Loading...
February 11, 2019 Agenda EIC SWENSON,MAYOR CITY OF WOODBURN JUAN SERRAT SR COUNCILOR WARD I LISA ELLSWORTH,COUNCILOR WARD II CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ROBERT CARNEY,COUNCILOR WARD III SHARON SCHAUB,COUNCILOR WARD IV MARY BETH CORNWELL,COUNCILOR WARD V FEBRUARY 11, 2019- 7:00 P.M. ERIC MORRIS,COUNCILOR WARD VI WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY ROOM- 1060 MT. HOOD AVE 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: A. City Hall and the Library will be closed on February 18 in observance of President's Day. The Aquatic Center and Transit will be open regular business hours that day. Appointments: B. Woodburn Recreation and Park Board 1 - Ayanna Zamora - Position VI - Sonny Ybarra - Position IV - Alexandra Sanarov-Ramirez- Student Position II 4. WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT SWEARING-IN CEREMONY 5. 15 MINUTE RECESS 6. COMMUNITY/GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS None. 7. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: None. Presentations: None. 8. COMMUNICATIONS None. This facility is ADA accessible. If you need special accommodation, please contact the City Recorder at 503-980- 6318 at least 24 hours prior to this meeting. **Habrd int6rpretes disponibles para aquellas personas Clue no hablan Ingl6s, previo acuerdo. Comunfquese al (503) 980-2485.** February 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page i 9. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC - This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. 10. CONSENT AGENDA - Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be adopted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council minutes of January 28, 2019 2 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. B. Report on Electric Fences 5 Recommended Action: Accept this report and take no further action to amend the Nuisance Ordinance. C. City Administrator Employment Agreement 9 Recommended Action: It is recommended the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an addendum for the employment contract of the City Administrator, to align the contract language regarding vacation accruals with the standard contract language. D. Briefing: Planning Commission Meeting to Host Discussion of Rent 10 Burden/Housing Affordability as Required by HB 4006 and OAR 813- 112-0030 Recommended Action:Staff recommends no particular action and provides this information as an item of interest for the Council. E. Crime Statistics through December 2018 18 Recommended Action: Receive the report. 11. TABLED BUSINESS None. 12. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 13. GENERAL BUSINESS-Members of the public wishing to comment on items of general business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time will be limited to 3 minutes. A. Council Bill No. 3087- A Resolution Setting the Amount of the Parks 23 and Recreation Systems Development Charges Under an Existing Methodology; Establishing an Alternative Rate Review Fee; and February 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page ii Setting an Effective Date for Imposition of the Fees and Charges Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving a Parks and Recreation SDC schedule, which has been updated to account for increasing construction costs, consistent with Ordinance No. 2250; and establishing an effective date of March 1 , 2019. B. Award of Construction Contract for the Woodburn City Hall 28 Integrated Audio/Visual Systems Project Recommended Action: That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the Local Contract Review Board, award the public improvement construction contract for the Woodburn City Hall Integrated Audio/Visual Systems Project to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Delta Systems Integration, Inc. in the amount of $86,521 .10. 14. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS - These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions that may be called up by the City Council. A. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of Variance 31 Application for Mid-Valley Community Church Gravel Driveway at 591 Gatch St (VAR 2018-03) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Council consider and decide by majority vote whether or not to call up this item and initiate a review of this Planning Commission decision pursuant to Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Section 4.02.02. B. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of a Modification to 34 Conditions of Approval for Lincoln Street Apartments Landscaping Plan at 1245-1255 E. Lincoln St. (MOC 2018-01) Recommended Action: Staff recommends no action and briefs the Council on this item pursuant to Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Section 4.02.02. The Council may call up this item for review if desired and, by majority vote, initiate a review of this decision. 15. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 16. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 17. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. 18. ADJOURNMENT February 11, 2019 Council Agenda Page iii �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU Prri,e�.:rrt rr f 1R'!87 February 6, 2019 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Swenson, Mayor SUBJECT: Committee Appointment The following appointments are made, subject to the approval of the Council. Please forward any adverse comments to me prior to the Council meeting on Monday, February 11, 2019. No reply is required if you approve of my decision. Woodburn Recreation and Park Board - Ayanna Zamora - Position VI - Sonny Ybarra - Position IV - Alexandra Sanarov-Ramirez- Student Position II 1 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2019 0:00 DATE POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY ROOM, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, JANUARY 28, 2019 CONVENED The meeting convened at 7:14 p.m. with Mayor Swenson presiding. ROLL CALL Mayor Swenson Present Councilor Carney Present Councilor Cornwell Present Councilor Schaub Present Councilor Morris Present—via telephone Councilor Ellsworth Absent Councilor Serratos Absent Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Assistant City Administrator Row, Public Works Director Liljequist, Community Development Director Kerr, Police Chief Ferraris, Finance Director Montoya, Communications Coordinator Moore, Community Relations Manager Gutierrez-Gomez, City Recorder Pierson COMMUNITY/GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce - Stuart Rodgers, Executive Director of the Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce, provided information on a large scale soccer tournament that the Chamber is planning and that it is expected to bring in a lot of people to participate in the event and who will also visit the local businesses while they are here. He announced that the Annual Meeting of the Chamber would take place at Country Meadows this Friday at 7:30 a.m. He also announced that the Distinguished Service Awards event will take place on March 8 at 6:00 p.m. at the Metropolis and that nominations are due February 8. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC Gary Seeger, St. Luke School, invited the City Council and the public to their annual dinner and auction that will take place on March 2 at 4:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA A. Woodburn City Council minutes of January 14, 2019, B. 2019 OLCC Renewal, C. Community Center Project Timeline &Update. City Administrator Derickson provided a staff report. Carney/Schaub... adopt the Consent Agenda with the commentary of the City Administrator. The motion passed unanimously. COUNCIL BILL NO. 3086 - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TIER II TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP PLAN Carney introduced Council Bill No. 3086. City Recorder Pierson read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Swenson declared Council Bill No. 3086 duly passed. FY 2019/20 FINANCIAL PLAN AND FIVE-YEAR FORECAST City Administrator Derickson provided a staff report. Finance Director Montoya provided Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, January 28, 2019 2 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2019 information on the Five-Year Forecast and PERS costs. Carney/Schaub... adopt the 2019/20 Financial Plan and Five-Year Forecast. The motion passed unanimously. