Loading...
Agenda - 02/23/2009CITY O F W 00 D B U R N KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR DICK PUGH, COUNCILOR WARD 1 ~. MEL SCHMiDT, COUNCILOR WARD II CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PETER MCCALLUM, COUNCILOR WARD III .TAMES COX, COUNCILOR WARD IV e FRANK LONERGAN, COUNCILOR WARD V FEBRUARY Z3, ZOO9 '~ 7.00 P.M. KRISTEN BERKEY, COUNCILOR WARD VI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS - Z7O MONTGOMERY STREET 1. CALL TO ORDER AND FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND APPOINTMENTS Announcements: None Appointments: None 4. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS Proclamations: A. Tulip Festival Presentations: B. Jim Row -Mill Creek Greenway Project update C. ODOT - I-5 Interchange update 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS None 6. COMMUNICATIONS None. 7. BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC -This allows the public to introduce items for Council consideration not already scheduled on the agenda. ••Ha(~ra interpretes c~isponi6[es Para aque[[as personas que no (7a6[an Ing[es~ previo acuerc~o. Comuniquese a[ (5031980-2485... February 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page i 8. CONSENT AGENDA -Items fisted on the consent agenda are considered routine and may be adopted by one motion. Any item may be removed for discussion at the request of a Council member. A. Woodburn City Council minutes of February 9, 2009 2 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. B. Recreation and Park Board Minutes of February 10, 2009 13 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. C. Community Services Statistics 17 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. D. Building Activity for January 2009 18 Recommended Action: Accept the Report. 9. TABLED BUSINESS None 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 11. GENERAL BUSINESS -Members of the public wishing to comment on items of general business must complete and submit a speaker's card to the City Recorder prior to commencing this portion of the Council's agenda. Comment time may be limited by Mayoral prerogative. A. Council Bill No. 2764 - A Resolution approving the application in 19 case CU 2008-01; adopting findings in support of said approval; and denying the appeal of said case. Recommended Action: Adopt the Resolution. 12. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS -These are Planning Commission or Administrative Land Use actions That may be called up by the City Council. None February 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page ii 13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 14. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. To conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to negotiate real property transactions pursuant to ORS 192.660(2J(eJ. 1 b. ADJOURNMENT February 23, 2009 Council Agenda Page iii COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING 0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, FEBRUARY 9, 2009. CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Figley presiding. 0020 ROLL CALL. Mayor Figley Present Councilor Berkey Present Councilor Cox Present Councilor Lonergan Present Councilor McCallum Present Councilor Pugh Present Councilor Schmidt Present Staff Present: City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Brown, Acting Police Chief Blevins, Community Development Director Hendryx, Associate Planner Dolenc, Recorder Tennant 0053 ANNOUNCEMENTS. A) City offices and the Library will be closed Monday, February 16, 2009, in observance of President's Day. The Aquatic Center will be opened during normal business hours. 0065 APPOINTMENTS. A) Sign Standards Focus Group: Mayor Figley stated that Councilor Pugh prevailed on her to divide the committee into two committees: (1) a sign specific committee, and (2) one of which would involve a more global look at zoning. She will be talking to those individuals who have already expressed an interest on serving on the Focus Group to determine which of the committees they are more interested in. She also encouraged other members of the community interested in serving on either one of these committees to contact her as soon as possible. B) Mayor Figley also announced that she was appointed to MWACT (Mid-Willamette Area Commission on Transportation) and she is looking forwazd to pursuing City projects which include the I-5 interchange project. 0132 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REPORT. Don Judson, Executive Director, stated that branding will be a topic the Chamber will be promoting over the next several months. Woodburn has a destination brand -Always Fresh Discoveries -which was uncovered by Bill Baker of Total Destination Management in a contract partnership with the Chamber and the City. Mr. Baker will be the guest speaker at the Chamber's Forum on Wednesday, February 11 `~, and he will talk about how he developed the brand with the cooperation of focus groups, interviews, Page 1 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 PROCLAMATION WOODBURN'S TULIP FESTNAL MARCH 25 thru APRIL 26, 2009 WHEREAS, the Woodburn Tulip Festival welcomes the world to view the vast acres of brilliantly colored tulips; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn Tulip Festival spotlights a unique, growing horticultural industry that was enjoyed last year by more than 125,000 visitors; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn Tulip Festival instills a spirit of unification and cooperation among the diverse groups of the people of the community; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn Tulip Festival provides fun filled activities for young and old, to "tip-toe" through the tulips and enjoy the majestic view of Mt. Hood and the quality of life we Oregonians cherish; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, KATHRYN FIGLEY, Mayor of the City of Woodburn, do hereby proclaim March 25 thru Apri126, 2009, to be the official WOODBURN TULIP FESIVAL 1VION'fH I hereby ask my fellow Oregonians to join me in encouraging participation and support of this beautiful event that promotes Woodburn throughout the country. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of oodburn t ffixed this 28`h day of February, 2009. ____---- p~n Figl ayor of Woo u COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING research, and surveys. On March 13~', the Chamber will host their 55`" Annual Distinguished Service awazd banquet at Wellspring. Nominations are due February 17~' and the awards will be for Senior First Citizen, Junior First Citizen, Outstanding Farmer, and a Special Recognition Awazd. In the past, area service clubs have nominated someone and selection committee has picked the awazd recipient among the service clubs. This year they are inviting all of the service clubs to nominate and recognize their own member of the year. The City-wide clean-up known as Woodburn Proud Day will be held on March 14`i'. Volunteers will be meeting at Mid-Valley Plaza parking lot at 8:00 a.m. and focus will be made on cleaning up along Highway 99E, Highway 214, and the Mill Creek greenway. He requested that volunteers call the Chamber office prior to the event since they would like to get an approximate number of volunteers in advance of the event. In regards to the Economic Development Task Force, he stated that he had met with Administrator Derickson and Conununity Development Director Hendryx to review the draft agenda for the first meeting of the task force which will include a guest speaker. 0439 WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT REPORT. Walt Blomberg, Superintendent, stated that their Facilities Task Force Planning Committee has been analyzing growth patterns over the last 5 and 10 years and have been trying to project how many students the district might have over the next 10 to 15 years. The Task Force has been struggling to determine how far to look out in the future for the purpose of student population over the next 10 to 15 years and then look at facility growth to meet the projected needs. The Committee has looked at a 15 yeaz package which would cost approximately $94 million to build two elementary schools, a middle school, and a small high school. They realize how difficult it would be to pass a bond issue of that magnitude especially in this economy but they do not want to lie to the taxpayers about the needs of the district. The School Board will make a decision to put a bond issue on the ballot in May ar to wait until next November in hopes that the economy might be better. He stated that the District recently completed a light retrofitting of all their buildings to be more energy efficient using tax credits saved over the last five years to pay for this project. They hope to move onto Phase 2 of this project beginning at the high school which will be more expensive to complete. Superintendent Blomberg stated that the School Board will be discussing as to how they will be making up some inclement weather days. Also, students will be involved in Woodburn Proud including the upcoming clean-up event. Lastly, he stated that the High School Boys Basketball team is tied for ls` place in league play. 0680 CONSENT AGENDA. A) approve the City Council regular and executive session minutes January 26, 2009; B) approve the Planning Commission minutes of December 11, 2008; C) accept the Planning Project Tracking Sheet dated January 29, 2009; D) accept the report on the Accounting of Emergency Expenses; Page 2 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 3 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING E) accept the letter regarding the I-5 Interchange Project Federal Appropriations Candidate; and F) approve the Park and Recreation Board workshop minutes of January 13, 2009. Councilor Pugh accepted with regret what the City has been told by the ODOT representative on the status of the I-5 interchange project. He stated that he is not finished with this issue in that what the community has been told and the way it is scheduled by ODOT is totally unacceptable in his opinion. He thanked Mr. Fox for his presentation but does not thank ODOT for their lack of prior communication or the plan they have outlined for the future. MCCALLUM/LONERGAN..... adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 0825 PUBLIC HEARING: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE (CU12008-O1 LOCATED AT 595 NORTH PACIFIC HIGHWAY. Tax Lot 051W17BB09300. Mayor Figley declared the public hearing open at 7:15 p.m.. Mayor Figley stated that she drives by the site daily and she has been looking harder at the site in more recent weeks. Councilor McCallum stated that he has driven by site numerous times and the Benavidez family is familiar to him in that they were in school while he was employed by the School District but feels that he can make a decision based on land use law. Councilor Schmidt stated that he has had ex-parte contact by looking the property over and by stopping to talk to the property owner. He believes that he will be able to issue a fair judgment on this project. Councilor Berkey declared an ex-parte contact since she has worked over the past year with Armando Benavidez Jr. but at no time was their discussion about this issue. Councilor Lonergan stated that he was familar with the site. Recorder Tennant read the Land use statement required under ORS 197.763. Associate Planner Dolenc stated that the applicant, Arnoldo Benavidez, had requested a conditional use for auto parts sales and installation of primarily tires and wheels in an existing building which was developed prior to the adoption of the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) and many site characteristics are non-conforming but permitted to continue under the WDO. The business is currently operating an auto parts without installation and automotive repair and a conditional use is required for auto parts installation. The property is zoned commercial general and surrounded on most of its perimeter by mixed uses of commercial general zoned property with two residential lots abutting on the northwest corner of the property. He stated that the Planning Commission had unanimously approved a conditional use with conditions and this decision has been appealed to the Council by Margarita Benavidez for a public hearing raising 11 points of appeal. 