Agenda - 10/09/2000
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
October 9, 2000 - Z'OO P.M.
270 Montgomery Street * * Woodburn, Oregon
1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS
Announcements:
A. Habitat for Humanity fund raiser; October 14,2000. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3A
B. Public Hearings: LID's: Alley project and Parr Road improvements - October 23,
2000.
C. Marion County Urban Growth Management Workshops, Nov. 8,2000 ......... 3C
Appointments: None
4. PRESENTA TIONSIPROCLAMA TIONS
Presentation: Recreation and Parks Master Plan Project Funding
.,---
Proclamations:
A. Crime Prevention Month, October 2000 ................................... 4A
B. Hands Are Not For Hurting Weeks - October 8 - 21, 2000 .................... 4B
5. COMMITTF.E REPORTS
A. Chamber of Commerce.
B. Woodburn Downtown Association.
6. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter from Betty Guzman .............................................. 6A
7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC (This allows the public to introduce items for
Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda.)
8. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine
and may be enacted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at
the request of a Council member.
A. Council minutes of September 25, 2000 regular and executive meetings. . . . . . . .. 8A
Recommended action: Approve minutes.
Page 1 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of October 9, 2000.
11r
B. Museum minutes of August 7, 2000 ....................................... 8B
Recommended action: Accept minutes
C. Relocation of Greyhound bus stop ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8C
Recommended action: Receive report (no action required)
O. Building Activity Report for September ................................... 80
Recommended action: Receive report (no action required)
E. Planning Tracking Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8E
Recommended action: Receive report (no action required)
F. Leaf pick up and disposal program ....................................... 8F
Recommended action: Receive report (no action required)
9. T ABLEO BUSINESS
10. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Consideration of City of Woodburn 2000 - 2001 Supplemental Budget:
1. Public Comment
2. Council Bill No. 2266 - Ordinance adopting a supplemental budget
for fiscal year 2000-2001 ........................................ 10A.2
Recommended action: Approve ordinance adopting 2000-2001
Supplemental Budget.
B. Council Bill No. 2267 - Ordinance adopting Master Fee Schedule. . . . . . . . . . . .. lOB
Recommended action: Approve ordinance adopting 2000-2001 Master Fee
Schedule.
C. Urban Renewal Feasibility Study. . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10C
Recommended action: Accept the feasibility study for the Woodburn Urban
Renewal District; approve the recommended preliminary district boundaries;
direct staff to initiate visioning and design activities; and authorize preparation of an
Urban Renewal Plan.
D. Traffic Safety Grant Award from ODOT ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10D
Recommended action: Approve receipt and allocation of grant award and approve
intergovernmental agreement between City of Woodburn and ODOT.
E. Liquor license application - La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant (formerly
Chung Sing Restaurant) Recommended action: Approve a Dispenser, Class A .. 10E
liquor license for La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant.
11.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
12. PUBLIC COMMENT
13. NEW BUSINESS
Page 2 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of October 9, 2000.
".
:I
g - g :g"" o II
-
~ ." Z
~ ~ ~ III S' ~
~ -g g'
..
~ ."
~ ~ z (3 ~ ."
)> v.> ~ ~
8
~ .... ~ ~
~ i CIl
o ~
~ ~ g li ~
I~ ~I ~B- -;""~IO
~ ~ s;,E! - 0 j:;) l
5.~~ ~~~~~
g ~ ~ ~ el~~ ;,. ~
CD J1
If ::6 ~b' I~ 0
Sa 0 ""
;" i :i'
_Ill j:;) 0.0 li
~- .... el::ll !!.
CD ~
~ 0-
5S 0 ." ~
~~ i- s'
~ .. !2.
9if !J~il~ 0' z ~
IOUI g !- ~
!!. - ~
!!!':= ." z
>25 III S' ~
~ -g g'
ii1
i?:::: ."
>::: ~ ."
la ~
10 ~
0-
~:i CIl
~~ ~ i
810
o- S
~-
~~ ~. g
J1
0
~ o 0
8 li 11
S'i ~ g
8 E i 0'
~ .~
""0
:::0
o
c..
m
(')
-t
-t
~
(')
"
z
C)
fA
J:
m
m
-t
I
f
vi'
~
i
,.
1Jf
~
~ ~ p ~ -v if =
(')
z ~ ~ ~ " z
5> z II) 6" Sl.
5> ~ @'
..
~ 0 "
~ z ~ i "
~ 5> ~ 0
~ !e.
~ ~ ... ~
~ C/l
~ :;
... ... ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ... ~
e i
... ~
~ II)
~ ~ ~ ::I,
0 ~
... ... ...
0 0 ~ 2' 0 ."
a a a 5'
o . ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~
... ... ...
~ ~ e 0 ." "
... i- S' 0
~ ~ ~ ~
0 ..
...
i 0' z ~
.. 0 ~
g e-
o lil
" z
~ II) 6" Sl.
~ ~'
iil
"tl
Z a "tl
5> "2 0
~ !a.
..
... (J)
a 0 ::;
~ c :::c
(\l -s.
0
... :r
~ CD
... II) 0
W ::I. 0
~ ::J
10
...
... 0
i3 2' P-
o
~ CD
~ ... ~ (')
...
i3 .g .0 ,
....
a ..' 0
ci' P-
o ::J
m-
" '"
"tl Z
III 0 g.
i ~.
"tl
a "tl
i 0
~ !/l.
c C/l
::;
Ii ~
if ~
III
::I.
tB
c 0 ."
Ii i S'
. . !!!.
0 ." "tl
i S' 0
!!!.
0- z 3:
... g. ~
0 ~.
0
~ z
0 g.
i ~.
iiI
"tl
j "tl
0
~ !/l.
en
c ::;
li ;n
~
I 0
~. 0
i' 0
!i
i g
g. a .
::l .
~
m
-0
:0
o
e-
m
o
-I
en
38
,.
ID'
14. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - These are Planning Commission actions that may
be called up by the City Council.
A. Site Plan Review 00-17, request to establish a manufactured home sales facility
at 1400 N. Pacific Hwy, Oregon Choice Homes, applicant ................... 14A
B. Site Plan Review 00-21, change of use to restaurant, 573 N. Front Street,
Jose Mendoza, applicant ............................................... 14B
15. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
16. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS
17. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public
body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed pursuant
to ORS 192.660(I)(h).
B. To evaluate the employment-related performance of the City Administrator
pursuant to ORS 192.660(I)(i).
C. To consider records that are exempt by law from public inspection pursuant to
ORS 192.660(I)(t).
18. ADJOURNMENT
Page 3 - Agenda, Woodburn City Council of October 9,2000.
1lr
3A
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FUND RAISER
The annual fund raising dinner for the Mt. Angel, Silverton, Woodburn Habitat for
Humanity affiliate will be held on Saturday, October 14,2000 at Silverton Immanuel Lutheran
Church, 303 N. Church Street (at the comer of Oak and Church). Social hour: 6:30 -7:00 p.m.
Dinner: 7:00 - 9:00 p.m.
Reservations are needed. In Woodburn call Doyne Deos at 503-982-9494. In Mt. Angel
and Silverton call the Habitat office at 503-873-0901. Donations will be accepted at the dinner.
The guest speaker will be Bill Bradbury, Oregon Secretary of State. There will be live
music, an auction, raffle tickets for a garden shed and photos of Habitat houses built by
volunteers. Come and learn about Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit Christian organization,
building houses for God's people in need.
" 1Yr
Workshop #1: Woodburn
Wednesday. November 8, 2000
6:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Woodburn High School,
Commons Area
1785 N. Front Street. Woodburn
The Marion County
Urban Growth Man-
agement Project will
help communitks in the
region create a strategy
to manage growth that
reflects the unique
values and resources in
each of the 20 cities, as
well as the unincorpo-
rated areas in the
County. The project,
conducted by Marion
County, is designed to
coordinate efforts of the
cities and the county
through a policy and
implementation strategy
which will become a
component of the
Marion County Com-
prehensive Plan. The
project is funded by
Marion County and the
State of Oregon. The
prflject is scheduled to be
completed by the end of
2001.
3t
Marion County
Urban GroV\lth Management
Workshops
Workshop #2: Stayton
Thursday, November 16, 2000
6:00 PM to 9:00 PM
Stayton High School,
Cafeteria & Commons Bldg.
757 W. Locust Street. Stayton
}
What is it all about? The workshop will be an
opportunity for the public to create a range of concepts to
guide development in the future. This process
will include reviewing local values and
concerns and creating alternatives
consistent with those values. For
example, if preserving the natural
beauty of the county is a key
value, the participants may
consider alternatives for
preserving areas such as Silver
Creek Falls and Detroit Lake.
Working in small groups,
citizens will participate in a
hands-on exercise to place jobs
and households in the 20 cities
and unincorporated areas in
Marion County. The workshops
will also explore the interrelationship
of issues, how the issues relate to the
state land use and transportation laws,
and how specific patterns of growth impact
the future livability of the region. This workshop
will allow citizens in Marion County to weigh the options
and make a choice about which values are more significant
for the livability of the region.
11r
'Or!..
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
To:
Marion County Urban Growth Management Project Stakeholders
From:
John Fregonese and David Ausherman, Fregonese Calthorpe Associates
Mike McKeever and Kimi Iboshi Sloop, McKeever/Morris a division of Parsons
Brinckerhoff
Date:
September 28, 2000
Subject:
Community Workshop Exercise
The October Stakeholder Group meeting agenda includes a dry-run of the exercise that we will
use during the community workshops in November. The purpose of the exercise is to increase
the public's understanding of the trade-offs involved in planning for future growth. The interactive
exercise provides groups of 6-8 people with the opportunity to identify where they would like new
growth to be located and what type of development it should be (i.e., types of residential and
employment uses) to create a new development pattern for Marion County.
For the exercise, the small groups will be asked to plan for either the north or south part of Marion
County (Salem is not included in either area. However, population and employment have been
allocated to Salem and we will use the outcomes from Salem Futures to determine the growth
pattern for Salem).
The game includes placing "chips" representing different development types on land around each
city, or redevelopment within the existing cities. Each team will have their option of chip packs
that represent conventional development that will result in significant UGB expansion, or more
compact development that will result in minimal expansion. Both chip packs represent the same
number of residents and jobs. Participants must place all residents and jobs, but may exchange
chips with a "banker" if they want to have more of a certain design type than they are provided in
the original chip pack.
Groups will have the opportunity to allocated jobs and residents to each city based on the desired
pattern of growth: there will not be a prescribed number of residents and jobs per city that must
be followed. There will also be an opportunity for the groups working on the north part of the
county to meet with groups working on the south part of the county and reallocate jobs and
residents to different parts of the county if desired.
The results of the workshop will be analyzed and alternatives will be created for Stakeholder
review and evaluation during the upcoming months.
The role of the stakeholders quring the workshops is to facilitate the small group exercise. We
will have facilitator instructions available at the next Stakeholder meeting.
,... 1lr
4A
A Proclamation for Crime Prevention
Month 2000
Whereas, the vitality of the city of Woodburn depends on how safe we keep our homes,
neighborhoods, schools, workplaces, and communities;
Whereas, crime and fear of crime destroy our trust in others and institutions, threatening
the community's health, prosperity, and quality of life;
Whereas, people of all ages must be made aware of what they can do to prevent
themselves, their families, and neighbors, and co-workers from being harmed by crime,
violence, and drugs;
Whereas, the personal injury, financial loss, and community deterioration resulting from
crime are intolerable;
Whereas, effective prevention requires investment by the whole community;
Whereas, crime prevention initiatives must include self-protection and security, but they
must go beyond these to promote collaborative efforts to make neighborhoods safer for
all ages and to develop positive opportunities for young people;
Whereas~ 9dults must invest time, resources, and policy support in effective prevention
ond interVention"strategies for youth, and teens must be~ngaged octively in driying crime
from their communities; .
,
~ . . .
- . ,.
. Whereas', effective crime' prevention programs excel because of portnershipsamong law
':~nforc~ment., 'Other-government agencies, <:ivic groups~ schools;fciith <:ommunities,. . .
. 'blisines~ses,'and'frldividuals as they help to nurture communal reSpOnsibility and instill
. pr~d~; .
. ,:.:;. ;~;;.~c. . <' "$ , ~.~.'. .,' '~: 0." . .
. : ,.:- ;.'\-'f~~~Y!i~~~~~o~~,R.ich.9~~'J~nni~g~Mar?r.ofJ~e}ii~:.~fW9odb~r~.(~5=lo ~er~~r . .,:")5 "j ';....
. '.:~';' ";~l>r9c1cinnJ9~Mr ~OOOas '.C~me';Pr~enhon' Mon\l1u'i:t~~CiW 9f WOOdburn, o'nd urge. -...
.' . "c".. .:~ ~ 0 ':~~ir~i~~~~{.'~iJ~vit~.}Jl.'~.9J.~a. .g. encie$rPuP. lie and. .])~v.~te Jt'stit9t'2~~tq~~' busif1ess~s t~A. .~~t'lIi;';:!.{';<:,,:
.' ........ .:;~:.:.~:,~.(4ri/~~~~'if?f~rr.!&Ti~~.~n~ work !~g~her ~~jh?i~~~~~~o~~.~.;\~ .~t,;;:i~'r:.:~y~~;~;~/.:~S.,~,.~
. '.:;';":o' .,..:.y.,~~. ". . ,. . '. ;. . ;;j;..~.: ", .i~~~,~-;;:~\'; :-r~;'s:; _ .,<:~;,'t: .; .<t+>
,.~~..~) ,~_ .Or ., '," t\ j \,.",lilrtnS._., ,;.. _... ......,.. I,,' - ~- yO,
t -. ~-". ...'_'. .' "'''''{""_' '..; '." ;,';""
... L -
Richard je'nnings, CitY of WoodblJrr\,.iMayor . .
!:;' ",.,;, . " ,':";;/ ,';1'" ',,', ";t.>';~;f{j:'{'S".
',~_. . '.:~..~.l...'.--~-.-~.:~,' .'~:>.\:..._." ..' y' ~;>~..'" )"~.' .~"".~,.,;'. :.,:.~. :. . '. '~~,.'. 0 . . T' 't '" '. ..... t...~
, ""~~I.'",'I:"-";l' ~ "i'::t:'f,~,,~> . '" ,,', "i_0,.;:.:~<::~i~~;~!i;.;::f:;,
.,''!>o ,. ~. '~.~~~. '~i'l" .1r<...".,. .f.~I~ . " -" .'l'j .: ,:;;.: . ....,.';<"... .j;/'. .......:. . ,It. IV"-).!..!k. vs......:.i., ."
," ..h'l~'" .~.. ....l,..:.....,.,~j,i > ..'....~..,.. -:- .,.'" ..',..........'!<. ':.,;~v/l'''C''.:t .....
", . .....,: tf,jo..~ ' .. Ji, ~!\....~'f."\~... iJ.l. "1";'. ~'" ,__,I, . r ..~ r -L'~J .~ .""''F. ~./'"'4 ~ ..
.;- "Po"",;.l." i. {: ':~'; '.'J: It..-;r. .;'t!.'~.,~:i'; ~..-:',. .,..' . '~.,.\..' I,' ~l~.~ .-.\..... .':.~i.,........ ......~.J_.~....-~.'.:.::---.~;:?:',-....;;.
.... . . .~..;If!,.l;,'}.r.:f.!~.J ., 'JJ:-~..-., -l ...."'j. .;;..T_....I'X.;.. - 11", \~ ,a:.. .. ..
-.:":..~<...,/.-. .- ,.::,~',- '., ... . .j.p....:~~"j..,..~:.~..;. '.,:"
.. ... ~. ~ . ". I
11!
4B
CITY OF WOODBURN
270 Montgomery Street · Woodburn, Oregon 97071 · (503) 982-5222
TDD (503) 982-7433 · FAX (503) 982-5244
PROCLAMATION
HANDS ARE NOT FOR HURTING WEEKS
October 8 - 21, 2000
WHEREAS, a world without violence is a dream we all share; and
WHEREAS, any form of mistreatment of another is abuse and all people have the right
to live free of violence; and
WHEREAS, the power to end violence is in our hands; and
WHEREAS, let us all join hands to unite as a family, community, state, nation and
world as we take this pledge: "I will not use my hands or my words for hurting myself or
others. "
NOW, THEREFORE, by the power vested in me as Mayor of the City of Woodburn, I
hereby proclaim October 8 - 21, 2000 as
Hands Are Not For Hurting Weeks
in the City of Woodburn and I call upon all citizens of Woodburn to join in this observance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and cause the seal of the City of
Woodburn to be affixed this 9th day of October, 2000.
Richard Jennings, Mayor
City of Woodburn
m-
. .':.'.::.;':.
/~.