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE CITY HALL REMODEL & HVAC UPGRADE PROJECT City Administrator Derickson informed the Council that there was an error on the agenda that did not correspond with the staff report and that the correct dollar amount for the contract is $2,511,537. Councilor Carney stated that he would like to see a report when change orders occur. Assistant City Administrator Row stated that staff will bring back updates to Council periodically on the project and they will include the change orders in that. Carney/Schaub... award the contract for the City Hall remodel and HVAC upgrade project as presented in the materials. The motion passed unanimously. LIBRARY OVERDUE FINES—ELIMINATE FINES ON YOUTH MATERIALS Library Manager Hunter provided a staff report. Carney/Cornwell...accept the library overdue fines proposal and the one-year pilot project as described by John Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. RENEWAL OF PRIVATE OFFICE LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE WOODBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Stuart Rodgers, Executive Director of the Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber is in favor of renewing this agreement. City Administrator Derickson provided a staff report. Carney/Schaub... renew the Private Office License Agreement with the Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce. The motion passed unanimously. TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY GRANT DISTRIBUTION AND PROPOSED THREE- YEAR AGREEMENT WITH THE WOODBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE City Administrator Derickson provided a staff report. Carney/Schaub...accept the Transient Occupancy Grant Distribution and three-year agreement with the Woodburn Area Chamber of Commerce. The motion passed unanimously. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT City Administrator Derickson stated that at the next City Council meeting the Council would receive a memo on the electric fence issue and that at the meeting after that they will receive a staff report on the noise ordinance. City Administrator Derickson also clarified that the recent domestic tragedy that occurred and was reported to be in Woodburn, actually occurred in Canby. He also added that there was another news report of a former deputy sheriff who was charged with sex crimes and he wanted to make it clear this person lived in Woodburn and that he was not a Woodburn Police Officer. He also announced that the Pix Theater demolition bid and the First Street Project bid are out and they hope to have those bids in front of the Council in the next month or two. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Councilor Schaub thanked staff for their work and looks forward to all the projects in the coming year. Mayor Swenson stated that he attended the French Prairie Forum and that he also attended a Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, January 28, 2019 3 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2019 new city official training. He mentioned that on Saturday he and Councilor Carney attended a workshop put on by Better Angels, which helps people talk across the political divide. Cynthia O'Brian with Better Angels provided more information on Better Angels workshops. He added that he met with Jeff Merkley's office. He also noted that there is an Industrial Roundtable coming up this Thursday. Economic Development Director Johnk provided information on the Industrial Roundtable. ADJOURNMENT Carney/Schaub... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m. APPROVED ERIC SWENSON, MAYOR ATTEST Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, January 28, 2019 4 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU February 11 , 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Derickson, City Administrator SUBJECT: Report on Electric Fences RECOMMENDATION: Accept this report and take no further action to amend the Nuisance Ordinance. BACKGROUND: At the January 14, 2019, Council meeting, Michael Pate of Electric Guard Dog discussed a commercial electrified security fence and requested that the Woodburn Nuisance Ordinance be amended to allow the installation of these fences in commercial and industrial zones. The Council then requested a report addressing: (1 ) the history of the City's current restrictions on electrified fences; (2) what comparable municipalities allow; and (3) what any ordinance amendment would entail, including the potential impacts. DISCUSSION: History of the Woodburn Ordinances The City of Woodburn has had a nuisance ordinance since at least the mid- 1960s. The current Woodburn Nuisance Ordinance provision was enacted in 2003 and prohibits electric fences: Section 4. Nuisances Affecfing Public Safety. No person or responsible party shall cause or permit a nuisance affecting the public safety. The following are declared to be nuisance affecting the public safety: A. Razor and Electric Fences. A fence constructed of materials that could cause bodily harm, including, but not limited to, those conveying electric current, razor wire, spikes, and broken glass. Ordinance 2338. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x_ City Attorney_x Finance—X- 5 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 Research reveals that when the present ordinance was adopted there was no specific discussion of the electric fence prohibition. Most cities do not allow electric fences because of safety concerns. Although historically the concern was with the danger of connecting alternating current ("AC") to a fence, these safety concerns are not completely eliminated with the use of direct current ("DC"). In addition to the Woodburn Nuisance Ordinance, the Woodburn Development Ordinance ("WDO") also provides for the regulation of newly constructed fences as "accessory structures." The WDO regulates: (1 ) location (e.g. not within vision clearance areas); (2) height of the fence (e.g. maximum height of 7 feet in residential areas); and (3) fence/wall materials (e.g. wood, stone, and brick). Survey of Surrounding Municipalities After conducting a review of surrounding municipal codes and ordinances, what emerged are three general trends. Many surrounding communities, like Woodburn, include a prohibition within their nuisance code or development code against electric fences (e.g. Tigard, Wilsonville, West Lynn, Tualatin, Milwaukie, Canby, Beaverton, and Troutdale). A smaller number of cities allow electric fences on an interior part of a lot, when they are used for enclosing livestock (e.g. Lake Oswego, Keizer, Hillsboro, Gladstone). Please note that the City of Woodburn does not allow for the keeping of livestock within city limits. Finally, a smaller number of cities do allow for the type of electrified security fencing that Mr. Pate has proposed. You can see below how those cities have implemented such regulations: Location Permitted Warning Signs City within City Locations Required Other Regulations &Criteria Code Product shall be listed by Yes; posted on a State of Oregon Portland Electrical Industrial Use the fence at approved testing Regulations Areas least every 50 laboratory feet 0 Electrical permits and inspections required 6 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 3 Location Permitted Warning Signs City within City Locations Required Other Regulations &Criteria Code • If within 6 ft. of street, sidewalk, or trail, the fence must be surrounded by a non- Yes; OSHA- electric fence w/3 ft. Gresham Nuisance Industrial Land approved separation or the Code Use Districts Danger Sign electrified portion must every 25 feet be at least 6 ft. above the ground • Must have approved disconnect device using a fire lock box • Must be part of a security Supplemental installation at a minimum Oregon Zoning Any Zone height of six feet and City Regulations prior written approval must be granted by the City Manager Application & Impacts Mr. Pate proposed that the City amend its nuisance ordinance to allow for the installation of electrified security fences on both industrial and commercially zoned properties. The primary argument for such proposal being that businesses with outside storage areas require greater security than that provided by just a 7-foot high fence or a standard security alarm system. This request for a modification of the nuisance ordinance is the first of its kind that the City has received and is based on site-specific proposed installations and not general policy considerations. No general appeal or demand to permit electric fences within the City has been otherwise received in the many years that the City's prohibition has been in place. Overall, the ordinance has worked as expected, deterring the public from constructing fences with what has historically been considered unsafe and hazardous materials. While at this time staff is not recommending that the Council amend the City's nuisance ordinance, should Council desire a change to the City's fence standards, some impacts that ought be deliberated upon include: public health and safety concerns; aesthetics and livability; business priorities and interest; alternative security and safety solutions/options; and the regulatory mechanisms for oversight. By and large, the Council would need to decide where these fences could be built (i.e. at what types of properties and within what zoning 7 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 4 districts) and what additional regulations or standards would apply to them. Finally, should the Council decide that some permitting process or oversight be included as part of an ordinance change, then consideration for how such a program is implemented and what additional forms and fees would be needed must also be thoroughly considered. The Council deciding to take no further action to amend the nuisance ordinance at this time would mean that no electrified fence could be installed as proposed at the AI's Trailer Sales property and staff would resume a code enforcement action against an industrial property where an electric fence was previously installed. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. 