1500 Associate Planner Dolenc reviewed the follolwing 11 points of appeal: # 1) Use of the property for automobile maintenance and repair is a nonconforming use under the WDO. It was noted that the use of the property for auto repair existed prior to Page 3 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 4 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING current zoning standards and may continue until it is terminated. #2) The proposed use will expand the nonconforming use in violation of the WDO. Planner Dolenc stated that the conditional use does not involve the expansion or addition to buildings or structures and the proposed conditional use is not precluded by the WDO. #3, #4, #5, #7, and # 10) These points of appeal deal with off-street parking, buffer walls, landscaping, access, and refuse. He stated that all of these items are non- conforming to the current code and are also regulated by the same section of the development ordinance. Since the proposed conditional use does not expand the building, it is not subject to a Design Review therefore any nonconforming parking, loading, landscaping, buffer walls, and refuse facilities would only need to be brought into conformity through a Design Review process and not a Conditional Use process. #6) The proposed use does not provide for the dedication of utility easements. Planner Dolenc stated that the site is served by existing utilities and the dedication of a public utility easement is not necessary for approval of this conditional use. #8) The proposed use does not meet the design standards of WDD 3.107. It was noted that the WDO does not require the nonconforming architecture of the building be brought into conformance through the conditional use process. #9) The applicant is currently displaying an illegal sign for the business. Planner Dolenc stated that there is a fairly lazge sign on the property which is a temporary sign which has been established pursuant to the applicant's obtaining a temporary sign permit. Therefore, the sign currently in place is not an illegal sign. He stated that one of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission is that the existing pole sign be brought into conformity either by being removed or converted into a monument sign that would conform to Section 3.110. # 11) The proposed use shall be compatible with the surrounding properties. He stated that there is a list of relevant factors to be considered in determining whether the proposed use is compatible. He stated that these are not mandatory standards but aze factors to be considered when making a decision. These factors include size, shape, location and topography of the site; capacity of public water, sewerage, drainage, street and pedestrian facilities serving the proposed use; impact of the proposed use on the quality of the living environment; conformance of the proposed use with applicable Comprehensive Plan policies; and the suitability of proposed conditions of approval to insure compatibility of the proposed use with other uses in the vicinity. Planner Dolenc reviewed each of these factors and staff concludes that the proposed use either meets the requirements of the WDO or is nonconforming which is permitted to continue subject to WDO 1.104. Staff is recommending that (1}the Planning Commission's decision be upheld and approve Conditional Use case CU 2008-01 subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report and (2) deny the appeal of case CU 2008-01. Planner Dolenc stated that the following four conditions of approval are recommended to insure compatibility with surrounding properties: I . Property owner shall execute an acceptance of these conditions on a form provided by the City; Page 4 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 5 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING 2. Property owner shall develop and maintain the subject property in accordance with all provisions of the WDO whether or not addressed in the staff review, conditions of approval, or public hearing; 3. Property shall be developed in substantial conformity to the plans attached as Exhibits A and B of the staff report except as modified by these conditions of approval; and 4. Property owner shall remove the existing pole sign in front of the building or convert it to a conforming monument sign. Councilor Pugh questioned what the present plan is for the old structure. Planner Dolenc stated that the structure is being re-used as is and the property owner has painted the building and made some interior modifications but the building will remain essentially as is. Councilor Cox questioned the difference between non-conforming use as compared to non-conforming conditions on a piece of property such as conditions related to the structure and landscaping. Planner Dolenc stated that anon-conforming use is a case in which the use of the property is changed from its original use but has some rights to continue due because of a vested property right to continue the use of the property even though it does not conform to the current standards. An example of anon-conforming building would be a situation where a building is built before zoning standards were established, however, those standards have since changed. The building would have non-conforming rights to continue in its in current location as built unless some other action was taken to terminate that use. 2440 Community Development Director Hendryx stated that the WDO has some provisions if a business with anon-conforming use stops for a period of 6 months, then it ceases to have its non-conformity. Likewise, the WDO code says that if there are non-conforming site characteristics such as setbacks or parking standards then additions to the building would require bringing up the whole site to the current code standards. He stated that those are similar standards that provisions that other jurisdictions have that he has operated in. Councilor Cox stated that his understanding is that if the use, such as a tire shop, is non- conforming and stops for consecutive 6 months, then the owner has lost the right. However, if the building or property is otherwise non-conforming in some of the other characteristics, they are allowed to continue even though the use, such as a tire shop, would have stopped for 6 months. The continuance of the use only affects the continuation of the permission for the non-conforming use and the property could be vacant for a couple of years and the owner would still not be precluded from continuing if it was anon-conforming characteristic. Planner Dolenc stated that Councilor Cox correctly summarized the difference between non-conforming use and non-conforming characteristics. Councilor Cox questioned if there was a difference in terms of permitted uses between (1) sale and installation of auto parts and (2) automotive repairs, and, for the purpose of this appeal, does it make any difference which label is used. Page 5 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 6 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING Director Hendryx stated that the WDO establishes uses and it has a differentiation between sales of parts which are allowed in a category and conditionally an applicant would have to go through the process if parts are installed. Councilor Cox stated that he understands the difference but questioned if, for purpose of the WDO, sale with installation of parts is the same thing as automotive repair. Planner Dolenc stated that parts dealers with installation aze listed separately from automotive maintenance in the WDO. Director Hendryx stated that both the maintenance of a vehicle and the installation of parts require a conditional use with the same basic standards. The complicated part is that there was a parts auto repair business at the subject site whereas they are now installing different categories -parts - which requires a new conditional use. Councilor Lonergan questioned if fuel tanks are still on site to where the applicant could sell fuel. Planner Dolenc stated that he was unsure if there were still tanks at the sight since he did not see any evidence of fuel tanks remaining. In regards to the business sign, he stated that the applicant can either remove the pole sign or convert it into a monument sign but whichever method is used needs to conform to the current sign code. 3l 15 Arnold Benavidez, applicant, requested that the Council deny the appeal. Jake Jacobsen, local businessman speaking on behalf of and support of Arnold Benavidez, his family, his business, and his deceased brother Armando. The appellant is Margarita Enrique Benavidez who had been married to Armando Benavidez. He stated that he is appealling to the Council that the request for the motion for appeal be denied on the following reasons: 1) appellant actions is not based on any violation of the WDO but an act of vengance against the applicant and is further driven by a contested probate case currently in Marion County Court; and 2) conditional use approved by the Planning Commission had received thorough examination by the Commission. He stated that the appellant and her attorney are taking action to further disrupt the life of Arnold Benavidez, his family, and his business. He mentioned that the appellant's counsel has mentioned to him that he has tried to get the issue settled without having legal issues brought forth and the appellant's attorney stated that it was the appellant's desire to ruin Mr. Arnold Benavidez and take his personal assets and business away from him. Additionally, he would stop at nothing in an attempt to tie Mr. Benavidez up in court if it took one appeal after another until the money runs out. The appellant has promised payment to her attorney with the assets of an estate that has not been settled. He stated that the conditional use permit was recommended for approval at the staff level in January and the Planning Commission heazd the application and approved it unanimously. He requested that the appeal be denied. 