The URL can be used to link to this page

March 11, 2019 Agenda EIC SWENSON,MAYOR CITY OF WOODBURN JUAN SERRAT SR COUNCILOR WARD I LISA ELLSWORTH,COUNCILOR WARD II CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ROBERT CARNEY,COUNCILOR WARD III SHARON SCHAUB,COUNCILOR WARD IV MARY BETH CORNWELL,COUNCILOR WARD V MARCH 11 , 2019- 7.00 P.M. ERIC MORRIS,COUNCILOR WARD VI WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT - 1390 MERIDIAN DRIVE 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: A. The March 25, 2019 City Council Meeting will be held at the Woodburn Fire District, 1776 Newberg Hwy. Appointments: B. Budget Committee 1 - Steven Kufeldt - Debbie Cabrales 4. WOODBURN BULLDOGS 4A STATE WRESTLING CHAMPIONS 5. WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT AWARDS CEREMONY 6. 15 MINUTE RECESS 7. COMMUNITY/GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS None. 8. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: None. Presentations: None. 9. COMMUNICATIONS None. This facility is ADA accessible. If you need special accommodation, please contact the City Recorder at 503-980- 6318 at least 24 hours prior to this meeting. **Habrd int6rpretes disponibles para aquellas personas que no hablan Ingl6s, previo acuerdo. Comunfquese al (503) 980-2485.** March 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page i 10. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC - This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. 11. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be adopted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council minutes of February 25, 2019 2 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. B. Liquor License Application for MJ Brother Inc. 6 Recommended Action: The Woodburn City Council recommends that the OLCC approve the Liquor License Application for MJ Brother Inc. C. Building Activity for February 2019 8 Recommended Action: Receive the report. 12. TABLED BUSINESS None. 13. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Legislative amendment to incorporate an updated Public 9 Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan (LA 2018-03) Recommended Action: Hold a public hearing and adopt the attached Ordinance which will incorporate a new Public Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. 14. GENERAL BUSINESS-Members of the public wishing to comment on items of general business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. A. Council Bill No. 3091 - An Ordinance Adopting an Updated City of 67 Woodburn Public Facilities Plan as Exhibit "B" of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan (LA 2018-03) Recommended Action: Adopt the Ordinance. B. Council Bill No. 3092 - An Ordinance Annexing Approximately 24.65 122 Acres of Territory Known as the Lowrie Property(Located at 9008 Parr Road NE, Marion County, Oregon) into the City of Woodburn PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON THIS AGENDA ITEM IS CLOSED. NO PUBLIC March 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page ii COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED. Recommended Action: Adopt the ordinance. C. Council Bill No. 3093 - An Ordinance Designating Zoning to 138 Approximately 24.65 Acres of Annexed Territory Known as the Lowrie Property, Located at 9008 Parr Road NE, Marion County, Oregon as Nodal Single Family Residential (RSN) Zoning District PUBLIC TESTIMONY ON THIS AGENDA ITEM IS CLOSED. NO PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED. Recommended Action: Adopt the ordinance. D. Award of Construction Contract for the Building Demolition Services 142 at 461 N. First Street Recommended Action: That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the Local Contract Review Board, award the construction contract for the Building Demolition Services at 461 N. First Street to Konell Construction & Demolition Corp, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, in the amount of $147,207.00. 15. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS - These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions that may be called up by the City Council. None. 16. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 17. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 18. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. 19. ADJOURNMENT March 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page iii �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU Pri,a�<;rrt rr rf aA'!R7 March 6, 2019 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Swenson, Mayor SUBJECT: Committee Appointment The following appointments are made, subject to the approval of the Council. Please forward any adverse comments to me prior to the Council meeting on Monday, March 11, 2019. No reply is required if you approve of my decision. Budget Committee Debbie Cabrales Steven Kufeldt 1 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 2019 0:00 DATE POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, FEBRUARY 25, 2019 CONVENED The meeting convened at 7:01 p.m. with Mayor Swenson presiding. ROLL CALL Mayor Swenson Present Councilor Carney Present Councilor Cornwell Present Councilor Schaub Present Councilor Morris Absent Councilor Ellsworth Present Councilor Serratos Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Assistant City Administrator Row, Community Development Director Kerr, Finance Director Montoya, Police Chief Ferraris, Deputy Police Chief Pilcher, Senior Planner Cortes, Community Relations Manager Gutierrez-Gomez, City Recorder Pierson APPOINTMENTS Carney/Ellsworth...approve the appointments of Michelle Te and Phillip Corcoran to the Tourism Advisory Committee. The motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC Janice Aiken, 1331 Princeton Road, stated that homeowners in Senior Estates are telling them that when they call the police on a drug house that they are being told the HOA needs to take care of it and the police can't do anything. She stated that the HOA's cannot take care of the problem, they can't tell them to leave. Dawn Cole, stated that they heard that the chief of police was going to report back to the Council on the nuisance house ordinance and putting some teeth in it, but when they showed up to the meeting they were disappointed to see that it was not on the agenda. She stated that there are drug homes in Senior Estates and questioned what they should do as a community to remedy this. Chief Ferraris stated that they can report these issues by calling the police department at the non-emergency number. City Administrator Derickson encouraged the Senior Estates Board to reach out to the City when they have questions or concerns. Dagmar Kinne,asked if there was going to be a nuisance ordinance.Mayor Swenson answered that only the noise ordinance is being brought tonight. City Attorney Shields provided an explanation of the Chronic Nuisance Ordinance. Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 25, 2019 2 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 2019 CONSENT AGENDA A. Woodburn City Council minutes of February 11, 2019, B. Creation of a Railroad Quiet Zone for the City of Woodburn, C. Business Oregon Brownbelds Redevelopment Fund Grant, D. Crime Statistics through January 2019. City Administrator Derickson provided a staff report on the Railroad Quite Zone. Carney/Ellsworth... adopt the Consent Agenda. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS Annexation of Approximately 24.65 Acres of Territory Known as Lowrie Property at 9008 Parr Rd NE (ANX 2018-02) A Public Hearing to consider input on the Annexation of Approximately 24.65 Acres of Territory Known as Lowrie Property at 9008 Parr Rd NE (ANX 2018-02). Mayor Swenson declared the hearing open at 7:25 p.m. for hearing public input on the Annexation of Approximately 24.65 Acres of Territory Known as Lowrie Property at 9008 Parr Rd NE(ANX 2018-02). Mayor Swenson asked if there were any conflicts of interest, ex-parte contacts or site visits. Mayor Swenson asked if there were any challenges and there were none. City Recorder Pierson read the Public Hearing Statement. Senior Planner Cortes provided a staff report and answered clarifying questions of the Council. The Applicant, Steve Miller, Senior Planner and Project Manager at Emerio Design, LLC, provided testimony in favor of the annexation and answered questions of the Council. Mayor Swenson asked if anyone from the public would like to speak either for or against this application. Dagmar Kinne, 586 Grant St., stated that she is not opposed to the annexation but is curious to know how many houses are planned and was told by Mr. Miller that there is no proposal yet. Ms. Kinne asked about it being by the park and the amount of traffic going to the park and Mr. Miller answered that they are aware of the proximity to the park and will be working to make sure the development will interface well with the park. Senior Planner Cortes clarified that talk of design is premature because there is no development proposed. He added that when development is proposed, it would come back to the City for approval. Mayor Swenson declared the hearing closed at 7:44 p.m. Councilor Carney stated that he feels comfortable with what has been presented so far and has no more questions. He added that he is prepared to vote positively on this. Ellsworth/Schaub... tentatively approve the application and request staff to bring back ordinances. The motion passed unanimously. FY 2018-2019 Supplemental Budget Request#2 A Public Hearing to consider input on the FY 2018-2019 Supplemental Budget Request 42. Mayor Swenson declared the hearing open at 7:46 p.m. for hearing public input on the FY 2018-2019 Supplemental Budget Request 42. Finance Director Montoya provided a staff report. Mayor Swenson asked if anyone from the public would like to speak on this subject. No members of the public wished to speak in either support or opposition of the FY 2018- 2019 Supplemental Budget Request 42. Mayor Swenson declared the hearing closed at 7:49 p.m. COUNCIL BILL NO.3088—AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 2312(THE WOODBURN NOISE ORDINANCE) TO CLARIFY AND STRENGTHEN IT AND Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 25, 2019 3 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 2019 DECLARING AN EMERGENCY Carney introduced Council Bill No. 3088. City Recorder Pierson read the bill twice by title only since there were no objections from the Council. City Attorney Shields provided a staff report. Chief Ferraris commented that this ordinance will give the police department the tools it needs. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Swenson declared Council Bill No. 3088 duly passed. COUNCIL BILL NO. 3089 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFERS OF FY 2018-2019 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET Carney introduced Council Bill No. 3089. City Recorder Pierson read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Swenson declared Council Bill No. 3089 duly passed. COUNCIL BILL NO. 3090—A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FULL FAITH AND CREDIT BORROWING AND RELATED MATTERS Carney introduced Council Bill No. 3090. City Recorder Pierson read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. Finance Director Montoya provided a staff report. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Swenson declared Council Bill No. 3090 duly passed. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE N. FIRST STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Public Works Director Liljequist provided a staff report. Carney/Schaub... award the construction contract for the N. First Street Improvements Project to Pacific Excavation Inc., in the amount of$3,688,000.00 and authorizing an additional $300,000 for this project as a contingency for potential project change orders that may occur during the construction process. The motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT AGENDA Mayor Swenson reviewed the draft agenda for the City Council Goal Setting Meeting taking place on March 2, 2019. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT City Administrator Derickson reported the following: — The March 11, City Council Meeting will be taking place at the Woodburn School District Administrative offices. He added that the Police Department Awards Ceremony would be taking place that night. — The March 25, City Council Meeting will be taking place at the Woodburn Fire District where the Fire Chief will give the URA a tour of the remodeled facilities. — The contamination at the site where tanks were removed on First Street is significant and the City will need to remove an additional 600 tons of contaminated soil. The estimated cost of the contamination removal is $74,460.00. The City has been working with DEQ and they have agreed to pay $37,000 towards the costs of removing the contamination. He added that it is possible that more contamination could be found Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 25, 2019 4 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 2019 after having the 600 tons removed and if so, they may be coming back to Council for additional budget authority. — Bids for the Pix Theater will be opened on Thursday and the City Council can expect that bid award to be on the March 11, City Council agenda. — The City Hall renovation project is proceeding really well. — FHDC is proposing a mural project on their new residential construction project and it has been introduced to the Mural Committee. — The Bungalow Theater had a fundraiser on Friday night with more than 40 people attending and about $1,500.00 was raised. They plan to have more fundraisers in the future. — This Thursday from 4-7 p.m. at the library, the Planning Department will be conducting an open house on the City's housing needs as part of the Comprehensive Plan update. — On March 4, the Planning Department will be conducting a TSP open house at the library. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Councilor Ellsworth congratulated the DSA award recipients. Councilor Cornwell thanked everyone involved with the ordinance changes. Mayor Swenson stated that he attended the annual banquet awards for the Mid-Willamette Valley Council of Governments and that it was heartening to see all the good work that is going on around us. ADJOURNMENT Ellsworth/Schaub... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. APPROVED ERIC SWENSON, MAYOR ATTEST Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 25, 2019 5 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} B V' March 11, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator THRU: James C. Ferraris, Chief of Police FROM: Martin Pilcher, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: Liquor License Application RECOMMENDATION: The Woodburn City Council recommends that the OLCC approve the Liquor License Application for MJ Brother Inc. BACKGROUND: Applicant: MJ Brother Inc. 1 1 1 N. Arney Rd. Suite B Woodburn, Oregon 97071 503 415-1167 Point of Contact: Vison Chen 2830 SE 136th PI Portland OR. 97236 Business: Sushi Brothers 1 1 1 N. Arney Rd. Suite B Woodburn, Oregon 97071 503 415-1167 Owners: Vison Chen License Type: New Outlet, Limited On-Premise Sales - Permits beer, wine, cider sales and liquor for on premise consumption only. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x Finance_x- 6 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 11, 2019 Page 2 On January 28, 2019, the Woodburn Police Department received an application for Limited On-Premise Sales liquor license for Sushi Brothers Restaurant. This restaurant contains a dining room with liquor sales at dining tables only. The restaurant sells food for consumption during all hours of operation. Sushi Brothers Restaurant is located at 111 N. Arney Rd. Suite B, Woodburn, Oregon 97071 . The hours of operation are from 11 :00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. Monday through Thursday and 11 :00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. Friday and Saturday. The establishment provides no entertainment either live or recorded. The restaurant has seating for 43 patrons with no accommodation for outside seating. The Police Department has not received any communication from the public or surrounding businesses in support of or against the proposed change. DISCUSSION: The Police Department has completed a background investigation on the subjects listed on the OLCC application. Vison Chen was clear in all database checks with a valid ODL and no criminal record. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None 7 CITY OF WOODBURN Economic and Development Services Department MEMORANDUM 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Date: March 4, 2019 To: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director From: Ted Cuno, Building Division Subject: Building Activity for February 2019 2017 2018 2019 No. Dollar Amount No. Dollar Amount No. Dollar Amount Single-Family Residential 0 $0 19 $4,652,178 3 $380,012 Multi-Family Residential 1 $9,868 11 $9,700,689 0 $0 Assisted Living Facilities 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Residential Adds & Alts 3 $54,932 4 $47,856 3 $69,410 Industrial 1 $3,000 1 $6,500 0 $0 Commercial 8 $8,405,080 12 $4,130,201 5 j $496,620 Signs and Fences 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Manufactured Homes 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 TOTALS 13 $8,472,880 47 $18,537,424 11 $946,042 Fiscal Year to Date (July 1 — $14,588,201 $35,212,393 $27,062,727 June 30 1ACommunity Development\BuiIding\Building Activity\B1dgAct-2019\memo-2019-2 Pebruary.doc 8 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU March 11, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator From: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Subject: Legislative amendment to incorporate an updated Public Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan (LA 2018-03) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council hold a public hearing and adopt the attached Ordinance which will incorporate a new Public Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND: Under state law, cities with populations in excess of 2,500 are required to develop and adopt a public facilities plan for all areas within their Urban Growth Boundary. The purpose is to ensure that cities are providing for development that is timely, orderly and efficient. Woodburn last updated its Public Facilities Plan ("PFP") in 2005 as part of the City's Periodic Review process. The proposed update incorporates infrastructure improvements completed since that time, the finalized Urban Growth Boundary amendment, and updated growth projections for the City. Importantly, this update also provides greater detail with regard to infrastructure planning for the City's Southwest Industrial Reserve ("SWIR") area. The proposed plan was prepared as part of a Special Public Works Fund Technical Assistance Grant the City received and with the assistance of the private consulting engineering firms of Murraysmith and DKS Associates. DISCUSSION: Amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan require a public hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission prior to being considered by the City Council. On December 13, 2018, in conformance with WDO 4.01 .09B. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x Finance—X- 9 and 4.01 .1OB., the Planning Commission held a public hearing and unanimously recommended that the Council adopt the proposed PFP. The City Council then completed its public hearing on March 11 , 2019 and is now ready to consider adoption of an ordinance. If adopted by the Council, this PFP will replace the current PFP as Exhibit 1-13 of the Comprehensive Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Adoption of the revised PFP will not, in and of itself, have any direct financial impact on the City. However, the PFP includes recommended infrastructure improvements which, if they are implemented would need to be budgeted for prior to constructing. Typically, these would be included as part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Attachments: 1 . December 13, 2018 Planning Commission Staff Report with attachments 2. Ordinance for LA 2018-03 with proposed Public Facilities Plan 10 Community Development Department Planning Division W.00DB �UR�tI1�1 4 270 Montgomery Street, Woodburn, Oregon 97071 • (503)982-5246 amw IIIIIIIII Iragrr+cr �xrr.�� V ��Su Staff Report To: Planning Commission From: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director �= f Meeting Date: December 13, 2018 (Staff Report prepared December 6, 2018) Item: Public Hearing on updated Public Facilities Plan (LA 2018-03) Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................2 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................2 RECOMMENDATION .......................................................................................................2 ACTIONS .......................................................................................................................3 ATTACHMENT LIST .........................................................................................................3 Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 1 of 7 11 Executive Summary The Public Facilities Plan ("PFP") is a required element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City last updated this plan in 2005 as part of the City's Periodic Review process. The proposed update incorporates infrastructure improvements completed since that time, the finalized Urban Growth Boundary amendment, and updated growth projections for the City. Importantly, this update also provides greater detail with regard to infrastructure planning for the City's Southwest Industrial Reserve ("SWIR") area. Amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan require a public hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission prior to being considered by the City Council. If adopted by the Council, this PFP will replace the current PFP as "Exhibit B" of the Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The PFP serves as a long-range planning document which identifies major infrastructure projects that are anticipated to serve future development. Goal 11 (Public Facilities and Services) of the Oregon Statewide Goals is intended to ensure that communities plan for and develop public facilities and services in a "timely, orderly and efficient arrangement." Oregon Revised Statute 197.712(2)(e) requires local governments to adopt a Public Facilities Plan for all areas within their urban growth boundary. The PFP includes public water, sanitary sewer, storm, and transportation facilities. It includes specific projects, maps and costs associated with these facilities. Completing this update to the PFP became possible when the city received a Special Public Works Technical Assistance grant from the State. With the $60,000 grant, the City hired the professional consulting team of Murraysmith and DKS Associates to complete the proposed PFP. It identifies major infrastructure projects necessary to serve the City through the year 2037 (statutorily mandated timeline) and documents the effect on utility and transportation infrastructure resulting from the Southwest Industrial Reserve expansion of the City of Woodburn. Recommendation Approval: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the staff report, any testimony received and recommend approval of the legislative amendment as proposed. Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 2 of 7 12 Actions The Planning Commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council on legislative amendments. The Commission should make a recommendation to the Council to: 1. Approve as presented; or 2. Approve with specific edits based on stated reasons; or 3. Deny, based on stated reasons. Staff will forward the Commission's recommendation and any pertinent discussion from the hearing to the City Council for its consideration. Attachment List 101. Analyses & Findings 102. 