8 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU Pri,a�arrt rr rf aA'!87 February 11 , 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Mel Gregg, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: City Administrator Employment Agreement RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign an addendum for the employment contract of the City Administrator, to align the contract language regarding vacation accruals with the standard contract language. BACKGROUND: HR Department has reviewed all employment contracts to ensure compensation practices are in line with the Oregon Pay Equity Law. The review demonstrated that the City Administrator's employment contract includes non- standard language for vacation accrual, which is defined as a certain rate. The standard contract language for City employees is to accrue vacation leave at the corresponding years of service in accordance with Human Resource Rules. DISCUSSION: In order to comply with the Oregon Pay Equity Law and be consistent with the City HR Rules, it is recommended to amend the City Administrator's contract Section 18 with the following language. Vacation Leave. Derickson shall accrue vacation leave corresponding to years of service, in accordance with Human Resources Rules. All accrued vacation leave is payable to Derickson under this Agreement upon termination or resignation. No vacation leave shall accrue beyond the maximum accrual limit, nor shall Derickson be entitled to any vacation leave that would otherwise have accrued during any period where the maximum accrual limit has been reached, and is not reduced through use or sell back provision of this contract. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The impact of the increased accrual rate to the budget shall be calculated through the budget process. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator x_ City Attorney_x_ Finance_x- 9 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU February 11 , 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator From: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Subject: Briefing: Planning Commission Meeting to Host Discussion of Rent Burden/Housing Affordability as Required by HB 4006 and OAR 813- 112-0030 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no particular action and provides this information as an item of interest for the Council. BACKGROUND: State Mandate In 2018, the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 4006 that through ( „re.d::a:an .. .I! a.li..!.�pl%.�..:Il::r::�.al::!!. ':..„.......I�:.!.:a..l..„..”.......(.. .. :.I: ......._a"J 3...:::::.�......1....2::::.0�30. required that: "(1) When a city with a population greater than 10,000 is informed by the Housing and Community Services Department that at least 25 percent of the renter households in the city are severely rent burdened, the governing body shall hold at least one public meeting within the year of being informed, to discuss: (a) The causes and consequences of severe rent burdens within the city; (b) The barriers to reducing rent burdens; and (c) Possible solutions to reduce the rent burdened households within the city." The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) advised the City that it could comply with this new statute by holding a hearing before the Planning Commission. The City through the Planning Division and with the assistance of the Community Relations Manager duly complied by hosting a discussion that opened the December 13, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, the agenda of which included a long-range planning project - the I .I_a:)a js„ fid:: 1 eea.: s A roa: 11 siis IIIA . Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x_ Finance_x- 10 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 Staff e-mailed copies of the agenda and sign-in sheets to the Oregon Housing and Community Services Department (OHSC) by February 1 , 2019 per rule subsection (2)(c) as well as the meeting notice and draft minutes as a courtesy supplements. The Commission meeting minutes are Attachment 1 . Local Survey Staff conducted a survey through December 20 that received 36 responses, 35 online via SurveyMonkey and 1 in print. Staff summarizes the responses to the one-page, four-question survey: 1. A "rent-burdened" household spends more than 50% of its income on rent. Are you rent-burdened? [Yes or No] Yes, 28; No, 8. 2. What do you consider to be "affordable" housing? Of the 36 respondents, 17 gave a dollar figure or range for monthly rent or mortgage payment, while 12 gave a percentage or ratio of income. The remaining 7 skipped or gave nonsensical or vague responses. The most common dollar figure was $700, with 5 respondents. The lowest figure was $450 and the highest $1,000. The average of the dollar figures and ranges is $610 rounded. The most common percentage was a tie between 25% and 33-1/3%, with 3 respondents each. The lowest percentage was 25% and the highest 50%. The average of the percentages or ratios is 36% rounded. As background, the standard minimum wage in and near Woodburn is $10.75 hourly and will increase July 1 , 2019 to $11 .25. The U.S. Census American Community Survey (ACS) jg._va„IIe S 1 9 01 estimated that for 2017 the Woodburn median household income was $47,042, equal to $3,920 monthly. The percentage of households that earn below $50,000 was 52.1%, and the percentage of households that earn below $25,000 was 23.9%. Assuming $700 monthly rent or mortgage payment, for a household with $25,000 income it would equal 33.6% of income. Alternately, assuming 36% rent for a $25,000 household, the amount would equal $750 monthly. 3. Do you believe a lack of affordable housing is a problem in Woodburn? 11 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 3 Yes, 32; No, 4. 4. What do you believe would make housing affordable? How? Of the 36 respondents, 8 respondents indicated rent control based on incomes, with one of them also specifying caps on mortgage payments as percentages of salaries and a different respondent specifying rent control based on the conditions of properties. Further, 6 respondents indicated increasing housing supply, 4 indicated increasing income or minimum wage, and 4 indicated simply to lower rents. Idiosyncratic comments included to: • Allow tiny houses and provide low-interest or interest-free loans to build tiny houses; • Cap homebuilder/landlord profit margins to 25%; • Cap housing prices by area based on average income of an area; • Increase supply of income-restricted housing; • Increase supply of middle class housing for those too wealthy to qualify for income-restricted housing but too poor to afford market-rate housing; and • Raise taxes on the wealthy. Media Coverage The December 19, 2018 print issue of the Woodburn Independent reported on the meeting "Wa:aa:aa.: I�vas...arro a.: roroers nea.: r a.:�I�vaa:as...a'll" a.:�tta:ara.:�a.:�I�valle �na:as.j.&. oa: wa'.)es" . ( ...........................................................................................I................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................., ................................................ ) Attachment: -Planning Commission December 13, 2018 meeting draft minutes (5 pages) 12 WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING/MEETING MINUTES December 13, 2018 CONVENED: The Planning Commission met in a public meeting session at 7 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, with Chair Charlie Piper presiding. ROLL CALL: Chair Piper,' Present Vice-Chair Bindelbw Present Commissioner Aiken Present Commissioner Corning Present Commissioner Dos Reis Present Commissioner Lassen Present Commissioner Berlin Present Staff Present: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director McKenzie Granum, Assistant City Attorney Colin Cortes, Senior Planner Introduction Chair Piper opened the workshop/meeting at 7 pm, and led the Commissioners in the flag salute. Minutes The November 8, 2018 minutes were approved as corrected. Business from the Audience Mayor Eric Swenson was introduced to the Commission and audience. Communication None Public Meeting: Commission Discussion: HB 4006: Statutorily Required Hosting of Meeting about Affordability of Housing / Rent Burden and Reporting to the State The Oregon Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 4006 that among other actions requires through Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 813-112- 0030) that cities including Woodburn with rent burdened populations to host by year's end a meeting about the affordability of housing and report 1 13 to the legislature a list of attendees and a meeting summary. The required topic wording is: "(a) The causes and consequences of severe rent burdens within the City; (b) The barriers to reducing rent burdens; and (c) Possible solutions to reduce the rent-burdened households within the City." Online and print surveys are available for interested persons to fill out and return by Dec. 20, 2018 at 5pm. Staff will report testimony received during the meeting to the legislature. Gustavo Gutierrez-Gomez, Community Relations Manager, translated for the the Commission and in turn for the Spanish-speaking audience. Maria Elena Guerra, Farmworker Housing Development Corporation (FHDC), claimed the City in 2015 conducted a workforce housing study that found 75% of the workforce cannot afford to live in town. She spoke about the development of income-restricted