
Section 2. That the Mayor and City Recorder of the City of Woodburn are authorized
to sign said agreement on behalf of the City.
Approved as to form';O'l,~~
City Attorney
Ocf l ~ ~ 1
).
Date
APPROVED:
Richard Jennings, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
l
Page 2
COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
f
llB
October 8, 1999
Misc. Contracts and Agreements
No. 17,678
1999 FUND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF
OREGON, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred
to as "State", and the CITY OF WOODBURN acting by and through its elected officials,
hereinafter referred to as "Agency".
RECITALS
1. By the authority granted in ORS 366.770 and 366.775, State may enter into
cooperative agreements with counties and cities for the performance of work on
certain types of improvement projects with the allocation of costs on terms and
conditions mutually agreeable to the contracting parties.
NOW THEREFORE, the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing
RECITALS, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
TERMS OF AGREEMENT
1. Agency has submitted a completed and signed Part I of the Project Prospectus
outlining the schedule and costs associated with all phases of the widening and
addition of bike lanes, sidewalks, storm drainage and modifications of existing signal
on Boones Ferry Road and Country Club Road, hereinafter referred to as "Project".
2. To assist in funding the project, Agency has requested State to exchange 1999
Federal Funds, which have been allocated to Agency, for State funds based on the
following ratio:
$94 State for $100 Federal
Based on this ratio, Agency wishes to trade $80,576 Federal Funds for $75,741
State Funds.
3. State has reviewed Agency's prospectus, considered Agency's request for the fund
exchange, and has determined that Agency's project is eligible\for the exchange
funds. - ,
4. The term of this agreement shall begin on the date all required signatures are
obtained and shall terminate within two calendar years following that date, unless
otherwise extended or renewed by formal agreement of the parties.
llB
Fund Exchange Agreement
10/08199
Page 2
5. The parties agree that the exchange is subject to the following conditions:
A. The Federal Funds transferred to State may be used by State at its
discretion.
B. State dollars transferred to Agency must be used for the project named in
Terms of Agreement, Item 1, Page 1, of this agreement. This fund
exchange is to provide funding for specific roadway projects and is not
intended for maintenance.
C. State funds may be used for all phases of the project, including
preliminary engineering, right of way, u'tility relocations and construction.
Said use shall be consistent with the Oregon Constitution and statutes
(Section 3a of Article IX Oregon Constitution). Agency shall be
responsible for accounting for expenditure of State Funds.
D. This Fund Exchange shall be on a reimbursement basis, with State funds
limited to a maximum amount of $75,741. All costs incurred in excess of
the fund exchange amount will be the sole responsibility of Agency.
E. State certifies at the time this agreement is written that sufficient funds
are available and authorized for expenditure to finance costs of this
agreement within State's current appropriation or limitation. Funds
available for reimbursement on or after July 1, 1999 are contingent upon
the legislatively approved budget of State.
F. Agency shall be responsible for all costs and expenses related to its
employment of individuals to perform the work under this agreement,
including but not limited to retirement contributions, workers'
compensation, unemployment taxes, and State and Federal income tax
withholding.
G. Agency shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations,
executive orders and ordinances applicable to the work ~nder this
agreement, including, without limitation, the provisions of ORa. 279.312,
279.314, 279.316, 279.320 and 279.555, which hereby are incorporated
by reference. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Agency
expressly agrees to comply with (i) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964; (ii)
Section V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; (iii) the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 and ORS 659.425; (iv) all regulations and
administrative rules established pursuant to the foregoing laws; and (v)
llB
Fund Exchange Agreement
10/08199
P.age 3
all other applicable requirements of federal and state civil rights and
rehabilitation statutes, rules and regulations.
H. Agency, or its consultant, shall conduct the necessary preliminary
engineering and design work required to produce final plans,
specifications and cost estimates; purchase all necessary right of way in
accordance with current State and Federal laws and regulations; obtain
all required permits; be responsible for all utility relocations; advertise for
bid proposals; award all contracts; perform all construction engineering;
and make all contractor payments required to complete the project.
I. Agency shall compile accurate cost accounting records. Agency shall bill
State in a form acceptable to State no more than once a month for costs
incurred on the project. State will reimburse Agency at 100 percent of
the billing amount not to exceed $75,741. The cost records and
accounts pertaining to the work covered by this agreement shall be
retained for inspection by representatives of State for a period of three
years following final payment. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
J. Agency shall, upon completion of project, maintain and operate the
project at its own cost and expense.
K. Agency, its consultants or subcontractors, if any, and all employers
working under this agreement are subject employers under the Oregon
Workers' Compensation Law and shall comply with ORS 656.017 which
requires them to provide workers' compensation coverage for all their
subject workers.
L. This agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of both
parties.
1. State may terminate this agreement effective upon delivery of written
notice to Agency, or at such later date as may be established by
State, under any of the following conditions: i
a. If Agency fails to provide services called for by this agreement
within the time specified herein or any extension thereof.
b. If Agency fails to perform any of the other provisions of tnis
agreement, or so fails to pursue the work as to endanger
T
llB
Fund Exchange Agreement
10/08199
Page 4
performance of this agreement in accordance with its terms,
and after receipt of written notice from State fails to correct
such failures within 10 days or such longer period as State may
authorize.
2. Either party may terminate this agreement effective upon delivery of
written notice to other party, or at such later date as may be
established by the terminating party, under any of the following
conditions:
a. If either party fails to receive funding, appropriations, limitations
or other expenditure authority at levels sufficient to pay for the
work provided in the agreement.
b. If Federal or state laws, regulations or guidelines are modified
or interpreted in such a way that either the work under this
agreement is prohibited or either party is prohibited from paying
for such work from the planned funding source.
3. Any termination of this agreement shall not prejudice any rights or
obligations accrued to the parties prior to termination.
M. State and Agency hereto agree that if any term or provision of this
agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
unenforceable, illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the
remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and
obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the
agreement did not contain the particular term or provision held to be
invalid.
6. Agency personnel who sign this agreement shall be duly authorized to do so by the
City Council.
7. This agreement and attached exhibits constitute the entire agree.ment between the
parties on the subject matter hereof. There are no understandin~, agreements, or
representations, oral or written, not specified herein regarding this agreement. No
waiver, consent, modification or change of terms of this agreement shall bind either
party unless in writing and signed by both parties and all necessary approvals have
been obtained. Such waiver, consent, modification or change, if made, shall be
effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose given. The failure
of State to enforce any provision of this agreement shall not constitute a waiver by
State of that or any other provision.
']r
Fund Exchange Agreement
10/08/99
F:age 5
lIB
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their seals
as of the day and year hereinafter written.
The funding for this fund exchange program was approved by the Oregon
Transportation Commission on October 15,1997, as a part of the 1998-2001 Statewide
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
The Financial Services Branch Manager approved the fund exchange on September
20, 1999.
The Oregon Transportation Commission on March 18, 1999, approved Subdelegation
Order No. 2 in which the Director grants authority to the Executive Deputy
Director/Chief Engineer to approve and execute agreements over $75,000 when the
work is related to a project included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program or in a line item in the approved biennial budget.
STATE OF OREGON, by and through
its Department of Transportation
CITY OF WOODBURN, by and through its
elected officials
By
Executive Deputy Director/Chief Engineer
By
Title
Date
By
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
Title
By
By
Region 2 Manager
Title
Date
Date
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY
APPROVED AS TO LEq,AL
SUFFICIENCY .
By
Assistant Attorney General
By
Agency Legal Counsel
.
Date
Date
llC
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2001-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AZTEC DRIVE EAST
OF HIGHWAY 99E.
Whereas, Council Resolution No. 1551 set a public hearing date for this
annexation proposal on October 25, 1999; and
Whereas. the City Council was unable to hold a public hearing on the scheduled
date and time due to a lack of a quorum; now, therefore,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to ORS 222.120, 7:00 p.m. on November 22, 1999 is declared to be
the time set for public hearing before the W oodbum City Council on whether the City of
Woodburn shall annex that property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Section 2. pursuant to ORS 222.120, no election is required on this issue.
Section 3. Notice of said hearing shall be published once each week for two successive
weeks prior to the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and
notices of the hearing shall be posted in four public places in the City for a like period.
Approved as to Form?Yl~ ~ II, 'I - Cfl
City Attorney Date
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
.
l
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 1 - COUNCil.. Bil..L NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
~
IIC
Legal Description: Tax Idts 4400,4500,4600
EXHIBIT "A"
A parcel of land situate in the N.W_ 1/4 Section 17, Township 5 South; Range 1 West of
the Willamette Meridian, City of Woodburn. Marion County, Oregon, said parcel is more
particularly described as follows
Parcel 1:
Beginning at and iron rod which is 6_147 chains North 870 00' East and 34.135 chains
North 320 21' East and 401.94 feet South 890 11' East and 338.57 feet South 010 51' East
from the southwest corner:of the E.C. Cooley Donation Land Claim in section 17, Township
5 South, Range 1 West o~ the Willamette Meridian in Marion County Oregon, said point of
beginning being the sout~west corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Quentin
Hollars, et ai, by deed recorded in Volume 595, Page 811, Deed Records for Marion County,
Oregon; and running thence South 890 11' East, along the south line of said Hollars tract,
256.74 feet to an iron rod +t the southeast corner thereof; thence North 010 51' West, along
the east line of said Hollars tract, 140.00 feet to an iron rod; thence North 890 11' West,
256.74 feet to an Iron rod Hn the west line of said Hollars tract; thence South 010 51' East,
140.00 feet to the point of beginning.
,
Parcel 2:
Beginning at a pointlon the West boundary of that tract of land deeded tolsabeU M.
Duke and Doris Antonia p,erez by deed recorded in Reel 22, Page 1296. Marion County
Deed Records at a point ~.571 chains South of the Northwest corner of said tract of land;
thence running South 10 3#, East 2.571 chains to the south boundary of said tract of land, at
a point 5.835 chains North 880 32' West from the southeast comer of said tract of land;
thence South 880 32' Ea~t along the south boundary of said tract of land 1.945 chains;
thence North 10 34' West 2.571 chains to a point on the East boundary of said tract of land
at a point at a point 2.571 !chains South of the northeast comer of said tract of land; thence
North 880 32' West 1.945 c?hains to the place of beginning.
Said Parcel contains 1.32 ~cres more or less_
l
~
IIC
EXHIBIT "A"
lJ[g~~lJ~ [P~lf [P[ffi@[MJO@~[Q) ~~[Q)
..~-
f',::-'b!_.!:'" .....c'-. n. notD 8J
w:...~.J:. '=~"'~J."
LOCATED IN THE THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17. T.5_S_. R_1.w_
W M CITY OF WOODBuRN. MARION COUNTY, OREGON
AUGUST 5. 1999
.:
........
=::. :n. :-.:t'.:u
.=r.:r..r:ur.li..... ._n'""
= a::= :~=r :.: '.I~''''''
CC1Lc~A ='U.: - f.W"-:'
........ -- '" ......:..
EA,Appt I(:",,~
f ..or'lE~
2 81G VALl<' .~,
:)_ NV ~~"
i'~O~:': i-
.
--n- \.
_ PRO.J€CT
lOC.'ION
~-
~. ----
,;.' i"
......\:,..
~~
~r. { ::..' 'Y ,....'~
l~'., ~ .",.
;\
I
C I1Y-OF woociilURN
VICINI1Y NAP
,-
..'''0116 ( ~ '.
,.,.
~
~
.
.
~
-.-.-- s....l'.... S(0l(~1"
-- .".- S'OJW 50["':'100(
I
. \ \ ~,' t ., " ,
I l. \ ~~ - .-,-.--'--~- ,..h-
_.J: i ~ \ ~~- -:__,.?':.'~::-;, -.. .-=r-l'~==--' -,
.11.__'> .~t\,..l __ ~:4~!!~_--'"""._._ -
-'-'-'~ORi~E' - \'\.....s-r. ::
'\ ~i
n,
l> -, '" \
--.-_.- ....IIA;.JIII(
S""'J'AQ~ SlIl(Il .......a..1
c.ro.. ....sz..
-,-,,,-~;
~~4
.1.,'......... ..~y;;
..~~~...r'
"'lLHELH ENGINEERING. INi
tor&( ',1IlC (1ItI;1~(1IIS , SUlldKlAS
~_I..; . <<$1.... . ~.
........I~......tt"
- _....1..........-......."
LA'ER liSt Hll-Pt..'"
PAO~' 9901 J
l-
-
If
lID
, City of Woodburn
Police Department
STAFF REPORT
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn OR 97071
(503) 982-2345
Date:
October 28, 1999
.--
/'
From:
Paul Null, Chief of Polic
Through:
Mayor and City Council ft/
John Brown, City Administrato'
To:
Subject:
U.S. Department of Justice Grant - COPS in the School
Intergovernmental Agreement - Woodburn School District
In April 1999, the police department applied for a U.S. Department of Justice grant to fund one
full time police officer to work primarily in the Woodburn High School. The grant proposal was
a collaborative effort with the school district. On September 15, 1999, the police department
received notification from the Department of Justice that Woodburn had been awarded $125,000,
under the COPS in the Schools grant program. Woodburn was one out of 226 communities
selected across the nation to be funded.
The grant will fund a full time entry level police officer for a three year period. The City of
Woodburn is obligated to retain the police officer position at the conclusion of the grant period.
Another grant requirement is the City of Woodburn and the Woodburn School District must enter
into an Intergovernmental Agreement which establishes financial, operational, and general
responsibilities of each agency. On October 21, 1999, the School Board approved the
Intergovernmental Agreement entering into a community partnership with the police department.
The School Resource Officer's wages and benefits over the life of the grant have been
established to be $133,297. The COPS grant will fund $125,000.; the Woodburn School
District has agreed to be responsible for the balance of $8,297. The police department will be
responsible for training, uniforms, weapon, and vehicle which will be funded out ofFY 99-2000
budget. The grant position will be a new position for the police department and will increase our
sworn staff from 24 to 25 positions.
Recommendation: The council accept the grant award from the U.S. D~p~nt of Justice,
COPS in the Schools grant program and approve the intergovernmental agre~ntent between the
Woodburn School District and the Woodburn Police Department.
lID
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2003
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A COPS IN THE SCHOOLS GRANT AWARD FROM
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND ENTERING INTO AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE WOODBURN SCHOOL
DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT SAID GRANT.
WHEREAS, the Woodburn Police Department, with the consent of the Woodburn
School District, applied for a U.S. Department of Justice Grant to fund the placement ofa full-
time police officer to work primarily at the Woodburn High School; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1999, the City of Woodburn received notification from
the Department of Justice that it had been awarded $125,000 under the COPS in Schools grant
program; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to formally accept this grant award and to
authorize an intergovernmental agreement with the Woodburn School District for implementation
of said grant; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City accept grant award no. 1999-SH-WX-0673 in the maximum
allowable amount of $125,000 under the U.S. Department of Justice, COPS in Schools program.
Section 2. That the City enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the Woodburn
School District for the purpose of implementing said grant award.
Section 3. That the City Administrator be authorized to execute, on behalf of the City,
said agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit" A" and is, by this reference,
incorporated herein.
ApproVedastoform~~ 11- L/-~;
City Attorney Date
Approved:
Richard Jennings, Mayor
l
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
EXHIBIT A
Pig. -1-. of /A
11D
U. S. Department of Justice
Office afCommunity Oriented Policing Services
COPS In School Award
~,~' .
,.
Mary Lou Leary
Acting Director
By signing this award, the signatory officials are agreeing to abide by the Conditions of Grant Award found on the
reverse side ofthis document:
Application Organization's Name:
Grant #:
ORI#:
Vendor #:
Law Enforcement Executive Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip Code:
Telephone:
Fax:
Government Executive Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip
Telef;RJIfe::
Fax:
Award Start Date:
Award Amount:
September I, 1999
$ 125,000
\
Signature of Law Enforcement Executive
with the authority to accept this grant
award.
Signature of Government
Executive with the authority to
Acct Class: 9R22020102
Woodburn, City of
1 999SHWX0673
OR02405
936002282
Chief Kenneth P. Wright
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, OR 97071
(503) 982-2345
(503) 982-2370
City Administrator John Brown
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, OR 97071
(503) 982-5222
(503) 982-5244
Award End Date:
Number of Officers: Full Time:
Part Time:
August 31, 2002
1
o
SEP 2 8 1999
Date
Paul E. Null, Chief of Police
Typed Name and Title of Law
Enforcement Executive.
