Loading...
Minutes - 02/26/2007 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING 0001 DATE. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, FEBRUARY 26, 2007. CONVENED. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Figley presiding. 0025 ROLL CALL. Mayor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Councilor Figley Bjelland Cox Lonergan McCallum Nichols Sifuentez Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Staff Present: City Administrator Brown, City Attorney Shields, Public Works Director Tiwari, Police Chief Russell, Community Development Director Allen, Finance Director Gillespie, Public Works Manager Rohman, City Recorder Tennant 0055 APPOINTMENTS. Mayor Figley appointed KaimafPatel, owner of the Budget Inn located on Highway 99E, to serve on the Wastewater Rate Advisory Committee. 0122 CONSENT AGENDA. A) approve the regular and executive session Council minutes of February 12,2007; B) accept the Planning Commission minutes of February 8, 2007; C) accept the Recreation and Park Board minutes of February 13,2007; D) receive the report on Claims for January 2007; E) receive the Police Department Statistics report for January 2007; F) receive the Community Services Department statistics report for January 2007; and G) receive the Country Club Road tree removal report. Mayor Figley stated that she would be pulling Item Goff ofthe Consent Agenda since there are individuals in the audience who would like to speak to the Council on this issue. COX/MCCALLUM... adopt Items A through F of the Consent Agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 0204 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD TREE REMOVAL REPORT. Jim White, 769 McNary Estates, Keizer, stated that he was the realtor that had sold the home located at 1400 Astor Way to the current owner, Sonja Westland, last fall. He stated that Ms. Westlund had come to City Hall today to discuss the removal of the trees and installation of the sidewalk next to her home, however, she felt intimidated by the City Administrator which is why she is at this meeting to express her feelings to the Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 .. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING Council on this issue. Mr. White stated that there had been a meeting in Senior Estates about a year ago when a City staff representative told the Senior Estates homeowners that they would not be installing sidewalks within Senior Estates. Residents in the area are now fearful that if sidewalks are installed on Country Club Road to Astor Way then more sidewalks will be installed within this area which is something the residents do not want to see occur. He stated that when he sold the house to Ms. Westlund, he was not aware of the Country Club Road improvement project which will soon take place. Sonja Westlund, 1400 Astor Way, stated that she had moved to this area to be near family and the rose garden and trees along Country Club Road which abuts her property were one of the main reasons for purchasing this particular piece of property. It was her understanding that Senior Estates homeowners had been polled by the City about two years ago about sidewalks and the homeowners had rejected the proposal. She objected to placement of the sidewalk since it would (1) only be a short section within Senior Estates, (2) eliminate the existing shrubbery screen, (3) bring pedestrians within 12 feet of the entire length of her home, and (4) eliminate her privacy. She expressed concern that installing this sidewalk would provide the City an opening for constructing more sidewalks within Senior Estates. She also expressed concern that the sidewalk access will bring more people into the nearby Senior Estates park and there will be more litter along the sidewalk area which she will need to pick up in order to keep her yard area clean. She felt that her property would lose some value if the sidewalk is installed and her privacy is eliminated. Paul Ribali, 1401 Astor Way, questioned if the project includes his property since there have been a number of markings placed on and adjacent to his property. Additionally, this is the first time he had heard about the sidewalks and removal of trees. Mayor Figley stated that this project involves the installation of sidewalks on both sides of Country Club Road between Boones Ferry Road and Astor Way. Within the City's more recent Transportation Plan, the City had rejected a proposal to install sidewalks throughout Senior Estates, however, the City did include two locations within Senior Estates for sidewalk installation. Public Works Director Tiwari stated that there will be no improvement west of Astor Way and the markings show where the underground utilities are located. Senior Estates sidewalks in the Transportation Plan are located on Hayes Street, on Country Club Road between Astor Way and Boones Ferry Road, and on the east side of Cascade. He stated that sidewalks need to get to an intersection where a wheelchair ramp can be installed. He also stated that he is willing to work with the property owners abutting the sidewalk to see what can be done to satisfy some of the safety concerns ofthe property owners. The City does have a 13-foot public right of way adjacent to the existing street thereby allowing the City to build the sidewalk, however, the City is still willing to look at alternatives that would help the property owners to feel more secure. The proposed sidewalk would be 5-foot wide along the curb line to Astor Way and trees I landscaping will be replaced. The Country Club improvement project is a part of a local assessment Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 .'1 ~. