The URL can be used to link to this page

Res. 2139 - Legislative Amendments to the WDORESOLUTION INITIATING LEGISLATIVEAMENDMENTS TO THE WOODBURN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) establishes the standards that development is required to meet, and clarity of those standards is critical as the community continues to grow and prosper, and WHEREAS, periodic revisions and updates to the WDO are necessary and expected to address current issues, revisions to statutes, and to remain consistent with revised plans; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has identified a list of potential modifications to the WDO necessary for conformance with state statutes related to Accessory Dwelling Units ("ADU") and necessary to implement the recently adopted Transportation System Plan ("TSP"), and WHEREAS, Section 4.10.09 of the WDO requires the City Council to initiate the consideration of any potential legislative amendments to the WDO by resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, Section 1. Pursuant to Section 4.10.09 of the WDO, the City Council initiates a review of the proposed legislative amendments to the WDO outlined in Exhibit "A", which is attached to this resolution. Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder Page 1— COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 ATTEST: &—eu"n '\�) hrn� Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 EXHIBIT A (PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS TO ADU'S) 2.07.01 Accessory Dwelling Units A. Applicability: 1. Accessory dwelling units shall be subject to all applicable development standards of the WDO except as provided for in this Section. 2. One accessory dwelling unit per each single-family detached dwelling—the primary dwelling— may be approved if the applicant shows compliance with the following criteria and standards. B. Siting: Accessory dwelling units may be detached and freestanding from the primary dwelling, located within or attached to the primary dwelling, or attached to an accessory structure garage. C. Architecture: The exterior of the proposed accessory dwelling unit shall match the architectural design of the dwelling or garage if attached to a garage, in terms of finish materials, roof pitch, trim, and window proportion. D. Accessory dwelling units shall be subject to the site development standards of the underlying zoning district, except: Lot coverage: Accessory dwelling units are not subject to the rear yard lot coverage limitation for Accessory Structures. 2. Building height. Accessory dwelling units shall not exceed the height of the principal dwelling unit. 3. Density: Accessory dwelling units are not included part of the density calculation for the underlying zone. E. Floor Area: The gross floor area of the accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the primary dwelling, or 725 square feet, whichever is less. The garage area shall be excluded from calculation of the floor area. F. Separation: There shall be a minimum six foot separation between detached accessory dwelling units and all other structures on the site. Page 3 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 G. Vehicles: Structures/vehicles licensed by the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles shall not be permitted as accessory dwelling units. H. Entrance: An accessory dwelling unit attached or located within a primary dwelling shall not result in any new door entrance being located on an exterior wall facing a front property line. J. I. Non -conformities: Legally non -conforming accessory structures located on residentially zoned land may be converted to an accessory dwelling unit in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.04. Page 4 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 (PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS TO THE TSP) 3.01 Streets 3.01.02 General Provisions A. No development shall be approved, or access permit issued, unless the internal streets, boundary streets and connecting streets are constructed to at least the minimum standards set forth in this Section, or are required to be so constructed as a condition of approval. B. Private streets are prohibited, except in manufactured dwelling parks, pursuant to State statute (ORS Chapter 446 and OAR 918-600). All private streets in manufactured dwelling parks shall comply with the standards of the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) and State statute. C. Materials and construction shall comply with specifications of the City of Woodburn. D. The standards of this Section may be modified, subject to approval of an Exception to Street Right -of -Way and Improvement Requirements. E. No building permit may be issued until all required public facility improvements are in place and approved by the Public Works Director, or otherwise bonded, in conformance with the provisions of this Code and the Design Manual. Improvements required as a condition of development approval, when not voluntarily provided by the applicant shall be roughly proportional to the impact of the development on public facilities. 