Date
l
John Brown, City Administrator
Typed Name and Title of Government
Executive.
Date
Award lD: 54692
~
CONDITIONS OF GRANT AWARD
EXHIBIT ---&
Page ~ of (~
liD
I. The funding under this project is for the payment of SALARIES AND APPROVED FRINGE BENEFITS for
three years for sworn entry level career law enforcement officers, lateral transfers, or rehired officers. Any
portion of salaries above entry level must be provided for by the grant recipient. Overtime, training, weapons,
communication equipment and vehicles cannot be paid for with COPS funding.
2. Prior to withdrawing funds under this award, the recipient must provide the Control Desk, Office of the
Comptroller, with the recipient organization's fiscal year and the name of the recipient organization's cognizant
Federal agency.
3. COPS Universal Hiring grant funds must be used to hire one or more new, additional career law enforcement
officers, beyond the number of officers that would be hired or el!lployed by the grantee in the absence of the
grant. Unless authorized in writing by the COPS Office, grant funds may not be applied to the salary or benefits
of an officer hired by a grantee prior to the Award Start Date listed on the front of this document.
4. Your agency is expected to retain the positions funded by COPS Universal Hiring grant funds at the conclusion
of the grant, in accordance with the retention plan contained in your grant application.
5. For grants of $500,000 or more, the grantee acknowledges that failure to submit an acceptable Equal
Employment Opportunity Plan (if grantee is required to submit one under 28 CFR 42.3-02) that is approved by
the Officer of Justice Programs, Office of Civil Rights, is a violation of its Assurances and may result in the
suspension of the drawdown of funds. For grants under $500,000, the grantee must submit a completed EEOP
Certification form and return it to the Office of Justice Programs, Office of Civil Rights within 120 days of the
grant award.
6. In order to assist the COPS Office in the monitoring of the award, your agency will be responsible for
submitting semi-annual progress reports and quarterly fmancial reports. As those reports become due, your
Grant Advisor will provide you with the fonns and information necessary for compliance.
7. Requests for extensions, without additional funding, of the grant award period should be submitted in writing no
sooner than two years after the official start date of the award to your GraJ11; Advisor.
8. Officers funded under this grant may only be involved in activities or perfonn services that exclusively benefits
your agency and the population that it serves. If YOl)r agency provides these officers to another agency through
a contractual arrangement, your agency is responsible for ensuring that this arrangement is in compliance with
the conditions of your grant.
9. The COPS Office may conduct a national evaluation of the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
program. The grantee agrees to cooperate with the evaluators.
10. The grantee agrees to abide by the tenns, conditions and regulations as found in the COPS Universal Hiring
Grant Manual.
11. The recipient agrees to complete and keep on file, as appropriate, as Immigration and Naturalization Service
Employment Eligibility Verification Fonn (1-9). This fonn is to be used by recipients offederal funds to verify
that persons are eligible to work in the United States.
f
:r
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
EXHIBI~ ~
Page of b
11D
This agreement is entered into between the City of Woodburn and Woodburn School
District for the purpose of clarifying the duties and responsibilities of a School Resource
Officer (SRO) to be placed with the District and to define the responsibilities of each of the
governmental bodies for the supervision and support of that position.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
A. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
1 . The City will provide a sworn police officer for assignment to School Resource
Officer position during the term ofthis Agreement. The officer's primary duty
will be assignment to anyone or more of the Woodburn School District
schools during the time of year school is in session. The officer may, however,
be used for other police duties outside of the school year. The City reserves
the right to reassign that officer to other police duties, irrespective of school
sessions, when an emergency exists and the officer is required elsewhere. The
determination of emergency is at the discretion of the Chief of Police.
2. Over the 3-year grant period, the City will provide $125,000 of federal grant
monies toward salary and fringe benefits of the School Resource Officer.
3. The City will be mutually involved with School Administrators in the selection
of any officer assigned to this position.
4. The Chief of Police will be solely responsible for the superVISion and
performance evaluation ofthe School Resource Officer but the City agrees that
the Chief will seek and utilize information provided by school administrative
personnel in the performance of those duties and the officer's suitability to
continue in that position. After consultation with the Chief of Police, the
Superintendent may require the assigned officer be removed from the School
Resource Officer position for reasons of unsuitability.
B. SCHOOL'S RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Over the 3-year grant period, the School will provide $8,297 toward salary
and fringe benefits of the School Resource Officer.
2. The school agrees to make the SRO part of the school's~taff in regard to
providing appropriate in-service training, inclusion in general staff activities,
and the provision of facility office space for the officer to work from.
3. The school will review and approve any curriculum to be presented to students,
staff, or parents by the officer.
4. The school agrees to assist the Chief of Police in establishing annual goals for
the School Resource Officer position.
11D
C.
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER'S DUTIES
EXHIBIT ~
Page"'.J:[:: of I..,
The following list of duties is not intended to be all inclusive but to describe the
principal activities in which the officer may be involved. These activities will not be
performed each day but as the need dictates.
1. Be physically available at appropriate times for personal interaction with youth
at school including informal talking with students, staff, or parents during
breaks, lunch, and before and after school activities.
2. Identify youths at risk of becoming delinquent through referrals to the School
Resource Officer from school personnel, student advisors, parents, and via
interaction with students themselves.
3. Assist in the diversion of youths identified as at risk of becoming delinquent
from entry into the juvenile justice system through crisis intervention and
referral to other resources and outside agencies.
4. Provide prevention education on vandalism, shoplifting, substance abuse,
child and sexual abuse, and issues of personal safety.
5. Perform as a resource center for youth needing referrals to the appropriate
government or private service agency.
6. Perform as an information source for District personnel on issues or criminal
trends involving youth.
7. Participate and support youth organizations designed to promote responsible
behavior (i.e., Natural Helpers, Oregon Student Safety On the Move, Oregon
Teen leadership Institute, etc.).
8. Take appropriate corrective enforcement or referral action in the schools on
behavior coming to the officer's attention which is criminal or disruptive to the
school learning environment.
9. Promote a positive attitude of youth toward community, school, and local
government, including police.
10. Develop and teach classes relevant to youth and crime issue\ (street law) which
are germane to this community. - .'
11 . Develop and teach classes regarding civic competence, rights and obligations
of youth according to law, rights and responsibilities of citizenship, and the
role of citizenship in society.
12. Develop and provide programs which produce peer conflict mediation.
13. Maintain records of calls for service provided to the school by the officer and
-
D.
IlD
the number of hours worked during the year relative to GRml1s~ues. ~
MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT Pa~....LL of
Each party to this agreement will annually review the conditions of the agreement to
determine if it is being properly administered, complied with, and to determine it's
sufficiency to meet program needs. Any modification of the terms of this Agreement
shall be executed in writing with the mutual consent of both parties.
E. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the signing of both parties and
continue through June 3D, 2000. This Agreement may be terminated prior to that
date by mutual consent of both parties or by one party notifying the other of their
intent to discontinue participation no later than 180 days prior to the end of the fiscal
year.
F. LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
For the purpose of coverage under the Oregon Tort Claims Act against any losses,
damages or liabilities arising out of the services and activities of any Woodburn Police
personnel assigned to the School District under the provisions of this agreement:
1. Each party shall protect their own employee with Worker's Compensation
insurance which meets the requirements of Oregon law;
2. Each party shall maintain in full force and effect adequate public liability and
property damage insurance or self-insurance to cover any claims which may
arise by virtue of their actions;
3. Each party assumes sole responsibility for the torts of its own personnel and
agrees, to the extent legally possible, to hold each other party to this
agreement harmless from liability arising from the acts or omissions of
personnel affiliated with such party.
G. RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT
The parties may renew this Agreement on the same terms and conditions as
contained herein by executing a mutual written renewal agreement before the end of
the term of this Agreement.
l
}(~-
D . Jack Reeves, PhD.
uperintendent
Woodburn School Dist~ct
Date: / () - d.-7- q 'l
John Brown
City Administrator
City of Woodburn
Date:
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JVSTlCE
liD
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)
EXHIBIT A
Page -.:..J.i.:.. of U
COPS IN SCHOOLS ADDITIONAL GRANT CONDITION *
The grantee is required to attend one COPS in Schools Regional Training Workshop in order to
satisfy this grant condition. The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) will be
the sole provider of training to satisfy this grant condition. The COPS Office will deliver a series
of approximately ten (10) regionally-based workshops (each one lasting several days), between
January 2000 and August 200 I.
This grant condition requires that the grantee send to the training the specific COPS in Schools
Officer(s) who will be deployed into the school(s). This condition also requires that one
representative from the specific school(s) into which officer(s) will be deployed attend this training
with the COPS in Schools Officer. The school representative must be an administrator (with
decision-making authority) and must be directly involved with the COPS in Schools program in the
grantee's school(s). The COPS Office will pay for the training, travel, lodging and per diem for
attendance of required participants.
Information with respect to available training opportunities will be forwarded to your agency in the
near future. Failure to comply with the condition - by not attending the required training, or by
sending inappropriate personnel to attend training - may result in the withholding of future COPS
grants or other federal funding, and any other available legal remedies.
-~~~
Signature of Law Enforcement Executive
YAvL E-, NULL-
Printed Name of Law Enforcement Executive
Ja ck R I!e-Vf'<'
Printed Name of-~hool Representative
* This Additional Grant Condition document must be signed and returned to the COPS
Office along with the signed award document. Grant funds will not be accessible to the
grantee until both documents are received. By signing this document, the signatory officials
indicate their understanding of, and agreement to abide by, the aforementioned grant
condition.
",.
lIE
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2004
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING INTO THE CITY OF WOODBURN APPROXIMATELY 63
ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BOONES FERRY ROAD
SOUTH OF THE RAILROAD CROSSING KNOWN AS "BOONES CROSSING";
AMENDING THE CITY OF WOODBURN ZONING MAP FROM MARION COUNTY
"URBAN TRANSmON FARM" (UTF) TO CITY OF WOODBURN "SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL" (RS); GRANTING CONDmONAL USE APPROVAL OF A PLANNED
UNIT DEVEWPMENT (PUD); ALLOWING A VARIANCE TO OPEN SPACE/INDOOR
RECREATION STANDARDS; IMPOSING CERTAIN CONDmONS ON APPROVAL OF
THE LAND USE APPLICATIONS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map have established certain
land uses within the City of Woodburn's Urban Growth Boundary, and
WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council has reviewed the record in Annexation Case No.
97-08; Zone Change No. 97-12; Conditional Use 97-03; Planned Unit Development 97-03; and
Variance No. 97-12 and considered all of the evidence presented; and
WHEREAS, public hearings have been conducted before the Planning Commission and City
Council all of the testimony presented has been considered, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the real property subject to these land use applications by Polygon Northwest
Company (the "subject property") is owned by Faye Zimmer and Nancy Bocchi and is legally
described in Attachment" jJ(', which is affixed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 2. That the subject property is depicted on the Exhibit Map for Annexation which
is affixed hereto as Attachment "B" and is by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. That based upon the Findings in Support, which is affixed hereto as Attachment
"C" and is by this reference incorporated herein, the subject property is hereby annexed to the City
ofW oodburn.
Section 4. That the Woodburn Zoning Map is hereby amended, as to the subject property,
from Marion County "Urban Transition Farm" (UTF) to City of Woodb4rn "Single Family
Residential" (RS) based upon the Findings in Support, which is affixed hereto as Attachment "C".
Page 1 - Council Bill No.
Ordinance No.
""
liE
Section 5. That the application granting conditional use approval of a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) is approved based upon the Findings in Support, which is affixed hereto as
Attachment "C".
Section 6. That the application allowing a Variance to open space/indoor recreation
standards is approved based upon the Findings in Support, which is affixed hereto as Attachment "C"
Section 7. That the land use applications approved by Sections 1 through 6 herein are subject
to the conditions contained in Attachment "0", which is affixed hereto and incorporated herein, which
the Council finds reasonable.
Approved as to form~ ~ II ~ S; - '11
City Attorney Date
Approved:
Richard Jennings, Mayor
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant City Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
l
Page 2 - Council Bill No.
Ordinance No.
~
ATTACHMENT. A - ---
Page -1- of .::::J::==
ALPHA ENGINEERING. INC.
liE
AUGUST 10, 1999
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
FOR ANNEXATION PURPOSES ONLY
BOONES CROSSING, WOODBURN
JOB NO. 395-011
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE PETER RAYMOND DONATION LAND
CLAIM NO. 58, IN SECTIONS 18 AND 19 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST,
AND SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, OF THE
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, MARION COUNTY, OREGON, SAID PARCEL BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PETER RAYMOND
DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58 LOCATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSIDP 5
SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, MARION
COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE NORTH 89035'00" WEST, 949.61 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 40054'50" WEST, 88.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61046'06" WEST, 102.57
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41017'57" WEST, 507.13 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN REEL 224, PAGE 88, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS,
BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO
FAYE E. ZIMMER AND NANCY K. BOCCm BY DEED RECORDED IN REEL
1229, PAGE 681, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS, ALSO BEING ON THE
EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF WOODBURN; THENCE ALONG SAID
CITY LIMITS ON SAID NORTH PARCEL LINE, NORTH 60043'29" WEST, 494.57
FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND
CONVEYED TO JAMES A. ROARKE AND LOIS E. ROARKE BY DEED
RECORDED IN REEL 300, PAGE 590, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CITY LIMITS, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
ROARKE TRACT, SOUIH 41015'00" WEST, 86.13 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN
ANGLE POINT THEREON; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE
EASTERLY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO EMIL KISTNER
AND TILLIE KISTNER BY DEED RECORDED IN REEL 134, PAGE 105, MARION
COUNTY DEED RECORDS, SOUTH 25030'00" WEST, 228.23 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID KISTNER TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID KISTNER TRACT AND ITS WESTERLY EXTENSION,
NORTH 61000'00" WEST, 589.77 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RrvHT OF WAY
LINE OF BOONES FERRY ROAD (MARKET ROAD NO. 38, BEIN9 to FEET
Plaza West. Suite 230.9600 SW Oak. Portland. Oregon 97223
Office 503-452-8003. Fax 503-452-8043
~
ATTACHMENT A_
Page...c.... of.:L:::
ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC.
liE
BOONES CROSSING
ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION (CONTD.)
WIDE); THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH
24030'00" WEST, 1802.95 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE
NORTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO NANCY R. VEZEY
BY DEED RECORDED AS REEL 1243, PAGE 272, MARION COUNTY DEED
RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND SAID NORTH
PARCEL LINE, SOUTH 89015'00" EAST, 549.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00045'00"
WEST, 37.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89015'00" EAST, 1510.00 FEET, MORE OR
LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID VEZEY TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID
EAST LINE, NORTH 00045'00" EAST, 37.00 F:EET TO' THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID VEZEY TRACT, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT.
TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRANK R. HAWLEY AND ALMEDA
HAWLEY BY DEED RECORDED IN REEL 323, PAGE 406, MARION COUNTY
DEED RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID HAWLEY TRACT,
AND THE WEST LINE OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN REEL 290, PAGE 157,
MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS, NORTH 00033'40" WEST, 903.42 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED -TO
F AYE E. ZIMMER AND NANCY K. BOCCHI BY DEED RECORDED IN REEL
1229, PAGE 683, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE, AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION, NORTH 89051 '13" EAST, 336.92
FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BROWN
STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST RIGijT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 01032'20"
WEST, 120.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN ANGLE POINT ON SAID RIGHT OF
WAY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 88027'40"
EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY
LINE, NORTH 01032'20" WEST, 305.54 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE'
EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ZIMMER AND BOCCHI .
TRACT; THENCE ALONG SAID EXTENSION AND SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH .
89051 '13" WEST, 394.04 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF PARCEL 2, AS DESCRIBED IN REEL 1393, PAGE 758, MARION COUNTY
DEED RECORDS, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE EXISTING
CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF WOODBURN; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, AND SAID EXISTING CITY LIMITS, NORTH 60001 '22
WEST, 163.44 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT 0,\ BEGINNING,
CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 63.51 ACRES. . .
