Loading...
06-27-2011 Presentation: WDO Update:AllyfoI•I• llpvpinnmpnt C C71 • is Principles of Land Use • Implement the community's vision • Comply with the 14 applicable state -wide planning goals • Separate incompatible uses (life, safety, public welfare) — Residential — Commercial — Industrial — Public • Provide a variety of development options and opportunities • Enable efficient public facilities Issues with the WDO • Difficult to understand • Difficult to administer • Circular references • Conflicting standards • Redundancies • Lots of Complaints Focus Group • Council appointed a group of residents to study the WDO and recommend changes • Who's in the Focus Group? • Dave Christoff, Tom Romer, Dick Jennings, Kristy Olson, Ken Triplett, John Baker, Jim Swee, Jim Cox, Durrell Cray, Gene Willman — Meetings over two years — Process • Gain understanding of requirements • Understand purpose and intent • Decide direction for changes Chapters 1.1 Organization and Structure 2.1 Land Use Zoning 2.2 Specified Use Standards 3.1 Development Guidelines and Standards 4.1 Administration and Procedures 5.1 Application Requirements 6.1 Appendices Notice Department of Land Conservation and Development (45 days) Notice Department of Land Cot r t n -[)IevL=l ent days Measure 56 (mailed to anyone affected by a restrictive zoning or regulation) Measure 56 Notice 2.1 Land Use Zoning 2.2 Specified Use Standards 3.1 Development Guidelines and Standards Measure 56 Notice • 5,900 different property owners • $2,000 mailing costs • Mandatory language • Respond to questions Order Less controversial (and no Measure 56 notice required) 1.1 Organization and Structure 4.1 Administration and Procedures 5.1 Application Requirements 6.1 Appendices Order Less controversial (and no Measure 56 notice required) 1.1 Organization and Structure 4.1 Administration and Procedures 5.1 Application RequirPmenF 6.1 Appenrlir-Ac More controversial (and require Measure 56 notice) 2.1 Land Use Zoning 2.2 Specified Use Standards 3.1 Development Guidelines and Standards 1.1 Organization and Structure 1.101 Structure 1.102 Definitions 1.103 Zoning Map 1.104 Nonconforming Uses and Development Standards 1.105 Planning Commission 1.106 Design Review Board 1.101 Structure • Index and purpose statement • Reordered alphabetically • Improved readability • Clarified conformance with guidelines No policy issues 1.102 Definitions • Improved readability • Consolidated topics (accommodations, care facilities) • Deleted "dictionary" definitions and unused terms • Added illustrations • Aligned with State Statutes No policy issues 1.103 Zoning Map • Index • Improved readability • Moved "Interpretation of Zoning District Boundaries "from Section 4.102.09.6 No policy issues 1.104 Nonconforming Uses and Development Standards • Index • Reordered alphabetically 1.105 • Index Planning Commission • Improved readability No policy issues 1.106 • Index Design Review Board • Improved readability No policy issues ra e' 4.1 Administration and P rote ures 4.101 4.102 Decision-making Procedures Review, Interpretation and Enforcement 1 7 L s r p I L S S I Am ye'i yCs No :ifrnr 4m101 0 0 0 0 0 Purpose Index Decision - making Procedures Reordered alphabetically Minor changes to text T4 ' 4n!i Y 12S — Eliminate application submittal requirements — Clarify notice requirements — Applicant posts on notice Improve readability No i R ly � r age 4.101 Policy Issues — Eliminate application submittal requirements — Applicant posts on -site notice = } t �htt ✓ 4 Ye'i 4.102 Review, Interpretation and Enforcement • Reordered alphabetically r-' ��, No rfYry= r 'i n,l 1 n d ex 4� • Permit expiration S. rlI :�I Sri , des — 3 yrs "rrr Fr,y,, hl'S�,`1aJ�;. r : r•. , �,. — 2 yrs - extensions `��'.r.r °I� • Interpretations — dictionary ry 11'C no �� s II'rrc • NAI CS h � Yes yes �I NMIp:!l:y 4.102 Policy Issues • Permit expiration — — Expiration - 3 yrs • Subdivisions, partitions, PUD's - 2 yrs • All other permits (Design review, manufactured parks, etc) - 1 yr — Extensions — 2 yrs •One year • Type II decision with notice —new requirement • Interpretations — dictionary • NAICS Application Types Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appeal Application Types Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appeal — Access Permit to a City Street, Excluding a Major or Minor Arterial Street — Design Review — Fence and Free Standing Wall — Grading Permit — Manufactured Dwelling Park, Final Plan Approval — Partition and Subdivision Final Plat Approval — Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Plan Approval — Property Line Adjustment; Consolidation of Lots — Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District Permit — Sign Permit — Significant Tree Removal Permit — Temporary Outdoor Marketing and Special Event Permit Application Types �l y Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appE-..., Type II — Quasi- Administrative: Director makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council Application Types �l y Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appE-..., Type II — Quasi- Administrative: Director makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council — Access Permit to a City Major or Minor Arterial Street — Architectural Standard Substitution — Design Review, Type II — Exception to Street Right of Way and Improvement Requirements — Partition, Preliminary Approval — Zoning Adjustment Application Types �l y Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appE-..., Type II — Quasi- Administrative: Director makes decision, notice of the rJr- ^_ion mailed to surrounding property owners_ gnneal to Oity Council Type III — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surrounding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council Application Types Type III — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surrounding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council — Conditional Use — Design Review, Type III — Exception to Street Right of Way and Improvement Requirements — Manufactured Dwelling Park, Preliminary Approval — Phasing Plan for a Subdivision, PUD, Manufactured Dwelling Park — Planned Unit Development (PUD), Preliminary Plan Approval — Planned Unit Development (PUD), Design Plan Final Approval — Special Conditional Use - Historically or Architecturally