~
QJ 3.c {
/G&~~-L~~~ (],-nA-d:
,~~)fe'--<-A ~~ d~' >
I' /,/, '. (J' r '" ~: ,/ ' ,
-ztu~ ~<~~~..,- ~ V./....CJ_.u'--1 .'
,,( /-, ,- 1/
~c=/d//JZv'J&-.~~- ,c~
, I ~L.&-f Uj~,~:-i :?I.Cy-,....:<-...-
~ J&-.' J. C:l J~~'
~ ~o ~1 ~~~t4-~~~I( c:: ~J ~.
t a~'/ z:5Ib u.: tr-q c&~ I. ~.t.
l /, / 7 -J.--jJ / ,
. c.~ ///(& -7 ~ Vi- &--7~ .::it ,
\'. 'U~', ~~~ v..~ .L-7 '.~ ' ,,/;!
\~'i/// - , ,/1
/'/Jltl-7j J////~/U~~_/
~
~~ ,I
h~
. . . - . ~. - -~'..
- ...-' ..~....... ,............:;,.;.- ;~-:.~~.:::.:.:.;_.
:it*~g~.::;~~;ji::~~'::~;:::'~{'~
.'.---.':'--' .
....
. .........
.....,
'._-. .... . . ......-..
. .:..- ::'.-::;":;)s~~:~~~~;~71B:'
. . ....
......:::::;:;;~.F~~~ti~~~
"
11r
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN,
COUNTY OF MARION, ST ATE OF OREGON, SEPTEMBER 25, 2000.
CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Jennings presiding.
0012 ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Jennings
Bjelland
Chadwick
Figley
Kilmurray
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director
Tiwari, Police Chief Null, Acting Community Development Director Mulder, Finance
Director Gillespie, Public Works Manager Rohman, Park Director Westrick,
Management Analyst Smith, Recorder Tennant
Mayor Jennings stated that he had spoken with Councilor Chadwick who is still
recovering from major surgery. She stated that she will be back to resume her Councilor
duties, however, she was concerned about the number of meetings that she has missed so
far.
0050 ANNOUNCEMENTS.
A) "Sacagawea Speaks": Dramatic portrayal by Joyce Badgley Hunsaker will be held on
Friday, September 29th, 7:00 pm, in the Woodburn High School Lectorium.
B) Fall Clean-up Day: Livability Task Force is coordinating this event and litter pick-up
along the city streets will be held on Saturday, October 7th. Volunteers are asked to report
to the Woodburn High School parking lot at 8:30 am for equipment and assignments.
C) Tree Planting Project: Volunteers are needed to help with this project which will be
held on Saturday, October 2151, at Legion Park.
D) Public Hearings on Alley Project and Parr Road Local Improvement Districts:
The hearings will be held before the City Council on October 23, 2000 as part of the
regular Council meeting.
E) Introduction of recently hired Building Official: Administrator Brown stated that a
conditional offer of employment has been given to Dan Nelson pending completion of
pre-employment tests. Mr. Nelson has been working for the City under a contract with
the County over the last several months and completed successfully for the position
which was part of an open recruitment process. It is anticipated that his work will begin
Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
".
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
in about two weeks and he will be in attendance at the next regular Council meeting.
F) Supplemental Budget: A supplemental budget will be reviewed by the City Council
at their October 9th meeting. The proposed budget will provide for the appropriation of
funds to pay for the document imaging system which is before the Council under a
general business item at this meeting. Revenues for the purchase of this equipment
include grant funds and city match funds. It was noted that changes in the budget law
allow the Council to follow a supplemental budget process which does not involve the
Budget Committee when the proposed budget is less than 10% of the operational budget
of the fund proposed to be adjusted.
0137 APPOINTMENTS TO LIBRARY BOARD.
Mayor Jennings appointed the following individuals to the Library Board:
Position I - Marie Brown to fill the unexpired term of Dorothy Jaeger with a term
expiration date of December 31, 2002;
Position VI - Ardis Knauf to fill the new position authorized by the Council with a term
expiration date of December 31, 2003; and
Position VII - Kevin Schiedler to fill the new student position authorized by the Council
with his term to expire on September 1, 2002.
PUGHlFIGLEY... approve the appointments to the Library Board.
Councilor Figley stated that she had reviewed the applications and feels that all of the
appointees will do an excellent job on the Board.
The motion to approve the appointments passed unanimously.
0207 PROCLAMATION HONORING STEVE GOECKRITZ UPON IDS
RETIREMENT FROM CITY SERVICE.
Mayor Jennings read the proclamation honoring Mr. Goeckritz for his 20 years of
dedicated city service as our Planning Director and Community Development Director
during which time the City has grown in residential, commercial and industrial
developments and undertaken several major land use projects.
Steve Goeckritz expressed his appreciation to the Council for their support. He also
stated that the Planning Commission is very conscientious about their vision of what the
City should be like in the future which will make transition easier for the new Director.
In his opinion, the management staff is the best and they work well with the Council in
accomplishing tasks benefitting the community.
The Councilors expressed their individual thanks to Steve for his service to our
community.
0402 PRESENTATION - HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AWARD.
Scott Summers, Chairman of the Human Rights Commission, stated that 6 awards are
presented throughout the year to individuals who, in the course of their daily lives, are
Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25,2000
"
11r
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
doing things that bring together people and cultures within our community. This
particular award recognized Nari Mendenhall for her work in managing different
apartment complexes. She took over at a complex which was having problems and did a
good job in creating a sense of community by helping the residents to work through
cultural barriers, coordinating social activities, and helping residents with financial
statements and other legal documents.
She expressed her appreciation to the Commission in honoring her for helping people,
therefore, she did not expect public recognition for by the community.
0490 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT.
Doug Templeton, Chamber Board member, informed the Council of the upcoming
Chamber events:
1) Silver Falls Tour Route opening will be held on September 28th with the opening
ceremony to be held at the Woodburn Outlet stores~
2) The Chamber Business Showcase went well this year; and
3) Chamber After Hours will be held on October 12th at Cascade Retirement Center and
on October 26th at the Mid-Valley Bank.
He also briefly commented on this year's leadership of the Chamber and expressed his
opinion that Phil Hand is doing an excellent job as Chamber President. He also stated
that Jane Kanz continues to do a good job as Executive Director.
0589 WOODBURN DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION REPORT.
Doug Templeton, WDA Chairman, expressed his appreciation to Administrator Brown
and Mayor Jennings for their attendance at their last meeting. The WDA hopes to have
some nice trash cans to show the Mayor and staff for placement in the downtown area.
0665 CONSENT AGENDA.
A) Council Minutes of August 28, 2000~
B) Draft Planning Commission minutes of August 10 & 24, and September 14, 2000~
C) Draft Library Board minutes of September 13, 2ooo~
D) Claims for the month of August 2000;
E) Planning Project Tracking Sheet~
F) Building Activity Report for August 2000;
G) Police Department Activities Report for April 2ooo~ and
H) Soccer field lighting at Woodburn High School.
FIGLEYIPUGH... adopt the consent agenda as presented. The motion passed
unanimously.
Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
"
~
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
0692 COUNCIL BILL NO. 2263 - RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO A LEASE OF
PROPERTY WITH UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.
Councilor Sifuentez introduced Council Bill 2263. Recorder Tennant read the bill by title
only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage,
the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 2263 duly passed.
0717 COUNCIL BILL 2264 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR
NON-UNION EMPLOYEES.
Council Bill 2264 was introduced by Councilor Sifuentez. The bill was read by title only
since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the
bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 2264 duly passed.
0741 COUNCIL BILL 2265 - RESOLUTION EXTENDING WORKERS'
COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE TO CERTAIN VOLUNTEERS.
Council Bill 2265 was introduced by Councilor Sifuentez. Recorder Tennant read the bill
by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final
passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Jennings declared Council Bill 2265 duly
passed.
0768 CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2000-01.
Councilor Figley questioned the difference in the Council Bill adoption date versus the
recommended December 15t effective date of the proposed schedule.
Management Analyst Smith stated that the Bill Sizemore measure on the ballot, if passed,
would affect fees for services and it could have a retroactive impact on all fees that have
been increased over the last couple of years.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y....approve the 2000-01 draft master fee schedule with an
October 9,2000 adoption date and a December 1,2000 effective date.
Staff noted that this schedule will be brought back before the Council at the next meeting
in ordinance form.
The motion passed unanimously.
0816 BID AWARD - UTILITY VEHICLE (WASTEWATER).
Bids for a utility vehicle to be used for maintenance operations were received from the
following vendors: Salem Farm & Garden, $5,412.00; Fisher-Ernst Group, $5,445.00~
and Lennon Implement, $5,486.00. Staff recommended that the Council accept the low
bid from Salem Farm & Garden.
FIGLEYIKILMURRAY ....low bid from Salem Farm & Garden in the amount of
$5,412.00 for a utility vehicle be accepted.
Mayor Jennings questioned if the City is required to accept the low bid when there is such
Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
111
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
a small difference in price between the bid from an out-of-town business and a local
business.
Councilor Pugh stated that there is less than 1 % difference in bids and he feels that the
City could write in the bid quotes that a company outside of the City would need to have
at least a 3% margin over a local business bid in order to receive the bid award. He also
stated that he would vote against awarding bids with this small of a margin until such
time as the City does give preference to local businesses.
Attorney Shields stated that the City is governed by state bidding laws and any local laws
are pre-empted.
The vote on the motion was 4-1 with Councilor Pugh voting nay.
0866 CONTRACT AWARD - W ASTEW A TER TREATMENT PLANT LAB
REMODEL PROJECT.
Bids for this project were received from the following contractors:
Corp Inc., $760,000; 2KG Contractors, $874,000~ DGS General Contractors, $908,000;
Bartel Contracting Inc., $910,000; Meng-Hannan Construction, $938,000; The Grant
Company, $960,000; Magno Pacific, Inc., $971,500; and J.E. Inc., $1,072,000. It was
also noted in the staff memo that not a single bidder fully complied with the rules of
signing all appropriate documents. Therefore, the City Attorney drafted Findings for this
bid which were presented to the Council for consideration acting in the capacity of the
Local Contract Review Board for the City.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y... accept the low bid from Corp Inc. in the amount of $760,000
based on the revised findings submitted by the City Attorney which was distributed to
each Councilor at this meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
0915 AGREEMENT FOR CABLE TELEVISION CONSULTING SERVICES.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y.... authorize the City Administrator to negotiate and execute
agreements with MuniCom for I) consulting services for cable television franchise
renewal, for an amount not to exceed $21 ,300~ and 2) consulting services for cable
television franchise transfer in an amount not to exceed $5,760.
Mayor Jennings stated that the law provides for a formal process that must be followed
and staff will attempt to have it done by January 1,2001, however, the City is not bound
by the January 1 st date since DirectLink was outside of the window period which would
require the January 1 st deadline.
The motion passed unanimously.
0965 ACCEPTANCE FOR PROPOSAL FOR DOCUMENT IMAGING.
The only proposal received was from VP Consulting in the amount of $22,610 for
software and implementation services. Staff recommended that this proposal be accepted
Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
111"
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
which would be partially funded from a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant that must
be obligated by September 30,2000.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y.... accept the proposal of VP Consulting to provide an imaging
and document management system for $22,610, and authorize staff to negotiate and the
Mayor to sign a contract with VP Consulting for the purchase, installation, and
maintenance of a document imaging and management system by Friday, September 29,
2000.
Mayor Jennings stated that this project is one of the City's first steps towards having the
ordinances and other city documents available for research on the internet.
The motion passed unanimously.
1010 CONTRACT AWARD FOR CENTENNIAL PARK PHASE II PARKING LOT
PAVING.
Bids for the paving of the parking lot were received from the following contractors:
Morse Bros., $74,423.25~ Roy L. Houck Co., $74,880.85~ and Parker Northwest Paving
Co., $76,601.90.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y.... award a construction contract to the lowest qualified bidder,
Morse Bros., for the Centennial Park Phase II parking lot in the amount of $74,423.25.
The motion passed unanimously.
1032 CITY LOGO REVISION.
Administrator Brown stated that the City had utilized the services of a designer to provide
several new logo designs for the purpose of updating the logo to be more in line with the
way the City is today. The Councilors were given copies of 4 designs which have made it
through various staff reviews. He briefly described what each design represented and
reminded the Council that they could still make changes to anyone of the designs
including the colors used. The logo would be used on city letterhead, business cards,
caps, department insignias, uniforms, patches, and other symbols that the City may be
developed in the future.
The Councilors individually expressed their views on each logo with the "City Icons" and
the landscape designs being the most popular of the 4 designs presented.
PUGH! .... landscape design be selected as the new city logo. The motion died for lack
of a second.
FIGLEY/SIFUENTEZ... treeless icon be adopted as the new logo.
Councilor Kilmurray suggested that the business cards not include the picture since it
may be too small by the time the picture is reduced in size. Staff will continue to work on
revising the design based on comments made at this meeting.
The motion passed unanimously.
Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
,. '!'If'
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
1511 BROKERAGE ACCOUNT WITH MCDONALD INVESTMENTS.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y.... authorize the Mayor, City Administrator, Finance Director,
and City Recorder to sign a "Corporate Resolution to Open and Carry a Brokerage
Account" form from McDonald Investments.
The motion passed unanimously.
Councilor Bjelland requested clarification of the interest earnings to be gained by
utilizing a private brokerage house versus the Local Government Investment Pool.
Finance Director Gillespie stated that, in any event, investing funds in the brokerage
house will generate more interest income to the City. If interest rates decline, the
investment yield will be greater to the City than if the interest rates increase.
1540 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - BULLET PROOF VEST GRANT.
The Police Department has been awarded a grant from the Dept. of Justice in the amount
of $2,189.00 which is approximately 50% of the cost to purchase 7 bulletproof vests.
FIGLEYIKILMURRA Y.... approve receipt and allocation of grant funds for the
purchase of bulletproof vests. The motion passed unanimously.
1650 OLCC LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION: ARANDAS TAQUERIA. 550 N
FIRST STREET #5.
FIGLEy/SIFUENTEZ.... approve a Restaurant Liquor License (R) for Isidro Sevilla
DBA Arandas Taqueria located at 550 N. First St. #5.
The motion passed unanimously.
1665 "NO PARKING" ON N. FRONT STREET NORTH OF HARRISON STREET.
Public Works Director Tiwari stated that city standards are that "No Parking" would be
on the east side of the roadway. However, the petition received had requested "No
Parking" on the west side. Since this is a change in city policy, staff was unsure as to
whether or not the Council would want to hold a public hearing giving the residents an
opportunity to express their views. He reiterated that the hearing was not required and
the Council could make a decision at this meeting.
Councilor Figley expressed concern in (1) residents re-thinking their position and then
deciding not to pursue the original plan and (2) making sure that adequate street parking
is available so that residents do not park on lawns.
PUGHlFIGLEY.... Public Works be instructed to install "No Parking" signs on the west
side of N. Front Street north of Harrison Street. The motion passed unanimously.
1870 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS.
A) Site Plan Review #00-06: Approval to construct a 14, 400 square foot industrial
building on a 1.27 acre site located north of 2725 N. Front Street.
B) Site Plan Review #00-15, Variance #00-06, Partition #00-03: Approval to construct an
Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
".
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25,2000
TAPE
READING
Auto Zone, Inc., auto parts store at 1041 N. Pacific Highway.
No action was taken by the Council on these two Planning Commission actions.
1888 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT.
A) On the October 9th Council meeting agenda, a business item will be brought before
the Council which is the consideration of the Urban Renewal District. The feasibility
study is almost complete and discussion will be held on the boundaries which includes
the downtown area and extends out to Highway 99E.
B) He also stated that he would be out of state beginning Wednesday, September 27th and
will return to the office on Monday, October 2nd. In his absence, Public Works Director
Tiwari will be in charge of the daily operations and Chief Null in charge of police
activities.
1936 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS.
Councilor Pugh stated that he is very pleased with the new sidewalk which abuts the
sound wall along Woodland Avenue.
Councilor Bjelland briefly reported on the Rural Investment Fund allocation of projects
for the upcoming year. Included on the funding list are 1) the Mill Creek watershed, and
2) the GIS improvement project, both of which will have some impact on the City. The
only other project Woodburn had in the running was an lllustrated Childrens Story
Anthology in three languages which was proposed by Woodburn High School.
Hopefully, next year Woodburn will be in a better position to submit projects that will be
specifically directed to Woodburn.
He also stated that the Marion County Growth Management Steering Committee will be
holding two community input meetings to review the work of the Growth Management
Task Force. The meetings will be a workshop type of environment in which the
consultants will provide a presentation on what Marion County is projected to look like in
the year 2050. Additionally, growth boundaries will be shown under a base assumption
that growth will occur and use up land as in the past. One of the meetings will be held in
Woodburn and he encouraged our local citizens to attend and participate in this process.