3567 Don Judson stated that neither of the parties in this case are members of the Chamber and he is not speaking as a Chamber representative. In his personal opinion, the items listed on this appeal have nothing to do with any fidelity to the zoning code. All the appellant wants to do is stifle competition in that they are afraid of another store opening up across the street with better service. He urged the Council to strongly deny this appeal and their Page 6 -Council Meeting Minutes, Februazy 9, 2009 7 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING attempt to use the City's laws for personal gain. Kevin Kenagy, Planning Commission member, stated that he had met the Benavidez family about a month ago, however, being a Planning Commission member has nothing to do with why he is testifying at this hearing. In his opinion, Mr. Benavidez is a good business and family man and urged the Council to deny the appeal. Daniel Adkinson, attorney for Margarita Benavidez, stated that this appeal is about properly applying the zoning code. He stated that staff had done a good job of analyzing the appeal, however, he disagreed with staff on the following key points: 1 }Grandfather non-conforming use: He agreed with staff s analysis that it has been well-established that it is grandfathered, however, it cannot be expanded and approving the tire installation will expand the auto repair business. 2) Ability to consider non-conforming developments being brought into conformance: He stated that they have raised issues about the parking area, driveway, setbacks, buffer with the residential zone, and refuse collection facilities. He stated that these are non- conforming to the zoning code and staff has concluded that, with this application, they cannot be brought up to code. He disagreed with staff and referred to criteria 2 of the conditional use provision which states that "...the use shall comply with the development standards of the zone..." and the commercial zone standards aze specifically defined. 3965 Councilor Cox stated that the point made by Mr. Adkinson was that the WDO requires, when granting a conditional use, it shall comply with the development standards of the zone. He questioned how staff would distinguish that statement from the idea that, in many respects, this building because of its age does not comply with some of the standards required for a new building. Planner Dolenc stated that the conditional use criteria referenced the zone standards which then refers to another section of the code that would, at first glance, look like the applicant would have to comply with everything. However, Section 1.104- Non Conformities -are recognized and protected as vested rights and it is staff s belief that the regulations need to be read with Section 1.104 in mind when applying the various standards. Director Hendryx stated that the other provision is that design review standards would come into play if an expansion of the building is involved then bringing up the standazds would be required. Councilor Cox questioned City Attorney Shields if he felt comfortable with a tenable basis for arguing that staff's interpretation is defendable if this appeal ends up in LUBA (Land Use Board of Appeals). City Attorney Shields stated that he has discussed this issue with staff and feels that it is a defensible interpretation of the WDO in that the design review is not invoked in this case and he is legally comfortable with the interpretation of the City's code. Mayor Figley closed the public hearing at 8:08 pm. COX/MCCALLUM.... deny the appeal and uphold granting of a conditional use subject to the same terms of conditions the Planning Commission findings as recommended in Page 7 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 8 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2004 TAPE READING the staff report, and Council request the appropriate resolution be brought back at the next meeting to substantiate that decision. Councilor Lonergan expressed his feeling that the Planning Commission gave the application due diligence. He appreciated staff's work in looking at both sides of this issue and felt that they presented a very good staff report. Councilor Schmidt agreed with comments made by Councilor Lonergan. Councilor McCallum concurred with comments made by the other Councilors and stated that the Council's decision needs to be made on land use laws and the WDO. Mayor Figley also thanked staff for a very clear presentation that answered questions she had on this topic. Councilor Pugh reiterated that the Council must comply with the law and how it is interpreted. He felt that this had been a fair and realistic addition to what he has already studied and support the motion made by Councilor Cox. The motion passed unanimously. 5012 COUNCIL BILL N0.2763 -RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF OPERATING CONTINGENCY APPROPRIATIONS DURING FISCAL YEAR 2008-09. Council Biil No. 2763 was introduced by Councilor McCallum. Recorder Tennant read the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Figley declared Council Bill No. 2763 duly passed. S 143 APPROPRIATIONS REQUEST FROM OREGON HOUSE DELAGATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010. Administrator Derickson stated that he had received a telephone call from Congressman Kurt Schrader's office inquiring as to whether or not the City would be interested in submitting a congressional allocation request form for the I-5 interchange project or other transportation projects the City might be interested in. It is his understanding that this would coincide with the Oregon Transportation Commission's support of a congressional allocation for the interchange project. He requested that the Council approve the submission of the form which will then be forwarded to Congressman Schrader's office for inclusion into their process for determining whether or not to support the request for allocation of resources to fund the project. Councilor Pugh questioned if this is tied in with the present economic stimulus package before Congress or is this a separate funding allocation. Administrator Derickson stated that this is not part of the federal economic stimulus package rather it is part of the normal Congressional earmark process that every Congressman and Senator goes through annually for advocacy for projects across the country. He reminded the Council that the stimulus package may not be available for the interchange project because of the definition of shovel ready, Even with the State stimulus package, they exclude the I-5 improvement project because of their shovel ready Page $ -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 9 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING definition. Councilor Lonergan questioned if staff knew how many allocation requests were sent out to communities throughout the State. Administrator Derickson stated that the Congressional eanmazk process has been subject to debate over the last couple of yeazs and it is hoped that those projects that aze imposing costs in our community that are a result of federal regulations or which would improve the regional economy would not be considered wasteful but would be considered beneficial and a way to offset the expense of federal legislation to our local citizens. PUGH/COX..... approve the submission of the Congressional Allocation Request form to Representative Kurt Schrader's office. The motion passed unanimously. 5704 OLCC LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 2009. Staff recommended the liquor license renewals for the following business establishments within the City: Off Premise Sales: 7-Eleven, Bi-Mart Corp., Dos Arbolitos Musica Latina, Gary's Market, La Azteca, Pipers Jewelry, Safeway Store #1976, Su Casa Imports, US Mazket #109, Woodburn Fast Serve Inc., Woodburn Shop N Kart, Your Northwest, A & J Market, Crossroads Grocery & Deli, EZ Stop Grocery & Deli, Harry and David #595, O'Donnell Enterprises, Roadrunner V Woodburn, Salvador's Bakery, The Bistro at Wellspring, Wal Mart Supercenter, Woodburn Grocery Outlet, Young Street Market, Woodburn Stop N Go Full On Premise Sales: BiII O Deli Pub, Cinco De Mayo Taqueria, Eagles Lodge, Elmer's Restaurant, Los Cabos Mexican Restaurant, Mazgaritas, Rumor's Bar and Grill, Senior Estates Golf & Country Club, The Raven Inn, El Dorado, Casa Marquez Mexican Grill, Denny's at Woodburn, Elks Lodge, Happy Garden Buffet, Lupita's, OGA Members Course, The Bistro at Wellspring, The End Zone, Yun Wah Limited On-Premise Sales: 7 Mazes Restaurant, Cactus Grill Taqueria & Restaurant, Maziscos El Sarandeado, Nuevo Arandas, Salvador's Bakery, Taqueria Guadalajara, Abby's Pizza Inn of Woodburn, DEDE's Deli, Mugsy's Bagels, Pizza Hut, Shari's of Woodburn, Woodburn Lanes Councilor Cox requested that staff call to OLCC's attention that Billy O Deli Pub is no longer in business and the Council had approved a different licensee for that location last fall. Acting Chief Blevins stated that he would check into that situation. LONERGAN/MCCALLUM.... recommend to OLCC renewal of liquor licenses for 20091isted in staff report with the question on the status of the Billy O Deli Pub license. The motion passed unanimously. Page 9 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 10 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 209 TAPE READING 5922 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT. A) Administrator Derickson stated that the federal economic stimulus package is still being worked on and he felt that it was important that the City have representation on the interests of Woodburn and the interchange project when same of these decisions are being made at the federal level. He proposed that the Counci! consider sending a delegate to coincide with Marion County's visit to Washington , D.C., with their lobbyists to lobby the City's Congressional delegation on the interests of the Oregon Transportation Committee's letter and recommendation of what is now about half of the funding for the project along with the Congressional earmark that the Council approved earlier in this meeting. He stated that his past experience has been fruitful when you show up and talk to those making the decisions and his recommendation is that the Mayor be designated and the City send her to Washington, D.C., to lobby for the interchange project to obtain support from Oregon Senators and Representatives. 