Plaza Wesl' Suile 230- 9600 SW Oak- Portland, Oregon 97223
Office 503-452-8003 - Fax 503-452-8043
'l'"
EXHIBIT MAP FOR ANNEXATION
LOCATED IN THE PElER RA '(MONO D.LC. NO. 58
-
AND IN SECllONS 18 AND 19, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST,
AND SECllON 13. TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST. W1LLAMETTE MERIDIAN
MARION COUNTY OREGON
I(
-:r
VAUO UNTIL 12-31-99
Is ~.
ok
t!
....
ItJ
I
SCALE: '''=400'
~I
liE
ATTACHMENT
Page --J.- of
8
N 89'.35'00' W 949.61'
~__ J' If)
NE CORNER
PETER RA YMONO
OLC NO_ 58
RS
(PUD-RS)
2,384,686 SF
(54. HAC)
N 01'.32'20' W
.305.54'
N 88'27'40. E I
10.00
N 01'.32'20' W 120.00'
L _ .3.36.92'
N 89'511.3
/
N
~
..;
o
Ol
~
'0
~
;.,
....
b
o
z
............... N 00'45'00' E .37.00'
S 8915'00' E 1510.00
PROJECT NO_ 395-01 1
SCALE: 1"==400'
DRAWN BY JTF
8-10-99
l
~
.ALPHA ENGINEERING INe.
PUNNING A DEVJ:I.OIIKENT 8ZRVICZS A SURVEYING
oma: 60:1-462-8003 A'AX 603-462-8043
PLAZA 1I'EST" SUITE 230 A teoO n OAK" PORTLAND,OR 87223
1i
ATTACHMENT c...
Page -'- of ' ~
~
lIE
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
Boones Crossing Stage Two Review
File Nos. Annexation 97-08, Zone Change 97-12, Conditional Use 97-03,
Variance 97-12, and Planned Unit Development 97-03
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The applicant, Polygon Northwest, requests City of Woodburn approval for annexation,
zone change, conditional use, variance, and planned unit development preliminary plat of
Boones Crossing (File Numbers Annexation 97-08, Zone Change 97-12, Conditional Use
97-03, Variance 97-12, and Planned Unit Development 97-03). Boones Crossing,-"
contains approximately 61.9 acres and will be subdivided into 242 detached single family
residential lots, two future multifamily residential lots, a future I-acre commercial parcel,
and a future parcel with use yet to be determined. Additionally, there will be three mini-
park tracts and a 3-acre City park tract. The primary property owner is Faye Zimmer and
Nancy Bocchi. Alpha Engineering is the project planner and engineer. The property may
be described as Tax. Lots 1100 and 1400 ofT5S, lW, Section 18C and a portion of Tax.
Lot 600 ofT5S, 1W, Section 19B.
II. PROCEDURAL STATUS
In accordance with the procedures set forth in the City of Woodburn Zoning Ordinance,
an application package for the aforementioned requests for the Boones Crossing project
was submitted by the applicant on October 31, 1997 for consideration by the City of
Woodburn Planning Commission and City Council. In accordance with the City of
Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, public hearings were held by the Planning Commission
and City Council to consider the subject applications.
III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Annexation
1.
The subject property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary and is
therefor~ urbanizab1e.pursu~t to Sta~ewide G~al. 14... ... . \
The subject property IS contiguous With the eXlstmg City lutuJs;,
The owners of Tax Lots 1100, 1400, and a portion 600 have petitioned the City
for annexation.
The City has the ability to provide public services to the site.
2.
3.
4.
Additionally,ORS 197.175(1) requires that cities exercise their planning and zoning
responsibilities in accordance with Statewide Planning Goals when annexing
'll"
ATTAC~MENT U
Page of f~
~
llE
unincorporated territory within a city's Urban Growth Boundary. The following section
will list the applicable Statewide Planning Goals.
Goal 2 - Land Use Planning - To establish a land use planning process and policy
framework as a basis for all decision and actions related to use of land and to assure an
adequate factual base for such decisions.
FINDING:
The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan and implementing Zoning Ordinance in
compliance with this goal. The Boones Crossing application was reviewed in compliance
with processes established by the acknowledged ordinances.
Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards - To protect life and property
from natural disasters and hazards.
FINDING:
The subject site has been sUIVeyed to determine if any hazards, such as wetlands or
floodplain impact the site. There are no hazards that would impact the proposed Boones
Crossing PUD.
Goal 10 - Housing - To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the State.
FINDING:
The subject development would provide housing opportunities for first time homebuyers
or first time move up buyers. Additionally, the mix of single family detached and
multifamily attached residential choices gives residents of Wood bum options for housing.
Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services - To plan and develop a timely, orderly and
efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban
and rural development.
FINDING:
The applicant's utility plans and capital improvement plans demonstrate that public
facilities and services are available to the site. Additionally, public improvements
constructed by the Boones Crossing development will provide the framework for
extension of public services to the subject area of the City's Urban Growth Boundary.
Goal 12 - Transportation - To provide and encourage a safe, convenit~\t and economic
transportation system. ,- . ~
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing development will provide necessary improvements to adjoining
streets as well as necessary street improvements internal to the development. The Boones
Crossing development will provide transportation improvements serving vehicular,
bicycle and pedestrian circulation.
~
ATTAOHrem u_
Page of- 15
lIE
Goal 14 - Urbanization - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to
urban land use.
FINDING:
The subject site is within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. The site is adjacent to the
existing city limits and has public utilities available to the site.
Zone Change
The applicable approval criteria for the proposed zone change is as follows:
(1)
Complies with the Comprehensive Plan;
.==---,
FINDING:
The proposed zone change from Marion County Urban Transition Fann (UTF) to RS
with a PUD overlay complies with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the site
as residential use.
(2) There is a public need for the change;
FINDING:
The applicant has provided a market analysis demonstrating a need for single family lots
with homes in the $110,000 to $160,000 range. The proposed PUD has been designed
using "smart development" techniques with a mix of uses. The proposed RS zone allows
PUDs through the Conditional Use process.
(3) The need is met by this proposal;
FINDING:
The RS zone on this 61.9 acre parcel provides a single property with the scale necessary
to develop a PUD with "smart development" techniques including home sites, street
system, open space and park areas, pedestrian linkages and neighborhood commercial
opportunities.
(4)
A va ilability of other appropriately zoned land in the vic)nity;
~
FINDING:
There are no other single parcels of similar size necessary to a develop a PUD ofthis size
in the vicinity.
(5) Unable to make reasonable use of the land as it is currently zoned.
r
ATTACfiMENT C!.-
Page~of 1<
lIE
FINDING:
The site is currently zoned County UTF. It is not developable in a manner that will meet
the needs of the area without annexation or zone change to RS.
Conditional Use
The applicable approval criteria for the proposed Conditional Use is as follows:
(1) That the Planning Commission has the power to grant the Conditional
Use;
FINDING: -=--'
Section 14.030 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the Planning Commission to hear and
decide Conditional Use requests. The subject conditional use was heard by the Planning
Commission prior to being forwarded to the City Council for consideration.
(2) That such Conditional Use, as described by the applicant, will be in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the district;
FINDING:
The majority of surrounding land uses are residential. The City Council has determined
that the proposed PUD will be compatible with the adjoining residential uses.
(3) That any condition imposed is necessary for the public health, safety or
welfare, or to protect the health or safety of persons working or residing
in the area, or for the protection of property or improvements in the
neighborhoods .
FINDING:
The City Council has imposed the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto, to insure that
the intent of this criterion is met.
Variance
The applicable approval criteria for the proposed Variance is as follows:
(1) That there are unnecessary, unreasonable hardships pJpractical
difficulties which can be relieved only by modifying the literal
requirements of the ordinance;
FINDING:
The City Council has determined that requiring 40% (24.8 acres) as common open space,
combined with the necessary right-of-way dedications on the 61.0 acre site would limit
'IT"
ATTACHMENT c..-
Page --5- of J <
liE
the ability to develop the site with "smart development" principles. The proposed
development will be providing other significant public improvements during
development. This, combined with the projected parks SDC fees will offset the reduction
in common open space.
(2) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applying to the land, buildings, or use referred to in the application, which
circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land, buildings or
uses in the same district; however, nonconforming land, uses, or
structures in the vicinity shall not in themselves constitute such
circumstances or conditions;
FINDING: -=-'
This proposal will implement "smart development" principles contained within the City's
TGM grant study prepared by McKeeverIMorris in June 1997. Surrounding properties
have developed prior to these design principles being in place, therefore setting this
property apart.
(3) That granting the application will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood of the premises;
FINDING:
The proposed PUD will be providing three mini-park areas as well as a fully improved 3-
acre public park in an area of the City currently lacking adequate park uses. The reduction
in common open will be mitigated by these park improvements and SDC fees collected
from the development.
(4) That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the
substantial property rights of the petitioner;
FINDING:
Requiring a 40% common open space dedication, combined with an approximate 20%
right-of-way dedication would only allow 40% of the site to be developed. Neighboring
conventional subdivisions are not required to dedicate 60% of its gross acreage for non-
residential uses. Therefore, this criterion is met.
(5) That the granting of the application will not, under thetrcumstances of
the particular case, adversely affect the health or saf~ty,'of persons
working or residing in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant;
and
FINDING:
The proposed development, with its neo-traditional characteristics will promote more
neighbor-to-neighbor interaction. The fully serviced development will have no adverse
ATTAC~ENT. C.
Page of I 5
lIE
affect on the health or safety of persons working or residing in the development or in the
vicinity.
(6) That granting of the application will be in general harmony with the intent
and purpose of this ordinance and will not adversely affect any officially
adopted Comprehensive Plan.
FINDING:
The development will provide adequate public open space and park areas. These areas,
combined with the SDC parks fees will mitigate the reduction of common open space and
meets the intent and purpose of this ordinance.
-~,
Planned Unit Development
The applicable approval criteria for the proposed Planned Unit Development are
contained within the City of W oodbum Comprehensive Plan sections: A - Residential
Land Development Plan Policies; B - Commercial Land Development Policies; G -
Housing Goals and Plan Policies; H - Public Service Goals and Plan Policies; and I -
Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies.
IV. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES
A. Residential Land Development Plan Policies.
A-I. Residential areas should be designed around a neighborhood concept.
Neighborhoods should be an identifiable unit bounded by arterials, non-residential uses, or
natural features of the terrain. The neighborhood should provide a focus and identity within
the community and should have a community facility such as a school, park or privately
owned community facility to allow for interaction within the neighborhood.
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing site is bounded by Boones Ferry Road along the project's western
portion and by a proposed south street along the project's south boundary. The development
will provide the neighborhood with three tree lined "boulevards" featuring landscaped
medians or tracts. Three mini-parks will be constructed to provide neighborhood residents
recreational opportunities. The central park will serve as the neighborh~'s focal open space
area and as the nexus of the single family residential, multifamily residential, and
commercial segments of the PUD. Amenities in Boones Crossing are scaled to the
neighborhood in which they have been located.
A-3. Development should promote, through the use of moderate density standards and
creative design, a feeling of openness and spaciousness with sufficient landscaped area and
open space to create a pleasant living environment.
'll"
ATTACH~~Nt c.... lIE
Page 01 IS"
FINDING:
The proposed density for the Boones Crossing PUD is approximately 5.4 units per acre. This
is consistent with the City's density range of 12 units per acre (maximum) for the Low
Density Residential Plan designation.
A-4. Streets in residential areas should be used by residents for access to collectors and
arterials, Residential streets should be designed to minimize their use for through traffic,
however. whenever possible dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs should be avoided.
FINDING:
The internal street system for Boones Crossing is designed to move vehicles through the
neighborhood with a minimum amount of out of direction travel and onto either Boones
Ferry Road or the proposed southern street. Boones Crossing is designed with a neo-
traditional, pedestrian oriented lotting pattern. The street layout has been designed to limit
vehicular travel while encouraging pedestrian and bicycle use through the provision of tree
lined streets and pathways. The number of streets accessing Boones Ferry Road and the
south arterial were kept to a minimum per City access standards, but will allow for a neo-
traditional grid-like lotting pattern. The use of narrow local residential streets will also to
serve to reduce traffic speeds further enhancing the pedestrian friendly goal of the
development.
A-5. Residential developments should strive for creative design which will maximize the
inherent values of the land being developed and encourage slow moving traffic. Each
residential development should provide for landscaping and tree planting to enhance the
livability and aesthetics of the neighborhood.
FINDING:
The internal street system, styled largely after the traditional grid pattern, will generally have
28-foot improvement widths on the majority of the streets (City's Local Residential
"Skinny" Street standard). This narrow improvement will serve as a traffic-calming device.
All streets will have planting strips, landscaped with street trees as illustrated on Sheet 8-
Open Space, Parks, and Street Details. Three streets will also have landscaped center
medians or tracts providing an enhanced sense of identity to the community.
A-9. Industrial and commercial uses which locate adjacent to re~ilntial areas should
buffer their use by screening and design control. and should be controlled with sufficient
setback so their location will not adversely affect the residential uses.
FINDING:
The site for the commercial aspect of this development is at the intersection of Boones Ferry
Road and the proposed southern street. A primary function of the commercial area will be
'Ir
ATTAC~ENT c!...--
Page . of I~ lIE
to serve the residents within the Boones Crossing PUD, therefore buffering of the
commercial uses will be accomplished through design control rather than screening. The
central park will provide a buffer between the single family uses and the commercial area.
Additionally, the multifamily area will also serve to buffer the single family uses from the
commercial area in a continuum of intensity.
A-IO. High density residential areas should be located so as to minimize the possible
deleterious effects on adjacent low density residential developments. When high density and
low density areas abut, density should decrease in those areas immediately adjacent to low
density residential land. Whenever possible, buffering should be practiced by such means
as landscaping, sight-obscuring fences and hedges. and increased setbacks.
=.r-~'
FINDING:
Streets and/or the central park will separate the multifamily residential uses from the single
family area. Land uses have been tiered to become less dense as they move away from the
intersection of Boones Ferry Road and the southern street in an effort to blend with the
surrounding community. This tiered effect places the neighborhood commercial at the
intersection of the two bordering streets. The commercial area is then ringed by the
multifamily uses and central park. The single family area then forms the outer ring of
development.
A-II. TrajJicfrom high density residential areas should have access to collector or arterial
streets without going through other residential areas.
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing community is adjacent to an arterial street and proposed southerly
street. This location will limit the amount of traffic accessing the multifamily sites from
proceeding through existing neighborhoods.
B. Commercial Land Development Policies.
B-3. Strip zoning should be discouraged as a most unproductive form of commercial land
development. Strip zoning is characterized by the use of small parcels of less than one acre,
with lot depths o! less than. 150 feet and parcels contain~ng multiple ~rilfway access poi~ts.
Whenever possible, the City should encourage or require commercial aevelopments which
are designed to allow pedestrians to shop without relying on the private automobile to go
from shop to shop. Therefore, acreage site lots should be encouraged to develop "mall
type" developments that allow a one SlOP and shop opportunity. Commercial developments
or commercial development patterns which require the use of the private automobile shall
be discouraged.
~ rr
ATTACH~ENT C.-
Page . of I~
lIE
FINDING:
The size of the commercial portion of Boones Crossing is sized to be of a smaller
neighborhood scale allowing pedestrians to access all shops within the commercial area
without needing to rely on their car to get from store to store. Additionally, many residents
of Boones Crossing will be able to walk or bike to the commercial area, consistent with
smart development, thus reducing the number of car trips necessary for shopping purposes.
The nature of the development is pedestrian oriented, including the commercial area which
is limited in intensity to serve the neighborhood through pedestrian connections.
B-4. Architectural design of commercial areas should be attractive with a spacious feeling
and enough landscaping to reduce the visual impact of large expanses of asphalt parking
areas. -~-,
FINDING:
Due to the commercial area's proximity to the residential area of Boones Crossing, it is
essential to ensure that the commercial area is attractive. The City will have the opportunity
to conduct a detailed review through Site Plan Review process when the commercial area
develops.
B-6. Commercial office and other low traffic generating commercial retail uses can be
located on collectors or in close proximity to residential areas if care in architecture and site
planning is exercised. The City should insure by proper regulations that any commercial
uses located close to residential areas have the proper architectural and landscaping buffer
zones.