3.01.03 Improvements Required for Development A. With development, the Internal, Boundary, and Connecting streets shall be constructed to at least the minimum standards set forth below. &.1. Internal Streets. Internal streets shall meet all standards of WDO and the TSP. C—.2. Boundary Streets. The minimum improvements for a Boundary Street shall be: One paved 11 -foot travel lane in each direction; 2-b. On -street parking on the side of the street abutting the development, if on -street parking is indicated in the TSP; Vic. Curb on the side of the street abutting the development; 4d. Drainage facilities on the side of the street abutting the development; Page 5 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 Vie. Street trees on the side of the street abutting the development; and &f. A sidewalk on the side of the street abutting the development. 4):3. Connecting Streets Via. The minimum improvements for a Connecting Street shall be one paved 11 -foot travel lane in each direction. fib. Connecting streets shall extend from the boundary street of a development, to the nearest intersection that meets the cross-section and improvement requirements of this Section, or 1,000 feet, whichever is less. [No change to figure] Figure 3.01A — Internal, Boundary, and Connecting Streets B. Half -street improvements are considered the minimum required improvement. Curb to curb or full -street improvements shall be required where traffic volumes generated by the development are such that a half -street improvement would cause safety and/or capacity problems. Such a determination shall be made by the City Engineer. C. To_ensure improved access to a development site consistent with policies on orderly urbanization and extension of public facilities the Planning Commission or Director may require off-site improvements concurrent with development. Off-site improvement requirements upon the site developer shall be reasonably related to the anticipated impacts of the development. D. When the Director determines that a required improvement of a Boundary or Connecting Street would not be timely, due to pending development of properties in the immediate vicinity or improvement of the streets which are identified in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the Director may accept a fee -in -lieu, in the amount equal to the costs of the required improvement. F—.E. When the Director determines that a required improvement of a Boundary or Connecting Street would not be feasible, due to physical constraints of properties in the immediate vicinity or an inability to obtain right-of-way dedication, the Director may approve construction of a partial -width street, to the minimum standards set forth above. Page 6 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 1.02 Definitions Alley: A public right-of-way not more than 2-8-22 feet wide and not less than 3D-18 feet in width that provides secondary vehicular access to property and intersects with a public street. 3.01 Streets 3.01.04 Street Cross -Sections A. These standards are based on the functional classification of each street as shown in the Woodburn TSP. The street right-of-way and improvement standards minimize the amount of pavement and right-of-way required for each street classification, consistent with the operational needs of each facility, including requirements for pedestrians, bicycles, and public facilities. B. All public streets under the jurisdiction of the City of Woodburn shall comply with the cross- sections depicted in this Section. 1. For the cross-section illustrated in Figures - MIG i 3.01G and H, the street shall have fewer than 1,000 average daily trips (ADT) per day when all future street connections are made. 2. The cross-section illustrated in Figure 3.01H, is optional in infill situations, or where adjacent streets are similarly constructed. Street trees shall be located in a street tree easement outside the public right-of-way. C. For local residential streets which are not identified in the Comprehensive Plan, rights-of- way and improvements are determined by the Director at the time of development, based upon the existing and future estimated average daily trips of the development and surrounding development. D. Streets designated as Arterials or Collectors in the TSP which are located within the Historic Settlemier Transportation Corridor do not require bicycle lanes or a center turn lane, unless the Director determines that a turn lane is warranted for safety reasons. The existing pavement should be used to the extent possible to preserve the historic corridor. Page 7 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 E. Streets designated as Collectors in the TSP shall accommodate bicycle lanes. The Director may waive this requirement for existing collector streets where right-of-way is not available to accommodate bicycles in a striped lane. Roadways with relatively low travel speeds (<35 moh) and low ADT (<3.000 ADT) may be reauired to use shared -lane pavement markings (e.g., sharrows) to designate a shared roadway. g j { St� § T #:V:* TRAM C.FfT#TURN � TASSA` L �£�iCG LAM ME 13 j 'k 4 E. ; LAN Lit* `. LAK L00, j LAARE kAkt U -APE WALX „�. ..._...._... _....,........—....,m....m_e �.10[ "tom .. �....