Loading...
Agenda - 09/28/2009KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR CITY O F 1N00 D B U RN DICK PUGH, COUNCILOR WARD 1 .1. MEL SCHMIDT, COUNCILOR WARD I) C ITY C O U N C I L, AC E N DA PETER MCCALLUM, COUNCILOR WARD JAMES COX, COUNCILOR WARD IV /~ e FRANK LONERGAN, COUNCILOR WARD V SEPTEMBER 2S, LOO 7 " 7.00 P.M. KRISTEN BERKEY, COUNCILOR WARD VI CITY HAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 270 MONTGOMERY STREET 1. CAII TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROIL CAII 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: None Appointments: A. Horst Raustein -Economic Development Committee 1 4. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: None Presentations: A. Urban Renewal B. ODQT -Tiger Grant 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS None b. COMMUNICATIONS None. 7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC -This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. "xabra interpretes ~isponi6~es Para aque~las personas que no (7a~~an Ing~es, previo acuerc~o. Comuniquese a~ ~So3) 980-2485." September 28, 2009 Council Agenda Page i .~ 8. CONSENT AGENDA -Items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and maybe adopted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council workshop minutes of August 31, 2009 2 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. Woodburn City Council minutes of September 14, 2009 11 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. B. June, July and August Claims Recommended Action: Accept the reports. 18 C. Pro Tem Judge 38 Recommended Action: Approve Carl Myers, Bar #75273 to serve as Pro Tem Judge for a period of 2 years. His resume is attached. 9. TABLED BUSINESS ---- None. 10. PUBIIC HEARINGS None 11. GENERAL BUSINESS -Members of the public wishing to comment on items of genera! business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time maybe limited by Mayoral prerogative. A. Council Bill No. 2801- A Resolution to amend the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Agreement No. R98414 with the State of Oregon and authorizing the City Administrator to sign such Agreement. Recommended Action: Adopt the Resolution. B. Council Bill No. 2802 - A Resolution entering into an Agreement with the Oregon Business Development for a forgivable loan under the State Revolving Fund loan and The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for Water System Consolidation Project (Project No. SZ9011) Recommended Action: Adopt the Resolution, September 28, 2009 Council Agenda Page ii C. Professional Services Contract Award Murray Smith & Associates for design and construction engineering of the water consolidation project Recommended Action: That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the City Contract Review Board, award the professional services contract for design and construction engineering of the Water Consolidation Project to the firm Murray Smith & Associates for a fee of ~4b5 856. C. Council update on Midge Fly presence in water supply system continuation of dialog on need for chlorination Recommended Action: Continue discussion on the need for chlorination of our municipal water system. 12. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS-These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions that maybe called up by the City Council. None 13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 15. ADJOURNMENT September 28, 2009 Council Agenda Page iii 'I. ~O~DBUR,~j September 28, 2009 T0: City Council FROM: Kathy Figley, Mayor SUBJECT: Economic Development Committee Appointment The following appointment is made, subject to the approval of the Council. Please forward any adverse comments to me prior to the Council meeting on Monday, September 28, 2009. No reply is required if you approve of my decision. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Horst Raustein 1 0001 D_ ATE, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, August 31, 2009. CONVENED. The workshop convened at 6;00 p.m.. ROLL CALL. CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Figley Present Chairperson Bandelow Late Councilor Berkey Absent Vice Chairperson Vancil Present Councilor Cox Present Commissioner Grosjacques Present Councilor Longergan Present Commissioner Grigarieff Present Councilor McCallum Present Commissioner Hutchison Present Councilor Pugh Present Commissioner Jennings Present Councilor Schmidt Present Commissioner Kenagy Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, Public Works Director Brown, Community Development Director Hendryx, Natalie Labossiere, Don Dolenc, Robert Knorr, Randy Scott, Marta Carrillo, City Recorder Tennant. 0_2 Mayor Figley stated that the meeting would be a joint City Council and Planning Commission workshop and not a public hearing. The workshops topics include the Park and Ride at the I-5/Highway 214 interchange and the Downtown Plan. It will be an informational meeting intended to allow the Council and the Planning Commission to talk with consultants and others involved with the two projects, and have questions answered. Once the Council and Commission are finished with their discussion, alI others in the audience will be invited to ask questions. Conflict of interest does not need to be declared and no decisions will be made at this meeting. Any decisions that will be made on these two projects will happen in the public hearing process or in conjunction with City Council votes after the process. A brief recess will take place between the two presentations. Mayor Figley stated that the first presentation of the evening would be on the transit facility and the primary purpose is to receive feedback and comments on the design. Once Public Works Director Brown, ODOT, and the consultants are finished with their presentation, Councilors and Planning Commissioners may share their questions and comments, and then the public. The next stage in the process is finalizing the design, right-of way, and permitting. 3.3 TRANSIT FACILITY Public Works Director Brown introduced the project consultants, which consisted of Tim Potter, area manager for ODOT, Ken Kreager, project manager for OTAK, Maggie Daily, landscape expert, and Rachel Laura, staff support for OTAK. He explained that the project has evolved since it was first presented to Council in January, when it was explained how the interchange, the transit facility, and the widening of Highway 214 were all connected to create a long term solution to the traffic congestion. The transit facility was intended to be the Lead off project but has now become phase I of the interchange Page 1-Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 2 project. The Federal Highways Administration has now required an environmental assessment that combines the transit facility and the interchange project into one project. ODOT has also received funding that has allowed it to aggressively move forward. Public Works Director Brown stated that he would like confirmation from Council, the Planning Commission, and the public that the preliminary design meets the expectation of the community. Once the design is accepted, ODOT can move forward and proceed with the design acceptance package, which allows them to acquire right-of way and secure all of the environmental compliance permits associated with the project. A forum is the best method to communicate with multiple parties at the same time. Tim Potter, ODOT project manager, stated that the primary driver for combining the transit facility with the interchange project was the change in the way water quality has been treated since the original environmental assessment. The agencies that oversee drainage would like to see the full impact of both projects since they are tied together and drain into the same area. Commissioner Jennings inquired whether the requirement for the new environmental impact study would delay the project. Mr. Potter stated that the requirement for the new study will not delay the project. The study would be supplemental to the existing document and explain how the water quality issues will be addressed. He stated that three projects would be embodied in the overall plan: (1) interchange project to Broughton Way, (2}Park-and-Ride at Evergreen Road, and (3) the environmental assessment of Broughton Way to Park Avenue. Ken Kreiger, OTAK, reviewed the transit site plan for the transit facility. The overall goal is to create an aesthetically pleasing, intermodal transit facility, The traffic flow would be simple and allow cars to enter from an access road off Evergreen Road into a parking lot built in accordance with Woodburn standards. Different modes of transportation would be separated for safety reasons and built out of different materials. Vehicles would exit from the access road and have plenty of distance for healing at the intersection. The platform area would be made of a series of materials and would include lighting for security and seating built into the raised planters. 17.7 The transit facility has been designed to allow for easy modification and incorporation into the interchange project. The change inroad grade level with the I-S lnterchange project will not affect the project. 22.4 Councilor McCallum asked if the transit facility would accommodate longer vehicles, such as motor homes or cars with trailers or boats, and questioned who would be responsible for security and landscaping. Mr. Kreiger stated that the transit facility does not incorporate areas for longer vehicles. Public Works Director Brown stated that the City would be responsible for the security of the area and the landscape maintenance. City Administrator Derickson stated that an aesthetically pleasing gateway would add value and potentially attract additional investment into the city. Mr. Kreiger presented slides on the platform area and explained that portions of the parking areas would have charging stations for electric vehicles, as it is expected that a greater number of electric vehicles will be used in the future. He presented slides on the landscaping and stated that trees would be planted in tree wells to expand the pedestrian zone. Vice Chairperson Vancil asked for clarification of the term tree well. Page 2 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 3 Mr. Kreiger explained that a tree wells are grated areas in sidewalks that have tree planted within them. The grates can be removed as the tree grows. Public Works Director Brown stated that one of the reasons for maximizing the area for pedestrian movement is that future development in the area is expected to be very pedestrian oriented. The transit facility will be utilized as meeting place for civic activities. Mr. Kreiger presented slides on the access road and stated that parking was removed for safety reasons to allow busses adequate room to turn, He explained that a median would be also placed near the intersection to prevent left turns and there would be a zone between Highway 214 and the parking area reserved for future highway improvements. Mr. Kreiger stated that the newly constructed welcome sign would be incorporated into the design of the facility and moved further into the property. The facility will also include two shelters, information signs and kiosks, waiting areas, rain gardens far drainage, and pedestrian access points along Highway 214. They have been working with private property owners and businesses along Evergreen Road to determine where the access points would be located. Commissioner Kenagy asked if the northlsouth portion of the intersection will be changed during the construction of the transit facility. Public Works Director Brown stated that the entire intersection will be reconstructed later but not during the construction of the transit facility, A final intersection configuration plan is being looked at but it is unsure whether there will be sufficient funds to complete the project. Commissioner Jennings stated that the Walgreens project has been through the Planning Commission and the entrance off Evergreen Road will be at the north end. Vice Chairperson Vancil asked if the Country Club Road intersection is being looked at. Mr. Kreiger stated that he has not worked with the engineer that is working on the Brice property, other than coordinating driveway entrances. The engineer on the Brice project is looking at overall traffic patterns within the development. Public Works Director Brown stated that issue must be looked at but it is out of the scope of this particular project. 41.9 Councilor Schmidt questioned why the trees would be planted near the sidewalks since it reduces visibility. Public Works Director Brown stated that the trees should not restrict visibility. 43.1 Tape 1 Side B Maggie Daily, project landscape expert, stated that the trees were selected from the City's pre-approved tree list. She explained that the shrubs layer is comprised primarily of native plants because of their easy maintenance. Councilor Pugh stated that the police need to have visibility of the area to monitor crime and the trees may create a barrier. Mr. Daily stated that the City may opt to trim the branches to a certain height and select a lower ground cover for better visibility. The trees are spaced thirty feet on center and should have plenty of space to grow. Public Works Director Brown explained that the transit facility would act as a gateway to promote aesthetic value. This design acts as a balance between aesthetic value and good visibility. Corr~missioner Jennings stated that he is opposed to the number of trees required by the Page 3 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 4 Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO}and the Planning Commission is looking at making a change to reduce the number of trees required. Ms. Daily reviewed the shelter's designs on the platform which included the raised planters and benches, signage and kiosks, and specialty paving. She explained that the shelters are designed with a glass wall to enhance security. Public Works Director Brown stated that the glass wall is also oriented to create maximum protection against the weather. 8~2 Ms. Daily stated that the rain garden would be made within the center of the parking lot. She explained that the rainwater that falls on the parking lot would flow into rain garden, be filtered by the plants and soil, and then enter the City's storm system. Public Works Director Brown stated that Public Works Department did an educational experiment with the'Woodburn School District and built a rain garden between French Prairie Middle School and Lincoln Elementary School and the project was a success. 10.7 Chairperson Bandelow arrived during questions and answers. 17,2 Commissioner Jennings expressed his concern over the intersection. Community Development Director Hendryx explained that there is not a public hearing process on the park-and-ride lot. The WDO lists a parking facility as an administrative process that Council can call up for review. Public comments should be received at this workshop. Public Works Director Brown stated that it is not routine to bring public projects to the Planning Commission. In this case, however, he thought it was important to inform the Commission and the public of this project and gain their support. He also reminded Council and the Commission that the park-and-ride is a federal and state project that the City does not have complete control over. Councilor McCallum inquired what the project would cost the City in terms of yearly upkeep and the affect on various city departments. Public Works Director Brown stated that the City is responsible for maintaining the facility for the next twenty years per the Inter Governmental Agreement (IGA}with ODOT. Commissioner Hutchison asked if it was required to have separate bike and walking paths and if it was a state design. Public Works Director Brown stated that the design was held to City standards. 1~ide sidewalks should be used in urban settings because of multiple uses. Community Development Director Hendryx clarified his earlier statement and explained that there is a Type II Design Review process for the bus shelter component of the project. The remaining portion would require administrative review and approval. Commissioner Jennings expressed concern over the landscaping visibility. Commissioner Pugh stated that there should be a Planning Commission meeting over this project. Mayor Figley encouraged the Council to administratively call the plan up. Councilor Cox stated that Public Works Director Brown and ODOT would like to receive the Council's blessing on this project. However, since the meeting is a workshop, a motion cannot be made. Vice Chairperson Vancil stated that this project is likely to have an impact on the city for the next thirty to forty years and shouidrequire awell-publicized public hearing, where any stakeholder can attend and share their views before the Council, state and federal Page 4 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 5 government representatives. 21.2 City Administrator Derickson stated that the purpose for tonight's meeting is to present the plan and provide an opportunity for feedback. Mayor Figley stated that the plan is preliminary and valid concerns have been expressed. She encouraged Council to call up the administrative action taken on this project to allow an opportunity for public input, specifically on the interchange portion of the project. Commissioner Jennings questioned whether the Evergreen Road improvements are a separate project or are included in the park and ride facility. Public Works Director Brown explained that the Evergreen Road improvements are included in this project. He stated that the reaction and the feedback he has received from this workshop has been invaluable in understanding where the focus should be centered. City Administrator Derickson stated that because this project is a legislative action, Council can design a legislative adoption process to include public hearings, open houses, or public workshops. Council has options to ensure that input has been received and the plan reflects the community's desires. Councilor Cox reminded the Council and Commission that this is an ODOT project, and any changes that they want should be expressed as early as possible. A motion to approve is not necessary, The City is acting as an advisor and not a decision maker. Councilor Pugh expressed concern over the delegation of functions between the Council and the Planning Commission. The Council should not make a decision without the Planning Commission's recommendation. Vice Chairperson Vancil explained that a legislative change in the WDO would be needed in order to allow the Planning Commission to make a decision. 29.4. Mindy Mayer, owner of the McDonalds on Highway 2I4. Ms. Mayer suggested that the plan include a way for the paxk and ride patrons to safely crass Highway 214 to get to the businesses on the south side of Highway 214. She questioned whether the intersection at Evergreen Road would allow enough time for pedestrians to cross the highway with ali of the semi truck traffic turning east off of Evergreen Road. Public Works Director Brown stated that to safely cross the street, pedestrians would have to use the crosswalk at Evergreen Road. He will try to address all of the design concerns regarding the project, including the sequencing of the traffic lights. He explained that the Ciry invited every business within the interchange management area to attend the night's workshop. Commissioner Jennings stated that City staff should visit every business affected by the project, Public Works Director Browns stated that ODOT will not allow the City to talk with businesses until the design acceptance package is completed. The right-of way acquisition process far federal projects is extremely delicate on bath timing and communicating with property owners. Mayor Figley encouraged everyone who has questions or concerns to complete a comment card, or write or email the City. Mayor Figley called a five minute recess at 7:1 ? p.m.. 34.4 Mayor Figley reopened the workshop session on Downtown Development Plan at 7:23 p.m.. Mayor Figley briefly recapped the workshop rules and expectations she presented at the beginning of the meeting. Comments would be limited to three minutes. She reminded Page 5 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 6 the Council, Commission, and the public to share their concerns and comments at this meeting as well as at the formal hearings in the future. Public hearings would be advertised in the Woodburn Independent newspaper and posted on the City of Woodburn website. Mayor Figley presented the calendar for the public review process. September 3, 2009 Measure 56 notice will be sent. September 17, 2009 staff report will be available. September 19, 2009 public hearing notice will be advertised in the Woodburn Independent newspaper. September 24, 2009 Planning Commission will hold its public hearing. October 12, 2009 Council will hold its public hearing. October 26, 2009 Council will formalize the adoption. 2`0 Tape 2 Side A Mayor Figley recognized the Downtown Stakeholders Working Group for all of the time and work they have dedicated toward this project, which included Bruce Thomas (Yes Graphics), Martin Ochoa (Lupita's), Lela Quiroz (Salvador's Bakery), Tom Flomer {Flomer's Furniture), Larry Grosjacques {Woodburn Planning Commission), Frank Lonergan (City Council}, Elias Villegas (Chemeketa Community College), Deb Yager (Woodburn Chamber), Paul Kenfield (Valley Manufacturing), and David Sato (La Caseta de Woodburn, Inc.}. Commissioner Jennings stated that decisions are not normally made the night of a Planning Commission public hearing and questioned whether the Planning Commission and the Council's public hearings were scheduled too close together. 3~2 Community Development Director Hendryx explained that the schedule is subject to change although there is a due date of late November. There will be adequate opportunity for a continuance if necessary. Community Development Director Hendryx introduced the Downtown Development Plan and gave an overview of the project's history. The Downtown Development Plan was originally created in the late 1990's, identified the community's aspirations, and was the forbearer of the urban renewal program. It has been eleven years since the original downtown plan has been completed and the City has since then recognized that the concepts need to be reevaluated. The project has been funded through ODOT's Transportation Growth Management (TGM) program and there are processes that must be followed. 6_S Tom Lister, OTAK Project Manager. Mr. Lister is the consultant for the Downtown Development Plan. He introduced himself and gave an overview of the downtown area, and identified it as the area near the railroad tracks including the Young Street and the Front Street corridors. Visions and goals of a thriving safe center for the community were set forth throughout the planning process. The old-town, downtown area should be a healthy place to live, shop, work, and play, and should be clean, safe, and attractive. Mr. Lister presented slides on the downtown area. He explained that he and the Stakeholder's Working Group approached the project by refining the original plan to integrate the natural assets of the community, including the locally owned businesses, hometown community, physical infrastructure, and culture. They also tried to identify opportunity for positive change which included a strategic business development plan to help the local business and conceptua! ideas and proposals to engage the community. He Page 6 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 7 explained that the approach is more of a roadmap and is not intended to take place in the next year. He explained that they have engaged the community through community workshops, stakeholder interviews, the Stakeholders Working Group, City staff's presentations to neighborhood meetings, and through Council and Planning Commission meetings. Mr. Lister stated that the general visions and goals seem supportive and have sentiment towards preserving the historic character of the old-town area which includes the preservation of buildings, close-knit residences, and narrow streets. He explained that there is not necessarily a parking problem in the downtown area since there are always a number of unutilized parking spaces, although people have the perception that there is a problem. Mr, Lister explained that a strategic business development plan is often utilized when trying to build a healthy business environment to encourage diversity without diminishing the important, locally owned business community that exists. Mr. Lister stated that he has heard comments and concern over future development of the area. Some of the areas that have been looked at closer include development concepts, transportation improvements, business development, housing strategies, and implementation measures. Mr. Lister identified several catalyst sites with opportunity for development that were selected with input from staff and the Stakeholder's Working Group. In the selection process, they looked at introducing more mixed development, blending housing, commercial, and retail uses in the same development, and developing more private-public partnerships. The first area the group identified was the Gateway District which includes the Mill Creek Bridge and Front Street. The group saw the area as having a mixed use development potential. Mr. Lister presented slides which depicted examples of buildings and housing that could be used in compliment with the existing nature of the area. Another area that was identified was near the Public Works building and the Downtown Plaza. He explained that this site was also identified as a mixed use area and presented slides that indicated the new uses of the existing buildings. He explained that currently there is not a building height restriction and explained that the new plan sets athree-story building height limit. Mr. Lister spoke briefly on the City owned Association Building in the downtown area and the partially owned block near the Aquatic Center. Both areas should be examined in the future to determine their development potential. The group also looked at the potential ofone-way streets in the downtown area and streetscape improvements on the First Street intersections. He explained that one-way streets would not provide more parking but would give the perception that there is more total parking in closer proximity to the downtown businesses. The group looked at the Young Street Corridor and its potential redevelopment, and evaluated the right-of way impacts. Mr. Lister briefly discussed the Strategic Business Development Plan and explained that its purpose is to attract support for the business community and the downtown area. The plan requires ongoing community outreach, includes a housing strategy, and an implementation plan. Mr. Lister presented slides and discussed zoning in the downtown area that would allow for mixed use development. The group suggested strengthening the Architectural Design Standards and Guidelines to include the appropriate zoning for the new uses and add limitations to building heights. Mayor Figley invited the Council and Commission for any questions or comments. Page 7 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 8 36.4 Vice Chairperson Vancil inquired of the housing density in the downtown area and questioned whether it was too significant for an agricultural city. Mr. Lister stated that the plan is not requiring a greater level of density in the downtown area, it is limiting the density. The main driver behind the density limitation was parking and achieving the highest density of parking while still allowing the City's open space requirements. Commissioner Jennings stated that he would appreciate hearing the questions and comments from the public. He also reminded everyone that they could speak directly to the Council and Planning Commission without conflict of interest. 41.0 Mayor Figley offered an opportunity to share information and ask any clarifying questions. She also reminded the public that they will have an opportunity to voice opinions and points of view during the public hearing process. 0,~8 Tape 2 Side B Mr. Lister answered several questions from the public. He explained that the Association Building is the former Salad Medical CIinic Building, that the downtown area boundaries were selected arbitrarily, and clarified the location of the Mayor's Alley. He also explained that no additional changes to the 1998 plan were discussed regarding the Mayor's Alley. Mr. Lister was asked whether there would be any alterations to the railway line in the plan's twenty to thirty year lifespan. He explained that the plan does not include any alterations to the railroad. Many people have discussed having an Amtrak station in the downtown area, although it has not been proposed. Many changes and costs would be associated with accommodating such an ambitious project. 4.2 Mayor Figley introduced the Historic Neighborhood Association who would be giving a brief presentation on the "Old Settlemier" District. Presentation material was distributed and the slideshow can be viewed on the Association's website at www.settlemierhouse.com. Ruth Wells, Historic Neighborhood Association member. Ms. Wells presented a slideshow on the "Old Settlemier" District which contrasted photos of the historic downtown to the present downtown. The plan identified five major priorities: l }reducing . crime; 2) cleaning up and preserving authentic historic buildings; 3) reducing traffic; 4} reducing noise; and 5) reducing problem rentals. Ms. Wells thanked the Stakeholder's Working Group for all their work but reminded staff and the Commission that there were no members who were residents and not also business or government representatives. The Historic Neighborhood Association asked that city residents be included in the Downtown Redevelopment Leadership Committee. 21.7 Mayor Figley invited the Council, Commission, and the public to ask any questions of the Historic Downtown Association. Councilor Pugh asked if the Association's plan extends beyond the railroad tracks since there are several older homes on the east side of the tracks. Ms. Wells stated that the plan is limited to the west side of the railroad tracks although the group is concerned that the businesses just beyond the railroad tracks would create a traffic problem for the downtown area. Mayor Figley invited those who requested to speak to share their comments. Darrell Crays, Historic Neighborhood Association Chairman. Mr. Crays read a statement that expressed his concerns over the Downtown Development Plans focus on business Page 8 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 31, 2009 9 and high density housing. Mr. Crays asked that the City take the Association's recommendations into consideration and asked Council, the Commission, and staff to include the residents of the city in the Leadership Committee, rather than just business owners and government representatives. Merri Berlin, Historic Neighborhood Association member, Ms. Berlin read a statement that recapped the five priorities identified in the slideshow and gave examples of what the plan should include, which were all included in the 1998 Development Plan. Robert Clark, Woodburn resident. Mr. Clark stated that he is concerned over his safety and would like the plan to focus on reducing crime. He would like immediate and concentrated effort by the police department in the downtown area. Greg Lundeen, Wolfer's Heating. Mr. Lundeen stated that Wolfer's Heating has been operating in the community for nearly 100 years. He is concerned that the proposed zoning will deflate the value of his property. Bruce Thomas, Yes Graphics and Chairperson of the Stakeholder's Working Group. Mr. Thomas thanked the City, ODOT and OTAK staff that have worked on the project, the Stakeholder's Working Group, the Historic Neighborhood Association, and the citizens that participated in the interviews and participated in the workshops. He stated that he is pleased with the amount of focus on the downtown and hopes that the work will continue in a positive and organized way. Richard Lowry, Historic Neighborhood Association member. Mr. Lowry thanked the Council and the Commission for accepting input from individuals and the community. He stated that he does not believe the current reality of the downtown area has been factored into the proposed plan. He would like the plan to include input from the city's residents. He believes the proposed density is too high, the growth cannot be supported without first cleaning the area, and the one way streets would be unsafe. Don Judson, Executive Director of the Woodburn Area Chamber. Mr. Judson stated that there are many commonalities among the consultant's proposed plan and the Association's plan, and both groups want to preserve the historic Woodburn. He is glad that crime reduction, noise reduction, and rental problems are being discussed now, rather than when the plan is implemented. Several audience members stated that their views had already been expressed. Mayor Figley thanked those in attendance. 10.5 Mayor Figley closed the workshop at $:58 p.m.. APPROVED KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR ATTEST Mary Tennant, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 9 -Council Meeting Workshop Minutes, August 3l, 2009 10 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING 0001 DATE; COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, SEPTEMBER 14, 2009. CONVENED. The meeting convened at 1:00 p.m. with Mayor Figley presiding. 