FINDING:
The commercial portion of the PUD has been sited at the intersection of Boones Ferry Road,
classified as a Minor Arterial on the Transportation Plan and a proposed southern street. As
noted previously, the Boones Crossing PUD has been designed with a tiered land use
progression: commercial uses at the intersection, followed by a ring of multifamily (and
central park), followed by the single family lots. Streets, parks, and landscaping will all
serve to buffer the commercial area from the single family portion of Boones Crossing.
Also, as noted in the response to Plan Policy A-9, the buffering of the commercial area from
the residential area will be accomplished through architectural design controls.
G.
Housing Goals and Plan Policies.
l
G-I. The housing goal of the city is to insure that adequate housing for all sectors of the
community is provided.
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing POO will provide housing opportunities for several segments of the
e--
ATTACHMENT IlJ~
Page~ of IS
residential market. The development will provide housing for first time home buyers and fIrst
time move-up buyers as well as one or two types of attached housing (townhomes and/or
apartments) for those relying on the availability of rental units, thus addressing the needs of
three to four different sectors of the community.
G-1-2. It is the policy of the City to encourage a variety of housing types to accommodate
the demands of the local housing market.
FINDING:
As noted in response to G-I, the Boones Crossing PUD will be providing housing for three
to four market areas: the fIrst time home buyer; fIrst time move-up home buyers; attached
housing for rent; and apartments or townhomes (to be developed in a later development
proposal). This mix of housing will provide housing opportunities for a broad spectrum of
Woodburn's citizens.
H. Public Service Goals and Plan Policies.
B-1. It is the goal of the City to provide adequate public services to all areas of the City
to include:
* Sewer lines of adequate capacity;
* Water lines of adequate capacity for both domestic supply and fire fighting
capabilities, and
Storm drainage to prevent flooding of valuable property where feasible;
*
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing PUD will not only provide services adequate for the development of
the Boones Crossing site, but will also provide needed services to neighboring properties in
this area of the City. The extension of services to the Boones Crossing site will enhance the
City's capability of providing these services to the City's residents beyond the Boones
Crossing site. Sewer, water and storm drain lines are provided to the property in satisfaction
of City standards. (please refer to Sheet 7 - Utility Plan and Sheet 9 - Capital Improvements
Plan for additional details.)
*
To provide a central system to accommodate the service lines t~include:
Sewage treatment facilities sufficient in capacity to accommodate the City's growth
until the year 2008;
Lift stations as necessary to service the sewer lines;
Well storage and treatment of water as is necessary to accommodate the needs of the
City, and;
Detention systems for flood water and storm drain runoff so as not to overburden the
drainage systems of the City,
B-2.
*
*
*
ATTACHMENT
Page -LL- of
r<,
/<::,
liE
FINDING:
The Boones Crossing site will be able to utilize gravity served sanitary sewer lines. The
sanitary sewer lines constructed as a part of the Boones Crossing PUD but will also serve a
wide area in this part of the City's planning area. Regarding water, Boones Crossing will
not only be installing internal water lines, but will also be installing water lines in Boones
Ferry Road and the southern street providing water service to neighboring properties.
Boones Crossing will construct two water quality facilities to handle storm water retention
during peak flows. (Please refer to Sheet 7 -Utility Plan and Sheet 9 - Capital
Improvements Plan)
H-5. Development Zones - The City should encourage development in areas of existing
facilities first. Secondly, the City should encourage development in areas where extensions
of existing city services can be accommodated. The city should encourage development of
new areas to which services can be most cheaply extended. The City should develop any
other areas only as a last resort. The City will adhere to the policies in the Storm Water and
Water and Sewer elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
FINDING:
The 60-acre Boones Crossing location provides the applicant with a site of sufficient scale
to develop a viable smart development project. Development at this location will provide
the City with service extensions to an area currently lacking. The Boones Crossing PUD will
also be providing the City with street improvements proposed on the City's Transportation
System Plan. This request for PUD approval is therefore consistent with this policy.
H-6. To insure that the growth does not increase the cost to the present City residents, the
City's policy should insure that new developments pay for any additional services they
demand. The City shall institute the necessary taxes and fees to insure that this is
accomplished as far as is practical.
FINDING:
Polygon Northwest will pay for the public improvements as outlined in the conditions of
approval. Where appropriate, Polygon Northwest will pay for approved connection fees and
SDC's related to the expansion of services in compliance with this plan policy.
I. Transportation System Plan Goals and Plan Policies. _ l
In June of 1996, the City adopted a new Transportation System Plan, Woodburn
Transportation System Plan, in compliance with the state statue and administrative rule
(OAR 660 Division 12). This plan repeals and supersedes the City's earlier transportation
plan. Appendix "E" of that plan identifies potential changes to the City Comprehensive Plan,
Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Code. However, the City has not adopted these
recommendations.
~
lIE
ATTACHMENT C/
Page...1.iZ::.. of / 5'
Goall
Develop a multi-model transportation system that avoids or reduces reliance upon one form
of transportation. and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts.
Policies:
1. Develop an expanded intra-city bus transit system which will provide added service
and route coverage to improve the mobility and accessibility of the transportation
disadvantaged. and to attract traditional auto users to use the system.
FINDING:
This plan takes into account the potential for an expanded intra-city bus transit system. The
commercial area will accommodate space for a future public transit stop servingt..'1osouth
end of the city. The pedestrian friendly design of Boones Crossing allows residents the
ability to walk or bike to a future transit stop at this location.
2. Develop a plan for providing travel options between Woodburn and Portland and
Portland and/or Salem, including inter-city bus service and potential bus/carpool park-n-
ride facilities.
FINDING:
Woodburn currently does not have an inter-city city transit system. If the service is initiated
as envisioned in the Transportation System Plan. the park and ride system, located at the 1-5
and Oregon 214 interchange, will not have a direct physical impact on this proposed
development.
4. Develop a bikeway system which will provide routes and facilities to allow
bicyclists to travel from residential areas to schools, parks, and places of employment
and commercial areas. Off-street facilities in City greenwaylpark areas will be
identified. Insure all new collector and arterial streets are constructed with bike lanes.
FINDING:
The Woodburn Bicycle Facility Plan identifies Boones Ferry Road, Brown Road, and the
southern street to be constructed with an on-street bike route. Improvements to these rights-
of-way will provide the required on-street striped bike lane. Additionally, bike parking will
be included in public areas such as the commercial portion of the develoI\Jnent as well as the
park areas. '
5. Identify sidewalk and off-street pathway improvements to improve pedestrian
mobility within neighborhoods and between residential areas and schools. parks. places of
employment and commercial areas. Insure all new collector and arterial streets are
constructed with sidewalks.
~
ATTACHMENt C!.--
Page -L3... of , ~
liE
FINDING:
The new Transportation System Plan recommends construction of sidewalks along with the
construction of new streets. In conjunction with the development of Boones Crossing, full
sidewalk improvements (as shown on Sheet 4 - Preliminary Subdivision Plat) will be
provided throughout the development. In addition to the provided sidewalks along the street
rights-of-way, Boones Crossing will also provide a greenbelt pathway bisecting the two
blocks immediately east of the central park (see Sheet 5 - Landscape Master Plan). This
greenbelt pathway will provide an attractive, convenient pedestrian linkage to the
development's main park parcel from the single family residential area of the PUD.
Goal 2 -=-'
Develop a street system which will handle projected year 2015 traffic demands in the
Woodburn area, and interconnects residential areas with employment centers, schools,
parks, churches and regional transportation facilities.
Policies:
1. Develop an updated roadway functional classification plan for the Woodburn area,
that reflects the desired function of different roadways, and is consistent with current federal
guidelines for the designation of major streets in an urban area.
FINDING:
Boones Ferry Road and the southern street are both shown as Minor Arterials on the City's
Street Functional Classification Plan. Brown Road is classified as an Access Street on the
Plan. The Boones Crossing PUD will appropriately connect to all three roads. The
dedication and construction of the southern street provides the City with a needed
transportation link identified in the City's Transportation System Plan.
4. Identify new east-west and north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the
City to relieve traffic demands on Highways 219/214, 211 and 99E.
FINDING:
The City has identified a new south arterial connecting Highway 214 and Highway 99E in
the western and southern portion of the City. The alignment for the new south arterial was
determined in part by the analysis ofK.ittleson and Associates, a transportation planning and
traffic engineering consulting firm and through the cooperation of the prqperty owners in the
area who are supportive of the proposed alignment. The applicant h~ incorporated this
arterial into the Boones Crossing plan and will build that portion of the roadway adjacent to
the project.
5. Develop updated street design standards for arterial, collectors, and local streets.
ATTACl~ENT
Page . of
c..---
Ie:
liE
FINDING:
Polygon Northwest will comply with street design standards as specified in the June 1996
Transportation System Plan. Boones Ferry Road and the southern street will be constructed
to the standards for a minor arterial. Interior streets, with the exception of the landscaped
boulevards, will be designed to the local residential "skinny" street with parking on both
sides. The landscaped boulevard streets have a modified design that provides two 14-foot
travel lanes with a 10-foot landscaped median and no on-street parking, Please refer to Street
Sections on Sheet 8 - Open Space, Parks, and Street Details.
Goal 3
Develop transportation improvements that will improve overall traffic safety in the
Woodburn area. -~,
Policies:
2. Develop a plan for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety for travel to/from local
schools.
FINDING:
Boones Crossing has full street improvements throughout the development providing
sidewalks on all streets and bike lanes on those streets identified on the City's Bicycle
Facility Plan. Internal to the Boones Crossing development, the streets have narrow street
sections or traffic medians to reduce speeds. Externally, Boones Crossing will be providing
needed improvements to two arterials and one access street.
Goal 4
Develop a set of reliable funding sources that can be applied to fund future transportation
improvements in the Woodburn area.
Policies:
3. Identify a traffic impact fee structure associated with new developments in the
Woodburn area to fund transportation improvements.
FINDING:
Polygon Northwest will comply with the adopted SDC fee and TIF schedule.
Goal 5
Develop amendments to City land use standards and ordinances to reduce travel demand
and promote use of modes of transportation other than the automobile.
-
}
Policies:
1. Identify changes in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance to encourage implementation
of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies by local businesses, TDM
ATTA~~ENT* lIE
Page _. of
strategies should include bicycle and car pool parking provisions, and allowable overall
parking reductions for employer institution of TDM strategies. including transit fare
subsidies, car pool matching programs, and flexible work hours.
2. Identify changes in the Woodburn Zoning ordinance to encourage transit and
pedestrian-oriented development. This includes proper building orientation to improve
access for transit users and patrons. direct pedestrian connections, and bus stop provisions
where appropriate development.
3. Identify changes in the Woodburn Subdivision Standards to encourage neo-
traditional development pattern and adequate local street standards to accommodate all
modes of transportation.
-~,
4. Adopt traffic impact analysis guidelines to be used by the City and developers to
identify the impact of new development on street system improvement needs.
FINDING:
The City has identified potential changes to the Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision
Standards and Comprehensive Plan to implement these policy recommendations. To date
these changes have not been adopted by the City Council and are therefore, not directly
applicable.
V. PUBLIC TESTIMONY RECEIVED
Testimony in support of the applications was presented by the applicant and their
representati ves.
There was no opposing testimony.
-
}
lIE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ATTACHMENTD
Page -L. of J 3
The applications are granted subject to the following conditions:
A. PLANNING:
1. The conditional use and variance requests are subject to the approval of the
annexation and zone change requests.
2. Any subdivision of the parcels shall comply with the applicable zoning ordinances and
regulations and any ordinance or regulation adopted under ORS 92.044 that are in effect
at the time of approval.
3. The Planned Unit Development (hereinafter "the PUD") shall be in substantial
conformity with the preliminary plan.
4. The Applicant shall provide for the installation of all franchised utilities and any
required easements on the final plat. Street lighting shall also be provided, as per PGE
plan schedule "B."
5. The Applicant shall provide City staff with a final light plan for the proposed
development for review by the Planning and Police Departments.
6. The Applicant shall show compliance with the vision clearance standard specified in
Chapter 8 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance.
7. The Applicant shall setback the garage 20 feet from the front property line or 20 feet
from the side property line if the side yard is adjacent to a street.
8. The Applicant shall comply with the single family dwelling driveway standards
specified in Chapter 10 of the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance.
9. The Applicant shall apply for site plan review for placement of the multi-family units
and neighborhood commercial buildings in Phases 3 and 4. In addition, the Applicant
shall include the development of the neighborhood park in Phase 2 rather than Phase 3.
The neighborhood park shall be available for use by the single family lots within Phases 1
and 2 of the Boones Crossing PUD at the time that these phases are completed.
. ~
10. The phases of the development shall be Phases 1, 2, 3, and 4 as_ depicted on the
following preliminary plat/subdivision map:
Page 1 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
I c HUU!~ iI~EI I
;il~lIIlili~ ~~~~~~~- l- En"
~9UM;~ <<i1-1 c!q 1(..; ~ 'l ~"11'l
I 'ij!j.~ IIII!!!! 51E~5J ~
! ;R~nnu ~3~
~~~;~Q. ~I~ :ii~~~!:
~ -- i! ~ · s
~..;~ ~;"" ~ e!
~i~ u-
'~'ll
U~
I !!! I
i III
e~ l ~ !~
:~ III (" R
~ ~ ~ i
HMENT D
of --13>0-
___----r------------
'<::::: ::::::::::;-.,
''', .....
---------'
___.____ .0." ".".T
---------.-------
n~~! liE
.. iil
~!;~ ~~ni~ I
U~ !~~iltil~
~i ~I~IU I
c.~ ~i!lu
~E ~ ;~
5 ~ i
a I~OJ
: ~~ol
. ~
: I~ol
~~z
~~m
~"U
froo
,-;p.
a-l
iii
t~o
~c
I~:D
i<O
CJ)
-en
o
z(J)
s:_
~
"Z
0_
1m =s,,~=_ D ~~- ~~~D
Page 2 _ Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD ~n:l33NI~3 t::lHd1l::l Wd9t>: tl2l 66 { t2 DO
ATTACHMENT V_ liE
Page~of~
11. SCOPE OF USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL AREA AND CONDITIONS ON ALLOWED USES.
The areas identified in the Applicant's site plan, designated for commercial use, shall be
restricted to neighborhood commercial uses as set forth below.
The neighborhood commercial area shall be primarily oriented to serve the residents of the
PUD. Neighborhood commercial uses are intended to be low-impact, pedestrian-oriented
businesses. The proximity of these commercial uses to residential uses in the PUD should
reduce automobile trips and promote energy conservation. Furthermore, this
neighborhood commercial area should not significantly compete with similar uses in other
areas of the city. Such uses shall be limited to certain types of personal services, retail
businesses and professional offices. The standards set forth below will allow the city to
control the impacts of such development, while at the same time, provide reasonable
flexibility in attracting viable and compatible commercial businesses to support this mixed-
use development.
The allowed uses within the neighborhood commercial areas identified in this PUD shall
be as follows, subject to site plan review:
a. Permitted Uses
i. Familv Services
(1) Pre-schools
(2) Day care facilities
(3) Nurseries
(4) Kindergartens
(5) Other family service uses determined by the Planning Director to be
similar in nature and impact to the uses set forth above
11. Personal Services with a gross floor area per business of 5,000 square feet
or less, including:
(1) Barber shops
(2) Beauty shops
(3) Bank or other financial institutions
(4) Laundry and tailor services
(5) Pharmacies
(6) Real estate offices
(7) Other personal services determined by the Planning Director to be
similar in nature and impact to the uses set forth above
-
}
Page 3 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTAC~ENT ~ lIE
Page - of I
111. Retail Businesses with a gross floor area per business of5,OOO square feet
or less, including:
(1) Antique shops
(2) Art and photo supply shops
(3) Cafes, coffee houses and bakeries
(4) Ice cream/candy stores
(5) Florists
(6) Gift Shops
(7) Other retail businesses determined by the Planning Director to be
similar in nature and impact to the uses set forth above.
IV. Single Family Dwellings above, beside or behind a neighborhood
commercial use.
b. Conditional Uses:
i. Grocery StoresIHea1th Food Stores
11. Video Rental Stores
ill. Professional offices for accountants, attorneys, medical, dental or other allied
professional offices and clinics, primarily oriented to serve residents of the
PUD.
c. Conditions on Allowed Uses:
i. Businesses may be open to the public only between the hours of 9 a.m. to 7
p.m.
11. Personal services or retail businesses with more than 5,000 square feet of
gross floor area per business shall not be allowed.