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING district and costs associated with the sidewalk installation will not be charged to these property owners as per the Council decision when the assessment district was originally formed. Councilor Cox questioned if a lawn strip would be placed between the curb and sidewalk. Director Tiwari stated that the sidewalk would be placed along the curb line and the only roadway to be widened within this project is from Boones Ferry Road to the west property line of Senior Estates. He had considered a proposal to curve the sidewalk around the trees but that would put the sidewalk even closer to her home. Councilor Lonergan questioned if there was a bike path on this side of the roadway. Director Tiwari stated that the bike lane is on the paved portion of the roadway. Mayor Figley felt that the City should work with the residents to offer the maximum in privacy and minimum of disruption. In regards to the installation of a fence, Director Tiwari stated that a fence is allowed along the property line and the property owner will need to go to the Community Development Department to obtain information on fence regulations and the fence permi 1. Councilor Cox expressed his appreciation to the individuals who addressed the Council to express their concerns since they were not familiar with what the project entailed. He stated that the development of the Transportation System Plan and the exclusion ofthe Senior Estates sidewalks was not an easy decision. The location of the sidewalk is on public property and the City has a right to install the sidewalk but the question is whether it should be done. He feels that placement of the sidewalk along the curb line is the best location in already developed areas since it is not as disruptive to existing landscape. In regards to the trees, they have been trimmed very heavily over the years due to the overhead power lines and he felt that ifthe City would replant the trees with ones that will not grow as tall, then, after a few years, the trees will look better than the trees proposed to be removed. Additionally, by placing the sidewalk along the curb line, Ms. Westlund's rose garden will not be affected by this project. Mayor Figley requested that the Public Works Department work with the property owners to make this experience as pleasant as possible. MCCALLUM/COX... adopt Consent Agenda item G. The motion passed unanimously. 2380 PUBLIC HEARING - SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-07. Mayor Figley declared the public hearing open at 7:40 p.m.. Finance Director Gillespie stated that the proposed supplemental budget had been reviewed by the Budget Committee at their January 27,2007 workshop, however, staff is also proposing two additional adjustments within the General Fund for Council consideration. He reviewed the revenue and expenditure adjustments detailed in the staff report. The beginning fund balance adjustment for all funds totaled $359,117 with additional revenues totaling $615,854. Expenditure adjustments totaled $535,406, contingency funds increased by $1,278,377, and reserves increased by $232,000. It was Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 .' .' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING also noted that the increase in the General Fund contingency brings the contingency amount up to 10.8% of budgeted General Fund expenditures. The additional changes proposed by staff are (1) that Library Administration program supplies and services expense of $141 ,420 not be transferred to the newly created Community Services program since Library Administration has a specific need for Library supplies and services, and (2) the copier proposed in the Technical & Environmental Services budget be purchased rather than leased and a transfer in the amount of $4,500 be made from the contingency account to the capital account instead of the proposed transfer of$2,000 between materials & services and capital outlay within the Engineering program. If the proposed changes are approved, the beginning fund balance adjustment for all funds totals $359,117 with additional revenues totaling $615,854. Expenditure adjustments total $535,406, contingency funds increase by $1,278,377, and reserves will increase by $232,000. No one in the audience commented on the proposed supplemental budget. Mayor Figley declared the public hearing closed at 7:55 p.m.. COX/NICHOLS... direct staff to draft an ordinance with the two changes proposed by the Finance Director, one being in the Library and Community Services administrative services area and the other in the Technical and Environmental Services fund for the copier purchase. Councilor Bjelland questioned if the City would be acquiring laptop computers for the Mayor and Council as an alternative to the agenda packets and if so, would it be accomplished prior to July 1. Administrator Brown stated that staff is doing the research on the laptop requirements and total cost for the equipment. The Council can appropriate the necessary funds for the equipment through a contingency transfer anytime before the end of the current fiscal year. The motion passed unanimously. 