The URL can be used to link to this page

Ord. 2643 - Transportation System Plan (TSP) Revision and WDO Amendment COUNCIL BILL NO. 3293 ORDINANCE NO. 2643 AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN ("TSP") TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECENT URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY ("UGB") EXPANSION AND AMENDING THE WOODBURN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ("WDO") RELATED TO THE INTERCHANGE MANAGEMENT AREA (IMA) (LA 23-01) WHEREAS, ORS 197.175 requires cities to prepare, adopt, and implement Comprehensive Plans consistent with statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and WHEREAS, Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 12 requires cities, counties and the state to create a transportation system plan that takes into account all relevant modes of transportation: mass transit, air, water, rail, highway, bicycle and pedestrian; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) was last updated in 2019 to guide the management of the appropriate transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, periodic revisions and updates to the TSP are necessary and expected to comply with statutes and administrative rules, administer new and revised long-range plans, and address current issues; and WHEREAS, there has been unprecedented commercial and residential development in the southwest area of the city; and WHEREAS, the City recently completed a UGB expansion, adding 237 acres of new industrial land in the southwest area; and WHEREAS, the current 2019 TSP does not account for the recent development or the recent UGB expansion; and WHEREAS, In July 2023, the City Council directed staff to initiate the hiring of a consultant (Kittleson & Associates) to update the 2019 TSP to address recent developments; and WHEREAS, the City received grant support from Business Oregon to assist with the development of the revised TSP; and Page - 1 - Council Bill No. 3293 Ordinance No. 2643 WHEREAS, the process was led by a professional consultant with input from a Technical Advisory Committee which included representatives from DLCD, Marion County, ODOT, and technical staff from the city; and WHEREAS, within the study area for the TSP revisions, the City also has an Interchange Management Area (IMA) overlay zoning district, which is intended to guide development around the 1-5/OR 214 interchange, focusing on managing traffic, promoting planned industrial growth (part of the Southwest Industrial Reserve - SWIR), and ensuring high-quality development; and WHEREAS, in 2005 the City entered into an Interchange Management Area (IMA) agreement with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT); and WHEREAS, as part of the IMA agreement, a 20-year budget cap on peak hour trips within the IMA Overlay District was incorporated into the City's WDO; and WHEREAS, the 20-year peak hour trip budget for the District sunsets at the end of 2025 and the City desires that change to be reflected in revisions to the City's WDO; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 23, 2025 and unanimously recommended approval of the TSP and WDO amendments to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Woodburn City Council held a public hearing on December 8, 2025, and tentatively approved the legislative amendments on a unanimous vote; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. For purposes of this ordinance amendment, all new text is shown as underlined (i.e. new text) and all deleted text is shown as stricken (i.e. deleted #-ex#). After this ordinance amendment is adopted, the Community Development Director shall correct the TSP and WDO to incorporate all revisions contained herein. Section 2. The revised Transportation System Plan (Exhibit A), attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted as an element of Volume II of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. The Woodburn Development Ordinance is amended as specified in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Page - 2 - Council Bill No. 3293 Ordinance No. 2643 Section 4. The legislative action taken by this Ordinance is explained and justified by the Analyses & Findings document attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C. Approved as to form: 00 City t tp4"Iho"e y Date Approved: Frank Loneri&, Mayor Passed by the Council 1,2, Submitted to the Mayor Approved by the Mayor --ya'i-wa"q 151 20-mp Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon Page - 3 - Council Bill No. 3293 Ordinance No. 2643 Exhibit A WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Prepared For: City of Woodburn 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 (503) 982-5246 Prepared By: Kitt elson&Associates, Inc. 851 SW 6'h Avenue, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 228-5230 FINAL September 2019 This Project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management ("TGM") Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development.This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act ("FAST Act"), local government, and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAI Acknowledgeis The development of the Woodburn Transportation System Plan was guided by the Project Management Team (PMT) a Technical Advisory Committee, and a volunteer Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC). The City of Woodburn would like to thank each of these individuals who devoted their time, expertise, and insight into the development of the plan. Project Management Team (P T) • Chris Kerr, City of Woodburn • Eric Liljequist, P.E., City of Woodburn • Michael Duncan, ODOT Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) • Dawn Cole- Estates Officer • Mark Hester- Business Representative • Kari Pankey- Parks Board • Charlie Piper- Planning Commission Chairperson • Sharon Schaub-City Councilor • Peter Skei- Industrial Property Representative • Sheryl Southwell- Industrial Property Representative • Elias Villegas-Chemeketa College • John Zobrist-Citizen Consultant Team Members • Matt Hughart, AICP, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. • Molly McCormick, Kittelson &Associates, Inc. • Julia Kuhn, P.E., Kittelson &Associates, Inc. • Adrienne DeDona, JLA Public Involvement • Clinton "CJ" Doxsee, Angelo Planning Group • Darci Rudzinski, AICP, Angelo Planning Group -Page 2- Exhibit A �Vnnxa�vx�T Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................9 WHY CREATE A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN?.......................................................................................................9 WOODBURN2019 .....................................................................................................................................................9 TSPUPDATE PROCESS...............................................................................................................................................13 TSPORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................14 SETTING THE VISION FOR WOODBURN'S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM .......................................................17 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES...........................................................................................................................................17 MOTOR VEHICLE SYSTEM ................................................................................................................................23 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.......................................................................................................................23 ROADWAYPLAN ......................................................................................................................................................29 FREIGHTPLAN.........................................................................................................................................../p040.4Qd4Qd,3.,7, TRAFFICSAFETY PLAN................................................................................................................................/p44444444p 4 LOCAL STREET CONNECTIVITY PLAN..........................................................................................................4.77-77-7.4442. TRANSITSYSTEM.................................................................................................................................525252614: EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE.........................................................................................................................57&7&2&4.47 TRANSIT PLAN PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS................................................................................................56&65 PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM..........................................................................................................................1 . .141::1 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES...............................................................................................................................676•7,.6.7,.6.4,,,.9:7p PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROJECTS.....................................................................................................................646444-63 5-9 BICYCLESYSTEM................................................................................................................................76,7676'1.11•1, BICYCLEFACILITIES....................................................................................................................................76:,p.6:,p.6:7.5:7.:4, BICYCLE PLAN PROJECTS..........................................................................................................................78:7.97.97:77.4 OTHER TRAVEL MODES......................................................................................................................17,9797 1, 1 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS (TSMO) PLAN................................. ......879 z8;z8&.84 RAILPLAN.................................................................................................................................................7D7..9.7:,.9.7:.8.98& AIR TRANSPORTATION...............................................................................................................................7D7..9.7:,.9.7:.8.98& MARINE TRANSPORTATION........................................................................................................................7D7.97.97,89.8!' PIPELINE....................................................................................................................................................7D7.97.97,89.8!' FUNDING........................................................................................................................................... .95,96,97,.97 9 FUNDING PROGRAMS AND REVENUE........................................................................................................7D5.9.9.9.9.9,9w'9. PLANNED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COST SUMMARY...............................................................................7D79;zw9pi GLOSSARY OF TERMS..................................................................................................................1.11..1011 1 91 —Page 3— ��.�.+ �� -�/ U`�|� �� WOODBURN 0TY OF WOODBURN | TRANSPORTA'MN SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE List of Tables TABLE l: FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON eY JURISDICTION.......................................................................27 TABLE 2: ROADWAY PLAN PROJECTS-----------------------------------------31 TABLE 3:TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECTS------------------------------------.4444444444: TABLE4:TRANSIT PLAN.................................................................................................................................. 69694699 9 4, TABLE 5: PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROJECTS-----------------------------------.656965644�iA TABLE 6: BICYCLE PLAN PROJECTS-------------------------------------.78797977.73 TABLE 7:TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STRATEGIES...............................................88&3&.03(-,.82 TABLE 8: LAND USE PROJECTS.......................................................................................................................8999999784� TABLE 9:ACCESS MANAGEMENT PROJECTS.................................................................................................909GPQ99�94 TA BILE lU: RA|LPROJECT .............................................................................................................................919 19 f�� TABLE ll:CITY()FVVOODBURN REVENUE HISTORY.......................................................................................9595-98&93.89 TABLE l2: POTENTIAL GRANT SOURCES AND PARTNERING OPPORTUNITIES...................................................969694694�9A TABLE l3: POTENTIAL NEW FUNDING SOURCES FOR CONSIDERATION eY THE CITY oFVV000aunm..............969696949A | TABLE l4: PLANNED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COST SUMMARY----------------------.9797979&.94 List of Figures FIGUREl: REGIONAL MAP............................................................................................................................................11 FIGURE 2: FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION---------------------------------'24 FIGURE 3: ROADWAY PLAN PROJECTS-----------------------------------.38999999g& FIGURE 4: FREIGHT ROUTES........................................................................................................................... 2424-24-2,99 FIGURE 5:TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECTS-----------------------------------'484g4,g4'74,3 FIGURE 6: LOCAL STREET C()NNECTNITY----------------------------------494,94,94S.44 FIGURE 7: EXiST|N0 TRANSIT FACILITIES.......................................................................................................... 454�.'P44'449� FIGURE 8: PEDESTRIAN PLAN PROJECTS----------------------------------.72727274�67� | FIGURE 9: BICYCLE PLAN PROJECTS ------------------------------------.83939381.77 Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. wcxxT Uuu:::p s Scm.j.II,Ihvvesl:.. a n(3us:ll kio� l Il e eiv ...; 3 rlllh tl.,,ll „ u.�u n,.33� a :3 :.p:n�'�og:::dflc ciu p:ll:cdI-xiii gg �oo;n e Illhe gd2V">Noini of hlhE 2019 I al', INc lhlugt)hg: j Ly±g coinshruc hioini c ind re c inih ol,p iD ing 2f hlhE Airruazoin., iuliullurrue ins ew !ije:,'[gigiig 53 :�jje y lle IlRoad and hlhuE coin, her be opeinEKJ ew,.xhe inisuc?iD c?i...l ve, 2e.,.e ini IlRocic h0 I'c rr IlROCI . I Ihuic re c,lhu�ainDgg r care., gu-ruocj rh hlhuE coin g ??ing b:JICJCXJh Of hlhuE aurruohlh l:,`rew,.ew,.11: and. 3uogJ k)in, I'cAinn e:,; ue,.rude injcil in�em„iic t)bcxhood ...and vallou r ohlh hem Ye`,.rude injal EXOc e h tea.."`Mgr ugc,c,,iDhy. . hlh)g l:'y of "v 'oodbu nn, fon- ally e2g)aindew d li r u baini g[gc vhlh) becjinc3gy vwlh)uch added. g3>pugAiMghc,,l 23Z c�g[u r � r .� u� e:,; oincju�r Ncil de ye lc?lpiie:,inn � w c�i Ic�in�c3 hc� hlhu�;,w w�a�llll�, c.uc;;�c�huin�c uc in�uiuc.c�in�h iu�k c),'>,pgc a in,oh,ES h0 hhuE geao,. � V" �� n� i..... I.c� c�,ccc�urr,�.p,rruc�c ci...e u�E se c�in�c...use c�„g iic�inlr.,..."v"�"c�c�c... u.�rin, ..:.e c..�c�in�...c�in� u.�.::. care c�....1:>c�in�in�,j,in�c >rcr.�e u 2024 ho ode,,inff r c Dij c3e::!. e lc lr>....g uTucxe`: c3e" ha„lile c3 lus..h of hm„inspgh,alloini iiiin .�c, u� e r n�irc��hru.... I>r2,�2c...h icX h,lhE''. h„Ihme I>g hiicr,ini of hlh, .3 l u 3r�...1 )E 2.025 I al:;'..Updgj2 uS HhE [XQCJUC Of Ns ru.r... care a....Ye uin�&rrue ins.... p..La.,in.... —Page 5— Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page b- 1 11 J r i r , i � r/ � � / i / � / / � / , / '' / / r i / i / �, / i � � i r / i / i , , � / i i i , . � � r � � / / � , � � � / � / i �, � , , � , , � / � / r � , r , . r / / f r i ,�� / �� ;� � � �� , J � „ � / / � , /, ,/ / i f �/ � � � ,y i , � i� //// � .� f /. , / i / t f . � �/ , � � � / �i �� a , � � r , .. �� , � �, � � � �, i � , / , � i f �, / ,� � / r // . �� . i ,� � % „ � � / ,,.,,r / ,, �, ,, u,, ,„ ,,/ i � � , . ., / �� ,,, i ,,,evil%/�i/, ., / � r rii„ / / ./.��,,, rill i r .,, ... .. � � ,....... .... r%/ .._ / 1 //� ,,, / // r %%% / % %%%% �y ,� rrrrrr/, ,� , //iii� it N ,,,, / �� a ,,, r�< /, ,, / , / ri /r f �///// i rrr / J � ra/ d/ rr / ri% rr � r ii/ // r, / r r /�%%,, � r .... . /% / %r r ��,. � / rrc %% r / %%/ �r.,,,rrr % r �, / i rr / „ia / ,i ///// /, / / / % / , /// / r /, „// /ice, i%/ / r� ,,/ ,,,, / /� / , /i /% r / /�i�� r rs/>� / / ii _,,,, r/ / ,,,,,,,,, iii / -„ r/,,.... /.. ,,,,/ ,,,, , / j r ryl �/ .,,, r ,,, ,e,//rr /. / �/ „, // ri /e/ ;,;;, ,,, r /%///%/////%// «�� rr�/ii/fir � r ,,,,, ,,,. ,..,;,., Nl�< t'�i'� '4 r //o� r /////// ��"''� ,, � /j / r ,. r, ,,,�„ 'a f ��gq ��ryry � ,,,,,,,,,r, � ,,,,,,, �„ .».,.�.., -i� �� MMMW^� „r " 4� �, r „'� � r � r ��y, , r: �m��wmm�w� mm, o � � � r rid riiiii ii / iiiij r >, r ,: ,,. ,,,: "rill �� .�N,� �/ � ', / ./�r ,,;� r it ;e ..,��. ,,,, �.a� , �� ,.� �' - u, �� tl.� r„�„,' ,. ,� � �, �� .��wflv�h�1 s myB � � r�� p , �f�� . 1�\\111ti� 1� � h � l�� o ,k IOIp1P11��"'�"�� x �� ,,;i�,;��jy ,/��/. �/////ii ��,� �� OI�Jf�f� t �� „„ pi�Y � � �� i �� , � �r � �� ,, � ��w�m. f r// ;/��/'yr ,�� ,d '' �r �y it ,�1 ,' ��,-,�� , � � �,J �; �� r �. > � �� h��o�dl o�1��„�„ �r o �,., �1iii� ,�1�� ll��;��' �` 1f ��/�r� �� ,r m I�1��/�� 1, , / !�/�i /��l�j�/�/��j�/��///�it l�l�� .. iili�� d / F k�M ,, r,�, / r1�!�/ /� / �,r� �x! �i= � I /� r�r r,/;i��%�/�i� /�� r ,� � ;,� f��%��%�� /��i�� ,� �� i pig w �',� ,�,r�, �,° ,,. ��1 rii��v/�� t ✓ �it �� e u �m h'uVV��4 //l �0�� l�l � �, , �;� I �:�� w, r r", �„ ", �" a� °� ,� n ��rl, � �� .� � ��,. � 'oe�,. ,�� , r '� i�� , r�i ,, h �. , .., r 1^Ym,. �/° � �a �� i �,. spa � s i mtt fi �°"" � i o � ,�,.; 1" � • r • . . . . . . . — — . . Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 8- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOOS:;BURN p TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA INTRODUCTION IL.....II Y CR II:::::: l..I[::::: A TR INS II:::'0 IR.F .T]O IN SYS.T1:..:::: II::.)IL.... The Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) is a long-range plan that sets the vision for the city's transportation system, facilities and services to meet state, regional, and local needs for the next 20 years. The TSP was developed through community and stakeholder input and is based on the system's existing needs, opportunities, and anticipated available funding. The plan also serves as the Transportation Element of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the 2019 TSP update is to address regulatory changes that have occurred in the region since the previous 2005 TSP, as well as to provide an updated list of projects to address local transportation needs and deficiencies. � I Pedestrians in Downtown Woodburn Playground Located Along the Existing Section of Mill Creek Greenway The TSP addresses compliance with new or amended Federal, State, and local plans policies, and regulations including the Oregon Transportation Plan (OTP), the State's Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), and presents the investments and priorities for the Pedestrian, Bicycle, Transit, and Motor Vehicle System. O I I LYR IN 2019 As shown in Figure 1, the City of Woodburn lies in the Willamette Valley in Marion County, approximately 30 miles south of Portland and approximately 20 miles north of Salem. Initially starting as land purchased for a tree nursery, construction of the railroad led to rapid development and incorporation as a city in 1889. Further growth occurred as additional tracks and 1-5 were constructed. Based on information from the Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC), Woodburn has an estimated 2016 population of 24,795 people, comprising 7.4%of Marion County's 333,950 residents. The community is known for its tourism, local events, and young and diverse population. Big attractions include the Woodburn Premium Outlets, several golf courses, Tulip Festival, Fiesta Mexicana, and the Woodburn Dragstrip with over 4.5 million visitors to the area each year. -Page 9- Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 10- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 1: Regional Map -Page 11 - Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 12- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L The TSP update process began with a review of local, regional, and statewide plans and policies that guide land use and transportation planning in the city. Goals and objectives were then developed collaboratively with the project's Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) to guide the evaluation of the existing and future transportation system conditions as well as the development of planned improvements. An inventory of the multimodal transportation system was conducted to serve as the basis for the existing and future conditions analyses. The existing and future condition analyses focused on identifying gaps and deficiencies in the multimodal transportation system based on current and forecast future performances. For each gap and deficiency, a solution, or set of potential solutions, was identified to address the system needs. The solutions were then evaluated to determine the preferred solutions, which were prioritized through the public involvement process and organized into planned project lists. The culmination of the TSP update process is this document, which presents the plans and solutions identified to address the existing and future gaps and deficiencies in the city's transportation system. Committees The project team developed the TSP update in close coordination with city staff, along with representatives from the local community. One formal committee, referred to as the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), had a significant role in the TSP update process. The CAC consisted of local residents with an interest in transportation. The CAC provided technical guidance and coordination throughout the project. CAC members reviewed and commented on technical memorandums and participated in committee meetings and community meetings. The CAC served as the voice of the community and the caretakers of the goals and objectives of the TSP update. Public Involvement The Woodburn TSP is the result of a collaboration among various public agencies, the community, and the project team of city staff, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and consultants. The public involvement process consisted of continuous face-to-face interactions at multiple events. These events included three drop-in style and three on-line open houses spaced over the course of key project milestones. A detailed summary of the open house outreach methods and feedback is provided in the technical companion document to the TSP. At the deliverable level, the project was supported by Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) made up of interested citizens, business representatives, and Planning Commission members. -Page 13- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y. OF WOODBURN p TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L an ml I' y r i j Open House #1 Open House #1 °•ymn)J�9H)I iv� -� oumi 1 r. ,ww war.w,irra I �l Open House #3 Open House #3 The Woodburn TSP is comprised of the main TSP summary document (Volume 1) and a volume of supporting technical appendices and other supporting documentation (Volume 11). Volume I (this document) is organized into the following sections: • Chapter 1 - Introduction • Chapter 2-Setting The Vision for Woodburn's Transportation System • Chapter 3-Motor Vehicle System • Chapter 4-Transit System • Chapter 5 - Pedestrian System • Chapter 6- Bicycle System • Chapter 7- Other Travel Modes • Chapter 8- Funding and Implementation Outline • Chapter 9-Glossary of Terms Volume 11 (under separate cover) contains the technical memorandums prepared during the development of the TSP including the detailed data and technical analyses that informed the plan. -Page 14- Exhibit A .pr Aa I �s W m au Y r � e Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 16- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..T,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L SETTING THE VISION FOR W U ' TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Setting a vision for a city's transportation system is an essential first step in maintaining the existing system and establishing the framework to accommodate potential growth. The public involvement process for the TSP provided a forum for the community to express their vision for the future of Woodburn's transportation network. The community advisory committee and other community members expressed a desire for a transportation system that maintains community livability, enhances existing transportation infrastructure, increases safety for all users, and provides a framework for potential growth. 