0015 ROLL CALL. Mayor Figley Present Councilor Berkey Absent Councilor Cox Present Councilor Lonergan Present Councilor McCallum Present Councilor Pugh Present Councilor Schmidt Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, Assistant City Administrator Stevens, City Attorney Shields, ,Public Works Director Brown, Community Development Director Hendryx, Acting Police Chief Blevins, Community Services Director Row, HR Assistant Sprauer, City Recorder Tennant OObO Mayor announced that Councilor Berkey has extended her resignation since she has moved out of her Ward and will no longer be able to serve as Councilor for Ward 6. She stated that under the Charter, this position will be filled by appointment and she encouraged anyone living within that Ward to contact her either by calling City Hali or through her a-mail so that she can discuss the position with them. She would like to make an appointment the first meeting of October. 0214 ANNOUNCEMENTS. A) Woodburn Public Library has resumed its Sunday operational hours from 1:00 pm until 5:00 p.m.. 0225 APPOINTMENTS. A} Economic Development Committee: Mayor Figley appointed the following individuals to serve on the Economic Development Committee: Walt Blomberg, Wendy Buck, Dave Christoff, Denis Gibson, John Hoffmann, Ruby Wolfer, Sheryl Southwell, Elias Villegas, Angelo Seminary, Tony Qrlandini, Brent Kerra, Frank Lonergan, and a Planning Commissioner yet to be named. Councilor Pugh asked whether she had considered the two names he had recommended. Mayor Figley stated that due to the size of the committee she did not add any additional members. Councilor Cox stated that the committee's size can be subject to change at later date. Page 1 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 11 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING Councilor McCallum stated that he had also made a recommendation to include members from outside the City of Woodburn that could bring resources to the committee. COX/MCCALLUM...approve the Mayor's appointments to the Economic Development Committee with the understanding that the committee size could increase or decrease since this is not a committee established by Council. The motion passed 4-1 with Councilor Pugh voting nay. Mayor Figley stated that she will take the names he suggested along with a couple of others under advisement. B) Recreation and Parks Board; Mayor Figley appointed Cheryl Shepherd to the Recreation and Parks Board with her term to expire December 12, 2012. SCHMIDT/MCCALLUM...approve the appointment of Cheryl Shepherd to the Recreation and Parks Board. 'l,he motion passed unanimously. Councilor McCallum requested that future staff reports include background information on the individual to be appointed. 0575 DECLARATION _OF WARD VI VACANCY. COX/MCCALLUM... declared Ward VI vacant due to the incumbent having moved out of the ward, and that the City accepts the resignation and vacancy with regret. The motion passed unanimously. 0660 PROCLAMATION; LIBRARY CARD SIGN-UP MONTH 2009. Mayor Figley read the proclamation declaring the month of September 2009 as Library Card Sign-up Month within the City and encouraged city residents to participate in this program and, for those who currently do not have a library card, visit the Library to obtain a card and use the services that are being provided. 0822 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT. Don Judson, Executive Director, presented the upcoming Chamber events and stated that an events calendar should be available on the Chamber's website beginning next month. Upcoming Chamber events: 1) Economic Development Committee meeting is scheduled for September 15`" at 9:00 a.m. at Chamber loft office; 2) Woodbum Area Tourism meeting is scheduled for September 15`h at 10:30 am at Chamber loft office; 3) Greeters will be hosted by Wolfer's Heating on September 18`~ at 7:30 a.m.; ~h 4) Greeters will be hosted by the Chamber in the Chamber's loft office on September 25 at 7:30 a.m. and a presentation will be given on the Historic Neighborhood Association; Page 2 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 12 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING 5}Career fair sponsored by the Armory and Chemeketa Community College will be hosted at the Woodburn Armory on September 18t" ftom 2:00 to 6:00 p.m.; b) Woodburn Downtown Association meeting is scheduled for September 23~; and 7) Energy, Water & Recycling seminar is scheduled for October 1 s` from 8:30 to l 1:30 at West Coast Bank east branch. 1039 WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT REPORT. Walt Blomberg, Superintendent, mentioned that the Woodburn Bulldogs won the football game against Roosevelt High School. Mr. Blomberg stated that one of the biggest issues raised at the last legislative session was bullying and harassment. He explained that Woodburn has a diverse student population and face many obstacles, but comparatively speaking, do not have the bullying and harassment problems that many of the other schools have throughout the state. Each year students are assessed through an anonymous survey and the results indicate that in each category measured, Woodburn students feel less harassed than the state average. He believes Woodburn schools are safe and free of harassment and hopes that it only improves. He also stated that despite the downturn in the economy, the student population has remained consistent and has not declined. Councilor McCallum also reminded the public that school is in session and lower speed limits are being enforced. Councilor Lonergan commended Mr. Blomberg an his interview on Channel 6 News. Mr. Blomberg gave an overview of the interview involving the assessment tests which includes English language learners. 1 S43 CONSENT AGENDA. A} approve the Council regular and executive session minutes of August 10, 2009; B) approve the Park and Recreation Board minutes of August 11, 2009 and September 8, 2009; C) accept the Community Services Department statistics for June and July 2009; D) accept the July 2009 Crime Statistics report; and E) approve the appointment of Terrie Stevens as Administrator Pro-Tem for the period of September 21 through September 25, 2009. Councilor Lonergan stated that the executive session minutes of August lOt" should be corrected to reflect his absence during the meeting. MCCALLUM/COX...adopt the Consent Agenda as presented with the correction in the executive session minutes. The motion passed unanimously. 1645 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL FOR PAYROLL SERVICES. LONERGAN/PUGH... accept the proposal of AmCheck in the amount of $34,718 to provide payroll services for the City of Woodburn. Councilor Schmidt questioned if the item could be postponed to the next meeting since he Page 3 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 13 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING has questions about the need for the services. He would personally like to keep payroll in-house if at all possible. Councilor Pugh stated that he also had questions about outsourcing payroll services but has discussed them with Assistant City Administrator Stevens and is now supportive of the changes being proposed. He explained that the City is no longer in the position of processing its payroll and applauded Assistant City Administrator Stevens for her work on this project. Assistant City Administrator Stevens explained that over the last twenty years, two long term employees have processed payroll, and now one of them is soon to retire and the other has already left. Our current payroll processes are very difficult to master and the software the City is using is due for an upgrade, but the City has opted not to upgrade it due to the cost. Many of the calculations are done manually. The City wanted to make sure payroll processing was covered by the end of year. If the contract is approved during this meeting, implementation can begin by October 2009. The contract will have a 60 day out clause to allow the new Finance Director to evaluate the best option. Councilor Schmidt inquired of the number of changes that are necessary each month. City Recorder Tennant stated that each month approximately 140 employees require manual adjustments. Certain components of FLSA need to be done manually and our current system does not calculate them. AmCheck will be capable of making those manual computations. Councilor Schmidt asked how long the City has used the current software. City Recorder Tennant stated that the City has used the current software since 2002. Councilor McCaIlum asked if AmCheck was a national company that supports other cities. Assistant City Administrator Stevens stated that AmCheck serves both public and private organizations. Councilor Cox asked if this payroll service would keep a balance of various employee leaves. Assistant City Administrator Stevens stated that all human resources records will be stored in the payroll system. Employees will also be given access to alI of their personal information and manager will have access to their employee's data online. Management will also have better access to reports. Councilor Lonergan asked if the company was capable of making automatic deposits. Assistant City Administrator Stevens stated that employees could elect to have direct deposit. Councilor Pugh stated that he does not generally support subcontracting payroll operations, but believes that in this case it is the right decision. Councilor Cox agreed with Councilor Pugh in that it is the right decision at this point in time, and also stated that it is a management decision. The motion passed 4-0-1, Councilor Schmidt abstained. Page 4 • Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 14 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING 2653 PHOTO RED LIGHT CAMERA SYSTEMS. SCHMIDT/COX...Pursuant to state law, "piggyback" onto the contract awarded to Redflex by the City of Albany and authorize staff to negotiate a contract for photo red light services with Redflex, Inc.. A representative from Redflex stated that once contract is approved the designs will be sent to the City their approval, and then to ODOT. It could be two weeks to multiple months before ODOT grants approval. The motion passed unanimously. 2902 AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR HADCASTLE STORM DRAIN CULVERT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -Bid #2009-10. Bids for the project were received from the following contractors: John Rice Excavating, inc., $44,109.00; Elting Northwest, Inc., $45,295.00; Cipriano & Son, $46,657.00; CR 'Woods Trucking, Inc., $47,569.00; Ground Hawg Environmental, $51,204.70; NW Kodiak Construction, $52,953.36; Kerr Contractors, Inc., $57,431.00; Emery & Sons Construction, $58,670.00; D & T Excavation, Inc., $63,489.88; Subcom Excavation, $66,675.00; E.D.G.E Excavating, $70,821.25; Gelco Construction Co, $73,521.50; and A-Affordable Excavating, Inc., $42,165.6$ (deemed as anon-responsive bidder). LONERGAN/MCCALLUM...award the construction contract for the Hardcastle Storm Drain Culvert Improvement Project to John Rice Excavating Inc. in the amount of $44,109.00. The motion passed unanimously. 2944 PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION: A) Community Development Director's approval of a pole sign at 285 S. Pacific Highway. Bam Properties LLC received approval of a Type II Design Review for a pole sign subject to conditions. Councilor Cox stated that he sent email to Community Development Director Hendryx and appreciated the Director's response, but mentioned that the staff report should include more background information so that the Council can make a decision without having to go to the location or through an in-depth reading of the order. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that he appreciated the comments and would work on preparing staff reports that provide more information. City Administrator Derickson asked when the Sign Committee might be done with the work and ready to make a recommendation. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the Sign Committee Focus Group will not be ready to make their recommendations for another six months. Page 5 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 15 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING 3544 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'SREPORT. A) Attended Red Cross "Real Heroes" Award Breakfast, in which two Woodburn Officers were recognized. There were approximately 400 people in attendance and it was a very moving and powerful presentation. Woodburn Proud worked with city staff to make the nomination. B) Participated in Local Government Personnel Institute (LGPI) training for two days last week on human resource issues. C) Invited Council to attend the League of Oregon Cities (LOC} 2009 Conference October 1 -3, 2009 at the Daubletree Hotel in Portland. He will attend and there will be many training and networking opportunities for the Council. Woodburn Proud also nominated the City for a Goad Governance Award. D}Involved with Chamber Board and will be serving on the Auction Dinner Committee to bolster the Chamber and will benefit Woodburn Proud. E) Community education on photo red light will be at the Rotary Club September 17, 2009. F}Citizen Police Academy has a full class and enough interested people to possibly fill one to two more classes. The Historic Downtown Association have been working on building interest. 3854 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS. Councilor Pugh stated that his impression is that it will be next spring before anything is done to add a safety walk to Salud Medical Center. He feels that it should not take a long period of time to address a safety issue, and does not want the issue to be forgotten. Public Works Director Brown stated that staff will be constructing a comprise in that the crosswalk will not be a fully signalized intersection that stops traffic. To do anything on an interim basis would be very difficult. The City must still issue a contract for the lighting design at the sidewalk area, and there are many other design details that must be addressed. He stated that the City has also faced a timing delay with the late response from Union Pacific to get the crossing orders in place. Councilor McCallum congratulated Woodburn Proud for the cleanup project and thanked the volunteers and Public Works for all of the work that have done. He stated that there were fewer volunteers during this cleanup event but the community seemed much cleaner to begin with than the first cleanup project. Councilor Schmidt questioned whether a "to-do" list could be created and listed at the bottom of the agenda. He also questioned whether a property owner should be responsible for a water bill fee when a tenant vacates a property with a balance due. City Administrator Derickson stated that the City's ordinance does not distinguish between alandlord/tenant relationship. The utility serves the property and not the individual and the property owner is ultimately responsible for the bill. Many Page 6 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 16 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 14, 2009 TAPE READING municipalities encourage landlords to require a deposit for this type of situation. City Administrator Derickson explained that taming water off to an occupied property is a serious decision that can create lifelsafety issues. Due process must be taken before water can be turned off. Public Works Director Brown stated that many would like delinquent bills to be forgiven like many other utility providers do. He explained that other utility providers turn delinquent bills to collection agencies but the City cannot do that. Ordinance 1995 clearly stated that outstanding bills must fall with the property and not with the individual, and requires a lien to be placed on the property. Councilor Pugh questioned whether enough notice is given to property owners. City Administrator Derickson stated that he will research the issue and report back to Council. Mayor Figley stated that she also attended Red Cross Hero's Breakfast and described it as a moving experience, and appreciated the opportunity to thank and applaud Sergeants Mikkola and Wilson. 5350 ADJOURNMENT. MCCALLUMICOX...meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m.. APPROVED KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR ATTEST Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 7 -Council Meeting Minutes, September 14, 2009 17 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O P W O O D B U R N PAGE 1 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME ^ ~ ~-~-- STATUS we______ STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT ____ __ RECONCILED AMT _---_~_ _ ____ __ DIFFERENCE ~__~________ aaanta:oxa ~ -aze=ws--a-ssa-e-xaaaa-aaC BANK ACCOUNT: AP A/P Accounts Payable a ______ ___ ~^ ~ ~ ~ 97955 6/30/2009 ELISABETH F CULTON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 243.29 243.24 .00 97956 6/02/2009 AFLAC REMITTANCE PROCESS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 763.54 763.54 .00 97957 6/02/2009 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 47,20 47.20 .00 97958 6/02/2009 ASIFLEX RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 119.00 119.00 .00 97959 6/02/2009 CASCADE COLLECTION INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 51.00 51.00 .00 97960 6/02/2009 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YE5 236.58 236.58 .00 9'7961 6/02/2009 COLUMBIA COLLECTION SERV RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 212.37 212.37 .00 9796"1. 6/02/2009 CRISIS CHAPLAINCY SERVICE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 115.00 115.00 .00 97963 6/02/2009 EBS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 127,878.11 127,878.11 .00 97969 6/02/2009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 40 RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 702.01 702.01 .00 97965 6/02/2009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AGT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 23,571.88 23,571.88 .00 97966 6/02/2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 9,327.36 4,327.36 .00 97967 6/02/2009 MARK B COMSTOCK RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 787.39 767.39 .00 97968 6/02/2009 MISDU RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES BD8.50 808.50 .00 97969 6/02/2009 OR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 568,29 568.24 .QO 97970 6/02/2009 OR TERRITORY FEDERAL CR U RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 3,719.00 3,719,00 .00 97972 6/02/2009 UNITED STATES TREASURY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 205.00 205.00 .00 97973 6/02/2009 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 237.10 237.10 ,00 97974 6/02/2009 WOODBURN POLICE ASSOCIATI RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,210.00 1,210.00 .00 97975 6/30/2049 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 161.80 161.80 .00 97976 6/30/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES B6B.95 868.95 .00 97977 6/05/2009 AARON N DEVOE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 29.00 29.00 .00 97978 6/05/2009 ACCJT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 290.00 290.00 .00 97979 6/05/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #45 RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 793.25 793.25 .00 97980 6/05/2009 AMA20N.COM CREDIT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,835.53 1,835.53 .00 97981 6/05/2009 ANIXTER INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 56.31 56.31 .00 97982 6/05/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 102.98 102.98 .00 97983 6/05/2009 ASAP SOFTWARE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 317.33 317.33 .00 97984 6/05/2009 BATTERIES NORTHWEST RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 299.25 299,25 .00 97985 6/05/2009 BEN GILLESPIE RECONCILED 6/30/2049 YES 77.00 7?,00 .00 97986 6/05/2009 BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 175.38 175.38 .00 97987 6/05/2009 BRIAN MILES RECONCILED 6f 30/2009 YES 29.99 29.99 .00 97968 6/05/2009 C.J. HANSEN CO INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,939.66 1,939.68 .00 97989 6/05/2009 CANBY TELECOM RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 19.95 19.95 .00 97990 6/05/2009 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 268.00 268.00 .00 97991 6/05/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 432.09 432.09 .00 97992 6J05/2009 L. CRAIG HALUPOWSKI RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 80.00 80.00 .00 97993 6/05/2009 DATAVISION COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 279.69 279.64 .00 97999 6/05/2009 DEMCO INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 78.39 76.39 .00 97995 6/05/2009 ENVIRO-CLEAN EQUIPMENT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 221.55 221.55 .00 97996 6/05/2009 GALE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 396.20 396,20 .00 97997 6/05/2009 GALL'S ARAMARK CO RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 158.74 158.79 .00 97998 6/05/2009 GAYLORD BROS INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 75.38 75.38 .00 97999 6/05/2009 HARPER,HOUF,PETERSON,RIGH RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YE5 16,602.00 16,802.00 .00 98000 6/05/2009 HYDRO-TEMP MECHANICAL INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,057.10 1,057.10 .00 98001 6/05/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 124.36 124.36 .00 98002 6/05/2009 ISOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YE5 754.00 754.00 .00 98003 6/05/2009 JANWAY COMPANY USA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 100.63 100.63 .00 98004 6/05/2009 JEANNIE ROGERS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 25.86 25.86 .00 98005 6/05/2009 JET HEATING INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 4,674.18 4,674.18 .00 98006 6/05/2009 JONATHAN STUART RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 19.99 19.99 .00 98007 6/05/2009 JONE5 AND BARTLETT PUBLIS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 65.18 85.18 .00 18 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 2 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 19:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # assn.•msa CHECK DATE soassas.s PAYEE NAME ss STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AM T DIFFERENCE 98008 a~ 6/05/2009 zCZZaa seaesee.aassa_nssas JULIE MOORE sssssaasssss RECONCILED o-o.ssssszsaass 6/30/2009 aaaazzze YES s..aazzzsss_aes 34.81 sasamsssssssszsaesex 34.81 zaazezasasaaaaW .00 98009 6/05/2009 KEITH A KIMBERLIN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 270.00 270.00 .00 98010 6/05/2409 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC RECONCILBD 6/30/2009 YES 3,695.00 3,695.00 .00 98011 6/05/2009 M & M AUTO WRECKING INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98012 6/05/2009 MARION COUNTY CLERK RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 91.00 41.00 .QO 98013 6/05/2009 NEOPOST LEASING RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 111.52 111.52 .00 98014 6/05/2009 NET ASSETS CORPORATION RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 460.00 460.00 .00 98015 6/05/2009 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,113.36 2,113.36 .00 98016 6/05/2009 NICHOLAS D WILSON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 273.38 273.38 .00 98017 b/05/2009 NITA J MARR RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 37.50 37.50 .00. 98018 6/05/2009 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 4,365.00 4,365.00 .00 98019 6/05/2009 OR EMPLOYMENT DEPT TAX UN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,022.43 2,022.43 .00 96020 6/05/2009 OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75 RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 3,168.83 3,168.83 .00 96021 6/05/2009 OREGON GLOVE COMPANY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 49.70 99.70 .00 96022 6/05/2009 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 214.26 214.26 .00 98023 6/05/2009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,934.41 2,934.41 .00 98029 6/05/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 35,297,08 35,297.08 .00 98025 6/05/2009 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLY INC RECONCILBD 6/30/2009 YES 57.00 57.00 .00 98026 6/05/2009 RALPH HARRIS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 79.20 79.20 .00 98027 6/05/2009 RMT EQUIPMENT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,028.29 1,028.29 .00 98028 6/05/2009 SALEM PRINTING-BLUEPRINT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 99.00 99.00 .00 98029 6/05/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,553.26 1,553.26 .00 98030 6/05/2009 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 750.00 750.00 .00 98031 6/05/2009 U.S. BANK RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 2,716.21 2,776.21 .00 98032 6/05/2009 WAVE BROADBAND RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 317.23 317.23 .00 98033 6/05/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1?9.55 179.55 .00 98034 6/05/2009 WILLIAM H REILLY & CO RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 917.46 917.46 .40 98035 6/05/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 648.00 648.00 .00 98036 6/30/2009 EBS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,927.09 1,927.09 .00 98037 6/30/2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 172.01 172.01 .00 98038 6/30/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 819.26 619.26 .00 98039 6/12/2009 ALEE' A ROBBINS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 92.50 92.50 .00 98040 6/12/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES X45 RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,361.55 1,361.55 .00 98041 6/12/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 434.90 434.90 .00 98042 6/12/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM & EQUI RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YE5 2,319.60 2,319.60 .00 98043 6/12/2009 C & S PRODUCTS INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 978.34 9?8.39 .00 98094 6/12/2009 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 984.00 984.00 .00 98045 6/12/2009 L. CRAIG HALUPOWSKI RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 800.00 800.00 .00 98046 6/12/2009 DAVID HIGGINBOTHAM RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 135.00 135.00 .00 98097 6/12/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 100.00 100.40 .00 98098 6/12/2009 DONALD DOLENC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 46.69 46.69 .00 98049 6/12/2009 FLOMER FURNITURE & APPLIA RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,189.00 1,189.00 .00 98050 6/12/2009 G.K. MACHINE INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,073.85 1,073.85 .00 98051 6/12/2009 GRAINGER INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES b1.65 61.65 .00 98052 6/12/2009 HEATHER PIERSON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 17.99 17.99 .00 98053 6/12/2009 IDEXX DISTRI$UTION INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 645.75 b45.75 .00 98054 6/12/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 160.08 160.08 .00 98055 6/12/2009 J. THAYER COMPANY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 139.00 139.00 .00 98056 6/12/2009 JACK'S OVERHEAD DOOR INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 395.00 395.00 .00 98057 6/12/2009 JET HEATING INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,035.00 1,035.00 .00 98058 6/12/2009 JORGE GASPAR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1b.50 16.50 .00 98059 6/12/2009 KEITH A KIMBERLIN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 517.00 517.00 .00 98060 6/12/2004 KEITH'S SPORTING GOODS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 151.80 151.80 .00 19 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D S U R N PAGE 3 DATE 9/21/09 AP0960 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED ~~~~~~~~~~a_saaassxs CHECK AMOUNT emas3a.ce.e -~ RECONCILED AMT L»2..»CaCCa~»__.ec DIFFERENCE eeaaaa»aSaaLaa! =xsasa»» 98061 »»»»~~=ec». 6/12/2009 .=a=~.~~~..___-_-»._ LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORP .. RECONCILED -- 6/30/2009 YES 1,422.00 1,422.00 .00 98062 6/12/2009 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 148.50 148.50 .00 98063 6/12/2009 LEGACY WIRELESS SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 6,923.06 6,923.00 .00 98069 6/12/2009 LOWE'S RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 11.94 11.94 .00 98065 6/12/2009 MARION COUNTY BLDG INSPEC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 923.12 923.12 .00 98066 6/12/2009 MOVIE LICENSING USA RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 290.00 290.00 .04 9$067 6/12/2009 MT ANGEL PUBLISHING RECONCILED 6/30/2449 YES 300.00 300.00 .00 98068 6/12/2009 NATALIE LABOSSIERE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 32.24 32.24 .00 98069 6/12/2009 NORCOM RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 26,374.09 26,374.09 .00 98070 6/12/2009 NURNBERG SCIENTIFIC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 167.93 167.93 .00 98071 6/12/2009 OLYMFIA BOOK CORP RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 493.87 493.87 .00 98072 6/12/2009 OR CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 584.87 584.87 .00 98073 6/12/2009 OR DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 665.66 665.66 .00 98074 6/12/2009 OR STATE POLICE ID SERVIC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 12.00 12.00 .00 98075 6/i2/2009 PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING RECONCILED 6/34/2009 YES 13,247.78 13,247.78 .00 98076 6/12/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 40,849.62 90,849.62 .00 98077 6/12/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 191 08 191.08 .00 98078 6/12/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,085.60 2,085.60 .00 98079 6/12/2009 5.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 159.00 159.00 .00 98080 6/12/2009 SALVADOR GODINEZ RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 650.00 650.00 .00 98081 6/12/2009 SANTIAGO KENT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 200.00 200.00 .00 98082 6/12/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 191.47 191.47 .00 98083 6/12/2009 SPORTS SUPPLY GROUP INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 438.79 438.74 .00 98084 6/i2/2o09 SPRINT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 99.99 49.99 .00 98085 6/17./2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 804.90 804.90 .00 98086 6/12/2009 TAYLOR MOTORCYCLE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,398.40 1,348.40 .00 98087 6/12/2009 THE G.R.E.A.T PROMOTIONAL RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 607.38 607.38 .00 98088 6/12/2009 TIMOTHY COBOS RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 298.81 298.81 .00 98089 6/12/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 6/30/2049 YES 80.66 60.66 .00 98090 6/12/2049 VIKING INSTRUMENT LA80RAT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 98091 6/12/2009 WOLFERS HEATING & AIR CON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,425.C0 2,425.00 .00 98092 6/12/2009 WOODBURN HEARING CENTER RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 35.25 35.25 .00 98093 6/12/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 3,140.13 3,190.13 .00 98094 6/12/2009 9li SUPPLY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 175.96 175.96 .00 98095 6/30/2009 SCOTT STINSON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .04 98096 6/30/2009 DOLLAR TREE STORE INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98097 6/18/2009 AGNES KELLY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 52.00 52.00 .00 96098 6/18/2009 AIM INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 67.08 67.08 .00 98099 6/18/2009 ALEXIN ANALYTICAL LAA INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 463.00 463.00 .04 98100 6/18/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 6/30/2004 YE5 84.18 84.18 .04 98141 6/18/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 6/30/i009 YBS 58.27 58.27 .04 98102 6/18/2009 AWARDS AND ATHLETICS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 377.49 377.49 .00 98103 6/18/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM & EQUI RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 371.17 371.17 .00 98104 6/18/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 189.33 189.33 .00 98105 6/18/2009 CENTER POINT LARGE PRINT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 580.82 580.82 .00 98106 6/18/2009 CHARLES JOHNSON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 4.00 4.00 .00 98107 6/18/2009 CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY LOLL RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 498.78 498.78 .00 98108 6/18/2009 CRIMINAL INFORMATION SERV RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 92.00 42.00 .00 96] 09 6/18/2009 DK & ASSOCIATES INC RECONCILED 6/30/2049 YES 4,646.25 9,646.25 .00 . 98110 6/18/2009 DON SCHUETZ RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 24.00 24.00 .00 98111 b 18/2009 EBSCO SUBSCRIPTION SERV RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,285.00 1,z85.4o .oo 98112 6/18/2049 ENTENMANN-ROVIN COMPANY RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,081.60 1,081.80 .00 98113 6/18/2009 FLORA STANISICH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 13.00 13.00 .00 zo WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 4 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # ..r--eass CHECK DATE sa PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 98114 a~a_a ~: 6/18/2009 y__eaasseaee=eeev=xe==sze=R FRANCIS CHITWOOD =e.