2018 Woodburn Public Facilities Plan Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 3 of 7 13 An This attachment to the staff report analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the legislative amendment relates to and meets applicable provisions. Section references are to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Oregon Administrative Rules or A� W[dMEW 101 Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 4of7 14 Legislative Amendment Provisions of the WDO 4.01 Decision-Making Procedures 4.01.02E.Type V Decisions(Legislative):Type V decisions involve legislative actions where the City Council enacts or amends the City's land use regulations, comprehensive plan, Official Zoning Map or some component of these documents.Type V decisions may only be initiated by the City Council.The Planning Commission holds an initial public hearing on the proposal before making a recommendation to the City Council.The City Council then holds a final public hearing and renders a decision. Public notice is provided for all public hearings(Section 4.01.14).The City Council's decision is the City's final decision and is appealable to LUBA within 21 days after it becomes final. This legislative amendment to the WDO Comprehensive Plan and qualifies as a Type V decision. Staff completed the public notices for the Commission hearing date of December 13, 2018, specifically a newspaper ad in the Woodburn Independent and mailed notice to select agencies— including Marion County, the Woodburn Fire and School Districts, and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration for adoption. Comprehensive Plan Policies, OAR's & Statewide Planning Goals Comprehensive Plan I. Public Facilities Goal 1.9 To ensure that growth is orderly and efficient,the City shall phase the needed public services in accordance with the expected growth. Extensions of the existing public services should be in accordance with the facility master plans and Public Facility Plan in this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-1.1 Public Facilities and services shall be appropriate to support sufficient amounts of land to maintain an adequate housing market in areas undergoing development or redevelopment. Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 5 of 7 15 B.Citizen Involvement and Agency Coordination Policy B-2.Woodburn shall coordinate with affected state agencies regarding proposed comprehensive plan and land use regulation amendments,as required by state law. The PFP ensures orderly and efficient growth in the City. It includes projects and associated costs necessary to provide public facilities and services. All state, county and regional entities were notified pursuant to state law. Statewide Planning Goals Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely,orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. The proposal directly addresses the intent of Goal 11 by adopting a Plan that provides for orderly and efficient public facilities and services. I. 1] Goal 14 Urbanization OAR 660-015-0000,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use,to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries,to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. The proposal furthers this goal by ensuring efficient use of land and providing for livable communities by planning for infrastructure to address future growth within the city's UGB. Oregon Administrative Rules: 660-011-0045 Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 6 of 7 16 Adoption and Amendment Procedures for Public Facility Plans (1)The governing body of the city or county responsible for development of the public facility plan shall adopt the plan as a supporting document to the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and shall also adopt as part of the comprehensive plan: (a) The list of public facility project titles, excluding (if the jurisdiction so chooses) the descriptions or specifications of those projects; (b) A map or written description of the public facility projects' locations or service areas as specified in sections(2) and (3) of this rule; and (c)The policy(ies)or urban growth management agreement designating the provider of each public facility system.If there is more than one provider with the authority to provide the system within the area covered by the public facility plan,then the provider of each project shall be designated. The proposal includes each of the required elements for Public Facilities Plans stipulated in OAR 660-011-0045 CONCLUSION Based on the above Findings, Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with all applicable Comprehensive Plan, Development Ordinance and state provisions for adoption. It is recommended that the City Council ultimately adopt the 2018 Woodburn Public Facilities Plan as Exhibit B of the Comprehensive Plan (LA 2018-03) Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 7 of 7 17 1 1 po murraysmilh w.QOeBURnr Public Facilities Plan July 2018 P u b lic F a cifil til e s P I a n City of Woodburn Ady 2G18 0 p80" C,�N k` 898 CAMIL E RENEW: Murraysmith water,Wasteawoter;Storm Wow 888 SW 5th Avenue Suite 1170 Portland,OR 97204 19 Acknowledgements is exf..)ressed to (.:711 who contribi ited t(.:) the c(.wnf..)1eb(.�)n this City of Woodburn Eric Liljequist, PE George Kuznetsoz Dago Garcia Curtis Stulz Frank Sutter Murraysmith Brian Ginter, PE Natalie Jennings, PE Claire DeVoe DKS Associates Mat Dolata, PE 17-1993 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 20 Table �� Contents � �� 1 N �" m�� ~�on 1.1 General.............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Service Area Characteristics------------------------------'1-1 �� Water" ��er m��N man 2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Water Dernand -------------------------------------.2-1 2.2.2 fxistingDrmond--------------------------------.2-2 2.2.2 Projected 2O57Drmond.....................................................................................2-5 2.3 VVaterSource--------------------------------------.2-3 2.3.2 Wells....................................................................................................................2-5 2.3.5 Source N/otrrProtection ....................................................................................2-4 2.4 Treatment........................................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Storage and Pumping......................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Water Distribution System..............................................................................................2-5 2.6.2 Existing System...................................................................................................2-6 2.6.2 Design (ritrriG.....................................................................................................2-7 2.6.5 AnoknisFindings--------------------------------.2-7 2.6.4 Svtem8rconncndotions......................................................................................2-7 2.7 Capital Improvement Projects........................................................................................2-8 2.8 Funding ----------------------------------------. 2-12 3" Sanitary Sewer Plan 3.1 Wastewater Planning History-----------------------------'3-1 3.2 Treatment........................................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Primary Collection System ..............................................................................................3-3 3.4 Capital Improvement Projects........................................................................................3-5 3.5 Funding -----------------------------------------.3-5 17-1993 Page Public Facilities Plan ]u|y2018 City ofWood burn 21 4" Storm Water Plan 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Design Storms..................................................................................................................4-1 4.3 Existing Inventory............................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Needed Drainage Improvements to Support Growth...................................................4-4 4.4.1 Detention Pn0ry ImplementGtion.......................................................................4-4 4.5 Requirements for New Developments...........................................................................4-5 45.2 City nfWoodburn Runoff Detention Requirement............................................4-5 45.2 \nfetv Requirements...........................................................................................4-6 4.5 SVV|R Expansion Area Projects........................................................................................4-6 4.7 Funding -----------------------------------------.4-7 5" Transportation Plan 5.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Capital Improvement Plan forSVV|RAnea-----------------------.5-1 17-1993 Page ii Public Facilities Plan ]uly2018 City of Wood burn 22 murraysm��`h Section 1 c III uiri I,,. Introduction 1.1 General The Public Facilities Plan (PFP) identifies major infrastructure projects necessary to serve the Year 2037 projected population of 35,025 and documents the effect on utility and transportation infrastructure resulting from the Southwest Industrial Reserve expansion of the City of Woodburn. As required by state statute, four elements have been studied: Domestic Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage, and Transportation. Information for this plan was derived from existing individual utility Master and Facilities Plans, and the previous public facilities plan, updating where necessary. A comprehensive analysis was performed for the SWIR expansion area as a part of this update. Tables summarizing projects and associated costs have been included in the body of this Public Facilities Plan Update. Maps showing the locations of infrastructure elements (Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Drainage) are included in the end of each section. Transportation projects and maps were derived from the Woodburn Transportation Systems Plan (TSP), which is currently being updated. 1.2 Service Area Characteristics Woodburn is located in Oregon's Willamette Valley approximately 18 miles north of Salem and 31 miles south of Portland in the Pudding River basin. The topography of the service area slopes slightly to the northeast. The area is relatively flat with an elevation differential of only 50 feet, ranging from 150 to 200 feet above sea level. The main drainage through the City is Mill Creek, which drains to the Pudding River. Senecal Creek drains a small portion of the City's UGB area west of I-5. A very small portion of the east part of the City (east of highway 99E) naturally drains directly to the Pudding River. The climate is mild with wet winters and dry summers. Rainfall averages about 45 inches per year and one year in ten will exceed 52 inches. The wettest months are usually November through February. The soils in the area are primarily of two associations, Amity silt loam and Woodburn silt loam. Both of these formations are found throughout the City in most areas except drainage channels. The Amity series consists of somewhat poorly drained soils formed in mixed alluvial silts. The layer is general 17 inches thick overlaying a 7-inch silt loam subsurface layer and a 13-inch silty clay loam subsoil. The Woodburn series consists of moderately well drained soils formed in silty alluvium and loess. The 17-inch surface layer overlays 37 inches of subsoil and a silt loam substratum to a 17-1993 Page 1-1 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodborn 24 depth of 68 inches. The course of Mill Creek is etched in bashaw clay and dayton and concord silt loams as well as terrace escarpment are also found in the service area. The geology of the area consists of Troutdale formation materials and Willamette silts overlaying Columbia River basalt. Depth to basalt is unknown but thought to be approximately 600 feet. The Troutdale formation consists of alternate layers of clay, silt, sand and gravel. The Willamette silt formation consists of stratified silt, sandy silt, clayey silt and silty clay and has poor drainage characteristics. The City is located in a Seismic Zone 3. Two major highways traverse the City; Interstate 5 along the west side of the City and 99E along the east side of the City. Both routes run generally north-south through Woodburn. Oregon Highway 214 is an east-west route through the City, and Highway 211 connects Woodburn to Molalla. Woodburn is bisected by the Union Pacific Railroad main line. The railroad extends north-south through Woodburn and parallels Front Street through the City. Willamette Valley Railroad uses spur tracks that parallel Front Street and a line that proceeds east from Front Street along Cleveland Street. 17-1993 Page 1-2 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodborn 25 Ct III oIIri 2 Water Plan 2.1 Introduction Murraysmith is in the process of updating the City of Woodburn Water Master Plan. It is expected to be completed in late 2018. The City's Water Master Plan was first prepared in 1997 and was updated in 2001. The current update provides a 20-year plan for the water system through the year 2037. The plan was based on a projected permanent population potential of 35,025, the coordinated Year 2037 population projection for this report. The City has 7,509 single family, multi-family, commercial, industrial, and public connections. The current service area of the water system is mostly inside the City limits with a few customers outside, although the service area will expand as annexations to the City occur within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). It is assumed that all growth will occur within the current 5,066-acre UGB. The water system analysis for the PFP includes future service to the SWIR area. The City anticipates that industrial land will be annexed to the City in the short term.Although most improvements necessary to serve expansion areas will be paid for by the developer, the CIP will be amended on an annual basis to include sanitary, sewer, water, storm drainage and transportation projects necessary to serve recently annexed areas. 2.2 Water Demand 2.2.1 Existing Water demand refers to all potable water required by the system including residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses as well as unaccounted for water. Potable water demands are described using three water use metrics: average daily demand (ADD), maximum day demand (MDD), and peak hour demand (PHD). Each of these metrics are stated in gallons per unit of time such as million gallons per day(mgd).ADD is the total annual water volume used system-wide divided by 365 days per year. MDD is the largest 24-hour water volume for a given year. In western Oregon, MDD usually occurs each year between July 1st and September 30th. PHD is the estimated largest hour of demand on the maximum water use day. Data was unavailable to calculate PHD thus a PHD:MDD peaking factor of 2 is used, consistent with water use patterns at other Willamette Valley water providers. Table 2-1 summarizes the City's current system-wide ADD and MDD based on water production data. 17-1993 Page 2-1 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 27 Table ®1 Historical Water Demand Estimates 2012 2.2 4.5 9.0 2013 2.2 3.9 7.8 2014 23 4.2 8.4 2015 2.4 4.5 9.0 2016 2.3 4,0 8,0 The City's water utility billing records are categorized by service type and meter size. For purposes of the graphic, records were summarized into five divisions: Residential, Commercial < 1-inch diameter, Commercial > 1-inch diameter, Industrial, and Sprinkler. Sprinkler consumption includes irrigation services supplied from the drinking water system at many of the City's public parks and schools. Percentages of current water consumption by customer type are calculated based on 2016 City water billing records. As illustrated in Figure 2-1, approximately 61% of Water consumption in Woodburn is by residential customers. Figure 2®1 2016 Water Demand per Customer Category IndusSprinkler,6% trial, 1%�, a �j jj Commercial<= 1",8% Does not include"Unaccounted-for Water' 17-1993 Page 2-2 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 28 2.2.2 Projected Estimates of future growth and related water demand within the Woodburn UGB are developed for 5-year increments to the year 2037 and a buildout condition. Population projections and the per capita water use developed for the Water System Master Plan were used to estimate demands for each 5-year increment, while current water use by zoning and comprehensive planning maps are used to estimate buildout demands. Projections are shown in Table 2-2. Table ®2 Woodburn Demand Projections 2017 2.4, 4.6 9.2 2022 2.6 4.9 9.8 2027 2.81 5.3 10.6 2037 3.2 6.1 12.2 Build-out 3.8 7.2 14.4 2.3 Water Source 2.3.1 Wells The City's seven wells tap the Troutdale aquifer, a large semi-confined aquifer. It is anticipated that the City will continue to utilize this aquifer as the sole source of water. Current wells are listed in Table 2-3 and shown in the figure at the end of this section. The existing total water source capacity is adequate to meet existing demands, but additional wells will be needed for future demands through build-out of the UGB. Table 2®3 Existing Wells Nazarene Well Located on Emergency 7 1967 1,000 1,000 333 Woodland Avenue' backup 9 Warren Donell Well located 1979 1,000 650 280 Supply on Country Club Road Centennial Well located 10 1988 ,1,000 ' 279 Supply 2205 National Way 800 11 1108 Astor Way 1989 1,000 650 288 Supply 12 Parr Road WTP 2003 1,200 650 305 Supply 13 555 S Settlemeir Road 2003 600 400 260 Supply 14 3099 Pacific Highway 2004 1,400 1,000 297 Supply Total Existing Non-Emergency Source Capacity 4,150 gpm(5.98 MGD) 17-1993 Page 2-3 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 29 2.3.2 Source Water Protection The State of Oregon Department of Human Services and Department of Environmental Quality have developed a Source Water Protection Plan for the City. The plan inventories potential sources of contamination, establishes best management practices for industries within the influence zone of the City's wells, allows the City to develop ordinances to provide protection of the aquifer, and maps the flow patterns of the aquifers. The Troutdale aquifer, from which the City's wells obtain the City's drinking water supply, is not a critical or restrictively classified groundwater area. The City does not at this time plan to request certification of the delineations in the Source Water Protection Plan for Statewide Planning Goal 5 purposes. 2.4 Treatment Historically,the City of Woodburn provided no water treatment or disinfection because the quality of water derived from City wells did not require disinfection and neither state nor federal water regulations required treatment or disinfection for wells. Increasing concerns with the odor, taste and staining problems generated by iron and manganese in the groundwater, a potential decrease in the federal arsenic standard and potential regulation of radon led the City to update its master plan and develop a treatment plan for the City's water supply in 2001. Iron and manganese levels in the City's water source caused numerous complaints about the aesthetic quality of the water. To eliminate the iron and manganese problems, the City constructed three treatment plants to treat all of the City's groundwater sources except Well 7 which is only operated for emergency supply. The three treatment plants are located at well sites on National Way, Country Club Road, and Parr Road. These treatment facilities treat water from wells at their sites and water transmitted from nearby wells through raw water transmission lines constructed with the treatment plants in 2003- 2004. The locations of the treatment facilities are shown in the figure at the end of this section. The existing total treatement capacity is adequate to meet water supply needs through 2037 and to build-out of the existing UGB. Treated water is pumped in the distribution system by booster pumps located at each water treatment plant, On-site ground level storage reservoirs provide suction supply to the pump stations. These facilities are described further in the next section. 2.5 Storage and Pumping Water system storage is considered to be comprised of four elements: equalizing, operational, fire flow, and emergency. "Equalizing storage" provides water supply when customer demand exceeds 17-1993 Page 2-4 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 30 the capacity of the wells and pumps to produce water flow. "Operational" accounts for the amount of reservoir volume between when the pumps come on and when they turn off, "Fire Oovv reserves" provides the volume of water needed to provide the demand for fire flow for a fire having a finite duration. "Emergency storage" supplies water when a portion of the water supply system is out of commission. Woodburn has reserviors as shown in Table 2-4 and in the figure at the end of this section. Table 2-4 Reservoir Inventory EME Parr Road 2.9 Ground Level Steel Tank National Way 1.7 Ground Level Steel Tank Country Club Road 0.3 Ground Level Steel Tank Elevated Tank 0.75 Elevated Steel Tank In normal operating conditions, pressure within the water system is established by the elevated tank. When demand in the system draws down the elevated tank level, booster pumps at the treatment plants are turned on to pump into the system from the ground level reservoirs and refill the elevated tank. If the level in the elevated tank continues to drop after the first pump has turned on, more pumps receive signals toturn on and pump into the system until the elevated tank water level reaches the pre-determined shutoff level. In addition to the hydraulic grade established in the system by the elevated tank,� pressure is maintained throughout the system by the booster pumps at each of the treatment plant sites controlled by pressure sensors located at various locations in the City. The booster pumps at each plant operate to maintain water levels in the elevated tank and tosupply demands placed upon the system by users from the ground level reservoirs at each water treatment plant. If the elevated tank is out of service for maintenance or other reasons, the treatment plant booster pumps and pressure sensor system will maintain desired system pressure. Ground level storage utilizes pumps to move water into the distribution system and work with the elevated storage reservoir to maintain water pressure. The pumps need to be large enough to satisfy anticipated peak demand flow rates. Asurnrnary of booster pumping capacity is presented in Table 2-5. They also need to have an automated auxiliary power supply to assure water is available during power failure. All three of the treatment plants have emergency generators capable of plant operation as well as operation of the wells located at each of the treatment plant sites. The City has portable generators that can be used to provide emergency power to other wells. 