3658 COUNCIL BILL NO. 2655 - ORDINANCE PROVIDING A PROCESS FOR THE FORCED CONVERSION OF ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATION FACILITIES UNDER THE AUTHORITY DELEGATED BY THE STATE OF OREGON. Council Bill No. 2655 was introduced by Councilor Sifuentez. Recorder Tennant read the two readings of the bill by title only since there were no objections from the Council. Councilor Cox referred to the staff memo in the agenda packet which recommends either confirmation or amendment of the Council's November 30,2006 consensus to underground overhead utilities on the remaining portions of the North Front Street improvement project, and adoption of the Council Bill which would provide for a process for the forced conversion of electric and communications facilities. He stated that he is opposed to undergrounding the full length of the North Front Street project until such time as funding has been identified and ratepayers will not be charged for the forced Page 4 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26, 2007 .. ~. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING conversion charges. Since the proposed ordinance is before the Council only for the purpose of addressing the particular problem as it relates to forced conversion, he did not feel that the ordinance should be adopted at this time. He reminded the Council that this is an Urban Renewal project which was sold to the voters of the City as a program that would improve specific areas of the City and he did not think that it was ever suggested that anything the City did would involve costs other than the money that was generated through urban renewal. In this case, the City is not proposing to levy a tax but it will have the same affect on everyone within the City since the cost to construct a portion of the underground utilities will be a charge on the consumers electric bill. Once the City requires PGE to do the undergrounding of electrical lines, they can go to the State's Public Utility Commission (PUC) to request a special service fee to be imposed on all electric users within the City to recoup their cost to do the work. Also, PGE will be in charge of the underground project and the City will have no control over costs whatever it may end up being. Staff has provided in the staffreport some estimates of the cost to the ratepayer and, even though it is a fairly nominal amount, they are just estimates at this time. He feels that this would be a hidden tax being imposed without any vote on their part, therefore, it would be a breach of faith of what the City undertook to do when the urban renewal district was formed. He does not object to undergrounding but revenue sources need to be identified and they should not be billed to the electric users within the City. He stated that he had not been at the November 30,2006 workshop and does not know the context in which the consensus was arrived at, but he encouraged the Council to take a good look at this issue and slow down on this decision until the City has a handle on the money situation. If necessary, he would suggest that the ordinance be amended to say that no order will be imposed on any utility to underground except if it is approved by a vote of the people. He reiterated his opinion that it should be up to the people to decide if they want to pay for undergrounding. He stated that he would be voting no on this ordinance and encouraged the other Councilors to do likewise. Mayor Figley stated that the Councilors in attendance at the workshop felt strongly that infrastructure projects promised at the time the urban renewal district was approved be completed. In her opinion, this is the City's only chance to do the undergrounding and in order to convert from overhead to underground utilities, it involves some undergrounding of side streets due to PGE's system configuration. Additionally, South Front Street was completed first and now has underground utility lines and the City has an obligation to underground the complete Front Street project. She shared Councilor Cox's concerns in that she would like to use some other revenue source if it were available but there does not seem to be any other source. Staff has continued to look for other sources in addition to discussing with PGE what cost economies might be available. Councilor Lonergan agreed with Mayor Figley in that there was a commitment to get this project done and, at the workshop, the Council spent a long time looking at the price and revenue options. He requested staffto comment on the costs for the undergounding and if those costs can be controlled through PGE. Page 5 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 ., .. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING Administrator Brown referred to his staff report in the agenda packet which provided initial cost estimates along with additional cost estimates for PGE conversion charges, additional distances for required side-street undergrounding, and changes in grade through the Hardcastle Street intersection. He agreed with Councilor Cox in that the costs could be higher when it is finally complete but he assured the Council that PGE has worked hard to try and provide a realistic cost estimate to the City. He stated that staff has talked to PGE about both options one of which would be the City controlling the project and the other where PGE would control the project. He felt that it would be cleaner ifPGE controlled the project and he did not feel that PGE would be doing anything more than just replace the system. Councilor McCallum questioned if the City would have any monitoring controls to see if the City was being charged a 15-20% administrative cost ifit was PGE's project. Administrator Brown stated that staff is dealing with a combination of both PGE public affairs and technical staff and as of this date, administrative fees have not been brought up as a cost in addition to what has already been factored into their estimates. He stated that he would like to get a decision from the Council as to whether or not to use this method to fund the project as currently designed. Another option would be to take about $500,000 out of the cost of this project which roughly equates to the stretch of undergrounding that runs from Hardcastle Avenue north to Highway 214 overpass. Funding sources in Phase I of the Front Street project included urban renewal funds and other City revenue sources and the two Phases yet to be completed also include a combination of urban renewal funds and other City revenue sources. This project has never been planned to stand alone as an urban renewal budget cost because there would never be enough funds available to complete this project in addition to other projects outlined in the urban renewal plan. At this time, he is recommending $2,050,000 of urban renewal money for this project and, if the project is extended one year, then there will be some additional funds available but not enough to meet the $500,000 shortfall. He continues to look for other funding sources, submitted an application for Economic Development funds, and will be meeting with the Governor's Economic Development team to try and find some money for this project. He will continue to diligently work to find the additional funds to complete the project even up until the time PGE would go before the Public Utility Commission for a rate adjustment but, in the meantime, the utility district is an opportunity for the City to raise the necessary funds for the entire project. In regards to the ordinance, it would only require the City to notify those residents that are within the underground utility district which is a considerably smaller area than those of which the cost would be spread over. The notice to these residents are required since they will have some responsibilities under this ordinance to deal with there own connection to their residence and, as in the past, the City may be able to help offset some of those costs to the residents. If this ordinance is adopted, the City will notify everybody in the PGE franchise area that will see the rate adjustment on their bill which will then give them the opportunity to come to the public hearing that the ordinance Page 6 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 9' .,.. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING requires to express their opinion. Councilor McCallum expressed his concern about continuing to delay this project since Front Street north of Hardcastle continues to deteriorate and there is a health and safety issue involved. 5631 Councilor Cox stated that he is not suggesting that the street improvement be abandoned nor is he suggesting that the City scrap the undergrounding of utility lines. However, there is a $500,000 shortfall between the funds that can be identified and the total project cost estimate. By telling PGE to proceed with the project, they will go to the Public Utility Commission to get a rate adjustment since they are entitled to recover as much of their expense as they can convince the Public Utility Commission that is reasonable. He felt that the City should go ahead with the project without passing this ordinance and, if some of the other sources ofrevenue do become available, then do the undergrounding portion of the project even ifit is at a later date. Administrator Brown stated that he did not disagree with Councilor Cox but this is a project that the City is trying to move along and he is unable to provide answers to all of the questions posed by the Council, however, there is a need to move forward on the design work on this project. He requested that Council give staff some direction on the previous Council action to have the engineer hold in abeyance any electrical work on the section of Front Street north of Hardcastle. The estimated cost for this portion of the engineering work is $25,000 and he would like to see this work done in the anticipation that funding can be found from some other source and it can then be installed at the time the street improvement is being made. Mayor Figley felt strongly that North Front Street have underground utilities and that the City not incur, not only the inefficiencies, but the substantially higher cost for installing underground utilities after the street has already been improved. She felt that the Council should authorize the design work to move forward even if the project needs to be delayed in order to find a funding source other than forced conversion. 