Specific dates will be made available at an upcoming Council meeting.
Councilor Sifuentez stated that she will be coordinating a clean-up crew as part of the
Livability Task Force October 7th program and she invited volunteers to participate in her
group that will be working in the area of MacLaren School.
Mayor Jennings stated that the City's Festival of Christmas Music will be held on
December 1 st ,4th, and 6th at the High School Lectorium. Additionally, he is working on
Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
11r
8A
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
TAPE
READING
appointing a steering committee who will put together a full month of activities
celebrating the Christmas season.
He also stated that he will be out of town between October 2nd and October 9th but will
return in time for the Council meeting.
2260 EXECUTIVE SESSION.
The Mayor requested that the Council adjourn to executive session under the authority of
ORS 192.660(l)(e), ORS 192.660(l)(h), and 192.660(1)(f).
PUGHlFIGLEY.... adjourn to executive session under the state statutes cited by the
Mayor. The motion passed unanimously.
The Council adjourned to executive session at 8: 10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:02 p.m..
2308 Mayor Jennings stated that no action was taken by the Council during executive session.
He also stated that he will be attending the opening ceremony of the Silver Falls Tour
route but will be unable to take the bus tour. Councilor Sifuentez stated that she will be
on the tour.
2374 ADJOURNMENT.
PUGHlFIGLEY... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m..
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 9 - Council Meeting Minutes, September 25, 2000
,. 1Tf'
8A
Executive Session
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
September 25, 2000
DATE. CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF
MARION, STATE OF OREGON, SEPTEMBER 25, 2000.
CONVENED. The Council met in executive session at 8: 19 p.m. with Mayor Jennings presiding.
ROLL CALL.
Mayor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Councilor
Jennings
Bjelland
Chadwick
Figley
Kilmurray
Pugh
Sifuentez
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
Mayor Jennings reminded the Councilors and staff that information discussed in executive session is
not to be discussed with the public.
Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Tiwari, City
Recorder Tennant
The executive session was called under the following statutory authority:
1) ORS 192.660(1)(e) to conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to
negotiate real property transactions;
2) ORS 192.660(1)(h) to consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body
with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed; and
3) ORS 192.660(1 )(f) to consider records that are exempt by law from public inspection.
ADJOURNMENT.
The executive session adjourned at 9:00 p.m..
APPROVED
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
ATTEST
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page I - Council Executive Session Minutes, September 25, 2000
111"
"\V"OODBURN "VVORLD'S
BERRY CENTER l\IUSEUM 8B
.1..55 North Front Street ~ Woodbum, Oregon 9707\ ~ (503) 982-95:~\
Woodburn City Museum Committee Meeting Minutes for August 2000
Museum Gift Shop e., August 7, 2000 e., 7:00 pm
I. Call to Order
Meeting called to order in the Museum Gift Shop at 7:00pm on August 7, 2000.
Committee Members:
Hazel Smith
V ance Yoder
Cindy Thomas
Leonard Van Valkenberg
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Bill Klein
Loy Kirksey
Amber Velasco
Kahut
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
The Committee also re wed a unanimously approved the facilities use request
by the home-schooling gr r resented by Susan Buck for the week of
November 13th. The group be preparing for and performing a Shakespearean
play. Staff noted that based on the direction provided by the Committee at the
previous meeting, the stage area behind the screen will be converted to storage
space following the approved facilities use, and will not be available for use by the
public for plays in the future.
Present
Staff:
Matt Smith
II. Committee Business
The Committee reviewed and
meettng.
y approved the draft minutes for the June
III. Communications and Correspondence
The Committee reviewed the letter of condolences sent to the wife of Clair Nelson,
a longtime volunteer and board member at the Museum, and expressed their
sympathies for his family and appreciation for his contributions to the Museum.
The Committee also reviewed a letter from Public Works Program Manager
regarding the proposed relocation of the parking zone for the Greyhound bus to
449 N. Front Street. Members indicated that while the bus parking may also be
MI/sel/m Committee Minl/les
AI/!,I/sI 7, 2000 M- Pal! 1 of 3
-
8B
documentation regarding ownership of the projector prior to sale. The Committee
agreed with the recommended action, and directed staff to begin investigating the
sale of the projector, and to return to the Committee prior to sale for approval.
The Committee discussed grant funding priorities for upcoming applications, and
directed staff, based on the Committee's 2000-2001 goals, to pursue funding for
projects related to safety and security first (goals [d] and [eD and cosmetic
reconstruction second (goal [aD.
VI. Adjourn
The Committee adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Mustllm ummitttt MinllltI
Allgllsl 7, 2000 ~ Page 3 of 3
".
8B
used by groups visiting the Museum in tour buses, anticipated problems with
loitering in front of the Museum are a serious concern for the Committee. The
Committee asked Hazel Smith to attend the Council meeting and express those
concerns on behalf of the Committee. Committee member Smith indicated that she
will attend the meeting.
IV. Museum Use Report
Staff reported that attendance at the Museum continues to climb during the
summer months.
V. Discussion Items
The Committee reviewed staffs progress toward developing a "Movies at the
Bungalow" program, and indicated their support for the continuing efforts toward
implementing the program.
Staff presented a brief report recommendi that Museum be renamed "The
Woodburn Historical Museum," to clari th purpose of the Museum to the
community and to visitors from other are ommittee members indicated that
the recommendation is appropriate, xpr ~ed concern regarding the impact
that the change would have on form ~'IDembers and others who founded the
Museum. The Committee indi <<th' they would be interested in learning the
opinions of the Museum fou approving the change, and directed staff
to initiate contact.
Staff reiterated the Co 'ttee's 'scussions at two previous meetings regarding the
conversion of the stage are nd the screen to storage space to allow for rotation
of exhibits in the Museum. Staff requested a final decision on the issue. After a
brief discussion, the Committee unanimously agreed that following the event
planned by the home-schooling group in mid-November, the area should be
converted to storage space.
Staff reported that the Museum currently houses two film projectors, and
recommended that the Committee direct staff to investigate the sale of the second
projector currently located at the rear of the theater. Staff indicated that the
projector presents a fire hazard when used, there is no known individuals with
sufficient experience to run the projector, and the projector is currently using space
that is more appropriately used to accommodate video projector equipment and the
lighting system. Funds generated by the sale would contribute to the renovation of
the theater interior. The following discussion focused on methods of advertizing
the sale, and Committee members suggested that staff ensure that the Museum has
MNJtNm Committee Minutes
AN!,NJt 7, 2000 ~ Pal! 2 of 3
,. 'In"
8e
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through the City Administrator
Public Works Program Manager q ft---
Relocation of Greyhound Bus Stop
TO:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
October 5, 2000
INFORMATION: The existing bus stop on Hayes Street east of First Street is being
relocated to Grant Street west of Front Street.
The existing bus stop used by the Greyhound and other intercity bus lines is on Hayes
Street east of First Street adjacent to the city parking lot. The Greyhound Bus Lines
agent has relocated to 479 N. Front Street which is on the corner with Grant Street.
They have requested that the city designate three existing parking spots on Grant
Street west of Front Street as a bus stop.
Staff has spoken with the business owners on Grant Street adjacent to the proposed
bus stop and they expressed no opposition to the conversion of the three parking spots
to a bus stop.
The existing bus stop on Hayes Street will revert to on street parking and there will be
three parking spots added at that location so there will be no net loss of parking spots
in the downtown area. No traffic operation or parking problems are anticipated from the
relocation.
,. 1Tf
8D
Community
Development
MEMORANDUM
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
(503) 982-5246
Date: October 2,2000
To: Jim Mulder, Acting Community Development Director
From: Building Department
Subject: Building Activity for September 2000
1998 1999 2000
Dollar Dollar Dollar
No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount
New Residence Value 8 $931,672 11 $1,175,188 5 $548,500
Multi Family 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Residential Adds & Alts 7 $85,791 2 $89,000 0 $0
Industrial 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Commercial Value 2 $138,904 0 $0 1 $750,000
Signs, Fences, Driveways 4 $30,581 3 $3,920 1 $3,000
Manufactured Homes 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
TOTALS 21 $1,186,948 16 $1,268,108 7 $1,301,500
July 1 - June 30
Fiscal Year To Date $4,212,836 $7,328,562 $2,645,675
Bldg\activity 9/00
,.
111"
8F
MEMO
FROM:
City Council through the City Administrator~
Public Works Program Manager q ~
TO:
SUBJECT:
Leaf Pick Up and Disposal Program
DATE:
October 4, 2000
The City Council has directed in past years that the Public Works increase its sweeping
effort during the fall. This effort has been directed at the downtown area and main
streets leading to schools. The areas where sweeping intervals are increased to weekly
are shown on the attached drawing. The remainder of the city is swept once per month
according to the usual schedule. This fall Public Works will continue this practice.
Increased sweeping will run from November 6, 2000 to December 15, 2000.
The yard debris recycling program is the suggested method for residents to dispose of
their leaves. Those residents with a larger amount of leaves can store them and fill the
container each week until they are all picked up.
There are some other options available to citizens who want to dispose of their leaves.
No cost leaf drop off will also be available from November 6, 2000 to December 15,
2000. This year, due to construction activity, the sewer treatment Dlant will not be
available for leaf disDosal, however, leaves can be disDosed of at the Public Works
materials yard at 300 Cleveland Street. They can be dropped off as follows:
Monday through Friday --- 8:30 am to 3:30 pm
Saturday --- 8:30 am to 1 :30 pm
The materials yard is on Cleveland Street just east of the railroad tracks. Signs will
direct individuals where to deposit the leaves. Leaves deposited must be removed from
plastic bags or other containers.
Some other options for disposal' include:
1 . Composting on private property.
2. Pickup at residence. United Disposal employees will pick up bagged leaves as
a part of regular service with regular charges.
3. Composting at Marion County site. Marion County is composting yard waste,
which can be dropped at the North Marion Station located at 17827 Whitney
Lane, NE near the ash disposal site. Information on cost and conditions can be
obtained by calling 981-4117.
'"
'- I~I
"(....("C;~
MA IN ;
FIRE STATION ~
=9 = ·
u
(
8F
..
, r--1 r
LEGEND
/
In.w.~t. Scheduled Weekly Sweeping
~"" Extension of Weekly Sweeping Dunng /
Leaf Clean-up
111"
lOA.2
Memo
TO:
Mayor & Council through the City Administrator ys'J
DATE:
Ben Gillespie, Finan"JjJirector
"fY\
October 2, 2000 .
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2000-01 Supplemental Budget Hearing
Recommendation: That the Council approve the attached ordinance adopting a supplemental
budget for 2000-01.
Baclq:round: Two items were inadvertently omitted from the 2000-01 budget.
The document imaging system was budgeted in 1999-2000, but purchase was delayed pending the
development of a complete and thorough RFP. The project has now been advertised and was
awarded at the September 25 Council meeting. A Department of Justice grant will provide
$17,000 of the $27,000 cost. The balance will come from funds carried over from the previous
year.
A grant from the Department of State Lands provided $33,000 for a wetlands inventory. The
final payment to the contractor ($16,500) was budgeted last year, but the work was not
completed until this year. That amount should be added to Contracted Services in the Planning
budget. Revenue to cover the cost was received under the grant in 1999-2000. Again, funds
carried over from last year are the funding source.
Parks has begun a new program that was not budgeted this year. The Recreation staffwill be
managing youth the baseball program. The cost of providing these activities ($10,000) will be
covered by user fees.
Financial Implications: None of these actions reduce the amount budgeted for Contingencies.
Police-Other Equipment (001-211-710.749) $ 27,000
Dept of Justice Grant (001-000-450-040)
Working Capital Carry Forward (001-000-405.000)
Document Imaging
$ 17,000
$ 10,000
w
Planning-Contracted Services (001-511-615.006) $ 16,500
Working Capital Carry Forward (001-000-405.000)
DSL wetlands inventory
Parks Leisure-Temporary Services (001-421-513.000)
Players Fees-Baseball (001-000-460.033)
New parks programs
$ 10,000
10A.2
$ 16,500
$ 10,000
",.
lOA.2
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2266
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2000-2001 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, Oregon State Statute 294.480 allows for the adoption of a
supplemental budget during a fiscal year to meet changes in financial planning, and
WHEREAS, the public notice required under State budget law was published in
the Woodburn Independent on September 30, 2000, and
WHEREAS, during the regular City Council meeting on October 9,2000,
citizens were given an opportunity to comment on the proposed 2000-01 supplemental budget,
now, therefore,
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That a supplemental budget for fiscal year 2000-01 is hereby adopted
as set forth below.
Section 2. That fiscal year 2000-01 revenues and appropriations are adjusted as
follows:
GENERAL FUND:
Revenues:
Working Capital Carryover
Bureau of Justice Equipment Grant (Police)
Players Fees - Baseball
$ 26,500
17,000
10.000
Total Resources - General Fund
Appropriations:
Police Department -
Capital Outlay
Total - Police
Planning Department -
Materials & Services
Total- Planning Department
Parks: Leisure Services -
Personal Services
Total - Parks Leisure Services
$ 53.500
$ 27.000
$ 27,000
$ 16.500
$ 16,500
$ 10.000
$ 10,000
Total Appropriations - General Fund
$ 53.500
Page 1 - Council Bill No.
Ordinance No.
,. lTf'
lOA.:
Section 3. That the City Recorder shall file with the Department of Revenue,
State of Oregon, a true copy of the supplemental budget as finally adopted in accordance with
Oregon Revised Statute 294.555.
Section 4. That if any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or portion of this
ordinance for any reason shall be adjudged invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
judgment shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, section or portion
of this ordinance directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment is rendered.
Section 5. This ordinance being necessary for the public peace, health and safety,
an emergency is declared to exist and this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage
by the Council and approval by the Mayor
Approved as to Form~. ~ ~
City Attorney
/o-tf-2()(jO
Date
APPROVED:
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, Recorder
City of Woodburn, Oregon
Page 2 - Council Bill No.
Ordinance No.
,.
f
lOB
MEMO
To:
From:
Via:
Subject:
Date:
Mayor and City Council .. .~ ':-~ )
Matt Smith, Management Analyst' . _ _47
John C. Brown, City AdministratorP"/
2000-2001 Master Fee Schedule
October 9, 2000
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance adopting the
2000-2001 Master Fee Schedule, effective December 1,2000.
Background:
The draft 2000-2001 Master Fee Schedule was presented to Council at the September
25,2000 Council meeting. Following a discussion regarding the effective date of the
schedule, Council directed staff to bring the Schedule back at the October 9, 2000 meeting
for adoption. The recommended effective date of December 1, 2000 is intended to avoid
any conflicts with Ballot Measure 93, which may require jurisdictions to refund all or a
portion of taxes, fees, and charges made or increased since December 6, 1998.
Discussion:
The attached schedule reflects direction given by Council at the September 25, 2000
meeting, as well as minor changes to correct a few clerical errors.
Staff notes that the staff report for the fee schedule presented at the September 25,
2000 meeting contains a mistake on page three. Fees for Public Works were described as
"increas[ing] incrementally to account for current costs of service." Public Works fees are
not increased in the 2000-2001 Master Fee Schedule.
Conclusion:
The Schedule contains fees that reflect the cost of providing service to the public,
and Council direction regarding the appropriate rate of recovery for each of those fees.
Accordingly, your approval of the attached schedule is recommended.
Financial Impact:
The increase in fees and charges resulting from the recommended schedule is
estimated at $10,000 for 2000-2001.
lIT
lOB
COUNCIL BILL NO. 2267
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR
CITY SERVICES ADOPTED IN 1999, ADOPTING THE 2000-2001 REVISED
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR THE
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SAID FEE SCHEDULE; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2245;
AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn has conducted an extensive and exhaustive analysis
of its services, the costs reasonable borne of providing those services, the beneficiaries of those
services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to comply with both the letter and the spirit of the Oregon
Constitution, applicable state statutes, and limit the growth of taxes~ and
WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a policy of recovering the full costs reasonably
borne of providing services of a voluntary and limited nature, such that general taxes are not
diverted from general services of a broad nature and thereby utilized to subsidize unfairly and
inequitable such special services; and
WHEREAS, a schedule of fees and charges to be paid by those requesting such special
services needs to be adopted so that the City might carry into effect its policies; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to develop a revised schedule of fees
and charges based on the City's budgeted and projected costs reasonably borne and to review the
schedule on an annual basis, NOW, THEREFORE
THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Repeal. The 1999-2000 Master Fee Schedule adopted on October 11, 1999
is hereby repealed. All fees and charges which are inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby
repealed.
Section 2. Fee Schedule Adoption. The City hereby adopts the 2000-2001 Master Fee
Schedule affixed hereto as Attachment "A" listing applicable fees and charges which shall be
charged and collected for those services enumerated.