17-1993 Page 2-5 Public Facilities Plan ]uly2018 City ofWood burn 31 Table ®5 2018 Water System Pump Station Inventory Parr Road 2 75 1,819 S/SE National Way 2 60 1,650 N/E Country Club Road 2 60 1,150 NW/W TOTAL CAPACITY 6 - 9,238 gpm(13.3 MGD) All Firm Capacity 3 4,619 gpm(6.7 MGD) All 'The target flow rate for all pump stations is approximately 1200-1300 gpm,in order to move equal amounts of water through all treatment plants,reservoirs,and pump stations.Pumps can ramp up to full capacity if needed. The City has adequate storage volume and pumping capacity to serve the needs of the City through 2037 and to buildout of the UGB. 2.6 Water Distribution System 2.6.1 ExistingSystem There are approximately 97 miles of transmission and distribution piping, ranging from 4- inch to 20-inch in diameter. The majority of the pipe within the service area is 6-inch or fl- inch diameter service piping. A summary of the quantity of pipe by diameter is outlined in Table 2-6. The majority of the pipe in the system is ductile or cast iron, in addition, there is a significant amount of asbestos-cement pipe in the Senior Estates area. Table 2® 2018 Water System Pipe Inventory �11!tli'I'I� tl 11 'I� l� s- -,Iliii'i I Iii V II ® i�, ® I 4® 13,963 6 160,417 8 217,320 10 22,816 12 79,853 14 8,382 16 2,174' 18 6,797 20 633 17-1993 Page 2-6 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 32 2,6,2 F)es' D /-['t��['a ° State administrative rules require the system maintain a rninirnurn pressure of 20 psi at all service connections atall times. Apressure range of4O-8O psi is recommended under normal operating conditions. The City requires the maximum day demand plus fire flow for a proposed development to be calculated. Demand must not exceed available supply. Calculated available fire Oovv is compared to the standards in Table 2-7. Table 2-7 Fire Flow [)eD1aOJs by Zoning Classification Low Density Residential (IRS, R15, RSN) 1,000 2 Medium Density Residential (RMN) 3,000 3 Commercial (CG, CO, DDC) 3,000 3 Public 3,000 3 Industrial 3,000 3 If the available fire flow is less than the required value, the developer may be required to either modify the proposed method of construction to reduce the required fire flow ormake system improvements to increase the available fire flow in the water system to the development. 2,6,3 /LDa|Vs's Findings Pressure within the distribution system is generally between 50 and 60 psi.The water system master plan did not identify significant pressure deficiencies during rnaxirnurn day flows. Under peak demand conditions, simulated as rnaxirnurn day demand with a simultaneous fire flow event, pressures inthe system may drop below 2O psi under existing conditions. Recommended improvements toaddress these deficiencies follow. 2,6,4 System RecOmeD/fat'ODs As areas within the UGB develop, the City will require developers to extend the transmission mains into these areas. A number of capital improvement projects have been identified to address these current and future deficiencies. The 2018 Water System Master Plan recommends replacing inadequate segments of the water distribution system before emergency situations occur or before capacity problems 17-1993 Page 2-7 Public Facilities Plan ]u|y2018 City ofWood burn 33 arise. The City will continue annual funding of an ongoing substandard main replacement program. The priorities for replacing pipes is as follows: ■ Pipes in areas of related frequent customer complaints. ■ Leaking pipes. ■ Pipes identified by either maintenance or operations as problem pipes. ■ Pipes four inches or less in diameter, and in areas that have the potential for growth. ■ Undersized transmission mains. ■ Aged Asbestos cement pipe. ■ Aged steel or cast-iron pipe. ■ Lead joint pipes. 2.7 Capital Improvement Projects The 2018 Water System Master Plan assumed that the SWIR area would be included in the 2022 scenario. Table 2-8 displays the water distribution system improvements needed to serve the SWIR expansion areas and other system improvements with estimates the cost of constructing the improvements. The only projects that are required for the SWIR expansion area is the project entitled "SWIR Extension," and the proposed wells. The CIP figure from the WSMP and the proposed water system map for the SWIR Master Plan are included in the appendix of this report. 17-1993 Page 2-8 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 34 Ll U � o i s Q- i U )° 0) m 0 z � U) i p a> L ° E ? p U) o o ) Q ( n'u L 0 � v � C) O 0'. O'.. o ® O \.. o O 0 o 0 0 0 N 0 O ® C' O 0 O Cl) O 0 Cl) 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O' O Or O O O C O O C O O_' 0< O 0 O 0 LD L() O 0 O 'IT I- V 0 0. O 0 O N a I+ : LD 0 00 00 Cfl 1- 0 (fl Cfl T O N T T V b Cl) Cfl 0 T 4A: EA £A.: EA EA: EA £A EA '..EA'.. EA EA EA EA EA 4A ........................ ® 0 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 L 0 O O O 0 O O ti f4 0 O O O " CCS 0 O O'. O O LD (D Cfl O 0'. S'')'. Cl) O a r Cl) Cl) Oi r r C6 00.: � O N N ® C '. EA '.. EA EA - EA EAI _ V A d O' O 0 O O ' U O 0' O 0 O 0' a) Cj O Ci O d- V 0' •� � LC) 00 •0 00 00 0 a C3 Cl) T N > O ® EA 6q EA £A; 00 0 0 O O O 70 0 O O C O N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0' C= 0 O O 0 O O' O' O O O D O O O' C c) tr�A L77 M LO O O O' V N 1 O LL O 000 0 •� a) EAEA EA 61�1I - -- ® e 0 ® e .... ...- e U e (D e e T o TL W 0 (6 0- -; 0')- Qp, C 6 E c E N E -0 (D N 0) a) ° 0_;o co ° a) a) -Z a) > C: >, C: — o -c- 0 L o aa)) O c E • a) aa)) () � W .o U (n its .(n W (? cs) L o, r- ° —_ 0 - a) c (, �_ rn iA � cn C: U E 0- 0 s� 0 its 0 a) 0, LD [r O o r ' z = � � Q OTZ3z U Qof U C/) OoEx I— C, >T >N Cl)' >V LC?' C>O r N rl N Q Co � 00 00 0 C C 0') cT _A 1Z N O !Z 1Z C O +_ N r4 4-uO > 00 U + m �- d ON e Table 2-9 Project List —Water is ri u i®n System Plan SEP Transmission Replacement 14111611 M-42 Country Club to elevated tank transmission replacement ' 7,573 $ 3,484,000 Projects for Future Development M-38 SWIR 10111141 01'1 2" 13,612 $ 5,027,000 M-39 OR-99E Southern Extension 8" 927 $ 214,000 M-40 OR99E:Aztec St to Blaine St 81" 389 $ 90,000 M-41 OR-99E: Lincoln St South to Existing Stubout 8" 271 $ 63,000 � 1 r l t / f / ( J / / ( 1 1 5-Year Fire Flow Projects M-1 Reconnect: Brown St to Vine St 121' 54 $ 40,000 M-2 Front St: Stonehedge to Newberg Hwy &Newberg Hwy: Front 12" 1,817 $ 627,000 St to Bulldog Dr Park Ave': Hardcastle Ave to Lincoln St& East/West sections of M-3 81" 1,852 $ 426,000 Woodpark Ter M-4 Lincoln St: Park Ave to hydrant west of Bryant St 8" 756 $ 174,000 M-5 Nuevo Amencer 8" 1104 $ 254,000 M-6 Loop Front St to Salud Medical Center 8" 706 $ 163,000 r / I / t ( / 1 � 10-Year Fire Flow Projects M-7 Southeast Industrial Area Improvements 8111011 5,390 $ 1,520,000 Front St: hydrant east of Hardcastle Ave to hydrant west of M-9' 10" 569 ' $ 163,000 Hardcastle Ave i 17-1993 Page 2-10 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 36 ® ®® NEW. 20-Year Fire Flow Projects M-8 OR-99E:TOMIin Ave to Young St 8" 459 $ 106,:000 M-10 Loop: Barclay Sq to Harvard Dr 8" 166 $ 39,000 M-11 Loop: High St to Settlemier Ave 81" 234 $ 54,000 M-12 James St: Legion Park to east end of Apts.& Park Ave: Parkview 8" 10" 1,390 $ 339,000 Ct to James St M-13 Woodburn RU Park: North Leg 81" 348 $ 81,000 M-14 French Prairie Middle School:Hwy 214 & Boones Ferry Rd 8" 907 $ 209,000 M-15 OR-214:Tomlin Ave to Cascade Factory Homes 611811 759 $ 150,000 M-16 Blaine St& McKinlet St: OR-99E west to hydrant 8" 10" 882 $ 229,000 M-17 Glatt Cir: North and South legs 8111011 561 $ 143,000 M-18 Loop: 2213 Country Club Ct to Country Club Rd 8" 226 $ 52,000 M-19 Loop: Industrial,area at end of Shenandoah Ln 10" 703 $ 201,000 M-20 Loop: Northernmost Driveway on Commerce Way 8" 762 $ 176,000 M-21 West ends of Hayes St and Young St 81" 381 $ 88,000 M-22 Park Cir: Park Ave to hydrant,south leg 8" 315 $ 73,000 M-23 Yew St: across 3rd 81" 35 $ 9,000 M-24 Loop: Lincoln Rd to North Pacific Plaza 8" 515 $ 119,000 M-25 Line West of Wellspring Confrence Center 81" 253 $ 59,000 M-26 Rainier Rd: Randolph Rd to Cascade Dr 8" 381 $ 88,000 M-27 Charles St: Charles Ct to Corby St 6" 342 $ 60,000 M-28 Greenview Ct: Greenview Dr. to hydrant 8" 220 $ 51,000 M-29 Oak St:2nd St to 1st St 81" 190 $ 44,000 M-30 Nuevo Amencer extention: 5th St to 6th St 8" 423 $ 98,000 M-31 Safeway on OR-99E 81" 649 $ 150,000 M-32 Loop: Apartments South of Stonehenge 8" 10" 1,114 $ 288,000 M-33 Line to Kerr Contractors 10" 159 $ 46,000 M-34 Newberg Hwy Dairy Queen 6" 193 $ 34,000 Evergreen Rd to line to North and Evergreen Estates to hydrant M-35 101" 307 $ 88,000 east M-36 Lincoln St. OR-99E to first hydrant north on Carol St 8" 493 $ 114,000 M-37 Stacy Allison Way: West end of Walmart Parking Lot 81" 512 $ 118,000 0 17-1993 Page 2-11 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 37 2.8 Funding The City allocates its water budget into three funds: Water fund, Water Equipment Replacement Reserve Fund, and the Water System Development Trust Fund. The available sources of revenues come from water user fees, service fees, interest revenues, system development charges and miscellaneous revenues. The City last completed a rate study in 1999, and is currently completing an update incorporating items from the 2018 Water System Master Plan Update. The purpose of a rate study is to determine the rates and system development charges that would be necessary to fund needed capital improvements and to ensure the ongoing fiscal health of the water system.The rate studies also ensure that required increases are equitable in terms of what each class of user pays. The rates and charges provide revenue for capital improvements and for operation of the water supply, treatment, and distribution system. Water rates were determined utilizing a cost-of-service or functional allocation of costs.The intent of this allocation is to recover revenue from classes of customers according to the demands that they place on the system. System Development charges can fund projects for growth. The system development charge is the sum of a calculated reimbursement fee and improvement fee. The reimbursement fee recovers costs associated with capital improvements already constructed or under construction. The improvement fee recovers costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed in the future. 17-1993 Page 2-12 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 38 CO, LrI / '1,` %/ i// �➢',�I%/�� t��Y I/ / / �� /1 Y/ nl i'r�.. �//./r� fiUl �� Y�� '��l�jU��%'(-�//l f�": ''��I; •--I ' �%"�/✓�//�/ //: 1 '" � �'%r; '"»,a if/////��;/� /////�fr'f' i�l%��%/?lr„�r , /�”' 'yy/w o� III /,% / �,/�,"/ if r�1�"�'r*✓�%I b�', '/ / 9/r//i,;; �I/��j�/ lI� ��I y� 1Ni E �y �, U.,v'� /1r/ Hill 71j- 1 f1 fr/� //f l��f �/'" %; � +►� ?(;;� � //r✓/�� / ;";,,; /U,,ri/i f ��/,�� vf„ '/////M IA" / ♦,r"':" ,;,M,� ,r/// " EF yMn v Amw, 1 M1 i /��i/iii /p/► f//%l Baan, C w,w ak' �y A0,� I "nn )I a < r/ r ,' .�n �, rl' j/ > r r to ' � � " r �;�� m '� 41 dnl "ud� {�Il r �r un e�//U / '� r rf /i%/ H inn, ��' �� i w� Gf/// i �lj' U � '' 1 L t/ D l �%rv"/ % & Po l 1 /%�^"r � %r;ppv"U ��; "/ ft� �qXl f % '/1 �fPff'. "nrPVl 2 / Vis,/ 0110, 01 %i%//,1 151"e') n 1 3f0 rr is No 'µryr err V n „ lt""&Q, / a MW /iii, v x „ 7 p/rip/ onn M ✓"v�for �,;,� / E �. CL ^` ' %/ W r ///i/ i ,no �1 // / // riia / r `/ 41 yaw 777" 1L r WE w. / ��'� 1>/i" ` p��1 r / r p/w✓i a '/'/l ' In 1 p err y i 4� a E �o w„ s 'U! %rar �pM1(t r'fJ"" „O/U,,,,✓, ' JOii d �',” wnCdl do rhr Y k�QCOD .�� / O C) Lu Li "r �'" h^ V///l �j V°' o l/ ��/rrp'//%// � r / pp w ✓ a //f / / /, / nrr♦rr Man Uirill/ /00 /11 -AN o v o f /Jv ' rai Q ///// o III o IIri 1 Sanitary Sewer Plan 3.1 Wastewater Planning History In November 1993, the City of Woodburn was notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) of a new requirement to develop a plan to meet the more stringent Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) effluent limits developed for the Pudding River. The volume of water in the Pudding River, during the summer months (July and August), is so low the river cannot dilute the treatment plant effluent sufficiently. Low flows result in oxygen levels, needed by certain aquatic life, to be below acceptable limits. The inability to maintain sufficient oxygen levels is the main reason the Pudding River has been classified as a water-quality limited stream. Total maximum daily loads were established for the Pudding River and waste load allocations were set for the Woodburn POTW. Waste load allocations are formally required as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. DEQ cannot reissue expired permits until some ongoing litigation is resolved, so many communities have to operate off of existing expired permit terms. Woodburn is currently one of those cities running under an expired permit, so technically it does not have to meet the new TMDL requirements. However, the City should prepare their system to be in compliance with their allocated waste load allocation in preparation for the day that DEQ can reissue permits. On December 28, 2004, the U.S. Environmental Quality Protection Agency (EPA) and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued the City a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The compliance schedule with this permit requires the City to develop a plan and construct facilities for meeting the more stringent POTW effluent limits developed for the Pudding River. The treatment plant's wastewater effluent temperature/winter ammonia discharge is higher than can be directly discharged to the Pudding River during parts of the year. Increased river temperatures/winter ammonia levels have an adverse effect upon aquatic life. DEQ has established temporary temperature and winter ammonia limits until the establishment of total maximum daily loads for the Pudding River and waste load allocations are required for the Woodburn POTW by the next NPDES. In response to DEQ's Pudding River notification, the City prepared and adopted the 1995 Wastewater Facilities Plan for its wastewater treatment and collection system. This plan was updated in May 2010. This plan is designed to guide operations and improvements to the City's treatment system through the year 2030. In addition to providing upgrade guidelines for the existing system, to meet regulatory requirements, the facilities plan provides for increasing the system's capacity to accommodate planned residential, commercial and industrial growth. 17-1993 Page 3-1 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 41 Additional efficiency is built into the plan by providing for phased construction of the improvements. The estimated cost of treatment facilities is divided into three phases that coincide with previous plans. Phase 1 improvements have already been completed, so they were excluded from the updated plan's CIP. Phase 2 represents year 2020 improvements and phase 3 represents year 2030 improvements. Phase 2 estimated costs (in 2017 dollars) are $30.3 million, Phase 3 estimated costs (in 2017 dollars) are $0.1 million. The plan will enable the City to look ahead to long-term needs through the year 2030, while implementing the improvements only as they are needed. The 2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan's CIP was developed assuming 38,916 persons in 2030, and thus can readily accommodate the coordinated Year 2037 population projection (35,025). The projection for this plan was based on an average annual growth rate that ranged from 1.22 percent to 1.56 percent (based on Marion County's projections for each 5-year period), whereas the Wastewater Facilities Plan utilized a growth rate of 2.8 percent until 2020 and then 1.9 percent. Based on this information, the proposed improvements presented in the existing Wastewater Facilities Plan will provide sufficient capacity for the SWIR area and projected population growth through 2037. Table 3-4 identifies projects to serve the UGB with the SWIR area. The Wastewater Facilties Plan study area encompassed the area within the Woodburn UGB and potential UGB expansion areas that are now included within the UGB. Some areas outside the UGB were also included in the study for public health reasons. 3.2 Treatment Phase 1 of planned improvements to the wastewater treatment facility was completed in 2003. A diagram showing the physical layout of the treatment facility is shown in the Wastewater Facilities Plan. The system flows were updated for this plan since the last wastewater facilities plan flows were calculated nearly a decade ago. The current flows and loading are presented in Table 3-1 with the hydraulic design capacity of the treatment plant. The City reports that biochemical oxygen demand (BODS) levels have remained approximately the same, so no update to these values have been made. 17-1993 Page 3-2 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 42 Table ®1 WWTP Loading and Capacity ®,m ®ee ® me Annual Dry Weather Flow(ADWF) 1.90 4.1 Annual Average Daily Flow(AADF) 3.00 4.8 Maximum Month Wet Weather 5.96 Flow (MMWWF5) Peak Week Flow(PWkF) 7.19 Peak Daily Average Flow(PDAF5) 11.45 Peak Instantaneous Flow (PIFs) 11.53 16 Average Daily BOD5 4,500 Ib/day 6,500 Ib/day Maximum Daily BODS 10,575 Ib/day No major improvements to the facility have been necessary since Phase 1 construction. Phase 2 improvements will be constructed when Phase 1 facilities near capacity. The facilities plan estimated this to be around 2020 but will likely be further out based on the recent flow analysis. The WWFP recommends construction of a separate industrial WWTP. The City maintains at least four large contracts with industrial facilities stating how much water can be discharged. These contracts currently allow for the release of far more discharge than is currently being released and as such, this is not currently a critical need to meet existing treatment requirements. If the SWIR area develops as anticipated with flows typical of other light industrial areas in the City, an additional 0.4 MGD peak wet weather flow is expected from the area according to WWFP projections for base flow and Rainfall Derived Inflow and Infiltration (RDI I).This will not necessitate a separate industrial treatment plant, and therefore it was excluded from the project list in section 3.4. The instantaneous capacity of the plant is not growing as quickly as projected and is currently only 72% of the design capacity of the WWTP. The City should remain proactive in analyzing new development impacts to determine when WWTP expansion will be needed. When the actual peak instantaneous flows to the WWTP come within 1 MGD of the existing capacity, alternatives should be reevaluated to determine what are the appropriate improvements to be implemented. 3.3 Primary Collection System The wastewater collection system conveys wastewater from residential, commercial, and industrial facilities to the treatment facility. A diagram showing the layout of the existing sewer trunk and interceptor lines and pump stations is shown in the figure at the end of this section. The Woodburn sanitary sewerage collection system is composed of approximately 87 miles of sewer line and 8 pump stations as shown in Tables 3-2 and 3-3. Figure 1 shows the sewerage service area analyzed in the Wastewater Facilities Plan and shows areas considered for service expansion outside of the current UGB. 17-1993 Page 3-3 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 43 The Wastewater Facilities Plan provides a description of potential needed improvements to the collection system in existing and future conditions. The 2020, 2030, and 2060 conditions in the Facilities Plan assume that the SWIR area is developed at 750 gallons/acre/day. The results of the hydraulic analysis showed that the Mill Creek Pump Station and I-5 Pump Station require capacity upgrades, as well as the I-5 Pump Station Forcemain. Further analysis of the condition of wastewater collection facilities is included in Volume II of the Wastewater Facilities Plan. The CIP shows projects that will be needed through the Year 2030 within the City Limits. Table ®2 Pipe Diameter and Material Inventory (Lengths in Feet) unknown 45 368 32 " 3,272 3,717 !19%. 4 896 101 1,747 2,745 6 1,894 1„387 145 2,270 3,114 15,765 24,575 6% 8 63,254 87,014 1186 580 92,294 4957 20,870 27,0153 64% 10 10,060 1,2,329 147 105 13,748 2,510 339 39,236 9% 12 5,919 8,687 2701 5,707 1,921 4,096 29,030 7% 14 209 2171 426 0% 15 223 13,557 745 1,323 15,848 4% 16 3082 155 167 i 3,404 1% 18 8,763 1,987 500 11,250 3% 24 1„576 437 3,993 29 6,035 " 1% 27 2,177 2,177 1% 36 1934 1,934 0%' Forcemain 14,355 14,355 3% sum 84,418 124,133 4,983 685 134,483 13,503 62,680 424,885 100% %of total 20% 29% 1% 0% 32% 3% 15% 100% Table 3®3 Pump Station Capacities 1-5 1215 3160 Santiam 112 -- Stevens 191 226 Greenview 406 -- Industrial 550 -- Mill Creek 9800 11,797 Rainier 300 -- Vanderbeck 700 'Firm Capacities from Table 5-1 and Additional Capacity from Table 5-2 of the2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan 17-1993 Page 3-4 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 44 3.4 Capital Improvement Projects The 2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan assumed that the SWIR area would be included in the 2020 scenario. It notes that both of the pump stations downstream of the SWIR area are undersized in the 2020 scenario. Table 3-4 presents the wastewater collection system improvements needed to serve the SWIR expansion areas and estimates the cost of constructing the improvements. The existing wastewater collection system would not have sufficient capacity to efficiently serve the SWIR expansion area. These are illustrated in Figure 8-1 of the WWFP which is included in the appendix of this plan. The proposed wastewater map from the SWIR Master Plan is also included in the appendix of this plan. Table ®4 Project List —Sanitary Sewer Plan ® . ® ® `® Mill Creek PS Stage 1 $616,500 Mill Creek PS Stage 2 $3,212,000 1-5 Pump Station $1,611,500 1-5 Forcemain $3,813,500 SWIR Area Sanitary Sewer Extension $11,987,000 Woodburn POTW Phase 2 $28,050,000 Woodburn POTW Phase 3 $6,000 Natural Treatment Systems Phase 2 $9,481,500 Natural Treatment Systems Phase 3 $138,000 Stevens PS Pump Station $1,220,500. Young Street Pipeline $2,186,000 Front Street Pipeline $1,282,500 Mill Creek Interceptor Pipeline $2,287,000 Progress Way Pipeline $1,679,500 Hays Street Pipeline $2,503,000 Brown Street Pipeline $1,148,000 Sanitary Sewer Service to North Pipeline $6,435,000 Sanitary Sewer Service to South Pipeline $986,500 Area outside UGB Pipeline $10,554,000 Pump Station Upgrades Reliability $339,000 SWIR Total $58,916,500 Overall Total $89,537,000 SWIR specific projects are shown in bold. 17-1993 Page 3-5 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 45 3.5 Funding To assure that the impact of providing and maintaining new sewer collection facilities is not a burden to the community, new development will be required to pay for the cost of collection facilities needed to serve such development. Extra capacity facilities required to meet the standards of the Wastewater Facility Plan will be paid from accumulated revenue of the System Development Charge Fund. The City will continue paying the cost of maintaining and improving the existing collection system with funds derived from user fees. Treatment plant upgrades will be financed through a combination of system development charge funds, loans, and grants. 17-1993 Page 3-6 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 46 O r/,,;;;;,' �/U/////,,,;,;,,,,, ,, ,u r ,� r �%/%/ --,,��J�ol)�j'�i'C��j� i;1✓��r, � ��///,/ICY„ %i;;rr %///%� f//��"' � ;;,,;, ,��i//j/I ,;i„ „'.. ;; %lr''t��I�a,� ,; i�i✓ 1r� ", 7 rl;lt//m r %//////// /r �� f /%,, ✓r/ �//, r � r Jh s1,gpf9P %/�%/%��/ ! ��o r/✓/%/ /N� /%ll /„ 'M�� 1 f fir,/,,�// ff a ,I44 ii �i/ir// <„ii g ivc "Is ��,4yll m ,+w o J / 0 ,m"C7*. ��' a'�- "�al 4 II : 'iii al P'44 0 44 ,76 �� / ? fl % / r,/// 0. Lo T dA V) 4”. %L' %' % 4 /oil h✓ /�//nrorr/'io /i 'AA / r a ' e /l w.,�q E av": a� i///I G, �i a 9 °Jws s r I 3 Q a /% a) d co r r �/ r,%l' I ri � f (ll � IW'kl b / of f ! o wl r "W � r/, ♦r �/ ff r / // // fev, fCS sM Ywr/ 11 err r. /// nus �r � kmJ r„ �,4 f : w wlgs d, uruw/ % ��➢/��(/1 / r 6,r v/ /i `4441 /4 �"w„w 'a9fa at mm `r� � ' Is r�'b sb � Jf�r r/ /� ;ypr �&n. a �wy/fir/r r///j// i m^"' I m� ( n✓ 1 /irir //lnir 1 4 a, /i //i �j �% m� ��,N' r '� o iG /� ,P b N �✓ U sll r� 71/lr 6 bm°/ // 7 t�i r✓//i / m / a e `s b V p ��i / ea a t ull r f6 f 4 I� Bo R „ f siG/ //�/�% rr / Ti w,0i/ m J fir, °s -,wybsinui vv "l/Jrir; (A ! O 0 w' � / ' '+b rl� ul4 b - 1 xya,. A f an w° psi �J)Y / f sy > ✓r7�'(Y s��,,. yysw e'w 'bo4 .