6613 PUGHiMCCALLUM.... accept Administrator Derickson's suggestion to send a delegate to Washington D.C. to discuss with Congressman Schraeder and lobby for a program to set the City's I-5 interchange project in motion. Mayor Figley stated that she is willing to go and staff is trying to get in touch with Marion County Commissioner Brentano to see if it would be most effective for her to go about the same time, before, or after he is in Washington, D.C.. The motion passed unanimously. 6781 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS. Councilor Schmidt stated that he had received an invitation from the Marion County Public Safety Coordinating Council for a demonstration on deadly use of force. Tape 2 Acting Chief Blevins stated that the Coordinating Council will be putting on a demonstration at the Police Academy utilizing an interactive video where an officer can be confronted by a armed suspect and the officer can make the call as to what to do in the situation. The Police Department has invited some business owners and other individuals in the community to attend the demonstration. This is the first demonstration the Coordinating Council has organized on use of deadly force and they plan on having this demonstration at least annually. Councilor Schmidt stated that he had the honor of riding with a police officer last Friday and reported that he was very pleased with the training our police officers have had and how proud he is of the department. Mayor Figley stated that she watched the installation of the gazebo at the Downtown Plaza last Saturday and she is looking forward to having the roof completed and that piece of the Urban renewal project completed. Page 10 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 11 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 2009 TAPE READING 0169 ADJOURNMENT. LONERGAN/MCCALLUM .... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m.. APPROVED ATTEST Mary Tennant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon KATHRYN FIGLEY, MAYOR Page 11 -Council Meeting Minutes, February 9, 2009 12 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order The meeting and was called to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call Board Chair Vacant Board Secretary Rosetta Wangerin Absent Member Joseph Nicoletti Present Member Judy Wesemann Present Member Eric Morns Present Member Charlene Williams Absent Member Alexa Morris Present In the absence of the Boazd Chair and Secretary, Joseph Nicoletti presided over the meeting. Staff present: Jim Row, Community Services Director; Stu Spence, Recreation Debbie Wadliegh, Aquatic Manager; Services Manager; Paulette Zastoupil, A.A; Matt Gwwnn, Public Works Maintenance Superintendent Annual Election of Officers Judy Wesemann/Eric Morris- Motion to move the election of officers to the March meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Approval of Minutes from January 13, 2009 Eric Morris/Judy Wesemann - Motion to accept the minutes as written. The motion passed unanimously. 5. Business from the Audience None. 6. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Jim explained that the Plan is in the final draft stage. He will present it to the Planning Commission on February 12, 2009. The Planning Commission will then conduct a public hearing on February 26, 2009 and, hopefully, recommend approval to the City Council. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on March 23 to adopt the Master Plan and the textual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. Adopt - A -Park Program Jim took this opportunity to introduce Matt Gwynn, Maintenance Superintendent for Public Works. Matt explained that his goal was to become more involved in the Parks and Recreation Boazd meetings. The Adopt - A -Park program was initiated by public works and the draft program will soon be finalized. Jim stated that the City recently implemented an insurance policy that reduces the City's liability by providing coverage to City volunteers, including those that participate in this program. The Adopt - A - Pazk Program will allow the City to accept and Page 1 13 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. solicit the interest of volunteer groups. Discussion took place on the program criteria, procedures, conflict with events and possible volunteer groups. Business from the Department Aquatics -Debbie Wadleigh Debbie played the Boazd an Aquatic Center commercial, which is airing in the local cable television mazket. Debbie partially attributes increasing Center attendance to the commercial. The Aquatic Center is offering a 12 x 12 Fitness Challenge; I2 days of fitness a month for 12 months and currently has 40 participants. At the end of the challenge, their names will be put into a drawing to receive a free yearly membership. The second winter sessions of swim lessons are starting, and the fourth grade swim lesson program is ending this week. The discount and promotion programs have shown to be successful and are continuing. The HVAC replacement project is still on track, with installation scheduled for April 27`x. Recreation -Stu Spence Sorts -Stu reported that the youth basketball is going well, with 204 kids participating on 21 teams. Men's League Basketball has 18 teams. Stu is looking for volunteers to help with Adult Basketball to streamline budget costs. Active Adult -The active adult trip to McMenamin's Ironworks Grill in Forest Grove had 15 participants, and the End of the Oregon Trail trip has 17 participants signed up. Teen Program -The Settlemier Teen Coordinator, Erica Robles is leaving, and Randall Porter will fill this position. The Woodbum School District is sponsoring a snack program for the teen programs. A recent teen trip to a Portland Winter Hawks game was a huge success. A Wii Fit system was purchased with Weed and Seed funds to be shared between the two teen program sites. Youth Advisory Board - In January, the YAB were invited to go as a part of the Public Health Legislative Day at the State Capitol. Stu passed out a Statesman Journal article that the teens were mentioned in. After School Club -After School Club funding through the 21S` Century Community Learning Centers grant program is ending this June. We have been working hard on a variety of options to continue the program. The School District is planning to apply for another 21S` Century Grant to fund the next 5 years of the program. Stu also provided an update on the status of the initiative o bring the Boys and Girls Club to Woodburn. He reported that the Woodburn Chamber of Commerce will distribute a community assessment survey to to community stake holders, in order to determine the community's readiness. This is the first step in getting a Boys & Girls Club in Woodburn. Information will be tallied and evaluated to see what steps are then necessary to bring a Club to Woodburn. Other -Stu shazed he has received 2 grants recently; PAL-YEP for $4,000.00 and AmeriCorps for 1 full time stipend volunteer from Mazch through August. Page 2 14 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. Parks and Facilities -Jim Row Budget Jim informed the Board that this will be a challenging budget year, with resources being tighter than recent yeazs. To prepare for the budgetary realities, the City has already made reductions in this current fiscal year to try to make sure that we can complete this year within budget. He also shared that the growth in property tax revenues will be lower than they have been in many, many years. Jim promised to keep the Board updated as budget process progresses. He also asked Board members to let him know if they had any budgetary requests that they would like to have considered. Gazebo Before his presentation, Jim took the opportunity to share the City's updated website with the Board, which contains a page dedicated to the Downtown Plaza Gazebo project. He shared pictures of the gazebo installation that took place on Saturday, February ?, 2049. The project was completed through the tremendous work of the Woodburn Rotary Club and Public Works Department personnel. He thanked Public Works personnel for all their work in planning and organizing the project to be volunteer friendly. Jim explained that due to funding limitations when the Plaza was initially constructed, the City determined that the gazebo would have to be constructed at a later date, with assistance from private donations. The original plan called for a custom designed gazebo at an estimated cost of more than $100, 000. Initial fundraising for the project fell short of that goal and by working with a manufacturer, we were able to modify one of their standazd designs and complete this project for $50,000. We are planning for the dedication to take place at the "Day of the Child" event on Sunday, April 26, 2009. Centennial Park Jim reported that the construction drawings are about 90% complete, and discussed features that were not on the original concept plan, such as walking path a around the perimeter of the fields, and a fenced off-leash dog area. Mill Creek Phase I Jim reported that the design work is almost complete and the draft wetland permit is being reviewed by the City. He plans to present an update on the project to City Council on February 23rd. He felt that the earliest they will be able to get the project out to bid, is early March. He hopes construction will begin azound July IS`. He commented that he is coordinating this project with the Marshall Street culvert replacement that Public Works is initiating. 