The URL can be used to link to this page

October 28, 2019 Agenda EIC SWENSON,MAYOR CITY OF W OO D B U R N DEBBIE CABRAL SRCOUNCILOR WARD 1 LISA ELLSWORTH,COUNCILOR WARD II CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ROBERT CARNEY,COUNCILOR WARD III SHARON SCHAUB,COUNCILOR WARD IV MARY BETH CORNWELL,COUNCILOR WARD V OCTOBER 28, 2019- 7.00 P.M. ERIC MORRIS,COUNCILOR WARD VI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS-270 MONTGOMERY STREET 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: A. City Hall, the Library, and the Aquatic Center will be closed on November 11 in observance of Veterans Day. B. The City Council meeting scheduled for Monday, November 11 has been moved to Tuesday, November 12. C. The Aquatic Center will be closed from November 11-15 for maintenance projects to be completed. A1212ointments: None. 4. COMMUNITY/GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS A. John Zobrist, Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce 5. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: A. Small Business Month 1 Presentations: B. Housing Needs Analysis Work Session 2 Recommended Action: Conduct a work session with staff to discuss the Housing Needs Analysis (HNA). C. John Morgan This facility is ADA accessible. If you need special accommodation, please contact the City Recorder at 503-980- 6318 at least 24 hours prior to this meeting. **Habrd int6rpretes disponibles para aquellas personas Clue no hablan Ingl6s, previo acuerdo. Comunfquese al (503) 980-2485.** October 28, 2019 Council Agenda Page i 6. COMMUNICATIONS None. 7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC - This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. 8. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be adopted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council minutes of October 14, 2019 5 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. B. Woodburn Planning Commission minutes of September 26, 2019 8 Recommended Action: Receive the minutes. C. Community Center Advisory Committee minutes of September 19, 12 2019 Recommended Action: Receive the minutes. D. Crime Statistics through September 2019 16 Recommended Action: Receive the report. 9. TABLED BUSINESS None. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 11. GENERAL BUSINESS-Members of the public wishing to comment on items of general business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. A. Council Bill No. 3111 -A Resolution Establishing the City of Woodburn's 21 2020 U.S. Census Complete Count Committee Recommended Action: That the City Council adopt a resolution creating a U.S. Census Complete Count Committee (CCC) to assist with the process of increasing Woodburn residents' awareness of and motivation to respond to the U.S. Census. October 28, 2019 Council Agenda Page ii 12. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS - These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions that may be called up by the City Council. A. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of Design Review, 25 Property Line Adjustment, and Variance Applications for Pacific Valley Apartments at 1310 & 1340 N. Pacific Hwy (DR 2019-03, PLA 2019-03, & VAR 2019-02) Recommended Action: Staff recommends no action and briefs the Council on this item pursuant to W°'.aa„aa,;jbeim Qeve ::) rrigf ( ra.: iiroa.: roe. e QQI Section 4.02.02. The Council may call up this item for review if desired and, by majority vote, initiate a review of this decision. 13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. 16. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL GOALS 2019-2021 Thematic Goals 1. Create an inclusive environment where residents participate and are engaged in the community(thatis vibrant,safe and active). 2. Promote an environment that encourages sustainable economic health maximizing our geographic, workforce, cultural and community assets. Strategic Goals 3. Create an inclusive environment where Woodburn residents want to participate and are engaged in the community. 4. Develop innovative funding sources to help support the completion of capital improvement projects. 5. Grow and support strategic partnerships for economic health. 6. Explore the development of a non-profit consolidation facility. 7. Improve Communication and Coordination with School District on matters of mutual interest. 8. Completion of the First Street remodel. 9. Completion of Phase 1&2 of the Community Center Project including the formation of an ad hocsteering committee to review and recommend design. October 28, 2019 Council Agenda Page iii 10. Creation of the Dick Jennings Community Leadership Academy. 11. Develop a strategy to limit PERS liability. 12. Establishment of a Woodburn 20 year community-visioning plan. October 28, 2019 Council Agenda Page iv i W�QODBURN• for € or1) or47tcd 9 89 PROCLAMATION NOVEMBER 2019 - SMALL BUSINESS MONTH WHEREAS,the City of Woodburn, OR celebrates our local small businesses and the contributions they make to our local economy and community; according to the United States Small Business Administration, there are currently 30.2 million small businesses in the United States,that employ more than 58.9 million people; and WHEREAS, small businesses employ 48 percent of all businesses with employees in the United States; and WHEREAS, on average, 33 percent of consumers' holiday shopping will be done at small, independently-owned retailers and restaurants; and WHEREAS, 91%of all consumers believe that supporting small, independently-owned restaurants and bars is important; and WHEREAS, 76%of all consumers plan to go to one or more small businesses as part of their holiday shopping; and WHEREAS,Woodburn, OR supports our local businesses that create jobs, boost our local economy and preserve our neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, advocacy groups as well as public and private organizations across the country have endorsed the Saturday after Thanksgiving as Small Business Saturday. NOW,THEREFORE, I, Eric Swenson, Mayor of the City of Woodburn do hereby proclaim that the month of November 2019, as SMALL BUSINESS MONTH and urge the residents of our community, and communities across the country, to support small businesses and merchants during the month of November and on Small Business Saturday and throughout the year. Dated this 28th day of October 2019. Eric Swenson, Mayor City of Woodburn, OR 1 BU October 28, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Housing Needs Analysis Work Session RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a work session with staff to discuss the Housing Needs Analysis (HNA). BACKGROUND: What Is an HNA? ORS 197.296 requires an HNA, which provides critical information for effective long- range planning by City staff and decision-makers. More specifically, ORS 197.296(3) provides: "In performing the duties under subsection (2) of this section, a local government shall: (b) Conduct an analysis of housing need by type and density range, in accordance with ORS 197.303 and statewide planning goals and rules relating to housing, to determine the number of units and amount of land needed for each needed housing type for the next 20 years." An HNA: • Projects the number of housing units needed within the next 20 years; • Reviews various factors that may affect housing mix, such as economic and demographic trends across the state and the nation; Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x_ City Attorney_x_ Finance_x_ 2 Honorable Mayor and City Council October 28, 2019 Page 2 • Identifies the housing types that will be affordable to projected household types based on household income; • Estimates the number and type of additional housing units needed; and • Quantifies a buildable lands inventory (BLI), that is, how much developable land is available for needed housing. Woodburn's current HNA was adopted by the City Council in 2005, related to the urban growth boundary expansion, and needs to be updated. How the Project Began: The 2018 Oregon Legislature allocated $1 .73 million to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). Funding was provided "for the purpose of providing technical assistance to local governments in increasing the affordability of housing" and DLCD was directed to prioritize cities with over 10,000 residents and in which 25% or more of rental households are "severely rent-burdened", meaning households that each spend more than 50% of household income (HHI) on rent. Woodburn has a 26% rent burden. The City applied for technical assistance to update the outdated HNA. On June 28, 2018, Woodburn was notified by DLCD that itwas selected from a large applicant pool. On September 10, 2018 the City Council entered into a memorandum of understanding with DLCD to update the HNA. DLCD selected FCS Group as the consultant. DISCUSSION: Public Involvement: The Planning Commission served as the project advisory committee, meeting several times starting December 13, 2018 and ending September 26, 2019. Staff convened a technical advisory group (TAG) on February 7 and May 10, 2019 to solicit technical input from local businesses, government agencies, and non-profit advocacy groups. As part of public involvement, staff and the consultant hosted two public open houses on February 28 and May 13, 2019. Planning Commission Recommendation: On September 26, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the HNA. The Commission understood that the required planning document is the HNA itself and that Appendix B: Draft Policies and Actions contains only some 3 Honorable Mayor and City Council October 28, 2019 Page 3 suggestions of the consultant. The table below indicates the July 25, 2019 Commission work session majority opinion for each measure. "Deferred" means no opinion and deferral to the City Council. Appendix B Measures Opinion Totals 2, 3, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20, No 21 C, E, F, G, I, J, & K2-K7 1 , 4, 5, 6, 9, 15, A, B, D, H, & Yes 11 K1 8, 11, 17-19, & 21 Deferred 6 Next Steps: After staff receives input from the City Council at this work session, a public hearing will be noticed and adoption of the HNA will be considered by the City Council. Technically, only the HNA itself will eventually be adopted as part of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Once the consultant finished the draft of the HNA, its agreement with DLCD ended. The City, through the Community Development Department, has contracted with FCS Group to assist in the final adoption of the HNA. The City's agreement with FCS has been budgeted and will not exceed $5,000. 4 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2019 DATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,CITY HALL,CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, OCTOBER 14, 2019 CONVENED The meeting convened at 7:03 p.m. with Mayor Swenson presiding. ROLL CALL Mayor Swenson Present Councilor Carney Present Councilor Cornwell Present Councilor Schaub Present Councilor Morris Present Councilor Ellsworth Present Councilor Cabrales Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Deputy Police Chief Pilcher, Economic Development Director Johnk, Operations Director Stultz, Community Development Director Kerr, Communications Coordinator Moore, City Recorder Pierson ANNOUNCEMENTS City Hall, the Library, and the Aquatic Center will be closed on November 11 in observance of Veterans Day. The City Council meeting scheduled for Monday, November 11 has been moved to Tuesday, November 12. The Aquatic Center will be closed from November 11-15 for maintenance projects to be completed. PRESENTATIONS Community Center- Assistant City Administrator Row introduced Jim Kalvelage with Opsis Architecture who provided a presentation on the Community Center project. He provided information on the preferred option 1 a and information on option 2a. Dylan Wells, Community Center Citizen Advisory Committee member, spoke in favor of the preferred option la and added that the City should look for partners to assist with funding the center. Anthony Veliz, Community Center Citizen Advisory Committee member, spoke in favor of the preferred option 1 a and added that there is the possibility that the City could take the cost off the taxpayers and make it a more private concept, along with the YMCA for example. The City Council asked questions and provided feedback throughout the presentation. Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 14, 2019 5 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2019 Carney/Ellsworth... move forward with option 1 a as described by the gentleman from Opsis. The motion passed 5-1 with Councilors Cornwell, Cabrales, Carney, Ellsworth and Schaub voting aye and Councilor Morris voting nay. CONSENT AGENDA A. Woodburn City Council minutes of September 23, 2019, B. Woodburn Planning Commission minutes of August 8, 2019, C. Community Center Citizens Advisory Committee minutes of September 4, 2019, D. Woodburn Recreation and Park Board minutes of September 11, 2019, E. Leasing Specialists LLC Agreement, F. Building Activity for September 2019, G. Liquor License application for The Playce. Carney/Schaub... adopt the Consent Agenda. The motion passed unanimously. COUNCIL BILL NO. 3110 -A RESOLUTION ADOPTING LOCAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE LIMITS FOR THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN TO THE PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT SYSTEM AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1817 Operations Director Stultz provided a staff report. Carney introduced Council Bill No. 3110. City Recorder Pierson read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Swenson declared Council Bill No. 3110 duly passed. CALL-UP BRIEFING: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE, DESIGN REVIEW, STREET EXCEPTION,AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FOR NELLIE MUIR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT 1800 W. HAYES ST (CU 2019-05, DR 2019-07, EXCP 2019-03, &VAR 2019-05) The City Council declined to call this item up. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT The City Administrator reported the following: • John Morgan would like to attend the October 28 City Council Meeting to help set the agenda for the November 2, City Council Goal setting retreat,part two. • He will be sending Council the housing needs assessment and added that it will be on the agenda of the October 28, City Council Meeting. • Information on the census effort and the formation of a Census Committee will be on the October 28, agenda. • He noted that he will be out next week at ICMA conference. • The League of Oregon Cities staff is going to come to Woodburn soon to expose their Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 14, 2019 6 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2019 staff to the challenges of local government. • The City is working on getting the enterprise zone expanded to include some industrial property. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Councilor Cornwell stated that she went to Habitat for Humanity's groundbreaking on Aztec. Councilor Cabrales recognized that it was Indigenous Peoples' Day. Councilor Carney stated that he went to the grand opening of Colonia Unidad and it's a good example of the affordable housing we are working on in this community. Councilor Ellsworth stated she also went to the opening of Colonia Unidad. She added that at the League of Oregon Cities she received a lot of information on affordable housing. Councilor Schaub stated that she also attended the League of Oregon Cities conference and that it was very educational. She added that she also attended the opening of Colonia Unidad and that it is a very nice building and an asset to Woodburn. She is excited to see that the trees have been planted. Mayor Swenson stated that the League of Oregon Cities conference was informative and that there are lots of entities looking for ways to address housing in their communities. He added that he also attended the Colonia Unidad opening. ADJOURNMENT Ellsworth/Morris... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. APPROVED ERIC SWENSON, MAYOR ATTEST Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, October 14, 2019 7 WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING/MEETING MINUTES September 26, 2019 CONVENED: The Planning Commission met in a 7 p.m. public meeting session in the City Hall Council Chambers, Chair Charlie Piper presiding. ROLL CALL: Chair P 'er Present Vice-Chairandow Present Commissioner - Apert Present t Commissioner Oc�rrrng s Absent Commissioner ? fes Absent Commissioner Lass+ n Present Commissioner Absent Staff Present: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Bob Shields, City Attorney Introduction Chair Piper opened the workshop/meeting at 7 p.m., and led the Commissioners in the flag salute. Minutes The minutes of August 8, 2019 were approved. Business from the Audience None Communication None Public Hearing Director Chris Kerr discussed the public's recent concern about the Woodburn hemp farm located south of Nellie Muir Elementary and west of Smith Addition. The leased property is regulated by the Oregon Department of Agriculture as an industrial hemp farm and is a legal, non-conforming use. The property was operated as a farm before annexing into the City, and even though it is now within City limits, it is allowed to continue as a farm, provided they have a license from that state department. 1 8 Nancy Bellinger, Hallmark Properties, voiced her concern about the hemp farm's pungent smell on behalf of other Woodburn citizens. CU 2019-05, DR 2019-07; EXCP 2019-03 and VAR 2019-05 - 1800 W Hayes St Chair Piper asked the Commission to mention any ex parte contact or conflicts of interest. He and Commissioner Lassen are members of the bond advisory committee (BAC) and discussed this proposal several times in its bond meetings. There were no challenges to their statements. Senior Planner Cortes discussed the conditional use request for a partial site redevelopment at Nellie Muir Elementary School, located at 1800 W Hayes St. The proposed project is affected by the Smith Creek Phase III project. That phase has a conditioned roadway that will come from the Smith Creek development and connect with W. Hayes Street. Some minimal frontage improvements are conditioned for Nellie Muir's conditional use and street exception requests, along with a wider sidewalk. This sidewalk would be sited as far south as feasible to give flexibility to street design for a planned capital improvement project for Hayes Street. Commissioner Aiken asked about capital improvement along W. Hayes Street. Public Works is attempting to acquire some land from multiple owners along Hayes from Settlemier Ave to Cascade Drive, but that is separate from this application. A right-of-way dedication of 11 Y2 feet is proposed and conditioned for this project. "CJ" (Clinton) Doxsee, Planner, Angelo Planning Group, 921 SW Washington St, Ste. 468, Portland, spoke. Mr. Doxsee first submitted written testimony in the form of a memo rebutting some of the conditions and proposing specific strike- through and underlined edits. He indicated he would summarize the Woodburn School District bond program and Nellie Muir improvements. Sarah Bishop, Director of Business, Woodburn School District, 7425 Bishop Road SE, Aumsville talked about the School District 2016 bond program, listing Woodburn school projects completed so far. John Henri, District Bond Projects Manager, seated next to Ms. Bishop, added a few comments about the program. Richard Higgins, architect with BLRB Architects, 621 SW Morrison, Ste. 950, Portland, talked about the proposed upgrades to Nellie Muir. All four Woodburn elementary schools are slated to be very similar, thus giving the same opportunities to all children in Woodburn. CJ Doxsee spoke again, agreeing with staff recommendations of approval, while proposing the following modifications on the topics of: 1. Bike parking distribution (8 stalls at the new main entrance as proposed instead of 12) 2 9 2. Lighting heights (lower instead of the up to 25-foot high lights the District wants) 3. Killian St. Parkway (future landscaping of what would be a setback abutting a street) 4. Hayes St. sidewalk (instead of no Hayes St. frontage improvements) 5. Items due by building permit issuance (instead of certificate of occupancy) The Commissioners discussed the material before them. Chair Piper talked about the lighting modifications being proposed, expressing ambivalence about tall lights. Chair Piper and Commissioner Aiken asked Senior Planner Cortes about the sidewalk condition of approval and its context. Chair Piper made a motion to accept CU 2019-05; DR 2019-07; EXCP 2019-03 & VAR 2019-05 containing the conditions of approval, but also with the proposed modifications as the applicant submitted. Commissioner Bandelow seconded the motion, which was approved unanimously. Workshop: LA 2019-02, Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) Recommended Measures: Senior Planner Cortes told the Commission that there were some proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and directed them to the provided addendum of September 19 as a cover sheet - and attaching the only public comments so far on the HNA recommended measures — from North Willamette Valley Habitat for Humanity. Senior Planner Cortes reminded the Commission that when they last met, they was not familiar enough with the proposed HNA amendments to voice an opinion and had agreed to receive and review proposed amendments. These amendments were revised to remove any that were dependent on the 38 recommended measures to which the Commission had indicated "no" during the July 25 work session —the second HNA work session. Benjamin Wilt, Construction Manager, North Willamette Valley Habitat for Humanity, 225 Franklin Ave, Mt. Angel, Oregon, proposed a potential waiver of system development charges (SDCs) and said they should be made appropriate to the type of development proposed. Chair Piper made a motion to approve the Housing Needs Analysis and forward it to the City Council. It was so moved, seconded by Commissioner Bandelow and unanimously approved. 