Section 3. Separate Fee For Additional Process. All fees set by this Ordinance are for
each identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service
that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis, the
Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
.. 'In"
lOB
fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units.
Section 4. Review. It is the intention of the City Council to review the fees and charges
adopted by this Ordinance on an annual basis based on the City's next annual budget and all the
City's costs reasonably borne as established at the time and, if warranted, to revise such fees and
charges based thereon.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect on December 1,2000.
~~ .A.A./"") 10- ~ - Z ~f!);O
Approved as to form: V 1.- , Q (I~
City Attorney Date
APPROVED:
RICHARD JENNINGS, MAYOR
Passed by the Council
Submitted to the Mayor
Approved by the Mayor
Filed in the Office of the Recorder
ATTEST:
Mary Tennant, City Recorder
City of W oodbum, Oregon
Page 2 - COUNCIL BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
,. 1r
.-J
~,
.
--,
ATTACHMENT-~
page....1- of:a::::::
The City of Woodburn
LOOO-2001
MaSi,,~Fee~;;~.ldale
Adopted by the City Council on October 9, 2000
" 1fJ'
lOB
~
.-
ir
The City of Wood bum
Annexations
Z~..~liP.~rnen~rnent
C<lrn~siveplan Amendment
Conditional Use
Variance
A~I()f~n~U~et..<:li()~logity Council
~inorPartiti()~(~I()ts()fle~s) ..
Mae Partition (involves road)
LC>t-':i~E!~~justrnents
SUtl<li'Ji~i()l1(410tsor more)
P.U.D. (41()tsorrnore)
Site P1linF\E!view (~ased on. square footage)
-under 4.000 sq. ft.
. ........... _m_...................___._.......
~,~.~9..~...~.?~~~..~q.:.ft.
-~.()I)()~.~.-~.~5q:~:
:!92.()I)()sq:~:.~1~,~~9 59. ft.
-200.000 sq. ft. +
$1.280
$1,325
$1,325.
$818
$908
$912
$898
$1,063 '
$276'
$1,498
$1,772
$1,354
$1,429
$1,429.
$873'
$973
$942
$957
$1,130
$289
$1,593
$1,900
ATTACHMENT A
Page ~ of --a-- 2000-2001 Master Fee: lOB
95%
93%'
93%
94%,
93%
97%
94%
94%
95%.
94%
93%
100%'
100%
100%
100%'
100%:
100%:
100%-
100%.
100%
100%i
100%i
$
$1,429
$1,429
$873'
$973:
$942-
$957-
$1,130
$289'
. ...... ~1.593pllJs$10p~rlot
$1,900 plu~$14.perl(lt
Copy Fees (tapes)
$3.00
Public Dance Permits
$115
$32
...Li~~ili~~~JPE!rr~uE!~tL..
NSF Check Fee
.. ........ _m..._._....___.___..~.~_....,.
-first and second time
. ._ ____...... m..__.__...._._~ _.__......
-remainder
. __..........._.___.......___....._.._..m.__.._.___.....
-avoidance payment
$20'
$25
$10
$0
C<lpy.~_thE! .B~d~t
.. U9~ Uce!!~_ .. .m.__m..
. ~(c:lll!Y~!i~!!~in.g~~tl}m..
.. .~c:I!lc:lJ!~L!!lg!J.c:ll!)gp.~agtl).......
:~~~I~~~~!~g~~I!~~~.........
....~~ ArT!p1~~.~i'errn~t
Solicitor's Ucense
.m..____....__..._.~__._.m.._.____ ..... ...........---~.........._.
....~?~F~...._.......__........_...............
. . ::::'1Qt~J~<:I1~rg~~~ig~~tlJrtllm
~ not fee char es r si nature
$174:
$54
$20
$23
$
.Fi~lQr.~lJ.~.!Jbral)'.M~~ri-"lll .
J<eYJ~il'lQ Gar~ll~n~R!'lpt~lTl~ntGc:lr~s
Charge for Interlibrary Loan (ILLs)
Lost Books and Materials
..-..._-------.....-.-.
Pri~~ng. GOI11ptJttlr
Camegie Room Use
Multi-Purpose Room Use
. ...... _....-.----~-~.....
Room Use Monitor Fee
$3.00
$120
$32
100%
95%.
100%
$6 361%
................................
$6 451%:
$6 . . '181oi~T
$24 0% '
100%
100%'
100%:
361%
.............-.........--.-...-.....
451%
............-.-......--.-.---..
181%:
$183
$56
$21
~?~, .
$63:
95% 100%
. ......... -----..
96% 100%
0- ._~_.~._._._...~.....____~_~_~_~.~
94% 100%
. ... "OO%T . 100%
85% 100%:
. ...... .. .-~..._~....... .+ ............;.
$61
$0.05
$12
$15
$151
;
33%'
100%
157%
159%
.......-.---...-----1...
159%i
Page 1 of7
33%,
100%.
132%
139%
100%
fee charged per page side (plus a research fee of
$28/hour, charged to the nearest 1/4 hour only for
complex duplicative requests requiring over 1/4
....~()!!r()tr.f3~~r<:l1t...._..._...........................__. .....m.......
$3.00, fee charged per tape (plus a research fee of
- $28/hour. charged to the nearest 1/4 hour only for
. complex duplicative requests requiring over 1/4
: hourofr~~rchL !
$120. fee charged per dance, $300 per year (fee applies
.mL()nlytogr()lIPllc::~~rgi!)g.<l<llTlilllli()!)L ..
$32
0%
... . .... ..mmm.._m .mm.:.:. "mm._ .. .....j
. .......... .$.2.~. ... ..mmm.m_m..mm.m I
$10 lfoa~~~~f:fe to avoid water shut-off (in addition I
$0-
$20
.. . $1.~3.
m$~
$21
$24
$63
. plllll.~().ticing..<:Q~tlli!)...ltl.~..!'lVtlm..()t ~..tiEl~ic:ll.....
pt!!llm~()ticil'lg.c::<>llt~..i!)..!~!'l~y.tlrlt()f~..~f3I1i~I......
. '1
..........1
~~~i:~~]~5}...........1.
activities identified in ORS 160-1Q0..04oo 6 8 j
.,1.Qj..c::h~rgl3(j~r..~.<3Y..(~!li!!'llTlsJj~c::llI~i!)g\'itiEl<>s)
....m .... $1.()()Lpl3rC<Jr~(f!'lf3e.lltc:l~!ill~l3(j~yGGRL,$)
5% return post +' fees average $3
lending ,
. . .cI1argElS.. .mmmm ....... ........... ...........mm ..m ........
list price L ordefault price(f~ a.ver~$?O}
$O.Q~. ... c~~rgl3(jpl3rPc:l9tl .. .. .
$16. charged per hour (fee for groups charging
.. a~lTlission only)
$21. charged per hour (fee for groups charging
acllTlillsi<>nonly) ...
$15: charged per hour for room use after business
, hours in addition to the room use fee (fee for
- groups charging admission only)
,. 1fT"
The City of Woodburn
ATTACHMENT --4s--
Page -2l- of -
2000-2001 Master Fee: lOB
Records Computer Scans
$13 $14
92%
100%
fee charged for average research time (includes !
first two pages, $1.00 each additional page)
$14 fee charged for average research time (includes I
$42~~t~~ci~;l~~~:~i~~i~~j~~~O($16, inl
$150' addition to therep<lrtf~ (plus $1.00 PElr rec()rd) I
.. .'@1 J~<:h?rg~~r(J(irsol1 ~
. $~m f~ charg~PElrD()Ur I'
$1~81. firstholJrofnuisancea~atefl1ent
contractor. I
costs'
I
I
..fjrsthoufOfPt>110)(i()usYl:39f:ltation?b?tf:lrnent . I
I
Archived Records Retrieval
Sta!ut()'Yl,lf:lDige1mp<lundment..(Resolution #1497)
. . fi!!9f:lrprj!1.tjl1g{fprJI1f:l$c:l1()Olpi!;t~c1)
. P()li~JI1"'f:lS~g?ti()l1!;.
NuiSClll~Abatement Fees (Ordinance#1822)
-first hour
-each additional hour or fraction thereof
Vegetation Abatemerlt F~s (Ordinance #1822)
-first hour
-each additional hour or fraction thereof
ConstnJction Pennit for Work in the Public Right of Way
(On1il1?1'~tt1?~~}-:9>!;tof Improvement
-jJ11~.$9!{)()()...m
~,-~~J25,0Q<l......
-$25,()()()..-..$1.()(),0()0
-::over$10(),QOO
'r\'~.~~~=Fi~! ...
1f\I~._~<>lEll;=~ClCh I\~ditional
~r!~p . .m
WaI~5.f:lryigEl.ll1!;t?n?ti()I1.Gh?rges..(Ordinance..#1~6t3)
-314' line and 518' meter
-1. line and meter
-1-112' and larger meters
$150 $185,
$2() . . $71
$54, $~
$130 $128
contractor contractor
costs costs
81%
94%
100%
102%
100%
5% of cost nfa nfa
$250' nfa nfa
$1,()()O, nfa nfa
$3,000 nfa nfa
$30 $39 78%
$15 $19 78%
$100 $126 79%
$200 $208 96%
$300 $311 97%
. cost del. by . nfa nfa
City.
$20' $21 95%'
Charge for Leak Adjustment Service
Reconnect for Non-PaymenVService (Ordinance #1965)
Restored:
-full payment during bus. hrs
-fun payment after bus. hrs (ADD)
. -f\J11.~.~l\t()l1 hQlid~!;, \V~kf:lnds(ADD)
-tumonloff
Curb Cuts
. ____________"WW__._____ ..
HAppr~El!l
T&E
$20
$50
$50
$20
$21
$77
$77
$21
$35.
$1.50
$1.00.
$39.
$1,50 i ..
$1.00.
Blu~~~nts=2~.~:3l).(f~llsh~t) $10 $11
BI~~f)riI1~=18.x2~.J~alfsh~t) $10 $11
RoIL~~.........HHH................. ........... ....... ........ ...$0.25 $0,25.
24.)(3f3'(Af:l~?I!;LW~M?ps!J'=~'CityMaps).... $5.00 $11
. GQn~~c:I!Qrl.~!?~?.r(LS~~i()l1!;m. . .$3~m nfa
Bt)fl<:/lrn?rIt.Mc>.I1l1f!lEl!"tM?P!Rf:lfeff;lngEl.... ..m. .. ....... . m.m . .............. . ........... $~. ....... ..mn/a.
...=~~~~_QKi~L~Z.~....UE..__:.2.I.~:~:..f:j....
Wastewater Monthly Charges (fees are the minimum
charges [Ordinance #2157])
95%
65%
65%'
95%'
91%
100%
100%
91%i
93%
100%'
45%'
nla'
nfa
mnia 1
-" .........t
Page 2 of7
81%
100%.
100%
100%:
100%.
nfCli
nla'
nfa
nfa
78%
78%
79%:
.. 5"10 ofC()!;t"m~'Yo ofc()!;t~lIt!1()tlf:ls!;tDan$1 ()
.J?~()JplusAO(o()\lf:lr$9!()9(). .
$1.0()0 i plus}% over$2~,0()0
$3,000, plus 2% over $100,000
$30
$15
$100
i
I
I
~~~ : $300 :1
.... 'nia'C()Sidet.~yTcost~~te~inedbYCiiy(pjusf5%o{said coslforl
mL .... .GltYLagrnll\l!;t~?tiv~?I1<:f()\lerhElagf:l)(pEll1!;~L ......... !
95% $20 i deducted from total credit of leak adjustment I
. I
. .JQrcllnan~~1866) ...1
65%'
95%!
. . ~.,.
91%'
100%
100%
91%
1 Q().% i
45%:
nfa'
nfa
nla.
$20' when bill has been paid in full PLUS when paid
L~l\V~I\~?I1)?I1<:f4Pmmm. ....................... ......... mm.' . ..... .......
$50' after business hours are payments between 4 pm
. and 8am
$501
$20' for other reasons other than non-payment
(excludes emergency such as waterline or
.. .. .~uiPrnElnt~rEli:l~Cl9Ell.
$35J f~fortwo(21 cuts ...
.. .. ~1.~OLJ~c;I)argf:l9PElrf()O~m ....
$1.00, fee charged per $1,000 of valuation on building
. ..PElll11it
$10
$10
$0.25 feechargedpElr square foot
. ~I" ... .....
$35:
. . . . . m$!i ... .... . .. . . ... mm..... ..m.... mmmm.... ......... ..... .
... $?O.Jf:lf:l?ndC()stgfsf:lryiPElEl!ltir11i:ltElQ..
,.
1l1'
The City of Wood bum
ATTAC~ENT ---'t
Page of
2000-2001 Master Fee SlOB
. Current Cost of Fee 35 3' RccOIll'd % Ado ted . . .
Reg,,3t.on Product or Service F S' of Current Cost PF Notes (Additional Fees, Units, ete)
ee ervlee Cost Recove ee
Residential-Slngle Family, Churches (per Unit, minimum
VollJlTlEl~ <:f)..
Multi-family, Apartments, Mobile Homes in Parks,
Con<lo~,Hotel, MClt~l(perunit,.rninimlJrnVCllume ..~ cf)
ResidentlallJnitsnotonc;itYMeterEld Water System
Commercial Businesses, Schools, RV Parks, Care
...Genters'E:lt~,..(PE:lr,lTlEltE:l~,..l11illil11.lJlT!y()llJ.ITlEl..~QQ.<:f}
Industrial
VolulTlElc:~arge
BOQ.~~~rQe..(perpound)
TSS Charge(pefpound)
RV O~mPStation~(per month)
-1Cll'_IT!\Jltipl~.R'{.C!lJ.mIl..~tClti()ns
. .-1ClfillC!i\li<:llJClLRYlJllit~in par\(
~-
-:ft*i~~C1lpergClIICln
-::CQIl'IlTlElr(;iClI..PEl!9(:l.UOl1... ..
..:::9ther areal! char~. ~,~"'__'_~_~"___'
. MoIttti""WitersentIceRelated Cha' es
.............,...,..~L......~..........,~.........-...........,......................................1]1...........
Deposit Application (Ordinance #1965)
.()t,h,eL~it~m()tJnt_
-1.
-1-112"
-2:'
-3.
-4.
-6.
.:::!i:..___ . ---..---- ".-
Water Monthly Rates (Ordinance #1866 modified by
ResoIutiQn#1097)
--518. - 314'
-1.
-1-112.
-2:'
=~. .
--4.
...-.-.-....-.--...-.-.--.......
-6.
~.
Multiple, Dwelling per unit
(;()IlSlJmp~()n lJPtCl~,7QQ<:f..
(;()IlSlJIT!P~QIl.()y.~~!7QQ<:f_, .- ..-,- .-
Fi~~..$prink~r.c:()I1Il~iQll.(QrgiIlCl~#1~~~J...
. Bul~W~~RCltE:lJQ!:C!iIlClI1.c:e.#1~1.....
Meter Error (when customer requests the city to test the
_1TlEl!e.L~!Y!119JIlQjyiC!lJ~'~P!E:ll11i~~.lQ_rC!il1C1Il_c:e..#1J.~~n...... ..
-518' - 3f4"
-1.
-1-1/2"
-2.
-3'
-4"
-6.
~. .. ..... --... ... ........... ....... ... .....-_. .....
Outside City Umits Surcharge for Water Charges
.(~1l~~1.~1.....
Hardship Relief (Ordinance #1965)
Hydrant Relocation
$20.20
$20.20
100%
100%. $20.20 volume charge over minImum =$3.59f100cf
$20.20 $20.20 100% 100% . $20.20'" volume charge overminimum;;$3.59h6OCt
$27.38 $27.38 100% 100% $27.38
$25.54 $25.54 100% 100%: $25.54 ' volume charge over minimum =$5.49/100cf
$54.62 100%' $54.62 ..._____~ .. .. ..........."."........u...
$54.62 100% minimum volume 1 ,000 ct, includes 1 st 25#800
and 9#TSS over min.
$2.27 $2.27. 100% 100% .$2,27[per1 OQcubic fElet
$0.85 $0.85 100% 100%: $0'85.
$0.25 $0.25 100% 100%: $0.25
$25.54
$2,75,
. $?~.54
$2.75
$0.525. $0.525
$0.070 $9.070 .
. ... J9""Q~~.. .... J9,Qfl?_
$40.00
$40.00
$45.00 .
$85.00
. . $179.00
$27
$~
$600.00
$7.45
$9.75
$20.40
$33.10
$69.40
.. .J1~lt?~~
..$285,?~ .
$496.90
$7.45
. ..$Q]O
.JQ,8~
. $3,QQ ......
$20.00 J
$2 .