8. Future Board Business None. 9. Board Comments No comments. Page 3 15 Minutes Woodburn Recreation and Parks Board Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:00 p.m. 10. Adjournment 8:05 p.m. Rosetta Wangerin, Board Secretary Paulette Zastoupil, Recording Secretary Date Date Page 4 16 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STATISTICS JANUARY 2009 Recreation Services Division Jan-08 Jan-09 002 8 YTD 2009 YTD Revenue: 17,535.66 10,369.94 $87,472.07 $89,913.49 Expenditures: 22,398.18 21,020.96 $203,462.03 $174,116.27 Program Attendance: Youth Sports: 226 204 702 924 Adult Sports: 160 180 2,061 864 Youth Programs : 0 2 1,610 429 Adult Programs: 6 20 23 151 Teen Programs : 285 646 2,737 4,009 After School Club : 2,392 1,939 10,592 9,751 Special Events: 0 0 9,500 2,783 TOTAL: 3,069 2,991 27,225 18,911 Aquatics Division Revenue: Expenditures: Cost Recovery: Attendance: Lesson Enrollment: Group: Adults: Private: 4th Grade: TOTAL: Library Division Jan-08 Jan-09 2 00 8 YTD 2009 YTD 19,206.72 14,410.17 95,904.35 108,238.90 52, 570.41 51,696.59 330,686.61 363,677.93 37% 28% 29% 30% 4,387 5,167 29,423 34,820 49 56 768 741 0 3 21 7 0 10 28 56 0 52 349 265 49 121 1,166 1,069 Jan-08 Jan-09 2008 YTD 2009 YTD Revenue: $6,220.58 $18,006.97 $46,590.70 $69,449.71 Expenditures: $78,029.11 $84,738.96 $555,474.29 $598,564.92 Library Attendance: 16,935 17,863 106,178 115,680 Library Circulation: 12,099 12,463 80,225 81,580 Adult Program Count: 0 1 11 21 Adult Attendance: 0 3 3,745 3,818 Youth Service Program Count: 28 25 180 148 Youth Service Attendance: 557 440 3,534 3,955 0 0 Database Usaoe: 345 605 3,444 11,775 Adult Computer Usage: 4,488 4,263 29,960 27,839 Youth Services Computer Usage: 863 851 5,911 6,381 Room Reservations 13 20 37 57 New Adds: 552 449 3,576 2,705 Volunteer Hours Worked: 81 127 653 751 JANUARY 2008 17 CI TY OF WOODB URN Community Development MEMORANDUM 270 Montgomery Sfreet Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Date: February 3, 2009 To: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director From: Building Division Subject: Building Activity for January 2009 2007 2008 2009 No. Dollar Amount No. Dollar Amount No. Dollar Amount Single-Family Residential 5 $1,191,564 10 $1,853,895 0 $0 Multi-Family Residential 0 $0 0 $0 2 $28,267 Assisted Living Facilities 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Residential Adds & Alts 3 $19,645 5 $80,000 3 $103,300 Industrial 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Commercial 1 $72,000 12 $528,943 9 $122,300 Signs and Fences 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Manufactured Homes 1 $40,000 0 $0 2 $50,000 TOTALS 10 $1,323,209 27 $2,462,838 16 $303,867 Fiscal Year to Date (July 1 - June 30 ;9,540,363 $19,969,982 56,443,637 I.~Cammunity Developmeet\BuilOing\Builtling AclrvdylBUigACt-2009tBldg Activity - Memostrnemo J~yy~ry 2009.AOc u~ r I~~r W D~ N r~cc,po,n„d re.sg February 23, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council through City Administrator FROM: Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Appeaf of CU 2008-01, located at S95 North Pacific Highway, tax lot 051 W 178809300. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution approving case CU 2008-O1 subject to conditions of approval and denying the appeal of case CU 2008-01. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Arnoldo Benavidez, requested a Conditional Use to sell and install auto parts (principally tires and wheels) at 595 N. Pacific Highway, in the Commercial General zone. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 11, 2008 and unanimously approved the application subject to conditions. The order effecting the decision was appealed to the City Council for a de novo public hearing. The City Council heard the case and the appeal on February 9, 2009. The Council voted to approve the case and deny the appeal, and instructed Staff to prepare a resolution memorializing that decision. DISCUSSION: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This decision is anticipated to have no public sector financial impact. 9 Agenda Item Review: City Attorney {u ^'J Finance COUNCIL BILL NO. 2764 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION IN CASE CU 2008-01; ADOPTING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF SAiD APPROVAL; AND DENYING THE APPEAL OF SAID CASE WHEREAS, an application was made by Arnoldo Benavidez, applicant, for a conditional use for auto parts sales and installation (principally tires and wheels), in the Commercial General zone and; WHEREAS, the Woodburn Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application at its meeting of December 11, 2008 and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission issued a final order on January 8, 2009 approving the application subject to certain conditions of approval, and; WHEREAS, the appellant, Margarita Benavidez, timely appealed to the Woodburn City Council under WDO 4.102.01; and WHEREAS, the Council held a de novo public hearing on the case at its meeting of February 9, 2009, and; WHEREAS, the Council considered the written and oral testimony presented by staff, the applicant, the appellant's attorney, and members of the public; WHEREAS, the Council found that the applicant had borne its burden of proof and that the facts did not sustain the eleven points of appeal raised by the appellant; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The application in case CU 2008-O1 is approved. Section 2. This decision is based upon evidence in the record before the Woodburn City Council and is justified by the findings and conclusions which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference are incorporated herein. Section 3. Approval of the application is subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by this reference are incorporated herein. Page 1 - COUNCIL BILL NO. 2764 RESOLUTION NO. 20 Section 4. The appeal of case CU 2008-01 is denied. Approved as to form: .~ ~~ ~ f ~ Zd 0 City Attorney Date Approved: Kathryn Figley, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Mary Tennant City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 2- COUNCIL BILL NO. 2764 RESOLUTION NO. 21 1 EXHIBIT "A" 2 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 3 4 WDO 2.106 Commercial General (CG) 5 6 The following uses may be permitted in the CG zone subject to the applicable development 7 standards of the WDO and the conditions of conditional use approval: 8 ... Motor vehicle and parts dealers (441) EXCEPT automotive parts without installation. 9 ... Automotive maintenance. (8111) (WDO 2.106.03.A.1, 2.106.03.G.1] 10 Findings: The proposed use is an automotive parts dealership with installation and automotive 11 maintenance. 12 Conclusion: The proposed use of the property is allowed as a conditional use in the CG zone. 13 14 15 The nonconforming use of a building, structure, or land shall be considered terminated if the 16 Community Development Director finds that the use of the building, structure or land ceased, 17 for any reason, for a continuous period of 6 months. [WDO 1.104.02] 18 Findin s: Property tax records indicate that the building was originally constructed in 1967. A site 19 visit found that the building design is typical a gasoline service station of that period. At that time, 20 automobile maintenance and repair were commonly conducted as an integral part of a service 21 station's business. According to the applicant, after the sale of gasoline was discontinued on the 22 subject property, the use of the property for automobile maintenance and repair was continued until 23 the present. City records indicate that water service to Pacific Northwest Transmissions began on 24 December 8, 1992. A digital photo taken December 17, 2004 shows a sign for Pacific Northwest 25 Transmission that advertises "complete auto repair." City records indicate that water service to 26 water service to Highway Auto Repair began on February 9, 2007. An Eviction Trespass Notice 27 was served on Highway Auto Repair on September 17, 2008. The applicant applied for a City 28 business license on September 22, 2008, listing automotive repair as an element of the business. 29 City records indicate that water service to Benavidez Tires and Wheels began on October 20, 2008. 30 The current proposal does not include expansion of the building, increase in off-street parking 31 requirements, or other activity that would require the building location, off-street parking, 32 architectural design, landscaping, or buffering to comply with current standards. 33 Conclusions: The use of the property for automobile maintenance and repair is a nonconforming use 34 because it is conducted without the conditional use currently required by the WDO. As a 35 nonconforming use, this element of the business may continue until it is terminated pursuant to 36 WDO 1.104.02. The Community Development Director has found no evidence that the use of the 37 building, structure or land ceased, for any reason, for a continuous period of 6 months. 38 39 40 Lots in a CG zone shall comply with the applicable standards of Table 2.1.10. [WDO 41 2.106.05.A] Exhibit A Page 1 of 9 22 TABLE 2.1.10 Lot Standards in a CG Zone In a CG zone the lot area for anon-residential use shall be adequate to contain all structures within the required setbacks. There shall be no minimum width or depth. 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Findings: The existing and proposed uses of the property aze non-residential. The lot area is adequate to contain all structures within the required setbacks. Conclusions: The lot is conforming for area in the CG zone. There is no minimum lot width or depth. Height, Building: The vertical distance above a reference datum measured to the highest point of the coping or flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. [WDO 1.102] The maximum height of buildings shall not exceed 70 feet. [WDO 2.106.05.B] Findings: The existing building is a single-story structure Conclusions: The existing building complies with WDO 2.106.OS.B. Special setback standards by street classification are established in Table 3.1,1. The special setback standards shall be applied to streets within the City of Woodburn as functionally classified in the Woodburn Transportation System Plan. [WDO 3.103.OS.D] TABLE 3.1.1 Special Setback Standards by Street Classification 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 { WTSP Functional Classification {Special Setback from Center Line { I Major Arterial 150 feet The minimum setback abutting a street shall be 15 feet plus any Special Setback, Section 3.103.05. (WDO 2.106.06.C.I.a.1] Findin s: Figure 7.1 of the Transportation System Plan shows Pacific Highway as a Major Arterial. Table 3.1.1 requires a special setback of 50 feet from the center line. The GIS system shows aright- of-way width of approximately 80 feet. In addition to the special setback of 50 feet from centerline (or 10 feet from property line), an additional 15 foot setback is required. The GIS system shows the existing building to be set back approximately 45 feet from the front property line. Conclusions: The existing building complies with the standards of WDO 3.103.OS.D, Table 3.1.1, and WDO 2.106.06.C.1.a.1. Development in a CG zone shall be subject to the setback and buffer requirements of Table 2.1.11. (WDO 2.106.05.C.2.a] Exhibit A Page 2 of 9 23 TABLE 2.1.11 Interior Yard and Buffer Standards for CG Zones Abutting Property Wall Interior Setback CO, CG, DDC, NNC, Alternative A: Wall requirements Alternative A: 5 ft. PISP, IP, SWIR or IL shall be determined in conjunction with zone the applicable Design Review process. Alternative B: Zero setback Alternative B: No wall required. abutting a building wall. 1 A solid brick or architectural wall with anti-graffiti surface, no less than 6 feet or greater than 2 7 feet in height: 3 a. Should be constructed on the perimeter property line ofnon-residential development 4 to mitigate adverse visual, noise and/or light impacts on the abutting use when no 5 comparable buffer exists. (WDO 3.107.06.B.8) 6 7 Findin s: The application is for Conditional Use approval and the building is not required to go 8 through a Design Review process at this time. 9 Conclusions: The wall requirements of WDO 2.106.OS.C.2.a and Table 2.1.11 (Alternative A) do 10 not apply to the proposed development. The guideline of WDO 3.107.06.B.8 is not applicable to 11 the current proposal. 