=czzaeean RECONCILED ase~a==x=G=L=a: 7/31/2009 eax=x=aa YES a==s=c=ee3seaea 9.00 =x~sae===ov=seeLxsxx 9.00 x=zasxa=maasas= .00 98115 6/18/2009 GALE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 343.03 343.03 .00 98116 6/18/2009 GELCO CONSTRUCTION RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 3,825.00 3,825.00 .00 98117 6/18/2009 GRAINGER INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 115.02 115.02 .,00 98118 6/18/2009 GREAT WESTERN SWEEPING IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 9,052.13 9,052.13 .00 98119 6/18/2009 GROUP MACKENZIE ENGR INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,269.28 1,269.28 .00 98120 6/18/2009 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 4,123.16 4,123.16 .00 98121 6/16/2009 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 330.78 330.78 .00 98123 6/18/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 21.44 21.44 .DO 98124 6/16/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,552.89 2,5S2.84 .00 98125 6/18/2009 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 160.00 160.00 .00 98126 6/18/2009 JACKIE BALE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 20.00 20.00 .00 98127 6/18/2009 JERRY JANSZEN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 9.00 4.00 .00 98128 6/18/2009 KUSTOM KREATIONS OF OREGO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 166.80 166.80 .00 98129 6/18/2009 M & M AUTO WRECKING INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 58.00 58.00 .00 98130 6/18/2009 MELBA HENDERSON RECONCILED 6/30/2409 YES 10.00 10.00 .00 98131 6/18/2009 MICHAEL FREDERICK RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 16.00 16.00 .00 98132 6/18/2009 MONIQUE HULLING-ADAMS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 9.00 9.00 .00 98134 6/18/2009 NExTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,553.50 1,553.50 .00 98135 6/18/2009 NORTHWEST GEOTECH INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,291.95 1,291.95 .00 9$136 6/18/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 907.41 907.41 .00 98137 6/18/2009 OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAM RECONCILED ?j31/2009 YES 19,878.87 19,878.87 .00 98138 6/18/2009 ONE CALL CONCEPTS INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 73.50 73.50 .00 98139 6/18/2009 OR DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 14.50 14.50 .00 98140 6/18/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 16.74 16.74 .00 98141 6/18/2009 OR PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 15.00 15.00 .00 98242 6/18/2009 OR RECREATION & PARKS ASS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 400.00 400.00 .00 98143 6/18/2009 PACIFIC OFFICE FURNISHING RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,910.18 2,910.18 .00 98149 6/18/2009 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 58.60 58.60 .00 98145 6/18/2009 PARC 55 HOTEL RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 568.26 568.26 .00 98146 6/18/2009 PATRICIA BASILE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 25.00 25.00 .00 98147 6/18/2009 PATRICIA EWING RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 9.00 9.00 .00 96148 6/18/2009 PATRICIA THURRELL RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 8.00 8.00 .00 98149 6/18/2009 QUALITY CONCRETE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,277.64 1,277.64 .00 98150 6/18/2009 RICARDO FUENTE RECONCILED b/30/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 98151 6/18/2009 RUTH GALLANT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 12.00 12.00 .00 98152 6/16/2009 RYAN NERCO CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 341.36 341.36 .00 98153 6/18/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 134.48 139.98 .00 98154 6/18/2009 SANTIAM BICYCLE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 2,752.10 2,752.10 .00 98155 6/18/2009 SHERATON TAMPA RIVERWALK RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 439.04 439.04 .40 98156 6/18/2009 SHERATON TAMPA RIVERWALK RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 439.04 439.04 .00 98157 6/18/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 197.05 197.05 .00 98158 6/18/2009 SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION GROUP RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 15,765.92 15,765.92 .00 98159 6/18/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,729.41 1,729.41 .00 98160 6f 18/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 26.84 26.84 .00 98161 6/18/2009 SU$WAY SANDWICHES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 80.00 80.00 .00 98162 6/18/2009 SUE FOFANA-DURA RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 129.00 129.00 .00 98163 6/18/2009 SUSAN K SAUSE, P.C. RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,600.00 1,600.00 .00 98164 6/18/2009 T-MOBILE RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 249.95 249.95 .00 98165 6/18/2009 TOWN AND COUNTRY LANES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 72.00 ?2.00 .00 98166 6/18/2009 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 60.00 60.00 .00 98167 6/18/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 94.87 44.87 .00 98168 6/18/2009 WEST PAYMENT CENTER RECONCILED 6/30/2049 YES 396.68 396.68 .00 21 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 5 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA C~{ECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE _=__---- 98169 --s__=___xsz 6/18/2009 xzs_szzzzaxaxaaz~a_xs_____s WILCO FARMERS sassxsaxsxxx RECONCILED __x_xxxxxxxsax: 6/30/2009 ssxx~s~a YES axrz~..~zaxaxxxs 673.25 axaazaa=zzszssaazsaa 673.25 az_zzszszxxssas .00 98170 6/18/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 59.85 59.85 .00 98171 6/18/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,677.60 1,677.60 .00 98172 6/30/2609 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 693.22 693.22 .QO 98173 6/30/2009 MAPS CREDIT UNION RECONCILED 6/30/2069 YES 128,929.25 126,929.25 .00 98179 6/30/2009 INDEPENDENT PUBLISHING RE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .DO 98175 6/30/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 200.00 200.00 .00 98176 6/30/2009 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 120.00 120.00 .DO 98177 6/30/2009 FUNLAND JUMPERS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98178 6/30/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 537.28 537.28 .00 98179 6/30/2009 POLICE TRAINING CONSULTAN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 400.00 400.00 .00 98180 6/30/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 190.07 190.07 .00 98181 6/30/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 6/30/2009 YES 1,350.00 1,350.00 .00 98182 6/29/2009 AFLAC REMITTANCE PROCESS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 763.54 763.59 .00 98183 6/29/2009 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 47.20 47.20 .00 98184 6/29/2009 ASIFLEX RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 115.50 115.50 .00 98185 6/29/2009 CASCADE COLLECTION INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 113.00 113.00 .00 98186 6/29/2009 CITY OF WOODBURN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 179.42 179.42 .00 98187 6/29/2009 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 236.58 236.58 .00 98188 6/29/2009 CRISIS CHAPLAINCY SERVICE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 115.00 115.00 .00 98189 6/29/2009 EBS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 126,557.49 126,557.49 .00 98190 6/29/2009 FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 147.80 147.80 .04 96191 6/29/2009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 40 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 762.01 702.01 .00 98192 5/29/2009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AGT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 24,074.60 24,074.60 .00 98193 6/29/2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,379.90 4,374.90 .00 98194 6/29/2009 MARK B COMSTOCK RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 767.39 787.39 .00 98195 6/29/2009 MISDU RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 808.50 808.50 .00 98196 6/24/2009 OR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,990.29 1,490.29 .00 98197 6/29/2009 OR TERRITORY FEDERAL CR U RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,519.00 3,519.00 .00 98198 6/29/2009 OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,029.48 3,024.48 .00 98199 6/29/2009 UNITED STATES TREASURY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 .00 98200 6/29/2009 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 237.10 237.10 .00 98201 6/29/2009 WOODBURN POLICE ASSOCIATI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,210.00 1,210.00 .00 98202 6/30/2009 A & A PEST CONTROL INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 294.00 294.00 .00 98203 6/30/2009 AARON N DEVOE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 24.99 24.94 .00 98209 6/30/2009 ADVANCED RV PAINTING & RE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .00 98205 6/30/2009 AG WEST SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 134.90 134.90 .60 98206 6/30/2009 AIM INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 67.08 67.08 .OD 98207 6/30/2009 ALL CLEAN PRESSURE WASHIN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,600.00 1,600.00 .00 98208 6/30/2009 ALPHA PROVEN ECOLOGICAL RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 89.00 89.00 .00 98209 6/30/2009 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 678.00 678.00 .00 98210 6/30/2009 AMERIMERC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 113.79 113.79 .00 98211 6/30/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,428.34 2,428.34 .00 98212 6/30/2009 ARROW STRIPPING & PAINTIN RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 1,299.00 1,299.00 .00 98213 6/30/2009 ASHLAND BROTHERS LANDSCAP RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 446.69 446.69 .00 98214 b/30/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 131.04 131.09 .00 98215 6/30/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 73.27 73.27 .00 98216 6/30/2009 AUTO ADDITIONS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2609 YES 494.73 444.73 .00 98217 6/30/2009 BATTERIES NORTHWEST RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 403.55 403.55 .00 98218 6/30/2009 BBC STEEL RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 186.00 186.00 .00 98219 6/30/2009 BEST EXPRESSION INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 594.05 549.05 .00 98220 6/30/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 404.59 904.59 .00 98221 6/30/2009 DLUMENTHAL UNIFORM 6 EQUI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 754.19 759.19 .00 z2 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 6 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE __=xazsxx 98222 aaaes~;=o~_ 6/30/2009 _s~sasaasasas=----___aaa_ex BROADViEw SECURITY act:asscaeasa RECONCILED acee_ssscess=a~ 7/31/2009 sss~z~== YES a.evo~aa~~~a__o 32.99 ev.oeexcoo_.c..eeova 32.99 ao.a.aeeeeeseea .00 98223 6/30/2009 CANBY TROPHIES & AWARDS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 141.50 141.50 .00 98224 6/30/2409 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 268.00 268.00 .00 98225 6/30/2009 CASCADE POOLS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 5.89 5.89 .00 98226 6/30/2009 CASE AUTOMOTIVE INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 988.19 988.19 .00 98227 6/30/2009 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 106.82 106.82 .DO 48228 6/30/2009 CAZ CREATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 654.00 654.00 .00 98229 6/30/2009 CH2M-HILL INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 14,980.79 14,980.79 .0.0 98230 6/30/2009 COASTAL FARM NOME SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,094.04 1,094.04 .00 98231 6/30/2009 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,830.14 1,830.19 .00 98232 6/30/2009 COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERV RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,350.00 1,350.00 .00. 98233 6/30/2009 COLUMBIA INSPECTION INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,156.30 3,158.30 .00 98234 6/30/2009 CON50LIDATED SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 98.58 98.58 .0.0 98235 6/30/2049 CUE5 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 428.44 428.44 .00 98236 6/30/2009 TEE'S PLUS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 544.84 544.84 .00 98237 6/30/2009 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 261.38 261.38 .00 98238 6/30/2009 DAN SHERER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 19.00 19.00 .00 98239 6/30/2009 DAVISON AUTO PARTS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,149.34 4,149.34 .00 98240 6/30/2009 DEBBIE WADLEIGH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 744.08 744.08 .00 98241 6/30/2009 CHARLOTTE CHAMBERLAIN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 153.31 153.31 .00 98242 6/30/2009 DENNIS GIBBON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42.32 42.32 .00 98243 6/30/2009 OR DEPT OF CONSUMER AND H RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 76.80 76.80 .00 98244 6/30/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 98245 6/30/2009 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 167.04 167.04 .00 98246 6/30/2009 DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 230.40 230.40 .00 98247 6/30/2009 ELISABETH F CULTON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 423.50 423.50 .00 98248 6/30/2009 ENGELMAN ELECTRIC INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,135.48 2,135.48 .00 98299 6/30/2009 EVERETT HEMSHORN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 105.34 105.34 .00 98250 6/30/2009 FASTENAL COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 283.57 283.57 .00 98251 6/30/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 194.26 194.26 .00 98252 6/30/2009 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 955.80 955.80 .00 98253 6/30/2009 FISHER FARM & LAWN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 310.23 310.23 .00 98254 6/30/2009 FISHER SCIENTIFIC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 32.23 32.23 .00 96255 6/30/2009 FISHER'S SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 938.10 938.70 .00 98256 6/30/2009 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 676.11 676.11 .00 98257 6/30/2009 PRONTIER GEOSCIENCES INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,068.00 3,068.40 .QO 98258 6/30/2009 G.W. HARDWARE CENTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,412.19 1,412.19 .00 98259 6/30/2409 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT CO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 168.00 168.00 .00 98260 6/30/2009 GRAINGER INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 300.24 300.29 .00 98261 6/30/2009 HACH CHEMICAL CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 997.36 997.36 .00 98262 6/30/2009 HALTON COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 956.97 956.97 .00 98263 6/30/2009 HARPER,HOUF,PETERSON,RIGH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 10,565.14 10,565.14 .00 98264 6/30/2009 HILLYER'S MID CITY FORD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 6,663.67 6,663.67 .00 98265 6/30/2009 HOME DEPOT GECF RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 129.00 129.00 .00 9826b 6/30/2009 HUBBARD CHEVROLET RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 714.89 714.89 .00 98268 6/30/2009 HYDRO-TEMP MECHANICAL INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 635.00 635.00 .OD 98264 6/30/2009 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 370.09 370.09 .00 96270 6/30/2009 INDUSTRIAL WELDING SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 231.67 231.67 .00 96271 6/30/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 231.15 231.15 .00 98272 6/30/2009 INNOCORP LTD RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 1,097.10 1,097.10 .00 98273 bJ30/2009 J. 7HAYER COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YBS 16.77 16.77 .00 98274 6/30/2009 J. WARD O'BRIEN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 178.02 178.02 .00 98275 6/30/2009 JACK RAWLINGS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 775.20 775.20 .00 23 w00DBURN LIVE C I T Y O F w 0 0 D B U R N PAGE 7 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE eea_c_=_ 98276 eeae_=e=..a_ 6/30/2009 a_saa=a.eca~s~assxa_~__s.xs JASON TLUSTY oa.eae.ooa.o RECONCILED es,.naoas..anrs 7/31/2009 s_sec.s. YES ~:ennxaane_n.=v 41.10 nevsc~sa_,a~xsaase~x 41.10 amzscss_zaaaeax .00 48277 6/30/2009 JIM ROW RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 221.61 221.61 .00 98278 6/30/2009 JOHN HUNTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 136.00 136.00 .00 98279 6/30/2009 KEY CREATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 20.51 20.51 .00 98280 6/30/2009 KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 174.60 174.60 .00 98281 6/30/2009 KOMPETITIVE EDGE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,227.76 1,227.76 .00 98282 6/30/2009 L.A. POLICE GEAR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,437.60 1,437.60 .00 98283 6/30/2009 LA8 SAFETY SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 377.87 377.87 .00 98284 6/30/2009 LABCONCO CORP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 403.87 403.87 .04 98285 6/30/2009 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 20.00 20.00 .00 98286 6/30/2009 LECOR TECHNOLOGY LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 520.00 520.00 .00 98287 6/30/2009 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,528.73 2,528.73 .00 98288 6/30/2009 LONG BROS/L&L BUILDING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,730.98 1,730.98 .00 98289 6/30/2009 LOU GOTTLIEB RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 388.01 388.01 .00 98290 6/30/2009 LOWE'S TROPHY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 12.50 12.50 .00 98291 6/30/2009 MAC TOOLS DISTRIBUTOR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 89.95 89.95 .00 98242 6/30/2009 MAGNAMATIC CORP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,719.36 1,719.36 .00 98293 6/30/2009 MARGARET LAMBERT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 151.34 151.34 .00 98294 6/30/2009 MARY TENNANT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42.90 42.90 .00 98295 6/30/2009 METROCOUNT (USA) INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,278.00 1,278.00 .00 98296 6/30/2009 MID COLUMBIA BUS CO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 419.00 419.00 .00 98297 6/30/2009 MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 192.00 192.00 .00 98298 6/30/2009 MID-VALLEY CYCLES LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 259.20 259.20 .00 98299 6/30/2009 MIKE ARAIZA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 101.90 101.90 .00 98300 6/30/2009 MOEHNKE MACHINERY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,275.00 2,275.00 .00 98301 6/30/2009 MOLALLA COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 149.70 149.70 .00 98302 6/30/2009 MUFFLERS, HITCHES & MORE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 44.24 44.24 .00 98303 6/30/2009 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 830.70 834.70 .00 98304 6/30/2009 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 140.00 190.00 .00 98305 6/30/2009 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,227.15 2,227.15 .00 98306 6/30/2009 NICKLAUS WEATHERMON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 45.76 45.76 .00 98307 b/30/2009 VITA J MARR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 33.50 33.50 .00 98308 6/30/2009 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 713.29 713.29 .DO 48309 6/30/2009 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 949.00 949.00 .00 98310 6/30/2009 NURNBERG SCIENTIFIC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 271.75 271.75 .00 98311 6/30/2009 NW CURRENT ENERGY LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 102.00 102.00 .OD 98312 6/30/2009 0R DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 75.00 75.00 .00 98313 6/30/2009 OREGON VINEYARD SUPPLY RECONCILED 7(31/2009 YES 239.79 234.79 .00 98314 6/30/2009 OSI BATTERIES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 187.51 187.51 .00 98315 6/30/2009 OVS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,897.73 1,897.73 .00 98316 6/30/2Q09 PAPE' MACHINERY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 477.51 477.51 .00 98317 6/30/2009 PAUL'S POWER EQUIPMENT & RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 28.50 28.50 .00 98318 6/30/2009 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 438.35 438.35 .00 98319 6/30/2009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,636.07 3,636.07 .00 98320 6/30/2009 PHOENIX ASPHALT & MAIN CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 9,760.00 9,760.00 .00 98321 6/30/2009 PORTER W YETT CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 944.84 944.84 .00 98322 6/30/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 20,972.10 20,972.10 .00 98323 6/30/2009 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,206.40 1,206.40 .00 98329 6/30/2009 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 47.98 47.98 .00 98325 6/30/2009 RALPH HARRIS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 266.38 266.38 .00 98326 6/30/2009 RANDALL G LANGBEHN INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 262.00 262.00 .00 98327 6/30/2009 RMT EQUIPMENT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 156.18 156.18 .00 98328 6/30/2009 S.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 145.00 145.00 .00 24 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B ll R N PAGE 8 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME - STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE. s..e.. e 98329 er_-_s-~-~•- 6/30 2049 / -~_z---_- -a-----a-s---~-_= SAFARI SAM'S ==sxsxssxssn RECONCILED ==x-^-ssxasa-=r 7 31 2009 / / arss---- YES -----=ero=====z 284.80 c==r=as=xssza-.=---- 284'80' =s=sa~aasaa=mac .00 98330 6/30/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 18.99 18.99 .00 98331 6/30/2009 SCHETKY NORTHWEST SALES RECONCILED. 7/31/2009 YES 193.79 193.79 .00 98332 6/30/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 121.61 121.61 .00 98333 6/30/2009 SILVERFLEET SYSTEMS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,388.15 4,388.15 .00 98334 6/30/2009 SOIL MOISTURE EQUIPMENT C RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 872.70 872,70 .00 98335 6/30/2009 SOLO PRINTING-EMBROIDERY- RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 399.50 394.50 .00. 98336 6/30/2009 SPRINT (AIRLINK) RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 700.00 700.00 .00 98337 6/30/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 899.08 899.08 .00, 98338 6/30/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 102.92 102.92 .00. 98339 6/30/2009 SUZANNE LEIGH RECONCILED 7/312009 YES 100.00 100.00 .0.0, 98340 6/30/2009 TAMMY GENTRY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,175.OQ 1,175.00 .00~ 98341 6/30/2009 TAYLOR MOTORCYCLE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 258.45 258.45 .00 98342 6/30/2009 TEREX UTILITIES INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 7,054.91 7,054.41 .00 98343 b/30/2009 TICOR TITLE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 400.00 400.00 .00 98344 6/30/2009 TIM QUINN SR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 80.b7 80.b7 .00 48345 6/30/2009 TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 190.80 190.84 .00 98346 6/30/2009 ULINE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 338.22 338.22 .00 98347 6/30/2009 U.S. BANK RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,909.37 2,404.37 .00 98348 6/30/2009 VALLEY PACIFIC FLORAL RECONCILED 7131/2009 YES 64,85 69.85 .00 98349 6/30/2009 WATERSHED INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 529.70 529.70 .00 98350 6130/2009 WENDELL B AMSTUTZ RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 211.50 211.50 .00 98351 6/30/2009 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 514.2? 519.27 .00 98352 6/30/2009 WHOLESALE REPLACEMENT HAR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 686.10 686.10 .00 98353 6/30/2009 WILLAMETTE CHAP RED CROSS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 126.80 126.80 .00 98354 6/30/2009 WILLIAM GABBER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 264.50 264.50 .00 98355 6/34/2009 WILLIAM H REILLY & CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,722.18 2,722.18 .00 98356 6/30/2009 WILLIAM NIGHTINGALE RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 32.04 32.04 .04 98357 6/30/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 397.98 34?.98 .00 98356 6/30/2009 LELAND FOSTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 141.19 141.19 .00 98359 6/30/2009 WOODBURN RADIATOR & GLASS RECONCILED 7131/2009 YES 120.00 120.00 .00 98360 6/30/2009 XEROX CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 289.23 289.23 .00 983b1 6/30/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,186.20 1,186.20 .00 98362 6/30/2009 ZERO WASTE USA INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 698.97 698.97 .00 98363 6/34/2009 911 SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 103.95 103.95 .00 98364 6/30/2009 OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 51.24 51.24 .00 98365 7/31/2009 WILLIAM S COLEMAN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .00 98366 7/31/2009 DAVID LUND/JAME5 HALTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,451.00 3,451.00 .00 98367 7/31/2009 GERARDO CALDERON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 281.60 281.60 .00 98368 7/31/2009 WAL-MART STORES INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 194.33 194.33 .00 98369 7/31/2009 EBS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 281.37 281.37 .00 96370 7/3112009 BOB THOMPSON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 98371 7/31/2009 US POSTAL SERV-CANBY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,579.61 1,579.61 .40 98372 7/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 893.78 893.78 .00 98373 7/10/2009 AKJ BOOKS RECONCILED 7131/2009 YES 126.77 12b.77 .00 98374 7/10/2009 AKULINA KALUGIN RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 199.65 149.65 .00 98375 7/10/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #45 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 803.25 803.25 .00 98376 7/10/2009 AMAZON.COM CREDIT RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 32.94 32.94 .00 98377 7/10/2009 ARC-OREGON TRAIL CHAPTER- RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 6,600.00 6,600.00 .00 98378 7/10/2009 ANNE ROSALES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 65.00 65.00 .00 98379 7/10/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 356.80 356.80 .04 98380 7/10/2009 AT&T RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 105.71 105.71 .00 98381 7/10/2009 AUTO ADDITIONS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,546.10 2,546.14 .00 25 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 9 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE r====°___ 98382 _--=--z.cea 7/10/2009 xeas==-Arr==-==--~~====D=== AWARDS AND ATHLETICS °=xss=a===-= RECONCILED a=ae=-=aer_oe_= 7/31/2009 ===_===- YES =--==s...rrz~== 7,600.40 ==o=~oaeaese~~a___c~ 7,600.00 c===~vr__r~aa__ .04 98383 7/10/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 256.46 256.48 .00 98384 7/10/2009 BIO-MED TESTING SERVICE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42.20 42.20 .00 98385 7/10/2009 BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 116.62 116.82 .00 98386 7/10/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM & EQUI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 195.60 195.60 .00 98387 7/10/2009 CANBY TELECOM RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 19.95 19.95 .00 98388 7/10/2009 CASCADE POOLS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,662.4? 1,662.47 .00 98389 7/10/2009 CASE AUTOMOTIVE INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 445.50 445.50 .00 98390 7/IO/2009 CAW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2449 YES 2,992.62 2,992.62 .04 98391 7/10/2009 CIMA INSURANCE RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 1,159.45 1,159.45 .04 98392 7/10/2009 CIS: CITY-CTY INS SERVS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 268,448.83 268,448.83 .40 98393 7/10/2009 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 984.00 984.00 .00 98394 7/10/2009 COMFORT INN & SUITES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,091.20 1,091.20 .00 98395 ?/10/2009 COMFORT INN & SUITES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 272.80 272.80 .00 98396 7/10/2009 CONSUMER REPORTS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 44.00 44.00 .04 98397 7/10/2009 COOKE STATIONERY COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 448.99 998.99 .04 98398 7/10/2409 CUMMINS NW LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 621.28 621.28 .00 98399 7/10/2009 DATAVISION COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 271.36 271.36 .00 99400 7/10/2009 DAVID M COREY PHD PC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 325.00 325.00 .00 98401 7/10/2009 DAVID MAYER RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 175.34 175.34 .04 98402 7/10/2009 DEMCO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 320.27 320.27 .00 98403 7/10/2009 DP NORTHWEST INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,673,04 1,873.00 .00 98404 7/10/2009 EAGLE CREST RESORT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 359.10 359.10 .00 98405 7/10/2009 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL COR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 408.00 408.00 .00 98406 7/10/2009 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 844.80 844.80 .00 98407 7/10/2009 ESRI INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,200.00 4,200.00 .00 98408 7/10/2009 FIRST STUDENT INC RECONCILED 7/31f2009 YES 227.50 227.50 .00 48409 7/10/2009 FIRWOOD DESIGN GROUP LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,191.25 3,191.25 .00 98410 7/10/2009 FUNLAND JUMPERS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 300.00 300.00 .04 98911 7/10/2009 GALE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 26.97 26.9? .00 98412 7/10/2409 GAYLORD EROS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 251.39 251.39 .00 98413 7/10/2449 HILLYER'S MID CITY FORD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 29.96 29.96 .00 98419 7/10/2009 BH INSURANCE LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,264.00 1,264.00 .00 98415 7/10/2009 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 229.44 229.44 .00 98416 7/10/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 528.80 528.80 ,00 98917 7/10/2009 ISOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 957.50 957.50 .00 98918 7/10/2009 JANE VAN LEERDAM RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 20.00 20.00 .00 98419 7/10/2009 LANDMARK FORD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,408.79 1,448.79 .00 98920 7/14/2009 LOCAL GOVT PERSON'L INST RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,474.00 1,474.00 .00 98421 7/10/2009 M & M AUTO WRECKING INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 192.00 192.00 .00 98422 7/10/2009 MARION COUNTY TREASURY DE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,506.34 4,506.34 .00 98423 7/10/2049 MCDONALD & WETLE INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98424 7/10/2009 MOBILITAT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,000.00 2,000.00 .00 98425 7/10/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 440.04 400.00 .00 98426 7f 10/2009 NEOPOST LEASING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 111.52 111.52 .00 9642'1 7/10/2009 NET ASSETS CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 510.00 510.00 .00 98428 7/10/2009 NETMOTION WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,612.50 2,612.50 .00 98429 7/10/2009 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 75,790.00 75,790.00 .00 98430 7/10/2009 NORDISK SYSTEMS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 9,197.33 9,197.33 .00 98431 7/10/2009 NORTH CLACKAMAS AQUATIC P RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 46.94 96.99 .00 98932 ?/10/2009 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 5,012,31 5,012.31 .00 96433 7/10/2009 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 987.50 987.50 .00 96934 7/10/2009 ODOT SAFETY DIVISION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 300.00 300.00 .00 26 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 10 DATE 9/2]109 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK ~ ~~~~L S CHECK DATE ~s_-~~ PAYEE NAME _...___ ~~~~_~~~ STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AM T OUN R ECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE ~~~ 98435 ~~.~~~ 7/10/2009 ~ __~~___ ~~~~~- OFFICE DEPOT imi~~..~.._~~~ RECONCILED 3~......224~5~~~~~ 7/31/2009 ~SSL3~~II YES S..iS....3~z~~~~~ 217.79 ~~~..~_i~~~~~~~LiiSS~ 217.79 ~~S~~is~CLC~i~ .00 98436 7/10/2009 OR BUILDING OFFICIALS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 170.00 170.00 .00 98937 7/10/2009 OR DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,000.00 2,000.00 ..00 98438 7/10/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,b89.50 1,689.50 .00 98439 7/10/2009 OR DIVISION OF STATE LAND RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,268.00 1,268.00 00 . 