3 10 Staff Update: The next Planning Commission meeting will be held October 10, Director Kerr voiced his expectation to hold meetings on all regularly scheduled calendar slots through to the end of the year. Director Kerr confirmed that the City Council formally adopted the updated Transportation System Plan (TSP) on September 23. Three weeks ago, the City Council authorized staff to begin the process of amending the Woodburn Development Ordinance and to implement some of the language from the TSP. Director Kerr will be modifying the accessory dwelling unit (ADIJ) WDO provisions due to statutory changes resulting from passed Oregon House Bill 2001 (HB, 2001). Commissioners present were given the updated Commercial Zones section of the WDO (WDO 2.03), which was modified by Council adoption on June 24, 2019. Adjournment The meeting was adjou red at 8:30 pm. J APPROVED A, ChaWPVO�',C it Date ATTEST Chris Kerr Date Community Development Director City of Woodburn, Oregon COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 Convened The meeting convened at 3:00 p.m. in the Woodburn City Hall Council Chambers Citizen Advisory Committee Members Present David Piper, Chair Dylan Wells, Vice Chair Melinda Avila Lani Biddle Sharyn Cornett Lisa Ellsworth Jeronimo Gaspar Rebecca Hayes Jenne Marquez Daysi Bedolla Sotelo Donna Stone Michael Vasquez Anthony Veliz Rachel Westrick Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, Assistant City Administrator Row, Parks and Recreation Manager Cuomo, Aquatics Supervisor Udermann, Others Present: Jim Kalvelage, Opsis-PIC Chris Roberts, Opsis-PM/Designer Gary Blackwell, Opsis-PA Ken Ballard, Ballard*King Kurt Lango, Lango Hansen Kyle Trulen, Lango Hansen Eric Swenson, Mayor John Zobrist, Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce Interim Executive Director The minutes from the September 4, 2019 meeting were unanimously approved (Wells/Bodella Soto) OBJECTIVES Review updates to program information and refinements to the concept design options for the building, site and park. Review test fits of seating configurations for the community multi-purpose room. Facility Layout: • The two options for preliminary concept plans were both presented with minor updates. The program layout is nearly the same in each option with some minor variations. Option 1 has Aquatic program functions on the east end of the existing Natatorium deck that replace the existing Wading Pool. Option 2 retains the existing Wading Pool. Page 1 12 COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 o In the Option 1 scheme the plans were shown with test fit layouts for the locker rooms and cardio/weights workout room. o The community multi-purpose room was combined into one large space that can be divided into two or three separate spaces for a variety of events. o An enlarged plan was presented with three different test fit layouts for the multi-purpose community room. The layout plan showed the room configured for a large banquet style event, a lecture event, and a scheme where two spaces are separated by a moveable partition. Natatorium Layout: o A new pool pump room approximately 750 sf in size and a new air handling HVAC unit (approximately 9' wide x 28.5' long) was shown just west of the proposed warm recreation pool. o The group discussed that the existing Natatorium HVAC unit is currently only about 10 years old. Based on an initial site walk assessment by the mechanical consultant the expected longevity of this custom HVAC unit is at least 25 to 30 years. The current recommendation is to maintain this existing air handling unit. Site Layout: • Two site plans were presented to show development of the site in two separate phases: the building development(Phase 1)versus the Park Master plan (Phase 2). o The Phase 1 site development plan shows adding new parking stalls along the east and north edges of the building. It also shows new tennis courts south of the building and more centrally located towards other existing park amenities. ■ A new pedestrian path continues east and connects the existing west parking lot and the proposed relocated tennis courts to the building. ■ The Phase 2 site development plan shows the same parking layout, relocated tennis courts, but expands on other site amenities in the park. • The playground is relocated more centrally to provide greater visibility and address safety concerns of the existing playground that is tucked within the trees. • A new park shelter, basketball court, open green space, and futsal court are all shown as an extension of park amenities on a central axis that starts with the relocated tennis courts at its southern end. o Jim Row discussed the future pathway/greenway trail that the City is installing just southwest of the community center site. It was discussed that a pedestrian crossing light will be installed along S Boones Ferry Road near the existing west parking lot entry drive. o The group discussed that a sidewalk on the south edge of the existing west parking lot would increase safety and access for pedestrians using the greenway trail and the community center and its park amenities. o Parking count requirements need to be verified. o Jim Row asked about how grading would work in the Phase 2 park development, specifically at the north edge where the futsal court is shown. Page 2 13 COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 ■ Kurt mentioned that ramping along the pathway from the green open space to the existing path in the trees would be studied. He also mentioned that amphitheater style seating could be integrated around the futsal court. Action: Opsis and Lango Hansen to verify parking count requirements. Lango Hansen to show sidewalk on south side of existing west parking lot. Community Outreach and Public Open House#1 Preparation • Jim, Jesse, and Josh reviewed various outreach approaches for inviting citizens to attend the first Public Open House that was scheduled for September 25, 2019. o Over 200 plus fliers were printed and distributed for display in other City facilities, public buildings etc. o Over 3200 fliers were distributed to local schools to invite families to participate. o Social media including the City's Facebook page was used to post the event. • Opsis to work with Lara Media Services to develop a survey to gather community feedback. o The survey will be provided in both digital and paper format, as well as available in English and Spanish language. o The primary goal is to structure the questions for high level feedback and gather key information for Opsis to integrate community feedback into the design process. • The City also mentioned that the Opsis presentation would be streaming live on a feed to the City's Facebook page. erieral CAC Notes • The Committee opened their meeting by passing a motion to approve the meeting minutes from the prior CAC meeting held September 4, 2019. • The two options were presented showing the minor variations between the floor plans. Opsis also pointed out some of the test fit layouts of the locker rooms (dry side versus wet side), cardio/weights room, and opportunities for additional cardio machines along the southwest corner of the elevated walking/jogging track. • The test fits of the community multi-purpose room were shared demonstrating that this space is very flexible and can accommodate a variety of events /seating configurations. o The group asked if or how each space would use the Kitchen if the room was divided into multiple spaces. Opsis described that often a larger event is setup adjacent to the kitchen for immediate access and that the smaller sub-divided room uses an in-room sink and warming counter. • Opsis showed some 3D images from the first development of the building massing and exploration of fenestration (window + door placement), and some general thoughts about exterior materials. • Opsis discussed the influence of the agrarian landscape, the more intimate scale of the nearby residential houses, and the civic presence of City Hall, the Public Library, and other buildings along 1st St and Front St. o Comments and question from the committee were quite diverse as summarized below: ■ Some viewed the architecture as a blank canvas with the opportunity for local community members, artists, etc., to leave their imprint on the building. ■ Some felt the building was still not unique and reflective of Woodburn. Page 3 14 COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 ■ How is rainwater from the roof captured? Could that rainwater be reused (e.g. for the pool or landscape irrigation)? ■ How many trees are being cut down to expand the building? ■ Could a brick campaign or something similar be a source of revenue for funding? • The phase 1 and phase 2 site development plans were shared with the committee. In general, both were well received. o The centralized playground addressed previous concerns of it feeling safe. o Some asked if the tennis courts could be replaced with a futsal court instead? ■ Jim Row explained to the design team and the CAC that maintaining the tennis courts on the park site is a requirement based on federal funding that was provided for the original construction of the tennis courts. ■ Design team mentioned that striping of both the indoor and outdoor courts could offer an opportunity for multiple uses (tennis,pickleball, futsal). • A rough draft of the cost estimate was shared with the committee. Option 1 (the scheme that replaces the existing wading pool)was priced. A summary is outlined below: o Direct construction costs totaled approximately $30,000,000. ■ This includes the building addition, refurbishing the exiting Natatorium, and the immediate site work(phase 1 site development). It does not include the new recreation pool. o Indirect cost totaled approximately $13,000,000. ■ This includes design and engineering fees,project management,permitting, testing, inspection, etc. o The proposed Aquatics new recreation pool would incur additional costs as outlined: ■ Direct construction costs totaled approximately $6,300,000. ■ Indirect costs totaled approximately $2,700,000. o The estimated all-in project cost is approximately $52,000,000. • The cost estimate assumes an indexed construction start of spring 2021. • Next scheduled meetings o September 251hPublic Open House o October 91h TDC and CAC o October 141h Woodburn City Council Presentation The meeting was adjourned. APPROVED Dylan Wells, VICE-CHAIR ATTEST Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 4 15 10/21/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2019 Year to Date CHARGE DESCRIPTION Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 1 1 3 5 2 6 1 0 21 ANIMAL CRUELTY 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 5 ANIMAL ORDINANCES 6 1 4 0 3 2 2 0 3 21 ARSON 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ASSAULT SIMPLE 10 9 1 9 10 11 9 14 4 77 ATTEMPTED MURDER 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 BURGLARY- BUSINESS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 BURGLARY-OTHER STRUCTURE 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 BURGLARY- RESIDENCE 1 0 3 0 4 1 2 2 0 13 CHILD NEGLECT 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON 2 1 1 4 1 0 2 5 0 16 CRIMINAL MISTREATMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 CURFEW 1 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 3 12 CUSTODY- MENTAL 9 6 8 5 5 3 10 4 4 5 CUSTODY- PROTECITVE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 10 3 5 14 13 12 11 3 7 DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 5 6 8 5 9 8 6 9 8 6 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 9 6 13 16 10 23 22 16 18 133 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 9 ELUDE 0 0 2 0 1 0 4 1 0 8 ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 FORCIBLE RAPE 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 7 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 2 0 3 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 FRAUD - BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRETENSES 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 1 8 FRAUD -CREDIT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 FRAUD - NOT SUFFICIENT FUNDS CHECK 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 FRAUD -WIRE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 45 26 37 37 38 36 51 39 43 352 FURNISHING 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 GARBAGE LITTERING 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HIT AND RUN FELONY 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR 6 2 3 5 3 2 3 2 1 27 IDENTITY THEFT 2 0 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 9 INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT 1 2 1 5 2 2 5 5 3 26 INVASION OF PERSONAL PRIVACY 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP -FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 MINOR IN POSSESSION 0 0 5 1 2 0 1 1 1 11 MINOR ON PREMISES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 1 2 1 OTHER 7 2 5 4 7 6 10 3 5 49 PROSTITUTION - ENGAGE IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 RECKLESS DRIVING 1 4 3 3 5 2 5 3 4 30 RECKLESSLY ENDANDERING 2 2 2 0 5 1 4 1 2 19 RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 9 ROBBERY- BUSINESS 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 1 0 1 ROBBERY-CAR JACKING 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 ROBBERY-CONV.STORE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ROBBERY-OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 RUNAWAY 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 5 EX CRIME -CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 EX CRIME -EXPOSER 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -FORCIBLE SODOMY 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 EX CRIME -INCEST 2 0 01 0 0 0 01 01 01 2 Page 1 of 2 16 10/21/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2019 Year to Date an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total EX CRIME -MOLEST(PHYSICAL) 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EX CRIME -NON-FORCE RAPE 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 EX CRIME -OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH AN OBJECT 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 TALKER 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 TOLEN PROPERTY- RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 HEFT- BICYCLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 HEFT- BUILDING 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 HEFT- FROM MOTOR VEHICLE 4 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 11 HEFT-OTHER 5 1 0 2 1 7 1 2 3 22 HEFT- PURSE SNATCH 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HEFT-SHOPLIFT 2 8 7 5 12 5 13 9 1 62 RAFFIC VIOLATIONS 10 11 8 7 8 4 17 8 7 80 RESPASS 18 3 9 6 7 6 12 10 8 79 UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 VANDALISM 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 7 VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 1 0 5 1 1 1 0 2 2 13 WEAPON -CARRY CONCEALED 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 6 WEAPON -EX FELON IN POSSESSION 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 EAPON -POSSESS ILLEGAL 0 2 1 —4-3 41 31 1 3 21 EAPON -SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA 01 11 01 0 0 01 21 01 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total 2019 Total 178 115 157 146 172 174 231 172 134 1,479 2018 Total 187 111 138 136 147 101 162 155 144 1281 2017 Total 135 169 176 166 164 143 152 155 138 1398 Arrests/Year 1600 1400 1200 GN`1 1800 Q 600 / 400 200 0 2017 2018 2019 Year Page 2 of 2 17 10/21/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2019 Year to Date CHARGE DESCRIPTION Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 3 4 2 4 5 4 6 3 0 31 ANIMAL CRUELTY 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 6 ANIMAL ORDINANCES 3 1 3 0 2 1 2 0 3 1 ARSON 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 ASSAULT SIMPLE 12 8 7 14 13 18 12 171 81 109 ATTEMPTED MURDER 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 BURGLARY- BUSINESS 2 1 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 11 BURGLARY-OTHER STRUCTURE 2 1 3 1 4 1 2 3 1 18 BURGLARY- RESIDENCE 8 2 5 6 14 7 7 5 6 60 CHILD NEGLECT 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON 16 14 15 10 15 18 14 16 5 123 CRIMINAL MISTREATMENT 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 CURFEW 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 8 CUSTODY- MENTAL 10 6 9 5 5 3 10 4 4 56 CUSTODY- PROTECITVE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 6 5 5 11 12 9 15 6 72 DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 5 7 8 5 9 8 6 9 8 6 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 9 7 15 9 11 14 22 12 14 113 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 8 ELUDE 1 1 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 10 ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 EXPLOSIVES 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 FORCIBLE RAPE 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 0 16 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 9 2 7 3 4 4 8 3 1 41 FRAUD-ACCOUNT CLOSED CHECK 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 FRAUD- BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRETENSES 2 5 6 2 4 4 2 3 4 32 FRAUD- CREDIT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE 3 2 2 2 0 5 21 2 2 20 FRAUD- IMPERSONATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 FRAUD- NOT SUFFICIENT FUNDS CHECK 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 FRAUD- OF SERVICES/FALSE PRETENSES 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 FRAUD-OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 27 18 28 26 29 31 40 25 26 250 FURNISHING 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 GARBAGE LITTERING 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HIT AND RUN FELONY 1 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 7 HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR 23 8 13 19 19 15 16 15 21 149 IDENTITY THEFT 6 5 3 3 4 2 1 8 1 33 INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT 1 0 1 6 2 3 2 7 2 2 INVASION OF PERSONAL PRIVACY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP - FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 KIDNAP - FOR RANSOM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MINOR IN POSSESSION 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 7 MINOR ON PREMISES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 MISCELLANEOUS 19 18 25 21 23 29 13 19 18 185 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 8 6 13 9 15 21 6 11 16 105 NON CRIMINAL DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 20 12 8 12 12 21 15 16 10 126 OTHER 6 3 7 5 9 7 11 3 5 56 PROPERTY- FOUND LOST MISLAID 3 4 4 2 1 4 3 3 4 28 PROPERTY RECOVER FOR OTHER AGENCY 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 PROSTITUTION - ENGAGE IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 RECKLESS DRIVING 2 6 3 5 6 2 7 3 5 39 RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION 2 3 0 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 ROBBERY- BUSINESS 0 0 0 0 1 0 01 1 0 2 ROBBERY- CAR JACKING 01 01 01 01 01 1 21 01 1 4 Page 1 of 2 18 10/21/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2019 Year to Date Jan IFeb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total ROBBERY- CONV.STORE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ROBBERY- OTHER 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 6 ROBBERY- RESIDENCE 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 RUNAWAY 0 1 1 3 4 5 0 2 1 17 SEX CRIME - CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 01 2 SEX CRIME - EXPOSER 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 SEX CRIME - FORCIBLE SODOMY 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 SEX CRIME - INCEST 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SEX CRIME - MOLEST (PHYSICAL) 2 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 11 SEX CRIME - NON-FORCE RAPE 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 6 SEX CRIME - OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SEX CRIME - PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE MATERIAL 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 SEX CRIME - SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH AN OBJECT 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 STALKER 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 01 4 STOLEN PROPERTY- RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 7 SUICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 HEFT- BICYCLE 1 1 0 6 8 1 3 3 1 2 HEFT- BUILDING 0 2 5 3 1 4 1 0 5 21 HEFT- COIN OP MACHINE 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 HEFT- FROM MOTOR VEHICLE 25 18 27 8 15 14 10 19 25 161 HEFT- MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS/ACCESSORIES 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 16 HEFT- OTHER 14 7 16 24 23 29 19 17 9 158 HEFT- PICKPOCKET 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 HEFT- PURSE SNATCH 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 6 HEFT- SHOPLIFT 12 14 22 21 24 17 20 16 12 158 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS 11 6 11 8 9 6 19 11 8 89 TRESPASS 8 6 10 8 12 14 13 15 13 99 UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE 3 0 2 1 0 1 1 2 2 12 VANDALISM 16 8 13 12 17 13 15 20 8 122 VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 5 3 5 3 2 6 0 0 3 27 WEAPON -CARRY CONCEALED 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 7 WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 WEAPON - POSSESS ILLEGAL 1 0 1 4 3 5 1 3 3 21 WEAPON -SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA 1 3 1 0 1 1 4 2 1 1 Jan I Feb I Marl Apr IMayl Jun I Jul lAug I Sep Total 2019 Total 330 23 32 297 371 374 352 346 282 2,912 2018 Total 1 4091 284 3171 3421 3161 3091 3111 3081 292 2,888 2017 Total 1 3221 2921 35 3171 3301 3071 3171 3211 307 2,868 Offenses/Year 3200 2800 2400 W 2000 0) W 1600 0 1200 800 400 0 . . 2017 2018 2019 YEAR Page 2 of 2 19 Woodburn Police Department ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS 2019 Year to Date 10/21/2019 Ordinance Discription Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Total Animal Complaint 38 29 44 36 50 38 48 80 40 403 Ordiinance -Abate/Nuisances 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 6 Ordinance -Abandoned Vehicles 66 39 50 34 18 48 38 51 42 386 Ordinance -Abate Graffiti 2 0 1 0 6 2 1 4 3 19 Ordinance - Land Use Violations 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 4 3 14 Ordinance -Oth Violation 34 30 51 45 40 74 68 60 53 455 Ordinance -Tall Grass 0 0 0 0 87 34 17 8 1 147 2019 Total 141 99 148 116 205 197 173 207 144 1,430 2018 Total 176 133 156 182 223 167 140 205 121 1,503 2017 Total 94 126 176 177 290 284 175 170 149 1,641 Ordinance Violations / Code Enforcement Officers 1600 1400 1200 N 1000 Z O Q 800 J 600 % p 400 200 0 - iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillilillillilI iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillI 2017 2018 2019 COMBINED TOTAL-CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Ordinance Violations / Year 1800 1600 1400 N 1200 Z O 1000 F 0 800 600 400 200 0 2017 2018 2019 YEAR TOTALS FOR ALL OFFICERS 1 20 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Item BU Pri,,�<;rrt rr rf aA'!87 October 28, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Row, Assistant City Administrator SUBJECT: U.S. Census Complete Count Committee RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution creating a U.S. Census Complete Count Committee (CCC) to assist with the process of increasing Woodburn residents' awareness of and motivation to respond to the U.S. Census. BACKGROUND: Recently, Mayor Eric Swenson, asked staff to prepare a resolution creating a U.S. Census Complete Count Committee (CCC) for the purpose of helping to ensure a high level of participation by Woodburn residents. The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 2) mandates a headcount every 10 years of everyone residing in the 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas of the United States. This includes people of all ages, races, ethnic groups, citizens, and noncitizens. The first census was conducted in 1790 and one has been conducted every 10 years since then. The next census occurs in 2020 and the U.S. Census Bureau must submit state population totals to the President of the United States by December 31, 2020. Data from the Census is utilized by the federal government for a wide range of important purposes, including: • Distribution of more than $675 billion annually in federal funds back to tribal, state and local governments • Determining the number of seats each state has in the U. S. House of Representatives • Redistricting of state legislative districts • Forecasting future transportation needs for all segments of the population Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_X City Attorney_X Finance—X- 21 Honorable Mayor and City Council October 28, 2019 Page 2 • Determining areas eligible for housing assistance and rehabilitation loans • Assisting federal, tribal, state, and local governments in planning and implementing programs, services, and emergency response • Designing facilities for people with disabilities, the elderly, and children DISCUSSION: CCCs are volunteer committees established by tribal, state, and local governments and community leaders or organizations to increase awareness and motivate residents to respond to the 2020 Census. CCCs serve as state and local "census ambassador" groups that play an integral part in ensuring a complete and accurate count of the community in the 2020 Census. The U.S. Census Bureau says that it cannot conduct the 2020 Census alone and that success of the census depends on community involvement at every level. Pursuant to the Woodburn City Charter, the Mayor has the ability to appoint volunteer committee positions with the consent of the City Council. Itis anticipated that CCC members will be appointed at upcoming City Council meetings. As established by the resolution, the CCC will not have a minimum or maximum number of members. Members may be community members or representatives of agencies serving the Woodburn Community. Members need not reside inside the Woodburn City Limits. As most of the Committee's work will be completed by then, the CCC will remain in place until June 30, 2020, unless otherwise extended or shortened by the Mayor, City Administrator, or City Council. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact from this item. 22 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3111 RESOLUTION NO. 2143 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF WOODBURN'S 2020 U.S. CENSUS COMPLETE COUNT COMMITTEE WHEREAS, The U.S. Census Bureau is required by the United States Constitution to conduct a count of all persons; and WHEREAS, in 2020, a count of every person residing in the United States will be conducted and will update population data last collected ten years ago; and WHEREAS, the Census count requires extensive work, and the Census Bureau requires partners at the state and local level to insure a complete and accurate count; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council determined that the establishment of a Complete Count Committee (CCC) will benefit the 2020 Census undertaking in Woodburn by increasing residents' awareness of the process and motivating residents to complete the Census questionnaire and be counted; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn's CCC will bring together a cross section of community members who will utilize their local knowledge and expertise to reach out to all persons of our community; and WHEREAS, CCC will work with the Census Bureau and the State of Oregon to strive for an accurate count; and WHEREAS the population data obtained from the Census is utilized by the federal government for a number of important purposes, including determining the number of seats each state has in the House of Representatives and legislative district boundaries, as well as distribution of federal funds to local communities; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Charter provides the Mayor with the ability to appoint volunteer committee positions with the consent of the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Establishment. The CCC is hereby established to assist with increasing Woodburn residents' Census awareness and motivation to complete the 2020 Census questionnaire online, by phone or mail. Section 2. Appointments. Consistent with the Woodburn City Charter, members of the CCC and the CCC Chair shall be appointed by the Mayor with the consent of Page 1—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3111 RESOLUTION NO. 2143 23 the City Council. Members interested in serving on the CCC shall submit a completed Application for Commission/Committee/Board Member Form to the City Administrator's Office. Section 3. Membership. The CCC composition will not have a minimum or maximum number of members. Members may be community members or representatives of agencies serving the Woodburn Community. Members need not reside inside the Woodburn City Limits. Section 4. Meeting Notices, Agendas & Minutes. The City Administrator through the City Recorder is responsible for developing and providing meeting notices, agendas and meeting minutes. Section 5. Meeting Schedule. The CCC will meet on a regular basis to develop and implement strategies for each organization to conduct Census 2020 outreach and mobilization. Meeting locations will be determined by the City Administrator and the Mayor. Section 6. Termination. The CCC will remain in place through June 30, 2020, unless otherwise extended or shortened by the Mayor, City Council or City Administrator. Section 7. Quorum. Because the CCC is advisory in nature, no quorum shall be required for the CCC to meet, discuss or provide advice or recommendations to the City Council or the City Administrator. Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3111 RESOLUTION NO. 2143 24 OFFI Iii♦ r�} B V' October 28, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator From: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Subject: Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of Design Review, Property Line Adjustment, and Variance Applications for Pacific Valley Apartments at 1310 & 1340 N. Pacific Hwy (DR 2019-03, PLA 2019-03, & VAR 2019-02) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no action and briefs the Council on this item pursuant to aaaaaavaearrp 1).eyalaa rrieroll ( ra.: iiroa.: roe. e II::.:��,: Section 4.02.02. The Council may call up this item for review if desired and, by majority vote, initiate a review of this decision. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 10, 2019 and unanimously approved the Design Review, Property Line Adjustment, and Variance (Type III) with the conditions recommended by staff through the „Ila' f Egjpg[t published October 3. Project Description The project is site development of 204 apartments across ten buildings A-H, J, & K. The buildings are three-story walk-ups, conventional for new construction of apartments. The complex includes a club house / leasing office, barbeque (BBQ) pit, play area, and "Jacobsen path" - a public 8-foot wide concrete bicycle/pedestrian path along where Jacobsen Road was vacated long ago, which is along the western half of the south property line. Zoning The subject property is in the Commercial General (CG) zoning district. Though at present in the CG district multiple-family dwellings are prohibited in some areas of the district and a conditional use (CU) in others because of Council 25 adoption of Ordinance No. 2573 on June 24, 2019, application submittal was prior to the effective date of the ordinance (July 24, 2019). Variances The project came with seven variance requests to vary from the WDO: 1 . Architectural Wall (Table 3.06D & 3.06.06) by having an evergreen shrubbery buffer with trees instead of a wall; 2. Street access minimum number (3.01 .05C); 3. Driveway minimum number (3.04.03A.2.b); 4. Parking ratio minimum (Table 3.05A); 5. Compact parking percentage maximum (3.05.03C); 6. Drive aisle width minimum (Table 3.05C); and 7. Parking area curb height minimum (3.06.021). Testimony Three parties testified in opposition: 1 . Joshua E. Schuyler, D.M.D. (Schuyler Family Dentistry, 1325 N. Pacific Hwy; wall variance) 2. Alex F. Muraviov (homeowner, 1297 Greenview Dr; wall variance) 3. Fred Muraviov (resident, 1297 Greenview Dr; driveway alignment) Wall Variance Outcome WDO Table 3.06D requires an 8-foot wall along the east rear property line, and with the variance request the proposal substitutes buffer landscaping through evergreen shrubbery and trees. Apartment building heights (33 feet, 9 inches) and setbacks (including 10-foot rear with rear projections allowed to be at 6 feet) meet WDO standards. The Commission - after long discussion of the issues raised, especially the wall variance - approved the wall variance with Condition V7-AW requiring buffer landscaping and restriction of outdoor wall and pole lights to being full cut-off fixtures and at lower heights. Appeal Any of the three parties with standing can appeal the Commission final decision per WDO 4.02.01 B, and the Council would hear an appeal. Site Plans See next page. Page 2 of 3 26 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ,b �21 TL 112iI a 9HQ � � �• rr ....... � .......................................................................................................................................................... Sitepp� .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................� ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... J v, , i a � r .r >, L�an�ds�cap......e........p flan...east..re�ar..�.p�............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Page 3 of 3 27 h OODBuRN lnc o r `,) orrated 1889 Needs Analysis Housing t P ��i, �- � ✓ r,„ y� �� is n r i Y "n :i r f�� .: /��.^,>w �Y',r��' `.�..t'1, ( y�=, % fi!J,� /r y�r�t��f�l/G✓i,� � i�/',>' rod r ±N'. ✓ r �� /�✓/' /� !1j,�' rrrr r f Jn I �b� ✓r r i/,' o*�, r r ,,.�� s... u�,,/�, v� 'v„4r�� -IR ,.«� l�J r a ��i✓m6gii S l %///�� / �� " ��1„l / airLer��` 1s Pr �,.,,y n 'e' ; i a y,, "a a, �A / a � � �� ,,,,,�✓, ,,,r; '„�/✓,rj, 1✓.few'. ,l r� r ;�r�/ �red i�rJ6 I.�Iq'� .,: ., Ij �� IJP �r ur r r: ai'�,✓ :./ �i a,y v,r, 'i' 1 f,� I",//m� e nr,g, / o"//J /,,, � r �,r ,/�n' � ��ny✓di� Y c „� Wr ''"ur �,r„rr// „irk n” `;,fir,,, ,!/a a�"n✓/ ,I�i� ".,, „,'; ,� 1,5 ��„�% �/ / �+ �f�, la n"y �' y p r � r✓ ...r � ;l,v �.l' r'7..�� , eD /r Id@✓ „ i ,,,,f!,, ,i�!G� /�/ <,��I� � a;�, V �/�,,.fi'"”` '.�lr= r „tee„-�+ ,r>ri a // 1„1'G, /,✓/' "�,y'`�a>.G,. �/9,�,.�, %i f/' a u �/,/� ;r„/ ,i��,l.. r �. uF, �/, I., ��/„ �/�� ✓� �;;1!'� yM° f �,", ;,lr. n �l ,1�'�� rY!r, /; r ,�„ �: ,�,hi f n r�,� ' ,a 7% ��'.,r/ ,!%�:nr (,�t•r / I�lv�',:,:1, '�''r«�i,w„��at,,,'.,� /�( �' .., / yA I.. ' r,, �/'l „' / wluw,,;, ��Gy��f J v� 4l%"7 /,i j, r�/"' I ire �VS° 4i� 1 a -y"'far ,1�1%!/�. �� %�, W��k�,,,m1�•%r°j1%� I%%/%/�� ///,U��/ /r°✓% mall /I �� f�y�t Jf pl V� � n �l �r = �� /��, y� � ��a � a��IrG �ii�/// �l a?u ��/�lr,va!'%��P%fit. �� 1,1�,�a,� �I ,,.. ��1.� I,...r" f � ✓.,,�/ �, �'� 1,%,,., :�,/.-; r. ;'d�,airy/l%�,Jl��„ a aa,✓r r,�� ;�,, ��i , 4, irk �' My ��/� ill/J' �si /ci, �/� %gena✓�l i �///�,,a c�� I ia�a % %/�1 �V,�, � r,,, ��,, �G J��. /,/� / ✓„ / „� ,, of r�l �lh�tll Illllllllll�lllllllllllll.�ftll� �� II f� �IIIIII��,.I� �i�,��!Vlnllllllllll��ll IIIIrvIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIrfII��IIIIII�II�IYf/,�I��,r l�/ �%�fair�`A).'��/��/��/11,,,,,,,/ //,�/> ,�,�,%/,/1/�/ba c3 This project is funded by Oregon general fund dollars through the Department of Land Conservation and Development. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the State of Oregon. C i.. )., .II i t..... .................. AcKNOWLEDGEMENTS Under Oregon House Bill HB 4006 (2018), the state legislature provided funding for housing needs studies as part of the Department of Land Conservation and Development's (DLCD) Technical Assistance grant program. Woodburn applied for, and received funding, to conduct a housing needs analysis starting June 2018. This work is made possible through the sincere input by City staff and the Woodburn Planning Commission. We specifically recognize and appreciate the time and attention dedicated to this work by the following people. City of Woodburn Chris Kerr, AICP, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, Senior Planner Dan Handel, AICP, Assistant Planner Woodburn Planning Commission Charles Piper, Chair Ellen Bandelow, Vice Chair Ronald Aiken Merri Berlin Sharon Corning Wassa Dos Reis Chris Lassen Woodburn Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Jacob de Soto, Director of HR & Safety, BrucePac Ted Stonecliffe, Transit Planner II, Cherriots Pam Phan, Policy & Organizing Director, Community Alliance of Tenants Robert Leeb, Principal in Charge, Leeb Architects Brandon Reich, Senior Planner, Marion County Jesse Hamberger, Lead Pastor, Mid Valley Community Church Christie Hughes, Mid-Willamette Valley Community Action Agency Maria Elena Guerra ("Meg"), Executive Director, Farmworker Development Housing Corporation Claudia Cantu, Housing Manager, Farmworker Development Housing Corporation ' 1 Michael Freels, Energy Analyst, Oregon Department of Energy Eugene Labunsky, developer through West Coast Home Solutions Benjamin Gutierrez, Assistant Store Director, WinCo Foods Adam Lisiewski, WinCo Foods Project Consultants FCS GROUP e , City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page T AB E OF CONTENTS AChD8wiedg808Dt6 ...............................................................................................................................................2 T@bhe8fContents...................................................................................................................................................i G8Cti8DL Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Housing Needs Analysis Structure ..........................................................................................................2 Goal iOand Oregon Regulatory Requirements..........................................................................................2 ReportOrganization.............................................................................................................................3 Section U. Housing Needs Projection......................................................................................................................4 Methodology.......................................................................................................................................4 Demographics and Socioeconomics........................................................................................................4 Housing Inventory and Tenancy..............................................................................................................6 FaotomaMeohnghouaingnooda -----------------------------------'ll HousingNeeds Forecast.....................................................................................................................l6 HousingDensity Levels...............................................................................................................22 G8Cti8D UL BUiW@bheL@Dd Inventory............................................................................................................24 Buildable Land Inventory Methodology...................................................................................................24 ResidentialLand Base........................................................................................................................25 LandClassifications...........................................................................................................................28 Development Constraints....................................................................................................................28 Residential Buildable Land Inventory Results..........................................................................................33 Summary ofResidential Buildable Land Inventory ----------------------------36 G8Cti8D |\i Land Needs R8QUDci|i@ti8D.........................................................................................................39 Residential Land Needs Forecast Methods .............................................................................................39 Housing Forecast and Residential Land Needs Methods............................................................................39 Reconciliation of Land Supply and Demand ------------------------------'44 ^�� FCS ��'-)L7�� i City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page ii B8Cti8D V. Key Findings and [Recommendations.............................................................................................48 key findings from the housing needs analysis..............................................................................................46 R0000mmondodHousing Actions..............................................................................................................46 AppendixA: EXistiDgO8V. Code..........................................................................................................................48 Appendix B: [Draft P8|iCieSand Actions...............................................................................................................49 GioSS@ry..............................................................................................................................................................59 ^�� F C S G' 'I" , L71) ii City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 1 Section1 . INTRODUCTION This report presents Woodburn's Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) for the 2019 to 2039 period. It is intended to comply with statewide planning policies that govern planning for housing and residential development, including Goal 10 (Housing) and Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660 Division 8. It provides the City with a factual basis to update the Housing Element of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO), and to support future planning efforts related to housing and options for addressing unmet housing needs. Future planning efforts, including development and redevelopment will be informed by this report as it provides the City with information about the housing market in Woodburn and describes the factors that will affect future housing demand, such as changing demographics. This analysis will help decision makers understand whether the City has enough residential land to accommodate growth over the next 20 years. This process included a series of technical advisory group (TAG) meetings coupled with public engagement sessions, and Planning Commission work sessions to receive feedback and provide revisions to the final housing needs analysis draft. The City of Woodburn and FCS Group solicited public input from the Planning Commission serving as an ad-hoc Project Advisory Committee. The Planning Commission as of this writing met three times December 13, 2018, March 14, 2019, and May 23, 2019 to discuss project assumptions, results, and implications and is scheduled to have a second workshop on July 25, 2019 to continue discussion of HNA recommended measures. The project relied on the Planning Commission to review draft products and provide input at key points (e.g. before recommendations and decisions were made and before draft work products were finalized). The project required many assumptions and policy choices that the committee needed to vet and agree upon, as these choices affect current and future residents. In short, local review and community input were essential to developing a locally appropriate housing needs analysis and housing strategy. 1=DLjUHc11=: )g(mIg&rT)&- d The city and consultants solicited input from the general public at two public open houses. The first open house, held on February 28, 2019 at the Woodburn Public Library, solicited comments on the preliminary results of the housing needs analysis including the buildable lands inventory. The second public open house, held on May 13, 2019 at Success Alternative High School, solicited comments on the final results of the housing needs analysis and housing strategy including recommended measures. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page F-1(.)US^ ')g l,,leeds XnaUVs^s SfrUX`fUre {�o ci�� 10 ci r)c"I ()rE�g 0 l�) ��R E�gU��CI�ory ��R E�qUirE�rf)E�l�)�S The passage ofthe Oregon Land Use Planning Act of |974 (ORS |97) established the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDO and the Department ofLand Conservation and Dcvc|opoocn{ (DlCD). The Act required the Commission to develop and adopt u mc{ of statewide planning goals. (]ou| 10 uddrcmmcm housing in Oregon and provides guidelines for |oou| governments to follow indeveloping their |oou| comprehensive land use plans and implementing policies. A{ uminimum, local housing policies must meet the applicable requirements of(]ou| |0and the m{u{o{cm and administrative rules that implement b (ORS 197295 to 197.314, ORS 197.475 to 197490, and OAR 600'008). (]ou| |0requires incorporated oidcm to 000/p|c{c uninventory of buildable residential lands. []ou| 10 also requires oidcm to encourage the numbers ofhousing units in price and rent ranges commensurate with the financial oupubUidcm of its households. (}ou] 10 defines needed housing types as "all housing on land zoned for residential use or mixed residential and commercial use that ia determined {omeet the need shown for housing within an urban growth boundary u{price ranges and rent |cvc|a that are affordable to households within the county with a variety of incomes, including but not limited to households with low incomes, very low inoorncm and extremely low in0000cm.~ ORS 197.303 defines needed housing types: (u) Housing that includes, but is not limited to, uUuohcd and dc{uohcd single-family housing and multiple family housing for both owner and renter occupancy. (b) Government assisted hoom .^ kiMobile home or manufactured dwelling parks asprovided in [>DS |97.475 {o |974o0. (d) Manufactured homes on individual lots planned and zoned for single-family residential use that are in addition to lots within designated manufactured dwelling subdivisions. (e) Housing for farmworkers. A rc000000cndcd approach to conducting uhooming needs unu\vmim is described in p/unning6/r Residential Growth: A Work-bookfor Oregon's Urban Areas, the Department of Land Conservation and Development's guidebook onlocal housing needs studies. Aydescribed inthe workbook, the mpcoiflo m{cpm inthe housing needs unu|ymim are: |. Pr co{ dhcnuo/bcrofncvvhoominguni{m needed in the next 20years. 2. Identify relevant national, m{u{c, and |oou| demographic and economic trends and factors that may affect the 20'ycuzpr jcodonofmtroohoc {ypcooiz. �Government assisted housing can beany housing type listed inORS 197.]O](a),(o),or(d). ^o � �� 1 ��LJ �) 2 -,0 ~ ��- ^� ��-xA��- � City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 3 3. Describe the demographic characteristics of the population and, if possible, the housing trends that relate to demand for different types of housing. 4. Determine the types of housing that are likely to be affordable to the projected households based on household income. 5. Determine the needed housing mix and density ranges for each plan designation and the average needed net density for all structure types. 6. Estimate the number of additional needed units by structure type. ORS 197.296 specifically applies to cities with 25,000 or more population, this statute is followed to determine housing needs for Woodburn, (2017 population 26,965). This analysis incorporates 20- year population growth for the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) based on forecasts provided by Portland State University's Population Research Center. Woodburn must identify needs for all needed housing types as well as adopt policies that increase the likelihood that they will be developed. This housing needs analysis was developed to meet the requirements of Goal 10 and its implementing administrative rules and statutes. IRe po aril Or ga n i z t iiare This report provides the technical basis of findings that support proposed housing policy recommendations and subsequent actions that the city will take to update its Comprehensive Plan and the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO). Each section of this report provides current data, assumptions and results that comprise all findings and conclusions: I. Introduction. II. Housing Needs Projection: provides a demographic overview and summary of market trends influencing housing growth in Woodburn. III. Buildable Land Inventory: identifies vacant, partially vacant and redevelopable residential land within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), and accounts for constraints to get to a final determination of capacity to meet 20-year needs. IV. Land Needs Reconciliation: This section compares expected land demand to vacant land supply to meet housing mix and densities described in the HNA. V. Draft Findings and Recommendations: highlights key findings and draft policy recommendations and actions the City should consider to address housing needs. VI. Glossary: list of key terms used in the housing needs analysis. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 4 Section PROTECTION The housing needs forecast is a 20-year projection from the base year of 2019 through year 2039 to accommodate population growth for the Woodburn UGB. This section of the report will describe the characteristics of the future demand for housing in the City over the planning period. The methodology for projecting housing needs considers a mix of demographic and socio-economic trends, housing market characteristics and long-range population growth projections. Population is a primary determinate for household formations—which in-turn drives housing need. Regional (Marion County) and local (City or UGB) population, households, income and market characteristics are described in this report using available data provided by reliable sources, such as the U.S. Census Bureau (Census and American Community Survey), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), Oregon Department of Housing and Community Services, Portland State University (PSU) and the City of Woodburn. Where trends or long-range projections are provided by an identified data source, FCS GROUP has included extrapolations or interpolations of the data to arrive at a base year (2019 estimate) and forecast year (2039 projection). The housing need forecast translates population growth into households and households into housing need by dwelling type, tenancy (owner vs. renter) and affordability level. I.; Ir ri :� ' Ir Ih li li° :� li c.) �c c.)In c.)Ir�n li c s Demographic trends are important for a thorough understanding of the dynamics of the Woodburn housing market. This section documents demographic, socioeconomic, and other trends relevant to Woodburn at the national, state, and regional levels. Demographic trends provide a context for growth in a region; factors such as age, income, migration, and other trends show how communities have grown and how they will shape future growth. Characteristics such as age and ethnicity are indicators of how the population has grown in the past and provide insight into factors that may affect future growth. 