Colonia Unidad [1750 Park Avenue; Design Review 2017-02], comprised of 44 low-cost apartment units and said there is a great need for affordable housing in Woodburn. She explained that Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) weighs grant applications with siting being a criterion, and that because Woodburn has more than its share of official affordable housing looking across Oregon as a whole, the town is "oversubscribed" such that OHCS would give no points for a project location being Woodburn, apart from actual need in town. Lorrie Cox, 1700 Rainier Road, described herself as a mother of four elementary school- age children and someone who had endured the school of hard knocks in life such that she and her children had some time ago unexpectedly lost her usual income and their house and that during the interim she rented, the rent amount was within $10 of her total take-home pay. She emphasized that calamity can befall people such that they find themselves in need of an affordable rental. A woman who spoke Spanish and resides on Aztec Drive stated that affordable Woodburn living spaces are saturated, with five or six people living in a room, paying $300-400 apiece. She mentioned predation by landlords includes rental application fees charged per person even for family members and multiple would-be tenants for a single unit. She has experienced great difficulty with the complicated applications and money that was required with each application. She suffered at least one one-week eviction notice. Waiting lists for rentals range from five months to a year. She stated landlords look upon renters like her as suspect and unable to keep up rent payments. As she is not a farmworker, she cannot work with Farmworker Housing, and migrant labor consumes the housing market during season 2 14 Pam Phan, of the statewide Community Alliance of Tenants (CAT), thanked the City for the mailed invitation to the meeting and introduced Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 90 as constituting state landlord/tenant law. CAT receives hundreds of calls monthly, and Marion County residents generate many calls including from Woodburn. Marion County is a top concern for CAT, even more than Multnomah County. No-cause evictions are a problem, and tenants' fear of them can and has led them not to make maintenance requests such that it hastens dilapidation of some properties. CAT offers to suggest solutions to the City and seeks to persuade the City to adopt local renter protections, including to: • Train about renters' legal rights and lease responsibilities • Increase no-cause eviction notice to 90 days minimum • Fund legal aid • Require relocation support, e.g. a small nominal fee paid by a landlord who opts for a no-cause eviction or even "damages" such as three times the monthly rent • Ban no-cause evictions by requiring they be of "good" or "just" cause. Ms. Phan noted also that landlords would be more likely to negotiate with and retain tenants when tenants are able to work with them, reducing for landlords the costs of finding replacement rental income. A woman who lives on NE McKinley Street in Portland spoke to "(a) The causes and consequences of severe rent burdens within the city", stating that Hispanic housing demand reinforces that demand. She seeks that because the City has a loop bus service and close-in destinations as a small city, along with the existing Hispanic population these further attract Hispanics. Married with three children, she often is blocked from a rental because of a landlord's occupancy limit. She has shared a rental house with another family. Speaking to "(b) The barriers to reducing rent burdens", tenants' credit records can be an obstacle. A man named Aaron said that housing is too expensive; that after paying Woodburn's high rent and basic bills, his paycheck is gone. Commission Workshop: Housing Needs Analysis (HNA): Task 2 "Housing Needs Projection" Introduction of Project: The City will be conducting a housing needs analysis so that Woodburn can better provide needed housing. Project objectives are to: • Guide decisions to ensure future growth is orderly, and efficient • Ensure adequate land is inside of the Woodburn urban growth boundary (UGB) to accommodate projected housing growth • Consider housing policies the city could consider to improve housing availability and affordability, and • Update and develop long-range planning policies in a manner that preserves the character of the city and helps achieve a high quality of life. 3 15 Objectives are for commissioners to ask questions of the consultant and staff and to discuss and describe what the project objectives mean to them concretely and what success looks like beyond legal and technical aspects. The Commission will advise on the HNA and meet additional times as the project proceeds to completion in June 2019. Tim Wood, FCS Group, said that Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) is a statewide goal. He presented a review of housing data and will return in March 2019 to bring the Commission up to date with further results. Chair Piper verified that FCS used the 2016 census as a baseline and that growth estimates came from Portland State University (PSU), which was tasked by the state to forecast population/housing growth. Mr. Wood will research the algorithms PSU used to arrive at the numbers quoted and get back to the Commission with a brief synopsis. As the proposed survey will eventually result in further data based on the numbers received from PSU, the Chair wondered if further analysis will be conducted as the twenty year timeline grows shorter. Senior Planner Colin Cortes noted that we are required to use PSU's numbers and said that as the time grows near to its twenty-year end, the City will decide whether to repeat the forecast and a new HNA. Woodburn has been averaging 60 home permits a year. Those average numbers will skew once the Smith Creek Development [105 Ben Brown Lane and vicinity; Subdivision 2017-01] is developed. Public Hearing: Public Facilities Plan (PFP) Update Comprehensive Plan Legislative Amendment (LA 2018-03) Consideration of a legislative amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a modified Public Facilities Plan (PFP). The PFP identifies major infrastructure projects proposed to meet future demand in the City. The Commission is required to make a recommendation on the proposal prior to City Council consideration. Lorrie Cox, 1700 Rainier Road, said that infrastructure for internet in Woodburn is sorely lacking. The proposed homes in Smith Creek may be sold to professionals that work from home. If we don't address the internet infrastructure needed, we may lose this whole section of possible buyers. The public hearing was closed. Director Chris Kerr noted that cable services aren't part of the Public Facilities Plan. Chair Piper said that the previous comment about internet infrastructure was valid in itself, though. 4 16 Commission Comments: Commissioner Dos Reis moved to amend the Comprehensive Plan to include the proposed Public Facilities Plan. Commissioner Bandelow seconded the motion, which was approved unanimously. Business from the Commission None. Staff Updates Commissioner Berlin was officially reappointed to a regular 4 year term of office. There will be no meeting on the fourth Thursday in December and a meeting on the second Thursday in January is doubtful. However, there will be a Planning Commission meeting with involving an annexation, a variance and a modification of conditions on the fourth Thursday in January. This is the last Planning Commission meeting at this location. For the next six months all Planning Commission and City Council meetings will take place at the Community Room in the Police Department. All City functions, including bill paying, will be available City Hall's well-publicized new location at 970 N Cascade Drive. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm. APPROVED Charlie Piper, Chair Date ATTEST Chris Kerr Date Community Development Director City of Woodburn, Oregon 5 17 1/23/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2018 Year to Date CHARGE DESCRIPTION Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 2 6 7 3 6 6 2 0 0 4 3 41 ANIMAL CRUELTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ANIMAL ORDINANCES 4 2 3 0 3 4 0 6 1 4 0 4 31 ARSON 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 ASSAULT SIMPLE 4 4 15 10 11 4 18 13 8 8 6 6 107 ATTEMPTED MURDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 BURGLARY- BUSINESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 BURGLARY-OTHER STRUCTURE 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BURGLARY- RESIDENCE 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 01 0 2 10 CHILD NEGLECT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 CITY ORDINANCE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON 5 0 1 2 6 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 27 CRIMINAL MISTREATMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 CURFEW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 0 4 3 0 17 CUSTODY- MENTAL 4 2 8 5 9 4 6 11 8 5 4 10 76 CUSTODY- PROTECITVE 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 8 18 5 7 0 8 6 5 10 3 8 81 DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 11 4 8 9 7 8 7 6 8 7 9 6 90 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 