�..�..-.m,..,_�.._.,...R.�.�m�..»»... PUBLIC UUTUTY < YJ6' 1 _SC66' tA6''E TR12' - IAM' Page 8 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 Major Arterial TRAVEL. CENTER TRAVEL LANE TURN PANE LAN[ .. 9• ._.....�.. _..____... 1 q• ._______...�..__' 12- 2'T4' 74'-- --- R4W = SOU' ROW PUBLIC UAUTY FRAV- NICE I.A"" f S1,D c —': LANE (.AN@ SCAPE 1 i'ALK �1' io' - 12' �. b• - 6' ,- d' ---� Figure 3.01B — Major Arterial PUB UZ UTIUTY CAST v ' v61 Moe LAND "m WAS, SWti LANE 12' w (*NTER TRAVEL LEFT Twm LANE LARE IM -01 Minor Arterial 12* 1,# * TRAVEL I BSE LAND S09 tANt LANE _kCApe WALX I" i 11 PUBLICPUBLIC UTILITY CSEMENTI ME LAND BIKE TRAVEL CENTER TRAVEL BIKE LAND UTILITY SIDE 5' 11-1 WALK $CAPE LANE LANE TURN LANE LANE LANE SCAPE WALK H 5' A/-- • 6' 6' 12• 12� 12- 6' 6' 6' . ................ . .................. . ........... . ......... . .... 48* --- e, ROW= 74' Figure 3.01C — Minor Arterial Page 9 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 OEM `15 "I LX ! SL4ZAIPae I LOAEA15 III 'I 127 TRXVfEt LEFT Tum LAUE LAM TSE Service Collector ewe i LAND sw LANE k SC PUBLIC ... s,.,..., m. UTILITY 0.SEMENT SIDE LAND B9KE TRAVEL CENTER TRAVEL BIKE LAND SIDE 5' 3'� WALK SCAPE LANE LANE TURN LANE LANE LANE SCAPE WALK I A_ 6• _ _ 6' S' 7i - 12' 12'-----,p4 12' 5' _ _ 6' _ 6• 46^ ROW = 72' Figure 3.01D —Service Collector Page 10—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 PUBLIC UTILITY 5' i s SMS 3 LAAO 8* TRAVEL TRAt LAND SIE, ., ._ t'IM a _.. Access SlTeet - Cornmeddal Street PUBLIC IF-A�LK ...'-' UDLITY E!ANDTRAVEL TBA�£L LANA SfOE I SCAP£ PARKING LAN£ €P AdE PARKING $C:APE WALK i ...........r......... E• ............. g• 12' 2' 8' ............ 6• ....._ 6' ..... _. }'......___........................................._.__..... _............................._.__............ ROW = 66' ............................_.................. Figure 3.01E — Access Street/Commercial Street Page 11— COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 PUSLiC UTILITY 5' W IV SIDE LANO TRAVEL cwrii Ttm TRAVEL LAND MDE WASL,K I SOVAPf LAN i LANE t LANE SCAPE WALK V Local Industrial Street Figure 3.01F — Local Industrial Street Page 12 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 TRAVEL I TRAWL I T UkU I LANE LANE I PARKMG I SCAAM Local Residential Street, 60 Foot Right-olf-Way PUBLIC PUBLIC UTILITY kSEMSIDE ENT UTILITY SIDE LAND TRAVEL TRAVEL LAND EASENAEP ' 5' 1' WALK SCAPE I PARKLMG, LANE LANE 1 PARKING SCAPE j WALK !I' 51 6' 6' 7' 7' 34' = 6()' Figure 3.01G — Local Residential Street with Parking Both Sides, 60 Foot Right -of -Way Page 13 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 PUSLIC UTUJTY 1 Me TH TRAVEL TRAVEL 7S Mm 61 WALK PARKM LANE LANE PARKINIGI WALK, 6" PUSUC Local Residential Street,50Foof Right -of -Way PUPLIC PU LIC UTILITY VT!LITY 4,SD,IENT 1 SIDE TRAVEL TRAVEL SIDE EASEMF� 5' 1' WALK PARKNG LANE LANE PARKING WALK 1, 5.5' -' 7.5' I I' I— I I' --- ' 5,5'p — 37'— ROW = 50' Figure 3.01H — Local Residential Street with Parking Both Sides, 50 Foot Right -of -Way [Delete figure] [Delete figure] [Delete figure] [Delete figure] Page 14—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 [Delete figure] [Delete figure] TUM W18 Lanai Paved Wdh 73' 'Midth 84' Pacific Highway 99E - Carl Road to Lincoln Street (MP M85 to MP 32.4 1) Figure 3.010 3.011 —PacificH 99E Page 15 —COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 i ' �e ' lniX2 L-ir"* Troal Lam Tv*wTj Le TMAI We Trmtme &,* � smmal Rule LIV* Turn Lam LM* ft Paed W&� = n . . .. . .......... . . . . ... .. . Pacific Highway 99E - Lincoln Street to 600 Feet South of Cleveland Street (MP 32.41 to MP 33.08) I I.E IAN : _E RAVEL "I CA, LANE LANE 61 6' TRAVEL C NItR TRAVEL .AN, R N LANE LANE 12' 14' 121 - -PAVED WIDTH = 74' - MINIMUM RIGHT OF -WAY WIDTH - N � 100'- TRAM 'E�A-C'".E ANEI!A 'A1;jWALI 12, 6' 6' 6' Figure 3.0112 3.01.1 — Pacific Highway 99E Lincoln Street to 600 Feet South of Cleveland Street (MP 32.41 to MP 33.08**) atscne Beered Trml Lam Twoway Lee Tei Lam Buffered LaIds'. &k Bike Lane Tm Lare Bike Lane Bulter Paved WkM = 53' Page 16 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 Pacific Highway 99E - 1,150 Feet South of Cleveland Street to South UGB lMP 33.19 to MP 34.07) Figure 3-.04-Q 3.01K — Pacific Highway 99E *One feet 4 r4ght 4 WGY GW -Side L2GGh sidewGlk is neededfer- eper-GtienGl pGrpeses. Transition between five -lone and three -lane roadways to occur between MP 33.08 and MP 33.19. Alley 1'! PUBLIC Pl1BL1C UTILITY UTILITY !EASEMENT �,SEMENT TRAVEL 5' 1' 2' LANE 2' V! 5' 22* Figure 3.01L —Alley #1 Page 17 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 Almy #2 PUBLIC PUBLIC UTILITY LMLITY hSEMENT TRAVEL EASEMENT 5' J2' LANE 2' J 5' 18, Figure 3.01M —Alley #2 2.05 Overlay Districts 2.05.02 Interchange Management Overlay District D. Administration 1. A T-Fa4ieTransportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is required for all land use applications subject to the provisions of this Section. The TIA must meet City and ODOT administrative rule (OAR Chapter 734, Division 51) requirements and shall include an evaluation and recommendation of feasible Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures that will minimize peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed development. 