+.+ byp, � ° w ` , 'Il 11 j swab`I�Olf4 / w ,,, U www a w a �e a flfG,/ / /!tw ,�%" �" a q IIIILL wv5i y� " a a 1"c !„, rILII I�1 'e All U u .ri U ri / rill ..... a r l � G /ij��/%/ 9a'P7 ww ww I /ilii ✓rUH /ll i �,, ;;., lJ/ll �� o A pq o ul //r ww // ///i ami o- / v r ✓d //l ,„w/ E x m +F/ s/�l� > /'✓aUPfi rr ✓r o E + w / r r m 0 o z a > o � D � r / o N LL m _a � ' iii// �” ��B /�//%/// /��/ ///�, �� 1+II�//�u7wrx�meeu■ w am�rauxr sr+w Ponsp�e '°y J d � III airi Storm Water Plan 4.1 Introduction The Woodburn Storm Drainage Master Plan was prepared by Crane and Merseth Engineering/Surveying between 1996 and 2001.The study area of the Storm Drainage Master Plan included the area within the UGB as it existed before the 2005 amendments and areas immediately surrounding the City that contribute runoff to Mill Creek and Senecal Creek upstream of the City. The study area comprised approximately 9,447 acres. The Storm Drainage Master Plan was based on the impervious area that existed in the base year, 1994. Impervious areas were projected for future land uses based on an assumption that every parcel within the UGB would fully developed at the maximum density allowed by the 2001 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. As noted, there are two major drainage basins within Woodburn - Senecal Creek and Mill Creek. The smaller basin, Senecal Creek, is divided into 13 sub-basins and the larger basin, Mill Creek, is divided into 51 sub-basins. These drainage basins contain development in SWIR area, although the land use assumptions may have changed. 4.2 Design Storms The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Published the Atlas 2 which defines how much rainfall will fall in every area throughout the United States during several different storm events. Table 4-1 shows the rainfall depth for 24 hours duration of different storm event frquencies in Woodburn. Since it is impossible to protect against every storm that could possibly occur, communities must pick a level of protection that is reasonable when factors such as cost and consequence of failure are considered. The City has selected the 25-year, 24-hour storm to be their design storm for pipe facilities and 100-year, 24-hour event for new detention facilities. 17-1993 Page 4-1 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 49 Table 4®1 AA Atlas 2 Volume 10 Rainfall Depths R11 i R2-year 2.3 5-year 2.9 10-year 3.3 25-year 3.8 50-year 4.2 100-year 4.4 4.3 Existing Inventory The Storm Drainage Master Plan contains a June 1999 inventory of the existing public storm water system's facilities in the Mill Creek and Senecal Creek basins in the City of Woodburn, but it is missing manyfacilities in the system. Since the master plan, the City has put together a Geographic Information System (GIS) to better catalogue and map their system. Although it is currently still a work in progress, it is more complete than the master plan. Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, and 4-5 list the currently catalogued information for culverts, conveyance piping, ditches, and other storm water infrastructure. Table 4®2 Existing Culvert Length Inventory IMINEMESimmil= 811 44 44 0.5% 12" 148 3,548 39 58 3,793 45% 15" 107 117 224 3% 18" 7 291 146 444 5% 24" 226 226 3% 30" 112 112 1% 36" 148 148 2% 42" 483 483 6% 481' 275 403 244 922 11% 54" 393 393 5% 60" 618 618 7% 72" 301 301 4% 96" 172 172 2% 108" 170 170 2% Other 215 246 461 5% Total 1,950 5,664 448 302 146 8,509 100% %of total 23% 67% 5% 4% 2% 100% 100% 1. Indicates approximate length only, no field survey data 17-1993 Page 4-2 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 50 Table ®3 Storm Drain Piping Length Inventory 4" 175 175 0.1% 6" 2514 260 617 174 3566 1% 8" 19577 661 5272 180 352 26041 8% 10" 23643 2158 10465 1152 187 958 38562 12% 12" 458 1563 41411 5260 17996 1244 149 761 68841 21% 14" 359 359 0.1% 15" 214 3456 15252 7496 8004 20 748 35191 111% 16" 270 270 0.1% 18" 2163 21646 5207 5182 2345 36542 11% 21" 232 4053 1309 235 5830 2% 24" 723 1842 17600 2549 3443 543 389 27088 8% 27" 1313 59 1371 0.4% 30" 390 1891 7202 2144 270 977 12873 4% 36" 2655 7540 494 95 2054 2323 15161 5% 42" 2695 1151 868 225 4939 2% 48" 1187 1273 18 2478 1% 54" 440 440 0.1% 72" 99 99 0.03% 78" 144 144 0.04% Unknown 1 1 929 3157 112 1 1 1 36563 40760 1 13% Total 1627 4475 11843 ; 169585 26545 54608 2755 3420 45873 320732 100% %oftotal 1% 1% 4% 53% 8% 17% 1% 1% 14% 100% 100% 1. Indicates approximate length only, no field survey data Table 4®4 Existing Ditch Length Inventory ��mquui�„IIID u1 III, t iIP� iiilll 1' 682 682 4.9% 2' 50 50 0% 3' 300 300 2% 4' 131 131 1% 5' 1,652 1,652 12% 6' 3,892 3,892 28% 7' 420 420 3% 8' 274 5,062 5,336 39% 9' 262 262 2% 10' 1,133 1,133 8% Total 274 13,584 P100% 3,858 100.0 %of total 2% 98% 100.0% 17-1993 Page 4-3 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 51 Table 4®S Other Storm Water Infrastructure ENIENE= Manhole 698 Catch Basin 1716 Outfall 56 Dry Well Sump 4 Detention Facilities 8 Inlets 108 4.4 Needed Drainage Improvements to Support Growth Recommendations for needed storm drainage projects through the year 2006 within City Limits are found in Chapter 9 of the Storm Drainage Master Plan. Very few of these projects were actually completed and growth has been the main driver of stormwater projects. The City plans on creating an updated Storm Water Master Plan in the near future, and new system inventories have been completed to better understand the system, since completion of the last plan. New additions to the system such as the SWIR area will be required to detain peak flows onsite to avoid additional impacts to the system downstream as described in the following subsections. 4.4.1 DetentionPolicy Implementation The Storm Drainage Master Plan includes a Storm Water Flow Management Program, including policies regarding detention. This policy requires on-site detention for new developments and identifies several locations in the City where a public detention facility may be sited. Portions of the existing drainageways function as detention sites. These sites will continue to function as detention areas. Programs directed at improving public safeguards during periods of high flow and incorporation of storm water treatment will be continued whenever possible. Detention facilities are sized based on the City Council adopted guide presented in Table 4-6, "Volumes for Different Intensity Storms for 10-Acre Site." The values in this table are based on the rational method. It requires that the difference in flow before and after development for each storm recurrence interval be detained. 17-1993 Page 4-4 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 52 Table 4-6 Volumes for Different Intensity Storms for a 10-acre site INE LZL 0.71 3.313 32,205 2.7hr 0.25 L167 11,340 LZL 0.71 3.087 30,672 2.76hr 0.25 1.087 10,800 2.86hr 0.25 M96 10,255 2.97hr 0.25 0.909 9,720 0.935" U1 2.024 23,899 3.28hr 0.25 0.713 8,415 To analyze the system, the SVV|R area was broken into two portions that are divided by 1-5. It is assumed that flow will not be conveyed across 1-5. The 50.8-acre portion to the east of |5 will be referred to as South SVV|R, and the 130.0-acre portion to the west of 1-5 will be referred to as the West SVV|R. The South SVV|R is expected to drain to existing storm pipes, and new pipes are planned for the West SWIR area which will outfall to Senecal Creek. Both areas will need detention for the difference in runoff volume between pre- and post-development conditions. The results are presented in Table 4-7. Table 4-7 Volumes for Different Runoff Calculation Methods South SWIR 2.2 West SWI R 5.6 4.5 Requirements for New Developments s 4,5,1 [^'tV of Woodburn RUDOff FleteDt'OD Requirement 1> Construct device that has capacity for detaining difference in run off volume received by undeveloped and developed land for a25-yearstorm. 17-1993 Page 4-5 Public Facilities Plan ]u|y2018 City ofWoodburn 53 2) Construct a discharge orifice of a size that the quantity of run off through the orifice is equal to run off flow from a storm of 5-year or less, undeveloped land. 3) Construct a detention facility to have a post-development 25-year capacity with a discharge orifice (or structure) sized to limit outflow to no more than the undeveloped site peak run off for the existing (undeveloped) 5-year frequency storm. Detention volumes calculated by the following methods are acceptable: A. Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph routing model (as prescribed by the King County Surface Water Design Manual) for the post development 25-year runoff hydrograph detained back to the existing 5-year peak site discharge. B. 18,883 CF/ 10 Acre drainage area as per City of Woodburn standard table, above, based on the rational method. 4.5.2 Safety Requirements 1) Depth of storm water within 30 feet from the edge of detention ponds, if open to public, shall be limited to 3 feet, then gradual slope (3%) to higher depth shall be allowed. Maximum pond side slopes shall be 3' horizontal to 1' vertical, however, gentler slope is desirable. 4.6 SWIR Area Projects Table 4-8 identifies storm water projects that will be needed to support planned development in SWIR area. For the purposes of this Public Facility Plan, storm water system improvements are focused on detention facility volumes to serve the fully developed SWIR area. Based on development timing, phasing and final development type, this volume may ultimately be met through multiple local detention facilities. Further analysis and planning for the SWIR area will better define how detention volumes are achieved. Note that minor collection piping within SWIR area is not included in the pond cost estimates as they will primarily be part of on-site development planning. The preliminary master plan for the area was created by others and is included in the appendix of this report. It does not show detention locations. An estimated cost for the projects in the figure is shown in Project 3 in table 4-8. The City highlighted a need to replace the culverts in Seneca Creek, as they are in disrepair, and likely undersized. Further study will be needed to determine culvert sizing and configuration. The price shown is based on a similar large culvert project but may vary significantly from the actual costs based on site and hydraulic conditions. The culverts are in ODOT right-of-way, so it may not be the City's financial responsibility to replace them. 17-1993 Page 4-6 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 54 Table 4-8 Project List- Storm Drainage Plan 1 West Area Detention Pond(s) $1,239,000 2 South Area Detention Pond(s) $561,000 3 SWIR Master Plan piping $2,877,000 4 0DOT Culverts $2,000,000 4.7 Funding To assure that the impact of providing and maintaining new storm drainage facilities is not a burden to the community, new development will be required to pay for the cost of storm drainage facilities needed to serve such development. Extra capacity facilities required to meet the standards of the Master Storm Drainage Plan may be paid from accumulated revenue of the System Development Charge Fund. The City will continue paying the cost of maintaining and improving the existing storm drainage system with funds derived from a combination of system development charges, Local Improvement Districts, and street maintenance and construction funds. 17-1993 Page 4-7 Public Facilities Plan July 2018 City of Woodburn 55 /lir t rl o /,,, I 1 1 all � I r y 3 P ��I i rV"�q u f N ° a��q� YUh rry/Oi,Y' Al ii 7 o %i%pgq'1X1�o-v), iYr �� t9t) E O b / ILL Vi Al i -off '� f6 i r � dJ a1ja111Dy if � � 9�Po �1" � r a owl' o H. IN I i 41 Ai tai 1 '; 'u Jt `� aid � �, d Pt', `„i i�Ha t” Al �h ¢ , � Q d Oa a w Of" ' " ryo �W iy P f L Z) t,i u P co 0 up if "Yt�h �n, thofa �re r ROMM , " � t�,,, +T Li f �� a i� n o" �l jiii � d 0 Nv %�/ //// .4 `m r � a'%YIi�a4/�,R�✓h,�lrorr r'� �'`,a fifM If m i o C) f E // r N L !6 !6 L U LL o, > o CCS ' J fa C) C) in O C) I 21 � ME ��ml, d � U) _ _ E J J a c m �3 � o N CO N v a � m y, Public Facilities Plan City of Woodburn Transportation Plan July 2018 PR GIN 6922 OREGON . 12, 08Z 0 DKS Associates Transportation 720 SW Washington St. Suite 500 Portland,OR 97205 58 �,5 e��~ � I o�iri � , Transportation �� [ �� 5°1 Introduction The Transportation System Master Plan is currently in progress. Details of the transportation system components will be found in the Transportation System Master plan when it is complete. 5.2 Capital ap~tN Nmprovement Nan for SWNR A rea A transportation project list has been provided as part of the Woodburn Facilities Plan Update. The project list includes a package of 13 roadway and intersection improvements identified to serve the Southwest Industrial/Urban Reserve (SVV|R) area. The transportation project list was developed by DKS Associates based on review of the adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP) and draft documents from theSVV|R Master Plan. Planning-level cost estimates were developed for each of the identified transportation projects based on project assumptions, regional construction unit costs, and engineering judgement. Costs do not include the costs for land acquisition and easrnents as they can vary significantly depending on the property and the owner. The updated transportation project list was developed to aid the City in implementing community-supported transportation projects and support pursuing external funding opportunities until the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update is completed (expected in late 2018). The TSP will provide a comprehensive revaluation of long range transportation needs, priorities, and solutions for the community. 171993 Page 5-1 Public Facilities Plan ]u|y2018 City ofWoodburn 59 �\ 10 10 / - - ) > If i\\ 2/i )4 )! f;( \ \ \ \ \ \ i i \ / \ i CD 15 } \ \ { { / 0 10 10 10 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \� \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ i rr � 219Ji ' 19 � 214 ; FIILSBORO SIL TON HWr,/WEV2, /rrrrr� +1 Sr x" /e�C 3' rrrrrrrrrrr;;rrr A OO LAND AV i ii r 1 ` 1 � 1;, iia��i�iii////i�i�iiiii// MITI FI D(? PER ST; /%j (r 'M a 1U /S ,rr rr / rr.... Ad �► // iLE 9RUN Ply 141E ��„ A/1111 ii r iirr nuuoii nui�'i66ipuuu;" a ur66G(ann ;;buuiuuu, n nmuouou nuiuun uiououu . � i i i r rrrrr„rr rrrrrrrrr i ,r r r rrr r ,r rr iio r / r / r G � / rrrrrrrrrr ��rr r rr / rrrrrr r r ii r r //,,,, „f ,,/ rrrrrrrrr „i ai /ilii 1111111/ / Note:Proposed Roadway �� r ,,,, ii�rr ��rr r r�irrrii a� Scale(approximate) Alignments are Preliminary ' and May be Modified rrrrrrrr""' rrrr%///%�ii� //////%�///%/iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,,,,,, 0' 500' 1000' During Development Review LEGEND iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillilillilI -Improve MajorArterial uuul-Project Number 11111 -Construct MinorArterial 00000000000000000000000000000001001011101 -Improve MinorArterial Trans„ j Transportation Projects uuuuue uu11 uuuuuue CkIntersection mumu uumumu uumumu uumumu uumuu -Construct Service Collector M Improvement _Construct Access Street Woodburn Facilities Plan Update No Scale 61 Appendix • Water Cll' figure from lNntrr System Master Plan • Wastewater Clk' figure from Wastewater Facilities Plan • .SWIR .SiormwTier CII' figure from SWIR Master Plan v ,o 0 a U o cu c a 3 C) w E r, / u IIto II yY fA �� m E t5 /.A /. X � I / Y � V1 r I C L D d p L +.+ O N N �. TN �...� U j IL v � l r r d i�/: q r `O / :jr Al 0 ',Vl I'!V't I i(I, 1 1 P""'j') ",� ;J ",� s;R . ) V�R JI1. I77 t 77 11 117,7 .J J +w y = C V UO > O i aEi ami ami 2 C� Q Q CL m Q 2 E a E E a E O O Q b (Dcl z N OCL .O o (Q W O O U N p] a s E E m W o Z a a ii CRR LL to C) D rr ° it ' a l ap Y p r g.r N ii 10U / / Ns ro/ Y ,7711, 7 ilio/ii�r r� "JI,",; r -:; ° � p / i 2 //,,/,;,, ' d o s° a ;-54 '.� � Y iii �, o m + A r , i� ri 1 51 a6 a im tl ``„u & "�w 0 Z Q`flWl .'aP”"""",,.0 ° ry .6 Q �� „`�. "'�'�✓` q '' tl "`�G�, P w x " r �eymk, w a` 2 a a r @ o a V er ;a r / A;, `m""'- 31ZN3JIOYW d y •� e e _e >m K as / f� wJr�/ p F w Lu W 1 , � "L z`; ✓ i d( � m� o '' Icc d aw` 'Ifw�:o qw f / �, m OO o�»fir` w / / W C f / f cn w w Ld XL L K' w / �/' L J�_ t� murraysmilh 8 8,8, VV ')I.I i AV I I'V I J I , l l //f f/0 I"()RI I Alvll..,R, OR 9/,?C)4 vvvvvv.I1"1Urroy"I"IIiti-I.U,l 66 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3091 ORDINANCE NO. 2569 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN UPDATED CITY OF WOODBURN PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN AS EXHIBIT "B" OF THE WOODBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (LA 2018-03) WHEREAS, ORS 197.175 requires cities to prepare, adopt and implement Comprehensive Plans consistent with statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and WHEREAS, the ORS 197.712 (2)e requires cites to develop and adopt a public facilities plan for areas within an Urban Growth Boundary containing a population greater than 2,500 persons and shall include rough cost estimates for projects needed to provide sewer, water, and transportation uses; and WHEREAS, Goal 11 of the Oregon Statewide Planning Goals, Public Facilities and Services, is intended to ensure that communities plan for and develop public facilities and services in a "timely, orderly and efficient arrangement"; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2016, the City applied for and received a Special Public Works Fund Technical Assistance Grant to complete a review and update of the City's Public Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2018, the Planning Commission in conformance with WDO 4.01 .09B. and 4.01 .1 OB. held a public hearing and recommended approval of this amendment to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on March 11 , 2019, the City Council held a public hearing, reviewed the record, accepted testimony and requested this Ordinance effecting the amendment (LA 2018-03); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan is amended to repeal and replace Exhibit B (the City of Woodburn Public Facilities Plan) as provided in Exhibit 1 , which is attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein. Section 2. The legislative action taken by the Ordinance is explained and justified by the Findings and Analysis in Exhibit 2 which is attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein. Page - 1 - Council Bill No. 3091 Ordinance No. 2569 67 Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page - 2 - Council Bill No. 3091 Ordinance No. 2569 68 Exhibit Page 1 0149 'Op murraysmilh hr W00DBUAN Public Facilities Plan July 2018 Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 49 Public Facilities Plan City of Woodburn July 2018 k N UKr- CAMILV-S RENEWS: � Murraysmith Water, Wastewater,Storm Water 888 SW 5th Avenue Suite 1170 Portland,OR 97204 70 Exhibit 1 Page 3 of 49 Acknowledgements is exrvessed to (.:711 who contribi ited t(.:) the c(.wnf..)1eb(.�)n this City of Woodburn Eric Liljequist, PE George Kuznetsoz Dago Garcia Curtis Stulz Frank Sutter Murraysmith Brian Ginter, PE Natalie Jennings, PE Claire DeVoe DKS Associates Mat Dolata, PE 71 Exhibit 1 Pane 4o 49 _�-�� Contents � �� 1N �" m�� ~�on 1.1 General.............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Service Area Characteristics------------------------------'1-1 �� Water" ��er m��N man 2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Water Demand -------------------------------------.2-1 2.2.2 Existing Drmond--------------------------------.2-2 2.2.2 Projected 2O57Drmond.....................................................................................2-5 2.3 Water Source--------------------------------------.2-3 2.3.2 Wells....................................................................................................................2-5 2.3.5 Source N/otrrProtrction ----------------------------2-4 2.4 Treatment........................................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Storage and Pumping......................................................................................................2-4 2.5 Water Distribution System..............................................................................................2-5 2.6.2 Existing System...................................................................................................2-6 2.6.2 Design (ritrriG.....................................................................................................2-7 2.6.5 Anoknis Findings--------------------------------.2-7 2.6.4 Svtem 8rconncndotions......................................................................................2-7 2.7 Capital Improvement Projects........................................................................................2-8 2.8 Funding ----------------------------------------. 2-12 3" Sanitary Sewer Plan 3.1 Wastewater Planning History-----------------------------'3-1 3.2 Treatment........................................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Primary Collection System -------------------------------.3-3 3.4 Capital Improvement Projects........................................................................................3-5 3.5 Funding -----------------------------------------.3-5 72 Exhibit 1 Page 5 of 49 4. Storm Water Plan 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Design Storms..................................................................................................................4-1 4.3 Existing Inventory............................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Needed Drainage Improvements to Support Growth...................................................4-4 4.4.1 Detention Policy Implementation.......................................................................4-4 4.5 Requirements for New Developments...........................................................................4-5 4.5.1 City of Woodburn Runoff Detention Requirement............................................4-5 4.5.2 Safety Requirements...........................................................................................4-6 4.6 SWIR Expansion Area Projects........................................................................................4-6 4.7 Funding ............................................................................................................................4-7 5. Transportation Plan 5.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Capital Improvement Plan for SWIR Area......................................................................5-1 73 murraysm�rth Section 1 Exhibit 1 Page 7 of 49 c Iii uiri I,,. Introduction 1.1 General The Public Facilities Plan (PFP) identifies major infrastructure projects necessary to serve the Year 2037 projected population of 35,025 and documents the effect on utility and transportation infrastructure resulting from the Southwest Industrial Reserve expansion of the City of Woodburn. As required by state statute, four elements have been studied: Domestic Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage, and Transportation. Information for this plan was derived from existing individual utility Master and Facilities Plans, and the previous public facilities plan, updating where necessary. A comprehensive analysis was performed for the SWIR expansion area as a part of this update. Tables summarizing projects and associated costs have been included in the body of this Public Facilities Plan Update. Maps showing the locations of infrastructure elements (Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Drainage) are included in the end of each section. Transportation projects and maps were derived from the Woodburn Transportation Systems Plan (TSP), which is currently being updated. 