12 13 14 Off street parking and storage shall be prohibited within a required setback or any yard 15 abutting a street EXCEPT for parking and storage adjacent to a wall. (WDO 2.106.OS.C.l.b.2] 16 Off street parking and storage shall be prohibited within a required setback EXCEPT for 17 parking and storage adjacent to a wall. [WDO 2.106.OS.C.2.c] 18 Parking and storage shall be prohibited within a required setback adjacent to a street, 19 EXCEPT for parking in driveways. [WDO 3.103.06] 20 Findings: The site plan does not show any parking or storage located within a required setback. 21 Conclusions: The site plan complies with the standazds of WDO 2.106.OS.C.l.b.2, WDO 22 2.106.OS.C.2.c, and 3.103.06. 23 24 25 Common refuse collection facilities shall be screened on all sides by an architectural block 26 wall and solid gate, both with an anti-graffiti surface, a minimum of six feet and a maximum 27 of seven feet in height. [WDO 2.106.06.E.3] 28 Findincs: The site plan shows a trash enclosure located at the rear of the building. The applicant 29 has indicated that he would delete the trash enclosure shown on the site plan and use the existing 30 refuse collection facilities located behind the restaurant. 31 Conclusions: The standazds of WDO 2.106.06.E.3 are not applicable to the project as revised. 32 33 Exhibit A Page 3 of 9 24 1 WDO 3.101 Street Standards 2 3 All public streets under the jurisdiction of the City of Woodburn shall comply with the 4 applicable cross section design standards noted in Section 3.141.03 and construction 5 specifications of the Public Works Department. [WDO 3.101.02.C.1) 6 Findin s: Highway 99E is a state highway maintained by the Oregon Department of Transportation. 7 Conclusions: Highway 99E is not "under the jurisdiction of the City of Woodburn" and street 8 improvements can not be required under WDO 3.101.02.C.1. 9 10 11 WDO 3.104 Access Standards 12 13 Radius of Curb Flare: 35 feet minimum. [WDO 3.104.OS.E.2] 14 Findin s: The site plan does not call out the curb radius. The City GIS system shows that the curb 15 radius is approximately 23 feet. The application is for Conditional Use approval and the building is 16 not required to go through a Design Review process at this time. 17 Conclusions: Curb radius is not applicable to Conditional Use approval. 18 19 20 Throat length of a driveway, extending from the closest vff street parking or loading space to 21 the outside edge of right of way for a:... 22 a. Major street connection: 50 feet minimum, with greater improvement as may be 23 required by a TIA. (WDO 3.104.05.E.4) 24 Street, Major: A street or highway classified in the Woodburn Transportation System Plan as 25 a Major Arterial, Minor Arterial, Service Collector, or Access street. [WDO 1.102) 26 Findings: The site plan shows a throat length of approximately 10 feet. The application is for 27 Conditional Use approval and the building is not required to go through a Design Review process at 2$ this time. 29 Conclusions: Throat length is not applicable to Conditional Use approval. 30 31 32 3.102 Utilities and Easements 33 34 Municipal water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage facilities shall be installed to applicable 35 Public Works Department and state standards. (WDO 3.102.01] 36 Findines: The conditional use does not require the installation of water, sanitary sewer, or storm 37 drainage facilities. 38 Conclusions: The standards of WDO 3.102.01 do not apply to this case. 39 40 41 All permanent utility service to development shall be underground EXCEPT where overhead 42 high-voltage electric facilities exist and for partitioned lots that are currently served by 43 overhead wires or cables. [WDO 3.102.02) Exhibit A Page 4 of 9 25 1 Findines: A site inspection showed that the property is served by existing overhead high-voltage 2 electric facilities. 3 Conclusions: Underground utilities are not required by WDO 3.102.02. 4 5 6 Public streets abutting development shall be illuminated with street lights installed to the 7 standards of the Public Works Department and the electric utility. (WDO 3.102.03] 8 Findin s: Highway 99E is a state highway maintained by the Oregon Department of Transportation. 9 Conclusions: Street improvements, including street lights, are not required on Highway 99E per 10 WDO 3.101.02.C.1. 11 12 13 The Public Works Department shall require dedication of specific easements for the 14 construction and maintenance of municipal water, sewerage and storm drainage facilities 15 located on private property shall be required in accordance with the Public Works 16 Department standards. [WDO 3.102.04.AJ 17 Findings: The conditional use does not require the installation of water, sanitary sewer, or storm 18 drainage facilities. 19 Conclusions: The standazds of WDO 3.102.04.A do not apply to this case. 20 21 22 Five foot wide public utility easements (i.e., easements for natural gas lines and for electric 23 and telecommunications wire or cable service) shall be dedicated along each lot line abutting a 24 public street. [WDO 3.102.04.8] 25 Findings: The proposed use of the property does not involve any increased need for pubic utilities. 26 Conclusions: Dedication of a public utility easement is not necessary for approval of this 27 conditional use. 28 29 30 WDO 3.105 Off Street Parking and Loading Standards 31 32 The provisions of this Section shall apply to the following types of development:... 33 B. Any additional parking and/or loading required by the WDO to accommodate a 34 change in use, or expansion of an existing use shall be subject to the following. 35 1. Applications subject to Type III Design Review, Section 5.103.02, shall conform 36 all parking, loading and landscaping for the subject use to the standards of the 37 WDO. 38 2. Applications subject to Type II Design Review, Section 5.102.02, where the 39 change or expansion increases the required area for parking, loading or 40 landscaping by 25 percent or more, shall conform to all parking, loading and 41 landscaping to the standards of the WDO. Parking, loading and landscaping 42 required for changes or expansions of less than 25 percent shall be limited to 43 those necessary to conform with the increment of change or expansion. [WDO 44 3.105.01] Exhibit A Page 5 of 9 26 1 Findin s: The proposed use does not require a Type II or Type III Design Review. 2 Conclusions: Since a Type II or Type III Design Review is not required, the provisions of WDO 3 3.105 do not apply. 4 5 6 WDO 3.106 Landscaaing Standards 7 8 The subject property shall be landscaped to the standards of Section 3.lOb and 3.107.03. 9 [WDO 2.105.06.F.2] 10 The provisions of this section shall apply: 11 A. To the site area for all new structures and related parking EXCLUDING single- 12 family and duplex dwellings and accessory structures; and 13 B. To the entire site area of the development, where the cumulative effect of additions to 14 structures and/or parking areas increases the total area covered by structure and 15 parking by 50 percent or more than existed at the date of the 1'I'DO adoption. [WDO 16 3.106.01 ] 17 Findin s: The application is for Conditional Use approval and the proposed new use of the subject 18 property is essentially the same as the previous use. No new structures, additions to structures, or 19 parking areas are proposed. 20 Conclusions: Since no new structures, additions to structures, or parking areas are proposed, the 21 provisions of WDO 3.106 do not apply. 22 23 24 WDO 3.107 Architectural Design Guidelines and Standards 25 26 The following design guidelines shall be applicable to all non-residential structures and 27 buildings in the RS, R1S, RM, CO, CG and P zones. [WDO 3.107.06.A] 28 Findin s: The use is proposed to be established in an existing non-residential structure in the CG 29 zone. The structure was built in 1967. 30 Conclusions: The structure is a nonconforming structure under WDO 1.104 and is not subject to 31 WDO 3.107. 32 33 34 WDO 3.110 Signs 35 36 The applicant has not submitted details of the proposed signage for review as part of this 37 application. The site sketch shows two pole signs and a wall sign. This land use decision does not 38 authorize the installation of signs. The property owner shall obtain a sign permit prior to the 39 installation of any sign. 40 41 42 Complex: Any group of two or more buildings, or individual businesses within a single 43 building provided at least two of the businesses have separate exterior entrances, on a site that Exhibit A Page 6 of 9 27 1 is planned and developed to function as a unit and which has common on-site parking, 2 circulation and access. A complex may consist of multiple lots or parcels that may or may not 3 be under common ownership. [WDO 3.110.03] 4 Findings; The site contains three buildings, is planned and developed to function as a unit, and has 5 common on-site pazking, circulation and access. 6 Conclusions: The site constitutes a "complex" under WDO 3.110. 7 8 9 Complex. 10 a. A pole sign is permitted on a street frontage that exceeds 1001ineal feet not to exceed 11 one pole sign for a complex. 12 b. A pole sign on a street with less than 3001ineal feet of frontage shall not exceed 15 13 feet in height and 50 square feet in area. [WDO 3.110.16.A.2] 14 Findings: The site sketch shows two existing pole signs in the complex. The City's GIS system 15 shows the site to have approximately 231 feet of street frontage. 16 Conclusions: No more than one pole sign may be authorized on the subject property, per WDO 17 3.110.16.A.2.a. No new pole sign could be established unless the existing pole signs were removed. 18 19 20 Nonconforming signs are those signs lawfully established prior to the adoption of Section 21 3.110 or subsequent amendment thereto or signs lawfully established on property annexed to 22 the City, which do not conform to the requirements of Section 3.110. Nonconforming 23 permanent signs may remain provided they comply with the provisions of Section 3.110.20. 