111. No drive through businesses shall be allowed.
IV. All Site Plan Reviews shall be reviewed by the Home Owner's Association
prior to submittal to the Planning Commission.
v. That portion of the PUD south of the east/west minor arterial shall be
designated a base zone ofPUD Single Family Residential subject to the right
of the Applicant to apply to the Planning Commission and the City Council at
a later date to obtain authorization to use the area for commercial uses.
12. The Applicant shall provide City stafFwith a copy of the final CC& R's
(Homeowner's Association) before City staffwill sign off on the plat. 'jrhe Applicant shall
also provide City staffwith a copy of the recorded CC & R's. :
13. The Applicant shall incorporate the multi-family complexes and neighborhood
commercial areas into the Home Owner's Association CC & R's.
Page 4 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
'I'"
ATTACHMENT U lIE
Page .:..5.- of J .3
14. The Applicant shall construct and dedicate to the City a three-acre neighborhood park
to be located within the PUD.
The park will be open to the public and will serve the PUD and surrounding
neighborhood.
15. Construction of the neighborhood park by the Applicant shall conform to all City
standards. The Applicant's minimum design and construction budget (which shall be
expended by the Applicant to create the neighborhood park) shall be $350,000.
16. In addition to the neighborhood park described above, the Applicant shall pay
to the City a Recreation and Parks Systems Development Charge of$161,805.
This is collected as a regulatory charge, based upon the City's Systems
Development Charge methodology, and does not constitute a development
exaction.
17. Final plans shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and standards,
The final construction plan shall include street landscaping and lighting. Street
landscaping shall be complete prior to acceptance by the City.
18, Construction shall conform to the City of Woodburn standard specifications and all
state building codes.
19. The Applicant shall provide the City with an acceptable bond or contract for
improvements as required in the Woodburn Subdivision Standards, Chapter ill Section 6
(4) prior to acceptance of the final plat and issuance of a building permit.
20. Prior to any construction, a reproducible mylar of the final plat shall be filed with the
Public Works Department after all required signatures have been obtained and the plat has
been recorded with Marion County.
21. On-site construction shall not commence until the improvement plans have been
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and all right-of-way permits,
system development charges and park fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance
have been paid.
22. Upon acceptable completion of all improvements to be maintained by the City, the
developer shall provide the City a maintenance bond good for one yeari in the amount of
100,10 of the improvement cost. }
23. Prior to building permit issuance the Applicant shall submit one set of reproducible
as-builts.
Page 5 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTACHMENT V
Page~ of I.?
lIE
24. Site Plan Review shall be required for the proposed multi-family units within the
PUD. At the time of Site Plan Review, the Applicant shall comply with the Woodburn
Zoning Ordinance,
25. The Applicant shall conform to the "Boones Crossing Landscape Master Plan"
(which was submitted by the Applicant and marked Attachment P) which is incorporated
herein by the reference. The Applicant shall also conform to the "Boones Crossing Open
Space, Parks, and Street Details" (which was submitted by the Applicant and marked
Attachment Q) which is also incorporated herein by this reference.
The Applicant shall place street trees along each of the roadways and shall cooperate with
the Woodburn Parks Department in the design of the 3 acre neighborhood park on the
southwest side of the subject site which the Applicant is required to dedicate and
construct.
26. The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible for watering, maintaining all
landscaped areas, and for replacing dead or dying plant materials. The Applicant shall
assume Homeowner's Association responsibilities with respect to landscape maintenance
during the first year of each phase of construction. The Applicant shall install a permanent
irrigation system under the common landscaped areas. Any other landscaped areas, such
as the pedestrian pathway and landscaped medians, shall be planted with materials that are
not dependent upon irrigation."
27. Prior to construction, the Applicant shall provide a concept illustration and
preliminary scale drawing of the proposed entry monument signs to City staff for review
and approval."
28. The Applicant shall be responsible for platting and recording the lot in accordance
with the subdivision standards.
B. PUBLIC WORKS: GENERAL CONDffiONS
1. The final plan shall conform to the construction plan review procedures and
standards.
2. On-site existing water wells and subsurface sewage disposal systems shall be
abandoned by the Applicant in accordance with state regulations.
~
3. All City-maintained facilities located on private property shall ~uire a minimum
16-foot wide utility easement to be conveyed to the City. ~
4. The Applicant, not the City is responsible for obtaining permits from any state
and/or federal agencies which may require approval or permit.
Page 6 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTACHMENT ])
Page -2-?f I :~
5, The Applicant, by this development, shall not cause storm water runoff to be
impounded on adjacent properties.
lIE
6. The subdivision shall be platted in accordance with standard surveying practice,
approved and recorded with Marion County.
7. The Applicant shall provide for the installation of all franchised utilities and shall
provide any required easements on the final plat. Street lighting shall also be
installed by the applicant as per PGE plan schedule "B".
8. The Owner/Applicant shall be required to enter into an improvement agreement as
outlined in the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance, Chapter ill, Section 6 prior to
acceptance of the final plat, Also prior to construction of the subdivision
commencing the City will require approved construction plans, a performance
bond in the amount of 1000.10 of the constructions costs and that the construction
permit fees be paid.
9. All work shall conform to the City of Woodburn Standards and all State Building
Codes and regulations.
10. The Applicant shall provide engineering plans for all the improvements outlined in
the Conditions of Approval. No construction activities shall be initiated until the
City-approved engineering plans are received by the Applicant. After completion
of the development, the Applicant shall provide "as builts" to the City.
11. No SDC credits shall be allowed for the improvements which are required by the
City as Conditions of Approval.
C. PUBLIC WORKS: STREET CONDmONS
1. Boones Ferry Road shall be improved from the south boundary of this
development to the existing railroad crossing approximately 150 feet north of this
development. This shall be a full street improvement, not half street as indicated in
the application. The improvement shall be in conformance with the Transportation
System Plan (hereinafter "TSP"), wherein Boones Ferry Road is designated as a
minor arterial. The railroad crossing on Boones Ferry/Settlemier Avenue is
currently being designed by the City and is to be scheduled for jmprovement. The
improvement portion shall end approximately 100 feet south ot)he existing
crossing. The pavement thickness constructed by the applicanf shall meet the
structural strength of an arterial street.
2. Boones Ferry Road is an existing 60-foot wide right-of-way. In accordance with
Page 7 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
r
ATTAC~ENT ~6 ~ lIE
Page ..t:1- pf - - -
the TSP, an additional 7 feet of right-of-way and a 10-foot wide utility easement
shall be dedicated by the Applicant to the City adjacent to this development.
3. The Applicant shall provide 50 feet wide right -of-ways and 28 feet wide
improved streets with parking on both sides along the interior residential streets
and 60 feet wide right-of-ways and 38 foot wide improved street with a 10-foot
wide landscape boulevard in the center, with no on street parking for these interior
residential collectors. In addition, the Applicant shall provide 10 foot wide utility
easements adjacent to the right-of-way line on all interior streets.
4. The Applicant shall provide connector paths of grass crete material for
emergency access at the end of several dead end streets, and not provide a cul-de-
sac for turn around provisions, The Homeowner's Association shall be responsible
for the maintenance of the area, including the grass crete provided for emergency
access. The final design shall make provisions to restrict access for other vehicles
except emergency vehicles.
D. PUBLIC WORKS: BROWN STREET IMPROvtMENTS
1. Brown Street adjacent to this development; shall be improved in conformance with
the Transportation System Plan (TSP). This shall be full street improvement, not a
half street improvement as indicated in the application. A standard 60 foot right-
of-way shall be required. The Applicant shall dedicate to the City that amount of
right-of-way necessary to meet the 60 foot standard.
2. Riszht-of-Way Acquisition and Improvement.
a. The Applicant has agreed to pay and shall pay to the City the full amount of
the City's costs necessary for the City to condemn the disputed right-of-way
of Brown Street from the northeast portion of the proposed PUD to
Comstock Way to the north provided that such payment from the Applicant
to the City not exceed $20,000. The City shall invoice the Applicant for all
necessary costs related to the condemnation of this property and the Applicant
shall pay the amount due to the City 30 days after the invoice is received.
b, If the City takes legal possession of the condemned prope4Y within 2 years of
the passage of the Ordinance granting development approval or by the
completion of Phase I, whichever time is later, the Applicant shall be required
to improve Brown Street from the northeast portion of the proposed PUD to
Comstock Way to the north within 1 year of the time that the City acquired
Page 8 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTAC~ENT V
Page~ of I ~
possession or prior to the completion of Phase 1, whichever time is sooner.
(Note: This is in addition to the full width improvement of Brown Street
required along the development itself)
. The connecting paved portion of road shall be at least 24' wide with
curb and gutter on both sides, a sidewalk on one side, and storm
drains as required by engineering design standards
. If additional widening of the connecting road is required, cost
distribution shall be allocated as outlined below:
. The City and the Applicant shall equally share the cost of widening the
street from 24' to 29'
. The City or the adjoining property owners shall pay any additional
cost needed to widen the street beyond 29' width
liE
c. Brown Street Sidewalk;
1. To provide safety to pedestrians, the Applicant shall install a sidewalk along
that side of Brown Street to be decided by the City from the end of the new
Steldov housing development near Bradley Street to Cleveland Street. The
actual costs of this sidewalk improvement shall be borne equally by the
Applicant and the City. This cost is estimated to be $40,000 to be paid by
the City and $40,000 to be paid by the Applicant. All other sidewalks must be
constructed according to prior conditions and city standards.
2. All of the Brown Street sidewalk construction shall be completed by the
Applicant as a part of Phase 1 infrastructure improvements
E. Brown Street Patching and Resurfacing
1. Because of the deep sewer line construction, a standard asphalt patch shall be
applied to the entire length of the Brown Street trench from Cleveland Street to
Comstock Way by the Applicant.
2. The Applicant shall resurface Brown Street from the Comstock Way intersection
to the Bradley Street intersection after providing the required asphalt grinding.
3. As a part of its city-wide resurfacing program, the City shall pay for street
resurfacing from Bradley Street to Cleveland Street. }
a. The south arterial shall be improved by the Applicant in accordance with the
TSP as a minor arterial. A 36 foot wide street improvement on 74 feet right-
of-way shall be required along the south portion of the property from Boones
Page 9 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTACHMENT 7J tIE
Page~ of /3
Ferry Road to the east property line. Sidewalks shall be required on the north
side of the arterial and shall not be required on the south side. Curbs shall be
required on both sides. The Applicant shall increase the 36 foot wide
pavement improvement to 48 feet wide when the commercial development
occurs within the PUD.
b. In summary, the Applicant shall provide the following street improvements:
Improvements
a.
Street inside the subdivision -
as per adopted transportation system
plan (fSP)
b.
Street outside the subdivision -
iii Adjoining residential portion of
subdivision development, conform
to TSP for width
11
Adjoining multi-family and
commercial portion of
subdivision, conform to TSP for
width
iii.
Not adjoining subdivision - i.e.,
extended to another connection
point as a secondary access,
conform to council approved
conditions
IV
Not adjoining subdivision - i.e.,
extended to another connection
point as a primary access,
conform to council approved
conditions
Applicant Responsibility
Sidewalks on both sides wI standard full width
pavement. up to 34' wide as shown
on TSP
one-side sidewalk wI standard full width
pavement. up to 34' wide
one-side sidewalk wI standard full width
pavement. as indicated on adopted TSP
one-side sidewalk wI two traffic lanes, i.e., up to
24' wide pavement. (such as existing gravel
portion of Brown Rd connection or as required by
council approved conditions) width between 24' &
29' shall be shared by the city. Applicant shall
not be responsible beyond the 29' width
one-side sidewalk wI up to 34' wide pavement.
*The added cost of pavement thickness due to structural strength need shall be paid by the Applicant
for the widths outlined.
E.
PUBLIC WORKS: DRAINAGE
}.
1. The storm sewer system and on-site detention shall comply with the City's Storm Water
Management Plan and Public Works Storm Water Practices. A hydraulic analysis shall be
provided to the City by the Applicant for review and approval.
Page 10 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
1'"
ATTACHMENT :D
Page -L.L... of I 3
2. On-site detention facilities shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association. Phase I
proposes to discharge through the existing facilities constructed with the Steklov Addition,
which is acceptable.
liE
Phase 2 proposes to locate a facility in the southern portion of the development,
discharging to Mill Creek through open drainage way. This shall require proper easements
for locating the system on private property and future access for maintenance needs be
provided. After review of the hydraulic analysis, the use and features of surrounding area
it may be that an open drainage way would not be allowed, but rather a underground pipe
system would be required. All necessary easements with third parties shall be provided by
the Applicant to the City prior to Phase 2 plat approval.
3. The development shall be subject to wetland regulations. The Division of State Lands
shall be contacted and proper permits obtained, if required.
D. SANITARY SEWER;
1. The Applicant shall, at its cost, serve the entire development, all phases, by installing a
deep sanitary sewer main from the Mill Creek interceptor located at the intersection of
Brown and Cleveland to the south and east ends of the development. The entire width of
Brown Street, that has been recently paved, shall be resurfaced by the Applicant after
patching the sewer trench. Phased sewer line construction shall be allowed, however, the
termini of sewer line locations and depths shall be such that it is suited for future
extensions to adjoining areas including the south end of the development.
The preferred location for the sanitary sewer extension shall be within the southerly
extension of Brown Street. However, if the right-of-way or easements can not be obtained,
the system may be constructed through the rear lots of the Steklov Addition as proposed by
the Applicant. This shall be acceptable only if the Applicant provides the necessary
easements the city, including access to each manhole for future maintenance.
If the deep sanitary sewer is not installed in the preferred Brown Street location then the
sanitary sewer shall be extended to Brown Street through either Vine Street or Park View
Blvd. It shall then be extended to the North and South line of the development at a
sufficient depth to provide for the future extensions.
E. WATER:
1. The 12" dia. water main shall be extended along Boones Ferry Road and the South
Arterial to the east boundary of this development as proposed by the Applicant
The interior water mains shall be internally looped and shall be sized in accordance with
flow and fire protection requirements.
The minimum looping requirements outside of the interior mains shall be as per the
following.
Page II - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
1'"
ATTACHMENT ~
Page -Lit:. of J ~
a. The interior system shall connect to the proposed 12" dia. main at each proposed
street intersection, including the streets providing only emergency access.
liE
b. The interior system shall be looped to provide proper fire flow and water quality.
Prior to the development of Phase 2 , this system shall be connected to either the
existing city main located in Parr Road (Steklov Subdivision) or the existing main
located on Brown Street, near Comstock Way.
The water line shall also be installed within Brown Street adjacent to this
development, and shall be extended to the north and south property line. The main
shall be sized according to flow requirements, however the minimum size shall be 8"
in dia.
C. The interior system shall be connected to proposed system at the end ofBridlewood
Subdivision at the end of Azalea Street. The minimum size shall be 8" in dia.
d. The proposed water main serving the cul-de-sac on Pana Street shall be looped to the
proposed main in Azalea Street.
2. Fire protection requirements, access, fire hydrant requirements and fire protection issues
shall according the Woodburn Fire Districts conditions of approval.
3. Actual fire hydrant locations and in line valving locations shall not be determined until the
construction plan review phase.
4. See wastewater/water comments in regard to cross connection requirements.
F. FIRE
1. The Applicant shall provide and maintain driveable access to within 150 feet on all sides of the
exterior of all structures.
2. A minimum fire flowlwater supply of 1000 gpm shall be provided and maintained for single
family residential, with a minimum of 1500 gpm for commercial and multifamily structures. Note:
commercial structures could require a higher flow depending on type of construction, size, use and
whether they are sprinkled.
3. Hydrants sha.l1 be spaced at an average maximum distance of 500 feet apf11. No structure
shall be more than 250 feet from a hydrant. Specific locations shall be appr<Jred by the City water
department and the Fire District.
4. All sprinkler installation and requirements shall be subject to approval of the City Building
Department and Woodburn Fire District.
Page 12 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
'"11'"
ATTACHMENT P
Page...1.J2::.. of /3
a. The interior system shall connect to the proposed 12" dia. main at each proposed
street intersection, including the streets providing only emergency access.
liE
b. The interior system shall be looped to provide proper fire flow and water quality.
Prior to the development of Phase 2 , this system shall be connected to either the
existing city main located in Parr Road (Steklov Subdivision) or the existing main
located on Brown Street, near Comstock Way.
