Loading...
Agenda - 03/23/2009CITY O F W 00 D B U R N DICK PUGH,T000NCC!'LOR WARD 1 J. MEL SCHMIDT, COUNCILOR WARD II AMENDED COUNCIL AGENDA PETER MCCALLUM, COUNCILOR WARD III JAMES COX, COUNCILOR WARD IV e MARCH 23, ZO~7 ~ 7.00 P.M. FRANK LONERGAN, COUNCILOR WARD V KRISTEN BERKEY, COUNCILOR WARD VI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAM6ERS - 270 MONTGOMERY STREET 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: A. Woodburn Proud, Inc. Blanchette High School seat dedication on March 27th Volcano Stadium. Appointments: B. Sign Focus Group C. Mayor Figley to the Councii of Government as Board Member 4, PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: None Presentations: A. Aware Food Bank -Mike Riggan with MacLaren B. Building Code Fees -Jim Hendryx 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS None. b. COMMUNICATIONS None. 7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC -This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. "Habra interpretes aisponib~es Para aquel~as personas que no habtan Ingjes~ previo acuerbo. Comuniquese a~ X503) 98o-2485... March 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page i 8. CONSENT AGENDA -Items fisted on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be adopted by one motion. Any item maybe removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council Minutes of March 9, 2009 2 Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes. B. Woodburn Planning Commission Minutes of January 22 and 17 February 12, 2009 Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes. C. Planning Project Tracking Sheet 26 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. D. Building Activity for February 2009 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. 31 E. Community Services February Department Statistics 32 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. F. Woodburn Recreation and Park Board Minutes of March 10, 2009 33 Recommended Action: Approve the Minutes. G. Woodburn Police Department Crime Statistics for January and 37 February, 2009 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. H. Woodburn Police Department Code Enforcement Statistics for 44 January and February, 2009 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. I. February Claims 46 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. 9. TABLED BUSINESS None. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 2008-01 (Parks and 51 Recreation Master Plan) (Previously provided to Council during the March 9th Meeting and available to download on the City's Website) March 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page ii 11. GENERAL BUSINESS -Members of the public wishing to comment on items of general business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time may be limited by Mayoral prerogative. A. Council Sill No. 2766 - A Resolution Directing that stop signs be 62 installed on Austin Avenue, Gafield Street, Smith Court, Workman Drive, and Maple Street where they intersect with Smith Drive and/or McLaughlin Drive. Recommended Action: Adopt the Resolution. B. Council Bill No. 2767 - A Resolution Supporting a Transportation 67 and Growth Management (TGM) Grant Application to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan Recommended Action: Adopt the Resolution. C. Liquor License New Outlet Full Off-Premise Sales 70 Recommended Action: The Woodburn City Council recommends that the OLCC approve a New Outlet application for EI Rancho Grande Market, Inc. D. Authority to apply for 2009 COPS CHRP Police Officer Funding 75 Grant Recommended Action: City Council authorizes staff to make application for a Police Officer Position under the 2009 COPS CHRP Grant. 12. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS -These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions that may be called up by the City Council. None 13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to carry on labor negotiations pursuant to ORS 192.6602) ~d). 15. ADJOURNMENT March 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page iii ~~~ ~. ~~~ `J`TOODBUR j~ Incorprr.t/rr! 18Fv March 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Kathy Figley, Mayor SUBJECT: Focus Group Appointments -Sign Standards (Woodburn Development Ordinance) Council has discussed the need to evaluate the City's sign standards, which are contained in the Woodburn Development Code (WDO). The purpose of the Focus Group will be to provide input as changes are evaluated and move forward to the Planning. Commission and City Council. The following appointments are made, subject to the approval of the Council. Focus Group -Woodburn Development Code [sign standards) Ellen Bandelow Pete McCallum Dan Dinges Teri Sunderland Sign Companies Cliff Zauner Mike Sumner Planning Commission City Council Business (small/large) Business (small/large) To be determined Citizen Chamber/Downtown Business owner Elizabeth Vega Hwy 99E Jake Jacobsen Citizen -extensive sign background Kelly Long Hwy 99E Separately, Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director would also like to have a Focus Group involved in other WDO amendments he is proposing to improve the WDO. f will make subsequent appointments for the WDO Focus Group. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator City Attorney ~r-J Finance COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING 0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, MARCH 9, 2009. CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Figley presiding. Mayor Figley stated that she recently learned of a tragedy that happened on Front Street involving a hit and run accident killing a 2-yeaz boy. She requested that a few moments be taken to remember this young child and send thoughts and prayers to his family. 0040 ROLL CALL. Mayor Figley Present Councilor Berkey Absent Councilor Cox Present Councilor Lonergan Present Councilor McCallum Present Councilor Pugh Present Councilor Schmidt Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Assistant City Administrator Stevens, Community Services Director Row, Public Works Director Brown, Community Development Director Hendryx, Building Official Krieg, City Recorder Tennant Mayor Figley stated that Councilor Berkey was unable to attend this meeting due to illness. 0110 PRESENTATION: DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UPDATE. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the overall objective is to look at the physical and economic revitalization of the downtown area. This area will include mixed use development, infrastructure and circulation improvements, landscaping, lighting, public art, and conveniently located public parking areas. A Stakeholder's Working Group was appointed by the Mayor in January 2009 and consists of members from the City Council, Planning Commission, local business owners, and representatives from the Chamber of Commerce and Chemeketa Community College. The consultants had conducted a series of interviews with a number of stakeholders on January 21, 2009 followed by an Open House held later that day with approximately 50 people in attendance. During the Open House, project goals were reviewed and attendees were given comment forms to complete in an effort to begin the public engagement process to see what they would like in the downtown area. The consultant has recently provided staff with the following reports to evaluate: (1) an existing conditions report which looks at the current status of the downtown, (2) a supplementary housing analysis report which Page 1 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 2 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING looked at the report developed by the previous consultant on this project, and (3) a draft downtown strategic business development plan on how to focus the activities in downtown . He stated that they aze also in the process of refining the plans with the consultants and there will be some minor changes to the Downtown Development Code and the Transportation System Plan. Additionally, the consultant is looking at some key sites and development opportunities to promote development and redevelopment, and the plan will review private and public sector roles for implementation. The next Stakeholder's Working Group meeting will beheld in May 2009, an Open House will be scheduled for June 2009, followed by public review and adoption during the months of July and August 2009. Councilor Cox requested staff to consider some other type of sign code provisions for the downtown development district rather than other zones within the City since it is a unique area and would not be allowed under any kind of a sign code that he can conceive of and yet it works fairly well. The other option would be to grandfather the signs into the code but this is not the same as saying it is a legal sign and if something happens to the business or the sign, they cannot rebuild it. Director Hendryx stated that he has recently been working with a local automotive downtown business regarding the current sign ordinance provisions and, with the zero setbacks in the downtown, there is no area for pole or monument signs. Therefore, the downtown businesses do not have the same square footagE for signage that businesses have in other parts of the City. An issue to discuss involves increasing the amount of signage allowed for wall and /or window signs in the downtown area to in an effort to provide them with signage coverage similar to what is allowed is other areas of the City. Councilor McCallum stated that the City needs to make sure that signs in the downtown area fit the look of the downtown theme in an effort to help owners to promote their businesses but still trying not to completely clutter the downtown area. Director Hendryx stated that one of the early suggestions is a loan and grant program for businesses in the downtown area and a good tool for the City to consider is an incentive program for business owners to change their signs to bring them up to code. Councilor Schmidt questioned if the City is still looking at the same plan that was looked at last October or has the design changed. Director Hendryx stated that at the last Open House there were a series of examples, however, no particular example in terms of design but they are staying on same themes of having an integrated downtown, a mix of uses, and good pedestrian circulation in the downtown area. Councilor Pugh expressed his opinion that the entire area of downtown include the homes surrounding the business area and the rehabilitation program to improve these homes should be high on the City's priority list. Page 2 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 3 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING 0870 OREGON YOUTH AUTHORITY PRESENTATION TO THE A.W.A.R.E. FOOD BANK. Mayor Figley stated that a presentation has been scheduled, however, Mr. Riggan is also ill and unable to attend this meeting. The presentation will be re-scheduled for a later date. 0885 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT. Dan Judson, Executive Director, informed the Council of the upcoming Chamber events: (1) Chamber Forum will be held at Cascade Park on Wednesday, March 11`h beginning at 11:45 am with the first speaker being Marion County Commissioner Patti Milne to give a "State of the County" address followed by guest speaker State Senator Peter Courtney. (2) The 55~' Chamber Distinguished Service Awards Banquet will be held at Wellspring with the social hour beginning at 6:00 pm, dinner at 7:00 pm., and the program at 7:45 p.m.. (3) On Saturday, March 14`h, the first Woodburn Proud city-wide cleanup day will begin at 8:00 a.m. and participants will meet at the West Coast Bank East branch. The City will provide transport services to the participants in addition to providing trucks to transport the bags to Allied Waste drop boxes who will take care of the disposal of the garbage. He reviewed a list of businesses and organizations that have offered clean up specific areas of the City and blue ribbons will be placed in these areas. He stated that he is looking forward to having members of the community come together to make the City look nice in preparation of the Tulip Festival. Administrator Derickson stated that this has been a real model on how the City can work with non-profit organizations in a collaborative effort and it can show what can be accomplished when everyone works together for a common goal. Mr. Judson expressed his appreciation to Administrator Derickson and Public Works Director Brown for their assistance on this project. (4) On March 18"', the first joint City /Chamber Economic Task Force meeting will be held between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. To date, 8 individuals have signed up to attend and it has not yet gone out to the press announcing the meeting. Mr. Judson also spoke about Tourism and reminded the Council that the Chamber separated the tourism piece of their activities from the main Chamber activities about a year ago since some members do not want to be a part of the tourism component. He stated that Woodburn is a destination point and an estimated 5 million people visit Woodburn annually with 4 million shopping at the Company Stores, another 250,000 attending the Woodburn Drag races, another 250,000 attending the Tulip Festival, another 200,000 plus visiting local nurseries. The two challenges being faced by the Chamber are (1) to keep the tourists coming during this economy and (2) to make the tourists stay longer in Woodburn. Last year, the Chamber partnered with a group formerly known as the Salem Convention Visitor's Association but is now called Travel Salem. The Chamber hired this group to figure out what the Chamber should be doing for tourism. A Page 3 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 4 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING 4-page section has been placed in the Travel Salem guide which is distributed all over the northwest. There are 180,000 printed copies of this guide and this is a good start for the Chamber is marketing Woodburn as a tourist site. Next year the Winter Olympics will be held in Whistler, Canada, and there will be a lot of motorists on I-5 driving to and from the Olympics. Additionally, a calendar of events for spring, summer and fall is now being printed with 80 events being listed and an itinerary brochure has also been printed to provide visitors options of what they can do in the area thereby patronizing local merchants. Lastly, he stated that merchants who want to be included in the next printing of the brochures will need to be a member of the Willamette Area Tourism (WAT) which involves a $50 membership fee. He stated that the Chamber is working on a lot of ideas to try and put together their budget to come back to the City in April to show where they would like to go with WAT during the next fiscal year. Councilor Schmidt questioned if a business needs to be a part of the Chamber in order to be a member of WAT. Mr. Judson stated that they do not have to be a member of the Chamber since these are two separate organizations with two different missions. Councilor McCallum stated that he was glad to hear of the work the Chamber has done to get others to contribute to the tourism program. Mr. Judson stated that a member of WAT will be allowed to have a brochure rack at the Visitor's Center and also be on the Internet. Anon-profit organization can be in the brochure at no cost but a profit making organization will need to pay the $50 membership fee. 1551 WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT REPORT. Walt Blomberg, Superintendent, stated that he has heard that schools are a sign of success when they have parking problems, therefore, all of their schools are very successful since they really do have parking problems at each of their schools. This is also a sign that they are outgrowing their schools and each school is beyond capacity. The School Board will meet in a special session on March 12`t' to discuss and vote on a possible bond measure for voter consideration. The Board will either submit a bond measure of approximately $94 million in the May or November election which will allow for expanding their facilities to accommodate current and future student population growth over the next 15 to 20 years. He stated that at the last Board meeting, the Excelsior Prep Charter School proposal was approved which would be a 6"' through 12`h grade school. The Board has asked those representing the Charter School to present a plan as to how they will serve English language learners since any school coming into their system needs to make sure they have a plan to serve those students. Another contingency is to insure that they will have enrollment with the Charter School estimating that they will have 100 students their first year but the Board has asked that they make sure they have at least 40 enrolled within the next two months. Lastly, the Board has asked for submittal of a facility lease agreement. Page 4 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 5 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING If those contingencies are made, the Board will proceed with a Charter agreement with the school. SupterintendentB1omberg stated that conferences will begin next week and encouraged parents to schedule conferences with their child's teacher in advance. He also mentioned that over last couple of months the high schools have had a number of universities from around the state recruiting students to attend their school and many students have been given on-site admissions. Lastly, he invited the public to attend the play "Monster" which is being put on by the Woodburn Arts and Communications Academy. The play will be held March 12, 13, and 14`° , 7:00 p.m., in the High School lectorium. Councilor McCallum stated that good schools are good for business and the City attracts a lot of people from outside Woodburn to events and conferences. These people spend dollars and schools need to be included in the whole mix whether it be athletic contests or a conference being held at the school(s). Superintendent Blomberg stated that he will be a member of the Task Force and he feels that schools are a critical piece of economic development and it is important that they can meet the needs of those families who move into our community as new businesses are established. 1975 CONSENT AGENDA. A) approve the City Council regular and executive session minutes of February 23, 2009. PUGH/COX ..... adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 2010 COUNCIL BILL NO. 2765 -RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TO APPLY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTS FROM THE OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FOR THE FINAL PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT AT CENTENNIAL PARK. Council Bill No. 2765 was introduced by Councilor McCallum. Recorder Tennant read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Figley declared Council Bill No. 2765 duly passed. 2100 PROPERTY PURCHASE AT 270 MARSHALL STREET. Community Services Director Row stated that he had provided a presentation to the Council at a previous meeting on the status of the first phase of the Mill Creek Greenway Trail project. This particular property acquisition is an item that is necessary for the City to construct the trail in the manner that it was designed. Currently, there is no access into Hennanson Park I off of Marshall Street. This particular trail project runs from the A Street right-of--way off of Cleveland Street through greenway properties all of the way to Hermanson pond and ends at the right-of--way of Deer Run Street. This trail will be Page 5 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 6 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING predominately a 12 foot wide asphalt trail which is designed in the regional multi-modal standard but as it goes through the more environmentally sensitive areas of Hermanson Park III and the Hermanson pond it will convert to a 6 foot wide wood chip trail. The property acquisition will provide a connection from a sidewalk that will be constructed from Cleveland Street along Marshall Street to the entrance of this park whereby an asphalt trail will then be constructed through Hermanson Park I and ending at Stark Street to the south of the park. He stated that staff has been negotiating with the property owner for quite a period of time and, over the last couple of weeks, have had discussions with the owner on the valuation of the property. A memo has been included in the agenda packet outlining the process followed to come up with the value that was offered to the property owner which has been subsequently accepted by the owner. It was noted that the staff is recommending the purchase of a small triangular portion of the property (1,125 square feet) owned by Edna Seeley and the negotiated price for the property is $10,000 in addition to the City paying for a property line adjustment, all transactional costs, and construction of a 3 foot block wall along the portion of Mrs. Seeley's northerly property Line adjacent to the trail. Councilor Schmidt questioned how close Mrs. Seeley's property comes to the drainage ditch. Director Row stated that her property terminates at the headwall of Mill Creek, therefore, for the trail to access the park property it would have to cut through the triangular piece property. If this property is not acquired, then the City would need to construct some sort of an elevated bridge into the park or extending the creek culvert a distance into the park which would also involve a lot of backfilling to create a natural pathway. There is a maintenance easement that follows the creek bed which gives the City access everywhere along the Mi1lCreek corridor to conduct maintenance activities. If an alternative access needs to be constructed to allow for access into the park from Marshall Street, it is estimated that the cost will be in excess of $60,000. Public Works Director Brown stated that the existing culvert is a deficient design in the way the headwall is currently configured and it will be reconstructed as part of the storm water project. A box culvert will be put in at this Location to try and simulate a more natural stream flow under Marshall Street and relieve the head pressure that is built up under heavy rainfall. The culvert is currently undersized and creates a barrier for the drainage of the system to work. He also stated that under the culvert project, independent of the trail project, the City would have had to acquire additional easements or public right-of- way at this location to complete the culvert replacement project. Councilor Schmidt questioned if there was a deadline in which a decision needed to be made. Director Row reviewed the timeline for the trail project which involves the completion of the final design, submittal of the wetland permit to the State once the property is acquired, a target construction start date of July 1, 2009 with construction during the summer months. The State grant period expiration date is September 30, 2009 and the project Page 6 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 7 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING must be completed with all reports and billings submitted by that date. Councilor Schmidt stated that he had met with a resident last Thursday who resides near the pond and some concerns were brought up that he would like to pursue before a decision is made. He also has concerns about certain aspects of the pathway and he does not feel comfortable about discussing and voting on the issue today. Due to the sensitive nature of his concerns, he would prefer to discuss it in executive session. If possible, he would like to have the Council hold this item over until the next regular meeting before a vote is taken. Director Row suggested that, regardless to the changes to the alignment, the City should still consider acquisition of this property since having this access into the park would be beneficial to the City. Currently, people do access the park off of Marshall Street crossing onto this private property and a resolution to this problem should be considered regardless of the trail project. Councilor Cox stated that he did not know what concerns Councilor Schmidt has, however, he questioned him to see if there was anything about his concerns that would prohibit the City from buying the property. Councilor Schmidt expressed his opinion that if the trail project was not constructed then he did not feel that it was necessary to acquire the property. However, if it is necessary to purchase the property to complete the culvert project then acquisition of the property would be acceptable. COX/PUGH.... approve the purchase and authorize the City Administrator to enter into a sale agreement and accept a deed from Edna Seeley for this property as outlined in the staff report. 3177 Mayor Figley stated that she wanted to give those in the audience an opportunity to speak on this issue even though it may involve other parts of the trail project. John Gervais, Woodburn Independent, raised the question of the validity of an executive session on the kinds of things that would possibly be discussed. Administrator Derickson stated that there has been no executive session scheduled at this point of time. Mayor Figley assured Mr. Gervais that there would not be an executive session at this meeting. 