98490 7/10/2009 OR PUBLIC PURCHASING ASSO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 80.00 40.00 . .00 98441 7/10/2009 OREGON SRO ASSOCIATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 200.00 200.00 .00 96442 7/10/2009 OREGON STATE BAR RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 165.00 165.00 .00 98443 7/10/2009 OREGON TRANSIT ASSOC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 450.00 450.00 .00 98444 7/10/2009 OSI BATTERIES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 426.14 426.14 .00 98445 7/10/2009 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 139.69 139.69 .00 98446 7/10/2009 PACIFIC RIM CONSTRUCTORS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 113,430.00 113,430.00 .00 98447 7/10/2009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,655.23 3,655.23 .00 98449 7/10/2009 FOLK DIRECTORIES INFOUSA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 425.00 425.00 .00 98450 7/10/2009 POPULAR SCIENCE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 28.00 28.00 .00 98451 7/10/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 37,782.37 37,?82.3? .40 98452 7/10/2009 PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 .00 98453 7/10/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,487.99 2,487.99 .40 98454 7/10/2009 R&R TREE AND LANDSCAPING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 7,245.00 7,245.00 .00 98456 7f 10/2009 ROTARY CLUB OF WOODBURN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 477.00 477.00 .00 98457 7/10/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 206.98 206.98 .00 98458 7/10/2009 SCHOLASTIC INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 705.00 705.00 .00 98459 7/10/2009 SIERRA SPRINGS RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 15.74 15.74 .00 98460 7/10/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 234.72 234.72 .00 98961 7/10/2009 SIGNWORKS OF OREGON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 58.00 58.00 .00 98462 7/10/2009 SNIPERCRAFT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2089 YES 150.00 154.00 .00 98463 7/10/2009 SP&B RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,473.50 2,473.50 .00 98464 7/10/2049 SPORTS ART FITNESS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 336.20 336.20 .00 98465 7/10/2009 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 110.00 114.00 .00 98466 7/10/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,446.98 1,046.98 .00 98467 7/10/2009 TACTICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 44.00 44.00 .00 98468 7/10/2009 TAP-RACK TACTICAL LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 200.00 200.04 .00 98469 7/10/2009 TIMOTHY COBOS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 117.00 117.04 .00 98470 7/10/2009 TRIAD TECHNOLOGIES INC RECDNCILED 7/31/2009 YES 69.10 69.10 .00 98471 7/10/2009 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 60,40 60.00 .00 98472 7/10/2009 U.S. BANK RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 400.40 400.00 .00 98473 7/10/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 48.00 48.00 .00 98474 7/10/2009 WAVE BROADBAND RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 317.23 3I?.23 .04 98475 7/10/2009 WESTERN DISPLAY FIREWORKS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 98976 7/10/2009 WOODBURN BOWL RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42.00 42.00 .00 98477 7/10/2009 WDBRN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 470.00 470.00 .00 98478 7/10/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 99.75 99.75 .00 98479 7/10/2009 WOODBURN SCHOOL DIST 103C RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 8,883.55 8,883.55 .00 98480 7/10/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 5,265.40 5,265.40 .00 98981 7JI0/2009 YG MEDIA EVAN THOMAS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,800.00 1,800.00 .00 96982 7/31/2009 AMERICAN EXPRESS-COSTCO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 48983 7/31/2009 TIMOTHY COSOS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 700.00 700.00 .00 98484 7/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 820.64 820.64 .00 98528 7/17/2009 ACE CHEMICAL TOILETS RECONCILED 7f31/2009 YES 699.50 699.50 .00 98529 7/17/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #45 RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,627.75 1,621.75 .00 98530 7/17/7.009 ANIXTER INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 411.34 411.34 .00 98531 7/17/2009 ANNIE wRUCKE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 30.61 30.61 .00 98532 7/17/2004 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 7f 31/2009 YES 84.18 84.18 .00 27 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 11 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK ~ CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE -_=_---- 98533 -_'--'=----= 7/17/2009 °aex___________sz._____._.a BI-MART CORPORATION .sesz.a..sasca RECONCILED so,easssssssx 7/31/2009 ssssssss YES s__ssesssssssas 46.97 sxssx_ose__s_sx__xex 46.97 xG==s_s.s__ss__ .00 98534 7/17/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 952.37 952.37 .00 98535 7/17/2009 COASTAL FARM HOME SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/3I/2009 YES 71.97 71.97 .00 98536 7/17/2009 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 493.34 493.34 .00 98537 7/17/2009 CRIMINAL INFORMATION SERV RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 26.00 26.00 .00 98538 7/17/2009 DAVID M COREY PHD PC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 95.00 95.00 .00 98539 7/17/2009 DAVISON AUTO PARTS RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 226.30 228.30 .00 98540 7/17/2009 DELL MARKETING LP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 254.90 254.90 .00 98541 7/17/2009 EAGLE EYE INVESTMENTS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 38.15 38.15 .QO 98542 7/17/2009 ELLA L SMITH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 45.89 95.89 .00 98543 7/17/2D09 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 675.84 675.64 .00 98544 7/17/2009 ERA NW PRO REALTY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 48.23 48.23 .00 96545 7/17/2009 FIRST STUDENT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 305.00 305.00 .00 98546 7/17/2009 FISHER FARM & LAWN RECONCILED 7J31f2009 YES 1,861.85 1,861.85 .00 98547 7/17/2409 G.W. HARDWARE CENTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 43.62 43.62 .00 98548 7/17/2009 HEIDI PATTERSON RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 38.73 38.73 .00 98549 7/17/2D09 HILLYER'S MID CITY FORD RECONCILED 7/31/2D09 YES 380.30 380.30 .00 98550 7/17/2009 HYDRO-FIT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 600.64 600.64 .00 98551 7/17/20D9 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 7/31/20D9 YES 132.76 132.76 .00 98552 7/17/2009 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,298.00 1,298.00 .00 98553 7/17/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 1/31/2009 YES 2,530.89 2,530.89 .00 98555 7/17/2009 JOE 0 HALLORAN RECONCILED 8/31/2004 YES 22.64 22.64 .00 98556 7/17/2009 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 194.70 19a.70 .00 98557 7/17/2009 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES RECONCILED 7J31/20D9 YES 15,191.88 15,191.88 .00 98558 7/17/2409 LECOR TECHNOLOGY LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 135.00 135.00 .00 98559 7/1?/2009 THE LIFEGUARD STORE INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 518.00 518.00 .DO 98560 7/17/2009 LINDA FENDER RECONCILED 7/31J20D9 YES 198.00 198.00 .00 98561 7/17/2009 LONG EROS/L&L BUILDING RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 66.38 66.38 .00 98562 7/17/2009 MARION COUNTY BLDG INSPEC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 717.19 717.19 .00 98563 7/17/2009 MARION COUNTY TREASURY DE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,871.40 2,871.40 .00 98569 7/17/2009 MISSOURI TURF PAINT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 674.25 674.25 .QO 98565 7/17/2049 MOLALLA COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 152.28 152.28 .00 98566 ?/17/2009 MOORE MEDICAL LLC RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 359.75 359.75 .00 98567 7/17/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 400.00 400.04 .00 98568 1/17/2009 MUFFLERS, HITCHES & MORE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 120.79 120.79 .00 98569 7/17/2009 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 4,637.20 4,637.20 .00 98570 7/17/2009 NORTHWEST ELEVATOR CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 900.00 900.00 .00 98571 7/17/2009 OAKS PARK ASSOCIATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 174.00 174.00 .00 98572 7/17/2009 OR DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 610.15 610.15 .00 98573 7/17/2009 OR DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 26.00 26.00 .00 98574 7/17/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 7/31/1009 YES 17.59 17.54 .00 98575 7/17/2009 OR MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFF RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 .00 98576 7/17/2009 PLAYKIDS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 119.99 119.99 .DO 98577 7/17/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 18,631.95 18,631.95 .00 98578 7/17/2049 PREMIER HOME BUILDERS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 38.15 38.15 .OD 98579 ')/17/2004 QWEST RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 196.65 196.85 .00 96586 7/1'1/2009 RAM STEELCO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 84.48 84.48 .00 98581 7/17/2009 RENAISSANCE RESERVE HOA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 230.22 230.22 .00 98582 7/17/2009 ROGERS MACHINERY COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 2,306.00 2,306.00 .00 98583 ?117/7009 S.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 19.00 19.00 .00 98584 7/17/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 40.71 40.71 .00 98585 7/17/2009 SALEM STEWARDSHIP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 47.17 47.17 .00 98586 7/17/2009 SCOTT DERICKSON RECONCILED 7f31/2009 YES 496.70 496.70 .00 28 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 12 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 19:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # -----=-= -`~- ~ CHECK DATE ~e_zeape__:c ~ PAYEE NAME eaee~va=aaza_ _=~e_sst ~~ ~ ~ STATUS ~ ~+ STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 98587 7/17/2009 _- a_a_ SILVERFLEET SYSTEMS __..ee eaa-n_ RECONCILED - --- _eanaea=e=ze.~~ 7/31/2009 - _ _~zsgco. YES _ ____ _ ~avx___~vaasm~- 1,937,99 ~~~__ ~____=eeatroaaesaea__ 1,937.49 seraasmeee-eaaa .00 98588 7/17/2009 SILVERTON HOSPITAL RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 119.00 119.00 .00 98589 7/17/2009 SOLO PRINTING-EMBROIDERY- RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,933.50 1,933.50 .00 98590 7/17/2009 SPORTS ART FITNESS RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 27.2.8 27.28 .00 98591 7/17/2009 SPRINT ~ RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 49.99 49.99 .00 98592 7/17/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,172.18 1 172.18 .00 98593 7/17/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 460.10 460.16 .00 98599 7/17/2009 SUSAN K SAUSE, P.C. RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,200.00 1,200.06 .00 98595 7/17/2009 TRACTOR TIME RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,435.00 1,435.00 .00 98596 7/17/2009 USA M08ILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 23.30 23.30 .00 98597 7/17/2009 WDBRN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 48,255.00 48,255.00 .00 98598 7/17/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42.40 42.00 .00 48599 7/17/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 103.65 103.65 .00. 98600 7/17/2009 YG MEDIA EVAN THOMAS RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 2,800.00 2,800.00 .00 98601 7/31/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 157,95 157.45 .00 98602 7/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 697.82 697.82 .00 98603 7/24/2009 ACE CHEMICAL TOILETS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 699.50 699.50 .00 98604 7/24/2009 AKJ BOOKS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 161.84 161.84 .00 98605 7/24/2009 ALEXIN ANALYTICAL LAB INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 390.00 390.00 .QO 98606 7/24/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 132.16 132.16 .00 98607 7/24/2009 AT&T RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 45.17 45.17 .00 98606 7/24/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 39.59 39.59 .00 98609 7/24/2009 BLACK BOX CORPORATION RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,010.68 1,010.68 .00 98610 7/24/2009 BONNEAU PRODUCTS CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 193.00 193.00 .DO 98611 7/24/2009 BROOKS PRODUCTS RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 1,099.12 1,099.12 .00 98612 7/24/2009 C.J. HANSEN CO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,141.50 1,147.50 .00 98613 7/24/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 192.80 192.80 .DO 98614 7/24/2009 CENTER POINT LARGE PRINT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,488.00 1,488.00 .00 98615 7/24/2009 CHEMSEARCH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 233.53 233.53 .00 98616 7/24/2009 CIS: CITY-CTY INS SERVS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 42,319.23 42,314.23 .00 98617 7/24/2009 CITY OF HILLSBORO RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 130,00 130.00 .00 98618 7/24/2009 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,080.60 1,080.60 .00 98619 7/24/2009 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YE5 1,036.50 1,036.50 .00 98620 7/24/2009 CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,455.00 1,455.00 .00 98622 7/24/2009 DATA911 LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,242.00 1,242.00 .00 98623 7/24/2009 DELL MARKETING LP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 5,556.59 5,556.59 .00 98629 7/29/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 159,415.64 159,415.69 .00 98625 7/29/2009 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 675.84 675.89 .00 98626 7/29/2009 FALKENBERG INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 31.80 31.80 .00 98627 7/29/2009 FIRST STUDENT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 226.50 226.50 .00 98628 7/24/2009 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 266.74 266.74 .00 98629 7/29/2009 FOOTHILLS MEDICAL SUPPLY RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 84.00 84.00 .00 98630 7/29/2009 GODWIN PUMPS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 580.00 580.00 .00 98631 7/29/2009 GREAT WESTERN SWEEPING IN RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 8,371.38 8,3?1.38 .00 98632 7/29/2009 HARPER,HOUF,PETERSON,RIGH RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 16,949.46 16,949.46 .00 98633 7/29/2009 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 690.96 690.96 .40 98634 7/24/2009 HOME DEPOT GECF RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 198.00 198.00 .00 48635 7/29/2009 BH INSURANCE LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 12,172.20 12,172.20 .00 98636 7/29/2009 I.C.M.A. RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 149.00 199.00 .00 98637 7/24/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 7/31/2004 YES 530.70 530.70 .00 98638 7/24/2009 ISOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 451.75 451.75 .00 98639 7/24/2009 JET HEATING INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 507.25 507.25 .00 98640 7/24/2009 KIWANIS CLUB OF WOODBURN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 225.00 225.00 .00 29 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 13 DATE 9/2 1/09 AP0960 TIME 19:2 4:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 98641 7/7.9/2009 KNORR SYSTEMS INC RECONCILED 7 31J2009 / YES 297.70 297.70 .00 98642 7/29/7,009 LANA CELMER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 12.00 12.00 .04 98643 7/29/2009 MAC TOOLS DISTRIBUTOR RECONCILED 7/31/2409 YES 483,60 483.60 .00 98644 7/24/2009 MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 10,672.00 10,672.00 .00 98645 7/24/2009 MUFFLERS, HITCHES & MORE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 492.61 992.61 .00 98646 7/24/2009 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RECONCILED 7/J1/2009 YES 2,500.00 2,500.00 .00 98647 7/24/2409 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 1,551.41 1,551.41 .00 98648 7/24/2009 NORMED RECONCILED 7J31J2009 YES 123.00 123.00 .00 98649 7/24/2009 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC RECONCILED 7f 31/2009 YES 253.15 253.15 .00 98650 7/24/2009 OAKS PARK ASSOCIATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 72.00 72.00 .00 98651 7/24/2009 OREGON CORRECTIONS ENTERP RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,600.00 3,600.00 .00 98652 7/24/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 355.00 355.00 .00 98653 7/24/2009 ORIENTAL TRADING CO INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 233.01 233.01 .00 98659 7/24/2009 PACER PROPANE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 37.50 37.50 .00 98655 7/24/2004 PETROCARD RECONCILED 7J31/2009 YES 3,465.54 3,485.54 .00 98656 7/24/2009 PRIER PIPE & SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 66.40 66.40 .OD 98657 7/24J2009 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 552.45 552.45 .00 98658 7/24J2009 REBECCA IRENE WALKER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 10.00 10.00 .00 98659 7/24/2009 RED WING SHOE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 208.99 208.99 .00 98660 7/24/2009 RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 265.48 265.48 .00 98661 7/24/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 18.43 18.43 .00 98662 7/24/2009 SCHOLASTIC INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 113.61 113.61 .00 98663 7/29J2D09 SHOPSMITH INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 94.79 94.79 .00 98669 7/24/2009 SIGVERFLEET SYSTEMS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 3,068.50 3,068.50 .00 98665 7/24/2009 SILVERTON HOSPITAL BUS HE RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 149.00 144.00 .00 98666 7/24/2009 SPRINT RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 700.00 700.00 .00 98667 7/24J2009 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURI RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 116.60 116.60 .00 98668 7/24/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 359.77 359.77 .00 98669 7/29/2009 T-MOBILE RECONCILED 7/31/2049 YES 249.95 249.95 .00 98670 7/29/2009 THE HUNT RECONCILED 8J3I/2009 YES 200.00 200.00 .00 98671 7J24/2009 TIM VISTICA RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 150.00 150.00 .00 98672 ?/24/2009 UNIVAR USA INC RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 9,597.55 9,597.55 .00 98673 7/24/2009 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 120.00 120.00 .00 98674 7/24/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 7/31J2009 YES 49.93 44.93 .00 98675 7/24/2009 VICKI MUSSER RECONCILED 8/31/2049 YES 16.50 16.50 .00 98676 7/29/2009 WENDELL B AMSTUTZ RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 65.00 65.00 .00 98677 7/24J2009 WEST PAYMENT CENTER RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 396.68 396.68 .OD 98678 7/24/2009 WILCO FARMERS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 410.80 410.80 .00 96686 7/24/2009 YG MEDIA EVAN THOMAS RECONCILED 8J31J2009 YES 80.00 80.00 .00 98681 7/31/2009 MICHELE ROBERTS RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 117.96 117.98 .00 98682 7/31J2009 JASON ALEXANDER RECONCILED 7/31J2009 YES 3,400.00 3,400.00 .00 98683 7,131/2009 EAGLE WEB PRESS RECONCILED ?/31/2009 YES 1,350.00 1,350.00 .00 98684 7/31/2009 AFLAC REMITTANCE PROCESS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 763.54 763.54 .00 98685 7/31/2009 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE IN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 47.20 47.20 .00 99686 7/31/2049 ASIFLEX RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,236.68 3,236.68 .00 98687 7/31/2009 CITY OF WOODBURN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 179.42 ,179.42 .00 98688 7/31/2009 COLONIAL LIFE INSURANCE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 173.83 173.83 .00 8689 9 7/31/2009 CRISIS CHAPLAINCY SERVICE RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 118.00 115.00 .DO 96691 7/31/2009 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 40 RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 702.01 702.01 .00 8692 9 7/31/2049 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST AGT RECONCILED 8/31/Z009 YES 23,679.76 23,679.76 .00 6 3 98 4 7 31 2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS / / RECONCILED 8/31/2409 YES 4,466.15 4,466.15 .00 98694 7/31/2009 MARK B COMSTOCK RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 796.52 7 6. 2 9 5 .00 98695 7/31/2009 MISDU RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 808.50 808.50 .00 30 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 14 LATE 9/21/D9 AP0460 TIME 14:29:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # cxx~zzsv CHECK DATE _azgz=_...aa PAYEE NAME .szs _____--_ STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 98696 7/31/2009 _z_zcc zaaaa---~ OR DEPARTMENT OF REVENU E -ssssssasaa RECONCILED ss:a:sss:sasaaas 8/31/2009 aaasssas YES sw^sssaoswsesxs 1,037.81 aasz.s:osszxmssxswws 1,037.81 sssssasasa==ssz .00 98697 7/31/2609 OR TERRITORY FEDERAL CR U RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,419.00 3,419.00 .00 98698 7/31/2009 OREGON AFSCME COUNCIL 75 RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,046.?7 3,096.77 .00 98700 7/31/2009 UNITED STATES TREASURY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 .00 98701 7/31/2009 WA STATE SUPPORT REGISTRY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 237.10 237.10 .00. 98702 7/31/2009 WOODBURN POLICE ASSOCIATI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,265.00 1,265.00 ,00. 98703 7/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 590.50 590.50 .06. 98709 7/31/2009 A & A PEST CONTROL INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 311.50 311.50 .00~ 98705 7/31/2009 A.L.S. TECHNOLOGIES INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 924.95 924,95 .00: 98706 7/31/2009 A-1 COUPLING & HOSE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 232.83 232.83 .00 98707 7/31/2009 ADAM STEWART RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 28.08 28.OA .00 98708 7/31/2009 AG WEST SUPPLY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2.92 2.92 .00 98709 7/31/2009 AMAZON.COM CREDIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 75.55 75.55 ..0,0 98710 7/31/2009 ANNE ROSALES RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 174.00 174.00 .00 98711 7/31/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 1,919.51 1,919.51 .00 98712 7/31/2009 ARROW STRIPPING & PAINTIN RECONCILED BJ31/2009 YES 1,437.72 1,437,72 .00 98713 7/31/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 8/31/2409 YES 62.44 62.44 .00 98719 7/31/2009 AT&T RECONCILED BJ31/2009 YES 62.00 62.00 .00 98715 7/31/2009 AUTO ADDITIONS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 426.00 426.00 .00 98716 7/31/2009 BATTERIES NORTHWEST RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 251.36 251.36 .06 98717 7/31/2009 BEAVERTON DENTAL EQUIP & RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 127.50 127.50 .00 98718 7/31/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,081.95 1,081.45 .00 98720 7/31/2009 C & S PRODUCTS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 329.95 329.95 .00 98721 7/3l/2009 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 268.00 268.00 .00 98722 7/31/2009 CAPITAL PAINT & DECORATIN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 101.04 101.04 .00 98723 7/31/2009 CASCADE FOOLS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 102.81 102.81 .00 98724 7/31/2009 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 213.12 213.12 .00 96725 7/31/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,610.07 1,610.07 .00 98727 7/31/2009 CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,992.00 1,992.00 .00 98728 7/31/2009 COASTAL FARM HOME SUPPLY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 649.23 699.23 .00 98729 7/31/2009 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 714.38 ?14.38 .00 98730 ?/31/2009 CODE 9 PUBLIC SAFETY EDUC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 297.00 297.00 .00 98731 7/31/2009 CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 5?,90 57.90 ,00 98732 7/31/2009 CONSOLIDATED SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 25.66 25.66 .00 98733 7/31/2009 CRISIS CHAPLAINCY SERVICE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 375.00 375.00 .00 98734 7/31/2009 CTL CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 310.00 310.00 .00 98735 7/31/2009 CUES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,450.00 2,450.00 .00 98736 7/3I/2009 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 184.50 184.50 .00 98737 7/31/2009 DALLAS AQUATIC CENTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 32.00 32.00 .00 98738 7/31/2009 DAVISON AUTO PARTS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,008.67 1,008.67 .00 98739 7/31/2009 DELL MARKETING LP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 9,551.18 4,551.18 .00 98740 7/31/2009 DENNIS GIBBON RECONCILED 7/31/2009 YES 322.85 322.85 .00 98741 7/31/2004 OR DEPT OF CONSUMER ANA B RECONCILED 8f 31/2009 YES 1,030.90 1,030.40 .00 98?42 7/31/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,488.00 3,488.00 .00 98793 7/31/2009 DOI-USGS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 7,650.00 7,650.00 .00 98749 7/31/2009 DON SCHUETZ RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 12.00 12.00 ,00 98745 7/31/2009 DP NORTHWEST INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,301.00 3,301.00 ,00 98746 7/31/2009 DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 415.64 415.64 .00 98747 7/31/2009 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 844.80 844,60 ,00 98748 7/31/2009 ERNIE GRAHAM OIL INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,437.53 1,433.53 .00 98749 7/31/2009 EVERETT HEMSHORN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 102.85 102,85 .00 98750 7/31/2009 FASTENAL COMPANY RECONCILED 8/31/2049 YES 6.27 6.27 .00 9875] 7/31/2009 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES I5I.94 151.44 .00 31 WOODBURN DIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 15 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 19:29:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT ~~=C~~7~S~~ DIFFERENCE ~~~~2~~~77~~CII~ ===x~ss~~ 98752 xs~x~~=~==_ 7/31/2009 =='=====~aaea2~=='======SC~ FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC IIS~SCS.....t~xt RECONCILED ~2xasa~~s~~~ 8/31/2009 ~~~sa~~~ YES =====~»5.....S 302.96 C~7L.L.== 302.96 .00 98753 7/31/2009 FIRWOOD DESIGN GROUP LLC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,556.66 4,556.66 ,00 98754 7/31/2009 FISHER FARM & LAWN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 720.80 720.80 .00 98755 7/31/2009 FISHER'S SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 514.55 514.55 .00 98756 7/31/2009 FLINT TRADING INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,311.38 1,311.38 .00 98757 7/31/2009 FLORA STANISICH RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 11.00 11.00 .00 98758 7/31/2009 FRANCIS CHITWOOD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 7.00 7.00 .00 96759 7/31/2009 FRY'S ELECTRONICS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 296.32 296.32 ,00 98760 7/31/2009 G.W. HARDWARE CENTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 765.51 765.51 .00 98761 ?/31/2009 GALL'S ARAMARK CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 36.86 36.86 .00 96762 7/31/2009 HACH CHEMICAL CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 87.7] 87.73 .00 98763 7/31/2009 NILLYER'S MID CITY FORD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,733.86 1,733.86 .00 98764 7/31/2009 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 354.96 354.46 .00 98765 7/31/2009 INDUSTRIAL WELDING SUPPLY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 72.27 72.27 .00 98766 7/31/2009 INTEGRA TELECOM RECONCILED 8/31/2049 YES 1,150.00 1,150.00 .00 48767 7/31/2009 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 .00 98768 7/31/2009 J. THAYER COMPANY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,466.02 1,466.02 .04 98769 7/31/2009 JACK'S OVERHEAD DOOR INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 257.00 257.00 .00 98770 7/31/2004 JERRY JANSZEN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2.00 2.00 .00 98771 7/31/2009 JET HEATING INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,409.50 1,404.50 .00 98772 7/31/2009 KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 174.60 174.60 .40 98773 7/31/2009 LABCONCO CORD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 249.03 249.03 .00 98774 7/31/2009 LAWSON PRODUCTS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 419.46 419.9b .OD 98775 7/31/2009 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 75.00 75.00 .00 98776 7/31/2009 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 9,066.28 4,066.28 .00 98777 7/31/2004 LL RESEARCH & CONSULTING RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 42.33 42.33 .00 98778 7/3112009 LONG BROS/L&L BUILDING RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 841.73 841.73 .00 98779 7/31/2009 LOU GOTTLIEB RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 637.95 637.95 .00 98780 7/31f2009 MAC TOOLS DISTRIBUTOR RECONCILED 8f 31/2009 YES 168.80 168.80 .00 98781 7/31/2009 MARGARET LAMBERT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 309.10 309.10 .00 98782 7/31/2009 MARION COUNTY BLDG INSPEC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 150.64 150.64 .00 98783 7/31/2009 MARION COUNTY PUBLIC WORK RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 13.00 13.00 .DO 98789 7/31/2009 MARION COUNTY TREASURY DE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,725.00 9,725.00 .00 98785 7/31/2009 MAY'S APPLIANCE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 253,00 253.00 .00 98786 7/31/2009 MELBA HENDERSON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 7.00 7.00 .00 98787 7/31/2009 MONIQUE HULLING-ADAMS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 9.00 4.00 .00 98788 7/31/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98789 7/31/2009 MT HOOD SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,078.00 1,078.00 .00 98790 7f 31/2009 NEOPOST INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 257.49 257.49 .00 98791 7/31/2009 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,269.20 2,269.20 .00 98792 7/31/2009 NORCOM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 26,374.09 26,374.09 .00 98793 7/31/2009 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 690.36 690.36 .00 98794 7/31/2009 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,015.52 1,015.52 .00 98795 7/31/2009 ODOT SAFETY DIVISION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 98796 7/31/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 50.23 50.23 .00 98797 7/31/2009 OR DEPT OF CONSUMER & BUS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 246.40 296.40 .00 98798 7/31/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 8,939.90 8,939.90 .00 98800 7/31/2009 OREGON VINEYARD SUPPLY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 157.12 157.12 .00 98801 7/31/2009 OREGON Z00 RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 132.00 132.00 .00 98802 7/3l/2409 PACIFIC AIR COMFORT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 872.02 872.02 .00 48$03 7/31/2009 PAPE' MACHINERY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 95.82 95.82 .00 98809 7/31/2009 PATRICIA EWING RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 11.00 11.00 .00 98806 7/31/2009 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY RECONCILED 9/31/2009 YES 363.70 363.70 .00 32 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 16 DATE 9/21/09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK ~ zx_ =_s== CHECK DATE c.zo=zxxszx PAYEE NAME xz STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE - 98807 7/31/2009 zxczz_s_ax.c.aax=a:xzsxzx PHOENIX ASPHALT & MAIN CO -ezzzaaaaeaa RECONCILED czsasass:zs=xa_ 8/31/2009 =a axxzsz YES; zo o==~xzasaxxax 3,300.00 x _ xzzxeeo=- xxz-zax _s== 3,300.00 a x=. osasss.ss cx .00 98808 7/31/2009 PORTLAND DOOR CONSTROLS I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 281.00 281.00 .OQ. 98809 7/31/2009 PORTLAND OPERA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 177.50 177.50 .DO 98810 7/31/2009 PUMP TECH SYSTEMS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 147.70 147..70 .00 98811 7/31/2009 PUMPTECH INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 9,234.17 9,234.17 .00 98812 7/31/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 462.76 462,76 .00 98813 7/31/2009 RALPH HARRIS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 391.05 391.05 .00 98814 7/31/2009 RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 196.78 196.78 .00. 98815 7/31/2009 RUTH GALLANT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 22.00 22.00 .00: 98816 7/31/2009 S.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 291.50 291.50 .00 98817 7/31/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 57.b4 57.64 .00: 98818 7/31/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 8/31/2409 YES 147.69 147.64 .00. 