The water line shall also be installed within Brown Street adjacent to this
development, and shall be extended to the north and south property line. The main
shall be sized according to flow requirements, however the minimum size shall be 8"
in dia.
c. The interior system shall be connected to proposed system at the end of Bridle wood
Subdivision at the end of Azalea Street. The minimum size shall be 8" in dia.
d. The proposed water main serving the cul-de-sac on Pana Street shall be looped to the
proposed main in Azalea Street.
2. Fire protection requirements, access, fire hydrant requirements and fire protection issues
shall according the Woodburn Fire Districts conditions of approval.
3. Actual fire hydrant locations and in line valving locations shall not be determined until the
construction plan review phase.
4. See wastewater/water comments in regard to cross connection requirements.
F. FIRE
1. The Applicant shall provide and maintain driveable access to within 150 feet on all sides of the
exterior of all structures. .
2. A minimum fire flowlwater supply of 1000 gpm shall be provided and maintained for single
family residential, with a minimum of 1500 gpm for commercial and multifamily structures. Note:
commercial structures could require a higher flow depending on type of construction, size, use and
whether they are sprinkled.
3. Hydrants shall be spaced at an average maximum distance of 500 feet apart. No structure
shall be more than 250 feet from a hydrant. Specific locations shall be approved by the City water
department and the Fire District.
4. All sprinkler installation and requirements shall be subject to approval of the City Building
Department and Woodburn Fire District.
Page 12 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
ATTACHMENT D lIE
Page ...1..3- ..of 13
5. As to premise identification, all markings and locations shall meet City standards. The
following street names are in conflict and shall not be used: Elm, Pine, Maple, Ash, Oak, Park
View, Azalea. Pana as proposed does not connect. The Applicant shall submit a new street name
for one of the two unconnected streets.
6. An onsite water supply system shall be available, operational and acceptable to the City prior
to the construction of any combustible buildings. Access during construction shall support the
weight of fire apparatus and allow access to structures.
G. RECORDATION: Per City Council direction, the Woodburn Planning Department shall record
the Conditions of Approval in the deed records of Marion County.
THE APPLICANT REPRESENTS THAT IT HAS READ AND AGREES TO ABIDE BY THE
FOREGOING CONDmONS OF APPROVAL
Polygon Northwest Company
}
Page 13 - Conditions of Approval, Boones Crossing PUD
IlF
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administrato~
Public Works Program Manager 4
TO:
SUBJECT:
Authorization for Letter to Chuck Sauvain on Underground Storage Tank
Low Level Contamination of Public Right of Way
DATE:
October 19, 1999
The City Administrator will sign the attached letter, unless council has questions or
would like additional information, to Chuck Sauvain regarding contamination from a
leaking underground storage tank at 689 N. Front Street that has migrated to some
extent beneath the Front Street right of way. Responsibility for the contamination will
remain the responsibility of Mr. Sauvain or future owners of the property at 689 N.
Front Street.
Sauvain Motors in 1993 removed leaking underground storage tanks from the
sidewalk area at 689 N. Front Street. There was contaminated soil around these
tanks which was removed. Soil was removed from a trench that was 12 feet wide,
13 feet deep and 42 feet long. Due to small amounts of contamination outside of this
area and potential danger to the adjacent building and street, DEO allowed the
contamination to remain under the building and the street. Tests on the east side of
Front Street indicated that no contamination had migrated across the street. The
levels of contamination in the street right of way and the building were significantly
under the cleanup limits for the contaminants found.
DEO has requested that Mr. Sauvain notify the owner of the right of way, the City
of Woodburn, and obtain the city's authorization to allow a portion of the
contaminant plume to remain under the Front Street right of way.
City staff visited the DEO office in Salem and review the entire file on the leaking
tanks. The data gathered indicated that the contamination that is unAer Front Street
F
is well under cleanup standards and that it does not extend beyond the right of way.
Staff also held discussions with DEO staff and they indicated that they did not
consider the existing levels under Front Street to be of concern and that the letter of
authorization from the city is needed to close the file on the site. Staff is
recommending that the City Administrator sign the letter to Mr. Sauvain authorizing
the contamination to remain under the right of way.
~
IlF
ODBURN
270 Montgomery Street .
TDD (503) 9
, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
FAX (503) 982-5244
October 26, 1999
Mr. Chuck Sauvain
3216 N. Soones Ferry Road
Woodburn, OR 97071
RE: LUST #24-91-4347
Sauvain Motor Company
689 N. Front Street, Woodburn, Oregon
Dear Mr. Sauvain:
You have provided the City of Woodburn notification that there is contamination
under city right of way near 689 N. Front Street as a result of the subject
underground storage tank leak. The city has reviewed the completed reports,
Initial response and abatement measures - Investigation for soil/groundwater
cleanup and Closure report - Sauvain Ford, for the property that were prepared by
your consultants. The City of Woodburn has right of way to the east of the area
of release of the contamination. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) has requested that the city provide you with "authorization granted ........ to
allow a portion of the contaminant plume to remain indefinitely beneath the right
of way" for submission to DEQ prior to their closing of the site.
\
It should be noted that if contamination is present in the North Front Street right of
way, that contamination continues to be the responsibility of the property owner.
Should such contamination remaining, in the future, effect publically owned
utilities present or work in the effected right of way, any cost associated with the
contamination will be the property owners responsibility.
1!"
The City of Woodburn will authorize the conta
Front Street right of way with the understa
additional corrective action, if required rem
subject site.
Sincerely,
John C. Brown
City Administrator
1lF
ion to remain under the North
t esponsibility for any future
he property owner of the
}
IlG
MEMO
DATE:
City Councillhrough City AdminiSlralor~
Assistant City Engineer ~
October 20, 1999
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Easement Covering the Southeast Corner of Jansen Way Subdivision
RECOMMENDATION:
That easement be accepted as presented.
BACKGROUND: The City is in the process of extending a gravity sewer to a 30-year-old
pump station. This will nullify the need for a pump station to be there any longer. The work
of extension is being accomplished as part of Miller Links Subdivision installation. Miller
Links is north of Vanderbeck alignment.
When the new gravity sewer is installed, it will be owned and maintained by the city. An
easement will, therefore, be required because Jansen Way Subdivision is privately owned.
DM:lg
Attachment
EASEMT/JansenWay
11G
GRANT OF EASEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That for and in consideration of the sum of One and
No/100 Dollar ($1.00) paid to, H Maroin Adams, Trustee and Claire L Adams, Trustee, has granted and
by these presents does grant an EASEMENT unto the City of Woodburn, a municipal corporation of the
State of Oregon, Grantee, its successors and assigns, for the construction, operation and maintenance of a
utility easement across the following described property, to wit:
A portion of that tract of land situated in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 6, Township 5 South,
Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Marion County, City of Woodburn, Oregon and being more
particularly described in a Warranty Deed, recorded in Deed Reel 1240, Page 687 of Marion County'Deed
Records.
Permanent Utility Easement:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 15, Block 5 of Woodburn Senior Estates No.8; thence
Northwesterly along the north line of Lot 15 and the arc ofa 1010 foot radius curve to the right an arc
distance of 61.04 feet. (the long chord of which bears North 83036'18" West a distance of 61.03 feet);
thence North 4040' 12" East parallel to the east line of said Deed Reel 1240, Page 687, a distance of 88.04
feet; thence South 83036' 18" East parallel to the above said long chord a distance of 61.03 feet to said east
line of Deed Reel 1240, Page 687; thence South 4040'12" West along said east line a distance of 88.04
feet to the point of beginning.
Contains a Total Permanent Utility Easement Area of 5390 square feet. more or less.
Temporary Construction Easement:
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width, adjoining and abutting the west and north side of the above
described Permanent Utility Easement. All sidelines are to be extended or shorten to intersection said
property lines.
Contains a Total Temporary Construction Easement Area of 1590 square feet. more or less.
Bearings are based on City of Woodburn control which is Oregon State Plane, North Zone 3601, NAD
83/91, US Foot.
Except for current structures as of September 29, 1999, no structure shall be placed within the easement or
within a 450 projection upward from the bottom of any pipe. Access, by the City of Woodburn, to the
utilities shall be allowed at any time for inspection or repair.
Restoration: Grantee agrees to remove and dispose of all waste material or debt}, fill all holes
and depressions caused by construction with material meeting the City standards and reshape the area to
conform to adjacent undisturbed topography. Landscaping and paving restoration shall be in
conformance with City standards,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said easement unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever.
H:/wp yroj/112-020/easement/easl.otl S.doc
09/29/99 3:2S PM
r
IlG
This instrument does not grant or convey any right or title to the herein described property,
except for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining uti1ities~ however, the rights to the
Grantor is exercising is herein granted, shall not interfere with Grantees use of said described real
property .
Dated this
day of
,19_.
GRANTEE: GRANTOR:
CITY OF WOODBURN, a
Municipal Corporation of the
State of Oregon
By: By:
Name Name
Title Title
By: By:
Name Name
Title Title
by
Brenda Williams - Notary Public - Oregon
My commission expires May 04, 2002
_OFFICIAL SEAL
. BRENDA.A. WILLIAMS
~../ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
. COMMISSION NO. 311906
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 4, 2002
---.......--
H :/wp jlrojll12-Q20/easementleaslotl ~.doc
2
09/29/99 3:2~ PM .
TAX LOT 100
IIG
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
1..:---------..:---.:1
CURB
100
JANSEN WAY PUMP
STATION (EXISTING
ON SEPT. 29, 1999)
A
TAX LOT
o
30'
60'
CURB
PERMANENT EASEMENT
l// ////.>/"f
JANSEN WAY
EXISTIN
17 ~ JANSEN WAY
GRAVITY SEWER
f7
16
/
/
/
/
/
/ I.{)
/
~
AS10R W A '( ()
15 0
-..J
WOODBURN QJ PROPOSED
SENIOR ESTATES HERITAGE PARK
14 'MEADOWS
DAlE ~ ~&_~H CITY Of WOODBURN FIGURE
SEPT 29, 1999 I.. .:.-:: ~~~::':" ~ J'ngineering fi'Uf'VI!Iing UllUTY EASEMENT
( .. .......
.. ........ 1/1
~~;.:,. ...:) lI:see SE lNCE RD. SUITE D
PRO.ECT NO. ::~;':" ..:: IilI..WNJIOE. OREGON 87222 S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 6
\:- ....')
. . un T.5S., R.1 WN W.M. CITY OF WOODBURN
112-020 ..::::':':' ::!/ PH: (~054-2OOl5
"::~:". .:. FAX: ) 054-2575 MARIO COUNlY, OREGON
I'
IlH
MEMO
For Council Action, through the City Administrator ~'K6.
Randy Scott, CE Tech III, through Public Works Director
Contract award for sidewalk construction, bid no. 20-07
October 21, 1999
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is being recommended the City Council award the construction contract to the lowest
responsible bidder, D & D paving Co, dba: Axis Curb Co. for the East Hardcastle Sidewalk
improvement in the amount of $45,420.65.
BACKGROUND:
The contract is for the installation of a 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk on the South side of East
Hardcastle Street, Project No 990045-45, Bid No. 20-07. The sidewalk will be installed from
Heritage Ave. to the existing sidewalk near Mall 99. Presently no sidewalk exists on either side
along this portion of East Hardcastle. The installation will provide for safer pedestrian traffic.
The preliminary design for future street improvements on East Hardcastle has been completed to
establish design grades and location of the future improvement. The sidewalk is being installed to
conform with location and grades as established by the design.
This improvement is funded under approved budget line item 363-631-710.004.
Staff received a total of two qualified bids, as listed below
1. D & D paving Co, dba: Axis Curb Co
$45,420.65
2. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.
$46,768.90
The Engineers Estimate
$49,360.00 ( Note the low bid is 8%
Below the Engineers estimate)
""
!
111
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through City Administrator?
Public Works Program Manager~ ~
TO:
SUBJECT:
No Parking on Arney Road and Robin Avenue
DATE:
November 3, 1999
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the installation of No Parking signs on Arney Road
and Robin Avenue.
BACKGROUND: The recent improvement of Arney Road and Robin Avenue
included the addition of bike lanes and sidewalks. Some portions of Arney Road
are on State of Oregon right of way and are OOOT responsibility. State statute
makes parking in a bike lane illegal but with the factory outlet stores and the
potential for large crowds especially during the upcoming holiday season OOOT
Region 2 has proposed placing of No Parking signs on the state portion of Arney
Road.
It is a standard practice to place No Parking signs along heavily traveled streets
with bicycle lanes. From a traffic operations perspective, vehicles should not park
on Arney Road or Robin Avenue in the vicinity of the factory outlet retail center.
OOOT would like city concurrence with the placement of the No Parking signs.
Staff recommends the placement of the No Parking signs on the state right of way
portion of Arney Road and Robin Avenue and, to be consistent, staff is also
recommending that the No Parking signs be placed on the city portion of these
streets also.
IlK
City of Woodburn
Police Department
Staff Reeort
Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-2352
270 Montgomery Street
From:
Paul Null, Chief of Polic
Date:
November 3, 1999
To:
Mayor and City Council ~
John Brown, City Administrator .Y
Through:
Subject:
Sound Amplification Permit - Woodburn Company Stores
Ordinance 1900, 3, (5)
The use or operation of an automatic or electric piano,
phonograph, loudspeaker or sound-amplifying device so
loudly as to disturb persons in the vicinity thereof or in such
manner as renders the same a public nuisance; provided
however, that upon application to the Council permits may
be granted to responsible persons or organizations to
broadcast programs of music; news speeches or general
entertainment.
The police department has received a request for a sound amplification permit from
Michelle Daily, Marketing Director, Woodburn Company Stores. The request is for
Saturday, November 20, 1999, from 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. The permit is to allow for live
musical entertainment in conjunction with a Christmas tree lighting ceremony at
Woodburn Company Stores. The event is open to the community.
Recommendation: The City Council approve a sound amplification permit for
Woodburn Company Stores on Saturday, November 20, 1999, for the hours of 5:30 -
6:30 p.m.
T
Nov-Ol-99 02:57P
P.02
'4
IlK
November 1. 1999
John Brown
City Administrator
City of Woodburn
Dear Mr. Brown:
-""Woodburn Company Stores would like to request a pennit for
amplification on November 20, 1999.
November 20th will mark the first annual tree lighting at Woodburn
Company Stores. This year, our Oregon grown Christmas tree will stand
68' tall and be decorated and lit. The tree lighting ceremony will be fun
for the whole family including performances by Linda Hornbuckle. Paul
Delay, Terry Robb, Curtis Salgado and Ron Steen and of course, Santa
Claus. We plan to entertain the audience from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.
The tree will officially light at 6: 15 p.m. live on KOIN news and be
followed by group caroling.
Please let me know if you require further information prior to issuing the
pennit.
Sincerely,
~~~~
WOODBU~
, COMPANY STORES
1OU1 Arney ){oad. =')m~, \'('oodhurn. Orq.loll <)70"")
')()j-l)Hl-19()() Fax:;O;-I.)H2-7'1../d
\VW\\". W( J( lllhu rnnlmr~1 ny:-;f( lrl'S. com
City of Woodburn
Police Department STAFF REPORT
270 Montgomery Street Woodburn OR 97071 (503) 982-2345
IIJ
From:
Paul Null, Chief of Police
Date:
October 19, 1999
Through:
Mayor and City Council
John Brown, City Administrator~
To:
Subject
Oregon Golf Association, Members Club, Inc - Liquor License Application
(License Upgrade and Name Change)
On October 15, 1999, the police department received application from Oregon Golf Association
Properties - Members Club Inc., to upgrade their liquor license from a Retail Malt Beverage
(RMB) license to a Dispenser Class A license (DA). Oregon Golf Association liquor license is
currently under the name of OGA Members Course - 19th Green. The applicant is also
requesting the liquor license be issued under the new business name of OGA Members Course.
Applicant, OGA Members Course, has been licensed by OLCC since May 1994. A
comprehensive background investigation was completed by the police department and nothing of
an adverse nature was found on applicants or the license premise. The background investigation
also established no violations of liquor laws have occurred at the licensed premise. OGA is in
the process of building a new club house, restaurant and lounge. The new restaurant & lounge
will be managed by Dennen Van Wagner. A background investigation was completed on
Mr. Van Wagner and nothing of an adverse nature was found.