10 10 7 2 5 51 4 6 2 7 4 7 69 DWS/REVOKED -FELONY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 1 4 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 17 ELUDE 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 EM BEZZLEM ENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EXPLOSIVES 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 FAMILY-OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 FORCIBLE RAPE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 1 2 3 4 20 FRAUD - BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRETENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 FRAUD -OF SERVICES/FALSE PRETENSES 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 52 25 16 38 38 24 35 32 43 44 21 40 408 FURNISHING 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HIT AND RUN FELONY 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR 4 1 1 1 4 3 3 3 5 2 7 2 36 IDENTITY THEFT 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 01 0 0 0 2 INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT 5 4 4 8 3 1 11 6 2 1 0 7 52 INVASION OF PERSONAL PRIVACY 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP -FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 MINOR IN POSSESSION 5 4 0 2 4 4 1 6 0 5 1 0 32 MINOR IN POSSESSION -TOBACCO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 12 NON CRIMINAL DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 OTHER 7 2 4 3 1 2 4 4 5 3 4 5 4 PROPERTY RECOVER FOR OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 RECKLESS DRIVING 1 0 2 3 2 2 1 3 3 4 4 2 27 RECKLESSLY ENDANDERING 5 0 0 2 3 1 6 3 3 0 3 0 26 RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 10 ROBBERY- BUSINESS 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8 ROBBERY- HIGHWAY 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ROBBERY-OTHER 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 ROBBERY- RESIDENCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 RUNAWAY 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 Page 1 of 2 18 1/23/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2018 Year to Date an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total EX CRIME -CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EX CRIME -EXPOSER 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -FORCIBLE SODOMY 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -MOLEST(PHYSICAL) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -NON FORCE SODOMY 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EX CRIME -NON-FORCE RAPE 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 EX CRIME -OTHER 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EX CRIME -PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE MATERIAL 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 TALKER 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 0 3 STOLEN PROPERTY- RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 HEFT- BICYCLE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HEFT- BUILDING 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 8 HEFT- FROM MOTOR VEHICLE 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 9 HEFT-OTHER 3 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 HEFT-SHOPLIFT 6 6 8 3 4 6 4 9 8 4 4 10 72 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS 21 7 7 9 8 5 10 6 8 8 3 6 98 TRESPASS 9 4 6 9 2 2 0 0 7 4 2 7 52 UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 11 VANDALISM 0 7 0 2 2 3 6 6 1 3 0 0 30 VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 WEAPON -CARRY CONCEALED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 WEAPON -EX FELON IN POSSESSION 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 10 EAPON -POSSESS ILLEGAL 2 1 1 4 3 0 6 4 3 0 0 3 27 EAPON -SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2018 Total 187 111 138 136 147 101 162 155 144 136 101 161 1,679 2017 Total 135 169 176 166 164 143 152 155 138 111 141 122 1772 2016 Total 143 109 143 149 156 137 157 198 192 150 159 104 1797 Arrests/Year 1800 1600 100 12200 N 1800 Q 600 400 200 0 2016 2017 2018 Year Page 2 of 2 19 1/23/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2018 Year to Date CHARGE DESCRIPTION Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 1 2 9 9 6 6 8 5 2 6 6 3 63 ANIMAL CRUELTY 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 6 ANIMAL ORDINANCES 2 1 2 0 2 4 1 2 1 3 0 2 20 ARSON 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 6 ASSAULT SIMPLE 9 14 15 13 9 7 24 181 121 12 7 8 148 ATTEMPTED MURDER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 BURGLARY- BUSINESS 2 8 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 0 3 26 BURGLARY-OTHER STRUCTURE 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 0 1 4 2 BURGLARY- RESIDENCE 3 1 8 12 1 5 12 6 4 7 4 5 68 CHILD NEGLECT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 CITY ORDINANCE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 COMPUTER CRIME 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON 13 11 16 17 7 7 10 12 9 12 6 18 138 CRIMINAL MISTREATMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 CURFEW 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 8 CUSTODY- MENTAL 4 2 9 4 9 4 6 11 8 5 5 11 78 CUSTODY- PROTECITVE 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 4 10 5 7 7 3 11 4 5 12 5 10 83 DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 11 4 8 10 7 8 7 6 8 7 9 7 92 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 10 8 6 2 7 5 4 6 4 9 3 5 69 DWS/REVOKED- FELONY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 1 6 0 1 4 0 1 2 1 1 1 3 21 ELUDE 2 2 3 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 12 EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 EXPLOSIVES 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 FORCIBLE RAPE 4 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 16 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 3 3 3 8 6 4 2 4 3 5 5 8 5 FRAUD-ACCOUNT CLOSED CHECK 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 FRAUD- BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRETENSES 3 4 3 3 7 4 5 2 7 8 6 7 59 FRAUD- CREDIT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE 2 1 1 3 0 8 1 5 2 4 2 2 31 FRAUD- NOT SUFFICIENT FUNDS CHECK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 FRAUD- OF SERVICES/FALSE PRETENSES 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 8 FRAUD-OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 36 20 14 25 27 22 25 21 29 19 14 17 269 FURNISHING 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 HIT AND RUN FELONY 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 7 HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR 22 13 12 17 12 18 23 16 16 11 26 16 202 IDENTITY THEFT 1 3 3 9 5 6 1 4 2 4 1 5 4 INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT 5 7 2 2 3 5 5 5 2 5 0 5 46 INVASION OF PERSONAL PRIVACY 0 01 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP - FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 MINOR IN POSSESSION 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 3 1 0 1 MINOR IN POSSESSION -TOBACCO 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MISCELLANEOUS 30 19 21 16 15 24 15 19 16 22 15 22 234 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 10 14 5 16 13 3 4 8 12 5 8 9 107 NON CRIMINAL DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE 10 6 10 14 27 20 16 6 15 8 6 11 149 OTHER 7 3 3 5 4 5 4 6 6 4 5 5 57 PROPERTY- FOUND LOST MISLAID 1 4 2 4 4 1 3 0 3 3 2 1 28 PROPERTY RECOVER FOR OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 RECKLESS DRIVING 3 2 4 3 3 2 1 3 3 5 4 3 36 RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION 3 2 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 16 ROBBERY- BUSINESS 1 1 Oj 01 21 01 1 01 1 0 0 1 7 ROBBERY- CAR JACKING 0 1 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 2 Page 1 of 2 20 1/23/2019 Woodburn Police Department MONTHLY CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2018 Year to Date an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total ROBBERY- HIGHWAY 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ROBBERY- OTHER 2 2 1 1 0 2 0 2 2 1 3 3 19 ROBBERY- RESIDENCE 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 RUNAWAY 0 0 3 5 1 1 5 3 1 2 5 2 28 SEX CRIME - CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 01 01 0 01 0 2 SEX CRIME - EXPOSER 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 SEX CRIME - FORCIBLE SODOMY 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 SEX CRIME - MOLEST (PHYSICAL) 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 11 SEX CRIME - NON FORCE SODOMY 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 SEX CRIME - NON-FORCE RAPE 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 12 SEX CRIME - OBSCENE PHONE CALL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SEX CRIME - OTHER 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 SEX CRIME - PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE MATERIAL 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 SEX CRIME - SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH AN OBJECT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 STALKER 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 STOLEN PROPERTY- RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 6 SUICIDE 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 HEFT- BICYCLE 2 1 1 0 1 3 3 3 2 0 1 