24 [WDO 3.110.20.A] 25 FindinQS: The two existing pole signs are evident in aerial photography taken in 2000 prior to the 26 adoption of WDO 3.110. 27 Conclusions: Since the two existing pole signs were established prior to the adoption of Section 28 3.110, they constitute nonconforming permanent signs subject to WDO 3.110.20. 29 30 31 Nonconforming permanent signs shall comply with the provisions of Section 3.110 when one 32 or more of the following occurs:... A Type II Design Review or Type III Conditional Use or 33 Design Review land use application is approved for the premises upon which the sign is 34 located. In a complex, if as individual tenant space is the subject of a Type II Design Review 35 or Type III Conditional Use or Design Review land use application, only signs attached to 36 such tenant space shall be required to comply with the provisions of Section 3.110. [WDO 37 3.110.20.B.4] 38 Findin s: The property is subject to a Type III Conditional Use. A site inspection found two pole 39 signs. The applicant will convert the existing pole sign in front of the building to a conforming 40 monument sign. The restaurant and auto repair shop each constitute individual tenant spaces. The 41 existing pole sign for the restaurant is not attached to the tenant space of the auto repair shop. 42 Conclusions: Since the restaurant and auto repair shop each constitute individual tenant spaces and 43 the existing pole sign for the restaurant is not attached to the tenant space of the auto repair shop, 44 the existing pole sign for the restaurant is not required to comply with the provisions of Section Exhibit A Page 7 of 9 28 1 3.110. The existing pole sign for the auto repair shop is attached to the tenant space of the auto 2 repair shop and is required by WDO 3.110.20.B.4 to comply with the provisions of Section 3.110. 3 4 5 WDO 5.103.01 Conditional Use 6 7 The proposed use shall be permitted as a conditional use within the zoning district. [WDO 8 5.103.O1.C.1] 9 Findings: WDO 2.106.03.A.1 lists as a conditional use in the CG zone "Motor vehicle and parts 10 dealers (441) EXCEPT automotive parts without installation." WDO 2.106.03.G.1 lists as a 11 conditional use in the CG zone "Automotive maintenance. (8111)" The proposed conditional use is 12 an automotive parts dealership with installation and automotive maintenance. 13 Conclusions: The proposed use of the property is allowed as a conditional use in the CG zone. The 14 criterion of WDO 5.103.O1.C.1 is met. 15 16 17 The proposed use shall comply with the development standards of the zoning district. (WDO 18 5.103.O1.C.2] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Findings: Compliance with the Commercial General (CG) zoning regulations [WDO 2.106] is explained in detail above. Conclusions: The proposed use meets the requirements of WDO 2.106. The proposed use shall be compatible with the surrounding properties. [WDO 5.103.O1.C.3] Findings: A beauty salon and a restaurant exist on the same lot with the proposed use. Two conforming and two nonconforming single-family dwellings abut the north lot line, as does a, professional office, fabric store, restaurant, and auto repair facility. An automobile repair facility abuts the lot on the south and west. A mobile home sales lot and a vacant commercial lot adjoin the lot across Highway 99E. Considerations. Relevant factors to be considered in determining whether the proposed use is compatible include: a. The suitability of the size, shape, location and topography of the site for the proposed use; Findings: The subject property is of adequate size, is irregular in shape but not excessively so, is located on a major arterial street, and is relatively flat. b. The capacity of public water, sewerage, drainage, street and pedestrian facilities serving the proposed use; Findings: The subject property is currently served by public water, sewerage, and drainage facilities. Street access is from a state highway. Sidewalks are not provided. The business is auto-oriented, not pedestrian-oriented. c. The impact of the proposed use on the quality of the living environment: Exhibit A Page 8 of 9 29 1 1) Noise; 2 2) Illumination; 3 3) Hours of operation; 4 4) Air quality; 5 5} Aesthetics; and 6 6) Vehicular traffic. 7 Findings: The previous and proposed use of the property is an automotive parts dealership with 8 installation and automotive maintenance. The proposed use would have impacts on the quality 9 of the living environment similar in nature and extent to those of the previous use regarding 10 noise, illumination, hours of operation, air quality, aesthetics, and vehicular traffic. 11 12 d. The conformance of the proposed use with applicable Comprehensive Ptan policies; 13 Findings: Comprehensive Plan policy B-4 provides that: "Architectural design of commercial 14 areas should be attractive with a spacious feeling and enough landscaping to reduce the visual 15 impact of large expanses of asphalt pazking areas." Comprehensive Plan policy B-6 provides 16 that: "Commercial office and other low traffic generating commercial retail uses can be located 17 on collectors or inclose proximity to residential areas if caze in architecture and site planning is 18 exercised. The City should insure by proper regulations that any commercial uses located close 19 to residential areas have the proper architectural and landscaping buffer zones." The proposed 20 use does not expand, intensify, or alter the pattern of existing development. 21 22 e. The suitability of proposed conditions of approval to insure compatibility of the proposed 23 use with other uses in the vicinity. [WDO 5.103.O1.C.3] 24 Findin s: The proposed conditions of approval minimize the effects of the proposed use vn 25 adjacent property. 26 27 Conclusion: The proposed use meets the criterion of WDO 5.103.O1.C.3. 28 Exhibit A 30 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The property owner shall execute an acceptance of these conditions on a form provided by the City. 2. The property owner shall develop and maintain the subject property in accordance with all provisions of the WDO, whether or not addressed in the staff review, conditions of approval, or public hearing. 3. The property shall be developed in substantial conformity to the plans attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B," except as modified by these conditions of approval. 4. The property owner shall remove the existing pole sign in front of the building or convert it to a monument sign conforming to WDO 3.110. Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 31 - `'~ ~ _ "' ,,"y , ' ~ ' , „fit r yt,: t > .. c A !- f ~ ~nl~' f y h . ~ . , a ,.- ~ J i ~ a 'Y 1 ci ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~'• s'r ` j •, ~ ,y, _ ~ ~~ . [,,r- ~, i l N.r ~ .. - 4{ ice,` _ ~~ f `e } ~ v . ~ ~~`..an.-:. r t jt y "~. r ; i' i; S `r'id 'Y .d~: .i ,r r~ ~ .~ ~r'. ~ .~° ~ '`:~ !_ -•- ~: '..,gyn.,- ~' ""~"'.. ~.'%r" ?.' ~... r ~ i~ ~i d r r ' F ~. 4 1jj' ~~ ~ t t-~~L +~ i ~` ut-. y `y~ ~.~ ~ ';r. '. ~}~i. tl~ ,y b a~! ;~ ~f,~~i!A~~ ~ 1 1, r# a. t r' r r ~ t,[ I ~ •~' .F ,~-1~ 1', ~~.a y't_ ~~'~ ~w, ~rf'" 'rt z ~..A ~ _ ~ ~ '`•~~, i `f~ e m .. .F'-,.+ i ~ 7,;~i~~ L~'~dlfCi' `'-~ ~ y~ ~r ; t` ' .s ~r+T d .. x 4~ ~~1 ~ •~ ~t~ r ~~~ ~.. ~t3 .. t ~ r ~ ~ _ ~~.~ ~n r s. ~" r ~ r' .. .~' ...T'rk~~'' z ~t ~> _` r i i'' p, -~ ."~v: i~~, ~ ~ Vii: •: ~, .~~~, ~f.~•.i ___.~ -5@OR214: Woodburn Interchange -5@OR214: Woodburn Interchange ~~ .~ '.. i OR 274 @ Evergreen Rd.: ', '' _Transi Facililjt~Woodburnl k 4~\~ ~' ~ _ •-' - TAMP -Access Management Alan Fox, R2 Project Leader - Project Leader Responsibilities - Development Process - Roles -Project Objectives & Components - DAP Elements -Risks/Issues/Opportunities - Public Involvement ~, 0 4~E~e9eenR ', __ Transit Facility_(Woodburn~__ Briefing Outline Terry Cole, R2 Lead Planner -Planning Background -Environmental Background {F t -~ ~~~#~ Y i { ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~`~~ ~~ Background -Planning Documents • 1997 - OR 214 Alternatives Analysis • 2000 - I-S/Woodburn Interchange Refinement Plan, CH2MHill, April • 2005 -City of Woodburn Transportation System Plan, 1996, updated • 2005 -City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, 1978, amendments through • 2005 -Woodburn Development Ordinance - ~.~ OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: ',___Tran~it Facilty~Woodburn) + .rr F_~_ 1~~~, Alternatives Considered and Dismissed in the Refinement Plan & EA • Second Interchange at Butteville Road • Second Interchange at St. Louis Road • Split Diamond • Single Point Diamond • Three-level Diamond • Folded Quadrant Diamonds • Tight Diamond • Standard Diamond • Partial Cloverleaf B _,~~~,~~_~.~. , OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Facility IWo_ o i~burn~ _ ___I f ~ +~ ¢ iq",'[Y ,~ ~~~~ __'a Alternatives Advanced in the Refinement Plan & EA • Standard Diamond • Partial Cloverleaf A • Parclo Alternatives Evaluated: »Widen Equal »Widen North ~~ • Parclo Alternative Selected: Widen North -modified .. ~~. ~' - _ - OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: _ _Transi~a~i it Wa db~~ _ s,-, .,.. ~~~ Interchange Environmental Approval • July 2005 -Environmental Assessment • August 2006 -Interchange Area Management Plan (TAMP) • November, 2006 -Revised Environmental Assessment • December 8, 2006 -Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) _, OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: _Transit_Faclity_~Woodbum~ ..~. b~'~d~? ,' ~i , E~-..... _ _ ~a-' Preferred Alternative -Widen North Modified .~ _ ___ w _~ __ .-- _ ___ _ _ ___ ~~ __.___.~__,___.._ _~_ _~ ~, ,~x .. ~\ 1 } 44ax'3,A !a'.an~ ~Wafw~.eA h~ta,¢.Ma:~ro ssnl 4kba~€za ~ ii - -., `,~,~' y n ~ ~~ ,.-. - f ~ ~ / ~~ i t ' + .. ~ i _ ~ a ~_~ f t ,. r ' at ~ x ,> $ ;; ~, _, ~ ~l~u~.v~~t - ~ _,~ ~a ',}u,nta ~ ,_ ~ ~t ~ ~._~ ~ i, f ~ a I i 4'y ~s' ___ ~ ; _ ~ ~ -'~i C ~ !~t ,' ~P ;; ,_ ' ~' , ` .~« z ~'~ _ ~, _ _' _. ~-- _ _._.._ - - - __-~, .o~,~.... ~__~v I . ,.~ __ _._. ~: - .. __..r~ Yy.. ~~. ~~. > _ '_E~EtiEy , ~ ~ k ,r o _-,,p ~. ~ ~ `- ~ ^`_ `gam ~ ~ ~, rid ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,f& ^~!' ;FCrt!1 $ RCYs'4' Lx>CflY ... _.. ' ~ 1 , - - ~ ~ ~ E ~' 54 . t .. .N ~ y, 1 F,' A ~ ~ w- ~~ _. r" t i :~ 4r ~~ ^fJe 4, , '~ ..' .Y ~ _... _.._ r=~u€d ."~.. Q _ ~ , j' r'~tLarrra.9ti w 2: i/r'i~i~r~ lv~r rLtn •••..e OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Tra~Facili~~Woo i~burn~_ ^'~~"~~~~ 111111 !i i ~/~}y~ h f .. ~, Preferred Alternative -Widen North Modified . _ ~ _~ ----__ --___~._ - -_ ~- _ _ r - _ ~_~ _~_ _ s .« ~ i Y r ,'~ a` ~ ~Y (1«'~ AG,xsan €ar~i Fem.. ova C#J {I, ~: ~ i - ~. ~ ~+ . ~ ~ ~' ~: j,. ,-~ td;.gt• ,M Nap P~. aw+use xt ~b~rX .7 - -~ ~ ry ~ ev 7F firax Y ~ ' ~~~ ,~ ~ i r{ ~.,~ e ~ ? :: Ax hH R F" a(tt+.: }3:yiR,~-~'-'Airy I `f ~ a ~~ M t _ T l~ tom' ~~ _ (', q .., r.._.._ ~ - roo j ~ ~ ~ ~,~ 3J Fc ate Lka hbf t~crh _ ~ tY _ • - 1~4 - ~ma ar ~ an. tkh.een .