Dispenser, Class A License: This is the only license that allows the sale of distilled spirit
drinks to the general public for consumption on the premises. The sale of wine and malt
beverages for consumption on the premises is also allowed. This dispenser license is
issued only to places where food is cooked and served and where food sales account for
25% or more of the gross (food and liquor) sales. This percentage is required at all times.
Hours of sale and consumption are 7 a.m. to 2:30 a.m.
Recommendation: The City Council recommend to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission to
grant a Dispenser, Class A license to the Oregon Golf Association Members Course.
cc Applicant
OLCC
""
"
Woodburn Police Department
IIJ
Distribution:
OLCC
Records
Initial. 1\eport
99-007347
Connect ,
Liqour Lic App - Upgrade
Reported Date/Time: 10/15/1999 0908
Occurred Date/Time: 10/15/1999 0908 to
Location: 2850
Hazelnut
DR
Woodburn Grid:
~1
~r-.b.-'-
UPLOAD SUldMARY:
On 101599, I began a liquor License application background investigation
into the OGA's members' Course. The business was applying for an upgraded
liquor license and new manager.
ADDITIONAL INFO:
Business:
OGA Members Course
UA:
2850 Hazelnut DR Woodburn, OR
Phone: (503) 981-0270 Type: Business
Past name of business: OGA Members Course (19th Green)
===
Business:
Oregon Golf Association Prop
UA:
2990 N Boones Ferry RD Woodburn, OR
Business:
Oregon Liquor Control Corom
UA:
213 Madrona ST SE Salem, OR
Phone: (503)378-4871 Type: Business
Lionel Salgado, Inspector OLCC
..ll
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES # 17~
Case Status/Date: EN 10/15/1999 Approved:
Follow-up Required: N Assigned to Patrol or Detectives:
Follow up Assigned to: # Date: By:
Other: C.M. Entry:
Page
1
~
99-007347
Woodburn Police Department
....----<l..
IlJ
Business:
Secretary of State
AKA:
158 Twelveth ST NE sALEM, OR
Phone: (503)986-2200 Type: Business
Corporation Commission Division
...h. ..Il
_--.==========--=~
Business:
Better Business Bureau
AKA:
SW Market ST Portland, OR
Phone: (503)226-3981 Type: Business
----
~
Business:
Dept of Justice- Atty General
AKA:
1162 Court ST NE Salem, OR
Phone: (503)378-4320 Type: Business
Department of Consumer/Business Services - Complaints
Business:
u.S. Bankruptcy Court
AKA:
1001 SW Fifth ST Portland,
Phone: (503)326-2231
OR
Type:
Business
~
io- It
Involved Person:
Stetson, Martin Sumner
AKA: Stetson, Tim
Hair: Grey/Partial
13310 SW Fox Run DR
Phone: (503)639-9210
OW: 393945 (OR)
Employer/School: Stetson and Associates
13310 SW Fox Run DR
Days: Varied
Hours: Varied
Schenectedy,New York/ General Manager OGA Members, Inc
DOB: OS/29/1944
Hqt: 5 FT 8
Eye: Brown
IN
Age:
Wqt:
55 WM
195
Lake Oswego, OR
Type: Home
SSN: 017-34-0691
Phone:
Lake Oswego, OR
(503)981-6105 Business
Work
Work
PoB:
~-~
Involved Person:
Pearson, Jerry Mizera
AKA: Pearson, Jerry
Hair: Grey/Partial
5970 Langford LN Lake Oswego, OR
Phone: (503)620-2836 Type:
OW: 1920772 (OR)
Employer/School: Self employed
OGA Members, Inc/ President of
DOB: 07/11/1935
Hqt: 6 FT 0
Eye: Blue
Age:
IN Wqt:
64 WM
185
Home
SSN: 535-30-4626
Financial Consul Phone:
the Board of Directors
(503)684-3438 Business
.
.:...
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES
# 17716
Page 2
W
I
99-007347
Woodburn Police Department
IlJ"
Involved Person:
Van Wagner, Dennen
Al(A:
Hair: Brown
29590 SW Courtside DR #1
Phone: (503) 582-8662
OLN: 9611005 (OR)
Employer/School: OGA Members, Inc
2850 Hazelnut DR
Work Days: varied
Work Hours: varied
OOB: 08/19/1971
Hqt: 6 FT 6
Eye: Brown
Wilsonville, OR
Type: Horne
SSN:
IN
Age:
Wqt:
--
28 WM
240
Phone: (503}981-0270 Business
Woodburn, OR
-
Ao-
~
__ ====- __ -r---=== -
C1UME ANALYSIS DATA:
SOLICITED:
Other
TOOL USED:
CRIME PREV:
Alarm
Operation ID
CARDS:
None
TARGET:
AREA: Residential
PREMISE: Golf Course Club House
# ENTERED: 0
~====== -========
-
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES
# 17716
~- ~
TYPE: Private
Page 3
99-007347
Woodburn Police Department
F
IlJ
Background Investigation:
Stetson, Martin Sumner -
1. Criminal History:
No criminal history was located for Mr Stetson.
2. Operator License Status:
No entries were found on the driving record of Mr Stetson.
Pearson, Jerry Mizera -
1. Criminal History:
No criminal history was found for Mr Pearson.
2. Operator License Status:
One entry was found where Mr Pearson was involved in a traffic
accident. The incident occurred on 032990.
No other entries were found on the driving record.
Van Wagner, Dennen -
1. Criminal History:
No criminal history was located for Mr Van Wagner.
2. Operators License Status:
One entry was found on Mr Van Wagner's driving record. The entry
was for a speeding citation. Van Wagner
convicted on the charge.
Corporation Division:
The Corporation Division was contacted. The division advised
that The OGA Members, Inc, is a valid
corporation and has been incorporated since July 7th, 1993.
Better Business Bureau:
1. No listings or complaints were found against the OGA Members,
Inc.
2. No listings or complaints were found against the business formerly
called the 19th Green/OGA Members Club.
Oregon Liquor Control commission:
1.
No liquor violation citations were issued to the 19th Green.
2.
No violation citations were issued to the OGA Members, Inc business.
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES
# 17716
Page 4
~
99-007347
Woodburn Police Department
11J
3. No violations incidents or violation citations were found on any
of the principle person involved in this license
application: Van Wagner, Stetson, or Pearson.
State of Oregon Department of Justice/Consumers Complaints:
1. No complaints were filed against the OGA Members, Inc./19th Green
business.
Bankruptcy Court:
1.
No bankruptcy issues were found by the court.
Records Scan for involved business:
1.
business
The scan
majority
insecure
involved
A records scan was conducted for the 19th
for the calendar year of 1997.
showed a total of thirteen (13) calls for
of the calls were for alarms, burglary,
premises, and traffic accidents. No calls
liquor violations or disturbances.
green/OGA Members, Inc
service. The
for service
2. A records scan was conducted for the 19th Green/OGA Members, Inc
business for the calendar years of 1998.
The scan showed a total of fourteen (14) calls for service for
the business. The calls were again for burglaries
alarms, vandalism, and traffic accidents. No calls were found
involving liquor violations or disturbances.
3. A records scan was conducted for the 19th Green/OGA Members, Inc
for the calendar year of 1999. A total of
ten (10) calls for service were found dating to June of 1999.
Again, as in the previous scans, no calls for service
involved liquor violations, disturbances, fights, etc.
Narrative:
On 101599, I completed a background investigation for a liquor license
application. and change of ownership for the business called the 19th
Green/OGA Members, Inc at located at 2990 N. Boones Ferry Rd. The new
club house address will be 2850 Hazelnut Dr.
I contacted spoke with Mr Martin Stetson. He advised that he has not monetary
interests, and he was not the owner of the OGA Members, Inc lounge/club.
He advised that he was General Manager for the golf course as well as
a consultant for the organization. He advised he has the authority to
conduct business for the organization, but that he would not be involved
in the actual sale of alcoholic beverages. He stated that would be left
up to bar manager, Dennen Van Wagner.
I contacted and spoke with Mr Jerry Pearson. He advised that he is the
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES
# 17716
Page 5
99-007347
Woodburn Police Department
IIJ
President of the OGA Members, lnc and the golf course. He advised that
He would not be involved in the running and sale of alcoholic beverages.
He stated that the manager of the bar, Dennen Van Wagner, would be the
one in charge of the that aspect of the business. Mr Pearson advised he
did not own and he did not have any monetary interests in the organization/business.
I contacted Mr Dennen Van Wagner. He advised me that he was the manager
of the food and beverage section of the OGA Members, Inc, business. He
advised that he was the primary license holder. He advised that he already
had a license from OLCC. He advised me that he would be on the premises
most of the time and be in charge of the section. He would also have input
on who is going to be hired to bar tend when the club house and lounge
fully opens. He stated the business hours for the restaurant/lounge would
vary by season. The hours were not set as yet, but as soon as that was
completed the I would be notified of what those hours would be.
I conducted a wants/DMV records scan on each of the involved person. They
were all valid and clear. No one had a criminal history. A records scan
on each person showed no calls for service involving any of them.
I contacted and spoke with Laurie McDaniels from OLCC in Salem. I requested
she check the files on the 19th Green, and the OGA Members, Inc. I was
advised, by Miss McDaniels, that the OLCC files showed no violations,
or complaints against the business. She also advised me that this was
an upgrading and a change of ownership from the 19th Green to the OGA
Members Course. I also spoke Miss McDaniels about the license possessed
by Mr Van Wagner. She advised me that no voilations were found in the
OLCC files involving Mr Van Wagner nor any of the other subjects on the
application. The license was valid for Van Wagner.
Reporting Officer: WILLIAM A. TORRES
# 17716
Page 6
I "
14A
CITY OF WOODBURN
270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244
NOTICE OF DECISION
WOODBURN PLANNING DIRECTOR
ACTION TAKEN: Site Plan Review 99-22
DATE OF DECISION: October 14, 1999
NATURE OF ACTION: On October 14,1999, the Woodburn Planning Commission
accepted the Planning Director's administrative approval of
a request by the City of Woodburn to construct a 288 square
foot storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works
materials yard located at 300 Cleveland Street. A copy of
the staff report is attached to this Notice of Decision and is,
by reference, incorporated herein.
APPEAL RIGHTS: The final decision of the Woodburn Planning Director is
appealable to the Woodburn Planning Commission if written
notice is filed with the Woodburn Community Development
Department within 10 days of the date this notice was
mailed.
Notice of Decision - SPR 99-22
14A
CiTY OF WOODBURN
270 Montgomery Street . Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244
5T AFF REPORT
SITE PLAN REVIEW 99-22
October 14, 1999
(Administrative Review)
I. APPLICATION INFORMATION:
Applicant: Woodburn Public Works Department
Property Owner: City of Woodburn
Application Deemed Complete: October 5, 1999
120 Day Rule Deadline: February 2, 2000
Staff Report Available for Public Review: October 8, 1999
II. NATURE OF APPLICATION:
The applicant requests administrative site plan approval to construct a 288 square foot
storage building on the City of Woodburn Public Works materials yard located at 300
Cleveland Street.
III. RELEVANT FACTS:
The applicant proposes to construct a 288 square foot storage building on an existing .45
acre site. The site is currently used for the storage of bulk materials such as sand and
gravel, and contains a wash rack for washing of city vehicles. The storage building is
proposed to be used for storage of vehicle washing supplies (no flammable materials) and
will provide a restroom.
The site is located at 300 Cleveland Street (Marion County Tax Map T5S R 1 W 1880 Tax
Lot 100).
The property is zoned PS (Public Service District) and has a comprehensive plan
designation of Public Use. The PS District allows, ~municipal or government service
building, structure, and use, i.e., reservoir, water tower, pump station, sewage treatment
plant, garbage and refuse landfill operations, bus, equipment, parking servicing or
repairing" 0NZO Section 37.060(a)).
Adjacent property to the north is zoned IL (Light Industrial District) and property to the east,
west and south is zoned RS (Single Family Residential District). There is a residential use
immediately adjacent to the east side of the site and a residential use at least 60 feet away
from the west side of the site. The site is relatively level, paved with asphalt and the
Page 1
14A
perimeter enclosed with a chain link fence with slats to provide screening from the adjacent
residential uses. The street frontage of the site has been landscaped with trees and red
lava rock.
No topographical or environmental constraints have been identified on the subject site.
IV. RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA:
A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan
B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance:
Chapter 8 General Standards
Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards
Chapter 11 Site Plan Review
Chapter 37 Public, Semi-public and Governmental Use Districts
C. Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards
D. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance
V. FINDINGS:
A. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan
STAFF COMMENT: Applicable goals and policies have been satisfied through the
implementing ordinances of the adopted zoning ordinance and other ordinances
in affect at the time of approval.
B. Woodburn Zoning Ordinance:
1. Chapter 8 General Standards
STAFF COMMENT: The proposal complies with all general standards
including the required 40 foot setback of buildings from the centerline of
Cleveland Street and vision clearance requirements.
2. Chapter 10 Off Street Parking, Loading & Driveway Standards
STAFF COMMENT: The nature of the use of the site does not require the
provision of designated parking, handicap, or loading spaces. However,
the site currently is paved with asphalt and provides ample space for
parking and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. An existing 30 foot wide
paved driveway is provided that meets commercial driveway standards. An
existing 6-7 foot high chain link fence with slats encloses the site and
provides a visual screen for the adjacent residential uses.
3. Chapter 11 Site Plan Review
SPR 99-22
City of Woodburn Public Works Dept.
Page 2
r
SPR 99-22
14A
Section 11.070. Criteria for Evaluating a Site Plan.
The following criteria shall be used in evaluating a Site Plan:
(a) The placement of structures on the property shall minimize
adverse impact on adjacent uses.
STAFF COMMENT: The placement of the proposed storage
building will minimize adverse impact on adjacent uses in that it will
be located in the middle of the site, is very small in size, and an
existing screen fence is provided.
(b) Landscaping shall be used to minimize impact on adjacent
uses.
(c) Landscaping shall be so located as to maximize its aesthetic
value.
STAFF COMMENT: The site currently is landscaped along the
Cleveland Street frontage. Landscaping includes trees and red lava
rock. Landscaping appears to be well maintained.
The Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards require a
landscaping plan be provided for uses in the PS District, but
provides no standards or requirements for such uses. Also, the PS
District provides no standards or requirements for uses allowed in
the district either. Inasmuch as there are no landscaping standards
or requirements for uses in the PS District, the existing landscaping
is deemed to satisfy the above criteria.
(d) Access to the public streets shall minimize the impact of traffic
patterns. Wherever possible, direct driveway access shall not
be allowed to arterial streets. Wherever possible, access shall
be shared with adjacent uses of a similar nature.
STAFF COMMENT: Cleveland Street is classified in the Woodburn
Access Management Ordinance as a Service Collector. The site
has an existing 30 foot wide driveway. This driveway has been
located and improved in compliance with city requirements.
(e) The design of the drainage facilities shall minimize the impact
on the City's or other public agencies drainage facilities.
STAFF COMMENT: The site is currently developed with catch
basins to convey storm water runoff. The proposed building will not
increase runoff since its proposed location is currently paved and
impervious. The existing drainage system has incorporated
City of Woodburn Public Works Dept.
Page 3
~
SPR 99-22
14A
pollution controls in compliance with State Dept. of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) requirements.
(f) The design encourages energy conservation, both in its siting
on the lot, and its accommodation of pedestrian and bicycle
traffic. (Note: specific solar access provisions are described in
Section 8.200.)
STAFF COMMENT: This is not applicable to the proposed
development in that the project consists of a small storage building.
(g) The proposed site development, including the architecture,
landscaping and graphic design, is in conformity with the site
development requirements of this Ordinance and with the
standards of this and other ordinances insofar as the location
and appearance of the proposed development are involved.
STAFF COMMENT: The proposed storage building will be
constructed with T -1-11 on the walls and a metal roof. The building,
due to its small size and location, is in conformity with site
development requirements
(h) The location, design, color and materials of the exterior of all
structures and signs are compatible with proposed
development and appropriate to the character of the immediate
neighborhood.
STAFF COMMENT: The proposed building is appropriate to the
character of the immediate neighborhood in that it is small and
located in the middle of the site with a screen fence surrounding the
site.