Significant Building — Special Use as a Conditional Use — Subdivision Preliminary Approval — Telecommunications Facility, Specific Conditional Use — Variance Application Types �l y Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appE-..., Type II — Quasi- Administrative: Director makes decision, notice of the deci - ion mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council ;f Type III — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surunding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding oronerty ow ners, aDDeal to Citv Council Type IV — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surrounding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes a recommendation to City Council, Council makes decision Application Types �l y Type I — Administrative: Director makes decision, no public notice or appE-..., Type II — Quasi- Administrative: Director makes decision, notice of the deci - ion mailed to surrounding property owners, appeal to City Council ;f Type III — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surunding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes decision, notice of the decision mailed to surrounding oronerty ow ners, aDDeal to Citv Council Type IV — Quasi - Judicial: Notice of public hearing mailed to surrounding property owners, notice of public hearing posted on the property, Planning Commission makes a recommendation to City Council Council makes decision — Annexation — Comprehensive Plan Map Change, Owner Initiated — Formal Interpretation of the Woodburn Development Ordinance — Zoning Map Change, Owner Initiated 5.1 Application Requirements 5.101 Type I Application Requirements 5.102 Type II Application Requirements 5.103 Type III Application Requirements 5.104 Type IV Application Requirements 5.101 Type I Application Requirements • Index and purpose statement 0 Reordered alphabetically • Improved readability • Removed unnecessary application requirements 0 Design review - increased size threshold for Type I review 5.101 Type I Application Requirements Design review - increased size threshold for Type I review • Non - residential Buildings — 500 sq ft in commercial or 1,000 sq ft in industrial zones — Expansion or new buildings that increase lot coverage by 10% or less — Change of use resulting in a 10% or less increase of required parking TYPE I REVIEW TYPE I REVIEW ALLISON WAY IJ Wal -Mart 213,556 square feet CG zone STACY ALLISON WAY Type 21,356 square feet ? "Sites with existing buildings, expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage by 10% or less. " r � • L 3 � , 7 Q o d 1 _ 1 � I � I 1� I ry 1 . 4* 'aft niversal Forest Products 122,600 square feet I P zone 5.101 Policy Issues • Type I review — 500 sq ft in commercial or 1,000 sq ft in industrial zones — Expansion or new buildings that increase lot coverage by 10% or less 5.102 Type II Application Requirements • Index and purpose statement • Reordered alphabetically • Improved readability • Removed unnecessary application requirements • Design review - increased size threshold for Type 11 review 5.102 Type II Application Requirements Design review - increased size threshold for Type II review • Non - residential Buildings — 1,000 square feet or less in the RS, R1 S, RM, and P /SP — 2,000 square feet or less than in the CO, CG, DDC, and NNC zones — 3,000 square feet or less in the IP, IL, and SWIR zones — CO, CG, DDC, NNC, I P, IL, and SWI R zones • Expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage by more than 10% but less than 25% — Single family and duplexes in the NCOD zone, but excluding structures subject to Type I review — Change of use resulting in a 10% but less that 25 %+ increase in required parking t � V�AL. _ , _do Type 11 1 -1 7 000 square feet "Non-residential structures 1,000 square feet or less in the IRS, R1 S, RM, and P/SP zones. STACY ALLISON WAY Or) Type II < 21 53,389 square feet ,> "For sites with existing buildings in the CO, CG, DDC, N NC, I P, IL, and SWI R zones; expansions or new buildings that increase d lot coverage by more than 10% but less than 25 %" r J� ■ �A 1 . 4* aft t 1, ` j oft - .4J , t t. 0111111110 Type 11 12 30,650 square feet "For sites with existing buildings in the CO, CG, DDC, N NC, I P, IL, and SWI R zones; , expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage by more than 10% but less than 25 %." 5.102 Policy issues • Type II review — Increasing threshold of Type 11 review 5.103 Type III Application Requirements • Index and purpose statement • Reordered alphabetically • Improved readability • Removed unnecessary application requirements • Design review - increased size threshold for Type III review 5.103 Type III Application Requirements • Design review - increased size threshold for Type III review — Non - residential structures in residential zones greater than 1,000 square feet in the RS, R1 S, RM, and P /SP zones — Multi- family dwellings not meeting all architectural design guidelines and standards — Structures greater than 2,000 square feet in the CO, CG, DDC, and NNC zones — Structures greater than 3,000 square feet in the I P, IL, and SWI R zones — For sites with existing buildings in the CO, CG, DDC, NNC, IP, IL, and SWIR zones; expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage by more 25% — Change of use resulting in a 25 %+ increase of required parking t Tw 4 Type III . ...... . . . . . . 1,001 square feet "Non-residential structures in residential zones greater, than 1,000 sq uare feet in the RS R S, RM , and P/S P zones. abor IL �ffff- -,-. ral I AL __ - W STACY ALLISON WAY f L f, qW WWII Q T f�] F u .. { Type III 53,390+ square feet - ' "For sites with existing buildings in the CO, CG, DDC, N NC, I P, 11- and SWI R zones;, expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage.; 6 h by more 25 %." � "' kil 1 . � 0 V .4J R f Type III 30 + square feet "For sites with existing buildings in the CO, CG, DDC, N NC, I P, IL, and SWI R zones; expansions or new buildings that increase lot coverage by more than 25 %." 5.103 Policy issues • Type III review — Increasing threshold of Type III review 5.104 Type IV Application Requirements • Index and purpose statement • Reordered alphabetically • Improved readability • Removed unnecessary application requirements 5.104 Policy issues • No policy issues Next Step Public hearing —July 11, 2011