1 18 HEFT- BUILDING 5 3 6 4 2 6 3 1 3 4 3 3 43 HEFT- COIN OP MACHINE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 HEFT- FROM MOTOR VEHICLE 42 14 26 22 18 24 12 14 23 19 22 23 259 HEFT- MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS/ACCESSORIES 1 5 3 2 2 4 1 2 0 4 3 4 31 HEFT- OTHER 30 24 22 26 16 16 24 21 13 13 7 18 230 HEFT- PICKPOCKET 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 6 HEFT- PURSE SNATCH 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 HEFT- SHOPLIFT 11 13 20 15 13 17 16 19 14 17 16 22 193 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS 28 10 9 11 16 6 7 9 14 7 6 7 130 TRESPASS 21 4 8 10 6 3 1 3 7 6 3 9 81 UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE 14 0 3 2 0 5 2 0 1 1 0 4 32 VANDALISM 23 17 23 20 31 27 15 31 12 20 15 32 266 VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 4 1 4 4 2 3 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 WEAPON -CARRY CONCEALED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 10 WEAPON - POSSESS ILLEGAL 2 2 1 3 2 1 5 3 4 2 1 6 32 WEAPON -SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA 0 1 3 1_0__V__1 1 0 0 0 0 2 8 Jan I Feb I Marl Apr IMayl Jun I Jul lAug I Sep I Oct I Nov Dec Total 2018 Total 1 4091 284 3171 3421 3161 3091 3111 3081 2921 2981 243 344 3,773 2017 Total 1 3221 2921 350 3171 3301 3071 3171 3211 3071 3111 3531 338 3,870 2016 Total 1 2651 2371 2821 2751 310 2651 2901 3171 2891 2631 3161 250 3,364 Offenses/Year 4000 3500 3000 W 2500 W 2000 LL 0 1500 1000 500 0 2016 2017 2018 YEAR Page 2 of 2 21 Woodburn Police Department ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS 2018 Year to Date 1/23/2019 Ordinance Discription Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Animal Complaint 35 27 38 44 55 45 42 45 35 37 30 32 465 Ordiinance -Abate/Nuisances 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 10 Ordinance -Abandoned Vehicles 83 58 59 72 39 29 44 77 26 63 35 43 628 Ordinance -Abate Graffiti 6 10 4 8 5 9 1 13 0 7 0 20 83 Ordinance - Land Use Violations 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 0 12 Ordinance -Oth Violation 51 36 54 58 50 44 46 65 58 75 41 22 600 Ordinance -Tall Grass 0 0 0 0 71 37 5 1 0 0 0 0 114 2018 Total 176 133 156 182 223 167 140 205 121 185 107 117 1,912 2017 Total 94 126 176 177 290 284 175 170 149 129 115 98 1,983 2016 Total 122 159 131 106 239 200 181 159 103 93 88 81 1,662 Ordinance Violations / Code Enforcement Officers 1800 1600 1400 N 1200 Z O 1000 0 800 600 400 200 0 2016 2017 2018 COMBINED TOTAL-CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Ordinance Violations / Year 2000 1600 N 0 1200 J 0 800 400 0 2016 2017 2018 YEAR TOTALS FOR ALL OFFICERS 1 22 u � -'49M& Item 8U February 11, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Row, Assistant City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution Updating Parks and Recreation SDC Fees RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution approving a Parks and Recreation SDC schedule, which has been updated to account for increasing construction costs, consistent with Ordinance No. 2250; and establishing an effective date of March 1, 2019. BACKGROUND: System development charge legislation was first adopted by the State of Oregon in 1989. The City of Woodburn has collected and utilized parks and recreation SDCs to meet the needs of the growing Woodburn community since 1992. The parks SDC methodology was most recently updated in 2016 and fees were most recently adjusted in March 2017. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2250, this adjustment is to be calculated and take effect on January 1 of each year. The Ordinance, provides for the SDC fees to be adjusted in an amount equal to the change in construction costs according to the Engineering News Record (ENR) Northwest (Seattle, Washington) Construction Cost Index. As of January 2019, the annual construction cost index increase was 4.9%. DISCUSSION: Effective March 1, 2019, all Parks and Recreation SDC fees will increase 4.9%. The updated schedule is as follows: Old Fee New Fee Residential (all housing types) $3,365/ dwelling unit $3,530/ dwelling unit Non-residential $133/ employee $140/ employee Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x City Attorney_x Finance_x- 23 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The increased revenues that are expected to result from the updated SDC fee schedule are unknown at this time. 24 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3087 RESOLUTION NO. 2127 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE AMOUNT OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES UNDER AN EXISTING METHODOLOGY; ESTABLISHING AN ALTERNATIVE RATE REVIEW FEE; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR IMPOSITION OF THE FEES AND CHARGES WHEREAS, ORS 223.297 - 223.314 authorizes local governments to impose system development charges; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance 2250 establishing Parks and Recreation Systems Development Charges; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted methodologies pursuant to Ordinance 2250 to justify the Parks and Recreation Systems Development Charges; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2250 provides that the amounts of the Parks and Recreation and Parks Systems Development shall be set by resolution; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2250 provides that the amounts of the Parks and Recreation and Parks Systems Development charges shall be adjusted annually to account for changes in the cost of constructing facilities; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2250 also allows the City to establish an alternative rate review fee by resolution; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE. The schedule of Parks and Recreation Systems Development Charges attached as Exhibit "A", and, by this reference, incorporated herein is hereby adopted to be imposed beginning the effective date identified in Section 3 of this resolution. Section 2. ALTERNATIVE RATE REVIEW FEE The minimum fee for review of an alternative rate review calculation shall be two-hundred-and-fifty dollars ($250), to be paid at the time the alternative rate calculation is submitted for review. If the City hires a consultant to assist in reviewing the information submitted, the cost of the consultant's review shall be Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 3087 ORDINANCE NO. 2127 25 shared equally by the City and the applicant, and the applicant shall pay its share of the cost of the consultant's review at the time the City decides whether or not to accept the alternative rate. Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date for imposition of the fees and charges identified in this resolution shall be March 1, 2019. Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Approved: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2- COUNCIL BILL NO. 3087 ORDINANCE NO. 2127 26 EXHIBIT "A" PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES SCHEDULE Effective: March 1, 2019 DEVELOPMENT TYPE SDC PER UNIT Residential (all housing types) $ 3,530/dwelling unit Non-residential $ 140/employee The non-residential fee is assessed based on a structure's gross square footage per employee as determined by the following Metro Employment Density Study guidelines: SQUARE FEET PER EMPLOYEE (Recommended Guidelines from Metro Employment Density Study) Standard Industry Square Feet Standard Industry Square Feet Classification(SIC) Per Employee Classification(SIC) Per Employ Manufacturing: Trucking 1,500 General 700 Communications 250 Food Related 775 Utilities 225 Textile,Apparel 575 Lumber,Wood Products 560 Retail: Paper and Related 1,400 General 700 Printing and Publishing 600 Hardware 1,000 Chemicals,Petrol, Food Stores 675 Rubber,Plastics 850 Restaurant/Bar 225 Cement, Stone,Glass,Clay 800 Appliance/Furniture 1,000 Furniture and Furnishings 600 Auto Dealerships 650 Primary Metals 1,000 Gas Station(gas only) 300 Secondary Metals 800 Gas Station(Gas and Service) 400 Non-Electrical Machinery 600 Regional Shopping Center 600 Electrical Machinery 375 Electrical Design 325 Services: Transportation Equipment 500 Hotel/Motel 1,500 Other 400 Health Services(hospital) 500 Health Services(clinic) 350 Wholesale Trade: Educational 1,300 Durable Goods 1,000 Cinema 1,100 Non-Durable Goods 1,150 Personal Services(office) 600 Finance,Insurance,Real Estate, Warehousing: Business Services(office) 350 Storage 20,000 Distribution 2,250 Government Administration 300 27 �'I'1 r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU Pri,a�.;rrt rr,a' aA'!R7 February 11, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Row, Assistant City Administrator SUBJECT: Award of Construction Contract for the Woodburn City Hall Integrated Audio/Visual Systems Project RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the Local Contract Review Board, award the public improvement construction contract for the Woodburn City Hall Integrated Audio/Visual Systems Project to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Delta Systems Integration, Inc. in the amount of $86,521 .10. BACKGROUND: City Hall was constructed in 1976 and has aged to the point that repairs and improvements are necessary in order to ensure that it will continue to effectively serve the City for years to come. Costs for this project