4. Chapter 37 Public, Semi-Public and Governmental Use Districts
STAFF COMMENT: The PS District allows, "municipal or government
service building, structure, and use, i.e., reservoir, water tower, pump
station, sewage treatment plant, garbage and refuse landfill operations,
bus, equipment, parking servicing or repairing" (WZO Section 37.060(a)).
Use of the property as a materials storage yard and vehicle washing facility
including the proposed storage building is consistent with the permitted
uses in the PS District.
Section 37.090 limits height of buildings to a maximum of 35 feet or 2 %
stories. The proposed building will be less than 20 feet in height.
Section 37.100 requires a front yard adjacent to a street with a minimum
depth of 20 feet. The site plan indicates that more than 20 feet is provided
City of Woodburn Public Works Dept.
Page 4
w
14A
between the proposed building and the street.
Section 37.110 requires a side yard setback with a minimum depth of 5
feet. The proposed building exceeds this requirement.
Section 37.120 requires a rear yard setback with a minimum depth of 20
feet. The proposed building exceeds this requirement.
Section 37.130 limits lot coverage by buildings to a maximum of 30%. The
proposed building will cover much less than 30% of the site.
Section 37.140 requires site plan review for all buildings and structures.
The proposed building is subject to administrative site plan review since it
is less than 4,000 square feet.
C. Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards
STAFF COMMENT: The Woodburn Landscaping Policies and Standards require
a landscaping plan be provided for uses in the PS District, but provides no
standards or requirements for such uses. Also, the PS District provides no
standards or requirements for uses allowed in the district either. Inasmuch as there
are no landscaping standards or requirements for uses in the PS District, the
existing landscaping is deemed to be sufficient.
D. Woodburn Access Management Ordinance
STAFF COMMENT: Cleveland Street is classified in the Woodburn Access
Management Ordinance as a Service Collector. The site has an existing 30 foot
wide driveway. This driveway has been located and improved in compliance with
city requirements.
VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION:
The proposed project complies with all City ordinances, policies and standards. Based on
the findings in this report, the Community Development Director grants administrative
approval of the applicant's request subject to the following conditions:
1 . The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance with the
preliminary plan.
2. All landscaping shall be maintained year round. Plantings shall be watered
regularly and in a manner appropriate for the specific plant species through the first
growing season, and dead and dying plants shall be replaced by the applicant
during the next planting season. No buildings, structures, storage of material, or
parking shall be permitted within the required landscape and buffer areas. All
landscape and buffer areas shall be maintained and kept free of all debris, weeds
and tall grass. The applicant shall show proof of how landscaping is to be
maintained and irrigated. The parking area shall be kept free of debris.
SPR 99-22
City of Woodbum Public Works Dept.
Page 5
14A
3. All conditions contained herein shall be conditions on the issuance of a building
permit. Violation of these conditions shall be considered a violation of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Building Department Conditions:
4. All work shall conform to City of Woodburn standards and State building codes.
5. Building permit issuance required prior to construction of storage building. Material
Safety Data Sheets shall be submitted along with three sets of complete building
plans for Building Department review and approval.
Fire District Conditions:
6. Repairs in storage building limited to exchange of parts. No spray paint operations
or use of open flame devices.
7. An on-site water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to
the city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during
construction must support the weight of fire apparatus and allow access to the
facility.
VII. ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Woodburn Fire District Comments
Building Department Comments
Site Plan Application
SPR 99-22
City of Woodburn Public Works Dept.
Page 6
A '~ach~efl+ A
WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT
Prevaltion Division 14A
Site Plan Review Comments
Memo To: Jim Mulder, Planner
City of W oodbum
Date: 10-05-99
From:
Robert Benck
Fire Marshal
Facility/ Project Name: City Storage Shed
Location: 300 E. Cleveland S1.
Occupancy Class: U
A. Access:
1. Exterior of Facility:
As proposed minimum access standards are met any adjustment to this proposal
must be reviewed by the Fire District for Fire Code Compliance.
2. To Interior of Facility:
Appear to meet minimum standards
B. Building Exit System: Items to be addressed when plans are submitted to Building Official.
1. Occupant Load:
2. Number of Exits:
3. Exit Hardware:
4. Exit Signage:
5. Emergency Lighting:
c. Fire flow/ Water Supply:
Minimum fire flow requirements for any structure other than residential is 1500
gpm..
D. Hydrants:
Adequate
E. Sprinkler/FDC:
NA
F. Alann System:
NA
,..
'G. Premise Identification:
To meet city standards and visible from public way.
14A
H. Special Occupancy Requirements:
Repairs limited to exchange of parts, no spry paint operations or use of open flame
devices.
L Building Siz.e & Limitations! Type of Construction:
Within limits.
J. Fire and Life Safety Review Requirement:
To be conducted by City Building Department.
K. Special Comments:
An onsite water supply system must be available, operational and acceptable to the
city prior to the construction of combustible buildings. Access during construction
must support the weight of Fire Apparatus and allow access to facility.
COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
PERMISSION TO BUILD. BUILDING PERMITS AND PLANS REVIEWS BY THE
APPROPRIATE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS REQUIRED. PERMITS AND APPROVED
PLANS MUST BE ONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT
1776 Newberg Hwy.
Woodburn, OR. 97071
(503) 982-2360 Fax (503) 981-5004
A-~d1me~f B
Woodburn Building Department
14A.
Site Plan Review Comments
Memo to: Jim Mulder, Planner
City of Woodburn
Date: October 7, 1999
From:
David Maret
Woodburn Building Department
FacilitylProject Name: Wash-rack Storage Shed
Location: 300 E. Cleveland St.
Occupancy: S-2
Type of Construction: V-N
A. Building Exiting System:
I. All man doors shall swing in the direction of travel when exiting the building.
B. ADA Requirements:
I. The proposed bathroom within the structure shall be ADA compliant. Unisex
bathrooms are not allowed within Oregon when employees exceed 10.
2. The bathroom door shall swing in the outward position.
C. Alarms/Sprinklers:
N/A
D. Special Requirements:
I. Material Safety Data Sheets shall be submitted along with three sets of complete
plans.
E. Building Size & Limitations:
I. Building consists of 288 square feet well within allowable limits.
All other comments reserved for plan review of proposed structure. All permits that are
applicable shall be obtained prior to start of work.
Compliance with these requirements does not constitute permission to build. Permits and
approved plans shall be onsite during construction.
Woodburn Building Department
270 Cleveland St.
Woodburn, OR 97071
(503) 982-5250 Fax (503) 982-5244
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
A#a.chmevr+ C
DIRECT QUESTIONS TO:
C;l~ ,,+ \JOuJbo('l'1
(APPLlCA T NAME)
2 7e fY1al\+jcjMef'~ Sttt.e..+
(ADDRESS) J (TELEPHONE)
PROPERTY OWNER: Ci +~ 0 +\,JtJ~d b tin'!
PROJECT NAME: Co t'\ 5+ (""1./ :_.t s+o (o...~ e
lOCATION OF PROJECT: ~ Cf€Je,(OlV\cQ
MAP & TAX ACCOUNT NO(s): S -1 w' IS 80
NAME OF DEVELOPER: C. +~ {) -+ \,t.~ a db 0 r t')
ARCH./ENG.: C I f~ 0+ \Aldod hJvr-.
T:1 RF:C'O *
OCT 0 5 1999 14A
Ci~ 2. __ S"2.tf 5wc\:'~". ,:(-:!~.\~~JN_
I [;E_..__;"~~- .1 .JEP1.
shed
S+( et. t
~of !tJo
Include 11 copies of the Site Plan including all the information required in the Zoning
Ordinance, for the particular type of development proposed. All materials are to be folded and
collated.
Include a detailed Statement of Intent, which describes the type and extent of the proposed
operation, .any phasing of development being proposed, maintenance of landscaping, etc..
Applicant may use the attached statement page and/or include a separate statement along
with this application. The statement of intent should include a discussion of the applicable
approval criteria.
.....................................................................
APPUCATlON CHECKUST
OFFICE USE ONLY
Number of
Copies
Y/N
6. Complete Application ......
6. Statement of Intent ........
(11 )
(11 )
( 4)
( 2)
( 1)
( 1)
1. Site Plans.......................
2. landscape/lrriga'n Plans...
3. Architectural Plans......:...
4. Sign Plans .....................
Date for Pre-application conference...Part I:
Scheduled Hearing Date......................:
Date of Engineering Conference.......Part II:
Page 6 - Standards Document for Ske Plan Review
6193
..
~
14A
STATEMENT OF INTENT
The intent of the City of Woodburn is to construct a 24 foot by 12 foot storage shed
on the city's public works materials yard at 300 Cleveland Street. The shed would
contains materials and supplies required for the operation of the wash rack that is at
the site as well as the materials storage area. It would also contain a unisex
bathroom. The frame would be of wood frame construction with manufactured roof
trusses. The siding would be T-111 and the roof would be steel.
I certify under oenalties orovided bv law that the information contained herein is true and
accurate to the best of mv knowledoe and belief. .
DATED this
/ ~day of tf)c~bllv
rt
I 19_.
SIGNATURES of each owner (husband & wife), contract purchaser, representative.
NAME /"..
Owner (~'v.lcJo,jb<lrl1
~
,
ADDRESS & ZIP CODE
2 70 m~ (\ t;j u Me v 'J st.
W c) u c/ L el{ n (t) k o/? tJ -, /
,
Contract Purchaser
Reoresentative
Page 6 - Standards Document for Site Plan Review
6f33'
4
r--
/ ~.
~ (). ;/
/ ~. //
/' itA.. /
/ //
,/ ~ /
.. ..
~7(.
f.cA78~ ~
/ i
, C. lY BM-1lO
/--:0 OF CURB
>-
~
~
HI
ex:
u..
&0
J..
14A
HWY 214
/
/
/
,
,
',,-
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT
SITE
'"''
".
"
"
I',.
I
,
,
,
..!
/
;"
/
,
,
END OF C
"
'.
179.90
END OF CURS
'.
".
'.
c ,", '-..
'. Z~~.
, ~~~4
'......... ",
'-.'
, ",
.... "
~ ",",
LG. 179.90 ". _ """',
".
"-
CONSTRUCT r ClASS C
~"MI.1( TO GRADE
t,(. ADCOfWNttWllH SPEoflC\l1ON
NI). TO CRADE.
f.G. 119.90
EXlS11NC e" f1VC PERf. PfP(
~,n~
~
""'''"
~......
"'......
"'......
:a:::r:r
"'''''''
000
11100
-C"I
-C"I~
.,~.,
---
C:CNrc
C'CC'CC"I
@)
cfI ~\
- ,
.J:S-":::..
8\-
-u----;~=_---t--~ -------~
LJ
c
}\)
~
"
!
I
r
I
I
\.
I
I
I
L
I
~.
~---------,.!
o
.... Ul
8 +
..,..,,.
-, ..
'J-
14A
-----1
T
"",,,,,
.........
.........
.........
:z::z::z:
"'''''''
000
11'100
_N
_N'"
"'''''''
---
~~~
NNN
@)
(X)
...
~. -1
p-'
cJ' =-
I
/
\
l1\
~
~
A
go
..........
-,
~
14A
, '
-.-.......T...
-.. . r
i It-I- .
JOB NUMBER
. ''t-.
'. -----+.--
." ..- "'f '
--1" 1
i~ -:.
14A
,
L_ ,_ _. .
,-.. -. t -I
..'- 1_. . t..., j'
..:~::.;.I'...'-+i
"-. . _.,1 ~-r:' j_L~
. - . ----~. '-i- 1 ...-..:..
.- ! l _.~ -- ;
j !JJ" I:
1 --;
l
I .. L.t.J'~1 !Lti ., ... ' ~.+-
~~=- kY I!WATfR~E~~.i(D-L~..
. "r': 't-' ;... . ~ -
= -_:_~8+' .J.. -: :;~--_.j~~,
; i' I I , l I
,,':-:: :.I-:; i -O:-~ '," :;,
tEl I
,1. ,.._,.
.; +-+.
-;~{~t--~,-- ..- -.--.-
'--. . -=r Lj-
!
~".t-~ i-
-1.
!
I
I
t. -+--,-,,;
I
1
I ,
".....- ,
--- 'i
..-j -~'Ti'
~.".- ~- .. ..----"'".
f .
1,--.-- "
~" ..:..
t
._-;.
o 'i 1
BY
. --;-- I
h~.'+'~
. '--1
7"--+- -+ .~". .~_.- 1
I ~', :1.--'.1 fii i . rn _I
'. ::~1==~=:_~. -::-:~.~.~~=_ .'
. .
1
.J
I
--~~~ i'-~.-:-r~T-'--
, I .
f..I.-- .....~.;.
I I
,.
1
J '
SHEET NO.
/"
SUBJECT
OATE
G E N-oCIS-3/5/Bf
16A
MEMO
From the Office of the City Attorney
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
l f(" S
N. ROBERT SHIELDS, CITY ATTORNEY I'"
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RESULTS OF GOVERNMENT LAW SECTION ELECTION
DATE:
OCTOBER 21, 1999
As most of you are aware, I have served for the past three years as a member of the Executive
Committee of the Government Law Section of the Oregon State Bar. The Government Law
Section has a statewide membership of approximately 500 government law lawyers and is
governed by its12 member Executive Committee.
On September 17, 1999, at the Oregon State Bar Convention, I was elected Secretary of the
Executive Committee. The Secretary is an officer in the progression to eventually become Chair.
I strongly believe that my participation in this professional activity has benefits for both me and
the City of Woodburn.
""
NOV 08 '99 04:08PM RLPHR ENGINEERIN
P.2/2
ALPHA ENGINEERING, INC.
November 8. 1999
Steve Goeckritz, Community Development Director
City of Woodburn Planning Department
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, OR 97071
RE: City Council Adoption ofBoones Crossing Conditions and Findings
Dear Steve:
This letter is being forwarded on behalf of our client, Polygon Northwest Inc. The proposed
conditions of approval have been reviewed by Pred Gast of Polygon ~orthwest and myself. We
find the proposed conditions to be in substantial conformance with earlier drafts agreed upon and
are in support of City Council adopting these findings and conditions at the Council's November
8, 1999 meeting.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
452.8003. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
ALPHA ENGlNEERING, INC.
~
Thomas McConnell, AlCP
Project Manager
~
.
Plaza West . Suite 230 A 9600 SW Oak A Portland. Oregon 9i223
OffICe 503-452-8003 . Fax 503-452-8043
A",-ww.alpha-eng.com A
-
11/08/1999 16:44 3606934442
, ,,' 1!~9Y, ~~ '91l...~: 3::P~BbPHB",P~J.tl~RING
POLYGON
\maN PUBLIC \liS
PAGE 02/02
P. 2/2 141 014
...,
S. As tD pranilo idaatific:atkm. all ,....~ and J~tiODS sba1l meet Cily standaniI. The
t'oUoWiDg meet aama are ml"lVlftier aDd ~iaac lM: used: Elm., PiDo, ~ AsIa, OM. Puk
VlCW, A~Iea.- Paa as proposed does DQt ~. 'The ApplbJl!.1bIU Illblnil . UW ItrIIr DIIJM
L._ of..!.. IedBd --..- . l, .".
_ CIGC we two unc:onn ... _. ; ~ :" , .
6. AD. oasHr; watcc I1IpIIIy syrtan sbaD. be ~lc. opcratJaDa1 &ad IOGIptIbla to tbG City prior
to the c:onsuuc:tian of ~ combusn'b1e h\)i1~~ ' Accc:ss cIuri!Ig conmw:zimlsbaU support the .,
Wlip ofSw appllQls aDd..now ~ to~.
G. RECORDATION: Per City CGUI1CiJ ~ the Wacdbum ptlq,nu" ~ an nconI
the CCDditioDs of ApprcMI iIl1bc cIcal records or~ COUDl)'.
i,
Ii.~,
.'~',;:
I.
nIE APPUCANT llEPBESENTS THAT rr ' ' AM) .\GImES TO ABIDE BY nm
.,:.1 W --. .
I.i
".:" n=N Cu.~
t ~ :
. ,
! ,~:
~ .
r 01
.7i"~\;lt
''''';:1
:'l"""
'ill
".
: ...
.'
..
i ,I'
~
.
. , ,
.', I
.- t ~
J.'i'..'
~,~ ,~,
" . 041
~ /"1: '
, I ~
", ~ :' .
.
lIage 12 - Condi1ioDs of Approv&J, Boones CroSsing PUn
.~ ,
.'
,..