98819 7/31/2009 SKILLS DEMO COMMITTEE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 150.00 150.00 .00 98820 7/31/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,873.79 2,873.74 .40 98821 7/31/2009 REXEL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 306.40 306.00 .00 98822 7/31/2009 TAYLOR MOTORCYCLE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 43.08 43.08 .00 98823 7/31/2009 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 63.00 63.00 .00 98824 7/31/2009 U S CRANE & HOIST INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 332.50 332.50 .00 98825 7/31/2009 UNIVAR USA INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 878.75 878.75 .DO 98626 7/31/2009 USA SECURITY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 79.85 74.85 .00 98827 7/31/2009 VALLEY PACIFIC FLORAL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 320.40 320.40 .00 98828 7/31/2009 WAVE BROADBAND RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 317.23 317.23 .00 98829 7/31/2009 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,513.10 2,513.10 .00 98830 7/31/2009 WESTERN BUS SALES INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,317.23 1,317.23 .00 98831 7/31/2009 WILLAMETTE CHAP RED CROSS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 61.00 61.00 .00 98832 7/31/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 45.00 45.00 .00 98833 7/31/2009 WILLIAM GARBER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 82.50 82.50 .00 98839 7/31/2009 WILLIAM H REILLY & CO RECONCILED 8/3i/2009 YES 9,100.13 9,100.13 .00 98835 7/31/2009 WOLFERS HEATING 6 AIR CON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 33.00 33.00 .00 98836 7/31/2009 WOODBURN FERTILIZER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 664.65 664.65 .00 98837 7/31/2009 WOODBURN HEARING CENTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 352.50 352.50 .00 98838 7/31/2009 WOODBURN RADIATOR & GLASS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 218.90 218.90 .00 98839 7/31/2009 XEROX CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 332.42 332.42 .00 98840 7/31/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED Bf31/2009 YES 1,333.00 1,333.00 .00 98841 8/31/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 154,62 154.62 .00 98642 8/31/2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 35.72 35.72 .00 98843 8/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 892.86 892.86 .00 98844 8/07/2009 A.C. GILBERT DISCOVERY VI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 97.50 97.50 .00 98845 8/07/2009 ABBY'S PIZZA INN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 45.90 45.90 .00 98846 8/07/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES q45 RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 793.25 793.25 .00 98847 8/07/2009 AMAZON.COM CREDIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 472.17 472.17 .Ob 98848 8/07/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 134.06 134.06 .00 98849 8/07/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 58.27 58.27 .00 98850 8/07/2009 SOLI TECHNICAL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 250.00 250.00 .00 98851 8/07/2009 BOOKS IN MOTION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 6.00 6.00 .00 98852 8/07/2009 CANBY TELECOM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 19.95 19.95 .00 98853 8/07/2009 CENTER POINT LARGE PRINT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE3 114.42 114.92 .00 98855 8/07/2009 CH2M-HILL INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 159,684.06 159,684.06 .00 98856 8/07/2009 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 984.00 984.00 .00 98857 8/07/2009 DAGOBERT GARCIA-MENDEZ RECONCILED 8/31/2004 YES 3,310.63 3,310.63 .00 98658 8/07/2009 DATAVISION COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 275.50 275.50 .00 98859 8/07/2009 CHARLOTTE CHAMBERLAIN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 26.66 26.66 .00 98860 8/07/2009 DELL MARKETING LP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 12?.91 127.91 .00 33 WOODBUr7N LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N DATE 9/21/09 PAGE 17 '['IMF 1.4:24:39 CHECK REGISTER AP0460 KARENHA CHECK # ::==nxc== CHECK DATE ==~=xcae.e PAYEE NAME x=z=~==O==ac=c.°====~_=-=== STATUS ~~aaaassaaz-- STATUS DATE _.=.__________.. UPDATED _ CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILE D AMT DIFFERENCE, 98861 B 07/2009 DP NORTHWEST INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 a-'--- YES --x--~___..~~ 402.50 402.50 DO 98862 8/07/2009 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL COR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 204.00 204.00 • p0 99863 8/07/2009 EMPLOYERS OVERLOAD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,615.66 1 615.68 , , 00 98869 8/07/2009 ENERTIA ENERGY INC RECONCILED 8 31/2009 / YES 33,804.80 33,604,80 • 00 98865 8/07/2009 FARONICS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 135.00 135.00 , . 00 96866 8107/2009 FOOD SERVICES OF AMERICA RECONCILED 8 31 2009 / / YES 542,01 592.01 . 00 96667 8/07/2009 GALE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 661.35 661,35 . 00 98868 6/07/2009 GOVERNMENT ETHICS COMMISS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 252.94 252.44 . oa 96869 8/07/2009 GRAINGER INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 767.52 767,52 . 00 98670 8/07/2009 HEADSETS.COM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 37,90 37.90 , 00 96871 8/07/2009 HOME DEPOT GECF RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 686,06 68b,06 . 00 98872 8/07/2009 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 494.77 499.77 . 00 98873 8/07/2009 INFO USA MARKETING INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 287,00 287.00 . 00 98874 8/07/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,121.12 1 121.12 . 00 98875 8/07/2009 (SOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 455.00 955.00 . 00 98876 8/07/2009 JOHN M GRADT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 15.00 15,0 0 . 00 98877 8/07/2009 JONATHAN STUART RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 72.93 72,93 . 00 98878 8/07/2009 J2 BLUE PRINT SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 497.00 497,00 . 00 98879 8/07/2009 KATHY WARNER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 59.00 59.00 . 00 98880 8/07/2009 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 20.00 20.00 . 00 96881 8/07/2009 LOWE'S RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 623.01 623.01 . 00 98882 6/07/2009 MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COG RECONCILED 8/31/2409 YES 128,00 128,00 . 00 98683 8/07/2009 N ROBERT SHIELDS RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 72.93 72.93 . 0 0 98884 8/07/2009 NEOPOST LEASING RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 111.52 111.52 , 0 0 98885 8/07/2009 NET ASSETS CORPORATION RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 490.00 440.00 .00 98886 8/47/2009 NITA J MARR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 98.83 98.83 00 98887 8/07/2009 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,505.86 9,505.86 . 00 98888 8/07/2009 OR DEPT OF CONSUMER & BUS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,631.54 1,631,54 . .00 98889 8/07/2009 OR PLANNING INSTITUTE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 280.00 280.00 00 98890 8/07/2009 OREGONIAN PUBLISHING CO RECONCILED 8/31/Z009 YES 191,29 191,24 . .p0 98891 8/07/2009 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 215.71 215.71 00 98892 8/07/Z009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,159.44 4,159.44 . 00 98893 8/07/2009 PIETRO'S PIZZA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE$ 75.00 75.00 . 00 98899 8/07/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 66,189.61 66,189.61 . ,00 98895 8/07/2009 RALPH HARRIS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 54,54 54.59 00 98896 8107/1.009 ROBERT KNORR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 11.45 11,95 , .00 98897 8/07/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 8/32/2009 YES 48.00 48.00 .00 96898 8/07/2009 SCOTT DERICKSON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 819.36 819,36 .00 98900 8/07/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 257.65 257.65 00 98901 8107/2009 SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION GROUP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 8,068.63 8,068.63 . .00 98902 8/07/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 397.36 347,36 .p0 98903 8/07/2009 STEVE KRIEG RECONCILED 8/31/2049 YES 352.60 352.b0 .00 98904 8/07/2009 SUCCEED SAFETY & HEALTH S RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,377.00 1,377.00 .00 96905 8/07/2009 TIM QUINN SR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 31.90 31.90 .00 98906 8/07/2009 U.S. BANK RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,196,00 3,196.00 .00 98907 8/07/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 102.92 102,92 ,00 98908 8/07/2009 VALLEY PACIFIC CONSTRUCT RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 57,886.83 57,886.63 .00 98909 8/07/2009 WHOLESALE SPORTS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 199.96 149.96 .00 98910 8/07/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 59.85 59.85 .00 96911 8/07/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SOCCER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 100.00 100.00 ,p0 98912 8/07/2009 WOODBURN BOWL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 174.00 174.00 .00 98913 8/07/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 177,04 1?7.00 .00 98914 8/07/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,573.17 3,573.17 .00 34 WOODAURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 18 DATE 9/21/09 TIME 14:29:39 ; CHECK REGISTER AP0464 KARENNA CHECK # CHECK DATE »»~~~~»» PAYEE NAME ZiSSSL L a SZSCS II STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 98915 8/31/2009 ~ ~~~ ~».~ Y »~~»5 EBS ~~~»~CaasCLS RECONCILED C~S~ii»SZLS~»»i 8/31/2D09 a3SS~~~S YES S~Sa;a.~»»»~~~~ 130,528.07 »~isxasisasaaaSaa:as 130,528.07 sssS'S SSZ.eeeoSS . 00 98916 8/31/2009 KERRY ZITEK RECONCILED 8/31/2D09 YES 250,. DO 250.00 . , .00, 9891.7 8/31/2009 OCEA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 165.00 165.00 .00 98918 8/31/1.009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 823.90 823.40 .00 98919 8/24/2009 ACE CHEMICAL TOILETS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 210.00 210.00 .00 98924 8/19/2009 ALBERT J HILLER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 38.15 38.15 .00 98921 8/14/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #45 RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,812.35 2,812.35 .00 94922 8/14f2009 ANIXTER INC RECONCILED 8/31f2009 YES 430.79 430.79 .00. 98923 8/14/2009 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 106.41 106.41 .00 98924 8/14/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 84.18 84.18 .0.0 98925 8/14f2009 ASIFLEX RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 115.50 115.50 .00 98926 8/14/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/,31/2009 YES 39.14 39.14 .00 98927 8/14/2004 BONG & WON NAM RECONCILED, 8/.31/2009 YES 189,.90 189.90 . OA 98928 8/19/2009 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 694.24 644.24 . .DO 98929 8/14/2009 CASE AUTOMOTIVE INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 148.25 148.25 .00 98930 8/24/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,877.78 1,87?.78 .00 98931 8/14/2009 COVANTA MARION INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 295.50 295.50 .00 98933 8/14/2009 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 266.50 266.50 .00 98934 8/14/2009 DEMCO INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 634.81 634.81 .00 98936 8/14/2009 GOVERNMENT ETHICS COMMISS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 589.03 589.03 .00 98937 8/14/2009 GROUP MACKENZIE ENGR INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 876.58 876.58 .00 98938 8/14/2009 INGRAM LIBRARX SERVICES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 658.50 658.50 .00 98939 8/14/2009 INTEGRA TELECOM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,080.00 1,080.00 .00 98940 8/14/2009 ISOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 552.50 552.50 .00 98992 8/14/2009 JOBS AVAILABLE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 210.00 210.00 .00 98993 8/14/2009 KBY CREATIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 20.54 20.54 .00 98944 8/14/2009 KOMPETITIVE EDGE RECONCILED Bf31/2009 YES 590.76 590.76 .00 98995 8/19/2049 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 306.90 306.90 .00 98947 8/19/2009 LLOYD CENTER ICE RINK RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 250.00 250.00 .00 98948 8/19/2009 M & M AUTO WRECKING INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 159.00 159.00 .00 98949 8/19/2009 MARY TENNANT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 648.21 648.21 .00 98950 8/19/2009 MOLALLA COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 149.70 199.70 .00 98951 8/14/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98952 8/19/2009 MXLOGIC INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,240.00 3,240.00 .00 98953 Bf14/2009 NORDISK SYSTEMS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 8,515.29 8,515.29 .00 98954 8/14/2009 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 745.71 745.71 .00 98955 8f14f2009 NURNBERG SCIENTIFIC RECONCILED 8f31/2009 YES 103.51 103.51 .00 98956 Bf14f2009 OCEA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 50.00 50.00 .00 98951 Sf19/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 56.72 Sb.72 .00 98958 8/19/2009 OMSI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 133.00 133.00 .00 98959 8/14/2009 ONE CALL CONCEPTS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 99.75 99.75 .00 96960 8/14/2009 OR DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 933.04 933.09 .00 98962 8f14/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 18,650.61 18,650.61 .00 98963 8/14f2009 QUILL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 77.70 77.70 .00 98964 8/14/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 221.84 221.84 .00 98965 8f14f2009 QWEST RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,003.84 2,003.89 .00 98966 8/14f2009 RED WING SHOE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 170.99 170.99 .00 98467 8/14/2009 RENAISSANCE RESERVE HOA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 92.37 92.37 .DO 98968 8/14/2009 RIVERHOUSE BEND RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 594.00 599.00 .00 98969 8/14/2009 S.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 12.80 12.80 .00 98970 8/14/2049 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 89.22 89.22 .00 98971 8/14/2009 SCHETKY NORTHWEST SALES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 33.72 33.72 .00 98972 8/14/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 340.75 340.75 .00 35 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 19 DATE 9/~1J09 AP0460 TIME 14:24:39 CHECK REGISTER KARENHA CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS ~ - STATUS DATE ~ ~ ~ ~ UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE --- 98973 -_______~___-_-scs~sa_ecaseacxeceoosa~ 8/14/2009 SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION GROUP ~ ... Z C =o~~~t RECONCILED S ~ 3 S L . . 8/31/2009 YES 1,254.95 1,259.45 .00 98975 8/14/2009 SILVERTON HOSPITAL BUS HE RECONCILED B/31/2D09 YES 455.OD 455.00 .00. 98976 8/14/2009 SPRINT RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 49.99 49.99 .00 98977 8/14/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,302.49 1,302.49 .00 98978 8/14/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 456,00 456.00 .00 98979 8/14/2009 STEED PROPERTIES LLC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 29.17 29.17 ..00 96980 8/14/2009 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO RECONCILED AJ31/2009 YES 772.58 772.58 .DO 98981 8/14J2009 WBN COMMUNITY ACCESS TV I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 98982 8 14 2009 / / WEST PAYMENT CENTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 396.68 396.68 .DO 98983 8/14/2009 WILCO FARMERS RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 1,037.55 1,037.55 .00 96964 8/14/2009 WOODBURN BOWL RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 296.00 246.00 .00 98985 6/14/2009 WOODBURN MASONRY INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,200.00 3,200.00 .00 98986 6/31/2009 RILEY POTTER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 98987 8/31/2009 BEST WESTERN OCEAN VIEW R RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 512.90 512.90 .00 96986 8/31/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 163.98 163.98 .00 98989 8/31/2009 MICHELE ROBERTS RECONCILED 8J31/2009 YES 300.00 300.00 .00 98990 A/31/2009 US POSTAL SERVICE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 217.60 217.60 .00 98991 8/31/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 694.60 694.60 .00 98492 8/21/2009 A-1 COUPLING & HOSE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YE5 72.98 72.98 .00 96993 6/21/2009 ALEE' A ROBBINS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 125.00 125.00 .00 98994 8J21/2009 ALEKIN ANALYTICAL LAB INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 377.00 377.00 .00 98995 8/21/2009 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 193.00 193,00 .00 98996 8/21/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 168.69 168.b9 .00 98997 8/21/2009 AT&T RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 95.17 95.17 .00 98998 8/21/2009 BBC STEEL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 86.00 86.00 .OD 96999 8/21/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 30.02 30.02 .00 99000 8/21/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM & EQUI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 391.80 341.80 .00 99001 8/21/2009 BOLDT, CARLISLE & SMITH L RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,845.00 1,845.00 .00 99002 8/21/2009 BROADVIEW SECURITY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 65.98 65.98 .QO 99003 8/21/2009 C.J. HANSEN CO INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,953.04 9,953.09 .00 99005 8/21/2009 CASCADE POOLS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES SOO.OD 500.00 .00 99006 8/21/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 92.64 92.69 .00 99007 8/21/2009 CENTER POINT LARGE PRINT RECONCILED 8/31J2009 YES 113.82 113.82 .00 99011 8/21/2409 CHARLOTTE CHAMBERLAIN RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 43.80 43.80 .00 99012 8/22/2009 DELL MARKETING LP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 241.69 291.69 .00 99013 8/21/2009 DEPAUL INDUSTRIES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 992.24 442.24 .00 99014 8/21J2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 959,580.00 954,560.00 .OD 99015 8/21J2009 ENERTIA ENERGY INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 24,909.76 24,909.76 .00 99016 6/21/2009 ENGELMAN ELECTRIC INC RECONCILED 8/31/20D9 YES 309.76 309.7b .00 99017 8/21J2009 ERNIE GRAHAM OIL INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 415.25 415.25 .OD 99018 6/21/2009 FIRST STUDENT INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 260.00 260.00 .00 99019 8/21/2009 FISHER'S SUPPLY INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 22.10 22.10 .00 99020 8/2]/2009 FRY'S ELECTRONICS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 189.77 169.77 .00 99021 8/21/2009 HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 326.70 326.70 .00 99D22 8/21/2009 HUNTZMAN ENTERPRISES RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 585.00 585.DD .00 99023 A/21/2049 J. THAYER COMPANY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 239.73 239.73 .00 99024 8/21/2009 JET HEATING INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 391.50 391.50 .00 99027 6/21/2009 KETCH-UM WILDLIFE CONTROL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,800.00 1,800.OD .00 99028 8/21/2009 KUSTOM KREATIONS OF OREGO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 513.00 513.00 .00 99029 8/21/2009 MAC TOOLS DISTRIBUTOR RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 191.22 191.22 .00 99030 8/21/2009 MARION COUNTY TREASURY DE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 3,691.80 3,691.80 .00 99031 8/21/2009 MCGILCHRIST & SONS ROOFIN RECONCILED 6/31/2009 YES 690.00 690.00 .00 99033 8/21/2009 MESHER SUPPLY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 99.74 49.74 .00 36 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 20 DATE 9/2 1JD9 TIME 14:2 4:39 CHECK REGISTER AP0460 KARENHA CHECK # se=eea_so CHECK DATE ....z:n=.n PAYEE NAME ~xc_cens=.saazae STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 99034 8/21/2009 .assn.=--e. MIKE ARAIZA x..2aCa6zocs RECONCILED aa=aooa.oa:.xns= 8/31/2009 azeaae-o YES naas~s=aesx:aea 171.50 _e.sczs_eo~xcerxaxse 171.50 a_ssaseeae:zap- .00 99035 8/21/2009 MOTION SAVERS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 293.20 293.20 .00 99036 8/21/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .00 99037 8/21/2009 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RECONCILED 8/31f2009 YES 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 99038 8/21/1009 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,495.05 1,495.05 .00 99039 8/21/2009 NICKLAUS WEATHERMON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 260.37 260.37 .00 99040 8/21/2009 NORCOM RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 26,374.09 26,3?4.09 .00 99091 8/21/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 8/31/2049 YES 117.31 117.31 .00 99092 8/21/2009 OGLETREE LIMITED PARTNERS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 31,351.00 31,351.00 .00 99093 8/21/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 16.77 16.77 .00 99044 8/21/2009 OR PLANNING INSTITUTE RECONCILED 8/31j2009 YES 213.00 213.00 .00 99045 8/21/2009 OVS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,966.81 2,466.81 .00 99096 8/21/2009 PACIFIC POWER PRODUCTS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 675.07 675.07 .00 99047 8/21/2009 PAPE' MACHINERY RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 35.39 35.39 .00 99098 8/21/2009 PLATT ELECTRIC CO RECONCILED 8/31/2009 XES 196.00 196.00 .00 99099 8/21/2009 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & TAPE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 592.00 592.00 .00 99050 8/21/2009 RECREONICS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 101.81 102.81 .00 99051 8/21/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 33.67 33.b7 .00 99052 8/21/2009 SCHOLASTIC INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 60.93 60.43 .00 99053 8/21/2009 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 74.99 74.99 .00 99055 8/21/2009 SILVERFLEET SYSTEMS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 4,855.66 4,855.b6 .00 94057 8/21/2009 SPRINT (AIRLINK) RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 700,00 700.00 .00 99058 8/21/2009 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURI RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 116.60 116.60 .00 99059 8/21/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,761.29 1,761.29 .00 99060 8/21/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 66.59 66.59 .00 99061 8/21/2009 SUSAN K SAUSE, P.C. RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,275.00 1,275.00 .00 99062 8/21/2009 T-MOBILE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 299.95 299.95 .00 99063 8/21/2009 US POSTAL SERVICE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 1,500.00 1,500.00 .00 99064 8/21/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 22.80 22.80 .00 99065 8/21/2009 WBN COMMUNITY ACCESS TV I RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,956.61 2,958.61 .00 99066 8/21/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 179.55 179.55 .00 99067 8/21/2009 WILLIAM NIGHTINGALE RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 175.00 175.00 .00 99068 8/21/2009 WOLFERS HEATING & AIR CON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 362.83 362.83 .00 99069 8/21/2009 WOODBURN COSMETIC ~ FAMIL RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 5,682.07 5,682.07 .00 99070 8/21/2009 WOODBURN TOGETHER RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 5,600.00 5,600.00 .00 99071 8/21/2009 XEROX CORPORATION RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 221.56 221.56 .00 99072 8/21/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 96.00 48.00 .00 99073 8/21/2009 YG MEDIA EVAN THOMAS RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 2,000.00 2,000.00 .QO 99100 8/31/2009 DENNIS GIBSON RECONCILED 8/31/2009 YES 434.61 434.61 .00 BANK AP TOTAL: 1,045 CHECKS --- -------------- ----------------- -- ._____-_.._____. 3,842,441.04 3,842,441.04 .00 RECONCILED 1045 CHECKS 3,842,941.09 NOT RECONCILED CHECKS .00 VOIDED CHECKS .00 UPDATED 1095 CHECKS 3,842,491.04 NOT UPDATED CHECKS .00 37 ~1 r. . ~~~~~~ ~7, ! ~~"~ i ~ ~'oan~U~~ 1~~,.rp,~r~!rrd th'~i9 Sept 22, 2009 T0: , Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM; Judge Zyryanoff SUBJECT, Pro Tem Judge RECOMMENDATION: Approve Carl Myers, Bar # 75273 to server as Pro Tem Judge for a period of 2 years. His resume is attached. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION; 1 will be out of the country on October 27th 2009 and a Pro Tem Judge will be needed. In addition, as further needs arise, Mr. Myers can be available to assist the court. Agenda Ifiem Review: City Administrato City Attorney ~~ Finance 38 Resume Of A. CARL MYERS " ATTORNEY 1815 Commercial Street SE, Salem, OR 97302 Telephone: 503.399.9219 "" E-mail: CarIM@Feiblemancase.com 1. EMPLOYMENT " ~ • Municipal Court Judge, City of Keizer,1999-present • Municipal Court Judge, City of Jefferson, 2005•present • "Municipal Court Judge Pro Tem, City of Sherwood, 2004•present • Municipal Court Judge Pro Tem, City of Keizer,1983-1999 • .Sole Practitioner; A. Carl Myers, Attorney at Law,1990•present • Practice Emphasizing Business Law and Government Relations, including Lobbying, Representation before state and local licensing boards, commissions, and governing bodies • Partner; Ramsay, Stein, Feibleman & Myers, P.C.,1981-1990 • Sole Practitioner; 1975.1981 • Admitted to Oregon State Bar, Sep#ember 1975, OSB No. 75273 • U.S. Army,1969-1971, Honorable Discharge, Vietnam veteran 1970.1911 2. WORK EXPERIENCE • 1975.2001 Trial Attorney, civil and criminal • City Attorney, Mill City, Oregon,1976-1981 • Court appointed torepresent at-risk children in custody and adoption cases • Appeared in Oregon Court of Appeals, Land Use Board of Appeals • Certified before U.S. Federal District Court for the District of Oregon • Government Affairs Consultant, Oregon State Bar Association, • Government Relations Consultant, Oregon Juvenile Department Directors Association, 1996-present • Legislative Consultant, Oregon Municipal Judges Association, 2001 Legislative Session • Legislative Consultant, Oregon Justices of the Peace Association, 2001 Legislative Session • Lobbyist, Oregon State Legislature, various clients,1988-present 3. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES • Speaker, numerous seminars on legislation and Iobbying,1990•present Economics of Law Profession Committee, Oregon State Bar,198fi-1989, Legislative Liaison • Chair, Joint Oregon Shorthand Reporters Committee, Oregon State Bar, 1986.1989 • Executive Committee, Administrative Law Section, Oregon State Bar, 2000•present • Member, Business Law Section, Estate Planning Section, Oregon State Bar • Public Service and Information Committee, Oregon State Bar, 1982.1986 • Oregon Revised Statutes Revision Committee, Oregon Legislature, 1989.1991 • Editor,1987 Oregon Legisiation Notebook, Oregon State Bar • Marion County District Court Judge Pro Tempore • Judge, Willamette Law School Mock Tria! Competition • Board Member, Oregon Municipal Judge's Association • Recipient, Oregon State Bar Public Service Merit Award, Resume of A. Carl Myers Page 1 of 2 39 4. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES • Capitol Planning Commission, State of Oregon,1981.2001, Chair 1995.2001 ~ Board of Directors, Oregon Club of Salem•Keizer,1981-1990, 9998-present • Board of Directors, Oregon's Heart Light (charity for children} 1985.1992 • Campaign Director, Yes for Yvur Schools Committee, 1984.1986 5. EDUCATION • Doctor of Jurisprudence, University of Oregon School of Law, May 1915 • Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, University of Oregon, June 1969 fi. REFERENCES ~ Provided Upon Request Resume of A. Carl Myers Page 2 of 2 40 ~'~ n. h~:+ • . ~~~ ~W''oo~B~~~ r r, i orb rrt: i ! .! 8 a ~ tz~. September 28, 2009 T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO INCREASE EXISTING CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN AGREEMENT N0. R98414 RECOMMENDATION; That Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Administrator to enter into an agreement to amend the existing Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan Agreement No. R98414. The amendment is to increase the City's current loan by an amount of $1,2b3,086. BACKGROUND: The City has a "Revenue Secured Loan" with DEQ in the amount of $4,093,115 to finance upgrades to the wastewater collection, treatment, disposal systems, and watershed enhancement projects. The loan was approved by the City on July 11, 2007. The City and DEQ enfiered into a Mutual Agreement and Order (MAOJ Case No. WQ/M-WR-07-082 in December of 2007. The MAO addresses limits and a compliance schedule for meeting effluent limits. The recent adoption of the Total Maximum Daily load (TMDIj far the Molalla-Pudding Sub-basin by DEQ places the compliance schedule within the MAO in motion. To meet the compliance limits and schedule, the City must make certain improvements to the wastewater facility in order to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits and conditions. Specific projects identified to meet the requirements of MAO include: Agenda Item Review; City Administratoi~~ City Attorney ~ Finance 41 Honorable Mayor and City Council September 28, 2009 Page 2 PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AND ESTIMATED TO COMPLY WITH MAO Recommended Improvements to Address Wintertime Ammonia Limits and Thermal Load Limits Improvement Cost* Blower and Aeration System Upgrades: Complete rework of DO and blower system $1,300,000 . (valves, instrumentation and control system) is recommended as an early project to . - manage the secondary process SVI. Replace two existing 1,050 scfm blowers with 3,000 scfm blowers. Assumes existing blower facility and air distribution system is adequate for increased capacity. Contact Stabilization Modifications: install piping from the influent channel through the $300,000 anoxic zone into the aerated zone with an isolation valve in the influent channel to allow for diversion of flow to the midpoint of the aerated zone under high flow conditions. Construct Wetlands to Cool Effluent and Meet New Thermal Load Limits: Develop a 10 acre $2,500,000 wetland within the existing effluent lagoons and 14 acres of wetlands within the Pudding River floodplain on City-owned property. install New outfaii for Floodplain Wetlands: This new outfall is needed to convey flows $1,620,000 sent to the flaodplain wetlands out to the Pudding River, Total $5,120,000 *Order-of-magnitude cost es#imates were prepared for the planned corrective actions and improvements. These included estimated construction costs plus an additional 25 percent for engineering, administrative, and legal (EALj costs. This type of cost estimate is made without detailed engineering data and it is normally expected that an estimate of this type would be accurate within +50 percent or •30 percent. DISCUSSION: DEQ has authorized an increase to the existing loan amount from $4,093,175 to $5,356,2b1, or an increase of $1,2b3,086 to partially finance MAO No. WQ/M-WR- 07-082. The City requested an increase of $5,000,000 to completely finance the MOA; however, DEQ is currently limited to only being able to provide $1,263,086 of the requested loan increase at this time due to restriction of funds available for the State Revolving Fund loan program. The City plans to make future requests for financing as DEQ funds become available. The proposed expenditures of this increased loan amount are consistent with the intent of the original loan in that the funds will be expended on watershed enhancement projects. The loan increase will have the same attractive interest rate of l .53 percent per year as the original loan. Other means of financing the wastewater capita( improvements needed to comply with the MAO will have a higher interest rate and greater debt service. One of the City's goals in executing the needed capital improvements for the wastewater system are to optimize the use of 42 Honorable Mayor and City Council September 28, 2009 Page 3 State Revolving Fund .Loans. to minimize the rate increases needed to finance the capital improvements identified for regulatory compliance. The action requested:o# Council is consistent with the Wastewater Facilities Plan Update and Rate Study. The Council is scheduled for the Plan Update and Rate Study at the October 2b, 2009 Council meeting. A rate increase will be required to pay the debt service incurred for this proposed 1,2b3,086 increase in the State Revolving Fund loan program. Council has not approved these required rate increases; therefore expenditure of these funds will not occur until the Council has approved a rate increase to pay the debt service of this loan. it.-is in the best interest of the City to secure needed revenue at the low-interest rate of the State Revolving Fund loan program. It is possible that DEQ will receive additional funds for the State Revolving Fund loan program in October 2009 and that the City may be eligible to receive the additional $3,3736,914 of the $5,000,000 originally requested. Should the City be successful in securing an additional loan increase, a resolution similar to one presented to Council by this action will be prepared. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the increase in the State Revolving Fund Loan #898414 increases the City's debt. Paying the debt service associated with this loan will require a future sewer rate increase. Debt service payments do not start until the barrowed funds are expended. Council is reminded that acceptance of this increase in the State Revolving Fund loan will require an increase in sewer rates for the fiscal year beginning of July 1, 2010 ranging from 9.5~o for low volume users to 1 boo for high volume users. Securing the loan increase provides the City the best opportunity to control the cost of debt needed to address the wastewater capital improvements. Failure to secure the loan increase at this time would deny Council the opportunity to acquire the revenue needed at the lowest interest possible. Should Council elect to not increase sewer rates to fund the debt service required, the unobligated loan balance can be returned to DEQ for redistribution to other municipalities. Approval of the attached resolution and amendment to increase the State Revolving Fund loan #898414 must be accompanied with a full understanding of Council that future sewer rate increases will be needed prior to obligation of this low interest loan. 43 COUNCIL BILL N0.2801 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN AGREEMENT N0. R98414 WITH THE STATE OF OREGON AND AUTHORIIlNG THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN SUCH AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the -City of Woodburn has determined that the City needs to _ ac~ornplish wastewater facilities improvements in order to comply with the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit, and ~~ ~ WHEREAS, the State of Oregon acting by and through its Department of Environmental Quality is authorized to enter into Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan agreements and disburse funds pursuant to OAR 340-054-00b5(2), and WHEREAS, the City of Woodburn through Resolution 1860 authorized entering into Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Agreement No. R98414 and for the City Administrator to sign said agreement, and WHEREAS, the City and DEQ entered into a Mutual Agreement and Order (MAO Case No. WQIM-WR-07-082 in December of 2007. The MAO addresses limits and a compliance schedule for meeting effluent limits for wastewater, and WHEREAS, the State of Oregon acting by and through its Department of Environmental Quality, has authorized an increase to the existing loan amount from $4,093,1'5 to $5,35b,261, an increase of $1,263,08b, to partially finance MAO No. WQ/M-WR-07-082, and WHEREAS, the City finds that the increased loan amount is necessary to meet the City's obligations and compliance schedule under MAO No. WQ/M-WR-07-082, NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS; Section 1. The City of Woodburn agrees to amend Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Agreement No. R984 i 4 with the State of Oregon acting by and through its Department of Environmental Quality, to increase the amount of the loan from $4,093,175 to $5,35b,2b1, an increase of $1,263,086. Section 2. That the City Administrator of the City of Woodburn is authorized to sign an amendment to Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Agreement No. R98414 on behalf of the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Page 1 -COUNCIL BILL NQ. 2801 RESOLUTION N4. 44 Approved as to form: Approved: Passed by Council___ __ __ Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Mary Tennant, City Recorder Cify of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2 -COUNCIL 61LL N0.2801 RESOLUTION N0. Date kathryn Figley, Mayor 45 .: i~.. ~~,~. '~~QDBUR N ta.;~; arr.? i,e5,, ~~w oxen., September 28, 2009 .TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT SAFE DRINKING WATER REVOLVING LOAN FUND, AMERICAN RECOVERY & REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009, FORG1VABlE lOAN AGREEMENT WITH OREGON BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Administrator to enter into an agreement with the Oregon Business Development Department {OBDD~ for a forgivable loan of 2 800 000 to consolidate existing water systems with the City's municipal water system, BACKGROUND; The City, on behalf of Shalimar Estates, Driftwood Mobile Home Park, and Chateau Ranchettes, developments that currently provide private water supply systems that are not in compliance with the Environment Protection Agency standards, has secured a forgivable loan from OBDD for the sum of $2,800,000 to provide municipal water to these developments. The Council approved on July 24, 2009, Ordinance #2459, authorizing Council discretion to extend City urban services outside of the City Limits and Urban Growth Boundary to address a public health emergency. This action was taken in preparation for the City being able to execute the scope of work needed to consolidate the identified private water systems with the City's municipal water system. The contract for executing this forgivable loan must be awarded by February 16, 2010 and construction must be completed by February 2012. DISCUSSION: The contract agreement is for the City to receive a $2,800,000 forgivable loan for the consolidation of water systems in and near the City of Woodburn, The forgivable loan means that the City will be reimbursed ~or host of design and Agenda Item Review: City Administrator~~ City Attorney Finance 46 Honorable Mayor and City Council September 28, 2009 Page 2 construction of the water system improvements to consolidate three private -water systems with the Cit-y's municipal water system. Should the City complete delivery of this. project asoutlined in the conditions of the agreement, all principle and interest of the loan is forgiven by OBDD. Should the City not complete the project. as agreed to in the contract, OBDD shall be repaid the loan amount and interest.: Therefore, #here is an element of risk to the City in accepting the contract agreement. The risk of not completing the project within the required timeframe is low. The Public Works Department has already begun the RFP process for contracting out the needed services and construction timelines ail fit within the required completion date. The benefit of having the State fully fund a solution to a known public health emergency would outweigh the risked posed by accepting the funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Upon successful completion of this project per the terms of the agreement, there is no cost to the City. The loan will be fully forgiven by OBDD. Should the City not successfully complete the project, the City is obligated to repay the loan amount and interest to OBDD. In the event that repayment of the loan was required, the City would use Water Supply Construction Fund reserves to repay the loan. 47 COUNCIL Blll N0. 2802 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OREGON BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR A FORGIVABLE LOAN UNDER THE STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN AND THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 FOR WATER SYSTEM CONSOLIDATION PROJECT (PROJECT N0. SZ9011) ~~IIIHEREAS, the City of Woodburn has been selected for receipt of a forgivable loan to consolidate water systems within and near the City through the State Revolving Fund Loari .and revenues made available by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and WHEREAS, the City finds Shalimar Estates, Driftwood Mobile Home Park, and Chateau Ranchettes, are developments near the City that currently provide private water supply systems that are nat in compliance with the Environment Protection Agency standards, and WHEREAS, the City finds that the most appropriate way to address the public health problems of these private water supply systems is to consolidate these systems with the City's watersystem as part of the Water Consolidation Project No. SZ9011, and WHEREAS, the Oregon Business Development Department (OBDD) forgivable loan is in the amount of $2,800,000 and estimated to be sufficient to accomplish all the work identified under the Water Consolidation Project No. SZ9011, and, WHEREAS, the City finds that no City funds will be expended for this Project and that the OBDD will forgive the loan principle and interest upon completion of fhe water consolidation project, NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY 01: WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Woodburn agrees to enter into a Contract and Loan Agreement with the State of Oregon acting by and through its Business Development Department, for a forgivable loan in the amount of $2,800,000 for Water Consolidation Project No. SZ9011. Sec#ion 2. That the City Administrator of the City of Woodburn is authorized to execute and deliver the Loan Agreement, other Loan Documents, and Contract between the City and the OBDD for Water Consolidation Project No. SZ9011 on behalf of the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Page 1 -COUNCIL BILL N0. 2802 RESOLUTION N0. 48 Approved as to form.; Approved: ~~3 0 Cit Att ne Dat Kathryn Figley, Mayor Passed by Council. Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor _ Filed in the Office of the. Recorder ATTEST: Mary Tennant, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2 -COUNCIL BILL N0. 2802 RESOLUTION NO. 49 '~OODBUR j~ ,n„~;~. ,rrr.~ ;,t ,; ., A September 28, 2009 T0: Honorab e Mayor and City Council in capacity as Local Contract Review Board FROM: Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: PROFESSIONA! SERVICES CONTRACT AWARD HURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING OF THE WATER CONSOLIDATION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION; That the City Council, acting in its capacity as the City Contract Review Board, award the professional services contract for design and construction engineering of the Water Consolidation Project to the firm Murray Smith & Associates for a fee of 465 85~. BACKGROUND: The Water Consolidation ~ Project is funded for $2.$ million by a combination of existing state program funding for clean drinking water and by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA7 of 2009, allocated through the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department, now renamed the Oregon Business Development Department ~QBDD). The City issued a Request for Proposals and utilized a Qualification Based Selection process per Oregon Revised Statutes and federal requirements. Murray Smi#h & Associates was selected as the best qualified firm to perform the scope of work associated with the Water Consolidation Project, Upon selection the fee was negotiated based on fee schedule, staff requirements, and hours estimated to complete tasks within the defined scope of work. DISCUSSION: The Water Consolidation Project calls for the extension of City water mains and providing distribution systems with metered domestic service to three existing Mobile Home Facilities. These facilities are currently operating private water supply systems that do not comply with current EPA/DEQ water quality Agenda Item Review: City Administratol~~ City Attorney ~ Finance 50 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sepfember 28, 2009 Page 2 standards. These facilities are the Shalimar Mobile Home Park located at 765 South Pacific Highway, Driftwood Mobile Home Park located at the 600 block of Cascade Drive, and Chateau Ranchet#es subdivision located at the 11000 block of Carl Road. The project scope for the.Shalimar facility includes extending a 12 inch diameter _ water.main along State Highway 99E, installation of a distribution system within ~~ the facility, extending the water main across Mill Creek, and connecting to the City existing system at Brown Street. The project scope for the Driftwood facility will consist of extending 8 inch diameter connection from both West Hayes and Cascade and installing a 6 inch diameter interior looped distribution system. The project scope for the Chateau Ranchette facility will consist of extending a 12 inch diameter water main under State Highway 99E and extending an 8 inch diameter distribution system within the facility. All work includes installation of individual residence water meters and connection to the residences plumbing system. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The project will be financed using a $2.8 million forgivable loan administered by the Oregon Business Development Department (OBDDJ. The EPA is the federal sponsor for the federal funding and DEQ is the sponsor for state funds. The professional service contract expenses for the Water Consolidation Project have been identified in -the approved project scope of work and estimate and identified by OBDD staff as an eligible expense for the forgivable loan. The professional services contract fees are considered participatory and eligible for reimbursement under the project forgivable loan. 51 .:~., ,: ..U~,..,.., (~ =, 4K, r:v ~O~DB[~R September 28, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: COUNCIL UPDATE ON MIDGE FlY PRESENCE IN WATER SUPPtY SYSTEM CONTINUATION OF DIALOG ON NEED FOR CHLORINATION PURPOSE: _,_____ Continue discussion on the need for chlorination of our municipal water system. Recent detection of the Midge Fly presence in the water system has raised public concern and media attention. Obtain from Covnci! direction on what information is needed to obtain approval to proceed with the design and installation of a chlorination system for the City's water supply system. BACKGROUND: The Council was first approached on the topic of the need for chlorination of our- municipal wafer system on November 10, 2008. The two documents attached to this staff report were presented to Council in support of the basis of my recommendation that the City should chlorinate its water supply system. The Council and a citizen in attendance at the Council meeting expressed opposition to my recommendation to chlorinate the water supply system. The key points of opposition to my recommendation for proceeding with chlorination of the water system that I recall are: 1. The health risk chlorination of the water supply system would impose on those allergic to chlorine. 2. The Council had been told in the past by Public Works that chlorination was no#-necessary with construction of our state of the art water treatment facilities. 3. That Woodburn's water source is ground water and there is tremendous community pride in the quality of ourwater source. The Midge Fly occurrence in October 2008 brought the issue of chlorination before the Council on November 10, 2008. It is again the Midge Fly that brings the issue of chlorination before the Council on September 28, 2009. The Midge Agenda Item Review: City Administratar~~' City Attorney _~~ Finance 52 Honorable Mayor and City Council September 28, 2009 Page 2 Fly will remain in our municipal water supply distribution system until the City elects to chlorinate our water supply system. However, it is not my recommendation that the City elect to chlorinate our water supply system to eliminate the Midge Fly. My recommendation to chlorinate the water supply system has far broader pu.bJic health benefits, I have attempted to summarize those benefits in the two documents attached to this staff report. The Midge Fly is a nuisance and expense to the City. The Midge Fly is a public relations and public confidence problem. The Midge Fly is not a public health or public safety threat. However, the conditions within our water supply distribution system that provides an ideal environment for the Midge Fly is also an ideal environment for pathogens and other organisms that do pose a public health and public safety risk to the citizens of 1Noodburn. The immediate benefit of chlorination is taking positive action to eradicate the Midge Fly from our water supply system. The long-term and much more significant benefit is protecting our community from communicable disease that can be spread through our water supply system. DISCUSSION: The actions taken to date that inhibit the infiltration of new organisms, such as the Midge Fly, into the water supply system do not eliminate the organisms that have already entered the water supply system. Those organisms that are in the water supply system flourish because they have an idea environment that has an ample food source and no predators in the food chain to reduce the population by natural means. The ample food source for the Midge Fly is the biofilm in the water supply system. The microbiology of distribution systems essentially consists of two different environments-microorganisms in the bulk water column and those in biofilms attached to the surfaces of pipes, sediments, and other materials. Microorganisms in the bulk water column originate from either the source water, from bacterial growth within the treatment process (e.g., within the treatment -- filters),, from biofilms within the distribution system, or from recontamination of the water from cross connections, intrusion, pipe breaks, or other external sources. Disinfecting the water entering the system does not control the microbiological activity that is associated with the biofilm environment in a water distribution system. This disinfection at point of entry reduces the possibility of new and potentially harmful organisms from entering and contaminating the water supply system. However, this point of entry disinfection does nothing to control the 53 Honorable Mayor and City Council September 28, 2009 Page 3 microbiological activity occurring within the water supply system without a disinfection process that contains a residual disinfection capability. The City's current water treatment processes provide point of entry disinfection that is associated with the use of Potassium Permanganate. Potassium Permanganate is primarily intended to remove unwanted mineral deposits in the raw well water. A secondary benefit of the Potassium Permanganate is the initial disinfection..of. the .raw water. However, Potassium Permanganate does not provide any residual disinfection of the water supply system. Chlorination of municipal water-systems is the most proven and cost effective means of providing system wide disinfection of water supply systems. While chlorination of the City's water system would not directly eliminate the Midge Fly, it would significantly reduce the biofilm within the water distribution system that provides nutrients in which the Midge Fly thrive within the water supply system. Chlorination provides greater protection to the community with regard to control of other pathogens that may enter the water supply system. The water supply system is not a sealed system and the possibility exists for contaminates entering the distribution system. The City hired the consulting firm Kennedy/Jenks to perform a disinfection system cost evaluation in July 2005. This study looked at various means of disinfection and-compared costs. The cost of providing onsite generation of chlorine (the safest means of providing chlorine) was estimated at $484,000. The use of chlorine gas injection is less expensive, but provides many handling safety issues that must be factored in doing a cost/risk comparison of alternatives. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City's decision to chlorinate its water supply system is a significant capital investment. However, the City is fortunate that the Water System Construction fund currently has sufficient balance to cover the costs of installing a chlorination system. The City currently flushes approximately 50 million gallons per year to address water quality within our water distribution system. The electrical power cost alone for pumping this volume of water through the system exceeds $17,000 per year. Our current maintenance practices are wasteful from a water resource and power consumption standpoint. While any cost savings realized from chlorinating the system will not begin to offset the cost of installation of a chlorination system, the fact that conservation of our natural resources and energy is realized has a long fierm financial benefit that should be recognized. 54 CITY OF WOODBURN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT POSITION PAPER ON Chlorination of Water Supply System Prepared by: Dan Brown Public Works Director November 26, 2408 1 55 Table of Contents T~ P-.~e_s Executive Summary 3 - 4 Background 5-6 Chlorination and Public Health 6 - 8 Chlorination -The Missing Benefit 8 - 9 Comparing Alternative Disinfection Methods 14 -16 De-Chlorination 16 Fiscal Impacts of Chlorination 17 Recommendation 17 Glossary 18 -19 2 56 Executive Summary ,_ The City ,of Woodburn's goal to provide clean, safe drinking water requires a ._ _ multi*barrier approach that includes: protecting source water from contamination, ~. `~ appropriately treating raw water, and ensuring safe distribution of treated water to consumers' taps. It is this final safe-guard that is lacking in the City of Woodburn's water supply system. Nearly all U.S. water supply systems that disinfect their water use some type of chlorine-based process, either alone or in combination with other disinfectants. The primary benefit of chlorination is controlling disease-causing organisms. However, there are other benefits that include: • Reducing disagreeable tastes and odors; • Elimination of slime bacteria, molds and algae that can grown in supply reservoirs and distribution piping. This is the "bio-film" that provides a food source for the Midge Fly. • Removes residual chemical compounds that cause unpleasant tastes and obstruct disinfection; and • Contributes to the removal of iron and manganese from raw water. Most importantly, only chlorine-based chemicals provide "residual disinfection" levels that prevent microbial re-growth and continue to protect treated water throughout the distribution system. The City's greatest public health responsibility is to safe-guard our water supply system from waterborne disease outbreaks. Well-known pathogens such as E. soli are easily controlled with chlorination, but can cause deadly outbreaks given conditions of inadequate or no disinfection. The City's current water treatment program does not provide system-wide disinfection and is inadequate to protect the community against such outbreaks. An example of a preventable outbreak is in the community of Walkerton, Ontario. Had a proper level of chlorine residua! been maintained, the death of seven people and the severe illness of 2,300 could have been prevented based upon the findings of the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. There are emerging pathogens, such as Cryptosporrdium, which are resistant to chlorination. The City of Portland has recently issued a Request for Proposals for consultants to assess the problem in Portland and to make recommendations as to how their water treatment system must be modified to safe-guard that community. Cryprosporidium is the cause of the largest reported drinking water outbreak in U.S. history. This outbreak affected over 400,000 people in 57 Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in April 1993. More than 100 deaths were attributed to this outbreak. As a result, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA} will .require water system operators to monitor Cryptosporidiumond adopt a range of supplemental treatment processes based on the concentrations of Cryptosporidium in the water supply source. Supplemental treatment processes are generally applied in conjunction with chlorination of the system for control of other pathogens. The discussion of chlorina#ion typically focuses on protection against microbial - _, contamination of the water supply system. However, the discussion must also include the control of disinfection byproducts (DBPs},which are chemical compounds formed unintentionallytyhen chlorine and other disinfectants react . with natural organic matter in water. In the early 1970s, the EPA determined that drinking water chlorination could form a group of byproducts known as trihalomethanes (THMs}, including chloroform. The EPA established the first regulatory limits for THMs in 1979. Available scientific evidence does not substantiate that DBPs in drinking water cause adverse health effects in humans. However, high levels of these chemical compounds should be avoided. Cost effective means to reduce DBP formation in the water supply system are available and should be used if needed. The concern of DBP presence in the water supply system as a result of chlorination should not be construed as a reason to not chlorinate. A report by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS 2000} strongly cautions: "The health risks from these byproducts at the levels at which They occur in drinking water are extremely small in comparison with the risks associated with inadequate disinfection. Thus, it is important that disinfection not be compromised in attempting to control such byproducts." Drinking water chlorination is fundamental to the prevention of waterborne disease. Chlorine's diverse benefits cannot be provided by any other single disinfectant. While alternative disinfectants (including chlorine dioxide, ozone, and ultra-violet radiation} are available, when consideration of individual benefits, limitations, and costs are applied, chlorine provides the most economical protection of the water supply system. Public Works Department recommends - proceeding in Fiscal Year 2008-2009 with a capital improvement project to install a chlorination system in the City water supply system. 4 58 Background ... The City of Woodburn has invested over $1l million to improve water quality. This investment was primarily made to remove iron and manganese from the raw water source. The capital improvements to the water supply system also included increasing storage capacity and meeting regulatory requirements for reducing concentrations of arsenic and radon. It is important to remember that these:treatmentgrocesses are designed to improve the quality of the raw water entering the water supply system. Disinfection that occurs during this treatment process is a secondary benefit of the process and does not provide protection from waterborne pathogens throughout the distribution system. The City's water supply system consists of three treatment plants that were located next to existing wells to reduce the cost of constructing raw water transmission lines and to provide redundancy in the event of mechanical failure or natural disasters. The three treatment plants are located near National Way {utilizing well 10 and a new well) in east Woodburn, near Country Ciub Road (utilizing wells 9 and 11) in north Woodburn and near Parr Road {utilizing two new wells) in south Woodburn. A future well and treatment facility will be constructed in west Woodburn should the Urban Growth Boundary expansion be approved. A control center that monitors the operation of all three satellite plants was constructed at the Water/Maintenance facility located on Young Street. The City's current treatment process consists of a potassium permanganate pressure oxidation filtration process. This process allows for the removal of iron .and manganese in the raw well water. The process also functions as a disinfectant of the raw water. Fortunately for the City, this chemical treatment and filtration process. is also fairly effective in reducing other nuisance elements, such as arsenic and radon that are regulated in a municipal water supply system. The raw water from the well is treated and disinfected by this process and high quality water is discharged from the treatment plant. However, this process provides no residual disinfection once the water leaves the treatment plant and this is where the need for chlorination arises. It is extremely unfortunate that the benefits of the potassium permanganate pressure oxidation filtration process were presented to the community as an alternative that allowed treated water to be distributed without residual chlorination, This is simply not the case. The potassium permanganate process accomplishes, and in some cases in superior fashion, the functions that a chlorination process provides at the treatment plant. However, it is the residual disinfection capabilities of chlorination that separate it from other disinfection methods. The City can not currently utilize its full system storage capacity because the water quality deteriorates rapidly due to the lack of chlorination. The City invested heavily in constructing a 2.7 million gallon ground storage tank at the Parr Road site, a 1.7 million gallon ground storage site at the National Way site, and a 300,000 gallons ground storage site at the Country Club Road site, These 5 59 three reservoirs, in conjunction with the 150,000 gallon elevated tank downtown, - are sum of the City's potential water storage capacity. The actual operation of the water system cannot take full advantage of this storage capacity because the water quality deteriorates rapidly due to the lack of chlorination and insufficient circulation of water. Should a natural or man-made disaster strike the City of Woodburn; the water capacity in storage would be considerably less than the theoretical capacity the system has been designed to provide. The City of Woodburn has a reliable source of ground water for the raw water feeding its water supply system. The quali#y of the ground water requires extensive treatment to remove unwanted elements and chemical compounds. The water treatment system does an excellent job of treating our raw water. The problem facing the City is that our current water supply system does not adequately maintain the quality of the water once it leaves the treatment plant. We have over~98 miles of water mains in the water supply system. Some of those mains are old and have exceeded their service life. We have daily activities that add to or tap into the water supply system and each one of those activities presents a potential opportunity for contaminates or waterborne disease to enter the water supply system. Only chlorination can provide protection in the piping system through its residual capacity other disinfection treatments lack. Chlorination and Public Health One of the greatest civil engineering achievements has been the application of science and technology in the treatment and distribution of water for safe use. Abundant, clean water is essential for public health. Both the U.S. Centers for Disease Control aril Prevention and the National Academy of Engineering cite water treatment as one of the most significant advancements of the last century. The most important step in the control ofdisease-causing microorganisms in drinking water is chemical disinfection. The most common form of chemical disinfection in North America is chlorination. Worldwide, significant improvements in public health and the quality of fife have been achieved through drinking water chlorination. Life magazine (1997) declared, "The filtration of drinking water plus the use of chlorine is probably the most significant public health advancement of the millennium." Why does the City of Woodburn not chlorinate its water? I believe that the City does not chlorinate its water because of a failure to recognize that providing safe drinking water is amulti-barrier system. For whatever reason, the Public Works Department did not communicate an emphasis for the need of amulti-barrier approach to protecting the water supply system. Meeting the goal of clean, safe drinking water requires amulti-barrier approach that includes protecting raw water and ensuring safe distribution of the treated water to consumer's taps. The 6 60 City goes to extraordinary effort to ensure safe distribution through extensive flushing and other maintenance activities. However, all of this hard work and expense is no subs#itute for chlorination of the water supply system. The City's source water is groundwater. Our community's investment in the .water treatment facilities provides a modern system to treat the raw groundwater _-~ of undesirable elements and chemical compounds. The treatment facilities also provide disinfection of the raw water, The need to treat and disinfect our raw - -~~ groundwater is very important step in providing safe drinking water, but the need to treat and disinfect does not stop there. Through state and federal agencies, :: ;. ,monitoring of both our raw water and its quality after treatment is monitored. We ,annually inform the public of the quality of the water being provided through an annual report that is distributed with water bills. Source water protection for the City of Woodburn is ensuring that the groundwater used for our raw water supply is not contaminated by surface water sources or injection wells. Public Works is currently working with the State of Oregon Health Division's Drinking Water Program, on documenting al! private wells within the City that could be potential sources of contamination of the aquifer that is the City's groundwater source of the raw water for the water supply system. The most prevalent contaminates in our groundwater are naturally occurring organic elements, arsenic and total coliform. Because the City of Woodburn's raw water source is the groundwater, the level of contamination of our raw water is significantly less than surface water sources. It appears that the water source has had a strong influence on the decision to not chlorinate our water supply system. However, the raw water source is only one factor to take into consideration when making a determination to chlorinate a water supply system or not. Every day, the City of Woodburn, water supply system treats and conveys approximately 4 million gallons through 98 miles of water mains. Broadly speaking, water is treated to render it suitable for human use and consumption. The main goal of treatment is to produce a biologically disinfected and chemical safe product. However, there are very important secondary requirements for treatment that include no objectionable taste or odor, low levels of color and turbidity cloudiness), and chemical stability anon-corrosive and non-scaling). Our treatment system has been customized to effectively treat our naturally occurring contamination in our groundwater generated raw water, If the City's source of raw water was surface water, our treatment system would be much more complex and expensive. The biggest challenge facing the City on providing safe drinking water is not treating our raw water, but rather maintaining that high quality of water in the storage and distribution part of the water supply system. In storage and distribution, drinking water must be kept safe from microbial contamination. A slippery film of bacteria, know as bio-film, exists within the City's reservoirs and 7 61 distribution pipes. Among disinfection techniques available, chlorination provides the unique quality that apre-determined chlorine concentra#ion can be designed to remain in~the treated water as measure of protection against harmful microbes encountered after the water leaves the treatment facility. It is important to know that in the event of a significant intrusion of pathogens, such as`a