6400 Councilor Bjelland expressed his opinion that the downtown area needs to have underground utilities and would like to see undergrounding out to Highway 214 but questioned when a final decision needs to be made on undergrounding for the portion from Hardcastle out to Highway 214. Administrator Brown stated that the City is quickly approaching a time period in which a decision needs to be made in order for PGE to get the job started and finished during the next construction season. At this point, staff has been discussing with PGE the undergrounding of the entire span which has been recommended by PGE in order to keep the costs down. He is unable to give a definite date for the Council to make a decision but the undergrounding needs to be done before any street work is started in this construction season. The plan is to do street work from Highway 214 to Hardcastle during this construction season and the remaining portion from Hardcastle to Cleveland in the following construction season. Councilor Bjelland stated that if the undergrounding is not done now then it will never be Page 7 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26, 2007 '" ...' COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING undergrounded and the question is what is the value of having underground and does it justify the additional cost to the ratepayer if forced conversion is the decision made by the Council. Even though he would prefer not to see a small increase on utility bills, it may be the only way that is feasible in order to accomplish what is in the public's best interest. Mayor Figley questioned if the Council needs to formalize their consensus of what they want to do regarding the undergrounding issue prior to voting on the Council Bill. City Attorney Shields stated that the two issues are related and the Council can take action on either issue first. Tape 2 Councilor Bjelland expressed his opinion that passing the ordinance would not obligate the City to force conversion rather it gives the City the right to do forced conversion along with the process to follow in order to establish an underground utility district. He felt that voting on the ordinance could be done at this meeting and the other issue can be voted on after the Council Bill. Councilor Cox agreed that passing the ordinance does not obligate the City to a course of action but the City has taken incremental steps with each one getting closer to the formation of underground utility district. He agreed that passage of the ordinance would not require formation of the utility district and reiterated his position that only the work that can be done with the money identified be completed at this time. Even though undergrounding is good when improving a street, he did not see it as a high priority since the City has so many other capital needs. Councilor Bjelland stated that he did not see where the $500,000 would be removed from other City sources to be used for this project rather funds obtained would be specifically for this project and could not be used for general capital projects. Councilor Nichols expressed his opinion that delaying the project will cost substantially more and if undergrounding is decided upon, then it is best to do it now even if a utility district is formed and ratepayers see an additional charge on their electrical bill. Mayor Figley called for a vote on the Council Bill. On roll call vote for final passage, the vote was 5-1 with Councilor Cox voting nay. Since an ordinance can only pass by unanimous vote at the first meeting in which the bill was introduced and read, this bill will be brought back to the Council at the next regular meeting for final action. 0312 MCCALLUM/NICHOLS... underground North Front Street from Hardcastle Avenue to the Highway 214 overpass and give staff authorization to proceed with the electrical engineering work for that portion of the project. The motion passed 5-1 with Councilor Cox voting nay. For the record, Councilor Cox stated that he would separately vote yes on going ahead with the engineering but he is voting against the motion since it is tied to proceeding with the undergrounding project. Page 8 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007 .'1 " COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING 0406 COUNCIL BILL NO. 2656 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INTER-FUND LOAN FROM THE WATER CONSTRUCTION FUND TO THE SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND. Council Bill No. 2656 was introduced by Councilor Sifuentez. The bill was read by title only since there were no objections from the Council. On roll call vote for final passage, the bill passed unanimously. Mayor Figley declared Council Bill No. 2656 duly passed. 