$30.00
$65.00
$1QQ.00
$130.00
$150.00
$165.00
$175.00
1.5 factor,
. . surcharge'
40%
varies.
nfa
n/a
nfa
nfa
n/a
nfa
n/a
nfa'
$7.45
$9.75
$20.40 '
$33.10
$69.40
$138.55
$285.55
$496.90
$7.45 '
$0.70..
$0.85
$6.03'
$20.00
$96.77
$116.77 '
$116.77
$186.77
$186.77
. $:34~.77.
... $:34~.77.
$346]7.
n/a
21% i 21% $20.00:
... 26%'''''. 26% :"'$30:00:'"
56% . . . '560/~T . u$65.00"
540/0 54 o/~..t....._... S"foojjoT'"
70% 70% $130.00
43% 43%. J1.?9,(l(),
48%4~0f0. $.165.00
50% . 500f0J.$1?~,()(). ..... .. . . ... ................. . .... ........... ... . ..'
nfa n/a ' 1.5 factor' surcharge factor is 1.5 for all rates & charges for
.~urc~ar e se!yi<:El~outsi<le<:ity.. .......... ......... .... ,... ..... ....
40 40% by submitting proof of $6,000 or less yearly
u...irl~
varies: fee detennined by the Water Division
100%
100%
100%
n/a
nfa
nfa
nfa
n/a
nfa
n/a
nfa
100%
100%
100%:
100%'
100%,
100%
"Toook-
100%
100%
100%,
J()()Ofo.
50%
100%
nfa
n/a
Page 3 of7
I
I
100%, $0.53. $251T1inilTlum I
100%. . $0.07.J2~lTIil1ilTlulTl I
...1 QQ'Y~l .... .$Q,Q~,.per.gClIJ()llf()r!El~iclElrlti<3IClrc:QlTIm~!(;iCl.I~ElPtCl@ . .1
I
1
i
I
100%'
100%
100%
100%.
100%[
....1()()'r~L
100%'
100%
100%[
100%.
..1WcyoL
50%.
100%
nfa
nla
$2~,54 ..... minilTllJrnLc:QrlllE;l<:ti()n
2.75 .lTIinilTlurnLc:QnnE;l<:ti()nper50cu~icfeElt .
n/a
$40.00, deposit amount not less than or an amount equal
. to estimated 3 month bill, at the discretion of the
.. ..u.c:ity
n/a'
nfa
nfa
nfa'
nfa.
n/a
nfa
$40.00.
"'$45:00;
$85.00 .
'$170:00"
I
1
....1
,
I
$7.45; 400cf minimum quantity
$9.75. 600 cf minimum quantity
. "$20.40I1'~00~minirr,umCluantny
$33.10 3,200 cf minimum quantity
. ......~$~AQI,..t,$QQ(;fl11iriiri1\Jl11q~~ritity)..
......$.l~,~~JJ.~,QQQ..<:f_lTlirllm.lJ,lT!q\J~r1!ity......
....... .$?85.~5.1.....~?,Q()()<:fl11inil11\JlTIqlJ(:lfltity
..... $4~,~L?7JQO()<:f millilTlumqljantity
$7.45
..$Q'?'Q~J)~rJQQ(;lJbi(; !~t.
JQ,~?LPE:lU()()(;tl~ig.!~t.............. .....'" .........
..$~.O()I.....PE:l!C!iClI11~t~rinch..ClfsE:ll'\lic:e...line..PElr ITlOnth
$29,QQL1st~(;tlbic feet (lTlinilTlurrl)
nfa,
n/a:
111"
The City of Wood bum
ATTACHt-AENT --4r--
Page ~ of
2000-2001 Master Fee S
lOB
. . Current Cost of Fcc as a 0" Recom'd % Adopted . .
Regulation Product. or Service F S' of Current Cost F Notes (Additional Fees. Units, etc.)
ee ervlce Cost Recovery . :e ",
e> '- < ' , ~ '( . ~ ~ 1 :; ... 'f ~ ~ <<:,~" '" '" t" ~ " ,~
. ~ ~ :t'~.?yq$\~"}:_d.';k;,.'",{~\!;~!.:ti!k.'kt}j. · g.:JJ.~:R.~"7__~&~W;'_~&f.:& k 0'Z::"*h,'
'_~UIIC!~~1CI~~f~.
Daily ~~l11i~i~~
~il~.JQ~~..'Nit~..pai~...CId~lt)
-y?~~(~~1~) .
-adultp9c:1~~YP).. .
--hOll()f:El(jciti?~nsJseniors. aQd. disabled)
Punch Cards
-child(Q~3) ....
-:YOlJth(~~18)
-adult(19~54)
-hOnored citizens {seniors and disabled)
Memtlers~ips(3I11onths )
...jndivi~~al (4 and up)
~pl~
-family
Memberships(annual)
-individual (4 and up)
-couple
-family
Pool Rentals
-1-50 swimmers/hour
-51-100 swimmersJhour
.. __. ........_.._____..m..__.___._
-101-150 swimmersJhour
.._._._____._..u.._______.....__~._ _
-151-200 swimmersJhour
L~egu?rd..Training
WSI
. ...--..-..............-.. -
Jr..bifegllardJrl!iQing..
Swimming bes~ons
MlIlt$~rnrniQgb~~ClQs .
. P!!.....a.t~_$~Lrn_rni!!g~~~ClQ~
Semi-Private Swimming Lessons
$0 $0
$1.25 $2
$2
$1.75 $3
$0 $0
$11.25 $22
$18 $35
$15.75 $30
$37.50 $72
$60 $116
$75 $145
$130 $251
$210 $405
$260 $501
$60 $158
$90 $236
$120 $315
$150 $394
$50 $158
0 .$253
$~5, $111
$25 $79
.$28 $89.
$49.. $1Z?
$60 $190
Ag~~~~cS,g~B~I~~l'!tfi~!........
DaiIY~~l11i~i?~~. .
-:<:hiI<lJ~..YJit~Pc:li~CId~lt)......
-youth (4-18)
-:adu~.(1~an~yp)
......:::t!9-llQ!~(t9.ti?l:l!!~..(~Q.i~l!Qc:lc:li~l!~Il:lc:l) ..
Punch Cards
......--...--..-..... ......
.~!I<lJO.:~L_ ..
"1'~~J~~~t
. -::ad~~P~.:~_L mm__.____._
--h()llQ!l:l<l(;i~?l3Q~.(~QiClrs..?n~.disa~Il:l<l)
Me01tlers~ips.(~..01~ths)
-i~di~i~u~IJ ~~n~up)
. -c<>lIple
-fal11Uy
Me01berships(~nnual)
-in~ivi~ual (4 and up)
-:e<>~ple .
-faJ11ny
Pool Rentals
-1-50 swimmerslhour
-51-100 swimmers/hour
..............-..............._.-...........
-101-150 swimmerslhour
-151-200 swimmers/hour
Lifeguard Training hours)
100%
52%
52%
52%
52%
52%
52%
38%
38%
38%
38%
32%
32%
32%
32%
32%
32%'
32%
53%
52%,
52%.
52%.
52%
52%
$38:
$60.
$75'
$130
$210
$260
$76
$101
$126
$151
$50.. 36hours
. . . ..$801iQ(;11Ic:liQgl>()()ks-40hClllrS
$35' 30 hours
$25session:tllessonsin 4 weeks
$28 J 15+-session:tl lesSons in 4 weeks
..' . .:.$$QJri1i~iri1~iTi4I~sQ~~~~i_~riji~~t~~mmmm...........
$72 \ minimum 4 lessons-per 30 minutes, 2 persons
j. silllilarageandability
$0 $0 100% . ..1000/0J .. .. $0
$1.75 $2 73%i 73%, $1.75
$2.50 $4 65% .......6~%J" $2.50 ]
$2.25' $3 67% 67%' .lZ,?~
$0 100% 1 $0
$22 ... ...... .m....._..._._.
73%i 7 $16
... .. .. m...._.~. ... ..................
$35 65%i 66%: $23
$30 65% 66%' $20i
$50 $72
$80 $116
$100 $145
$170 $251
$?~Q, $405,
$350' $501.
$75 $158
$105 $236:
$135 $315i
$165 $394'
$60 $158
69%'
69%i
69%
68%
69%.
70%
48%
44%
. ...1.
43%'
42%,
38%
Page 40f7
69%'
69%
69%:
68%
69%,
70%:
58%
49%
45%,
42%'
38%'
$50'
$80
$100
$170'
$280:
$350'
. ......~91
$116i
$141 :
$166\
$60: 36 hours
"
11r
The City of Woodburn
ATTAC~MENT -4
Page of 6
2000-2001 Master Fee Sl lOB
WSI. (including books-40 hours)
Jr.. Lifeguard Training (30 hours)
S'tVilTlll1i~g..b~sS<)~s
Adult Swimming Lessons
Private Swimming. Lessons
Semi-Private Swimming Lessons
. ~l!~!IP~l!m~lR~!~~l1.t~!Ic1N.()!I~~~~icl~nt
Dances
S 'aJ Tri
pec;1 .PS
SPElCiallnstruction Pr~rams
Dance Class
Production Dance & Performance
Martial Arts
Athletics
O~n<?XIl1
.... ~u~(~~1~ ~rvisit) .
-adul!(15.1~.hrvisit punch. card)
-yout~J1h~ visit)
Youth SoccerlBasketball
-one player ~rfarllily
-two players per family
-three players per family
-four players per family. ..
. "t1lJ!t~IIM~I1~~ntF~..
..l\tIlJ_~.-'~~~~!~IIManClQElfl1~l1tF~..
SUll1rll~_~~y~~IT1P .
-per week
-all 5 weeks
. ....-....-------.-......--........-...... ............- ................-.....
.~~~_~IT1_e_~~.~.~_(flE'l~_.~~.~)......
_~~~~~~mp~2~~(aIl5 w~1s.~L_
~~iR~ffly""."~"_ ........___.
WClQtIll!JIl1~l!l}lty~~I1l~r (all fees per hour)
-auditoriumlfireside room
_n...... .~.___m_ __ _._.....
--(lutiit()riurn/firesi@r()()ll1wIfClOd antil>everages
--/(itch~~(~/r()()ll1 ~ental)
. . -j(~ch~~(~?"'~L
. -::entir~builtli~g
~it(perr~t~I)..
F<lCiI~ty~onit~~(lltJildin~..staff)
.. P~rkF<lCiliti~J~~t1~X)
-lej;Jion..Park..~i~nic
-Settlemier Park Picnic
-B~r1i~h~IT1.~CiI'k.. Pi~ni~
-Senior Estates Park Picnic
-anxentirep~rk
Athleti~fi~I~~Jperh~~~) .
_ .~n1.~I!li_~Pl!l<(!l()~~!~!l~~~ln
...~~ej;Ji~I1~CiI'k.~~~_~_~~~~~II)
~ettl~rllier..~~rkJX~ttl.~~r)
-L~i~n..P~rkJ~ult.~~r)....
~t~nnialp~rkJYouths()C(;Elr)
-Centen~ial..~arkJacI~lt..~~r)
-Centennial Park (softballlbaseball)
Field r:>r~..(all!~per~alT1~)
~!~~L
_~L_______. ..
AtIll4:l~fi~ldljg~ting ..
Deposits (per youth rental)
$2 $2
varies varies
$20.. $24
$40.. $45
$20 $19
100%
nla
83%
89%
105%
100%
nla
83%
89%
100%
includingbooks-4Q hours
30 hours
.~~!li()~~.J~~~"-!li"-4..Y!~.~.~....... ..
15-+-session-8 lessons in 4 weeks
.....- ---------------...
minimum 4lessons:per30 lTlinutes
minimum 4 lessons-per 30 minutes, 2 persons
similar ~ge. and atJility
$2 per event
varies. per event
$20. pers~ssion:4Y!eeks,JhLCI~~sEls
$4QI per session:12Y!eeks,1hr. classes..
$19,
$1 $1 100% 100%: $1
$15 $17 88% 88% $15
$0 $1 0% 0%. $0
$16 $24 67% 75% $18'
$30 $48 63% 71% $34
$40 $72 56% 69% $50
$48 $97 49% 68%. $66
$125 .$110 114% 100%. $110 per team
$1,2581 119% 100% $1,258, perseasgn
$30 $48 63% 63% $30'
$150 $243 62% 62% $150
$10: $13 77% 77%' $10
,.._------~Q-------_.__. $67 60% 60%'
$_10.
$15,
$10
$15
..~35,
$50
$10:
$15
$15
$8
$8'
$150'
...$
$5
$5
$17
$5
$17
$5
$35
..._J~~.:
$15
$25
$23
$41
$23
$23
$41
n/a
$10
$33
$33
$33
$33
$150
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17
$36,
.._-$~:
$15
nla
43%,
37%
43%'
65%
85%
nla
100%'
45%
45%
24%
24%
100%
29%
29%
29o/~
100%
29%
100%
29%
97%:
.,
97,,/0]
1000/0'
nla
Page 50f7
43%'
37%
43%.
65%
85%'
nla
100%
45%,
45%:
24%
24%
100%
29%1
29%
29%
100%
29%
100%
29%
97%'
..~?"/c>L
1 OQ%,
nla
$10'
$15.
$10
$15
~~5:
$50
$1
j
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1
i
I
\
I
$15
$15
$8
$8'
$150
.....$~j.....~h~l~ingJ.~r~ggil1g!...s~ttil1g.tJ~s~!l...
................_$~~Lq,~I~j!!gflTl~~l~g...._--...... ........___
. . . . .$11i_ . ~lIfee!lper~gur:$~ttl~lTlier~Jegi()I1P~~s
$25
111"
The City of Wood bum
ATTACHMENT A
Page..2.-. of '0'
2000-2001 Master Fee S( lOB
Current Cost of Fee as a C," Recom'd 0/, Ad t d
Regulation Product. or Service F S' a/Current Cost oPFe Notes (Additional Fees, Units, etc.)
ee ervlce Cost Recove ee
.~_____~__________J_ .
..--=~~~~~m
Woodbu01.eommunityCenter (all fees per hour)
-auditoriumlfireside room
-auditorium/fireside room wlfood and beverages
-kitchen (wfroom rental)
-kitchen (alone)
-ootire building
Deposit (per rental)
F acili!y_Mo~it~rs(~~n~ingstaff)
..GityJ:!~ILG9ll.,~IGh~lTl~r!)J~11 fee!)perh(lur)
-chambers room
._"... _m........"......._________......".
-chalTl~rs room wlfood and beverages
~itctlen{Yifroom rental)
.. ..:::k.it~{~I()l1ElL
Depo!)il{perr~tal)m
Facility Monitors (building staff)
Park Fac;i1i~es(per day)
~i()f'l~~rkPicnic
-Settlemier Park Picnic
-Burlingham Park Picnic
-Senior Estates Park Picnic
-any entire park
Athletic Fields (per hour)
-SettJemier par\({softtl;:lIIIb;:lSeball)
-legi()ll..~ark.(softball~~all)
-SE!ttIElrT1i~r.Park..(you~..soccer)
~L~i()ll ~ark (CI(j~lt soccer).
.~'!I~'!i~LfJ;:lr\(_{y()lJ_th_s~r)
~~tl:!l:'~i~I~~rk{~~lt~occer) ..
--Ger1t~"!;:llp~r\(Jso~~;:lnlb_C1!)Elb;:lll). ..
Field ~J~lIf~perg~rn~)
-softball/baseball
-soccer
. AthIEl!i<::EiEll.cj Li9hti,!gm
_~!~~Jpl:lry()~_th.!~~!~I).....
Deposits (per adult rental)
....~~~.R~~m~jL"~.._._..____....__._~_
W()()(jblJITlColTllTllJ'!ity GEl.,ter(all fees per hour) ..
-auditoriumlfireside room
-auditorium/fireside room wlfood and beverages
-kitch~ ('oYIrO<?fTl re~t~9
-kitchen (alone)
-entire building
Deposit (per rental)
Facility Monitors (building staff)
City Hall Council GhamtJers(all.fees per..hour)
-{;halTltJersr()()lTl. ..
-chambElrs r()()mwlf()()(j and.. beverages
-kitchen (wfroom rental)
~~chen{al()l1e}..
~~_{pe!~mi:ll)
F acjlity Monitors {building staff)
Park Facilities(perday)
-L~ion Park Picnic
-Settlemier Park Picnic
-Burlingham ~arkPi(;f)ic
-Senior Estates Park Picnic
Athletic Fields (per hour)
$
$20 $23 87%
$25 $41 61%
$15 $23 65%
$20 $24 83%
$35 $41 85%
$50 nfa nfa
$10 $10 100%
new fee $23 nfa
new fee $41 nfa
new fee $23 nfa
new fee $24 nfa
new fee nfa nfa
new fee $10 nfa
$33 91%
$33 91%
$33 24%
$33 91%
$150 100%
$17 29%
$17 29%
$17 29%
$17 118%
.$l7m 41%
$17 118%
$17 41%
$3 $36 97%
$35 $36 97%
$15 $15 100%
$25 nfa nfa
$50\ nfa nfa
...........__...__.........__.______u.m.