•tw:<nan II.'rb E~sr sen x~r ~'» >4r Ee r ,.eo tin ~} U - -r.~ ~~ ~-i S.w% L=" r . ~ py r ~ o `~S`yq+` n 1 i I j ~ _ t, ~f''~. ~~ J~p~ t ~5 uata s €M ,ecp, Eversraeen WaY cumf /7cr~ »~~~r ~~~ C~~ .~ C 1:. ~f.~ ~ ^_~-.- r ( ~ ... x"~ .~.R. _ ?.t i > ~` S f'L "t:lftQ }~'"~ '~~ ._ r yr'~6 ~ ~ 7I r_cwas. ^ Y. r•~,a~fn G-, t .. ., ~ `~ ' - ,. ~, _ ~. ' » ~' ' 6 ~, ri ~~ ,_ -~ - '-"-'ter ,-.r•-~-•-,•~ ~ T ISii ` .r'.,T..f. .-,_._. ~ -~. ~ O~c~~n 21A ~ ~ C... i +..?~~ ~ ~~~ 1{ r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ stir i I '~.~~ ~ T ~. t ~ ~ T E 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ` ~ i .3 ~ ~ ~ iy.3ooiot _.--~"'"^r ~ ~ '~ r , ,-~ - f,` , ` ~ f ~J bat ise ~~'., c ... ' q - ` . i ~.' ~ r wL ` "Rt r T D ~ Tjll ~ ~ ~_. ___._.. era.. 1 ry 1~.. Yjy ~_ ~ A. ~ .. jdd ~_ _ 'i~ ~} r ~ - '1y., ~ ,~ 9 ~: ~ ' 4eeess Caa~nr une .-r•,+~ _;~ ~ Figure fi * ,~ 3x ~ ~«:, ~,,~ i i'"' ,-- ,~ Wood bum Interchange ImprovemenF,9, ~"` ?. _ ~ ~ ,..~~ .~ _ :.: r ~S e re ~._ ~'ropc iy 8. RQNi Lyra ... .. ____. ». c Widen North ~- ~ lSC,r.Sr1- .w.~ f OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: ', '__ Tra_n~Fa~ility (Wood_burn _ • _.~~ Imp~e'nr'en -~gpllAMp meet k aid Ride pe~elop ~, RAW Acquisition Design relim~nary e P es~gn . lnter~h a 9e F ~na~ D . lnter~h onstru~tion eG . Intercha meet Review . Dever Road Construction . Local n~toring Generation meet of TAMP . Trip . periodic Assess ctions O ~ 4 ~ Eyergree ab~~ __ Transit F~~s~l~.~ tom, ~ -. e~'1+ r.-...' ~, ~~ ~.4~ ~ _ TAMP Trip Budget Overlay Zone Legend Comprehensive Plan Commercial Industrial ~ MDR LegenA N Figure 4 - Reads ., •IC rdDR '"~ ~. a Interchange Management . Tax tas - 37or~ s Area (IMA) Overlay District ~, u;~~r z~,e _.: o;,en Sva<a ,n,aenr.-s ,e ~~, r ~esaen~i~l < Iz o lea ; ,~o z:c,o 3.0~,o I-5/Woodburn TAMP Jomercial Residential%12 Feet Industrial ~~ ~~ Residential < 12 ~.~- Residential > 12 O Open Space ~~ Roads ~~ Tax Lots ~, Overlay Zone OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: __ Transit_Facili~jc~4odburn __ i.> ~ ~ ~~ ,... ~~~ -, :. Overview of Woodburn Projects Fa x.5 6 . }.r ~ - __ %uiT.` i a ~~_~, Woodburn ,. Interchange ,, F.~_._.> ' ~ Park & Ritte~+ -,-. Evergreen Rd. OR 214 a... ~.~ s ~~ ~_~ ~.. ~~ . ~~ ~ _ ~. ~ r-r;~.: Broughton Way -~~'ark Ave. ~ ~ _ Woodland -Ave. .a~..~~,_ ,. tv r:~ r _ _..... ... ,. i~+7t l .a .... - _ tM"swr: r lr=4F,~~ • ldi~ +t7te ~'__ ` '/.~ij{ `:L "' ` _, . ., OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: '_ ....Transit Facili~~Woodburn~ :~4~ ~ ~- ~ ~ _ Project Leader Responsibilities • Scope Management • Schedule Management • Cost Management • Quality Management • Risk Management • Project Team Leadership • Public Involy Management ement/Communications ~M. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Tr nsit Facili~ Woodburn) _ ~"~'1,,,, j~ ~ < ~ ~ ,. r, r, .<_ ~~ Roles • PDT -Project Development » Concept » DAP » Public Involvement -Private Development Review • City » PDT Member » Project & Private Development Review ~~ G?-- - '~ ..;~.,. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: _ Tr~nsi Facilty_(Woodburn~__ Project Developmen TfaOSIII{Jn tt Maintenaac+ .~~`t, On,Site 1'tofk Before ~: '~ Begins On-Site Wor4s ~'~~ ${+ginS .'~,`fj r,~ ~~! ,~ C~ :. Y ~ ~~MM ~ ~ytlyly~~. . aTLP FrotecE ~ We are ~n~f~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~vizonme~f~l here Re~r~~ a~p~ov~~ DQSign ~ ~~ We are oin 9 9 to here I~tSY$f1iS@ ~ SNt Plans, Ft~~dl ~~,'~ ~re(ir~inaty I~Yt3fd ~~~~ ~ $~8ifi~3~ifr?k5 $~ ~~1 ~t~+~„~15 Pt~as far C~atraet Desic~'B~Bu~ld ' Est~ma~s #~r '~r GR'15ItG'L~aJR '~flnstn~ct~rr~ ._ -,~ ~..._.m._...._ .r.~ ..,. _ . C~R51dtlCliOn ..~ .. _ _._ _ ~..__..._..,.~..,..~ ~,~.~ ~ \ ` It t i t 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: i~~tit,E,iti:+,>,i ,~~ ~ ist .,~_,,~~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~~ ~~~s~~', .7.YYy ~~ Project Objectives • Improved Connectivity - Design a fully improved interchange - Design a fully improved P & R facility - Connect Evergreen Rd. w/Country Club Ct. • Aesthetics compatible with gateway location - Interchange design - City development Code - Interchange & Transit Facility • Stakeholder Involvement - Aesthetic treatment of interchange - Traffic Control Plan • Complete DAP package ....~_..,~ ~-~-. ', OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: '__ _ Transit. Facility (W_ood_burn~ • Interchange and Layout Sheets • Plans & Design Narrative -footprint complete and ready for ROW acquisition • Design Exceptions/concurrences & access management deviations impacting footprint obtained • Roadside Development Preliminary Concept • Offsite material source decisions made ,~~ _ ~ ~,x on 2ta~e.a.s...~na.: ' TrgR4H Eae11l(yfwootlbum~. ". DAP Elements ~~ ~. ~"~ ' ',' I J . , re 4Y iR'~~:. y F ~t .. _ DAP Elements (contd.) • Traffic Mitigation and Communi Plan w/concurrence by affected agencies • Construction Staging Plan • Intergovernmental Agreements cations completed • Engineering Disciplines address local concerns • Public Involvement completed for all relevant desi n decisions ~-~ ~--~.-_ g ~"~ OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Fa~ltat (-Woodburn __ ~-~~ .~'f ..: Er-j~r" ~ .,ate.,.... ~ ~~~ Project Risks /Issues /Opportunities • High level of OTC Interest • Gateway to Woodburn- aesthetic issues • Three physically connected projects • City Contribution to project ($8 million) • Private development - on both sides of Evergreen Rd. and redevelopment of other quadrants • Escalating land values • Unknown utility relocations • Potential wetlands • Topography -relatively flat area; drainage issues ,~.~=~= . ,~ ~- OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: i _Transit_Facility (Woodburn '~ I 'O' _ ~ ~~ I~ A h~~~ ~~k b~ ~ 1D O ~ a=' a,~' z a ~~ I *I o. _ ..~ `~~`~``'~~ _ Ip I !( I ~I! ~~~_ `• I ~II` `~ ~ ' ~ t l ~ ! ~'i i I ~, }'~~ ,., ,_„ • '. ~ ~ ~' .--* _ . - _.~.....-.~«..-~vw. ~~ 1 ~. _..~ `fir--~_,,,~ ~-T-=-~ ~ " ~-- ~,x u ~J ~ ~r ~ l T x ` ~s fX,uB ROA@ t t 1 t , 4. ~ a 1 t t ,,~ ;~ ' \~```~ i ~ ~~ ~~ ~' , ~ = ~ e.k~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~€ 1 1 ~~~'~ R)' 1.1~Fl~ ~~~, ~af~i iz~~:Y +j ~ 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ar ~ ~ .~s n ~ . - , ;, _~_~~ ~ ~~ n O O 0 v 0 3 c~ 11 ~. w w, ~~ ~>> ~~~ ~, ~ ~~~~~~ Public Involvement External to Proiect • Public Meeting on Transit alternative design concepts shelters, site amenities and elements Facility: the two for landscaping, other visual Internal Proiect Meetings • Kickoff Informational Meeting w/Stakeholders • Aesthetic Considerations • Traffic Control Plan OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: __ Transit Facility ~Woodburn~___ r ~Ji, ._ End OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Facility (Woodburn) ~~ " ~. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transi~_Fa~ili~t~Wood rn~ ,; , ~~~~~~ ~. €~-~~ - - _ Reserve Slides ~~ ~P. .»~ ~~. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Facility_(Woodburn~ ___ E ~~~~~'~~!~~~~ ~~~~'~. .., ~. ~ r ~i ' t ~ .~ ~~, _ _ ~\ '/ ~~ ~ ~ ~ - t i ~ North Access Road ', t ~ ~~ ~ ,.~ - ._-. ~ Two Way .j t I ~' `: West Access Raad ;~ __ _ -- ^~, i ~ ~ ~ ' -`; ~, Twa Way ~ f ~ ,, ~ r' ! ~ "' _ ~ _ 5 -2vr-12,4 -~,:, " . ~ ,~~ i 3 ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ . _~ .. _ _--~-_ .~ _ a ~ ~~'~'~` ~ ~ ., ~ SauthAccess Raad - ~~ ~ ~ ~' t~.., ,: 3-'fin {- '~'4~ I~ ; ~ ,;- One Way Bus Only Left Out Turns „.. ;;#+~ ~ ~ { ~ IjV S Park and Ride Fac>Tty Only , - -, ~,, !~ ~ ~ ~ .. ,, ,. ~ ~ ,. -, s - -~~~ ~ ~ EverareenRoad u.. . -_ __ __ ~ - - ~--~~~~_- e _~. __ .._ .~,_ ~ ~~ Oxon 214 f ~, _ ___ ,~ ~S , K..~. .~ .. . ~ .. _ _ - _-~ .~.. ~.~. ~. _~ ------~~. "~" i 4 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit. Facility. (Woodburn~___ Access Control ~~.~ ~` Y4~ .. ~ ~ ~_w_. _ "., ~,ti ~ __ ~W Preferred Alternative -Widen North ~~ r ~- -_-_~ ~ ~E& ~..~ y f ,.,t a [ ~,~, ,. r i ~ ~ e. ~ .~ "'*7a4' f ~ Fair ~ ~ ' S ;' ~- _ 1- ~ ' "`q ~ ~ J.: a ~. `J t~p~: ~-:Y~j .. ! H.mfa;.r ~ ,~ ~ . ~ ~ s. _ ux ar ~ ~.G -- ~ ,•= s ~.... ~ :: `- ~` ~ < .5!ks7,x dSa.08c•..sea+l~'acJxat~a at*arxe=y~an. Ramtl 3 z ~ ~~ .~ , r, _,,~, -...~ ~ ~ .T ~ ~ c. r <i t ' -~. ~~. ~',~ ~ .- a ~ ~ ' , .. ~ , 3 f ~ ~`-~ t ~ i"~' g - _ - ~k~Iner RCS ~ .~,~~ G ~ ~ ~ ~. F __ ~ r _' 1 r ~ ` ~ r ~ .~.. _ ,~ _ .. ... . ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ - a ~ ~ ,%w ~ - t ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ,- ---_ -, -- _ ~ ~ j .~- ., _ ~: r i ro d. ,~ .._i ,- ~ ; ~j ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ r~ .-. s ... it ~,.. x . 31m Yom' 1..___Jyar. 2 ~l ~ y .. AA , c 7 c A ~ ~~ r ~ i 3 ; ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ '.~ r~ r ,~ Golf ~' ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 _~ k ~ ~° ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ 3 ''V f ~ `~ ' t ` * ~ t y ~.. _.. 1 ~ ~ ~ -.~_ _ ..~ ~ ~ ~ to rr~u ,... W s, a_ ~ ,p ~ _ Staccp A ~wr e4oy }pity ~, t ~s v t~ ~ > .~. ,r ~ ~ ~ ~"'` Z`+~~ ~ , ~ h ~" t ",~..1 Atla u~Jts ve FS Yn.iH3g ?iu! ~.~ OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: '' Transit_Facility_(Woodburn) __ Er ~~~1 *~ s. ~, r. ~~~ k r } ~"R... ._ Implementing Actions Park & Ride and Evergreen Rd. ~ ~, r ~ ~~.M . _. ~ . ,. ~ ~ ,, s~ Interstate - 5 ~ s,, ~ ~* _ », ~~ ~ f.~, ' ~ - - - ;~ ,, ~w' Y+ ~, r -~ t' i - ~~ ~ Evergreen Rd. _ rv,. ~ t ~ ~.. __ - ~ Extension " ,~ ~ `~ Park & Ride Facilit ~- ~ ~` ~± , y n .,~.-; = ~ Oregon 214 ~- ~ ~ ~~ _~~~~ _ r-~" Woodburn Interchange _ R ~t :. T _ n _ .. a ~' w OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: '_ Transit Faci_lity_(Woodburn) ~, ~ '~~~ ~,~ ._ ~~ OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Facility Project Scope Country Club Court ----~-- --s-~ -~,-, - - -~r-^"" ~~; X. ~ r ~ _ ~`` ~~. { t fj Z :n-..y,. _1 f L..""L-" _... t~...Cy-- - .. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: Transit Facil~~Woodburn~__ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ f P'alrt~ i /. s ;z • "/ E~arbr r .~ .. Nor€x_~s ,'+ , f Y R I Evergreen Rd. '~ '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ _„ Extension ,-~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~' <: L '~ I -• i P ~ ~ ~ .. f7 i~ f' Project PRELIMINARY Cost Estimate (Inflated to 2010) • PE $ 5,332,000 • ROW 17,019,000 • UR 2,959,000 • Construction 47.000.000 Total: $72,310,000 .._ . OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: '_ ___Transit Facility_(Woodburn~__! ~ '`' '~. ~ hy C~~~ `µ~~~dif ~'. Current Project Budget • PE (To DAP) • ROW $1,626,163 92,000 • UR -0 - • Construction - 0 - Total: $1,718,616 ~.. OR 214 @ Evergreen Rd.: ', Transit .Facility ~WQOdburn~__'