0452 MARION COUNTY INTERAGENCY METHAMPHETAMINE STRIKE FORCE AGREEMENT. Staff recommended Council authorization to participate in the newly formed team of narcotic investigators which includes law enforcement personnel from Woodburn, Salem, and Keizer Police Departments, Marion County Sheriffs office, and support from Oregon State Police and the Oregon Department of Justice. This program is funded through a grant which is included in the proposed 2006-07 supplemental budget. BJELLAND/MCCALL UM... authorize the Chief of Police to sign the Interagency Agreement in order to provide a Meth Strike Force Investigator. The motion passed unanimously. 0490 POSITION UPGRADE: EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN. Staff recommended the upgrading of the Police Evidence Technician position from 30 hours per week to 40 hours per week to process evidence recovered by police officers, assist in processing major crime scenes, and to document, log, and store evidence maintaining the proper chain of custody. BJELLAND/COX... authorize the upgrade of the Evidence Technician from part-time (.75 FTE) to full-time (1.0 FTE). The motion passed unanimously. 0535 ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - BROWN STREET. Conveyances for public right of way and utility easement were submitted by PMFB LLC and Rose Zeinka in conjunction with the Boones Crossing Phase Two subdivision NICHOLS/COX.... accept the Public Rights of Way as described on Attachment "A" and "B", and the Public Utility Easement as described on Attachment "C" in the agenda packet. The motion passed unanimously. 0535 AGREEMENT WITH KJM FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Staff recommended an addendum to the agreement with KJM and Associates for construction management services relating to the construction of the new police facility. Page 9 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26, 2007 ., COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING BJELLAND/NICHOLS... authorize the City Administrator to execute the addendum to the agreement for construction management services with KJM and Associates, Ltd.. The motion passed unanimously. 0560 NORTH MARION COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS (NORCOM) LEASE AGREEMENT. Staff recommended that Council authorize the execution of an agreement with NORCOM for leasing 1,750 square feet within the new facility and allowing them use of other common areas within the facility. NICHOLS/MCCALLUM... authorize the City Administrator to execute the lease agreement with North Marion County Communications (NORCOM). The motion passed unanimously. 0588 PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS. A) Planning Commission's approval of Subdivision 06-02, Variance No. 06-15, Variance 06-16 and SWOD (Significant Westland Overlay District) No. 06-02 located at 344 Hardcastle Avenue. The Planning Commission's final order allows for subdividing 1.6 acres into 6 single-family residential lots. No action was taken by the Council to bring this land use action up for review. 0625 CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS. City Administrator Brown stated that review of Council goals with the Department Heads will take several hours and he questioned the Council as to whether they would prefer a workshop on March 10, 2007 or a later date in order to meet with staff and review the goals. Following a brief discussion on this issue, Administrator Brown stated that he would contact each Councilor to see what date would work best for all the members. 0809 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS. Councilor McCallum reminded the public that the Woodburn Kiwanis Club and the French Prairie Kiwanis Club will be sponsoring the annual Mayor's Prayer Breakfast on March 16,2007, from 6:30 am unti18:00 am. Councilor Sifuentez stated that she is MacLaren's Chairperson for the Governor's Food Drive and donations received from MacLaren's efforts will be given to the AWARE Food Bank. She stated that a $1.00 donation will purchase 6 pounds of food and she encouraged the Mayor and Councilors to contribute to this fundraiser since the food bank is in need of food for distribution to local residents. Councilor Cox stated that he was pleased with the letter Administrator Brown wrote on the proposed limitation of Parks System Development charges and with the letter Attorney Shields has written to LCDC regarding the appeal of a portion of a partial remand of periodic review task 3.b relating to the City's transportation system plan. Page 10 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26, 2007 9' ...- I<- .. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 26, 2007 TAPE READING 0950 EXECUTIVE SESSION. Mayor Figley stated that Attorney Shields has informed her that he did not need to meet with the Council on current litigation or litigation likely to be filed, therefore, she entertained a motion to adjourn into executive session under the authority of ORS 192.660(1)(d) to conduct deliberations on labor negotiations. NICHOLS/MCCALLUM... adjourn to executive session under the authority ofORS 1 92.660(1)(d). The motion passed unanimously. The Council adjourned to executive session at 8:47 p.m. and reconvened at 9:04 p.m.. 0968 Mayor Figley stated that no action was taken by the Council while in executive session. 0989 ADJOURNMENT. NICHOLS/MCCALLUM... meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.. ~ - ~, / ~ OR /~ \ I \ L '-.I ATTEST q~~ ~~,J- Mary T e ant, Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page 11 - Council Meeting Minutes, February 26,2007