... __.. ._h.....~.._.~..._.~____.......~..,.......~P ......,;+
$30 $23 130%
$50 $41 122%
$25 $23 109%
$27 $23 117%
$45 $41 110%
$50"' nfa nfa
$10 $10 100%
. neYiJee. $23 nfa
new fee $41. nfa
new fee \ $23.. nfa
new fee $24 nfa
new fee nfa nfa
new fee $10 nfa
$50 $33 152%
$50 $33 152%
$37: $33 112%
$37i $33 112%
Page 6 of7
87%
65%
83% $20
85% $35
$50
100% $10
87%, $20
61% $25
65% $15
83% $29.
nfa $50.
100% $10
91% $30
91% $30
24% $8
91% $30
100% $150:
29% $5,
29%\ $5
29%' $5
100% $17
41% $7
100% $17
41%
nfa
97%,
97%'
100%
nfa
157%\
122%'
109%'
117%
110%
nfa'
100%.
157%
122%
109%
113%'
nfa'
100
152%
152%
112%
112%
$35, . chalking, dragging, s~ttingbases
$35,m<::halking...
. ... . $J~,aIIJeesp~r~()ur-$El~JElTTli~r~LEl9i()n I'ilrks
$25:
$50i
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
$36
$50,
$25
$27'
$45
$50
$10
$~El\
$50.
$25
$27
$50
$10
.~
$50,
$50
$3
$37
I!r
Current Cost of Fee as a 00 Recam'd % Ado ted
Regulation, Product, or Service F S' of Current Cost PF Notes (Additional Fees, Units etc)
ee ervlce Cost Recave ee '
ATTAC~MENT A
Page of p,
2000-2001 Master Fee
lOB
The City of Woodburn
-Settlenuer Park (softball/baseball)
-Legion Park (softballJbaseball)
-Settlemier Park (youth soccer)
-Legion Park (adultsoccer)
~ntenniClI..Park.{youth..soccer)
-Centennial Park (adult soccer)
....................,.................,..
-:-Centennial Park (softb(lllibasepaU)
FiElid ~r~pJ(lI~!~~per game)
-softballlbaseball
-soccer
Athletic Field Ughting
Deposits (per youth rental)
D~~it~Jpera~ult r~~t(ll)
Other
Special Event Permit
PLU~ ~dditional [)(IYs
OR Per Event Per Attraction Fee
.___... . .... ...__.'................._..__.__....".m......_____.............,.
Coml11unity Garden. Plots::-Residentand Non-Resident
1 st 20' x 40' Plot
2nd 20' x 40' Plot
$10
$10
$10
$25
$10
$25
$10
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17
$17 .
59%
59%
59%
147%
59%
147%
59%
59%
59%
59%
147%
59%
147%
59%
$10
$10
$10
$25
$10
$25
$10
$6 $36 17% 97% $35 chalking,. dragging, setting bases
$12 $36 33% 97% $35 chalking
$3 $15 20% 100% $15 allfeesperhour-Settlemier& Legion Parks
$25 n/a n/a n/a $25
$50 n/a n/a n/a $50
,275 $1 ,275 100% 100% $1,275
$400 $400 100% 100% $400
$50 $50 100% 100% $50 .\NhichElver is greater
$22 100% 100% $22
$22 $22 100% 100% $2z'
-----_.._-~-~-----~-----------------------_._---- -
Page 7 of7
111"
loe
October 9, 2000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and q!y~uncll
City Administrator ~
Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Recommendation:
It is recommended the City Council:
1. Accept the feasibility study for the Woodburn Urban Renewal District;
2. Approve the recommended preliminary district boundaries;
3. Direct staff to initiate visioning and design activities; and
4. Authorize preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan.
Background:
In 1998, the City Council approved the Woodburn Downtown Development Plan.
Although Council approved the plan, a related capital plan was not approved. The
Council has, nevertheless, remained interested in improving the physical appearance of the
downtown area and its viability as a commercial center. Accordingly, staff proposed an
urban renewal district to generate funds needed to implement the Downtown Development
Plan, to address underdevelopment in the downtown and portions of Highway 99 E, and
to improve housing between the two commercial areas. The Budget Committee authorized
the proposal this spring, and funding for a feasibility study and to draft an urban renewal
plan was included in the 2000-2001 budget. In July 2000, the firm of Spencer and
Kupper was retained to determine whether an urban renewal district is feasible for
Woodburn, and if so, to conduct design work related to the downtown and develop an
urban renewal plan.
Discussion:
Attached are the completed feasibility study and a map of the proposed boundaries
for an urban renewal district for Wpodburn. The study relied on direction from my office
and the Community Development Department regarding the areas to be considered and
efforts to be undertaken, and on Information provided by the Public Works department
regarding deficiencies in facilities and infrastructure in the area. The study addresses the
amount of tax increment financlng that may be generated in the proposed area, from
which improvements can be funded, and whether conditions in the area are sufficient to
meet State urban renewal requirements. Mr. Charles Kupper will make a presentation at
your October 9, 2000 meeting to provide information regarding urban renewal, and to
discuss the study.
,.
111"
toe
.. Honorable Mayor and City Council
October 9, 2000
Page 2.
You will consider whether efforts should be continued to the design phase and
development of an urban renewal plan. If authorized, the design phase will be conducted
by Mr. Lloyd Lindley, an architect who worked on a similar phase for the Downtown
Development Plan. The design phase will validate or modify the vision for the Downtown
established two years ago, and will address the future appearance of, and uses in, the
downtown. Design work will be conducted in English and Spanish, and will follow a period
of intensive outreach to insure maximum citizen participation. I obtained approval from
the Governor's Office for funds to support bi-Iingual outreach, and am currently seeking
additional funds so the scope of the design phase can be expanded.
Concurrent with design, an urban renewal plan will be drafted. The plan is required
to establish a district, and will be guided by staff on your behalf, and by a steering
committee of stakeholders, property and business owners, and interested citizens. The
plan will formalize the district boundaries, determine the tax increment financing available
within those boundaries, and establish a plan of work to be accomplished. It is currently
anticipated that improvements will include street, sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping
improvements; building fa~ade and streetscape improvements; water and sewer line
replacements; utility under grounding; housing rehabilitation; and small business incubation
and assistance. The Planning Commission and City Council will review the plan. If
adopted, the District will be formed in early 2001, and begin collecting tax increment the
following year.
Financial Impact:
Only rough estimates of the Impact of the proposed urban renewal district are
available, and are approximately $20,000,000 (in 2000 dollars) over a twenty-year life
of the district. The full impact will be determined as the plan is being developed. The
City, and the County and Fire and School districts will be impacted. The base for the
district will be established using the tax base for 2000. The base will be frozen at that
level for existing taxing entities. Growth on the base, from either the 3% annual
adjustment, or from increases in va1uation due to development will be directed to the
District. If the district is formed, taxing entities will lose access to the use of revenues from
that growth. They will, however, upon cessation of the district in twenty years, regain
their share of growth on what is expected to be a greatly increased tax base. In the
meanwhile, each entity and the Woodburn community is expected to benefit from the
economic and social effects of improving the downtown and Highway 99E, and housing
between the two commercial areas.
]CB
111"
toe
URBAN RENEWAL FEASIBILITY STUDY
CITY OF WOODBURN
Prepared by Spencer & Kupper
Sept. 2000
INTRODUCTION
Background: In 1994, Woodburn adopted the Downtown Historic District to encourage the
preservation of buildings having special historical, architectural or cultural significance in
the portion of downtown generally between Lincoln and Arthur Streets, and First and Front
Streets. Design guidelines and review criteria were used by the Woodburn Downtown
Association to evaluate new development and exterior alterations, and to make
recommendations to the Woodburn Planning Commission.
The City and the Woodburn Downtown Association recognized that a more comprehensive
program to revitalize the downtown was needed, and in late 1996 secured a grant from the
Mid- Willamette Valley Council of Governments to undertake this revitalization planning
effort. In the spring of 1997 a group of downtown business and property owners, residents,
members of the Woodburn Downtown Association and city officials gathered to consider
the future of downtown Woodburn. This Steering Committee shared an inclination to make
a collective contribution to downtown's health and revitalization. The committee worked
with a consultant team headed by Spencer & Kupper, and during the following seven
months developed a vision and revitalization plan for the area.
That study effort resulted in the Woodburn Downtown Development Plan. That Plan
defined an ambitious vision focusing on a revitalization of Downtown Woodburn. It
proposed a list of capital improvements to help implement the vision, but to date, no source
of funding for implementing the vision has been identified. The Woodburn Downtown
Development Plan, noted, however, in the section on Public Actions that "A key city action
is to develop a program for downtown public improvements. An overall improvement
strategy is recommended to start with an annual improvement budget of approximately
$40,000, ............ .but anticipate that an urban renewal program may be implemented, and
bonds sold to complete a larger package of projects.. .."
This urban renewal feasibility stUdy follows up on that recommendation. However, the
scope of the feasibility study extends beyond the boundary of the Downtown Historic
District, to include other areas where urban renewal activities could be used to make public
improvements, to improve physical conditions, or attract new private investments. The area
examined in this feasibility study is outlined in a map attachment to this report.
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page I
. ~
IIr
toe
Purpose of the Feasibility Study: The purpose of this feasibility study is to examine the
data, goals, and assumptions of the proposed urban renewal district, and determine whether
the district as proposed would be:
. In compliance with the basic requirements of ORS 457, the Oregon statute governing
formation of urban renewal areas, and
. Feasible from a financial and policy standpoint.
For the purpose of making those determinations, this Feasibility Report examines the
following issues which are crucial to determining project feasibility.
. Does the area within the proposed boundary of the Renewal Area contain blighting
conditions as defined in ORS 4577
. Does the area within the proposed boundary of the Renewal Area meet the tests of the
25% limitation on acreage and value within an area imposed by ORS 4577
. Do the proposed project activities address and help treat the blighting conditions?
. Are the proposed project activities eligible as urban renewal activities?
. Has an estimate been made of the renewal project costs and revenues?
. Does it appear that there will be sufficient revenues to carry out project activities?
1. PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND ACREAGE
Preliminary Boundary: A map indicating a preliminary urban renewal area boundary is
attached as Exhibit "A". This preliminary boundary was developed by staff as a tool for
determining the feasibility of establishing an urban renewal district. It i~ not l'I finn, or finl'll
honnnl'lry If the City proceeds with preparation of an urban renewal plan, the final
boundary of the urban renewal district would be developed through a citizen involvement
process.
The preliminary area proposed is irregularly shaped, and incorporates the traditional
downtown core of Woodburn, a portion of the commercial district along Highway 99E, and
extends west to incorporate a large tract of vacant commercial land to the southeast of the
Woodburn Interchange of 1-5.
ORS Requirements: Oregon urban renewal law limits the total acreage in urban renewal
areas to 25% of the total acreage within a city. Woodburn contains approximately 2900
acres within its City limits. This would allow the City of Woodburn to have approximately
725 acres in renewal areas. The preliminary area boundary contains approximately 220
acres. There is no other urban renewal area currently active in the City of Woodburn. The
acreage in the preliminary renewal area represents approximately 7.6% of the total acreage
in Woodburn, well within the State's 25% acreage limitation on renewal areas.
Finding: The preliminary boundary suggested by City staff is well within the ORS acreage
limitation.
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 2
11r
toe
2. BLIGHTING CONDITIONS
ORS Requirements: In order to form an urban renewal district, the City of Woodburn
must find that blighted areas exist within the urban renewal boundary. ORS 457.010 defines
"blighted areas" and blighting conditions in the following manner. Underlining and italics
are provided for emphasis:
457.010 Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) "Rliehted area~" meaM areas which, by reason of deterioration, faulty planning,
inadequate or improper facilities, deleterious land use or the existence of unsafe structures,
or any combination of these factors, are detrimental to the safety, health or welfare of the
community. A blighted area is characterized by the existence of one or more of the
following conditions:
(a) The existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living,
commercial, industrial or other purposes, or any combination of those uses, which are
unfit or unsafe to occupy for those purposes because of anyone or a combination of the
following conditions:
(A) Defective design and quality of physical construction;
(B) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing;
(C) Overcrowding and a high density of population;
(D) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces and recreation
facilities or
(E) Oh~ole~cenceJ deterioration) dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses;
(b) An economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of property resulting from faulty
planning;
(c) The division or subdivision and sale of property or lots of irregular form and shape and
inadequate size or dimensions for property usefulness and development;
(d) The laying out of property or lots in disregard of contours, drainage and other physical
characteristics of the terrain and surrounding conditions;
(e) The existence ofinadeqnate ~treet~ and other rig}tt~ of way) open !'\Pace~ andntilitie~;
(f) The existence of property or lots or other areas which are subject to inundation by water;
(g) A prevalence of c1f'.preciated valne~, impaired investments and social and economic
maladjustments to such an extent that the capacity to pay taxe~ i~ redncec1 and tax
receipts are inadequate for the cost of public services rendered;
(h) A growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas, resulting in a ~taenant &
nnprodnctive condition of laQd potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the
public health, safety, and welfare~ or
(i) A loss of population & rednction of proper ntili7.ation of the area, resulting in its further
deterioration and added co~t~ to the taxpayer for the creation of new public facilities and
services elsewhere.
Blighting Conditions Within Preliminary Boundary: The feasibility study reveals the
following conditions that constitute blight within the preliminary boundary:
A. Depreciated values and reduced utilization of the area:. The total assessed valuation of
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 3
111'
toe
land (exclusive of Right-of-way) within the proposed renewal area boundary is estimated at
approximately $24,000,000 for the 1999-00 tax year. That represents an assessed valuation
of only about $109, 100 per acre, an extraordinarily low figure for an urban area. The value
per acre reflects a high incidence of vacant and underutilized land within the area. The
study area includes large tracts of vacant, undeveloped land along Route 99E, and in the
area Southeast of the Woodburn interchange of 1-5. The low value per acre also reflects a
significant number of vacant, or poorly maintained properties within the downtown area,
and along Young Road. These conditions point to an unproductive condition of potentially
useful land, and a reduction in proper utilization of the area. These under-productive areas
also result in added costs to the taxpayer for the creation of new public facilities and
services elsewhere. The presence of these underutilized areas meets the ORS definition of
blight.
B. Inadequate streets, right-of-way, and utilities: The City of Woodburn Public Works
Dept. surveyed the proposed project area for deficiencies in curbs, sidewalks, streets, water,
sewer, and other infrastructure elements. The results of the survey are contained in a report
dated October 2, 2000. Numerous deficiencies in curbs, sidewalks, streets, handicapped
access, storm sewer connections, and storm water drainage were discovered. A summary
listing of the deficiencies is attached as Exhibit A of this feasibility report. The full report
and photographs are available for review at the City of Woodburn offices.
C. Obsolete and deteriorated.JJUildings: A windshield survey of buildings in the project
area was conducted in September, 2000. The purpose of the survey was to identify
properties which appeared to be in need of major maintenance or rehabilitation. These
properties would meet the definition of obsolete or deteriorated buildings. Within the
downtown commercial area, there are numerous buildings that exhibit signs of poor or
deferred exterior maintenance, and would benefit from rehabilitation assistance. In addition,
many properties within the downtown area have been re-modeled over time, with major
modifications and additions to facades, window openings, and canopies. The quality and
appearance of the modifications is mixed, at best. The result gives downtown Woodburn
the appearance of an obsolete, declining, commercial area. The survey also showed
several residential structures along Young A venue to be in need of major repair and
rehabilitation. It is not possible to tell from an exterior survey the possible extent of
rehabilitation needed on these properties, or whether rehabilitation is economically feasible.
Photographic documentation of examples of the described building conditions is contained
in an October 2, 2000 report on area conditions prepared by the Woodburn Public Works
Dept. The full report and photographs are available for review at the City of Woodburn
offices.
Findings: Based on a preliminary evaluation of the conditions found within the preliminary
urban renewal area boundary, the proposed renewal area qualifies as a "blighted area"
within the definition found in ORS 457. Additional, detailed information on blighting
conditions will be compiled if the decision is made to proceed with an urban renewal plan.
3. ASSESSED VALUE LIMITATIONS
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 4
,.
1Ir
toe
Oregon urban renewal law limits the total valuation in urban renewal areas to 25% of the
total value in the city. The tax roll for the 2000-01 year still is in preparation at the time this
report is being drafted. Data for the 1999-00 tax year shows that Woodburn contains
$713,897,168 in assessed value. This would allow $178,474,292 in assessed value within
renewal areas. The current (1999-00) assessed value within the preliminary boundary area
is estimated to be approximately $24,000,000.