3.01 Streets 3.01.01 Applicability Page 18 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 A. Right-of-way standards apply to all public streets. B. Improvement standards apply to all public and private streets, sidewalks and bikeways. C. F-unet+epal Mobility standards are identified in the `^ oodbuFn TCD Section 3.04.05.E. D. The requirements of Section 3.01 apply to all development, and is not limited to partitions, subdivisions, multi -family, commercial or industrial construction, or establishment of a manufactured dwelling or recreational vehicle park. Construction of a single-family dwelling or placement of a manufactured dwelling does not, for the purposes of this Section, constitute development, however, in no case can this type of development occur without minimal access as determined by the Director. 3.04 Vehicular Access The purpose of this Section is to establish procedures and standards for granting vehicular access to public streets. Pedestrian access to public streets and between buildings is required and specified by the Woodburn Development Code (WDO). 3.04.01 Applicability and Permit 3.04.02 Drive-Throughs 3.04.03 Driveway Guidelines and Standards 3.04.04 Improvement Standards 3.04.05 Traffic Transportation -Impact Analysis 3.04.05 Traffie Transportation Impact Analysis A. The following provisions establish when a proposal must be reviewed for potential transportation impacts; when a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) or Transportation Impact Letter (TAL) must be submitted with a development application in order to Page 19—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 determine whether conditions are needed to minimize impacts to and protect transportation facilities; the required contents of a Transportation Impact Analysis; and who is qualified to prepare the analysis. B. When a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is Required. The City or other road authority with jurisdiction may require a TIA as part of an application for development, a change in use, or a change in access. A TIA shall be required where a change of use or a development would involve one or more of the following: 1. A change in zoning or a plan amendment designation; 2. Operational or safety concerns documented in writing by a road authority; 3. An increase in site traffic volume generation by 250 Average DailV Trips (ADT) or more; increase in weak hour volume of a particular movement to and from a street or highway by 20 percent or more; 5. The development is expected to impact intersections that are currently operating at the upper limits of the acceptable range of level of service during the PM peak operating hour. 6. The development is expected to significantly impact adjacent roadways and intersections that have previously been identified as high crash locations or areas that contain a high concentration of pedestrians or bicyclists such as school zones. 7. An increase in the use of adiacent streets bV vehicles exceeding the 20,000 -pound gross vehicle weights by 10 vehicles or more per day; 8. Existing or proposed approaches or access connections that do not meet minimum spacing or sight distance requirements or are located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are restricted, or such vehicles are likely to queue or hesitate at an approach or access connection, creating a safety hazard; or 10. A TIA required by ODOT pursuant to OAR 734-051. C. When a Transportation Impact Assessment Letter (TAL) is Required. Where the provisions of WDO 3.04.05.13 do not apply, the applicant's traffic engineer shall submit a transportation assessment demonstrating that the proposed land use action is exempt from TIA requirements. At the discretion of the City Engineer, a TAL maV satisfV the CitV's transportation analysis requirements when a development meets all of the following criteria: Page 20—COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 1. The development is anticipated to generate fewer than 24 PM peak hour trips and fewer than 250 daily trips. 2. The development is not expected to significantly impact intersections that currently are not meeting the City's acceptable level of service standards during the PM peak time period. 3. The development is not expected to significantly impact roadways and intersections that have an identified safety concern. D. TIA Preparation. The TIA shall be prepared by a professional engineer with competence in traffic engineering, licensed in the State of Oregon, in accordance with the following requirements: 1_. A_proposal establishing the scope of the TIA shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer. The evaluation requirements shall reflect the magnitude of the proiect in accordance with accepted traffic engineering practices and will include an assessment of key intersections impacted by the proposal. The City Engineer will review the scope of the TIA and will provide written comments to the applicant acknowledging that the scope is adequate or what additional information is required. 