3308 Brenda Tuley, Hermanson Street, stated that she lives at end of Deer Run adjacent to the wetlands and has some serious objections to the trail project. She has made several calls to the Police Department since living there due to drug activity, vandalism, and a homeless camp at the end of Deer Run. The problem with the homeless camp is that it is located in the County and the City Police can do nothing since the Sheriff's department has the jurisdiction over that area which is where the Park and Recreation Department wants to end the trail project. She feels that the trail project would invite more problems into the neighborhood and feels that a lot of the problem stems from a meth house on Wilson Street. In regards to the homeless camp, it will start up again in the spring when weather gets warmer. Additionally, she is concerned that she will see more tagging on Page 7 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 8 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING the back of their fence if the trail project is constructed. She stated that the wetlands is a beautiful area as it currently is and would prefer that it not be changed. Corey Cox, Hennanson Street, expressed his opposition to the trail in the current design. Over the past four years, he has not seen the City provide any maintenance or trash removal from this area and the residents have been the ones doing the work. He picks up the trash monthly which includes alcohol bottles and other debris from various parties held in the area. He stated that he has called the Police on a regular basis to remove trash and get people to stay out of the area after dazk. He stated that he had expressed these concerns in the June 2008 meeting and his fear is that the Parks and Recreation Department is spending money on walking paths that will not be maintained and will continue to attract the opposite of the type of people the Community Service Director is hoping for. He would much rather see the money spent to finish projects that have already been started and focus on projects outlined in their Master Plan which include maintenance of locations and more security at park facilities. Robert Estrada, Hermanson Street, expressed his concern with having more people back in the pond area and the illicit activity at a home on Wilson Street which causes problems along the wetlands. He agreed that the pond and wetlands is a beautiful area and he can understand wanting to give people access to the area but agrees with other residents in this area that the trail project will attract an element they do not need in their neighborhood. He also expressed concern about an increase in traffic along Hermanson if a parking lot is located on the south end of the project. Zandi Cox stated that she grew up in Woodburn and has been a 4-year resident on Hermanson Street. In regards to the acquisition of the property, she is in support of the purchase thereby providing public access off of Marshall Street. In regards to the rest of Hermanson Park, she is opposed to the dirt walking path near the pond in that it is a wetland which is very wet more than 6 months out of the year and almost impossible to maintain. She does not understand why the City wants to spend so much money on a walking path and does not believe that it will be maintained by the City. She believed that the trail project is not right for that area and that it will continue to attract illicit activity. She stated that she understood the timeline the City is under to get the project done by September 30, 2009, however, she felt that the City should not rush into a project that may not be right for an area. She reiterated that the neighborhood would like to keep the area as it is and the problems they currently have there should be addressed first. Dagmar Krone, Grant St, stated that, as a fairly new resident of Woodburn, she had heard of this project two weeks ago and she was excited about it since she runs, rides a bicycle, and walks two large dogs. In order to really get any exercise, she currently drives to Portland to Forest Park and to a park in Forest Grove. She stated that when she saw the Mill Creek project, she noticed that City housing development is in clusters and feels that the project would tie these clusters together. She did not believe that the project is intended to bring outsiders into run the trail. Her experience with trail projects in other areas involve a large number of runners, bicyclists, pedestrians, and sometimes people on Page 8 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 9 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING horses. She did not want to diminish the concerns of the individuals who spoke at this meeting, however, she would like to see a continuous 8-mile trail in Woodburn that is used asintended. Councilor Pugh stated that both he and Councilor Schmidt have stated that they would object to a 12-foot wide asphalt pathway and that a 6-foot asphalt pathway would be more than adequate. Judy Vandersteen, Hermanson Street, stated that they purchased the property twelve years ago because of the wetlands and they had been assured by their realtor that it would always be a protected wetland and they would not have to worry about more traffic or construction. She does not want to have the existing habitat in the wetlands disturbed. She also opposed the purchase of the property since she believes that people will continue to walk across the private property and the private property owners will not do anything to stop this current practice. She also did not want any of the Mill Creek greenway even started since the small amount of improvements the City has made in the past few years to try and improve the water flow to prevent flooding has made it much worse. She also agreed with her neighbors in that there is too much drug activity in the area and from the house on Wilson Street there is a straight path to the homeless camp just south of the city limits. Cliff Zauner stated that when he was a member of the State legislature in 2001, they did a tour of the area because there was a environmental concern due to the housing development in this area. After hearing about this project, he called the Fish & Game Commission today to inquire about permits. Several questions had been asked by the Commission representative as to whether or not the DSL permit covered the fill and removal of dirt and if a totally revised project review has been submitted to the Fish and Wildlife for the whole project. In regards to the grant money, these funds may not be available after this initial phase since the legislature is having a battle over allocation of grant money. He would also like to see another survey to be sent out in the utility bills to solicit comments and hopefully receive more than just 320 responses in a community in excess of 20,000 population. He suggested that the project be delayed until problems on the trail project are cleared up but did not object to the purchase of the property where the culvert will be replaced. Councilor McCallum questioned who he talked to at the Fish & Game Commission. Mr. Zauner stated that her name was Margie who stated that she did not process the application but someone from her department did the work previously. Councilor Schmidt stated that 80% of the City's utility customers received the survey but only 320 surveys were returned. When he asked for a list of who received the surveys, he was told that the mailing list was protected and the names would not be released. Mr. Zauner stated that a path was built in the Tukwila development which is maintained by the residents in this area but very few people use the path. Page 9 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 10 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING Councilor McCallum stated that part of the problem in this development is that the pathway did not get completed even though the pathway was a major selling point for homes in that development. Tim Vandersteen also expressed his opposition to the expansion of the wetlands area in that they have seen a lot of crime in this area and the things that do go on makes him nervous. He stated that he has not seen all of the plans but it concerns him as to where the City is really going with this project and does not understand why the City builds a park without an access in the first place. He questioned the need to purchase access to a park that is already in existence but people cannot really get to. He stated that they have seen tagging and gang activity in that area and did not feel that opening up the area to the south city limits would be a positive thing for the neighborhood. Mayor Figley stated that Hermanson Park I is one of several parks that were remnant parcels deeded to the City by developers who did not want the land. This park has been City owned since the 1960's if not earlier and, at that point, the City considered it acceptable. Acting Police Chief Blevins expressed his appreciation of the comments made by members of the audience. He stated that the Police Department has been working hard on that area although it is true that the camp is in the county and they have been trying to work with the County Sheriff's office on this issue. The Police Department is excited about the trail project since it gives them access that they do not have now through the use of motorcycles and bicycles. Their plan is to patrol that area once it is completed given the call load. He did not want to comment on specific houses and the activity at those locations but they are aware of those houses. Councilor McCallum stated that he has brought up the question on security in the past and he requested that Acting Chief Blevins comment on how having the trail in place might attract others to use it which in turn would make it uncomfortable for the undesirable individuals to use the trail. Acting Chief Blevins stated that the Police have the power to exclude people from any City park but that does not completely solve the problem since the undesirables will just go elsewhere. The department can continue to work with the County to try and get them to commit to some kind of control out there whether it be their code enforcement personnel or sworn deputies who could tear down the tents. If both the City and County worked together in this area, it is hoped that some of these existing problems can be eliminated. 6500 Councilor Cox questioned if the azea is opened up and a path of any sort and size would increase or decrease the problem of the undesirable element. Acting Chief Blevins stated that he did not have an answer to this question since that area is pretty well secluded at this time which is why they hide out there now. With the increased traffic and open access it will give others an opportunity to go into this area and hopefully keep the undesirables out of the area. The key is to have the cooperation of the County and to maintain regular patrols of the area. Page 10 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 11 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING Tape 2 Councilor Schmidt expressed his opinion that people walking on the path during the day will observe the laws but is concerned that those who do not obey the laws will use it at night. Councilor Cox stated that even if acquisition as part of the greenway did not occur, Public Works still needs to do something about the culvert regardless of whether the path project is constructed. He questioned what needs to be done and when would it happen since there are two issues being discussed at this meeting -one being the overall issue of the greenway and the other issue being whether or not to acquire this small triangular piece of property. Public Works Director Brown stated that the culvert replacement on Marshall Street has been on the Capital Improvement Program and, as the Mill Creek project was moving forward, he accelerated the culvert replacement project to align with the trail project since both the street access, the sidewalk construction, the connectivity of the trail concept and the ability to improve the hydraulic behavior of Mill Creek upstream from Marshall Street was advantageous to the City to make sure the culvert replacement aligned with this project. The current culvert is a constriction which allows the water to build up on the upper side of Mill Creek which is in Hermanson Park I and has created flooding across Marshall Street. By increasing the culvert size, it would allow relief of that water to maintain lower velocity and thereby preserving property on the downstream side of Marshall and where Mill Creek makes the turn to go underneath Cleveland Street. With culvert project, they would still have to go to Mrs. Seeley and acquire property and construction easements in order to replace the culvert which is why they have been very engaged in the initial negotiations to acquire the property. He feels that it is important for the City to correct these things at the same time with the sidewalk access being improved and access into either the park or the trail all being enhanced by this culvert replacement. Councilor McCallum expressed his appreciation of the neighbors coming in before the Council to discuss this issue. He stated that security is top on his list and a project of this type will mean more staff and more maintenance but, at the same time when this entire project is completed, it will be one of those positive destinations that Woodburn will have and feels that the project will make their neighborhood better than what they have now. Councilor Cox felt that this has been a very interesting discussion and will be voting for the acquisition of the property since it needs to be acquired anyway. He stated that he has an open mind about where the City goes from there, however, this particular property is needed far the public works project and the price is relatively small and a good investment of public money at this time. Councilor Pugh stated that purchasing this property is not final approval of the plan and there are still issues that need to be addressed on the trail plan but is supportive of the purchase of the property. Page 11 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 12 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAP E READING Mayor Figley stated that she supports the purchase of the property because she does remember how that section of Marshall Street looked back in 1996 when the area flooded. Councilor Schmidt questioned if the City had aright-of--way in that area 13 feet from the curb back on both sides of the street. Director Brown stated that the City did not have aright-of--way in that area to the depth mentioned by Councilor Schmidt and there is an insufficient amount ofright-of--way available to do the construction work without acquiring the property. On roll call vote, the motion passed 4-0-1 with Councilor Schmidt abstaining. 0729 OLCC LIOUOR LICENSE NEW OUTLET FULL ON-PREMISE SALES: Cinco De Maxo TacLueria #2.611 N. Pacific Highway. A liquor license application was submitted by Roberto I. Caballero, DBA: Cinco De Mayo Taqueria #2, for a New Outlet full on-premise sales at the business location previously occupied by Heidi's Cafe which did not have a liquor license. COX/LONERGAN.... recommend to OLCC approval of a new outlet application for Cinco De Mayo Taqueria #2. Councilor McCallum stated that he did not oppose the motion but each application does add an additional burden on the Police Department since they have to monitor and answer calls for service. The motion passed unanimously. 0830 OLCC LIQUOR LICENSE NEW OUTLET OFF-PREMISE SALES: C & M Market, 936 N. Pacific Highwav. A liquor license application was submitted by Basil Elias, DBA: C & M Market, for a New Outlet Off-Premise Sales to be located at 936 N. Pacific Highway in Ma1199. MCCALLUM/PUGH... recommend to OLCC approval of the liquor license application of C & M Market. The motion passed unanimously. 0860 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A) Administrator Derickson stated that staff has provided the Council with a copy of the Park Master Plan which has been through the Planning Commission and will be on the next Council agenda for discussion. B) Administrator Derickson stated that he will be attending an Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) meeting on Wednesday, Mazch 11`h, to testify in support in the City's $950,000 request for stimulus funds to complete Phase II of the Frvnt Street project. He invited other Councilors to attend and he will be scheduling a brief meeting for Wednesday morning to go over the points they would like to make before the OTC. C) Administrator Derickson stated that he had seen on the Planning Commission agenda where Community Development Director Hendryx has put together a presentation on the Sign ordinance that graphically shows every sign that is allowed in the City under the Page 12 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 13 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING existing ordinance. He was surprised to see how many are actually allowed and he will be providing a copy of the allowable signs to the Council and to anyone else that is interested since it will be a good starting point for the Sign Ordinance revision process. D) On March 18`t', the first joint meeting of the Economic Development Committee will be held and Councilor Lonergan is a part of this Committee. He hoped that there will be a large group of people in attendance to see what is being proposed and how the City can advance their economic development planning. E) Lastly, he stated that he had attended a workshop at the Chemeketa Community College campus and learned that Woodburn's downtown campus serves approx 8,800 students of which 70% are from Woodburn. 1125 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS. Councilor Cox stated that he would let Administrator Derickson know what his time availability will be on March 1 I"' Councilor Schmidt stated that he had received an e-mail regarding the Charter school trying to find a location to lease and the zoning ordinance does not allow a charter school in a commercial building. Previously the Sylvan Learning Center was located in the Woodburn Crossing shopping center and questioned if it would be possible to allow the school in that commercial area. Councilor Pugh stated that the shopping center has plenty of available space and feels that the Council should consider a change in the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) so that a school could be located in a commercial zone. Mayor Figley felt that it would be interesting to know from the School District's point of view what their minimum requirements aze. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that this issue had been brought up last week and in his review of the WDO, it does allow elementary and secondary schools in residential, downtown, and nodal commercial zones only. A code amendment would be necessary to allow schools in a commercial zone and it is a policy decision as to whether or not this would be appropriate. It was noted that some communities do allow schools in all but industrial zones. Councilor McCallum that when satellite schools were located in the City, it was the businesses that complained to the schools and did not like having the kids surrounding their businesses. Councilor Pugh stated that he did not know if the owners of the shopping center would want to have a school on their property. Councilor Cox also mentioned that Sylvan Learning Center was a remedial program for youth who needed help but a charter school would have the same type of needs for a playgrounds and recreational areas that any other school would have which aze not necessarily found in a shopping center. Councilor McCallum stated that charter schools do not have to meet all the standards that a public school is required to have. Page i 3 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 14 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING Councilor McCallum stated that before the Sign Ordinance was adopted there was a photographic study of different signs in Woodburn and with the adoption of the Sign Ordinance, the City is a much more attractive place. He questioned if staffwas able to locate the photographs of the different signs that were used in the study. Director Hendryx stated that his staff did find the photographs. Councilor McCallum stated that he is a stamp collector and he has collected a number of cancellations of special stamps from a multitude of post offices. He stated that he considers the Woodburn Post Office to be outstanding and they give excellent care to their customers. Councilor Pugh stated that there had been a traffic speed issue in the Smith Addition and he shared with the Council that the attitude of the residents is now that they feel it has been resolved. He questioned if there is any necessity for official action to be taken to install stop signs on particular streets in that area. Administrator Derickson stated that he has requested Public Works Director Brown to look into the request for the addition of some stop signs and he will keep the Council posted as the work progresses. Mayor Figley briefly reviewed her trip to Washington DC to meet with Oregon congressional leaders on transportation needs for the City. She stated that they had taken the time to explain what has been done what the needs are and how they fit into an overall economic development package to Congressman Schraeder and staffers from Senator Wyden's and Senator Merkley's offices. Time was also spent with the senior staffer for the Environment and Public Works committee to hear the I-5 interchange proposal if it made it to the earmark list. They were not able to schedule an appointment time with Congressman De Fazio or his staffer but she took the liberty after the Marion County representatives had left and she was also able to meet with one of Congressman DeFazio's staffers and one of the Iverson family members was also there to help fill in the gaps to talk about the Woodburn interchange congestion. She also had some conversations with some Senior staff members of the Federal Highway Administration and she became aware of an additional pool of stimulus money dedicated toward large projects and towards projects that may not be asshovel-ready. After attending last week's MWACT meeting, these funds are on ODOT'S radar and the issue of whether or not Woodburn would qualify is up for discussion. She stated that she will be sharing a written report with the Council and is looking forward to the Wednesday meeting with the Oregon Transportation Commission. Page 14 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 15 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MARCH 9, 2009 TAPE READING 2500 ADJOURNMENT. MCCALLUM /PUGH ....meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.. APPROVED KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR ATTEST Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 15 -Council Meeting Minutes, March 9, 2009 16 WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES January 22, 2009 CONVENED The Planning Commission met in a regular session at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers with Chairperson Bandelow presiding. Chairperson Bandelow questioned members of the Planning Commission having potential conflicts such as family, financial, or business relationship with regard to the meeting. If such a potential conflict exists, she asked whether the commissioner in question believes he or she is without actual bias or whether he or she would like to step down from the Planning Commission during the meeting. There were none. Chairperson Bandelow announced that the agenda is available at the back of the room. We will consider items one at a time according to the order listed in the agenda. The Planning Commission Meeting would be treated as a workshop. All persons wishing to speak are welcome to speak at any point in time without going to the podium. ROLL CALL Chairperson Bandelow P Vice Chairperson Vancil A Commissioner GrosJacques P Commissioner Grigorieff P Commissioner Hutchison P Commissioner Jennings P Commissioner Kenagy P Staff Present: Jim Hendryx -Community Development Director Jon Stewart -Assistant City Attorney Natalie Labossiere -Senior Planner Don Dolenc -Associate Planner Sasha Sprauer-Administrative Assistant Commissioner Jennings led the salute to the flag. MINUTES A. Woodburn Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 8, 2009. Commissioner Jenninas moved to accept the minutes. Commissioner Grigorieff seconded the motion, which unanimously carried. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE None. Planning Commission Meefing January 22, 2009 Page 7 of 4 17 DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Planning Commission Training Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained types of land use decisions. Legislative decisions allow for latitude. They are made from a policy making body and the rules are applied to the entire city. Quasi judicial decisions are inflexible. The Commission acts as a judge and the rules are applied to individuals. Most of the time, the Planning Commission would make quasi judicial decisions. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained that legislative land use decisions are policy decisions constrained by state and local laws. There are procedural requirements that must be followed. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to the required statements that the Planning Commission and staff must read during public hearings. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained quasi-judicial land use decisions in-depth. The rules and processes that are required are constrained, with the goal that they provide due process and fair treatment. He stated staff must ensure that applications comply with the WDO requirements, and both staff and the Planning Commission must use limited discretion throughout the process. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained that staff and the Planning Commission must make decisions based on the criteria effective at application submittal. Assistant City Attorney Stuart described the difference between ambiguities in the code versus disagreement with the code. Ambiguity in the code refers to questions of the provision's meaning. The provision is unclear or vague. The Planning Commission has the option to ask staff for more research when a provision is ambiguous. Disagreement with the code refers to specific definitions. The provision does not allow leniency or discretion, and the code is black- and-white. The Planning Commission has the option to request a formal interpretation by City Council when they disagree with a provision. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained how to ensure evidence enters the record. Evidence is in the record when it is in the application, staff report, and/or written or oral testimony in a public hearing. Evidence found during a site visit could be declared in a public hearing when it allows for rebuttal. A decision must be based on what is in the record. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to evidence collected during site visits in past projects. Assistant City Attorney Stuart stated when applicants, staff and/or the Planning Commission disagree with the intended purpose of an area, staff must research and provide additions! findings. The Planning Commission can call for a continuance when they need more findings or need to review documents submitted into record. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained that the burden of proof lies on the applicant. They must have findings to show that their project meets WDO requirements. Assistant City Attorney Stuart stated that decisions must be based on what a reasonable person could find. Planning Commission Meeting January 22, 2009 Page 2 of 4 18 Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained the procedural requirements of a public hearing. Everyone has a right to a public hearing and to present or rebut evidence. Rebuttal is always allowed when new evidence is entered into the record. The Planning Commission must notify the public that they have ex-parte contact, and disclose and describe the content before the hearing. The public can challenge a Planning Commissioner about having ex-parte contact, or a conflict of interest. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained that ex-parte contact is any contact with the applicant before the public hearing. Bias is prejudice or prejudgment that would intertere with the objectivity of the case. Conflicts of interest are actual conflicts or relations that would result in persona! financial gain or loss based on the decision of the Planning Commission. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to evidence versus arguments, and the procedural requirement to allow for rebuttal. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained that evidence is facts, and arguments are the discussion of facts. He also stated that before the close of a public hearing, the public can request the record remain open for seven days. The Planning Commission has the option to allow for a continuance, or for the record to remain open. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to when the Planning Commission should ask staff questions. It is best to ask questions when the hearing is open. The Planning Commission can ask staff clarifying questions at any time during the public hearing. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to the timeframe of the public hearing. If the Planning Commission wishes to set a timeframe for oral testimony, they must set the time limit at the start of the public hearing. Rules must remain consistent. The Chairperson may ask the speaker to focus and address the criteria. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained ethics and commission rules of the Planning Commission. The Attorney and Assistant City Attorney represent the city. The State of Oregon's Ethics Commission represents the Planning Commission and requires each commissioner to complete a quarterly ethics form. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to bias and what must be declared in a hearing. Bias is subjective and does not need to be declared, although the public may challenge whether there is bias. Assistant City Attorney Stuart explained the order in which the Planning Commission must conduct a hearing. During the preliminary announcements, when the Planning Commission reviews the posted meeting outline, the public has the opportunity to "Raise it or Waive it." They can bring up an issue for further discussion, or they loose the opportunity to bring it up later. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the Open House on January 21, 2009 was a success. He also stated that the Mayor would appoint a task force dedicated towards updating the WDO Sign Regulations. He would like the Planning Commission to create a subcommittee to address staff reports, and a subcommittee to create Planning Commission rules. Planning Commission Meeting January 22, 2009 Page 3 of 4 19 BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION None. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hutchison moved to adjourn the meeting, Commissioner Grigorieff seconded the motion, which unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM. APPROVED ELLEN BANDELOW, CHAIRPERSON Date ATTEST Jim Hendryx Date Community Development Director City of Woodburn, Oregon Planning Commission Meeting January 22, 2009 Page 4 of 4 20 WOODBURN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES February 12, 2009 CONVENED The Planning Commission met in a regular session at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers with Chairperson Bandefiow presiding. Chairperson Bandelow questioned members of the Planning Commission having potential conflicts such as family, financial, or business relationship with regard to the meeting. If such a potential conflict exists, she asked whether the commissioner in question believes he or she is without actual bias or whether he or she would like to step down from the Planning Commission during the meeting. There were none. Chairoerson Bandelow announced that the agenda is available at the back of the room. We will consider items one at a time according to the order listed in the agenda. We will follow the hearing procedure outlined on the public hearing procedure board. All persons wishing to speak are requested to come to the podium and give their name and address. Any individuals speaking from other than the podium will not be recognized. ROLL CALL Chairperson Bandelow P Vice Chairperson Vancii P Commissioner GrosJacques P Commissiioner Grigorieff P Commissioner Hutchison A Commissioner Jennings A Commissioner Kenagy P Staff Present: Jim Hendryx -Community Development Director Jon Stewart -Assistant City Attorney Jim Row -Community Services Director Natalie Labossiere -Senior Planner Don Dolenc -Associate Planner Sasha Sprauer -Administrative Assistant Vice Chairperson Vancil led the salute to the flag. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE Community Development Director Hendrvx stated that because there were no hearings on the agenda, the planning commission meeting would be treated as a workshop. Community Services Director, Jim Row, would present the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan to the Planning Commission. MINUTES A. Woodburn Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 22, 2009. Commissioner Grosiacaues moved to accept the minutes, with a change on the Building Activity Report date to reflect January 2009. Commissioner Gri oq rieff seconded the motion, which unanimously carried. Planning Commission Meeting February 12, 2009 Page 7 of 5 21 DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Pfan presentation Community Services Director Row explained that a public hearing for the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan was scheduled for the following Planning Commission meeting, February 26, 2009, for a recommendation to City Council. He wanted to allow the Planning Commission an opportunity to ask questions, request changes or request more information. The plan represents an update to the 1999 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. It follows a different methodology in making the plan by assessing the level service and making recommendations. The processes required that the city measured and reflect on public input, inventory and analyze the current system, complete a leve{ of service analysis, and determine recommendations. The project began with akick-off meeting with the consulting team in November 2007. There was significant community input that began with focus group meetings made up of members of the public, stakeholders, Parks and Recreation partners, and staff. The citizen's survey took place in February and March 2008. In total, Community Services mailed 5,000 surveys to residents within the zip code, which represented a 68% saturation level. In total, 349 surveys were completed and returned, which represented a 7% response rate. The survey results indicated that several demographic groups had been underrepresented. Ethnic origin, homeownership, and age demographics were not representative of the community. The responses of the survey were weighted to reflect the underrepresented groups. The department completed an Inventory Assessment and Level of Service Analysis to determine the condition of every park in the City. Each component of the park was given a neighborhood and a community score to indicate the level of service it provided. The plan also includes a Recommendations and Action Plan. The recommendations were presented to the public in September 2008 and then modified to reflect the public's concerns. The plan identified several key issues that need to be addressed, which include planning, marketing and communications, and credibility. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and Community Services Director Row in regards to marketing and reaching the Spanish speaking community. Community Services Director Row stated that he would like to implement a "mystery shopper' program to measure the level of service Community Services offers their customers and participants. The department needs to track performance measures and create standards for evaluating their programs, increase programming and partnerships, and increase cost recovery and funding through both traditional and alternative methods. The Operations and Maintenance recommendation suggested material and equipment sharing between City Departments. The interconnection requires good communication between Park Planning and Development, Recreation Programming, and Maintenance and Operations. The plan is split into four, four-year periods with varying budgets. Planning Commission Meeting February 72, 2009 Page 2 of 5 22 There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and Community Services Director Row in regards to the priorities given to the parks, and the reasoning for their placement in the plan. They discussed the difficulty in funding existing parks without the use of System Development Fees (SDCs). There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and Community Services Director Row in regards to how SDCs are utilized by the City. There was discussion in regards to the lack of park space behind the development southeast of Interstate 5 and its location on the priority list. Community Services Director Row stated that the Planning Commission can recommend the new park southeast of I-5 be moved higher up on the priority list. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and Community Services Director Row in regards to creating a walking route from the Evergreen area to Centennial Park. The City should look at standards for dedicated land for future major development. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and Community Services Director Row in regards to funding. Community Services Director Row stated that they have received funding through Oregon lottery dollars dedicated by Measure 66, Land and Water Conservation Fund, Recreational Trails program, and general obligation bonds. Community Services Director Row gave an overview of several recommended projects which included the Community Center and a Cultural Arts Center. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to the new residential areas in the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). There was discussion in regards to the new residential area in west Woodburn, currently developed with single family homes on one acre lots. Community Services Director Row stated that they would look at removing the park recommendation in west Woodbum, and ensure that the area south of I-5 is a high priority. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the Public Hearing for this project was scheduled for the following Planning Commission Meeting. The Planning Commission can recommend changes to the plan to City Council. Chairperson Bandelow asked if there were any questions for staff. None. B. Planning Commission Survey Discussion Community Development Director Hendryx presented the results of the Community Development Survey that was distributed to the Planning Commission, City Council, staff and the public. The survey includes alt of the comments that were received. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to customer service, downtown parking, and signage. There was discussion in regards to the Planning Commissioners experience with the department and the changes that they have seen in the last several months. Planning Commission Meeting February 12, 2009 Page 3 of 5 23 Chairperson Bandelow stated that sign enforcement is complaint driven and not evenly enforced throughout the community. Community Development Director Hendrvx stated that the Mayor has put together a list of people to serve on a focus group to review the sign code in the Woodburn Development Ordinance iWDO). The list will include a Planning Commissioner and City Councilor. Staff will also review critical issues in the WDO regarding the sign code. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to WDO usability and understandability. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that staff was currently reviewing the entire development process. The goal is to create clear expectations and more information for customers. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to various changes that could be made to the WDO. Community Development Director Hendrvx invited the Planning Commissioner to a workshop conducted by the Mid-Willamette Valley Council of Governments. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission in regards to sign code violations and exempt signs allowed by the WDO. C. Review of Staff Report Formats Community Development Director Hendrvx stated that staff had collected staff reports from other cities for the Planning Commission to review and discuss in regards to format. Each Planning Commissioner listed their likes, which included having the planning background and history at the beginning of the staff reports, the pictures and aerial photos included in the reports, an applicant's findings section, and a 120-day clock on the front page. They also liked having a table of contents, line numbering, and an executive summary. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to citing the section number in the WDO, instead of the entire statement. Community Development Director Hendryx stated that staff would make format changes to their staff reports for the Planning Commission to review. REPORTS Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the Building Department had a busy month. There was discussion amongst the Planning Commission and staff in regards to taxi-cab services and mobile produce sales. BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION None. Planning Commission Meeting February ?2, 2009 Page 4 of 5 24 ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Grosiacaues moved to adjourn the meeting, Commissioner Kenaav seconded the motion, which unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:05 PM. APPROVED ATTEST ELLEN BANDELOW, CHAIRPERSON Date Jim Hendryx Date Community Development Director City of Woodburn, Oregon Planning Commission Meefing February 12, 2009 Page 5 of 5 25 Project AppBcant Description Status: Date Deemed 120 Day Planner Referrals Faalit~s Mail Notice Notice to Post Stl Rpt Due PC Hearing PC Final Appeal Sitelocation: Received Complete Comp Date Meeting for PC Paper Properly Admin Dec. Order Deadline CPA 2008-01, City of Amend the Comp. Plan Received 12129/2008 Natalie D2106/2009 01/31/2009 02/26/2009 Woodburn - to adopt the revised labossiere Community Parks and Recreation Services Master Plan as a sub- exhibiL FSUB 21X18.01, Steve Final Subdivisbn Recert+ed 09/03!2008 Don Dolenc 09/12/2008 Farnsworth- approval Welkin Engineering 344 Hardcastle Ave. 1A2007A2, City of LegislatrveAmendment Received 11/26/2007 Natalie Woodburn Period Review Remand - Labossiere Street City of Woodburn LA 2007-03, City of legislative Amendment Received 11(26!2007 Nata1'~e Woodburn labossiere 270 tulon~omery St. PAR 2008-07, Theron Covey, Partition property into 2 Received 09110/2008 Don Dolenc Churchill parczls Leonard 417 Gatch Street 05/24/2008 05!24/2008 06/05/2008 06/13/2008 06/1312008 06/26/2008 e y ~~, +~~ wa, 3.; , ,. .3' .'..~ -i4'`~~,~ ~' K,t_~'r ;.~~- ~ ;_.a'aF,'~ i >a` ~~P ~ ~' a .~ry'~i ~~ s~ - fi ~ 'k _, n '": .~,'' ~ k~, ~ .?a: 8fi~. -~.~ ~. <~, r; . :: ~ .-c.~;;,,;„m -_::.~p+y9o- .~ .~- ~.~!,• .: ~ .., 'L '~ _.- J. ~~~} ~.-r.. ~~~ u _ .}a; uPw s«. ~. .v~, .} "}.. da.. r. ~ ~. PUD 2006.01, ZC 2006-01, Boones Crossing, LLC - Parcels 1, 2 8 3 of Partition Modifications to Boones Inwmplete 1013112006 2128!2007 04/29/2007 Natafe Labossiere CU 2006.04, CPC 2007-01 Mike Hanks Plat2006-55 Crossing PUD ~~~ ~ ,fit ,-_ ~~ ~ a r_ nw~`-`s~Rr' - ~": FS._ ..1~.i ~ 5.Y _- nr , ~~-~.t ~. _ : w c~a~ . p~v: Incomplete Ltr Project Applicant SiteL.ocation: Description Status: Date Received Sent Out 120-App Received 180-Expiratlon: Plaimer Type t Applications App Complete ! Folder Name Pre-App Memo Applicant Project! PreApp Mtg SiteLocation Description Date Recd: Complete Status: Planner: FNC 2009-002 Arnold Benavidez Benavidez Tires 595 N Pacific HY 30' x 20' x 6' wooden fence 02/05/2009 Don Dolenc FPUD 2007-02 Bryan Cavaness Boones Crossing Dahlia Street and Phase III Brown Street 07/12/2007 Don Dolenc FSUB 2008-01 Steve Castle Court 344 Hardcastle Ave. final subdivision plan approval Farnsworth- Subidivision Welkin Engineering 09!0312008 PlA 2009-01 City of City of Woodburn Hermanson Park I Adjust the property line to include 1,125 03!03/2009 Woodbum -Jim and Marshall Street sq ft of property acquired from 270 Row Marshall Street Received Don Dolenc Don Dolenc _.ss,~~ ~~ _ - ~..~~ . BL =Business License EXT =Extension FPUD =Final PUD SIGN =Sign Permit TMKT =Temporary Marketing Permit TSP =Temporary Sign Permit PAPP =Pre-Application FNC =Fence Permit PLA =Property Line Adj Taesday, March 70, 2009 28 Activity Report - February 012009 to /?'arch 09 2009 Folder Narne Applicant Project SiteLocation Description Date Rec'd.• App Comple Status: Planner: BL 2009-013 HFD No 55, Inc. - J Crew Factory 1001 Arney RD STE retail apparel sales 02/02/2009 02/02!2009 Approved Don Dolenc Nicole Calhoun 904 BL 2009-014 Clark Signs -Dale Dale L. Clark DBA Contractor Electric sign manufacturing, intallation 02/02/2009 02/02/2009 Approved Don Dolenc L. Clark Clark Signs and repairs BL 2009-014 Maria Guadalupe Maria's Beauty Salon 595 N Pacific HY beauty salon 02/03/2009 02/18/2009 Approved Don Dolenc Estrada BL 2009-015 Isidro Arroyo Radio Cab 297 Hawley ST taxi service 02/11/2009 02/11/2009 Approved Don Dolenc BL 2009-16 Curtis Bunch Hobbies Supplies 436 Oats Street E Commerce Hobbies Supplies 02/17/2009 02/19/2009 Approved Don Dolenc BL 2009-17 Randall A. Bronge International Contractor General Contractor 02/17/2009 02/19/2009 Approved Don Dolenc Contractors BL 2009-18 Eufrosinia Fabric Boutique 774 N Pacific HY Retail fabric sales and embroidery 02/18/2009 02125!2009 Withdrawn Don Dolenc BL 2009-19 BL 2009-20 BL 2009-21 BL 2009-22 BL 2009-23 Chemishoff Johnny Guzman Team Guzman 289 Harvard DR Marta Ivanov F. Quality Construction Contractor of Woodburn John Bradley R & H Construction Contractor Co. Colton Tidwell BAN AMER 199 N Front ST Victoriano Rodriguez P. MESINAY Clean Up 384 Gatch ST BL 2009.24 Eric Camp All Fuel Installation and Service FNC 2009-002 Arnold Benavidez Benavidez Tires FNC 2009-03 Dagmar Kinne Dagmar Kinne FNC 2009-04 Maria Loyola Maria Loyola services motorcyGe diagnostic service 02/27/2009 03/02/2009 Denied-Final Don Dolenc cleaning service 03/03/2009 03/05/2009 Approved Don Dolenc General Commercial Construction 03/05/2009 Contractor income tax service and processing, and 03/05/2009 notary cleaing service 03/06/2009 03/06/2009 Approved 03/06/2009 Approved 03/09/2009 Approved contractor fireplace installation 595 N Pacific HY 586 Grant ST 2333 W Hayes ST SIGN 2009-07 Ramsay Signs - Chevron - Woodburn 2990 Newberg HY Steve Walker Fast Service Inc. 03/06/2009 03/09/2009 Approved 30' x 20' x 6' wooden fence 02/05/2009 Replacement wooden fence 02/20/2009 02/20/2009 Approved 1.4' fence at W property line; 2. 6' 02/27/2009 02/27/2009 Approved fence 12' from W property line; 3. 6' fence at E property line (2) new canopy "Chevron Word Marks" 02/04/2009 02/04/2009 Approved signs and (1) new "Chevron Hallmark" signs. Don Dolenc Don Dolenc Don Dolenc Don Dolenc Don Dolenc Natalie Labossie Don Dolenc Don Dolenc Tuesday, MarcG 10, 2009 BL, =Business License EXT =Extension SIGN =Sign Permit TM KT =Temporary Marketing Permit TSP =Temporary Sign Permit PAPP =Pre-Application FNC =Fence Permit 29 Folder Name Applicant Project SiteLocation Description Date Recd: App eomple Status: Planner: SIGN 2009-08 Meyer Sign Vans 1001 Arney RD STE (1) new electrical wall sign 02/06/2009 02/13/2009 Approved Don Dolenc Company 504 SIGN 2009-09 Ray King King's Cupboard 2225 N Pacific HY (1) new wall sign 02I09J2009 02109!2009 Approved Don Dolenc STE A TMKT 2009-01 Cipriano Cipriano Velasquez 2620 Newberg HY flower sales for Mother's Day at Dairy 02112!2009 02/1312009 Approved Don Dolenc Velasquez Queen TSP 2009-02 Contact - MAPS Credit Union 1860 Newberg HY 38" x 110" temporary banner, displayed 02/24/2009 02!25!2009 Approved Don Dolenc Jennifer for 2 periods beginning Marcfi 2, 2009 Schnelling Tuesda~~, hfarch 1 D, 2009 BL =Business License EXT =Extension SIGN =Sign Permit TMKT =Temporary Marketing Perznit TSP =Temporary Sign Permit PAPP =Pre-Application FNC =Fence Pernlit 30 CITY OF WOODBURN Communify Development MEMORANDUM 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Date: March 4, 2009 To: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director From: Building Division Subject: Building Activity for February 2009 2007 2008 2009 No. DoNar Amount No. Dollar Amount No. Dolla- Amount Single-Family Residential 7 $1,209,640 10 $1,941,000 2 $310,663 Multi-Family Residential 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Assisted Living Facilities 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Residential Adds & Alts 2 $24,754 3 $51,836 4 $18,555 Industrial 0 $0 0 $0 4 $154,900 Commercial 10 $909,050 6 $2,116,100 7 $55,650 Signs and Fences 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Manufactured Homes 0 $0 1 $20,000 1 $17,209 TOTALS 19 $2,143,444 20 $4,128,936 18 $556,977 Fiscal Year to Date (July 1 - June 30 511,683,807 ;19,969,982 ;7,000,614 L-~Comnu~ty DwNoprt+~nl~Bui~anp~Buildbq ~Ctlv~M8ldWct-2009~BICp Adlvib- Msmosvrbno Feoruary 2oo9.doc 31 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STATISTICS FEBRUARY 2009 Recreation Services Division Feb-0 Feb-09 2008 Y7D 2009 YTD Revenue: 12,971.50 1,763.50 100,443.57 91,676.99 Expenditures: 27,158.21 25,111.62 230,620.24 199,227.89 Program Attendance: Youth Sports : 226 204 928 1,128 Adult Sports: 1fi0 190 2,221 1,054 Youth Programs: 0 0 1,610 429 Adult Programs: 5 33 28 184 Teen Programs: 342 1,118 3,039 5,127 After School Club : 2,651 2,415 13,243 12,166 Special Events: 0 27 9,500 2,810 TOTAL: 3,344 3,987 30,569 22,898 Aquatics Division Feb-08 Feb-09 2008 YTD 2009 YTD Revenue: 15,863.18 20,493.80 111,767.53 128,732.70 Expenditures: 44,980.98 52,182.69 375,667.59 415,860.62 Cost Recovery: 35% 39% 30°I° 31 Total Facility Attendance: 5,532 4,548 34,955 39,368 Lesson Enrollment: Group: 93 60 861 801 Adults: 7 4 28 11 Private: 6 5 34 61 4th Grade: 0 22 428 287 LESSON TOTAL: 181 91 1,426 1,160 Library Division Feb-08 Feb-09 2008 YTD 2009 YTD Revenue: $1,935.99 $18,477.59 $48,241.38 $87,927.30 Expenditures: $72,740.27 $83,696.07 $628,214.56 $682,260.99 Library Attendance: 18,144 17,475 124,322 133,155 Library Circulation: 10,561 11,941 90,786 93,521 Adult Program Count: 3 2 14 23 Adult Attendance: 95 29 3,840 3,847 Youth Service Proaram Count: 27 30 207 178 Youth Service Attendance: 436 509 3,970 4,464 Database Usaae; 1,483 668 4,927 12,443 Adult Computer Usaae: 4,424 4,013 34,384 31,852 Youth Services Computer Usaae: 836 904 6,747 7,285 Room Reservations 14 28 51 85 New Adds: 317 363 3,893 3,068 Volunteer Hours Worked: 70 135 723 886 FEBRUARY 2008 32 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order The meeting and was called to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call Board Chair Vacant Board Secretary Rosetta Wangerin Absent Member Joseph Nicoletti Present Member Judy Wesemann Absent Member Eric Morris Present Member Charlene Williams Present Member Alexa Morris Absent Staff present: Jim Row, Community Services Director; Stu Spence, Recreation Debbie Wadliegh, Aquatic Manager; Services Manager; Paulette Zastoupil, A.A; Matt Gywnn, Public Works Maintenance Superintendent; Aubrie Corey, Ameri- Corps Volunteer. Annual Election of Officers Board Chair -Eric Morris nominated Rosetta Wangerin for Board Chair. No other nominations, so the Board unanimously elected Rosetta Wangerin to the position of Board Chair. Board Secretary -Joseph Nicoletti nominated Eric Moms for the Board Secretary position. No other nominations, so the Board unanimously elected Eric Morns to the position of Board Secretary. 4. Approval of Minutes from February 10, 2009 Joseph NicolettiJEric Morris -Motion to accept the minutes as written. The motion passed unanimously. 5. Business from the Audience None. 6. OLD BUSINESS Parks and Recreation Master Plan Jim reported that the Master Plan went to the Planning Commission on February 12, and then again presented at a public hearing on February 26`x' where the Planning Commission recommended one significant change; to move the recommendation to add one park on the southwest side of the city, east of I-5 up from the 2013-2016 time period to the 2009-2012 time period. The Commission then formally recommended approval to the City Council. The Plan will now be presented to the City Council at a public hearing on March 23, 2009. A copy of the Plan's Executive Summary was distributed to the Board and Jim gave a brief PowerPoint presentation and explained the process, key issues and cost estimates and timelines that are in the summary. Page 1 33 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. 7. NEW BUSINESS Woodburn Proud Clean-Up Day The Woodburn Proud Clean-up Day on March 14~', 8 a.m. -noon is a joint effort of the Woodburn Chamber of Commerce and the City, to clean up the community along Hwy 99E and Hwy 214 and segments of the greenway and various parks throughout the city. People interested in helping, need to report to the West Coast Bank at Mid-Valley Plaza at 8 a.m. to view a required ODOT safety video. They will then be transported to various designated clean-up locations. Woodburn Public Works will be on duty to pick up filled trash bags, tires, debris and etc from the clean-up locations. Other areas such as; Legion, Burlingham and Settlemier Parks aze scheduled to be cleaned by various service and school groups. Woodburn Proud, Inc This is a continued effort to create a foundation to solicit and accept donations and distribute funds toward community causes. The Foundation was created in early 2007, but never really got off the ground. As a result of the December 2008 bombing tragedy, the process of organizing the Foundation has gained a significant head of steam, including broadening its focus to include supporting the families affected by the bombing incident. As a result of the change in focus, the foundation has been renamed Woodburn Proud. Inc. The organizing committee hopes to file for the organization's IRS tax exempt status in the coming months. Business from the Department Recreation -Stu Spence Adult Sports -Men's League Basketball has 18 teams and will be ending in 2 weeks. Stu is organizing an Adult Soccer League this summer. Youth Sports -Youth basketball ended last Saturday with 204 kids on 21 teams. Spring is gearing up with T-ball, Toss-ball (coach pitch) and Girls softball. The department held a Junior NBA/WNBA skills challenge in February where 28 kids participated, and 4 winners received free Blazers tickets. Active Adult -The active adult trip to Oregon Trail and Interpretive Center had 21 participants, the Itzhak Perlman concert in February had 12 participants. Teen Program -The Settlemier Teen Center is now averaging about 15-20 kids a day. The PALYEP Grant paid for ski lessons at Mt. Hood Ski Bowl and 26 kids participated. The participants were required to have passing school grades and regular attendance to be invited to go on this field trip. Youth Advisory Board -Still meeting monthly. Boys and Girls Club & After School Club - He reported that the Woodbum Chamber of Commerce has finished the community assessment survey and now is in the hands of the Boys & Girls Club offices in Salem. They will review the surveys and schedule a meeting with the stakeholders to see what the next step will be. The 21St Century Grant application, being prepared by the schools district is due April 17~'. The next five year's focus is primarily on high school after Page 2 34 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. school programs, but Stu stated that there will be enough money to help elementary school programs be sustainable for the next 5 years. Other Student Health Advisory Council (SHAG), a coalition that is interested in making Woodburn youth healthier, is raising money to provide helmets for all elementary school kids, provided by OHSU at a very affordable price. SHAG has sent out a Teen Sexual Health Survev to gather perceptions, attitudes and opinions from parents about their teen's sexual health. The survey will conclude in late March, and results will be presented at a public forum. On February 28`", 20 After School Club staff went to a youth development training in Lincoln City. Stu met with Arlene Walker and talked about a high school service project day in May 2009. The concentrated efforts will be to spread bark from the Library to Settlemier Park along with other projects. Stu introduced Aubrie Corey, AmeriCorps volunteer that will be working with the department Mazch through August 2009. Aquatics -Debbie Wadleigh January and February's 20% membership discount has resulted in increased membership sales over the same period last year. Swim lesson enrollment increased by 45 participants over the previous session, due partially to the end of the high school swim team season, which increased the days and times lessons could be offered. The program special this month is 25% off any rental. Department activities for spring and summer are being planned in collaboration with Stu and Aubrie. The HVAC replacement project is still on track, with installation scheduled for Apri127~'. Parks and Facilities -Jim Row Gazebo Jim reported that Public Works completed the roofing installation and electrical hookup on the Downtown Plaza Gazebo, and shared pictures of the finished project. The dedication is tentatively being planned to take place at noon on Sunday, April 26, 2009 at noon, which is the "Day of the Child" event. Centennial Park Jim reported the construction drawings and cost estimates are still being finalized, and as it is such an expensive project, they aze looking at funding alternatives. Some avenues that are being considered are; SDC monies, the Baseball Tomorrow Grant Fund, the State of Oregon Local Government Grant program, which is funded by lottery dollars, contributions from the community, and a possible contribution of labor by the National Guard. 8. Future Board Business None. Page 3 35 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, March 10, 2009 ?:00 p.m. 9. Board Comments Eric Morris stated the he was concerned with the Mill Creek Greenway project after last night's public testimony at the City Council meeting. He said, "It would be nice to hear public comment at our meetings, so that we can process and pass that message along during the planning stage, instead of at the end of a project. City Council was hearing comments from a group of individuals, when I definitely have never heard those comments since I have been on the Parks and Recreation Boazd." Discussion then took place on the present board member vacancy and Jim stated the he would check on the status with Mayor Figley. 10. Adjournment 8:25 p.m. Eric Morris, Board Secretary Paulette Zastoupil, Recording Secretary Date Date Page 4 36 PROGRAM : PL6650 REPORT MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSE USER LINDAEU DATE 3/18/2009 TIME 9:38:47 HOLD NC COPIES OUTPUT QUEUE: `DEFAULT DISTRIBUTION: *NONE SELF C'I'I ON OPTIONS ORI q ; OR0290500 WPD YEAR. 2009 FROM MONTH. O1 TO MONTH. C2 CALCULATE ALL CHANGES YES ADULT/JUVENILE/80TH BOTH 37 Woodburn Police Dept. PAGE 1 DATE: 3/18/2009 PL6850 TIME: 9:36:4'] MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSE FOR JANUARY THRU FEBRUAR't 20D9 LINDAEU ORIN: CR0240500 WPD RES ULTS FOR ALL CHARGES CHARGE DESCRIPTION .IAN k'6'B TOTAL AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 2 1 3 AGGRAVA'fEJ MURDER 0 C 0 ANIMA:, ORDINANCES 0 0 0 ARSON 0 0 0 ASSAULT SIMPLE 2 7 9 ATTEMP?ED MURDER 0 0 0 BOMB THREAT 0 0 D BRIBERY 0 0 U BURGLARY - BUSINESS 2 0 2 BURGLARY - OTHF'.R STRUCTURE 0 1 1 BURGT~ARY - RESIDENCE 0 2 Z CHILD ADBANDOMENT 0 0 0 CHILD NEGLECT 0 0 0 CITY ORDINANCE 0 0 0 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDAi,ISM OR ARSON 2 2 4 CUREF.W 2 9 6 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE C 0 0 CUSTODY - DETOX 0 3 3 CUSTODY - :MENTAL 2 1 3 CUSTODY - PROTECITVE 0 0 0 DISORDERLY CON D'JCT 2 6 8 DOCUMENTATION 0 0 0 DRINKING IN PUBLIC 0 0 0 DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 2 LO 12 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 11 24 35 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 0 0 0 JWSJREVOKED - FELONY 0 1 1 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 3 3 6 ELUDE 0 1 7 EMBEZZLEMENT 0 0 0 ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY 0 0 0 EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL 0 0 0 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 2 2 4 FAMILY-OTHER 0 0 0 FORCIBLE RAPT 0 0 0 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 5 5 10 FRAUD - ACCOUNT CLOSED CHECK 0 0 0 FRAUD - BY UECEP?IONIFALSE PRE^ENSES 0 0 0 FRAUG - CREDIT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE 0 1 FRAUD - IMPERSONATION 3 5 8 FRAUD - NO'1' SUFFICIENT FUNDS CNECK 0 0 0 FRAUD - OF SERVICES/FALSE PRETENSES 0 0 0 FRAUD - WIRE 0 0 0 FRAUD-OTHER 0 U D 1'UGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 70 24 44 FURNISHING 0 I 1 GAMBLING - GAMES 0 0 0 GAM BI.I NG - OTHER 0 0 0 GARBAGE LITTER_NG 0 0 0 NIT AND RUN FELONY D D - 0 NIT AND HUN-MIS DRMEANOR 3 3 6 I'.L F.GAL ALIEN - INS HOLD 0 0 0 38 Woodburn Police Dept. PAGE 2 DATE: 3/18/2009 PL6850 TIME: 9:38:-17 MONTHLY ARRESTS BY OFFENSE FOR JANUARY THRU FEBRUARY 2009 LINDAEU ORI#: OR0240500 WPU RES ULTS FOR ALL CHARGES CHARGE DESCRIPTION ~ JAN f'EB ----------- TOTAL ------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- INTIMIDATION /OTIIER CRIMINAL THREAT ---- 1 ---------------------------------------- 1 2 JUSTIFIABLE fOMICIDE 0 0 0 KIDNAP - FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE C 0 0 KIDNAP - FOR RANSOM G 0 0 KIDNAP - HI-JACK,TERRORIST C 0 0 KIDNAP - HOSTAGE/SHIELD OR REMOVAL/DELAY WITNESS 0 0 0 LICENSING ORDINANCES 0 0 0 LIQUOR LAW-OTHER 0 0 C LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS 0 0 0 MINOR IN POSSESSION 4 3 I MINOR ON PREMISES 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 0 MOTOR VEHICLE 'C ifi{FT 2 2 4 NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE - TRAFFIC 0 0 0 NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER 0 0 0 NON CRIMINAL. DOMESTIC DISTURBAKCE 0 0 0 OTHER 7 5 12 PROPERTY - FOUND LOST MISLAID 0 0 0 PROPERTY RECOVER FOR OTHER AGENCY 0 0 0 PROSTITUTION - COMPEL 0 0 0 PRCSTITUTION - ENGAGE IN 0 0 0 PROSTITUTION - PROMOTE 0 0 0 PUBLIC IIEALTH AND SAFETY ORDINANCES 0 0 0 RECKLESS DRIVING I 5 6 ROBBERY - BANK 0 0 0 ROBBERY - BUSINESS 0 0 0 ROBBERY - CAR JACKING 0 0 0 ROBBERY - CONV.STORE O 0 0 ROBBERY - HIGHWAY 0 0 0 ROBBERY - OTHER 5 0 5 ROBBERY - RESIDENCE 0 0 0 ROBBERY - SERVICE STATION 0 0 0 RUNAWAY 1 5 6 SEX CRIME - CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - EXPOSER 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - FORCIBLE SODOMY 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - INCEST 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - MODEST (PHYSICAL) 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - NON FORCE SODOMY 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - NON-FORCE RAPE ~ 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - OBSCENE PI{ONE CALL 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - OTHER 0 U 0 SEX CRIME - PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE MATERIAL 0 0 0 SEX CRIME - SEXUAL ASSAULT WIT F: AN ORJECT 0 0 0 STALKER 0 0 0 STOLEN PRO?ERTY - RECEIVING, BUYING, POSSESSING 1 4 5 SUICIDE 0 C 0 THEFT - BICYCLE. 