'BOA II....S A I I The project team developed goals and objectives for the TSP update to help guide the review and documentation of the preferred future Woodburn transportation system. As described in Technical Memorandum #6: Preferred Alternatives, the goals and objectives through a range of evaluation criteria that were applied to select preferred alternatives and priority rankings among the identified projects. In compliance with state, regional, and local planning requirements, the goals and objective below emphasize a multimodal system that supports all modes and users. Goal 1 - Multimodal Mobility Provide a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Objective 1 Develop an expanded intrcity bus transit system that provides added service and route coverage to improve the mobility and accessibility of the transportation disadvantaged and to attract traditional auto users to use the system. Objective 1 Develop a plan for providing travel options between Woodburn and Portland or Salem, including intercity bus service and potential bus/carpool park-and-ride facilities. Objective 1 Develop a comprehensive low stress network of bicycle lanes and routes that link major activity centers such as residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, commercial areas, and employment centers. -Page 17- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ( I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAI Objective 1 Develop a comprehensive network of sidewalks and off-street pathways that improve pedestrian mobility within neighborhoods and link residential areas to schools, parks, commercial areas, and employment centers. Objective 1 E Maintain adequate intersection and roadway capacity on the key east-west and north- south arterials. Goal 2 - Connectivity Provide an interconnected street system that is adequately sized to accommodate existing and projected traffic demands in the Woodburn area. Objective 2 Verify and Incorporate the relevant strategies and infrastructure projects from the existing TSP, I-5/OR 214 IAMP, and 99E Refinement Plan Objective 2 Identify new east-west and north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the City to relieve traffic demands on Oregon 219/214, 211, and 99E, and coordinate with Marion County to construct the street connections needed outside of the urban growth boundary (UGB). Objective 2 Develop updated street design standards for arterials, collectors, and local streets. Goal 3 - Safety Provide a transportation system that enhances the safety and security of all transportation modes in the Woodburn area. Objective Address existing and potential future safety issues by identifying high collision locations and locations near schools or with a history of fatal, severe injury, and/or pedestrian/bicycle-related crashes and developing strategies to address those issues. -Page 18- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Objective Identify street and railroad crossings in need of improvement, as well as those that should be closed or relocated. Objective Develop a plan for designated truck routes through the City, and a plan to handle truck and rail hazardous cargoes Goal 4 - Strategic Investment Provide a financially sustainable transportation system through responsible stewardship of assets and financial resources. Objective Identify new and innovative funding sources for transportation improvements Objective 4B Preserve and maintain the existing transportation system assets to extend their useful life. Goal Land Uses t ti Integration Review and update land use standards and ordinances to create a balanced built environment where existing and planned land uses are supported by an efficient multi-modal transportation system. Objective Identify a range of potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of the transportation system by shifting single- occupant vehicle trips to other modes and reducing automobile reliance at times of peak traffic volumes. Objective 5B Identify revisions to the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule -Page 19- Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 20- pit A uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu� IIIIII I � f ..:.. .. ..... Nl .... ..... i ;07 m uuuum�W" f , / / / / i1 / • • • • • - - • - • Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 22- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L MOTOR VEHICLE SYSTEM Streets serve a majority of all trips within Woodburn across all travel modes. In addition to motorists in private vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit riders use streets to access areas locally and regionally. This section summarizes the updated functional classification system, roadway plan, freight plan, safety plan, and local street connectivity plan that make up Woodburn's motor vehicle system. IF LJ IN C T'10 IN A II..... CII..... S III IIr A"T]OI SY ...]:::::.M A street's functional classification defines its role in the transportation system and reflects desired operational and design characteristics such as right-of-way requirements, pavement widths, pedestrian and bicycle features, and driveway (access) spacing standards. Figure 2 illustrates the functional classification of streets within Woodburn, which includes the following designations as defined by the current Woodburn TSP: • Freeways-The primary function of the interstate is mobility, because freeways connect major cities, regions within Oregon, and other states, and serve as major freight routes. The freeway should provide "safe and efficient high-speed continuous flow." The freeway has full access control with access limited to the interchange. Only motorized vehicle traffic is served. • Major Arterials- Primary functions are to serve local and through traffic as it enters and leaves the urban area, connect Woodburn with other urban centers and regions, and provide connections to major activity centers within the UGB. Emphasis should be on traffic flow, pedestrian and bicycle movements. On-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. • Minor Arterials - Primary functions are to connection major activity centers and neighborhoods within the UGB and to support the major arterial system. Minor arterials should have a higher degree of access, shorter trip lengths, lesser traffic volumes, and lower travel speeds than major arterials. Like major arterials, emphasis should be on traffic flow, pedestrian and bicycle movements. On-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. • Service Collector- Primary function is to provide connections between neighborhoods and major activity centers and the arterial street system. Some degree of access is provided to adjacent properties,while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Service collectors carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than major and minor arterials. On-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. -Page 23- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA • Access Streets- Primary function is to connect residential neighborhoods with service collectors or arterials. On-street parking and access to adjacent properties is prevalent. Slower speeds should be provided to ensure community livability and safety for pedestrians and cyclists. In many cases, cyclists can "Share the road" with motor vehicles because of low traffic volumes and speeds.Sidewalks or pathways should be provided for pedestrians. • Local Streets- Primary function is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses.Short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low traffic volumes characterize local streets. Cyclists can share the road with motor vehicles. Sidewalks or pathways should be provided for pedestrians. oca.l..2h eh sigincih oin r uinclude re side injci,llocal r e Q hsancj,,, oindu r 6cil kcal rh e:le: s. r9 f �AA School Bus Woodburn Public Library Table 1 summarizes the functional classifications of the major arterial, minor arterial, and service collector streets within Woodburn and identifies the overlapping ownership/maintenance and jurisdictional relationships that exist. The functional classifications used in local TSPs should be consistent with other regional planning efforts. As shown in Table 1, there are several streets that currently have conflicting classifications. -Page 24- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 2: Functional Roadway Classification -Page 25- q H_ cm i O LL Z r 0 Y E 9 @ ,,.. Z RZ U Vj i id. A U i�i wu O U c ru m o q cn @ c 0 ''II o P CD 0 0 w zn a� A9 � 1 e c c � N � IL 4 c c CO, CZ m �.Al Ul Of Ix t m o . R µ� w e_ ti ,aonkt �_ rn ¢ ° !-i:. i� 6l_ n o 0 �. rc Q� DOQ O Q 0 C m ca «.. �. W aw B z m B t � P � 0 0, A r . a lip r Pe � m C7 c � ro o ro o i r_ y ' m Z �B d 0 i ....,. W � o f M C, LL C'V CR D O r S� f4 � E � J e " o c MI 71 r i 71 � O 0 1 Cy O Z v v >U a o � o _ rvi j rr»•9s'.'. o P�' o a 0- .0 S v� r I " `w; myr fnlw' ry 3 v ''°'+.v aw remr mw mw nvr.umw rtti�------------ tons i _J Gl C f3 i `1 U {im U T � 4 N ^O ti „ �B 0 LL 0 Q 0 N ® o � Cd$ "f p fl 0. 8 4 & q tt oo 11-2 n^ P 9 � � �" „�, �➢ h� � afar ham+om� d b U u o F ii - n LL 00 JI LL g f 40o Al, — � n F— I q a a a b a N '11A4 - n µ r w� i N � O U7 d y Y r -tTi 6 LfJ co c V� c, 5 h 3 m Q> T s o 0 o I � o fl iL a Q N E(} id O 2 Q o � � CL -. a 0 2., e it i ti „w � b { � q a m E I � m C _ 31 4 - LU Z Cll .T co Cn IL O w u e� CD CY) iL E � O Q 20 an r J ^`' ,way•w .. II bw w, w"myw 4 u n e' �""^wwuww✓" I(f,f P r � b v rdk � { ki 1P Q) r fJ IX� o z� ? tl U o i C 20 TJ O i A m r� c W qyi l 8 , O G i r F� o Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 26- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Table 1: Functional Classification Comparison by Jurisdiction WIN Buttevilled Major Major (north of OR 219 and south of OR 219) County/C`,ty Minor Arterial Collector Collector No Butteville Road ODOT Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes (segment where aligned with OR 219) OR 219(Butteville Road to Woodland ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No Avenue) OR 219(Woodland Avenue to 1-5) ODOT Major Arterial Principal No Arterial Woodland Avenue City Access Street Major No Collector Arney Road City/Private Service Major No Collector Collector 1-5 ODOT Freeway Interstate Yes OR 214(1-5 to OR 99E) ODOT Major Arterial Principal Yes Arterial OR 214(OR 99E to UGB east limits) ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No Stacy Allison Way City Service Local No Collector Center Street City ServiceLocal No Collector Evergreen Road (OR 219 to Boean Major City Minor Arterial No Lane) Collector Evergreen Road (Boean Lane to end City Minor Arterial Local No of road) Harvard Drive City Access Street Local No Stubb Road C,` +rC,`ity, Access Street No Local No Designation Parr Road ' r /City Service Major Major No Collector Collector Collector Hayes Street City Service Major No Collector Collector Oregon Way City Access Street Major No Collector Astor Way City Access Street Major No Collector Country Club Road City Access Street Major No Collector Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue County/City Minor Arterial Arterial Minor Arterial Yes (north of Parr Road) Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue County/City Minor Arterial Major Minor Arterial Yes (south of Parr Road) Collector -Page 27- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN p TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN MIN Tukwila Drive City Access Street Major No Collector Hazelnut Drive City Access Street Major No Collector 5rh Street City Access Street Major No Collector Harrison Street City Service Major No Collector Collector Lincoln Street County/City Service Local Major No Collector Collector Garfield Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Young Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Cleveland Street City Service Major No Collector Collector Front Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Industrial Avenue City Service Major No Collector Collector Progress Way City Service Major No Collector Collector OR 211 ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Park Avenue City Access Street Major No Collector Hardcastle Avenue County/City Service No Major No Collector Designation Collector Gatch Street City Access Street Major No Collector Brown Street City Service Major No Collector Collector OR 99E (north of OR 214 and south of Young ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No Street) OR 99E(segment where aligned with Principal OR 214) ODOT Major Arterial Arterial No Service Major Cooley Road C,«E:kF kyC,itY. Collector Local Collector No Roadway Cross-section Standards A functional classification system as shown in Figure 2 has to work together with roadway cross- section standards to allow for standardization of key characteristics within roadway classifications while also providing some flexibility based on context. A roadway's cross-section and design will vary between streets and between segments based on adjacent land uses and demands, but the overall street network should also be considered. The Woodburn -Page 28- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBU N 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Development Ordinance Section 3.01.041 contains the current roadway cross-sections standards for the city that work together with the identified functional classification system shown in Figure 2. Y II...'II.....A IN Roadway Facilities The roadway facility types that are currently utilized or that are recommended through the roadway plan projects are described below. Turn Lanes Separate left-and right-turn lanes, as well as two-way left-turn lanes (TWLTL) can provide separation between slowed or stopped vehicles waiting to turn and through vehicles. The design of turn lanes is largely determined based on a traffic study that identifies the storage length needed to accommodate vehicle queues. Turn lanes are commonly used at intersections where the turning volumes warrant the need for separation. Traffic Signals Traffic signals allow opposing streams of traffic to proceed in an alternating pattern. National and state guidance indicates when it is appropriate to install traffic signals at intersections. When used, traffic signals can effectively manage high traffic volumes and provide dedicated times in which pedestrians and cyclists can cross roadways. Because they continuously draw from a power source and must be periodically re-timed, signals typically have higher maintenance costs than other types of intersection control. Signals can improve safety at intersections where signal warrants are met, however, they may result in an increase in rear-end crashes compared to other solutions. Signals have a significant range in costs depending on the number of approaches, how many through and turn lanes each approach has, and if it is located in an urban or rural area. The cost of a new traffic signal ranges from approximately$250,000 in rural areas to $500,000 in urban areas. Signal Timing/Phasing Modifications Signal retiming and optimization offers a relatively low-cost option to increase system efficiency. Retiming and optimization refers to updating timing plans to better match prevailing traffic conditions and coordinating signals. Timing optimization can be applied to existing systems or may include upgrading signal technology, such as signal communication infrastructure, signal controllers, or cabinets. Signal retiming can reduce travel times and be especially beneficial to improving travel time reliability. In high pedestrian or desired pedestrian areas, signal retiming can facilitate pedestrian movements through intersections by increasing minimum green times to give pedestrians time to cross during each cycle, which may create additional delay for other https://www.woodburn-or.00v/dev-planning/paae/woodburn-development-ordinance-wdo -Page 29- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA intersection users. Signals can also facilitate bicycle movements with the inclusion of bicycle detectors. Signal upgrades often come at a higher cost than signal timing and phasing modifications and usually require further coordination between jurisdictions. However, upgrading signals provides the opportunity to incorporate advanced signal systems to further improve the efficiency of a transportation network. Strategies include coordinated signal operations across jurisdictions, centralized control of traffic signals, adaptive or active signal control, and transit or freight signal priority as further described in the Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) section. These advanced signal systems can reduce delay, travel time, and the number of stops for transit, freight, and other vehicles. In addition, these systems may help reduce vehicle emissions and improve travel time reliability. Roundabouts Roundabouts are circular intersections where entering vehicles yield to vehicles already in the circle. They are designed to slow vehicle speeds to 20 to 30 mph or less before they enter the intersection, which promotes a more comfortable environment for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized users. Roundabouts have fewer conflict-points and have been shown to reduce the severity of crashes, as compared to signalized intersections. Roundabouts can be more costly to design and install when compared to other intersection control types, but they have a lower operating and maintenance cost than traffic signals. Topography must be carefully evaluated in considering a roundabout, given that slope characteristics at an intersection may render a roundabout infeasible. The cost of a new roundabouts ranges from approximately$2 million to$4 million depending upon the number of lanes and the slope conditions. i n I�Ifl�bl / end r,iri is i%ii "U ' Traffic Signal Roundabout Through Lanes When the demand per lane on a roadway segment has reached saturation, a potential solution is to construct additional through lanes. Although this theoretically adds capacity to the corridor, -Page 30- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L added lanes can allow latent demand from the system to show an increase in demand. Added lanes may also create induced demand where drivers see that roadway as less of a barrier with its increased capacity, drawing in additional new demand and potentially maintaining or worsening the rate of congestion. When a roadway does not have a consistent number of travel lanes per direction along a corridor, an added through lane may provide a consistent cross-section allowing for less weaving by vehicles traveling the corridor. Roadway Plan Projects The projects developed for the roadway plan are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Figure 3. These projects are intended to address existing and projected future transportation system needs for motor vehicles as well as all other modes of transportation that depend on the roadway system for travel, such as pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and truck freight. Table 2: Roadway Plan Projects EN Noll,11111111 Ib- SPI ithern(117(117 m= M t,G�Gtl;@� 4414 $'77 � 11-4444,+�..R FAh(4A(;6;d#OffiG 1-4GI (#GIffiG !.I QR 919 f...w, G&R-.,+iGIA GIAGI G tNNG ,loft t rR'GRe (iR Street de&igR GtiGR NNith 1-.01-e&#i GIR!.1-d @!G, 'Glo TTTgr' .,I !