1=D0Lj,I , i0la 7 The City of Woodburn recorded a record-high population of 24,685 in 2017 (estimate by PSU). Taking into account residents living in unincorporated Marion County but inside the UGB, the total Woodburn UGB population is estimated at approximately 26,965. Since the year 2000, Woodburn has grown at a relatively faster pace than Marion County as a whole (Exhibit 2.1). City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 5 Long-range population forecasts (prepared by PSU) anticipate 8,845 new residents will be added to the Woodburn UGB, a subset of the 74,892 added to Marion County by year 2039. This equates to an annual average growth rate (AGR) of 1.4%and a 12.1%"capture rate" of future County-wide population growth for the Woodburn UGB (see Exhibit 2.2). t, IIh 'flblt 2„1;, IPopulatloin "III"ireinds (2000-2017) 000 0 0 0 000 0 Woodburn City 20,100 24,080 24,685 1.2% Marion County 284,834 315,335 339,200 1.0% Oregon 3,421,399 3,837,300 4,141,100 1.1% Source:U.S.Census Bureau and Portland State University Population Research Center. Abbreviations:AGR-Annual Growth Rate t, IIhr'Ublt 2„2;, IPopulatloin IPir njectloins (2019..2039) O m 0 0 O m 0 Wooburn UGB 26,965 35,810 8,845 1.4% Marion County 344,341 419,233 74,892 1.0% Oregon 4,224,122 5,151,616 927,494 1.0% Source:Portland State University Population Research Center Forecasts of Oregon's County Populations and Components of Change,2017-2068. Compiled byFCS Group.AGR=average annual growth rate. rrn.:(:)rY)E- C rrCII t: City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 6 Woodburn has a diverse mix of older and younger residents with a notable concentration of young residents, especially when compared with Marion County and Oregon. As indicated in Exhibit 2.4, Woodburn has a relatively high share of residents under 19 years of age. ExIh'flblt 2„4: IPopulatloin by Age Cohort, 201 °tl tl tl tl tl 0 0 tl tl Me 0 to 19 33.9% 27.9% 24.1 20 to 44 31.2% 33.0% 33.5% 45 to 64 21.0% 24.4% 26.5% 65 and older 13.9% 14.6% 15.9% Total 100% 100% 100% Source:2013-2017 American CommunitySur\ey5-Year Estimates(Table DP05) IF-II c.)u s i Ir°)cwt II In ve Ir°)1r- ry and Te Ir°)an cy The current housing inventory, mix and tenancy sheds light on existing conditions locally as well as market demand preferences. According to current estimates by the U.S. Census, American Community Survey, the City of Woodburn had 8,273 housing units as of 2017. Analysis of historical development trends in Woodburn provides insight into the functioning of the local housing market. The mix of housing types and densities, in particular, are key variables in forecasting the capacity of residential land to accommodate new housing and to forecast future land need. The specific steps are described in Task 2 of the DLCD Planning for Residential Lands Workbook as: 1. Determine the time period for which the data will be analyzed. 2. Identify types of housing to address (all needed housing types). 3. Evaluate permit/subdivision data to calculate the actual mix, average actual gross density, and average actual net density of all housing types. This section presents information about residential development by housing type. There are multiple ways that housing types can be grouped. For example, they can be grouped by: 1. Structure type (e.g., single-family detached, apartments, etc.). 2. Tenure (e.g., distinguishing unit type by owner or renter units). 3. Housing affordability (e.g., subsidized housing or units affordable at given income levels). 4. Some combination of these categories. For the purposes of this study, we grouped housing types based on: (1) whether the structure is stand- alone or attached to another structure and (2) the number of dwelling units in each structure. The housing types used in this analysis are consistent with needed housing types as defined in ORS 197.303: • Single-family detached includes single-family detached units, manufactured homes on lots and in mobile home parks, and accessory dwelling units. • Single-family attached is all structures with a common wall where each dwelling unit occupies a separate lot, such as row houses or townhouses. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 7 • Multifamily is all attached structures (e.g., duplexes, tri-plexes, quad-plexes, and structures with five or more units) other than single-family detached units, manufactured units, or single-family attached units. Like most Oregon cities, single-family detached housing is the most prevalent classification in Woodburn, representing 67% of the housing stock. The remaining housing units in Woodburn include multi-family units (15% of the inventory), townhomes and plexes (9%), and mobile homes/other units (9%), as shown in Exhibits 2.5-2.6. Exlh'flblt 2„5: IExistling lHousling Mix aind "III"einaincyA, 2013-2017, City o,f Wood Ilburrin 11 „II i IppIppIppIlpp YIIIIJ I I Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2017. Owner-occupied housing units in the City of Woodburn account for 59% of the housing inventory while renter-occupied units account for 36% with vacant housing units constituting the balance. Most homeowners reside in single-family detached units (86%) or manufactured homes/other units (11%). The majority of renters also reside in single-family housing units closely followed by multi-family housing units (apartments) and lastly townhouses/plexes (Exhibits 2.6-2.7). °off .. � jF JA�° .�'LJ 1 7 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 8 t,kh 'llb[t 2.6: tf n[ts by III"einuirre by Structure III'yllpe, 2013-2017A, City o,f Wood 11hburrin a a a Single Family Detached 4,217 1,119 235 5,571 Townhomes(Flexes 72 668 20 760 Multi family(5+units) - 1,174 39 1,213 Mfg.home/other 614 45 70 729 Total Units 4,903 3,006 364 8,273 Distribution 59% 36% 4% 100% a a a Single Family Detached 86% 37% 65% 67% Townhomes(Flexes 1% 22% 5% 9% Multi family(5+units) 0% 39% 11% 15% Mfg.home/other 13% 1% 19% 9% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Source:American Community Survey,2013-2017;compiled by FCS GROUP. Exhibit 2„7: Exist'ing Housing III"einaincy, 2013-2017, City of Wo ot~11k)t:irrt n a Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2017. ' 1 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 9 flflorclldUIn-: IIdOUSiitrgIIitrv&tdory A 2016-17 statewide study of housing affordability was led by the Oregon Housing and Community Services Department (OHCS) which included all cities and counties, including Marion County and the City of Woodburn. The study included an inventory of existing housing units subsidized by nonprofits, local, state, or federal entities in each community and compared the housing supply to the need (based on an equitable distribution of the total statewide inventory) for subsidized housing. Overall findings from the subsidized housing inventory/needs analysis for the City of Woodburn and Marion County are reflected in Exhibit 2.8. The OHCS study concluded that there were 387 subsidized affordable housing units in Woodburn, which was slightly in excess of the City's equitable statewide (demand) allocation. f,xllhnGll)lt 2,.8:, C;urrirreint Illinveintoirry of uIt)sldlzed IHousling Urilts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affordable Housing Units in Inventory 387 3,059 Need(EquitA Distribution Percent 0.5% 7.5% Equitable Distribution of Units 334 4,675 Actual Units/Equitable Distribution of Units 115.8%1 65.4% Source:Oregon Housing and Community Services Housing Needs Versus Inventory Summary As would be expected, upper-income households tend to own rather than rent, and the opposite is true for lower-income households, as shown in Exhibit 2.9. Exhibit 2.9:, Woodbi.prin "III"en(ancy Iby Incoinne IU.^v 1, 2017 0 I 0 I o 0 0 0 00: o � o :o � o:o M Upper(120%or more ofMFI) $70,080 or more 1,795 644 36.6% 21.4% Middle(80%to 120%ofMFI) $46,720 $70,080 1,175 507 24.0% 16.9% Low(50%to 80%of MFI) $29,200 $46,720 965 623 19.7% 20.7% VeryLow(30%to 50%of MFI) $17,520 $29,200 658 421 13.4% 14.0% ExtremelyLow(lessthan 30%of MFI) $17,520 or less 309 812 6.3% 27.0% Total 4,903 3,006 100% 100% Source:US Census Bureau 2013-2017 ACS(Table S2503),compiled by FCS GROUP An evaluation of renter income levels versus available housing inventory indicates that there is a current shortfall or gap in available rental housing inventory in Woodburn at the upper- and lower- price points (Exhibit 2.10). This is understandable at the lowest price points where there is almost always more demand than supply. The fact that there is more housing demand for good quality rentals than what is in the current supply reflects an aging housing inventory and demonstrates strong potential market demand for new apartments that rent for $1,250-$1,875 per month (for 2+ bedrooms). City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 10 Exh'flblt 2.10: II1'eintaIl IHousling Gaps, City of WoodIlhburrin, 2017 Iv :I .Iva m a $75,000 or more: 553 $1,875 272 (281) $50,000 to$74,999: 423 $1,250-$1,875 455 32 $35,000 to$49,999: 629 $875-$1,250 963.75 335 $20,000 to$34,999: 402 $500-$875 819 417 Less than$20,000: 812 Less than$500 it 408 (404) Zero or Negative Income 187 Require Subsidy 88 (99) Total 3,006 - 3,006 - Source:US Census Bureau 2013-2017 ACS *Calculated as 30%of income range based on HUD guidelines HIraEI cirlk:EOir)cmflysN s As mentioned previously most of the housing in Woodburn is classified as single-family detached units. New housing construction permits issued by the City indicate that 400 permits were issued over the seven-year time frame (Jan. 2012 to Dec. 2018). As indicated in Exhibit 2.11, about 67% of new construction was for single family detached homes. The remaining 33% was for multifamily apartments and other housing types. Exhibit 2.11;, Wo odbuirin Ill tosin0 I veintoirry (20110-2017) City of Woodburn Housing Inventory(2012-2018) a a Owner Occupied 3,490 3,318 Renter Occupied 2,595 2,739 Vacant 484 706 Total 6,569 6,763 Owner Occupied% 57.4% 54.8% Renter Occupied% 42.6% 45.2% Total 100.0% 100.0% M :.....WK 0 I 666666�.�,,� `:,i I Single-Family Detached 5,187 269 5,456 Townhome/Plexes 1,095 4 1,099 Multifamily 1,615 101 1,716 Mobile Home 654 26 680 Total 8,551 400 8,951 Source:U.S.Census Bureau,and American Community Survey,and City of Woodburn. 2013 to 2017(Tables DP04,B25077 and B25064). `housing growth based on permits issued by City. Median home values in the City at the end of 2017 were $167,500, while median rents jumped to $936, according to the U.S. Census, American Community Survey 2013-2017 data. In comparison to other housing markets, Woodburn home prices now appear to be increasing more quickly at a rate of 14.8 percent year-over-year (November 2017 and November 2018). As indicated in Exhibit 2.12, median home sales prices in Woodburn increased to $256,000 in November 2018. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 11 The observed home sales prices in Woodburn still lag behind comparable cities including Newberg, Salem, Silverton and Wilsonville in terms of media home sales prices. Exllhnbllblt 2.11 1 edlain Ill nunne Soles IPirIce III"irreinds born) Selected Mair ets m m a : Woodburn $223,000 $256,000 14.8% Newberg $318,000 $342,000 7.5% Salem $239,000 $264,000 10.5% Silverton $271,000 $305,000 12.5% Wilsonville $443,000 $457,000 3.2% Source:Zillow.com;analysis by FCS 11/09/18. Ifw:�. ,1r�:b Ire r 1r li li° c Ih �: �.� li li° c li° � a(J There is a linkage between demographic characteristics and housing choice. As shown in Exhibit 2.13 below, housing needs change over a person's lifetime. Other factors that influence housing include: • Homeownership rates increase as income rises. • Single family detached homes are the preferred housing choice as income rises. • Renters are much more likely to choose multifamily housing options (such as apartments or plexes) than single-family housing. • Very low-income households (those earning less than 50% of the median family income) are most at-risk for becoming homeless if their economic situation worsens. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 12 i1,x Mllbi12„120;, 111 o us1ing lLife Cyc m IIS( 1� Of h111at� � 1 uo�r o� r uo o ,pli Will* 104aw (jouptoqui rrv, Hu w, I F#M11IK,,u, I ch(., evi The relationship between demographic changes, income levels and housing needs can be used to forecast future housing needs. The primary demographic age cohorts are shown in Exhibit 2.14 and described below. i1, llh 'llbit 2„l Woodburn Pop. by Age Cohort Source-. U.S. Census, ACS 2012®17 �avg) m Generation 11111111 MiilllleniiMs im G n "ratioin X. Baby Boorneirs uVnt' onratoon �� F ..�� 'LJ ILS 12 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 13 flee t Geineirratloin (those Ilborrurnl Ilbef ire 1725 to 1945) This includes retirees better than age 74, who were raised during the Great Depression, Word War I or World War 11. This cohort currently accounted for 6%of the city's population in 2017 and is projected to be the fastest growing segment over the next 20 years. As they reach their 80s some desire to move into assisted living facilities with nearby health care services and transit access. alby IBooinn Geineirratloin (Ilboirrin 1746 to 1964) Baby boomers (currently age 55 to 74) accounted for 19% of Woodburn residents in 2017, up from 15% in 2010. The boomer population segment has been growing more rapidly than the other cohorts over the past 10 years and many are now entering their retirement years. Boomers usually prefer to "age in place" until after age 80,then may downsize or move in with family members (sometimes opting to reside in accessory dwellings off the main house). Geineirratloin Z (Ilboirrin 1765 to 19 0) Gen X is the demographic cohort following the baby boomers and preceding the Millennials. This cohort (currently includes people between age 39 to 54) accounted for 16% of the Woodburn residents in 2017, and is expected to overtake the baby boom cohort in numbers within the next decade. GenX households often include families with children, and many prefer to live in single family detached dwellings at various price points. Milleni lals (Ilboirrin 11 y f0 to e(xrrlly 2000x) Millennials (currently in their twenties or thirties) accounted for 25% of the Woodburn residents in 2017, and is second only to the Generation Z segment in numbers. This segment is expected to increase more slowly than the overall population over the next few decades. Younger millennials tend to rent as they establish their careers and/or payback student loans. Working millennials often become first-time homebuyers, opting to purchase smaller single family detached homes or townhomes. Geineirratloin '" (Ilboirrin unKild•2000s or lateirr) GenZ includes residents age 19 or less. This is Woodburn's largest demographic segment and accounted for 34% of the Woodburn residents in 2017. It includes children living primarily with GenXers and Baby Boomers. This segment has been increasing in Woodburn over the past several years, but this growth may slow considerable in the future as GenXers are delaying starting families and tend to have fewer children than past generations. f11sllpain1c oind otheir ethninlc girouIlps The largest single ethnic group in Woodburn by far includes the Hispanic/Latino segment, which is spread among all demographic cohorts. Woodburn's Hispanic/Latino population accounted for 56% of its residents in 2017, down from 59% in 2010, according to the U.S. Census and American Community Survey data. While the overall growth may slow in comparison to the past, it is still projected to be the fastest growing racial/ethnic group over the next few decades. HoLjs, itrg ciflflorrclidbiiIINy rr.01trSk.1E�rrciHoitrc When preparing a residential land need analysis, it is important to consider housing affordability issues facing Woodburn today. Like many communities in Oregon and the U.S., income levels in City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 14 Woodburn are generally not keeping up with housing prices and rents; thereby creating a housing affordability challenge. The median home price in Woodburn was $272,500 (2019, Pt Q), which is higher than the Marion County median home price, but lower than the statewide average (see Exhibit 2.15). t,xllh 'flblt 2„15 Median Horne Price,Woodburn, Marion County, Oregon 2019 $272,500 $217,100 $346,100 Rents in Woodburn are also above the Marion County average. According to the U.S. Census, American Community Survey: 2012-2017 (average), the median gross rent in Woodburn ($936/month) was about 6 percent above the county average (Exhibit 2.16). Exhibit 2„1 Median Gross Rent„ Woodburn, Marion County, Oregon, Other Comparison Cities, 2013-2017 1 x.10 $11,000 $989 9 992 ' X1.,02 , �0 $4,K) ?o >r, $200 �ssssssssssssy Oregon ��Ia6on ti ODI)U[[rrr MonrnouO-t `,dr',tn KOzeu Dai rcrrr IIorjsiitrg coo � IVbrjrr::IE- itrc According to U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD), households are "cost burdened” if they pay over 30% of their income on housing. Households are "severely cost burdened” when they pay over 50% of their income on housing. As shown in Exhibit 2.17, households earning less than $20,000 are experiencing the greatest hardship with respect to housing cost burdens. Nearly 4 out of 5 households with income less than $35,000 are housing cost burdened. And nearly half of the households with income between $35,000 and $50,000 are cost burdened. °off .. � (F JA�° .�'LJ 1 14 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 15 I xhGIIblt 2„17 Housing Cost Burden by Income, Woodburn, 2013-2017 1, 0i fhlKN/ly0H)0 f42A fl-I�f V0,000l a x12f';i 991 ��, ��r,'r � �, I1UllJf1111,1u11�1J1111f)I1J�1J11119111fII�IlU1�lJlld!�f1J11J11�1J�JJJJJ1J11111�1Jl1��1J11J1111»JJJJJ11J1J�JJ�JIJJ�1J11J11�1J�JJJJJ1J11�I1�1J1111f)I1J11J111111,'' ski€,W119 +�I�;"'.9�.4i4a"f4j Hl fsj 8% R Z", r' 4f"n� bo':in, 'osu blurdwenr,d in Not Cost,5 urdened Overall, in 2017, about 19% of the households in Woodburn were cost burdened. An analysis of severe rent burdens in Woodburn indicates that 26% of the renters and 12% of the homeowners are paying more than 50% of their income on housing costs (see Exhibit 2.18). Exhibit 2„1 Severe Housing Cost.Burden by Tenure, Woodburn, 20113-2017 III Illy l)wonas � 1 I Old m C rr;rBuraun, ,,,gid oiiii Not f'.;;ra aC l wd,,,,noij Woodburn is one of many cities in Oregon where over 25% of renter households spend more than half of their income on rent. Below is a comparison chart of other cities in the region, as well as Marion County and the State of Oregon as a whole (Exhibit 2.19). City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 16 t,xhillbit 2„17' Severe Rent Cost Burden,Woodburn, Marion County„ Oregon,. tither Comparison Cities„ 2013-2017 �.6ilPdih� ,. °��y°�+lrt ,�,"��"��"��'�"��"��"��"��"��""�" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl111I111I111I111I111I111I111I111I111I111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIl11Il11Il11Il11Il11Il11Il11Il11Il11IllIl111111111111111111111111111111111111111111J1JIlJIIJIIJIIJIIJIIJIIJIIJIlJ11 The housing needs analysis for Woodburn includes an assessment of population growth forecasts, market trends and housing characteristics. The analysis of housing mix scenarios (summarized in Section 4)results in a 20-year housing demand forecast of 3,012 dwelling units. To determine the appropriate mix of future housing demand, it is important to consider changing demographic and socio-economic conditions, such as: in Owner-occupied single family detached housing, including standard as well as small lot housing types is expected to remain the largest housing segment in the future, but its share of the overall housing inventory will decrease. This segment is driven largely by the projected increase in the number of Gen X and Millennial households with children. While current median home prices in Woodburn are higher than the Marion County median, home prices in Woodburn are over $100,000 below median home prices in the southern portion of the Portland Region. For duel-earning households whose inhabitants work in different communities (such as Salem and Portland), Woodburn is a nice central location in which to buy a home. in Demand for rental housing is expected to increase significantly in the future in light of the projected population growth, low rental vacancy rates (below 3%), and relatively low income levels in comparison to housing purchase prices. According to U.S. Census American Community Survey: 2013-2017 data, Woodburn's median household income was 13%below that of Marion county while median home prices were 26% higher, and median rents were 6.5% higher. Renting is expected to be the most viable housing option for about 4 in 10 households in the future. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 17 As indicated in the following exhibits, the future net new housing demand by tenancy assumes that 1,333 (44%) of the units are owner occupied and 1,679 (56%) are renter occupied. This would represent an increase in renter households with a measured change in the current tenancy mix, which is currently 62% owners and 38%renters, according to the U.S. Census, American Community Survey (2013-2017 average). The expected housing types required to meet the market characteristics of demand segments discussed previously is shown in Exhibit 2.20. The recommended future net new housing mix includes: in 1,563 single family detached units (low density); in 320 townhomes/plexes (medium density); in 1,129 apartments (including 329 medium-density garden-court apartments and 800 higher- density apartments). This forecast includes 20 units of shared housing units for people in non-institutional group quarters. The non-institutional group quarters housing forecasts reflect the number of units (with multiple people per unit) for future residents in congregate care, farmworker dwellings and transitional housing. This does not include institutionalized residents such as people in hospitals or correctional facilities. Exhibit 2„20 Proj. Housing Needs by General Classifications,Woodburn UGB, 2019-2039 Low-density(single family detached,mfg.housing) 1,258 305 1,563 Medium-density Townhomes,plexes,group quarters 10 310 320 Garden apartments(@16 dus/acre) 30 299 329 Higher-density apartments(@31 dus/acre) 24 776 800 Grand Total 1,322 1,690 3,012 Note:numbers may not exactly add due to rounding. Source:Woodburn HNA,Housing Needs Forecast(Task 2 and Task 4)findings,June 2019. A comparison between the current housing mix and the baseline housing forecast is provided in Exhibit 2.21. The findings indicate that the share of single-family detached housing is projected to decrease from 69% (current inventory) to 64% (future inventory in 20 years), while the share of multifamily housing in Woodburn is projected to increase from 19% (current inventory) to 24% future inventory). e SF LJ 11 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 18 t,xhit blit 2„21 Cuirrsntand Proj. Mousing Mix„Woodburn UGB Current Housing Miix Prof.Net New Res.Mux FUlture Housing Mix 0 Singlo. FainAy el Tovvi3O-�ornes/Plc es 11 f,Jidti fan"Iiiily The current market gap for rental housing is a key reason why the future housing need forecast expects the share of apartments to increase significantly, and the share of renters to increase from 38% (current share of renters) to 43% (projected future share of renters), as shown in Exhibit 2.22. Exhibit 2.22 IExistirig arid Il)roject d I lousirigNeeds by "Ferlaricy, 621% 571% 440,E 431% 81% ti I I 111 1111 1 Gu rrNrrt Housing inn Mie Prot Net New Housing sing Mie Future Housing siing Mie IN Owners 11111111 [Renters °off FS.. � �F JA .�' ,,.J C�' 18 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 19 The types of housing that is most suited to meet qualifying income levels for home ownership vary by family income level. The recommended distribution of future demand by price level is shown in Exhibit 2.23. t, IhUbit 2„23 Woodburn Owner-Occupied Housing Needs: 2019-2039 Upper(120%or more of MFI) Greater than Greater than 36.6% 484 Standard Homes $70,080 $436,000 Middle(80% to 120%of MFI) $70,080 $436,000 26.4% 349 Small and Standard Homes,Townhomes Small Homes, Low(50% to 80%of MFI) $46,720 $334,650 35.0% 463 Townhomes,Mfgd. Homes,Plexes Very Low(30%to 50%of MFI) $29,200 $209,300 2.0% 26 Govt.Assisted Extremely Low(less than 30%of MFI) 0.0% 0 Total 100.0% 11322 Note:numbers may not exactly due to rounding. *Assumes 30%of income is used for mortgage payment,20%downpayment,6%interest,30-year mortgage for middle and upper-income housing,and 5%downpayment for low and very-low income housing. Source:Woodburn HNA analysis, Task 2 and Task 4 findings,June 2019. The rental housing needs forecast for by affordability level is shown in Exhibit 2.25. The rental housing need is fairly evenly distributed among the family income segments. Exhibit 2.24 Woodburn Rental-Occupied Housing Needs: 2019-2039 NNEEMMEMMM Upper(120%or more of MFI) Greater than Greater than 21% 362 Standard Homes, $70,080 $1,752 Townhomes Small Homes, Middle(80% to 120%of MFI) $70,080 $1,752 17% 285 Townhomes, Apartments Small Homes, Low(50% to 80%of MFI) $46,720 $1,168 21% 350 Townhomes,Mfgd. Homes,Plexes,Apts. Very Low(30%to 50%of MFI) $29,200 $730 21% 355 ADUs,Govt.Assisted Apts. Extremely Low(less than 30%of MFI) 20% 338 Govt.Assisted Apts. Total 100% 1,690 *Assumes 30%of income is used for rental payments. Source:Woodburn HNA analysis, Task 2 and Task 4 findings,June 2019. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 20 For comparison purposes, the current U.S. Housing and Urban Development fair market rents within Marion County range from $658 for an efficiency (studio) unit to $1,707 for a four-bedroom unit (Exhibit 2.25). ExlhiltAt 2„25 HUD Fair Market Rent (FMR) by Unit Type, Marion County, 2019 $658 $736 $972 $1,405 $1,707 ORS 197.303 defines needed housing, in part, as "all housing on land zoned for residential use or mixed residential and commercial use that is determined to meet the need shown for housing within an urban growth boundary at price ranges and rent levels that are affordable to households within the county with a variety of incomes, including but not limited to households with low incomes, very low incomes and extremely low incomes, as those terms are defined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development under 42 U.S.C. 1437a." Per HUD standards, low income households are those making 80% or less of median family income (MFI), very low income households make between 30% and 50% of MFI, and extremely low income households make 30% or less of MFI. Using 2017 MFI statistics, the monthly attainable housing cost for low-income families in Woodburn is as follows: • Extremely Low Income, $438 or less • Very Low Income, $438 to $730 • Low Income, $730 to $1,168 If families within these classifications pay more than these amounts they will be "rent burdened"to some degree. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 21 i,klh 'llblt 2.26: Wo od1lh)uirin IFl usling Cost wAinalysis (I sed oin Mairloin C;ouility Medi in IF irrilVy II urnc ou ne) Marion Countx Median Farnilx Income Level 2017* $58,400 Upper(120%ormoreofMFl) $1,752 or more Middle(80%to 120%of MR) $1,168 $1,752 Low(50%to 80%of M F 1) $730 $1,168 VeryLow(30%to50%ofMFI) $438 $730 Extremely Low(less than 30%of M Fl) $438 or less Upper(120%ormoreofMFl) $436,000 or more Middle(80%to 120%of MR) $291,000 $436,000 Low(50%to 80%of M F 1) $182,000 $291,000 VeryLow(30%to50%ofMFI) $109,000 $182,000 Extremely Low(less than 30%of M Fl) $109,000 or less Notes: *based on Housing and Urban Development thresholds for Marion County in 2017 **assumes 20%down payment on 30-year fixed mortgage at 4.0%interest. Source:analysis by FCS Group using Housing and Urban Development, and US Census data. Suiryr -nciry of IIdou..j.sang II`,1ee('-Js i=°:)ireccis. Based on the population projections detailed earlier, the new housing demand within the Woodburn UGB amounts to 3,012 housing units over the next 20 years. This housing need forecast assumes that the current share of group quarters population and housing vacancy levels remain constant. The projected number of housing units that would be suited to meet affordable median family income levels for owners and renters is summarized in Exhibit 2.27. i,xllh 'llblt 2„27 Projected Housing (Need by Tenancy and Income Level,Woodburn, 2019-2039 0 Owner-Occupied Renter Occupied 11 Upper(120%or Wddlo)Btl% to Low(60% to lett% Very Low(30%to Extrer° oti y Low mon re of I"uMFq 120%of IMM) of IFI) 60%of MFO )loss than'30 gym of R) City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 22 IF-II(.)USii ')g IDeir)siity Levels The Woodburn city planning staff reviewed: history of building permits issued (years 2012-2018), recent development applications; and local development and zoning code provisions to document allowed densities and expected future average density levels (as measured in dwelling units per net acre).' As indicated in Exhibit 2.28, there are four general housing classifications: low-density, medium-density, high-density, and commercial/mixed-use that were considered in this analysis. Single family detached housing is primarily provided in the RS, RIS, and RSN zones. (See WDO 2.02 for residential zoning district details.) These zones currently allow 5.2 to 10.89 dwellings per acre and permit the development of all housing types: detached, attached/townhomes, duplexes, accessory dwellings, multifamily/apartments and manufactured homes. The low-density single family also includes homes with small lots and buildings within common lots, including cottage home parks and accessory dwellings, as well as manufactured home parks. According to the Housing Choices Guide Book(for housing resources see the Oregon DLCD website inQ;iy.s._// cr d �cr n.. `� /�'e /iJ_� /a d d�s/i_I:crvu�sg�� Rd�smu r�cs,,,��l�'��), cottage cluster developments are ideal for smaller households as an alternative to standard single family homes and apartments. They are often built in clusters of 5 to 25 units at densities ranging from 5 to 35 units per acre (note the maximum allowable RSN density in Woodburn is currently 10.89 units per acre). The overall expected average density for single family detached housing in Woodburn is 6 units per acre. Townhomes and plexes are classified as medium-density housing and are permitted in all residential zone districts; and allowed outright in the mixed use and commercial zone districts. The RM district focuses primarily on medium density development, with allowed densities ranging from 6 to 16 dwellings per acre. The overall expected average density levels for townhomes/plexes in Woodburn is 12 units per acre for townhomes and 16 units per acre for garden court apartments. Higher-density apartments are typically constructed as multifamily developments with 5 or more units per structure. Multifamily dwellings are permitted in all residential and mixed use and commercial zones. The allowable density ranges from 10 to 22 units per acre in the RMN zone, and 12 to 32 units per acre in the DDC, CO, CG,NNC, and MUV zones. (See WDO 2.03 for commercial zoning district details.) The overall expected average density for higher density apartments in Woodburn is 31 units per acre. z The City of Woodburn recorded construction permits for 400 dwellings between Jan.2012 and Dec.2018, including 269 single family units, 101 multifamily units,26 manufactured homes and 4 townhome/plex units. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 23 Ekh'flblt 2.28 Allowed aind IExlpeclWed L)evelopinneint L)einslty Ilby Iifousling 1['ype, City of n ndllburrin MMINE101im Low Density Single farridy RS,RIS,RSN 5.2-10.89 6 L detached Medium Darttr Small lot singlib famlllyW 12 townhotnei,plexes, (townbornes/plexes), coftages:,garden RM apafteints 16(garden apts) High Density Apartments,condos, RMN(Nodal Multi-(Family Residential) 110-22 22 Commercial and Mired Use 12-32,01th DOC(Downtown Osveiop" t& exceptions to DDC Cqnser�ation),CO(COnm6rdal Office), Apartments or condos I and NNC which, CP(CommeMal General)„NNC:(INodat 31 al), 'with,commercial have neither, Nei�ihborhoodCommarci MVV(M'ixed use'villag6) minimurn or maximum Note: Exhibit 2.28 relative housing density categories derived from Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-038-0060. Development density (measured in terms of dwelling units per net buildable acre of land area) along with projected housing demand is used to calculate residential land needs. As indicated in Exhibit 2.28 and Appendix A, the Woodburn development code allows a range in development densities depending upon residential and commercial and mixed-use land use zones. City of Woodburn planning staff has estimated average densities for each zone type based on current development permitting activity and their professional Judgement. S "11 11 �"' F ( �"?JA ,jj; C LJ 11 23 `e t City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 24 Section 111 . BuILDABLE LAND INVENTORY In accordance with OAR 660-008-0005 (2), an estimate of buildable land inventory (BLI) within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) has been created to determine that amount of land available to meet housing needs. The BLI analysis uses the most current Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data provided available for the Woodburn UGB (specific GIS data sources are shown in Exhibit 3.1). L)ii II d db IIe Land II ir)ve ir)N- ir)/ Meflh c)d c II c)g)/ The objective of the residential BLI is to determine the amount of developable land available for future residential housing development within the UGB. The steps taken to perform this analysis are as follows: 1. Calculate gross acres by plan designation, including classifications for fully vacant and partially- vacant parcels. This step entails "clipping"all of the tax lots that are bisected by the current UGB to eliminate land outside current UGB from consideration for development at this time. City staff input was provided to provide a level of quality assurance to review output is consistent with OAR 660-008- 0005(2). 2. Calculate gross buildable acres by plan designation by subtracting land that is constrained from future development, such as such as existing public right-of-way, parks and open space, steep slopes, and floodplains. 3. Calculate net buildable acres by plan designation,by subtracting future public facilities such as roads, schools and parks from gross buildable acres. 4. Determine total net buildable acres by pian designation by considering potential redevelopment locations and mixed-use development opportunity areas. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 25 t,xllhGll)[t X0„1:, WoodIlh)uirin I Itlll IL')oto Sources w. w- City Limits GIS Layer Woodburn City Limits Boundary City of Woodburn UGB GIS Layer Urban Growth Boundary City of Woodburn WB Zoning GIS Layer City of Woodburn Zoning Designations City of Woodburn WB Comp Plan GIS Layer City of Woodburn and UGB Comprehensive Plan Designations City of Woodburn mczoning GIS Layer Marion County Zoning Designations City of Woodburn Taxlots GIS Layer Taxlots with Assessed Value and Property Class Code City of Woodburn RCWOD GIS Layer Riparian Corridor Wetland Overlay District City of Woodburn FEMA 100 Year Floodplain GIS Layer FEMA Floodways and 100-yr.Floodplains City of Woodburn Wetlands GIS Layer Siginificant Wetlands City of Woodburn PropertyClass Tabular Property Class and Linked Coding Marion County Assessor' NAIP 2016 GIS Service Web service providing aerial imagery Oregon-GEO' tmjp �r w w c o_i7r v imr al�ax. 1 tmjp imzsc•re_,,,rra mra•vpE„,rrarirrlirxrc i t,a•r�icc, The detailed steps used to create the land inventory are described below. The residential land base reflects current Woodburn Comprehensive Plan land use designations. The Comprehensive Plan map for the Woodburn UGB is provided as Exhibit 3.2. Properties that are within the residential land base include the following Comprehensive Plan classifications: Residential Land Use Classifications • Low-Density Residential (RS, RIS, RSN) • Medium-Density Residential (RM) • High Density Residential (RMN) Higher density residential classifications include commercial and mixed-use zone classifications which currently allow multifamily development, the following Comprehensive Plan classifications are included in the residential land base: Commercial and Mixed-Use Land Use Classifications �=IMINIZIMI= DDC Downtown Development&Conservation Co Commercial Office CG Commercial General NNC Nodal Neighborhood Commercial MUV Mixed Use Village °off .. � (F rr ��° .�'LJ 11 25 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 26 For additional information on allowed uses within these zones,please refer to: • Woodburn Development Ordinance (WOO) • Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Table 2.03A, E4. The DDC zoning district covers downtown Woodburn and is described in ro_07_07B 12_t.�.; the DDC also establishes that downtown development has no minimum off-street parking requirement. For analysis purposes, each of these land use classifications have been grouped into residential development categories that represent the expected level of development based on the housing types/densities that are permitted by the City (housing types must be permitted outright or by conditional development approval). This includes: low, medium and high density residential categories; as well as a commercial/mixed use category (which allows a mix of low, medium and high density housing). This analysis assumes that all of the vacant and part-vacant residential land base will be available for future housing development and can be served with adequate public facilities, including roads, water, sanitary sewer, and storm water systems. Draft BLI findings and results were reviewed by City Staff and subjected to public review, then refined accordingly based on the input received. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 27 tEkh'flb[t 20,.2,. C;ty of WoodIlbuirin C;oiinnplrreh eiinsive IPlain IDesIgin tIorls 1 � � fill 1f ry"J(I�(I�(IJ(I1(IJIIfIIJII�II�IIIIJ(��I��ri. �� 1111 11 ,)11 r /r;i i j r r r � O////jj�r�J/ o�� 11 � 1,, 1 ,''�111>1��jrr��ll�9J11 /J/J��uriii$11�Illlfl r i"il •`� r/;'��j/ ' i�� 11111�1l'll�llllllJl� r; /�t "il lid Ga r„ rf ;I:r� rrr r d �✓��Fm+j4 .,� f .✓0 � I+r�� n„ �,��,�u�r, f�r %� . r r. 77 ...� � L J, / V lay cf�j "'lW jo e City of Wdoodburn / —•City Limits Commercial L©uu Density Residential Open Space and Parks �;<,UUB Reserve Buildable Lands Inventory Comprehensive Plan m U G B INNER,Industrial (Medium Density Residential 1DJTRY1�Public Use °oto .. � �F J ��° .�'LJ 1 27 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 28 Land The next step includes classifying each tax lot(parcel) into one of the following categories. • Vacant land: Properties with no structures or have buildings with very little value. For purpose of the BLI, residential lands with improvement value less than $10,000 are considered vacant. These lands were also subjected to review using aerial photography; and if the land is in a committed use such as a parking lot, an assessment has been made to determine if it is to be classified as vacant, part vacant or developed. • Partially vacant land: Properties that are occupied by a use (e.g., a home or building structure with value over $10,000)but have enough land to be subdivided without the need for rezoning. This determination is made using tax assessor records and aerial photography. For lots with existing buildings, it is assumed that 1/4 acre (10,890 sq. ft.) is retained by each existing home, and the remainder is included in the part vacant land inventory. • Vacant Undersized: Properties that are vacant or part-vacant with less than 3,000 sq. ft. of land area. This category is excluded from the vacant land inventory since these lots are not likely large enough to accommodate new housing units. However, it is possible that some may be suitable for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). • Developed & Non-Residential Land Base: Properties unlikely to yield additional residential development for one of two reasons: they possess existing building structures at densities that are unlikely to redevelop over the planning period; or they include parcels with Comprehensive Land Use Plan designations that do not permit housing development. • Public and Constrained (unbuildable) land: Properties which are regarded as unlikely to be developed because they are restricted by existing uses such as: public parks, schools, ballfields, roads and public right-of-way (ROW); common areas held by Homeowners Associations, cemeteries; and power substations. In cases where public-owned land does not fall into one of the above-mentioned categories and is planned or zoned to allow housing, those tax lots are included in the vacant or part-vacant residential land inventory. These tax lot classifications were validated using aerial photos, building permit data, and assessor records. Preliminary results were refined based on City staff and public input received during the Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) planning process. IDve II cp irne ir)t. The BLI methodology for identifying and removing development constraints is consistent with state guidance on buildable land inventories per OAR 660-008-0005(2). By definition, the BLI is intended to include land that is "suitable, available, and necessary for residential uses." "Buildable Land" includes residential designated land within the UGB, including vacant, part vacant and land that is likely to be redeveloped; and suitable, available and necessary for residential uses. Public-owned land is generally not considered to be available for residential use unless the underlying zoning permits housing. °off .. � (F JA�° .�'LJ 1 28 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 29 Land is considered to be "suitable and available" unless it: • Is severely constrained by natural hazards as determined by the Statewide Planning Goal 7; • Is subject to natural resource protection measures determined under Statewide Planning Goals 5, 6, 15, 16, 17 or 18; • Has slopes over 25 percent; • Is within the 100-year flood plain; or • Cannot be provided or served with public facilities (no land was identified in this category). Based on state guidelines and data provided by the City of Woodburn, the following constraints have been deducted from the residential lands inventory. • Land within waterbodies and floodways. Lands identified within waterbodies and floodways per the FEMA FIRM maps. • Land within floodplains. This includes lands in flood-hazard areas (the 100-year floodplain). • Land within wetlands. This includes areas identified as significant wetlands in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. • Land within natural resource protection measures. This includes riparian wetland overlay districts that are identified in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. • Land with slopes greater than 25%. However, no land was identified as having steep slopes. Exhibits 3.3-3.5 illustrate these types of"environmental" constraints. s This conclusion is based upon the 2005 Woodburn Public Facilities Plan (http://www.ci.woodburn.or.us/sites/default/files/%2810-31%29052005PublicFacilitiesPlan.pdf) City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 30 t, IIh 'flb[t 33„ IFloodIlplafins aind I loodwys , r//%,z," r J r,; ,/,�o; / /r it,,.4/ I%!c� ,,, �%✓/rfil�' �/:= ILrr ,,,, "'�"//i % /-'- , r,""'. ,., "( 1,, ,,, 0,11 r �<// -, of / ,. ,/ rI/ r ra, ,^/ n r r �, �;�-„ r.. s ,,.I,.� � 77`. ✓' ./,//r r �� I V 'ia j� ��, +��ro// ✓fir/. yT/Il ✓,/ y r ✓/ /ri// � , / al� ��✓�II1;GJ� /'„� J� �,,� �iiy / r. / r / �a yr y �r �, /. ��'(� Ir��/r�rr 11' r'il�fi E v, L r r; r/ � � 1 u � �/ rl✓ 'i �� I�� JI/%1NII r ✓ 1 ! r fir/ ri, � ,//,� //1.��/��%i 'd: r F ��' �/��(, r "grid/�✓' �� / r ��%i � / ;,r � � tiw �'� � r/ /Ij%0//��do ��i��,4 �/fir ! ”' .r ��,M C, l ��' I� ? �'�r �' � ✓, r � sup P ��I��DG/// 1�O%% �IG�N/' � w,�,w s i i� /, � /r f'I �✓ �Y I/ / �%�� /i /l�� r,,��/, � it f�✓"dl1' �/I�t��rJ� l / , �,. r ��%%.% � '� �� «�� Hary��,* .yr J.: L ,✓ ��// / %/;,: r a�ii//i%iii„'✓/ �� fr/ ,� �� / �/,/�/ ///��//%/;LL//, °,�r/J�L � �" %!/� y� �� r%��; 0� � � Irk City Of Woodburn n Buildable Lands inventory L bln IS r,Ih 8—rdw� Roodw^aya �•a a°off FS.. � "�' ,,.J C�' 30 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 31 t, Ilh 'llb[t 3.4. Wetlainds v` ror �� // /y ', r, kr�/ii F�J6 , Iki r, m„�,0/Di/i!r r ✓r/�/� lw^wo k r�i�j/rr� / ,..r r r r i /• S:: ;�� %�Di/r� rlj /V` i/ �//�1%//%//%//i/� i��r�,� ��,rr,!r1 1/.;✓✓✓, ��/l �1%Ik%//, ' it�� , �% I, sa,;ri'r ,�i ii gar i 1 1/ i ,,. / rr� ,::-,�/1„ ,,,�/,r / ,.r/. ,:,,” a„ s /iii✓lfff // I'-. + //,..,/i.,,;� I r /. Edi✓ �/.�, Y' � v r r / City Of Woodburn Buildable Lands Inventory Significant Wetlands ll ,xS 11 °off .. � �F y ��° 11 31 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 32 t, Ilh 'llb[t 3„ „ IIRI� p irrG un Wetlainds verrl yIDistifi t _.✓ ,, � mfr /�/ f / /�/ / �' l l I r y /NJ✓/ r � '� tl ,II✓/��//// ,,,;p ,//' /i i ,(i%�!,, F�.r��' <�/ �,.i��✓ f f��i/%///j VW� r�i �I µ r I / M / r 1 r / a City Of Woodburn Buildable Lands inventory Riparian,Corridors&Wetlands Overlay District e; a._ °off .. � �F rr ��° 1) 32 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 33 Res^der)f^dU BU^UdabUe Land Unver)f -YrV ReSUUfS Laind �Bame As noted above, the residential land base for the E|LJ includes all tax lots inthe U(]B with residential, 000000croiu| and ooizcd'omc land use designations. A summary ofthe land base bv generalized plan designation im provided in Exhibit 3,6. The findings indicate that there are 13,003 {ur |o{m in the land base with 2,900 gross uorcm. Exhlflblt 16: C�iromm Acreage lin 1�emldeintla[ Laind Base, Wood bu rin IJC��B Low-Density Residential 5,506 42% 1,988 69% 1 169 Medium-Density Residential 671 5% 459 6%. High-Density Residential - 0% - 0% Commercial/Mixed Use 6,826 52% 454 16% Source: City ofWoodburn GIS data, FCS GROUP analysis. 0eveUopmneint Stattom Before the deduction of environmental oonm1zuin{u, the rcaidcndu| land humc has been o|ummiOcd by development status to uydnuu1u land that is ^^oonunud1ud" and not likely to be developed for additional residential uses. These definitions include residential land that im developed, tax lots that exempt rcmidcndu| development, public-ownership, and public right-of-vvuy4, as described previously (results are summarized inExhibit 3'7). Exhibit 17: 1�emUdeintla[ [and base befoire eirivUroinmneinta[ corimtiraintm are applied, Woodburn 'Developed non-residential and other constrained acres Developed or Total Non�Res Land Public/ Und6rsjzed'(Iess Committed Low-Density Residential 431 161 P113 1,340 55 0.90 1,396 Medium-Density Residential 121 46 167 284 8 0.17 292 Commercial/Mixed Use 105 12 117 335 2 0.00 337 Source:City ofWoodburn GIs data,FCS GROUP analysis. 4 Includes right-of-way that is defined as a tax lot in the GIS database,which exempts residential development. This includes most major existing right-of-way which is excluded from the buildable land base. ^o � �� 1 ��LJ �1 33 -,0 ~ ��- ^� ��-xA��- � City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 34 Buiidollfle ILoind ofteir C;oinslhirroiints oind IPuItflic Facilities The BLI methodology calculates the residential land base after accounting for the environmental constraints (described in the prior section), and future public facilities (e.g., streets and roads, parks and school facilities) per safe harbor assumptions allowed under OAR 660-024-0040 (10).s The findings indicate that out of a total of 2,900 gross acres, 2,025 acres are committed, and 90 acres are environmentally constrained (see Exhibit 3.8). Approximately 75% of the buildable land inventory is classified as vacant and 25% is classified as partially vacant land. After allowing for future public facilities and future right-of-way, there are 607 net buildable acres within the vacant and part vacant land inventory. This includes 420 acres with low-density plan designations, 115 acres with medium-density designations, no explicit high-density designations and 72 acres in commercial and mixed-use designations (see Exhibit 3.8). Exhillhw)ilh 18: ""daunt oind IPoirr°I-•"daunt II 1'lesideintlall laird Ilbase atteirr oii c oinslhirroiints, oodIlh)uirin UGtl° 2017 Sol Low-Density Residential 1,988 1,396 31 560 140 420 Medium-Density Residential 459 292 13 153 38 115 High-Density Residential - - - - - - Commercial/Mixed Use 454 337 45 72 - 72 Source:City of Woodburn GIS data,FCS GROUP analysis. *assumes 25%of builable low and medium densitiy land area is utilized for future public facilities. Commercial! and Mixed Use Loind Assuumll tions It should be noted that all vacant and part-vacant commercial and mixed-use land (72 acres in total) is included in the table above. This land was included because housing development is a permitted use (i.e. it is allowed) on land with commercial and mixed-use zoning. However, since most commercial and mixed-use zoned land area will be developed for non-residential use (e.g., retail, services, office, etc.), it is assumed by the City of Woodburn that 35% of the commercial and mixed- use land area will be developed as housing over the next 20 years. That assumption will be reflected in the "Residential BLI Results" section of this report below. s The Woodburn buildable land inventory assumes that 25%of the net buildable land area contained in the low- density and medium-density residential land base is allotted to future land needs for roads, parks and school facilities. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 35 I'1edevelopirii int Areas In accordance with OAR 660-024-0050, FCS GROUP also considered "redevelopable" lands, defined as follows by OAR 660-008-0005(7): "Redevelopable Land" means land zoned for residential use on which development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be converted to more intensive residential uses during the planning period." Given the unpredictable nature of real estate development, especially as it relates to residential redevelopment projects resulting in demolition and replacement of existing structures and development of net new housing units, the following broad-based methodology was used to estimate redevelopment potential in Woodburn: in To comply with the redevelopment definition above, the Woodburn buildable land inventory includes an analysis of developed residential/commercial & mixed-use properties that have existing structures and are located within the Woodburn UGB. • In order to sharpen the focus on land most likely to "be converted to more intensive residential use during the planning period", the redevelopment land inventory includes: tax lots with over 10,890 square feet (1/4 acre) of buildable land area; and tax lots with "land values"that are greater than "improvement values" based on current county assessor records. As a proxy for "present or expected market forces" which will drive redevelopment, these remaining properties were considered the universe of"redevelopable" lands. • Like the analysis of vacant and part-vacant lands described in preceding sections, "redevelopable" lands were by low, medium, high density residential and commercial/mixed- use categories based on their underlying comprehensive plan and zoning classifications, and environmental constraints were removed to determine net buildable land area. • Finally, this analysis assumes a rate of redevelopment which results in net new housing of the properties identified above. Woodburn planning staff recommended a rate of 3%based on redevelopment activity observed in the past. This factor was applied to the total universe of redevelopment land area to determine the net redevelopable land to be included in the Woodburn residential buildable land inventory (Exhibit 3.9). ExIh'flblt 19: II 1'1edevelopatfle ILaind Illinveintoirry, Wood Ilburrin lwl 'B, 2019 m mm m m m m Low Density 53 182.3 23.0 159.3 4.8 Medium Density 22 28.9 0.1 28.8 0.9 High Density 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Commercial and Mixed Use 79 95.3 0.0 95.3 2.9 m �a Source:City of Woodburn GIS data,FCS GROUP analysis. *Assumes a 3%redevelopment rate per City Staff. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 36 U rn rn ary (:)fIR 'S li(J 'li"I��.li dI BU iII d a b IIe Land II lr e lr)N DIry The combination of vacant, partially vacant and redevelopable land area for the residential and commercial/mixed use classifications results in the total Woodburn residential buildable land inventory. The sum of all categories provides 567.1 acres of buildable residential land within the Woodburn UGB. As shown in Exhibit 3.10 this is primarily made up of 425.1 acres of low-density land (420 acres of vacant land and 4.8 acres of redevelopable land); and 115.9 acres of medium- density land (115 acres of vacant and 0.9 acres of redevelopable land). The commercial and mixed- use land area expected for housing includes 26.1 acres (71.6 net acres of vacant land plus 2.9 acres of redevelopment land) multiplied by the 35% housing conversion factor.6 ExIllnGltAt 3,10: SuinnnKnoirry of II1'lesldeintlall IBuIldatfle ILoind Illinveintoirry, n ndlk)uirrin UGB,B, 2019 Total Residential Buildable Land Inventory,Woodburn UGB � PoN. - Low Po ONIMENNO, W � B Po Density 420.3 4.8 100% 425.1 Medium Density 115.1 0.9 100% 115.9 High Density - 0.0 100% - Commercial and Mixed Use 71.6 2.9 35% 26.1 Source: City of Woodburn Buildable Land Inventory analysis,June 2019. Exhibits 3.11 and 3.12 illustrate the buildable vacant and partially vacant buildable land areas for the residential and commercial/mixed-use land base within the Woodburn UGB. a Estimate of residential land use within commercial and mixed-use zones provided by City of Woodburn planning staff based on prior and pending land use plan applications as of June 14,2019. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 37 t, IIh'flb[t 111 Ili esGdeintI ll IBufldk)Ve ILaind IIIIIrnveintolrry, WoodIk)uirrin U 'B, 2019 � I � � r z M� r D r f l � rII i t �11...�� f ______ J it LTT l� ,,, �• E 1 i l m, r u � City of Woodburn Buildable Lands Inventory City Limits Riparian Condor Vacant Land Classification U G B Signiticant Wetlands: Partially Vacant Net Buildable- r^es Residential B.aseZdnes Roodplains °off LJ CP F ..�� F y ��° .�' 37 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 38 t, IIh 'flb[t 3.12: C oinninneircG V aindMixed-Use IBuIldIkAe ILaind Ilinveintoirry, Woodkwirin UC'B, 2019 mm "IIIIII ?r „. m ............. -1- . u 7 .�. I,�' � (jj ( ILII ------------- ++f / III ..w IIT - _ . P" W r V - � .f m r C—__t �ry ._.. �� UI a Ci of Woodburn Buildable Lands Inventory City Limits Riparian Corridor Vacant Land Classification LIGB Significant VV'etlands:,,,,.Partially Vacanl Net Buildable- Roodplains CoinIMIxedUse.Base Zones ° 'c`.6 c`� r, °I� LJ CP FCS �F y ��° .�' 38 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 39 Section RECONCILIATION This section provides an estimate of residential development capacity (measured in new dwelling units) and an estimate of Woodburn's ability to accommodate needed new housing units for the 2019 to 2039 period, based on the findings of the housing needs analysis. A comparison of 20-year residential land needs (demand) is made relative to the residential buildable land inventory. This provides a means of reconciling housing land demand with buildable land supply within the UGB. Determining residential land needs requires converting the number of housing units into net acres of land area. This requires an understanding of local development code allowed housing types and density levels, which are grouped into low, medium and high-density levels. As shown previously in Exhibit 2.28, the range of allowable densities and average expected housing density is expressed in dwelling units per acre. Development density (measured in terms of dwelling units per net buildable acre of land area) along with projected housing demand is used to calculate residential land needs. As indicated in Appendix A, the Woodburn development code allows a range in development densities depending upon residential and commercial and mixed-use land use zones. City of Woodburn planning staff has estimated average densities for each zone type based on current development permitting activity and their professional judgement. Iwr - , - : dI()� ° � i° II i ° i _ ° f � � The HNA planning process included three housing forecast methods. in Method 1, reflects a "safe harbor"housing forecast and related land needs scenario. in Method 2, reflects the baseline housing forecast with local density assumptions. in Method 3 (Hybrid), includes the recommended housing forecast and related land needs based on local density assumptions. "Safe harbor" means an optional course of action that a local government may use to satisfy a requirement of Goal 14 (urbanization); and if the city needs to expand their urban growth boundary, a safe harbor analysis lends protections from appeals on certain elements. A safe harbor is not the only way or necessarily the preferred way to comply with the requirements of a housing needs analysis. It was employed for the city of Woodburn as an alternative way of looking at residential land need scenarios for the 20 year forecast. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 40 Safe Iftoirrllboirr Method The steps taken to determine land needs using the safe harbor provisions include the following guidelines contained in OAR 660-024-0040(1)-(8). Cooirrdlinated IPoIp: labour Growth IFoirrecast The land needs determination for a potential UGB expansion must be based upon the coordinated population growth forecast for the urban area as determined under rules in OAR-660-032. For this analysis, the 20-year planning period is 2019-2039. According to Portland State University population growth forecast, the population within the Woodburn UGB is projected to increase from 26,965 to 35,810, resulting in 8,845 net new residents by year 2039. Average IHousehold Size Relevant findings regarding specific requirements include: (a)A local government may estimate persons per household for the 20 year planning period using the persons per household for the urban area indicated in the most current data for the urban area published by the U.S. Census Bureau. The most current estimate of persons per household in the City of Woodburn is 3.15 per U.S. Census, American Community Survey: 2013-2017 estimates. Local IDevelolpinn ent Code Provisions Relevant findings regarding specific requirements include: (b) If a local government does not regulate government-assisted housing differently than other housing types, it is not required to estimate the need for government-assisted housing as a separate housing type. Woodburn does not regulate government assisted housing differently than other housing types. (c) If a local government allows manufactured homes on individual lots as a permitted use in all residential zones that allow 10 or fewer dwelling units per net buildable acre, it is not necessary to provide an estimate of the need for manufactured dwellings on individual lots. Woodburn allows manufactured homes on individual lots as a permitted use in all residential zones that permit fewer than 10 dwelling units per net buildable acre, subject to development standards. (d) If a local government allows manufactured dwelling parks required by ORS 197.475 to 197.490 in all areas planned and zoned for a residential density of six to 12 units per acre, a separate estimate of the need for manufactured dwelling parks is not required. Woodburn allows manufactured dwelling parks in all zones which permit 4 to 7 dwelling units per acre. Housling "q'acai c III'late Assuimptloins (e)A local government outside of the Metro boundary may estimate its housing vacancy rate for the 20year planning period using the vacancy rate in the most current data published by the U.S. Census Bureau for that urban area that includes the local government. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 41 The most current estimate of overall housing vacancy in the City of Woodburn is 4.4% per U.S. Census, American Community Survey, 2013-2017 estimates. MiIho 1: Sai Iliailllboir liou;slng Mix and Dimsiit l�,I o This method is described in OAR 660-024-0040(8)(f) and "Table F from the rule. According to the rule, Woodburn is grouped into the category of cities with a population over 25,000. As indicated in Exhibit 4.1, this method assumes 2,932 net new dwelling units, with a required mix as follows: 50% low-density, 25% medium-density, and 25% high-density. This method requires an overall (citywide) minimum density within residential base zones of: 6 dwellings per net acre; 8 dwellings/acre for UGB analysis; and the city must allow at least 10 units per acre overall (citywide) on its buildable residential land base. Land needs are determined by dividing the housing need forecast(2,932 dwellings) by 8 dwellings per acre, which results in a potential UGB residential land need of 366 net buildable acres. The Woodburn UGB Buildable Land Inventory analysis determined that the UGB currently has 543 net buildable acres for future residential. Hence, the overall UGB would be sufficient to meet future demand. Exhibit 4.„1 Method 1 Safe Harbor Combined Housing Mix and Density Method,Determination of Residential Land Need,Woodburn UGB Itl 0 tl I” tl tl l"" 1 Current Population Est.(2019) 26,965 population Table A 2 Is Pop.Over 25,000? Yes 3 20-Yr Population Change 8,845 Table A 4 Population in Group Quarters 0.7% 60 population Table B Group quarters units 3.0 20 dwelling units allowance 5 Population in Households 8,786 population calculation 6 Average Household Size 3.15 Table B 7 Number of Households 2,789 households calculation 8 Vacancy Factor 4.4% 123 dwellings Table C 9 Dwelling Units Added 2,932 dwellings 10 Dwelling Mix Safe Harbor Percent Dwellings Low Density Residential 1 50% 1,466 dwellings see OAR 660-024-0040(f) Medium Density Residential 2 25% 733 dwellings see OAR 660-024-0040(f) High Density Residential 25% 733 dwellings see OAR 660-024-0040(f) Total 100% 2,932 dwellings calculation 11 Dwelling Unit Density Requirements DU/Net Acre 3 UGB Land Need Net Acres Required overall minimum 6 see OAR 660-024-0040(f) Assume for UGB analysis 8 366 net acres see OAR 660-024-0040(f) Zone to Allow 10 see OAR 660-024-0040(f) 1 Includes single family detached dwellings, manufactured homes and mobile homes. 2 Includes townhomes, plexes and group quarters units. a Analysis consistent with OAR 60-024-0040(f).This applies to all residential zones within the City and UGB. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 42 Method 2: IBaseV'ine IFlousling I eed Forecast Method This method includes emerging market trends and forecasts derived from Section 2 and assumes that the average household size declines slightly over the next 20 years. This is done in order to reflect national trends of shrinking household sizes (in large part due to the increasing share of empty nesters and retirees), as well as a recognition that the 3.15 average household size figure derived from the 2017 American Community Survey is the highest observed of any year from 2009 to 2017. The average household size figure in method two moves from 3.15 (current) to 3.07 (future) people per dwelling unit. This results in a housing forecast of 3,012 dwelling units. But unlike the preceding method, this approach takes into account the expected average development density levels based on local market activity and City of Woodburn planning staff assumptions. The housing mix is as follows: 60.6% low density, 7.0% manufactured housing, 10.6% townhomes/plexes, 10.9% garden apartments, and 10.9% higher-density apartments. Land needs are determined by dividing the housing needs by the average density assumptions as follows: in Low density: 1,824 dwellings - 6 units/acre = 304 acres • Mfg. housing (or small lot cottages): 210 dwellings - 8 units/acre = 26 acres • Medium density townhomes/plexes: 320 dwellings - 12 units/acre = 27 acres • Medium density garden court apts.: 329 dwellings - 16 units/acre = 21 acres • Higher density apts.: 329 dwellings - 31 units/acre = 11 acres Total land requirements equates to 388 net buildable acres (see Exhibit 4.2). Exhibit 4.2 Baseline Housing Need Forecast,Woodburn UGB Net New Dwellings 1 Future Housing Need Expected Housing Mix Low Density Residential 1 Single family detached 1,824 60.6% Woodburn HNA Task 2 findings Manufactured Housing 210 7.0% Woodburn HNA Task 2 findings Medium Density Residential z Townhomes,Plexes,ADUs 320 10.6% Woodburn HNA Task 2 findings Apartments(garden apts.) 329 10.9% Woodburn HNA Task 2 findings Higher Density 329 10.9% Woodburn HNA Task 2 findings Total 3,012 100.0% UGB Land Need 2 Expected Housing Density DUs per acre s (Net Acres) Low Density Residential 1 Single family detached 6.0 304 calculation Manufactured Housing 8.0 26 calculation Medium Density Residential z Townhomes,Plexes,ADUs 12.0 27 calculation Apartments(garden apts.) 16.0 21 calculation Higher Density 31.0 11 calculation Total/Average 7.8 388 calculation Includes single family detached dwellings,manufactured homes and mobile homes. z Includes townhomes,plexes and group quarters units. 3 Density estimates derived from City of Woodburn planning staff,June 2019. T� �" City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 43 Method 3 (IFtyItxrrld): Ilflecoinninneunded IHousling I eed Forecast Method The HNA Advisory Committee and Planning Commission reviewed and discussed the baseline housing forecast and considered current multifamily market gaps described in Section 2. As such, Method 3 was generated to address housing attainability needs and emerging multifamily development opportunities. Method 3 assumes that the total housing demand required to address population growth is consistent with the overall baseline housing forecast (Method 2) of 3,012 dwelling units. However, the expected medium and high-density housing mix is expected to be like Method 1. Medium and high-density housing has been allocated among three housing types: townhomes/plexes; garden apartments, and higher-density apartments. This results in a net new housing mix as follows: 51.9% low density, 10.6% townhomes/plexes, 10.9% garden apartments, and 26.6% higher density apartments. Land needs are determined by dividing the housing need forecast by the average density assumptions as follows: • Low density (includes single family detached and mfg. housing): 1,563 dwellings - 6 units/acre = 261 acres • Medium density townhomes/plexes: 320 dwellings - 12 units/acre = 27 acres • Medium density garden apts.: 329 dwellings - 16 units/acre = 21 acres • Higher density apts.: 800 dwellings - 31 units/acre = 26 acres Total land requirements equates to 334 net buildable acres (see Exhibit 4.3). Exhibit 4.3 Recommended Housing Mix and Residential Land Needs,Woodburn UGB Po Po I." Net New Dwellings 1 Future Housing Need Expected Housing Mix Low Density Residential 1 1,563 51.9% Balance of baseline total dwelling demand forecast Medium Density Residential 2 Townhomes,Plexes,ADUs 320 10.6% Method 2 Apartments(garden apts.) 329 10.9% Method 2 Higher Density 800 26.6% estimate based on pipline projects Total 3,012 100% UGB Land Need 2 Expected Housing Density DUs per acre 3 (Net Acres) Low Density Residential 1 6.0 261 calculation Medium Density Residential 2 Townhomes,Plexes,ADUs 12.0 27 calculation Apartments(garden apts.) 16.0 21 calculation Higher Density 31.0 26 calculation Total/Average 9.0 334 calculation 1 Includes single family detached dwellings,manufactured homes and mobile homes. 2 Includes townhomes,plexes and group quarters units. a Density estimates derived from City of Woodburn planning staff,June 2019. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 44 c.)f Land SU�P�PUV and Dernand A 000/pudmon of the 20-year rcmkicndu| land needs (demand) is o/udc rc|udvc to the rcmidcndu| buildable land inventory. This provides uoocunm ofreconciling residential land demand with the existing buildable land within the Woodburn iT(]B. The reconciliation ofiT(]B rcmidcndu| land need and land supply is summarized below. The results indicate that with the recommended housingforecast (Method 3), the WoodburnNGB would plan for 3,012 net new dwellings over the next 20 years. Based onthe three ooc{hodm cvuhuu{cd, this xxxu|d require between 333.5 acres (Method 3) and 366.5 uorcm (Method |) ofnet land area. As the Buildable Land Inventory shows the residential land supply {obc 567.1 uorcm, the overall iT[]E| is sufficient to address the 20'ycuzhousing need forcoum{ (mcc Exhibit 4.4). Ekh'flblt 4.4 Racnnci|atinnnfResidential Land Need,VVnndburnUGB lRacmnnnnamdad "Dwellings/Units MENNEN=@ Low Density 1 1,466 2,034 1,563 Medium Density 2 733 649 649 Higher Density 733 329 800 Total 2,932 3,012 3,012 Land Need (net acres) Low Density 1 330.2 260.5 Medium Density 2 47.2 47.2 Higher Density 10.6 25.8 Total 366.5 388.1 333.5 Buildable Land Inventory(net acres) Low Density Residential 1 425.1 425.1 425.1 Medium Density Residential 2 115.9 115.9 115.9 Higher Density Residential(Commercial&Mixed Use zones) 3 26.1 26.1 26.1 Total 567.1 567.1 567.1 UGB Land Surplus/Deficit(net acres) Low Density 1 94.8 164.6 Medium Density 2 68.7 68.7 Higher Density Residential(Commercial&Mixed Use zones) 3 15.5 0.3 Total 200.6 179.0 233.5 adequate adequate zIncludes single family detached dwellings, manufactured homes and mobile homes. 2 Includes townhomes, plexes,garden-court apartments,and group quarters units. 3 Includes higher density apartments.The phrase "high density" derives from OAR 660-038-0060 and applies to existing zoning districts allowing what Woodburn terms "medium" density of 16 or more unitsperaore: RlVlN, DDC,CO3CG, NNC,& lVlUV. ^o � �� 1 ��LJ �) 44 -,0 ~ ��- ^� ��-xA��- � City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 45 ooclIIbL.,rire SLAfl:iiCir-: ir)cy ir)c IIysi The reconciliation analysis also indicates that the UGB has a surplus supply of low-density (94.8- 164.6 acres) and medium-density zoned buildable land (68.7 acres) to meet projected residential land needs for single family detached, manufactured housing, townhomes, duplex and garden apartment housing needs. The findings indicate that the 20-year land need for higher-density apartments exceeds the buildable land inventory for the RMN zone by 38 acres. This deficit could be accommodated within the remaining surplus supply of medium density zones (including the RM zone which currently limits development density to 16 units per acre) and/or some of the vacant commercial buildable lands (which include a total of 72 net buildable acres (according to the Woodburn HNA Buildable Land Inventory, May 2019). In review of the 2001 Economic Opportunities Analvsis for the city of Woodburn the demand for commercial land over the 1999-2020 time exceeded the vacant commercial buildable land supply (146 acres).To respond to the need, on December 14, 2015, the city and Marion County jointly approved a remanded and amended version of the Woodburn UGB, which included an additional 23 acres of commercial land. In conclusion, to fully address high-density land needs, the city will need to identify policy measures to ensure that the forecasted demand for 800 higher density apartments/condos can be accommodated within the UGB. The city can meet this demand on a portion of remaining vacant or redevelopable low or medium density zoned land and vacant commercial zoned land. In order to reduce the conversion of vacant commercial zoned land to higher density apartments, the city may also consider rezoning up to 10 acres of vacant RM land to allow higher densities (e.g., increase allowable density from 16 to 24 units per acre) when certain objective standards are met(e.g., site size/configuration/access, proximity to public transit, etc.) to address the higher density multifamily housing needs. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 46 Section RECOMMENDATIONS KEY RND�NGS F C THEIHOUSJ G NEEDS ANALYS6 • Based on the population growth forecasts for the Woodburn UGB (20-year population growth of 8,845 people) and housing and demographic characteristics, the baseline housing needs forecast plans for 3,012 net new dwelling units. A variety of housing is needed over the next 20 years, including 1,322 owner-occupied dwellings and 1,690 renter-occupied dwellings. • Woodburn's existing policies generally comply with Goal 10. The local development code allows a wide mix of housing types and density ranges (see Appendix A). • There is sufficient capacity within the current UGB to accommodate planned residential development and related land needs over the next 20 years. The current UGB contains 567 acres of buildable residential land inventory, and residential land needs are forecasted to require 333.5 acres based on the recommended housing mix. • Woodburn has a need for additional affordable housing. Woodburn has a current unmet need for affordable rental housing and the citywide rental vacancy rate of 3% is very low compared with other communities in Oregon. Also, 26% of renter households in Woodburn are severely rent burdened. The City will need to optimize the available land within the UGB by considering the following: 1. Continue to encourage medium and high-density development within RM, RMN, DDC, NNC, MUV and appropriate sites within the CO and CG zones. 2. Consider amendments to development code standards regarding setbacks, parking requirements, etc. to ensure full utilization of vacant land for future development. 3. Consider and adopt development code amendments that encourage infill within residential zones and redevelopment within commercial and mixed-use zones. 4. In order to reduce the conversion of vacant commercial zoned land to higher density apartments, the city may also consider rezoning up to 10 acres of vacant or redevelopable low or medium density residential land to allow higher densities (e.g., increase allowable density from 16 to 24 units per acre) when certain objective standards are met (e.g., site size/configuration/access, proximity to public transit, etc.) to address the higher density multifamily housing needs. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 47 To help encourage or incentivize construction of affordable housing priced at 80% or below of the median family income levels, the City should consider the following: 5. Identify public-owned properties that could be used for affordable housing. 6. Partner with local housing authorities or non-profit housing developers to provide offsite infrastructure (sewer, water, road improvements) or parking that supports affordable housing development. 7. Prepare a sliding scale system of System Development Charges (SDCs) which would provide charges that vary by home size and type. 8. Provide policies that allow SDC deferrals for affordable housing developments until a certificate of occupancy is granted. 