2. If the TIA identifies conditions less than the minimum standard established in Section 3.04.05.E, improvements and funding strategies mitigating the problem shall be considered concurrent with the development proposal. E. Mobility Standards. Intersection operational performance is based on Level of Service (LOS) and volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio. The following mobility standards apply: 1. Along state facilities, the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) governs the mobility standards. Referred to specifically as mobility targets, the maximum v/c ratios for signalized and unsignalized intersections can be determined from Table 6 of the OHP. 2. For City streets, the following mobility standards are used for evaluation: 1. For signalized and all -way stop -control intersections, Level of Service (LOS) if or better shall be maintained. 2. For signalized intersections, the intersection volume -to -capacity ratio shall be less than 1.00 regardless of LOS. Page 21— COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 3. For unsignalized intersections, volume -to -capacity ratio of less than .90 on the critical movement shall be maintained, provided the queues on the critical approach can be appropriately accommodated. 3. The evaluation of traffic operations is conducted using the methodology outlined in the most recent edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. F. Approval Criteria. The TIA shall be reviewed according to the following criteria: 1. The analysis complies with the content requirements set forth by the City and/or other road authorities as appropriate; 2. The study demonstrates that adequate transportation facilities exist to serve the proposed land use action or identifies mitigation measures that resolve identified traffic safety problems in a manner that is satisfactory to the road authority; 3. For affected City facilities, the study demonstrates that the project meets mobility and other applicable standards established in the WDO and TSP, and includes identification of multi -modal solutions used to meet these standards as needed• and 4. Proposed design and construction of transportation improvements are in accordance with the design standards and the access spacing standards specified in the WDO and TSP. G. Conditions of Approval. 1. The City may deny, approve, or approve a proposal with conditions necessary to meet operational and safety standards; provide the necessary right-of-way for planned improvements; and require construction of improvements to ensure consistency with the future planned transportation system. 2. Construction of off-site improvements. including those related to bicvcle and pedestrian facilities, may be required to mitigate impacts resulting from development that relate to capacity deficiencies and public safety; and/or to upgrade or construct public facilities to City standards. 3. Where the existing transportation system is shown to be impacted by the proposed use, improvements such as paving; curbing; installation of or contribution to traffic signals; and/or construction of sidewalks, bikeways, access ways, paths, or streets that serve the proposed use may be required. Page 22 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 4. Improvements required as a condition of development approval, when not voluntarily provided by the applicant, shall be roughly proportional to the impact of the development on transportation facilities. Findings in the development approval shall indicate how the required improvements directly relate to and are roughly proportional to the impact of development. 3.05 Off -Street Parking and Loading 3.05.02 General Provisions A. All required parking and loading spaces shall be retained and maintained in accordance with the standards of the WDO. N. In parking areas three acres and larger intended for use by the general public, pedestrian pathways sha11 be raised or separated from parking, parking aisles, and travel lanes by a raised curb, concrete bumpers, bollards, landscaping, or other physical barrier. If a raised pathway is used, curb ramps shall be provided in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibilitv Guidelines. 3.05.03 Off -Street Parking E. All uses that are required to provide 10 or more off-street parking spaces and residential structures with four or more dwelling or living units shall provide a bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main building entrance. The number of required rack spaces shall be one space per ten vehicle parking spaces, with a maximum of 20 rack spaces. Where required bicycle parking exceeds 10 rack spaces, 50% of the required spaces shall be sheltered, "long-term" spaces. Long-term bicycle parking areas may be in a conveniently located garage or storage unit, under an eave, in an independent structure, or provided similar cover. 3.05.03 — Off -Street Parking Page 23 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 H Parking areas that have designated employee parking and more than 20 automobile parking spaces shall provide at least 10% of the employee parking spaces (minimum two spaces) as preferential carpool and vanpool parking spaces. Preferential carpool and vanpool parking spaces shall be closer to the employee entrance of the building than other parking spaces with the exception of ADA accessible parking spaces. 