-IoRI GRd PI) 9B8T Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane, OR 214 from including changes to signal timing as $20,300,000 R3 Cascade Drive State Street design Medium to OR 99E appropriate,in coordination with ODOT (and (Cost in conjunction with bicycle facility includes 32) improvements) As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan,widen roadway to provide a 0,000 OR 99E from continuous two-way left-turn lane and wider $12,30(Cost (Cost R4 Lincoln Street to State Street design shoulders,including changes to signal timing Medium includes 33, south UGB as appropriate,in coordination with ODOT B4 (and in conjunction with pedestrian and ,P3,and bicycle facility improvements) P4) -Page 31 - Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L III,R111 111,11111111 6k ooc:l r<rwrr vk kww h x;#yc, 144 FF hk4EA yc $O clrrwrwe =W° 4o«n Pr Rr Rood Upgrade to Service Collector urban (Project R5 te):,odktii A+teev k)( Coon YCJty, Street design standards including bicycle and pedestrian Low includes and P Rr Rood. enhancements B21 and ket rh to y i ty, :) Poi i IE'ood fi,orn Stralblo IEood to. I Ve"!cgie"o 7 lEe gd. Butteville Road from r.mi,o It Upgrade to Minor Arterial urban standards $0 i�i ki e,ve;c1 (Project R6 C,"-wrHww::rt�yC,`ity Street design including bicycle and pedestrian Low oxte i7t Lek 1'4on. includes B7 R o�I c,at�2 i9 to enhancements c,r7.:tl ie;e;c ,t.,,ic1e,, and t'6I">) southern UGB Brown Street $01 from Comstock g pg rof.to Service Collector Upgrade e lyi�c,vvr7 x i e e R7 Avenue to Vine CityStreet design urban standards including bicycle and Low (Project Vve ivae;ererrx ° includes pedestrian enhancements <rk.�k.le�vc.y. '"x'1)1'1 9.) OR 214/ Investigate corridor signal timing and -5 Southbound Traffic signal R8 Ram State timing coordination adjustments in coordination Medium $15,000 p g with ODOT Intersection OR 214/ Investigate corridor signal timing and -5 Northbound Traffic signal R9 Ram State timing coordination adjustments in coordination Medium $15,000 p g with ODOT Intersection OR 214/ Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and R10 Evergreen Road State timing coordination adjustments in coordination Medium $15,000 Intersection with ODOT OR 214/ Oregon Way/ Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and R1 1 Country Club State timing coordination adjustments in coordination Medium $15,000 Road with ODOT Intersection OR 214/ Install intersection capacity improvement Front Street such as traffic signal (if warranted),turn R12 State Traffic control Medium $1,000,000 Ramp lanes,or roundabout in coordination with Intersection ODOT Install intersection capacity improvement OR 214/ such as traffic signal (if warranted),turn R13 Park Street State Traffic control Medium $1,000,000 Intersection lanes,or roundabout in coordination with ODOT Install a second left-turn lane on the OR 214/ southbound approach,install a second Intersection receivinglane on the east le u 7 fell cT . 4} R14 OR 211/ State geometric g Medium $I„,900,000 Ie'wnt �nn Iorlo,,and OR rse considerations us date signal timing Intersection p g g' coordination with ODOT —Page 32— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. `w"VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Ib- Parr Road/ Install intersection capacity improvement Settlemier $500,000 tct R15 rityTraffic control such as traffic signal (if warranted),turn Low1s C)C)C)C)C)C)Avenue Intersection lanes,or roundabout OR 99E/ Intersection- Reconfigure the westbound approach to R16 Hardcastle State geometric incorporate one left-turn lane and one thru- Medium $50,000 Avenue Intersection considerations right turn lane in coordination with ODOT OR 99E/ Intersection- Install a shared through-right turn lane on the eastbound approach and reconfigure the R17 Lincoln Street State geometric existing approach lane as a separate left- Medium $500,000 Intersection considerations turn lane in coordination with ODOT As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan,install a third westbound lane to OR 99E/ Intersection- provide separate left,thru,and right turn R18 Young Street State geometric lanes in coordination with ODOT.Implement Medium $550,000 Intersection considerations protected-permissive left-turn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches. Install intersection r rof)rrr#y f cgffic r of fi, 1. improvement such as traffic signal (if OR 99E/ warranted),turn lanes,or roundabout in Cleveland Medium R19 Street State Traffic control coordination with ODOT.Consideration $1,000,000 Intersection should be given to railroad preemption and the proximity to the signalized intersection at OR 99E and Young Street. Ben Brown Lane Extend Ben Brown Lane frorn I Iar a[d [Y vr, c rn 1 Ic Yc21 c R20 L rivr to City New roadway to Evergreen Road at�s tl Ir:c�rs Access Street Medium $5,100,000 Coo „ } G..or(.roor,Pr.l.!-I -+h tp P(4rr RP(4-I -I�(.h Stacy Allison �' Way ficrri Extend Stacy ill sc2i7 Woy south to R22 rire;i Sfi'o :f. Y Y '' d(it t le...� oi, Medium $7,300,000 t City New roadway li lc�,l,a�stricsl�tF,y,r,tlEc,c�... "�e;ivir.e;...C,'c,lle;r.t,.,.. tcfli sclush ic ... . Cool .:.................... Brown Street urn Vino. Extend ui,o.South R23 s ae, to. City New roadway Arterial (it th ,"�o k.south to the F jai Medium $800,000 Rifuio Sc'u.rtl.l W wooct4c)rsct C.'C NE4w e<° t v Y t!,e t vv °1', vi l"'oo 1 ME4( 4-�r -(-)4weo4 1 Xf nd liscl�,a,sticil ICood to(I,Ritmt,C;'on'4oc; C,'onne-" .ti<)n 4+ cr.new 4 o�c!,rl kndt ks4-ikrf S4e e't tl��e R25 S«srthwe'4 City New roadway southern extensions of Stacy Allison Way crnd Medium $1,800,000 woodbf krV-khnclus Roca t crt..fl Ir,1 or,ol hkdustlicl,l. h i., it 1Eo(7d s'fondoi' t �yar � Street r+l.r,!-I1.rl-Ir(_4n I extol d Apr+h+.. gediijm Q� pQQ'QQQ —Page 33— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. `w"VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L im Noll,i� r o + r +r +, ARIA, n Co c+roo+ o + Z lJ l..,or C+roo++..C+� hh C+roo+ Evaluate the need for intersection OR 99E/ Intersection- rlrgcjif r.citic ins incfiacfirsg traffic control, Industrial R28 State/City geometric ill�ar�irsc�tic,r7 signing,and striping,including Medium $100,000 Avenue Intersection considerations any sight distance constraints in coordination with ODOT Construct the Southern Arterial from attr vlllr.Rood.to RjfuI(. Southr:l r7 R29A City New roadway I ve°,idle e;1�7IEc,c�cl e;xte,l7,lc,l�7r�4�c?c?d- (2lanes),,, Medium $d�=��`,(?-4?W) Arterial 61/02000 C;:<°n stl uct tlho,S u.a tlhoi rs ill toi kil fi,orn sou fl,ie:l n I voi clle on Rood e.rte n on to 6e.ttlornie.l /eve, Me,jurn,. ,, :'c I't ;CI„te i,kil C,'„!,,y. ;Wv Ic;rc clWvc y ( Ic 17t.,1 IIncl-lilnu r.ol7slcioi'('Uon k) c c lc te:c1,.< c ;,irscl,,,,.crf tl " UPIEIE (111 1Ino.. tl ie:l r C Y, n7 t uct t 111 ,7c Irk. ..7 .� . I`de;vvl.� .. .. 'le:lrsAl e,llci Icrrri,. �` ) IE:,rC, �� M„t;rli�arn„ >,r,1C)C,,,. C;,% c�c�clvvc� illfoikil. ",of lorlrk,,i ver to O t"'Ir lserii.? Woodland Intersection- Modify the intersection layout to address R30 Avenue Curve City geometric truck turning movement constraints Medium $100,000 Modification considerations George As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Street/Hillsboro Intersection- Plan,close vehicular access to George R31 Silverton State/City geometric Street from Hillsboro Silverton Highway when Medium $60,000 Highway considerations future local street access is provided to the Intersection east d �i,oriq rn I'c�ll IEc�c�c1 C,,ty IVe.uvl�,c�cscluvcTy I c�Is�lEcrc�cl totl�e; f�ahare;ma's-+��+��Ic��atl i�WrYte,,Yicsl IVIr:cliuriW„ C)C) I«s c1 Vc fi,orlW cr `il R { d to tl o Rit( o, y ,cr�aA oikl7 sdu st kil I�;'c,r�r1 We,l vlr.e,C,clle,r�tc!i�r��WVV � ..:..Y tl1erra tncsl Inc. I de:vv I,,,,, � C e ri„ . �Y rl �;tc�l"sc�c�lc1: :. � �t Mj:,:cll�ar„ 4>/s,J`>�)C)C)C;'., I�t3E3 C;i( �'«rsrlvvr,,,, I ir1� `�«�at i�rte:rlrs r to South AI foi,ril ICilllrsl i Irarirac�1. �'%'r'�f>� I EsC)C) °ve fi,orn I Xto ost to I ve IcCji'o n Wk3 strlalblo Rood tcr, C,`,,ty Ve.uv I c cscluvcTy IEcrcf c1 �I �� vt:Wy :cli ari,'1„ 00. i `� arlric ve"Iule'on Rood d+��rdd le�tsrrr4rr.�icrr�r;,�rHr�r�.ioW',:eralrrdcrr;trrrcre�t!k, sclle .r tcsr,`.,. he ffir. r.crr7hcrl 1 r1]c strvr1 rM / Y C,It W+ °e WW „ I.e;r.c,r7f6 er rtho, i; f>`>C)C),C)C)C)tct, I ite r;e,r tic�l"i I ., W:cllsrrF:i: C)C)C)C)^ I cal i Y r,cg�,,rrn trlr, rr(e[so(.'tion. 4 Y � c e r„(,e'mcs c n'i.. he Fflr ,iclrsc l c,l Ic a scic l:]el,utl uvl1e;l7ti,c,l ve.rl7r.rit, 1 .... n f n uvc�l'I'c�r7tec1. d+��rdd le�tsrrr4rr.�icrr�r;,�rHr�r�.ioW',:eralrrdcrr;trrrcre�t!k, Cee:r„ C`it hr("[sIrc,lshcrl c° s'+ r rW�lr ice" rdfWwree y II ite r e„r tl«ri 1 $>E3CJCJ„CJ CJCJCJ k3Fk, 1IE'e;]r c et r yr $ ( �o+r ie, Irste;lr,e"r.hc,rs r w rr7e.trir� � sflc pare; tl � �,I lic I��. , 1 / c nslr hc,l Le,.c1. hr ff,% ,Iclrsr l � Y. 1 e.rrsti«ri�s tl 1er... � � r �" c,i,rlif .;. hc�ffir. r II .,arc�ve:rr7l i `s e�d.iisrlr l:rce�i,;(t vvl ie;r7,wol'I orsT,od.. —Page 34— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. `w"VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L 11111111 Holl,1111 Mill I Ili s sri e rrl. o r eeconfi«I. «ssisrt< .>«sf�t r f I VCecye;e,rs I«s st. c tetvbs Fes e"feestt 1,'))C),000 to Rk . l ite.r,e[r�fI)[i Ve' C,',!t° ��rclo rne:frir ViyCelE'e"r.�cni7,ficiaare:tho,irrfea�se"r.firrrr/rn«iify fl�i,e: yC li yl i a:�i: ,;, r,c�l Iri�7Gsrc�Ve:rr7r:rif< r.c�ri�sice:res ic�ris, c� ir. r.cri"s,.. «ad.l:rrir l:r«a,l,;tt v ie:r7,,W(11 (In:tf.d. Intoise,r Hon fc7(III woy„sLu)., M;ei t elr ;; ,e,r.ficrrs 14f): 200� l Rood. C ,ty ti,ofcrcih cl crti,ol When wol'ionted.Ln ric,Ve;riConts +ar s�11 ie e re re.sic�r i� l rr �v� �r ere"s� 4� Intersection OR99E /Southc°rrkc°Ms+Cri ce"r .sic°e". hoffir. r.cri"shcsl Intersection ? eometric liric)Iric fe irfe e;r.ficri"s lc yc)aat,, Medium $50,000 R3yi Arterial State/City I Vol Y 9 r.00i'(iiisgHo r r onti„ol, is 1Jn , g sci r h it 2iDg,..,.iD. considerations rr vvifl i 01001. +a,44 ie rr r .sic r lrr v ere"s 4� R C)i Road So Intersection ��rffleerni�er S. ArteriBoonoal I ee��uth City g .... .. Ar " Y� � � $3,000 OOOs'; / y ?� .gfeometric Voluote c�ndc I7 fall fl ies, Medium �n. Intersection considerations Iric,l lkltt hc�ff c c onti crl .tc ;,aarne ct i cr(a,ii,sciol:rcr.f.a:tt..,, Fsrrfr l nn eose,e.�on imr)aov rr�neenf, to occornrncrsstr4ee Soso a A4eokIt<.«Fa+-aeee.fic+-s Evergreen Intersection- vvi4a fiaee of I e�eacsa�ee�r+-s R4i() Arterial South City ,�I geometric) ono, is tho,,iiSouthAife{inol lPi,ovicie s.r irc is feY,"s Medium $480,OOO,n?. ? n. Intersection considerations south bound and le:ff o!nd i iu if t�aa]Igrse s on fl ier. I Ve,iciie:e:i"s IEcrc ci c l's,Cricrc r.l1...,11IcrZd ,sfcrrr::, r,� r ti' I on aI ie: Vea;, iie:e:rr IE'<',rgrr gieiri«gr.j?.,,,. VVice:i"s liaa s;wVi e:IEcs„c, d to i21;rVicie'(I...sor2' !!Igt.".. Intersection OUt il.]c and le:ff tarn lane:. Pi,ovicie:s,t.l'rc is fei,. hciffir. r ontiol on fl iy ,South Arterial City ? geometric So e 2u r.o ti,ol fl ee: R4:-f- ,� VV e:afl i Ai,fec i Medium $476,000 ,, Butteville Road,/, i y cal c� r'ricrc�r l i.Cfc Intersection considerations ",ouH i Ai toi,kil IRood1. 4,k)li irgpr v erneenfs:k, So 4la Aafeoir .crFa+-a ee..fi«Fse. Vict F lJl'rciic cie:roadway to bof of Stacy Allison Vo+1VVVcs $7,1 OO,000r'; R4isy? y City Street Design r�r��r��r'r'�rnr'rke,designated fTruck Ways Medium nn Widen i«odvvV pyl lice Il; vm,to include«new,lane in each direction and a two-way left-turn OR 219 west of $4,680,0004; R44:,i Butteville Road State Street Design lane (in conjunction with pedestrian and Low � bicycle facility improvements) in coordination with ODOT Gatch Street fi orn 1',lo nr, Upgrade Gotch Ch r,of to Service Collector R4`>4 Ch,,,e:e:f to. City Street Design urban standards including bicycle and Low $1,870,OOO ; 1 k1icicosflf'«<, pedestrian enhancements Avenue —Page 35— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN `w"VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L mill RIIII ,ill,,11111 ill ill Brown Street fi< rn C,'lovt, j„ yrStreetDesign ofto Service CollectorI,�rs,m c,vvrs f,i e�e 7$2,8100,000�2R4F f ,t tc, Cit ards including bicycle and Low Comstock. pedestrian enhancements t c,f I�f„ce te,rs ti,.l..lul cel",e,i T,y 1 r cj i e,c1 is rs l'c�i i,lEc,c�c c;�, ii s e,i use+.,.. Itsa evi e,IEc,c1,.. BuffoAl "1l 0(10/. lnfoi'socfion �artl, of f�) fl i,e oufl i„fc) I21l2yk l it rli�stF i7r e..,, 1 hc,is ;i f yc,satl , _ c�r7c1 ii ste,i�;e yi te,i ic11 ) ,r,r�liclr7r:r.j.I'r�il:: C��.�:�Y. clr«rnr tilt 1 E 7 I;;I i c1f,',i, Eoo(,i r.c,rsskioiofho s„l,, ". ve is ie,e !7tc�og( c,'. ,vvirsc irn ,le rne,r s IEC�(7( e,r e,rs�sic,,,,,, .. cic,,l,,e, fl ie,iec liclrse,cju7foi's ,c,,fion of c onvol tt, to i g firs/i c11 it cLs f.,.c,r71,.y.,. C46M <f fix l nve tic Lc 'c2L]d iIns 111 I,c,te"Infkll vllle, c,f c / ,i,er.tic,rs �;c�fe,ty r.c,sar7te erne c�,l,sare to gciclie `}..`,ic11 it UM .i�,rl "r�<� � y'jll CFj C isc1 �,i �Y. �,is;ieje ij tic,rs.l=. TOTAL High Priority Costs 972007000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs 74,670,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs 00,0(K) TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) '84T 370a000 1.Project to be funded by others 2.The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes,and other characteristics. n„ ,rst"s c,rsly c,rs 1 the e,,�"st"si,1e,of Buf ,� „�, , , sae': ce:C)Y,e„�i I x ,e�is�i„rs i,rni ,� i«i�lsars i ,I,�i;fsa,�i ify C,'c,salsr.il on C, nco'I Jo 2 c ;r y ;f, C„,'° �r.�tc,l:,e,r,1s I, :C)C)�;� '... `1�C)i,1u�s, �� .1s,r i�r��rs,1,�r.�lt„s,)vvle„1.�i�1e„1 I:, t,J ie,yt,�te". «. C)re.c c,rs c,rs 17e,r.e,rnl:,c,,i 2Z :'C)L v 'o[ cs do'J y I , tl ie,cal.' f l,.�1.!e cost e,�s r;i 7cs e,rc�i,ic1e,is I',Y„c,vic e,c c,c� c,v...., c i i ",rct..., e,r. c,c:,e, e,rrr7iri, , ,rc, ,ricT,e iri e,rl�c r ic,ri cscicl�c,ricsl c1gtcI, ssac.J. ,i css[i01lii f wvT c, iy inl`oYrnglto cs n ri,d ssarYc,sa,ii,,do I,ig e,inviionrnc',nkil coi'ijli kxls.,,,.tf>/`,`>flC),,,.022 ins tl,?,t,l ,v,lr«st ,"tirrste ifs tsfr ic sl ifl ,t,rrr„ , 1, cs;l1 > , ))2,0Q0 i" . l ,vfl r ,�t e,ltirr �te...%f �r ,sr.l �,,s .t..."s.i i i cle,terr7irie,cl. it ie,I iicyl;ie,r cost f,��hrr7cstc' vvcs�s ric,;.l�acle,cl i,.i call tc,tcllf,. —Page 36— Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 37- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 3: Roadway Plan Projects -Page 38- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 39- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOOS:;BURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L IR II::.::.:IIG IL...ILT' 11='IL....A IN Efficient truck movement plays a vital role in the economical movement of raw materials and finished products. The designation of freight routes provides for this efficient movement while at the same time maintaining neighborhood livability, public safety, and minimizing maintenance costs of the roadway system. Per the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), the only designated freight route in Woodburn is 1-5. In addition, OR 214 is designated a National Network Truck Route per ODOT TransGIS information online. Freight routes are shown on Figure 4, identifying freight routes and freight ways throughout Woodburn that facilitate the movement of freight in the city. National Highway System Routes The National Highway System (NHS)is designated by the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and includes roadways that are "important to the nation's economy, defense, and mobility."2Within Woodburn, 1-5 is part of the Eisenhower Interstate System and OR 219, OR 214, and OR 99E are classified as MAP-21 NHS Principal Arterials. 2 https://www.fhwa.dot.00v/planning/national hiahwav system/ -Page 40- Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 41 - Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 4: Freight Routes -Page 42- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 43- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N `wlT.Y OF WOODBURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA TIAAI I IIC SAI II::::::1Y 11:='II.....A IN Traffic safety has a significant impact on how people use the transportation system within Woodburn, particularly in areas where real or perceived safety risks prevent people from using more active travel modes, such as walking, biking, and taking transit. Table 3 identifies the traffic safety projects that will be included in the Woodburn TSP update. Additional safety projects and improvements are identified as part of the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit plans later in the document, in addition to the safety-related projects already discussed in the roadway plan previously in this section. Figure 5 illustrates the traffic safety plan projects. Table 3:Traffic Safety Projects Ib- in III,,,Mill. (#GffiG GI $ 249/� ytteyillle State Gte ge etriG 44 (`r. +ir.�l ir-1 or-I ire f�l hG A,P.M.o Rt&) if/1.,heR ^TT r, 01 O anced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout,or other appropriate geometric Northern OR enhancements) if/when 214/ Intersection warranted cnnd in S2 Butteville State/County geometric Medium $/5))0,000 to$1s2,000,0001 Road considerations "''d`€')ir++ tic,+-s vaitk+ Intersection c4 X—A) end sr) "fy, rnr2jovorne,infs to gcldi,os< )I it..dl stgnc,lirnitgticrns 6<;;' rn* ,c1 Enhanced signs and Front Street/ pavement markings(e.g. S3 Lincoln Street City Intersection Medium $50,000 Intersection stop signs,warning signs, and/or beacons) Evaluate the intersection layout,signing,and Front Street/ Intersection- striping in correlation to Young Street/ the railroad tracks. S4 City geometric High $100,000 Garfield Street Provide clarification for Intersection considerations westbound drivers trying to proceed through the intersection —Page 44— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L all III,.miin III,,,mlis As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor OR 99E/CCE Plan,update roadway S5 }i 4 City Lighting lighting to meet ODOT Medium $2,150,000 roadway lighting standards in coordination with ODOT As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT: Restrict left-turn movements and eventually close the Silverton Avenue intersection on OR 99E and vacate the segment of Silverton Avenue OR 99E access between OR 99E and between Birds Eye Avenue S6 Yaouung Street State Intersection Medium $60,000 Cleveland Restrict left-turn Street movements onto Birds Eye Avenue from Hillsboro Silverton Highway and eventually close the Birds Eye Avenue intersection on Hillsboro Silverton Highway and vacate the segment of Birds Eye Avenue between Hillsboro Silverton Highway and Silverton Avenue Evaluate the intersection layout,signing,and striping in coordination OR Intersection- with ODOT,including any S7 Tomlin Avenue State geometric sight distance High $100,000 To considerations constraints.Consider restricting the southbound left-turn movement -Page 45- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L all III,.miin III,,,mlis Ib kFske,vrks-1>uh«k�i-fy enkeos,-,s.ki«n to :,x i<s ki ncl'x tjl'{:k.d's kk sns e. lirksikkskickrss t�elklF� xis �c�lik d;skk ns ,i's1ke -vvkR n klai?k�krrveikls .... .... �' yr hcicskt,„'.and iInsfoll u.ar7kr:irnr:c:ssaarrs to rnikic,;kve;c,ve.f:rs.V. nfoi<kxr.kickn f,gs ofy.As Butteville Intersection- will c2f i�k f, "I fkll lkc:i 1y ir:cic,:vr:lckikri e;rst,,,, `[>i;fJoo'of)C)C."ost ii Icliid("l ii I S8 Road/ �l-��ska'rk��C,'ifv, geometric �h�rsTiti+r�w��klliclf;l„ Parr Road considerations r o 74kjo kl Ir,it glicli7ri ont, R4 I',uffo illo,Rood fail kl of to kl Io,soufll I k<k,�21i 2ykjo' rnikickve;cl ;kcslklkirscl clrsc�. rskr:i<l r.kickrs f,cll it rsr.r:. I c~al,J,ckvvirl„c�l.rniklerne;rskcsrc,rs c,f Sccaakl i Ai koijol LIE'22.1..rsi::7.f:t. I voi'01oon IEclod r.x <:.I::,s "�s,. , r.crsr,' Ir kxks.L-(Jno n k.;�,i,oc ion ol, «rkvk,i k if k«.!:Jg Ik in/1„g It: o a k<k^1 1 y�. Evaluate traffic safety along OR 99E,OR State/ 219/OR214,Front Street, S9 City-wide County/City Study Evergreen Road,and Low $100,000 other key corridors to identify appropriate countermeasures Fnhl4nc_Rd tr(4fic- ntrPI Y, Gte ge etriG lJikklklke;ic,ksklvvksy licll;l,kirkc,1„ B affoAlr S I..L. Rood c2y, I JQLDIku cll Iki,,kcl ;tJfy'si r dkLoy. c L TOTAL High Priority Costs $2,2200,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs TOTAL Low Priority Costs $Igoo,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $h,2h2,2Qg7,S60,0004512000Q„ 1.A cost estimate range is provided to allow for a design project to determine the appropriate intersection control using additional data,such as right-of-way information and surrounding environmental conditions.$500,000 is the planning- level cost estimate if a traffic signal is determined,and$2,000,000 is the planning-level cost estimate if a roundabout is determined.The higher cost estimate was included in all totals. —Page 46— Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA 2.The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes,and other characteristics. IL....( C IL.... ....III��::::::��::::::.... COIN I Il::::::r ..�.II V I�..�..Y II::.'IL....A IN As indicated above, the street system within Woodburn is largely built-out. Therefore, there are limited opportunities for new arterial, Service Collector, or Access Streets. However, there are opportunities for new local streets in select areas throughout the city that could improve access and circulation for all travel modes. Figure 6 illustrates the general location of the local street connections identified for the Woodburn TSP update. Roadway alignments for each connection are not provided as they are anticipated to be determined as part of future development. Costs are not provided for these projects as they are anticipated to be constructed by future development. Any local street connectivity projects that are desired to be city-initiated projects should be identified as a high priority and included in the cost-constrained plan. —Page 47— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 5:Traffic Safety Projects -Page 48- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 6: Local Street Connectivity -Page 49- rrrr/ rrrrr , %/ /,,,,,,,,,%%%%rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/rrr// /r rr, ,rr ,oao�o00 � I 1 rr rrr rill, %;, I i rr / r rrrr, r,/ r r r t rrrrr/ i�rr 1 r„ rr ,rrrrr //�i / / / / r, rrr„rr rr / / rri r I I � / r /r / rr„rr rr �/ ��Illlllliiiiu / r rrr// I / ail i I r /i / / r/ / r r / , i/arrrrrii�� r i i r r uu�uu'u�i �//�i�rs/ P it r, rr rr J,/�it r F/% r// rii ,r ,rrr��i�i// r✓1i�i//6rd r///%ij�%/.