broken water main, the level of average chlorine residual will be insufficient to disinfect the contaminated water. Monitoring of the sudden drop of the chlorine residual will provide a warning to staff of a contamination of the water distribution system has occurred. Chlorination -The Missing Benefit The application of chlorine to the City's drinking water would provide significant benefit of destroying pathogenic disease-causing} organisms. Chlorine disinfectants reduce the level of many disease-causing microorganisms in the drinking water to almost immeasurable levels. It also reduces many disagreeable tastes and odors. Chlorine oxidizes many naturally occurring substances such as algae secretions, sulfides and odors of decaying vegetation. Chlorine disinfectants eliminate slime bacteria, molds, and algae that commonly grow in water supply reservoirs and on the walls of water mains. What is often overlooked is that chlorine disinfectants destroy hydrogen sulfide and remove ammonia and other nitrogenous compounds that have unpleasant tastes and _hinder disinfection. Chlorine would reduce the amount of potassium permanganate that is added at the treatment facility to remove iron and manganese from our raw water. The following excerpt is from The ChlorinationlChloramination Handbook. Copyright 1996, American Water Works Association. "How does chlorine carry out its well-known role of making wafer safe? Upon adding chlorine to water, two chemical species, known together as "free chlorine," are formed. These species, hypochlorous acid {HOCI, electrically neutral) and hypochlorite ion {SCI-, electrically negative), behave very differently. Hypochlorous acid is not only more reactive than the hypochlorite ion, but is also a stronger disinfectant and oxidant. The ratio of hypochlorous acid to hypochlorite ion in water is determined by the pH. At low pH {higher 8 62 acidity), hypochlorous acid dominates while at high pH _ .... ~~~ hypochlorife ion dominates. Thus, the speed and efficacy _' of chlorine disinfection against pathogens may be affected by the pH of the wafer being treated. Forfunately,bacteria . ~.. ~ and viruses are relatively easy targets of chlorination over a wide range of pH. However, treatment operators . ; . of surface water systems treating raw water contaminated by the parasitic protozoan Giardia may take advantage of the pH-hypochlorous acid relationship and adjust the ... pH to be effective against Giardia, which is much more ... = ~ - resistant to chlorination than either viruses or bacteria. Another reason for maintaining a predominance of hypochlorous acid during freatmenf has to do with the fact that pathogen surfaces carry a natural negative electrical charge. These surfaces are more readily penetrated by the uncharged, electrically neutral hypochlorous acid than the negatively charged hypochlorife ion. Moving through slime coatings, cell walls and resistant shells of waterborne microorganisms,hypochlorous acid effecfively destroys these pathogens. Wafer is made microbiologically safe as pafhogens either die or are rendered incapable of reproducing. A fypical bacterium has a negatively charged slime coating on ifs exterior cell wall, which is effectively penetrated by electrically neutral hypochlorous acid, favored by lower pH's." 9 63 Comparing Alternative Disinfection Methods Prior to the fate ~970's, chlorine was almost exclusively used to treat drinking water. Chlorine was considered the preferred disinfectant, based upon the following characteristics: • Effective against most known pathogens • Provides a residual to prevent microbial re-growth and protection of treated water through the distribution system • Suitable fora wide range of waterquality concerns • Easily monitored and controlled • Cost effective to use Municipalities have recently face a series of new concerns that include: • Treating resistant pathogens such as Giardia and Crypfosporidium • Minimization of disinfection byproducts • Tightening security at treatment facilities Professional literature suggests that no single disinfection method is right for all circumstances facing a drinking water provider. Rather water systems should consider using a variety of methods to meet the overall disinfection goals at the treatmen# plant and provide residual protection throughout the distribution s_ys_. The City's current water distribution system is not meeting this recommendation. DISINFECTION TECHNOLOGIES - AN OVERVIEW Provided below is a brief description of the various disinfection technologies available and lists the major advantages and limitations associated with each. • CHLORINATION Chlorine is applied to water in several forms (elemental chlorine (chlorine gash, hypochlorite solution (bleach), or dry calcium hypochlorite) that are described below, General advantages and limitations are: Advantages • Highly effective against most pathogens • Provides a residual to protect against recontamination and to reduce bio- hlmgrowth in the distribution system • Easily applied, controlled, and monitored 10 64 • Strong oxidant meeting most preoxidation objectives • Operationally the most reliable • The most cost-effective disinfectant Limitations • Byproduct formation (THMs, HAAs) • Will, oxidize bromide to bromine, forming brominated organic byproducts ~- • Not effective against Cryptosporidium • Requires transport and storage of chemicals • ELEMENTAL CHLORINE Elemental chlorine is the most commonly used form of chlorine. It is transported and stored as a liquefied gas under pressure. Water treatment facilities typically use chlorine in 100 and 150-Ib cylinders or one-ton containers. Some large systems use railroad tank cars or tanker trucks. Advantages • Lowest cost of chlorine forms • Unlimited shelf-life Limitations • Hazardous gas requires special handling and operator training • Additional regulatory requirements, including EPA's Risk Management Program and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Process Safety Management program • SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE Sodium Hypochlorite, or bleach, is produced by adding elemental chlorine to sodium hydroxide. Typically, hypochlorite solutions contain from 5 to 15% chlorine, and are shipped by truck in one- to 5,000-gallon containers. Advantages • Solution is less hazardous and easier to handle than elemental chlorine • Fewer training requirements and regulations than elemental chlorine Limitations • Limited shelf life • Potential to add inorganic byproducts (chlorate, chlorite and bromate) to water 11 65 • Corrosive to some materials and more difficult to store than most solution chemicals • Higher chemical costs than elemental chlorine • CALCIUM HYP4CHLORITE Calcium hypochlorite is another chlorinating chemical used primarily in smaller applications. It is a white, dry solid containing approximately 65°lo chlorine, and is commercially available in granular and tablet forms. Advantages • More stable than sodium hypochlorite, allowing longer storage • Fewer training requirements and regulations than elemental chlorine Limitations • Dry chemical requires more handling than sodium hypochlorite • Precipitated solids formed in solution complicate chemical feeding • Higher chemical costs than elemental chlorine • Fire or explosive hazard if handled improperly • Potential to add inorganic byproducts (chlorate, chlorite and bromate) to Ovate r • ONSITE HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION In recent years some municipalities have installed on-site hypochlorite generators that produce weak hypochlorite solutions ~~0.8%) using an electrolytic cell and a solution of salt water, Advantages • Minimal chemical storage and transport Limitations • More complex and requires a higher level of maintenance and technical expertise • High capital cost • Operating costs are often higher than for commercial hypochlorite • Requires careful control of salt quality • Weak solution requires high volume chemical feed and control • Byproducts in generated hypochlorite may be difficult to monitor and control • System backup may be more difficult and costly 12 66 • CHLORAMINES Chloramines are chemical compounds formed by combining a specific ratio of chlorine and:ammonia in water. Because Chloramines are relatively weak as a disinfectant, they are almost never used as a primary disinfectant. Chloramines .'provide a durable residual, and are often used as a secondary disinfectant for long distribution lines and where free chlorine demand is high. Chloramines may also be used instead of chlorine in order to reduce chlorinated byproduct formation and to remove some taste and odor problems. Advantages • Reduced formation of THMs, HAAs • Will not oxidize bromide to bromine forming brominated byproducts • More stable residual than free chlorine • Excellent secondary disinfectant, has been found to be better than free chlorine at controlling coliform bacteria and biofilrn growth • Lower taste and odor than free chlorine Limitations • Weak disinfectant and oxidant • Requires shipment and handling of ammonia or ammonia compounds as _ well as chlorinating chemicals _ ~ _ • Ammonia is toxic to fish, and may pose problems for aquarium owners • Will cause problems for kidney dialysis if not removed from water • CHLORINE DIOXIDE Chlorine dioxide (C102) is generated on-site at water treatment facilities. In most generators sodium chlorite and elemental chlorine are mixed in solution, which almost instantaneously forms chlorine dioxide. Chlorine dioxide characteristics are quite different from chlorine. In solution it is a dissolved gas, which makes i# largely unaffected by pH but volatile and relatively easily stripped from solution. Chlorine dioxide is also a strong disinfectant and a selective oxidant. While chlorine dioxide does produce a residual it is only rarely used for this purpose. 13 67 Advantages • Effective against Cryp~osporidium • Up to five times faster than chlorine at inactivating Giardia • Disinfection is only moderately affected by pH • Will not form chlorinated byproducts (THMs, HAAs) • Does not oxidize bromide to bromine (can form broma#e in sunlight) • More effective than chlorine in treating some taste and odor problems Selective oxidant used for manganese oxidation and targeting some chlorine resistant organics Limitations • Inorganic byproduct formation (chlorite, chlorate) • Highly volatile residuals • Requires on-site generation equipment and handling of chemicals (chlorine and sodium chlorite) • Requires a high level of technical competence to operate and monitoring equipment, product and residuals • Occasionally poses unique odor and taste problems • High operating cost (chlorite chemical cost is high) • OZONE Ozone (03) is generated on-site at water treatment facilities by passing dry oxygen or air through a system of high voltage electrodes. Ozone is one of the strongest oxidants and disinfectants available, Its high reactivity and low solubility, however, make it difficult to apply and control. Contact chambers are fully contained and non-absorbed ozone must be destroyed prior to release to avoid corrosive and toxic conditions. Ozone is more often applied for oxidation rather than disinfection purposes. Advantages • Strongest oxidantldisinfectant available • Produces no chlorinated THMs, HAAs • Effective against Crypfosporidium athigher concentrations • Used with Advanced Oxidation processes to oxidize refractory organic compounds Limitations • Process operation and maintenance requires a high level of technical competence • Provides no protective residual • Forms brorninated byproducts (bromate, brominated organics) • Forms nonhalogenated byproducts (ketenes, organic acids, aldehydes) 14 68 • Breaks down more complex organic matter; smaller compounds can enhance microbial re-growth in distribution systems and increase DBP formation during secondary disinfection processes. • Higher operating and capital costs than chlorination • Difficult to control and monitor particularly under variable load conditions • ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION .Ultraviolet (UV} .radiation, generated by mercury arc lamps, is anon-chemical disinfectant. When UV radiation penetrates the cell wall of an organism, it damages genetic material, and prevents the cell from reproducing. Although it has a limited track record in drinking water applications, UV has been shown to effectively inactivate many pathogens while forming limited disinfection byproducts. Advantages • Effective at inactivating most viruses, spores and cysts • No chemical generation, storage, or handling • Effective against Crypfosporidium • No known byproducts at levels of concern Limitations • No residual protection • Low inactivation of some viruses ~reoviruses and rotaviruses} • Difficult to monitor efficacy • Irradiated organisms can sometimes repair and reverse the destructive Effects of UV through a process known as photo-reactivation • May require additional treatment steps to maintain high-clarity water • Does not provide oxidation, or taste and odor control • High cost of adding backup~emergency capacity • Mercury lamps may pose a potable water and environmental toxicity risk based upon the advantages and limitations of the available methods of disinfection,--only chlorine-based disinfectants provide residual protection, an important part of the multi-barrier approach to preventing waterborne disease, the City of Woodburn water supply system needs. EPA has published requirements for residual disinfection in water distribution systems. Under Oregon Administrative Rules, systems using ground water shall provide continuous disinfection as prescribed in OAR 333-061-0050(5) under the following conditions: 15 69 tA} When there are consistent violations of the total coliform rule attributed to the source water quality; (B} When a potential health hazard exists as determined by the Department. .Condition (A} is focusing on the raw water source and does not take into consideration the entire water distribution system for requiring disinfection. Condition (B) could be applied to requiring disinfection as a result of contamination of the treated water while in the storage and transit facilities of the water supply system. It appears that the Oregon Administrative Ruies are reactionary to a problem versus specifying amulti-tiered treatment as proposed by this position paper. De-Chlorination Objections to the chlorination of the City's water supply system have been attributed to concern regarding objectionable taste of chlorinated water or health complications created by chlorinated water. Chlorinated water can be de- chlorinated by chemical treatment. Tablets contain Sodium Sulfite (81.3%} and Ascorbic Acid Vitamin C} neutralizes the chlorinelchloramines in the water. Filtration is an option for residential or point of us de-chlorination. The cost of point of use filters for residences ranges from $50 to $1500, depending on whether the filter is for a tap only or entire residential service. Most filters are good for 5,000 gallons or 5 years. The filtration system is designed to address sediment and/or particulate matter, VOCs, chlorine, chloloform, benzene, pesticides, lead, iron, tastes, odors, and other potential contaminates and harmful chemicals. There are multiple manufacturers offering comparable products. The ability to de-chlorinate the City water at point of use should address concerns raised by those members of the community that have expressed concern with either taste or health issues associated with a chlorinated water system; The City could consider providing economic assistance to those residents needing de-chlorination and unable to afford the purchase of such device. De-chlorination will increase the maintenance costs to the City for system flushing. When flushing the system to the natural water shed, it will need to be de-chlorinated.prior to discharge. The other option is to flush the water system into the sanitary sewer system. Regardless of procedure used, it will be more labor intensive than current practice of just flushing to the surface and storm water drainage facilities near point of flushing. 1fi 70 .. Fiscal Impacts of Chlorination The fiscal impacts of chlorinating the City water supply system are substantial. The~estimated capital cast of installation of a chlorination system is between $500,000 and$600,000. The existing treatment facility design consultant, Kennedy/Jenks, .prepared a Technical Memorandum is July 2005 to address system~disinfection. The Technical Memorandum recommended on-site generation and storage of sodium hypochlorite. This Technical Memorandum was prepared at the same time the City encountered the incident of E. Collin the water system and was exploring the possible need to provide system disinfection. The KennedylJenks Technical Memorandum estimated annual operations and maintenance costs for the on-site generation and storage of the sodium hypochlorite system at $48,900 per year. Public Works staff feels that this increase in operations and maintenance costs would be offset by reduced operations and maintenance costs associated with the current potassium permanganate treatment when employed in conjunction with a chlorination system. The adopted budget includes a Water Construction Fund balance of $4,374,618. Public Works budgeted $600,000 for water capital improvements for FY08-09 and loan payments for FY08-09 are $754,000. Investing in a chlorination system for the water supply system is financially feasible and possibly could be executed within the currently approved capital improvement budget. This means that the chlorination of the water supply system could be done without impacting water rates. Recommendation The Public Works Department recommends that the City of Woodburn proceed in fiscal year 2008-2009 with a capital improvement project to provide chlorination to the City's water supply system. 17 71 Glossary Adsorption: Attachment of a effects in human populations. An substance~to the surface of a solid, epidemiological study often Aquifer: A natural underground compares two groups of people layer, often of sand or gravel, which who are alike except for one factor, contains water. such as exposure to a chemica! or Bacteria: Microorganisms often the presence of a health effect. The composed of single,cells shaped like investigators try to determine if any rods, spheres or spiral structures. factor is associated with the health Bioterrorism: Terrorism using effect. biological agents. Filtration: The operation of Chlorination: The process of adding separating suspended solids from a a form of chlorine to water or liquid (or gas) by forcing the mixture wastewater. through a porous barrier. Clarification: Removal of bulk water Free Chlorine: The sum of from a dilute suspension of solids by hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite gravity sedimentation, aided by ions expressed in terms of mg/L or chemical flocculating agents. ppm. Coagulation: Irreversible Groundwater: The water that combination or aggregation of systems pump and treat from particles to form a larger mass. aquifers (natural reservoirs below the Contact Time: The period of earth's surface). disinfection in water treatment. Haloacetic Acids: A group of Disinfection: Destruction of harmful disinfection byproducts that includes microorganisms, usually by the use dichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic of bactericidal chemical compounds, acid, monochloroaceticacld, Disinfection Byproducts: bromoacetic acid, and dibromoacetic Compounds created by the reaction acid. of a disinfectant with organic Maximum Contaminant Level compounds in water. (MCL): The highest level of a Distribution System: A network of contaminant that EPA allows in pipes leading from a treatment plant drinking water. MCIs are set as to customers' plumbing systems. close to Maximum Contaminant Emerging Pathogen: A pathogen Level Goals (MCLGs) as feasible that gains attention because it is using the best available treatment either a newly recognized disease- technology and taking cost into causing organism, a known consideration. MCLs are enforceable organism that starts to cause standards. disease, or an organism whose Maximum Contaminant Level Goal transmission has increased, (MCLG): The level of a contaminant, Epidemiology: The study of the determined by EPA, at which there occurrence and causes of health would be no risk to human health. 18 ?2 .This goal is not always economically Surface Water: The water that or technologically feasible, and the systems pump and treat from - goal is-not legally enforceable. sources open to the atmosphere, Microbial Oontamination: such as rivers, lakes, and . Contamination of water supplies with reservoirs. microorganisms such as bacteria, Toxicology: The branch of medical :..viruses and -parasitic protozoa. science devoted to the study of Microorganisms: Tiny living poisons, including their modes of .....organisms that can be seen only with action, effects, detection, and ~_-.the. aid of a microscope. Some countermeasures. microorganisms can cause acute Trihalomethanes: Agroup of health. prob{ems when consumed disinfection byproducts that includes in drinking water. Also known as chloroform, bromodichloromethane, microbes. bromoform, and Organic Matter: Matter derived from dibromochloromethane. organisms, such as plants and Turbidity: The cloudy appearance of animals. water caused by the presence of tiny Oxidation: Any reaction in which particles. High levels of turbidity may electrons are transferred. interfere with proper water treatment Parasitic Protozoa: Single-celled and monitoring. microorganisms that feed on bacteria Ultraviolet Radiation: Radiation in and are found in multicellular the region of the electromagnetic organisms, such as animals spectrum including wavelengths from and people. 100 to 3900 angstroms. Pathogen: Adisease-causing Viruses: Microscopic infectious - organism. agents, shaped like rods, spheres or pH: A measure of the acidity or filaments that can reproduce only alkalinity of an aqueous solution. within living host cells. Raw Water: Water in its natural Waterborne Disease: Disease state, prior to any treatment for caused by contaminants, such as -drinking. ~ microscopic pathogens like bacteria, Residual: The measurement of viruses and parasitic protozoa, in chlorine in water after treatment, water. Risk Assessment: The process Watershed: The land area from evaluating the likelihood of an which water drains into a stream, adverse health effect, with river, or reservoir. some statistical confidence, for various levels of exposure. 19 73 .J L ~IO~DBUR~ ~.. ~:..~:.. ~~: ~ _ PUBLIC WCIRKS DEPARTMENT December 23, 2008 T0: Scott Derickson, City Administrator .~-- I`ROM: Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: CHLORINATION POSITION PAPER SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM A position paper discussing the benefits and concerns of chlorinating the City of Woodburn's water supply system was submitted to you on November 26, 2008. On December 2, 2008, you asked me to address six questions you had regarding City chlorination of the water supply system. Listed below are your questions and my responses to those questions. ~. What problems have occurred in the pas# 20 years that chlorination would have prevented? Since 1992 the City has had approximately 31 routine sampling sets test positive for Total Coliform. Of those positive sampling sets, 24 of them tested negative with the repeat samples. If the first set of repeat samples are negative, there is no violation recorded the Department of Human Services (DHS}. The following 5 events are instances are where the repeat samples tested posi#ive and would be considered a violation under current standards. A brief summary of each event is provided below: Ev~. • August 15 2006. Three routing samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Sample station locations were Hayes Street, Country Club Road and Sallal Road. System flushing and nine repeat samples were taken. • August 16 2006.Of the nine repeat samples, six tested positive for Total Coliform. System flushing and six more repeat samples were taken • August 18, 2006.Of the six repeat samples taken, five tested positive for Total Coliform. System flushing and six repeat samples were taken. • August 21, 2006.Of the six repeat samples taken, two tested positive for Total Coliform. System Flushing and seven repeat samples were taken. ~4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December 23, 2n08 P~ac~e ? • August 22: 2006.Of the seven repeat samples taken, two tested positive for Total Coliform. Two repeat samples taken in the area of failed samples - • August 23, 2006.Of the two repeat samples none tested positive for Total Coliform. • An information insert was included in the water billing of quality issue ~- ~ The incident lasted seven days the crew flushed 202 fire hydrants with a total of 1:978,500 gallons of water being used. Event 2. • July 26, 2006. One routine sample tested positive far Total Coliform Sample location was vVell #7, it was taken off line. Three repeat samples were taken • July 27, 2006.Of the Three samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Well #7. Two repeat samples were taken . -July 28; 2006. The repeat samples tested negative for Total Coliform. No notice was required; the UVell was taken off line. Event 3. • May 24, 2005. Two routine samples tested positive for Total Coliform One sample tested positive for E-Coll. Country Club Road Reservar and Parr Road Reservoir. Eight Repeat samples were taken • May 25, 2005: Of the eight samples two tested positive for Total Colifor~». Twelve repeat samples were taken. A Boil Water Notice was issued to the public per DHS request. • May 26,~2D05: Of the twelve repeat samples four tested positive for Total Coliform. Eight repeat samples were taken. • May 27, 2005 Results showed all repeat samples tested negative for Total Coliform. The public was put on notice they no longer needed to boi! water 75 PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENT December 23; 2005 Fc~ge 3 Event 4. • June 6; 2001. Routine sample taken at the elevated storage tank tested positive for Total Coliform. Three repeat samples were taken. • June 7.2001. Two of the three repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. System flushing and took repeat samples on the 8th June 12, 2001 Repeat samples tested negative for Total Coliform. Event 5. • June 16, 1993, One routine sample tested positive for Total Co(iforrn. Four repeat samples were taken. • June 18, 1993. Two repeat samples tested positive fior Total Coliform. • June 21, 1993. Eight repeat samples were taken, • June 22, 1993. Two of the eight samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Repeat samples taken. • June 23,1993 all repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. • June 24,1993 four repeat samples were taken. • June 28, 1 y9;~. Une of the four repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Five repeat samples were taken. "• June29,1993. A(I repeat samples tested positive far Total Coliform. • June 30, 1993. Notice of was published in the paper. • July 2,1993. Five repeat samples were taken. • July 6, 1993. Four of the repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Twelve repeat samples were taken. • July 7, 1993. One of the four repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. Five repeat samples were taken. • July 9, 1993. One of repeat samples tested positive for Total Coliform. 76 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December '?3, ?008 f'UC~~; ~ July 12,1993. Nine repeat samples were taken. - ~ • July 93;,1993. Three of the repeat samples tested positive for Total ~Coliform. City chlorinated the distribution system in the failed sample areas. .; , July 19, 1993. Nine repeat samples were taken. . July 20, 1993.One of the nine samples taken failed. • July 21, 1993 two repeat samples taken • July 22, 1993 all repeat samples tested negative for Total Coliforrn. It is highly likely that chlorination would have prevented the high Total Coliforrn counts resulting in these failing samplings. However, it is important to remember that reasoning for chlorination is not to eliminate Total Coliforrn but rather to protect against other pathogens that maybe entering the water supply system. Chlorination does not correct the-problem, it minimizes the public health impact of contamination of the water supply system. 2. Specifically,. what currenf water system problem will be resolved by chlorination and/or why is chlorination something that needs consideration at this point in time? The City currently has two organisms in the water supply system that indicates there is sufficient organic matter in the water supply system to sustain those organisms. Neither; the Midge Fly larvae or the Copepod crustacean are a public health risk. However, they are distressing to the public when observed in their water and the ~reserice erodes public confidence in the quality of the public water supply system. Chlorination will not eliminate the Midge Fly, but will reduce the bio-mass within the - water distribution system that sustains them through their normal life cycle. Copepods will be killed by chlorination. While that does not eliminate them from the water supply system, a dead Copepod is nearly undetectable. The City of Woodburn water supply system is large and there are infinite opportunities for contamination of the water supply system. Chlorination is a precautionary action to provide residual protection of the water while it transits the distribution system. The Midge Fly and Copepod presence in the system is a warning to us that if the system will sustain an environment for these organisms, it will provide an environment rich for micro-organisms and pathogens. 77 PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENT December 23, 2008 Page ~~ 3, Wha.i level of confidence can the City Council have il~ that by making a capi#al investment in chlorination the problem can be resolved? Chlorination of the water supply system was not presented as a solution to the water supply system problems. It was presented as being an appropriate preventive measure #o protect the public in the event the water supply system is contaminated, Contamination may be as a result of human error or intentional contamination of the system. If the expectation is that chlorination will eliminate high Total Coliform sample readings or elimination of all organisms in the water supply system, then there is a significant misunderstanding of how chlorination protects the public in a municipal water supply system. This question may be better. addressed by asking, "What is the basis for not chlorinating the water supply system to provide a higher level of public protection from pathogens in the system?" Chlorination of the water supply system was not done when the treatment plants ~rrere constructed as a cost saving measure. The justification for taking this cost saving measure was that our raw water supply is ground water and it does not need to be chlorinated. This justification does not recognize that ground water can be contaminated and that the distribution system can also be a source of contamination. The confidence the Council can have in making this investment is that they have taken appropriate precautionary measures to ensure the public health of its citizens by providing disinfection of the water supply system. Most municipalities similar in size to - .. Woodburn have elected to disinfect their water supply system. Are we wiser than those communities or have we inadequately done a risk assessment of not chlorinating? 4. Realistically, what. level of health risk exists it chlorination does not occur? This is a question that more qualified individuals than I should be asked. Based upon my education and experience. I believe that there is significant health risk to the community in not chlorinating. I am not personally comfortable with waiting for that event to occur and then haviEig regulators direct us to chlorinate. There is sufficient in.forma#ion available that chlorination would be appropriate precautionary action by the City to ensure public health of its citizens. The Environmental Protection Agency has been working for many years to try and strengthen regulations for disinfection of ground water. The fact that we currently are not required to disinfect our water distribution system is realty a deficiency or loop-hole in the current regulations, I believe the experts in the field are not camfortable with the lack of a regulatory requirement of municipal water system disinfection, regardless of the water source. 5. What new health risk might occur if chlorine is added to the water supply? 78 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December 23, 208 Page b -The studies that Ihave -read regarding the health risks created by chlorination of the ..water system .are_inconclusive. Our exposure to other chemicals and chemical by- _ products present in-the environment statistically document a greater health risk than cflorination of water~supply systems. Disinfection of water at the point of use allows pother metho~ds~ of disinfection that are not chemically based, but are not practical far . „ municipa! water supply system. As stated in the Chlorination Position Paper, most literature I have researched suggests that the risk to the community of not chlorinating -its water supply system is. significantly greater than any documented health risk created by chlorinating. 