have been included in the approved FY 18/19 budget. On January 28, 2019, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Banlin Construction for the majority of the work related to this project. Given the specialized nature of the work to replace the City Council Chambers audiovisual system, it was bid separately from the larger renovation project. Delta Systems Integration was hired by the City in summer 2018 to develop the design for the audiovisual system. Following the City and State's formal procurement bidding process required for a public improvement project of this size, the City advertised an "Invitation to bid" for the project in the Oregon Daily Journal of Commerce and also sent the invitation directly to five qualified contractors. One (1 ) bid was received for the project by the January 23, 2019 deadline, at which time it was opened and public read. While only one bid was submitted for the project and even though the sole bidder was also the project designer, Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x_ City Attorney_x_ Finance—x- 28 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 staff is comfortable recommending approval, since the bid was determined to be responsible and responsive, and also within budget. Delta Systems Integration, Inc. $86,521 .10 The Engineer's Estimate for the project is: $80,000 The low bid is approximately 8% higher than the Engineer's Estimate. DISCUSSION: This project will replace the outdated audiovisual system with one that is much more modern and reliable. Project components will include: • Two 86 inch presentation display screens • Individual presentation screen monitors for each City Council Member and staff at the dias • High definition video system with digital broadcast connection • Integrated audio system with high quality microphones and speakers • A video monitor located in the lobby area for meeting overflow and general information display • Touch screen interface that controls A/V system components • Integrated public comment digital timer The entire project is anticipated to take approximately 5-6 months to complete. In preparation for the project, City Hall staffing and services have already been relocated to a temporary facility, located at 970 N. Cascade Dr. The contract award is in conformance with public contracting laws of the State of Oregon as outlined in ORS Chapter 279C and the laws, regulations of the City of Woodburn, therefore, staff is recommending the contact be awarded. FINANCIAL IMPACT: $3,415,000 is allocated for the entire City Hall project in the adopted FY 18/19 budget. Funding includes $1,815,000 in cash on hand from the General Fund, and $1 ,600,000 in loan proceeds. At an upcoming meeting, staff will ask Council for authorization to secure the financing necessary to fully fund the project. The loan will be paid down over a 4-year period. The City had received preliminary approval for a rebate of approximately $25,000 from the Energy Trust of Oregon due to the energy savings that would 29 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 3 result from the lighting and HVAC upgrades included with this project. Unfortunately, the Energy Trust's final evaluation revealed that the HVAC portion of the project no longer qualified and that the City would now only receive a lighting rebate of approximately $6,000. 30 �'I'1r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU February 11 , 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator From: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Subject: Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of Variance Application for Mid-Valley Community Church Gravel Driveway at 591 Gatch St (VAR 2018-03) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council consider and decide by majority vote whether or not to call up this item and initiate a review of this Planning Commission decision pursuant to Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Section .4 02„02.. ....................................................... The Commission included a somewhat unusual condition on the approval requiring a pedestrian access easement over the subject property which also prohibits the construction of a trail within that easement until 2035. This prohibition would restrict the City's ability to construct the segment of the Mill Creek Greenway Trail on the subject property, should the City acquire the funds to do so. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 24, 2019 and unanimously approved a request by the Mid-Valley Community Church to grant a variance to allow a temporary encroachment into a Riparian Area Wetland Overlay District ("RCWOD"). Staff recommended denial, but prepared potential conditions anticipating that the Commission might deliberate and conclude differently than the staff recommendation. As part of the approval, the PC included conditions proposed by Staff (identified as "Scenario 1 " in the attached Staff Report) and added an additional condition: "Pursuant to the Planning Commission approved motion of January 24, 2019, the text of the Condition V6 easement shall indicate that the City would not construct the segment of the Mill Creek 31 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 Greenway Trail pursuant to the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan (2007) on the subject property (Tax Lot 051 W 18AA 05700) as a capital improvement project until January 2, 2035." In addition to the applicant, several persons affiliated with the church testified in support of the variance, and no parties testified in opposition. Floyd R. Lenhardt, owner of adjacent property along the opposite, westerly side of Mill Creek, testified in favor of the variance but in opposition to the Mill Creek Greenway generally. He expressed dislike of environmental regulations and alleged trespass and vandalism on his land. This is the testimony that presumably motivated the Commission motion that imposed the restriction on constructing a path until 2035. < t A 21 x k� 51 .�.� .-�•G7 C;i � eu � �: '�, 1 .h � y,r � 'F1 �` � �© x � a �,,� ^:°`faf¢I �� r i a.a `r bhp Note:The fired line is the road or path in question Variance gravel driveway site plan 32 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 3 r �r Unpermitted driveway- View from Young Street(Code enforcement site visit Oct. 25, 2017) The Planning Commission approval still provides the City with the right to access the property and is an important step to implementation of the Mill Street Greenway Trail. It is important to note that if the easement restricting the construction of a trail is recorded and the City desires to build the path before 2035, it will still need consent from the land owner. This is no different than the present scenario where no such easement exists. Further background and context is available via the Planning Commission website here: .G(a.i11 _fin „Ilr��_�ll , ,;lla�„ff fie„pa;)rll . Feel free to call me directly with any questions at 503-980-2445. 33 �'I'1�r I Iii♦ r} Y 9M& Its BU February 11 , 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator From: Chris Kerr, AICP, Community Development Director Dan Handel, Associate Planner Subject: Call-Up Briefing: Planning Commission Approval of a Modification to Conditions of Approval for Lincoln Street Apartments Landscaping Plan at 1245-1255 E. Lincoln St. (MOC 2018-01) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no action and briefs the Council on this item pursuant to Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Section �2 02.. The Council may call up this item for review if desired and, by majority vote, initiate a review of this decision. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 24, 2019 and unanimously approved the Modification to Conditions of Approval application with an additional condition: "Applicant shall submit a modified landscape plan that indicates a total of at least 1 ,500 Plant Units (per Table 3.0613: Plant Unit (PU) Value), to be primarily located along the perimeter of the property." Staff recommended approval of the application as proposed; however, the Commission deliberated and concluded that additional landscaping was necessary. The proposal is a land use application, Modification of Conditions of Approval MOC 2018-01 (Type III), requesting to modify and reduce the landscaping that was originally approved for a multifamily residential development. Attachment 101 is the approved landscape plan providing 2,018 Plant Units, part of VAR 2017-05 and DR 2017-05; Attachment 102 is the proposed modified landscape plan, which reduces the total Plant Unit count to 1 ,073. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator_x_ City Attorney_x Finance_x- 34 Honorable Mayor and City Council February 11 , 2019 Page 2 Further information about the application can be found on the Planning Commission web page .h 11 It I ,.L w d lb j r n.,a').r..,.�j.s/ E 2.- .......... ...../ .................... .. .... ..................................................................................................................:............................:............. gd�2 The applicant testified in support of their proposal, no other parties testified. Attachments: 101 : Approved Landscape Plan 102: Proposed Landscape Plan 35 54 Landscape Revision's 12-1-17, AJL 78 1. North "o�ther" yard- 3,172sf-�600 paving=2,572sf 5. Common area; (�pu/. J. 0 50'sf)---67x3=, �p required, r-` A' rew sind i i- (I pu/509,sf)=51pu required. 