1.2 Service Area Characteristics Woodburn is located in Oregon's Willamette Valley approximately 18 miles north of Salem and 31 miles south of Portland in the Pudding River basin. The topography of the service area slopes slightly to the northeast. The area is relatively flat with an elevation differential of only 50 feet, ranging from 150 to 200 feet above sea level. The main drainage through the City is Mill Creek, which drains to the Pudding River. Senecal Creek drains a small portion of the City's UGB area west of I-5. A very small portion of the east part of the City (east of highway 99E) naturally drains directly to the Pudding River. The climate is mild with wet winters and dry summers. Rainfall averages about 45 inches per year and one year in ten will exceed 52 inches. The wettest months are usually November through February. The soils in the area are primarily of two associations, Amity silt loam and Woodburn silt loam. Both of these formations are found throughout the City in most areas except drainage channels. The Amity series consists of somewhat poorly drained soils formed in mixed alluvial silts. The layer is general 17 inches thick overlaying a 7-inch silt loam subsurface layer and a 13-inch silty clay loam subsoil. The Woodburn series consists of moderately well drained soils formed in silty alluvium and loess. The 17-inch surface layer overlays 37 inches of subsoil and a silt loam substratum to a 75 Exhibit 1 Page 8 of 49 depth of 68 inches. The course of Mill Creek is etched in bashaw clay and dayton and concord silt loams as well as terrace escarpment are also found in the service area. The geology of the area consists of Troutdale formation materials and Willamette silts overlaying Columbia River basalt. Depth to basalt is unknown but thought to be approximately 600 feet. The Troutdale formation consists of alternate layers of clay, silt, sand and gravel. The Willamette silt formation consists of stratified silt, sandy silt, clayey silt and silty clay and has poor drainage characteristics. The City is located in a Seismic Zone 3. Two major highways traverse the City; Interstate 5 along the west side of the City and 99E along the east side of the City. Both routes run generally north-south through Woodburn. Oregon Highway 214 is an east-west route through the City, and Highway 211 connects Woodburn to Molalla. Woodburn is bisected by the Union Pacific Railroad main line. The railroad extends north-south through Woodburn and parallels Front Street through the City. Willamette Valley Railroad uses spur tracks that parallel Front Street and a line that proceeds east from Front Street along Cleveland Street. 76 Exhibit 1 Page 10 of 49 Ct Iii oIIri 2 Water Plan 2.1 Introduction Murraysmith is in the process of updating the City of Woodburn Water Master Plan. It is expected to be completed in late 2018. The City's Water Master Plan was first prepared in 1997 and was updated in 2001. The current update provides a 20-year plan for the water system through the year 2037. The plan was based on a projected permanent population potential of 35,025, the coordinated Year 2037 population projection for this report. The City has 7,509 single family, multi-family, commercial, industrial, and public connections. The current service area of the water system is mostly inside the City limits with a few customers outside, although the service area will expand as annexations to the City occur within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). It is assumed that all growth will occur within the current 5,066-acre UGB. The water system analysis for the PFP includes future service to the SWIR area. The City anticipates that industrial land will be annexed to the City in the short term.Although most improvements necessary to serve expansion areas will be paid for by the developer, the CIP will be amended on an annual basis to include sanitary, sewer, water, storm drainage and transportation projects necessary to serve recently annexed areas. 2.2 Water Demand 2.2.1 Existing Water demand refers to all potable water required by the system including residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses as well as unaccounted for water. Potable water demands are described using three water use metrics: average daily demand (ADD), maximum day demand (MDD), and peak hour demand (PHD). Each of these metrics are stated in gallons per unit of time such as million gallons per day(mgd).ADD is the total annual water volume used system-wide divided by 365 days per year. MDD is the largest 24-hour water volume for a given year. In western Oregon, MDD usually occurs each year between July 1st and September 30th. PHD is the estimated largest hour of demand on the maximum water use day. Data was unavailable to calculate PHD thus a PHD:MDD peaking factor of 2 is used, consistent with water use patterns at other Willamette Valley water providers. Table 2-1 summarizes the City's current system-wide ADD and MDD based on water production data. 78 Exhibit 1 Page 11 of 49 Table ®1 Historical Water Demand Estimates 2012 2.2 4.5 9.0 2013 2.2 3.9 7.8 2014 23 4.2 8.4 2015 2.4 4.5 9.0 2016 2.3 4,0 8,0 The City's water utility billing records are categorized by service type and meter size. For purposes of the graphic, records were summarized into five divisions: Residential, Commercial < 1-inch diameter, Commercial > 1-inch diameter, Industrial, and Sprinkler. Sprinkler consumption includes irrigation services supplied from the drinking water system at many of the City's public parks and schools. Percentages of current water consumption by customer type are calculated based on 2016 City water billing records. As illustrated in Figure 2-1, approximately 61% of Water consumption in Woodburn is by residential customers. Figure 2®1 2016 Water Demand per Customer Category IndusSprinkler,6% trial, 1%�, a �j jj Commercial<= 1",8% Does not include"Unaccounted-for Water' 79 Exhibit 1 Page 12 of 49 2.2.2 Projected 2037 Demand Estimates of future growth and related water demand within the Woodburn UGB are developed for 5-year increments to the year 2037 and a buildout condition. Population projections and the per capita water use developed for the Water System Master Plan were used to estimate demands for each 5-year increment, while current water use by zoning and comprehensive planning maps are used to estimate buildout demands. Projections are shown in Table 2-2. Table ®2 Woodburn Demand Projections 2017 2.4, 4.6 9.2 2022 2.6 4.9 9.8 2027 2.81 5.3 10.6 2037 3.2 6.1 12.2 Build-out 3.8 7.2 14.4 2.3 Water Source 2.3.1 Wells The City's seven wells tap the Troutdale aquifer, a large semi-confined aquifer. It is anticipated that the City will continue to utilize this aquifer as the sole source of water. Current wells are listed in Table 2-3 and shown in the figure at the end of this section. The existing total water source capacity is adequate to meet existing demands, but additional wells will be needed for future demands through build-out of the UGB. Table 2®3 Existing Wells Nazarene Well Located on Emergency 7 1967 1,000 1,000 333 Woodland Avenue' backup 9 Warren Donell Well located 1979 1,000 650 280 Supply on Country Club Road Centennial Well located 10 1988 ,1,000 ' 279 Supply 2205 National Way 800 11 1108 Astor Way 1989 1,000 650 288 Supply 12 Parr Road WTP 2003 1,200 650 305 Supply 13 555 S Settlemeir Road 2003 600 400 260 Supply 14 3099 Pacific Highway 2004 1,400 1,000 297 Supply Total Existing Non-Emergency Source Capacity 4,150 gpm(5.98 MGD) 80 Exhibit 1 Page 13 of 49 2.3.2 Source Water Protection The State of Oregon Department of Human Services and Department of Environmental Quality have developed a Source Water Protection Plan for the City. The plan inventories potential sources of contamination, establishes best management practices for industries within the influence zone of the City's wells, allows the City to develop ordinances to provide protection of the aquifer, and maps the flow patterns of the aquifers. The Troutdale aquifer, from which the City's wells obtain the City's drinking water supply, is not a critical or restrictively classified groundwater area. The City does not at this time plan to request certification of the delineations in the Source Water Protection Plan for Statewide Planning Goal 5 purposes. 2.4 Treatment Historically,the City of Woodburn provided no water treatment or disinfection because the quality of water derived from City wells did not require disinfection and neither state nor federal water regulations required treatment or disinfection for wells. Increasing concerns with the odor, taste and staining problems generated by iron and manganese in the groundwater, a potential decrease in the federal arsenic standard and potential regulation of radon led the City to update its master plan and develop a treatment plan for the City's water supply in 2001. Iron and manganese levels in the City's water source caused numerous complaints about the aesthetic quality of the water. To eliminate the iron and manganese problems, the City constructed three treatment plants to treat all of the City's groundwater sources except Well 7 which is only operated for emergency supply. The three treatment plants are located at well sites on National Way, Country Club Road, and Parr Road. These treatment facilities treat water from wells at their sites and water transmitted from nearby wells through raw water transmission lines constructed with the treatment plants in 2003- 2004. The locations of the treatment facilities are shown in the figure at the end of this section. The existing total treatement capacity is adequate to meet water supply needs through 2037 and to build-out of the existing UGB. Treated water is pumped in the distribution system by booster pumps located at each water treatment plant, On-site ground level storage reservoirs provide suction supply to the pump stations. These facilities are described further in the next section. 2.5 Storage and Pumping Water system storage is considered to be comprised of four elements: equalizing, operational, fire flow, and emergency. "Equalizing storage" provides water supply when customer demand exceeds 81 Exhibit 1 Page 14 of 49 the capacity of the wells and pumps to produce water flow. "Operational" accounts for the amount of reservoir volume between when the pumps come on and when they turn off, "Fire flow reserves" provides the volume of water needed to provide the demand for fire flow for a fire having a finite duration. "Emergency storage" supplies water when a portion of the water supply system is out of commission. Woodburn has 4 reserviors as shown in Table 2-4 and in the figure at the end of this section. Table ®4 Reservoir Inventory EME Parr Road 2.9 ' Ground Level Steel Tank National Way 1.7 Ground Level Steel Tank Country Club Road 0.3 Ground Level Steel Tank Elevated Tank 0.75 Elevated Steel Tank In normal operating conditions, pressure within the water system is established by the elevated tank. When demand in the system draws down the elevated tank level, booster pumps at the treatment plants are turned on to pump into the system from the ground level reservoirs and refill the elevated tank. If the level in the elevated tank continues to drop after the first pump has turned on, more pumps receive signals to turn on and pump into the system until the elevated tank water level reaches the pre-determined shutoff level. In addition to the hydraulic grade established in the system by the elevated tank, pressure is maintained throughout the system by the booster pumps at each of the treatment plant sites controlled by pressure sensors located at various locations in the City. The booster pumps at each plant operate to maintain water levels in the elevated tank and to supply demands placed upon the system by users from the ground level reservoirs at each water treatment plant. If the elevated tank is out of service for maintenance or other reasons, the treatment plant booster pumps and pressure sensor system will maintain desired system pressure. Ground level storage utilizes pumps to move water into the distribution system and work with the elevated storage reservoir to maintain water pressure. The pumps need to be large enough to satisfy anticipated peak demand flow rates. A summary of booster pumping capacity is presented in Table 2-5. They also need to have an automated auxiliary power supply to assure water is available during power failure. All three of the treatment plants have emergency generators capable of plant operation as well as operation of the wells located at each of the treatment plant sites. The City has portable generators that can be used to provide emergency power to other wells. 82 Exhibit 1 Page 15 of 49 Table ®5 2018 Water System PumpStation Inventory Parr Road 2 75 1,819 S/SE National Way 2 60 1,650 N/E Country Club Road 2 60 1,150 NW/W TOTAL CAPACITY 6 - 9,238 gpm(13.3 MGD) All Firm Capacity 3 4,619 gpm(6.7 MGD) All 'The target flow rate for all pump stations is approximately 1200-1300 gpm,in order to move equal amounts of water through all treatment plants,reservoirs,and pump stations.Pumps can ramp up to full capacity if needed. The City has adequate storage volume and pumping capacity to serve the needs of the City through 2037 and to buildout of the UGB. 2.6 Water Distribution System 2.6.1 ExistingSe There are approximately 97 miles of transmission and distribution piping, ranging from 4- inch to 20-inch in diameter. The majority of the pipe within the service area is 6-inch or fl- inch diameter service piping. A summary of the quantity of pipe by diameter is outlined in Table 2-6. The majority of the pipe in the system is ductile or cast iron, in addition, there is a significant amount of asbestos-cement pipe in the Senior Estates area. Table 2® 2018 Water System Pipe Inventory �11!tli'I'I� tl 11 'I� l� s- -,Iliii'i I Iii V II ® i�, ® I 4® 13,963 6 160,417 8 217,320 10 22,816 12 79,853 14 8,382 16 2,174' 18 6,797 20 633 83 Exhibit 1 Page 16 of 49 2.6.2 Designea State administrative rules require the system maintain a minimum pressure of 20 psi at all service connections at all times. A pressure range of 40-80 psi is recommended under normal operating conditions. The City requires the maximum day demand plus fire flow for a proposed development to be calculated. Demand must not exceed available supply. Calculated available fire flow is compared to the standards in Table 2-7. Table ®7 Fire Flow Demands by Zoning Classification Low Density Residential (IRS, R15, RSN) 1,000 2 Medium Density Residential (RMN) 3,000 3 Commercial (CG, CO, DDC) 3,000 3 Public 3,000 3 Industrial. 3,000 3 If the available fire flow is less than the required value, the developer may be required to either modify the proposed method of construction to reduce the required fire flow or make system improvements to increase the available fire flow in the water system to the development. 2.6.3 Analysis Findings Pressure within the distribution system is generally between 50 and 60 psi.The water system master plan did not identify significant pressure deficiencies during maximum day flows. Under peak demand conditions, simulated as maximum day demand with a simultaneous fire flow event, pressures in the system may drop below 20 psi under existing conditions. Recommended improvements to address these deficiencies follow. 2.6.4 Systemeco e aio s As areas within the UGB develop, the City will require developers to extend the transmission mains into these areas. A number of capital improvement projects have been identified to address these current and future deficiencies. The 2018 Water System Master Plan recommends replacing inadequate segments of the water distribution system before emergency situations occur or before capacity problems 84 Exhibit 1 Page 17 of 49 arise. The City will continue annual funding of an ongoing substandard main replacement program. The priorities for replacing pipes is as follows: ■ Pipes in areas of related frequent customer complaints. ■ Leaking pipes. ■ Pipes identified by either maintenance or operations as problem pipes. ■ Pipes four inches or less in diameter, and in areas that have the potential for growth. ■ Undersized transmission mains. ■ Aged Asbestos cement pipe. ■ Aged steel or cast-iron pipe. ■ Lead joint pipes. 2.7 Capital Improvement Projects The 2018 Water System Master Plan assumed that the SWIR area would be included in the 2022 scenario. Table 2-8 displays the water distribution system improvements needed to serve the SWIR expansion areas and other system improvements with estimates the cost of constructing the improvements. The only projects that are required for the SWIR expansion area is the project entitled "SWIR Extension," and the proposed wells. The CIP figure from the WSMP and the proposed water system map for the SWIR Master Plan are included in the appendix of this report. 85 4- - O X 00 N 0 ®® O O O - O � O O O O -0,0 O O` O 0 O 0 O ® O O C1. O O O 0 O n + 0' O O N 0 O ® � O 0 O C� O 0 (o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0; 0; O 0= O 0= O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0O 0' O 0 LD L() O 0 O 'I7 I— , V 0 0 0 0 0 �_; N a I— LD 0 00 •� 00 (101— 0: (0 (D T O (N T T V IT Cl) (D 0 T CA: EA CA.: EA CA: EA CA EA '..CA'.. EA CA EA EA EA 4A ........................ ® 0. O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 L O O O O O O O ti f4 0 O O O r- " (D 0 O 0 O O LCA (D O 0' C'')' co O a r Cl) co 0 a Lf)IT �+ r r PO 00.: +N) O N 613 6q d O' O 0 O O ' U O 0. O Q O O'. O LC) 00 •0 00 00 0 a C3 Cl) T N > O ® EA 6q EA £A; _0 C3 (U 7 0 0 0 O O 0 O _00 O 0 C O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 C: O O 0 0 O O O' O O 0 O O 0' Q C i (fl LL C3 LO 666'' T N � 00' O 000 0 00 .e� , r C+0 r' N ®� T *.T' Q N Cfl O'. •� , (U CA. EA -® 4A I EA' � EA EA 61�1I - -_ ® Qe 0 ® e .... .... T Q a 2 � 0 e U e a) e e T O T L W 0 (6 0- ... E N E -p. (D Q) t� (U. s_ 3 (n (u ° as (n 5 4 (Da o aa) a� u (D �' c (u [Y Q w 0 E x 0 O 0- 0 co -p -0 (U (U (U � � � Z � o � 0 L o (D c O c E a� a0i E () W .o U 0 its .W W °? L (6 ° N C EP (U _ �i 0 0 (U 0 V) L o, r— (u —_ 0 — (u c �_ C� sz (D (ts L i� _ (n U E (u M 0_ its 0 (u 0, [r O 0 r ' z = � � Q 0- Z3 z U Q � U cn O iL cr' C Q Co � >T >N (?' >V LC?' C>O r N rl N 00 00 0 C C 0') cT _A 0? Q' N O Q IZ C O +_ N 7 /q� ,^ E O L W s�+..y ® Li rt,^+ a) tC V/ a) Q Exhibit 1 Page 19 of 49 Table 2-9 Project List —Water is ri u i®n System Plan 1101 SEP Transmission Replacement 14111611 M-42 Country Club to elevated tank transmission replacement ' 7,573 $ 3,484,000 Projects for Future Development M-38 SWIR 10111141 01'1 2" 13,612 $ 5,027,000 M-39 OR-99E Southern Extension 8" 927 $ 214,000 M-40 OR99E:Aztec St to Blaine St 81" 389 $ 90,000 M-41 OR-99E: Lincoln St South to Existing Stubout 8" 271 $ 63,000 � 1 r l t / f / ( J / / ( 1 1 5-Year Fire Flow Projects M-1 Reconnect: Brown St to Vine St 121' 54 $ 40,000 M-2 Front St: Stonehedge to Newberg Hwy &Newberg Hwy: Front 12" 1,817 $ 627,000 St to Bulldog Dr Park Ave': Hardcastle Ave to Lincoln St& East/West sections of M-3 81" 1,852 $ 426,000 Woodpark Ter M-4 Lincoln St: Park Ave to hydrant west of Bryant St 8" 756 $ 174,000 M-5 Nuevo Amencer 8" 1104 $ 254,000 M-6 Loop Front St to Salud Medical Center 8" 706 $ 163,000 r / I / t ( / 1 � 10-Year Fire Flow Projects M-7 Southeast Industrial Area Improvements 8111011 5,390 $ 1,520,000 Front St: hydrant east of Hardcastle Ave to hydrant west of M-9' 10" 569 ' $ 163,000 Hardcastle Ave 87 Exhibit 1 Page 20 of 49 NEW. ®® ® 20-Year Fire Flow Projects M-8 OR-99E:Tomlin Ave to Young St 8" 459 $ 106,:000 M-10 Loop: Barclay Sq to Harvard Dr 8" 166 $ 39,000 M-11 Loop: High St to Settlemier Ave 81" 234 $ 54,000 M-12 James St: Legion Park to east end of Apts.& Park Ave: Parkview 8" 10" 1,390 $ 339,000 Ct to James St M-13 Woodburn RU Park: North Leg 81" 348 $ 81,000 M-14 French Prairie Middle School:Hwy 214 & Boones Ferry Rd 8" 907 $ 209,000 M-15 OR-214:Tomlin Ave to Cascade Factory Homes 611811 759 $ 150,000 M-16 Blaine St& McKinlet St: OR-99E west to hydrant 8" 10" 882 $ 229,000 M-17 Glatt Cir: North and South legs 8111011 561 $ 143,000 M-18 Loop: 2213 Country Club Ct to Country Club Rd 8" 226 $ 52,000 M-19 Loop: Industrial,area at end of Shenandoah Ln 10" 703 $ 201,000 M-20 Loop: Northernmost Driveway on Commerce Way 8" 762 $ 176,000 M-21 West ends of Hayes St and Young St 81" 381 $ 88,000 M-22 Park Cir: Park Ave to hydrant,south leg 8" 315 $ 73,000 M-23 Yew St: across 3rd 81" 35 $ 9,000 M-24 Loop: Lincoln Rd to North Pacific Plaza 8" 515 $ 119,000 M-25 Line West of Wellspring Confrence Center 81" 253 $ 59,000 M-26 Rainier Rd: Randolph Rd to Cascade Dr 8" 381 $ 88,000 M-27 Charles St: Charles Ct to Corby St 6" 342 $ 60,000 M-28 Greenview Ct: Greenview Dr. to hydrant 8" 220 $ 51,000 M-29 Oak St:2nd St to 1st St 81" 190 $ 44,000 M-30 Nuevo Amencer extention: 5th St to 6th St 8" 423 $ 98,000 M-31 Safeway on OR-99E 81" 649 $ 150,000 M-32 Loop: Apartments South of Stonehenge 8" 10" 1,114 $ 288,000 M-33 Line to Kerr Contractors 10" 159 $ 46,000 M-34 Newberg Hwy Dairy Queen 6" 193 $ 34,000 Evergreen Rd to line to North and Evergreen Estates to hydrant M-35 101" 307 $ 88,000 east M-36 Lincoln St. OR-99E to first hydrant north on Carol St 8" 493 $ 114,000 M-37 Stacy Allison Way: West end of Walmart Parking Lot 81" 512 $ 118,000 0 88 Exhibit 1 Page 21 of 49 2.8 Funding The City allocates its water budget into three funds: Water fund, Water Equipment Replacement Reserve Fund, and the Water System Development Trust Fund. The available sources of revenues come from water user fees, service fees, interest revenues, system development charges and miscellaneous revenues. The City last completed a rate study in 1999, and is currently completing an update incorporating items from the 2018 Water System Master Plan Update. The purpose of a rate study is to determine the rates and system development charges that would be necessary to fund needed capital improvements and to ensure the ongoing fiscal health of the water system.The rate studies also ensure that required increases are equitable in terms of what each class of user pays. The rates and charges provide revenue for capital improvements and for operation of the water supply, treatment, and distribution system. Water rates were determined utilizing a cost-of-service or functional allocation of costs.The intent of this allocation is to recover revenue from classes of customers according to the demands that they place on the system. System Development charges can fund projects for growth. The system development charge is the sum of a calculated reimbursement fee and improvement fee. The reimbursement fee recovers costs associated with capital improvements already constructed or under construction. The improvement fee recovers costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed in the future. 89 % CO, '41 X LU // i //// ;✓/// r '/i,,,ar /� l 1(O ��r � lJ /Il/fie ///� / cal /f' 1 i �""►� ��i �i�l� e.i!> 7�rJl/ VMS, (l� � /yl✓�/ /,.l % ^Md s m r .""^. ,�k1 n m�°Wf/„/ n 1/�% y /Ir rfy lr�l/ /ii rvr;., z w r / / f Aljr ' vv �.. / 1 y xv- ion'' W /i /krJ�r / // / /%/� y>,"� ' i%1119 y%li �, jj IS /i V / //" r' yUr"✓ �✓„ ', /y/ /Homo, ��rrl/i % � k��u V�«�� i'^ � r� � / °r'� 'o p//71 H i n �r //0 9 m y %// � a 4 /rc.