6, If there are pofentia~l health risks, what has the Oregon Department of Health not required chlorination? DHS does not have the legal authority to require chlorination if your raw water source is ground water. I believe. EPA; DEQ; and DHS all recognize that this exemption from chlorination is outdate and should be changed. As with many of our laws, it is also influenced politically. Right now there are many private wells that do not chlorinate. Where would you draw the line on requiring disinfection % The question weighs heavy on elected officials responsible for creating the laws that protect us. DHS realizes that.there--are only a few communities that have elected to not disinfect their water supply systems. Since most communities have taken the action to disinfect their water supply systems, sampling and monitoring reduces the risk of undetected contamination. The City. has been on the borderline of having disinfection requirements being imposed on us by DHS. I am not comfortable with the City being on the borderline of having requirements for disinfection being required and would prefer to make the decision to disinfect as a precautionary measure than being mandated to do it by an agency who is responsible for providing minimal public Health standards. I view DHS as being the safety net and not necessarily establishing best practices for providing a municipal water supply system. Conclusion The intent of the Chlorination Positian Paper was to open communications with Council regarding the prior decision to not chlorinate the City's water supply system. Chlorination is not intended to reduce the maintenance and management effort of providing the City .safe water. Chlorination by itself will not insure that the City will never fail a sampling test or experience organisms in our water supply system. However, it will provide a higher level of protection for our community from micro-organisms and pathogens than the current practice to not chlorinate the water supply system. It is my hope that we will take an equally hard look at the basis of the decision to not chlorinate our wafer supply system and assess the appropriateness of that decision. Attached: Newpaper Articles regarding water quality issues 79 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December 23, ?008 Page 80 Statesman Journal, Salem, Ore.,.Tuesday, June 22,1993 Page 2C . LOCAL/OREGaN Officials find bacteria in water in Woodburn but say it's safe RY Cheryl Barton 'n~ Statesman,loume~ WQaDBURN - ~'hrce sarn- plos of the city's drinking water tested positive for bacteria, .but officials say residents are safe. Tl~e 1J.S. l;nvironmental Pro- tection Agency haB notified the rity that its water- eaceeciaci the maximum contau~inant level for total coliforn~ bacteria, Randy Rohman,-the city's public works program manager, said. Last week a sample taken ou Country Club Road tested colif orrx~ positive A repent sample at that site and to the west of it also tested positive, but two follow-up trstb were negative. The city collects 17 water sam- ples each month. If wore than one teat is positive, that exceeds the fedei"dl 8tQ11(lai'(1. Samples aLo aro tented for fecal caliform. None of the sam• plea contained any such bacteria. Colifarm bacteria Are common and generally are not harmful, according to t]ie agency, Howovar, when the bacteria are present in drinking water, that generally indicates a prob- lem with water treatment or pipes, It~ also indicates that the water might be contaminated with argaaisms that could cause disease, agency officials said. City a~iciAla said that the re- sults migltt Dave been positivQ becuuso tap spigots in the sam• ling were not completely steril- ~zed.~Tlus wAS thought to be the cause of positive samples iii Feb- ruary, Rohmansaid. Ttte c.~ty took two more tests os~ Monday t8 determine the cause of the coutaznu3atiou and worked with the state Health Division ~- resolve tl~e problem. Results are expectrd latAr this week. 81 Woodburn Yudopondent, ~Paudl~urn, Oro,, ~Vedneeday, June1,9,1993-Page 3 City's water flunks test ~Yoodb~p received notice leaf week that three saaaples of ~ita drinking water had tested positive for bacteria but officials say residents are eai'o. According to Public Works Pr can Manager Ttaady Rohman; the U.B. Environmental Protection Ngency notified the city that it had exceeded the Ildsximam Contaminant Level for. microbiol 'eel conteminat~on is the aty'8 drittlriAg waker. For a system of Woodburn'a size, total coliform poeltiyo lee canrtat e~cceed ore per months, cite calleeta 17 eamplea pe~c month. Last weak, one of four samples taken on Gbunhy Club Road tested colifa~rm positive, said Rohman. Tne State Health Aivision was contacted and the sty took repeat sample8 ae regulated by the EPA. R~opoat samples were taken from the original sits and the surrounding area. The sty was notified Friday that two of the four repeat samples had tasted positive, wMcb means the' city had exceeded tt~e.federal level. Additional samples were collected tlrom the area Mande}~, the results oi' which arP ea~;neck~ lain this week Coliform bacteria are common, axording to the EPA, and ere .. generally nod harmfhl. The samples did not captain any ' E. Coll bacteria, which are corisldered mare serious and an acute health risk 82 Oo W . ~ 1 ~. ~ ~1` 1 Statesman Journal, S$lem„Ore. Frlda~~ ~?nne 25, 1993 . , . a a 5D a . ~ ^ ' 0 Sa ~ tented' sitive for coliform. 3~o p° area in accordance with 'state .. ten into t}le i e5 is that a: P A ea residents ar n t at risk e o of four followup samples taken.' the next day also tested Bxt~ve P° Health Division ' uuc sate • ~, ~ Four followu sam lee were p p , and is eneratin bacteria ' he ~ , said a Katie no idea how it t . ut continue testae and , , exceeding the atps maaomam • taken Thursday t4 see ' if the , there. • flus w~ d~S ~Ites contaminant level for total colif- ,~ o ba said Ran Mena, Roh fiushin worked or zf the bacter',a g have spread. The results will be "We're ho in a cod 'lushin P g g ~ ,~ will cure the roblem. P ' man, the dty's pablic wor pm- read toda . Y Y Coliform a' ' b eterta aze comznoa Ch Ba n By eryl rto . mans r. gram ge . Five ~ other tea~te taken and enei~ l al y a_e not harmful, The Slateat~an ~ourna~ Two re eat aam lee taken P P thro hoot. the ci and at the uS ~ accor ' to the g U.S. En~ron- • WOODBUR1vT --- Four more 1Vlonday at the ' ' ~ site and ~ well nearest to the itlYB test I~ , mental P'mtection en K-- Ag cy Ha sam lee from the ci s drinkin p ty' g to the west of it tested eitive ' ~ , sztea on Monde tested ne eve. Y ga- ev er when the bacteria are •. water hay e ~ tented sit~ve for . as chd two more taken ~`ues Rahman Bud ~ Qffi©als have ent m dnalnn water that P~ g bacteria this we ut officals ek, after some of the hues Were ari P ntled out unsten'le 68Jn P~ ' nerall, 1~1d1Cates a roblem ~ y P sa residents are not at risk. Y tia~ty flushed, $o}~nen said. methods as a ssible cause be- po with water treatm nt a or pipes, The c~t~~ was notified last week The ci flnsbed i sat fuIl , P Pe cause there have been so man s None of the sam le p s taken con- that asample taken on Country Aaw ~P eeda and Th Y positR~e tests. ~ ~tained an fecal colif w ' orris htch y . Club Road north of Highway ~z4 thmughont the Senuor ~ Estates Somehow somethin has t- B go can cruse diBease. Page 2C LQ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ Statesman Journal, Satem, Ore., Saturday, Juno 26,1693 Uregon Dateline ._ ~~.~. Woodburn Another v~ater sample pos~ve for hao#eria Another 8awple of Waodbur<i'a driaking water tested positive fur bacteria an Friday. It was the fourth positive sam• ple taken on County Cluh Road in nine days, City of~aals said Woodburn residents were not at risk. '1'este were negative on three other samples taken on Thurs• day in the Soruor Estates aren at~d eve others tsiken eleetvhere, Said Randy Rahman, the cites public works program manager, Officials will co~itinue to (lush the pipes, Rohmnn s~~icl. The city is working with the state Health Division to dcti:r- n3ine the cause of the contafuina• tion, he said. -• From staff reports 84 Statesmen Journal, Salem, Ore., Thursday, July 1,1993 LOCAL/REGION Page 4D Qregon Dateline Woodburn More bacteria found in 9eniflr Estates water `t'hree more samples taken from drinking water in the Se- nior Estates area tested gosi- fivefor bacteria on Wednesday, ~lcvcn samples taken near Counbry Club Road north of Highway 214 have tested po~i- tive for eta! cvtifnrm bacteria . , in the lasttwo weeks, -~ City officials said ~foodburn - -.: - , ~ residents were not at risk, how- ever. Water service to 19 resi= deuces was shut off for several hours on Wednesdoy to block off, chloruiata and f4ush the pipes, said Randy Rohman, the city's public works program manager. More tests will be taken on I+riday to see if the troatrnont worked, ha said. Those results - will be ready oat TueFday. - Coliforiii bacteria are eeui• znon in nature and generally are slot harmful, iZohman saki, liowever, when they are present in drinking water, that usually means. there is a prob- Ietry with water treatment or pi}}cq. 85 ! tll; \il6Y G! Yt UUillllll'il t1itN Ca- we~li~d tllc Maximum (,o,itan~i• Want 1,~vci ~'h4CL) fa• itticrubiulugi- cal contarni-lation i,l tits cit}~ water supply. The MCL exceeded is based an the presence or absence of total coliforu~ bacteria in a sam• pie. The City had two ,samples test positive for total colii'orm bacteria where t11c monthly MCL is one. `t'he City testa 17 slrnpies monthly for total coliforma. The following statement contains information about potential health effects: 'The UtitQd States Environ- mental Protection Agency (Ei'A) eet$ drinking water standard3 and has determined that tl~e presence of total cnlifnrme is a possible health concern. Total coliforms are oomman in the environment and are generally not harmful tlsom- eelves, Ttto presence of these bac- teria in' drinking water, lwwever, generally is a result of a problem with water treatment of the pipes which dietribtrte the water, atsd indicates that the way mAy be cnn• Laminated with organisms that t~:a cause disease. Disease symp- toms may include ditsrrhea, crempa, Weasel,, and possible jaundice, and any associated headashee and fatigue. Those symptoms, Itowover,.r~x~e not just assodated with discase•caueing organismB in drin~ng water, but also may be caused by a number of factors other than your ' g water. EFA ~ set au enforceable drinking woLer standard for total coliforms to reduce the risk of these adverse health effects. Un- der this etandflrd, na more than 6.U percent of tho aIImptes col- lectedduring amonth can oantxin these bacteria, except those sya- tems collecting fewer then 44 eampleslutanth that havo one total coliform positive sample par month are net vlolating the elan- lard, Drinking w4tcr which meets this standard fie usuallyy not also-1 sated with a health risk from dis• ea¢o-causing bacteria and a}iou3d lfe considered safe." All samples tested did net con• taus fecal colifotm or E. Coll bacte- ria. Some follow•up tests taken since the MCL was exceeded have also been positive. The City is evaluating potential causes of the positive aarnptes at this tisue, The City is flushing water Iiluaa iu the nrca where the cantaminatian was found and will be conductarig addi• tiotwi testing. At this tune thorn ~a no action required by Gtity resi- dents. The paint of cont<~ct for ques- tions fie liandall Rohman, City of • Woodburn, 270 Montgomery Street, ~voadbt,rn, Olt J7071. The cantarta l~honc uu>uber iK 982- G246 and office hours are from 8 Ann, to nuuu and l p.m. to 5 p.m. Published: June 30,1993. ~ V r3lr-LS }1'G}~ ~ Yt L b Affidavit O~ Publication S'f ~l'1'L or GI~GON, SS. Cow~ty of .Marion I, Las Reitan , l~euig [first duly sworli, depose ar~d say I am the PUI3LISI~I~Tt of il~e Wooclbuu~ Independent, n i~ewsPaPer of ~etiernl circt~latlon as Clef it~ccl by OnS 193,0 f 0 and 1)3.U2U, prilzted and published at Woodburn Ut tl~c aforesaid county slid sGite, ihnt the PQ!# ~ 932198 C ~y of Wood rr~ •••_ public notdce c~ printed copy of wllicli ss l~ereta annexed, was published in the entireissue of said netivspaper for one weckhveeks fill Ehe followi»g issues: June 30,1993 Subsct~ibed a»d swol~t to before the this 3~h clay of June , l g 93~ ~ J ,. Notary Public for Ore~o-i (ltity Cou~n~issia>I,l;xpires .9/1~ 9~ ~ ~ ,,, OfiyICIAI. SEAL ~~ ~ MARIE C. BERi~AAO ~, .' ~ ~lOTARY PllAi.l~ • OREGO~t , '~ Cl~Mld!^~510~t N0.007010 ~Y1`~Ctt~+#IriSSNJl; EKfIRLS SUPT t2, 1595 , ,.~,. 86 ~~7 ~)1 . ~"STEt~1 r :~7t)71~~7`~7 ~ ,, ;r WD water receives more testing By LeAnn Hamnik 01the lridependenc ~'he dty of Woodburn wt~s expected t4 receive word 11~tesday as to the r~vlte of yet another round of water sampling caaductsd P~ciday in Senior Estotea, "We're still haviag problems," sedd Raad~- Robman, ~toodburn public ~vorka program manager, prior bo the recent testa. Rohm$n told the City Counal last Moad~y the cl$pattment, was .bopaibI that flushing of the system in flu ~'ected area would correct tl~ problem, and that the flue samples taken that d+~- would come back s~ogativa fnr babtcrla Resu}ts received ley the city one day later, , ,however, proved othorwiw, Three oi' the Bye samples taken after the ecystem had. been flushed tested ,positive four total ouliform bacteria, The home that has produced a earJBe of positive samples, towell as~ foux additional ltionaes in its vicinity, ware r~-tested. 'lhe $ampli point was near Ura~ua end Country Giub, roads, acxording to Itohman, Prior to that sampling, service to 20 homes ooruiectad to the main line alaag Country Giub Roadway shut offfar three to four hours.: Durlssg that time, a chlorine disitd'ecEaat wa8 placed in the line wbet~e it remained for a few haute, said ltohman, {See WATi:R, page 2) Water testing continues In Woodburn area. 87 a e ?~-W~dburn Independent, yCoadburn, Ore., Wedaoeduy, Ju1y~7,19Q3 Yg WATER Officials don't find it a worry .. - The line was then flushed, - ~ priniar~ily to ensure that no traces of chlorine stayed behind, and additional samples re•taksn. "~Ve still don't feel it's A cause for concern," sAid Rohman. "It's just. something we have to determine tits aourcol and get it out of there: ' The ata~te Health Dlvldon still maintains that it ie not coacerned ' : at this time about public eafeq±, said Rohman, and ie not requesting any action by cit3~ . residentb. Coliform bacteria are fairly common, according to the U.~i. Environmental Protection Agency-, ' sad are generally not harmful. Rohman stresses that no ectmplca have. contained any fecal , ~~ ~ colifara~ or E. Coll bacteria, which are considered more serious and an acu#trheaitb risk. The city began re•aampling its water supply i n the Sealor Estato s area three weeks ago a#ter It had been notifiied that three samples . taken irr' the subdivision had tested positive for bacteria. ., ~'or a system of tNoodUoi'ri's size, total ooliform positive . gamp)es _ :cannot exceea~one per poc month. 'fine city normally ~ collects 17 samples monthly. Once the water cavein the __ po91t1v8 SalIlpl88 l6 reIDOVBQ' BAld Rohman, the immodiate area will be closely monitored over the following months. 88 ..5~y.~~ s ~ ` , ` ; ; . • .., 4 ~ •• _ • ~ , ' • - ~+ ~ ~ ~ `~---~;afr~~day; ~3unej~~~~'• rQ ~;, .Irt '~~,~;!;rf1~d:~~ d(~i .~ •,•, :~ r ;{ itF~~'~'~•`1 •;'tr'i• .~~~e•.:~r„lia.tt;Ji, ~E,.~• ~•, , :,,~. •t~ .i.. .r'~~I~;.r~~ - r. ~ ~ -~: ';,7i~1 . ~ S ~~A rP~ '.~#~.~ +~. •',~I~ 1• ': r fi ~ r . ~ .!1 .;r ;.,'* • ~+i '.. yr Y` C:i,`41 tr.l,.tt.! ~ ~ , t 1,~ ~~1' .'! 7S ' ,+ :tr •• t• 1 i~•1• w y 1 t.^ f. 1 ~ ..f ~~'..' ! 1• . •• • r • ~ 'si~~TF`t:tl~,'~'.nSf~1 ly,;1:.Hr• .:,'r~t. 1"~.S~+w' trt: ... . , .. .•t..;~'~r.r',~. p:.a~~..,;i1i\~ •• - :~ r ~•,,. , . ~.,~ ,. ,ir •~ ~, •'~ ~~jj]jT 4.~, ~'i:i •t: i :~: ..~. .,' •' ~.:~•k,Y:;' ~ . h ~~~• ' ' ~ ~ ~ . •i •'! ~•.Lf'r'iy+'i~~ r•4.~~ . ~~. ' in•~rCsponsc to ~tJic test results'. , ~ '~~'~nl~otizbcm hactcri~i, accat~d-. ~fo>=m .~ ~••eve~t'y ~ritiitth: Tlx • ^i ~~ +t "_ ., ' ~.~1~ tTr ~.~ • • "Y"l1~!" p~!~l~V,ti~LLw ~NM'.',M?v~~1 '~"21~ I,i~. ~ .. ~ l~a`,~' N=` ~ ••' I~Y; ~ to ~ j .t.. ~.,y_/,~..,; pV/~f~ f~l~lnrr'~~rnl~~ ~ d~11:baCt~g .~:u.~~~~ ~tlto:~~e~t fit; we retes,~l, ttulew.~=~:U~ ~~ ~ ~:~ .~, ' ~ t' '.l?VttV .} I... t'. i:t \f'.L.. .~. 9s'~• .,•I~. . r, } * ~l 7M .~"r t` +1~~, .. 1 . 'I~y'-6~~d ~, ~r'suppltY~yR- , °.contamina~gn;~~ut , ~ ~~~~~~~'ott~seccind•positive riesult ~ ~~•,~t~ ~ .I!1u;sbutf~.y~et~~; 4oblcros . `"• ccl.ihat~a~b~uunless nutliin h~rnfti~:tn ~:. r:.~,,;.+~~~:t azca of tle'syb~e .. :~:;iitiVe~ yea •1hra~1 ~* I, s c J t• ~, ..~s ~ 1 ' ~ "f0'~'Of ~baCte•,'~ ' '; "1~'I `~ ~ ~ 918;did'~~!~ ~':~gtililaTl said. "~IC:tJ1iA~~~~;9`ly~~'~,~~ r4~;Wb,'~~, s• :.g~:''R~aA~S~idr • -b's,i ~ ~ .. ~' , .i ~l,~!1 r '. v+,~.4~ J f •, •. y....~. t t i . r ~ i7..rt' y•'~.+I ~.,.,r .. ~ tics ~a `c~l~Qtm~ wa9'~-' . fe~Ql~~t1A~~ ~ tei``V~~ood= :,. ~,.. c>~sinh~t,on Art~~ ' . so,~v ~,r.:..' °~veh tliaugb residents ~gn: Y• ,t i __ ` ,~ L ~ ,. .r ti •,.~ ~ .•N ,.-• t •. BSI ~'•~' ~6~~f.+ {,.,, ~.~~}~ ' t~tiitk• I:. s'PI~ 1~.. 'Qusb~~ , ~.. t'' e``si3b'ect ~ have to be alarlnu~;abo ~t~~ ;~,t1~'111~Ut11C•O~~r :WuU~'~,w.-r::. ., y1vj;1,[ :._:.~ ... - r;~u.'s;j:; :.+~K;~'; .r ,...wlr.~iii~ •! `.~~'"~:;:, ,•. "+~# .::~tcimaci •aui rondcr~ area,; ' $ cnt): . n'aults •the~ ~ ~t' , 'ing dater ear ec ~ iiith.: ~y. a .,~~~~ ,~. ,• ;.: r ~ ~ t.• t, A>xi•~l~iob '" :~~¢l~'nrt~'~=" '~n~,,~'c~wate~ ~ugply safe ftn resi- ~~~ ~a~ct~oen;i~~~ve and wc'rL portits.fuidi ~• '.c ttunun sclf;~s.~~ ~~t'''~~ ~r1+co hu~ic~s;•ii .k•~clenlb to drink. .: .'~t~~ui$,~ar'the•resul#s of a third" . ;In addi~ tQR9' i4-~~iiclc'in. an ~ ah•a• ~ Tel ~ ~; y req ed.i{i, .2~ Hecause,Wcx~dburn's•walcr sup;'_ ,lriu(ep,~r~de t, i cnts'will tcc~ ~c• ~ •' ~ '~„a aatbr that ~sub'ect • Th cit is uir d~ . ~ • . . • .. , .; 'r ~ •~ ~~.~~...., ~ V ;W4t~t'~si~,~ily,is cout~uuiriatul with water system:spmpl~-arttt4n~i~~1a'~''ply comp, frorh wells;.d~s'city. `rtiote i~tfo~'4tiomahout -hc iqc, ~~fccA~~'vi~~. croli bACteiia. ~ is'altuvvi~l~~n]}l:c~n~~iosititi~e~ltis~t~~ ''~ ~Isa voluntarily te~t~; tho~e'~fbxtcol~. • ~c~t i~ ihcir next wAlcr hills,,, . ''`i~K• .. ~_.;:i.!;'j1,7~.''{~,•{+.•~~'lln~~~.•7sT•'+~~t' ~ ~. •~`~:'^~~.r.~N1: ai~...li~w:~..;,. .~ .. i 89 Peppi Kosikowski 611 Harrison St. Woodburn, OR 97071 To: The City of Woodburn opening 5th Street to Hwy 214? September 24, 2009 The City of Woodburn was given three Alternative Analysis in the Woodburn Transportation System Plan, for road improvement in October of 2005. Alternative 1: Minimum Capacity Improvements Alternative 2: Full Widening of Uregon 214 and construction of the South Arterial Alternative 3: Fu11 Capacity and Connectivity Improvements Of the three Alternatives the City chose Alternative 1 and 2. Could Alternative 1 and 2 be accepted without the 5~' Street improvement? I have lived on 5th Street for more than 20 years. In that time I have followed the various changes in our community. When the farm worker housing went in on Hwy 214 and 5th Street I was concerned about the fate of 5th Street. I attended the public hearing and was told the following: Woodburn Planning Commission meeting 11-12-1992 Quotes from staff "Staff stated that to open 5th Street would take council action and there was no request to do so in the application." And "Randy stated that in the future 5th Street would have to figure into the city's transportation plan. At the present time it is not a good idea due to most parts of 5th Street being a non curbed 22 ft wide street." The Woodburn Independent article "City Marks $2.5 Million for Streets" dated July 15, 1993 outlined the road cha ~ges that the City of Woodburn wanted to direct money to. In that article there was no mention of 5 Street improvement. So, I thought this is good. The City is standing by their word. In 2006 we became aware of the Woodburn Transportation System Plan and contacted the City. At that time, we were told that the opening of 5th Street was just an option and not to be concerned. In 2008 we saw a City work crew down at the north end of 5th Street. This time we e-mailed Mayor Figley. Her response is as follows: I have attached signature and address of the people who live or own property on or near 5th Street. They are asking you to listen to them. They are asking you not to open 5th Street. Thank you for listening to me. , ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ C~ Peppi osi owski 503-982-2973 5th Street Open to Hwy 214? The City of Woodburn is planning to open 5th Street through to Hwy 214. They have already put the project out to bid from contractors and received those bids back. If we do not act now ~#~ street wt~~ be opened without any input from the PEOPLE most EFFECTED. You and I! BY SIGNING THIS YOU ARE LETTING THE CITY OF WOODBURN KNOW THAT THEY NEED STOP AND LISTEN TO THOSE WHO LIVE ON 5TH STREET. TO THE CITY OF WOODBURN, DO NOT OPEN 5TH STREET TO HWY 214. Name Address DATE ~ ~ ~~ r, ~~ ~~~~ t ~ ,~ L~ ,.~ ~C ~h ~ ~ J ~ ~- '` ~ ~ s 5~ ~ t ~ ~ .~ ~. v ~~~ »/~ f~ vy. ~ /yra ~/T//_g/~.~~ -~~-~~ y ~g v9 69 9 /i a~ /a 9 ~I~~ Y/~8/aP to H~ 2~ 4? et ppen -- 214. Th Y Str e --= n co Hwv ~~~ fanning to open 5th Street throu9 ^^a ub m is P ~ontraclors and received u~ f om he The ~~tiY °~ W~V out to bidfrom ui the p~~1e~ red without anY ~~P have a~~eady ~Po not a~ now bth street w~~~ be °P~ most EFFECTED. You and ~~ back. If we THE C1TY 4F PEOPLE RE LETi~NG gY SIGNMG PHIS YOU A Np LISTEN 70 OW THAT TNEY NEED S70P A LNE ON or NEAR 5TH SSREES. V~IOODBURN KN THOSE WHO Name <- TO THE CIT`( OF WOODBURN, _ ,.n^N 5TH STREEZ TO HW`~ 214.DAT= pd~re5~ L ,~~ s~r ~ V~ =~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~# ~ - ,. ~~' { ~ ~, / ^l ~, ~~ ~~ V y p~ " ~ . ! ' 7 ` ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ r ~?~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.1 ` ~ Jk ~ y "" "~ ~.~/ I ~.~ .,*. ~-., ~:~ ~. ~~ ~~ y ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~, ~~ I ~~ ~_ _- 1 ~~, ~- ~. C; ~" c., ~ f >~ 1~,' 1 (/ 5th Street Open to Hwy 214? The City of Woodburn is planning to open 5th Street through to Hwy 214. They have already put the project out to bid from contractors and received those bids back. If we do not act now nth street will be opened without any input from the PEOPLE most EFFECTED. You and I! BY SIGNING THIS YOU ARE LETTING THE CITY OF WOODBURN KNOW THAT THEY NEED STOP AND LISTEN TO THOSE WHO LIVE ON or NEAR 5TH STREET. TO THE CITY OF WOODBURN, DO NOT OPEN 5TH STREET TO HWY 214. Name ~~~ ,.., Address DATE ~~ . .~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ,,.. .~,., r' r .i /L 4 r 1 5th Street Open ~o Hwy 214? The City of Woodburn is planning to open 5th Street through to Hwy 214. They have already put the project out to bid from contractors and received those bids back. If we do not act now 5th street will be opened without any input from the PEOPLE most EFFECTED. You and I! BY SIGNING THIS YOU ARE LETTING THE CITY OF WOODBURN KNOW THAT THEY NEED STOP AND LISTEN TO THOSE WHO LNE ON 5TH STREET. TO THE CITY OF WOODBURN, DO NOT OPEN 5TH STREET TO HWY 214. Name Address DATE ., ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ 6 50 ,~1~ xh.s a_ ~1Nal~ (gyp N19h5; I o 9/ ~/o~ 9lly/o9 d ~yn~R q,l~g/o~ ~~'~ /~ ~~~ a ~ ~'us~n ass Fi'~, f ~ ~~~- Gary & Peppi Kosikowski 611 Harrison St Woodburn, OR 97071 September 24, 2009 To the Honorable Mayor, Planning Commission, City Council, and Concerned Citizens: This correspondence is in regard to the proposed Downtown and Traffic Plans. Our first statement is a request that any decisions about these Plans be CONTINUED. The issues are toa important for a single evening of discourse and debate. The following statements, I hope, will open a positive dialogue in the debate of changes to our City. I believe that our present planners mean well but are getting conflicting signals from City Officials, State Officials, and the citizens. dim and his crew is a competent bunch but the demands of their job can be overwhelming. AS A CITY, we need to reach a common vision for change that benefits all, not just special interests, If the present Front Street construction is any representation of the scope of the City's vision for an improved downtown, we are in trouble. How can access be improved while street widths are substantially decreased? How will one-way streets and opening new streets improve the flow of traffic to a now constricted road surface? Have you forgotten that the MAIN RAILROAD LINE FOR THE WEST COAST runs thru downtown? It's not going anywhere; it's only getting busier. A viable downtown must meet the present needs of it's populace and anticipate future demands. The design will foster and encourage investment. It will provide safe and secure housing. It will promote ownership, not only of property, but also of what it represents and demands. It can be stated simply: the quality of a neighborhood is not determined by the intent of the planners, it is determined by the quality of the neighbors, The City must make family home ownership a priority. "Single family" houses in the downtown area are used as income property rentals) with no regard for the intent of the zoning statutes. An Enforcement Officer once told me that the rule of "a man's home is his castle" governs how people live in these houses. A castle two doors from me has anywhere from 8-15 single, unrelated men "sub-renting" sleeping space in it on any given night. Downtown Urban Renewal District Plan Overview 1997 to Today What is urban renewal? • Tool to improve specific areas that are poorly developed - Areas typically that have deteriorated buildings, failing utilities, weak business activities (blight) • Authorized by Oregon Statute to finance improvements - Tax Increment Financing - a portion (the increment) of property tax revenues from properties within the district is designated to support financing improvements within area Purpose of the Woodburn Urban Renewal Plan? • Revitalize and redevelop the "historic downtown" core of Woodburn - Present - a positive image - Create - a safe environment - Create - a place for businesses to thrive - Fund projects in downtown and along Highways 99E & 214 What are Woodburn's specific plans for urban renewal? • Urban renewal provides funding for a variety of projects and programs. • Woodburn's Urban Renewal Plan authorizes funding for up to 62 projects. This includes: -Street and associated public improvements: • Streets • Sanitary sewers • Storm sewers • Streetscaping • Undergrounding power -Redevelopment assistance: • Home rehabilitation • Business assistance How Does the Downtown Development Plan Relate to Urban Renewal? Downtown Development Plan CITY ~F WOODBURN Oregon SPENCER & KUPI'EIZ with LLOYD D. LtNDLEY, ASLA Downtown Development Plan Vision for the Future • Created vision • Established broad goals • Basis of Woodburn's Urban Renewal Plan pN~NcP-- ~. a ~pRrfi T ~t~~IAL uM ~ ~ 1 ,yy~e M~'~t EGA' \ ..-. ~~ U~lftY COLS \ fiOMM ' , t~ ~ Ip . ~ ~ a ~ ,.., ,< ~ 1 ~~ ~~ ;, o v •,,. l ~,... risan ~ ~ A d a, r. Har CY b. ,. ~.; ~~, ~ d~ ~~ ~~ incolr- a, ~ d ~ y ~T"1 C EJ t p~t1R~ 1 ~~~~ co~~~!~'r'' ~1 +~ ~ t. t a y, ~ ~ INS ~ or1T N'~l /tohp A t, BS ~ .,;,~ w ~ 4p ~ i ,W +CD ~pC~ f,~ RK 1~ ~a ~i A'f~ a EN ~ 49 ~ ~'a ~ d,. r ~r T. M 1 G, 4 ~ ,~ ~ Ar1~' r a ~ ~ ti J, L L,~- fi 0~ iLR~p o~ 9 ~` MU3EUM A Q ~ ;. '~ +~ 4 ~ ~- a ~~n ~ ~ ~t d ~ ~ ~.~ ~ e~°~ ~ e~ G1 ~ ~ ~ a F~ ~ - -'"' ~, ~~ ~ . rt Ct'NtytL y. hR~~T ,,,, . ~,NOP~ ---~' AN a srwrn ~; r \ s ._.. ~~ apeN srP4 ,.r. t ~,-~- t~w ~~ g`` is`,~},,.~. a ram t D~ g an~~~ C yyoodburn Ci of ~~~~ ent eip ~ ev P nt~wn ~Qw nCet&~~Pp° gpe with Lindley, ASL~ l.Voyd U CITY OF WOODBURN Mayor's Alley Downtown Development Plan ,,~ , Public Market - improvements to City parking lot. .. ati..~.,. ~, .. ~, C..I .. t~. ~ l,~ ~~~ r~ `. :. .. ~' ~, ~~ ~.i~ Spenser & Kopper wish 41oyd Q. Li~ulley, ASLA Mayor's Alley would reach from Harrison Street to West Clevelar2d Street provcdm a special place for shopping, dining and events within the Jzeart of Downtown. Mayor's Alley Improvements special paving, lightin ,trash enclosures, and furnis ings. I"~la.~ Mayor's Alley looking north from Hayes Street. Details CITY OF WOODBURN Downtown Development P-an rest S Pedest-•ian curanectlara - City Hcrll to Lihrru;Y• Ctt Y Library ^ pa P•ylnns serve a rrcuaaber of uses. They would ~ su > >art u rcnao > > and arcade alor: ,the east !1 l) b ...r--- edge ofthe Public Market. They could provide specralry lighting ulurrg Mayvr;s Allay curd could be features al dTC end of east-west str•eetr on Front Street City Hall betHleen the railroad and parkin • .. i. t,xu~l7 94 ~..~...... Nortk>, Front Sr!•eet '___. Speiuer & Kopper wills Ll~~yd D. Lindley, ASLA Rerttuve and replirce street pees alum, fl Front-Harri•sun to Oak. Street trees arad furnis•Irings oaa eaa7•west street between First acrd Fr'carat - pak, Cleveland, Arthrrr•, Ga.r field, Hayes, Grant, Cirtcoln, Nurr•isora Downtown Development Plan Vision for the Future • Basis for Downtown Urban Renewal Plan • Calls for specific improvements • Urban Renewal Plan incorporates projects identified in the Downtown Development Plan • Downtown Development Plan Update - -Further refinement of 1998 Plan - Catalysis projects How is urban renewal financed? • Authorized by Oregon Statute to finance improvements in those areas that need special attention and revitalization - Using "tax increment financing". Under tax increment financing, a portion (the increment) of property tax revenues from properties within the urban renewal district are designated to support financing for improvements to the urban renewal area. How is urban renewal financed? 7+! Tic Fi~t~+~ continued Assessed ~1~+'~lu~ Its l~r~ F~arre~ar~l Area '- 1'~x ~C~VE1r~Ua~ ~rm~m~eanE Fh:~e~ err! e~ ~oaeM ~prt~n i~~s ti~th~r Tex Ram ~rMr~~nent ~r~fhl~Y~'~O~PII' ~~r4 r~ ~~~ :~ r r '~~~on9 O~MOrick r~~ How is urban renewal financed? continued • Tax increments are used to repay municipal bonds. Bond proceeds are used to finance improvements that will revitalize the district • New taxes are not imposed to fund urban renewal • Bonds and tax increment financing used to fund projects in the urban renewal plan • Increment of property taxes generated in urban renewal area is temporarily (20 yrs) shifted to repay the bonds used to finance projects in the downtown area Will taxes increase as a result of urban renewal? • Under Oregon Statute -property tax rates are fixed. New property taxes will absolutely not be created as a result of urban renewal • Woodburn's Downtown Urban Renewal Plan also does not authorize any special assessments • Tax revenue generated from the increase in property values multiplied by current tax rates pays for urban renewal Will urban renewal mean less money for schools, etc? • Woodburn is re uired to districts boards~School County, etc.) - no major objections were • • consult with other taxing District, Fire District, Marion raised or comments filed State's School Financing Statutes (ORS Cha tax increment financing, in most cases, does the total amount received by a school district ~pter 327), not affect Property taxes paid out to schools, local governments, and other taxing districts at the same rate and level that were being paid before the formation of the urban renewal Will urban renewal mean less money for schools, etc? continued • Property tax proceeds resulting from the increase in property values within the urban renewal district (called the "tax increment") can be used for urban renewal • In many cases the increase in value would be the result of the urban renewal, so the increase in value and property tax revenues would not have occurred without urban renewal How long will the Urban Renewal District last? • The Urban Renewal District will last 20 years • Tax increment financing will remain in place for a period of time until the bonds are paid off Where else has Urban Renewal been used? • Examples of urban renewal can be seen in our neighbors - Tualatin's downtown "Tualatin Commons" - Sherwood's "Old Town District' - Many well-known places in Portland • Waterfront Park • River Place • Pioneer Courthouse Square - Lake Oswego -downtown - Hillsboro, Gladstone, and Oregon City Will Urban Renewal force property owners to sell? • Plan does not propose any forced sale of property - City has the power to condemn property for public uses, such as street right-of-way • Plan does not propose that the City use its condemnation power • Plan does not require any property owners to modify their property - City does not have the authority to require property owners to modify their property, except to abate nuisances How was the Urban Renewal Plan developed? • Citizens & businesses (1997) partnered with the City to develop Woodburn's Downtown Development Plan • Plan looked for financing for the "catalyst" projects identified in the Downtown Development Plan • Urban renewal and tax increment financing was identified as a potential source of financing • Urban renewal plan was completed in 2001 • The Woodburn's Downtown Urban Renewal Plan provides the financing for the public improvement projects identified in the Woodburn's Downtown Plan What are the boundaries of the Urban Renewal District? • Woodburn's Urban Renewal District includes the City's "old town" • Young Street to Hwy 99E and includes properties along Hwy 99E to the Hwy 214/99E intersection • Front Street to Hwy 214, Hwy 214 west to Interstate 5, and includes some properties on Stacy Allison Drive C CD CD V•^ ~"'~` rf Who is in charge? • Woodburn's City Council, (officially called the Urban Renewal Agency when attending to urban renewal issues) administers the District • Urban Renewal Agency is a separate legal entity from city government, it is governed by the City Council • Similar to other Urban Renewal Agencies • The Urban Renewal Agency must publicly adopt an annual budget like any other government • Subject to all the land use and development requirements of the City, County, State of Oregon and other agencies • Improvement projects are subject to the same public review as any other project the City of Woodburn undertakes How much can be spent? • The Woodburn Downtown Urban Renewal Plan will finance up to $29 million in public improvements over 20 years Pian Projects by Program Streets Undergrounding Redevelopment Fire Other Administration Total $10,026,073 3,128,657 5,040,000 1,135,000 1,504,500 2,270,000 $23,104,230 Urban Renewal -Next Steps • Urban Renewal Agency -Following consideration of Downtown Development Plan Update -modify Urban Renewal Plan accordingly - Review projects - Review financing & assumptions - Prioritize funding • Loan & Grants • Other projects X.~ N r+ O~ •J