2,060 sf lawn 2,948 sf. Meets requirement. PLANT MATERIALS LIST 4-�S tree (qD 4p�u=16 5-S tree (*, 4pu=20 Sym. Quan. B,otanical/Common Name Size Conditioh Material Size, Plant Unit (PU) Value OREWN, 1/25/82 2-L tree ( 10pu=20 I-M tree (g-), 8pu=8 36-L shrub (4, 2pu=72 196 S shrub ,g, I pu=196 TREES 20-S shrub (4,) 1 pu=20 19 L shrub (a) 2pu=38 Total.................128PU I Acer palmatuml 4 Lawn 1pu/50'=41pu 0-7 Japanese Map�it 211'eal. B&B M 8 PU eac,h/8 0 .4, Q Total.............303PIJ 16 Acer rubrum Tcd Sunset'/ 2. East "other" yard; 6,99,3sf-300 paving--6,693sf E) (I pu/50'sf)=134pu required. Red Sunset Red Maple 211cal. B&B L 1.0 PU each/160 6. Setbacks abutting a, street area; 2000sf-580p�aving=:1,420sf 3 Acer rubrum "Ifford'/ 6-1, tree 10pu=:60 (Ipu/.1.5'sf)--95pu required. TlIford Red Maple 211cal. B&B M 8 PU each/24 I-M tree Ci�, 8p,u=8 1-M tree 8pu=8 39 Prunus serrulata'Amanogawal/ Z 20-S tree (4:), 4pu=80 2-S tree (4-), 4pu=8 Ct A. Japanese Flowering Cherry 211cal. B&D S 4 PU each/156 7Z 307'-L shrub C4), 2pu=614 6-L shrub C& 2pu=12 Z". C2 165�-S shrub Cd,�, 1pu=165 207-S shrub *, , 'I pu=2,07 Total Tree PU...--.......348 570'sf lawn/50'sf=11 Total................235PU SHRUBS Total................938PU AD 24 Azalea Hino Crimson/ Net landscaping meets minimum of 30% total. H.,C. Azalea 2 gal. Container M 1-0 PU each/24 3. West "other" yard; 1.9,2904-12,448 paving:=6,,842sf (D 49 Berberis thunbergli 'Dwarf Pygmy / 1.0 PJJr (Ipu/50's,f=1.37pu required. D.P. Japanese Barberry 2 gal. Container M each/49 5-L tree I O�pu=50 38 Cornus stolomfer/ CD 0 ;4 9-S tree 4pu=36 Redtwig Dogwood 5 gal. Container L 2 PU each/76 �Zb 80-1, shrubs (4), 2pu=160 Submitted on Jamiary 12,, 2018 982 Festuca glauca 'Elijah Blue"I 51-S shrubs ( Ipu=51 E.B. Blue Fescue @ 18"o.c. I gal. Container S I PU each/922 Total., ..............297PU A.Lelsinget , RLA 143 Penniseturn alopocuroides 'Little Bunny'/ IZ4 T CC �*.* -.4 Lan dscapeArchitect L.B., Dwarf Fountain. Grass 2 gal. Container M 1.0 PU each/143 Z 4. Off-street parking, and loading area; 36,042-28,196=7,846sf 179 !6 Japanese Pieris 2, PU each]92 (1pu/20'sf=392pu required. 3 gal. Con sin r. L 40 car spaces; with 8 1, tree (q-,) 10pu, meets tree requirement. UF 25 Phatnalrrii�i� > 0 14 L 2 PU each150 8 L tree (J�. 10pu=80 Fraser Photins 5 gal., Container .Irl -e� 4 I M tree (,i�) 8pu=8 9 Prunus laurocerasus/ 11� 13 S tree, (#,) 4pu�=52 English Laurel 5 gal., Container L 2 PU each/18 128 1, shrub (#-�, 2pu=256 3 Prunus lusitanlea/ C> L 2 PU each/6 1.17SshrubC Ipu=376 Contai Portugal Laurel 5 gal. in�er Cd �Z;- U E- Total shrubs..........632PU 95 SpIraea.japonlca 'GoldflamOl E...4 7� M 00 Goldflame Spimea 2 gal. Container 2 PU each./190 d j cri -<t �11 n Total Shrub/Ground. Cover 1,670 Total Trees/Shr s/Ground Covers-2,018 IN ub Required Landscape .per Carlson, Veit, 20,163 sf landscape area PU= 1,008; project ex ceeds b� 2 to I ratio. Meets Landscape requirements. L 1��"PHOLL DECD %31 1 1 t A r - I I&kcer rubrum'Red Sunset' t25-Photina�fiase''r-I­ -"'- I C I I I I Red Sunset,Red Map Fraser Phot* ma 4so English Laurel t \-7--� %-Pieris-jipon el' 143-Pennisetum alopecuro'ides 'Little Bunnv' I-Acer palmatum L.B.Dwarf Fountain Grass v-26 Azalea Hino Crim' -s-o'-fi E.B. Blue Fescue @ 18,10. II.C.Azalea 982-Festu Oix Japanese Maple, _A\- 3-Acer rubrum 'Tilford' A COO a tA 15, % //a'ww"", 0 co b ;114 4– M IM 7--T Law 0 t t 7Y X x X X X-- X Ix let INI 3-Prunus lusitanica Japanese: PkA DECD Is ortugal Laurel co 49-Wrlieris thunbergii 'Dwarf Pygmy' 1- 4- D.P.Japanese Barberry, 39F-Piltuiftigs"'errulata 'Amanogawa,' 38-Cornus stolonifer 954�66iai Jiponli a,-'Goldflame' A.Japanese Flowering Cherry Re�dtwig 1!�pgwpqd Goldflame S,piraea 7, JOB NO., DATE Sepj-_14� 201-7 DESIGN BY AJL CHE K BY AJL RECD Plant 'LJn * 1. Calculation loop �AN 12 Permit Set Submittal L3ol ECONOP41C DEVE[QM-",�FF IIERIVV:11-1 DI'll"--"�","'���ill"�'��'�,,�i" 2 lich nNo eti"t 1, 0 1, 36 (3SE PLANTMATERIALS LIST � , Size r „ a�:dre.,,gip LN�diT. " � �1 ����"+ , ��� l�l � ��� Size .. r� Nla��N°� ���. ,. OREGON RUBBER HOSE AROUND 1/25/82 5v TRUNK 'R ,. OR APPROVEDTIE I-Acer pwalmatrrnr/ 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE Japanese Maple 2""cal,. B& M 8 l''U each/8 12-Acer rubrrrrn 'Red Sunset'/ 2X2 PRESSURE TREATED STAKES ( PER TREE lied Sunset lied 'laple 2"cal. B&B 10 P1J each/120 1' - ° 1" - R" .3-Acer rubrum,, 'Tillrrrd'/ " Ilford Iced Maple 2"cal. B&B M8 PU each/24 PEEL BACK NwNIN; TOP 1/3 WATERINGBERN 24-Prunus sr~rrulRata Anianrrgawa'/ OF BURLAPLCH PROVIDE w N�IAM BARK MULCH Aw Japanese Flo werin Wherry 2,"cal. B&B 4 PIJ each/96 . AREA AROUND /ALL TREES FINI IE GRADE S HR��B� Total N l rcc. l 1.1. ., ..248 COMPACTED SOIL, MIX 50/50 f � k1� 4 � PEEL RANK Tt -Azalea l.linrr Crimson/TOPSOIL/ ARDEN MI � , _.. :. °N 3 O" BURLAP MINIMUM. H.C"w Azalea al. Container 1.0 I �� c�rc:la/�CO PACTED TOP SOIL �. ; REMOVE /ALL W IRES, TIES, ,•• ,w � 4... � ' r �. ' � J�r-1 erl�errs th�urrl�er~�rr l a err J�' l�raa�a /-_ . wJ f ontainer N 1 ATERI Ll .P. aparrese iJarberry dal. 1sects/1tihaw "g n .�,.,...:,.. a�, r r a r SOIL N' 4 o rR r. s stol ni fe .; ,," .p� d1,1` try.. 1 ,, v,,a �s , COMPACTED 50f50 Irl t ! 9 � TOPS�L GARDEN MIX 4-Cornus n +nnd gal. Container 1- 1: 1.1 e 41 ro / y arch/ ' f tw w 'Elijah ; fl-l�estrrrMa larrcRa Blue / Revisnns 1 tl/: "r p COMPACTED TOP SOIL E.B. Blue Fescrr,r. ( 1 "rr.cw 1 gal. Container 1 1''l_.N each/3201 �/1�, AJI� rw 1 1''"errrrisetrrrrr a / each/51 *Revision ,I. ./ ,/l8 .Aw�JL . ap+ecerrarrrl�s 'Little �rrnrr " MIN, 1 .0 l L.1 . � NI N�NN�EN�N3IN�N�N 1 l,w.l �. l�►tivRarf l+tarrnt�arn (..r�rss gal. r�nt�rrrrc:r -:Pierre japoncia/ wla«panese Piens gal, Container L 2 :PU each 1 :12 � �� W 2cerwasus/ � �, � Z ..; SHRUB P' w.A "Tll �a DETAIL TREE Pa' .�a�'TII�1G DETAIL -Prunusl'"rrrnrrs herr , � Container � New' English 1.�,�aaurel„ �w gal. .., 2 1 l_� cacli/ 6* *Poo W � w� NTS _ p 4 .. japonica aae / � J ...... .__. �4- rr,ae�u � .4 � Container � �4 � NOTE: Goldflame Sprr�aaea girl. 1:.., Plf each/11.18 1. DRIVE STAKES OUTSIDE OF R00173ALL 2. SET TREE ' ABOVE FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR NO OF SOIL Snd/Rydro-seed1, ' ,10 s.f. 142 P`Us, 'I."oral �aaubs Ground `o cis.. 8 Total a�a�l/1Jydro-seed; ' 1 s.i.,142 �,� � Trees r lWrrta,I l reel.... ..... .... ,r .. ?48 Total Shrub/Ground over .......6�8 ''� Total l�,a rrr 2 l4� Total * 16- __ .rRequired Landscape '8.1�. per Carlson Veit;, errs thnnber�rr T) 'wwarf Pygmy / � 11J6 s.f. landscape area � 20�sl:/ .m., l .P. .Japanese Barberry 19-Prunus laurracerasrrs/ 24-Prunus serrrrllata 'A�rnan�rgaw°a°/ , " English . Japanese Flowering Cher � P J .. 1,008; Rev. Project exceeds eds the Laurel rel � _ � _ ., ininaa��r.arrr landscape requirements �r) �'1,073"�f'U'S r X_h-J�rerrs a uncia/ J � ,aRw„� ,.. .w W -� __.. .. _.m :... — a al )i a anew P'rerrs .,... ,. .__.. .._...�..-_ _. __.: .. ....___�m n 1 1--Acer paJrnatrr.rrar/ t2-Azalea l4inc �rlrrnsan/ 1 -Aa.cear rubrum 'Red Sunset'/ 51-P'ennlsetum alrr,pecrrroides 'Little Runny'/ y Japanese MapleH.C. Azalea ���.. lied sunset Red Maple L., . . vr°arf Fountain +b'ras's r .. _ ;.. %W J ,N. wwr Y ww o , I ww w , , :cer rrrbrurn J rlfrrrd / R e � � � , C"rifcur Jed Maple , d s . mm .. � A.�1�1 _ P'a-a.ara a 1 w. . � ass aurcrcerasus/ Tm U l English 1.., rrrcl p F IX AR f, 4 www 4 •. r� w " n « a i a ) � r r w. ,. w.l i .,. . , a ... . , R . w r 4 Nk 4 @ qw w x r ... '. w r i LnL R a« a w r �„«k,..x�,ww, .., .,. "°�.:z^sYw 1 .:�'^,.,r.k.. w..w.. ".r.. ...� �o �5C. ,�..w»»,r.«.. n� .. .,.«,.�.,,_ ..r ... ,wrr �" �... ,� „Yf iL .,. ........�. ',,.,,�ww ,SC�, .�..�,. �. ..� '..>—,.""" � «.)C., F w; 4_ rraea japonica oldflarrre'/ ., 4 p J l 320- 'estuca lacca 'Elijah Ulue"/ I d N Goldflame Spiraea _ � U TM J 4��ar►rnu.r straltrnifer/ � � E.B. flue �f+"escrre l.h"orc. e�,dt i Dogwood w P I. All to attar +aufovers shall he of a size upon installation . " '° ground coverage within 3 years. Net landscaping insets rrrinin r�rr�ra art 0�,�'�total. 2. Installation of plant materials and irrigation specified in an approved landscaping plan shall! occur at the time o a condition of final occupancy. Should site conditions make shall be REVISION'S SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 3,2018 »w installationww lie �,rrdrew�vv E+etsiaaarer°, Iwo . impractical, table performance guarantee may be approved, subject the requirements y I�arrrl,realre Architect rrrr Tactical err wacce pP J g earnents of this Ordinance (lection LEISING R DE IGN a�' 10' 201 404 sa l 4w02.08)).. alerrac,Oregon ; . The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining_ e,� � � p luw � p all V=�-err,.a� landscaping, fences, condition, as to present rdscaprrr�, f�earrcc.s, and walls in �craard t,onditrorr err a healthy and orderly appearance. Unhealthy and dead plants JOB air . shaorigil be nal landscape and replaced, in conformance with the rgw p 4, .� six tech high concrete curb shall be provided betvweerr Lat ndscapt: Itpl"11 asap' s ,JL landscaped areas. and parking and circulation areas. dee _ ..._ �:,�, CHECKED By ,k Civil for details. s ��T 5„ No "Significant� Trees exists on this private property site. .. . All new trees will be equal or greater f`f1values than the � 02 L10 � _ code requires 37