„ r�/��/�/%%/,;«u r N//%„e„✓ r r/p rr/i r � �'� l� � IP"�` /j ri� �r rr �✓G�0 y/ F Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 51 - Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TRANSIT SYSTEM Public transportation can provide important connections to destinations for people that do not drive or bike and can provide an additional option for all transportation system users. Transit complements walking, bicycling, or driving trips: users can walk to and from transit stops and their homes, shopping or work places, people can drive to park-and-ride locations to access a bus, or people can bring their bikes on transit vehicles and bicycle from a transit stop to their final destination. X IIS.T'IIN G T'�R A IN S II.T' S IR VIICII:::::: The transit system within Woodburn consists of fixed-route and paratransit services as well as school and shuttle bus service. Fixed-Rout Fixed-Route Service Public transportation in Woodburn today is provided by Woodburn Transit Service, Cherriots Regional, and Canby Area Transit, as described below. Figure 7 shows the existing transit facilities. Woodburn Transit Service Woodburn Transit Service operates a fixed-route bus line in Woodburn, providing connections throughout town as shown in Figure 7. As shown, fixed-route transit service is provided along the major east-west corridors linking neighborhoods to all major retail and commercial areas. The route also connects to the Woodburn Memorial Transit Facility located off of OR 214. Service is provided from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM at approximately 1-hour headways. Cherriots Regional Cherriots Regional operates the IOX Woodburn/Salem Express bus line that provides weekday service between Salem and Woodburn along the 99E corridor. Stops are located along Front Street, OR 214, Settlemier Avenue and Downtown Woodburn. Cherriots Regional also operates the 20X N. Marion Co./Salem Express bus line that provides weekday services between Salem, Silverton, and Woodburn. Stops are located along OR 214 and 99E. The service operates Monday- Friday from 7:30 AM -7:00 PM with 2 to 2.5 hour headways. Canby Area Transit Canby Area Transit (CAT) operates the Route 99 bus line which provides daily bus service between Woodburn and Canby along the 99E corridor. The Woodburn stop is located near the 99E/OR 214 intersection. The service operates Monday- Friday from 6:30 AM-8:00 PM with headways that range from 1 to 2.5 hours. -Page 52- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF W ODBU N 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Dial-A-Ride Service Woodburn provides Dial-A-Ride service for people with disabilities and the elderly living within Woodburn who are not able to utilize the fixed route bus. The service operates Monday- Friday from 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM and utilizes a fully accessible van. The van provides door to door service for any purpose to any location within the Woodburn City limits. The Dial-A-Ride program also arranges for volunteer drivers to take elderly Woodburn residents and those with disabilities to medical appointments in all areas between Portland and Salem. Requests for service must be made at least one day in advance. Otherrvi Greyhound The Greyhound bus service provides a regional transportation option, with buses to Portland from Woodburn three times per day. The station is located on Front Street and is open from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. everyday. Park-and-Rides The Woodburn Memorial Transit Facility (Park& Ride) is located off of Evergreen Road north of OR 214. Woodburn Transit Service regularly stops at the park & ride facility. The Cascades POINT bus service, operated by MTR Western in partnership with ODOT, makes 2 daily northbound stops and 2 daily southbound stops at the new transit facility. Riders can buy tickets to go as far as Eugene to the south, and Portland to the north. Schedule and ticket information is available at the website and the Amtrak Cascades site. Jim. Woodburn Memorial Transit Center Bus -Page 53- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 7: Existing Transit Facilities -Page 54- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 55- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L T.IIR A INSI.T. II::.'II..... II II::.T0J1� ::::.:rC"F I I II::.T( RAM Public transit service within Woodburn is provided by Woodburn Transit Service, supplemented by regional service provided by Cherriots Regional and Canby Area Transit. In addition to coordinating as needed with local and regional transit agencies to help implement their planned service enhancements, the City of Woodburn can support improved transit service by providing easy and safe walking and bicycling connections between key roadways, neighborhoods, and local destinations; by providing amenities, such as shelters and benches, at transit stops; by encouraging an appropriate mix and density of uses that support public transit; and by providing and planning for park-and-ride locations. Table 4 summarizes the transit plan identified for Woodburn. Table 4:Transit Plan Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Woodburn Woodburn Tl Medium $5,000 Fleet Transit/City Purchase of Category B and C vehicles(1 each)for use in the City's expanded transit services. (100%funding level 2020-21) Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Woodburn Woodburn T2 Fleet Transit/City Purchase a Category B vehicle that will replace the second Medium $5,000 oldest full-size vehicle in the WTS fleet;will be used for the City's existing local fixed route circulator. (130%funding level 2021) Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Woodburn Woodburn T3 Fixed Route Transit/City Addition of weekend service for Woodburn Transit Service Medium $5,000 fixed route and paratransit services(Sat.9am-5pm, Sun.9am-3pm) by up to 2,156 revenue hours(FY20-21). (100%funding level 2020-21) Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Woodburn Woodburn Modify the existing 60-minute fixed route loop;add an T4 Medium $5,000 Fixed Route Transit/City additional 30-minute route that will serve high frequency stops on weekdays(7am-7pm)within the Woodburn city limits.Total additional service will be up to 6,192 revenue hours(FY20-21). (100%funding level 2020-21) Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Woodburn Woodburn Modify the existing 60-min.fixed route by adding a new 30 T5 Fixed Route Transit/City min.route that serves high frequency stops(up to 1,456 Medium $5,000 revenue hours);this service will operate Saturdays(9am- 5pm) and Sundays(9am-3pm).Also includes Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service. (130%funding level 2020-21) -Page 56- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Woodburn Woodburn T6 Fixed Route Transit Increase frequency of existing route to 30 minutes Medium $0 Woodburn Woodburn T7 Fixed Route Transit Convert existing route to two-way operations Medium $0 Work with Woodburn Transit as growth occurs to provide new or re-routed service to other areas of Woodburn including: • Parr Road via an extension of Evergreen Road • Crosby Road Woodburn Butteville Road T8 City-wide Transit/City The employment center southwest of the I-5/0R Medium $5,000 214 interchange • Woodburn Industrial Park along the Progress Way and Industrial Avenue corridors • Gateway subarea between Front Street and Mill Creek • Neighborhoods in southeast Woodburn Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to establish a free shuttle Woodburn Woodburn between the Woodburn Company Stores and Downtown T9 Company Transit/City Woodburn,hourly during peak shopping and entertainment Medium $5,000 Stores hours Woodburn Coordinate with Woodburn Transit and major employers to T10 City-wide Transit/City establish a peak-only employer shuttle Medium $5,000 Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Urban and Rural Cherriots Expand service for up to 7,557 revenue hours on urban& T11 Cherriots/City Medium $5,000 Regional rural Regional services.Includes startup costs for hiring new Services employees,and coordination of schedules with connecting services.Also establishes a Youth fare category(ages 6- 18).(100%funding level 2020-21) Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Keizer to Establish one new Regional route from Keizer to Wilsonville T12 Cherriots/City Medium $5,000 Wilsonville with a stop at the Woodburn Memorial Park and Ride. Increase service on weekdays by 30 percent on urban& rural Regional services by up to 5,245 revenue hours. (130% funding level 2020-21) Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements Urban and funded through the STIF: Rural Cherriots T13 Regional Cherriots/City Add Saturday service to urban&rural Cherriots Regional Medium $5,000 services with up to 3,919 revenue hours of new service Services (FY20-21). Includes coordination of schedules with other connecting services. (100%funding level 2020-21) —Page 57— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements i7 funded through the STIF: Urban and Rural Cherriots Add 30 percent more Saturday service to urban&rural Tl 4 Cherriots/City Regional Regional services by up to 215 revenue hours(FY20-21). In Medium $5,000 Services FY21,adds 6 holidays to the same routes.Includes coordination of schedules with connecting services. (130% funding level 2020-21) Woodburn Coordinate transfers between the different agency services T15 City-wide Transit/ Medium $5,000 Cherriots/City in Woodburn Coordinate with Cherriots to provide a stop in Woodburn for T16 Woodburn Cherriots/City SMART Route 1X,providing service to WES station in Medium $5,000 Wilsonville and downtown Salem Coordinate with Cherriots to consider further new service connections for Woodburn including: Woodburn to 0 Service to Portland-connect to TriMet via the T17 Portland Cherriots/City Tualatin Park-and-Ride,directly into downtown Medium $5,000 Portland, or the MAX Orange Line light rail service. • Demand-responsive service to Hubbard one day per week Woodburn Evaluate all bus stops to verify static bus route information T18 City-wide Transit/ signage is visible and accessible and that bike racks are Medium $25,000 Cherriots available at major bus stops T19 Stop 755016: Woodburn New shelter Low $5,000 Walmart Transit T20 Stop 20419: Woodburn New shelter Low $5,000 Garfield Street Transit Woodburn Investigate transferring the paratransit system to a local T21 City-wide Low $5,000 Transit social service agency TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $15,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $115,000 1.Project to be funded by others. —Page 58— Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 59- `h I" �, ry U, M �d 1 x I r xw, dl / I I r r r , ��%F/��j ! ��%//✓�/I��//%�%/i/��r/,:r /�f %�/ � './r/%%r r✓: /r°ri/ �/f %/ c"��✓,,,;"V r/ rF� a ",,,,,;,� ,.:,.,. , n„�r r"°:r„, %!�%�/�%//r%/%,�/d/ri//rp�✓r�if�i�/?my�„_ ,,. �/r Frrrr�l r/�/r✓Jf r7 �/k/��(rrF x �� ,. '. �,,�/m��l/��i �/✓ rn"ti7r�/ ^r^°ym'�a��)a,,,; »ny //a >irmfrr�ta'^r ��n�IL'�9;F�y.,..dLy��/��' r/fl HFi a!✓;v+...r ,, ":"y" r "'"'�' rA / � M ,l � Irw dd /I Wpo-/ �"'� ud✓ ✓r,y lw krmleyr«d y N' � :,.. l ��iG,,f«yur�u« yy�� o,,A�t,✓Ir�1, r,,,i r4i,xu„rl�giiraw'�rJ��+a✓ay�i »rvj'�;Nr��" l?� I;h�s'r�// ;„�i�L�'/v4��✓UIO��U� G�r�h ilL�rrU«�r,' ' ,d y �al� ,,.,��; �l%.��'��,�.i�rdr�,w I✓r� �✓iraiY+x�l�',G/r,`� /",�,f'rrN'�r�/ ,f/X,/ �"/frr/�i ��,rh+� IErm�r� rI�N.✓rir�r+ijry�"afx°�x'l�� a r.�l "rrN�T t��r r' W'1N`r�i ° l�x� 6M ry.,/Y/�r�r�?Ar/i/7y �r,lt 4yrrx �6�r��,✓�d�,fzwrpl��fYY��yN (3r ��r✓i�r( f�! �f II r � u Y ryll � ,, �, der U✓r�� „rr,; ,r rs F,I r r, y,'r, ° � r,'!',. , '�'/�,1�"' Y«r9 '�,�1 r ��Iyllru,N l„xi,f'r/,a� rr,kr,4 r✓J Ju ,-�r,J, !,;r� m ";.,� �',, r U7nA !yi.yY, ,,;, �,l„/Y%�,r rY �� ;,r , A✓a /.A. Y ud� r nMr�%� Ir�! � r��Yv I k;N r.:r !,r(f/rl'yil �l �.r, Y ;„ , ytaw rr,i;,N, �, /" � I rb✓ti((/ �a�r�, �,lw, ,,6„ u f /f� s>Yl r0✓%!�e �,✓`r- � r.»$e r ,,�r,(IrWrr✓ v,sw,, «y� ,,"'�r,. ,� r ,,„, s f,^x „ rq ;..;,Y`r, r,w�.�N �� .} Y✓, � �r ., ✓ 1G .,/ !r� N'Y+,r°',�I r�P -,r r Ar'." »,r, N / �- a d r, �,.:-r, �.r , ./l^r<, rr' r l {fi f�,�, ✓rr ,�...v"' � 4"!'"�nr,�+ lu, 9Na »�r�rew�,.r/�,u'� ,. l,, d +..✓',,.,. � .,r^,F r;c, .,a,, " w .y ,�� Y �� ,hmruoi�J/ r ,./A Ir'r, / �rF o �✓r',� ��,, r. j/��;C,.rJ � 1 J Nr , 9i'", „ri,,r� n;,� �„rW ,:r .'%�1„, ,,.. '" r/4; �7�„YF�`J�. ,., r ,,r�� /` „1..,,,r'. i :I,r,,,'SR„ r,�w:'uu.- ✓ti ,�'e.., ,,.:J�u.«, ..tiaF W. « ,,.: n,,,,,.. , / r•,.:;d'�'f;.. l,I r ll,,;. �, 7�r;�,y�f, qr rr�,,;,d I,l✓,dn„1// �„ro.,7'a/r .J. eaArJY;.�(r ,w�r,.�,, �l,s uGr x.;p� r .;rx,. ..�,n( :,.r ;i'rm. ✓9 r', �� ",�„�»3. r sA <, �,, f ra,✓ rr r rvra /,,r 9,r i ./ �/,,,,r N,� r,,r � r ,r. Y War { ,,M„», r a, ,;//(✓ � � � ,a/ ,., ,,...1/ „r/s':; r r,,.r✓/N�1 �,.�1� ,..,u � ,,. a !re :;fir»* ;-,� rr�,,r ,... rrw ,,.,,, ,, .f �r, �d✓ r .9N ,../41.0 Via/. » , u �w1',.. x,.... rJ�..a,. nr »r ;K.. )�..�.f r .„ /,.,.rt <,,,. ,, , / .fdr' I�P r"".*wik<:.1±, reA✓ .r�, h'wir yr.a.?/ "i,n. ,d :w>'•,., r r„u /. i"., �,r vl r,r✓r„ „kN�,, r/I r," /J r"r-, r /. �O rr9 h ,�r�f f >� i,, :,rv, /am,,..w✓c„ ✓a ,:,,,lr�, ,riw, ,,.,!„�r a„ /r,r:, k.l�.,. M,v »„ N' ",l�r ,r1i/� f2 w, p,ni�ru f� �l�dsF"/`�i /�%+,��°�%Jlrlr//%�rl�,rr ✓ „ . �ir�w,,.Jr r r. r�,7 ". 'y �^., ! ,/✓/% ,,,...,,,, r� �. <..r % �d*.. � ,9r"r r: f^w;w rrr� �� ~rr 'IMIW W„"„o; rnAr.. xi.-i�^ „ a"F�,,.,", �4. r J ,vr'y J r ! r°,r n » I t�� r . , Jl x�n � u�, C/1h, ✓,,r r 1`, Ar,,, Ari I, �»r✓U, ,,r; nd �« � ,, r I�� , ✓i zr, , ,e N~,,,r 8,u, ».� .vtll,l » r�rr„ Irv,;, r, ,yr, ,. „r,..�� a ,rJl1 r. "i",B" !!' `�.,r „„ (,(:, ..�,,. r., „rr ,,rL'i r�"� w' :•2",r„N /!7^", rr, P r ,,, ✓ ..+� r 4 G.,. R6 1k` na rou@A ,lw. �� rr r!� Y !,! :,:, llir ,, p 1 4. �,� ,i,r.,. Y,P r'�r di RC „, y; .Y R ,,,,uoz °w.,_ ,r,N,"/ ✓., .Mmow ,,,..,hy' „,w,, r s h v r,.. r M ,,fi r,,,7 ,,, r�y ,W l � r,r ,�r � .,"Lmg, �r ✓vU a ,,,, r,, 0 r., ., �`'F P �U r �, ,,,s, V r ;, r� r „,, 5✓kli � s � r w, r,Ih d«r �?"»;"`r�" rf, / ! iid,� ,,,: ✓ ,✓';�`r,.". rl/r�. r rf>, .� ��,�. :,, ,ter ,�.9 a �W.rr :1y �,,,��r, ,.,: rMf, ''"N r r,,.<+u/n, ly' �..:. r I. ✓u ,.. � l ,rr,v ,,r., .. � ,.r,.,.r in, ,,,,rr. sr% .NAM , r uy,".�a» r r ,.,, s�„. ,,•71 ¢a! u r� r'•1, d Mw� wfr�-n;;: „�r„rv^.f;, rr Xr,,r ,^,�.. ✓r, ,.;, �' m,wrF/,a:✓dr. +3N .,r� ..,.,r;r � ;w h ,u,r;,"P.., r �h ,u,r ,,... .,., � ' .. !W L,. �,N�';; J y��. ¢ L .�.,n ,S Fl"r!' r u .l at �rir.,,,f r,,,,.�: 6 ,,..r, r�*'' 4 lµ,...7�� /r�.; r r ll',r,✓r r I Y"�'W,,r r�s m 9V:4d'�r„ rl� ,.,,�,>rt^.,,r�",,ij' ,,y ,r;r, � I ul �oNa M fr.�, � � % �, �tr ✓ n.,, rr /G a N,,r „n �„ ,w` .,.,,,, «�,, r., j n«r€w�.r r �o « <s,d ;�; � , , I, w.,, n. " > l.7lA✓1"w ra»rr,r<'1% Nf.,. r ,.M: ,,. ,. d,,,.,y .,,....r ,/ "r+ .� r d"j r.,� 1 d �: ,;, " „ � ...ar N7 w.,,".: FNa a�,f<. d'' nl n „ws✓r,,, J r., „rir ,, ,, ✓i ✓.. '�.w fiNw ,w a;»».,�a, r' I..u..,, ✓ ;Taal m L.. MI ✓ rosy✓i ,/ M „, Liww ,rw ,( ,. yam,. . ,,. hd#� .,J" y, M':!a�r M r.. M Y, .;,, .., wN�w: ,.,„M aM' _,., � N s., r r r / �,rr hJd ,r r�"A„ o .;;/ ,Y lr ,,: �1Nr,, r ii �✓„/r e" dN v:,. N a m,r,,.r ,.m�.. � I>'.,w., r✓r . .:,r. .�n>r,swd...'n „n';Mr r :„ IIN�q n,l«;A-�, u(I N,l, r, , ,' M a-,,rwJ all, ,, *Nr�:�r,JN�1[ r j D '" �„,w��f 'r,r�W �,,f„,M1 dk,;,,,r „,rp��w� 'vc„u„r M,d"vP r'✓fr✓y Id ��.,,p „� � a r�A4'�, I �i1w' rle 7rt NL,NIh . I ' „ ynY),,;w�lfk'„„fin, �,y/�y nnv�^"�',am�0 M��xNM�J1... w"'✓ da,,M„"f r w�'x r�,r�!n,',r h,N�`N� ,f1,ra�r� y","rl a�duM`7 'WW�N'Ni�«p dr r�,r,Ah,;'"rw dd''^Y :.Mw,m'gr �,N1L,"�� /r",A ,M2.;,;rr,,r :, r , a /r^�M' y�g r rm r✓ ✓,rl�"��"N�a „,!^ ?.,, ,,; r s„ M r 9v1 6. r'��/, f ,*gr , /r a;, r v"Lw,r, � y ,:9`A ar",Na. t"ar ,,,rl.. a;:,; w va;<.e ,.,,�., ,,.. r, y I ,r.;ei;,�`. 1�., r,�„Aim u4 r �h nr- , ,; n fr, �:(. ✓" k1✓T�. m „ „"..,,�"" N u y, �A ��u,�, ,«„..u, �a Ulf » U rv,,,bl�w� d,» .,, � ✓ ,I,�"n,oe .,, Ir y �, »~f,,U/�>�" "r s r ��, ),�ar rl �t"✓~7r ,y M'wMf,Ybr F...,,� r,.,w S""p d� M're r ¢� ;ay..� ,. � 7'hl�'JI''x, ;",,:A! "r�' �„ ';"��F !r ^kr y«r„ yy'yUy,;, ! d'�o�.r „ ,,, ✓M,�/!7 r+ma:� ,g✓ u a r7ti,:^ ��';/" y rah i r �r vN„,r �W w 'w�"�A uJ��rr�'N"Wdk 'Mv d�.,,,�,�" �,^ r�',"�d^; f�»r r `�" ray /rr)r✓u! r,»,N r I ,m ru w�J;a ,.:!r,%i ✓r .. �"S"`,r^»°'��,,n,.r(✓r»av Aa;.",,;.,"y&hrr v ,, ., M r,,,t�d „,rl�:.,wyyt« �A, ',M ,,� 5* A"'"rw,.,,. lrr ��,� ��N,V. Wa V'` r„ ��,a Iri/„it ,k", ,,� �o.ui /wm�wS��'' rr�a lr..:N,y �u r,5 rk r7",97�diwn � ,,� ✓�'d,^'-,r n,�,�.,; � ;;� T/ ^ rr, ¢,rr MiMW„h; ya .1 i r �...". ,,,,dOp Y; ,r ,,,.. lN,., r,,,,+w ., !u ,..�. ,✓� �I� .,.?&'✓r ''"% w,. r ;mmr".;f b;. , 1+,', ,.,..d r � ,w, Mr�yl, V ,. ,,,,�"" ;r ar YI Y/ ,n - ml„ y. ,.. a r -.wv,r ,-,r �`"',,,.✓ %-, r,:..ra Y. ,,., „1�+:� �'m� M�:„h ,r. w(�.r,M�,/. ' � �A r ,.rd' Y ,v,�,w I, vA�^ y�, M" r ,A,,;,,,,! /f 1 91 «l+ 'W„ r Y?„r�,,��'f,+,w tur' ,W. '��t a I� �, ,M""A JI (��.d., a✓, I A ! �'' 1 r,.Y,�".,I �, „1Yi:.: �+,,; ;,"^y Idf drllly rA� ok r" ;, �rM M' f�5' r ��GA.di"N� r" �w7•,,. f r� J�"�"x, r Nr „», ° ,�' .n� of ."n,M r' � nui r�di �r< � N ,t r, `;r,(r,✓r, �r l a +,�;,�" ,✓ � �pU NON*^ ^� I ✓ r„�a ;a' My'' ;F" ,» mua�, N row»» !�_r Y ,:',,r, !" ,,, ;r, - r a ✓/✓r niy`,,., �9I,,,,y� a �' :w,r'Ff,W J'M ",,rl,�� fw�,r ✓,r,.., ^I !,!m , } "a�;,. r �',' xr l0/'' (�'�pM'"...r; �° l;:'�ijl! "�4x rye,,+;I I f"`'^7>WY`.,,i,�;, ;r, w ,� ,✓rr,. r,, ro'J„';,: r .d rr Ykldlm lrr,„ ,r ;d"NV t r C d;��ih N"d".t y '"„(UM y * a f M`r v re rw I��wA!apN vl Iuw r rl� (»,, �"' ,u' ah u ; r" M, " I y row �`�� ,� �,�,.;� ��Y" ;,,, z ,Tyrr✓»�Y ,�«I��i' ,''", ,�`%'a «�1�r*�Y^ ' Urir 1>��„ ,;, ,�, �r r Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 61 - Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF W ODBU N 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAI PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM Woodburn's pedestrian system consists of sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and multi-use paths. A majority of city streets currently have sidewalks on at least one side of the roadway. The pedestrian plan includes several projects to construct new sidewalks where they are lacking and to fill in the gaps in the existing sidewalks along the city's streets. Although many of the pedestrian projects are located on Service Collector streets or higher, a few local street pedestrian projects are included to provide access to essential destinations such as schools, parks, churches, and other land uses. The pedestrian plan also includes several enhanced pedestrian crossings, multi-use paths, and accessways that support the pedestrian system. �J...) I S'TRAIN A C II IL....II II This section summarizes the facility types integrated into the pedestrian plan, addressing gaps and deficiencies identified in the existing system and forecast as part of future needs. Sidewalks Sidewalks are the fundamental building blocks of the pedestrian system. They enable people to walk comfortably, conveniently, and safely from place to place. They also provide an important means of mobility for people with disabilities, families with strollers, and others who may not be able to travel on an unimproved roadside surface. Sidewalks are usually 6 to 8-feet wide and constructed from concrete. They are also frequently separated from the roadway by a curb, landscaping, and/or on-street parking. Sidewalks are widely used in urban and suburban settings. Ideally, sidewalks could be provided along both sides of the roadway; however, some areas with physical or right-of-way constraints may require that sidewalk be located on only one side. Sidewalk solutions include: • Fill in the gaps • Install sidewalks on one-side of the roadway • Install sidewalks on both sides of the roadway • Re-construct existing sidewalks with appropriate width and buffer • Improve existing sidewalks with appropriate lighting Access ways Non-vehicular connections between cul-de-sacs and adjacent roadways can significantly reduce travel distances for pedestrians, thereby encouraging more people to walk. Woodburn has a few existing accessways that create connections between neighborhoods and pedestrian and bicycle routes. Potential new connections could use existing City right-of-way between cul- de-sacs or unconnected roadways to provide a paved path, unpaved path, or trail for non- motorized use. -Page 62- Exhibit A WOODBURN ("ITY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN 77 r'N r ri : ,' � iumpi III �VVii uui"i"'�VVi`uV �� uuuf�uu �V r v Sidewalk Gap Sidewalk Improvements Multi-use t s and Trails Multi-use paths are paved, bi-directional trails that can serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Multi-use paths and trails can be constructed adjacent to roadways where the topography, right-of-way, or other issues don't allow for the construction of sidewalks and bike facilities. A minimum width of 10 feet is recommended for low-pedestrian/bicycle-traffic contexts; 12 to 20 feet should be considered in areas with moderate to high levels of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Multi-use paths can be used to create longer-distance links within and between communities. They play an integral role in recreation, commuting, and accessibility due to their appeal to users of all ages and skill levels. �v✓��r t4��, �r' NPn n V� l �ry�✓drdyr9x erYf� i r�✓/, � 'i�o�n� '�� '9» I J rW �,, ,� V�(II�IiIInl011111111ih� <' llll�lllr�llflhl�I�ftlbfli�lf��/,r(' ,, ;.r,,✓.,ar, , I i „. `�" ��s�a� 7r�i� '.. .