9. Develop a tax abatement program, such as the multiple-unit limited tax exemption program, to promote development of affordable housing. 10. Consider establishing a local affordable housing construction excise tax to be used to incentivize development of income restricted housing. Further policies have been recommended, however, due to the limited timeframe of this project, these policies have not been reviewed and approved by the Woodburn Planning Commission. Policies outlined in Appendix B will be discussed with the Planning Commission, refined based on Planning Commission input and summarized in a housing strategies report to follow. e SF LJ 11 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 48 AP�PENDix A: ExISTING DEV . CODE Woodburn HNA Residential Density Assumptions RS Low density Residential Single Family Minimum:5.2 unit acre-7.26 6.0 (Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1) R1S Low density Retirement Community Single Minirniurn: none;max of 12.1 0** Family Res. units/acre (WIDO Table 2.02D) RSN Low density Nodal Single Family Residential 7.9 units/acre to 10.89 units/acre 9.9 (Policy Table 1) RM iMedium density Medium Density Residential 10 units/acre to 16,units/acre 15 (Policy'll"alble 1) RIVIN High density Nodal Multi-family Residential 10 units/acre to 22 units/acre 18 (Policy Table 1) DDC High density Downtown Development& Row house: minimum,12,max of 26 Conservation 16 units/acre; Multi-family: no minimum,no max (WDO Table 2.038) co 1-figh density Commercial Office 31 Stand-alone multi-family: 12 minimum,no max; in mixed-use development: no minimum,max 32 units/acre (WDO Table 2.03D) CG Wgh density Commercial General 31 Row house: minirnum,12,rnax of 24 units/acre; Stand-alone miulti-family: 12 minimum,max 32 units/acre; In mixed-use development: no minimum,max 32 units/acre (WIDO rable 2.03C) INNC Hiigh density Nodal Neighborhood 18 Commercial Row house: minimum 20,no max; Multi-family: minimum 19,no max (WDO Table 2.03F) MuV High density Mixed Use Village Row house: minimum,12,max 32 2019 units/acre; Stand-alone multi-family: 12 minimum,Truax 3,2 units/acre; lnnflixed-usedevelopment: no minimurn,max 32 units/acre (WIDO Table 2:.03E) Expected average housing density per net buildable acre on,land used for residential development,based on Woodburn city planning staff estimates. "The RIS axone is limited to a cluster of retirement single-family subdivisions(Woodburn Golf&Estates)that are fully devOopled and were developed mostly in the 1960s. The City does not intend to designate this zoning district to additional property or developments because the,purpose of the zone is to accommodate existing devellopment that pre-clates the minirnium lot sizes and setbacks and irnaximum lot coverages of the Woodburn Zoninig Winance, (WZO;1973)and the WDO(2002 through pwsenr), Therefore,the existing built density of the R15 zone,whateve�r it is,will remain as is, "%4� 48 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 49 AP�PENDIX B :1 FT POLICIES AND ACTIONS The City of Woodburn has several existing housing-related policies in the Comprehensive Plan that will be revisited as part of the HNA update. This section identifies and recommends measures to help address Woodburn's housing needs, and are divided into three categories: (1) First priority measures that amend the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) which serves as the main regulatory tool of the City; (2) Long-term actions outside the WDO; and (3) Amendment and addition of Comprehensive Plan policies. Oveirafll IHousling Objectives A. Streamline the WDO to increase amount and rate of housing production, thereby improving housing availability and affordability. B. Induce more development infill (minor partitions)through many "small projects" of varied housing types (houses, accessory dwellings units, duplexes, and "cottage clusters") to allow for gentle, incremental change to neighborhoods and to accommodate changes in household sizes across people's lives (e.g., as households desire to "age in place"). Supporting infill development makes use of existing infrastructure capacity and reduces or defers the need to make costly capital investments on new and extended infrastructure, thereby limiting the level of housing costs that get passed on to buyers and renters. C. Reduce household housing combined costs by reducing transportation costs as well as housing costs. D. Consider and adopt a number of long-range measures above and beyond the WDO in a manner that preserves the character of the city and helps achieve a high quality of life. First IPirloirrlty: Ii')O Ainneindinneints The City should adopt the following strategies listed in order of effectiveness: Part One 1. Reduce off-street parking ratios, especially for multi-family dwellings. For multi-family within 500 feet of a bus stop measured along street and off-street measured along street and off-street bicycle/walking path centerlines, allow roughly 10% less to mimic the 10% transit reduction for shared parking in WDO 3.05.05A3. For single-family within 500 feet, allow houses to have 1 stall. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 50 A. Multi-family Preferred: Reduce from 2.0 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling to 1 per studio, 1.25 per one-bedroom, 1.5 per two-bedroom, and 1.75 for three or more bedrooms. Require a small number of visitor stalls for projects of many dwellings. B. Multi-family Alternative: Reduce from 2.0 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Transportation Planning Handbook recommended ratios of 1.25 per studio, 1.5 per one-bedroom, and 2.0 for two or more bedrooms. 2. Unbundle parking from rent. To provide for social equity and to prevent parking displacement, require that instead of recouping the costs of parking from multi-family rent, landowners if recouping must charge a separate and uniform parking rent and only to tenants who choose to park vehicles on site. A uniform rent means not charging tiered rents for garage stalls, carport stalls, reserved stalls, and open air stalls because tiers would incentivize garage and carport stalls to go empty while tenants would compete for remaining open air spaces and/or park on nearby streets. (Note: This could be in the WDO and/or a general City ordinance about multi- family housing.) 3. Reduce the side and rear setbacks for the RM and RMN zones (which are currently as much as 36 feet). 4. Allow carports as an alternative to the garages required for multi-family complexes and either eliminate the minimum coverage of parking or lower from 50%. 5. Require developers to improve bus stops through WDO 3.01. (Notes: The target adoption date for this measure is either October 2019 or the same as adoption of the Transportation System Plan Update whatever is earliest. The measure would boost Long-Range Measure 2 below about a transit SDC.) 6. Require more bicycle parking for multi-family developments, at least one per dwelling, and eliminate the bicycle parking maximum. 7. Decrease single-family minimum interior lot size from 6,000 to 5,000 sq. feet and the corner lot size from 8,000 to 5,500 sq. feet and allow the longer of two street frontages to be set back fewer than the 20 feet required for a front yard (12 feet). 8. Facilitate duplexes: Allow duplexes on interior lots, not just corner lots, and eliminate or reduce larger lot size requirements with duplexes (currently 10,000 sq. feet in RS/RSN, 8,000 in RM/RMN). 9. Increase or remove maximum lot coverages for single-family lots. 10. Narrow minimum driveway, drive aisle, and alley widths to be consistent with minimums in Appendix D of Oregon Fire Code. 11. Remove the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) owner occupancy requirement; and for houses in the DDC zone remove the conflict between the current DDC requirements of no off-street parking with the one-stall requirement for an ADU by not requiring ADU parking in the DDC. 12. Remove architectural provisions for multi-family buildings that require building walls and rooflines to jog arbitrarily, which adds to construction costs and fails to achieve positive design features. 13. Allow subcompact parking stalls (up to 5%), allow a higher percentage of compact parking stalls (60%), and require a minimum amount/percentage to be compact. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 51 14. Require new houses that are one story to have both minimum roof pitch of 12:12 and attic trusses to allow for later interior remodels into habitable finished attics. 15. Tailor single-family lot development standards so as to not burden owners of historical platted lots in central Woodburn that pre-date zoning and are typically narrower and/or smaller (5,000 sq. feet). Allow reduced setbacks and increased lot coverages in central Woodburn for houses, accessory dwelling units, and duplexes. 16. Help tenants weather heat waves in new multi-family dwellings unlikely to have cooling as well as heating by requiring minimum finished ceiling heights of 9 feet to allow heat to pool above head height, requiring rooms along the outside walls of dwellings to have operable windows to vent heat, and requiring all operable windows to have screens to keep insects out. (Tenants would less likely need to buy individual portable or window AC units.) 17. Lower the off-street parking maximum, currently whatever is twice the minimum (200%), to allow 5% excess parking and allow request for more excess through Zoning Adjustment and Variance. 18. Allow deferral of up to 50% of required off-street parking through an open space reserve. If remaining parking proves needed as conditioned, developer would construct it on reserve area. (Palo Alto Municipal Code 18.52.050(b) "Deferral of Meeting Full Requirement by Landscape Reserve") 19. Revise the WDO shared parking allowance to allow actual reduction of minimum ratios. 20. Remove from multi-family zoning and development the requirement for a buffer Architectural Wall where adjacent to a different zoning district or development of a different land use(s). Part Two 21. Create and incentivize provisions for single-family developments to take the form of"cottage courts" or "pocket neighborhoods", with small houses ideal for starter and retired households, an outdoor commons, a communal building (such as a clubhouse or commercial kitchen) and pooled and shared off-street parking. toing..']['eirrin~a Measuires Part Three The City should resolve to adopt the following measures: A. Implement a City construction excise tax (CET) to fund affordable housing through City capital improvement projects (any of land acquisition, building rehabilitation, and new construction) and to provide seed money for independent 'cru �_u �utu_d y_➢dtta _duts�-ts, (CLTs). Oregon law allows up to 1.0% of building permit valuation for projects of$100,000 or more (2Qj_(1 �jd_lu"a Bill ll 5 33 t torollet�l). Target adoption date: October 2019. 1(a): If and when recession occurs, spend accumulated CET funds on purchasing lower value, financially distressed properties from developers and landowners receptive to said purchase. Have a priority list of properties to acquire especially during recession. 1(b): Spend accumulated CET funds to build " uts stnu � jtiai➢d°_��tcruu sun "product" for which there are few or no Woodburn new construction real estate "comparables", including small apartment courts (with 6 to 12 apartment units), triplexes, quadplexes, cottage courts, small °off .. � jF J ��° .�'LJ 1 51 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 52 houses (1,000-1,800 sq. ft), live/work units (domicile above or adjacent to commercial space), and mixed use developments (e.g., apartments above shops). This would help meet market demand and provide "comps"to developers and real estate lenders that it's reasonable to build such products in Woodburn. 1(c): See Measure I below about piloting ADUs. B. Adopt a transit system development charge (SDC) to expand and improve the city bus system, including to install shelters at stops and expand fleet. (Note: Over time, better local transit would attract more residents from needing to own cars thereby allowing them to redirect family budgeting from cars to housing.) Target adoption date: February 2020. Apply the SDC towards Measure K1 below about public parking or revise the existing Traffic SDC to apply to Measure K1. C. Adopt "inclusionary zoning" standards for multifamily developments of a certain size (e.g., over 80 units) to provide a percentage of units (i.e., up to 20%per ORS �9'7.309(5)) to be affordable to households that earn less than 80% of the median family income level. (This measure would necessitate ongoing documentation, inspection, and enforcement. The City could use the historic city hall at 550 N. 1st Street as a demonstration project because the City won a $200,000 Oregon Main Street Revitalization grant to spend in collaboration with the property owner for the city's desire to see the building rehabbed. Though the rehab likely would not have more than 80 units, the City and property owner could reach a deal that a percentage of whatever number of units would be affordable.) Target adoption date: November 2020. D. Institute a small developer training program. Because many Woodburn small developers are homebuilders and contractors that lack ability of large firms to do well land use entitlement (architecture, engineering, surveying, and site planning), not just building dwellings, they are often stymied by conventional WDO and Public Works requirements. At the same time, small developments are an ideal way to meet Goal B. Through written packets and quarterly trainings, small developers can more often bring projects to fruition. The Portland chapter of the not-for-profit]lnc rcrn nudaaN j, d d ➢cr��,,u �d° ud,_, ➢➢uaa ,° , can assist the City. Target adoption date: October 2019. E. Require percentage ofADUs (as shadow dwellings) within new single-family subdivisions and partitions. Note: This works best if paired with Measure F below. Target adoption date: October 2019. F. Institute a density bonus program for both single and multi-family development. For example, if 15-20% of dwellings in new construction are sold or rented below a certain amount related to area median income and rents are kept low for a time certain period (e.g., 7 years), then the City would allow the number of single-family lots per acre to increase or the number of multi- family dwellings per acre to increase a moderate amount, e.g. 10-20%. (This measure would necessitate ongoing documentation, inspection, and possibly enforcement.) Note: Based on ORS 197.309(3), this is a means of implementation of Measure 1 above. Target adoption date: June 2020. G. Institute a Zero Energy Ready Home Bonus Program for single family homes. Encouraging development of affordable energy efficient homes with lower operating costs by recommending newly constructed residential buildings achieve at least equivalent performance levels with the City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 53 U. S. Department of Energy Zero Energy Ready Standard. Homes built to this standard would be eligible for reduced SDC fees and/or expedited planning review. Per EO 17-20 Oregon's state building code will be amended to require equivalent performance levels as the Zero Energy Ready Standard by October 1, 2023. Incentivizing early adoption will provide homeowners with high performing homes that are less expensive to maintain and homebuilders will gain valuable practice in learning how to meet the future building code. Energy Trust of Oregon also offers incentives and building science support to assist home builders in meeting these performance standards. H. Reduce system development charges (SDCs)for ADUs, apartments and cottage homes. Adopt new SDC methodology report or amendment to existing SDC methodology for transportation, water, sewer, parks, stormwater, etc. that results in a lower SDC for smaller dwellings including ADUs. For example, if SDCs for new ADUs are reduced by 50%, their construction would be more attractive to individual homeowners with small capital. Multifamily dwellings and cottage homes could also warrant a lower SDC, which would allow developers to deliver housing at a lower cost to the renter/home buyer. Target adoption date: July 2021. L Pilot construction program for 1-3 ADUs by spending funds (possibly CET funds per Measure A above through ORS 197.309(3) and general funds) on creating one to three ADUs for qualified lots as a demonstration project with willing property owners. The ADUs could be created through any of interior remodels, additions, or new construction of outbuildings. The City could consider providing loans or grants for design and/or interior furnishings and use the ADUs for publicity, hosted events, and tours for a year. Then the City would allow the homeowners to retain the ADUs and rent them out. Current ADUs construction estimates range from $40,000450,000 for an attached unit and $90,000-$110,000 for an outbuilding. J. Pilot for one year to 18 months one "tiny house" village on City property. Then, as a zoning overlay, designate up to two locations in the city where "tiny houses" are allowed with clear and objective standards, such as in the Gateway District that covers the CG zone east of downtown or on marginal commercial lands in the Highway 99E corridor, and remaining large (2+ acre) residential parcels within central Woodburn such as houses of worship. K. Reduce transportation costs for residents by: 1. Reduce parking costs for households by managing parking as a public asset. Specifically, outside the downtown and especially the commercial center of the Nodal Development Overlay, Gateway Overlay, and along Highway 99E including the Mixed Use Village zone, acquire additional sites for new public parking garages and lots. Allow nearby private developments to share by their buying into or renting stalls to fulfill some or all of the off- street parking minimums. As fleets transition to automated vehicles (AVs or driverless cars), parking demand drops, and car and ride share become in demand in Woodburn, the City can allow more development to make use of public off-street parking and manage the facilities as transit, car/ride share, and taxi regional hubs. Look first to existing public sites with excess land or surface parking, such as Centennial Park or Woodburn district schools. Focus on leveraging commercial and multi-family developments. When: Begin by July 2020. 2. Conduct a study of various transportation services and cost reduction measures for qualifying low income households. This may include consideration of the costs and City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 54 benefits of operation of a jitney bus or ride share service, capping taxi fares, or assessing punitive fees on taxi operators to reduce predation on migrant laborer passengers who are unable to afford private cars to travel between the city and farms where the Woodburn bus does not reach. Note that existing Dial-a-Ride service is limited to the disabled and the elderly and typically within 3/4 mile of the bus line. (This measure would necessitate ongoing inspection and enforcement.) When: By November 2020. 3. Institute a fee in-lieu of off-street parking for some or all parking for a development. Combine with the item a. program above. 4. Install electric vehicle fast charging stations in City parking lots (city hall, parks, downtown lots) and partner with developers to install EV charging stalls conveniently close to local residents. Require multi-family developments to have at least two EV stalls and allow them to count them towards the off-street parking stall minimum. This would hasten fleet transition to cheaper to operate vehicles. When: By June 2020 or, for city hall, completion of city hall remodel whatever is earliest. S. Require Electric Vehicle Ready Construction. Require parking structures for all newly constructed residential and commercial buildings are ready to support the installation of at least a level 2 EV charger. Making a building EV ready is simple during initial construction, but post-construction upgrades can be expensive. Per EO 17-20 Oregon's state building code will be amended to require all newly constructed residential and commercial buildings are ready to support the installation of at least a level 2 EV charger by October 1, 2022. 6. Require Solar Ready Building Construction. Require commercial buildings and new homes be designed and built to accommodate the future installation of solar panels and equipment after construction is complete. Solar ready homes are built to allow for easier installation of a solar electric system when the homeowner is ready to invest in a system. By designing for a clear solar roof space, installing conduit from the attic to the electric panel, and leaving room for future components of a solar electric system, a Solar Ready project can decrease the installation cost of a system. Per EO 17-20 Oregon's state building code will be amended to require all newly constructed buildings will be ready for the installation of solar panels and related technologies by October 1, 2022. 7. Require new and existing homes receive a Home Energy Score at their point of sale. Home Energy Score systems help homeowners and homebuyers better understand a home's energy use, and how even small improvements can make a big difference in energy savings. The Oregon Department of Energy developed a standard home energy scoring system which is being utilized by the City of Portland. Counnllpirreh einsGve (Plain IPlicy Ainneindinneints Amend text and policies: tow IL)einslty II 1'1esGdeintloV (Lainds Low density residential areas are the most sensitive land use and must be intensively protected. In general they are not compatible with commercial and industrial uses and some type of buffering technique must be used to protect them. Also, arterials and other transportation corridors can severely affect the usefulness of low density residential areas. In general, low density residential areas have been located according to existing patterns of development and in areas which are protected from high traffic flows and City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 55 commercial and industrial uses. When greenways are used as buffers between other land uses and low density residential areas it is extremely important to maintain the visual and physical separation that the greenway provides. Small lot single-family residential development is appropriate in Nodal Development areas and may be allowed in Medium Density Residential areas. Small lot senior housing is encouraged adjacent to existing senior housing areas, in cottage clusters or pocket neighborhoods, and as part of infill development as described in Policy D-1.12. P u It i'ic tJ s In addition to the four major types of land uses (medium density residential low density residential, commercial, and industrial), lands for public use are shown. These are lands, which are used or intended for use by governmental units, including lands which are currently owned by the City or School District. Future acquisition sites are not indicated, however, as this may affect the price the public would have to pay. In most cases, residential land is acquired for park and school use; for this reason, the Public Use category is considered as a"Residential Land Use". Because the location of these sites depends a great deal on price and availability, the City and School District will have to make decisions f4as the time 14e is needed .,b a, tt the best ,,,..,limo acquire approaches. Specifically, City and District representatives including councilors, board members, and staff should jointly plan long-range for additional school sites in the UGB, even if through executive sessions as allowed for real estate by Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 192.660(2)(e) and as the school board feels is warranted. The City should focus on siting additional civic buildings and parks and the District on additional schools upon applications for annexation of residential land within the UGB, multi-family development, mixed-use development that includes multi-family dwellings, and planned unit development(PUD). By the time of applications, the agencies should have already identified needed facilities and their target locations within the UGB. The above would help make sure existing and future residents need not travel far to get to and from schools, parks, and other civic uses. Section ID i esiiderflioi Bound tis D-1.10 High density residential areas should be located to minimize the possible deleterious effects on any adjacent low density residential development. When high density and lower density areas abut, densityheights should decrease in those high density areas immediately adjacent to low density residential land. Whenever possible, buffering should be practiced by such means as landscaping, and sight-obscuring fences and hedges, and ine f eased setbaeks. This policy does not apply in the Nodal Development Overlay, Gateway Overlay, or Mixed Use Village (MUV) zoning district. �� .. � jF ��° .