0 0 0 ^II F. FT - BUILDING 2 C 2 THEFT - COIN OP MACHINE 0 0 0 THEFT - FROM MOTOR Vk:HTOLE 0 0 0 THEF'C - MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS/ACCESSORIES 0 0 0 39 Wocdb~~rn Policc Dept. PAGE 3 DATE: 3/18/2009 PL685O TIME: 9:36:47 MONT HLY ARRESTS BY OF'F'ENSE FOR ,iANUARY THRU FEBRUARY 20C9 LINDAEU DRIB: ORO240500 WPD RES ULTS FOR ALL CHARGES CHARGE DESCRIPTION JAN FEB --- -------- ---' -'------- ----------- ------ - ---------- TOTAL ----------'-- ---------------`--------------------- THEFT - OTHER ---- ----------- ---- 8 -------- 4 - 12 THEFT - PICKPOCKET 3 0 3 THE F'I' - PURSE SNATCH 0 0 0 THEFT - SHOPLIFT 13 18 3I TRAFFIC ORDINANCES 0 0 0 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS 13 26 39 TRESPASS 3 2 5 VANDALISM 3 4 7 VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 0 4 4 WARRANT ARREST FOR OUR AGI?NCY 0 0 0 WEAPON - CARRY CONCEALED 0 1 WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION 0 0 0 WEAPON - OTHER 0 0 0 WEAPON - POSSESS ILLEGAL 0 2 2 WEAPON - SHOO'"ING IN PROHIBITED AREA 0 0 0 WILLFUL MURDER 0 0 0 ZONTNG ORDINANCc 0 0 0 20C9 TOTAL: 13i 192 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 323 2008 TOTAL: 197 207 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 404 2007 TOTAL: 194 23 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 407 40 PROGRAM PL6660 REPORT MON TIILY CRIMINAL OFFENSES REPORT USER LINDAEU UATE 3/18/2009 TIME 9:38:58 BOLD YES COPIES 1 OUTPUT QUEUE: *DEFAULT DISTR?BUTTON: 'NONE SELECTION OPT IONS ORI M OR0240500 WPD YEAR. : 2009 FROM MONTN. O1 TO MONTH. 02 UATE TYPE TO USE. REPORTED CALCULATE ALL OFFENSES. YES 41 Woodburn Police Dept. PAGE 1 DATE: 3/18/20C9 PL6860 TIME: 9:38:58 MONTHLY CR:MIKAL OFFENSES 'r'OR .iANUARY THRU FEBRUARY ^009 LINDAEU ORItt: OR0290500 WPD RESU LTS FOR ALL OFFENSES DAT F. USED: CASE REPORTED DATE CHARGE DESCRIPTION JAN FEB TOTAL AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 3 2 5 ANIMAL ORDINANCES 2 2 4 ASSAULT SIMPLE 3 10 13 BURGLARY - BUSINESS 2 1 3 BURGLARY - OTHER STRUCTURE 1 2 3 BURGLARY - Rh:SIDENCE 7 3 10 CHILI) NEGLECT 1 0 1 CRIME DAMAGE-NO VAKDALISM OR ARSON 13 6 19 CURFEW 2 3 5 CUSTODY - DETOX 1 3 4 CUSTODY - MENTAL 3 0 3 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2 5 ~ DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE 2 10 .2 DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS 11 11 22 DWS/REVOKED - FELONY 0 1 1 DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR 3 3 6 FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE 2 2 4 FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING 15 6 21 FRAUD - BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRE':ENSES 0 1 1 FRAUD - CREDiT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE 3 1 4 FRAUD - IMPERSONATION 5 6 11 FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY 21 28 49 FURNISHING 0 1 1 HZT AND RUN FELONY 1 0 1 HIT ANU RUN-MISDEMEANOR 11 10 21 INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT 2 1 3 MINOR IN POSSESSION 4 1 ~ ~ MISCELLANEOUS 7 3 10 MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 11 13 24 OTHER 12 5 1~/ PROPERTY - F'OUNp LOST MISLAID 8 7 15 PROPERTY RECOVER FCR OTHER A6ENC:Y 0 1 1 RECKLESS DRIVING 0 5 5 ROBBERY - OTHER 1 0 1 RUNAWAY 5 7 12 SEX CRIME - MOLES'T' (PHYSICAL) 1 1 2 STALKER 1 0 1 STOLEN PROPERTY - RECEIVING,BUYING, POSSESSING 3 5 8 SUICIDE 1 U 1 THEFT - RUILUING 5 2 ~ THEFT - COIN OP MACHINE 1 0 1 THEFT - FROM MOTOR VEHICLE it 4 15 :HEFT - MO'T'OR VEHICLE PARIS/ACCESSORTF,S 7 2 9 THEFT - OTHER 1~ 7 24 THEFT - PICKPOCKF.'f 2 0 THEFT - PURSE SNATCH 0 - TI!F.FT - SHOPLIFT 12 8 20 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS 7 :9 26 TRESPASS 2 3 5 VANDALISM 34 13 47 VF.H ICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY 5 0 5 42 Woodburn Police Dept. DATE: 3/18/20C9 TIME: 4:36:56 MONTHLY CRIMINAL OFFENSES FOR JANUARY THRU FEBRUARY 2009 OR1N: OR0240500 WPD RESULTS FOR ALL OFFENSES DATE USED: CASE REPORTED DA'7"r: PAGE 2 PL6860 LINDAEU CHARGE DF.S CRiPTION JAN F'1:R TOTAL WEAPON - CARRY CONCEALED 1 0 1 WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION 0 1 1 TOTAL: 275 225 500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2U09 TOTAL: 275 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 2008 TOTAL: 323 362 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6B5 2007 TOTAL: 372 419 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '791 43 WPD Monthly Code Enforcement Statistics January 2009 Incident T e Total Abandoned Vehciies 7 Grafitti Abate 9 Abate Nusiance 4 Animal Com taints 40 Area Check 8 Business License Check 1 Field Investi ation Re ort 14 Foot Patro! 6 Li uor A lication 51 Ordinance 86 Other 17 Total 243 44 WPD Monthly Code Enforcement Statistics February 2009 Incident T e Total Abandoned Vehciles 8 Grafitti Abate 9 Abate Nusiance 3 Animal Com taints 29 Area Check 7 Business License Check 1 FIR 4 Foot Patrol 9 Ordinance 103 Other 13 Total 186 45 PROGRAM AP0960 REPORT CHECK REGISTER USER VEEOT DATE 3/18/09 TIME 10:19 HOLD YES COPIES 1 OUTPUT QUEUE: PINHP3055 DISTRIBUTION: +NONE SELECTION OPTIONS BANK ACCOUNT A/P FROM CHECK NUMBER : +ALL THRU CHECK NUM9EA +ALL FROM CHECK DATE 2/01/2009 THRU CHECK DATE 2/28/2009 RECONCILIATION STATUSES: RECONCILED UPDATED ALL 46 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B UR N PAGE 1 DATE 3/ 18/09 AP0460 TIME 10: 19:13 CHECK REGISTER VEEOT CHECK # - ° CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME ---- STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE __:_::~_~~~s:z:e~es~~~~..:~~ :~_~.:_:.:__ - BANK ACCOUNT: AY A/P Accounts Payable ~z.~------a- .s_a:.:e.::.:.. ~.____~: ~___~~::___~~-- __~~..=~:ms~~~.a~~__ zas~====~~_____ 96561 2/27/2009 COLUMBIA COLLECTION SERV RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 19.76 19.76 .00 96563 2/27/2009 RILEY POTTER RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 425.00 425.00 .00 96564 2/27/2009 EBS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 126,060.54 126,060.54 .00 96565 2/27/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 871.70 871.70 .00 96566 2/27/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 183.23 183-23 .00 96567 2/06/2009 A-QUALITY TYPEWRITER 6 CA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 57.60 57.60 .00 96568 2/06/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #45 RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 798.25 798.25 .00 96569 2/06/2009 AMAZON.COM CREDIT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 278.34 278.34 .00 96570 2/06/2009 AMERICAN POLICE HALL OP F RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 40-00 90.00 -00 96571 2/06/2009 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES SB.27 58.27 .00 96572 2/06/2009 ATLAS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 96574 2/06/2009 AWWA N.W. OREGON SUBSECT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 285.00 285.00 .00 96575 2/06/2009 BI-MART CORPORATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 68.69 68.69 .00 96576 2/06/2009 BLACKSTONE AUDIOBOOKS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 126.57 126.57 .00 96577 2/06/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM & EQUI RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 106.80 106.80 .00 96578 2/06/2009 BROTHERS CONCRETfi CUTTING RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 560.00 560.00 .00 96579 2/06/2009 CANHY TELBCOM RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 19.95 19.95 .00 96580 2/06/2009 CASCADE POOLS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 542.70 542.70 .00 96581 2/06/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 909.88 909.88 .00 96582 2/06/2009 CODfi 4 PUBLIC SAFETY EDUC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 99-00 99.00 .00 96583 2/06/2009 COMPLETE WIRELESS SOLUTNS RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 164.50 164.50 .00 96584 2/06/2009 CUES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 187.95 167.95 .00 96585 2/06/2009 DAN SHERER RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 11.99 11.99 .00 96586 2/06/2009 DATAVISION COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 294.50 299.50 .00 96587 2/06/2009 DUNK ELECTRONICS INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 973.02 473.02 .00 96588 2/06/2009 FIRST STUDENT INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 671.55 671.55 .00 96589 2/06/2009 PIRWOOD DESIGN GROUP LLC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 4,185.00 4,185.00 .00 96590 2/06/2009 FLOMER FURNITURE & APPLIA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 258.00 258.00 .00 96591 2/06/2009 GALE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 28.76 28.76 .00 96593 2/06/2009 GEORGE VISTICA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 50.21 50.21 .00 96594 2/06/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 683.30 683.30 .00 96595 2/06/2009 ISOLUTIONS CONSULTING LLC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 503.75 503.75 .00 96596 2/06/2009 J. THAYER COMPANY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 617.30 617.30 .00 96597 2/06/2009 JET HEATSNG INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 636.50 636.50 .00 96599 2/06/2009 JOHN PILAFIAN WINDOW CLEA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 26.00 26.00 .00 96600 2/06/2009 KEY CREATIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 36.53 36.53 .00 96602 2/06/2009 LAZARO YHARRA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 96603 2/06/2009 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 55.00 55-00 .00 96604 2/06/2009 MARION COUNTY BLDG INSPEC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 366.19 366.19 .00 96605 2/06/2009 MARION COUNTY CLERK RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 41.00 91.00 .00 96606 2/06/2009 MATTHEW K GWYNN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 96.86 96.86 .00 96607 2/06/2009 MOLALLA COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 149.70 149.70 .00 96608 2/06/2009 MOORE MEDICAL LLC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 76.13 76.13 .00 96609 2/06/2009 NORSE BROS DBA KNIFE RIVE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,000.00 1,000.00 .00 96610 2/06/2009 MT HOOD RAILROAD RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 140.40 140.40 .00 96611 2/06/2009 NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL A RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,575-00 1,575.00 .00 96612 2/06/2009 NATIONAL DISTRICT ATTYS A RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 950.00 950.00 .00 96613 2/06/2009 NEOPOST LEASING RECONCILHD 3/09/2009 YES 111.52 111.52 .00 96614 2/06/2009 NET ASSETS CORPORATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .00 96615 2/06/2009 NSXTEL COMMUNICATIONS RECONCILHD 3/09/2009 YES 2,083.09 2,083.09 .00 96616 2/06/2009 NITA J MARR RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YHS x5.99 45.99 .OD 96617 2/06/2009 NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 19,906.18 19,906.18 .00 47 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 2 DATE 3/ 18/09 AP0460 TIME 10: 19:13 CHECK REGISTER VEEOT CHECK q ~ CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIPFERENCfi : -__~=: 96618 ~=a~s_s~~~ »~~~a~o~_~_"--'~__~:_=__..: 2/06/2009 OACP :~=0=°===_~= RECONCILED '_°`_==::"S='= 3/09/2009 ='___~:~ YES ===s~_~as~_~:~a 250.00 =:~_~~~~~.~~~:.~z=~. 250.00 e~s~_a.~~aav~.~ .00 96619 2/06/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 201.06 201.06 .00 96622 2/06/2009 OR DEPT OF ENERGY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 330.00 330.00 .00 96623 2(06/2009 OA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 180.00 180.00 .00 96624 2/06/2009 OREGON CITY TRAVEL INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 644.80 644.80 .OD 96626 2/06/2009 ORIENTAL TRADING CO INC RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 213.80 213.80 .00 96627 2/06/2009 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 300.55 340.55 .00 96628 2/06/2009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 2,177.31 2,177.31 .00 96629 2/06/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 60,756.88 60,756.88 .DO 96630 2!06/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 128.02 128.02 .00 96631 2/06/2009 RADIX CORPORATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 204.00 204.00 .00 96632 2/06/2009 RANDALL G I.ANGBEHN INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 290.50 240.50 .00 96633 2/06/2009 RID WING SHOE STORE RECONCILED 3/09(2009 YES 1,512.49 1,512.99 .00 96634 2/06/2009 RINGEY'S RADAR RECONCILHD 3/09/2009 YES 115.77 115.77 .00 96635 2/06/2009 SANDRA KINNEY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 33.99 33.99 .00 96636 2/06/2009 SILKE COMMUNICATIONS INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 151.03 151.03 .00 96637 2/06/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 3/09(2009 YES 171.19 171.19 .00 96638 2/06/2009 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 470.92 470.92 .00 96640 2/06/2009 WILLIAM H REILLY 6 CO RECONCILED 3f09/2D09 YES 6,025.90 6,025.90 .00 96641 2/06/2009 USA SECURITY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 74.85 74.85 .00 96642 2/06/2009 VALLEY PACIFIC FLORAL RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 66.85 66.85 .00 96693 2/06/2009 WI LIJIMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YE5 119.70 119.70 .00 96694 2/06/2009 WILLIAM G WEISMANN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 697.50 697.50 .00 96645 2/06/2009 WOODBURN INDEPENDENT RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 147.00 147.00 .00 96646 2/06/2009 WOODSURN RADIATOR & GLASS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 225.00 225.00 .00 96647 2/06/2009 XEROX CORPORATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 287.49 287.44 .00 96648 2/06/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 192.00 192.00 .00 96649 2/27/2009 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 513.33 513.33 .00 96650 2/27/2009 WILLIAM A TORRES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 600.00 600.00 .00 96651 2/27/2009 ERIC S BERGREN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 300.00 300.00 .00 96652 2/27/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN AECONCIGED 3/09/2009 YES 818.80 818.80 .00 96653 2/13/2009 ACE CHEMICAL TOILETS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 611.00 611.00 .00 96654 2/13/2009 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES H45 RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,361.55 1,361.55 .00 96655 2/13/2009 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT CO INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 433.07 433.07 .00 96656 2/13/2009 AMSTERDAM PRINTING RECONCILED 3/09(2009 YES 999.92 994.92 .00 96658 2/13/2009 ARAMARK UNIPORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 108.98 108.98 .00 96659 2/13/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 198.70 198.70 .00 96660 2/13/2009 BASELINE SURVEYING LLC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 500.00 500.00 .00 96661 2/13/2009 BIO-MED TESTING SERVICE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YE5 84.40 84.90 .00 96662 2/13/2009 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 219.00 219.00 .00 96663 2/13/2009 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 51.92 51.92 -00 96664 2/13/2009 CHARLES JOHNSON RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 3.00 3.00 .00 96665 2/13/2009 CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLL RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 926.20 926.20 .00 96666 2/13/2009 CODE 4 PUBLIC SAFETY EDUC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 99.00 99.00 .00 96667 2/13/2009 COOKE STATIONERY COMPANY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 103.05 103.05 .00 96668 2/13/2009 CTL CORPORATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 10.00 10.00 .00 96669 2/13/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,048,978.00 1,098,478.00 .00 96670 2/13/2009 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 135.00 135.00 .00 96671 2/13/2009 DON SCHUETZ RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 15.00 15.00 .00 96673 2/13/2009 ANTHONY A LOPEZ RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 120.00 120.00 .00 96675 2/13/2009 FLORA STANISICH RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 10.00 10.00 .00 96676 2/13/2009 FRANCIS CHITWOOD RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 6.00 6.00 .00 96677 2/13/2009 PRY'S ELECTRONICS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 53.94 53.94 .00 48 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D B U R N PAGE 3 DATE 3/ 18/09 AP0460 TIME 10: 19:13 CHECK REGISTER VEEOT CHECK # CHECK DATE PAYEE NAME STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 96678E a 2/13/2009 LGREAT NESTERN SWEEPING IN RECONCILEDa '3/09/2009 YES a== =9z_23 133~14aa `as=aa`23,133'14 i =v 500 96679 2/13/2009 GROUP MACKENZIE ENGR INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 7,466.57 7,466.57 -00 96680 2/13/2009 HALTON COMPANY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 467.05 467.05 .00 96681 2/13/2009 HARPER,HOUF,PETERSON,RIGH RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 22,138.15 22,136.15 .00 96682 2/13/2009 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 142.29 142.29 .00 96683 2/13/2009 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 156.00 156.00 .00 96684 2/13/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 158.85 158.85 .00 96685 2/13/2009 INSTANT FIRE PROTHCTION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YE3 390.30 390.30 .00 96686 2/13/2009 INTEGRA TELECOM RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 587.00 587.00 .00 96687 2/13/2009 J. THAYHR COMPANY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 297.99 297.99 .00 96688 2/13/2009 JERRY JANSZEN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 8.00 8-00 .00 96689 2/13/2009 JORGE GASPAR RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 59.39 59.39 .00 96690 2/13/2009 KEIZER YOUTH SPORTS ASSOC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 650.00 650.00 .00 96691 2/13/2009 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 80.85 80.85 .00 96692 2/13/2009 LAWTON PRINTING INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 66.35 66.35 .00 96693 2/13/2009 LOWE'S RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 265.28 265.28 .00 96694 2/13/2009 MARION COUNTY TREASURY DE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 3,150.00 3,150.00 .00 96695 2/13/2009 MELBA HENDERSON RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 7.00 7.00 .00 96696 2/13/2009 MONIQUE HULLING-ADAMS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 9.00 9.00 .00 96697 2/13/2009 MSI GROUP INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 400.00 400.00 .00 96698 2/13/2009 MXLOGIC INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 3,058.03 3,058.03 .00 96700 2/13/2009 NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSO RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 15.00 15.00 .00 96701 2/13/2009 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 700.00 700.00 .00 96702 2/13/2009 NORCOM RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 26,374.09 26,374.09 .00 96703 2/13/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 334.15 334.15 .00 96704 2/13/2009 OR DEPT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 2,038.94 2,038.94 .00 96705 2/13/2009 OR DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 15.25 15.25 .00 96706 2/13/2009 ORIENTAL TRADING CO INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 144.83 144.83 .00 96707 2/13/2009 OVS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 33.52 33.52 .00 96708 2/13/2009 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YHS 52.33 52.33 .00 96709 2/13/2009 PACIFIC SURVEY SUPPLY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 185.66 185.66 .00 96710 2/13/2009 PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 19,199.21 19,194.21 .00 96711 2/13/2009 PATRICIA EWING RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 8.00 8.00 .00 96713 2/13/2009 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 18,899.63 18,899.63 .00 96719 2/13/2009 PUMP TECH SYSTEMS INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 217.34 217.34 .00 96715 2/13/2009 QUALITY CONCRETE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 387.50 387.50 .00 96716 2/13/2009 QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 246.75 246.75 .00 96717 2/13/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 191.84 191.84 .00 96718 2/13/2009 QWEST RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 2,076.39 2,076.34 .00 96719 2/13/2009 RUTH GALLANT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 15.00 15.00 .00 96720 2/13/2009 S.O.S. LOCK SERVICE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 15.00 15.00 .00 96721 2/13/2009 SAFEWAY STORES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 102.38 102.38 .00 96722 2/13/2009 SEARS COMMERCIAL CREDIT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 584.39 584.39 .00 96723 2/13/2009 SECRETARY OF STATE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 110.00 110.00 .00 96724 2/13/2009 SILVERFLEET SYSTEMS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 3,741.94 3,741.94 .00 96725 2/13/2009 SPECIAL OCCASIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 169.00 169.00 .00 96726 2/13/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 889.08 889.08 .00 96727 2/13/2009 STATESMAN-JOURNAL NEWSPAP RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 62.61 62.61 .00 96728 2/13/2009 TRUE CARE INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YBS 100.00 100.00 .00 96729 2/13/2009 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 177.50 177.50 .00 96730 2/13/2009 VALLEY PACIFIC CONSTRUCT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 268,404.30 268,904.30 .00 96731 2/13/2009 WAVE MEDIA SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YHS 1,000.00 1,000.00 -00 96732 2/13/2009 WBN COMMUNITY ACCESS TV I RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 4,233.95 4,233.95 .00 49 WOODBURN LIVE C I T Y O F W O O D H U R N PAGE 4 DATE 3/1 8/09 AP0460 TIME 10:1 9:13 CHECK REGISTER VEEOT CHECK # L == CHECK DATE = PAYEE NAME =====~=a.:==='= s STATUS STATUS DATE UPDATED CHECK AMOUNT RECONCILED AMT DIFFERENCE 96733 2/13/2009 WILCO FARMERS RECONCILED` -_as 3/09/2009` iYESa6iL 8II2iS=a211a71== ==~__=====211?71 _~. ==__s`szc5iappf 96734 2/13/2009 WILLAMETTE VALLEY SECURIT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 179.55 179.55 .00 96735 2/13/2009 WOLFERS HEATING & AIR CON RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 28.80 28.80 .00 96736 2/13/2009 WOODBURN AMBULANCE SERV I RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 219.70 219.70 .00 96737 2/13/2009 XEROX CORPORATION RECONCILID 3/09/2009 YES 19 .9D 14.90 .00 96738 2/13/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 540.00 540.00 .00 96739 2/13/2009 YG MEDIA RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 75.00 75.00 .00 96741 2/27(2009 VEE OTT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 550.00 550.00 .00 96742 2/27/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 684.94 684.94 .00 96794 2/20/2009 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICE I RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 24.80 24.80 .00 96746 2/20/2009 BLACKSTONE AUDZOBOOKS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 253.37 253.37 .00 96747 2/20/2009 BLUMENTHAL UNIPORM & EQUI RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,051.30 1,051.30 .00 96799 2/20/2009 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 69.52 69.52 .00 96751 2/20/2009 CHARLES WHITE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,283.25 1,283.25 .OD 96752 2/20/2009 DK & ASSOCIATES INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 4,707.50 4,707.50 .00 96753 2/20/2009 GALE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 136.60 136.60 .00 96754 2/20/2009 GENERAL BINDING CORP RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 461.97 461.97 .00 96755 2/20/2009 HILTI RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 126.76 126.76 .00 96756 2/20/2009 IKON OPFICE SOLUTIONS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 295.59 295.59 .00 96757 2/20/2009 INDUSTRIAL WELDING SUPPLY RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 23.00 23.00 .00 96758 2/20/2009 INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 35.95 35-95 .00 96759 2/20/2009 MID-WILLAMETTE UTILITY CO RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 52.00 52.00 .00 96762 2/20/2009 NORTHWEST LOW VOLTAGE SYS RECONCILID 3/09/2004 YES 102.00 102.00 .00 96763 2/20/2009 OFFICE DEPOT RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 87.99 87.99 .00 96764 2/20/2009 PACIFIC AIR COMFORT INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,392.81 1,392.81 .00 96765 2/20/2009 PENWORTHY CO RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 350.58 350.58 .00 96766 2/20/2009 PETROCARD RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YSS 470.97 970.97 .00 96767 2/20/2009 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRING RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 204.29 204.29 .00 96768 2/20/2009 SZLVERTON HOSPITAL RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 306.00 306.00 .00 96770 2/20/2009 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURI RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 110.00 110.00 .DO 96771 2/20/2009 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 1,585.44 1,585.44 .00 96772 2/20/2009 T-MOBILE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 249.95 299.95 .00 96774 2/20/2009 WATERSHED INC RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YE5 838.10 838.10 .00 96775 2/20/2009 YES GRAPHICS RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 78.00 78.00 .00 96777 2/27/2009 OR DEPT OF MOTOR VEfiZ CLE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 70.00 70.00 .00 96778 2/27/2009 OR DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLE RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 74.50 74.50 .00 96779 2/27/2009 PETTY CASH RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 157.70 157.70 .00 96781 2/27/2009 VALLEY MAILING SERVICE IN RECONCILED 3/09/2009 YES 515.20 515.20 .00 BANK AP TOTAL: 196 CHECKS --- -------------- ----------------- -- --------------- 1,731,341.62 1,731,341.62 .00 RECONCILED 196 CHECKS 1,731,341 .62 NOT RECONCILED CHECKS .00 VOIDED CHECKS .00 UPDATED 196 CHECKS 1,731,341 .62 NOT UPDATED CHECKS .00 50 J / \~,, j ,101 7 ~ ~J~jOODBURN ',~~ l ncu.pe.nie,l tBR9 March 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 2008-01 RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing on CPA 2008-01 to consider text amendments to the City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit. BACKGROUND: The Woodburn City Council passed Resolution 1914 on November 10, 2008 that initiated consideration of a legislative land use decision to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Plan Update. The Woodburn Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and considered the amendments and recommended adoption with a condition that the 2013-2016 priority recommendation to add one park to the southwest area East of I-5 be reprioritized to the 2009-2012 priority recommendation. DISCUSSION: The Staff Report containing the Legislative Amendment Findings is attached as Exhibit A. The proposed comprehensive plan text amendments are attached as Exhibit B. Finally, the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan has been provided to the City Recorder. Each of you was also given a copy of the plan under separate cover. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact identified with the recommended action. Agenda Item Review: City Administrat~'!~- City Attorney ~~~ Finance 51 EXHIBR Pace _~,__ ~ ~ _ ~' '~ ~ ~ Community Development Department '~OODBURN Planning Division 270 Montgomery Street, Woodburn, Oregon 97071 • (503) 982-5246 • (503) 982-5244 .. ,.,.ta r:~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT STAFF REPORT City Council Public Hearing A lication T e T e V- Le islative Amendment A lication Number CPA 2008-01 Project Description Comprehensive plan text amendment to revise the "Parks and Recreation-Open Space/Parks Goals and Policies" section and to adopt the updated City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a sub-exhibit to the Com rehensive Plan A licant/Re resentative Ci of Woodburn/Jim Row Planner Assi ned Natalie Labossiere A lication Received December 29, 2008 A lication Com lete Februa 10, 2009 Date of Staff Re ort March 6, 2009 Date of Hearin March 23, 2009 120-Da Deadline Le islative Amendments not sub'ect to 120-da time limit BACKGROUND & PROPOSAL -The City Council adopted Resolution No. 1914 on November 10, 2008 initiating consideration of a legislative land use decision to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan update. This plan is an update to the 1999 Parks and Recreation Comprehensive plan that was prepared by Don Garner & Associates, and is intended to help meet the City of Woodburn's needs of current and future residents by positioning Woodburn to build on the community's unique parks and recreation assets and identify new opportunities. The proposed Parks and Recreation Master Plan was prepared by the consulting team of Mackenzie/GreenPlay, LLC with the assistance of the Recreation and Park Board and City staff. In addition to the recommendations included within the plan, staff is also recommending amendments to revise the Open Space/Parks Goals and Policies in the Comprehensive Plan and to adopt the updated City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit to the Comprehensive Plan. The Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan will help the City determine the phasing, timing and funding for implementing these and other projects and services over the next several years. The plan contains the following sections: • Executive Summary • The Planning Context • Analysis of Programs and Spaces • Funding • Great Things to Come • Recommendations and Action Plans The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and recommended that City Council adopt the draft revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and the updated parks and Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit to the Comprehensive Plan with a condition that the 2013-2016 priority recommendation to add one park to the southwest area East of I-5 be reprioritized to the 2009-2012 priority recommendation. 