��. Accessways Multi-use Paths and Trails —Page 63— Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAi Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings Pedestrian crossing facilities enable pedestrians to safely cross streets, railroad tracks, and other transportation facilities. Planning for appropriate pedestrian crossings requires the community to balance vehicular mobility needs with providing crossing locations for desired routes of walkers. Enhanced pedestrian crossing treatments include: • Median refuge islands Curb extensions • High visibility pavement markings and Pedestrian signals signs e Pedestrian countdown • Rapid rectangular flashing beacons heads (RRFB) e Leading Pedestrian • Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons interval Many of the treatments listed above can be applied together at one crossing location to further alert drivers of the presence of pedestrians in the roadway. See Attachment "A" for a detailed description of enhanced pedestrian crossing treatments. _m I X YI„ v Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing with RRFBs Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing with Pedestrian Signal �J::.) ID :S T'IR II A IN II::.)IL....A IN II::.) Table 5 identifies the pedestrian plan projects for the Woodburn TSP update. As shown, the projects are separated into projects based on roadway classification, as well as projects at intersections and in other locations throughout the city.The priorities shown in Table 5 are based on the project evaluation criteria as well as input from the project team and the general public. The cost estimates are based on average unit costs for roadway improvements. Table 8 illustrates the location of the pedestrian plan projects. -Page 64- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Table 5: Pedestrian Plan Projects „wi m Ib- Major Arterials R6++o o Re(.(J A qid R1A1l.Ikq it #eT o ._Io(d iit tp OR 99E from Cost Lincoln Street to Remove existing sidewalks and install new P2 State New sidewalks Medium included in southern City sidewalks in coordination with ODOT R42 Boundary OR 99E from Cost P3 southern City State New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with Low included in Boundary to ODOT southern UGB R42 Minor Arterials Butteville Road/OR 219 Install new sidewalks in coordination with P4 from northern State/County New sidewalks ODOT Medium $1,500,000 UGB to OR 219 Butteville Road from r mi,o f Cost rl,i Install new sidewalks on tl to e osf Akio P5 r e County New sidewalks ',uffoville,IEood Medium included in R62 I=W�°o4t�,�4�'y?icy to southern UGB Evergreen Road P6 from Stacy City Sidewalks-Fill Fill in the gaps High $200,000 Allison Way to in gaps Boean Lane Boones Ferry P7 Road from County/City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $150,000 northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Install new sidewalks on one side.This Settlemier project improves safe routes to school for P8 Avenue from City New sidewalks Nellie Muir Elementary School,Heritage High $300,000 Oak Street to Parr Road Elementary School,and Valor Middle School Boones Ferry Install new sidewalks.This project improves Road from Parr safe routes to school for Heritage ctr+I e P9 County/City New sidewalks $800,000 Road to Elementary School and Valor Middle clilari. southern UGB School Front Street from Install new sidewalks on one side.This P10 northern UGB to City New sidewalks project improves safe routes to school for High $400,000 Hazelnut Drive Woodburn High School P1 1 Young Street City Sidewalks-Fill Fill in the gaps Medium $200,000 in gaps —Page 65— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m OR 211 from OR Install new sidewalks in coordination with P12 99E to eastern State New sidewalks ODOT Medium $500,000 UGB Service Collectors Hayes Street Fill in the gaps.This project improves safe from Harvard Sidewalks-Fill P13 City routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary High $600,000 Drive to in gaps Cascade Drive School I yr rclir:r:rl Road f[orn Pa[[ Road �o S E4kl Fkeo r)1 and Pa[[ Road Install new sidewalks.This project improves Cost safe routes to school for Heritage P14 � 1 r:-()��ar��C,'ij„v, New sidewalks High included in c,ear x re Fa }' dr Elementary School and Valor Middle R52 �w rar School vwr kwa r I C I',k4 vw r k war C,;i y Lincoln Street Sidewalks-Fill Fill in the gaps.This project improves safe P15 from Cascade City routes to school for Washington High $450,000 Drive to OR 99E in gaps Elementary School Industrial P16 Avenue from City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $500,000 Progress Way to OR 99E Progress Way P17 from Industrial City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $850,000 Avenue to OR 214 Hardcastle Fill in the gaps.This project improves safe Avenue from Sidewalks-Fill P18 Front Street to City in gaps routes to school for Washington High $450,000 Elementary School Cooley Road Brown Street Cost from Cleveland Sidewalks-Fill P19 City Fill in the gaps Medium included in Street to end of in gaps roadway R72 Cooley Road from OR 211 to Sidewalks-Fill P20 County Fill in the gaps Medium $650,000 Hardcastle in gaps Avenue Access Streets Woodland P21 Avenue from City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $250,000 Jory Street to Arney Road Stubb Road Cost from Harvard P22 County New sidewalks Install new sidewalks c,r7 „fl, e;vve;s is <;<, Medium included in Drive to Parr T,I ie;col i kiol;. R262 Road —Page 66— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ('VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m Oregon Way P23 from Country City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $250,000 Club Road to OR 214 Hazelnut Drive Fill in the gaps.This project improves safe from Graystone Sidewalks-Fill P24 Drive to Front City in gaps routes to school for Woodburn High High $150,000 Street School Gatch Street Fill in the gaps.This project improves safe from Hardcastle Sidewalks-Fill P25 Road to City in gaps routes to school for Washington High $350,000 g p Elementary School Cleveland Street Park Avenue Install new sidewalks on one side.This P26 from Hardcastle City New sidewalks project improves safe routes to school for High $65,000 Avenue to Lincoln Street Washington Elementary School Local Streets Willow Avenue P27 from McNaught City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on both sides Medium $350,000 Road to OR 219 Cascade Drive Install new sidewalks.This project improves P28 from OR 214 to City New sidewalks safe routes to school for Nellie Muir High $400,000 Hayes Street Elementary School Ben Brown Lane from end of Sidewalks-Fill P29 roadway to City in gaps Fill in the gaps Medium $200,000 Boones Ferry Road Oak Street from P30 Boones Ferry City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $150,000 Road to Front Street Ogle Street from P31 Cleveland Street City New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $900,000 to Boones Ferry Road Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Front Enhanced Construct ADA-compliant ramps and P32 Street/Young City sidewalks on the east leg of the Medium $15,000 Street crossing intersection Construct ADA-compliant ramps and Front Enhanced sidewalks on the east leg of the P33 Street/Lincoln City crossing intersection.This project improves safe High $15,000 Street routes to school for St Luke's School Cascade Enhanced Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. P34 Drive/Hayes City This project improves safe routes to school High V141`,21000 Street crossing for Nellie Muir Elementary School Park Enhanced Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. P35 Avenue/Legion City This project improves access to Legion Medium V141`,21000 Park Driveway crossing Park —Page 67— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m Hazelnut Drive/ Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. Broadmoor Enhanced P36 City This project improves safe routes to school High V14 I,,,.,,C),000 Place crossing Accessway for Woodburn High School As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,update the existing crossing to an enhanced OR 214/N Enhanced pedestrian crossing with a pedestrian P37 Bulldog Drive State/City crossing hybrid beacon coordinated with the High $150,000 surrounding traffic signals in coordination with ODOT.This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan,install countdown pedestrian timers Enhanced and construct ADA enhancements at key OR 99E from OR crossing_ signalized intersections along OR 99E in P38 214 to Young State/City coordination with ODOT,including: Medium $605,000 Street Signalized g� intersection OR 214/OR 211 • Hardcastle Avenue • Lincoln Road • Young Street As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan,install curb extensions on minor street legs of intersections(curb extensions to shorten pedestrian crossing distances parallel to OR 99E,not for crossing of OR 99E) between Arlington Street and OR 99E from OR Enhanced Cleveland Street(up to 8 locations) in P39 214 to Young State/City crossing coordination with ODOT.Potential Medium $950,000 Street locations include: • Alexandria Avenue • James Street • Williams Street • Blaine Street • Aztec Drive • Laurel Avenue • Tomlin Avenue As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,install an OR 99E, north of Enhanced enhanced pedestrian crossing in P40 Williams Street crossing State/City coordination with ODOT,that may include High $ `,1„`)21000 raised median refuge island,sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting,and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR OR 99E, 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,install an between NE Enhanced enhanced pedestrian crossing in P41 Laurel Avenue State/City coordination with ODOT,that may include High $ `,1`)21000 and Tomlin crossing raised median refuge island,sidewalk infill, Avenue supplemental street lighting,and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). -Page 68- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,install an OR 99E, enhanced pedestrian crossing in between Blaine Enhanced P42 Street and Aztec State/City crossing coordination with ODOT,that may include High $,�>IC), ,000 Drive raised median refuge island,sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting,and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,install an OR 99E, north of Enhanced enhanced pedestrian crossing in P43 Mount Jefferson State/City crossing coordination with ODOT,that may include Medium $, `>1`)Q'000 Avenue raised median refuge island,sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting,and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study,install an OR 99E, north of Enhanced enhanced pedestrian crossing in P44 James Street crossing State/City coordination with ODOT,that may include Medium $ `,1„`)0'000 raised median refuge island,sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting,and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). Boones Ferry Road/ Enhanced Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. P45 Constitution City This project improves safe routes to school High $F,�>I`21000 Avenue/Tukwila crossing for Woodburn High School Drive Multi-use Pathways As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan,construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: • Hazelnut Drive • Bulldog Drive (east crossing) Mill Creek Multi-use OR 214 state highway) High $2,000,000 P46 Greenway City pathway 0 Hardcastle Avenue • Lincoln Street • Young Street • Cleveland Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School —Page 69— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m Ib- As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan,construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: Mill Creek • Bulldog Drive (west crossing) Greenway- Multi-use P47 Northern City pathway Meridian Drive Medium $700,000 tributary Boones Ferry Road This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School, Lincoln Elementary School,and French Prairie Middle School As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan,construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street Mill Creek connections: Greenway- Multi-use 0Parr Road P48 Western City pathway Ben Brown Lane Medium $900,000 tributary Settlemier Avenue • Front Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School nA�it+i II Imo Pl.+hP 1.+h T woo 00 As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan,construct a north-south multi- Washington use path connection between Hardcastle Elementary Multi-use P50 School Multi-Use City pathway Avenue and Lincoln Street,west of Medium $90,000 Path Washington Elementary School.This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School Mill Creek As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Greenway Multi-use Plan,construct extension of Mill Creek P51 Southern City pathway Greenway multi-use path to Belle Passi Medium $90,000 extension Road Construct a connection between the Evergreen Road Multi-use Evergreen Road multi-use path and P52 Pedestrian City pathway pedestrian facilities that are part of future Medium $20,000 Connection development to the south ' e Q@At@AAil.I Pork.,-,64i 6 o r+h n nd" .,, 9 �9i�B£tIAi3 S(gA#+9m Bri,F6 441 l4i I -Page 70- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L „w� m As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT,install June WayMulti-use a new accessway to OR 99E(near the P55 Accessway State/City pathway Audrey Way intersection),may not Low $80,000 connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E Johnson Street Multi-use As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor P56 Accessway State/City pathway Plan and in coordination with ODOT,install Low $45,000 a new accessway to OR 99E As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Elm Street Multi-use Plan and in coordination with ODOT,install P57 Accessway State/City pathway a new accessway to OR 99E,may not Low $25,000 connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E Wilson Street Multi-use As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor P58 Accessway State/City pathway Plan and in coordination with ODOT,install Low $55,000 a new accessway to OR 99E As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT,install Hawley Street Multi-use a new accessway to OR 99E(possibly part P59 Accessway State/City pathway of future street extension),may not Low $55,000 connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E A Street Multi-use Install a new accessway that connects A P60 Accessway City pathway Street north to Cleveland Street and/or Low $25,000 Mill Creek Greenway(western tributary). Greenview Drive Multi-use Construct a multi-use path extending from P61 Multi-use Path City pathway Greenview Drive west to OR 99E Low $70,000 Provide wayfinding to bike routes,multi- P621 City-wide City Wayfinding use paths, parks,schools,and other Medium $30,000 essential destinations $ .'42Q'0 TOTAL High Priority Costs 1750,000602 1922 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs 10,300,0008 p: 1199 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $ k�5'0 5a000 $.1.,L.gj"2gg TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) 4.:7a4007000„1,,,, 1.Project not shown on Pedestrian Plan Map 2.Cost estimates are not included for projects that would be completed as part of a roadway project,such as locations where roadway widening will relocate the curb and require new sidewalks to be installed.The cost for these projects is included in the corresponding roadway projects described later in the memo. 3.The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes,and other characteristics. —Page 71 — Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 8: Pedestrian Plan Projects -Page 72- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 73- '„ri IN m„ W �" nod"",, ✓ , " e, r ro r �� (Pr(ldffflnuaarr") �J➢U I f �f%r�lJl/fly I d d .gym o " r�r;yu 6 I Mn i II r i r rn I Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 75- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN BICYCLE SYSTEM Woodburn's bicycle system consists of on-street bike lanes and other bicycle provided on a few roadways within the city. The bicycle plan includes several projects along the city's Major and Minor Arterial and Service Collector streets for connectivity throughout the city. The bicycle plan also includes projects on access and local street that provide direct access to essential destinations. Alternative t Designate an alternative route along a parallel street that provides a more comfortable environment for cyclists with the same level of connectivity. The alternative route could be identified by wayfinding signs, which could also be used to identify essential destinations that can be reached by the route. The alternative route may provide shared-lane pavement markings and signs, on-street bike lanes, or other bicycle facilities. PavementShared Lane Markings and Signs Shared-lane pavement markings (often called "sharrows") are not a bicycle facility, but a tool designed to help accommodate bicyclists on roadways where bike lanes are desirable but infeasible to construct. Sharrows indicate a shared roadway space for cyclists and motorists and are typically centered in the travel lane or approximately four feet from the edge of the travelway. Sharrows are suitable on roadways with relatively low travel speeds (<35 mph) and low ADT (<3,000 ADT); however, they may also be used to transition between discontinuous bicycle facilities. Sharrows could be applied along a variety of streets within Woodburn where room for on-street bike lanes is limited. On-Street i lanes On-street bike lanes are striped lanes on the roadway dedicated for the exclusive use of cyclists. Bike lanes are typically placed at the outer edge of pavement (but to the inside of right-turn lanes and/or on-street parking). Bicycle lanes can improve safety and security of cyclists and (if comprehensive) can provide direct connections between origins and destinations. On-street bike lanes could be applied along a variety of streets within Woodburn where space allows. Separatedi Facilities Separated bike facilities include buffered bike lanes and separated bike lanes, or cycle tracks. Buffered bike lanes are on-street bike lanes that include an additional striped buffer of typically 2-3 feet between the bicycle lane and the vehicle travel lane and/or between the bicycle lane and the vehicle parking lane. They are typically located along streets that require a higher level of separation to improve the comfort of bicycling.Separated bike lanes, also known as cycle tracks, are bicycle facilities that are separated from motor vehicle traffic by a buffer and a physical barrier, such as planters, flexible posts, parked cars, or a mountable curb. One-way -Page 76- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAi separated bike lanes are typically found on each side of the street, like a standard bike lane, while two-way separated bike lanes are typically found on one side of the street. r R 1 On-street Bike Lanes Buffered Bike Lanes CrossingsEnhanced Enhanced bicycle crossing facilities enable cyclists to safely cross streets, railroad tracks, and other transportation facilities. Planning for appropriate bicycle crossings requires the community to balance vehicular mobility needs with providing crossing locations that the desired routes of cyclists. Enhanced bicycle crossings include: • Bike Boxes - designated space at an intersection that allows cyclists to wait in front of motor vehicles while waiting to turn or continue through the intersection. • Two-Stage Left-turn Boxes - designated space at a signalized intersection outside of the travel lane that provides cyclists with a place to wait while making a two-stage left-turn. • Pavement marking through intersections-pavement markings that extend and bike lane through an intersection. • Bike Only Signals-A traffic signal that is dedicated for cyclists • Bicycle Detection-Vehicle detection for bicycles Additional information on the enhanced bicycle crossing treatments is provided in Technical Memorandum 5: Alternative Analysis and Funding. Wayfinding i s Wayfinding signs are signs located along roadways or at intersections that direct bicyclists towards destinations in the area and/or to define a bicycle route. They typically include distances and average walk/cycle times. Wayfinding signs are generally used on primary bicycle routes and multi-use paths. -Page 77- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L BC Y C IL....I[::::: II::.)IL.... I II::.)IR J II::::::.C'T' Table 6 identifies the bicycle plan projects for the Woodburn TSP update. As shown, the projects are separated based on roadway classification. The priorities shown in Table 6 are based on the project evaluation criteria as well as input from the project team and the general public. The cost estimates are based on average unit costs for roadway improvements. Figure 9 illustrates the location of the bicycle plan projects. Table 6: Bicycle Plan Projects Major Arterials np�i�c. # Ile Rec� Wiest — C+ +o RiI.o�ncc-icr-,cl.1-,0q AAo il�w, .,I1 o!