Finding: Property within the preliminary area boundary is estimated to be 3.36% of the
total assessed value in the City of Woodburn, well within the State's 25% value limit.
4. ELIGIBILITY OF PLAN ACTIVITIES
ORS Requirements: The activities to be funded and undertaken with urban renewal
revenues should meet the following criteria:
. They must be activities permitted by urban renewal statute. In general, this means that
projects must be of a capital improvement nature, or basic "bricks and mortar" activities.
. They must be directed at treating and improving the substandard conditions in the urban
renewal area.
. They must be consistent with goals and policies set forth in the City's Comprehensive
Plan, and other adopted policy documents.
. The activities must be located within the renewal area boundary.
Basis for Project Identification: The activity list of an urban renewal plan attempts to
address the issues and conditions stated in the plan's goals. The goals and objectives which
came out of the Downtown Development Plan in 1997 emphasized improving the
appearance, public perception, and usefulness of the downtown. Those goals could readily
apply to the proposed urban renewal area, with additional goals developed through a public
involvement process..
No specific list of project activities has been developed for this feasibility analysis.
However, a preliminary list of activities was identified in the Downtown Development Plan
in 1997. The proposed project boundary encompasses land outside the downtown area, and
activities in those other areas should be considered in a renewal plan effort. It can be
assumed that, at a minimum, the urban renewal plan would encompass most, or all of the
following activities identified in the 1997 plan. The list of projects below is illustrative. It
is not a firm, or final list of urban renewal project activities. The list of project activities
inserted into the renewal plan would be refined, updated, and augmented through a
Design Workshop process, with oversight provided by a council appointed Citizen's Task
Force. The Task Force would be formed prior to continuing work on the urban renewal
plan. The Design Workshop would be initiated simultaneously with work on preparing an
urban renewal plan.
A list of potent 1 a I urban renewal projects includes:
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 5
,.
11'
IOC
.
Mayor's Alley Improvements- Special paving, lighting, trash enclosures, furnishings.
Street trees and furnishings on east-west streets between First and Front- Oak,
Cleveland, Arthur, Garfield, Hayes, Grant, Lincoln, Harrison
Remove and replace street trees along Front- Harrison to Oak
Public Market improvements to City parking lot., including special columns and Shelter
Pedestrian connection- City Hall to Library
Screen lumber yard from Front A venue with fence and landscape improvements
Improve north side of aquatic center to tie into Downtown.
Improve First Street including street trees, pedestrian intersections, lighting, furnishings-
Harrison to Oak
Create a stop in Downtown Woodburn- High Speed/Commuter/Excursion Rail
Walking plaques for historic places
Place overhead wires underground
Develop additional public parking lots.
Pedestrian and bike connections between Downtown and regional parks
Assist in development of a Railroad Museum/restaurant and a Historic Woodburn
Museum.
Wall art, gateways, pedestrian improvements and pedestrian crossings at RR on the east
side of Front A venue- Harrison to Oak
Develop plan for a new community center.
Redevelop downtown theater
Storefront Design and Improvement Program
Establish action program for a downtown public market
District programs for street furnishings, signage, street trees, public art and memorial
plaques
Street improvements to Young Ave and Hayes Street.
Land acquisition for public improvements or redevelopment
Housing rehabilitation and redevelopment
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Findings: All of the listed improvements are consistent with Woodburn's Comprehensive
Plan. The listed improvements meet the requirements of ORS 457 and will help to address
the blighting conditions found within the preliminary urban renewal area boundary. These
improvements are typical of those undertaken in other urban renewal districts around
Oregon. None of the project activities in the preliminary list appear ineligible for renewal
funding, or appear infeasible to implement..
5. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
ORS Requirements: Oregon's urban renewal law does not give explicit requirements on
evaluating the financial feasibility of an urban renewal plan. ORS 457.085 (3)(g) only
requires that a renewal plan be accompanied by a Ita financial analysis of the plan with
sufficient information to determine feasibility". In actual practice, the feasibility analysis
typically should document that there will be adequate resources to carry out the activities
described in the plan, that the resources will be available in a timely fashion, that debt
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 6
,.
111"
toe
incurred to carry out the plan can be paid off, and that the tax increment provisions of the
plan can be ended in a reasonable period of time. Determining financial feasibility relies in
large part on common sense and financial prudence. The estimates of project costs and
timing, and the estimates of revenues (including sources other than tax increment) needed to
pay for project costs should be reasonable, and important assumptions should be
documented.
Cost of Plan Activities: It was noted in Section 4 that Design Workshops and a public
involvement process would be used to develop a final list of project activities. Therefore,
no firm cost estimates can be made at the time of this feasibility study. Review of the
activities proposed in the 1997 Downtown study shows that the total cost of projects was
estimated at about $1 million. That estimate seemed low even for the projects envisioned in
that small-scale effort, in a very limited geographic area.. It can be expected that a full-scale
urban renewal program will involve considerably higher costs. For purposes of estimating
project duration, this feasibility study assumes that the total project costs will be
approximately $20 million in year 2000 dollars. Aeain, this. fil?lre is. not final, but used only
for illustration.
Estimate of Revenues to Pay for Plan Activities: The tax increment revenues to pay for
project activities will be generated by the growth of assessed values within the preliminary
area boundary. The preliminary boundary contains tracts of undeveloped and undeveloped
land along 99E, and near the Woodburn Interchange. These areas have good potential for
value growth through new development. The traditional core area of Downtown Woodburn
has little vacant land. Value growth in that portion of the renewal area will come from
growth of existing values in the area, and infill and redevelopment opportunities arising over
the long term.
City staff prepared a list of potential development opportunities in the preliminary renewal
area. These opportunities were discussed with staff, and reviewed in a site visit and area
tour. Based on the information available, value growth for the preliminary area is estimated
to come from the following components of value:
. A 3 % annual indexing of total assessed values in the renewal area.
. Short-term, predictable values. These are values for projects under way, or permitted,
and expected to come onto the tax rolls in the next two or three years. These short-range
projects total approximately $3.7 million.
. Longer-range values expected to be created by the development of now-vacant land
southeast of the Woodburn b,lterchange. It is estimated that 50 acres of land will be
developed for a mix of Campus Industrial, and commercial uses with a value estimated
at approximately $36million. A seven year year buildout period is assumed.
. Longer-range values expected from the development of vacant land northeast of 99E and
Route 214. It is estimated that 10 acres of land will be developed for commercial uses,
with value estimated at approximately $9.5million over a three year year buildout
period.
. An assumption of an additional $350,000 in minor new construction annually.
Table I of Attachment B to this Report shows estimated growth of values in the preliminary
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 7
1If
toe
boundary area, and the tax increment revenues that would result. Table 1 uses a 25 year
time frame for the analysis period. This period allows the collection of sufficient revenue to
payoff $20 million in year 2000 costs. Within a period of 25 years, it is estimated that
approximately $128 million in new assessed values will be added to the preliminary renewal
area. The cumulative tax increment revenues generated during that period are expected to
be approximately $32.5 million.
Estimate of Time Needed to Carry Out Plan Activities: ORS 457 imposes no time
restrictions on carrying out an urban renewal plan. As a policy question, however, there is
an issue regarding how long the plan might operate before it generates sufficient revenue to
payoff estimated project indebtedness, and return the values in the area to the tax rolls.
While the project list is not complete and project costs have not been refined, it appears that
a twenty-five year revenue estimate will be adequate to accomplish the proposed urban
renewal district goals and objectives.. The estimate of plan timing can be refined if the plan
progresses.
Table 2 of Attachment B to this Report shows an illustration of how $20 million in project
costs would be covered by short and long term debt covered by tax increment revenues.
Table two assumes two long term bond issues, and other short-term borrowings. Table 2
shows all project costs covered, and all debt paid by the year 2024-25.
Estimate of Maximum Indebtedness to Carry Out Plan Activities: ORS 457 imposes no
restrictions on the maximum amount of indebtedness that can be inserted into a renewal
plan. The requirement is simply that the costs be a good faith estimate. Therefore, no actual
maximum indebtedness needs to be established at this feasibility stage. The list of project
activities and identification costs should be developed with public discussion and
involvement. As projects and project costs are defined through a public process, the
maximum indebtedness for the plan will be established.
Financial Feasibility Evaluation: The tax increment revenues appear adequate to
accomplish the major goals set forth earlier in this document. In any event, revenue and
expenditure constraints imposed by the annual budgeting process, and by financial markets
will ensure that the Urban Renewal Agency does not enter financial obligations that are
infeasible to carry out.
Findings: The preliminary assessment indicates that an urban renewal district formed
within the preliminary boundaries, identified would be financially feasible.
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 8
".
toe
6. TAX IMPACTS OF CARRYING OUT A PLAN
Urban Renewal Under New Taxation Rules: As a result of Ballot Measure 50, the
financial impacts of carrying out an urban renewal plan have undergone radical change.
Prior to the passage of Ballot Measure 50, renewal revenues were raised by a form of levy
imposed on all property owners in the city that initiated the renewal program. Thus, renewal
resulted in an increase in total taxes paid by property owners.
Under Oregon's new tax rate based system of property taxes, total tax rate!': will not chanee
as a result of adopting an urban renewal program. Thus, there will be no effect on taxpayers
from establishment of an urban renewal district. Instead, the potential revenues raised by
taxing bodies will be affected. New values created within the urban renewal area after the
formation of the Renewal District (these values are often called incremental values) will not
be available to other taxing bodies for raising property tax revenues. The revenues from
those incremental values will instead be directed to the Renewal Agency for purpose of
paying off indebtedness to carry out project activities. The effects of this foregone revenue
will vary with the size of the tax bodies,tax rates, and the cumulative level of incremental
values in the renewal area.
Local Impacts: In general, the city that forms the renewal area tends to have the largest
share of the overall tax rate, and therefore will sustain the most revenue foregone. That will
be the case with the City of Woodburn.
It should be noted that under the current system of funding K-12 schools, establishing an
urban renewal area does not impact the per-student revenue for schools. The funding per
student is derived from a complex formula that establishes a uniform statewide per student
funding level. The amount of funds received by Woodburn schools is determined by this
formula, not by the amount of taxes raised locally.
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 9
IOC
7. SUMMARY OF URBAN RENEWAL FEASIBILITY FINDINGS
The previous sections of this analysis have provided information on each of the key issues
that should be evaluated in making the decision to proceed with an urban renewal plan. In
summary, the feasibility findings are these:
. The preliminary area proposed does not exceed the acreage and total assessed value
limits established by ORS 457.
. The preliminary area contains blighting conditions as defined by ORS 457.
. The proposed list of project activities appears to be eligible for renewal funding.
. The resources appear adequate to meet proposed plan objectives. Decisions on the use
of resources will be made annually in the City's budget process. There is no reason to
believe that there will be difficulty in retiring indebtedness incurred to carry out project
activities.
On this basis, it appears feasible to establish an urban renewal plan for the preliminary
boundary area.
ATTACHMENTS TO FEASIBILITY REPORT
ATTACHMENT A - SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES
ATTACHMENTB-TABLES 1 and 2
MAP OF PRELIMINARY AREA BOUNDARY
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 10
!1'
toe
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
ATTACHMENT A
INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES
Attachment A includes the following report of field investigation results by the Woodburn
Public Works Department. This listing is extracted from the PW report dated Oct. 2, 2000.
8ACKGROITND:
Public Works commissioned a survey of existing trees within the right-of-ways of the
downtown area from Cleveland Street north to Harrison Street and from Front Street west to
Settlemier Avenue. This report included assessment of tree conditions, sidewalk, curb and
road impacts and recommendations. This report was used to identify sidewalks, curbs and
roads needing repairs.
The breakdown of pictures and assessment areas used to typify calculations of repair work
was broken down in to three areas commerciallbusiness (50%), residential (35%), and
public properties (15%).
FIELD RESlTLTS'
A repair is required approximately every 60 LF of residential property sidewalks.
A repair is required approximately every 200 LF of commerciallbusiness property
sidewalks.
A repair is required approximately every 350 LF for public property sidewalks.
This district needs approximately 65 ADA ramps constructed or reconstructed to current
ADA standards. This is approximately 70 percent of the existing.
Many of the commercial sidewalks in this district have driveway approaches, which are not
up to standard or are no longer in service.
Over 20 businesses have built ~p ramps off the sidewalks, which extend out into the
walkways and are potential trip hazards.
Many of the residential sidewalks have sunken due to old trees being removed, stumps
ground and subsurface soils displaced to the low spots created and/or by irrigation
construction.
Ten (10) trees have been identified as needing immediate removal. Thirteen (13) trees are
identified as needing to be removed within the next year. All twenty-three trees present
potential danger to property and the public at large.
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page II
,.
II!"
toe
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
ATTACHMENT A
INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES (continued)
Removal and replacement of approximately 600 SF of existing sidewalks on public
properties is needed immediately.
Removal and replacement of 50 LF of existing curb on public properties is needed at this
time.
Removal and replacement of approximately 450 SF of both residential and
commerciallbusiness sidewalks immediately.
Removal and replacement of approximately 4,750 SF of both residential and
commerciallbusiness sidewalk within the next 5 years.
Repair approximately 500 SF of roads damaged by tree roots immediately.
Removal and replacement of approximately 250 LF of curbs on residential and
commerciallbusiness properties.
There are currently approximately I I buildings vacant or partially vacant.
Many downtown structures are improperly connected to storm sewers or are outfalling onto
sidewalks.
At least half a dozen businesses have broken windows, which have "do it yourself repair
work utilizing tape, paper, plywood and/or other like materials.
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 12
111"
toe
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Report
ATTACHMENT B - TABLE 1
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Report
Table 1
VALUE AND REVENUE PROJECTIONS
Total BM50 Tax Tax Increment Cumulative
Rate
Year Inremental value for UR Revenue for TI Revenue
Revenue vear
2001-02 $1,190,000 $18.31 $21,784 $21,784
2002-03 $5,745,900 $18.31 $105,182 $126,966
2003-04 $7,108,277 $18.31 $130,121 $257,087
2004-05 $14,107,465 $18.31 $258,246 $515,333
2005-06 $21,316,629 $18.31 $390,214 $905,546
2006-07 $28,742,068 $18.31 $526,141 $1,431,687
2007-08 $42,056,490 $18.31 $769,869 $2,201,556
2008-09 $56,820,345 $18.31 $1,040,131 $3,241,687
2009-10 $62,383,663 $18.31 $1,141,970 $4,383,657
2010-11 $68,113,881 $18.31 $1,246,865 $5,630,523
2011-12 $71,347,298 $18.31 $1,306,055 $6,936,578
2012-13 $74,677,717 $18.31 $1,367,020 $8,303,598
2013-14 $78,108,048 $18.31 $1,429,815 $9,733,413
2014-15 $81,641,289 $18.31 $1,494,493 $11,227,906
2015-16 $85,280,528 $18.31 $1,561,111 $12,789,017
2016-17 $89,028,944 $18.31 $1,629,728 $14,418,745
2017-18 $92,889,812 $18.31 $1,700,404 $16,119,149
2018-19 $96,866,507 $18.31 $1,773,200 $17,892,349
2019-20 $100,962,502 $18.31 $1,848,179 $19,740,528
2020-21 $105,181,377 $18.31 $1,925,408 $21,665,936
2021-22 $109,526,818 $18.31 $2,004,954 $23,670,890
2022-23 $114,002,623 $18.31 $2,086,886 $25,757,776
2023-24 $118,612,701 $18.31 $2,171,277 $27,929,053
2024-25 $123,361,082 $18.31 $2,258,199 $30,187,252
2025-26 $128,251,915 $18.31 $2,347,728 $32,534,980
City of Wood bum - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
Page 13
I' r W
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Report
ATTACHMENT B - TABLE 2
In the table below, the balance of costs at the beginning of each year
(Total Cost Remaining) are inflated 2.5% to account for annual
increases in construction costs.