� u4��9N� � W n m«v, r �// n " T r i m f / t � 1 r v 9 %y/ v u fd Mir p Vy" i pi m"u/ / rr �)W�d !lo / w{r u V r / m� r p ur r/ap toi a / Cr / rff ifr o v19 rzoo 7 , r//G0% J q 1G7 orn IIE �a 'O f rN U pY yJ� / 1 rr / nmem Oq y �,� r �" l ii �r /1/vr Tigre {q 0. /l r/ D a (A 9 / 0 . v LL G/ �/✓ //%i "1/ " /� a, i �- /r// �V �/ Ira 0/ �oir mrTM r "qn 'ur minc AM*ww ///yli?1 y� /✓L/ H "" ai or n / //�// a'S ari Gk's gat ri 1 ��//y ♦ ////ii/. %/I 9�wi 71 q) V�li //ii/ii/i /� ♦ / Mr/ .,.. Nr, E /ill 3�r ,�sG�nr iwx /6 - _ SO rL / /. -i 'a / Exhibit 1 Page 24 of 49 Secduiri Sanitary Sewer Plan 3.1 Wastewater Planning History In November 1993, the City of Woodburn was notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) of a new requirement to develop a plan to meet the more stringent Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) effluent limits developed for the Pudding River. The volume of water in the Pudding River, during the summer months (July and August), is so low the river cannot dilute the treatment plant effluent sufficiently. Low flows result in oxygen levels, needed by certain aquatic life, to be below acceptable limits. The inability to maintain sufficient oxygen levels is the main reason the Pudding River has been classified as a water-quality limited stream. Total maximum daily loads were established for the Pudding River and waste load allocations were set for the Woodburn POTW. Waste load allocations are formally required as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. DEQ cannot reissue expired permits until some ongoing litigation is resolved, so many communities have to operate off of existing expired permit terms. Woodburn is currently one of those cities running under an expired permit, so technically it does not have to meet the new TMDL requirements. However, the City should prepare their system to be in compliance with their allocated waste load allocation in preparation for the day that DEQ can reissue permits. On December 28, 2004, the U.S. Environmental Quality Protection Agency (EPA) and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued the City a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The compliance schedule with this permit requires the City to develop a plan and construct facilities for meeting the more stringent POTW effluent limits developed for the Pudding River. The treatment plant's wastewater effluent temperature/winter ammonia discharge is higher than can be directly discharged to the Pudding River during parts of the year. Increased river temperatures/winter ammonia levels have an adverse effect upon aquatic life. DEQ has established temporary temperature and winter ammonia limits until the establishment of total maximum daily loads for the Pudding River and waste load allocations are required for the Woodburn POTW by the next NPDES. In response to DEQ's Pudding River notification, the City prepared and adopted the 1995 Wastewater Facilities Plan for its wastewater treatment and collection system. This plan was updated in May 2010. This plan is designed to guide operations and improvements to the City's treatment system through the year 2030. In addition to providing upgrade guidelines for the existing system, to meet regulatory requirements, the facilities plan provides for increasing the system's capacity to accommodate planned residential, commercial and industrial growth. 92 Exhibit 1 Page 25 of 49 Additional efficiency is built into the plan by providing for phased construction of the improvements. The estimated cost of treatment facilities is divided into three phases that coincide with previous plans. Phase 1 improvements have already been completed, so they were excluded from the updated plan's CIP. Phase 2 represents year 2020 improvements and phase 3 represents year 2030 improvements. Phase 2 estimated costs (in 2017 dollars) are $30.3 million, Phase 3 estimated costs (in 2017 dollars) are $0.1 million. The plan will enable the City to look ahead to long-term needs through the year 2030, while implementing the improvements only as they are needed. The 2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan's CIP was developed assuming 38,916 persons in 2030, and thus can readily accommodate the coordinated Year 2037 population projection (35,025). The projection for this plan was based on an average annual growth rate that ranged from 1.22 percent to 1.56 percent (based on Marion County's projections for each 5-year period), whereas the Wastewater Facilities Plan utilized a growth rate of 2.8 percent until 2020 and then 1.9 percent. Based on this information, the proposed improvements presented in the existing Wastewater Facilities Plan will provide sufficient capacity for the SWIR area and projected population growth through 2037. Table 3-4 identifies projects to serve the UGB with the SWIR area. The Wastewater Facilties Plan study area encompassed the area within the Woodburn UGB and potential UGB expansion areas that are now included within the UGB. Some areas outside the UGB were also included in the study for public health reasons. 3.2 Treatment Phase 1 of planned improvements to the wastewater treatment facility was completed in 2003. A diagram showing the physical layout of the treatment facility is shown in the Wastewater Facilities Plan. The system flows were updated for this plan since the last wastewater facilities plan flows were calculated nearly a decade ago. The current flows and loading are presented in Table 3-1 with the hydraulic design capacity of the treatment plant. The City reports that biochemical oxygen demand (BODS) levels have remained approximately the same, so no update to these values have been made. 93 Exhibit 1 Page 26 of 49 Table ®1 WWTP Loading and Capacity ®,m ®ee ® me Annual Dry Weather Flow(ADWF) 1.90 4.1 Annual Average Daily Flow(AADF) 3.00 4.8 Maximum Month Wet Weather 5.96 Flow (MMWWF5) Peak Week Flow(PWkF) 7.19 Peak Daily Average Flow(PDAF5) 11.45 Peak Instantaneous Flow (PIF5) 11.53 16 Average Daily BOD5 4,500 Ib/day 6,500 Ib/day Maximum Daily BODS 10,575 Ib/day No major improvements to the facility have been necessary since Phase 1 construction. Phase 2 improvements will be constructed when Phase 1 facilities near capacity. The facilities plan estimated this to be around 2020 but will likely be further out based on the recent flow analysis. The WWFP recommends construction of a separate industrial WWTP. The City maintains at least four large contracts with industrial facilities stating how much water can be discharged. These contracts currently allow for the release of far more discharge than is currently being released and as such, this is not currently a critical need to meet existing treatment requirements. If the SWIR area develops as anticipated with flows typical of other light industrial areas in the City, an additional 0.4 MGD peak wet weather flow is expected from the area according to WWFP projections for base flow and Rainfall Derived Inflow and Infiltration (RDI I).This will not necessitate a separate industrial treatment plant, and therefore it was excluded from the project list in section 3.4. The instantaneous capacity of the plant is not growing as quickly as projected and is currently only 72% of the design capacity of the WWTP. The City should remain proactive in analyzing new development impacts to determine when WWTP expansion will be needed. When the actual peak instantaneous flows to the WWTP come within 1 MGD of the existing capacity, alternatives should be reevaluated to determine what are the appropriate improvements to be implemented. 3.3 Primary Collection System The wastewater collection system conveys wastewater from residential, commercial, and industrial facilities to the treatment facility. A diagram showing the layout of the existing sewer trunk and interceptor lines and pump stations is shown in the figure at the end of this section. The Woodburn sanitary sewerage collection system is composed of approximately 87 miles of sewer line and 8 pump stations as shown in Tables 3-2 and 3-3. Figure 1 shows the sewerage service area analyzed in the Wastewater Facilities Plan and shows areas considered for service expansion outside of the current UGB. 94 Exhibit 1 Page 27 of 49 The Wastewater Facilities Plan provides a description of potential needed improvements to the collection system in existing and future conditions. The 2020, 2030, and 2060 conditions in the Facilities Plan assume that the SWIR area is developed at 750 gallons/acre/day. The results of the hydraulic analysis showed that the Mill Creek Pump Station and I-5 Pump Station require capacity upgrades, as well as the I-5 Pump Station Forcemain. Further analysis of the condition of wastewater collection facilities is included in Volume II of the Wastewater Facilities Plan. The CIP shows projects that will be needed through the Year 2030 within the City Limits. Table ®2 Pipe Diameter and Material Inventory (Lengths in Feet) unknown 45 368 32 " 3,272 3,717 !19%. 4 896 101 1,747 2,745 6 1,894 1„387 145 2,270 3,114 15,765 24,575 6% 8 63,254 87,014 1186 580 92,294 4957 20,870 27,0153 64% 10 10,060 1,2,329 147 105 13,748 2,510 339 39,236 9% 12 5,919 8,687 2701 5,707 1,921 4,096 29,030 7% 14 209 2171 426 0% 15 223 13,557 745 1,323 15,848 4% 16 3082 155 167 i 3,404 1% 18 8,763 1,987 500 11,250 3% 24 1„576 437 3,993 29 6,035 " 1% 27 2,177 2,177 1% 36 1934 1,934 0%' Forcemain 14,355 14,355 3% sum 84,418 124,133 4,983 685 134,483 13,503 62,680 424,885 100% %of total 20% 29% 1% 0% 32% 3% 15% 100% Table 3®3 Pump Station Capacities 1-5 1215 3160 Santiam 112 -- Stevens 191 226 Greenview 406 -- Industrial 550 -- Mill Creek 9800 11,797 Rainier 300 -- Vanderbeck 700 'Firm Capacities from Table 5-1 and Additional Capacity from Table 5-2 of the2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan 95 Exhibit 1 Page 28 of 49 3.4 Capital Improvement Projects The 2010 Wastewater Facilities Plan assumed that the SWIR area would be included in the 2020 scenario. It notes that both of the pump stations downstream of the SWIR area are undersized in the 2020 scenario. Table 3-4 presents the wastewater collection system improvements needed to serve the SWIR expansion areas and estimates the cost of constructing the improvements. The existing wastewater collection system would not have sufficient capacity to efficiently serve the SWIR expansion area. These are illustrated in Figure 8-1 of the WWFP which is included in the appendix of this plan. The proposed wastewater map from the SWIR Master Plan is also included in the appendix of this plan. Table ®4 Project List —Sanitary Sewer Plan ® . ® ® `® Mill Creek PS Stage 1 $616,500 Mill Creek PS Stage 2 $3,212,000 1-5 Pump Station $1,611,500 1-5 Forcemain $3,813,500 SWIR Area Sanitary Sewer Extension $11,987,000 Woodburn POTW Phase 2 $28,050,000 Woodburn POTW Phase 3 $6,000 Natural Treatment Systems Phase 2 $9,481,500 Natural Treatment Systems Phase 3 $138,000 Stevens PS Pump Station $1,220,500. Young Street Pipeline $2,186,000 Front Street Pipeline $1,282,500 Mill Creek Interceptor Pipeline $2,287,000 Progress Way Pipeline $1,679,500 Hays Street Pipeline $2,503,000 Brown Street Pipeline $1,148,000 Sanitary Sewer Service to North Pipeline $6,435,000 Sanitary Sewer Service to South Pipeline $986,500 Area outside UGB Pipeline $10,554,000 Pump Station Upgrades Reliability $339,000 SWIR Total $58,916,500 Overall Total $89,537,000 SWIR specific projects are shown in bold. 96 Exhibit 1 Page 29 of 49 3.5 Funding To assure that the impact of providing and maintaining new sewer collection facilities is not a burden to the community, new development will be required to pay for the cost of collection facilities needed to serve such development. Extra capacity facilities required to meet the standards of the Wastewater Facility Plan will be paid from accumulated revenue of the System Development Charge Fund. The City will continue paying the cost of maintaining and improving the existing collection system with funds derived from user fees. Treatment plant upgrades will be financed through a combination of system development charge funds, loans, and grants. 97 � %%//j'; �(�/dR' ,N,,, �j�%3 nn I I�// �j Y 4�ii, f,� ,/! ,/�„�r.'/ •��%/G��%%%%/%%�/%//%///i/�Gyfi�ti,' .—i LT Lrl o —''S3` ,,,,,,r;, ///,r=, ,,,, r��i ✓�/j, ✓`i !rl r„ / �" Ji,,,:;, ,o, /i, ��/ „ �"'"Y /�/""'��'l j/ '!�%r�r rfii% ",i%% � wjr a,0" �r% 1%/'✓! /i/ f�'7�/ v,1/i rill/ /O//%i/ X.�/elf l r7 l ! g ' y ,r y!/ ,.rr rry / / u / 0// Y O / "up1 n / / , rr / + /Rlt nl wM a cR r w%i /lir p/fy//I% a A 'Iktgq i�lil�r% r� hkV'b '" / A✓ >•d�¢%/ : //i/�1 d Jl,��`o / % mv/v /%/ f �/fR" ! r / r 4)G / a�5 "; �/ � �a J/ m � W /, d ♦�Q / m' a e9a � �n w G7 e J 1 it ° �/, ` „ /rJ�' i i ,,, '(I' ° e✓ �+ rt r / r/ / � 6S4/Y If%/�c �rY f/ / w �6 ri/r// V� �! „, R ✓ <,. {A „r r//iiri4ri� �/r, � ' / / /,N .////////iii /r / // d�'' r ✓Ffj �� v"*h AYIM a,� AT gg JX4 �y g//4r ' a � y pr win 11" l V /r //iJr'Y i q� / U41 �/r rir i%/ "1)y)IJS7(f /'%r %�� CO f ,raj / „qS i 1iq DIfJ�w// /✓ r f, G� °) � ;MF IME � � � ° !i4�n'^"P/r o //� > �i v y ��//O��/ / ly 'sA r '', 4 ;'f / 0. d�// / //%ii/t E/ ViC �� n'' 1� m� 4 /"14Gf1� ��r q 4 �, ' ,✓+y �,��p, C'"� ''// I�%��O / 3 C ' jfl //�/ 14 � i U, r,✓s r >� p q / ea, b awp / m s p r UI r7" 1� �!✓ f0 Ak` 'O QO d 3 Ce+�" V ! . Wr 4Y r dy Yr� °yuool w JI% Na a �Ia wa jY rwr1 Y�0/ O U lIJ� mR 4 a LL // .......... r lr b� a ra 3 d r // r/A'+; v //ip r /f a/ %ai Y%llll/f+ iM r> �N%/'f/91r�%/'l/ ill✓ i �'r a. 9e�f°; „s"a t Tv l O/Up Ilk J4. ^ Iml, 10 - o, IJ✓ yb rt aura r�Aas r ./wNl „; / �,;,,, ' % / 0 .� ID / NO, E x (7 p4°^4q, a 1p/ � to z a to F� °s,I p,: r a r o L ar �i�/�//,r� �/IIU�✓ Jsa�� " / S� n a � ' �..i o; FK J J1�e, /j/fa MAI, // aj E `o - - `° N i p //// yq H F " k Ak sBgi rm B o r �` gA spa 0 J d a r / ffJl rr ��G 1�G�f��fPjJ�A aveecama,;a�maa.�e � N �ocw wt //,r l /a ii euaaaex m . r r' ice'//stir«,/, / Exhibit 1 Page 32 of 49 Sectlairi Storm Water Plan 4.1 Introduction The Woodburn Storm Drainage Master Plan was prepared by Crane and Merseth Engineering/Surveying between 1996 and 2001.The study area of the Storm Drainage Master Plan included the area within the UGB as it existed before the 2005 amendments and areas immediately surrounding the City that contribute runoff to Mill Creek and Senecal Creek upstream of the City. The study area comprised approximately 9,447 acres. The Storm Drainage Master Plan was based on the impervious area that existed in the base year, 1994. Impervious areas were projected for future land uses based on an assumption that every parcel within the UGB would fully developed at the maximum density allowed by the 2001 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. As noted, there are two major drainage basins within Woodburn - Senecal Creek and Mill Creek. The smaller basin, Senecal Creek, is divided into 13 sub-basins and the larger basin, Mill Creek, is divided into 51 sub-basins. These drainage basins contain development in SWIR area, although the land use assumptions may have changed. 4.2 Design Storms The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Published the Atlas 2 which defines how much rainfall will fall in every area throughout the United States during several different storm events. Table 4-1 shows the rainfall depth for 24 hours duration of different storm event frquencies in Woodburn. Since it is impossible to protect against every storm that could possibly occur, communities must pick a level of protection that is reasonable when factors such as cost and consequence of failure are considered. The City has selected the 25-year, 24-hour storm to be their design storm for pipe facilities and 100-year, 24-hour event for new detention facilities. 100 Exhibit 1 Page 33 of 49 Table 4®1 AA Atlas 2 Volume 10 Rainfall Depths R11 i R2-year 2.3 5-year 2.9 10-year 3.3 25-year 3.8 50-year 4.2 100-year 4.4 4.3 Existing Inventory The Storm Drainage Master Plan contains a June 1999 inventory of the existing public storm water system's facilities in the Mill Creek and Senecal Creek basins in the City of Woodburn, but it is missing manyfacilities in the system. Since the master plan, the City has put together a Geographic Information System (GIS) to better catalogue and map their system. Although it is currently still a work in progress, it is more complete than the master plan. Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, and 4-5 list the currently catalogued information for culverts, conveyance piping, ditches, and other storm water infrastructure. Table 4®2 Existing Culvert Length Inventory IMINEMESimmil= 811 44 44 0.5% 12" 148 3,548 39 58 3,793 45% 15" 107 117 224 3% 18" 7 291 146 444 5% 24" 226 226 3% 30" 112 112 1% 36" 148 148 2% 42" 483 483 6% 481' 275 403 244 922 11% 54" 393 393 5% 60" 618 618 7% 72" 301 301 4% 96" 172 172 2% 108" 170 170 2% Other 215 246 461 5% Total 1,950 5,664 448 302 146 8,509 100% %of total 23% 67% 5% 4% 2% 100% 100% 1. Indicates approximate length only, no field survey data 101 Exhibit 1 Page 34 of 49 Table ®3 Storm Drain Piping Length Inventory 4" 175 175 0.1% 6" 2514 260 617 174 3566 1% 8" 19577 661 5272 180 352 26041 8% 10" 23643 2158 10465 1152 187 958 38562 12% 12" 458 1563 41411 5260 17996 1244 149 761 68841 21% 14" 359 359 0.1% 15" 214 3456 15252 7496 8004 20 748 35191 111% 16" 270 270 0.1% 18" 2163 21646 5207 5182 2345 36542 11% 21" 232 4053 1309 235 5830 2% 24" 723 1842 17600 2549 3443 543 389 27088 8% 27" 1313 59 1371 0.4% 30" 390 1891 7202 2144 270 977 12873 4% 36" 2655 7540 494 95 2054 2323 15161 5% 42" 2695 1151 868 225 4939 2% 48" 1187 1273 18 2478 1% 54" 440 440 0.1% 72" 99 99 0.03% 78" 144 144 0.04% Unknown 1 1 929 3157 112 1 1 1 36563 40760 1 13% Total 1627 4475 11843 ; 169585 26545 54608 2755 3420 45873 320732 100% %oftotal 1% 1% 4% 53% 8% 17% 1% 1% 14% 100% 100% 1. Indicates approximate length only, no field survey data Table 4®4 Existing Ditch Length Inventory ��mquui�„IIID u1 III, t iIP� iiilll 1' 682 682 4.9% 2' 50 50 0% 3' 300 300 2% 4' 131 131 1% 5' 1,652 1,652 12% 6' 3,892 3,892 28% 7' 420 420 3% 8' 274 5,062 5,336 39% 9' 262 262 2% 10' 1,133 1,133 8% Total 274 13,584 P100% 3,858 100.0 %of total 2% 98% 100.0% 102 Exhibit 1 Page 35 of 49 Table 4® Other Storm Water Infrastructure ENIMEM= Manhole 698 Catch Basin 1716 Outfall 56 Dry Well Sump 4 Detention Facilities 8 Inlets 108 4.4 Needed Drainage Improvements to Support Growth Recommendations for needed storm drainage projects through the year 2006 within City Limits are found in Chapter 9 of the Storm Drainage Master Plan. Very few of these projects were actually completed and growth has been the main driver of stormwater projects. The City plans on creating an updated Storm Water Master Plan in the near future, and new system inventories have been completed to better understand the system, since completion of the last plan. New additions to the system such as the SWIR area will be required to detain peak flows onsite to avoid additional impacts to the system downstream as described in the following subsections. 4.4.1 DetentionPolicy Implementation The Storm Drainage Master Plan includes a Storm Water Flow Management Program, including policies regarding detention. This policy requires on-site detention for new developments and identifies several locations in the City where a public detention facility may be sited. Portions of the existing drainageways function as detention sites. These sites will continue to function as detention areas. Programs directed at improving public safeguards during periods of high flow and incorporation of storm water treatment will be continued whenever possible. Detention facilities are sized based on the City Council adopted guide presented in Table 4-6, "Volumes for Different Intensity Storms for 10-Acre Site." The values in this table are based on the rational method. It requires that the difference in flow before and after development for each storm recurrence interval be detained. 103 Exhibit 1 Pane 36 of 49 Table 4-6 Volumes for Different Intensity Storms for a 10-acre site INE LZL 0.71 3.313 32,205 2.7hr 0.25 L167 11,340 LZL 0.71 3.087 30,672 2.76hr 0.25 1.087 10,800 2.86hr 0.25 M96 10,255 L2L 0.71 2.582 27,605 2.97hr 0.25 0.909 9,720 0.935" U1 2.024 23,899 3.28hr 0.25 0.713 8,415 To analyze the system, the SVV|R area was broken into two portions that are divided by 1-5. It is assumed that flow will not be conveyed across 1-5. The 50.8-acre portion to the east of |5 will be referred to as South SVV|R, and the 130.0-acre portion to the west of 1-5 will be referred to as the West SVV|R. The South SVV|R is expected to drain to existing storm pipes, and new pipes are planned for the West SVV|R area which will outfall toSeneca| Creek. Both areas will need detention for the difference in runoff volume between pre- and post-development conditions. The results are presented in Table 4-7. Table 4-7 Volumes for Different Runoff Calculation Methods South SWIR 2.2 West SWI R 5.6 4.5 Requirements for New Developments s 4,5,1 [^'tV Of UUOOdbU[D RUDOff FleteDt'OD Requirement 1> Construct device that has capacity for detaining difference in run off volume received by undeveloped and developed land for a 25-year storm. 104 Exhibit 1 Page 37 of 49 2) Construct a discharge orifice of a size that the quantity of run off through the orifice is equal to run off flow from a storm of 5-year or less, undeveloped land. 3) Construct a detention facility to have a post-development 25-year capacity with a discharge orifice (or structure) sized to limit outflow to no more than the undeveloped site peak run off for the existing (undeveloped) 5-year frequency storm. Detention volumes calculated by the following methods are acceptable: A. Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph routing model (as prescribed by the King County Surface Water Design Manual) for the post development 25-year runoff hydrograph detained back to the existing 5-year peak site discharge. B. 18,883 CF/ 10 Acre drainage area as per City of Woodburn standard table, above, based on the rational method. 4.5.2 Safety Requirements 1) Depth of storm water within 30 feet from the edge of detention ponds, if open to public, shall be limited to 3 feet, then gradual slope (3%) to higher depth shall be allowed. Maximum pond side slopes shall be 3' horizontal to 1' vertical, however, gentler slope is desirable. 4.6 SWIR Area Projects Table 4-8 identifies storm water projects that will be needed to support planned development in SWIR area. For the purposes of this Public Facility Plan, storm water system improvements are focused on detention facility volumes to serve the fully developed SWIR area. Based on development timing, phasing and final development type, this volume may ultimately be met through multiple local detention facilities. Further analysis and planning for the SWIR area will better define how detention volumes are achieved. Note that minor collection piping within SWIR area is not included in the pond cost estimates as they will primarily be part of on-site development planning. The preliminary master plan for the area was created by others and is included in the appendix of this report. It does not show detention locations. An estimated cost for the projects in the figure is shown in Project 3 in table 4-8. The City highlighted a need to replace the culverts in Seneca Creek, as they are in disrepair, and likely undersized. Further study will be needed to determine culvert sizing and configuration. The price shown is based on a similar large culvert project but may vary significantly from the actual costs based on site and hydraulic conditions. The culverts are in ODOT right-of-way, so it may not be the City's financial responsibility to replace them. 105 Exhibit 1 Page 38 of 49 Table ®8 Project List- Storm Drainage Plan 1 West Area Detention Pond(s) $1,239,000 2 South Area Detention Pond(s) $561,000 3 SWIR Master Plan piping $2,877,000 4 0DOT Culverts $2,000,000 4.7 Funding To assure that the impact of providing and maintaining new storm drainage facilities is not a burden to the community, new development will be required to pay for the cost of storm drainage facilities needed to serve such development. Extra capacity facilities required to meet the standards of the Master Storm Drainage Plan may be paid from accumulated revenue of the System Development Charge Fund. The City will continue paying the cost of maintaining and improving the existing storm drainage system with funds derived from a combination of system development charges, Local Improvement Districts, and street maintenance and construction funds. 