-I in tp ,AfBFlFi6 OR 214 from Cost B2 Progress Way State Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in Medium included in to OR 99E coordination with ODOT R3 z OR 99E from Cost B3 Lincoln Street State Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in Medium included in to southern coordination with ODOT City Boundary R42 OR 99E from Cost B4 southern City State Bike lanes Widen roadway and install buffered bike Medium included in Boundary to lanes in coordination with ODOT R42 southern UGB Minor Arterials OR 219 from western UGB State Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in B5 to Butteville coordination with ODOT Medium $1,000,000 Road Butteville Road/OR 219 Widen roadway and install bike lanes in B6 from northern State/County Bike lanes coordination with ODOT Medium $3,200,000 UGB to OR 219 Butteville Road from cmn,onf. Luc,Ye"1, Cost B7 ,,xte;r7ts1',e +ra County Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium included in ...,a a1) R62 to southern UGB Evergreen B8 Road from OR City Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $500,000 214 to Hayes Street Boones Ferry Road from B9 northern UGB County/City Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $500,000 to Hazelnut Drive -Page 78- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ('I..T,.Y OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Em „wpm R Em Hill 111111 Settlemier Install shared lane markings and signs. Avenue from This project improves safe routes to B10 Harrison Street City Shared street school for Nellie Muir Elementary School, Medium $25,000 to railroad Heritage Elementary School,Valor Middle tracks School,and St. Luke's School Boones Ferry Road from 311 Dahlia Street County/City Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $1,500,000 to southern UGB Widen roadway and install bike lanes. Front Street This project improves safe routes to B12 from northern City Bike lanes school for Woodburn High School, High $8,050,000 UGB to Boones Ferry Road Heritage Elementary School,Valor Middle School,and St. Luke's School Garfield Street B13 from 3rd Street City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 to Front Street Garfield Street B14 from Smith City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 Drive to 3rd Street Perform a corridor evaluation that would 3151 Young Street City Study consider design treatments to improve Medium $15,000 bicycle comfort and safety such as striping,signing,and wayfinding OR 211 from Widen roadway and install bike lanes in B16 OR 99E to State Bike lanes Medium $1,000,000 eastern UGB coordination with ODOT Service Collectors Arney Road from Robin Install shared lane markings and signs in B17 Avenue to OR State Shared street coordination with ODOT Low $5,000 219 Harvard Drive Enhance the parallel route of Harvard from Stacy Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen B18 Allison Way to City Bike lanes Road in place of Stacy Allison Way. Install Medium $15,000 Evergreen buffered bike lane striping on both sides Road of the roadway Hayes Street Install bike lane striping.This project B19 from Harvard City Bike lanes improves safe routes to school for Nellie Medium $35,000 Drive to Cascade Drive Muir Elementary School Hayes Street from Cascade Widen roadway and install bike lanes. B20 Drive to City Bike lanes This project improves safe routes to Medium $3,000,000 Settlemier school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Avenue -Page 79- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L 1. m „wpm Ism Im iiiiiii I didi I III lye gc ,e,F1Pol,I, Rood f[orn Sfulbb Sf("of to I v,i cli on Rood f'-sae:, Rood fr) �,odkfi{ Widen roadway and install bike lanes. Cost Fa4 o k)l ond This project improves safe routes to B21 P he I d fr C„`'44H ::4yC„`ity Bike lanes school for Heritage Elementary School High included in ev Cri Y. and Valor Middle School R52 I'iy°a-+r�K1K�e a71,.f'aaK:K: 1tif.'�F#k1 fKk'�Y'�h o Ka vv�fK�- C„`#yc Lincoln Street Install shared lane markings and signs. B22 from Cascade City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $20,000 Drive to Front Street school for Washington Elementary School Lincoln Street Install bike lane striping.This project B23 from Front city Bike lanes improves safe routes to school for High $55,000 Street to OR 99E Washington Elementary School Cleveland B24 Street from City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $15,000 Front Street to OR 99E Hardcastle Install shared lane markings and signs. B25 Avenue from City Shared street This project improves safe routes to High $15,000 Front Street to OR 99E school for Washington Elementary School Brown Street from Install shared lane markings and signs Cleveland frorn C„`loovolond frrxr:f fc2.. iariric. B26 City Shared street Low $ts20,000 Street to end I'oulovoid. Iinsfoll k ko,Igi,i , f iainQ fiorin. of K«<s,lvro�hr�yfl i,w. fa,i n,l Ifr,ulov(xd to fl o,`oufl i Mfo[ksl,. Soufl Mfo[kil Cooley Road B27 from OR 211 to County Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $1,300,000 Aubrey Way Cooley Road from Aubrey B28 Way to County Bike lanes Install bike lane striping Medium $15,000 Hardcastle Avenue Access Streets Stubb Road Cost B29 from Harvard County Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low included in Drive to Parr Road R262 Astor Way B30 from Country City Bike lanes Install bike lane striping Low $25,000 Club Road to OR 214 Tukwila Drive B31 from Boones City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $5,000 Ferry Road to Hazelnut Drive —Page 80— Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ('VTY OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Em „wpm R Em Hill 111111 5th Street from Install shared lane markings and signs. B32 OR 214 to City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $20,000 Garfield Street school for St Luke's School Gatch Street from Install shared lane markings and signs. B33 Hardcastle City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $15,000 Road to Cleveland school for Washington Elementary School Street Park Avenue Install shared lane markings and signs. B34 from OR 214 to City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $20,000 Lincoln Street school for Washington Elementary School Evergreen Road from B35 Country Club City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 Court to OR 214 Local Streets Country Club Road from B36 Evergreen City Bike lanes Install bike lane striping Medium $40,000 Road to Astor Way Cascade Drive Install shared lane markings and signs. B37 from OR 214 to City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $10,000 Hayes Street school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Smith Drive Install shared lane markings and signs. from Hayes B38 Street to City Shared street This project improves safe routes to Medium $5,000 Garfield Street school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Meridian Drive B39 from Hazelnut City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 Drive to OR 214 1 st Street from B40 Harrison Street City Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Medium $15,000 to Cleveland Street Provide wayfinding to bike routes,multi- B401 City-wide City Wayfinding use paths, parks,schools,and other Medium $30,000 essential destinations TOTAL High Priority Costs $8,125,2,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $12,280,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $1210,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $20,5,2115 ,,000 1.Project not shown on Bicycle Plan Map. 2.Cost estimates are not included for projects that would be completed as part of a roadway project,such as locations where additional roadway width is needed to install bike lanes.The cost for these projects is included in the corresponding roadway projects described later in the memo. 3.The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes,and other characteristics. —Page 81 — Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L -Page 82- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Figure 9: Bicycle Plan Projects -Page 83- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ("VTY OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Blank l 1x17 page -Page 84- ! i 1 1 / 1 , / / / w' . w I w � i / I I i r� �rrrry a r um � (� �� 1>�y ➢ �� mid ��iri0 ri��k III � �I II l larrr y Oy /irii i r , r I �{I ��//, �/, � r 7" r,i( � � „vi n�'fl%Gl�(��A 6�✓r�ol i ,/;� ; u iI /� �/ ✓1f �l , //�/ i [v,w/�///ual�n N d ,,,. � A � �r IN Fm ri' ,.r ;,:,. ,,, ,l" ��, �1 a� rt� �� G �,.,.,,;� � m�,�*m�r, fir.,✓�; ,y �rti"�� w� ��, r,l v� ;�;;�" � TJ�r�r!�� w; y, Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 86- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN OTHER TRAVEL MODES This section summarizes the plans for other travel modes in Woodburn. TRA INS 11:::'0 R"I..A..-II O I SYS.T.II::::M MA II A G II::::::M II::::::II .T. AINID (I II::.)II:::RA.T] IN (..I.SMO) II:=)II.....AI Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) is a set of integrated transportation solutions intended to improve the performance of existing transportation infrastructure. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies are two complementary approaches to managing transportation and maximizing the efficiency of the existing system. TDM addresses the demand on the system: the number of vehicles traveling on the roadways each day. TDM measures include any method intended to shift travel demand from single occupant vehicles to non-auto modes or carpooling, travel at less congested times of the day, etc. TSM addresses the supply of the system: using strategies to improve the system efficiency without increasing roadway widths or building new roads. TSM measures are focused on improving operations by enhancing capacity during peak times, typically with advanced technologies to improve traffic operations. Transportation Transportation System Management (TSM) focuses on low cost strategies that can be implemented within the existing transportation infrastructure to enhance operational performance. Finding ways to better manage transportation while maximizing urban mobility and treating all modes of travel as a coordinated system is a priority. TSM strategies include traffic signal timing and phasing, traffic signal coordination, traffic calming, access management, local street connectivity and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Traffic signal coordination and ITS typically provide the most significant tangible benefits to the traveling public. The primary focus of TSM measures are region-wide improvements, however there are a number of TSM measures that could be used in a smaller-scale environment such as within the City of Woodburn. TSM projects and programs that are recommended for the City of Woodburn to explore include the following: • Update signal timing plans and coordinate signals to better match prevailing traffic conditions o OR 99E from Hardcastle Avenue to Young Street (or to the potential future Cleveland Street traffic signal) is one candidate corridor for coordination • Implement truck signal priority at key signalized intersections along OR 214 and OR 99E. Truck signal priority can reduce delay, travel time, and the number of stops for freight vehicles, helping reduce vehicle emissions and improve travel time reliability. • Work with ODOT to develop and implement a Traffic Management Plan for the OR 99E corridor that responds to increased congestion resulting from incidents on 1-5 and regional events -Page 87- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Transportation Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is a policy tool as well as a general term used to describe any action that removes single occupant vehicle trips from the roadway during peak travel demand periods. As growth in the City of Woodburn occurs, the number of vehicle trips and travel demand in the area will also increase. The ability to change a user's travel behavior and provide alternative mode choices will help accommodate this potential growth in trips. Technical Memorandum 5: Alternative Analysis and Funding identifies several policies and programs that may be effective for managing transportation demand in the City of Woodburn, especially within the next 10 to 20 years. Table 7 summarizes the strategies that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. As with all new public and private investments, the implementation of TDM strategies is sure to draw opposition from some. Given Woodburn's lack of experience with TDM strategies, it is important that decision-makers understand their long-term costs and benefits and are able evaluate these along-side arguments from opponents in achieving outcomes that best reflect the City's vision and goals while effectively reducing travel demand. Table 7:Transportation Demand Management Program Strategies ..... ......M 11 M Carpool/Vanpool Coordinate a rid eshare/carpool/vanpool program TDMI Match Services County/City that regional commuters can use to find other High $5,000/year commuters with similar routes to work Carpool/Vanpool Coordinate with employers to designate TDM2 Parking Program City carpool/vanpool preferential parking Low $5,000/year Work with nearby cities,employers,transit service TDM3 Collaborative County/Cit providers,and developers to collaborate on Medium Marketing y marketing for transportation options that provide an $5,000/year alternative to single-occupancy vehicles Limited and/or Update the Woodburn Development Ordinance to TDM4 Flexible Parking City include strategies that encourage multi-modal High $25,000 Requirements transportation Parking Modify the City's current parking policy to allow for TDMS Management City the potential to charge for parking Low $10,000 Transit Fare City/ Work with Woodburn Transit to provide transit fare TDM6 Subsidies Woodburn subsidies Low $5,000 Transit Work with employers to encourage TDM measures Employer TDM such as allowing employees to work at home one day TDM7 Measures City a week and scheduling shift changes to occur Low $5,000/year outside of peak travel periods TOTAL High Priority Costs $125,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $215,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $440,000 -Page 88- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Other potential TDM projects include: • Encourage the development of high-speed communication in all part of the city (fiber optic,digital cable, DSL, etc).The objective would be to allow employers and residents the maximum opportunity to rely upon other systems for conducting business and activities than the transportation system during peak periods. • Encourage developments that effectively mix land uses to reduce vehicle trip generation. These plans may include development linkages (particularly non-auto) that support greater use of alternative modes. Land 5 The types and intensities of land uses are closely correlated with travel demand. Land use patterns in many areas of the city are suburban in nature with low densities throughout the city and more industrial and commercial uses in the eastern part of the city near OR 99E. In the future the city will continue to have a mixture of housing and industrial densities, as well as areas of mixed-use development (i.e., a mix of residential, retail, commercial and/or office uses). Technical Memorandum 5: Alternative Analysis and Funding identifies several land use strategies that could be implemented in Woodburn. Table 8 summarizes the strategies that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. Table 8: Land Use Projects ..... ......M 11 ME Commercial and Establish neighborhood commercial and mixed-use LU 1 Mixed-use Nodes City nodes within the city Low $25,000 LU2 Alternative State/City Work with ODOT to develop alternative mobility Low $25,000 Mobility Targets targets at critical intersections along state highways. Through development,right-of-way dedications Right-of-way should be provided to facilitate the future planned LU3 Dedications C�y transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed Low $0 development Through development, half-street improvements Half-street (sidewalks,curb and gutter,bicycle lanes/paths, LU4 Improvements City and/or travel lanes) should be provided along all site High $01 frontages that do not have full buildout improvements in place at the time of development TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $50,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $50,000 1.Project to be funded by others. -Page 89- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Access Management Plan Numerous driveways or street intersections increase the number of conflicts and potential for collisions and decrease mobility and traffic flow. The City of Woodburn, as with every city, needs a balance of streets that provide access with streets that serve mobility. Access management is a set of measures regulating access to streets, roads, and highways, from public roads and private driveways. It is a policy tool which seeks to balance mobility, the need to provide efficient, safe and timely travel with the ability to allow access to individual properties. Proper implementation of access management techniques should guarantee reduced congestion, reduced collision rates, less need for roadway widening, conservation of energy, and reduced air pollution. Measures may include but are not limited to restrictions on the type and amount of access to roadways, and use of physical controls, such as signals and channelization including raised medians, to reduce impacts of approach road traffic on the main facility. City of Woodburn access spacing standards can be found in the Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 3.04.02 and OAR Division 51, which specifies access management spacing standards for ODOT facilities. In coordination with the access spacing standards presented in these documents, Table 9 summarizes the access management projects identified to help Woodburn balance access and mobility throughout the city. Table 9:Access Management Projects ..... ......M 11 im Develop access management standards that reflect Access Spacing functional classification of the roadway and that AMl Standard City coordinate with the ODOT standards that regulate Low $25,000 Modification several major roadways in Woodburn Investigate and implement opportunities to provide Alternative alternative access to nonstate facilities when AM2 Access City reasonable access can occur(consistent with the Low $25,000 State's Division 51 access management standards) Access Variance Define a variance process for when the standard AM3 Process City cannot be met Low $25,000 Establish an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at Access each opportunity.Cross-over easements should be AM4 Consolidation City provided on all compatible parcels(topography, Low $25,000 access,and land use) to facilitate future access between adjacent parcels and inter-parcel circulation. Access Consider opportunities to restrict certain turning AM5 Movement City movements at accesses(such as a right in-right out Low $25,000 Restrictions access) TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $125,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $125,000 —Page 90— Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN I TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L IAA II IL.... 11:='IL....A IN The existing rail system in Woodburn includes freight rail, while there are currently no passenger rail terminals. Union Pacific Railroad operates a Class I rail line through Woodburn. These tracks parallel the east side of Front Street. A total of five at-grade crossings and one grade separated crossing exist along the rail line. Willamette Valley Railway operates a Shortline Railroad track that parallels the north side of Cleveland Street in the south side of town. A total of five public at-grade crossings exist along this rail line. In addition to these crossings, the rail line serves multiple local businesses along the corridor. Table 10 summarizes the rail system projects that best meet the identified goals and objectives of this plan. Table 10: Rail Projects Ma' EM Establish a downtown Amtrak passenger rail stop along Front Street in downtown Woodburn, potentially RA1 Front Street City as a public-private partnership at the''Y''property Low $10,000 adjacent to Locomotive Park Front Street and Investigate the opportunity to remove private grade RA2 Cleveland Street City railroad crossings by providing alternative access to Medium $10,000 parcels as development and redevelopment occurs Butteville Road, State/County/ Explore a passenger rail stop if commuter rail is RA3 north of OR 219 City extended between Wilsonville and Beaverton down Low $5,000 to Salem TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $10,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $15,000 TOTAL Program Costs(20 years) $25,000 I IR T.IIR A IN S 11:::'0 IR T'A T'10 I There are no airports located within the city limits. The closest airports include the Aurora State Airport (classified as an Urban General Aviation Airport) located approximately 8 miles to the north via OR 99E and OR 551 and the Mulino Airport located approximately 14 miles to the northeast via OR 211 and OR 213. No air projects or programs were identified as part of the TSP process. i IR II II::.: .T.IRA INS II:::' R'T'A'T]0 I Marine transportation is not available within the City of Woodburn, and no marine projects or programs were identified as part of the TSP process. There are no major pipeline transport facilities within the Woodburn UGB, and no pipeline projects or programs were identified as part of the TSP process. -Page 91 - Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 92- a / o J l �v i I / f i /i i o� Im A , Y I i i � a 6 min I i ul r I � �I i / / u� i r I ,t �r II } � I u, i i I I I I. I I i it„ail I i � 4 I I I I, I I�I I V� I � I I MI� I I�I I III I 411�� I � t I • Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 94- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN p TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN FUNDING F 9J I IIING 11:::TOGRAMS AINID The City of Woodburn has historically relied upon multiple revenue sources to fund the maintenance of its transportation network and make capital improvements. These local gas tax revenue, inter-governmental (primarily state gas tax revenue), franchise fees, and other miscellaneous revenue. Table 1 1 displays the total revenue by source used to fund transportation projects within Woodburn over the most recent seven years that comprehensive data was available. Table 11: City of Woodburn Revenue History I I Taxes $129,412 $115,692 $102,517 $101,761 $106,537 $182,109 $121,1 Inter Government $1,480,082 $1,454,076 $1,409,311 $1,384,277 $1,597,518 $1,312,024 $1,116, , ,Franchise $359,820 $357,983 $336,707 $360,046 $353,381 $326,713 $347,621 $348,896 Transportation SDC Fees $33,396 $183,698 $440,595 $521,933 $411,527 $400,172 $153,268 $306,370 Other $69,856 $59,518 $49,532 $319,086 $49,457 $88,767 $27,147 $94,766 