52 EXHIBIT Page,,,, of RECOMMENDATION -Conduct public hearing to receive public testimony and consider Planning Commission and Staff recommendation for adoption of amendments to the City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and adoption of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit. Oregon Revised Statutes 197 require amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to conform with the Comprehensive Plan, the applicable regulations in the Woodburn Development Ordinance, and the Statewide Goals and Guidelines. The following provides the required analysis. RELEVANT APPROVAL CRITERIA: Woodburn Development Ordinance § [WDO 4.101.06.E] [WDO 4.101.09.A.3] City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan §Review, Revision, and Update pg 11 and Policy B-1. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS OF FACT: Type V Procedural Requirements jWDO 4.101.06.E] Findings: The Woodburn City Council passed Resolution Number 1914 on November 10, 2008 that initiated consideration of a legislative land use decision to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update by the Planning Commission with a recommendation to the City Council for adoption. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and considered evidence and testimony regarding the comprehensive text amendment and adoption of the City of Woodburn Parks & Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit. The City Council is scheduled to hold a final public hearing on March 23, 2009 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and testimony regarding the identified text amendments. This legislative action was initiated through the procedures outlined in the Woodburn Development Ordinance for this type of action. 2. ape V Notification Requirements [WDO 4.101.09.A.31 Findings: Notification of the legislative amendment was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DECD) on December 30, 2008, consistent with the requirements for a Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment notification contained in Oregon Revised Statutes 197.610 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660, Division 18. A certificate of mailing of the required notice to the DECD is provided in the record. The Planning Commission conducted a work session regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment during the Planning Commission's regular meeting of February 12, 2009 Notification of the legislative amendment was published in the Woodburn Independent Newspaper on January 31, 2009. All notification contained information regarding the time, date, and location of the pubic hearings, the file number, the staff contact for questions or submission of testimony. All notification also included a summary of the proposed text amendments. AlI notification documents provided information regarding the public hearing procedures and how to review or obtain copies of the documents to be considered. Notification requirements consistent with the provisions of the Woodburn Development Ordinance and statutory requirements were met for this legislative amendment to the Woodburn Development Ordinance. Comprehensive Plan Policy Consistency -Review Revision and Update A. Compliance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; Findings: The Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan is in compliance with Comprehensive Plan goals and policies related to Goal L-1, which states that the Parks and Recreation Master Plan shall establish a framework for land acquisition and future park improvements within the community 53 EXHIBIT ~__ Page ~ of ~~ B. Compliance with the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan; Findines: The Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan is also in compliance with various elements of the Comprehensive Plan relating to enhancing the quality of life that are discussed under growth management goals and policies, natural and cultural resources goals and policies, and open space/parks goals and policies. C. Compliance with Statewide Goals and guidelines; Findines: There are 19 state land use goals that have been adopted by the state legislature. Goals 15 - 19 are not applicable to Woodburn as they related to Willamette River Greenway (Goal 15), Estuarine Resources (16), Coastal Shorelands (17), Beaches and Dunes (18), and Ocean Resources (19). Goal 1 -Citizen Involvement: The project was guided by a project team, made up of the Recreation and Park Board and city staff. Focus groups were conducted December 11 ~' and 12~', 2007. There were a total of 4 focus groups, and almost 50 participants including: community stakeholders, department staff, Park Board members, and school district representatives. In addition, a public forum was held on December 12, 2007. Its adoption will occur after public hearings before both the Woodburn Planning Commission and City Council. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goal 2 -Land Use PlanninE: During the year-long effort of updating the Plan, the project team conducted a needs assessment, examined existing facilities, programs, and services, conducted a comprehensive community input process, and determined the current and recommended levels of service for the community. Throughout the process citizen needs were incorporated into the Plan. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goa13 -Agricultural Land and Goal 4 -Forest Land: These goals are indirectly applicable to the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and to adopt the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as by providing usable open space for the community, agricultural and forest lands can be preserved. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goal 5 -Open Snace, Natural and Cultural Resources: The Parks and Recreation Master Plan encourages the preservation of natural resources and the enhancement of public open space. The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendments encourage the City to provide sufficient land for neighborhood parks by pursuing partnerships with schools and other agencies. It also states that the City will implement the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goal 6 -Air, Water, and Land Resources Oualit~ This goal is not directly applicable to the Comprehensive Plan text amendments, but it does encourage the City to acquire privately-owned segments along Mill Creek, Goose Creek, and Senecal Creek and other stream corridors. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goa17 -Natural Hazards: It is the policy of the Comprehensive Plan to implement and manage the Mill Creek, Goose Creek and Senecal Creek corridors as public greenways and pathways to ensure flood control and that Woodburn's waterways are preserved and well-maintained. These amendments are consistent with this goal. 54 EXHIBIT Page ~ of ~. Goal 8 -Recreational Needs: The update of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan represents a significant effort to enhance recreational services and amenities available to the residents of Woodburn. Through the intensive solicitation of public information, recreational needs were identified and strategies formed to achieve the community's vision in regards to recreational needs. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goa19 - Economy: The proposed request to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan will help to invigorate the Woodburn economy by ensuring that the current and future needs of the community which in turn adds to the regional draw to Woodburn. Goal 10 - Housing: The proposed request to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan establishes the framework necessary for supporting the parks, facilities, and recreational services needs of both, existing housing residents, and the residents of potential future housing developments in the community. Providing improved park facilities and services enhances the residential community and is consisted with this goal. Goal 11 -Public Facilities and Services: The proposed Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies needed public improvements and acquisitions to enhance and expand the public parks system. These amendments are consistent with this goal. Goal 12 -Transportation: The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan encouraging walkability by providing parks, trails, and indoor facilities within one- third mile of Woodburn residents, promotes multi modal transportation and is consistent with this goal. Goal 13 -Energy: This goal is not directly applicable to the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan. However, as noted above the creation of multi use paths may reduce the community's consumption of energy, by reducing local automobile travel. As such, the proposal complies with this goal. Goal 14 -Urbanization: The Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master plan intends to support urbanization with recreational opportunities which will ensure development in an orderly manner. These amendments are consistent with this goal. D. That there is a public need for the change; Findines: There is a significant public need for the update to the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive plan. The process of updating the plan involved significant public outreach to ensure that Woodburn residents' parks and recreation program, facilities, and parkland needs were addressed. This information, coupled with an inventory and condition assessment of current parks and facilities, constituted the basis for the Plan's recommendations for improvements to the park system's infrastructure. 55 EXHIBIT Page -~ of G• E. That this land best suites that public need; and Findings: No specific pazcel of land is identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. However, three sections of the City are identified as areas where the City should acquire property and develop parks, in order to meet the parkland needs of the expanding City. 4. Comprehensive Plan Policy Consistency -Citizen Involvement [Policy B-11 Findings: Focus groups were conducted December 11`f' and 12~', 2007. There were a total of 4 focus groups, and almost 50 participants including: community stakeholders, department staff, Pazk Board members, and school district representatives. In addition, a public forum was held on December 12, 2007. The State of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development was provided notification 45 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing of the proposed text amendments. The DLCD provides other potentially interested parties the opportunity to review text amendments from local governments throughout the state. Notification of the proposed text amendments was published in the Woodburn Independent newspaper 25 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission conducted a work session on the update to the Woodburn Parks and Recreation plan at the public meeting of February 12, 2009 that was a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and considered evidence and testimony regarding the comprehensive text amendment and adoption of the City of Woodburn Parks & Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit. 5. Comprehensive Plan Policy Consistency -Coordination jPolicy B_21a~ Findings: Notification and a copy of the text amendments were provided to the DLCD, consistent with this policy as documented in the record. 56 St~etl~etrgk- -Deleted Text Section Bold Underline -Proposed Text Change L. Parks and Recreation Open Space /Parks Goals and Policies Goals EXHIBIT ~~ -~- L-1. The Woodburn Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan shall establish a framework for land acquisition and future pazk improvements within the community. It is the goal of the City to provide adequate parks, recreation facilities, and open space to maintain Woodburn's livability and managed growth, and to provide social, economic and environmental benefits to individuals, families and the community. L-2. Downtown Woodburn should remain a centerpiece of activity, culture, and commerce within the City. Library Pazk, the Downtown Plaza, Woodburn Aquatic Center, Settlemier Park, the Woodburn World's Berry Center Museum, and Locomotive Park should be used as catalysts for downtown revitalization. Policies L-1.1 The City will ensure that sufficient land is made available €er~a~s-ead to meet current and future parks and open spaces ,.:: ..... ......... ............. y ~ »..~.., ........--r-- > > > > .needs by acquiring and developin¢ new parks in the area west of Interstate 5; the southwest area of the city. east of Interstate 5; and the southeast area of the City, west of Highway 99E. L-1.2 . Where feasible, the City wiU acquire and develop neighborhood parks, trails, and open spaces through the development review process. L-1.3 .The Citv will ensure that parks system development charges are adequate to meet the parks. trails, and open space needs created by development. StaYf Report - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2/26/2009 Page 1 of 3 57 S#.~i#~- -Deleted Text Section Bold Underline -Proposed Text Change EXH1Bi~' Page ,~ of L-1.4 f'aei~ies: To ensure walkability, the City will strive to provide parks, trails, and indoor facilities within one-third mile of Woodburn residents. L-1.5 The Citv will ensure the most efficient and effective means of providing sufficient_land for neighborhood narks by pursuing partnerships with schools and other aeencies to establish joint parkland acquisition development and operational ventures. IT-1:5 L-1.6 It is the policy of the City to maaoge implement the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan, and to manage the Mill Creek, Goose Creek and Senecal Creek corridors as public greenways and pathways; multiple functions will include open space and habitat preservation, flood control, cycling and walking on all-weather pathways, nature recreation and education, and limited playground activities where there is a deficiency of neighborhood parks. The Citv will establish and enforce a healthy streams policy to ensure that Woodburn's waterways are preserved and well- maintained. 1?-1-H L-1~ To provide for a continuous public greenway and pathway system, it is the policy of the City to acquire privately-owned segments along Mill Creek, Goose Creek, and Senecal Creek and other stream corridors including the west tributary from Settlemier Park to Parr Road. It is the policy of the City to seek dedication of floodplains and creek corridors for natural areas, neighborhood recreation areas, open space and transportation. 1~ L-18 To ensure adequate maintenance of the City's pazks, res~eatier~d open spaces, and recreation facilities, the City will prepare comprehensive management plans, including maintenance level of service aget standards for each €ae~il`ity site. 1~8 L-19 . The City wilt ensure that adequate funds are budgeted annually to meet established level of service standards for narks, open spaces, and recreation facilities. L-1.10-The Citv will support the development of an "Adopt a Park" prosram to encourage community involvement in the stewardship of narks and trails. I~-9 L-1.11 Because recreation participation preferences and interests vary among employment, ethnic, social, and cultural groups, it is the policy of the Staff Report - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2/26/2009 Page 2 of 3 58 S~ilEeth~euglt- -Deleted Text Section o~ae817 of Bold Underline -Proposed Text Change a ~' City to . ensure that parks, open spaces. facilities, and pro¢rams are developed to meet the diverse needs and interests of Woodburn's population. Staff Report - Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2/26/2009 Page 3 of 3 59 IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF WOODBURN, OREGON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2008-01 FINAL ORDER WHEREAS, a proposal was initiated by the Woodbum City Council on November 10, 2008 to initiate consideration of a legislative land use decisions to adopt the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan update, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a work session on February 12, 2009 regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment and the Woodbum Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and considered the written and oral testimony presented by staff and other interested persons, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission closed the hearing, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission moved to recommend that the City Council approve the draft revisions to the "Parks and Recreation -Open Space/Parks Goals and Policies" section of the Comprehensive Plan and to adopt the updated City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan as asub-exhibit to the Comprehensive Plan and instructed staff to prepare a final order to substantiate the Commission's decision. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COMMISSION: The Planning Commission hereby recommends that City Council adopt the draft revisions to the Comprehensive Plan and the updated Parks and Recreation master Plan as asub-exhibit to the Comprehensive Plan with a condition that the 2013-2016 priority recommendation to add one park to the southwest area East of I-5 be reprioritized to the 2009-2012 priority recommendation as contained in Exhibit "A", based on the findings contained in Exhibit "B", which are attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. Approved: Ellen Bandelow, Chairperson Date: r / I X11 ~~ , 0 60 COUNCIL BILL N0.2753 RESOLUTION NO. i91a A RESOLUTION INITIATING CONSIDERATION OF A LEGISLATIVE LAND USE DECISION TO ADOPT THE WOODBURN PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan on October 31, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Ptan contains goals and policies related to the provision of open space and parks; and WHEREAS, the 1999 Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan is described by reference in these goals and policies; and WHEREAS, the City, with considerable public involvement, has developed a draft of a Woodbum Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 7. Pursuant to Section 4.101.17 of the Woodburn Development Ordinance, the Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update is referred to the Planning Commission to initiate the consideration of a legislative land use decision. / ~ Approved os to form: v ' ~ ~~ ~' ll ~ ~~, 6 City Attorney , ~, Date n Ap Passed by the Council NovembZ'r 10, 2008 Submitted to the Mayor November i2, 2008 Approved by the Mayor November I2, 2008 Filed in the Office of the Recorder November 12, 2008 aTTEST: Mary T inant City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page I -COUNCIL BILL NO. 2753 RESOLUTION NO. 1914 61 _ / ,~`~~~~ '~IOODBUR,[~j ~~~`' /n~or~.crarcd IFFY March 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Dan Brown, Public Works Director SUBJECT: STOP SIGN INSTALLATION IN SMITH ADDITION RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has received public complaints regarding traffic behavior within the Smith Addition. Staff observations of traffic behavior revealed that a lack of traffic control at key intersections was resulting in excessive speed and failure to yield behavior. The Public Works Department, by policy, does not recommend the continuance of uncontrolled intersections where stop signs meet minimal warrant requirements prescribed by the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The public complaint and request for traffic calming in the Smith Addition was determined by Public Works to be contributed to by a lack of basic traffic control based upon a number of uncontrolled intersections. DISCUSSION: The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states that stop signs can be warranted on streets that enter a through street or with the intersection of a less important road with a main road. The Woodburn Transportation System Plan (WTSP) classifies Smith Drive and McLaughlin Drive as Local/Residential streets. Both Smith and McLaughlin Drives have an existing 31-foot improved width. Recent traffic counts showed the average weekday traffic of 500 vehicles per day. There have been no traffic accidents recorded by Woodburn Police Department at any intersections in Smith Addition. However, citizen complaints and staff visual observations confirmed that a significant number of vehicles do not actually stop at uncontrolled intersections. Stuff observed a significant number of drivers not properly yielding and not stopping at uncontrolled intersections. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator/y~F~ City Attorney N~-~ Finance Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 2009 Page 2 It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to allow the installation of stop signs as shown to provide improved traffic control at these intersections. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Estimated Cost for installation of 1 1 STOP signs is $1,100 and 13 painted STOP Bars is $600 including materials and labor, which will be funded from the regular Street Maintenance Budget. 63 COUNCIL BILL N0.2766 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THAT ADDITIONAL STOP SIGNS BE INSTALLED IN SMITH ADDITION AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED HEREIN WHEREAS, ORS Chapter 810 grants to the City of Woodburn, the authority to install stop signs at various locations within the City limits; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered a staff report from the Public Works Director recommending that certain STOP signs be placed at specific intersections as specified below and as warranted by the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council authorizes STOP signs be installed at the following described locations: A. On McLaughlin Drive at its intersection with Austin Avenue. B. On Austin Avenue at its intersection with Smith Drive. C. On Smith Court at its intersection with Smith Drive. D. On Smith Drive at its intersection with Workman Drive. E. On Workman Drive at its intersection with Smith Drive. F. On McLaughlin Drive at its intersection with Smith Drive. G. On Smith Drive at its intersection with Maple Street. H. On Maple Street at its intersection with Smith Drive. Section 2. That the STOP signs authorized in Section 1 are specifically depicted in Attachment "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 3. That the Public Works Director is delegated authority to paint STOP lines or STOP bars at any location in Smith Addition where there is a STOP sign. Page 1 -COUNCIL BILL NO. 2766 RESOLUTION NO. 64 Approved as to form: ~' ~~ ~~~ . City Attorney .~ ! S Zo° `1 Dat Approved: Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder Kathryn Figley, Mayor ATTEST: Mary Tennant City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2 -COUNCIL BILL NO. 2766 RESOLUTION NO. 65 ti ~ f _ J J,r~ , ,. - ,,. o v r , ~ ~ ~. - ~ --( ~ , ~ r, , , tz F ~ ~ - ~ ~ t ,. ..: .. _~ ~ . -- - - - _... ._- -i. -. .. i ' ~ .~ ~, c f i r _ ',. ~ _. - t ~ r~ ~ .. --~:. - ~ .W HAYES ST ~; Z r Q r ~. ` _ -- :_ ' _ v -- - - - __ ,- _ -- t - . W _ _ HAYE -- SST ~, ;~ r - _ - _. ._ ~ _ _ __ _ ~ ~ ., . -, . _ ; __ 1- tL I ? i -- a - 1 I I L - ; - -- x ~ ~ - r; c r GARF ' J IELD ST ,.-__ ~,c T ~ ~.; ~ , TTTT ~ ~ _.__ .. .ii ~ _ _. ~ .._ ~ _ r - .. r- . ; t _ _. _ _ DESANTIS OR - ~ ~ ~- ~- ~ PEE ~ LEGEND ~ ~ . ,s ,'~P ~~ ~~ ~~< . , ; ~ ~~ , ~ EXST. STOP SIGN _ y y ~ L~ . O `~ " ---- EXST. STOP BAR ~= ` • i , ~ ~, , ~ PROPOSED STOP SIGN - ~ r' _ . -- PROPOSED STOP BAR ~ ' . ~! ~ - ,cu; '' y ~~ y..;,, { ~ ,. ~. . ,"` -~~ i `~ << ~ ~ ,J ~"„t 2 ~ r OBE f,C~; ,~'T ~ , , ~ .~ ?~ O~ . !-- „ y ~ Sp ~ _ ~ - ~ ' ` c , ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~~ ~_ r Mq ~~ p _ . ~ ~ r ; S ~~ . .~ O ~ qk ~ _ I - ~ ,~ - r ,, Sr ~ ~ :, o .s, j r U - r' ti tz %~~ ~__ ~ /~~~' ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r. ~0,' ` ~h`r'' t t -eJ r .. ~~ a ~. _ SMITH pR ~ t __ ~~ _ - , . ~' ' ~, ~, , ~ j - ;- --_. - ~ Y _ - ,, ~ ' ~ _ r -_ __~ L_.... __ _ - - -. ____ - 1 ~ .. ~ ~t -.._ __ - ~ ~ ~ ; _ ey , - - f ..rti ir-„ ~ a .._ ~ - .., r s s ,a PROJECT TITLE: N -- ~- --- SMITH ADDITION TRAFFIC SIGNS - DRAWING NAME: FIGURE 1 W E OODBUR PROJ. N0: 2009-012-19 DESIGNED: DB Incor orated 1889 DWG. NO: P-1 DRAWN 8Y: GK PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: 3 17 09 REVIEWED: EL S ENGINEERING DNISION SCALE: NTS APPROVED: EL w~ w n ~~ n 4 ~. flo ~ \ ~ '~~`^ WOOD UR,~ lncuryurnied 1889 A ~z~,. March 16, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Jim Hend x, Community Development Director ~~'''~l'/~~ ry SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting o Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Grant Application to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached resolution in support of a Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) grant application to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan. BACKGROUND: Hwy 99E provides access to businesses along the corridor, serves as a major north/south transportation route between Wilsonville and Salem, and is one of the City's main transportation corridors. Rehabilitation of the highway, including streetscape improvements is necessary in order to revitalize the City's Commercial General District fronting Hwy 99E. The proposed Highway 99E Corridor Plan will guide future development, access, and improvements along this major corridor on the east side of the City. The project will involve the development and adoption of strategies, projects, Transportation System Plan (TSP) and transportation capital improvement program amendments, and land use and site development regulations to improve access management, local street connectivity, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, and operations of Hwy 99E. DISCUSSION: City staff is in the process of applying for a TGM grant to provide funds necessary to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan. TGM is a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DECD). It is primarily funded by SAFETEA-LU, the federal "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: Legacy for Users" and State of Oregon funds. Applications were due March 13, 2009 with announcement of grant awards by the end of May 2009. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator. City Attorney ` "' -' Fi 67 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 2009 Page 2 One of the application criteria requires the City to demonstrate local support for the project. Attached is a resolution in support of a TGM grant application to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan in the amount of $202,532.00. FINANCIAL IMPAC'i: There is no direct financial impact to the City's general fund. The City is responsible for providing a match of 11% or more of the total cost of the project. It is anticipated that this will be provided in the form of staff labor using existing resources. is\Community Development\Planning\TGM 99W\CC memo_grant resolution.doc 68 COUNCIL BILL NO. 2767 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF WOODBURN TO APPLY FOR A TRASNPORATION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT GRANT FROM THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND OREGON DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development sponsor a joint Transportation and Growth Management (TGMj grant program for local governments; and WHEREAS, An eligible use of the TGM grant program is for a corridor plan along Hwy 99E that combines transportation and land use planning; and WHEREAS, the City desires to improve the visual appearance of Hwy 99E and guide future development with improved access management, local street connectivity, and pedestrian and bicycle safety; and WHEREAS, the outcome of this effort will be a Highway 99E Corridor Plan that will provide the planning document that will guide implementation mechanisms; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Woodburn be authorized to apply for a Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) grant from the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development for $ 202,532.00 to develop a Hwy 99E Corridor Plan as specified above. Approved as to form: !