Woodburn Urban Renewal Feasibility Report
Table 2
PAYING FOR PROJECT COSTS
Assumption - $20 Million in Year 2000 Costs
Total Cost
Remaining
$20,000,000
$20,477,672
$20,792,814
$21,277 ,270
$21,064,051
$21,431,321
$21,668,448
$14,826,085
$14,761,896
$14,591,716
$14,309,765
$13,960,095
$13,539,194
$13,043,406
$12,468,928
$11,811,805
$11,067,921
$5,758,873
$5,434,107
$5,024,368
$4,525,227
$3,848,092
$3,067,527
$2,178,354
$1,080,663
Year
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007 -08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
Resources
$21,784
$192,000
$34,501
$726,977
$155,445
$291,372
$7,203,974
$424,236
$526,075
$630,970
$690,160
$751,125
$813,920
$878,598
$945,216
$1,013,833
$5,449,509
$457,305
$532,284
$609,513
$770,991
$855,382
$942,304
$1,124,049
$1,,219,031
Balance
$19,978,216
$20,285,672
$20,758,313
$20,550,293
$20,908,606
$21,139,949
$14,464,474 II'
$14,401,849
$14,235,821
$13,960,746
$13,619,605
$13,208,970
$12,725,274
$12,164,808
$11,523,712
$10,797,972
$5,618,412 ,/
$5,301,568
$4,901,823
$4,414,855
$3,754,236
$2,992,710
$2,125,223
$1,054,305
$0
Note: ** indicates borrowing of two or more years term
City of Woodburn - Urban Renewal Feasibility Study
toe
Page 14
,.
111'
-----.... .
. City of Woodburn
Police Department
tOD
STAFF REPORT
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn OR 97071
(503) 982-2345
Date:
September 26, 2000
Paul Null, ChiefOfPOliC@
Mayor and City Council
John Brown, City AdmiIDstratorP
From:
To:
Through:
Subject:
Intergovernmental Agreement - Traffic Safety Grant A ward
Recommendation: The City Council approve receipt and allocation of grant awards for traffic
enforcement, and approve the intergovernmental agreement between the Oregon Department of
Transportation, Transportation Safety Division, through the Oregon Association of Chiefs of
Police, and the Woodburn Police Department.
Beginning in 1993, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Transportation Safety
Division, has supplemented local law enforcement agencies through overtime reimbursement for
seatbelt enforcement and more recently DUll enforcement. The Oregon Association of Chiefs
of Police now administers the grant for ODOT.
ODOT realizes increased traffic enforcement reduces traffic accidents~ and also understands
local agencies limited funding to provide some police services. Through this understanding,
ODOT has set aside special funding to reimburse local efforts for enforcement of traffic laws,
particularly safety belt, speed, and DUll. Through grant funding, police officers will be able to
enforce traffic laws without having to be called to other police business. Public attention about
traffic safety will be gained, data about safety belt use will be gathered, and hundreds of traffic
enforcement hours will be added. The expected result will be decreased deaths and injuries from
motor vehicle crashes due to safety seat belt, DUll, and other traffic enforcement..
In August of this year, the Woodburn Police Department applied for a seat belt grant, titled Three
Flags Grant, and a DUll enforcement grant. On September 21, 1999, the Woodburn Police
Department was awarded the two traffic safety grants totaling $9,000. The grant monies will
become available on October 1, 2000, and must be expended by September 30,2001. Woodburn
Police Department is obligated to meet the goals of the grant as provided in the Statement of
Work (attached) to qualify for overtime reimbursement. The funds used to reimburse local
efforts are federal transportation funds. The reimbursement will allow us to assign officers to
approximately 300 hours of additional patrol time through out the city. The Motorcycle Traffic
Team will be the primary users of overtime grant funds.
" 'I!f'
IOD
September 22, 2000
f ',_moo ----~--.-;~~~-:._=_;-;- /-;-:---_..------,
, r;~"'~..q/."[l i
; ~~~_~_~~..-., ~'-,~ ~ t_ ~ i
l' ---- 1 I
FROM:
All Traffic Safety Division Grant Applicants
Karlyn Campbell, Project Director
;
: ~ "n ~~::-;::-,--;:, "., _''-'' - I
, -/,'it J( ~l !.',.;r 1}"'I',~ i.': ,: ~r, r nl"DT I
' ' " \, " , "','.,, ,t- II - I
_ __.._________________~~:.._t- . ; _
TO:
RE: Grant allocations
This is to announce the completion of the allocation process for the Traffic Safety
Division DUll and Safety Belt grants for the 2000-2001 grant year.
There were 85 applications for Safety Belt grants amounting to a total of $401,320. The
funds available are $288,000. There were 82 applications for the DUn grants
amounting to a total of $520,865. The funds available are $292,500. These numbers
made the job a bit difficult!
The committee considered a number of different factors before deciding the final grant
amount; size of community, unique factors of each community, previous history of grant
usage, previous results, proposed plan describing how the grant would be used, to
name a few. Because so many grant requests came from departments that had not
participated before, it was determined that all applying should be funded at some level.
For new applicants, often a minimum was allocated. Many departments received far
less than the request.
The committee included: Chief Steve Winegar, Tualatin, President OACP; Chief Marc
Adams, Keizer, 2nd Vice-President OACP; Chief Jay Waterbury, The Dalles, Board
Member OACP; Mayor Mike Holden, Uncoln aty, Retired O1ief; Sheriff Jan Oements,
lane County; Gretchen McKenzie, OOOT - Impaired Driver Program Manager and
myself.
Your signed grant contract, which indicates the amount of your grant, is included in this
mailing. Report forms are also induded. Be sure all reports are filled out completely
and submitted by the sth of the month following the activity. (SUbmit a report even if
there has been no usage) Please be sure to make enough copies to last the full grant
year. Overtime can be scheduled starting October 1, 2000.
Good luck in your use of these funds during the coming year! If you have any
questions, please don't hesitate to call.
1320 CAPITOL ST NE
SUITE ]50
SALEM. OR 97303
503.3]5-1411
800.784.2867
FAX: 503.315.1416
" 'In"
IOD
SAFETY BELT OVERTIME
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Statement of Work
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OBLIGA nONS:
The following assignments will be performed during effectiv~ agreement dates:
I. To provide overtime traffic enforcement on a year-round basis and during the scheduled Three Flags
Campaign blitz periods, with emphasis on safety belt, speed and DUll laws.
2. Each participating Department will send a representative to the lbree Flags Campaign Workshops.
Each participating officer shall attend one of the workshops. Departments with fewer than six sworn
officers will only be required to participate in one workshop.
3. All officers receiving overtime pay must complete a safety belt training course or have completed the
two-hour training course, "Safety Belt Training Course for Police Officers" since 1995, which can be
presented by request in an area convenient to the department or through the Department of Public
Safety Standards & Training. The agency is responsible for training time of officers participating in
the overtime enforcement program.
4. Officers will be permitted and encouraged to issue multiple citations to drivers who have committed
several violations. For example; "exceeding maximum speed" and "failure to wear a safety belt"
5. The agency will conduct observed-use surveys prior to each of the Three Flags Campaign blitz periods.
Post enforcement surveys will be conducted at the end of each of the Three Flags Campaign blitz
periods. Departments will be encouraged to utilize senior volunteers or reserves whenever possible.
6. The agency will inform the news media of blitz activities and conduct enhanced media efforts before
and after each enforcement blitz period.
7. The agency will report Three Flags Campaign blitz activities and results following each blitz period to
the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police listing traffic enforcement activity as shown on the
appropriate reporting form, which will be provided to each department upon approval of its grant
8. The agency agrees to document traffic enforcement, using straight-time hours by non-federally
funded officers, at twice the number of hours submitted for overtime reimbursement under this
Agreement.
9. Objectives: ,
. To increase restraint usage to 90% by September 30th, 2001.
. . To increase awareness and compliance with chUd restraint laws.
. Total contact objectives (warnings and citations) per overtime hour worked = 2
10. Grants will be provided in the amount of $3,000 per participating Department. Larger grants
will require approval of the allocation committee. Overtime hours will be paid at a rate of $30 per
hour.
,.
111'
ton
2000-2001
TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION
DUll GRANT APPLICATION
Department:
Woodburn Police Department
Chief of Police:
Paul E. Null
Person Responsible for Grant: Craig Halupowski
Address: 270 Montgomery Stree"4 Woodburn, OR 97071
Phone #: 503-982-2345
Fax #: 503-982-2370
Grant Awarded:~ 000
Grant Request: $6,000.00
Grant Obiectives
4. Shall collect data onthe number of DUll arrests, the number of fatal and injury crashes
and the number of seat belt violation citations/warnings resulting from the grant, forthe
period of the grant and will provlde this information to the Oregon Association Chiefs of
Police on a monthly basis. Reimbursement will be made at a rate of $30.00Ihour for total
TSD hours worked, upon receipt of their monthly report.
As a TSD grant fund recipient, I agree to the above stated objectives and certify that funds
will be used to enhance existing DUll patrols. Existing enforcement levels will remain at or
above ~ for grant n ~71r..j) /l/1
Slgnature:~~' U ~ Date: 05-- :l.3-~<OC)O
~hie of Police
Signatur., . .J.Z 1:J:s _~6Ll Date: q/ZI/ClJ
1320 CAPITOL ST NE Projec Direc
__EM. OR 97303
Please sign, make a copy for your records and return original to the OACP office. After
award is determined. a signed copy will be returned to you.
"I lITE ISO
503.315-1411
800.784.2867
FAX: 503.3151416
,. 1fT'
IOD
2000-2001
TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVISION
SAFETY BELT GRANT APPUCATION
Department
WoodbuxnnPolice Department
Chief of Police Paul E. Null
Grant contact Craig Halupowski
Address 270 Montgomery Street, Woodburn, OR 97071
Phone
503-982-2345
Fax
503-982-2370
Yes, we want to apply for the base grant of $3000
x
We would like additional funding in the amount of $3000.00
Total Grant Request: $6000.00 Grant Awarded: $5000
Please describe the reasons you can use additional funding and explain specifically how you plan
to use it. Refer to the Statement of Work, which outlines the requirements for this grant. Please
consider the requirement that, for every hour of overtime, two hours of straight time is required
under the tenns of the grant (local match).
In September 2000, the Woodburn Police Department will be instituting
a traffic team byplacing.two motorcycle units on the road. The
department will be requiring the traffic team to work overtime to
utilyze the overtime grant funds available.
Signature:
~() J ,({L{~
Chief of Police
4~~~b....L
Project Director
Date: Oi'-.2...3 -.2..00,0
Signature:
Date: a/2i/OO
1320 CAPITOL ST N E Please sign, make a copy for your records and return original to the OACP office. After award is
detennined, a signed copy will be returned to you.
"liTE 150
_ _~EM. OR 97303
503.315-1411
800.7842867
FAX: 503.315.1416
" 'In"
" City of Woodburn
Police Department
lOE
STAFF REPORT
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn OR 97071
(503) 982-2345
Date:
October 3, 2000
From:
Paul Null, Chief ofPoli e
To:
Mayor and City Council
John Brown, City Administrator)/J;?
Through:
Subject:
Liquor License Application - La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant
(Formally Chung Sing Restaurant)
Applicants:
III Amigas + 1, LLC
Tina Wiltsey
4207 Paintbrush Court NE
Salem, OR 97303
Robert Puentes
3915 Courtney Lane SE
Salem, OR 97302
Location:
La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant
327 N. Pacific Hwy.
Woodburn, OR 97071
Licence Type: Dispenser, Class A - This license is issued to restaurants with a separate lounge
or bar area, and permits sale of hard liquor, wine and beer.
Recommendation: The Woodburn City Council approve a Dispenser, Class A liquor license
for La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant, 327 N. Pacific Hwy.,Woodburn.
The police department received an application for a liquor license from applicants Tina Wiltsey
and Robert Puentes on September 7, 2000. The application is for a change of ownership and
name change from Chung Sing Restaurant to La Estrellita Mexican Restaurant.
The department has completed an extensive background and criminal records investigation on
the applicants. The applicants have no criminal record and nothing of a questionable nature was
found in their backgrounds.
Ms. Wiltsey is currently the owner of the Raven Inn located on 99E in Woodburn. In 1996 the
Woodburn City Council, at the recommendation of the Chief of Police, placed the establishment
on a Compliance Plan due to a history of drug activity and disorderly conduct involving tavern
.. 1If'
. patrons. Ms. Wiltsey has worked very rigorously to conform to the compliance plan which has
greatly reduced criminal activity at this establishment. For the last three years, the Raven Inn has tOE
received a favorable recommendation from the city council to OLCC for license renewal.
Ms. Wiltsey has no plans on discontinuing her operation at the Raven Inn establishment. Ms.
Wiltsey advised she will not be involved in the day to day operation of the restaurant. Ms.
Wilstey will be operating a newly established realty office in the rear portion of the restaurant
building.
Mr. Puentes currently owns and operates ten (10) other La Estrellita Mexican Restaurants, seven
(7) of which are located in the Salem - Keizer area. A records check through OLCC revealed no
history ofliquor law violations at any of the Le Estrellita establishments. A check of Salem and
Keizer Police Department records show no history of criminal activity at these restaurants.
Mr. Puentes advised he will be the manager of the Woodburn restaurant. His hours of operation
will be 11 :00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Monday thru Thursday and 11 :00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday thrn
Sunday. Mr. Puentes advised there will be no dancing or live music at the restaurant. The
restaurant will continue to have a small lounge off the dinning area.
cc GLCC
Applicants
,. 1Jf'
14A
Community
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
(503) 982-5246
Date:
October 4, 2000
rY
Mayor & City Council thru City Administrato,)?"
To:
From:
Planning Commission
Subject:
SPR 00-17; Oregon Choice Homes
At their regularly scheduled meeting of September 28, 2000, the Planning
Commission approved with conditions Site Plan Review 00-17 to establish a
manufactured homes sales and display facility on the N. Pacific Hwy.
I.
APPLICANT:
Mark Fisher
Fisher Advisory
7582 SW Vlahos Drive
Wilsonville, OR 97070
II.
OWNER:
Fisher Advisory
7582 SW Vlahos Drive
Wilsonville, OR 97070
III. NATURE OF APPLICATION
The proposed site plan is for the sale and display of manufactured homes. Only
the north portion of the subject property is to be developed for said purpose.
This portion is to consist of a sales office, which is to be a permanent
manufactured home, and 5 temporary manufactured homes for customer display.
Such portion of the property is to be landscaped and paved with a parking area.
There is also to be a free-standing sign at the west corner of the property along
the highway. The northeast section of the site is to be graveled and used for
temporary storage of manufactured homes. These units would not be utilized for
display or any other use while on the site.
IV. RELEVANT FACTS
The subject property is located on the east side of Hwy 99E between the
Jehova's Witness Assembly Hall and Chu's Restaurant. The property is
addressed at 1400 N. Pacific Hwy, further described on Marion County Assessor
Maps as Township 5 South, Range 1 West, Section 18 DB, Tax Lot 1900.
,.
111'
14A
Total size of the property is 1.85 acres, however, the proposed development
would only utilize the northern 1.15 acre section of the parcel. The remainder of
the property extends to the south and around the east side of Chu's Restaurant,
and such area is to be left vacant at this time.
The applicant is proposing to share Chu's access onto the highway since the
subject parcel does not have adequate frontage along Hwy 99E for a separate
access. There would exist a reciprocal access and parking easement between
Oregon Choice Homes and the adjacent parking lot owned by Chu's. The
manufactured sales lot would have a 24-foot access at the northeast corner of
Chu's existing parking lot, and such access would be secured with a four (4)-foot
tall hinged iron gate.
,. 1fT'
14B
Community
270 Montgomery Street
Woodburn, Oregon 97071
(503) 982-5246
Date:
October 4, 2000
Mayor & City Council thru City Administrator ";iJ7
To:
From:
Planning Commission
Subject:
SPR 00-21; EI Ranchero Restaurant
At their regularly scheduled meeting of September 28, 2000, the Planning
Commission approved with conditions Site Plan Review 00-21 to establish a Mexican
food restaurant in Woodburn's Downtown.
I.
APPLICANT:
Jose Mendoza
1200 Roy Avenue
Woodburn, OR 97071
II.
OWNER:
Francisca Garcia
1791 W. Lincoln Street
Woodburn, OR 97071
III. NATURE OF APPLICATION
The applicant requests administrative site plan approval to establish a 1,760
square foot restaurant on Front Street in the Downtown Design and Conservation
District. Included in the building space would be a kitchen, restroom, and a 14-
table seating and dining area.
There would be upgrading of the building's fa~de which would include the
addition of an awning. The color theme on the front of the building would
represent the Mexican FlaQ, which would be on the awning and the decorative
arches above the windows on the second story. The remainder of the building
front would be cleaned and re-painted with the existing color, and the brick grout
for the first story would be painted to match that of the building front located
adjacently to the south.
IV . RELEVANT FACTS
The site is located at 573 N. Front Street, further described on Marion County
Tax Assessor Maps as Township 5 South, Range 1 West, Section 18AB, Tax Lot
111"
14B
4600. The site is zoned Downtown Design and Conservation District (DDCD) and
has a Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Commercial. The use is
permitted outright by zoning district.
There was previously a shoe and jewelry store in the building. There are
buildings to the north and south of the subject building which are attached by a
common wall. Steen's Jewelry is in the neighboring building space to the south.
There are multi-tenant businesses in the building to the north, and the second
story consists of apartments.
,. 1Tf'