Revenue Total $2,072,566 $2,170,967 $2,338,662 $2,687,103 $2,518,420 $2,309,785 $1,765,243 $2,266,107 Taxes=Local Gas Tax revenue Inter-Government=State Gas Tax,State Fund Exchange Other=Misc.revenue,interest income Based on the information shown in Table 11, the City of Woodburn has generated an average of approximately$2,266,107 per year in total revenue for transportation-related maintenance/projects. Potential Funding Sources The projected transportation funding analysis shows that the City of Woodburn will have a limited source of funds that can solely dedicated to transportation-related capital improvement projects over the next twenty years. As such, Woodburn will likely need to seek additional funds via transportation improvement grants, partnerships with regional and state agencies, and other funding sources to help implement future transportation-related improvements. Table 12 identifies a list of potential Grant sources and Partnering Opportunities to consider during the course of the 20-year planning horizon. Following Table 12, Table 13 identifies a list of potential new funding sources for Woodburn to consider in an effort to bolster funds for additional capital improvement projects. -Page 95- Exhibit A WOODB�pRN,,.,. ('I..T,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L Table 12: Potential Grant Sources and Partnering Opportunities The Statewide Transportation Improvement The next STIP (2018-2021)will be Statewide Program (STIP) is Oregon's 4-year capital Streets organized into two different improvement program for major state and categories that focus on projects Improvement Bike lanes Transportation regional transportation facilities.This scheduling Sidewalks that will fix/preserve the existing - Program (STIP) and funding document is updated every two Trails transportation network and years. Projects included on the STIP are enhance/improve the transportation allocated into the five different ODOT regions. network. Federal Funding Large trails or trail networks with a transportation Multi-Use Trails Projects in urban areas have purpose can compete for TIGER grant awards. traditionally been funded at a Additional significant federal funding sources minimum of$10,000,000 and rural include TAP,STP and CMAQ.Depending upon trails of lower project costs are the location and purpose,trails can also be considered for TIGER funding. funded by HUD CDBG funds, USDA rural development programs,or EPA funding. Oregon Bicycle The Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Grant See STIP above See STIP above. and Pedestrian program ended as a standalone solicitation Program process in 2012.Grant monies are now distributed through the "Enhance" process in the STIP program noted above. ATV Grant Operation and maintenance,law enforcement, Multi-Use Trails http://www.oregoru.gov/o[2rd/ATV/12 Program emergency medical services,land acquisition, ages/grants.aspx leases,planning,development and safety education in Oregon's OHV (off-highway vehicle recreation areas). Table 13: Potential New Funding Sources for Consideration by the City of Woodburn �m III Fees tacked onto a monthly utility bill or tied to The cost of implementing such a the annual registration of a vehicle to pay for system could be prohibitive given improvements,expansion,and maintenance to the need to track the number of the street system.This may be a more equitable Primarily Street vehicle miles traveled in every User Fees vehicle.Additionally,a user fee assessment given the varying fuel efficiency of Improvements vehicles.Regardless of fuel efficiency, specific to a single jurisdiction does passenger vehicles do equal damage to the not account for the street use from street system. vehicles registered in other jurisdictions. The fee is based on the number of trips a Preservation,restoration, particular land use generates and is usually Street Utility collected through a regular utility bill.For the and reconstruction of Other cities have adopted street Fees/Road communities in Oregon that have adopted this existing paved residential maintenance utility fees at varying streets. Includes amounts charged to residential Maintenance approach,it provides a stable source of sidewalks,ramps,curbs meters.Woodburn could consider a Fee revenue to pay for street maintenance allowing for safe and efficient movement of people, and gutters,and utility similar program. relocation. goods,and services. A tax that is paid at the option of the taxpayer to fund improvements. Usually not alegislative -Streets The voluntary nature of the tax limits Optional Tax requirement to pay the tax and paid at the time -Sidewalks the reliability and stableness of the other taxes are collected,optional taxes are Bike lanes funding source. -Page 96- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA usually less controversial and easily collected Multi-Use Trails since they require the taxpayer to decide Transit whether or not to pay the additional tax. Sponsorship has primarily been used Financial backing of a project by a private by transit providers to help offset the Sponsorship corporation or public interest group,as a means Multi-Use Trails cost of providing transit services and of enhancing its corporate image. maintaining transit related improvements. Trails with a transportation purpose can Projects in urban areas have compete for TIGER grant awards. Depending traditionally been funded at a Federal Funding upon the location and purpose,trails can also Trails minimum of$10,000,000 and rural be funded by HUD,CDBG funds,USDA rural trails of lower project costs are development programs,or EPA funding. considered for TIGER funding. ��::. ��..... I I II::I "F III I , II::.'( IR..I.. ..I..II( IN 6 Y .T II : T. (WMAIR Y Table 14 provides a summary of the full cost of the planned and financially constrained transportation systems. As shown, the full cost of the planned system is approximately 74i , million over the 20- ear period, including $, ER6,4 million in high priority projects, $122, ,„192,;z million in medium priority projects, and $1 ,105 million in low priority projects. Based on the anticipated funds available for capital improvement projects, the financially constrained plan includes all of the high priority projects. This leaves no forecasted funding for the City to complete medium and low priority projects over the 20-year period without additional funding. Table 14: Planned Transportation System Cost Summary Planned Transportation System Bicycle $8,I `r 120.1000 $12,280,000 $d-I C)l)().'000 $20,`,d`r` 0,,000 Pedestrian $h 1sC)C)C)C) ,1` )f)Ch) $10,'I()())/(),,000 $t `>1sF1)000 $17,4wW>`r R1),,000 Roadway l:,C,;,,,,,?�,C)C)C),r;�fh)C)C4) l,()1,rSC)rS,C,),C)C),✓mot r'�,C;)fh));) „1,., 3rSC),C)Cr)C},CX)f)C;h) 1:,�C)rSl,.,. Safety V);200,000 $5,260,000 $r1;100,000 $h 2L C)C)C)/`>60 000 Transit $100,000 $15,000 $1 15,000 TDM I $125,000 $100,000 $215,000 $440,000 Land Use $50,000 $50,000 Access Management $125,000 $125,000 Rail $10,000 $15,000 $25,000 06,4ft5a00�00 ;46a400aTb 11 :p0Tf�p00.... OA�abba00,�" 00604 7,�k0a00 $�.,�4„4f511� .... TDM:Transportation Demand Management 1:Includes annual costs occurred every year. —Page 97— Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("IT.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LA The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as codified in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-012- 0045, requires that local jurisdictions identify and adopt land use regulations and code amendments needed to implement the TSP. The land use regulations and code amendments are provided under separate cover. -Page 98- // d i a Exhibit A This page intentionally left blank -Page 100- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOOS:;BURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM L GLOSSARY OF TERMS The following terms are applicable only to the Woodburn Transportation System Plan and shall be construed as defined herein. Access t: Refers to measures regulating access to streets, roads and highways from public roads and private driveways. Measures may include but are not limited to restrictions on the type and amount of access to roadways and use of physical controls such as signals and channelization including raised medians, to reduce impacts of approach road traffic on the main facility. Access (Street): A street designated in the functional classification system that's primary purpose is to connect residential neighborhoods with service collectors or arterials. On-street parking and access to adjacent properties is prevalent. Slower speeds should be provided to ensure community livability and safety for pedestrians and cyclists. Access way: Refers to a walkway that provides pedestrian and or bicycle passage either between streets or from a street to a building or other destination such as a school, park, or transit stop. Alternative Mods: Transportation alternatives other than single-occupant automobiles such as rail, transit, bicycles and walking. Americans with Disabilities Act : A civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, and all public and private places that are open to the general public. Average Annual Daily ffi : A measure used primarily in transportation planning and traffic engineering that represents the total volume of vehicular traffic on a highway or roadway for a year divided by 365 days. Average Daily ffi : This is the measurement of the average number of vehicles passing a certain point each day on a highway, road or street. Bicycle Facility: Any facility provided for the benefit of bicycle travel, including bikeways and parking facilities. Bicycle Network: A system of connected bikeways that provide access to and from local and regional destinations. Bicycle Boulevard: Lower-order, lower-volume streets with various treatments to promote safe and convenient bicycle travel. Usually accommodates bicyclists and motorists in the same travel lanes, often with no specific vehicle or bike lane delineation. Assigns higher priority to through bicyclists, with secondary priority assigned to motorists. Also includes treatments to slow vehicle traffic to enhance the bicycling environment. Lane:Bike Area within street right-of-way designated specifically for bicycle use. -Page 101 - Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAN Capital Improvement I I : A community planning and fiscal management tool used to coordinate the location, timing and financing of capital improvements over a multi-year period. Capacity: The maximum number of vehicles or individuals that can traverse a given segment of a transportation facility with prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. Citizen AdvisoryCommittee : An advisory committee consisting of volunteer citizens from the community they represent. Congestion ifl fl / it Quality (CMAQ): A program within the federal ISTEA and TEA- 21 regulations that address congestion and transportation-related air pollution. Crosswalk: Portion of a roadway designated for pedestrian crossing and can be either marked or unmarked. Unmarked crosswalks are the national extension of the shoulder, curb line or sidewalk. Cycle Track: An exclusive bike facility that combines the user experience of a separated path with the on-street infrastructure of a conventional bike lane. A cycle track is physically separated from motor traffic and distinct from the sidewalk. Management:Demand Refers to actions which are designed to change travel behavior in order to improve performance of transportation facilities and to reduce need for additional road capacity. Methods may include subsidizing transit for the journey to work trip, charging for parking, starting a van or carpool system, or instituting flexible work hours. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): A regulatory agency whose job is to protect the quality of Oregon's environment. Department of Land ConservationI t : A public agency that helps communities and citizens plan for, protect and improve the built and natural systems that provide a high quality of life. Driveway : A short road leading from a public road to a private business or residence. Eastbound : Leading or traveling toward the east. Fiscal Year : A year as reckoned for taxing or accounting purposes. Geographic Information Sysf s (GI : A system designed to capture, store, manipulate, analyze, manage, and present all types of spatial or geographical data. Grade: A measure of the steepness of a roadway, bikeway or walkway, usually expressed in a percentage form of the ratio between vertical rise to horizontal distance, (e.g. a 5%grade means that the facility rises 5 feet in height over 100 feet in length.) Grade Separation: The vertical separation of conflicting travelways. High Capacity r sit : A form of public transit distinguished from local service transit such as bus lines by higher speeds, fewer stops, more passengers, and more frequent service. -Page 102- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOOS:;BURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Highway Design I : A manual that provides uniform standards and procedures for the design of new roadways and the major reconstruction, rehabilitation, restoration, and resurfacing of existing roadways. Intelligent r s rt tf sf s (ITS): the application of advanced technologies and proven management techniques to relieve congestion, enhance safety, provide services to travelers and assist transportation system operators in implementing suitable traffic management strategies. ServiceLevel of : A qualitative measure describing the perception of operation conditions within a traffic steam by motorists and or passengers. An LOS rating of"A" to "F" describes the traffic flow on streets and at intersections, ranging from LOS A, representing virtually free flow conditions and no impedance to LOS F representing forced flow conditions and congestion. Local (Street): A street designated in the functional classification system that's primary purpose is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses. Short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low traffic volumes characterize local streets. Major Arterial (Street): A street designated in the functional classification system that's primary functions are to serve local and through traffic as it enters and leaves the urban area, connect Woodburn with other urban centers and regions, and provide connections to major activity centers within the UGB. UniformManual on i Control Devices : A document issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) to specify the standards by which traffic signs, road surface markings, and signals are designed, installed, and used. Minor Arterial (Street): A street designated in the functional classification system that's primary functions are to connection major activity centers and neighborhoods within the UGB and to support the major arterial system. Multi-Modal: Involving several modes of transportation including bus, rail, bicycle, motor vehicle etc. Multi-Use Path: Off-street route (typically recreationally focused) that can be used by several transportation modes, including bicycles, pedestrians and other non-motorized modes (i.e. skateboards, roller blades, etc.) National Highway System : The National Highway System is interconnected urban and rural principal arterial and highways that serve major population centers, ports, airports and other major travel destinations, meet national defense requirements and serve interstate and interregional travel. Northbound : Traveling or leading toward the north. OregonI istr ti Rules : The official compilation of rules and regulations having the force of law in the U.S. state of Oregon. It is the regulatory and administrative corollary to Oregon Revised Statutes and is published pursuant to ORS 183.360 (3). -Page 103- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAN Oregonrt t of Transportation : ODOT is a public agency that helps provide a safe, efficient transportation system that supports economic opportunity and livable communities throughout Oregon. ODOT owns and operates two roadways (OR 213 and OR 21 1) that are located in Molalla or provide access to the city. There are street design and operational standards for these roadways which supersede Molalla's street design and operational standards. OregonI I : The document that establishes long range policies and investment strategies for the state highway system in Oregon. Oregonvised Statutes : The codified body of statutory law governing the U.S. state of Oregon, as enacted by the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and occasionally by citizen initiative. The statutes are subordinate to the Oregon Constitution. PeriodPeak : The period of the day with the highest number of travelers. This is normally between 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. Pedestrian Connection: A continuous, unobstructed, reasonability direct route between two points that is intended and suitable for pedestrian use. These connections could include sidewalks, walkways, accessways, stairways and pedestrian bridges. Pedestrian Facility: A facility provided for the benefit of pedestrian travel, including walkways, crosswalks, signs, signals and benches. Pedestrian Scale: Site and building design elements that are oriented to the pedestrian and are dimensionally less than those sites designed to accommodate automobile traffic. Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP): A planning document that contains policies and guidelines to help local jurisdictions implement the policies in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and its modal plans, include those for active transportation, freight movement, and high capacity transit. Regional Transportation I : The transportation plan for the Portland Metro region. Right-Of-Way r / : A general term denoting publicly owned land or property upon which public facilities and infrastructure is placed. Safetyrl rif Index SystemI : An indexing system used by Oregon Department of Transportation to prioritize safety improvements based on crash frequency and severity on state facilities. Service Collector (Street): A street designated in the functional classification system that's primary function is to provide connections between neighborhoods and major activity centers and the arterial street system. Some degree of access is provided to adjacent properties, while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Shared : Roadways where bicyclists and autos share the same travel lane. May include a wider outside lane and/or bicycle boulevard treatment (priority to through bikes on local streets). -Page 104- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAN Single-Occupancyi te or Single-Occupant Vehicle (SOV): A vehicle containing only a single occupant, the driver. Southbound : Traveling or leading toward the south. Statewide Tras rt ti Improvement Plan (STIP): The capital improvement program that identifies founding and schedule of statewide projects. System Development Charge (SDC): Fees that are collected when new development occurs in the city and are used to fund a portion of new streets, sanitary sewers, parks and water. Technical Advisory itt : An advisory committee consisting of state, county, and city staff that review and provide feedback on technical memorandums. MemorandumTechnical : A document that is specifically targeted to technically capable persons, such as practicing engineers or engineering managers, who are interested in the technical details of the project or task. Traffictr I Devices: Signs, signals or other fixtures placed on or adjacent to a travelway that regulates, warns or guides traffic. Can be either permanent or temporary. Transportation AnI sis : A geographic sub-area used to assess travel demands using a travel demand forecasting model. Often defined by the transportation network and US Census blocks. Transportation Demand Managemef : A policy tool as well as any action that removes single-occupant vehicle trips from the roadway network during peak travel demand periods. Transportation and Growth t : A program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) that supports community efforts to expand transportation choices. By linking land use and transportation planning, TGM works in partnership with local governments to create vibrant, livable places in which people can walk, bike, take transit or drive where they want to go. Transportation Managemet Area (TMA): A Transportation Management Area is an area designated by the Secretary of Transportation, having an urbanized area population of over 200,000, or upon special request from the Governor and the MPO designated for the area. Transportation Planning I : A series of Oregon Administrative Rules intended to coordinate land use and transportation planning efforts to ensure that the planned transportation system supports a pattern of travel and land use in urban areas that will avoid the air pollution, traffic and livability problems faced by other large urban areas of the country through measures designed to increase transportation choices and make more efficient use of the existing transportation system. Transportation Ssf t : Management strategies such as signal improvements, traffic signal coordination, traffic calming, access management, local street connectivity, and intelligent transportation systems -Page 105- Exhibit A WOODB�pR.N,,.,. ("I..I,.Y OF WOODBURN 0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LAN Transportation Sst t and Operations : An integrated program to optimize the performance of existing multimodal infrastructure through implementation of systems, services, and projects to preserve capacity and improve the security, safety, and reliability of our transportation system. Transportation Ss I : Is a comprehensive plan that is developed to provide a coordinated, seamless integration of continuity between modes at the local level as well as integration with the regional transportation system. Stop Control : An intersection, where one or more approaches is stop controlled and must yield the right-of-way to one or more approaches that are not stop controlled. Area:Urban The area immediately surrounding an incorporated city or rural community that is urban in character, regardless of size. GrowthUrban : A regional boundary, set in an attempt to control urban sprawl by mandating that the area inside the boundary be used for higher density urban development and the area outside be used for lower density development. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): The cumulative distance a vehicle travels, regardless of number of occupants. Volume to Capacityl / : A measure that reflects mobility and quality of travel of a roadway or a section of a roadway. It compares roadway demand (vehicle volumes) with roadway supply (carrying capacity). Westbound : Leading or traveling toward the west. -Page 106- Exhibit B ATTACHMENT 103 PROPOSED WDO AMENDMENT 2.05.01 InterchanLye ManaLyement Area Overlay District A. Purpose The purpose of the Interchange Management Area Overlay District(IMA) is to preserve the long-term capacity of the I-5/Highway 214 Interchange. Preserving the capacity of the interchange is essential for the City's future. Continued access to I-5 is critical for existing businesses and for attracting new businesses and development to the community. The IMA complements the provisions of the Southwest Industrial Reserve (SWIR) Zoning District by ensuring that industrial land is retained for the development envisioned in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. The IMA also ensures that needed industrial, commercial and residential lands within the IMA are protected from incompatible development generating excessive vehicle trips. The vehicle trip budget(Table 2.05A) identifies by parcel the maximum amount of peak hour trips for each parcel within the IMA and is intended to be high enough to accommodate peak hour trips anticipated by the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and the Transportation Systems Plan (TSP), but low enough to restrict unplanned vehicle trips that could adversely affect the I-5/Hwy 214 Interchange. B. Applicability The provisions of this Section apply to all Type II—V land use applications that propose to allow development that will generate more than 20 peak hour vehicle trips (based on the latest Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual) on parcels identified in Table 2.05A. The provisions of Section 2.05.02F apply to all properties within the boundary of the IMA. C. Vehicle Trip Budgets This Section establishes a total peak hour trip generation budget for planned employment (commercial and industrial) land uses within the IMA. 1. J he i 1:.A 4it-j,i)udt yet 0 I�)fYaeaflt eoffi .efeial afid ifidusl+ial pafeels idefI4 died 41 1,44e 105A is 2,500 peak..,.hd`uiF veliiele.,.4ips. Ati es44.mated 1,500 addil4otia l peak houiF fesidefI44a l 4 afe to flfled Wit io th e...IMA: The IMA vehicle trip budget is allocated to parcels identified in Table 2.05A on a first-developed, first-served basis. 2. Parcel budgets are based on 11 peak hour trips per developed industrial acre, and 33 peak hour trips per developed commercial acre. 3. The parcel budget for each parcel will be reduced in proportion to actual peak hour vehicle trips generated by new development on any portion of the parcel. 4. The City may allow development that exceeds the parcel budget for any parcel in accordance with this Section. Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 2.05 Page 1 Exhibit B F Figure 2.05B — Interchange Management Area Boundary and Subareas Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 2.05 Page 2 Exhibit B Vehicle Trip Budget by Parcel (Parcel Budget) Table 2.05A Subarea Assessor's Tax Lot Comprehensive Buildable Maximum Peak Number Plan Designation Acres Hour Vehicle Trips A 052W1100300 SWIR 88 968 052W 14 00200 B 052W14 00600 SWIR 22 242 C 052W1400700 SWIR Exempt Exempt 052W 14 00800 D 052W14 00900 SWIR 106 1,199 052W 14 01000 052W 14 01100 E 052W14 01200 SWIR 4 44 052W 13 01100 F 052W14 01500 SWIR 96 1,056 052W 14 01600 G 052W23 00100 SWIR 46 506 H 052W12AC 04301 Commercial 2 66 052W12C 00604 1 33 I Commercial 052W12C 00605 3 99 052W12C 02300 7 231 J Commercial 052W12C 02400 2 66 052W12C 02100 7 231 052W12C 02200 6 198 K Commercial 052W 13 01600 5 165 052W14 02300 6 198 052W 14 02000 8 264 L Commercial 052W 14 02100 5 165 052W13BD 00900 (westerly portion) M 052W13BD 01500 Nodal Commercial 9 297 052W13BD 01600 052W13BD 01700 052W13BD 01800 D. Administration This Section delineates responsibilities of the City and ODOT to monitor and evaluate vehicle trip generation impacts on the I-5 interchange from development approved under this Section. Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 2.05 Page 3 Exhibit B 1. TIA: In addition to Section 3.04.05, the following applies: A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is required for all land use applications subject to the provisions of this Section. The TIA must meet City and ODOT administrative rule (OAR Chapter 734, Division 51)requirements and shall include an evaluation and recommendation of feasible Transportation Demand Management(TDM) measures that will minimize peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed development. 2. For a land use application subject to the provisions of this Section: a. The City shall not deem the land use application complete unless it includes a TIA prepared in accordance with TIA Requirements; b. The City shall provide written notification to ODOT when the application is deemed complete. This notice shall include an invitation to ODOT to participate in the City's review process; c. ODOT shall have at least 20 days to provide written comments to the City, measured from the date the completion notice was mailed. If ODOT does not provide written comments during this 20-day period, the City's decision may be issued without consideration of ODOT comments. 3. The details of City and ODOT monitoring and coordination responsibilities are found in the Woodburn—ODOT Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA). a. The City shall be responsible for maintaining a current ledger documenting the cumulative peak hour trip generation impact from development approved under this Section, compared with the IMA trip budget. b. The City may adjust the ledger based on actual development and employment data, subject to review and concurrence by ODOT. c. The City will provide written notification to ODOT when land use applications approved under this Section, combined with approved building permits, result in traffic generation estimates that exceed 33% and 67% of the IMA trip budget. 4. This Section recognizes that vehicle trip allocations may become scarce towards the end of the planning period, as the I-5 Interchange nears capacity. The following rules apply to allocations of vehicle trips against the IMA trip budget: a. Vehicle trip allocations are vested at the time of design review approval. b. Vehicle trips shall not be allocated based solely on approval of a comprehensive plan amendment or zone change, unless consolidated with a subdivision or design review application. c. Vesting of vehicle trip allocations shall expire at the same time as the development decision expires. E. Allowed Uses Uses allowed in the underlying zoning district are allowed, subject to other applicable provisions of the Woodburn Development Ordinance and this Section. F. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments 1. The provisions of this Section (2.05.02.17) apply to all Comprehensive Plan Map amendments within the IMA. This Section does not apply to Zoning Map amendments Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 2.05 Page 4 Exhibit B that result in conformance with the applicable Comprehensive Plan Map designation, such as Zoning Map amendments that occur when land is annexed to the City. 2. Applications for Comprehensive Plan Map amendments and for Zoning Map amendments shall determine whether the proposed change will significantly affect a collector or arterial transportation facility. 3. To ensure that the remaining capacity of the I-5 Interchange is reserved fortargeted employment opportunities and needed housing, this section imposes the following prohibitions on Comprehensive Plan Map amendments within the IMA: a. Comprehensive Plan Map amendments that will increase the net commercial land area within the IMA shall be prohibited. b. Comprehensive Plan Map amendments that allow land uses that will generate traffic in excess of the IMA trip budget shall be prohibited. G. Interchange Capacity Preservation Standards Land use applications subject to the provisions of this Section shall comply with the following: w4k 4kef a pt)Toved...devel°G°fflitifitS SHI) e t t��...$kis Spa„e 44ofT�;...�"�i(�"�*'�;'�'t��n'I'f'�4. .. 2-1.Peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposed development shall not exceed the maximum peak hour vehicle trips specified in Table 2.05A for the subject parcel, except: a. Development may be allowed to exceed the maximum, if the development will contribute substantially to the economic objectives found in the Comprehensive Plan. b. Residential development on a parcel zoned Commercial shall be allowed to exceed the maximum. -3-22Transportation Demand Management(TDM) measures shall be required to minimize peak hour vehicle trips and shall be subject to annual review by the City. Woodburn Development Ordinance Section 2.05 Page 5 Exhibit C Attachment 101 Analyses&Findings A. Legislative Amendment Applicable Provisions of the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) WDO 4.01 Decision-Making Procedures 4.01.02E. Type V Decisions (Legislative):Type V decisions involve legislative actions where the City Council enacts or amends the City's land use regulations, comprehensive plan, Official Zoning Map or some component of these documents. Type V decisions may only be initiated by the City Council. The Planning Commission holds an initial public hearing on the proposal before making a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council then holds a final public hearing and renders a decision. Public notice is provided for all public hearings (Section 4.01.14). The City Council's decision is the City's final decision and is appealable to LUBA within 21 days after it becomes final. This WDO amendment and modification to the TSP are considered a post-acknowledgement plan amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and qualify as a Type V decision. Staff completed all required public notices (originally noticed for October 9, 2025 and continued until October 23, 2025) pursuant to the WDO 4.01.14: September 4, 2025: 35-day PAPA notice to DLCD September 18, 2025: (WDO) notice requirements for legislative amendments mailed and posted, including notice to Marion County, service providers and ODOT October 23, 2025: The Woodburn Planning Commission held a public hearing unanimously recommended approval of the TSP and WDO amendments to the City Council. December 8, 2025: The Woodburn City Council held a public hearing and voted to tentatively approve the Legislation. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Policies H. Transportation Goal 1.9 To ensure that growth is orderly and efficient, the City shall phase the needed public services in accordance with the expected growth. Extensions of the existing public services should be in accordance with the facility master plans and Public Facility Plan in this Comprehensive Plan. The proposed revisions provide updates for the continued orderly and efficient planning and growth in current and new UGB areas. The update includes planning for transportation with LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 1 of 6 Exhibit C estimated costs for each project in the subarea. Not modifying the WDO to remove the trip cap in the IMA would prohibit any possibility of orderly growth and would prevent the opportunity for extension of necessary infrastructure to serve the SWIR and UGB expansion properties, as already approved by DLCD as part of our 2024 UGB expansion. B-2. Woodburn shall coordinate with affected state agencies regarding proposed comprehensive plan and land use regulation amendments, as required by state law. This project was partially funded by a grant from Business Oregon. DLCD, ODOT, and Marion County staff served on the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) that oversaw the project. All required parties were notified of the proposed amendments pursuant to state law and Staff made modifications to the WDO amendment to address written concerns raised by ODOT. H-6.2 Woodburn will implement plans as provided in the Woodburn TSP. (b) The TSP shall include a map depicting future street connections for areas to be urbanized. This is especially important in Nodal Development Overlay and Southwest Industrial Reserve overlay areas. The TSP revisions were made to the roadway and local street connections maps, including street connections to serve the most recently approved UGB which includes both overlay Districts. B. Applicable Statewide Planning Goals There are a total of 19 Statewide Planning Goals. Staff finds Goals 3- 10, 13, 15 and Goals 16-19 for Coastal Statewide Planning Goals are not applicable. Staff finds that the Statewide Planning Goals applicable to this land use decision are as follows: • Goal 1: Citizen Involvement • Goal 2: Land Use Planning • Goal 9: Economic Development • Goal 11: Public Facilities and Services • Goal 12:Transportation • Goal 14: Urbanization Goal 1: Citizen Involvement -OAR 660-015-0000(1) The City and its consultants provided citizen involvement opportunities in a variety of ways as part of the planning process. - Technical Advisory Group. The City formed and conducted meetings with a technical advisory group (TAG) that met over four times to review materials and provide direction at key milestones. LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 2 of 6 Exhibit C Planning Commission and City Council Meetings. Staff provided public workshops and updates on the TSP update before the Planning Commission and City Council to present information. Staff provided notice to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) in compliance with OAR 660-018-0020 and notified affected government agencies in conformance with WDO 4.01.14D as outlined above. Goal 2: Land Use Planning-OAR 660-015-0000(2) Goal 2 requires each local government in Oregon to establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions. Goal 2 also includes requirements for coordination with other jurisdictions and government agencies, requires that plans include implementation measures, and that plans be reviewed periodically and amended as needed. The City last updated and adopted its Transportation System Plan (TSP) in 2019 and in order to ensure that the City has an accurate plan for transportation needs and costs, most specifically for the recently expanded and fast-growing Southwest Industrial Reserve (SWIR), the City Council initiated this Type V legislative process and update with assistance from a transportation consultant. Goal 11: Public Facilities and Services -OAR 660-015-0000(11) The City last updated and adopted its Transportation System Plan (TSP) in 2019 and in order to ensure that the City has an accurate plan for transportation needs and costs, most specifically for the recently expanded and fast-growing Southwest Industrial Reserve (SWIR), the City Council initiated this Type V legislative process and update with assistance from a transportation consultant. Goal 12:Transportation -OAR 660-015-0000(12) Compliance with Goal 12 is found under Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012 below. Goal 14: Urbanization -OAR 660-015-0000(14) The proposal furthers this goal by revising the TSP and WDO to ensure efficient and orderly infrastructure to address growth within the city's UGB, including the recent UGB expansion of 237 acres. LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 3 of 6 Exhibit C C. Applicable Oregon Administrative Rules: 660-012 Transportation Planning Rule ("TPR") Local TSP's and amendments to Plans must comply with the provisions of this rule. The TPR requires local governments to prepare a transportation systems plan (TSP) that meets the requirements of OAR 660-012. The City's existing TSP complies with the requirements of Goal 12 and the proposed revisions do not render any elements out of compliance. Woodburn's adopted 2019 TSP established a transportation system that is adequate to serve lands within the UGB at that time and is consistent with the Marion County TSP, and in coordination with ODOT and DLCD. The updated elements in the revised TSP include the new UGB area and removal of one of the trip caps in the IMA that is no longer applicable. All other requirements and protections of the IMA still apply. The IMA provisions envisioned by the City's adopted targeted industries and Comprehensive Plan are preserved. 660-012-0010 Provides that transportation planning be divided into two phases, transportation system planning and project development. These revisions update the TSP consistent with all provisions of Division 012. The proposed revisions do not render any elements out of compliance and staff finds the two phases are not changed. 660-012-0015 Includes requirements for preparation and coordination of transportation system plans. The proposed revisions comply with all of the applicable requirements for preparation, coordination and adoption of TSPs as is required under this section of the TPR. The TSP amendments are incorporated as part of City's Comprehensive Plan. The preparation of the Plan was closely coordinated with affected government agencies and service providers, including a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) comprised of ODOT, Marion County, and DLCD staff. The revisions also amend projects and cost summary basis under Chapter 3 of the TSP to remove completed project and add new needs for expansion areas. The proposed revisions do not render any elements out of compliance. 660-012-0020 This section of the TPR describes the elements that TSPs must contain. Staff finds these amendments, together with the previously adopted and acknowledged TSP, include all of the elements required by the TPR and are consistent with OAR-660-012-0020. These minor amendments to the TSP include updates to Chapters 3 ("Motor Vehicle System") and 8 ("Planned Transportation System Cost Summary"). The amendments do not alter previously adopted policies, financial plans, TDM provisions, or non-vehicular plans. The projects added to the project list include locations, descriptions, providers, and planning level cost estimates per this Division. The proposed revisions do not render any elements out of compliance. LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 4 of 6 Exhibit C 660-012-0030 The provisions of this section set forth how needs shall be identified in TSP's. The amendments comply with these requirements as noted in Technical Memorandum #2, dated May 31, 2024 which included an assessment of needs for Bicycle Facilities; Pedestrian Facilities;Transit Service; Streets and Highways; Intersection Operations; and, Transportation Safety within and directly adjacent to, the study area and incorporated into the revised TSP. The proposed revisions do not render any elements out of compliance. 660-012-0035 This section concerns how the transportation system alternatives analysis was performed. The City has an acknowledged TSP consistent with the TPR provisions of 660- 012-0035. Proposed amendments to the TSP account for the new UGB expansion area, address existing development(s), and remove completed TSP projects for a more current cost basis. As described in the Technical Memoranda prepared by the consultant and included in this amendment, ODOT's Analysis Procedures Manual (APM versions 1 and 2) as well as guidance by the TAG, provide the basis for transportation system alternatives. Three alternatives were considered including a 'No-Build' option. 660-012-0040 This section of the TPR requires that a TSP include a transportation financing program and sets forth what such a program is required to include. The funding program in the TSP is reasonably assured and the proposed revisions did not significantly modify the financing program. There are no changes to the fiscally constrained dollar amounts. The TSP amendments include a list of planned transportation facilities including the estimated timing and rough cost estimates. The proposed changes are de minimis and are consistent with OAR 660-012- 0040. 660-012-0045 The provisions of this section concern how a TSP is implemented. The City has an adopted and acknowledged TSP, an approved WDO, and Public Works Standards that implement the TSP. The proposed revisions, together with previously adopted and acknowledged ordinances, fully implement the applicable provisions of OAR 660-012-0045. The WDO amendment to the IMA does not adversely impact the long-term capacity of the interchange since the IMA parcel trip caps remain in place as well the transportation demand management (TDM) measures. The only revision is to remove the 20-year planning cap for area peak hour trips that has expired. All other IMA regulations remain in place on applicable properties within the IMA. These amendments have been adopted pursuant to all local and state requirements. 660-012-0060 This section sets forth requirements for plan and land use regulation amendments. These amendments, together with previously adopted and acknowledged ordinances, fully implement the applicable provisions of OAR 660-012-0060. The revisions and WDO amendment do not alter any of the mobility targets for the interchange. The IMA trip cap LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 5 of 6 Exhibit C remains in place on applicable properties in the IMA; therefore, no re-evaluation is necessary at the intersection at this time. The transportation facilities identified in the TSP amendments are considered to be financially feasible and are included in the System Cost Summary. LA 23-01: Analyses& Findings Page 6 of 6