3.05.03 — Off -Street Parking I. Parking spaces and parking areas may be used for transit related uses such as transit stops and park-and-ride/rideshare areas provided minimum parking space requirements can still be met. 3.07 Architectural Design 3.07.06 Standards for Non -Residential Structures in Residential, Commercial and Public/Semi Public Zones A. The following design guidelines shall be applicable to all non-residential structures and buildings in the RS, RSN, R15, RM, RMN, CO, CG, and P/SP zones. D. On -Site Pedestrian Circulation 1. Walkways shall connect all building entrances with adjacent sidewalks and on-site parking areas, and shall connect off-site adjacent uses to the site unless topographic or existing development constraints preclude making certain walkway connections 2. Where walkways cross a parking area or driveway they shall be clearly marked with contrasting paving materials (such as light -color concrete inlay between asphalt), which may be part of a raised/hump crossing area. Paint or thermo-plastic striping and similar types of non -permanent applications may be approved for crosswalks not exceeding 24 feet in length. Page 24 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139 (NEW SECTION] 3.11 Transit Access and Supportive Improvements 3.11.01 Purpose 3.11.02 Applicability 3.11.03 General Requirements 3.11.01 Purpose A. To support existing transit routes, consistent with the Woodburn TSP, as well as future enhanced transit connections within the City and between Woodburn and other cities in Marion County. B. To ensure future development includes provisions for transit riders and that access to transit is safe and convenient. 3.11.02 Applicability A. Development that is proposed adjacent to an existing or planned transit stop, as designated in an adopted transportation or transit plan, shall provide transit access and supportive improvements in coordination with the transit service provider. 3.11.03 General Reauirements A. Proposed development shall provide reasonably direct pedestrian connections between the transit stop and primary entrances of the buildings on site. For the purpose of this Section, "reasonably direct" means a route that does not deviate unnecessarily from a straight line or a route that does not involve a significant amount of out -of -direction travel for users. B. The primary entrance of the building closest to the street where the transit stop is located must be oriented to that street. C. A transit passenger landing pad that is ADA accessible. D. An easement or dedication for a passenger shelter or bench if such an improvement is identified in an adopted clan. E. Lighting at the transit stop. F. Other improvements identified in an adopted plan. Page 25 —COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 l;4-Tiltil offPTi1111111RA91'1 4.01.06 Conditions of Approval A. All City decision-making bodies have the authority to impose conditions of approval reasonably related to impacts caused by the development or designed to ensure that all applicable approval standards are, or can be, met on Type II, III and IV decisions except annexation. All conditions of approval shall be clear and objective or if the condition requires discretion shall provide for a subsequent opportunity for a public hearing. B. Regarding need transportation improvements, the City may deny, approve, or approve a proposal with conditions necessary to meet operational and safety standards; provide the necessary right-of-way for planned improvements; and require construction of improvements to ensure consistency with the future planned transportation system. 1. Construction of off-site improvements may be required to mitigate impacts resulting from development that relate to capacity deficiencies and public safety; and/or to upgrade or construct public facilities to City standards. 2. Where the existing transportation system is shown to be impacted by the proposed use, improvements such as paving; curbing; installation of or contribution to traffic signals; and/or construction of sidewalks, bikeways, access ways, paths, or streets that serve the proposed use may be required. 3. Improvements required as a condition of development approval, when not voluntarily provided by the applicant, shall be roughly proportional to the impact of the development on transportation facilities. Findings in the development approval shall indicate how the required improvements directly relate to and are roughly proportional to the impact of development. i C. Compliance with Conditions: 1. The applicant shall agree in writing that the applicant and successors shall be bound by the conditions prescribed for approval of the development. 2. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall be the basis for revocation of the permit(s) and/or instituting code enforcement proceedings pursuant to the Section 4.02.10 and 4.02.11 and ORS 30.315. Page 26 — COUNCIL BILL NO. 3106 RESOLUTION NO. 2139