106 d! r i l/r� i r✓ 1 p III I Lri ✓ r 1 Ln L / Xr Lu lj"l� 7J'IV r I I (00 Jill a /NDN f. ill„1II�1 / / �, oi� Tal i1i 111 Iil�l�il� �!�4' �N Nil �I lal r 1 fill Ll C el r „ r41 IpA kV Gid' I � ;loos N" r x4� s 07 �f0 f611/% 1U91pal /Iy �I ;,, � �%%%/arlrr / = f0 � . Aj . ....... o/ or 1 'O o G 71 Aj 'O r' I,II i ✓w'' , V N1 if r CL d 1 a mil' I 1 N I��ICL m° ib4fl� ' 51 hwIu b " �nia�i,ynr71 ry 4 i °lI � i I I al II✓,YG" II'e ,rl, �X r ,Nr�Iv;�nmi„ ;�E°Na r 1I N, 1 ii fi/ a ✓�! , JillnI N"I 111 A WoIola ° ' } 'u�{ NIN� ani 1 r r.. / !I a�11 41i QIP R l j fil 14, 1411 pj USN Ili i o Aj1��'. 1 f�IIII 1I iu t �N 1 1 III ISyp1 1! i�l� �,m I1,71k I14 file��J �b(r1I r IrI� I � .0 llilAll 1 1 Ip, 1� 1 a 4 Ii lily i t r �ICL IPI a III lj"L I ISI I�1 IIC 1 Sr INI I 11I ,, ni lup 4�1 (A iol Aj-Ilij I 3 iI � 1°SII LL I �I ao^i U V .� a a "f11g1.1�N � ��5, m a a CD In 1 9 IN"/ �' rrrprnrp 'r o / lalul ,I v w IIS A [#°,� ISW n II r ",.. .rn O p� v ILL CS Ail 0 C) Q (n O C) Qo � C 0 N co N V r y -i 'a U a o Exhibit 1 Page 41 of 49 Public Facilities Plan City of Woodburn Transportation Plan July 2018 PR Glke 6922 OFIEGiON U DKS Associates Transportation 720 SW Washington St. Suite 500 Portland,OR 97205 109 Exhibit 1 Pane 42 of 49 �� . � �� Transportation �� [ �� 5°1 Introduction The Transportation System Master Plan is currently in progress. Details of the transportation system components will be found in the Transportation System Master plan when it is complete. 5.2 Capital ap~tN Nmprovement Nan for SWNR A rea A transportation project list has been provided as part of the Woodburn Facilities Plan Update. The project list includes a package of 13 roadway and intersection improvements identified to serve the Southwest Industrial/Urban Reserve (SVV|R) area. The transportation project list was developed by DKS Associates based on review of the adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP) and draft documents from theSVV|R Master Plan. Planning-level cost estimates were developed for each of the identified transportation projects based on project assumptions, regional construction unit costs, and engineering judgement. Costs do not include the costs for land acquisition and easrnents as they can vary significantly depending on the property and the owner. The updated transportation project list was developed to aid the City in implementing community-supported transportation projects and support pursuing external funding opportunities until the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update is completed (expected in late 2018). The TSP will provide a comprehensive revaluation of long range transportation needs, priorities, and solutions for the community. 17-1993 Page 5-1 Public Facilities Plan ]u|y2018 City ofWoodburn 110 \ \ \ ? - E \\ \\\ \\ \�\ \\ \\ i 2 \ �: ) }i / - )!if i}j o ) > If )4 )! )j \ \ \ \ \ \ i \ / \ i \ - - - - - - - - - - \ ! \f { { / 0 10 10 10 10 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \� \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ :# §f :#> Exhibit 1 Page 44 of A Q_ V 219 / / 219 ; 214 1IILSBORO 1 SILVERTON 1 1 i Sr8" l9/ y l WOODLANE A6/ / 0 �%aiaai i 1 ' „ aaaaa � 1 1 o _ C4 i 1 1 1 ii• .11 HOOPER Sr , o /aa�'aa� W@ ']tE V. CSWEET WA y �i� �► LE,BRUN RD NE fl� � '„ / fl� i i / PARF;` ,'wwuwr aGG auk Gu6GGf ani uouu saaNUG iiiiiiiuoY f ROWE- AP, MauGa % ia ..... %11111, c�fl,. ii %%%%%%%%/ice � .::... ..............iii............... i 1 ,,,,,,,,, / Note:Proposed Roadway a /aa,,,�/��i f,,� aaaaaaaaaaaa�? Scale(approxima#e) Alignments are Preliminary and May be Modified a ��°' a '�� Y i // / % 0' 500' 1000' During Development Review LEGEND iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillilI -Improve MajorArterial uuul-Project Number 11111 -Construct MinorArterial 00000000000000000000000000000001001011101 -Improve MinorArterial Transportation Projects uuuuua uu11 uuuuuua Intersection mumu uumumu uumumu uumumu uumuu -Construct Service Collector M , Improvement _Construct Access Street Woodburn Facilities Plan Update No Scale 112 Exhibit Pa e450149 Appendix • Water Cll' figure from lNntrr System Master Plan • Wastewater Clk' figure from Wastewater Facilities Plan • .SWIR .SiormwTier CII' figure. from SWIR Master Plan 0 0 0 �r o � U x 0 LU o a� a � y In o o z�N cl c t � � / v a - c f > ° 2 62 LL LL j � � f Y / P A� G r F l 19 h I. Ew ,j 10 d^ %/ r v 0 J 0') w y T, LJ O c Y N E wU O � N .t/1. .t/1. N N 0 J j N N N Q t/1 Q Q CO R 2 (n ` > > E O a c E u E (Z E O O Q O (6 O .Oo (6 (6 a- N N 6 d C O ), (Q N O O- O- c� O O U E 00 Q Q C '� O O U N p] a s E E m W o Z a a Yi to C) ID ' o a lir % '%%/ N/w "/ �' E' J%i//rig ap Y p r g.r //iiia N /i CN x / g7 / r P G r rr ' '4/�r / / 'ro/ r� r / / /lid%/� kv " ® r 1 r *Ns o b�,., "��^* 4 / m � A 40 llo,"ax m 9 my! N, i n 91 m o(1) , a a � Jq 'rl C m ro m 1," ,vim NNNN w � srr�vx3 r rii% r $a VVo� w ad;/--, ®r' irimO 4u a i3y r A ro 'P CF 7 L w LJJ; 8 a L1 a r 8-� I�IIIIIIII' t L) r , � v , i f f � % � �� { l 1. ✓ �� '�, t , j� i r Vr J f� W pp W Lij i� W zd. LL L)Qw ,o �w ' orccr�, m ©, n "l w 0 W ua / / �// i ' cn ZD I O to L'6tl L_J 'X^rc X°Lc'fY` w / Jw n,w w,;a LL- LL�� „ i� Exhibit 1 Page 49 of 49 R(",(" `�,rv;VV ')I.Ii AV I'VIJI , ,`�rv;lJl l l //ff70 I"()RI I Alvll..,R, OR 9/,?C)4 vvvvvv.I1"1Urroy"I"IIiti-I.U,l 117 Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 4 Analyses & Findings This attachment to the staff report analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the legislative amendment relates to and meets applicable provisions. Section references are to the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Oregon Administrative Rules or Woodburnlf) li .i .! O[ „....................ince „ ,l ,,,,,, ,, ,, WINO . Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 4 of 7 118 Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 4 Legislative Amendment Provisions of the WDO 4.01 Decision-Making Procedures 4.01.02E.Type V Decisions(Legislative):Type V decisions involve legislative actions where the City Council enacts or amends the City's land use regulations, comprehensive plan, Official Zoning Map or some component of these documents.Type V decisions may only be initiated by the City Council.The Planning Commission holds an initial public hearing on the proposal before making a recommendation to the City Council.The City Council then holds a final public hearing and renders a decision. Public notice is provided for all public hearings(Section 4.01.14).The City Council's decision is the City's final decision and is appealable to LUBA within 21 days after it becomes final. This legislative amendment to the WDO Comprehensive Plan and qualifies as a Type V decision. Staff completed the public notices for the Commission hearing date of December 13, 2018, specifically a newspaper ad in the Woodburn Independent and mailed notice to select agencies— including Marion County, the Woodburn Fire and School Districts, and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The Planning Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration for adoption. Comprehensive Plan Policies, OAR's & Statewide Planning Goals Comprehensive Plan I. Public Facilities Goal 1.9 To ensure that growth is orderly and efficient,the City shall phase the needed public services in accordance with the expected growth. Extensions of the existing public services should be in accordance with the facility master plans and Public Facility Plan in this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-1.1 Public Facilities and services shall be appropriate to support sufficient amounts of land to maintain an adequate housing market in areas undergoing development or redevelopment. Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 5 of 7 119 Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 4 B. Citizen Involvement and Agency Coordination Policy B-2. Woodburn shall coordinate with affected state agencies regarding proposed comprehensive plan and land use regulation amendments, as required by state law. The PFP ensures orderly and efficient growth in the City. It includes projects and associated costs necessary to provide public facilities and services. All state, county and regional entities were notified pursuant to state law. Statewide Planning Goals Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. The proposal directly addresses the intent of Goal 11 by adopting a Plan that provides for orderly and efficient public facilities and services. �,� Goal 14 Urbanization OAR 660-015-0000,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use,to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries,to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. The proposal furthers this goal by ensuring efficient use of land and providing for livable communities by planning for infrastructure to address future growth within the city's UGB. Oregon Administrative Rules: 660-011-0045 Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 6 of 7 120 Exhibit 2 Page 4 of 4 Adoption and Amendment Procedures for Public Facility Plans (1)The governing body of the city or county responsible for development of the public facility plan shall adopt the plan as a supporting document to the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and shall also adopt as part of the comprehensive plan: (a) The list of public facility project titles, excluding (if the jurisdiction so chooses) the descriptions or specifications of those projects; (b) A map or written description of the public facility projects' locations or service areas as specified in sections(2)and (3) of this rule; and (c)The policy(ies)or urban growth management agreement designating the provider of each public facility system.If there is more than one provider with the authority to provide the system within the area covered by the public facility plan,then the provider of each project shall be designated. The proposal includes each of the required elements for Public Facilities Plans stipulated in OAR 660-011-0045 CONCLUSION Based on the above Findings, Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with all applicable Comprehensive Plan, Development Ordinance and state provisions for adoption. It is recommended that the City Council ultimately adopt the 2018 Woodburn Public Facilities Plan as Exhibit B of the Comprehensive Plan (LA 2018-03) Legislative Amendment LA 2018-03 Page 7 of 7 121 �'I'1 r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU Pri,e�arrt rr rf 1R'!87 March 11, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Ordinances Enabling Annexation and City Zoning Designation of Approximately 24.65 Acres of Territory Known as Lowrie Property at 9008 Parr Rd NE (ANX 2018-02) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached ordinances. BACKGROUND: On February 25, 2019, the City Council completed a public hearing and tentatively approved Annexation ANX 2018-02 for the Lowrie Property at 9008 Parr Road NE. It then and directed staff to prepare two ordinances for Council adoption that annex the subject property and designate City zoning. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Ordinance to annex A. Exhibit A: Legal Description B. Exhibit B: Map C. Exhibit C: Analyses & Findings 2. Ordinance to designate City zoning A. Exhibit A: Legal Description B. Exhibit B: Map Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x Finance_x 122 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3092 ORDINANCE NO. 2570 AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 24.65 ACRES OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE LOWRIE PROPERTY (LOCATED AT 9008 PARR ROAD NE, MARION COUNTY, OREGON) INTO THE CITY OF WOODBURN WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described in Exhibit "A" and mapped in Exhibit "B", which are affixed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the subject property is Marion County Tax Lot 052W13 00800; and WHEREAS, consistent with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 222.1 1 1 (2) the owner of real property in the territory to be annexed initiated by petition a proposal for annexation, a copy of the petition being on file with the City Recorder (ANX 2018-02); and WHEREAS, the applicant, Emerio Design, LLC, obtained written consent from the owners of the territory and has requested annexation of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the property to be annexed is within the City Urban Growth Boundary (UGB); and WHEREAS, the property to be annexed is contiguous to the City and can be served with City services; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2019 the Woodburn Planning Commission considered the annexation application and, after a duly advertised public hearing, recommended approval of the annexation; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2019, the Woodburn City Council held a public hearing, reviewed the record, heard all public testimony presented on said application, and upon deliberation concluded that the proposed annexation meets the applicable approval criteria under City of Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) 5.04.01 C.; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Page - 1 - Council Bill No. 3092 Ordinance No. 2570 123 Section 1. That the subject property, legally described in Exhibit "A" and mapped in Exhibit "B", is annexed to the City of Woodburn. Section 2. That the City Council adopts the Analysis & Findings, affixed hereto as Exhibit "C" and by this reference incorporated herein. Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page - 2 - Council Bill No. 3092 Ordinance No. 2570 124 EM- Civil Engineering Land Survey " its Land Use Planning Construction Management ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION JOB NO. 041-025 TAX LOT 800 05 2W 13 MAY 29, 2018 EXHIBIT A (PAGE 1 OF 2) A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S.W. 1/4 AND THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, MARION COUNTY, OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EXISTING CITY LIMIT OF THE CITY OF WOODBURN ON THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN REEL 3822, PAGE 457, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS (TAX LOT 800 05 2W 13), SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PARR ROAD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 517, 30.0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE); THENCE ALONG SAID EXISTING CITY LIMIT AND SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°18'51" WEST, 1596.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 800; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EXISTING CITY LIMIT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 800, NORTH 89020'17" WEST, 660.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 800, NORTH 00°16'47" EAST, 1593.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID PARR ROAD (30.0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 89041'21" EAST, 89.40 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREON (SAID ANGLE POINT BEARS NORTH 00°31'24" EAST, 540.45 FEET, SOUTH 89041'21" EAST, 1297.99 FEET, AND SOUTH 00°21'00" WEST, 30.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PETER RAYMOND DLC NO. 88); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 89°39'00" EAST, 571.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 24.19 ACRES MORE OR LESS. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON JANUARY 15, 1987 JON T. FEIGION 2252 EXPIRES 12-31-19 REFERENCE SURVEY: SN 34512 MARION COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS 8285 S.W. Nimbus Avenue « Beaverton, Oregon 97008 r 503-515-5528 1 TEL ..�_..........._.� .. .__........___..._ 503-639-9592 FAX www.emeriodesign.com 125 EXHIBIT A (PAGE 2 OF 2) A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S.W. 1/4 AND THE S.E. 1/4 OF SEC. 13, T.5S., R.2W., W.M. MARION COUNTY, OREGON PARR ROAD S00'21'00"W (COUNTY ROAD NO. 517) 30.00' 60' S89"'41'21"E 1297.99'—_' //- Ir d/ S89"39'00"E 571.69'-"��, L301 J- ECL S89*41'21"E POINT OF BEGINNING EAST LINE u') 89.40' OF REEL 3822, PAGE 457 S4 goo to ui C14 NORTHERLY NW to CORNER PETER 0) LO RAYMOND DLC 880) DESCRIBED AREA LO 24,19 ACRES -700 io SCALE:1"=300' 00 1 z 0 300, 600 Tk- JOOO -VL Soo LEGEND I ECL EXISTING CITY LIMIT Cily OF WOODBURN TL TAX LOT, MARION COUNTY TAX MAP 05 2W 13 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYO R N89*20'1 7"W ECL 660.14' TL 12p0 j OREGON� JANUARY 15, 1 87 ................... JON T. FEIGION '4 ii d ii a T 2252 REFERENCE: SN 34512 MARION COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS EXPIRES 12-31-19 DRAWN BY. JTF CITY OF WOODBURN mrlmy J13 JOB NO.: 041-025 ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1"=300' 9008 PARR ROAD 6445 SW FALLBROOK PLACE, STE. 100 BEAVERTON, OREGO88 97008 DATE: 5-29-18 MARION COUNTY, OREGON TEL: (503) 746-8812 FAX: (503) 639-9592 TAX LOT 800 05 2W 13 www.emeriodesign.com 126 Attachment 102 Analyses & Findings This attachment to the staff report analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the application materials relate to and meet applicable provisions such as criteria, requirements, and standards. They confirm that a given standard is met or if not met, they call attention to it, suggest a remedy, and have a corresponding recommended condition of approval. Symbols aid locating and understanding categories of findings: Symbol Category Indication Requirement (or guideline) met No action needed Requirement (or guideline) not met Correction needed Requirement (or guideline) not applicable No action needed ......................................................................."..............i .. " ...................................................."......(......................................). Section references are to the Woodburn rn Develo j_� r ��„� ��: u��a�ice ADO Table of Contents Location.........................................................................................................................................................1 LandUse &Zoning........................................................................................................................................1 StatutoryDates.............................................................................................................................................3 AnnexationProvisions ..................................................................................................................................3 ApplicantIdentity........................................................................................................................................11 Location Address(es) 9008 Parr Rd NE Tax Lot(s). 052W13....00800... Nearest Parr&Stubb Rds intersection Land Use & Zoning Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Low Density Residential with Nodal Development Overlay Zoning District Nodal Single Family Residential (RSN), upon annexation Overlay District(s) none Existing Use(s) Vacant rural dwelling ............................................................. SII"CIIII SII ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 1 of 11 127 For context, the comprehensive plan land use map designations and zoning are illustrated below and the zoning is tabulated further below: Pa o l��lll�lill�l s F Fj Y r _F F G Ci Comprehensive Plan land use map excerpt Zoning map excerpt (Note: The City geographic information system[GIS]is not yet updated to show RMN zoning to the north within the annexed Smith Creek Development site(ANX 2017-05;Ordinance No. 2566, Exhibit"C"map.) Cardinal Direction Adjacent Zoning North East of Stubb Rd: Nodal Multi-Family Residential (RMN) West of Stubb Rd: No City zoning because not yet annexed; would be RMN East Public and Semi-Public(P/SP) [Centennial Park] South No City zoning because not yet annexed;would be RSN West Northerly: RMN Southerly: RSN ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 2 of 11 128 Statutory Dates Application November 2, 2018 Completeness 120-Day Final March 2, 2019 per Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS)?? .178. (The nearest and Decision Deadline prior regularly scheduled City Council date is February 25, 2019.)* *However, the Assistant City Attorney had counseled staff on January 16, 2018 that an annexation request is not subject to the 120-day deadline for final action per 227.178(8). Annexation Provisions Because the proposal is for annexation, per 5.04 it requires a Type IV review with City Council decision. The applicant submitted application materials on June 8, 2018 and revised and additional materials on October 3, 2018 (excerpted within Attachment 103). 2.05.04 Nodal Overlay Districts C. Master Planning Requirement 1.A master development plan shall be approved by the City Council for the entire area designated as Nodal Overlay on the Comprehensive Plan Map, prior to annexation of any property within the Nodal Development Overlay Comprehensive Land Use Plan map designation.The master plan shall be conceptual and non-binding in nature, but may be used as a general guide for development within the Nodal Overlay Districts. 2.The required master plan shall show: a)The location and rights-of-way for existing and planned streets.These streets shall provide access to all existing and proposed parcels,consistent with the Transportation System Plan (TSP); b)The location and size of existing and planned sanitary sewer,storm water and water facilities,at adequate levels to serve existing and proposed development; c)The location and area of the Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District(RCWOD). Planned streets and public facilities that cannot reasonably avoid the RCWOD shall be indicated; d)A development plan for the Nodal Neighborhood Commercial center, neighboring multi- family areas,and potential parks,including planned pedestrian and bicycle connections within the Nodal Overlay District as shown on the Transportation System Plan,and pedestrian and bicycle connections to Southwest Industrial Reserve areas; e)A development plan for all residential areas,demonstrating consistency with applicable nodal design standards. The applicant e-mailed staff on January 16, 2019 confirming that he wishes ANX 2018-02 to reference the Nodal master plan that Stafford Land Company already produced as part of ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 3 of 11 129 annexing the territory to become the Smith Creek Development (ANX 2017-05). This Nodal master plan accompanied the first annexation of property with the Comprehensive Plan Nodal overlay, and the City Council accepted and adopted it via Resolution No. 2124 on November 13, 2018 and its Exhibit "A". For convenient context, below is a shrunken reproduction of one of the master plan sheets focusing on open space, off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths, and a road and street network: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... EXHIBIT C-15-2 � NODAL OPEN SPACE& + r r d PATHWAY PLAN NODAL OVERLAY BOUNDARY r' + v P !s r a o BIKE PATHS,SIDEWALKS & PATHWAYS 1 � HOUSES WITH ALLEYS r + 11_a -I Ii. qf{' $ u ® APARTMENTS t r ' j e t { I 1 4 C 4 w �a 0 r I F Nrrry t......• G J A� on rasi+rvc � �, I a 91 u y „t rvsary m,m - -- ✓ DISCLAIMER. ALL CONCEPTUAL ELEMENTS SHOWN 'OUTSIDESMfTH CREEK RESIDENTIAL 2 h�+ DEVELOPMENTARE NON BINDING ON �IF�f ANYADIACENTPROPERTVOWNFR. B Resolution No. 2124 Exhibit "A"Nodal Master Plan Sheet of 8 Open Space& Pathway Plan 5.04.01 Annexation A. Purpose: The purpose of this Type IV review is to provide a procedure to incorporate contiguous territory into the City in compliance with state requirements,Woodburn Comprehensive Plan,and Woodburn Development Ordinance. B. Mandatory Pre-Application Conference: Prior to requesting annexation to the City, a Pre- Application Conference(Section 4.01.04)is required. ... C. Criteria: 1. Compliance with applicable Woodburn Comprehensive Plan goals and policies regarding annexation. ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 4 of 11 130 2. Territory to be annexed shall be contiguous to the City and shall either: a. Link to planned public facilities with adequate capacity to serve existing and future development of the property as indicated by the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan; or b. Guarantee that public facilities have adequate capacity to serve existing and future development of the property. 3. Annexations shall show a demonstrated community need for additional territory and development based on the following considerations: a. Lands designated for residential and community uses should demonstrate substantial conformance to the following: 1) The territory to be annexed should be contiguous to the City on two or more sides; 2) The territory to be annexed should not increase the inventory of buildable land designated on the Comprehensive Plan as Low or Medium Density Residential within the City to more than a 5-year supply; 3) The territory proposed for annexation should reflect the City's goals for directing growth by using public facility capacity that has been funded by the City's capital improvement program; 4) The site is feasible for development and provides either: a) Completion or extension of the arterial/collector street pattern as depicted on the Woodburn Transportation System Plan; or b) Connects existing stub streets,or other discontinuous streets,with another public street. 5) Annexed fulfills a substantial unmet community need,that has been identified by the City Council after a public hearing. Examples of community needs include park space and conservation of significant natural or historic resources. b. Lands designated for commercial,industrial and other uses should demonstrate substantial conformance to the following criteria: ... D. Procedures: 1. An annexation may be initiated by petition based on the written consent of: a. The owners of more than half of the territory proposed for annexation and more than half of the resident electors within the territory proposed to be annexed; or b. One hundred percent of the owners and fifty percent of the electors within the territory proposed to be annexed; or C. A lesser number of property owners. 2. If an annexation is initiated by property owners of less than half of property to be annexed, after holding a public hearing and if the City Council approves the proposed annexation,the City Council shall call for an election within the territory to be annexed. Otherwise no election on a proposed annexation is required. E. Zoning Designation for Annexed Property: All land annexed to the City shall be designated consistent with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan,unless an application to re-designate the property is approved as part of the annexation process. F. The timing of public improvements is as follows: ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 5 of 11 131 1. Street dedication is required upon annexation. 2. Dedication of public utility easements(PUE) is required upon annexation. 3. Street improvements are required upon development. 4. Connection to the sanitary sewer system is required upon development or septic failure. 5. Connection to the public water system is required upon development or well failure. 6. Connection to the public storm drain system is required upon development. Regarding subsection B., staff hosted the pre-application conference (Pre-App 2018-01) on March 21, 2018. Regarding the criteria of subsection C.: 1. The City Comprehensive Plan, Section G. Growth Management and Annexation contains annexation policies on pp. 30-31. The annexation criteria in the WDO already reflect the goals, including efficient City services. First, the territory to be annexed is within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The premise of a UGB is to define an area feasible for the City to provide services to greenfield development over approximately 20 years as described in the Comprehensive Plan. So, in this way the annexation of territory within the UGB is consistent with the comp plan. Second, the territory also is adjacent to infrastructure that development can make use of or extend into the territory to develop it: • Roads and street: Parr Road borders to the property to the north, providing a means of access. The road is now also under City jurisdiction following annexation of the right-of-way (ROW) between Centennial Park to the east and a little past Stubb Road to the west by the Stafford Lan Company for the Smith Creek Development through application ANX 2017-05 and Ordinance No. 2565, Exhibit "B" map, adopted November 13, 2018 and per the City Charter effective 30 days later on December 13, 2018. • Transit: Along Parr Rd, the City can run transit vehicles. • Potable water: The City geographic information system (GIS) illustrates public water lines both within Parr Road and to the east Centennial Park. • Sanitary sewer: A public sewer line is to the east within Centennial Park and that approaches the east boundary of the territory. • Stormwater sewer: The south side of the Parr Rd ROW includes a ditch that conveys east to a stormwater line near the northeast corner of the property at 828 Parr Rd (Tax Lot 052W13 00600), approximately 800 feet east of the territory. ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 6 of 11 132 • Other: Other franchise utility providers attend to such utilities as electric power, cable television and internet, natural gas, and cellular wireless telephony, often using existing or extended ROWs. The applicant had stated verbally to staff that the landowner has no intention of subdividing and developing the territory until the developer or developers of the Smith Creek Development—the territory generally north of Parr Road and east of Stubb Road annexed through Ordinance No. 2565 — provides the infrastructure upon which Smith Creek Development is premised. At that point, developers of adjacent greenfield properties to the south and west within the UGB can annex and build off that infrastructure at lesser cost to themselves. (As described in the Final Order for the Smith Creek Development dated November 2018, per Condition SUB-1 that project of nine phases might take as long as until 2026 to record final plats and construct fully. The subject territory is across Parr Road from Phase 3A, which includes the south leg of Stubb Road, and Phase 4A.) Were the Smith Creek Development not to be, the WDO and other City development regulations would still require a developer of the subject territory to extend infrastructure in order to develop. The proposal does not conflict with the goals and meets the goal of efficient City services. 2. The territory is contiguous to the City. Per the comp plan and with implementation through the WDO, upon development of the territory the City would require improvements that guarantee that public facilities have adequate capacity to serve such development. The Public Works Department identified no impediments to serve the existing vacant house. Additionally, the applicant's narrative (p. 7) states: "The subject property is currently contiguous with the city limits on one (1) side (i.e. east property boundary). All public utilities and services are available to the site either within Parr Rd. or by extending stormwater lines to the north and discharging into Smith Creek after being treated. A preliminary stormwater report has been included in this application to demonstrate adequate capacity for stormwater facilities." Staff concurs. 3. Examining the considerations under subsection a.: 1) The territory to be annexed is contiguous to city limits on two sides— north and east. ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 7 of 11 133 2) The comp plan land use map designates the territory Low Density Residential. The applicant's request to annex indicates anticipated market need for housing types such as detached houses, corner duplexes, and row houses that would be permitted upon application of the RSN zone. There is probably an oversupply of annexed Low Density Residential because though the vast majority of such land was under active land use entitlement (such as for planned unit development and subdivisions) or building permit reviews or was undergoing construction, with the late 2018 annexation of the Smith Creek Development territory this is no longer the situation. That property of 150 gross acres split between Low and Medium Density Residential is also entitled for development of 820 dwellings in the form of 708 houses and 112 row houses. The significance of this becomes clearer with compared with data now available as the City enters into Task 3 of its Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) long-range planning project. The consultant's memo "Woodburn Housing Needs Analysis, Draft Housing Needs Forecast, Task 2 deliverable" that was Attachment 103 of the staff memo to the Commission on December 13, 2018 concludes with an estimated forecast or projection that over the next 20 years (to about 2039) Woodburn will need a total of 3,000 more dwellings of which about 1,910 would be houses and 411 would be rowhouses or townhouses (p. 10, table Exhibit 15). Dividing that those numbers by four based on the assumption of dividing 20 years into four 5-year periods and an assumption of even and steady market development, the rounded numbers are 478 houses and 103 row houses or townhouses. Thus, it is clear with new information subsequent to the Smith Creek territory annexation that the Smith Creek Development alone could provide more than a 5-year supply of 20-year projected needed housing on its portion of UGB land designated Low and Medium Density Residential. However, staff notes that the aforementioned Smith Creek Development is nine phases and per its Condition SUB- might take as long as until 2026 to record final plats and construct fully— longer than a 5-year window. Second, the applicant expressed intention to not pursue development until the Smith Creek Development actually develops and extends City infrastructure so as to become adjacent to the subject property. Also, the applicant has no reason to spend more money on extending infrastructure when sooner or later the developer or developers of the Smith Creek property will pay for the infrastructure that serves that development and incidentally bring it close to the subject property. There is no corollary subdivision application with the annexation application. For these ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 8 of 11 134 reasons, staff believes the consideration of 2) about buildable land inventory is of little importance and that the proposal poses no threat of manifesting a glut of market-rate housing. The applicant's narrative states on p. 8: "As further discussed in responses above to Section 5.03.06.B.5 of this report [Technical Report 2 Residential Land Needs Analysis, May 2005], if the average population increase from the year 2018 to 2020 will be approximately 560 persons per year, as projected by EcoNorthwest's lower growth rate,this equals a need for a housing supply of over 180 housing units per year.This is based on an average household size of 3.11 persons per dwelling unit.The future housing construction on the subject site will start in approximately 2020—2021 with occupancy around 2022-2023. With construction of approximately 100 housing units over a 3 to 5-year period, this equals between 20 to 34 housing units per year.This is well within the amount of housing projected by the City of Woodburn for absorption annually, which results in balanced urbanization for the city.The availability of Low and Medium Destiny land in the city limits is currently very low, and annexation of the subject property will provide needed territory for development to create a supply of Low density land. This need is demonstrated in the Comprehensive Plan as the lands in the Nodal District are described as a unique housing variation need. As this area proposed for annexation will be one of the first Nodal areas to be developed in the City, it will allow the area to meet this undeveloped demand for a new housing type mix described in the Comprehensive Plan. Once this new land is available for development, the absorption rate is expected to be higher than historical averages, due to the fact that the zone allows for and the applicant is proposing a new housing type not available in other zones." Staff concurs. 3) The applicant's narrative states on p. 9: "[W]ith the development of the Smith Creek project immediately north of the subject property, additional facilities will be made available to the subject property, so approving the annexation proposed will direct growth to use both the City's existing facilities, as well as those constructed as part of the Smith Creek development." Staff concurs. ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 9 of 11 135 4) The mostly flat site with no obvious physical constraints and is physically feasible for urban residential redevelopment. Regarding subsection a), staff expects that a developer of the subject property would extend Stubb Road. The developer or developers of the Smith Creek property will improve the road into a major thoroughfare pursuant to Transportation System Plan (TSP) Figure 7-1 that classifies Stubb Road as Access Street class and will also join it with Harvard Drive. This serves to make the intersection of Parr and Stubb Roads ideal for access to the subject property. A second reason for staff expectation is because of both the adopted Nodal master plan illustrating Stubb Road extending south across and through the subject property all the way to the UGB. A third reason is that as part of the March 21, 2018 pre-app, staff made clear through slide presentation images and text as well as spoken word during the pre-app that based on WDO 3.01.05 Street Layout staff desires extension of Stubb Road across the subject property so that a local street network serving the southwestern area within the UGB can branch out westward. The applicant had verbally agreed to the concept and included a copy of the subsequent April 11, 2018 pre-app memo by staff among the application materials. Subsection b) is not applicable. 5) The applicant asserts no unmet community need, and the Council has not yet identified such a need. Annexation of the subject territory demonstrates substantial conformance by conforming with all the above five considerations except consideration 2). Regarding D., the applicant obtained the requisite written consent and such that no election is needed. Regarding E., the applicant confirms the proposal includes no request to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use designation or upon annexation to designate the territory with City a zoning district other than RSN. (Pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, RSN is the only zoning district that implements Low Density Residential that has also the Nodal Development Overlay.) Regarding F., the applicant need not address subsection 1. Because the City already annexed adjacent Parr Road ROW via the Smith Creek territory annexation (Ordinance No. 2565, Exhibit "B" map). Regarding subsection 2., Public Works staff indicated that dedication of public utility easements (PUEs) is deferred until development. The criteria are met. ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 10 of 11 136 Applicant Identity Applicant Steve Miller, Senior Planner/ Project Manager Emerio Design, LLC Applicant's n/a Representative Landowner(s) Clyde H. Lowrie,Jr. & Umbrella Game LLC ANX 2018-02 Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 11 of 11 137 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3093 ORDINANCE NO. 2571 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING ZONING TO APPROXIMATELY 24.65 ACRES OF ANNEXED TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE LOWRIE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 9008 PARR ROAD NE, MARION COUNTY, OREGON AS NODAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSN) ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described in Exhibit "A" and mapped in Exhibit "B", which are affixed hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, consistent with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 222.1 1 1 (2) the owner of real property in the territory to be annexed initiated by petition a proposal for annexation, a copy of the petition being on file with the City Recorder (ANX 2018-02); and WHEREAS, because the subject property is already within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), it has an existing Comprehensive Plan map land use designation of Low Density Residential; and WHEREAS, the landowner as applicant requested that, consistent with Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) 5.04.01 E., the City designate the annexed territory as Nodal Single Family Residential (RSN), which is the one zoning district that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan per Policy Table 1 ; and WHEREAS, this zoning designation is contingent upon annexation of the subject property to the City of Woodburn, for which the applicant has petitioned and filed the petition with the City Recorder; and WHEREAS, on January 24, 2019 the Woodburn Planning Commission considered the annexation application and, after a duly advertised public hearing, recommended approval of the annexation; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2019, the Woodburn City Council held a public hearing, reviewed the record, heard all public testimony presented on said application, and, upon deliberation, concluded that the proposed annexation meets the applicable approval criteria under City of Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) 5.04.01 C.; and Page - 1 - Council Bill No. 3093 Ordinance No. 2571 138 WHEREAS, the City Council agenda item cover staff report mentioned that zoning designation follows annexation, compatibility of the RSN district, and applicant acceptance of RSN designation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon the effective date of the annexation enacted by Ordinance 2570 being considered contemporaneously with this request, the Woodburn Zoning Map is amended designating the zoning on the subject property described in Exhibit "A" and mapped in Exhibit "B" as Nodal Single Family Residential (RSN). Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page - 2 - Council Bill No. 3093 Ordinance No. 2571 139 EM- Civil Engineering Land Survey " its Land Use Planning Construction Management ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION JOB NO. 041-025 TAX LOT 800 05 2W 13 MAY 29, 2018 EXHIBIT A (PAGE 1 OF 2) A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE S.W. 1/4 AND THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, MARION COUNTY, OREGON, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE EXISTING CITY LIMIT OF THE CITY OF WOODBURN ON THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN REEL 3822, PAGE 457, MARION COUNTY DEED RECORDS (TAX LOT 800 05 2W 13), SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PARR ROAD (COUNTY ROAD NO. 517, 30.0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE); THENCE ALONG SAID EXISTING CITY LIMIT AND SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°18'51" WEST, 1596.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 800; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EXISTING CITY LIMIT, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 800, NORTH 89020'17" WEST, 660.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 800, NORTH 00°16'47" EAST, 1593.02 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID PARR ROAD (30.0 FEET FROM CENTERLINE); THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 89041'21" EAST, 89.40 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREON (SAID ANGLE POINT BEARS NORTH 00°31'24" EAST, 540.45 FEET, SOUTH 89041'21" EAST, 1297.99 FEET, AND SOUTH 00°21'00" WEST, 30.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PETER RAYMOND DLC NO. 88); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 89°39'00" EAST, 571.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 24.19 ACRES MORE OR LESS. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON JANUARY 15, 1987 JON T. FEIGION 2252 EXPIRES 12-31-19 REFERENCE SURVEY: SN 34512 MARION COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS 8285 S.W. Nimbus Avenue « Beaverton, Oregon 97008 r 503-515-5528 1 TEL ..�_..........._.� .. .__........___..._ 503-639-9592 FAX www.emeriodesign.com 140 141 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} B V' March 11 , 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Eric Liljequist, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for the Building Demolition Services at 461 N. First Street RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the Local Contract Review Board, award the construction contract for the Building Demolition Services at 461 N. First Street to Konell Construction & Demolition Corp, the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, in the amount of $147,207.00. BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of maintenance or repair over the years the Pix Theater building has undergone extensive damage resulting in significant environmental conditions (i.e. mold, air quality, asbestos, lead paint, etc.) as well as concerns of the structural integrity of the building. Therefore, at your October 22, 2018 meeting the City Council authorized the purchase of the property located at 462 N First Street (formerly PIX Theater) for the purpose to demolishing the building and restoring the site as secured parking for a period of time. The City published bid documents for the demolition of the building, hazardous materials abatement, structural analysis, and site restoration. Bids were publicly opened on February 28, 2019. Five (5) bids were received as follows: Konell Construction & Demolition Corp $147,207.00 Staton Companies $178,000.00 Elder Demolition $216,450.00 3 Kings Environmental $230,000.00 Kerr Contractors Oregon, Inc. $353,278.00 Engineering Estimate: $250,000 Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x Finance—X- 142 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 11, 2019 Page 2 The recommended award is approximately 41% lower than the engineering estimate but does not include recommendations from the Structural Engineering Analysis, related to securing the structural integrity of the adjoining buildings during and after demolition, which will be completed with the contract scope of work. DISCUSSION: The timing of this project is greatly influenced by the construction of the First Street Improvements Project. Final site work (i.e. asphalt, lighting, etc.) will be incorporated into the First Street construction. Award of this contract will be based on the lowest cost offer of the responsive and responsible Bidders in accordance with Section 00130 of the Oregon Standard Construction Specifications and all modifications by Special Provisions. Therefore, staff is recommending award of the contract to Konell Construction & Demolition Corp. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this project of $297,207 ($147,207-contract award, $150,000- contingency) will be funded through Woodburn's Urban Renewal Agency's First Street project budget in FY 2018-19. If the project extends beyond FY 2018-19, the costs will be carried forward into the FY 2019-20 URA budget. 143