/ ,'~~~~~ City Attorney Approved: Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Mary Tennant City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon ~- fig- zc~c Date Kathryn Figley, Mayor Page I -COUNCIL BILL NO. 2767 RESOLUTION NO. 69 ~~ ~ 1~,~. WOODBURj~j ~~~"~' /~r~,lr; rn der! iAA9 March 13, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator THRU: Charles Blevins, Acting Chief of Police FROM: Jason R. Alexander, Acting Captain ~ SUBJECT: Liquor License New Outlet-Full Off-Premise Sales RECOMMENDATION: The Woodburn City Council recommends that the OLCC approve a New Outlet application for EL Rancho Grande Market Inc. BACKGROUND: Applicant: EL Rancho Grande Market Inc. 1335 N. Pacific Hwy Suite 130 Woodburn, Oregon 97071 503.981.3131 Business: EL Rancho Grande Market Inc. 1335 N. Pacific Hwy Suite 130 Woodburn, Oregon 97071 503.981.3131 Owners: Rigoberto Pineda 1025 North 3ra Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 503.951.8308 License Type: Full Off-Premise Sales-Permits beer, wine, and cider sales for off- premise consumption only. Agenda Item Review: City Administrator City Attorney Finance 70 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 13, 2009 Page 2 On March b, 2009 the Woodburn Police Department received an application, requesting approval for a New Outlet for EL Rancho Grande Market Inc located at 1335 N. Pacific Hwy Suite 130 Woodburn, Oregon. The above mentioned applicant is applying for a New Outlet off-premise sales license through the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. The business will be open daily, Monday thru Sunday, from 7:00 am to 10:00pm. This establishment is a convenient store, which will sell food items along with both alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. There will be no live music however there will be a stereo used for music. There will not be karaoke, pool tables or lottery. The Police Department has received no communication from the public or surrounding businesses in support of or against the new outlet. DISCUSSION: The Police Department has completed a background investigation, in connection with the OLCC, on the applicant and found nothing of a questionable nature, which would preclude the issuance of this license. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None 71 oY-K~`Yy (Lo~.F' cr,po~yr,*) PAID OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION ltX~- i P~~~ ~~ TYPE ucl`NSIv rYpEs CI Full On-Premises Sales ($402.60/yr) 0 Commercial Establishment ^ Caterer O Passenger Carrier ^ Other Public Location ^ Private Club ^ Limited On-Premises Sales ($202.60/yr) ~6ff-Premises Sales ($100/yr) ^ with Fuel Pumps ^ Brewery Public House ($252.60) O Winery ($250/yr) D Other: FOR CITY AND COUNTY USE ONLY ACTIONS The city council or county comr~: O Change Ownership ~`! New Outlet (name of city or county) ~~ O Greater Privilege recommends that this Ilcens~b~: ^ Additional Privilege J~, O Other Granted D Denied ^ , By: (signature) (date) Name: Title: ^ Limited ~Corporatlon ^ Limited Liability Partnership Company OLCC US ONLY Application Recd by: tJ Date: 2 ~ ~,^~ ^ individuals I"~~~Vl~. 90-day authority: ^ Yes ^ No D 1. Entitv or Individuals applyjpg for t,~ license: [See SECTION 1 of the Guide] _ ,~- ®-+~ - 2. Trade Name (dba):~ 3. Business Location 4. Business Mailing Address (number, street, ~® rural route) (city) (county) ~~~ p (PO box, number, street, rural route) (city) (state) (ZIP code) 5. Business Numbers: ~~Z~'~l ~~~ '~ -~ ~ 3 ~ (7y ~~ > ~~ ~ ~ - ,~ ~ S 4L (phone) ~ (fax) 6. Is the business at this location currently licensed by OLCC? OYes ~"U 7, If es to whom: ~ y ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Type of License:__ .'~ % /~'y, 8. Former Business Name: o 9. Wlll you have a manager? ^Yes ~lo Name: -!-~ '~ Lt,`i Ir ~~, /1 1.r' ';~~!<~ ~~(,~ • 1) f'; ; (manager must fff~~I out an individual~tory form) 10. What is the local governing body where your business is located? L't-~~i/~Gt'~jL~1~2'? /:~""t ~:~ ~ r"~~ ~ ~-1•'~-/ ~;; ,~.-~ _ (na~ of city or c unty) ~ ,_ 11. Contact person for this application: ~ I ~ ~~~~~~i) ~ c~(,C~ r~ 7~' ?~ ~~~ ~ ~`~.. ~ y ~~~ . nam f (phone number(s) 1c~~..~' .v. _5~ s~-. Gv~-o~ r~1~-~~~~~ r ~v.~) L~~>'- ~~ ~3 _y :~ r i, (address) (tax number) h~1 .--t'-'- I understand that if my answers are not true and complete, the OLCC may deny. my license application. Appll a~ Slg s) and Date: ~ - O Date ~~~ G7 ~ OO Date ® Date ~ ~~ ~ ® ~ ~1 Date 1-800-452-OLCC 56522) www.oregon.gov/o cc ~ - (rev. 12/07) 72 • OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION BUSINESS INFORMATION Please Print or Type~` / ~ ` /' /~ Applicant Name:_ G~ /~~{~1~~L1© ~~ac~~t° /~t{./,~T' i.;f. Phone: 1 .~3~ %~~ ~Og Trade Name (dba~:~f ~di `? Cd~,~ (~'~,~ ~>d ./j-~~;,,~j~~~~ ~`r~ C . Business Location Address: ~ ~3,~ ~. TGtlY~)~~ ~~'UI ~'~2 ~.~~7 City:_ ~(_~U`~U~ ZIP Code: ~~~/ r+~ ~ r+ • • •• ~~ • Business Hours: Outdoor Area Hours: Tne outdoor area is used tor: Sunday '!~' Q~n to ~.n~ Sun y to od service Hours: to Monday ~ 4H to Monday to ^ Alco ervice Hours: to Tuesday ~ o~ to ZOOM Tuesday o ~ Enclosed ho Wednesday ANt to ""r`1`- Wednesday to , _ Thursday ~_ to ~~ Thursday to The exterior a~ is adequa 'ewed andlor Friday ~ Aw to 1Q~ Friday i supervis ,1iy Service Permittees. Saturday ~ uw to /rD 7~ Satur to ~_ (investigator's Init~ ) Seasonal Variations: O Yes ~No If yes, explain: ` Check all that apply: ~ ` ~ • • • ' ~ ^ Live Music ^ Karaoke I~' Recorded Music ^ Cofin-operated Games Sunday Monday to to ^ DJ Music ^ Video Lottery Machines Tuesday to Wednesday ^ Dancing ^ Social Gaming Thursday to r-1 ^ P l T bl Friday S d to u Nude Entertainers oo a es atur ay to ^ Other: Restaura Outdoor Lounge: Other (e Banquet: Total Se, OLCC USE ONLY Investigator Verified Seating:_(Y) _(N) Investigaior Initials: Date: I understand if my answers t true an p ete, the OLCC may deny my licelnse applica ion. Applicant Signature: ~~ - Date: 1-800.452-OLCC (6522) www.oregon.gov/o/cc (rev. 1?J07) 73 .~ ORSGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION FLOOR PLAN • roar Moor reran must ne surrmrtted on tnrs,fQrm. • Use a separate Floor Plan Form for each level or Aoor of the building. • Applicants must provide a sketch that shows the specific area of the premises (e.g. dining area, bar, lounge, kitchen and restrooms). Fail On-Premises (commercial establishments) applicants must also show dining tables. See example on back 74 ~~ /t7tYTi~/ L , l ~~ 7"( I Date' miuais- 1 Clry and ZIP Code 1-800-452-OLC C (6522) www.oregon.gov/o/cc (rev. 12(07) 1\ Woo~BVRN ~~`~ lnroryrrticA IFS9 March 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Scott D. Russell, Chief of Police and Charles Blevins Acting Chief of Police SUBJECT: Authority to apply for 2009 COPS CHRP Police Officer Funding Grant RECOMMENDATION: City Council authorizes staff to make application for a Police Officer Position under the 2009 COPS CHRP Grant. BACKGROUND: The ability of the Woodburn Police Department to staff and maintain Police Officer positions is crucial to the Department's ability to provide timely and effective service to the citizens of The City of Woodburn. Staffing levels are a perennial topic of discussion as we see increased population and commensurate levels of crime. However, additional staff is expensive, take large amounts of training and supervision time at the front end, and therefore gains in service and crime reduction can take substantial time to materialize. For these reasons the Department has sought high levels of computerization, maintained a flat organization, and strategically deployed our resources in order to maximize the number of officers on the street. Currently the Department maintains a level of 1.3 officers per 1000 citizens, slightly off the average of 1.5 for the Western U.S. In the past we have utilized grant positions to raise our staffing levels. Previous COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services Office of the US Department of Justice) programs have proved beneficial for the City of Woodburn including the COPS FAST grants of the 1990's which provided three additional police officer positions. As well as the COPS in Schools grant, this provided our current SRO (School Resource Officer) position. All of these grants provided for three year funding followed by a requirement that the City maintain the position for of least 12 months. Through careful planning and management all of these positions were eventually absorbed into the Department's budget at the appropriate time and are maintained to this day. This process allowed for police services to be in place and operating well before the City had to begin paying for them. Agenda Item Review: City AdministratoJ~i~ City Attorney ~.~ Finance 75 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 2009 Page 2 DISCUSSION: On March 16, 2009 the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) announced the opening of their 2009 competitive grants process for the COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP). The grant process will be completed on April 14, 2009 and all grant applications must be received by that time. The grants will provide one billion dollars in funding to assist in the hiring and rehiring of additional police officers by local governments. There is no local match required however, the funding will be based on current entry level salary and benefits of the grantee agency. The grants will pay for 100% of the entry level salary and benefits for 36 months for newly hired, full time, sworn, law enforcement officer positions. There is no cap on the number of positions that a City may apply for however, all such hired positions must be retained for a minimum of 12 months after the conclusion of the grant. The City of Woodburn, as part of our current hiring freeze, has maintained an open police officer position since January of 2009. This position was partially funded by the Meth Strike Force through private funds (Approx. 75%) and partially funded through the Police Department budget Approx. 25%). We have been notified that there will be no additional funding through the Meth Strike Force and even if we were allowed to utilize the funds form the Department budget they would be insufficient to fund a full time position. The Department firmly believes that all reasonable efforts should be made to work on bringing department staffing closer to the 1.5 officers per thousand citizens level. The citizens of Woodburn have certain expectations of the level of performance of their police department, and these expectations can only be met through proper staffing levels and the availability of police manpower when they call upon us for service. Yet we are faced with our statutory requirement that the City of Woodburn produce a balanced budget, and it is clear that this will put all city services in jeopardy including public safety. The COPS CHRP grant provides an opportunity to increase staffing during difficult financial times without placing a major burden on the current budget. It allows a police officer position to be brought in earlier than the normal course of budget growth would allow and assures that at the end of the grant there will be enough population and fiscal growth within the City to support the position. FINANCIAL IMPACT: In year one the grant will provide approximately $74,768 towards the position and the City's share will be $0. 76 Honorable Mayor and City Council March 23, 2009 Page 3 In year two the grant wilt again provide $74,768 towards the position and due to the agreement with the WPA and projected health insurance costs the City's share will be $6,320. !n year three the grant will again provide $74,768 towards the position and due to the agreement with the WPA and projected health insurance costs the City's share will be $ ] 1, 614. Over the three year grant period the COPS Office will have provided a total of $224,304 towards the position and the City of Woodburn will have provided a total of $17,934 77 1._ !~ ~~ 1~~. OODBUR W N lrccor~ora itA 4889 ~ ~ April 13, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Scott Derickson, City Administrator Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director FROM: Steve Krieg, Building Official SUBJECT: Building Division Proposed Fee Methodologies and Changes RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached ordinance adopting revised fees for the building inspection program which will assist in the financial support far the operation of the Building Division. BACKGROUND: The fast time the building division fees were increased was November of 2002. At that time the commercial building permit fees were not increased. Only the one-and two-family building permit fees and the commercial and residential mechanical permit fees were increased. The State of Oregon Building Codes Division recently adopted Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 918-050 (See Attachment"A"). OAR 918-050 requires all jurisdictions that administer a building inspection program to adopt "consistent form and fee methodology rules". OAR 918-050 requires the new fee methodology rules be in place by January 1, 2009. OAR 918-050 requires municipalities to adopt the latest International Code Council (ICC) valuation table as of April 1 of each year. OAR 918-050 lists fee methodologies that are new to the City of Woodburn. It is necessary for the City to adopt revised fees and the latest valuation table from ICC for the building inspection program to comply with OAR 918-050. The building inspection program is funded by fees for permits and plan reviews in accordance with Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 455.210(c). ORS 455-210(c) requires fees collected by a municipality be used for the administration and enforcement of a building inspection program for which the municipality has assumed responsibility under ORS 455.148 or 455.150 (See Attachment "B"). Agenda Item Review; City Administrator City Attorney Finance Honorable Mayor and City Council April 13, 2009 Page 2 The building division has been operating with a reserve fund from collected permit and plan review fees that allow it to continue operation when there is a downturn in construction permit activity and/or the economy. The Council has established that the building division reserve fund should be approximately equal to one years operating costs. Over the past six years the building division reserve fund has been maintained at this level (See Attachment "C"). With the recent downturn in construction permit activity and the economy, the building division has had to spend down its reserve fund (See Attachment "C"). By the end of January 2009 the reserve fund is 54 percent of the FY '08-'09 budgeted expenses. At the current projected construction permit` activity level and with the current fee schedule, the building division reserve fund is expected to be depleted sometime in early 2010 without an upturn in the economy. Currently the City of Woodburn has the lowest commercial and .residential building permit fees in the State of Oregon (See Attachment "D", "E" and "F"). Currently the City of Woodburn is one of only two. jurisdictions I could find with two fee tables for building permits. We currently have one fee table for commercial building permits and one for residential building permits (See Attachment "G"). The commercial-building permit fee table is from 1976, while the residential permit fee table is from 1979..{adopted in 2002). To simplify the process for our customers so they can determine building permit fees and be consistent with what mostother jurisdictions do, it is proposed to eliminate the two fee tables and use only one table for both residential and commercial projects (See Attachment "H"). In conjunction with the single (uniform) fee table, the building division .proposes to increase the uniform fee table. The residential building permit fees would increase by approximately five (5) percent which would create an approximate 35 percent increase in the commercial building permit fees. Currently building fees do not recover the costs of providing the services to our customers. Thus the reduction in the reserve fund. From FY 03-04 to FY 08-09 the building division's operating costs have increased 42% (See Attachment "C"). From FY 03-04 to FY 08-09 the building division's revenue was projected to be decreased 15% when the budget documents were prepared in February 2008. It is now expected that revenue will decrease more than projected due to the downturn in the economy. The building division has ended the year with a negative budget in three of the last six years, but until the end of FY 07-08 has been able to maintain approximately one years operating funds in the reserve account (See Attachment "C"). DISCUSSION: Honorable Mayor and City Council April 13, 2009 Page 3 The building division doesn't feel that raising fees to totally cover costs at this time is prudent considering the current economic climate. The proposed uniform fee table will bring the City of Woodburn into compliance with the new rules under OAR 918-050 while helping to offset the costs of providing service (See Attachment "H"). The ICC publishes a revised valuation table each year, usually before April 1st. The building division is recommending new or increased fee categories for minimum permit fee for commercial and residential building and mechanical permits, phased permits, deferred submittals, master plan reviews, change of occupancy, temporary certificate of occupancy, stand` alone residential fire sprinkler systems, and expedited plan reviews: These new or adjusted fees would put Woodburn into compliance with OAR 918-050 and 'align Woodburn with other jurisdictions. The increased fees. would help to offset some of the costs of providing services. If the building division were to recommend a fee increase to totally cover its operating costs over the last seven months, a fee increase of approximately 400 percent would be needed. It is hoped that the downturn' in the economy will not last more than another year and when the, economy starts its upward trend the building division will have the resources needed to continue operation. A history of permit activity chart is included for a comparison of permit activity by permit type (See Attachment "I"). FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. OREGON SECRETARY OF STATE It ~~E - Oregon State Archives . s~ca caHtkcr us ~ legCsl~tive ......records rngmt genealogy _ gover~or5 , holdings 5ta#e aSlen[Y ~ local gawt web ~xhibtts tour .-.._._._..a_ The Oregon Administrative Rules contain OARs filed through October 15, 2008 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, BUILDING CODES DIVISION DIVISION 50 TRI-COUNTY ADMINISTRATION General Administration 918-050-0000 Purpose and Scope Division 50 provides administrative procedures for use in all regions of the state and, where applicable, to specified regions of the state. These rules do not supersede or repeal the existing provisions of the state building code and related statutes and rules. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 8-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 7-1-00; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0010 Definitions The following definitions are adopted for OAR chapter 918, division 050: (1) "Tri-county region" or "Tri-county regional" refers to the geographical area that includes Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties. (2) "Division" means the Building Codes Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services. Attachment "A" Page 1 of 7 (3) "Permit" includes any license, certificate, approval, registration, insignia of compliance, label, or similar form of permission required by law to begin construction, reconstruction, alteration, installation, or repair on a structure, device, or equipment regulated by the state building code. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.842, 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.842, 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 8-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 7-1-00; BCD 20-2003, f. 12-31-03, cert. ef. 1-1-04; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0020 Standard Tri-County Regional Application Forms (1) All jurisdictions within the Tri-County region shall use standard permit application and intake checklist forms as approved by the division. (2) The division shall consider for adoption proposed amendments to the standard application and intake checklist forms. (a) Proposals for amendment to the application forms shall include: The existing unamended form(s); (A) The form(s) containing the appropriate amendments; and (B) A brief explanation of the need for the amendments. (b) Proposals to amend the approved forms must be filed with the division no later than February 1 or August 1. (c) The division shall notify all affected municipalities and interested parties of the division's determination regarding proposed amendments and provide copies of the amended form(s). (d) Any form changes shall be effective in all Tri-County region jurisdictions on July 1 or January 1 following adoption. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 8-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 7-1-00; BCD 20-2003, f. 12-31-03, cert. ef. 1-1-04; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0030 Standard Tri-County Regional Processes Attachment "A" Page 2 of 7 All jurisdictions within the Tri-County region shall use uniform processes for permit application, plan review, permit issuance and recording inspections as approved by the division, including, but not limited to: (1) Minor labels; (2) Issuing permits when no plan review is required; (3) Recording inspections; (4) Partial permits; (5) Deferred submittals; (6) Over-the-counter permits that require plan review; and (7) Plan review issue resolution. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 8-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 7-1-00; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 Uniform Fee Methodology 918-050-0100 Tri-County Regional Fee Methodology for Residential Permits All municipalities in the Tri-county region shall use the following methodologies consistent with the terminology of the state building code to calculate permit fees for residential construction. (1) Plumbing permit fees for new construction include one kitchen and are based on the number of bathrooms, from one to three, on a graduated scale. An additional set fee shall be assessed for each additional bath or kitchen. (a) An additional fee shall not be charged for the first 100 feet of water and sewer lines, hose bibbs, icemakers, underfloor low-point drains and rain drain packages that include the piping, gutters, downspouts and perimeter system. (b) Fee does not include: (A) Any storm water retention detention facility; (B) Irrigation and fire suppression systems; or Attachment "A" Page 3 of 7 (C) Additional water, sewer and service piping or private storm drainage systems exceeding the first 100 feet. (c) Additions, alterations and repairs shall be calculated based on the number of fixtures, appurtenances and piping with a set minimum fee. (2) All mechanical permit fees shall be calculated per appliance and related equipment with a set minimum fee. (3) Effective July 1, 2007, structural permit fees for new construction and additions shall be calculated using the most current ICC Building Valuation Data Table, multiplied by the square footage of the dwelling to determine the valuation. The valuation shall then be applied to the jurisdiction's fee schedule to determine the permit fee. The plan review fee shall be based on a predetermined percentage of the permit fee as set by the local jurisdiction. (a) The square footage of a dwelling, addition, or garage shall be determined from outside exterior wall to outside exterior wall for each level. The square footage of carports, covered porches or patios and decks shall be calculated separately at fifty percent of the value of private garages from the most current ICC Building Valuation Data Table. (b) Permit fees for remodels and alterations shall be calculated using the valuation determined by the fair market value as determined by the building official, and applied to the jurisdiction's fee table. (4) Additional local administrative fees or other local fees shall not be added to the cost of the building permit, except those administrative fees adopted by a municipality for plan reviews performed by licensed plan reviewers accepted pursuant to ORS 455.465. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.046, 455.048 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.046, 455.048 Hist.: BCD 9-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 10-1-00; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06; BCD 5-2007, f. 5-11-07, cert. ef. 7-1-07 918-050-0110 Tri-County Regional Fee Methodology for Commercial Permits All municipalities in the Tri-county region shall use the following methodologies consistent with the terminology of the state building code to calculate permit fees for commercial structures. (1) Plumbing permit fees shall be calculated based on the number of fixtures and footage of piping with a set minimum fee. The plan review fee shall be calculated separately based on a predetermined percent of the permit fee as set by the local jurisdiction. (2) Mechanical permit fees shall be determined based on the value of the mechanical equipment and installation costs and applied to the jurisdiction's fee schedule with a set minimum fee. The Attachment "A" Page 4 of 7 plan review fee shall be based on a predetermined percentage of the permit fee as set by the local jurisdiction. (3) Effective July 1, 2007, structural permit fees shall be calculated using the most current ICC Building Valuation Data Table, using the occupancy and construction type as determined by the building official, multiplied by the square footage of the structure to determine the valuation, or value as stated by the applicant, whichever is greater, to determine the valuation. The valuation shall then be applied to the jurisdiction's fee schedule to determine the permit fee, with a set minimum fee. When the construction or occupancy type does not fit the ICC Building Valuation Data Table, the valuation shall be determined by the building official with input from the applicant. The plan review fee shall be based on a predetermined percentage of the permit fee as set by the local jurisdiction. (4) Additional local administrative fees or other local fees shall not be added to the cost of the building permit. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.046, 455.048 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.046, 455.048 Hist.: BCD 9-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 10-1-00; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06; BCD 5-2007, f. 5-11-07, cert. ef. 7-1-07 918-050-0120 Tri-County Regional Electrical Permit Fees Electrical Permit fees in the Tri-County region shall be calculated based on the categories, procedures and requirements established in OAR 918-309-0020 to 918-309-0070. Additional local administrative fees or other local fees shall not be added to the cost of the building permit. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 9-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. e£ 10-1-00; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0130 Tri-County Regional Manufactured Home Siting Permits (1) All jurisdictions in the Tri-County region shall charge a single fee for the installation and set- up of manufactured homes. This single fee shall include the concrete slab, runners or foundations when they comply with the prescriptive requirements of the Oregon Manufactured Dwelling and Park Specialty Code, electrical feeder and plumbing connections and all cross-over connections. Additional local administrative fees or other local fees shall not be added to the cost of the building permit, except those administrative fees adopted by a municipality for plan reviews performed by licensed plan reviewers accepted pursuant to ORS 455.465. Attachment "A" Page 5 of 7 (2) Decks, other accessory structures and foundations that do not comply with the prescriptive requirements of the Oregon Manufactured Dwelling and Park Specialty Code, utility connections beyond 301ineal feet, new electrical services or additional branch circuits, new plumbing and other such items that fall under the building code may require separate permits. (3) When the jurisdiction has reason to believe that the existing electrical service to a manufactured dwelling may be unsafe or inadequate, the jurisdiction may require a separate permit to inspect the electrical service. [Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.] Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 9-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 10-1-00; BCD 26-2000(Temp), f. 10-4-00, cert. ef. 1-1- O 1 thru 6-29-01; BCD 31-2000, f. 12-27-00, cert. ef. 1-1-01; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0140 Residential Fire Suppression Systems Stand-alone and multi-purpose fire suppression system permit fees charged in the Tri-County region shall each be calculated as separate flat fees based on the square footage of the structure with graduated rates for dwellings with 0 to 2000 square feet, 2001 to 3600 square feet, 3601 to 7200 square feet and 7201 square feet and greater. The permit fee shall be sufficient to cover the costs of inspection and plan review. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 19-2001, f. 12-21-01, cert. e£ 4-1-02; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0150 Medical Gas Plumbing permit fees for medical gas systems installed in the Tri-County region shall be determined based on the value of installation costs and the system equipment, including but not limited to, inlets, outlets, fixtures and appliances and applied to the jurisdictions fee schedule with a set minimum fee. The plan review fee shall be based on a predetermined percentage of the permit fee as set by the local jurisdiction. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.844 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 19-2001, f. 12-21-01, cert. ef. 4-1-02; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0160 Attachment "A" Page 6 of 7 Phased Projects The plan review fee charged in the Tri-County region for a phased project is based on a minimum phasing fee, to be determined by the jurisdiction, plus 10 percent of the total project building permit fee not to exceed $1,500 for each phase. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.842 & 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.842 & 455.846 Hist.: BCD 11-2002, f. 6-28-02, cert. ef. 7-1-02; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. l -1-06 918-050-0170 Deferred Submittals The fee charged in the Tri-County region for processing and reviewing deferred plan submittals shall be an amount equal to a percentage, to be determined by the local jurisdiction, of the building permit fee calculated according to OAR 918-050-0110(2) and (3) using the value of the particular deferred portion or portions of the project, with a set minimum fee. This fee is in addition to the project plan review fee based on the total project value. Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.846 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.842 & 455.844 Hist.: BCD 12-2002, f. 6-28-02, cert. ef. 7-1-02; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06 918-050-0800 Permit Surcharges (1) Aone-percent surcharge will be assessed upon the total permit fees collected pursuant to ORS 455.210(4)(c). (2) Effective January 1, 2008, a four percent surcharge will be assessed upon the total permit fees collected pursuant to ORS 455.210(4)(d). Stat. Auth.: ORS 455.044 & 455.210 Stats. Implemented: ORS 455.044 & 455.210 Hist.: BCD 10-1999(Temp), f. 9-7-99, cert. ef. 10-1-99 thru 3-28-00; BCD 17-1999, f. 12-30-99, cert. ef. 1-1-00; BCD 8-2000, f. 6-15-00, cert. ef. 7-1-00, Renumbered from 918-020-0520; BCD 31-2005, f. 12-30-05, cert. ef. 1-1-06; BCD 10-2007, f. 9-28-07, cert. ef. 1-1-08 The official copy of an Oregon Administrative Rule is contained in the Administrative Order filed at the Archives Division, 800 Summer St. NE, Salem, Oregon 97310. Any discrepancies with the published version are satisfied in favor of the Administrative Order. The Oregon Administrative Rules and the Oregon Bulletin are copyrighted by the Oregon Secretary of State. Terms a~,d cona;t;ons oruse Attachment "A" Page 7 of 7 Oregon Revised Statute Chapter 455 -Building Code 2007 EDITION BUILDING CODE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ADMINISTRATION 455.210. (3) (c) Fees collected by a municipality under this subsection shall be used for the administration and enforcement of a building inspection program for which the municipality has assumed responsibility under ORS 455.148 or 455.150. Attachment "B" Pagel of 1 Building Division Budget Comparision of FY 03-04 to FY 08-09 85% 142% Comparision of Revenue and Expenses $400, 000 $375,000 $350, 000 $325,000 $300,000 $275,000 $250,000 $225,000 $200,000 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 -Revenue Total -Expense Total Building Division Continaencv Date Contin enc Increase Decrease Jul 1,2002 $ 304,995 Jul 1, 2003 $ 353,044 $ 48,049 Jul 1, 2004 $ 373,822 $ 20,778 Jul 1, 2005 $ 323,120 $ 50,702 Jul 1, 2006 $ 366,579 $ 43,459 Jul 1,2007 $ 361,653 $ 4,926 Jul 1, 2008 $ 310,540 $ 51,113 Jul 31,2008 295,015 $ 15,525 Au ust 31, 2008 269,782 25,233 Se tember 30, 2008 $ 256,006 13,776 October 31, 2008 $ 239,761 $ 16,245 November 30, 2008 $ 230,448 $ 9,313 December 31, 2008 $ 219,343 $ 11,105 Janua 31, 2009 205,694 $ 13,649 Attachment "C" Page 1 of 1 Revenue Fund 000-3081 Expense Fund 123-521-2241 Survey of Local BUILDING Permit Fees Created: September 2006 Updated: November 2008 This is Not a comparison of SDC's, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Land Use or other fees -ONLY BUILDING PERMIT FEES These are existing rates. Many of the agencies surveyed are currently reviewing their programs and may propose increases NOTE: THIS IS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES ONLY, CONTACT JURISDICTIONS FOR ACCURATE NUMBERS Valuation & Fee 1976 UBC Woodburn Commercial Permits (Currently) Marion County Salem 1979 UBC Benton County Independence Monmouth Woodburn Residential Permits (Currently) Newberg Silverton Lebanon Woodburn (Proposed) The Building Department McMinnville'"` Portland Tigard*" Dallas Corvallis Albany'` Sweet Home Wilsonville Oregon City" Milwaukie Forest Grove All Fees Were Verified November 2008 $1-500 $2,000 $25,000. $50,000 $100,000. $250,000 First. $100K Plus/$1000 10.00 32.50 170.50 283.00 433.00 808.00 433.00 2.50 10.00 32.50 170.50 283.00 433.00 808.00 433.00 2.50 60.00 60.00 198.00 310.50 460.50 873.00 460.50 2.75 65.00 65.00 198.00 310.50 460.50 873.00 460.50 2.75 13.00 42.50 221.65 367.90 562.90 1,050.40 562.90 3.25 13.00 42.25 221.65 367.90 562.90 1,050.40 562.90 3.25 13.00 42.25 221.65 367.90 562.90 1,050.40 562.00 3.25 13.00 42.25 221.65 367.90 562.90 1,050.40 562.00 3.25 13.00 42.25 221.65 367.90 562.90 1,050.40 562.90 3.25 21.50 42.25 221.90 368.15 563.15 1,050.65 563.15 3.25 42.50 50.30 227.25 372.05 566.40 1,053.90 563.15 3.25 15.00 45.00 229.00 379.00 579.00 1,104.00 579.00 3.50 65.00 65.00 235.00 390.00 590.00 1,107.50 590.00 3.45 40.00 60.00 224.00 394.00 594.00 1,119.00 594.00 3.50 15.28 44.98 254.28 368.03 595.53 910.03 527.53 2.55 44.60 74.75 255.76 402.01 597.01 1,089.01 597.01 3.28 62.50 62.50 226.95 366.70 606.70 1,092.70 606.70 3.24 60.00 60.00 248.37 416.62 641.12 1,202.12 641.12 3.74 20.48 55.90 270.96 446.70 680.11 1,265.11 680.11 3.90 60.00 60.00 264.70 429.70 689.70 1,259.70 689.70 3.80 50.00 87.80 319.65 508.64 760.64 1,360.64 760.64 4.00 48.20 86.30 288.49 456.99 763.75 1,399.75 763.75 4.24 40.00 72.19 328.13 536.25 811.88 1,656.38 811.88 5.63 18.75 62.10 327.52 542.02 830.52 1,562.52 830.52 4.88 22.50 63.00 325.00 580.00 879.00 1,629.00 879.00 5.00 "Proposed fee, jurisdiction is going through a fee increase "`Additional fee schedule for $500K and above in value Attachment "D" Page 1 of 1 Survey of Local RESIDENTIAL MECHANICAL Permit Fees Created: November 2008 This is Not a comparison of SDC's, Plumbing, Building, Electrical, Land Use or other fees -ONLY MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES These are existing rates. Many of the agencies surveyed are currently reviewing their programs and may propose increases NOTE: THIS IS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES ONLY, CONTACT JURISDICTIONS FOR ACCURATE NUMBERS Minimum Peeper Piece of Maximum Fee pei- Piece Residential Mechanical Permits Minimum Permit. Fee Equipment of Equipment Dallas 40.00 3.00 11.25 McMinnville** 20.00 5.50 13.25 Tigard** 72.50 10.00 14.00 Albany* 60.00 8.50 20.00 Marion County 65.00 10.00 20.00 Oregon City* 52.25 8.00 20.00 Salem 65.00 20.00 20.00 Woodburn (Proposed) 65.00 20.00 20.00 Wilsonville 44.50 9.20 23.05 Sweet Home 50.00 15.00 25.00 Corvallis 20.00 10.00 30.00 Canby" 80.00 8.25 46.50 Milwaukie 60.00 8.50 47.00 Benton County 50.00 7.00 50.00 Woodburn (Currently) 25.00 6.00 95.00 All Fees Were Verified November 2008 "Proposed fee, jurisdiction is going through a fee increase Attachment "E•• Page 1 of 1 Building Division -Mechanical Fees Effective September 26, 2001 Service Fee Base Fee $25 Forced Air > 100,00 BTU _ ___ ____ ~__ $14 __ _ -- _- Forced Air < 100 00 BTU ~ _ ~ $27 - -- - Suspended/Recessed Wall/Floor Mounted Unit Heater $14 Compressor Shp / 100,000 BTU Boiler ~ $15 _Compressor_15hp_/_500,000 BTU Boiler _ _ $30 Compressor 30hp / 1,000,000 BTU Boiler ~ _ $42_ Compressor_50hp_/ 1,.750,000 BTU Boiler $65_ r Compressor over 50hp / 1,750,000 BTU Boiler $95 Air Handling Unit to 10,000 CFM $14._ Air Handling Unit over 10 000 CFM ~ -- -- $z2 Evaporative Cooler, $15 _ -- - Domestic Hood ~ $1 a ~ Commercial Hood ~' __ $40 Domestic Incinerato _ __ $1 ~ Commercial Incinerator ' $?5 Exhaust Fan & Duct/Dryer Vent ~ $6 Wood Stove, Gas Decorative Appliance ~ $14 Appliance Vent Not Included ~n Appliance -_- $9 _ ~ Repair/Alteration/Addition of Heating or_ _ __ i __ __ $14 Gas Line 1-4 Outlets - -- ___ Additional Gas Outlets Gas -Line Without Appliance Fire Damper or Water Heater Regulated but Unclassified Equipment Smoke Detector/Shut Down I:\Community Development\Building\Miscellaneous\Other\Building Fees-9-27-Ol.wpd $6 $~ Attachment "G" Page 1 of 3 Building Division -Structural Fees Effective September 26, 2001 Service Fee Notes (Additional Fees, Units, etc.) Residential (all fees do not include state surcharge) Total Valuation --$1.00 to $500.00 --$501.00 to $2,000.00 --$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 --$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 --$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $13.00 $13.00 for the first $500, plus $1.95 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 $42.25 for the first $2,000, plus $7.80 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $221.65 for the first $25,000, plus $5.85 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $367.90 for the first $50,000, plus $3.90 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 --$100,000 and up $562.90 for the first $100,000, plus $3.25 far each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Commercial (all fees do not include state surcharge) Total Valuation --$1.00 to $500.00 --$501.00 to $2,000.00 --$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 --$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 --$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 --$100,000 and up $10.00 $10.00 for the first $500, plus $1.50 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 $32.50 far the first $2,000, plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $170.50 for the first $25,000, plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $283.00 for the first $50,000, plus $3.00 far each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $433.00 for the first $100,000, plus $2.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof utner Inspections OutsideNormal Hours I $48 _ f'~charged per hour __ Re-InspectlOnS_(for which no fee specifically indicated) _ I _ $48 ----leach- nspeCtlOnS (for which no fee spec~ficalty indicated) ---ttt $4$ 1iCharged per hOUr __ _ _ __ Plan Review (Mechanical) ~ 25% of mechanical permit- _ _ I -_ _ __ Plan Review (Structural) 65% 'of structural permit ' Plan Review (Fire, Life Safety) 25% of structural permit additional Plan Review lnvestiaation Fee $48 (,required by changes, additions, or (revisions to approve plans, charged per (hour ___ $48 ~ -_ Attachment "G" Page 2 of 3 BUl~D1NG vALIlATiflN DATA At the request ai numerous building Officials. f3ulfdirtE Standards"' offers ttte 6oIloMMtg blame valuation data I,epresenting a cost; for most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most oonuran for marry cities. tvw general lasses are wr>sidered for these, one for 'average" c~ruiruction and the other for 'good.' A~usirnenu should be made for special architecttrra( ix strtrcWral features and the location of the pro)ett. Hig-ter or louver unit costs may often result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of 'valuation' in Section 223 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code° and thus include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work. except as specifically fisted below. The unit costs aiso inGude the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for proiects reviewed by the International Conference of Building Officials will be based on valuation ,...,.a t....., .ti..~.. f....,..~.• ..n.:rh ...n.n oel~Mietv+rl in Anrir 7nn2_ vv...p.....,... ....... ...v-... .. b.. .. .. .._.. COSt Oar $QWf! Occupancy enC Type root. Arew(e .-_._ __.___.._ -_ __. rou pe* SQwrc Oaupancy and Type Foot AveraCe Cost ~ $glli(e Otxupancy rrnd Type Foot. AMeraee Cost pet Sgwre ~u+PO^eY orr~ Type ~. AveraLe 1. APARTMEM MOUSES: Type I ar It ER.•.......... 588.70 7. DWEWNGS: Type V-Masonry........ 575.70 13. JARS: Type I ar II F.R............5 159.10 20. RESTAURANTS: Type IN--1-Hour ......... 597.40 (Good) 5109.20 (Good) 596.90 Type III-1-Hour......... 145.50 Type ill-N ................. 94.10 Type V-Masonry Type V-Wood Frame . 67.30 1 Type V-1-Hour.......... 109.10 type V--1'Hour.......... 89.20 (ar Type Ilq......,._ .. 72.40 ~ (Good) $92.40 j 14. LIBRARIES: TYpe V-N .................. 85.70 (Good) 588.70 Basements- 1 Type i or II F.R............ 116.40 21. SCFIOOLS: Type V-Wood Frarce ~ 63.80 Semi-RNShed ...... 1 20.10 I Type 11-1-Hour.......... 85.20 Type I ar 11 F.R............ 111.20 (Good) 58200 (Good) 523.20 I Type II-N............_.... 81.00 Type It-1-Hour .......... 75.90 Type !-8asernent Garage 37.40 ~ Un4nrsned_.... .. _ 14.60 Type ill-l-Hour ......-.. 90.00 Type III-1-Hour ......... 81,20 AUDRORIUMS: 2 (Good) 517.70 j Type III-N ................. 85.50 Type III-N ................. 78.10 . Type I ar II F.R........... 104.80 8. FlRE STATIONS: Type V-1-Hour.......... 84.50 Type V-1•HOUr.......... 76.10 Type II-1-Hour ......... 75.90 Type I a I1 F.R............ 114.40 Type V-N .................. 81.00 Type V-N.................. 72.60 Type il-N .................. 71.80 Type II-1-Hour.......... 75.30 15. MEDICAL OfF1CES: 22. SERYICf STATIONS: Type III-1-Hour ......... 79.80 Type II-N .................. 71.00 Type I Or II F.R.•.......... 119.50 Type II-N.................. 67.20 Type III-N ................. 75.70 Type III-1•HOUr ......... 82.40 Type ~1_~,..,-..... 9220 Type NI-1-Hour......... 70.10 Type V-i-Hour.......... 76.30 Type 111-N ................. 78.90 Type 1~-.,--............. 87.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 53.70 Type V-N .................. 71.20 Type V-1•Hour.......... 77.30 Type III-1-Hour ......... 100.00 Canopies ................... 28.00 3. BANKS: Type V-N .................. 73.30 Type III-~J ................. 93.10 Z3. STORES: Type I ar II F.R.•.......... 148.10 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Type V-1-Hour.......... 90.20 Type I Or 11 FR.'.......... 82.40 Type II-1-Hour.......... 109.10 Type 1 or I( F.R............ 103.70 Type V--N .................. 87.00 Type II-1-1bur.......... 50.40 Type II-N .................. 105.60 Type II-I-HOUr.......... 84.20 18. OFFlCES••: Type Ii---N.................. 49.30 Type III-1-HOUf ......... 120.40 Type Ii-N .................. 80.60 Type I or II f.R.•.......... 106.80 Type ill-1•Hour ......... 61.30 Type III--N ................. 116.10 Type III-1•Hour......... 87.70 Type II-1•Hour.......... 71.50 Type III-N................. 57.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 109.10 I Type III-N ................. 84.10 Type 11--N.................. 68.10 Type V-1-Hour.......... 51.60 Type V-N .................. 104.50 Type V-1-Hour.......... 84.70 Type NI-1-Hour .......,. 77.20 Type V-N.................. 47.70 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type V-N .................. 81.80 Type III-N................. 73.80 24. THEATERS: Type II-1-Hour.......... 51.00 10. HOSPITALS: Type V-1•HOUf.......... 72.30 Type I or II F.R............ 109.80 Type II-N .................. 47.60 Type I or II F.R.'.......... 163.20 Type V-N.................. 68.10 Type III-1-Hour......... 80.00 Type ill-l-Hour ......... 55.50 Type III-1-Hour ......... 135.10 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: Type III-N ................. 76.20 Type III-N.a .............. 51.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 128.90 y~ood Frame,..,,---.-..... 24.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 75.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 37.40 li. HOTELS AND MOTELS : Masonry ..................... 27.40 Type V-N.................. 71.20 5. CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R.•.......... 101.00 Open Carports............ 16.60 25. WAREHOUSES"': Type I or II FR............ 99.20 Type III-1•HOUf ......... 87.50 I8. PUBLIC BUIUNNGS: Type 1 Of II FR............ 49.40 Type II-1-Hour .......... 74.50 Type III-N ................. 83.40 Type I or II F.R.•.......... 123.40 Type II or V-i-Hour ... 29.30 Type 11-N .................. 70.80 Type V-1-Hour.......... 76.20 Type II-I-HOUr.......... 100.00 Type II or V-N........... 27.50 Type iii--l-Hour ......... 81.00 Type V-~I .................. 74.70 Type II-~1.................. 95.60 Type III-1-Hour ......... 33.20 Type Iil-N ................. 77.40 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type 111-1-Hour ......... 103.80 Type III-N ................. 31.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 75.70 Type 1 or II F.R............ 56.90 Type III--N ..........:...... 100.20 EQUIPMENT Type V-N .................. 71.20 Type 11-1-Hour.......... 39.60 Type V-1-Hour.......... 95.00 AIR CONDfTiONING: 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPRALS: Type II-N .................. 36.40 Type V-N.................. 91.60 Commercial............ 4.20 Type 1 or 11 F.R.•.......... 139.20 Type 111-i-Hour......... 43.60 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: Residential ............. 3.50 Type i1--1•Hour.......... 96.60 Type III-N ................. 41.10 Type I or 11 F.R.•.......... 48.90 SPRINWFR SYSTEMS.. 2.60 Type III-1-Hour ......... 99.00 Tilt-up ........................ 30.00 Type I or II Open PaAting'36.70 Type V-1-Hour.......... 93.30 Type V-1-Hour.......... 41.10 Type It--N .................. 28.00 Type V-N .................. 37.60 Type III-1-Hour ......... 37.00 Type II{~1 ................. 32.90 Type V-1-Hour.......... 33.70 Attachment "G" Page 3 of 3 City of Woodburn, Building Division Permit Plan Review and Other Miscellaneous Fees (Except One- and Two-Family Residential Mechanical Permits) Effective April 15, 2009 Service Fee Notes (Additional Fees, Units, etc.) Building and Mechanical Permit Valuations (includes fire suppression and fire alarm permits): $1.00 to $2000.00 $65.00 minimum permit fee $2001.00 to $25,000.00 $65.00 for the first $2,000, plus $7.40 for each additional $1,000.00 ocfraction thereof, to and including $25,000' $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $235.00 for the first $25,000, plus $6.20 for each additional $1,00.0.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50;000 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $390.00 for the first $50,000, plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $100,001.00 and up $590.00 for the first $100,000, plus $3.45 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof _ __ _ _ -~- - - l ~_ ~ Note 1: The commercial mechanical valuation includes the cost of all equipment and installation costs. Note 2: The commercial building valuation shall be the greater of the ICC Building Valuation Data Table current as of Aril 1 of each ear or the valuation as rovided b the a > p Y P - - Y Pp cant. - I One- and Two-Family Dwelling Carport, Covered Porch, Patio, and Deck: The square footage of a carport, covered porch; patio, or deck shall be calculated separately at fifty (50) percent of the value of a private garage from the most current ICC Building Valuation Data table. _ - --- - __ 1 _ __ _ _. _ _ __ __. _ _- _ _ -- ---- - _ One- and Two-Family>Dwelling Addition, Alteration, and Repairs: Permit fees shall be calculated based on the fair market value as determined by the building official and then applying the valuation to the permit fee table. - -- -~ - - ~ - Building and Mechanical Plan Review Fees (includes fire suppression and fire alarm permits) Plan Review (Residential Building) ~ 65% ~f building permit fee Plan Review (Commercial Building)_ 65% of building. permit fee Plan Review (Fire- and Life-Safety) ( 40% Tof building permit fee Plan Review (Commercial Mechanical)_ _ _ 65% of mechanical permlt_fee ~- - Additional Plan Review ~ $85.00 charged per hour, (required by changes, additions, ~lor revisions to approved- plans)- . -- - - _ --- _ _- - __ _ _ _ I I I: Community Development\Building\Fee Increase\Building & Mechanical Permit Fees 2008-1 Page 1 of 5 ~ _ _ _ i __ i _ __ _ _ - - - Specialty Program Fees: ~ 'I Deferred Submittals (Plan Review) 100% of permit fee calculated using the value of the Phased Permits (Plan Review) Master Plan Review Fee administrative Fee for Processing State of )regon Master Plans or Plans Reviewed -y a Third Party Plans Examiner Expedited Plan Review deferred portion of the project, with a minimum fee of $300.00. This fee is in addition to the building or mechanical permit fee. A separate fee is assessed for each deferred submittal of the project. 10% of building permit fee calculated using the value of the entire project, plus $300.00 up to a maximum fee of $1,500.00. This fee is in addition to the permit fee. A separate #ee is assessed for each phase of the project. 65% of building permit fee'for first plan and 30% of building permit fee for each separate review of same construction plan _ - - _ 10% ~of building permit fee with a minimum fee of $200.00 $150.00 charged per hour, in addition to the calculated plan review fee. - ~ _ __ - Inspection Fees: _ __ _ I Inspections Outside Normal Hours $130 ___ charged per hour (minimum 2 hours) _ _ ~ Re-Inspections (for which no fee ~ $85 icharged per hour (minimum 1 hour) specifically indicated) Inspections (for which no fee specifically ~ $85 charged per hour (minimum 1 hour) II indicated) _ ___ Stand Alone Residential Sprinkler System Fees: _ __ Square Footage __ _ 0 to 2,000 square feet 2,001 to 3,600 square feet --- ___ 3,601 to 7,200 square feet ____.-- 7,200 square feet and above _ __ Fee $297.00_. - $396.00 - __ -_ $330.00 $545.00 of permit fee, fee is in addition to the permit fee ~I Issued for 30 days, $100 for each 30 day reissue charged per hour, minimum fee of two hours _.. -. _ __ - - _ _ _ I I: Community Development\Building\Fee Increase\Building & Mechanical Permit Fees 2008-1 Page 2 of 5 anufactured Dwelling and Cabana Installation Permits: A single fee is charged for the set-up of manufactured homes. This single fee includes the concrete slab, runners, or foundations when they comply with the prescriptive requirements of the Oregon Manufactured Dwelling standard, electrical feeder and plumbing connections, and all cross-over connections. other accessory structures, and foundations that do not comply with the prescriptive requirements of the Oregon ~ctured Dwelling and Park Specialty Code, utility connections beyond 30 lineal feet, new electrical services or ial branch circuits, new plumbing, and other such items that fall under the building code require separate >ermits. nstallation Permit istant bracing systems __ ma and Park Permits: _. - _ -_ $250.00 ( _ $130.00 1 $130.00 -- The fees for each permit issued for the construction, addition, or alteration of a manbfactured dwelling park, jrecreational vehicle park, or organizational camp developed shall be calculated using;the valuation of the work and the most recently adopted buildin permit valuation table.,' Plan Review 65% of permit fee ~ _ __ -_- __ - __ --- Excavation and Grading Permits: The fee for an excavation and grading permit shall be calculated using the valuation of the work and the most recently adopted building permit valuation table. 1-- o Plan Review 65 /o ~of _permit fee _ _ I _ -_ a _ -- _ _ __ __ Demolition Permits: ~_ _ _ __ _ The fee for a demolition permit shall be calculated using:-the valuation of the work and the most recently adopted building permit valuation table. __ __ Plan Review ~ 65% of permit fee - -.. ~ - -- - - i -- _-_ -- - (The fees listed above do not include the State of Oregon permit fee surcharge or the statewide code development,:,training, and monitoring fee for Manufacturered dwellings or the school district construction excise tax.) I: Community Development\Building\Fee Increase\Building & Mechanical Permit Fees 2008-1 Page 3 of 5 City of Woodburn Building Division One- and Two-Family Dwelling Mechanical Fees (Includes Manufactured Homes) Effective April 15, 2009 ITEM Fee (per appliance/equipment) Heating & Cooling (includes relocation) Gas Connections (unlimited number of connections) ~ $20.00 Furnace including ductwork & vent (forced air) $20.00 __ Air Conditioner, Heat Pump, or Evaporative Cooler ~ __ $20.00 Unit Heater (suspended, recessed wall, floor ~, __ $20.00 mounted) Air Handling Unit $20.00 Water Heater ~ $20.00 Range -- - _ _ $20.00 - - Clothes Dryer _ _ _ _ ~ $20.00 Fireplace /Insert /Stove /Log Lighter /Decorative j $20.00 Fireplace ___-____ Barbecue ~ $20.00 Boiler Gas Connection :and Venting Only 1 $20.00 Venting (includes relocation) Range Hood $20.00 __ _ _ _ - Bath Fan $20.00 __ __ Clothes`Dryer Exhaust $20.00 __ _ - Exhaust Fan. _ _ _ $20.00 Miscellaneous (includes relocation) Other Equipment or Appliance not Listed above Minimum Permit Fee $20.00 $65.00 (The fees listed above do not include the State of Oregon permit fee surcharge.) I: Community Development\Building\Fee Increase\Building & Mechanical Permit Fees 2008-1 Page 4 of 5 building Valuation Data (r~;,,+;n;,Nr,; accurate values for that purpose. However, the Square Foot Construction Costs table can be used to determine the cost of an addition that is basically astand-alone building which happens to be attached to an existing building. In the case of such additions, the only alterations to the existing building would involve the attachment of the addition to the existing building and the openings between the addition and the ex- isting building. • For purposes of establishing the Permit Fee Multiplier, the es- timated total annual construction value for a given time period (1 year} is the sum of each building's value (Gross Area x Square Foot Construction Cost) for that time period (e.g., 1 year). The Square Foot Construction Cost does not include the price of the land on which the building is built. The Square Foot Construction Cost takes into account everything from site and foundation work to the roof structure and coverings but does not include the price of the land. The cost of the land does not affect the cost of related code enforcement activities and is not included in the Square Foot Construction Cost. Square Foot Construction Costsa, b, `, ~ Group (2006 International Building Code) __ Type of Construction t IA IB ItA 118 11iA HIB IV VA VB A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage 196.11 169.78 185.37 177.60 167.20 162.27 171.92 _ 152.56 146.94 Assembly, theaters, without stage 177.62 171.29 1 fi6.88 159.10 i 48.75 f 43.82 153.43 134.10 128.49 A-2 Assembly, nightclubs 149.94 145.74 142.04 136.49 128.53 124.91 131.71 116.50 112.58 A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls 148.94 144.74 140.04 135.49 126.53 123.91 130.71 114.50 111.58 A-3 Assembly, churches 180.72 174.39 169.98 162.21 151.82 146.89 156.54 __ 137.18 131.57 A-3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, museums __ ___ __ _ ` J 152.81 __ 146.48 141.07 134.30 122.33 118.97 128.63 108.26 103.65 A_-4 Assembly, arenas 176.62 170.29 164.88 158.10 146.75 142.82 152.43 132.10 127.49 B Business __ 154.16 148.70 _ 144.00_ 137.27 125.07 120.41 _ 131.97 109.81 105.37 E Educational 166.52 160.91 156.34 149.52 _ 140.14 132.98 144.59 123.34 118.69 F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard 92.68 88.42 83.70 80.93 72.45 69.29 77.68 59.67 56.50 F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard 91.68 87.42 83.70 79.93 72.45 68.29 76.68 59.67 55.50 H-1 High Hazard, explosives 86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 N.P. H234 High Hazard 86.84 82.58 78.86 75.09 67.79 63.63 71.84 55.02 50.85 H-5 ` H_PM____ ___ ____ 154.16___ _148.70 144.00 137.27 125.07 120.41 131.97 109.81 105.37 I-1 Institutional, supervised environment 152.30 147.06 143.14 137.34 128.24 __ 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54 I-2 i Institutional, hospitals _ _ 256.26 250.80 246.11 239.38 226.55 N.P. 234.08 211.31 N.P. I-2 i ---- Institutional, nursing homes 179.18 173.72 169.02 _ 162.30 150.51 _ __ N.P. _ 157.00 135.27 N.P. I-3 Institutional, restrained 174.99 169.52 164.83 158.10 147.16 141.52 152.80 131.92 125.48 ~ I-4 Institutional, day care facilities 152.30 147.08 143.14 137.34 128.24 124.73 138.61 116.09 111.54 M Mercantile _^ _111.44 107.24 _102.53 97.99 89.62 87.00 93.21 77.59 _ 74.67 R-1 - Residential, hotels 154.24 -- 149.02 145.08 139.28 129.95 126.44 140.32 117.80 113.25 R-2 '~ Residential, multiple family 129.33 124.11 120.17 - 114.37 - 105.16 101.65 115.53 -_ 93.01 88.46 R-3 Residential, one- and two-family 122_11 _ 118.76 . 