�' ,.� C�' 55 JA City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 56 5ectloin C2 Wood Ilburrin IHire IL')Gstirl t C;Coir linatloin Goals aind (Poli les Goals C2-1. To coordinate with the independent Woodburn Fire District and facilitate application of the Oregon Fire Code (OFC) to development and redevelopment, especially Appendix D Fire Apparatus Access, that meets the OFC, makes use of fire official discretion as the OFC grants especially through Sections D103.1 and D103.3, and accommodates fire apparatus access well in infill and urban development contexts without excessive land consumption, to increase cyclist, pedestrian, and driver safety by lessen speeding of passenger cars, and accommodate other site planning objectives such as maximizing the number of multi-family units within allowed density, siting and sizing common area open space, reducing the urban heat island effect, reducing housing construction costs, and serving Policy D-1.12 regarding infill development. I'1esldeintlall (Laind tJse D-1.12 The City shall through WDO amendment induce more gentle infill residential development through many small private development projects of varied housing types, particularly through accessory dwelling units (ADUs); small houses; "cottage courts", "cottage clusters", or"pocket neighborhoods"; and duplexes with a focus on central Woodburn RS-zoned lots and small RMN- zoned lots. [Measures 15, 21, & D] D-1.13 Effective no later than June 30, 2021, the City shall allow duplexes by right in any zoning district that allows a detached single-family house by right, allow duplexes on lots interior to a block as well as corner lots, and not require a larger minimum lot size for a duplex, all to conform to Oregon House Bill 2001 (2019), Section 2.(3). The City may continue to regulate duplexes as a Special Use through WDO 2.07.07 with reasonable, clear, and objective design standards. D-1.14 The City shall pursue Policies H-1.5 and H-1.6 with an emphasis on lessening parking burden on multi-family development. D-1.15 The City shall adopt a construction excise tax (CET) to fund affordable housing pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 197.309(4) and other statutes as amended by Oregon Senate Bill 1533 (2016). The CET shall take effect by July 8, 2020. [Measure A] D-1.16 As e-commerce and automated vehicles (AVs) reduce demand for commercial lands and off- street parking respectively, in the Highway 99E corridor delineated in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and for City capital investment and land acquisition related to housing development, for the purpose of"suburban retrofit"the City shall prioritize its housing investment in the corridor as multi- family housing and, especially in the Gateway Overlay and Mixed Use Village (MUV) zoning districts, with less off-street parking than is conventional. D-1.17 For purpose of housing development, the City should identify and lobby owners of decaying and marginal Highway 99E Corridor commercial properties who are eager to liquidate but for whom little or no market exists to sell on terms that meet their financial needs. The City should purchase bargain price lands while also serving as buyer of last resort from owners motivated to obtain capital for personal needs such as to buy a home, pay medical debt, retire, or otherwise not risk poverty. City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 57 D-1.18 The City as part of its housing capital improvement projects shall have internal mix of affordable and market rate units as much as feasible without conflicting with any state regulations that might make collection and spending of affordable housing monies contingent on certain mixes. For an affordable housing project, the City shall have several levels of affordability relative to median income. D-1.19 The City shall require multi-family developments that charge for off-street parking, whether bundled with rent or separately, to charge a uniform amount without distinguishing among classes of parking stalls such as by charging the most for garage stalls, less for carport stalls and open air reserved stalls, and the least for open air stalls at the outer edges of parking areas. [Measure 2] D-1.20 The City should institute a training program for small developers (infill developers) by April 2020. [Measure D] D-1.21 Effective no later than June 30, 2021, the City shall amend WDO 2.07.20 Accessory Dwelling Units to neither require owner occupancy nor require construction of additional off-street parking on sites where an excess of off-street parking exists, all to conform to Oregon House Bill 2001 (2019), Section 7.(5)(b)(B). D-1.22 The City should either (a)rescind WDO 3.05.03F.2 that requires garages for multi-family dwellings or (b) amend the section to require carports and also either eliminate the minimum coverage of parking or lower it from 50%. [Measure 4] ectiloin Int "III"irrourisllpoirt(.i�WG puri H-1.5 The City shall prioritize through WDO standards and capital improvement projects walking, cycling, transit, and car/ride share within Woodburn as chief means to reduce the transportation cost of combined household housing and transportation costs. H-1.6 Effective by December 25, 2019, the City shall require developments to provide bicycle parking that is plentiful, amply sized, conveniently placed, easily found, and at least partially covered or sheltered. [Measure 6] H-1.7 Effective by December 25, 2019, the City shall require developers to improve existing and planned Woodburn Transit System and Salem-Keizer Cherriots bus stops similar to how it requires improvement of other public infrastructure as part of street improvements. The City shall require developers to provide bus stops with bicycle parking and as part of its capital improvement of bus stops should provide bicycle parking. [Measure 5] H-1.8 Effective by July 8, 2020, the City shall adopt a transit system development charge (SDC) to expand and improve the Woodburn Transit System (WTS), attracting riders and reducing car travel. [Measure B] H-1.9 The City shall expand and manage as a public asset across the city and UGB a system of parking garages and/or lots and shall allow developments to buy into or rent stalls as part of developments meeting off-street parking requirements, if such requirements exist. The objective is to allow and facilitate efficient use of regional and right-sized amounts of off-street parking, lessen land consumption development by development by off-street parking especially for multi-family, prevent forcing developments to provide individual supplies of excess parking, and provide for transition into transportation hubs for taxis, automated vehicles (AVs), and car and ride share services. e SF LJ 11 City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 58 Specifically, the City shall outside the Downtown Development and Conservation (DDC) zoning district identify, acquire agency over, and implement at least one such parking site by August 2021 and an additional site by August 2022. One shall be in the southwestern area of the city or UGB, and one shall be within the Highway 99E corridor delineated in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan. [Measure K1] H-1.10 The City should lower off-street parking requirements and prioritize first the land use categories of multi-family, mixed-use that includes multi-family, and commercial. Secondary priority are industrial and civic/semi-public/public and categories. Effective by December 25, 2019, the City should lower any minimum ratios that exceed those recommended in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Transportation Planning Handbook to no more than the ITE ratios or below them. [Measure 1] H-1.11 Effective by December 25, 2019, the City shall raise the allowed percentage of off-street parking stalls that can be compact. [Measure 13] 5ectloin IK IL')owintowin IL')eslgin K-7.5 The City shall tailor single-family lot development standards so as to not burden owners of historical platted lots in central Woodburn that pre-date zoning and are typically narrower and/or smaller (5,000 or fewer square feet) and facilitate more housing in central Woodburn through infill development in service of Policy D-1.12. The City should in central Woodburn allow house, accessory dwelling unit, and duplex reduced setbacks and increased lot coverages and consider reducing minimum off-street parking requirements compared to conventional residential greenfield development. [Measure 15] Sectiloin M t,ineirrgy t;oinservatloin M-1.9 The City should install electric vehicle (EV) fast charging stations in at least two City parking areas (among city hall, the aquatic center, parks, public garages and lots, and City street parking) and should partner with commercial and industrial developers to install EV charging stalls on or off-street and conveniently close to local residents. [Measure 4] City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 59 GLOSSARY The definitions below do not necessarily supersede those in ORS, OAR, the WDO, or per WDO 1.02 & 4.02.06B.6.b. the New Oxford American Dictionary, 2010 edition. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): An interior, attached or detached residential structure that is used in connection with or that is accessory to a single-family dwelling. [ORS 197.312(5)(b)]. Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI): An assessment of the capacity of land within the city Urban Growth Boundary to accommodate forecasted housing and employment needs. Buildable Residential Land: Includes land that is designated for residential development that is vacant and part-vacant and not constrained by existing buildings or environmental issues. Constrained land: Land that is unavailable for future net new residential development based on one or more factors, such as environmental protections, public lands, floodplains, or steep slopes. Cost Burdened: Defined by US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) as households who spend over 30% of their income on housing. Cottages: Small, single-level, detached units, often on their own lots and sometimes clustered around pockets of shared open space. A cottage is typically under 1,000 square feet in footprint. Density: Defined by the number of housing units on one acre of land. Development density: Expected number of dwelling units (per acre) based on current zoning designations. Family: A group two or more people (one of whom is the householder)related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing together. High Density: Lots with the average density of 12+ dwelling units per acre [based on OAR 660-038- 0060(1)(b)(B)(111)]. Best suited for multifamily housing such as apartments and condos. Housing Needs Analysis (HNA): The Housing Needs Analysis consists of four distinct reports that analyze the state of housing supply, housing affordability issues and the City's ability to meet projected housing demand going into 2040. Housing Unit(or Dwelling Unit): A house, an apartment or other group of rooms, or a single room is regarded as a housing unit when it is occupied or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters; that is, when the occupants do not live and eat with any other person in the structure and there is direct access from the outside or common hall. Household: Consists of all people that occupy a housing unit. HUD: Acronym for US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the federal agency dedicated to strengthening and supporting the housing market. Low Density: Lots with the average density of 3-4 dwelling units per acre [based on OAR 660-038- 0060(1)(b)(13)(0]. Best suited for family housing such as single family detached homes. Manufactured Housing: is a type of prefabricated home that is largely assembled of site and then transported to sites of use. The definition of the term in the United States is regulated by federal law City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 60 (Code of Federal Regulations, 24 CFR 3280): "Manufactured homes are built as dwelling units of at least 320 square feet in size, usually with a permanent chassis to assure the initial and continued transportability of the home. The requirement to have a wheeled chassis permanently attached differentiates "manufactured housing" from other types of prefabricated homes, such as modular homes. Manufactured Home Park (or manufactured home park): a local zoning designation that is specifically intended to address demand for this housing type. OAR chapter 813, division 007 is adopted to implement section 9, chapter 816, Oregon Laws 2009, and sections 2, 3 and 4, chapter 619, Oregon Laws 2005, as amended by sections 10 to 12, chapter 816, Oregon Laws 2009, and sections 19, and 21, chapter 503, Oregon Laws 2011 for the purpose of regulating manufactured dwelling parks. Median Family Income (MFI): The median sum of the income of all family members 15 years and older living in the household. Families are groups of two or more people (one of whom is the householder) related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing together; all such people (including related subfamily members) are considered as members of one family. Medium Density: Lots with the average density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre [based on OAR 660- 038-0060(1)(b)(B)(11)]. Best suited for small lot housing such as single family attached, townhomes, plexes and cottages. Mixed Use: Characterized as two or more residential, commercial, cultural, institutional, and/or industrial uses into one combined building or building(s) on the same parcel of land. Multi-Family Housing: Stacked flats in a single buildings or groups of buildings on a single lot. Parking is shared, and entrance to units is typically accessed through a shared lobby. See also WDO 1.02 Definitions, "Dwellings ... Multiple-Family Dwelling": A building on a single lot containing three or more dwelling units. Note: This definition does not include row houses, where attached single-family dwelling units are located on separate lots." Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR): Administrative Rules are created by most agencies and some boards and commissions to implement and interpret their statutory authority(ORS 183.310(9)). Agencies may adopt, amend, repeal or renumber rules,permanently or temporarily. Every OAR uses the same numbering sequence of a three-digit chapter number followed by a three-digit division number and a four- digit rule number. For example, Oregon Administrative Rules, chapter 166, division 500,rule 0020 is cited as OAR 166-500-0020. (oregon.gov) Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS): The codified laws of the State of Oregon. Part-vacant land: Unconstrained land that has some existing development, but can be subdivided to allow for additional residential development. Plexes and Apartments: Multiple units inside one structure on a single lot. Usually each unit has its own entry. See also WDO 1.02 Definitions, "Dwellings ... Multiple-Family Dwelling": A building on a single lot containing three or more dwelling units. Note: This definition does not include row houses, where attached single-family dwelling units are located on separate lots." Seasonal dwellings: These units are intended by the owner to be occupied during only certain seasons of the year. They are not anyone's usual residence. A seasonal unit may be used in more than one season; for example, for both summer and winter sports. Published counts of seasonal units also City of Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis June 2019 page 61 include housing units held for occupancy by migratory farm workers. While not currently intended for year-round use, most seasonal units could be used year-round. Severely Cost Burdened: Defined US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) as households who spend over 50% of their income on housing. Single Family Attached: Dwelling units that are duplexes without a subdividing property line between the two to four housing units. "Attached" duplexes require a single building permit for both dwelling units. The "attached" units would be addressed with one numerical street address for the overall structure with separate alpha-numeric unit numbers for each dwelling. Single Family Detached: Free standing residential building, unattached, containing separate bathing, kitchen, sanitary, and sleeping facilities designed to be occupied by not more than one family, not including manufactured and mobile homes. Townhome (also known as duplexes, rowhouse, etc.): Attached housing units, each on a separate lot, and each with its own entry from a public or shared street or common area. See also WDO 1.02 Definitions, "Dwellings ... Row House": "A building containing three or more dwelling units, arranged so that each dwelling unit is located on a separate lot. The building often consists of a series of houses of similar or identical design, situated side by side and joined by common walls." Urban Growth Boundary (UGB): Under Oregon law, each of the state's cities and metropolitan areas has created an urban growth boundary around its perimeter—a land use planning line to control urban expansion onto farm and forest lands. Vacant housing unit: A housing unit is vacant if no one is living in it at the time of enumeration, unless its occupants are only temporarily absent. Units temporarily occupied at the time of enumeration entirely by people who have a usual residence elsewhere are also classified as vacant. Vacant land: Vacant and part-vacant land identified within the local buildable land inventory that is not developed and unconstrained for future planned residential development. Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO): The land development and zoning code of the City of Woodburn, which the City Council last amended June 24, 2019 via Ordinance No. 2573. WOODBURN TOURISM ADVISORY COMMITTEE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 28TH , 2019 �i The Tourism Advisory Committee was assigned by City Council as the functional arm of tourism efforts in Woodburn . i ............ ............... Cylzm I Am Q WO Ui WHO ARE WEE WE ? TOURISM ADVISORY COMMITTEE CURRENT MEMBE S • Paul Iverson, Committee Chair, • Lori Powers, Academy Mortgage Wooden Shoe • Eric Swenson, Mayor • Lorrie Cox, Realtor • Jay Lawson, Republic Services • Michelle Te, publishing • John Zobrist, Chamber of Commerce • Taylor Casal, Premium Outlets • Lisa Ellsworth, City Council • City Staff-Amanda Setzer HOLES OF THE COMMITTEE Strive to stimulate and encourage the development of local tourism efforts within the Woodburn area. • Create a strategic plan • Identify strategic priorities in promotion, marketing, fundraising and relationship building • Guide and advise City Council and Chamber • Develop and implement tourism programs • Promote Woodburn's area tourism activities and events in the public and on an individual basis i OUR GOALS WHAT ARE THE MAIN FOCUS AREAS OF THE PLAN ? . To consistently promote Woodburn in MARKETINGan enticing appealing wa and a ealin for both Y community members and visitors. WHAT ARE THE MAIN FOCUS AREAS OF THE PLAN ? . To consistently promote Woodburn in MARKETINGan enticing appealing wa and a ealin for both Y community members and visitors. 2. Increase strategic collaboration with key PARTNERSHIP stakeholders and create partnerships with business owners and community organizations to promote Woodburn tourism. WHAT ARE THE MAIN FOCUS AREAS OF THE PLAN ? . To consistently promote Woodburn in MARKETINGan enticing appealing wa and a ealin for both Y community members and visitors. 2. Increase strategic collaboration with key PARTNERSHIP stakeholders and create partnerships with business owners and community organizations to promote Woodburn tourism. FUNDRAISINGGft�� 3. Develop funding resources to market and promote area tourism. WHAT ARE THE MAIN FOCUS AREAS OF THE PLAN ? . To consistently promote Woodburn in MARKETINGan enticing appealing wa and a ealin for both Y community members and visitors. 2. Increase strategic collaboration with key PARTNERSHIP stakeholders and create partnerships with business owners and community organizations to promote Woodburn tourism. FUNDRAISINGGft�� 3. Develop funding resources to market and promote area tourism. 4. Participate in Woodburn area tourism attractions, events, and activities. PARTICIPATION ................ O MARKETING STRATEGY PLAN Goal: To promote Woodburn in an enticing and appealing way which drives interest for community members and tourists so they spend more time here. MARKETING STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: To promote Woodburn as a great place to spend time. • Create "Day Trips" that start and end in Woodburn • Market the idea that Woodburn and the surrounding areas are an "All Day" kind of place. • Identify places of interest and suggested itineraries' MARKETING STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: To promote Woodburn as a great place to spend time. • Create "Day Trips" that start and end in Woodburn • Market the idea that Woodburn and the surrounding areas are an "All Day" kind of place. • Identify places of interest and suggested itineraries' Execution: • Social Media- Increased posting on all social media platforms • Create professional marketing materials • Update Travel Woodburn Website with day trips, itinerary planning, points of interest • Search Engine Optimization for Travel Woodburn Website PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PLAN Goal: To Promote tourism with a greater impact by partnering with key stakeholders. PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Increase strategic collaboration with key stakeholders, businesses and community entities who can help promote tourism. • Add effective stakeholders the Tourism Advisory Committee • Identify partners that could benefit from a relationship with Travel Woodburn PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Increase strategic collaboration with key stakeholders, businesses and community entities who can help promote tourism. • Add effective members to the Tourism Advisory Committee • Identify partners that currently lack a relationship with Travel Woodburn Execution: • Partner with tour bus companies to have stops in downtown • Utilize hotels to drive more visits • TAC committee members reach out to businesses and recruit members FUNDRAISING STRATEGY PLAN Goal: Gain access to financial resources to market and promote tourism. FUNDRAISING STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Utilize partnerships and current resources to increase funding. • Increase grant seeking efforts • Identify places to find funding from private sources FUNDRAISING STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Utilize partnerships and current resources to increase funding. • Increase grant seeking efforts • Identify places to find funding from private sources Execution: • TAC members responsible to participate in grant efforts through research, application and implementation • Present TAC to local business, civic and non profit groups EVENTS STRATEGY PLAN Goal: To be a leader in events throughout the Woodburn Community. EVENTS STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Identify more ways to promote and produce events in the community. • Promote and encourage events that bring people to Woodburn • Support the efforts of other events. • Identify how other events are successful EVENTS STRATEGY PLAN Strategy: Identify more ways to promote and produce events in the community. • Promote and encourage events that bring people to Woodburn • Support the efforts of other events. • Identify how other events are successful Execution: • Share information with all groups who are planning events • Utilize a community event calendar and promote it's use • Visit with Civic, Business and Non-Profit groups to promote community event calendar j CURRENT EVENTS . u I/m/m/m T •/m/. Flavor de Futbol M/l/m/l/m/. • Taste of Woodburn Il ......... TTiTTiTTTTT 4th of July j Fiesta Mexicana T mom MENI/m/. CURRENT „m , PROJECTS , j Create greater online presence j (website, social media, etc.) A Tj • Tourism education through T presentations and communications P � �jT j • Marketing materials in tourism locations (tent cards in hotelsw. T brochures at attractions etc.) 0 QUESTIONS ? THANK YOU