115.86 112.68 108.62 105.77 110.77 101.74 95.91 R-4 Residential, care/assisted living facilities S-1 Storage, moderate hazard S-2 Storage, low hazard U Utility, miscellaneous 152.30 85.84 84.84 65.15 147.08 81.58 80.58 61.60 143,14 76.86 76.86 57.92 137.34 74.09 73.09 55.03 128.24 65.79 65.79 49.70 124.73 62.63 61.63 46.33 138.61 70.84 69.84 51.94 116.09 111.54 53.02 49.85_ _ 53A2 48.85 3923 37.34 j a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous b. Unfinished basements (all use group) = $15.00 per sq. ft. c. For shell only buildings deduct 20 percent. d. N.P. =not permitted Electronic files of the latest Building Valuation Data can be downloaded from the Code Council website at www.iccsafe.org/cs/techservices 52 building safety journal January-February 2008 Attachment "H" Page 5 of 5 City of Woodburn Building Division Number of Permits Issued by Type FY 1998-1999 FY 1999-2000 FY 2000-2001 FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004-2005 FY 2005-2006 FY 2006-2007 FY 2007-2008 FY 2008-2009' New Residence 119 210 100 148 122 141 89 96 63 73 5 Multi-Famil 3 0 0 134 0 0 0 3 20 21 10 Assisted Livin Facilities 0 0 0 210 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Adds 8 Alts 52 30 22 81 38 55 50 44 60 45 26 Industrial 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 4 5 Commercial 22 4 7 61 66 114 130 100 122 76 57 Si ns, Fences, Drivewa s 47 73 41 30 28 39 54 31 17 6 0 Manufactured Homes 27 9 4 15 5 17 15 9 15 11 4 Totals 272 326 174 679 261 368 338 283 298 236 107 Commercial permits are not tracked by new or significant rehabs, only by numbers. As of February 28, 2009 Attachment "I" Page 1 of 1 Woodburn Community Development Department Building Division Overview Building Division • Current fee methodology out of compliance • Fees not recovering costs • Several building functions do not recover any costs • Building community - d~culty determining fees • Lowest fees in state • Proposed fees continue to remain Tower then most jurisdictions Building Division Building Inspection Program Residential 1 8 2 Family Dwellings 11 Individual Inspections (typically) - Footing -Electrical -Marion County - Foundation -Plumbing -Marion County - Under floor - Insulafion° - Exterior brace panels _ Interior brace panels - Framing _ Drywall - Mechanical (gas piping, ductwork, - Re-inspections equipment) -Final -Certificate of Occupancy Community Development Department Planning Dlvislon Building Division - Current Planning -Plan Rwiew • Land use I & 2 Famiy (Conditional Use Residential Permits, Partitions. Commercial etc) Mechanical (FNAC) -Long Planning -Inspection • Comprehensive 18 2 Femity Plan Residerrtial • Woodburn Commercial Development Ordinance ~~~ (HVAC) • Urban Growth -Marion County Boundary, etc. Plumbing • Electrical Building Division Plan Review -1 & 2 Family Residential • Conformance to Oregon Residential Specialty Code • Fire, Life & Safety • Structural Design • Energy Code Compliance Building Division Plan Review - Commercial (other than 1 8r 2 family dwellings) • Fire sprinkler • Fire suppression • Fire alarm • Mechanical (HVAC) • Conformance to Oregon Structural Specialty 8 Mechanical - Specialty Codes • Fire, Life, 8 Safety review • Structural design • Energy Code Compliance • Disabled access 1 Building Division Building Inspection Program Commercial Inspections (other than 1 & 2 family dwellings) 15 individual inspections (typically) -Foundation -Plumbing -Marion County -Roof sheathing -Insulation - Exterior Shear wall -Fire sprinkler -cover -Under floor -Suspended Ceiling - Interior shear wall -Drywall -Framing - Reinspections - Mechanical (HVAC) -Final -Certificate of - Elecfical -Marion Occupancy County Building Division Current Staffing Levels - Building Official (.20 F'fE) - Residential Inspector (.20 FTE) '- Administrative Assistant (.15 FTE) Previous- Staffing Levels - Building Official (1 FTE) - Residential Inspector (1 FTE) - Administrative Assistant (.3 FTE) - Permit Technician (1 FTE) Building Division Existing Methodology -Residential Valuation of Project (cost of building) 2002 Valuation equalslpermit fee - Plan review fee/building permit fees • Single family dwelling ($92.40) • Garage ($24.30) • Valuation (2000 sq ft dwelling with garage) -$204,240 • Permit fees (plan review & building) - $1,489.74 - Fees provide for single family plan review and building inspections, administrative support, records, overhead, etc. Building Division Other plan reviews and inspections - Retaining walls - Fences (over 6 feet) - Signs - Tanks (storage, fuel, etc). - Flag poles - Towers 8 antennas Building Division • Revenue Sources - Dedicated fund - Plan Review fee - Building Permit fee - Incidental fees - Totally funded by building related fees Building Division Proposed Methodology -Residential • Valuation of Project (cost of building) 2008 • Valuation equals permit fee - Plan review feelbuilding permit fees • Single family dwelling ($95.91 sq. ft.) • Garage ($37.34 sq. ft.) • Valuation (2000 sq. ft. dwelling with garage) - $221,692 • Permit fees (plan review & building) - $1,667.99 • Increase of 10% - Fees provide for single family plan review and building inspections 2 Building Division Existing Methodology -Commercial • Valuation of Project (cost of building) • Valuation equals/permit fee - Plan review fee/building permit fees • Tenant improvement - $100,000 " • Permit fees (plan review 8 building) - $714.45 - Fees provide for commercial plait review and building. inspections, administrative support, records, overhead, etc. Building Division Existing Methodology -Mechanical • Fees based upon equipmenUappliance - Air wnditioner (Compressor Shp) - Furnace (Forced Air >100,000 BTU) - Fire Damper or Water Heater • Examples - Air conditioner (Compressor Shp) $15.00 - Furnace (Forced Air>100,000 BTU) $27.00 - Fire Damper or Water Heater $ 6.00 - Base fee 25.00 Total Mechanical fee $73.00 Fees provide for plan review and building inspections, administrative support, records, overhead, etc. Building Division Problem • Every jurisdiction determined fees differently -hundreds of variations • Builders unable to determine permit costs for projects • State Recognized problem - Portland Metropolitan Area - Applied statewide Building Division Proposed Methodology -Commercial • Valuation of Project (cost of building) • Valuation equals/permit fee - Plan review fee/building permit fees • Tenant improvement - $100,000 • Permit fees (plan review & building) - $973.50 • Increase 36% - Fees provide for commercial plan review and building inspections Building Division Proposed Methodology -Commercial Mechanical Fees based upon valuation of equipment/appliance - Air conditioner (Compressor Shp) $5,000 - Furnace (Forced Air>100,000 BTU) $1,800 - Fire Damper a Water Heater $ 300 • TotalYaWe $7,100 • Example • Total value $7,100 • Permit fee $109.40 Fees provide for Commercial plan review and building inspections, administrative support, records, overhead, etc. Building Division Solution- • Adoption of uniform valuation methodology (OAR 918- 050) • Consistent fonrr and fee methodology • Yearly adopt Intemationat Code Council (iCC) valuation table • Implemented by January 1, 2009 3 Building Division City of Woodburn - Residential valuation table - Commercial valuation table - Mechanical fee table (commercial) based upon appliance/equipment not value - New methodology (commercial) equals fees based upon value not app iance/equipment type - Unpredictable methodology - Proposing one table -standardized throughout Oregon - Few jurisdictions have separate tables - Valuation table -basis for all fees Building Division • Next Steps -Adopt new fee methodology (fee neutral where possible) - Adopt new fee methodology (revise fees as noticed) - Phase in fee increases - Continue discussion with City Council Building Division • Building fee increases - Approved by the State - 60 day notice provided to the building community for questions and appeals - No comments received - Fee table increase ranges from 5% for residential and 35% for commercial building permits TIC t8~ ~~ DESIGN ~ O~ N: C E ~' T S. _, C~rnuna~tiry raid Lrnul,.~~~f,e rirclrite~t, v;,~~~~~~_ ~ N~ACKENZIE recommendation 12009-2012 Priorities Capital Cost Estimate Capital Funding Sources Annual ~ & M Cost Estimate O/M Funding. ~- j J V Id I I. C, k Create Master Plan for General ! $40,000-$60,000 General Fund $5,000 ! Burlingham Park Fund ~ Construct a dog park at $50,000 CIP, Partnerships $5,000 General Centennial Park ~ Fund Finish construction on the 'final phase of Centennial Park $1,500,000 CIP, Levy ~~ _ ' $10,000 peer acre ...a~ ~ General ~ Fund Complete construction of the first phase of the Mill Creek $500,000 ~ C1P, Grants, $10,000-$12,000 ..._._. ~ General ~ I Greenway ~ Partnerships _ --' per mile ~_ ~~.. Fund ~~~ Add ortable restroom p 15 000- 20 000 $ General I ~ enclosures to parks as needed ~ CIP each _ ~ $1,000 Fund Replace playground at ~ $40 000 ~ IP, Grants, General , ~ _~ $1,000 General Wyffels Park i Fund, Partnerships CIP Grants ~ Fund ' General ~ Add Gazebo to Plaza , , $70,000 ~ $2,000 j ~ Partnerships ~ Fund Acquire Properties for Mill ~ $100,000 per ~ CIP, Grants, N/A N/A 1 Creek Greenway _ acre ~~-_ Partnerships ~~ ;Repairs to Aquatic Center $300,000 I CIP, General Fund ~ N/A N/A ~ Park Comfort & Convenience ~ $40,000 CIP, General Fund N/A N/A !Features i j Add one park to the SW area $150,000- CIP SDC's ~ $8,000-$10,000 an ~ General 3 f East of I-5 of Woodburn _..w $200,000 acre Fund ;Total 2009-2012 CIP +/-$3,410,000 (in 2008 dollars) 'Recommendation f Capital Cost ~ Capital Funding iAnnual tJjM OjM Funding , 2013-2016 Priorities Estimate j Sources Cost Estimate ~ Sources Renovate Legion Park per $2,500,000 CIP, Levy I ~ N/A General Fund ,established master plan Add one park to the SE area $150 000- ' CIP, SDC's $8,000-$10 000 ~ General Fund of Woodburn $200,000 an acre Add a destination or boundless playground $500,000 ~ CIP ~ ~ $5,000 ! General Fund/grants Add a spray ground/feature $200,000 ~ CIP ~~ $5,000 General Fund Add spray features /water `slides to A uatic Center q $250,000 ~ CIP, Bond $5,000 General Fund `~~ ~ ~ Community Center ~ ~ ~~ $8 500,000 _ _ Bond, Levy, CIP, ~ __. ~ i $300 000 _. ~..~.. ~ E General Fund j ;Grants, Partnerships I ' Bond, Levy, CIP, ~ ,u Cultural Arts Center $4,000,000 , ~ Grants, Partnerships $200,000 General Fund _ Construct a Picnic Shelter in ~ r 000 $50 CIP, Grants, $2,000 ~. ~ General Fund ~ Burlingham Park ~ , Partnerships 4 _ _ Replace Practice Backstop at ~ _ ~ CIP, Grants, ~_v._.~~ ~ _~ .~ ~, Park Ne Ison $15,000 Partnerships ~ $500 General Fund _ _ Replace Playground at ~ _ $60,000 ~~~ CIP, Grants, ~ ~~ $2,000 ~~~ General Fund "Centennial Park partnerships „Acquire Properties for Mill ~ ~ $100,000 per CIP, Grants, N/A ~ N/A E 'Creek Greenway acre Partnerships _ N^ ~ Develop Additional Phases 000 $750 CIP, Grants, ~ $10,000- General Fund of Mill Creek Greenway , ~ Partnerships $12,000 a mile Park Comfort & ~ $40,000 F CIP, General Fund ~ N/A N/A ;Convenience , ~ ~ ~~~~ w T..a..l 'fA1 ~ 9A1 C ~`ID ~ ~ Recommendation 2017-2019 Priorities i ' _-Capital Cost Estimate Capita! 1 Funding Sources Annum O & M Cost Estimate O/nn Funding Sources ;Make irnprovemen s to $1,700,000 ___ _ ._ . r Settlemier Park_according to (adjusted from 2003 ~ CIP, Levy ~ N/A General the established Master Plan estimates} Fund Add one park to the west ~~ ~ __ area of Woodburn as growth ~ 150 000- 200 000 $ $ CIP SDC's 8 000- 10 000 an a r $ ~ e $ General demands and as fond is ~ ' ~ Fund dedicated by development ~ , r~.~~...~.a. .~ ~~._., ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ Continue to assess and CIP, Grants, ~ ~ I ;renovate the World Burr ~ ~ unknown Partnerships, ~ N A S onsorshi s E / General F d 'Museum as fundin allows g ~ p p , un ~ ~....~ ._.~~a ~ ~ _._.~...__.~.~ ~ ......_..., Donations ' Acquire Properties for Mill ~ 100 0 0 r ~ $ ~ 0 pe acre CIP, Grants, ~ ~ N/A N/A Creek Greenway ~ , partnerships ~ ~ Develo Additional Phases of ~ ~ CIP G t ~~ ___.~, E p $750,000 , ran s, ~ $10 000-$12 000 a mile General Mill Creek Greenwa y ~ , , Partnerships ~ Fund :Park Comfort & Convenience -.~ - CIP, General ~~ _ € ___ ._ ~~~ Features $40,000 ' Fund N/A t N/A _ ~ Total 2017-2019 CIP +/-$3,950,000 ~______. ~.. __... ...____a.._ _ ~ 4 ~....~ ~, (in 2008 dollars) .~ _._w..~ ~~. Total Ten Year CIP +/-$27,425,000 ~ ~ (in 2008 dollars) t MAP D: RECOMMENDATIONS . Lode b ead ~ bW orro perk wmt of kttaauts 5 b keep up vdln maxri demaixb BURt.I#GHAAf PARK • Create a erecter pion ..,. t.. ..~~.i_. t ~... t,.;,; ~, r 4.... '• i. ~ I ~ ... tie -.. _-. t ,.. ,.. , .. r,. _. _._-.j _ ~_._. __ _ ~7 t ~ ___.._.._._..-T .~ ' f .r j -_._ , U__.-"°" nwcx~e. in>w., r..~~,.m u~i~~-gyn.: ~~~~~,~~~~...... ~~~~~~~ ~~ Fu,. v,.,w,.,i r.,.::n~;. •„nym ~..,~..in•~~n ter r~: n,-~a ~;,,,: r..,,,, "yl +...,.i. ~........ ~. 4~+• EYrn ~•Al,~~l.v~,n5 .~~~J Trnn~~~rt; to l.r M1'ni_r ~In~ "~ -DESIGN CONCEPTS ;..; !. LLGGND Uoundan- - Wixxlbunr ~CorEx~rate I,i mit `1 Gaisting Urban Growth Unundary (UGU) ~~ Planncxi L'rban Growth tknindan' (CSGR) RYrcation Lczatiens '. ___'. Park !~ Schad --•--••-7"" _ City Ovrned - Qther r fndcxrr Facilities f~ !.._._.....; +~ i3urrien I imihn~ PrJetitrian Arrvsh ~ „--. Railroad /~~-~ -River, Sl rea m, Inigatira~ -....--'~ IEGtON wtaK 1i eAddspr~grouM CITY OF tNOODBURN -OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN ~~ }'• '~ t f 1 t t~ ~t, C~~aL~~~L~~R', +~ i c `;~ ~ J ~~ ~C. ,~ `tea ~ L ~ .~ ~ ~ t, p ~ • ~ ~ .,. "~ /~ ~ ,~ 3~~3~0 9 ~~ P Dear City Council, Park Board and neighbors ~ ~ ~ ~ We are in favor of the Parks and Recreation Boards master plan for our city. The greenway will be an asset for our residents to walk, jog and enjoy a beautiful area. Improvements to existing Legion and Wyffel Parks aze needed and will encourage family activities. Our only concern is to be assured the azea will be patrolled and policed well to discourage illegal activities... Dan & Ardis Knauf ((~, K~ ~ ~at4 ~ Li~~ln s~. Page l of 1. '1~~ 3/~3/oy Rosetta Wangerin p' ~ °~"~` From: <Craftytas@aol.com> To: <rwangerin@wbcable.net> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:51 PM Subject: (no subject) I am in favor of the parks and recreations masterplan that is being worked on. Teresa Sisto A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http:iipr.atwola.eom/promoclk/100126575x1219858252x1201366219/aol?redir=http:%2F% 2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2 Fdefault. aspx%3 Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgl D%3D62% 26bcd%3 DM archfooterN 062) 3/23/2009 Page 1 of 1 Q~~~f/ _g/a3/o 9 ~r y „~=~~•yt Rosetta Wanaerin From: "Marilee Anglin" <anglin.marilee@gmail.com> To: "Rosetta Wangerin" <rwangerin@wbcable.net> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:46 PM Dear City Council, I would like to communicate my support of the Master Plan for Parks in our city of Woodburn. I deeply appreciate the significant work and thoughtful consideration that. has been given to all aspects of this comprehensive proposal. The needs of our growing community and the livability of Woodburn are of great concern to me and I am grateful for the ways those issues have been addressed by the Parks and Recreation Board as they approached this work. As an educator, I believe that neighborhood parks are an essential element for the growth and development of healthy children and young people. They provide the necessary space to actively and positively express the energy of youth, as well as meeting needs for all ages. I encourage you to support this Master Plan. With. Anticipation, Marilee Anglin 356 E. Lincoln St Woodburn, Oregon 97071 Director, Little Lambs Preschool 3/23/2009 Page 1 of 1 ~,~~ 3/a-,3/o 9 ~ •'s'°~~ Rosetta Wangerin From: "Betty Donnelly" <bdonnell@oregonsbest.com> To: "'Rosetta Wangerin"' <rangerin@wbcable.net> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 5:12 PM Subject: Parks & Recreation Master Plan As a long time resident of Woodburn, I have followed with great interest the Parks and Recreation Board's progress toward the creation of a Master Plan for our city's recreational future. The Master Plan as invisioned by this committee and its professional staff seems to me to provide for an exceptional recreational plan for the coming years. 1 highly recommend the acceptance of this Master Plan as the blueprint for our future Parks and Recreation goals. Sincerely, Betty L. Donnelly 338 E Lincoln St. Woodbum, Oregon 97071 3/23/2009 ~~ t~ 3I~ 3~0 S /o,asPm To whovu. it v~.a~ cowcerv~., n~t~ v~,av~.e is Douglas I--Fav~,v~.av~,, av~,d ~ dive at9~8 ~4vu~t~ ct, a~ov~.c~ w~tl~ wt~ wife t~tari,a awd daughter Nicole. we purchased our hovu.e ivy, the spriv~g o f 200- awd absolutely Love our v~eighbors awd weighborhood. we have had few problevu.s siv~,ce vu,ovivl,g ivy,. Twice our daughter's car was bro~Zew iv~,to, awd ovLce our fevLCe was tagged. other thaw that we have had No other issues with our persowal property. Siv~,ce our bac~~ard is ow the greevLwa~ we have v~.ever cowsidered fevLciv~,g is o f f. ~t feels li~Ze we are iiviwg iw the couwtr~ vu.ost o f the tiwi.e. we have various breeds o f ducks, geese, peacocks, awd vLot to wtewtiow raccoow's s4~uw~-,,s, awd frogs. This is v~,ot a large area for the birds awd av~,ivu.als to begin, with. It is our cov~.cerv~, that with the proposed waif-ziwg path, the wetiawd habitat wiii disappear awd we wiii start to experievLce aw iv~,crease of theft awd vav~.dal,iziv~,g of persov~al property. with the currev~t ecovLovxic crisis, ~ w slnoc ed that the City of woodburv~, would evevL coveceder this proposal right wow or ivy. the wear future. The vu.ov~e~ that wiii be used for this project should be put to wt.ore iw~.portav~,t use such as........ vu.aiv~,taivi,iv~,g our currewt parks awd roads iw our toww. who will patrol the path at Wight whev~. budgets are gettiv~,g tight? wiii the residewts that live ivi, Tukwila awd sewior Estates give up haviv~,g their vLeighborhoods watched btu Woodburv~ police iw order to patrol a walhiv~,g path that follows alovt,g a ruv~,of f ditch? shouLdv~.'t the city be vu.ore cov~.cerv~,ed about ~ieepiwg the citizev~.s safe thew addiv~g wre problewi.s? i awti. vtiot opposed to wetlawd walk,iv~,g trails li{~e the owe out b~ Troutdale orz. I-towever, trails such as that, are vLot desigv~ed for residev~tial areas that the couv~,cil vu.evu.bers are so iw favor o f! its a tax pa~ivLg cltizew that lives alovLg the proposed site, i avv. verb vvi,uch agaivLst it. shouldw't those that live ow the proposed area have a sad so ivy, the fi,v~,al decisiov~ ow this? i awe aware that there are sowt.e woodburw residevLts that feel they vLeed a vLew trail to traiv~, ow for ru~,,v~,iwg av~,d walk-z,iv~.g. please ~zeep iw w~.iv~,d that chavu.poeg park av~,d willavu.ette Missiov~ are less thavL 3o vu.iv~,utes frowt. woodburv~,, awd have a vu.uch better selectiovL o f trails that are outstawdiwg for traiwiwg. Mt ~wgel ~tbb~ has beevL a site for 20~ voad ruv~,s for ears awd that is ovLl~ 25 wt.iv~utes frown. Woodburv~,. its i cowclude wL~ wife awd i are opposed to the ~-tervuavLsow Trail that will go behiwd our hovu.e. .Siv~cerel~ //L %~ Douglas rz. ~tawwavL--~`~ /O , z//s~ .~i-. Hello, My name is Eric Morris, I live at 1505 Hardcastle AVE. I wanted to comment on the Mill creek greenway project. I have served on the Parks and recreation board for a year now. At almost every monthly meeting of the board we discuss the project. I can only remember one person, in the last year, who voiced a concern about the trail that is being placed in the Hermanson area. Recently, I watched several individuals complaining to the city council about the trail. Where have these people been? The Mill creek greenway project has been on the books for years. Now that we are finally going to get something done, then people start objecting. Increased crime was a concern, which our police chief said they would address. The trail will open the area up to increased patrols. It will also allow all Woodburn residents to access the area. I believe the silent majority of Woodburn residents would like to see our city parks and greenways improved. This project is something we can all be proud of. I continue to fully support the project. Thank you. Eric Morris V1-ppDgUR#V TRA#L #MPFtOVEMEPJTS T - ~ T ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ DEER RUN STRE -~-~ E ~ ,.ewT ,~... ~r ~ t,. o ~r ~T ~ jar ° "b ~Q" ~ ~~ . ~ ~l S r ' i ,£'. r r 5, {~.~ ~. - I > > ~ y e2 Q A w, t ~ s s ~ T r- J - ` ~ - / S .+.'hT Iw4R ujlA 4 f.,.: yy`~' t _f ~ ~ ~ _ J _ _,. _. ,. ,,: ~ -~ r..~ ....c.-,... t r - _ ~ ' ~ltj3 ~. ~ ~` . _. ,._. _ p, ,~ ~ , ~-. ; - ~,r - _.;~ o~ :~ 9«v rwt wmn aawn+m O ~': r r- /' yam' _ ,~ aI iE11wp V ~ r ~tas giwMOE ~ ,. ~ 1~ ~..+r O RMIO lrt we'x 110 9 ~ O./T ACEf ~ s ~ an 11y1i pf i[11gR M R _ r+eu nsi v ~etAa aLa d ~ 100 Y1w11 /iOOD !{,~Y>'171Ap ^~ t r^'_'_ r fans eax a en++i1 AAt+ (sj •iowne ntr raofa'ne rue Au uw1 ewm '0 ,vaw o< aeue~ ur m aen fs enrseo~ v woso sf .M,rn iRTrt .. .Aex u»c ewe ~,ew.w* .... , smti oiwi 1!f m r"pl~1p Kiu~e _. .... awVTAn 1m ue p .~ ~ ~ ff ~ ,~ ~ fawn a7RT aw~a auwa . ~ .._ - ,~ ~ -_ -. '- sae a1 tMi ~ Li1ap tt4at7fO fY a .e fa u ufol reermeP ~ vclteie! wmnctnf i1 YA1Igt~ yppb VISMf 7 i[ i 18 i Fet >lwit Awllal No MPR IIGff~AaL 3 9p ~Q~~ 0 Tl - afar , z1ae1 ereT - y ~ lRY 31O WM~a/ ~ ~ ~ B[W W1a ( < n - ~~j~~I ~ _ ' lb RY Ni. =e ORAL BIa 7fEf (~ "' ^'+ ! ADIar2 IJ6f 2! 90faf>E G1Qf'n1M iiJ yRt ~OOC aftlf `_• ~ O pAla ! 1~' aKttt al ~Lnf AFadiaiilee ~ L[TK a1 9A.7 1E Mnitei ilfliAel ~ ~ ' ~~4/Tnf~~ :.. gray fYMa[ "~, (. .~ $ OaeeuWa f4 ;r~~K\11 YM ~ L alT PIE ~ 81191 ~ 91Ff Pui1e G iTE + /~. ~,~ ~ Ie1A1Q 42. 1NT. f AT OOeM ~~~ 9i~M+Oe SU awf f TDE NAi ?9T wt OO9[ O ltd abort AIO PwTf11T {i8U 9O0~ ® /MOIY AIYh sY AO afgt Y eE M ll Q aarAfY ~ i Uoill pm'tli0 IWf d ~P11OeFRlr aou9111rt /, ~ N15 iO R- RAfI fATOiI O ptipACQD R~ ?l A7NS tl1 3RD ! MI/IT~M flLS1M3 ~ FXSIIC iAl96R tK 1~ A //~~ ~Uaa~ MTN91i1~~ ti/ +al IGI~R71 !~ R/L ~~ ~ ii,,,,~ ~ p1A® fo rl.foer ~" a refs YO.L mna.n OOMC2 OL/~Vd DEEM ~ PATHYYAY 9uioaf ~_____ nine p,iora rml e1mr~. wA ~.frwLa~,,• ~ ~ ~ IYgIl.i~EBCIIUY7RAr.PRO~GT 2 EERT~W87REEf F. x,.l=...~• • ~.,wn?9 e~i acs9s D 710N A!/ a.n.rww+r _ 'A AfpP~1HYW1Y 7~ 270 GUl1TflOM~tY ST., WOOO~. UR p7071 ~pp0 lF PEOE'~T~N aoie Ae ee9iel ew ~Y1R iOO~ p9emaaspal.w~i ~i = a .A ', y\ ~ F~ ~ ~ 0 0 000 000 ~ ~ ~ -~ ~a gg>~ K q w } ~ ~~~v ~ a ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ er ~~ ~b~~~~~i~~~~ 51~. ~ pprF 5Q~ Q _ ~ 1a~ y8 ~'.~ a. ~ Y 3 k ~ ~ 4 :i ~7 ~CS~ ~ ~ '~~i~ ~ ~ ~ j 9t ~ ~~~~ $ ~ I ~r b i .sue ~~~~. ~~ ~~~N ~ !~ sR ~ ~ 9 s =~ i ~i4 r ~ ', a .oi . ~ ~ q y / ~_ a Lo.1 ,et a i s , ~„ ' M~ ~ '~ VVVV ~j yon I"'1`~3 I'~ i~~ r, ~; ~. -, ;~ ~ ; _ ., ~~ ~ ~; r , j ~ ~~H NA ~ ~~ xYt ~ ~ ~ ., r' ~ 7~l ~^ ~ `~ ~ ,~ 1 ~ ~ _~` o V ~~ v ym{ pp~~ `"~__~ c ~ ~y ~ 4 . z ~ ua ~ ~" ~ ; ,~, R ! t ~ ~; _ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 ' ~ ~ g ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ r{n~ ~ f2 ~ n ~ cv 3 l'~~ ~ t " R a i~ 44 ,Q £ i~ { r7Sj $ ~ ~~vg ~ ~ ~~ ~ , (~ ~~~ y0' ~. :i :~ ~ a n s~ ~ t z ~o®®o®ooo o ~ o 000 g 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ a~ ~ ~N~~Rq ~a = ~ ~ s~9 ~~9~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ } ~~ ~ ~ ~`., O c E; ~~ ~ ~'" r L~ ~~ '' ~" ~ j._____ ._.___---- O~~ " ;~u `' a yd~ ~a'~ ~ y6~ a b ~ ~ t1 Y• v ~ t ~ ~ iS ~. ~ A t ~' ~~ ~~~ 1~9~ ~~ ~~~ ~~E ~i ~~ r ~ --,Gr! b ~~i~ i ~, w ~E ~~ i ~ ~'~~~; A ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~,~ ~----~ ~ I r .~ 6 `^ yo'+ z ~~ ~ ~ A e ° ~y n@ ~ ~ ~ Q AVM , '7~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 Q,~~ Y~ ~~~, „~'t~ ~_ ~ qK tY v ss ` ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ F• ~~ 4 '~`< ' , a x -....__ ~~~' O ;~ ~~ ~... } ~'L 1~ d r~yb '~ Qn`° t 5 ~ ~ ~~~ , 1 ~'~ ~ ,::,. ...:._ ... _._O.- -._...._ - .__. . GRAPHIC 9CA18 C14IE~ O KM 6' wD[ a116>`7wIT lDrMIAR 21 RDOCAIE DDer CAE VAI,[ WISOE al7x aT nuE• AKA m erEwl aAx 0 Kr ccYUCIE dEKrAr alt fa ETD DETAl Na 1 w nwr) 11b0-b, SAeD1T CW, AEP11AlL Ale) ODeT PDCMAAN , t,r.. a n BoID> AS YO~ESMT ro [CYfeUCT w,erAr O KIID4S }MTgll M ENSIe,D pIpCAAT AKI K-gUDC / Knua[ As KmsAltr ro wml wDr d7eY O PP04D[ EDETINJt CCTDIR ARQRO DEer ]C' YANC Cp11RACPoR m OQDIIi NeAfKr {ems j asnlEeAea a eam emlol m o[m,Lwc rtAanrrr n rwoeaeu, sQ mA~ T,n sar b ~aG>t QEEr vAtu Ycml EQwo :awvx b K1aG/E deT 8CY eAw10 /ODrMr< O KWCAtC FkeeN6 wW1CA eMW soeewc (~ AaCRCT der M (1Y110K) 9O !a HeK1R DCTAL 1 ,Iq 6MfT to ser ae'.clrAr DTTAa s nn wrtT „ ss QE,crAr 0[tLL 7 7Ef Mar © CND lRYADf Co1Ef1EKe011 AT lllAe7 dD O PI,CIq eEn TEat[C,IQI IQI All CATQI Wlb w m eDD tt oorpterAY d MaccT as ©. wAA,Eeo rmrsneAY QlDesa' as m Ec FTACJ!•0 xro V UFEIKAY a!~ Q10Er10 AT eACK O EOL,IAIA'. Q 'PQiiAAN QMYReIE m l0T' fIC1A 4 D[TAL QI 91FC7 11 O BC~UCUEO AIlfp, IMIMIMLA611C CII -Q60D~ m C~ ~ ,q /lY EI7I MEDeO/p 1eA1rIL ® AAL DRCIIDMAL wWAE[ ® OrYO T7Ee1N0 CII~ IQ71Eel. AbOX III{L Ml'IAV IAKID CNLt EAMQ/T N IILCOEAl1Y (IM 1' AeDY 0Y11D1) ® EE01 QIEe K7IMl LCNEIMICIIEK Q7141eUL'r TTK 'A• CUAe A110 AIIRII NM QEA bAIC fQ'7M 'A' MIIICYT owe AT eAa aT to E[TA~ also-, a MF[T Odk ,~A.aR la „so-, aw , Alo aae-, a .aT a sa / . _ awvc TAU TNw ® DID olAS KT/Eil Q>teluDllaY 1 ;~GsA"°' ., - ., t ,,~ - ..~ ~1 q. ._._._ ' ' dEMD ODIA'%E[ OIIMNAY ~ { _ . i dsnm aT,oKTt QaKwr ~dElpO OD1q~R pwKNAY ,. oAAAx ~r, DRIVEWAY DETAIL 3 DRI ~ D~ $ ~ ~ _ J .. y _ .... . ;..- ....- -- uo soer°r~'wl ai,art ._.nm,w s' wru nec ~'`~~ ~ • ... ` ~~ v t ~, -~ rA. A i . A[II' 3ia[rAlx ~~ ~._ [w zoETax 9 C%KT aEroT L._IKY wArt DRIVEWAY DFTAI~ I ... ~, scar. I'.~e' mNn1ACI0E ro carlwAi AieaabT a~ASlo saewAUl ~~'ti.~ CURVE TABLE NavAllaro I+1[ no~rArtt Dlw[ °~ eleia[ ~ ~~ ROpT Mme' p~ - WR 1E110T11 RAOIU$ DF1.TA CNtlID CHORD BCR ECR C1 ~wl_ ~] ROTiY E11~FiR AIO QTY OF eDDOQAN a YDT FT.AEwL! y7'~ n I el ,o.CO t I a I , Ill 4~ ro ECTAEI DoslnD ~ YNIr Al rROrMm ~ C2 1 I I) 17 17 f IT W gA0 SiDrw~curouT DETAIL „L,c_S7 C~9 REIURN M1 PAST ,gF_n~RN ~ osnD/w soAaE: , :s SIOEWAUC ON MAR8HALL STREET sEaanwT a,c •..,~/off; :ooo SGLF: i -b Q VW,A oacl~ oea~ CITY OF WOODBURN MILL CREIX (iREENWAYTtiA~ PRO.IECT V ' wPYlO~1EY4wwEM ErAAC n swwll Dou ~' m F,r„~ DEypn omw. RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTI~NT DEERRUN STREET - AIJ,ttSFWlBT'REET ' w"~" OQI~BUR 270 MONTGOMERY ST.. WOOC~URN. OR 97071 •",. ~~~• 9000 LF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PATHWAY ~.~ mr_ •D, a.>9a _-- AwAEer ,u ra-mE .,ml.w . ~~ •w. ~0 p '~ j ~ ~ ~~ :~ GRAPHIC sCAtr :. ~". r ~ - ern~ac mvAC wrs {I yr couvwva ~r ;r' a - '.- rt7r rra ruvm w meAnACE soot x f YAII IOI Oflw,"l@ pltA4l1 O~ 11ta Yt -~L V' -:1~ :d. YoF CO1lAClf P 1r1taN5 STA 9`]S - M!0 BAC16faL MMO U@Dl4R IM v.. RE~ASMNG wat oEraa t ~rsmc oasAC ra Oi E91HMO1f _ lY ,~ .~ . '101 (LIIIC4D dU\6 K4 wOa frMl STA !f!O - N>O i_e. UIfE!llfM ~ ~~ RETAI~AIt nET/NL 2 I --3.RYET {//lK 4_. ,~. ~:= ? Q ,''r ~ ,~~~ ~f ~, ~~ rIx rvr zioo ti ~ \ \ _ _-- `o \~ J ~~ XIIIKY lY1S-~ -•~ ~ ~ ` ~ K ~~~nJ4 ~~ ~ ids w:rtloo tlolllO/Rr~ ~ 1' f1 iAlf tM tOfl \ dfY O~ •Opp@Kn `.~ C--xersmc mvu otrs Q lGIlIAD11 I4 ~y lllemllert w RETnIWNG y(dFi bETAY? tO aY ~ w'JnraT 11NL 9Y ll[Ul 1lY fi¢t O vES M14T'R SfATUI X6165 6~wtli rl ~~ ~{y~ ~IM~ o aowtc aM / 9O ~wllO~ldl Ili YRMIIE~ ~O[ O OE71lOiOtp MWL. >S L[TK A6S 9OLT O SEr~ @lilf( ~ a~ rlsr/wi na/a'I6* at roltt g66a an.uo l ' l61OR I ' ' ®mra °~""'° ~ow~ 741O !f M6O 1lC Q4I61 A A sUU10M1 ~~ ~ ~ ~"'°l l1 trteFlllWl tl1O61 wR 1Y 1K MD f ow mna-m sc un,o wr .w.e. oo gE OEY/L OM 'J6i t] ~iwOR1pC A IPOO! l1iC 7' 1M w>a® © pM01O-[ MI~7 I~O:M /Ul rit y1Ral 6i1l6 W iU SOU IT OOfa6~Y Q p6p,[Cf !R ~ . O PIrIMT 6N6R 4M~Y[ Q p~iMrM QIO{f0 N iHY 9Ul SQ 6erAL 01 9iET tl Q "+/AIiMO IBET~YI <wO~~ UUI W E RI® WO lF lIPSlNt41 ~ OlOfii Ai t4Ol !~ mf.TNX, set oG1A~ a sKr /l b ~<.l i.oo .~ >v4 +.- "^-~ 1,!' - ,~ i ~~ IIyF;~i1'~llf=BCE llmsaa wiocron ~'k~ .`.`~ mnaclm vamAOr Tua1i- Ac PA~¢p11 sFCn~u, ~~.- \ ~ rAe tnr zzoo / ~~'~ iAx wr z<oI - J cewc.EO m >He ~*v o~ .uooau~x ~-~ .._... a REO 1QedpF11 Al MR 2K. aw(2 np ~ ~~~ lri ~~ ~. ... 4,. --_~ (~ - -~.. r.~~ I~~i ~ `mod' °~t~RMi ea OM'r °' ~`. n'.\. /-~7^~ i M ~r7 ~ axz or wia~-~- ~~ ~ ~ Y ''~ 1OplI~ARlt00p~~1I~17i11O ,~ ~~` .~ r~iii~r / n. p . 1 /: ~~ l ~ P.Y. 93- 75 PA !Lt t , ~, fO \ PA NL'E7. a i ~, alxctc z I'. [~. / YAFCF.L 2 98-219 ml.e / \\ ~!<<! - CITY OF WOODBtIiZN ~ MILL CF FteCRp1-TION NIA PI VOCQ OB-AttTi~ENi p~ 270 t110NTGOM@2Y ST., W00081JRN, OR 07071 9000 lF i IMO TItA<PRO.LECf ~ 7 _- __ _ _ _ ~.~ ,~~~.=, .:.y~ .::.. GRAPHIC SCAIE ,, «~, .._ - .__--_ _ .. .:ter=~=-. , ~ ..' .. _ _.. fMM.r, ' I NOTEC w ... "q ; ,: •'" _ 0 Is• sawolr as nvc ~ aM ~• gip: .. ,: t'~ v:r ^ ,,, y _-. UNIl97 OManM16L NDaD, O[IAl It~7 y~j ~~~~ ~ ~~..; .,' _,~_.--~---~-~-+ ~ scer >a o6rk Ilex-s a sar To / ~__~-~ ~'~ O 71' aOE Oplpl[R OIMMIAY AMMM r[R ORAL ' ,~ ~ ~ 1160-1, TEL aRµ pl IIQT 10 I1 ~~ J_-~ O A Wµ. ~ e[TAR~MC 2~Ar0 POI v OM/~Otm ~~ 6NA a; '. ~ 0 rm Ra-L )trlcY. st O[TAL a naT la r ^' ~~ i °0 >a wla aac~risrloa mlml m mlml, ~~ , ~ ! 0 ~ nom ar~c'Hr *ACac raw«o tocn]]Iw ax '; ' Maa>q ~, ~_ _. , ~ _ eQ rnlo Oroaar oul~ , ~ „ ,,.,,~ 67.10 ~,. .. _. ~ ~ _ .- O R N Gu ViN r ? `~ BP( - ,",• ~4~ i ~ ] ~...,r' c art hz v r larc s)•laro 12 L .) Iln OOMWD! NIO 06rAN0 f10r1 dlNll. AI~YD [ OF _ e .... . _ 6MIft ]tOIMI . NMtl CAaMMC71M m ~Olrr n~ ~ _ ~' ;~ ~ I 1 ~ 6Mg7Ma K 0 710Y1 MO'aa GOMlIMIICII~1 i ~ atT ocTMas a aat'r ,o ^,P ~ ,y s 6 q ~ Q rsoMam s]Imw ava .M wm awnr T g owA¢ cG,.a ;-J ~~ ~ ~ $ r '~ 6AMOUT MM I• rMal rA¢ v OIMIL 10]IQ Oaa At ~ T"L1°~--» ~ ( ®wr Qra xn oancWAr omlr ... 11 eu-ae.7a [ M `]1Y) 11im ~/ L tMli (MLI . asn f '- a ~ ~~ 1 '~.. Q ooa aoR eLnvrAr aT AMO MI]tAU atM r a,moarc p rn]r w ' r' cwo and nae wan r va aRrAlx >a etTAL a € [~.,aa~.il~... ~ Y __ ~ e,• 6MlTT „ .w Ix ]A]wr.AS MT]iL1ARY oIM r rMOM rAr( l ~, I O! [Mai OlarlI,, MOI,AO[ IIAI. rlJ~ OMIT, ~ ~ OIKi lOOAADN Or G6R OW tlR MOT 1a1K1Q)~ ~. 1 CONIRACM7A m NIIrY wGna ..: ~. • ' ~+'r >• uraacr aarr oMr axMl66t m 7Y O7Mgti[ Ma oTr nr .. ~ ~'~ / ~oAy ~wm~ ~n~ a ]a ottn~ a aatt Ta Acakr f ~~~ r +, t• f ` • •.. :,~' ' I I ~ ©MMIONOaMIf AMT ~ m MKa]7i >maOlf~lAgM-~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.~- _,.z-""`_._ .... ....... ~ ~ :... ,,,~ AI011 bIlOW01 ~ BQ ORAL pl OQ! If _-. ~..:..:~~: f. ee6alA .: ~ I ~ ~ .,~0. __ _ _ _ _ ® eMro7loMML acnAee , ~_ _._.._' ~ tMK siM,u ~ ~ 'T a arnCli Y ~ ' D t~lf ~ ~~t• ~` MMRIIi . CiAR li ,y ~ ~ BaAf ~ M~ip1nF~PIM / R raM ~ ?.~~ 'P~~"."'.~f1,. as 1 M '~---COIIAOIm usmAOc ~ pAaKING LOT A . PA M1ENT cc TIdN ~~ I ae.u t t ~ \~~i - d -]/r MOML ~ ! '~, pee.ooy ~ pea7o '. Q ~-. ~ V V K- ~ -,ti r-~_0~~~~~~ i ` ~ 0 C' ~ ~ eROwN couRr ., ~~lllTl~-t ~ ( far MO/I RAMP TEXTURE DETAIL p6zaot oo]MMe a.6e :, !)6I.OO s%n Tom= ~~ Y R.O~ Ut Wtf „~ l~ i~•, ... __._,_.__. ..... _ !~y'~,_ eow eA« ar MAIL( // .n A PARKINC3 IMPROVEMENTS AT BROWN STREET ] L ~' ~""` °°°~` °~ ' CfTY OF WOODBURN MILL CREEK OREENWAY TRAM PROJECT 8 ]cYC Aa aowl aMe raMrnr Maa I wo. o.eow ..MM.~....... RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT DEER RUN SlREEf - MARSHALL STREET M0. ]tHVa,l fRe1~ ~ oam .~,~.a~^.,,~ D 270 MONTGOMERY 9T., WOODBURN, OR 97071 $OOp ~ pEpEgjRfAN /WD BICYCLE PATHWAY 7